Church Fathers / Complete editions / NPNF2 10
Ambrose: Select Works and Letters
Quick answer
Read Ambrose: Select Works and Letters, Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Series II Volume 10, in full with public-domain source-edition provenance.
- Series
- Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Series II
- Volume
- 10
- Contents
- Ambrose: Select Works and Letters
- Edition date
- 1896
- Length
- 455,342 OCR words
- Source
- Original Internet Archive scan
Questions about this volume
What is included in Ambrose: Select Works and Letters?
Ambrose: Select Works and Letters. The page preserves the complete source-edition text.
Is this Church Fathers text public domain?
The underlying edition was published 1896 and is public domain in the United States. PRYR links to the original scan and records its source hash.
Where can I verify the source edition?
Use the original Internet Archive scan linked here and again at the bottom of the page.
Complete source-edition OCR. This page preserves the full public-domain volume while work-level, sermon-level, letter-level, and chapter-level editions are being cleaned and indexed.
(■■^■'W'r^e.V,-.
5?^!!^i'i?^^;,i . ^:^
■Hi
■KM
'"'i'—'""'i*,"r'i'iii'ii" I iii'i.iiiiii'JLiiwujT:
— '^''OWWW'Wiwwi Mill g8t»ag>K3aa<miMjifc;aM>ra
8«gBiaiJgiar:-
wiWif«nwft«w>iaiisoMiB^i«>afltfftii»t»fei<?<y--- ^- -
»^ ---St
Ciltnttnt itf
|lWlrsInj
(Cnllmir^
|}iuTl|a$c?> from
<>
A SELECT LIBRARY
NICENE AND POST-NICENE FATHERS
OP
THE CHRISTIAN CHURCH.
TRANSLATED INTO ENGLISH WITH PROLEGOMENA AND EXPLANATORY NOTES.
VOLUMES I. -VII.
UNDER THE EDITORIAL SUPERVISION OF
PHILIP SCHAFF, D.D., LL.D., ^„ HENRY WAGE, D.D.,
Professor of Church History in the Principal of King's College,
Union Theological Seminary, Neiv York. Lotidott.
IN CONNECTION WITH A NUMBER OF PA TRISTIC SCHOLARS OF EUROPE
AND AMERICA.
VOLUME X.
ST, AMBROSE
SELECT WORKS AND LETTERS.
NEW YORK :
THE CHRISTIAN LITERATURE COMPANY.
OXFORD AND LONDON:
PARKER & COMPANY.
1896.
^.
c .
ID
Copyright. 1896,
THE CHRISTIAN LITERATURE COMPANY.
t
SOME OF
THE PRINCIPAL WORKS OF ST. AMBROSE,
TRANSLATED BY
THE REV. H. DE ROMESTIN, M.A.,
Of St Johtt's College, Oxford, and Hector of Tiptree, £sseXf
WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF
THE REV. E. DE ROMESTIN, M.A.,
Of New College, Oxford,
AND
THE REV. H. T. F. DUCKWORTH, M.A.,
0/ Alerton College, Oxford.
CONTENTS.
Tjanslator's Preface ix
Prolegomena xi
DOGMATIC TREATISES, ETHICAL WORKS, AND SERMONS.
On the Duties of the Clergy xxhi
On the Holy Spirit 9^
On the Death of Satyrus 1 59
On the Belief in the Resurrection 174
On the Christian Faith 199
On the Mysteries 315
On Repentance 327
Concerning Virgins 361
Concerning Widows 391
LETTERS.
Letter XVII. To Valentinian II 411
Memorial of Symmachus 414
Letter XVIII. To Valentinian II., in reply to Symmachus 417
Letter XX. To Marcellina as to the Arian party 422
Letter XXI. To Valentinian II., declining challenge of Auxentius 427
Sermon against Auxentius 430
Letter XXII. To Marcellina on finding the bodies of SS. Gervasius and Protasius 436
Letter XL. To Theodosius as to the burning of a Jewish Synagogue 440
Letter XLI. To Marcellina on the same 445
Letter LI. To Theodosius after the massacre at Thessalonica 450
Letter LVII. To Eugenius, reproving him 453
Letter LXI. To Theodosius, after his victory over Eugenius .... 455
Letter LXII. To Theodosius, urging him to be merciful 455
Letter LXIII. To the Church at Vercellse 457
TRANSLATOR'S PREFACE.
Although, according to the plan of this " Library," Commentaries on Holy Scripture are
omitted, and the field of selection is thus somewhat lessened, it has been no easy matter
to decide which of St. Ambrose's many treatises should be chosen and which omitted.
Obviously the great work on the Faith, De Fide, must be included, and this implied
the addition of that on the Holy Spirit. Then the treatise on the Duties of the Clergy, as
throwing much light on the ideas of the Fourth Century as to what was expected of
ecclesiastics, seemed to claim a place. And after these the difficulty becomes very great.
It is unfortunate that the limitations of space do not admit of the inclusion of all the
dogmatic and ascetic treatises. Similarly, one would have been glad to insert the ad-
dresses on the deaths of the two Emperors Valentinian and Theodosius. More, also, of
his letters might well have been added, though, as they have appeared in full in the
Oxford " Library of the Fathers," this is a matter for less regret.
As will be seen, I have availed myself of the assistance of my son, the Rev. E. de
Romestin, of New College, and of the Rev. H. T. F. Duckworth, of Merton College, each
of whom took high honours in the Theological School at Oxford.
The work has been carried out under some difficulties, and not the least has been the
loss in travelling of a considerable portion of the manuscript, the whole of which had to be
translated anew,
ix
PROLEGOMENA TO ST. AMBROSE.
I. LITERATURE.
§ I. Editions.
All the Editions of the works of St. Ambrose which preceded that of the Benedictines
are very inadequate. Of these the chief are the following :
1. Venice, a. d. 1485.
2. Cribellius, a. d. 1490.
3. Auerbach, Basel, a.d. 1492, reprinted in 1506, with a full Index. These are very-
faulty Editions.
4. Erasmus, Basel, a.d. 1527, reprinted and re-edited by different persons, in various
places [by Baronius amongst others, a.d. 1549].
5. Gillot Campanus, Paris, a.d. 1568.
6. Felix de Montalto [afterwards Pope Sixtus V.], Rome, a.d. 1580-1585, reprinted at
Paris, a.d. 1603.
7. The Benedictines of St. Maur, Paris, a.d. 1686-1690, reprinted at Venice, a.d. 1748
and 1 78 1, as well as with additions by Migne, Patres Latini, Vols. XIV.-XVII.
8. A new edition by Ballerini, Milan, a.d. i 875-1 886, founded on that of the Benedic-
tines, but by no means superior to it.
There is still room for a critical edition of the works of this great Father, which are
unfortunately very corrupt, but in many points it is not likely that the work of the Bene-
dictine editors can be improved upon.
9. There are separate editions of some of the treatises of St. Ambrose, as of the
Hexaemeron and De Officns Clericorum, in the Bibliotheca Patrum Eccl. Latinae Selecta,
Leipzig, Tauchnitz. The De Officiis has also been edited, with considerable improvements
in the text, by Krabinger, Tiibingen, 1857, and the De Fide and De Pceniieyitia, by Hurter
in the Vienna selections from the Fathers.
§ 2. Translations.
There seems to have never been any attempt to translate the works of this great
Christian Father and Doctor in full.
Some few treatises, De Officiis, De excessu frairis Satyri, De Virginiiaie, and several
other short ones, appear in German, in the select writings of the Fathers, published by
Kosel of Kempten. The Epistles have been translated into French by Bonrecueil, Paris,
A.D. 1746 ; and the De Officiis and Epistles into English, the former by Humfrey, London,
a.d. 1637 ; the latter in the Oxford " Library of the Fathers, "revised by E. Walford, London,
1881 ; whilst the De Mysieriis appears in a little volume of Sacramental Treatises, published
by Messrs. J. Parker & Co., Oxford, under the supervision of the Editor of this volume.
There is a very valuable little monograph entitled Studia Ambrosiana, chiefly critical, and
unfortunately brief, by Maximilian Ihm. Leipzig, Teubner, 1889.
§ 3. Biographies and Authorities for the Life of St. Ambrose.
(a.) Ancient.
Many of his own writings. — Life of St. Ambrose by Paulinus,* a deacon of the Church
of Milan. — St. Augustine, Confessions, V. 23, 24; VI. 1-6; IX. 13-16; and many other
passages in his writings. — St. Jerome, De Scripiorihus Ecclesiasticis, c. 134. — Rufinus,
* Paulinus, who had been in constant attendance on St. Ambrose, and was with him at his death, wrote this life a few years after that
event, at the request of St. Augustine.
xi
xii PROLEGOMENA TO ST. AMBROSE.
Ecclesiastical History, XI. 11,15, 16,18.— Socrates, Eccl. History, IV. 30; V. 11.— Sozomen,
Eccl. History, VI. 24 ; VII. 13, 25.
(b.) Modern.
Baronius, Annals, a.d. 397, n. 25-35 ; Life of St. Ambrose in the prolegomena to the
Roman Edition of his works.— The Life of St. Ambrose gathered from his own writings, in
the Benedictine Edition (excellent).— Hermant, Vk de Si. Amhro'ise, Paris, 1678.— Tille-
mont, iMhnoires, etc., Tome X. St. Ambroise[pp. 78-386J, and notes, pp. 729-770.— Ceillier,
Histoire generate des Auteurs sacres, Tome V. pp. 328 ff. Ed. 2, Paris, i86c. — Dupin,
Tome ii. pp. 438-515. [This writer says that the text of St. Ambrose is more corrupt than
that of any other Father. See Alzog, Patrologie, p. 296. Ed. i.~|— Cave, Hist. Lit. Vol. I.
262. — Schoeneman, Bibliotheca hisiorica PP. Lat. I. 388-419. — Silbert, Lehen des hciligcn
Ambrositis, Vienna, 1841 — Baunard. Histoire de St. Ambroise, Paris, 1872 [translated into
German, Freiburg, 1873]. — Life of St. Ambrose, by Archdeacon Thornton, London, and
other shorter sketches. — Fessler [JungmannJ, Institutiojies Patrologice, I. 655 [also Patro-
logies of Moehler, Alzog, etc. J. Articles in the YxeVonxg Kirchen-Lexikon, the Dictionary
of Christian Biography, and other encyclopaedias.
II. NOTES ON SECULAR AND CHURCH HISTORY DURING THE LATTER PART
OF THE FOURTH CENTURY.
After the Council of Nica^a, a.d. 325, the faith of the Catholic Church was established,
but a considerable time was to elapse, and the tide of heterodoxy was to ebb and flow
many times before peace should finally ensue. The " conversion " of the Emperor Con-
stantine, though not followed, till he was dying, by baptism, led not merely to the
toleration but to the protection and, as it were, the "establishment" of the Christian
religion. This very naturally was followed by a large influx of worldliness into the
Church, and bishops began to be time-servers and courtiers. St. Ambrose, however, was
not of this number, but whether in defence of the Catholic faith, of the property of the
Church, or, as in his legations to Maximus, for the protection of those in peril or anxiety
who sought his aid, he braved every danger, even that of death itself.
During the greater part of the life of St. Ambrose many of those in power, amongst
others the empress mother Justina, were Arians. Julian, though too early to affect the
actions of the bishop, apostatized to paganism, which also numbered many supporters of
high station. On the other hand, the influence of St. Ambrose, exercised even with severe
strictness, was all-powerful with Theodosius, known as the emperor who subdued the
Arian heresy and abolished the worship of idols in the Roman Empire.
The various historical events during the lifetime of St. Ambrose will be found entered
under the different years in the subjoined table ; it remains only here to give some account
of his burial-place.
St. Ambrose having discovered the bodies of SS. Cosmas and Damian, a.d. 389, placed
them under the right side of the altar in his basilica, and desired that he should be himself
buried near them to the left, which was done a.d. 397. In the year 835 the Archbishop
of Milan, Angilbert II.; caused a large porphyry sarcophagus to be made in which he l^d
the body of St. Ambrose between the other two under the altar. In 1864 some excava-
tions and repairs revealed m s//« a magnificent sarcophagus nearly four and a half feet in
length, three in width, and nearly two in height, without the covering, placed length-
wise. Further excavations brought to view two other tombs, one to the right and one to
the left, lined with marl)le and placed east and west, not as the sarcophagus, north and
south. In the one to the left were a few pieces of money, one of Flavins Victor, one of
Theodosius, with some fragments of cloth of gold and other things. These were evidently
the original resting-places of St. Ambrose anrl of S.S. Cosmas and Damian, and the sarco-
phagus that constructed under Lothair, a.d. 835, by Angilbert.
PROLEGOMENA TO ST. AMBROSE.
Xlll
III. HISTORICAL SUMMARY AND CHRONOLOGICAL TABLES.
A.D.
34°-
341
343
347
348
349'
350
35'
352-
353-4-
354
355
356
357
359
361
362
363
364
366,
367
368-74.
St. Athanasius restored.
Valentinian and Valens
37°.
372.
373-
374-
St.
St.
Birth of St. Ambrose (probably at Treves), youngest son of
Ambrose, Prefect of the Gauls. Constantine II. killed
at Aquileia. Death of Eusebius.
Seventh Council of Antioch. Second exile of St. Athanasius.
Photinus begins teaching his heresy.
Birth of St. John Chrysostom. Council of Sardica. St.
Athanasius restored.
Birth of Prudentius the Christian poet.
Synod of .Sirmium against Photinus.
Death of the Emperor Constans. St. Hilary, Bishop of Poi-
tiers. Magnentius proclaimed Emperor of the West.
Photinus condemned by a semi-Arian synod.
Liberius, Pope in succession to Julius.
About this date St. Ambrose is taken by his mother to live
at Rome, where his sister Marcellina received the veil
at the hands of Liberius at Christmas, either A.D. 353,
or more probably 354. Suicide of Magnentius the
Emperor.
Birth of St. Augustine. Death of the Emperor Gallus.
Liberius the Pope, Dionysius, Bishop of Alilan, and Lucifer,
Bishop of Cagliari, banished by an Arian synod at Milan.
Third exile of St. Athanasius.
Banishment of St. Hilary of Poitiers.
Liberius subscribes (as the Arians say) an Arian Creed, and
returns to Rome a.d. 35S.
Council of Anminum. Macedonius of Constantinople de-
posed. Eudo-vius consecrated Bishop.
Julian Emperor.
Fourth exile of St. Athanasius.
Death of the Emperor Julian.
Felix Pope.
Death of the Emperor Jovian,
Emperors.
Death of Liberius in September. Damasus elected in his
place, but the see is also claimed by Ursinus.
Gratian, though only a boy, declared Augustus by his father
Valentinian.
Successful career of St. Ambrose in legal business and as
" consular."
Basil, Bishop of Cjesarea.
Gregory of Nazianzus, Bishop of Susium.
Death of St. Athanasius.
Death of Auxentius, the Arian Bishop of Milan, and election
of St. Ambrose, though still only a catechumen, by ac-
clamation. St. Martin Bishop of Tours.
St. Ambrose sends a deputation of clerics to St. Basil to ask
for the bodv of St. Dionvsius, late Catholic Bishop of
Milan. fSt.' Basil, Ep. 197.]
Death of Valentinian in November. His son Valentinian is
admitted by Gratian to be Emperor of the East, though
only four years old.
Ambrose writes the three books, De Virginibus ; one,
De Vidicis ; which is followed by the book, De Vir-
ginitate.
The first two books, De Fide, written at the request of Gra-
tian, who was setting out to the relief of Valens against
the Goths. Valens is overcome and killed at Adrianople.
Many Christians having been made captives, St. Am-
brose sells Church plate to redeem them.
Theodosius is proclaimed Augustus. Death of St. Basil and
of St. Ephrem Syrus. Gratian, on his way back from
Thrace, requests St. Ambrose to come to meet him and
receives the first two books of the treatise De Fide, and
asks for a further one on the Holy Spirit ; the latter was
written two years later. Death of Satyrus, brother of St.
Ambrose. The two treatises on his death written.
379-80. Famine in Rome. — .See De Off. III. 46-48.
380. Baptism of Theodosius at Thessalonica. Books ITI.-V. of
the De Fide\srM&n about this time. The basilica which
had been sequestered by Gratian is restored to the
Church.
Synod at Rome under Damasus at which St. Ambrose was
present. Probably in the same year St. Ambrose conse-
crated .^nemius Bishop of Sirmium in spite of Arian
opposition.
Death at Constantinople of Athanaricus, leader of the Goths.
The three books, De Spiritii Saticto, written. Death of
Peter, Bishop of Alexandria. The CEcumenical Council
of Constantinople commences under the presidency of
Meletius of Antioch. Also at Aquileia a council, at
which St. .'\mbrose took a leading part, was held against
the heretics Palladius and Secundianus. An account is
given of the proceedings in Epistles 9-12.
St. Ambrose presides over a council of Italian bishops to
take into consideration the troubles at Antioch and. Con-
stantinople. Epistles 13, to Theodosius, and 14, his reply.
374-5-
375-
377- St.
37S.
379-
380.
381.
381-2.
State the proceedings. Theodosius summoned a council
to consider the same matters at Constantinople.
382. Gratian orders the removal of the image of \ ictory from the
forum at Rome. [Ep. 17, 18. J Acholius, Bishop of
Thessalonica, dies and is succeeded by Anysius.
383. The Priscillianists endeavour in vain to gain Damasus and .St.
Ambrose to their side by means of a visit to Rome and
Milan. On the 25th of August Gratian is assassinated at
Lyons by the instigation of Maximus. A great dearth at
Rome. IDe Off. III. 7, 49; Ep. 18. J
3S3-4. First legation of St. Ambrose to Maximus on behalf of
Justina the Empress and her son Valentinian II.
384. The memorial of Symmachus the prefect 01 the city to Valen-
tinian, requesting the restoration of the Altar of Victory,
and the reply of St. Ambrose. [Ep. 17, 18.] A synod
at Bordeaux against the Priscillianists. Death of Dama-
sus, who is succeeded by Siriciusas Pope.
385. Priscillian and his companions are condemned to death at
Treves at the instigation of the Spanish Bishops Idacius
and Ithacius. The Ithacians consecrate Felix as Bishop.
[Ep. 42-51.] The persecution at Milan of Catholics by
Justina in Holy Week. [Ep. 20.] The law of Valen-
tinian II., granting Arians equal rights with Catholics.
Auxentius claims the see of Milan. [Sermon against
Auxentius and Ep. 21.] The deposit which a widow had
entrusted to the Church at Trent having been carried off
by imperial order, St. Ambrose succeeds in procuring its
restitution. \De Off. II. 29, 150, 151.] New basilica at
Milan consecrated.
386. Finding of the bodies of St. Gervasius and Protasius [Ep. r2].
Epistle 23 to the bishops of the province of .(Emilia on
the right day for the observance of Easter.
386-7. The exposition of the Gospel according to St. Luke
written.
387. Baptism of St. Augustine at Milan by St. Ambrose at Easter.
Second mission of St. Ambrose to Maximus. [Ep. 24.]
E.xpulsion of St. Ambrose from Treves because of his re-
fusal to communicate with the murderer of his sovereign.
In the later part of the year Maximus crosses into Italy
and enters Milan.
388. At Constantinople the Arians destroy the residence of the
Catholic Bishop Nectarius. [Ep. 40, § 13.] Death of
Justina, and conversion of Valentinian II. by Theodosius.
Theodosius marches against Maximus, who is every-
where defeated [Ep. 40, § 23I, and executed at Aquileia.
Third application concerning the Altar of Victory.
390. The excessive cruelty with which Theodosius punished a
sedition at Thessalonica brought on him exclusion from
communion, and a severe rebuke at the hands of St. Am-
brose. The Emperor's penitence and readmission to
communion. A synod is held at Milan against the
Ithacian heretics, and Felix, Bishop of Treves. [Ep. 51.]
391-2. The deputation of part of the Roman Senate to Valentinian
to request the restoration of the Altar of Victory in the
Forum. [Ep. 57, § 5. J The treatise De iitstitidiotte
Virgi7iis, written about this time, as also, De Officiis.
392. Valentinian II. killed at Vienne by Arbogastes [Ep. 53, § 2 ;
De oh. I'a/etit. 25 ff.]. His body is brought to Milan.
The address, Consolatio de ob. Val. A further delegation
from the Senate is sent to Eugenius respecting the Altar
of Victory [Ep. 57, § 6 ff.].
393. On the arrival of Eugenius at Milan St. Ambrose leaves the
city for Bononia Faventia and Florence. The letters to
Eugenius and Sabinus written about this time.
393-4. At Florence St. Ambrose dedicates a basilica, in which he
deposits the bodies of the martyrs Vitalis and Agricola,
which he had brought from Bononia. His address on
this occasion was that which is inscribed, Exhortatio
Virginitatis. He writes Ep. 59.
394. Theodosius sets out from Constantinople against Eugenius.
About the beginning of August St. Ambrose returns to
Milan. Eugenius defeated by Theodosius and slain,
Sept. 6. St. Ambrose intercedes and obtains pardon for
the followers of Eugenius. After this St. Ambrose
writes the Ejiarratiotits on Psalms 35-40 and Ep. 61,
62.
Death of Theodosius at Milan. St. Ambrose's oration De
obitu Theodosii. Honorius and Arcadius Emperors.
St. .Augustine, Bishop of Hippo. Death of Rufinus.
Dissensions at Vercella, the occasion of writing Ep. 63, and
of a visit to that Church.
St. Ambrose consecrates a bishop for Ticinum, and shortly
after falls ill. He commenced the Enarratio on Psalm
43, which he left unfinished; and died in the night be-
tween Good Friday and Easter Eve, having recom-
mended Simpliciauus as his successor.
395-
396-
397-
XIV PROLEGOMENA TO ST. AMBROSE.
IV. ON THE DOCTRINE OF ST AMBROSE.
There is a very complete agreement on the part of St. Ambrose with the Catholic
teaching of the universal Church. St. Augustine speaks of him as "a faithful teacher of
the Church, and even at the risk of his life a most strenuous defender of Catholic truth,"'
"whose skill, constancy, labours, and perils, both on account of what he did and what he
wrote, the Roman world unhesitatingly proclaims."^ In matters both of faith and morals
by his words and writings he greatly benefited the Church and was called by St. Jerome
"a pillar of the Church."'^
In his dogmatic treatises, more particularly in his books on the Faith, he shows great
skill and penetration, and his reasoning is full and clear, meeting the most subtle objec-
tions with patient industry. Scarcely any ancient writer has treated the mystery of the
Holy Trinity and the theological difficulties connected with it more clearly and con-
vincingly than St. Ambrose in his De Fide and De Spiritu Sancto.
In his expositions of Holy Scripture he treats of the threefold sense, the literal, the
moral, and the mystical, devoting more pains, however, and time to the latter than to the
former. He gives special consideration to the mystical interpretation of such passages
as may seem to contain in a literal sense anything diverging from sound morality. Many
of his other mystical interpretations of plain, simple matters of fact have much beauty, as
in his treatment of the story of the building of the ark, the marriage of Isaac, and the
blessings of the Patriarchs. The literal sense is followed specially in the Hexa'emeron, the
treatise on Paradise, Noah and the Ark, and the Exposition of the Gospel according to St.
Luke. The moral sense, though referred to throughout his writings, is more particularly
sought out in the Expositions of the Psalms.
St. Ambrose was a diligent student of the Greek writers, whom he often follows largely,
especially Origen and Didymus, as also St. Basil the Great and St. Athanasius, and he has
also adapted many points of allegorical interpretation from Philo. He is fond of alleging
scriptural proofs, and when he argues from reason often confirms his argument by some
quotation or reference, a task easy for him who, from his consecration, was so diligent a
student of holy Scripture.
As to justification, St. Ambrose ascribes the whole work to the Holy Spirit, Who seals us
in our hearts, as we receive the outward sign in our bodies. Through the Holy Spirit we
receive a share of the grace of adoption. Christ was perfect according to the fulness of
His Majesty ; we are perfected by a continual progress in virtue.*
With regard to baptism, he taught in accordance with the received belief of his day that
it is the sacrament of adoption and regeneration, wherein sin is forgiven, 5 and the Holy
Spirit confers new life upon the soul and joins it mystically to Christ. As to the Real
Presence in the Sacrament of the Eucharist, his doctrine is no less definite. In his treatise
on the Faith he says of tlie elements that they " are transfigured \jransfigiirantur'\^\>y the
mystery of the sacred prayer into flesh and blood. "7 He interprets various texts, also,
in many places in the same sense. In a like spirit he maintains that the power of forgiving
sins on repentance is vested in the ministry of the Church.^ The intercession of the
saints, and up to a certain point their invocation, is likewise upheld. 9
There was a Latin version made from the Septuagint, including the Apocrypha, in Africa,
and in use there at the end of the second century, very barbarous, and copying even
Greek constructions. Of this text SS. Ambrose and Augustine used a recension. But our
author seems to have been very independent, and to have made use of several different ver-
sions of holy Scrijiture, translating, as it would seem, often for himself from the Septuagint,
referring also to Symmachus, Theodotion, and Aquila, though thinking less of the latter.
When the prophets, he says, were moved by the Holy Spirit, they were troubled and
darkened witli their own ignorance. '° Prayer, he asserts, is necessary for understanding
holy Scripture." Each Testament is not equally easy, and we are not to criticise what
^ Cont.Jul. Pelag.W.-ST.. ^ Cnnt. Jul. Pelag.l. ^o. ^ Adv. Rtifin.V i.
« De Sfi. S. I. 79, 8o; De Fide, V. qi. _ " De Pccn. I. .-56.
« For the force of the word /r<j«4/?^Krrt«/«>- in early ecclesiastical Latin, compare Tertullian, «(/?'. Praxeani, c. 27: " Transfigu-
ralio iiiterremptio est pristini. Oinne eniin,quodcunque transfigiiratur iu aliud desinit esse quod fuerat, et itictpit esse quod non
eratV
' De Fid. IV. 124. » De Ptgn. II. 12, etc. » Ep. 22 De ob. TJieod. 41-51 : De Viduis., s?.
1" Z?tf^<5r*4. II. 61. " Ps. cxviii. 59. "'
PROLEGOMENA TO ST. AMBROSE. xv
we do not understand.' He speaks of the Hebrew as the truth,* but states that the
Septuagint added much that is useful.-'
The Arians are repeatedly charged by St. Ambrose with falsifying and manipulating
Scripture for their own ends, not always, it would seem, very justly, but the same charge
is a common one against all heretical bodies in early days. As to the Canon, he would
seem to have no very definite rule. He admits Tobit as prophetic, Judith as canonical, nor
does he distinguish between canonical and deuterocanonical, while the sapiential books
are all attributed to Solomon. He quotes Baruch as Jeremiah, and refers to the History
of Susanna, Bel and the Dragon, and other apocryphal works as " Scripture." Ezra, he
says, re-established holy Scripture by memory, ^ and he quotes the fourth book of Esdras.
V. LIFE OF ST. AMBROSE.
St. Ambrose, Bishop of Milan, one of the 'ft^ir Latin doctors of the Church, was
descended from a Roman family of some distinction, some time Christian, and counting
martyrs as well as state officials amongst its members.
His father, likewise named Ambrosius, was prefect of the Gauls, an office the jurisdic-
tion of which extended over Spain, Britain, Cis- and Trans-Alpine Gaul. His chief official
residence was Treves, where probably St. Ambrose was born, as seems most likely, a.d. 340.5
After his father's death, his mother and his elder brother, Satyrus, went with St. Am-
brose to Rome, not earlier than 353, where his elder sister, Marcellina, received the veil
at Christmas from Pope Liberius, the exact year being uncertain.
Here the future bishop devoted himself to legal studies, in which he met with great
success. His skill in law and general reputation soon led to his advancement, and about
A.D. 370 he was appointed by the Praetorian Prefect Probus governor of Liguria and
yEmilia, with the rank of consular.^ On this occasion Probus is said to have closed an
address to St. Ambrose with the words, "Go and act, not as a judge, but as a bishop."
This advice was so well followed by Ambrose, that owing to his equity and kindness the
people came to look up to him rather as a father than as a judge.?
After some few years Auxentius,^ the intended Arian Bishop of Milan, died, a.d. 374,
and it is said that during the discussion as to the appointment of his successor a child
cried out m the assembly, "Ambrose Bishop, "and, although he was but a catechumen and
so canonically unqualified, the multitude immediately elected him by acclamation.
St. Ambrose did all in his power, even, if we accept the statements of his biographer
Paulinus, probably a clerk of Milan, resorting to some questionable expedients, to
escape from the dignity laid upon him, but when his election was ratified by the Emperor
Valentinian, he recognized his appointment as being the will of God, and insisted on being
baptized by a Catholic priest. Eight days later, December 7, a.d. 374, he was conse-
crated Bishop.
The first care of the new bishop was at once to divest himself of his worldly property,
giving his silver and gold to the poor and the Church, and committing the management of
his estates, except a life interest for his sister, to his brother Satyrus, who gave up his own
office to come to his assistance, and enable him to devote himself wholly to theological
study and his other episcopal duties.
His chief studies were holy Scripture and ecclesiastical writers, especially St. Basil the
Great and Didymus of Alexandria, from whom no less a man than St. Jerome accused him
of plagiarizing. His natural abilities and thorough knowledge of Greek stood him in good
stead, when, as he says himself,^ he had to learn and to teach at the same time.
The life of St. Ambrose was a pattern of the discharge of episcopal duties. He spent
much time daily in study and devotion, besides the more public duties of his office. '° He
1 Ep. 63-78. De Farad. II. 7. = De Noe et Area, XII. 6a ' Hexaetn. V. 20. ♦ Ep. 63,30.
^ The exact date depends upon whether the passage " barbaracis motibiis et bellorum procellis" etc., Ep. lix., 12-3, refers to the war
against Maximus, a.d. 387, or to that against Eugenius, A.D. 393-4; so that the birth year of St. Ambrose might be 333 or 340. The
latter date is, however, most generally accepted
' ' Of the 116 provinces of the empire 37 were governed by magistrates with the title of consular.
' De Exc. Sat. I. 25, 49, 58.
' Auxentius, a Cappadocian. was ordained priest by Gregory, usurper of St. Athanasius, see of Alexandria. He was much esteemed by
the .Arians ; and when after a synod at Milan, a.d. 355, the Catholic Bishop Dionysins was banished with many others, Auxentius was
intruded in his stead, and, as St. Athanasius remarked, a Latin Church received as its pastor one who was ignorant of the Latin tongue,
St. Hilary and others endeavoured to remove him, but in vain, and in 369 Auxentius was excommunicated in a synod at Rome, but suc-
ceeded in maintaining his post.
" De Off. lib. I. c. i. 4. " Ep. xx. 15.
xvi PROLEGOMENA TO ST. AMBROSE.
preached every Sunday and at certain seasons daily. His labours in preparing catechu-
mens for baptism were blessed with great success, amongst those taught by him being
St. Augustine.
But the zeal and courage of the new Bishop were soon tried. The Empress mother
Justina was still an Arian, but had little influence during the life of the Emperor Gratian,
who was much attached to St. Ambrose. After his murder, however, a.d. 383, his brother
Valentinian II., a boy of only twelve years of age, ascended the throne and was naturally
much under his mother's influence. Justina led him to support a demand of the Arians
for the use of the Portian basilica, situated outside the walls of Milan. This being refused,
a second application was made for the large and newer basilica within the city. Ambrose
replied, "The Emperor has his palaces, let him leave the churches to the Bishop." Soldiers
were sent to secure the delivery of the basilica, but St. Ambrose with the faithful occupied
the building and remained within, singing psalms and hymns till the soldiers retired.
St. Ambrose was no less successful in his zeal against the expiring heathenism of
Italy than against Arianism. One of the many remnants till recent times of heathen
worship had been the Altar of Victory in the Senate-house at Rome, which was removed
under Gratian ; the prefect of Rome, Symmachus, himself a heathen but a friend of St.
Ambrose, appealed to Valentinan II. that it might be restored, and Ambrose successfully
opposed this appeal in two Epistles (17, 18) addressed to the young Emperor. Yet
again, when Theodosius assumed the imperial power [a.d. 387], a renewed attempt was
made and once more frustrated. Later on, Eugenius the usurper judged it politic to take
the heathen's side, Mhe Altar of Victory was once more set up, and the temples stood
open as in the days of old. But this triumph lasted only for a brief period. When
Theodosius defeated the usurper at Aquileia, in the spring of 394, he also defeated pagan-
ism, which sank to rise no more as a public religion, though it long lingered in private
amidst indifference, toleration, and at times persecution.
The influence exercised by Ambrose upon the rulers of his day is sufficiently manifested
by these facts, but he had the courage to use not only influence, but, when needed, rebuke
and Church discipline.
Only a few months after his elevation to the see of Milan, he remonstrated with Valen-
tinian I. concerning the severity of his rule and other abuses, and required amendment.
The Emperor's reply did him honour: "Well, if I have offended, prescribe for me the
remedies which the law of God requires." Again, on another occasion, in 390, Theodosius
had put down a seditious movement in Thessalonica with great severity, causing some
7,000 persons to be slain. St. Ambrose at once, disregarding the possible consequences
to himself, wrote him a letter (Ep. 51) on the subject, exhorting him to repentance, and
pointing out that he could not permit him to be present at the celebration of the Mysteries,
till he had openly testified his sorrow. At another time when the same Emperor had
ventured into the sanctuary or chancel of the church, which was the right of the clergy
alone, St. Ambrose rebuked him and caused him to retire.
These acts of ecclesiastical discipline were also accompanied by others in which the
l^reat Bishop was able in temporal matters to assist the imperial family.
Twice on behalf of the young Emperor Valentinian II. he undertook a mission to Treves,
to see the usurper Maximus, and when Valentinian died, St. Ambrose delivered a striking
oration at his funeral, recording his many virtues. Theodosius did not survive his victory
over Eugenius for many months. In January of the following year [a.d. 395], he died at
Milan, and the funeral oration which St. Ambrose pronounced over him is also extant.
Yet whilst thus devoting much time to weighty affairs of State, the Bishop never
neglected the duties of his office. He preached every Sunday, at great festivals, once or
more often, every day. He celebrated the Holy Mysteries daily. His life was marked
by perfect purity, sympathy, energy, and devotion. He was always ready to help those
requiring assistance, and so when Augustine came to Milan to teach rhetoric, a.d. 384, he
was kindly received and fascinated. Probably he owed his conversion even more to the
life and character than to the teaching of St. Ambrose.
One subject St. Ambrose never tired of recommending was Virginity ; and such was
the power of his exhortations that mothers used to forbid their daughters to attend his
sermons and addresses.
The indefatigable zeal of the great Bishop further exhibited itself in the number of his
^ ijt. Ambr. Ep. 57.
PROLEGOMENA TO ST. AMBROSE. xvii
writings. Many of them consist of addresses subsequently worked up into treatises,
and are on all subjects, dogmatic, controversial, exegetical, and ascetic. There remain
also a large number of valuable letters, and some hymns, probably from four to twelve of
those ascribed to him being genuine, and in use to the present day.
But besides his writings and his resistance to the attacks of Arianism, heathenism,
or the secular power, St. Ambrose devoted himself to actively defending the cause
of the Church and of orthodoxy wherever he had the opportunity. Although the
death of Satyrus, a.d. 379, must have greatly added to the troubles of St. Ambrose, he was
as watchful as ever against all possibilities of heretical aggression. To his care and
opposition to the party of the Empress Justina it was owing that the city of Sirmium was
preserved in a.d. 381 from receiving an Arian bishop. And in the same year, when the
Arians, hoping for large support from the East, had almost persuaded the Emperor to
summon a general council at Aquileia, St. Ambrose prevailed upon him to summon only
the neighbouring bishops, and what might have been a serious evil was avoided.
In such ways the holy man, embracing in his far-seeing care the interests of
religion far and wide, spent his days in unceasing labour till his health failed in the
year 397, when, as is related by Paulinus, Count Stilicho, saying that the loss of such a
man threatened destruction to Italy, persuaded the nobles of the city to request St.
Ambrose that he would pray for longer life. But the Saint replied: "I have not so
lived amongst you as to be ashamed of living, and I do not fear to die, for we have a good
Lord. " As some of the bystanders were discussing in whispers who would be St. Ambrose's
successor, and mentioned Simplicianus, he overheard them, and said, "An old man, but
good." For the last few hours of his life Ambrose lay with his arms extended in the form
of a cross, praying. Honoratus, Bishop of Vercellae, lying in another room, heard him-
self called thrice, and coming down, offered him the Body of the Lord, after receiving
which St. Ambrose breathed his last, on Good Friday night, April 4-5, a.d. 397, and was
laid to rest on Easter morning in the Ambrosian basilica at Milan, where he still is
reverenced, and in which the Ambrosian liturgy and rites, differing considerably from the
Roman use of the rest of the churches of Italy, continue to this day, though doubtless
with many moditications subsequent to the time of St. Ambrose.
VI. WRITINGS OF ST. AMBROSE.
The extant writings of St. Ambrose may be divided under six heads. I. Dogmatic;
11. Exegetic ; III. Moral ; IV. Sermons ; V, Letters ; VI. A few Hymns.
I. Dogmatic and Controversial Works.
1. De Fide. The chief of these are the Five Books on the Faith, of which the two first
were written in compliance with a request of the Emperor Gratian, a.d. 378. Books III. -V.
were written in 379 or 380, and seem to have been worked up from addresses delivered
to the people [V. prol. 9, 11; HI. 143 ; IV. 119]. This treatise vindicates the Divinity of
Christ from the attacks of the Arians, and has always enjoyed the highest reputation,
being quoted and referred to again and again.
2. De Spiriiu Sancto. The three books on the Holy Spirit may be considered as a
continuation of the above treatise, and were also addressed to Gratian in compliance with
his request, a.d. 381. In this treatise St. Ambrose shows that the Holy Spirit is God, and
of one nature and substance with the Father and the Son. He makes use of the Greek
writers, SS. Didymus, Basil the Great, and Athanasius, and was on this ground attacked
by St. Jerome. See Rufinus, Apol. adv. Hieron. II. 23-25.
3. De Incarnationis DominiccB Sacramento. The book on the Mystery of the Lord's
Incarnation owed its origin to a challenge to dispute publicly given to St. Ambrose by
two Arian chamberlains of Gratian. On the day appointed they were, as Paulinus
relates in his life of St. Ambrose, thrown out of the chariot which was conveying them and
killed. On the next day, that the people might not be disappointed, this discourse was
delivered, but the reference made to the absence of the challengers hardly suits the story
of Paulinus. The treatise is a very valuable argument in defence of our Lord's Divinity
and Eternity, and that He is perfect God and perfect Man. In rewriting the address the
Bishop added a refutation of the argument that the Begotten and the Unbegotten could
8
xviii PROLEGOMENA TO ST. AMBROSE.
not be of one nature and substance. The treatise may be considered as a supplement to
that concerning the Faith.
4. De Mysteriis. A valuable treatise on the Mysteries, under which title St. Ambrose
includes Baptism, with its complement, Confirmation, and the Eucharist. It is some-
what similar to the Caiecheses Mystagogicce of St. Cyril of Jerusalem, expounding the
doctrine and ceremonies of these sacraments. On doctrinal grounds the authenticity of
the work has been impugned by some modern writers, but there is no sufficient founda-
tion for their arguments, as the teaching may be paralleled in many other passages of
St. Ambrose. The date is not certain, but may be about a.d. 387.
5. Libri duo dc poenitentia. These books on Penitence were written about a.d. 384,
against the Novatians. In the first book the writer proves that the power of forgiving
sins was left by Christ to His Church. In the second book, insisting on the necessity of
repentance and confession, he also refutes the Novatian interpretations of Heb. vi. 4-6
and St Matt. xii. 31-32. This treatise has also underservedly been questioned on
doctrinal grounds by some moderns.
These treatises are all translated in this volume.
_ II. EXEGETICAL WoRKS.
St. Ambrose was in the habit of explaining various books of holy Scripture in coursed
of lectures, which he subsequently worked up, often at the request of friends, into
treatises in the shape in which they have come down to us. Of the class we have :
1. Hexaenicron. This treatise, expounding the literal and moral sense of the work of
the six days of creation [Gen. i. 1-26], consists of nine addresses to the people of Milan,
delivered in the last week of Lent, probably a.d. 389, and is now divided into six books.
The writer has studied Origen, but followed rather the teaching of St. Hippolytus and
Basil the Great, though he expresses himself often quite in a different sense.
2. De Paradiso. This is the earliest or one of the earliest of the extant writing-s of
St. Ambrose, though the exact date is uncertain. In it he discusses what and where
Paradise was, and the question of the life of our first parents there, the temptation, fall
and its results, and answers certain cavils of the Gnostics and Manichees. He also
enters into an allegorical exposition comparing Paradise with the human soul.
3. De Cain el Abel. The treatise is now divided into two books, but the division is too
inartistic to have been made by the writer. As to the date, it was later than the last
treatise, but probably not many months. The interpretations are very mystical, and touch
upon moral and dogmatic questions.
4. De Noe et Area. This treatise has reached us in a mutilated condition. It was
written probably before theZ^e Officus andZ>e Abraham, but after the works on Paradise and
Cain and Abel, though the exact date cannot be determined. The exposition is literal
and allegorical.
5. De Patriarchis. Seven books preached and written at various dates about 387 or
388. The same kind of interpretation is followed in these as in the former treatises.
6. De fuga scECuli. Written probably about a.d. 389-390. An instructive treatise
setting forth the desirability of avoiding the dangers of the world, and for those who must
live in the world, showing how to pass through them most safely.
7. De Elia et jejimio. A treatise composed from addresses delivered during Lent,
certainly after a.d. 386, possibly 389.
8. De Tobia. A work quoted by St. Augustine ( C. Jul. Pelag. I. 3, 10), consisting of
sermons on the story of Tobias, and chiefly directed against the practice of usury.
9. De Nabuthe Jezraelita. One or two sermons against avarice, probably written
about a.d. 395.
10. Libri \w. de inter pellatiotie Job et David. The first and third books have Job, the
second and fourth David, for their subject, and formed a course of sermons the date of
which is uncertain.
11. Apologia prophetce David ad Theodosium Augustum. A number of addresses de-
livered, it would seem, about a.d. 384, quoted also by St. Augustine.
12. Enarrationes in xii. Psahnos Davidicos. Commentaries on Psalms i, 35-40, 43, 45,
47, 48, 61 (according to St. Ambrose's numbering). These seem to have been partly
preached, partly dictated at various dates, and much in them is borrowed from St. Basil.
13. Expositio P salmi cxw'm. This treatise is one of the most carefully worked out of
PROLEGOMENA TO ST. AMBROSE. xix
all the writings of St. Ambrose and consists of twenty-two addresses to the faithful, each
address comprising- one division of the Psalm. From various allusions, it would seem
that the completed work dates from about a. d. 388.
14. Ex posilio Evaiigelii secundum Lticani. The ten books of this commentary consist
likewise of sermons in Vvdiich St. Ambrose explained the Gospel during a period of one or
two years, in 386 and 387.
III. Ethical Writings.
Among the ethical or moral writings of St. Ambrose, the first place is deservedly
assigned to:
1. De Officiis Ministroruni. In three books, which are translated in this series.
2. De Virginihiis. Three books concerning Virgins, addressed to his sister Marcellina in
the year 377, probably, like most of the treatises of St. Ambrose, revised from addresses, the
first of which was delivered on the festival of St. Agnes, January 21. This would seem to
have been perhaps the very earliest of the writings of St. Ambrose, judging from the open-
ing chapter. The treatise is referred to by St. Jerome, St. Augustine, Cassian, and others.
3. De Vidiiis. This shorter work, concerning Widows, was probably written not very
long after the last mentioned treatise.
4. De Virginitate. A treatise on Virginity, the date of which cannot certainly be fixed,
but the writing De Vidiiis is referred to in chapter 9.
5. De Insiiiiitione Virginis. A treatise on the training and discipline of a Virgin,
addressed to Eusebius, either bishop or a noble of Bologna, after St. Ambrose had admitted
his niece to the rank of Virgins, probably about a. d. 391 or 392.
6. Exliortatio Virginitatis. A commendation of Virginity preached on the occasion of
the consecration of a church at Florence by St. Ambrose, a.d. 393 or 394.
IV. Sermons and Addresses.
1. Contra Auxentium. A sermon against Auxentius, concerning giving up the basilicas
to the Arians, usually inserted between the twenty-first and twenty-second of the letters
of St. Ambrose.
2. De Excessiif rains Satyri. The two addresses on the occasion of the death of St.
Ambrose's brother Satyrus, translated in this volume.
3. De ohitu Valcfitiniani Consolalio. The Emperor Valentinian having been murdered
by Arbogastes, Count of Vienne, his body was brought to Milan, and remained two months
unburied. At last Theodosius sent the necessary rescript, and at the funeral solemnities
St. Ambrose delivered the address entitled the "Consolation."
4. De ohitu Theodosii oratio. A discourse delivered forty days after the death of the
Emperor Theodosius before the Emperor Honorius at Milan.
V. The Letters of St. Ambrose.
The Benedictine Editors of St. Ambrose have divided his Epistles into two classes : the
first comprising those to which they thought it possible to assign dates ; the second those
which afford no data for a conclusion. Probably in many cases* the exact year is not so
certain as the editors have made it appear, but they seem arranged in a fairly probable con-
secutive order.
The Letters.
1. To the Emperor Gratian, in reply to his request for a treatise on the Faith. Written
A.D. 379, before August, as Gratian came to Milan in that month.
2. To Constantius, a bishop, on episcopal duties, and commending to him the care of
the vacant see of Forum Cornelii, or Imola. Probably written about a.d. 379.
3. 4- To Cornelius, Bishop of Comum, the first a friendly letter, the second contain-
ing also an invitation to the consecration of a church by Bassianus, Bishop of Laus
Pompeia, now Lodi Vecchio, near IMilan. Written probably after a.d. 381.
5. 6. To Syagrius, Bishop of Verona. On a charge falsely brought against the Virgin
Indicia. They may have been written a.d. 380.
XX PROLEGOMENA TO ST. AMBROSE.
7, 8. To Justus, perhaps Bishop of Lyons. On holy Scripture. If the conjecture
that Justus was the Bishop of Lyons is correct, written about 380 or 381.
9-12. Letters concerning the Council of Aquileia, held a.d. 381, to the bishops of the
provinces of Gaul, to the Emperor Gratian and his colleagues. Two men, Palladius and
Secundianus, held Arian opinions, and the former appears to have asked Gratian to con-
voke a General Council, pleading that he was unjustly condemned. St. Ambrose pointed
out to the Emperor that such a question as the orthodoxy of two persons could be settled
by a local council in Italy ; and as a result, by the Emperor's mandate, a council of Italian
bishops met at Aquileia, other bishops having also permission to attend. Palladius and
Secundianus were condemned, and these letters have reference to the proceedings at the
council. They were probably written by St. Ambrose in the name of the council, a.d. 381.
13, 14. Two letters addressed to Theodosius, the former relating the decisions of a
council, probably held at Milan, on the Meletian schism at Antioch, and the latter further
e.xpressing the desire of the bishops for a council on this subject, and also on the opinions
of ApoUinaris. Written a.d. 381 or 382.
15. To the Bishops of Macedonia, in reply to their notification of the death of Acholius,
Bishop of Thessalonica, who baptized Theodosius, and had met St, Ambrose at a council
in Rome. Written a.d. 383.
16. To Anicius, on his election to succeed Acholius, whose labours and life are com-
mended by St. Ambrose. Written a.d. 383.
17. 18. On the occasion of the attempt of Symmachus and the heathen senators to
procure the restitution of the image and Altar of Victory in the Roman Senate-house,
frustrated by St. Ambrose, a.d. 384.
19. To Vigilius, Bishop of Trent, subsequently martyred, written probably about a.d.
385-
20. To his sister, Marcellina, giving an account of the frustrated attempts of the Arian
and imperial party to gain possession of a basilica at Milan, a.d. 385,
21. To the Emperor Valentinian II., declining the challenge to dispute with the Arian
Auxentius before lay judges, a.d. 386.
22. To his sister Marcellina, giving an account of the finding of the bodies of SS.
Gervasius and Protasius, and of the consequent miracles. Written a.d. 386.
23. To the bishops of the province of .Emilia, on the proper date for the observance of
Easter, in 387. Written a.d. 386.
24. To Valentinian II., with an account of St. Ambrose's second mission to Maximus
on his behalf Written probably a.d. 387.
25. 26. Inscribed the former to Studius, the second to Irenseus, but from internal
evidence these appear to be the same person. It deals with the question, howfara judge
being a Christian may lawfully sentence any one to death. Written probably about a.d.
388-
27-33. Addressed to Irenseus, on various questions. Written about a.d. 387.
34-36. To Orontianus, a cleric, on the soul and other questions. Written after 386.
"i,"], 38. To Simplicianus, who became the successor of St. Ambrose in the see of Milan,
setting forth that holiness is perfect freedom.
39. To Faustinus, on the occasion of the death of a sister. Written probably after a.d.
40. To Theodosius. The Jewish synagogue at Callinicum in Mesopotamia having
been destroyed by the Christians, and a meeting-house of the Valentinian heretics also
burnt by the Catholics, Theodosius ordered that the bishop should rebuild the synagogue
at his own expense, and the monks be punished. St. Ambrose remonstrates with the Em-
peror, and it would seem, from the following letter to his sister, at first unsuccessfully.
41. To his sister Marcellina, relating the circumstances alluded to above, and telling
her of his sermon before the Emperor, and of his subsequent refusal to celebrate the
Eucharist, until the Emperor had promised to rescind the order. The date of the two
letters is a.d. 388.
42. Reply of .St. Ambrose and a synod at Milan to the notification of Pope Siricius
announcing the sentence of excommunication passed upon Jovinian and his followers.
43. 44. To Horontianus, in reply to his inquiries on some points connected with the
Creation.
PROLEGOMENA TO ST. AMBROSE. xxi
45. To Sabinus, Bishop of Placentia, in answer to questions concerning Paradise.
46. -To the same, on the subject of an Apollinarian heretic.
47-49. To the same, with books and on private matters.
50. To Chromatius, probably Bishop of Aquileia, explaining how evil men may be
used to utter true prophecies.
51. To Theodosius, after the massacre at Thessalonica, Written a.d. 390.
52. A private letter to Titianus.
53. To Theodosius, to express the sorrow of St. Ambrose at the death of Valentinian II.,
slain by Arbogastes.
54. 55. To Euscbius, not, it would seem, the Bishop of Bologna who was present at
the Council of Aquileia, but rather a lay friend to whom St. Ambrose wrote his treatise on
the training of a virgin. Probably written a.d. 392 or 393.
56. To Theophilus. The troubles of the church of Antioch through the Meletian
schism might have terminated on the death of Paulinus, had he not on his deathbed
consecrated Evagrius as his successor in violation of the canons. Theodosius, being
pressed by the Western bishops, now summoned a council at Capua, commanding Fla-
vian to attend, which command he however disobeyed. The council referred the matter
to Theophilus of Alexandria and the bishops of Egypt. But Flavian, as Theophilus had
informed St. Ambrose, refused to submit to their decision. This is the reply of St.
Ambrose advising Theophilus to summon Flavian once more, and communicate the re-
sult to Pope Siricius. The letter must have been written quite at the end of a.d. 391, or
the beginning of 392.
57. To Eugenius the usurper, to avoid whom St. Ambrose had left Milan, and to
whose letters he had sent no reply. Written a.d. 393.
58. To Sabinus, Bishop, on the resolution of Paulinus and Therasia to forsake the
world. Written probably a.d. 393.
59. To Severus, Bishop probably of Naples, telling him of James, a Persian priest, who
had resolved to retire from the world into Campania, and contrasting this with his own
troubles, owing to the invasion of Eugenius, a.d. 393 or 394.
60. To Paternus. against a proposed incestuous marriage.
61. To Theodosius, after his victory over Eugenius. Written a.d. 394.
62. To the same, urging him to be merciful to the followers of Eugenius. Written in
the same year.
63. To the Church at Vercellae.
The second division of the letters, being those which cannot be dated, begins here in
the Benediction Edition.
64. To Irenaeus, on the Manna.
65. To Simplicianus, on Exodus xxi v. 6.
66. To Romulus, on Aaron's making the calf of the golden earrings.
67. To Simplicianus, showing how Moses yielded to Aaron in matters relating to his
priestly character.
68. To Romulus. Explanation of the text Deut. xxviii. 23.
69. To Irenaeus, answering a question as to the prohibition under severe penalties in
the INIosaic law, of disguising the sex by dress.
70. 71. To Horontianus, on part of the prophecy of Micah.
72. To Constantius, on the rite of circumcision.
73-76. To Irenseus. Why the law was given, and the scope of the Epistle to the
Ephesians. The letter numbered 75 is plainly a continuation of 74, although inscribed
to Clementianus, a difficulty similar to that about letter 26.
77, 78. To Horontianus, contrasting the condition of the Jew and the Christian.
79, 80. To Bellicius, on recovery from sickness, and on the miracle of healing the man
blind from his birth.
81. To certain clergy, against despondency.
82. To Marcellus, concerning a lawsuit.
83. To Sisinnius, commanding him for forgiving his son, who had married without
consulting him.
84. To Cynegius.
85. 86. To Siricius, with thanks for letters, and commending Priscus.
xxii PROLEGOMENA TO ST. AMBROSE.
87. To Segatius [more probably Phsebadius], Bishop of Agens, and Delphinus,
Bishop of Bordeaux. Polybius, mentioned in the letter, was proconsul of Africa between
the years 380 and 390.
88. To Atticus. Commendation of Priscus.
89. To Alypius. Acknowledgment of letters.
90. To Antonius. On the mutual affection of himself and St. Ambrose.
91. To Candidianus, probably a fellow-bishop. A letter of affection.
VI. Hymns.
During the persecutions stirred up by the Arian Empress Justina, a.d. 385-6, referred
to in his 20th letter, St. Ambrose and the faithful spent the whole night in the basilica, and
the holy Bishop employed the people in singing psalms and hymns. A large number of
hymns have been attributed to St. Ambrose, the number having by some editors been
brought down to twelve, of which, however, only four are certainly his compositions.
1. Eierne reriim Conditor, referred to by St. Augustine, Retract. I. 21, and by St.
Ambrose himself, Hexaem. \ . 24, 88. The hymn is still in use at Lauds on Sunday.
2. Deus Creator oni7iiu77i. Quoted by St. Augustine, Con/. IX. 12, 32.
3. Jayn surigit Jiora tertia. Also quoted by St. Augustine.
4. Veni Redemptor gentium. A Christmas hymn, quoted by Pope Celestine, a.d. 430,
in a sermon against the Nestorians, preached before a synod at Rome, and also by other
writers.
Of other hymns one commencing, Illutninans Altissimus, is quoted by Cassiodorus as
an Epiphany hymn by St. Ambrose, and the same author refers to another, Orabo tnente
Dominum. The Benedictine Editors admit six other hymns, but they are supported by no
authority anterior to Venerable Bede.
VII. Doubtful and Spurious Works.
This volume cannot of course comprehend the arguments and discussions necessary
for any critical examination of certain works whether doubtful or certainly spurious, but
their names may be given and certain conclusions stated.
1. Five books on the Jewish war, ordinarily attributed to Hegesippus. This is a trans-
lation into Latin and a condensation in part of the well-known work of Josephus. Ihm,
a very thorough student of St. Ambrose, seems quite disposed to maintain after careful
examination that this is the work of St. Ambrose.
2. De lege Dei. This treatise, a sort of compendium of Roman law in the fourth
century, and comparison of it with the law of Moses, is ascribed, in a translation published
by Mai,' to St. Ambrose, who is said to have undertaken the work at the command of
Theodosius. On the authenticity, however, of this treatise there probably will always
remain much doubt.
3. Among works more or less doubtful arc De Sacramentis, admitted by the
Benedictines, but rejected, and apparently on sufficient grounds, by Ihm.
4. Apologia David altera. Suspected by Erasmus, Tillemont, and Ihm.
5. De lapsu Virgifiis consecratce. A severe castigation of a fallen virgin and of her
seducer. The treatise seems to have been written by a certain Bishop of Nicetas, and a
MS. at speaks of it as having been revised by St. Ambrose.
6. There are further three brief addresses ascribed by some persons to St. Ambrose,
touching on the question of selling all and giving to the poor. Some of the matter is like
St. Ambrose, but the same cannot be said of the diction and style.
VIII. Lost Writings of St. Ambrose.
1. Expositio IsaicB prophetice, referred to by St. Augustine as well as by St. Ambrose
himself
2. Liber de Sacramento regenerationis sive de philosophia, referred to by St. Augustine.
3. Libellus ad Pansophium puerum, written a.d. 393-4, according to Paulinus in his
life of St. Ambrose.
4. Libri quatuor regfiorum, rQieirad io \n ihe miroducHow to the work on the Jewish
war.
5. Expositio fidei, quoted by Theodoret and others as a writing of St. Ambrose.
' Scriptorum veterum nova ColUctio, Vol. X.
ON THE DUTIES OF THE CLERGY.
INTRODUCTION.
St. Ambrose, esteeming- very highly the dignity of the ministerial office, was most
desirous that the clergy of his diocese should live worthily of their high vocation, and be
good and profitable examples to the people. Consequently he undertook the following
treatise, setting forth the duties of the clergy, and taking as a model the treatise of Cicero,
De Officiis.
The writer says that his object is to impress upon those whom he has ordained the
lessons which he had previously taught them. ' Like Cicero, he treats of that which
is right, becoming, or honourable [decoruni], and what is expedient \uiile\; ^ but with refer-
ence not to this life but to that which is to come, teaching in the first book that vv'hich is
becoming or honourable ; in the second, what is expedient ; and in the third, considering
both in conjunction.
In the first book he divides duties into " ordinary," or the way of the commandments,
binding upon all alike; and "perfect," which consist in following the counsels. After
treating then of some elementary duties, such as those towards parents and elders, he
touches upon the two principles which lead the mind, reason and appetite, and shows that
what is becoming consists in thinking of good and right things, and in the subjection of
the appetite to reason, 3 and supplies certain rules and examples, ending with a discussion
on the four Cardinal Virtues, Prudence, Justice, Fortitude, and Temperance.
In the second book, passing from what is becoming to what is expedient, he points out that
we can only measure what is really expedient by reference to eternal life, in contradiction
to the errors of heathen philosophers, and shows that what is expedient consists in the
knowledge of God and in good living. Incidentally he shows that what is becoming is really
that which is expedient, and ends the book with several chapters of practical considerations.
In the third book he treats of duties of perfection, and lays down as a rule that in every-
thing we must inquire what is expedient, not for individuals, but for many or for all.
Nothing is to be striven after which is not becoming ; to this everything must give place,
not only expediency but even friendship and life itself. By many examples he then proves
how holy men have sought after what was becoming, and have thereby secured what was
expedient.
The object of St. Ambrose in basing his treatise on the lines of that of Cicero would
seem to have been the confutation of some of the false principles of heathenism, and to
show how much higher Christian morality is than that of the Gentiles. The treatise was
probably composed about a. d. 391.
1 II. 6, § 25.
2 I. 9, § 28.
^ I. 24, § 106.
xxiii
THREE BOOKS ON THE DUTIES OF THE CLERGY,
BY
ST. AMBROSE, BISHOP OF MILAN.
BOOK I.
CHAPTER I.
A Bishop's special office is to teach ; St. Ambrose him-
self, however, has to learn in order that he may teach ;
or rather has to teach what he has not learnt ; at
any rate learning and teaching with himself must
go on together.
1. I THINK I shall not seem to be taking'
too much on myself, if, in the midst of my
children, I yield to my desire to teach, see-
ing that the master of humility himself has
said : " Come, ye children, hearken unto me:
I will teach you the fear of the Lord." '
Wherein one may observe both the humility
and the grace of his reverence for God.
For in saying " the fear of the Lord," which
seems to be common to all, he has described
the chief mark of reverence for God. As,
however, fear itself is the beginning of wis-
dom and the source of blessedness — for they
that fear the Lord are blessed ^ — he has
plainly marked himself out as the teacher
for instruction in wisdom, and the guide to
the attainment of blessedness.
2. We therefore, being anxious to imitate
his reverence for God, and not without jus-
tification in dispensing grace, deliver to you
as to children those things which the Spirit of
Wisdom has imparted to him, and which
have been made clear to us through him,
and learnt by sight and by example. For
we can no longer now escape from the duty
of teaching which the needs of the priest-
hood have laid upon us, though we tried to
avoid it : ^ "For God gave some, apostles ;
and some, prophets ; and some, evangelists ;
and some, pastors and teachers. "■♦
' Ps. xxxiv. [xxxiii.] ii. 2 n, {-xii. [cxi.] i.
' Paulinus, in his Life of St. Ambrose, xA?i\.a various expedi-
ents that he tried, to enable him to avoid the office to which he had
been called ; e.g. how he caused torture to be applied to prisoners,
contrary' to his usual practice, in the hope that this might lead to
his rejection. More than once, also, he endeavoured to escape the
honour by flight.
* Eph. iv. II.
3. I do not therefore claim for myself the
glory of the apostles (for who can do this
save those whom the Son of God Himself
has chosen .?) ; nor the grace of the pro-
phets, nor the virtue of the evangelists, nor
the cautious care of the pastors. I only de-
sire to attain to that care and diligence in
the sacred writings, which the Apostle has
placed last amongst the duties of the saints; •
and this very thing I desire, so that, in the
endeavour to teach, I may be able to learn.
For one is the true Master, Who alone has
not learnt, what He taught all ; but men
learn before they teach, and receive from
Him what they may hand on to others.
4. But not even this was the case with
me. For I was carried off from the judg-
ment seat, and the garb \infnHs\ of office,
to enter on the priesthood,^ and began to
teach you, what I myself had not yet learnt.
So it happened that I began to teach before
I began to learn. Therefore I must learn
and teach at the same time, since I had no
leisure to learn before.^
CHAPTER n.
Manifold dangers are incurred by speaking ; the
remedy for w^hich Scripture shows to consist in
silence.
5. Now what ought we to learn before
everything else, but to be silent, that we
may be able to speak } lest my voice should
condemn me, before that of another acquit
1 I Cor. xii. 10.
- St. Ambrose, at the time of his election to the episcopate, was a
consular magistrate, and was not even baptized. The infula was
a flock of red and white wool formed into a fillet, and worn on the
head; from which ribands hung down on either side. It was a
mark of religious consecration, and so worn by the priests and ves-
tal virgins. In later times it was adopted also by the emperors
and magistrates as a sign of their semi-sacred character.
" The following is found in many MSS., but not in the Benedic-
tine edition " Jit quantitmlibet quisque profecerit nemo est qui
docere tioti egeat dum vivii."
ST. AMBROSE.
me ; for it is written : "By thy words thou
shalt be condemned. " ' What need is there,
then, that thou shouldest hasten to undergo
the danger of condemnation by speaking,
when thou canst be more safe by keeping
silent ? How many have I seen to fall into
sin by speaking, but scarcely one by keep-
ing silent ; and so it is more difficult to
know how to keep silent than how to speak.
I know that most persons speak because
they do not know how to keep silent. It is
seldom that any one is silent even when
speaking profits him nothing. He is wise,
then, who knows how to keep silent. Last-
ly, the Wisdom of God said : ' ' The Lord liath
given to me the tongue of learning, that I
should know when it is good to speak. "^
Justly, then, is he wise who has received of
the Lord to know when he ought to speak.
Wherefore the Scripture says well : "A
wise man will keep silence until there is
opportunity." ^
6. Therefore the saints of the Lord loved
to keep silence, because they knew that a
man's voice is often the utterance of sin,
and a man"s speech is the beginning of
human error. Lastly, the Saint of the Lord
said : "I said, I will take heed to my ways,
that I offend not in my tongue. "4 For he
knew and had read that it was a mark of
the divine protection for a man to be hid
from the scourge of his own tongue, 5 and
the witness of his own conscience. We
are chastised by the silent reproaches of our
thoughts, and by the judgment of con-
science. We are chastised also by the lash
of our own voice, when we say things
whereby our soul is mortally injured, and
our mind is sorely wounded. But who is
there that has his heart clean from the im-
purities of sin, and does not offend in his
tongue .'' And so, as he saw there was no
one who could keep his mouth free from evil
speaking, he laid upon himself the law of
innocency by a rule of silence, with a
view to avoiding by silence that fault which
he could with difficulty escape in speaking.
7. Let us hearken, then, to the master of
precaution : "I said, I will take heed to my
ways ; "' that is, "I said to myself: in the
silent biddings of my thoughts, I have en-
joined upon myself, that I should take heed
to my ways." Some ways there are which
we ought to follow; others as to which we
ought to take heed. We must follow the
ways of the Lord, and take heed to our own
ways, lest they lead us into sin. One can
> S. Matt. xii. 37- ' Is. 1. 4 fLXX.]. s Ecclus. xx. 7.
* Ps. xxxix. [xxxviii.] i. » Job v. 21.
take heed if one is not hasty in speaking.
The law says : " Hear, O Israel, the Lord
thy God."' It said not: "Speak," but
"Hear." Eve fell because she said to the
man what she had not heard from the Lord
her God. The first word from God says to
thee : Hear ! If thou hearest, take heed to
thy ways ; and if thou hast fallen, quickly
amend thy way. For: "Wherein does a
young man amend his way ; except in
taking heed to the word of the Lord.?"^ Be M
silent therefore first of all, and hearken, that ■
thou fail not in thy tongue.
8. It is a great evil that a man should be
condemned by his own mouth. Truly, if
each one shall give account for an idle
word,^ how much more for words of im-
purity and shame.? For words uttered
hastily are far worse than idle words. If,
therefore, an account is demanded for an
idle word, how much more will punishment
be exacted for impious language ?
CHAPTER III.
Silence should not remain unbroken, nor should it
arise from idleness. How heart and mouth must be
guarded against inordinate affections.
9. What then ? Ought we to be dumb.?
Certainly not. For: "there is a time to
keep silence and a time to speak." 4 If, then,
we are to give account for an idle word, let
us take care that we do not have to give it
also for an idle silence. For there is also
an active silence, such as Susanna's was,
who did more by keeping silence than if she
had spoken. For in keeping silence before
men she spoke to God, and found no greater
proof of her chastity than silence. Her
conscience spoke where no word was heard,
and she sought no judgment for herself at
the hands of men, for she had the witness of
the Lord. She therefore desired to be
acquitted by Him, Who she knew could not
be deceived in any way. 5 Yea, the Lord
Himself in the Gospel worked out in silence
the salvation of men.'' David rightly there-
fore enjoined on himself not constant silence,
but watchfulness.
10. Let us then guard our hearts, let us
guard our mouths. Both have been written
about. In this place we are bidden to take
heed to our mouth ; in another place thou
art told: "Keep thy heart with all dili-
gence." 7 If David took heed, wilt thou not
* Deut. vi. 4.
* Eccles. iii. 7.
' Prov. iv. 23.
^ Ps. cxix. [cxviii.] 9.
* Sus. V. 35.
' S. Matt. xii. 36.
•= S. Matt. xxvi. 63.
DUTIES OF THE CLERGY.— BOOK I.
take heed? If Isaiah had unclean lips —
who said: "Woe is me, for I am undone,
for I am a man, and have unclean lips " ' —
if a prophet of the Lord had unclean lips,
how shall we have them clean ?
11. But for whom was it written, unless
it was for each one of us : " Hedge thy pos-
session about with thorns, and bmd up thy
silver and gold, and make a door and a bar
for thy mouth, and a yoke and a balance
for thy words " ? ^ Thy possession is thy
mind, thy gold thy heart, thy silver thy
speech : "The words of the Lord are pure
words, as silver tried in the fire." ^ A good
mind is also a good possession. And, further,
a pure inner life is a valuable possession.
Hedge in, then, this possession of thine, en-
close it with thought, guard it with thorns,
that is, with pious care, lest the tierce pas-
sions of the flesh should rush upon it and
lead it captive, lest strong emotions should
assault it, and, overstepping their bounds,
carry off its vintage. Guard thy inner self.
Do not neglect or contemn it as though it
were worthless, for it is a valuable posses-
sion ; truly valuable indeed, for its fruit is
not perishable and only for a time, but is
lasting and of use for eternal salvation.
Cultivate, therefore, thy possession, and let
it be thy tilling ground
12. Bind up thy words that they run not
riot, and grow wanton, and gather up sins
for themselves in too much talking. Let
them be rather confined, and held back
within their own banks. An overflowing
river quickly gathers mud. Bind up also
thy meaning ; let it not be left slack and
unchecked, lest it be said of thee : "There
is no healing balsam, nor oil, nor bandage
to apply. "4 Sobriety of mind has its reins,
whereby it is directed and guided.
13. Let there be a door to thy mouth,
that it may be shut when need arises, and
let it be carefully barred, that none may
rouse thy voice to anger, and thou pay back
abuse with abuse. Thou hast heard it read
to-day: "Be ye angry and sin not. "5
Therefore although we are angry (this aris-
ing from the motions of our nature, not of
our will), let us not utter with our mouth
one evil word, lest we fall into sin ; but let
there be a yoke and a balance to thy words,
that is, humility and moderation, that thy
tongue may be subject to thy mind. Let it
be held in check with a tight rein ; let it
have its own means of restraint, whereby it
can be recalled to moderation ; let it utter
' Isa. vi. 5. - Ecclus. xxviii. 24, 25. ' Ps. xji. [xi.] 6.
* Isa. i. 6 [LXX.]. '' Ps. iv. 4.
words tried by the scales of justice, that
there may be seriousness in our meaning,
weight in our speech, and due measure in
our words.
CHAPTER IV.
The .same care must be taken that our speech proceed
not from evil passions, but from good motives ; for
here it is that the devil is especially on the watch to
catch us.
14. If any one takes heed to this, he will
be mild, gentle, modest. For in guarding
his mouth, and restraining his tongue, and
in not speaking before examining, ponder-
ing, and weighing his words — as to whether
this should be said, that should be answered,
or whether it be a suitable time for this
remark — he certainly is practising modesty,
gentleness, patience. So he will not burst
out into speech through displeasure or
anger, nor give sign of any passion in his
words, nor proclaim that the flames of lust
are burning in his language, or that the in-
centives of wrath are present in what he
says. Let him act thus for fear that his
words, which ought to grace his inner life,
should at the last plainly show and prove
that there is some vice in his morals.
15. For then especially does the enemy
lay his plans, when he sees passions engen-
dered in us ; then he supplies tinder ; then
he lays snares. Wherefore the prophet says
not without cause, as we heard read to-day :
' ' Surely He hath delivered me from the snare
of the hunter and from the hard word. "'
Symmachus^ said this means "the word of
provocation ; " others " the word that brings
disquiet." The snare of the enemy is our
speech — but that itself is also just as much
an enemy to us. Too often we say some-
thing that our foe takes hold of, and where-
by he wounds us as though by our own
sword. How far better it is to perish by
the sword of others than by our own !
16. Accordingly the enemy tests our arms
and clashes together his weapons. If he
sees that I am disturbed, he implants the
points of his darts, so as to raise a crop of
quarrels. If I utter an unseemly word, he
sets his snare. Then he puts before me the
opportunity for revenge as a bait, so that in
desiring to be revenged, I may put myself
in the snare, and draw the death-knot tight
for myself. If any one feels this enemy is
1 Ps. xc. 3 [LXX.].
^ Symmachus, said to have been an Ebionite, lived c. 193-21 1.
He translated the Old Testament into Greek. This was one of the
versions Origen made use of in his Hexapla edition of the Bible.
ST. AMBROSE.
near, he ought to give greater heed to his
mouth, lest he make room for the enemy ;
but not many see him.
CHAPTER V.
We must guard also against a visible enemy when he
incites us by silence ; by the help of which alone we
can escape from those greater than ourselves, and
maintain that humility which we must display
towards all.
17. But we must also guard against him
who can be seen, and who provokes us,
and spurs us on, and exasperates us, and
supplies what will excite us to licentiousness
or lust. If, then, any one reviles us, irritates,
stirs us up to violence, tries to make us
quarrel ; let us keep silence, let us not be
ashamed to become dumb. For he who
irritates us and does us an injury is com-
mitting sin, and wishes us to become like
himself.
18. Certainly if thou art silent, and hidest
thy feelings, he is wont to say : " Why are
you silent.-* Speak if you dare : but you dare
not, you are dumb, I have made you speech-
less." If thou art silent, he is the more
excited. He thinks himself beaten, laughed
at, little thought of, and ridiculed. If thou
answerest, he thinks he has become the
victor, because he has found one like him-
self. For if thou art silent, men will say :
"That man has been abusive, but this one
held him in contempt." If thou return the
abuse, they will say: "Both have been
abusive.'' Both will be condemned, neither
will be acquitted. Therefore it is his object
to irritate, so that I may speak and act as
he does. But it is the duty of a just man
to hide his feelings and say nothing, to
preserve the fruit of a good conscience, to
trust himself rather to the judgment of good
men than to the insolence of a calumniator,
and to be satisfied with the stability of his
own character. For that is: "To keep
silence even from good words ; '' ' since one
who has a good conscience ought not to be
troubled by false words, nor ought he to
make more of another's abuse than of the
witness of his own heart.
19. So, then, let a man guard also his humi-
lity. If, however, he is unwilling to appear
too humble, he thinks as follows, and says
within himself: "Am I to allow this man to
despise me, and say such things to my face
against me, as though I could not open my
mouth before him ? Why should I not also
* Ps. xxxix. [xxxviii.] 2.
say something whereby I can grieve him.?
Am I to let him do me wrong, as though I
were not a man, and as though I could not
avenge myself.' Is he to bring charges
against me as though I could not bring to-
gether worse ones against him ? "
20. Whoever speaks like this is not gentle
and humble, nor is he without temptation.
The tempter stirs him up, and himself puts
such thouo^hts in his heart. Often and often,
too, the evil spirit employs another person,
and gets him to say such things to him; but
do thou set. thy foot firm on the rock.
Although a slave should abuse, let the just
man be silent, and if a weak man utter in-
sults, let him be silent, and if a poor man
should make accusations, let him not answer.
These are the weapons of the just man, so
that he may conquer by giving way, as those
skilled in throwing the javelin are wont to
conquer by giving way, and in flight to
wound their pursuers with severer blows.
CHAPTER VI.
In this matter we must imitate David's silence and
humility, so as not even to seem deserving of harm.
21, What need is there to be troubled
when we hear abuse ? Why do we not
imitate him who says : "I was dumb and
humbled myself, and kept silence even from
good words '" ? ' Or did David only say this,
and not act up to it .-* No, he also acted up
to it. For when Shimei the son of Gera
reviled him, David was silent ; and although
he was surrounded with armed men he did
not return the abuse, nor sought revenge :
nay, even when the son of Zcruiah spoke to
him, because he wished to take vengeance
on him, David did not permit it.^ He went
on as though dumb, and humbled ; he went
on in silence ; nor was he disturbed, although
called a bloody man, for he was conscious
of his own gentleness. He therefore was
not disturbed by insults, for he had full
knowledge of his own good works.
22. He, then, who is quickly roused by
wrong niakes himself seem deservinir ot
insult, even whilst he wishes to be shown
not to deserve it. He who despises wrongs
is better off than he who grieves over them.
For he who despises them looks down on
them, as though he feels them not : but he
who grieves over them is tormented, just as
though he actuidly felt them.
' Ps. x.xxix. 2 [xxxviii. 2].
* 2 Sam. [2 Kings] xvi. 6 S.
DUTIES OF THE CLERGY.— BOOK I.
5
CHAPTER VII.
How admirably Ps. xxxix. [xxxviii.] takes the place
of an introduction. Incifed thereto by this psalm
the saint determines to write on duties. He does
this with more reason even than Cicero, who wTote
on this subject to his son. How, further, this is so.
23. Not without thought did I make use
of the beg-inning of this psahii, in writing
to you, my children. For this psahn wiiich
the' Prophet David gave to Jeduthun to sing,'
I urge you to regard, being deUghted my-
self with its depth of meaning and the ex-
cellency of its maxims. For we have learnt
in those words we have just shortly touched
upon, that both patience in keeping silence
and the duty of awaiting a fit time for
speaking are taught in this psalm, as
well as contempt of riches in the follow-
ing verses, which things are the chief
groundwork of virtues. Whilst, therefore,
meditating on this psalm, it has come to
my mind to write "on the Duties."
24. Although some philosophers have
written on this subject, — Panaetius,^ for
instance, and his son amongst the Greek,
Cicero amongst the Latin, writers — I did not
think it foreign to my office to write also
myself. And as Cicero wrote for the in-
struction of his son,^ so I, too, write to teach
you, my children. For I love you, whom
I have begotten in the Gospel, no less than
if you were my own true sons. For nature
does not make us love more ardently than
grace. We certainly ought to love those
who we think will be with us for evermore
than those who will be with us in this world
only. These often are born unworthy of
their race, so as to bring disgrace on their
father ; but you we chose beforehand, to
love. They are loved naturally, of necessity,
which is not a sufficiently suitable and con-
stant teacher to implant a lasting love. But
ye are loved on the ground of our deliberate
choice, whereby a great feeling of affection
is combined with the strength of our love :
thus one tests what one loves and loves what
one has chosen.
CHAPTER VHI.
The word " Duty " has been often used both by philo-
sophers and in the holy Scriptures ; from whence
it is derived.
25. Since, therefore, the person concerned
1 This psalm in the Hebrew is inscribed to Jeduthun, one of the
three leading musicians in the temple services.
^ A Stoic philosopher who lived and taught at Athens, c. B.C. 120.
His chief work was a treatise irepi. rov Ka9ri<oPTo<;, which Cicero
himself afterward used as the groundwork of his own book de
Officiis. 2 Cic. de Off. I. 2.
is one fit to write on the Duties, let us
see whether the subject itself stands on the
same groimd, and whether this word is
suitable only to the schools of the philoso-
phers, or is also to be found in the sacred
Scriptures. Beautifully has the Holy Spirit,
as it happens, brought before us a passage
in reading the Gospel to-day, as though He
would urge us to write ; whereby we are
confirmed in our view, that the word offi.-
cium, "duty," may also be used with us.
For when Zacharias the priest was struck
dumb in the temple, and could not speak,
it is said : " And it came to pass that as
soon as the days of his duty \officii\ were ac-
complished, he departed to his own house. " '
We read, therefore, that the word officium,
"■ duty," can be used by us.
26.* And this is not inconsistent with
reason, since we consider that the word
officium (duty) is derived from efficere (to
effect), and is formed with the change of
one letter for the sake of euphony ; or at
any rate that you should do those things
which injure [officiant^ no one, but benefit
all.
CHAPTER IX.
A duty is to be chosen from what is virtuous, and
from what is useful, and also from the comparison of
the two, one with the other; but nothing is recog-
nized by Christians as virtuous or useful which is
not helpful to the future life. This treatise on duty,
therefore, will not be superfluous.
27. The philosophers considered that
duties^ were derived from what is virtuous
and what is useful, and that from these two
one should choose the better. Then, they
say, it may happen that two virtuous or two
useful things will clash together, and the
question is, which is the more virtuous, and
which the more useful } First, therefore,
"duty" is divided into three sections:
what is virtuous, what is useful, and what
is the better of two. Then, again, these
three are divided into five classes ; that is,
two that are virtuous, two that are useful,
and, lastly, the right judgment as to the
choice between them. The first they say
has to do with the moral dignity and in-
tegrity of life ; the second with the con-
' Luke i. 23. The Vulgate has officii; the Greek text reads :
T^? Kenovpyia<;-
^ In this section it is impossible to give the point in a translation,
but the passage does not affect the argument. The text runs as
follows : " IVec ratio ipsa abhorret, quandoquidevi officium ab effi-
ciendo dictutn putamus, quasi efficium : sed propter decorem ser-
monis una imtmdata litera, officium nunczipari, vel eerie, ttt ea
agas quce nulii officiatit, prosint omnibus.^'
^ Cic. de Off. I. 3, § 9.
ST. AMBROSE.
\
veniences of life, with wealth, resources,
opportunities ; whilst a right judgment must
underlie the choice of any of them. This
is what the philosophers say. '
28. But we measure nothing at all but
that which is fitting and virtuous, and that
by the rule of things future rather than of
things present ; and we state nothing to be
useful but what will help us to the bless-
mg of eternal life ; certainly not that which
will help us enjoy merely the present time.
Nor do we recognize any advantages in
opportunities and in the wealth of earthly
goods, but consider them as disadvantages
if not put aside, and to be looked on as a
burden, when we have them, rather than as
a loss when expended.
29. This work of ours, therefore, is not
superfluous, seeing that we and they re-
gard duty in quite different ways. They
reckon the advantages of this life among
the good things, we reckon them among the
evil things ; for he who receives good things
here, as the rich man in the parable, is tor-
mented there ; and Lazarus, who endured
evil things here, there found comfort.^
Lastly, those who do not read their writings
may read ours if they will — if, that is, they
do not require great adornment of language
or a skilfully-treated subject, but are satis-
fied with the simple charm of the subject
itself.
CHAPTER X.
What is seemly is often found in the sacred writings
long before it appears in the books of the philoso-
phers. Pythagoras borrowed the law of his silence
from David. David's rule, however, is the best, for
our first duty is to have due measure in speaking.
30. Wp: are instructed and taught that
"what is seemly "-5 is put in our Scriptures
in the first place. (In Greek it is called
Tzpirzov.) For we read: "A Hymn be-
seems Thee, O God, in Sion." In Greek
this is : loiTzpiytet u/ryog 6 ^£09 ^v l''.(6,>.'i And the
Apostle says : " Speak the things which
become sound doctrine. "5 And elsewhere:
" For it beseemed Ilim through Whom are
all things and for Whom are all things, in
bringing many sons unto glory, to make the
Captain of their salvation perfect through
sufferings." *^
31. Was Panoetius or Aristotle, who also
wrote on duty," earlier than David.' Why,
Pythagoras himself, who lived before the
1 Cic. de Off. I. 3-
« Ps. Ixv. [Ixiv.] I.
- S. Luke xvi. 25.
^ Tit. ii. I.
» Cic. de Off. I. 27.
* Heb. ii. 10.
time of Socrates, followed the prophet
David's steps and gave his disciples a law of
silence. He went so far as to restrain his
disciples from the use of speech for five
years. . David, on the other hand, gave his
law, not with a view to impair the gift of
nature, but to teach us to take heed to the
words we utter. Pythagoras again made
his rule, that he might teach men to speak
by not speaking. But David made his, so
that by speaking we might learn the more I
how to speak. How can there be instruc-
tion without exercise, or advance without
practice .'
32. A man wishing to undergo a warlike
training daily exercises himself with his
weapons. As though ready for action he
rehearses his part in the fight and stands forth
just as if the enerny were in position before
him. Or, with a view to acquiring skill and
strength in throwing the javelin, he either
puts his own arms to the proof, or avoids
the blows of his foes, and escapes them
by his watchful attention. The man that
desires to navigate a ship on the sea, or to
row, tries first on a river. They who wish
to acquire an agreeable style of singing and
a beautiful voice begin by bringing out their
voice gradually by singing. And they who
seek to win the crown of victory by strength
of body and in a regular wrestling match,
harden their limbs by daily practice in the
wrestling school, foster their endurance,
and accustom themselves to hard work.
-^l. Nature herself teaches us this in the
case of infants. For they first exercise
themselves in the sounds of speech and so
learn to speak. Thus these sounds of
speech are a kind of practice, and a school
for the voice. Let those then who want
to learn to take heed in speaking, not re-
fuse what is according to nature, but let
them use all watchful care ; just as those
who are on a watch-tower keep on the alert
by watching, and not by going to sleep.
For everything is made more perfect and
strong by exercises proper and suitable to
itself.
34. David, therefore, was not always
silent, but only for a time ; not perpetually
nor to all did he refuse to speak ; but he
used not to answer the enemy that provoked
him, the sinner that exasperated him. As
he says elsewhere: "As though he were
deaf he heard not them that speak vanity
and imagine deceit : and as though he were
dumb he opened not his mouth to them."'
Again, in another place, it is said : "Answer
• Ps. xxxviii. [xxxvii.] 13.
DUTIES OF TTIR CLERGY.— ROOK I.
not a fool according to his folly, lest thou
also be like to him. " '
35. The first duty then is to have due
measure in our speech. In this way a sac-
rifice of praise is offered up to God ; thus a
godly fear is shown when the sacred Scrip-
tures are read ; thus parents are honoured. I
know well that many speak because they
know not how to keep silence. But it is not
often any one is silent when speaking- does
not profit him. A wise man, intending to
speak, first carefully considers Avhat he is to
say, and to whom he is to say it ; also
where and at what time. There is therefore
such a thing as due measure in keeping
silence and also in speaking ; there is also
such a thing as a due measure in what we do.
It is a glorious thing to maintain the right
standard of duty.
y
CHAPTER XI.
It is proved by the witness of Scripture that all duty is
either "ordinary" or "perfect." To which is added a
word in praise of mercy, and an exhortation to prac-
tise it.
36. Every duty is either "ordinary" or
"perfect,"^ a fact which we can also con-
firm by the authority of the Scriptures. For
we read in the Gospel that the Lord said :
" If thou wilt enter into life, keep the com-
mandments. Hesaith: Which.? Jesus said
to him : Thou shalt do no murder, Thou
shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not
steal. Thou shalt not bear false witness.
Honour thy father and thy mother. Thou
shalt love thy neighbour as thyself " ^ These
are ordinary duties, to which something is
wanting.
37. Upon this the young man says to
Him: "All these things have I kept from
my youth up, what lack I yet.' Jesus said
unto him : If thou wilt be perfect, go and
sell all thy goods and give to the poor, and
thou shalt have treasure in heaven ; and
come and follow Me. "4 And earlier the
same is written, where the Lord says that
we must love our enemies, and pray for
those that falsely accuse and persecute us,
and bless those that curse us. s This we are
bound to do, if we would be perfect as our
Father Who is in heaven ; W^ho bids the sun
to shed his rays over the evil and the good,
and makes the lands of the whole universe
fertile with rain and dew without any dis-
tinction.*^ This, then, is a perfect duty (the
* Prov. xxvi. 4.
* S. Matt. xix. 17, 18, 19.
* S. Matt. V. 44.
2 Cic. de Off. I. 3, § 8.
* .S. Matt. xix. 20, 21.
*S. Matt. V. 45.
Greeks call it /.azopOioiJM), whereby all things
are put right which could have any failings
in them.
38. Mercy, also, is a good thing, for it
makes men perfect, in that it imitates the
perfect Father. Nothing graces the Chris-
tian soul so much as mercy ; mercy as
shown chiefly towards the poor, that thou
mayest treat them as sharers in common
with thee in the produce of nature, which
brings forth the fruits of the earth for use
to all. Thus thou mayest freely give to a
poor man what thou hast, and in this way
help him who is thy brother and companion.
Thou bestowest silver ; he receives life.
Thou givest money ; he considers it his for-
tune. Thy coin makes up all his property.
39. Further, he bestows more on thee
than thou on him, since he is thy debtor in
regard to thy salvation. If thou clothe the
naked, thou clothest thyself with righteous-
ness ; if thou bring the stranger under thy
roof, if thou support the needy, he procures
for thee the friendship of the saints and eter-
nal habitations. That is no small recom-
pense. Thou sowest earthly things and
receivest heavenly. Dost thou wonder at
the judgment of God in the case of holy
Job .'' Wonder rather at his virtue, in that
he could say : "I was an eye to the blind,
and a foot to the lame. I was a father to
the poor. Their shoulders were made warm
with the skins of my lambs. The stranger
dwelt not at my gates, but my door was
open to every one that came. "-^ Clearly
blessed is he from whose house a poor man
has never gone with empty hand. Nor
again is any one more blessed than he who
is sensible of the needs of the poor, and the
hardships of the weak and helpless. In the
day of judgment he will receive salvation
from the Lord, Whom he will have as his
debtor for the mercy he has shown.
CHAPTER XII.
To prevent any one from being checked in the exer-
cise of mercy, he shows that God cares for human
actions ; and proves on the evidence of Job that all
wicked men are unhappy in the very abundance of
their wealth.
40. But many are kept back from the duty of
showing active mercy, because they suppose
that God does not care about the actions of
men, or that He does not know what we do
in secret, and what our conscience has in
view. Some again think that His judgment
' Job xxix. IS, 16.
8
ST. AMBROSE.
in no wise seems to be just ; for they see
that sinners have abundance of riches, that
they enjoy honours, health, and children ;
while, on the other hand, the just live in
poverty and unhonoured, they are without
children, sickly in body, and often in grief.
41. That is no small point. For those
three royal friends of Job declared him to be
a sinner, because they saw that he, after
being rich, became poor; that after having
many children, he had lost them all, and that
he was now covered with sores and was full
of weals, and was a mass of wounds from
head to foot. But holy Job made this
declaration to them: "If I suffer thus be-
cause of my sins, why do the wicked live.?
They grow old also in riches, their seed is
according to their pleasure, their children are
before their eyes, their houses are prosper-
ous ; but they have no fear ; there is no
scourge from the Lord on them. ' '
42. A faint-hearted man, seeing this, is
disturbed in mind, and turns his attention
away from it. Holy Job, when about to
speak in the words of such a one, began
thus, saying: "Bear with me, I also will
speak ; then laugh at me. For if I am found
fault with, I am found fault with as a man.
Bear, therefore, the burden of my words. '" ^
For I am going to say (he means) what I do
not approve ; but I shall utter wrong words
to refute you. Or, to translate it in another
way : " How now .-* Am I found fault with
by a man ? " That is : a man cannot find
fault with ine because I Vave sinned, al-
though I deserve to be found fault with ; for
ye do not find fault with me on the ground
of an open sin, but estimate what I deserve
for my offences by the extent of my misfor-
tunes. Thus the faint-hearted man, seeing
that the wicked succeed and prosper, whilst
he himself is crushed by misfortune, says to
the Lord: "Depart from me, I desire not
the knowledge of Thy ways. ^ What good is
it that we serve Him, or what use to hasten
to Him .' In the hands of the wicked are all
good things, but He sees not their works."
43. Plato has been greatly praised, be-
cause in his book "on the State," ^ he has
made the person who undertook the part of
objector against justice to ask pardon for
his words, of which he himself did not ap-
prove ; and to say that that character was
only assumed for the sake of finding out the
truth and to investigate the question at
issue. And Cicero so far approved of tliis.
' Job xxi. 7-9.
- Job xxi. 2-4, differing, however, widely from both the Hebrew
and Greek text.
3 Job xxi. 14. * Plato, t/c Ri-f>ub. II. 2.
that he also, in his book which he wrote
"on the Commonwealth," thought some-
thing must be said against that idea.
44. How many years before these did Job
live ! He was the first to discover this, and
to consider what excuses had to be made
for this, not for the sake of decking out his
eloquence, but for the sake of finding out
the truth. At once he made the matter
plain, stating that the lamp of the wicked is
put out, that their destruction will come ; '
that God, the teacher of wisdom and instruc-
tion, is not deceived, but is a judge of the
truth. Therefore the blessedness of indi-
viduals must not be estimated at the value
of their known wealth, but according to the
voice of their conscience within them. For
this, as a true and uncorrupted judge of
punishments and rewards, decides between
the deserts of the innocent and the guilty.
The innocent man dies in the strength of
his own simplicity, in the full possession of
his own will; having a soul filled as it were
with marrow. 2 But the sinner, though he
has abundance in life, and lives in the midst
of luxury, and is redolent with sweet scents,
ends his life in the bitterness of his soul,
and brings his last day to a close, taking
with him none of those good things which
he once enjoyed — carrying away nothing
with him but the price of his own wicked-
ness. ^
45. In thinking of this, deny if thou canst
that a recompense is paid by divine judg-
ment. The former feels happy in his heart,
the latter wretched ; that man on his own
verdict is guiltless, this one a criminal ; that
man again is happy in leaving the world,
this man grieves over it. Who can be pro-
nounced guiltless that is not innocent in
the sight of his own conscience.'' "Tell
me," he says, " where is the covering of his
tabernacle; his token will not be found. ' ■♦
The life of the criminal is as a dream. He
has opened his eyes. His repose has
departed, his enjoyment has fled. Nay, that
very repose of the wicked, which even while
they live is only seeming, is now in hell,
for alive they go down into hell.
46. Thou seest the enjoyments of the sin-
ner ; but question his conscience. Will he
not be more foul than any sepulchre } Thou
beholdest his joy, thou admircst the bodily
health of his children, and the amount of
his wealth ; but look within at the sores and
wounds of his soul, the sadness of his heart.
And what shall I say of his wealth, when
1 Job xxi. 17. » Job xxi. 24.
■' Job xxi. Very freely used all through this section.
* Job. xxi. 28.
^
DUTIES OF THE CLERGY.— BOOK I.
thou readest : "For a man's life consisteth
not in the abundance of the thing-s which he
possesseth " ? ' When thou knowest, that
though he seems to thee to be rich, to him-
self he is poor, and in his own person re-
futes thy jutlg-ment ? What also shall I
say of the number of his children and of his
freedom from pain— when he is full of grief
and decides that he will have no heir, and
does not wish that those who copy his ways
should succeed him ? For the sinner really
leaves no heir. Thus the wicked man is a
punishment to himself, but the upright man
is a grace to himself — and to either, whether
good or bad, the reward of his deeds is paid
in his own person.
CHAPTER XIII.
The ideas of those philosophers are refuted who deny
to God the care of the whole world, or of any of its
parts.
47. But let us return to our point, lest we
seem to have lost sight of the break we
made in answering the ideas of those who,
seeing some wicked men, rich, joyous, full
of honours, and powerful, whilst many up-
right men are in want and are weak,- — sup-
pose therefore that God either cares nothing
about us ;(\vhich is what the Epicureans
say), or that He is ignorant of men's actions
as the wicked say — or that, if He knows all
things, He is an unjust judge in allowing
the good to be in want and the wicked to
have abundance. But it did not seem out
of place to make a digression to meet an
idea of this kind and to contrast it with the
feelings of those very persons whom they
consider happy — for they think themselves
wretched. 1 suppose they would believe
themselves more readily than us.
48. After this digression I consider it an
easy matter to refute the rest — above all the
declaration of those who think that God has
no care whatever for the world. For in-
stance, Aristotle declares that His providence
extends only to the moon. But what work-
man is there who gives no care to his work.?
Who would forsake and abandon what he
believes himself to have produced .' If it is
derogatory to rule, is it not more so to have
created .' Thousfh there is no wrong: involved
m not creating anything, it is surely the
height of cruelty not to care for what one
has created.
49. But if some deny God to be the
Creator, and so count themselves amongst
1 S. Luke xii. 15.
the beasts and irrational creatures, what
shall we say of those who condemn them-
selves to such indignity ? The)^ themselves
declare that God pervades all things, that
all depend upon His power, that His might
and majesty penetrate all the elements,
—-lands, heaven, and seas'; yet they think it
derogatory to Him to enter into mans spirit,
whitch is the noblest thing He has given
us, and to be there with the full knowledge
of the divine Majesty.
50. But philosophers who are held to be
reasonable laugh at the teacher • of these
ideas as bajrotted and licentious. But what
shall I g^ of Aristotle's idea ? He thinks
that Gt)d,is satisfied with His own narrow
bounds, and lives within the prescribed lim-
its of His kingdom. This, however, is also
what the poets' tales tell us. For they re-
late that the world is divided between three
gods, so that it has fallen to the lot of one to
restrain and rule heaven, to another the sea,
and to a third the lower regions. They have
also to take care not to stir up war one with
the other by allowing thoughts and cares
about the belongings of others to take hold
of them. In the same way, Aristotle also
declares that God has no care for the earth,
as He has none for the sea or the lower re-
gions. How is it that these philosophers
shut out of their ranks the poets whose foot-
steps they follow .-* ^
CHAPTER XIV.
Nothing escapes God's knowledge. This is proved by
the witness of the Scriptures and the analogy of the
sun, which, although created, yet by its light or heat
enters into all things.
51. Next comes the answer to the ques-
tion, whether God, not having failed to show
care for His work, now fails to have know-
ledge of it ? Thus it is written : " He that
planted the ear, shall He not hear.' He that
made the eye, shall He not regard .'' " ^
52. This false idea was not unknown to
the holy prophets. David himself intro-
duces men to speak whom pride has filled
and claimed for its own. For what shows
greater pride than when men who are liv-
ing in sin think it unfit that other sinners
should live, and say : "Lord, how long shall
the ungodly, how long shall the ungodly
' It is only fair to state that the character of Epicurus is mainly
known in modem times from opponents or persons who did not
understand him. See the account in Diet, of Gr. and Rom. Bio-
graphy.
- Arist. Metaph. i. 2. An allusion to Aristotle's saying that " the
poets lie much."
■* Ps. xciv. [xciii.J q.
lO
ST. AMBROSE.
triumph ? " ' And later on : " And yet they
say, the Lord shall not see : neither shall
the God of Jacob regard it."^ Whom the
prophet answers, saying: "Take heed, ye
unwise among the people : O ye fools, when
will ye understand ? He that planted the
ear, shall He not hear? or He that made the
eye, shall He not see ? He that rebuketh the
nations, shall He not punish? — He that
teacheth man knowledge ? The Lord know-
eth the thoughts of man that they arc vain. " 3
Does He Who discerns whatsoever is vain
not know what is holy, and is He ignorant of
what He Himself has made ? Can the work-
man be ignorant of his own work ? This one
is a man, yet he discerns what is hidden in
his work ; and God — shall He not know His
own work ? Is there more depth, then, in
the work than in its author? Has He made
something superior to Himself; the value of
which, as its Author, He was ignorant of, and
whose condition He knew not, though He
was its Director? So much for these per-
sons.
53. But we are satisfied with the witness
of Him Who says : "I search out the heart
and the reins. "■♦ In the Gospel, also, the
Lord Jesus says: "Why think ye evil in
your hearts ? For He knew they were
thinking evil. "5 The evangelist also wit-
nesses to this, saying: "For Jesus knew
their thoughts." ®
54. The idea of these people will not
trouble us much if we look at their actions.
They will not have Him to be judge over
them. Whom nothing deceives ; they will
not grant to Him the knowledge of things
hidden, for they are afraid their own hidden
things may be brought to light. But the
Lord, also, "knowing their works, has given
them over unto darkness. In the night,'' he
says, "he will be as a thief, and the eye of
the adulterer will watch for the darkness,
saying, No eye shall see me. ; he hath cov-
ered up his face." 7 For every one that
avoids the light loves darkness, seeking to
be hid, though he cannot be hid from God,
Who knows not only what is transacted, but
also what will be thought of, both in the
depths of space and in the minds of men.
Thus, again, he who speaks in the book Ec-
clesiasticus says: "Who seeth me? The
darkness hath covered me, and the walls
have hidden me ; whom do I fear?"* But
although lying on his bed he may think
thus, he is caught where he never thought of
■Ps. xciv. fxciii.l .^.
•'' Ps. xciv. [xciii.] S-ii.
8 S. Matt. ix. 4.
' Job xxiv. 14, 15.
- Ps. xciv. [xciii.] 7.
* Jer. xvii. 10.
" S. Luke vi. 8.
• Ecclus. xxiii. iS.
it. " It shall be," it says, " a shame to him
because he knew not what the fear of the
Lord was. " '
55. But what can be more foolish than to
suppose that anything escapes God's notice,
when the sun which supplies the light enters
even hidden spots, and the strength of its
heat reaches to the foundations of a house
and its inner chambers? Who can deny
that the depths of the earth, which the win-
ter's ice has bound together, are warmed by
the mildness of spring? Surely the very
heart of a tree feels the force of heat or cold,
to such an extent that its roots are either
nipped with the cold or sprout forth in the
warmth of the sun. In short, wherever
the mildness of heaven smiles on the earth,
there the earth produces in abundance fruits
of different kinds.
56. If, then, the sun's rays pour their light
over all the earth and enter into its hidden
spots ; if they cannot be checked by iron
bars or the barrier of heavy doors from get-
ting within, how can it be impossible for the
Glory of God, which is instinct with life,
to enter into the thoughts and hearts of
men that He Himself has created? And-
how shall it not see what He Himself has
created? Did He make His works to be
better and more powerful than He Himself
is. Who made them (in this event) so as to
escape the notice of their Creator whensoever
they will ? Did He implant such perfection
and power in our mind that He Himself
could not comprehend it when He wished ?
CHAPTER XV.
Those who are dissatisfied with the fact that the good
receive evil, and the evil good, are shown by the ex-
ample of Lazarus, and on the authority of Paul, that
punishments and rewards are reserved for a future
life.
57. We have fully discussed two ques-
tions ; and this discussion, as we think, has
not turned out quite unfavourably for us. A
third cjucstion yet remains ; it is this : Why
do sinners have abundance of wealth and
riches, and fare sumptuously, and have no
grief or sorrow ; whilst the upright are in
want, and are punished by the loss of wives
or children ? Now, that parable in the Gos-
pel ought to satisfy persons like these ; ^ for
tlie rich man was clothctl in purple and fine
linen, and dined sumptuously every day ;
but the beggar, full of sores, used to gather
the crumbs of his table. After the death of
' Ecclus. xxiii. 31,
* S. Luke xvi. 19 ff.
DUTIES OF THE CLERGY.— BOOK I.
II
the two, however, the beggar was in Abra-
ham's bosom in rest ; the rich man was in
torment. Is it not plain from this that re-
wards and punishments according to deserts
await one after death .'
58. And surely this is but right. For in a
contest there is much labour needed — and
after the contest victory falls to some, to
others disgrace. Is the palm ever given or
the crown granted before the course is
finished.'' Paul writes well ; He says: "I
have fought a good fight, I have finished my
course, 1 have kept the faith ; henceforth
there is laid up for me a crown of righteous-
ness, which the Lord, the righteous judge,
shall give me at that day ; and not to me
only, but unto all them also that love His
appearing."'^ " In that day," he says, He
will give it — not here. Here he fought, in
labours, in dangers, in shipwrecks, like
a eood wrestler ; for he knew how that
"through much tribulation we must enter
into the kingdom of God. " ^ Therefore no
one can receive a reward, unless he has
striven lawfully ; nor is the victory a glo-
rious one, unless the contest also has been
toilsome.
CHAPTER XVI.
To confirm what has been said above about rewards
and punishments, he adds that it is not strange if
there is no reward reserved for some in the future ;
for they do not labour here nor struggle. He goes
on to say also that for this reason temporal goods are
granted to these persons, so that they may have no
excuse whatever.
59. Is not he unjust who gives the reward
before the end of the contest .'' Therefore
the Lord says in the Gospel : "Blessed are
the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom
of heaven. "3 He said not: " Blessed are the
rich," but "the poor." By the divine judg-
ment blessedness begins there whence hu-
man misery is supposed to spring. ' ' Blessed
are they that hunger, for they shall be filled ;
Blessed are they that mourn, for they shall
be comforted ; Blessed are the merciful, for
God will have mercy on them ; Blessed are
the pure in heart, for they shall see God ;
Blessed are they that are persecuted for
righteousness' sake, for theirs is the kingdom
of heaven ; Blessed are ye when men shall
revile you, and persecute you, and shall say
all manner of evil against you for righteous-
ness' sake. Rejoice and be exceeding glad,
for plentiful is your reward in heaven. "4 A
reward future and not present, — in heaven,
not on earth, — has He promised shall be
given. What further dost thou expect .'
What further is due ? Why dost thou de-
mand the crown with so much haste, before
thou dost conquer ? Why dost thou desire
to shake off the dust and to rest .' Why dost
thou long to sit at the feast before the course
is finished ? As yet the people are looking
on, the athletes are in the arena, and thou
— dost thou already look for ease .-*
60. Perhaps thou saycst : Why are the
wicked joyous ? why do they live in luxury ?
why do they not toil with me .-' It is because
they who have not put down their names to
strive for the crown are not bound to un-
dergo the labours of the contest. They who
have not gone down into the race-course
do not anoint themselves with oil nor get
covered with dust. For those whom glory
awaits trouble is at hand. The perfumed
spectators are wont to look on, not to join
in the struggle, nor to endure the sun, the
heat, the dust, and the showers. Let the
athletes say to them : Come, strive with us.
The spectators will but answer : We sit here
now to decide about you, but you, if you
conquer, will gain the glory of the crown and
we shall not.
61. They, then, who have devoted them-
selves to pleasures, luxury, robbery, gain, or
honours are spectators rather than com-
batants. They have the profit of labour,
but not the fruits of virtue. They love their
ease ; by cunning and wickedness they heap
up riches ; but they will pay the penalty of
their iniquity, though it be late. Their rest
will be in hell, thine in heaven ; their home
in the grave, thine in paradise. Whence
Job said beautifully that they watch in the
tomb,' for they cannot have the calm of
quiet rest which he enjoys who shall rise
agam.
' 2 Tim. iv. 7, 8.
» S. Matt V. 3.
* Acts xiv. 22.
* S. Matt. V. 4 ff.
62. Do not, therefore, understand, or speak,
or think as a child ; nor as a child claim
those things now which belong to a future
time. The crown belongs to the perfect.
Wait till that which is perfect is come, when
thou mayest know — not through a glass as
in a riddle, but face to face ^ — the very
form of truth made clear. Then will be
made known why that person was rich who
was wicked and a. robber of other men's
goods, why another was powerful, why a
third had many children, and yet a fourth
was loaded with honours.
63. Perhaps all this happens that the ques-
tion may be asked of the robber : Thou
^ Job xxi. 32.
1 Cor. xiii. 12.
12
ST. AMBROSE.
wast rich, wherefore didst thou seize on the
goods of others ? Need did not force thee,
poverty did not drive thee to it. Did I not
make thee rich, that thou mightest have no
excuse ? So, too, it may be said to a person
of power : Why didst thou not aid the widow,
the orphans also, when enduring wrong ?
Wast thou powerless ? Couldst thou not
help? I made thee for this purpose, not
that thou mightest do wrong, but that thou
mightest check it. Is it not written for thee :
"Save him that endureth wrong .?" ■ Is it
not written for thee : " Deliver the poor and
needy out of the hand of the sinner " ? ^ It
may be said also to the man who has abun-
dance of good things : I have blessed thee
with children and honours ; I have granted
thee health of body ; why didst thou not
follow my commands .-* My servant, what
have I done to thee, or how have I grieved
thee ? Was it not I that gave thee children,
bestowed honours, granted health to thee .'
Why didst thou deny me .'' Why didst thou
suppose that thy actions would not come to
my knowledge .'' Why didst thou accept my
gifts, yet despise my commands.'*
64. We can gather the same from the
example of the traitor Judas. He was
chosen among the Twelve Apostles, and had
charge of the money bag, to lay it out upon
the poor,^ that it might not seem as though
he had betrayed the Lord because he was
unhonoured or in want. Wherefore the Lord
granted him this office, that He might also
be justified in him ; he would be guilty of a
greater fault, not as one driven to it by
wrong done to him, but as one misusing
grace.
CHAPTER XVII.
The duties of youth, and examples suitable to that age,
are next put forth.
65. SiNXK it has been made sufficiently
plain that there will be punishment for
wickedness and reward for virtue, let us
proceed to speak of the duties which have
to be borne in mind from our youth up,-*
that they may grow with our years. s A
good youth ought to have a fear of God, to
be subject to his parents, to give honour to
his elders, to preserve his purity ; he ought
not to despise humility, but should love for-
bearance and modesty. All these are an
' Ecclus. iv. 9. - Ps. Ixxxii. [Ixxxi] .).
•' S. John xii. 6. * Cic. </e Off. I. 34.
"Thus the Henedictine edition reads; most others have: " ac-
Crescaiit siiiiiil stiidia l>onoruin acttiioii"
ornament to youthful years. For as serious-
ness is the true erace of an old man, and
ardour of a young man, so also is modesty,
as though by some gift of nature, well set off
in a youth.
66. Isaac feared the Lord, as was indeed
but natural in the son of Abraham ; being
subject also to his father to such an extent
that he would not avoid death in opposition
to his father's will. ' Joseph also, though
he dreamed that sun and moon and stars
made obeisance to him, yet was subject to
his father's will with ready obedience.^ So
chaste was he, he would not hear even a
word unless it were pure ; humble was he
even to doing the work of a slave, modest,
even to taking flight, enduring, even to bear-
ing imprisonment, so forgiving of wrong as
even to repay it with good. Whose modesty
was such, that, when seized by a woman, he
preferred to leave his garment in her hands
in flight, rather than to lay aside his mod-
esty.^ Moses, 4 also,»and Jeremiah, s chosen
by the Lord to declare the words of God
to the people, were for avoiding, through
modesty, that which through grace they
could do.
y
CHAPTER XVIIL
On the different functions of modesty. How it should
qualify both speech and silence, accompany chastity,
commend our prayers to God, govern our bodily
motions ; on which last point reference is made to
two clerics in language by no means unsuited to its
object. Further he proceeds to say that one's gait
should be in accordance with that same virtue, and
how careful one must be that nothing immodest
come forth from one's mouth, or be noticed in one's
body. All these points are illustrated with very ap-
propriate examples.
67. Lovely, then, is the virtue of modesty,
and sweet is its grace ! It is seen not only
in actions, but even in our words, ^ so that
we may not go beyond due measure in
speech, and that our words may not have an
unbecoming sound. Tlie mirror of our mind
often enough reflects its image in our words.
Sobriety weighs out the sound even of our
voice, for fear that too loud a voice should
offend the ear of any one. Nay, in singing
itself the first rule is modesty, and the same
is true in every kind of speech, too, so that
a man may gradually learn to praise God,
or to sing songs, or even to speak, in that
the principles of modesty grace his advance.
68. Sihnice, again, wherein all the other
' Gen. xxii. g.
' Gen. xxxix. 12.
" Jer. i. 6.
^ Gen. xxxvii. 9.
* Ex. iv. 10.
« Cic. <ie Off. I. 37, § 134.
DUTIES OF THE CLERGY.— BOOK I.
13
virtues rest, is the chief act of modesty.
V Only, if it is supposed to be a sign of a
childish or proud spirit, it is accounted a
reproach ; if a sign of modesty, it is reck-
oned for praise. Susanna was silent in
danger, ' and thought the loss of modesty
was worse than loss of life. She did not
consitlcr that her safety should be guarded
at the risk of her chastity. To God alone
she spoke, to Whom she could speak out in
true modesty. She avoided looking on the
face of men. For there is also modesty in
the glance of the eye, which makes a
woman unwilling to look upon men, or to
be seen by them.
69. Let no one suppose that this praise
belongs to chastity alone. For modesty is
the companion of purity, in company with
which chastity itself is safer. Shame, again,
is good as a companion and guide of
chastity, inasmuch as it does not suffer
purity to be detiled in approaching even the
outskirts of danger. This it is that, at the
very outset of her recognition, commends
the Mother of the Lord to those who read
the Scriptures, and, as a credible witness,
declares her worthy to be chosen to such an
office. For when in her chamber, alone,
she is saluted by the angel, she is silent,
and is disturbed at his entrance,- and the
Virgin's face is troubled at the strange ap-
pearance of a man's form. And so, though
she was humble, yet it was not because of
this, but on account of her modesty, that she
did not return his salutation, nor give him
any answer, except to ask, when she had
learnt that she should conceive the Lord,
how this should be. She certainly did not
speak merely for the sake of making a
reply.
70. In our very prayers, too, modesty is
most pleasing, and gains us much grace
from our God. Was it not this that exalted
the publican, and commended him, when he
dared not raise even his eyes to heaven ? ^
So he was justified by the judgment of the
Lord rather than the Pharisee, whom over-
weening pride made so hideous. ' ' Therefore
let us pray in the incorruptibility of a meek
and quiet spirit, which is in the sight of
God of great price, "+ as St. Peter says. A
noble thing, then, is modesty, which, though
giving up its rights, seizing on nothing for
itself, laying claim to nothing, and in some
ways somewhat retiring within the sphere
of its own powers, yet is rich in the sight
of God, in Whose sight no man is rich.
' Sus. V. 35.
^ S. Luke xviii. 13, 14.
^ S. Luke i. 29 ff.
* I Pet. iii. 4.
Rich is modesty, for it is the portion of God.
Paul also bids that prayer be offered up
with modesty and sobriety.' He desires
that this should be first, and, as it were,
lead the way of prayers to come, so that the
sinner's prayer may not be boastful, but
veiled, as it were, with the blush of shame,
may merit a far greater degree of grace, in
giving way to modesty at the remembiance
of its fault.
71. Modesty must further be guarded in
our very movements and gestures and gait.^
For the condition of the mind is often seen
in the attitude of the body. For this reason
the hidden man of our heart (our inner self)
is considered to be either frivolous, boast-
ful, or boisterous, or, on the other hand,
steady, firm, pure, and dependable. Thus
the movement of the body is a sort of voice
of the soul.
72. Ye remember, my children, that a
friend of ours who seemed to recommend
himself by his assiduity in his duties, yet
was not admitted by me into the number of
the clergy, because his gestures were too
unseemly. Also that I bade one, whom I
found already among the clergy, never to
go in front of me, because he actually
pained me by the seeming arrogance of his
gait. That is what I said when he returned
to his duty after an offence committed.
This alone I would not allow, nor did my
mind deceive me. For both have left the
Church. What their gait betrayed them to
be, such were they proved to be by the
faithlessness of their hearts. The one for-
sook his faith at the time of the Arian
troubles ; the other, through love of money,
denied that he belonged to us, so that he
might not have to undergo sentence at the
hands of the Church. In their gait was dis-
cernible the semblance of fickleness, the
appearance, as it were, of wandering buf-
foons.
73. Some there are who in walking per-
ceptibly copy the gestures of actors,^ and act
as though they were bearers in the proces-
sions, and had the motions of nodding sta-
tues, to such an extent that they seem to
keep a sort of time, as often as they change
their step.
74. Nor do I think it becoming to walk
hurriedly, except when a case of some dan-
ger demands it, or a real necessity. For we
often see those who hurry come up panting,
and with features distorted. But if there is
no reason for the need of such hurry, it gives
cause for just offence. I am not, however,
* I Tim. ii. 9.
« Cic. (ie Off. I. 35.
3 Cic. de Off. \. 36.
14
ST. AMBROSE.
talking of those who have to hurry now and
then for some particular reason, but of those
to whom, by the yoke of constant habit, it
has become a second nature. In the case
of the former I cannot approve of their slow
solemn movements, which remind one of
the forms of phantoms. Nor do I care for
the others with their headlong speed, for
they put one in mind of the ruin of outcasts.
75. A suitable gait is that wherein there is
an appearance of authority and weight and
dignity, and which has a calm collected
bearing. But it must be of such a character
that all effort and conceit may be wanting,
and that it be simple and plain. Nothing
counterfeit is pleasing. Let nature train our
movements. If indeed there is any fault in
our nature, let us mend it with diligence.
And, that artifice may be wanting, let not
amendment be wanting.
76. But if we pay so much attention to
things like these, how much more careful
ought we to be to let nothing shameful pro-
ceed out of our mouth, for that defiles a man
terribly. It is not food that defiles, but un-
just disparagement of others and foul words. '
These things are openly shameful. In our
office indeed must no word be let fall at all
unseemly, nor one that may give offence to
modesty. But not only ought we to say
nothing unbecoming to ourselves, but we
ought not even to lend our ears to words of
this sort. Thus Joseph fled and left his gar-
ment, that he might hear nothing incon-
sistent with his modesty.^ For he who de-
lights to listen, urges the other on to speak.
77. To have full knowledge of what is
foul is in the highest degree shameful. To
see anything of this sort, if by chance it
should happen, how dreadful that is ! What,
therefore, is displeasing to us in others, can
that be pleasing in ourselves .'' Is not nature
herself our teacher, who has formed to per-
fection every part of our body, so as to pro-
vide for what is necessary and to beautify
and grace its form ? However she has left
plain and open to the sight those parts which
are beautiful to look upon ; among which,
the head, set as it were above all, and the
pleasant lines of the figure, and the appear-
ance of the face are prominent, whilst their
usefulness for work is ready to hand. But
-those parts in which there is a compliance
with the necessities of nature, she has partly
put away and hidden in the body itself,
lest they should present a disgusting ap-
pearance, and partly, too, she has taught and
persuaded us to cover them.^
» Cic. de Off. I. 35. § «27- * Gen. xxxix. «. » Cic. <U Off. I. 35-
78. Is not nature herself then a teacher
of modesty } Following her example, the
modesty of men, which I suppose ' is so
called from the mode of knowing what is
seemly,^ has covered and veiled what it has
found hid in the frame of our body ; like that
door which Noah was bidden to make in
the side of the ark ; ^ wherein we fin d a figure
of the Church, and also of the human body,
for through that door the remnants of food
were cast out. Thus the Maker of our
nature so thought of our modesty, and so
guarded what was seemly and virtuous in
our body, as to place what is unseemly be-
hind, and to put it out of the sight of our
eyes. Of this the Apostle says well :
"Those members of the body which seem
to be more feeble are necessary, and those
members of the body which we think to be
less honourable, upon these we bestow more
abundant honour, and our uncomely parts
have more abundant comeliness. " ^ Truly,
by following the guidance of nature, diligent
care has added to the grace of the body.
In another places I have gone more fully
into this subject, and said that not only do
we hide those parts which have been given
us to hide, but also that we think it unseem-
ly to mention by name their description, and
the use of those members.
79. And if these parts are exposed to view
by chance, modesty is violated ; but if on
purpose, it is reckoned as utter shameless-
ness. Wherefore Ham, Noah's son, brought
disgrace upon himself ; for he laughed when
he saw his father naked, but they who
covered their father received the gift of a
blessing.^ For which cause, also, it was an
ancient custom in Rome, and in many other
states as well, that grown-up sons should
not bathe with their parents, or sons-in-law
with their fathers-in-law, 7 in order that the
great duty of reverence for parents should
not be weakened. Many, however, cover
themselves so far as they can in the baths,
so that, where the whole body is bare, that
part of it at least may be covered.
80. The priests, also, under the old law,
as we read in PLxodus, wore breeches, as it
was told Moses by the Lord: "And thou
shalt make them linen breeches to cover
their shame : from the loins even to the
thighs they shall reach, and Aaron and his
sons shall wear them, when they enter into
the tabernacle of witness, and when they
1 Cic. de Off. I. 40, § 142.
* " modestia . . quatn a modo scieniite, quid deceret, appella-
tarn arbitror.^^
■'* Gen. vi. 16. * i Cor. xii. 22, 23.
" A mbr. de Noe et A rca. cap. viii. " Gen. ix. 22.
' Cic. de Off. I. 35. § "g-
DUTIES OF THE CLERGY.— BOOK I.
15
come unto the altar of the holy place to
offer sacrifice, that they lay not sin upon
themselves and die."' Some of us are said
still to observe this, but most explain it
spiritually, and suppose it was said with a
view to guarding modesty and preserving
chastity.
CHAPTER XIX.
How should seemliness be represented by a speaker ?
Does beauty add anything to virtue, and, if so, how
much .' Lastly, what care should we take that noth-
ing conceited or effeminate be seen in us .''
81. It has given me pleasure to dwell
somewhat at length on the various functions
of modesty ; for I speak to you who either
can recognize the good that is in it in your
own cases, or at least do not know its loss.
Fitted as it is for all ages, persons, times,
and places, yet it most beseems youthful and
childish years.
82. But at every age we must take care
that all we do is seemly and becoming, and
that the course of our life forms one har-
monious and complete whole. Wherefore
Cicero ^ thinks that a certain order ought to be
observed in what is seemly. He says that
this lies in beauty, order, and in appointment
fitted for action. This, as he says, it is
difficult to explain in words, yet it can be
quite sufficiently understood.
8^. Why Cicero should have introduced
beauty, I do not quite understand ; though
it is true he also speaks in praise of the
powers of the body. We certainly do not
locate virtue in the beauty of the body,
though, on the other hand, we do recognize
a certain grace, as when modesty_is wont
to cover the face with a blush of shame, aiici
to make it more pleasing. For as a work-
man is wont to work better the more suit-
able his materials are, so modesty is more
conspicuous in the comeliness of the body.
Only the comeliness of the body should not
be assumed ; it should be natural and art-
less, unstudied rather than elaborated, not
heightened by costly and glistening gar-
ments, but just clad in ordinary clothing.
One must see that nothing is wanting that
one's credit or necessity demands, whilst
nothing must be added for the sake of
splendour.
84. The voice, too, should not be languid,
nor feeble, nor womanish in its tone, — such
a tone of voice as many are in the habit of
using, under the idea of seeming important.
^ Ex. xxviii. 42, 43.
« Cic. de Off. I. 35> § 126.
It should preserve a certain quality, and
rhythm, and a manly vigour. For all to do
what is best suited to their character and
sex, that is to attain to beauty of life. This
is the best order for movements, this the
employment fitted for every action. But as
I cannot approve of a soft or weak tone of
voice, or an effeminate gesture of the body,
so also I cannot approve of what is boorish
and rustic. Let us follow nature. The
imitation of her provides us with a principle
of training, and gives us a pattern of virtue.
' CHAPTER XX.
If we are to preserve our modesty we must avoid
fellowship with profligate men, also the banquets of
strangers, and intercourse with women ; our leisure
time at home should be spent in pious and virtuous
pursuits.
85. Modesty has indeed its rocks — not
any that she brings with her, but those, I
mean, which she often runs against, as when
we associate with profligate men, who, under
the form of pleasantry, administer poison to
the good. And the latter, if they are very
constant in their attendance at banquets
and games, and often join in jests, enervate
that manly gravity of theirs. Let us then
take heed that, in wishing to relax our
minds, we do not destroy all harmony, the
blending as it were of all good works. For
habit quickly bends nature in another direc-
tion.
86. For this reason I think that what ye
wisely do is befitting to the duties of clerics,
and especially to those of the priesthood —
namely, that ye avoid the banquets of
strangers, but so that ye are still hospitable
to travellers, and give no occasion for
reproach by reason of your great care in
the matter. Banquets with strangers en-
gross one's attention, and soon produce a
love for feasting. Tales, also, of the world
and its pleasures often creep in. One cannot
shut one's ears ; and to forbid them is
looked on as a sign of haughtiness. One's
glass, too, even against one's will, is filled
time after time. It is better surely to excuse
oneself once for all at one's own home, than
often at another's. When one rises sober,
at any rate one's presence need not be con-
demned by the insolence of another.
8']. There is no need for the younger
clergy to go to the houses of widows or vir-
gins,_ except for the sake of a definite visit,
and in that case only with the elder clergy,
that is, with the bishop, or, if the matter be
somewhat important, with the priests. Why
i6
ST. AMBROSE.
should we give room to the world to revile ?
What need is there for those frequent visits
to give ground for rumours ? What if one of
those women should by chance fall? Why
shouldst thou undergo the reproach of an-
other's fall? How many even strong men
have been led away by their passions ? How
many are there who have not indeed yielded
to sin, but have given ground for suspicion ?
88. Why dost thou not spend the time
which thou hast free from thy duties in the
church in reading ? Why dost thou not go
back again to see Christ ? Why dost thou
not address Him, and hear His voice? We
address Him when we pray, we hear Him
when we read the sacred oracles of God.
What have we to do with strange houses ?
There is one house which holds all. They
who need us can come to us. What have
we to do with tales and fables ? An oflice
to minister at the altar of Christ is what we
have received ; no duty to make ourselves
agreeable to men has been laid upon us.
89. We ought to be humble, gentle, mild,
serious, patient. We must keep the mean
in all things, so that a calm countenance and
quiet speech may show that there is no vice
in our lives.
CHAPTER XXI.
We must guard against anger, before it arises ; if it
has already arisen we must checiv and calm it, and if
we cannot do this either, at least we should keep our
tongue from abuse, so that our passions may be like
boys' quarrels. He relates what Archites said, and
shows that David led the way in this matter, both in
his actions and in his writings.
sj 90. Let anger be guarded against. ' If it
cannot, however, be averted, let it be kept
within bounds. For indignation is a terrible
incentive to sin. It disorders the mind to
such an extent as to leave no room for
reason. The first thing, therefore, to aim at,
if possible, is to make tranquillity of char-
acter our natural disposition by constant
practice, by desire for better things, by fixed
determination. But since passion is to a
large extent implanted in our nature and
character, so that it cannot be uprooted and
avoided, it must be checked by reason, if,
that is, it can be foreseen. And if the mind
has already been filled with indignation be-
fore it could be foreseen or provided against
in any way, we must consider how to con-
quer the passion of the mind, how to re-
strain our anger, that it may no more be so
* Cic, de Off. I. 25, § 89.
filled. Resist wrath, if possible ; if not, give
way, for it is written : " Give place to
wrath. '■ '
91. Jacob dutifully gave way to his
brother when angry, and to Rebecca ; that
is to say, taught by counsels of patience, he
preferred to go away and live in foreign
lands, rather than to arouse his brother's
anger ; and then to return only when he
thought his brother was appeased.^ Thus it
was that he found such great grace with
God. W'ith what offers of willing service,
with what gifts, did he reconcile his brother
to himself again, so that he should not re-
member the blessing which had been taken
away from him, but should only remember
th^ reparation now offered ? ^
^92. If, then, anger has got the start, and
has already taken possession of thy mind,
and mounted into thy heart, forsake not thy
ground. Thy ground is patience, it is wis-
dom, it is reason, it is the allaying of indig-
nation. And if the stubbornness of thy oppo-
nent rouses thee, and his perverseness drives
thee to indignation : if thou canst not calm
thy mind, check at least thy tongue. For
so it is written : " Keep thy tongue from
evil, and thy lips that they speak no guile.
Seek peace and pursue it.''-* See the peace
of holy Jacob, how great it was ! First, then,
calm thy mind. If thou canst not do this,
put a restraint upon thy tongue. Lastly,
omit not to seek for reconciliation. These
ideas the speakers of the world have bor-
rowed from us, and have set down in their
writings. But he who said it first has the
credit of understanding its meaning.
93. Let us then avoid or at any rate check
anger, so that we may not lose our share of
praise, nor yet add to our list of sins. It is
no light thing to calm one's anger. It is no
less difficult a thing than it is not to be roused
at all. The one is an act of our own will,
the other is an effect of nature. So quarrels
among boys are harmless, and have more of
a pleasant than a bitter character about them.
And if boys quickly come to quarrel one
with the other, they are easily calmed down
again, and quickly come together with even
greater friendliness. They do not know how
to act deceitfully and artfully. Do not con-
demn these children, of whom the Lord
says : " Except ye be converted and become
as this child, ye shall not enter into the
kingdom of heaven." s So also the Lord
Himself, Who is the Power of God. as a
Boy, when He was reviled, reviled not again,
' Rom. xii. ig. - Gen. xxvii. 42.
■* Ps. xxxiv. [xxxiii.J 13, 14.
^ Gen. xxxii. 3 ff.
^ S. Matt, xviii. 3.
DUTIES OF THE CLERGY.— BOOK I.
17
when He was struck, struck not back. ' Set
then thy mind on this — Hke a child never to
keep an injury in mind, never to show
malice, but that all things may be done
blamelessly by thee. Regard not the return
made thee by others. Hold thy ground.
Guard the simplicity and purity of thy heart.
Answer not an angry man according to his
anger, nor a foolish man according to his
folly. One fault quickly calls forth another.
If stones are rubbed together, does not fire
break forth .-'
94. The heathen — (they are wont to exag-
gerate everything in speaking) — make much
of the saying of the philosopher Archites ^
of Tarentum, which he spoke to his bailiff:
"O you wretched man, howl would punish
you, if I were not angry."' But David al-
ready before this had in his indignation held
back his armed hand. How much greater a
thing it is not to revile again, than not to
avenge oneself ! The warriors, too, prepared
to take vengeance against Nabal, Abigail re-
strained by her prayers. ^ From whence we
perceive that we ought not only to yield to
timely entreaties, but also to be pleased with
them. So much was David pleased that he
blessed her who intervened, because he was
restrained from his desire for revenge.
95. Already before this he had said of his
enemies : " For they cast iniquity upon me,
and in their wrath they were grievous to
me."' * Let us hear what he said when over-
whelmed in wrath : " Who will give me
wings like a dove, and I will flee away and
be at rest. "5 They kept provoking him to
anger, but he sought quietness.
96. He had also said : " Be ye angry and
sin not. "^ The moral teacher who knew
that the natural disposition should rather be
guided by a reasonable course of teaching,
than be eradicated, teaches morals, and says:
" Be angry where there is a fault against
which ye ought to be angry." For it is im-
possible not to be roused up by the baseness
of many things ; 7 otherwise we might be
accounted, not virtuous, but apathetic and
neglectful. Be angry therefore, so that ye
keep free from fault, or, in other words :
If ye are angry, do not sin, but overcome
wrath with reason. Or one might put it
thus : If ye are angry, be angry with your-
selves, because ye are roused, and ye will
not sin. For he who is angry with himself,
because he has been so easily roused, ceases
to be angry with another. But he who
' I Pet. ii. 23.
- lived c. B.C. 400. A noted philosopher, and also general.
=> I Sam. fi Kings] X.XV. ^ Ps. Iv. [liv.] 3. ^ pg. ly. [jiy i ^
* Ps. iv. 4. 1 Cic. de Off. I. 38, § 136.
wishes to prove his anger is righteous only
gets the more inflamed, and quickly falls
into sin. " Better is he,"' as Solomon says,
" that restraineth his anger, than he that
taketh a city," ' for anger leads astray even
brave men.
^-97. We ought therefore to take care that
we do not get into a flurry, before reason
prepares our minds. For oftentimes anger
or distress or fear of death almost deprives
the soul of life, and beats it down by a
sudden blow. It is therefore a good thing
to anticipate this by reflection, and to
exercise the mind by considering the matter.
So the mind will not be roused by any
sudden disturbance, but will grow calm,
being held in by the yoke and reins of
reason.
CHAPTER XXII.
On reflection and passion, and on observing propriety
of speech, both in ordinary conversation and in
holding discussions.
98. There are two kinds of mental mo-
tions ^ — those of reflection and of passion.
The one has to do with reflection, the other
with passion. There is no confusion one
with the other, for they are markedly dif- \
ferent and unlike. Reflection has to search
and as it were to grind out the truth. Pas-
sion prompts and stimulates us to do some-
thing. Thus by its very nature reflection
diffuses tranquillity and calm ; and passion
sends forth the impulse to act. Let us then
be ready to allow reflection on good things
to enter into our mind, and to make passion
submit to reason (if indeed we wish todirecfeA
our minds to guard what is seemly), lest
desire for anything should shut out reason.
Rather let reason test and see what befits
virtue.
"^-^99. And since we have said that we must
aim at the observance of what is seemly,^
so as to know what is the due measure in
our words and deeds, and as order in speech
rather than in action comes first ; speech is
divided into two kinds : first, as it is used in
friendly conversation, and then in the treat-
ment and discussion of matters of faith and
justice. In either case we must take care
that there is no irritation. Our language
should be mild and quiet, and full of kind-
ness and courtesy and free from insult.
Let there be no obstinate disputes in our
familiar conversations, for they are wont
* Prov. xvi. 32.
3 Cic. de Off. I. 37.
2 Cic. de Off. I. 36, § 132.
1 8
ST. AMBROSE.
only to bring up useless subjects, rather
than to supply anything- useful. Let there
be discussion without wrath, urbanity with-
out bitterness, warning without sharpness,
advice without giving offence. And as in
every action of our life we ought to take
heed to this, in order that no overpowering
impulse of our mind may ever shut out
reason (let us always keep a place for
counsel), so, too, ought we to observe that
rule in our language, so that neither wrath
nor hatred may be aroused, and that we may
not show any signs of our greed or sloth.
ICO. Let our language be of this sort, more
especially when we are speaking of the
holy Scriptures. For of what ought we to
speak more often than of the best subject
of conversation, of its exhortation to watch-
fulness, its care for good instruction.'' Let
us have a reason for beginning, and let our
end be within due limits.' For a speech
that is wearisome only stirs up anger. But
surely it is most unseemly that when every
kind of conversation generally gives ad-
ditional pleasure, this should give cause of
offence !
loi. The treatment also of such subjects
as the teaching of faith, instruction on self-
restraint, discussion on justice, exhortation
to activity, must not be taken up by us and
fully gone into all at one time, but must be
carried on in course, so far as we can do it,
and as the subject-matter of tlie passage
allows. Our discourse must not be too
lengthy, nor too soon cut short, for fear the
former should leave behind it a feeling of
aversion, and the latter produce carelessness
and neglect. The address should be plain
and simple, clear and evident, full of dignity
and weight ; it should not be studied or too
refined, nor yet, on the other hand, be un-
pleasing and rough in style.
,/
CHAPTER XXIIL
Jests, although at times they may be quite proper,
should be altogether banished among clerics. The
voice should ha plain and frank.
I02. I\Ien of the world give many farther
rules about the way to speak, ^ which I think
we may pass over; as, for instance, the way
jesting should be conducted. ^ For though
at times jests may be proper and pleasant,^
yet they are unsuited to the clerical life.
For how can we adopt those things which
we do not find in the holy Scriptures .-"
1 Cic. «V O/r. I. 37, § I35-
" Cic. lU OJjf. 1. 2y, § 103.
' Cic. de Off. I. 37.
103. We must also take care that in relat-
ing stories we do not alter the earnest pur-
pose of the harder rule we have set before
us. "Woe unto you that laugh, for ye
shall weep," ' says the Lord. Do we seek
for something to laugh at, that laughing
here we may weep hereafter } I think we
ought to avoid not only broad jokes, but
all kinds of jests, unless perchance it is not
unfitting at the time for our conversation to
be agreeable and pleasant.
104. In speaking of the voice, I certainly
think it ought to be plain and clear.- That
it should be musical is a gift of nature, and
is not to be won by exertion. Let it be dis-
tinct in its pronunciation and full of a manly
vigour, but let it be free from a rough and
rustic twang. See, too, that it does not
assume a theatrical accent, but rather keeps
true to the inner meaning of the words it
utters.
V CHAPTER XXIV.
There are three things to be noticed in the actions of
our life. First, our passions are to be controlled by
our reason ; next, we ought to observe a suitable
moderation in our desires ; and, lastly, everything
ought to be done at the right time and in the proper
order. All these qualities shone forth so conspic-
uously in the holy men of Old Testament time, that
it is evident they were well furnished with what men
call the cardinal virtues.
105. I THINK I have said enough on the
art of speaking. Let us now consider what
beseems an active life. We note that there
are three things ^ to be regarded in con-
nection with this subject. One is, that
passion should not resist our reason. In
that way only can our duties be brought
into line with what is seemly. For if pas-
sion yields to reason we can easily main-
tain what is seemly in our duties. Next,
we must take care rest, either by showing
greater zeal or less than the matter we take
up demands, we look as though we were
taking up a small matter with great parade
or were treating a great matter with but
little care. Thirdly, as regards moderation
in our endeavours and works, and also
with regard to order in doing things and in
the right timing of things, I think that
everything should be open and straiglit-
i^orward.
/ 106. But first comes tiiat which I may call
the foundation of all, namely, that our pas-
sions should obey our reason. The second
' S. Luke vi. 25.
•' Cic. de C>^. I. 39, § 141
- Cic. de Off. I. 37, § 133.
DUTIES OF THE CLERGY.— BOOK I.
19
and third are really the same — moderation
in either case. There is room with us for
the survey of a pleasing form, which is ac-
counted beauty, and the consideration of
dignity. Next follows the consideration of
the order and the timing of things. These,
then, are the three points, and we must see
whether we can show them in perfection in
any one of the saints.
107. First there is our father Abraham,'
who was formed and called for the instruc-
tion of generations to come. When bidden
to go forth from his own country and
kindred and from his father's house, though
bound and held back by many ties of rela-
tionship, did he not give proof that in him
passion was subject to reason ? Who does
not delight in the sweet charms of his native
land, his kindred, and his own home ? Their
sweetness then delighted him. But the
thought of the heavenly command and of
an eternal reward influenced him more.
Did he not reflect that he could not take his
wife with him without the greatest danger,
unused as she was to hardships, and so ten-
der to bear insults, and so beautiful as to be
likely to arouse the lust of profligate men ?
Vet he decided somewhat deliberately to
undergo all this rather than to escape it by
making excuses. Lastly, when he had gone
into Egypt, he advised her to say she was
his sister, not his wife.
108. See here what passions are at work !
He feared for the chastity of his wife, he
feared for his own safety, he had his sus-
picions about the lust of the Egyptians, and
yet the reasonableness of performing his
duty to God prevailed with him. For he
thought that by the favour of God he could
be safe everywhere, but if he offended the
Lord he could not abide unharmed even at
home. Thus reason conquered passion,
and brought it into subjection to itseif.
109. When his nephew was taken cap-
tive,^ without being terrified or dismayed at
the hordes of so many kings, he resumed
the war. And after the victory was gained
he refused his share of the spoil, which he
himself had really won. Also, when a son
was promised him, though he thought of the
lost vigour of his body, now as good as
dead, and the barrenness of his wife, and
his own great age, he believed God, though
it was against the law of nature.^
no. Note how everything meets together
here. Passion was not wanting, but it was
checked. Here was a mind equable in
action, which neither treated great things as
^ Gen. xii. i ff.
- Gen. xiv. 14.
^ Gen. XV. 4; xvii. 15.
unimportant or little things as great. Here
there was moderation in different affairs,
order in things, fitness of occasion, due
measure in words. He was foremost in
faith, conspicuous in virtue, vigorous in
battle, in victory not greedy, at home hos-
pitable, and to his wife attentive.
111. Jacob also, his holy grandson, loved
to pass his time at home free from danger ;
but his mother wished him to live in foreign
parts, and so give place to his brother's
anger.' Sound counsels prevailed over
natural feelings. An exile from home, ban-
ished from his parents, yet everywhere, in all
he did, he observed due measure, such as
was fitting, and made use of his opportuni-
ties at the right time. So dear was he to
his parents at home, that the one, moved by
the promptness of his compliance, gave him
his blessing, the other inclined towards him
with tender love. In the judgment of his
brother, also, he was placed first, when he
thought that he ought to give up his food to
his brother.^ For though according to his
natural inclinations he wished for food, yet
when asked for it he gave it up from a feel-
ing of brotherly affection. He was a faith-
ful shepherd of the flock for his master, an
attentive son-in-law to his father-in-law ; he
was active in work, sparing in his meals,
conspicuous in making amends, lavish in re-
paying. Nay, so well did he calm his
brother's anger that he received his favour,
though he had feared his enmity.^
112. What shall I say of Joseph.? 4 He cer-
tainly had a longing for freedom, and yet
endured the bonds of servitude. How meek
he was in slavery, how unchanging in vir-
tue, how kindly in prison ! Wise, too, in
interpreting, and self-restrained in exercising
his power ! In the time of plenty was he
not careful .' In the time of famine was he
not fair .'' Did he not praiseworthily do
everything in order, and use opportunities at
their season ; giving justice to his people by
the restraining sruidance of his office.''
113. Job also, both in prosperity and ad-
versity, was blameless, patient, pleasing,
and acceptable to God. He was harassed
with pain, yet could find consolation.
1 14. David also was brave in war, patient
in time of adversity, peaceful at Jerusalem,
in the hour of victory merciful, on commit-
ting sin repentant, in his old age foreseeing.
He preserved due measure in his actions, and
' Gen. xxvii. 42 ff.
- Gen. XXV. 34. St. Ambrose at times gets carried away by his
subject and says more than is warranted by the words of the Bible.
Cf. also II. § loi; II. §154; III.§ 64.
'•' Gen. xxxiii. 4. * Gen. xxxix.
20
ST. AMBROSE.
took his opportunities as they came. He
has set them down in the songs of succeed-
ing- years ; and so it seems to me that he has
by his life no less than by the sweetness of
his hymns poured forth an undying song of
his own merits to God.
115. What duty connected with the chief
virtues was wanting in these men ? ' In the
first place they showed prudence, which is
exercised in the search of the truth, and
which imparts a desire for full knowledge ;
next, justice, which assigns each man his own,
does not claim another's, and disregards its
own advantage, so as to guard the rights of
all ; thirdly, fortitude, which both in warfare
and at home is conspicuous in greatness of
mind and distinguishes itself in the strength
of the body; fourthly, temperance, which
preserves the right method and order in all
things that we think should either be done
or said.
CHAPTER XXV.
A reason is given why this book did not open with a
discussion of the above-mentioned virtues. It is also
concisely pointed out that the same virtues existed
in the ancient fathers.
116. Perh.\ps, as the different classes of
duties are derived from these four vuiues,
some one may say that they ought to have
been described first of all. But it would
have been artificial to have given a definition
of duty at the outset,^ and then to have
gone on to divide it up into various classes.
We have avoided what is artificial, and have
put forward the examples of the fathers of
old. These certainly offer us no uncertainty
as regards our understanding them, and give
us no room for subtlety in our discussion of
them. Let the life of the fathers, then, be for
us a mirror of virtue, not a mere collection
of shrewd and clever acts. Let us show
reverence in following them, not mere cle-
verness in discussing them.
117. Prudence held the first place in holy
Abraham. For of him the Scriptures say :
"Abraham believed God, and that was
counted to him for righteousness ; " ^ for no
one is prudent who knows not God. Again :
"The fool hath said. There is no God;" 4 for a
wise man would not say so. How is he
wise who looks not for his Maker, but says
to a stone : " Thou art my father"? s Who
says to the devil as the Manichaean does :
> Cic. (feO^: I. 5-
* Ps. xiv. [xiii.J i.
= Ib. I. 2, §7.
* Jer. ii. 27.
^ Gen. XV. 6.
" Thou art the author of my being " ? ' How
is Arius^ wise, who prefers an imperfect and
inferior creator to one who is a true and per-
fect one ? How can Marcion 3 or Eunomius4
be wise, who prefer to have an evil rather
than a good God .-' And how can he be
wise who does not fear his God ? For :
" The fear of the Lord is the beginning of
wisdom. "5 Elsewhere, too, it stands : "The
wise turn not aside from the mouth of the
Lord, but come near Him in their confession
of His greatness.'"^ So when the Scripture
says : "It was counted to him for righteous-
ness," that brought to him the grace of
another virtue.
1 1 8. The chief amongst ourselves have
stated that prudence lies in the knowledge
of the truth. But who of them all excelled
Abraham, David, or Solomon in this.-* Then
they go on to say that justice has regard to
the whole community of the human race.
So David said : " He hath dispersed abroad
and given to the poor. His righteousness re-
maineth for ever. "7 The just man has pity,
the just man lends. The whole world of
riches lies at the feet of the wise and thejust.
The just man regards what belongs to all as
his own, and his own as common property.
The man just accuses himself rather than
others. For he is just who does not spare
himself, and who does not suffer his secret
actions to be concealed. See now how just
Abraham was ! In his old age he begat a
son according to promise, and when the
Lord demanded him for sacrifice he did not
think he ought to refuse him, although he
was his only son.^
1 19. Note here all these four virtues in one
act. It was wise to believe God, and not
to put love for his son before the commands
of his Creator. It was just to give back
' Manes, the founder of Manicheism, living about a.d. 250. He
taught that there were two original principles absolutely opposed one
to the other. On the one side God, from Whom nothing but good
can go forth ; on the otlier original evil — the author of all matter —
wliich therefore is evil too. Man was formed by this evil spirit.
For, whilst man's soul is an emanation from the good God, man's
body in which the soul is imprisoned was framed of material ele-
ments. Hence the Manich.-ean is here represented addressing the
devil as his father, the author of his earthly existence.
^ The father of Arianism, born a.d. 256, was condemned at the
Council of Nicaea a.d. 325. He denied that Christ was " of one
substance with the Father; " but held Him to be a kind of second-
ary God. created out of nothing before the world. But he con-
sidered Him to be the creator of the world.
' Marcion flourished between the years a.d. 140-190. He also
taught the existence of more than one Principle, and held that fnan
was created by an inferior Being.
* F^unomius was the leader of the extreme Arian party, flourishing
c. A.D. :?6o. He maintained the absolute unlikeness of the Son to
the Father not only in substance but even in will. Hence his party
were called Atioma'tins {av6noio<;, unlike). In baptizing they also
applied no water to the lower part of tlie body, asserting that it was
created by an evil spirit, thus with Marcion recognizing the dual
Principle. Theodoret, who is the authority for this latter and some
other charges against the Eunomians, says, however, that he is
speaking from hearsay, not of his own knowledge, //a-r. Fab. IV. 3.
" Ps. cxi. [ex.] 10. " Prov. xxiv. 7 [LXX.l.
Ps. cxii. [cxi.J 9.
' Gen. xxii. 3.
DUTIES OF THE CLERGY.— BOOK I.
21
what had been received. It was brave to
restrain natural feelings by reason. The
father led the victim ; the son asked where
it was : the fathers feelings were hardly
tried, but were not overcome. The son said
again : " INIy father," and thus pierced his
father's heart, though without weakening his
devotion to God. The fourth virtue, tem-
l^erance. too, was there. Being just he pre-
served due measure in his piety, and order
in all he had to carry out. And so in bring-
ing what was needed for the sacrifice, in
lighting the fire, in binding his son, in
drawing the knife, in performing the sacri-
fice in due order ; thus he merited as his
reward that he might keep his son.
1 20. Is there greater wisdom than holy
Jacob's, who saw God face to face and won
a blessing.'" Can there be higher justice
than his in dividing with his brother what
he had acquired, and offering it as a gift .•" -
What greater fortitude than his in striving
with God ? 3 What moderation so true as
his, who acted with such moderation as
regards time and place, as to prefer to hide
his daughter's shame rather than to avenyfe
himself .''■+ For being set in the midst of
foes, he thought it better to gain their affec-
tions than to concentrate their hate on him-
^21. How wise also was Noah, who built
the whole of the ark ! s How just again !
For he alone, preserved of all to be the
father of the human race, was made a sur-
vivor of past generations, and the author of
one to come ; he was born, too, rather for
the world and the universe than for himself
How brave he was to overcome the flood !
how temperate to endure it ! When he had
entered the ark, with what moderation he
passed the time ! When he sent forth the
raven and the dove, when he received them
on their return, when he took the oppor-
tunity of leaving the ark, with what modera-
tion did he make use of these occasions !
CHAPTER XXVI.
In investigating the truth the philosophers have broken
through their own rules. Moses, however, showed
himself more wise than they. The greater the dig-
nity of wisdoqa, the more earnestly must we strive to
gain it. Nature herself urges us all to do this.
12 2. It is said, therefore, that in investi-
gating the truth, we must observe what is
seemly. We ought to look for what is true
' Gen. xxxii. 29, 30.
* Gen. xxxii. 24-26.
' Gen. xxxiii. 8.
* Gen. xxxiv. 5.
«Gen.
VI. 14.
with the greatest care. We must not put
forward falsehood for truth, nor hide the
truth in darkness, nor fill the mind with idle,
involved, or doubtful matters. What so
unseemly as to worship a wooden thing,
which men themselves have made .'' What
shows such darkness as to discuss subjects
connected with geometry and astronomy
(which they approve of), to measure the
depths of space, to shut up heaven and earth
within the limits of fixed numbers, to leave
aside the grounds of salvation and to seek
for error ?
^12^. Moses, learned as he was in all the
wisdom of the Egyptians, ' did not approve
of those things, but thought that kind of
wisdom both harmful and foolish. Turning
away therefrom, he sought God with all the
desire of his heart, and thus saw, questioned,
heard Him when He spoke. ^ Who is more
wise than he whom God taught, and who
brought to nought all the wisdom of the
Egyptians, and all the powers of their craft
by the might of his works ? He did not
treat things unknown as well known, and
so rashly accept them. Yet these philoso-
phers, though they do not consider it con-
trary to nature, nor shameful for themselves
to worship, and to ask help from an idol
which knows nothing, teach us that these
two things mentioned in the words just
spoken, which are in accordance both with
nature and with virtue, ought to be avoided.
124. The loftier the virtue of wisdom is,
the more I say we ought to strive for it, so
that we may be able to attain to it. And
that we may have no ideas which are con-
trary to nature, or are disgraceful, or un-
fitting, we ought to give two things, that is,
time and care, to considering matters for the
sake of investigating them. For there is
nothing in which man excels all other living
creatures more than in the fact that he has
reason, seeks out the origin of things, thinks
that the Author of his being should be
searched out. For in His hand is our life
and death ; He rules this world by His nod.
And to Him we know that we must give a
reason for our actions. For there is noth-
ing which is more of a help to a good life
than to believe that He will be our judge.
Whom hidden things do not escape, and
unseemly things offend, and good deeds
delight.
125. In all men, then, there lies, in accord-
ance with human nature, a desire to search
out the truth, which leads us on to have a
longing for knowledge and learning, and
* Acts vii. 22,
* Ex. iiL 4,
22
ST. AMBROSE.
infuses into us a wish to seek after it. To
excel in this seems a noble thing to man-
kind ; but there are only few who attain to
it. And they, by deep thought, by careful
deliberation, spend no little labour so as to
be able to attain to that blessed and virtuous
life, and to approach its likeness in their
actions. "For not he that saith to ]\Ie,
Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of
heaven, but he that doeth those things that
I say.'' To have a desire for knowledge
without actions to correspond — well ! I do
not know whether that carries anything
more with it.
CHAPTER XXVIL
The first source of duty is prudence, from whence
spring three other virtues ; and they cannot be sepa-
rated or torn asunder, since they are mutually con-
nected one with the other.
126. The first source of duty, then, is
prudence.^ For v/hat is more of a duty than
to give to the Creator all one's devotion antl
reverence .'' This source, however, is drawn
off into other virtues. For justice cannot
exist without prudence, since it demands
no small amount of prudence to see whe-
ther a thing is just or unjust. A mistake on
either side is very serious. " For he that
says a just man is unjust, or an unjust man
is just, is accursed with God. Wherefore
does justice 3 abound unto the wicked .''"■♦
says Solomon. Nor, on the other hand, can
prudence exist without justice, for piety
towards God is the beginning of understand-
ing. On which we notice that this is a bor-
rowed rather than an original idea among the
worldly wise, for piety is the foundation of
all virtues.
"^y 127. But the piety of justice 5 is first
directed towards God ; secondly, towards
one's country; next, towards parents ; ^ last-
ly, towards ail. This, too, is in accordance
w^ith the guidance of nature. From the
beginning of life, when iniderstanding first
begins to be infused into us, wc love life as
the gift of God, we love our country and our
parents; lastly, our companions, with whom
we like to associate. Hence arises true
love, which prefers others to self, and seeks
not its own, wherein lies the pre-eminence
of justice.
1 S. Matt. vii. 2 1. - Cic. r/e Off. I. 6.
^ Some MS.S. have " injustitice,^'' others " pecuniif," which
seems to be a correction to bring it into harmony with the LXX :
*^ ivari vnrjp^e xpriixaTa a<^poi't."
* Prov. xvii. i5[LXX.]. '^ Cic. i/e Off. I. 7.
* Siimma Thcol. II. 2, q. lor. St. Thomas Aquinas acrees in
making piety a part of justice, and a gift of the Holy Spirit, but
places parents before instead of after our country.
1 28. It is ingrained in all living creatures,'
first of all, to preserve their own safety, to
guard against what is harmful, to strive for
what is advantageous. They seek food and
coverts, whereby they may protect them-
selves from dangers, storms, and sun, — all
which is a mark of prudence. Next we find
that all the different creatures are by nature
wont to herd together, at first with fellows
of their own class and sort, then also with
others. So we see oxen delighted to be in
herds, horses in droves, and especially like
with like, stags, also, in company with stags
and often with men. And what should I
say on their desire to have young, and on
their offspring, or even on their passions,
wherein the likeness of justice is conspicu-
ous }
129. It is clear, then, that these and the
remaining virtues are related to one another.
For courage, which in war preserves one's
country from the barbarians, or at home
defends the weak, or comrades from rob-
bers, is full of justice ; and to know on
what plan to defend and to give help, how
to make use of opportunities of time and
place, is the part of prudence and modera-
tion, and temperance itself cannot observe
due measure without prudence. To know
a fit opportunity, and to make return accord-
ing to what is right, belongs to justice. In
all these, too, large-heartedness is necessary,
and fortitude of mind, and often of body, so
that we may carry out what we wish.
CHAPTER XXVin.
A community rests upon justice and good- will. Two
parts of the former, revenge and private possession,
are not recognized by Christians. What the Stoics
say about common property and mutual help has
been borrowed from the sacred writings. The great-
ness of the glory of justice, and what hinders access
to it.
^ 130. Justice, 2 then, has to do with the so-
ciety of the human race, and the community
at large. For that which holds society to-
gether is divided into two parts, — ^justice and
good-will, which also is called liberality and
kindness. Justice seems to me the loftier,
liberality the more pleasing, of the two.
The one gives judgment, the other shows
goodness.
131. But that very thing is excluded with
us which philosophers think to be the office
of justice. For they say that the first ex-
pression of justice is, to hurt no one, except
' Cic. (ie Off. I. 4.
■ Cis. de Off. I. I 7.
DUTIES OF THE CLERGY.— BOOK I.
23
when driven to it by wrongs received. This
is put aside by the authority of the Gospel.
For the Scripture wills that the Spirit of the
Son of Man should be in us. Who came to
give grace, not to bring harm. '
132. Next they considered it consonant
with justice that one should treat common,
that is, public property as public, and priv-
ate as private. But this is not even in
accord with nature, for nature has poured
forth all things for all men for common use.
God has ordered all things to be produced,
so that there should be food in common to
all, and that the earth should be a common
possession for all. Nature, therefore, has
produced a common right for all, but greed
has made it a right for a few. Here, too,
we are told that the Stoics taught that all
things which are produced on the earth
are created for the use of men, but that
men are born for the sake of men, so that
mutually one may be of advantage to an-
other. ^
133. But whence have they got such ideas
but out of the holy Scriptures ? For Moses
wrote that God said : " Let us make man
in our image, after our likeness, and let
them have dominion over the fish of the
sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over
the cattle, and over every creeping thing
that creepeth upon the earth." ^ And David
said : " Thou hast put all things under his
feet ; all sheep and oxen, yea, and the
beasts of the field, the fowls of the air, and
the fishes of the sea. "4 So these philoso-
phers have learnt from our writings that all
things were made subject to man, and,
therefore, they think that all things were
produced also for man's sake.
134. That man was made for the sake of
man we find stated also in the books of
Moses, when the Lord says : "It is not
good that man should be alone, let us make
him an helpmeet for him."s Thus the
woman was given to the man to help him.
She should bear him children, that one man
might always be a help to another. Again,
before the woman was formed, it was said
of Adam : " There was not found an help-
meet for him. "^ For one man could not
have proper help but from another.
Amongst all the living creatures, therefore,
there was none meet for him, or, to put it
plainly, none to be his helper. Hence a
woman was looked for to help him.
135. Thus, in accordance with the will of
God and the union of nature, we ought to
* S. Luke ix. 56.
* Ps. viii. 7, 8.
^ Cic. tfe Off. I. 9.
« Gen. ii. 18.
' Gen. i. 26.
* Gen. ii. 20.
be of mutual help one to the other, and to
vie with each other in doing duties, to lay
all our advantages as it were before all, and
(to use the words of Scripture) to bring help
one to the o'l-er from a feeling of devotion
or of duty, by giving money, or by doing
something, at any rate in some way or
other ; so that the charm of human fellow-
ship may ever grow sweeter amongst us,
and none may ever be recalled from their
duty by the fear of danger, but rather account
all things, whether good or evil, as their
own concern.' Thus holy Moses feared
not to undertake terrible wars for his people's
sake, nor was he afraid of the arms of the
mightiest kings, nor yet was he frightened
at the savagery of barbarian nations. He
put on one side the thought of his own
safety so as to give freedom to the people.
136. Great, then, is the glory of justice ;
for she, existing rather for the good of
others than of self, is an aid to the bonds of
union and fellowship amongst us. She holds
so high a place that she has all things laid
under her authority, and further can bring
help to others and supply money ; nor does
she refuse her services, but even undergoes
dangers for others.
137. Who would not gladly climb and
hold the heights of this virtue, were it not
that greed weakens and lessens the power
of such a virtue } ^ For as long as we want
to add to our possessions and to heap up
money, to take into our possession fresh
lands, and to be the richest of all, we have
cast aside the form of justice and have lost
the blessing of kindness towards all. How
can he be just that tries to take from another
what he wants for himself.'*
138. The desire to gain power also ener-
vates 3 the perfect strength and beauty
of justice. For how can he, who attempts
to bring others under his own power, come
forward on behalf of others } And how can
a man help the weak against the strong,
when he himself aspires to great power at
the cost of liberty ?
CHAPTER XXIX.
Justice should be observed even in war and with
enemies. This is proved by the example of Moses
and Elisha. The ancient writers learnt in turn from
the Hebrews to call their enemies by a gentler term.
Lastly, the foundation of justice rests on faith, and its
symmetry is perfect in the Church.
- 139. How great a thing justice is can be
' Cic. de Off. I. 9, § 30. ' Cic. de Off. I. 7, § 24.
= Cic. de Off. I. 8, § 26.
24
ST. AMBROSE.
gathered from the fact that there is no place,
nor person, nor time, with which it has
nothing to do. It must even be preserved
in all dealings with enemies.' For instance,
if the day or the spot for a battle has been
agreed upon with them, it would be consid-
ered an act against justice to occupy the
spot beforehand, or to anticipate the time.
For there is some difference whether one is
overcome in some battle by a severe en-
gagement, or by superior skill, or by a mere
chance. But a deeper vengeance is taken
on fiercer foes, and on those that are false as
well as on those who have done greater
wrongs, as was the case with the Midianites. ^
For they had made many of the Jewish
people to sin through their women ; for
which reason the anger of the Lord was
poured out upon the people of our fathers.
Thus it came about that INIoses when vic-
torious allowed none of them to live. On
the other hand, Joshua did not attack the
Gibeonites, who had tried the people of our
fathers with guile rather than with war, but
punished them by laying on them a law of
ijondage.^ Elisha again would not allow the
king of Israel to slay the Syrians when he
wished to do so. He had brought them into
the city, when they were besieging him,
after he had struck them wnth instantaneous
blindness, so that they could not see where
they were going. For he said: "Thou
shalt not smite those whom thou hast not
taken captive with thy spear and with thy
sword. Set before them bread and water,
that they may eat and drink and return and
go to their own home."-* Incited by their
kind treatment they should show forth to
the world the kindness they had received.
" Thus" (we read) " there came no more the
bands of Syria into the land of Israel. "s
140. If, then, justice is binding, even in
war, how much more ought we to observe it
in time of peace. Such favour the prophet
showed to those who came to seize him.
We read that the king of Syria had sent his
army to lie in wait for him, for he had
learnt that it was Elisha who had made
known to all his plans and consultations.
And Gehazi the prophet's servant, seeing the
army, began to fear that his life was in
danger. But the prophet said to him :
"Fear not, for they that be with us are
more than they that be with them." ^ And
when the prophet asked that the eyes of his
servant might be opened, they were opened.
Then Gehazi saw the whole mountain full
^Cxc. deOjr. I. II, §34-
* Josh. ix.
» i UJ Kings vi. 23.
- Num. xxxi.
* 2 [4I Kings vi. 22.
*> 2 UJ Kings vi. 16.
of horses and chariots round about Elisha.
As they came down to him the prophet says:
"Smite, O God, the army of Syria with
blindness." And this prayer being granted,
he says to the Syrians : " Follow me, and
I will bring you to the man whom ye seek."
Then saw they Elisha, whom they were en-
deavouring to lay hold of, and seeing him
they could not hold him fast. ' It is clear
from this that faith and justice should be
observed even in war ; and that it could not
but be a disgraceful thing if faith were
violated.
141. So also the ancients used to give their
foes a less harsh name, and called them
strangers. == For enemies used to be called
strangers after the customs of old. This too
we can say they adopted from our writings;
for the Hebrews used to call their foes
"allophyllos," that is, when put into Latin,
" alienigenas" (of another race). For so we
read in the first book of Kings : "It came
to pass in those days that they of another
race put themselves in array against Israel. " ^
142. The foundation of justice therefore is
faith, •♦ for the hearts of the just dwell on
faith, and the just man that accuses himself
builds justice on faith, for his justice becomes
plain when he confesses the truth. So the
Lord saith through Isaiah : "Behold, I lay
a stone for a foundation in Sion."s This
means Christ as the foundation of the Church.
For Christ is the object of faith to all ; but
the Church is as it were the outward form
of justice, she is the common right of all.
For all in common she prays, for all in com-
mon she works, in the temptations of all
she is tried. So he who denies himself is
indeed a just man, is indeed worthy of Christ.
For this reason Paul has made Christ to be the
foundation, so that we may build upon Him
the works of justice,^ whilst faith is the foun-
dation. In our works, then, if they are evil,
there appears unrighteousness ; if they are
good, justice.
CHAPTER XXX.
On kindness and its se\'eral parts, namely, good-will and
liberality. How they are to be combined. What
else is further needed for any one to show liberality
in a praiseworthy manner.
143. Now we can go on to speak of kind-
ness, which breaks up into two parts, good-
will and liberality. Kindness to exist in
perfection must consist of these two qualities.
It is not enough just to wish well ; we must
' 2 [4] Kings vi. 8-23.
' I Sam. fi Kings] iv. i.
"^ Isa. xxviii. 16,
- Cic. de Off. I.
* Cic. de Off. I.
" I Cor. iii. 11.
12.
7. § 23.
DUTIES OF THE CLERGY.— BOOK I.
also do well. Nor, again, is it enough to do
well, unless this springs from a good source,
even from a good will. "For God loveth
a cheerful giver."' If we act unwillingly,
what is our reward .' Wherefore the Apostle,
speaking generally, says : " If I do this thing
willingly,"l have a reward, but if unwillingly,
a dispensation is given unto me. "^ In the
Gospel, also, we have received many rules
of just liberality.
144. It is thus a glorious thing to wish
well, and to give freely, with the one desire
to do good and not to do harm. For if we
were to think it our duty to give the means
to an extravagant man to live extravagantly,
or to an adulterer to pay for his adultery,
it would not be an act of kindness, for there
would be no good-will in it. We should be
doing harm, not good, to another if we gave
him money to aid him in plotting against his
country, or in attempting to get together at
our expense some abandoned men to attack
the Church. Nor, again, does it look like
liberality to help one who presses very hardly
on widows and orphans, or attempts to seize
on their property with any show of violence.
145. It is no sign of a liberal spirit ^ to
extort from one what we give to another, or
to gain money unjustly, and then to think it
can be well spent, unless we act as Zacchaeus ^
did, and restore fourfold what we have taken
from him whom we have robbed, and make
up for such heathenish crimes by the zeal of
our faith and by true Christian labour. Our
liberality must have some sure foundation.
146. The first thing necessary is to do
kindness in good faith, and not to act
falsely when the offering is made. Never
let us say we are doing more, when we are
really doing less. What need is there to
speak at all ? In a promise a cheat lies hid.
It is in our power to give what we like.
Cheating shatters the foundation, and so
destroys the work. Did Peter grow angry
only so far as to desire that Ananias and his
wife should be slain .'* 5 Certainly not. He
wished that others, through knowing their
example, should not perish.
147. Nor is it a real act of liberality if thou
givest for the sake of boasting about it,
rather than for mercy's sake. Thy inner
feelings give the name to thy acts. As it
comes forth from thee, so will others regard
it. See what a true judge thou hast ! He
consults with thee how to take up thy work,
and first of all he questions thy mind. ' ' Let
not," he says, " thy left hand know what
; Cor.
IX. 7.
* S. Luke xix, 8.
' I Cor. ix. 17.
^ Acts V. ij.
s Cic. de Off. I. 14, § 43.
thy right hand doth." ■ This does not refer
to our actual bodies, but means : Let not
him who is of one mind with thee, not
even thy brother, know what thou doest,
lest thou shouldst lose the fruit of thy re-
ward hereafter by seeking here thy price in
boastfulness. But that liberality is real
where a man hides what he does in silence,
and secretly assists the needs of individuals,
whom the mouth of the poor, and not his
own lips, praises.
148. Perfect liberality is proved by its
good faith, the case it helps, the time and
place when and where it is shown. But
first we must always see that we help those
of the household of faith. ^ It is a serious
fault if a believer is in want, and thou
knowest it, or if thou knowest that he is
without means, that he is hungry, that he
suffer distress, especially if he is ashamed of
his need. It is a great fault if he is over-
whelmed by the imprisonment or false accu-
sation of his family, and thou dost not come
to his help. If he is in prison, and — upright
though he is — has to suffer pain and punish-
ment for some debt (for though we ought
to show mercy to all, yet we ought to show
it especially to an upright man) ; if in the
time of his trouble he obtains nothing from
thee ; if in the time of danger, when he is
carried off to die, thy money seems more to
thee than the life of a dying man ; what a
sin is that to thee ! Wherefore Job says
beautifully : " Let the blessing of him that
was ready to perish come upon me. "^
\>1^9. God, indeed, is not a respecter of per-
sons, for He knows all things. ■ And we,
indeed, ought to show mercy to all. But as
many try to get help on false pretences, and
make out that they aremiserably off ; there-
fore where the case is plain and the person
well known, and no time is to be lost, mercy
ought to be shown more readily. For the
Lord is not exacting to demand the utmost.
Blessed, indeed, is he who forsakes all and
follows Him, but blessed also is he who does
what he can to the best of his powers with
what he has. The Lord preferred the two
mites of the widow to all the gifts of the
rich, for she gave all that she had, but they
only gave a small part out of all their abun-
dance, f It is the intention, therefore, that
makes the gift valuable or poor, and gives
to things their value. The Lord does not
want us to give away all our goods at once,
but to impart them little by little ; unless,
indeed, our case is like that of Elisha, who
1 S. Mat. vi. 3.
^ Job xxix. 13.
^ Gal. vi. 10.
* S. Luke xxi. 3, 4.
26
ST. AMBROSE.
killed his oxen, and fed the people on what
he had, so that no household cares might
hold him back, and that he might give up
all things, and devote himself to the pro-
phetic teaching. '
150. True liberality also must be tested in
this way : - that we despise not our nearest
relatives, if we know they are in want. For
it is better for thee to help thy kindred who
feel the shame of asking help from others,
or of going to another to beg assistance in
their need. Not, however, that they should
become rich on what thou couldst other-
wise give to the poor. It is the facts of the
case we must consider, and not personal
feeling. Thou didst not dedicate thyself to
the Lord on purpose to make thy family
rich, but that thou mightest win eternal life
by the fruit of good works, and atone for
thy sins by showing mercy. They think
perhaps that they are asking but little, but
they demand the price thou shouldst pay
for thy sins. They attempt to take away
the fruits of thy life, and think they are act-
ing rightly.^ And one accuses thee because
thou hast not made him rich, when all the
time he wished to cheat thee of the reward
of eternal life.
151. So far we have given our advice,
now let us look for our authority. First,
then, no one ought to be ashamed of be-
coming poor after being rich, if this liappens
because he gives freely to the poor ; for
Christ became poor when He was rich, that
through His poverty He might enrich all." 4
He has given us a rule to follow, so that we
may give a good account of our reduced in-
heritance ; whoever has stayed the hunger
of the poor has lightened his distress.
" Herein I give my advice," says the Apos-
tle, "for this is expedient for you, that ye
should be followers of Christ. " s Advice is
given to the good, but waniings restrain
the wrong-doers. Again he says, as though
to the good : " For ye have begun not only
to do, but also to be willing, a year ago. "^
Both of these, and not only one, is the mark
of perfection. Thus he teaches that liber-
ality without good-will, and good-will with-
out liberality, are neither of them perfect.
Wherefore he also urges us on to perfection,
saying : 7 "Now, therefore, perform the
doing of it ; that as the will to do it was
ready enough in you, so also there may be
the vvill to accomplish it out of that which
1 I [3] Kings xix. 20. = Cic. de Off. I. 17, § 5S.
' " Et se j lisle facer e fnUant.'''' These words are omitted in many
MSB. ^ ^
4 2 Cor. viii. g. ^ i Cor. vui. 10.
0 2 Cor. viii. 10. ' 2 Cor. viii. 11-15.
ye have. For if the will be ready, it is ac-
cepted according to that a man hath, and
not according to that he hath not. But not
so that others should have plenty, and ye
should be in want : but let there be equality,
— your abundance must now serve for their
want, that their abundance may serve for
your want ; that there may be equality, as
it is written : " He that gathered much had
nothing over, and he that gathered little had
no lack." '
152. We notice how the Apostle includes
both good-will and liberality, as well as the
manner, the fruits of right giving, and the
persons concerned. The manner certainly,
for he gave advice to those not perfect.
For only the imperfect suffer anxiety. But
if any priest or other cleric, being unwilling
to burden the Church, ^ does not give away
all that he has, but does honourably what
his office demands, he does not seem tome
to be imperfect. I think also that the
Apostle here spoke not of anxiety of mind,
but rather of domestic troubles.
153. And I think it was with reference to
the persons concerned that he said : "that
your abundance might serve for their want,
and their abundance for your want." This
means, that the abundance of the people
might arouse them to good works, so as to
supply the want of food of others ; whilst
the spiritual abundance of these latter might
assist the want of spiritual merits among
the people themselves, and so win them a
blessing.
154. Wherefore he gave them an excel-
lent example: "He that gathered much
had nothing over, and he that gathered little
had no lack." That example is a great en-
couragement to all men to show mercy.
For he that possesses much gold has noth-
ing over, for all in this world is as nothing ;
and he that has little has no lack, for what
he loses is nothing already. The whole
matter is without loss, for the whole of it is
lost already.
155. We can also rightly understand it
thus. He that has much, although he does
not give away, has nothing over. For how-
ever much he gets, he always is in want,
because he longs for more. And he who
has little has no lack, for it does not cost
much to feed the poor. In like manner,
too, the poor person that gives spiritual
blessings in return for money, although he
1 Ex. xvi. iS.
'■ St. Ambrose, allowing clergy to retain some of their patrimony
so as not to burden the Church, is less strict than St. Augustine, who
would have them give up everj'thing and live in common. Serm.
3SS.
DUTIES OF THE CLERGY.— BOOK I.
27
has much grace, has nothinis;- over. For
grace does not burden the mind, but Hght-
ens it.
156. It can further be taken in this way :
Thou, O man, hast nothing ov^er ! For
how much hast thou really received, though
it may seem much to thee .' John, than
whom none was greater among those born
of woman, yet was less than he who is least
in the kingdom of heaven.'
157. Or once more. The grace of God is
never superabundant, humanly speaking, for
it is spiritual. Who can measure its great-
ness or its breadth, which one cannot see .-'
Faith, if it were as a grain of mustard seed,
can transplant mountains — and more than a
grain is not granted thee. If grace dwelt
fully in thee, wouldst thou not have to fear
lest thy mind should begin to be elated at
so great a gift ? For there are many who
have fallen more terribly, from spiritual
heights, than if they had never received
grace at all from the Lord. And he who
has little has no lack, for it is not tangible so
as to be divided ; and what seems little to
him that has is much to him that lacks.
158. In giving we must also take into
consideration age and weakness ; sometimes,
also, that natural feeling of shame, which
indicates good birth. One ought to give
more to the old who can no longer supply
themselves with food by labour. So, too,
weakness of body must be assisted, and
that readily. Again, if any one after being
rich has fallen into want, we must assist,
especially if he has lost what he had from
no sin of his own, but owing to robbery or
banishment or false accusation.
159. Perchance some one may say : A
blind man sits here in one place, and people
pass him by, whilst a strong young man
often has something given him. That is
true ; for he comes over people by his im-
portunity. That is not because in their
judgment he deserves it, but because they
are wearied by his begging. For the Lord
speaks in the Gospel of him who had already
closed his door ; how that when one knocks
at his door very violently, he rises and gives
what is wanted, because of his importunity.^
CHAPTER XXXI.
A kindness received should be returned with a freer
hand. This is shown by the example of the earth.
A passage from Solomon about feasting is adduced
to prove the same, and is expounded later in a
spiritual sense.
160. It is also rights that more regard
IS. Matt. xi. II. = S. Luke xi. 8. ^ cic. </£• Cijf. I. 15, § 47.
should be paid to him who has conferred
some benetit or gift upon thee, if he ever is
reduced to want. For what is so contrary
to one's duty as not to return what one has
received.'' Nor do 1 think that a return of
equal value should be made, but a greater.
One ought to make up for the enjoyment of
a kindness one has received from another,
to such an extent as to help that person,
even to putting an end to his needs. For
not to be the better in returning than in con-
ferring a kindness, is to be the inferior ; for
he who was the first to give was the first in
point of time, and also first in showing a
kind disposition.
1 6 1. Wherefore we must imitate the nature
of the earth ' in this respect, which is wont
to return the seed she has received, multi-
plied a thousand- fold. And so it is written:
" As a field is the foolish man, and as a vine-
yard is the man without sense. If thou
leavest him, he will be made desolate." ^ As
a field also is the wise man, so as to return
the seed given him in fuller measure, as
though it had been lent to him on interest.
The earth either produces fruits of its own
accord, or pays back and restores, what it was
entrusted with, in fruitful abundance. In
both these ways a return is due from thee,
when thou enterest upon the use of thy
father's possession, that thou may est notibe
left to lie as an imfruitful field. It may be
that a man can make an excuse for not
giving anything, but how can he excuse
himself for not returning what was given ?
It is hardly right not to give anything ; it
is certainly not right to make no return for
kindness done to oneself. ^
162. Therefore Solomon says well :
"When thou sittest to eat at the table of a
ruler consider diligently what is before thee,
and put forth thine hand, knowing that it
behoves thee to make such preparations.
But if thou art insatiable, be not desirous of
his dainties, for they have but a deceptive
life. "4 I have written these words as I wish
that we all should follow them. It is a good
thing to do a service, but he who knows not
how to return one is very hard. The earth
herself supplies an example of kindliness.
She provides fruits of her own accord,which
thou didst not sow ; she also returns many-
fold what she has received. It is not right
for thee to deny knowledge of money paid
in to thee, and how can it be right
to let a service done go without notice .' In
the book of Proverbs also it is said : that the
1 Cic. de Off. I. 15, § 48.
3 Cic. de Off. I. 15, 1 48.
2 Prov. xxiv. 30 [LXX].
♦ Prov. xxiii. i [LXX.].
28
ST. AMBROSE.
repayment of kindness has such great power
with God, that through it, even in the day
of destruction, a man may find grace,
though his sins outweigh all else.' And
why need I bring forward other examples
when the Lord Himself promises in the
Gospel a fuller reward to the merits of the
saints, and exhorts us to do good works,
saying : " Forgive, and ye shall be forgiven ;
give, and it shall be given unto you ; good
measure, shaken together and running over,
shall men give into your bosom." ^
163. But the feasting that Solomon speaks
of has not to do with common food only,
but it is to be understood as having to do
with good works. For how can the soul
be feasted in better wise than on good
works ; or what can so easily fill the mind
of the just as the knowledge of a good work
done.' What pleasanter food is there than
to do the will of God.'' The Lord has told
us that He had this food alone in abundance,
as it is written in the Gospel, saying : " My
food is to do the will of My Father which is
in heaven." ^
164. In this food let us delight of which the
prophet says : " Delight thou in the Lord." ■♦
In this food they delight, who have with
wonderful knowledge learnt to take in the
higher delights ; who can know what that
delight is which is pure and which can be
understood by the mind. Let us therefore
cat the bread of wisdom, and let us be filled
with the word of God. For the life of man
made in the image of God consists not in
bread alone, but in every word that cometh
from God. 5 About the cup, too, holy Job
says, plainly enough : "As the earth waiteth
for the raih, so did they for my words." ^
CHAPTER XXXIL
After saying what return must be made for the service
of the above-mentioned feast, various reasons for
repaying kindness are enumerated. Then he speaks
in praise of good-will, on its results and its order.
165. It is therefore a good thing for us to
be bedewed with the exhortations of the
divine Scriptures, and that the word of God
should come down upon us like the dew.
When, therefore, thou sittest at the table of
that great man, understand who that great
man is. Set in the paradise of delight and
placed at the feast of wisdom, think of what
is put before thee ! The divine Scriptures
are the feast of wisdom, and the single books
are the various dishes. Know, first, what
dishes the banquet offers, then stretch forth
thy hand, that those things which thou
readest, or which thou receivest from the
Lord thy God, thou mayest carry out in
action, and so by thy duties mayest show
forth the grace that was granted thee.
Such was the case with Peter and Paul, who
in preaching the Gospel made some return
to Him Who freely gave them all things.
So that each of them might say : "By the
grace of God I am what I am. and His grace
in me was not in vain, but I laboured more
abundantly than they all."^
166. One repays the fruit of a service done
him, and repays it, gold with gold, silver
with silver. Another gives his labour. An-
other— and I do not know whether he does
not do it in fuller measure — gives but the
best wishes of his heart. ^ But what if there
is no opportunity to make a return at hand.?
If we wish to return a kindness, more
depends on the spirit in vi'hich we do it
than on the amount of our property, whilst
people will think more of our good-will,
than of our power to make a full return.
For a kindness done is regarded in the light
of what one has. A great thing, therefore, is
good-will. For even if it has nothing to give,
yet it offers the more, and though there is
nothing in its own possession, yet it gives
largely to many, and does that, too, without
loss to itself, and to the gain of the many.
Thus good-will is better than liberality itself
It is richer in character than the other is in
gifts ; for there are more that need a kind-
ness than there are that have abundance.
167. But good- will also goes in conjunc-
tion with liberality, for liberality really
starts from it, seeing that the habit of giving
comes after the desire to give. It exists,
however, also separate and distinct. For
where liberality is wanting, there good-will
abides — the parent as it were of all in com-
mon, uniting and binding friendships to-
gether. It is faithful in counsel, joyful in
times of prosperity, ami in times of sorrow
sad. So it happens that anyone trusts him-
self to the counsels of a man of sfood-will
rather than to those of a wise one, as David
did. For he, though he was the more far-
seeing, agreed to the counsels of Jonathan,
who was the younger.'' Remove good-will
out of the reach of men, and it is as though
one had withdrawn the sun from the world.'*
For without it men would no longer care to
show the way to the stranger, to recall the
' Allusion is made to Ecclus. iii.
' S. John i*. 34.
» S. Matt. iv. 4.
31. * S. Luke vi. 37, 3S.
♦ Ps. xxxvii. 4.
• Job. xxix. 23.
* I Cor. XV. 10.
" I Sam. [i Kings] xx. 11 if.
2Cic. (feO_f. II. 20, §69.
* Cic. de Aiiiic. 13, § 47.
DUTIES OF THE CLERGY.— BOOK I.
29
wanderer, to show hospitality (this latter is
no small virtue, for on this point Job praised
himself, when he said: "At my doors the
stranger dwelt not, my gate was open to
everyone who came"'),' nor even to give
water from the water that flows at their door,
or to light another's candle at their own.
Thus good-will exists in all these, like a fount
of waters refreshing the thirsty, and like a
light, which, shining forth to others, fails
not them who have given a light to others
from their own light. -
168. There is also liberality springing
from good-will, that makes one tear up the
bond of a debtor which one holds, without
demandiu": anv of the debt back from him.
Holy job bids us act thus by his own ex-
ample.^ For he that has does not bor-
row, but he that has not does not put an
end to the agreement. Why, then, if thou
hast no need, dost thou save up for greedy
heirs what thou canst give back immediately,
and so get praise for good-will, and that with-
out loss of money.''
1 69. To go to the root of the matter — good-
will starts first with those at home, that is,
with children, parents, brothers, and goes on
from one step to another throughout the
world. 4 Having started from Paradise, it
has filled the world. For God set the feel-
ing of good-will in the man and woman,
saying: "They shall be one flesh, "5 and
(one may add) one spirit. Wherefore Eve
also believed the serpent; for she who had
received the gift of good-will did not think
there was ill-will.
\y'
/
CHAPTER XXXni.
Good-will exists especially in the Church, and nourishes
kindred virtues.
1 70. Good- WILL expands in the body of the
Church,'' by fellowship in faith, by the bond
of baptism, by kinship through grace re-
ceived, by communion in the mysteries.
For all these bonds claim for themselves the
name of intimacy, the reverence of children,
the authority and religious care of parents,
the relationship of brothers. Therefore the
bonds of grace clearly point to an increase
of good-will.
171. The desire to attain to like virtues
also stands one in good stead ; 7 just as again
good-will brings about a likeness in char-
^ Job xxxi. 32.
2 Cic. de Off. I. 16.
3 Job xxxi. 35 [LXX.].
* Cic. de Off. I. 16, 17.
^ Gen. ii. 24.
6 Cic. de Off. \. 17, §55.
'' Cic de Off. \. 17, § 55.
acter. For Jonathan the king's son imitated
the gentleness of holy David, because he
loved him. Wherefore those words : "With
the holy thou shalt be holy," ' seem not only
to be concerned with our ordinary inter-
course, but also to have some connection
with good-will. The sons of Noah indeed
dwelt together, and yet their characters
were not at all. alike. Esau and Jacol) also
dwelt together in their father's house, but
were very unlike. There was, however, no
good-will between them to make the one
prefer the other to himself, but rather a
rivalry as to which should first get the
blessing. Since one was so hard, and the
other gentle, good-will could not exist as
between such different characters and con-
flicting desires. Add to this the fact that
holy Jacob could not prefer the unworthy
son of his father's house to virtue.
172. But nothing is so harmonious* as
justice and impartiality. For this, as the
comrade and ally of good-will, makes us
love those whom we think to be like our-
selves. Again, good-will contains also in
itself fortitude. For when friendship springs
from the fount of good-will it does not hesi-
tate to endure the great dangers of life for a
friend. " If evils come to me through him,"
it says, "I will bear them." ^
CHAPTER XXXIV.
Some other advantages of good-will are here enume-
rated.
173. Good-will also is wont to remove the
sword of anger. It is also good-will that
makes the wounds of a friend to be better
than the willing kisses of an enemy. '• Good-
will again makes many to become one.
For if many are friends, they become one ;
in whom there is but one spirit and one
opinion. 5 We note, too, that in friendship
corrections are pleasing. They have their
sting, but they cause no pain. We are
pierced by the words of blame, but are
delighted with the anxiety that good-will
shows.
174. To conclude, the same du'ip^ are not
owed to all. Nor is regard ever paid to
persons, though the occasion and the cir-
cumstances of the case are generally taken
into consideration, so that one may at times
have to help a neighbour rather than one's
brother. For Solomon also says : " Better
is a neighbour that is near than a brother far
' Ps. xviii. 26. 2 Cic. de Off. 1. 17, § 56. ^ Ecclus. xxiii. 31.
■• Prov. xxvii. 6. ^ Cic. de Off. I. 17, § 57.
30
ST. AMBROSE.
off. " ' For this reason a man generally
trusts himself to the good-will of a friend
rather than to the ties of relationship with
his brother. So far does good-will prevail
that it often goes beyond the pledges given
by nature.
CHAPTER XXXV.
X
On fortitude. This is divided into two parts : as it
concerns matters of war and matters at home. The
first cannot be a virtue unless combined with justice
and prudence. The other depends to a large extent
upon endurance.
175. We have discussed fully enough the
nature and force of what is virtuous from
the standpoint of justice.^ Now let us
discuss fortitude, which (being a loftier vir-
tue than the rest) is divided into two parts,
as it concerns matters of war and matters
at home. But the thought of warlike mat-
ters seems to be foreign to the duty of our
office, for we have our thoughts fixed more
on the duty of the soul than on that of the
body ; nor is it our business to look to
arms, but rather to the affairs of peace.
Our fathers, however, as Joshua, the son of
Nun, Jerubbaal, Samson, and David, gained
great glory also in war.
176. Fortitude, therefore, is a loftier virtue
than the rest, but it is also one that never
stands alone. For it never depends on
itself alone. Moreover, fortitude without
justice is the source of wickedness.^ For
the stronger it is, the more ready is it to
crush the weaker, whilst in matters of war
one ought to see whether the war is just or
unjust.
177. David never waged war unless he
was driven to it. Thus prudence was com-
bined in him with fortitude in the battle.
For even when about to fight single-handed
against Goliath, the enormous giant, he
rejected the armour with which he was
laden. 4 His strength depended more on his
own arm than on the weapons of others.
Then, at a distance, to get a stronger throw,
with one cast of a stone, he slew his enemy.
After that he never entered on a war with-
out seeking counsel of the Lord, s Thus he
was victorious in all wars, and even to his
last years was ready to fight. And when
war arose with the Philistines, he joined
battle with their fierce troops, being desirous
* Prov. xxvii. 10.
■^C\9..deOff. I. 19.
^ 2 .Sam. [2 KingsJ v. ig.
Cic. de Off. I. 18, § 61.
I Sam. [1 Kings] xvii. 39 ff.
of winning renown, whilst careless of his
own safety. ■
178. But this is not the only kind of for-
titude which is worthy of note. We con-
sider their fortitude glorious, who, with great-
ness of mind, " through faith stopped the a
mouth of lions, quenched the violence of T
fire, escaped the edge of the sword, out of
weakness were made strong."- They did
not gain a victory in common with many,
surrounded with comrades, and aided by the
legions, but won their triumph alone over
their treacherous foes by the mere courage
of their own souls. How unconquerable
was Daniel, who feared not the lions raging
round about him. The beasts roared, whilst
he was eating. ^
CHAPTER XXXVI.
One of the duties of fortitude is to keep the weak
from receiving injury; another, to check the wrong
motions of our own souls ; a third, both to disregard
humiliations, and to do what is right with an even
mind. All these clearly ought to be fulfilled by all
Christians, and especially by the clergy.
1 79. The glory of fortitude, therefore, does
not rest only on the strength of one's body
or of ones arms, but rather on the courage
of the mind. 4 Nor is the law of courage
exercised in causing, but in driving away all
harm. He who does not keep harm off a
friend,^ if he can, is as much in fault as he
who causes it. Wherefore holy Moses gave
this as a first proof of his fortitude in war.
For when he saw an Hebrew receiving
hard treatment at the hands of an Egyptian,
he defended him, and laid low the Egyptian
and hid him in the sand.s Solomon also
says : " Deliver him that is led to death." ^
180. From whence, then, Cicero and Pa-
naetius, or even Aristotle, got these ideas is
perfectly clear. For though living before
these two, Job had said : "I delivered the
poor out of the hand of the strong, and I
aided the fatherless for whom there was no
helper. Let the blessing of him that was
ready to perish come upon me. "7 Was not
he most brave in that he bore so nobly the
attacks of the devil, and overcame him with
the powers of his mind.?^ Nor have we
cause to doubt the fortitude of him to whom
the Lord said: "Gird up thy loins like a
man. Put on loftiness and power. Humble
every one that doeth wrong. " 9 The Apostle
'. i^,^'"i\'^'J?'5s] xxi. 15. 2 Heb. xi. 3^, 34.
^ Bel and the Dragon v. 39. 4 cic. de Off \ 23.
B ,-,"■ J'' J!- P™^- '"'"^- ' ■• ' Job xxix. 12, 13.
Cf. Job I. 12, w. 1. 22, and Job ii. 6, w. ii. 10.
« Jobxl. 2, 5, 6[LXX.].
DUTIES OF THE CLERGY.— BOOK I.
31
also says : ' ' Ye have a strong consolation. " '
He, then, is brave who finds ct)nsolation in
any grief.
181. And in very truth, rightly is that
called fortitude, when a man conquers him-
self, restrains his anger, yields and gives
way to no allurements, is not put out by
misfortunes, nor gets elated by good suc-
cess, and does not get carried away by every
varying change as by some chance wind.^
But what is more noble and splendid than
to train the mind, keep down the flesh, and
reduce it to subjection, so that it may obey
commands, listen to reason, and in under-
going labours readily carry out the inten-
tion and wish of the mind ?
182. This, then, is the first notion of for-
titude. For fortitude of the mind can be re-
garded in two ways. 3 First, as it counts all
externals as very unimportant, and looks
on them as rather superfluous and to be de-
spised than to be sought after. Secondly, as
it strives after those things which are the
highest, and all things in which one can see
anything moral (or as' the Greeks call it,
-pi-(r^,) with all the powers of the mind.
For what can be more noble than to train
thy mind so as not to place a high value
on riches and pleasures and honours, nor to
waste all thy care on these .? When thy
mind is thus disposed, thou must consider
how all that is virtuous and seemly must be
placed before everything else ; and thou
must so fix thy mind upon that, that if aught
happens which may break thy spirit, whe-
ther loss of property, or the reception of
fewer honours, or the disparagement of un-
believers, thou mayest not feel it, as though
thou wert above such things ; nay, so that
even dangers which menace thy safety, if
undertaken at the call of justice, may not
trouble thee.
183. This is the true fortitude which Christ's
warrior has, who receives not the crown un-
less he strives lawfully. ■♦ Or does that call
to fortitude seem to thee but a poor one :
" Tribulation worketh patience, and pa-
tience, experience, and experience, hope".? s
See how many a contest there is, yet but
one crown ! That call none gives, but he
who was strengthened in Christ Jesus, and
whose flesh had no rest. Affliction on all
sides, fighting without and fears within.^
And though in dangers, in countless labours,
in prisons, in deaths 7 — he was not broken
in spirit, but fought so as to become more
powerful through his infirmities.
1 Heb. vi. 18. 2 Cic. de Off. I. 20, § 68.
\ Cie. de Off. I. 20, § 66. ••2 Tim. ii. 5
^ Rom. V. 3, 4.
' 2 Cor. vii. 5.
' 2 Cor. xi. 24 ff.
184. Think, then, how he teaches those
who enter upon their duties in the Church,
that they ought to have contempt for all
earthly things : "If, then, ye be dead with
Christ from the elements of this world, why
do ye act as though living in the world?
Touch not, taste not, handle not, which all
are to perish with the using."' And fur-
ther: "If ye then be risen with Christ,
seek those things which are above, not
those things which are on the earth." ^ And
again: " INIortify, therefore, j'-our members
which are on the earth. "^ This, indeed, is
meant for all the faithful. But thee, espe-
cially, my son, he urges to despise riches
and to avoid profane and old wives' fables
— allowing nothing but this: "Exercise
thyself unto godliness, for bodily exercise
profiteth a little, but godliness is profitable
unto all things." ^
185. Let, then, godliness exercise thee
unto justice, continence, gentleness, that
thou mayest avoid childish acts, and that
rooted and grounded in grace thou mayest
fight the good fight of faith. 5 Entangle not
thyself in the affairs of this life, for thou art
fighting for God.^ For if he who fights for
the emperor is forbidden by human laws to
enter upon lawsuits, to do any legal busi-
ness, or to sell merchandise ; how much
more ought he who enters upon the warfare
of faith to keep from every kind of business,
being satisfied with the produce of his own
little bit of land, if he has it.? If he has not
that, let him be content with the pay he
will get for his service. Here is a good wit-
ness to this fact, who says : "I have been
young and now am old, yet. have I not seen
the righteous forsaken, nor his seed begging
bread. "7 That is the true rest and temper-
ance of the mind which is not excited by the
desire of gain, nor tormented by the fear of
want.
CHAPTER XXXVII.
An even mind should be preserved in adversity as
well as in prosperity. However, evil things must be
avoided.
1 86. There is also that true freedom of
the mind from vexation which makes us
neither give way too much in our griefs,
nor be too elated in prosperity.^ And if
they who urge men to undertake the affairs
of the state give such rules, how much more
1 Col. ii. 2o, 21, 22. * Col. iii. i, 2. * Col. ill. 5.
* I Tim. iv. 8. ' i Tim. vi. 12. " 2 Tim. ii. 4
'' Ps. xxxvii. [xxxvi.] 25. * Cic. de Off. I. 21, § 72.
32
ST. AMBROSE.
ought we who are called to do duty in the
Church, to act thus and do those things
which are pleasing to God, so that Christ's
power may show itself forth in us. We
too must prove ourselves to our Captain,
so that our members may be tlie weapons of
justice ; not carnal weapons in which sin
may reign, but weapons strong for God,
whereby sin may be destroyed. Let our
flesh die, that in it every sin may die. And
as though living again after death, may we
rise to new works and a new life.
187. These, then, are the services of forti-
tude ; and full they are of virtuous and
seemly duties. But in all that we do we
must look to see, not only if it is virtuous,
but whether it is possible, so that we may
not enter upon anything that we cannot
carry out. ' Wherefore the Lord, to use His
own word, wills us to flee in the time of per-
secution from one city to another ; ^ so that
no one, whilst longing for the crown of mar-
tyrdom, may put himself in the way of dan-
gers which possibly the weak flesh or a mind
indulged could not bear and endure.
CHAPTER XXXVHL
We must strengthen the mind against troubles to come,
and build it up by looking out for them beforehand.
What difficulties there are in doing this.
188. But again, no one must retire through
cowardice, or give up his faith from fear of
danger. With what grace must the soul be
equipped, and the mind trained and taught
to stand firm, so as never to be disturbed by
any fears, to be broken by any troubles, or
to yield to any torments ! With what difti-
culty indeed are they borne ! But as all
pains seem less in the fear of greater pains,
so also, if thou dost build up thy soul by
quiet counsel, and dost determine not to go
from thy course, and layest before thee the
fear of divine judgment and the torment of
eternal punishment, canst thou gain endur-
ance of mind.
189. If a man thus prepares himself, he
gives signs of great diligence. On the other
hand it is a sign of natural ability, if a man
by the power of his mind can foresee the
future, and put as it were before his eyes
what may happen, and decide what he ought
to do if it should take place. It may hap-
pen, too, that he will think over two or three
things at once, which he supposes may come
either singly or together, and that he settles
what he will do with them as he thinks
will be to the most advantage, in the event
of their coming either singly or together.
200. Therefore it is the duty of a brave
man not to shut his eyes when anything
threatens, but to put it before him and to
search it out as it were in the mirror of his
mind, and to meet the future with foreseeing
thought, for fear he might afterwards have
to say : This has come to me because I
thought it could not come about. If mis-
fortunes are not looked for beforehand, they
quickly get a hold over us. In war an un-
expected enemy is with difficulty resisted,
and if he finds the others unprepared, he
easily overcomes them ; so evils unthought
of readily break down the soul.
200. In these two points, then, consists the
excellency of the soul : so that thy soul,
trained in good thoughts, and with a pure
heart, first, may see what is true and vir-
tuous (for "blessed are the pure in heart, for
they shall see God '"), ' and may decide that
only to be good which is virtuous ; and,
next, may never be disturbed by business
of any kind, nor get tossed about by any
desires.
201. Not that this is an easy thing for any
one. For what is so difficult as to discern,
as though from some watch-tower, the
resources of wisdom and all those other
things, which to most seem so great and
noble .•* Again, what so difficult as to place
one's decision on fixed grounds, and to
despise what one has decided to be worth-
less, as of no good.? Or, once more, what
so difiicult, when some misfortune has hap-
pened, and it is looked on as something
serious and grieving, as to bear it in such a
way that one considers it nothing beyond
what is natural, when one reads : "Naked
was I born, naked shall I go forth. What
the Lord gave, the Lord hath taken away"^
(he who said this had lost children and pos-
sessions), and to preserve in all things the
character of a wise and upright man, as he
did who says: "As the Lord pleased, so did
He. Blessed be the name of the Lord. "^
And again : "Thou speakest as one of the
foolish women speaketh. Shall we receive
good at the hand of God, and shall we not
receive evil ? " ■♦
1 Cic. ^ O^. I. 21, § 73-
« S. Matt. X. 23.
> S. Matt. V. 8.
Job i.
^ Job. 1. 21. * Job. ii. 10.
DUTIES OF THE CLERGY.— BOOK I.
33
CHAPTER XXXIX,
One must show fortitude in fighting againnt all vices,
especially against avarice. Holy Job teaches this
lesson.
202. Fortitude of soul, then, is not an un-
important thing-, nor is it cut off from the.
other virtues, for it wages war in conjunc-
tion with the virtues, and alone defends the
beauty of all the virtues, and guards their
powers of discernment, and tights against
all vices with implacable hate. It is uncon-
querable as regards labours, brave to endure
dangers, stern as against pleasures, hard-
ened against allurements, to which it knows
not how to lend an ear, nor, so to speak, to
give a greeting. It cares not for money,
and flies from avarice as from a plague that
destroys all virtue. ' For nothing is so much
opposed to fortitude as when one allows one-
self to be overcome by g-ain. Often when the
enemy is repulsed and the hosts of the foe
are turned to flight, has the warrior died
miserably among those whom he has laid
low, whilst he is busy with the spoils of the
fallen ; and the legions, whilst busy with
their booty, have called back upon them
the enemy that had fled, and so have been
robbed of their triumph.
203. Fortitude, then, must repulse so foul
a plague and crush it down. It must not
let itself be tempted by desires, nor shaken
by fear. Virtue stands true to itself and
bravely pursues all vices as though they
were the poison of virtue. It must repel
•^nger as it were with arms, for it removes
c(^ansel far off. It must avoid it as though
it were some severe sickness.^ It must
further be on its guard against a desire for
glory, which often has done harm when
sought for too anxiously, and always when
it has been once attained.
204. What of all this was wanting in holy
Job, or in his virtue, or what came upon
him in the way of vice .'' How did he bear
the distress of sickness or cold or hunger.^
Flow did he look upon the dangers which
menaced his safety .' Were the riches from
which so much went to the poor gathered
together by plunder.? Did he ever allow
greed for wealth, or the desire for pleasures,
or lusts to rise in his heart ? Did ever the
unkind disputes of the three princes, or the
insults of the slaves, rouse him to anger .'
1 Cic. de Off. I. 20, § 68.
- There is a considerable variation of text here. The original of
the translation is : " iracuKdiam velut giiibtisdam propii/set armis,
guiE tollat consilium, et tanqtiavi (pgritudiuem Titet." Cod.
Dresd. reads: " iracundiam . . . propiihet nrietihis artnisqtie tol-
lat et coiivicia taTtqttatn legritudittem litet.''''
3
Did glory carry him away like some fickle
person when he called down vengeance on
himself if ever he had hidden even an invol-
untary fault, or had feared the multitude of
the people so as not to confess it in the sight
of all .'* His. virtues had no point of contact
with any vices, but stood firm on their own
ground. Who, then, was so brave as holy
Job.-* How can he be put second to any,
on whose level hardly one like himself can
be placed }
CHAPTER XL.
Courage in war was not wanting in our forefathers, as
is shown by the example of the men of old, especially
by the glorious deed of Eleazar.
205. But perhaps renown in war keeps
some so bound to itself ' as to make them
think that fortitude is to be found in battle
alone, and that therefore I had gone aside
to speak of these things, because that was
wanting in us. But how brave was Joshua
the son of Nun, who in one battle laid low
five kings together with their people ! ^
Again, when he fought against the Gibeonites
and feared that night might stop him from
gaining the victory, he called out with deep
faith and high spirit : ^ " Let the sun stand
still ; " and it stood still until the victory was
complete. Gideon with three hundred men
gained a triumph over a great nation and
a cruel foe. '^ Jonathan when a young man
showed great courage in battle, s and what
shall I say about the Maccabees .?
206. First, I will speak of the people of
our fathers. They were ready to fight for
the temple of God and for their rights, and
when attacked on the Sabbath day by the
craft of the enemy, willingly allowed wounds
to be inflicted on their unprotected bodies,
rather than to join in the fight, so that they
might not defile the Sabbath.^ They all
gladly gave themselves up to death. But
the ^laccabees thinking that then all the
nation would perish, on the Sabbath also,
when they were challenged to fight, took
vengeance for the death of their innocent
brethren. And afterwards when he had
been roused by this to fresh exertions, King
Antiochus, having begun the war afresh
under the leadership of his generals Lysias,
Nicanor, and Georgias, was so utterly
crushed, together with his Eastern and Assy-
rian forces, that he left 48,000 lying on the
battle-field, slain by an army of but 3,000 men,
1 Cic. de Off. I. 22. - Josh. x. ^ Josh. x. 12.
* Judg. vii. ^ I Sam. [i Kings] xiv. i. ^ i Mace. ii. 35 £f.
r
34
ST. AMBROSE.
207. Mark the courage of the leader, Judas
Maccabaeus, as exemplified in the character
of one of his soldiers. Eleazar, • meeting with
an elephant higher than all the rest, and
with all the royal trappings upon it, and
thinking that the king was on it, ran hastily
and threw himself into the midst of the
legion ; and. casting away his shield, with
both hands he slew those opposed to him,
until he reached the beast. ^ Then he got
beneath it, thrust in his sword and slew it.
But the beast in falling crushed Eleazar and
so killed him. What courage of mind was
his then, first, in that he feared not death,
next because, when surrounded by enemies,
he was carried by it into the thickest of his
foes and penetrated the very centre ! Then,
despising death, and casting away his shield,
he ran beneath the huge beast, wounded it
with both his hands, and let it fall upon him.
He ran beneath it so as to give a more dead-
ly blow. Enclosed by its fall, rather than
crushed, he was buried in his own triumph.
208. Nor was he deceived in his intention,
though he was deceived by the royal orna-
ments. For the enemy, startled at such an
exhibition of valour, dared not rush upon
this single unarmed man, held fast though
he was. They were so terrified after the
mischance of the slaughter of the beast, that
they considered themselves altogether un-
equal to the valour of one. Nay, King
Antiochus, son of Lysias, terrified at the for-
titude of one, asked for peace. He had come
to the war with 120,000 armed men and with
32 elephants, which glittered and gleamed
with the sheen of arms like a line of burning
lamps, as the sun rose upon them, marching
along one by one, like very mountains for
size. 3 Thus Eleazar left peace as the heir
of his courage. These are the signs of
triumphs.
CHAPTER XLI.
After praising Judas' and Jonathan's loftiness of mind,
the constancy of tlie martyrs in their endurance of
tortures, which is no small part of fortitude, is next
brought before us.
209. But as fortitude is proved not only
by prosperity but also in adversity, let us
now consider the death of Judas Maccabaeus.
* I Mac. vi. 43.
'The Latin text has: " iitraqtie mami iiiterficiehai, donee f>er-
vejiit ad bestinm." Cod. Dresd., ed. Med. h.tve : " Jitraquc maiiu
interficicbat bestiality atqne intravit sab eaiii.'^
^ Ed. Bened. Irere has : " ita nt ah ortii sol is per singulas bestias
velitt monies qnidam splendor arinoriim (orusco, tanquain laiiipa-
dibus ardctitihus." Cod. Dresd. and Goth. : " ita ut . . . quidam
annoriiin cornscoriiin . . . rejulgercnt." Other ancient editions :
" ita ut . . ■ qiiidam artnorum corusco . . . re/uigerenl"
For he, after Nicanor, the general of King
Demetrius, was defeated, boldly engaged
20,000 of the king's army with 900 men who
were anxious to retire for fear of being over-
come by so great a multitude, but whom
he persuaded to endure a glorious death
rather than to retire in disgraceful flight.
"Let us not leave," he says, "any stain
upon our glory." Thus, then, engaging in
battle after having fought from sunrise till
evening, he attacks and quickly drives back
the riglit wing, where he sees the strongest
troop of the enemy to be. But whilst pur-
suing the fugitives from the rear he gave a
chance for a wound to be inflicted. ' Thus he
found the spot of death more full of glory
for himself than any triumph.
210. Why need I further mention his bro-
ther Jonathan, who fought against the kings
force, with but a small troop. ^ Though for-
saken by his men, and left with only two,
he retrieved the battle, drove back the enemy,
and recalled his own men, who were flying
in every direction, to share in his triumph.
211. Here, then, is fortitude in war, which
bears no light impress of what is virtuous
and seemly upon it, for it prefers death to
slavery and disgrace. But what am I to say
of the sufferings of the martyrs.'' Not to
go too far abroad, did not the children of
Maccabaeus gain triumphs over the proud
King Antiochus, as great as those of their
fathers.' The latter in truth were armed, but
they conquered without arms. The company
of the seven brothers stood unconquered,3
though surrounded by the legions of the
king — tortures failed, tormentors ceased ;
but the martyrs failed not. One, having
had the skin of his head pulled off, though
changed in appearance, grew in courage.
Another, bidden to put forth his tongue, so
that it might be cutoff, answered: "The
Lord hears not only those who speak, for
He heard Moses when silent. He hears
better the silent thoughts of His own than
the voice of all others. Dost thou fear the
scourge of my tongue — and dost thou not
fear the scourge of blood spilt upon the
ground ? Blood, too, has a voice whereby it
cries aloud to God — as it did in the case of
Abel." /
212. What shall I say of the mothef^
who with joy looked on the corpses of her
children as so many trophies, and found
delight in the voices of her dying sons, as
though in the songs of singers, noting in
her children the tones of the glorious harp
' I Mace. ix. 8.
^ 2 Mace. vii. i ff,
' I Mace. xi. 6S.
* 2 Mace. vii. 20.
DUTIES OF THE CLERGY.— BOOK I.
35
of her own heart, and a sweeter harmony of
love than any strain of the kite could give?
213. What shall I say of those two-year-
old children of Bethlehem," who received
the palm of victory before they felt their
natural life within them ? What of St. Agnes,
who when in danger as regards two great
matters, that is, chastity and life, protected
her chastity and exchanged life for immor-
tality ?
214. And let us not pass by St. Lawrence,
who, seeing Xystus his bishop led to martyr-
dom, began to weep, not at his sufferings
but at the fact that he himself was to remain
behind. With these words he began to ad-
dress him : "Whither, father, goest thou
without thy son .' Whither, holy priest, art
thou hastening without thy deacon .? Never
wast thou wont to offer sacrifice without an
attendant. What are thou displeased at in
me, my father.? Hast thou found me un-
worthy.? Prove, then, whether thou hast
chosen a fitting servant. To him to whom
thou hast entrusted the consecration ^ of the
Saviour's blood, 3 to whom thou hast granted
fellowship in partaking of the Sacraments,
to him dost thou refuse a part in thy death ?
Beware lest thy good judgment be en-
dangered, whilst thy fortitude receives its
praise. The rejection of a pupil is the loss
of the teacher ; or how is it that noble and
illustrious men gain the victory in the con-
tests of their scholars rather than in their
own ? Abraham offered his son, Peter sent
Stephen on before him ! Do thou, father,
show forth thy courage in thy son. Offer
me whom thou hast trained, that thou, con-
fident in thy choice of me, mayest reach the
crown in worthy company."
215. Then Xystus said : " I leave thee not
nor forsake thee. Greater struggles yet
await thee. We as old men have to
undergo an easier fight ; a more glorious tri-
umph'over the tyrant awaits thee, a young
man. Soon shalt thou come. Cease weep-
ing ; after three days thou shalt follow me.
This interval must come between the priest
and his levite. It was not for thee to con-
quer under the eye of thy master, as though
thou neededst a helper. Why dost thou
seek to share in my death ? I leave to thee
its full inheritance. Why dost thou need
my presence.? Let the weak disciples go
before their master, let the brave follow him,
that they may conquer without him. For
they no longer need his guidance. So Elijah
left Elisha. To thee I entrust the full suc-
cession to my own courage."
216. Such was their contention, and surely
a worthy one, wherein priest and attendant
strove as to who should be the first to suffer
for the name of Christ. When that tragic
piece is played, it is said there is great ap-
plause in the theatre as Pylades says he is
Orestes, whilst Orestes declares that he is
really himself. The former acted as he did,
that he might die for Orestes, and Orestes,
that he might not allow Pylades to be slain
instead of himself. But it was not right
that they should live, for each of them was
guilty of parricide, the one because he had
committed the crime, the other because he
had helped in its commission. But here
there was nothing to call holy Lawrence to
act thus but his love and devotion. How-
ever, after three days he was placed upon
the gridiron by the tyrant whom he mocked,
and was burnt. He said: "The flesh is
roasted, turn it and eat. " So by the courage
of his mind he overcame the power of fire.
CHAPTER XLH.
The powers that be are not needlessly to be irritated.
One must not lend one's ears to flattery.
217. I THINK we must take care, lest in
being led on by too great a desire for glory,
we should abuse the powers that be, and
arouse the minds of the heathen, who are
opposed to us, to desire persecution, and
excite them to anger. How many do some
cause to perish, that they themselves may
continue to the end, and overcome their
tortures !
218. We must also look to it that we do
not open our ears to flatterers. To allow
oneself to be smoothed down by flattery
seems to be a sign not only of want of forti-
tude, but a sign of actual cowardice.
1 S. Matt. ii. 16. , , « ,.
2 " Consecrationem." So all MSS. Ed. Rom. alone has dis-
fettsationem."
' Consecration seems a strange expression in the mouth of a
deacon, but it mav be explained either by the intimate connection
between the celebrant and his deacon, as at the present day in the
Liturgy of the Eastern Church ; or it may refer to the hallowing of
the faithful in the partaking of the Sacrament. The word conse-
cratio is not always restrained to the consecration properly so
called, as may be seen by the prayer in the Roman missal said by
the priest when he drops a consecrated particle into the chalice
which has also been already consecrated ;—"//<•/■<: ro;«w/.r^/o et^
cotisecratiQ CorporUet Sanpiinis . . .fiat nobis in vitam atertiam:
CHAPTER XLHL
On temperance and its chief parts, especially _ tran-
quillity of mind and moderation, care for what is vir-
tuous, and reflection on what is seemly.
219. As we have spoken of three of the
virtues, there remains but the fourth for us
to speak of. ' This is called temperance and
1 Cic. de Off. I. 27.
36
ST. AMBROSE.
moderation ; wherein, before all else, tran-
quillity of mind, the attainment of gentle-
ness, the grace of moderation, regard for
what is virtuous, and reflection on what is
seemly are sought and looked for.
220. We must keep to a certain order in
life, so that a foundation may be laid with
our first feelings of modesty, for that is the
friend and all}^ of calmness of mind. Avoid-
ing over-confidence, averse to all excess, it
loves sobriety, guards what is honourable,
and seeks only what is seemly.
221. Let choice of intercourse come next.
Let us link ourselves with older men of
approved goodness. For as the companion-
ship of people of our own age is the plea-
santer, so that of our elders is the safer. By
their guidance and the conduct of their lives
they give colour to tlie character of younger
men, and tinge them as it were with the
deep purple of probity. For if they who
are ignorant of a locality are very glad to
take a journey in the company of skilled
guides, how much more ought young men
to enter on the path of life, which is new to
them, in the company of old men ; so that
they may not go wrong, and turn aside from
the true path of virtue. For nothing is
better than to have the same men both to
direct us in life, and also to be witnesses of
how we live.
222. One must also in every action con-
sider what is suitable for different persons,
times, and ages, and what will also be in
accordance with the abilities of individuals.
For often what befits one does not befit
another ; one thing suits a youth, another
an old man ; one thing does in danger,
another in good fortune.
223. David danced before the ark of the
Lord.' Samuel did not dance; yet David
was not blanned, while the other was praised.
David changed his countenance before the
king, whose name was Achish.^ If he had
done this without any fear of being recog-
nized, he would certainly not have escaped
the charge of levity. Saul also, surrounded
by the company of prophets, himself pro-
phesied. Yet of him alone, as though he
were unworthy, was it said : "Is Saul also
among the prophets .' " ^
CHAPTER XLIV.
Every one ought to apply himself to the duties suited
to his character. Many, however, are hindered by
following their fathers' pursuits. Clerics act in a
different way.
224. Each one knows his own powers.
* 2 Sam. [2 Kings] vi. 14.
I Sam. xxi. 13. ■■ Sam. xix. 24.
Therefore let each one apply himself to that
which he has chosen as suitable to himself
But he must first consider what will be the
consequences. He may know his good
points, but he must know his faults also.
He must also be a fair judge of himself, so
as to aim at what is good and avoid what
is bad.
225. One is more fitted for the post of
reader, another does better for the singing,
a third is more solicitous for exorcising those
possessed with an evil spirit, another, again,
is held to be more suited to have the charge
of the sacred things. All these things a
priest should look at. He should give each
one that particular duty for which he is best
fitted. For whither each one's bent of mind
leads him, or whatever duty befits him, that
position or duty is filled with greater grace.
226. But as this is a ditScult matter in
every state of life, so in our case it is most
difficult. For each one is wont to follow
his parent's choice in life. ' Thus those
whose fathers were in the army generally
enter the army too. And others do the
same with regard to the different profes-
sions.
227. In the clerical office, however, noth-
ing is more rare than to find a man to follow
his father's footsteps,- either because the
difficulties of the work hold him back, or
continence in the uncertain days of youth
is too difficult to hold to, or the life seems
to be too quiet for the activity of youth.
So they turn to those pursuits which are
thought to be more showy. Most, indeed,
prefer the present to the future. They are
fighting for the present, we for the future.
Wherefore it follows that the greater the
cause in which we are engaged, the more
must our attention be devoted to it.
CHAPTER XLV.
On what is noble and virtuous, and what the difference
between them is, as stated both in the profane and
sacred writers.
228. Let us then hold fast modesty, and
that moderation which adds to the beauty
of the whole of life. For it is no light thing
in every matter to preserve due measure
]^ Cic. (/(? OJ". I. 31, § 114.
- It has been supposed that St. Ambrose in this passage by
"father" means " sinritual father," in whose hands the teaching
and guidance of the young was put. But there is no reason why the
word sliould not be taken in its ordinar>' sense. If so, liowever, the
father must liave been in one of the inferior orders only, or else
his children must have been born before he was admitted to the
priesthood. For elsewhere (I. 25S), as here, St. Ambrose clearly
shows that absolute continence is required of priests, after enter-
ing on their sacred office.
DUTIES OF THE CLERGY.— BOOK I.
37
and to brine: about order, wherein that is
plainly conspicuous which we call " de-
corum, ■' or what is seemly. This is so closely
connected with what is virtuous, that one
cannot separate the two." For what is
seemly is also virtuous — and what is virtuous
is seemly. So that the distinction lies rather
in the words than in the things them-
selves. That there is a difference between
them we can understand, but we cannot
explain it.
229. To make an attempt to get some
sort of a distinction between them, we may
say that what is virtuous may be compared
to the good health and soundness of the
body, whilst what is seemly is, as it were,
its comeliness and beauty. And as beauty
seems to stand above soundness and health,
and yet cannot exist without them, nor be
separated from them in any way — for un-
less one has good health, one cannot have
beauty and comeliness — so what is virtuous
contains in itself also what is seemly, so as
to seem to start with it, and to be unable to
exist without it. What is virtuous, then, is
like soundness in all our work and under-
taking ; what is seemly is, as it were, the
outward appearance, which, when joined
with what is virtuous, can only be known
apart in our thoughts. For though in some
cases it seems to stand out conspicuous, yet
it has its root in what is virtuous, though
the flower is its own. Rooted in this, it
flourishes ; otherwise it fails and droops.
For what is virtue, but to avoid anything
shameful as though it were death ? And
what is the opposite of virtue, except that
which brings barrenness and death ? If,
then, the essence of virtue is strong and
vigorous, seemliness will also quickly spring
forth like a flower, for its root is sound. But
if the root of its purpose is corrupt, nothing
will grow out of it.
230. In our writings this is put somewhat
more plainly. For David says : " The Lord
reigneth, He is clothed with splendour."^
And the Apostle says : "Walk honestly as in
the day. " ^ The Greek text has eua^rj/jj/vo)^
— and this really means : with good clothing,
with a good appearance. When God made
the first man. He created him with a good
figure, with limbs well set, and gave him a
very noble appearance. He had not given
him remission of sins. But afterwards He,
Who came in the form of a servant, and in
the likeness of man, renewed him with His
Spirit, and poured His grace into his heart.
1 Cic. de Off. I. 27.
•* Rom. xiii. 13.
- Ps. xciii. [xcii.]
and put on Himself the splendour ' of the
redemption of the human race. Therefore
the Prophet said : "The Lord reigneth. He
is clothed with splendour." * And again he
says : "A hymn beseems Thee, O God, in
Sion."3 That is : It is right and good to
fear Thee, to love Thee, to pray to Thee, to
honour Thee, for it is written : " Let all
things be done decently and in order. "•♦
But we can also fear, love, ask, honour
men ; yet the hymn especially is addressed
to God. This seemliness which we offer to
God we may believe to be far better than
other things. It befits also a woman to
pray in an orderly dress, ^ but it especially
beseems her to pray covered, and to pray
giving promise of purity together with a
good conversation.
CHAPTER XLVI.
A twofold division of what is seemly is given. Next it
is shown that what is according to nature is virtuous,
and what is otherwise must be looked on as shame-
ful. This division is explained by examples.
231. Seemliness, therefore, which stands
conspicuous has a twofold division.^ For
there is what we may call a general seemli-
ness, which is diffused through all that is
virtuous, and is seen, as one may say, in
the whole body. It is also individual, and
shows itself clearly in some particular part.
The first has a consistent form and the per-
fection of what is virtuous harmonizing* in
every action. For all its life is consistent
with itself, and there is no discrepancy in
anything. The other is concerned when
there is any special action done in a virtuous
course of life.
232. At the same time let us note that it
is seemly to live in accordance with nature,
and to pass our time in accordance with it,
and that whatever is contrary to nature is
shameful. For the Apostle asks: "Is it
comely that a woman pray unto God un-
covered ; doth not nature itself teach you
that if a man have long hair, it is a shame
unto him.? For it is contrary to nature."
And again he says: "If a woman have
long hair, it is a glory unto her." ^ It is
according to nature, since her hair is given
her for a veil, for it is a natural veil. Thus
nature arranges for us both character and
1 The words decorum and honestuvt being used in different
senses, it is not possible to give the points in a translation as in the
original.
^ Ps. xciii. [xcii.] i. * Ps. Ixv. [Ixiv.] i.
* I Cor. xiv. 40. ^ I Tim. ii. g, 10.
^ Cic. de Off. I. 27, § 96. ' I Cor. xi. 13, 14.
?8
ST. AMBROSE.
appearance, and we ought to observe her
directions. Would that we could guard her
innocence, and not change what we have
received by our wickedness !
233- ^^Q have that general seemliness ;
for God made the beauty of this world. We
have it also in its parts ; for when God made
the light, and marked off the day from the
night, when He made heaven, and separated
land and seas, when He set the sun and
moon and stars to shine on the earth. He
approved of them all one by one. There-
fore this comeliness, which shone forth in
each single part of the world, was resplen-
dent in the whole, as the Book of Wisdom
shows, saying : "I existed, in whom He re-
joiced when He was glad at the completion
of the world." • Likewise also in the build-
ing up of the human body each single mem-
ber is pleasing, but the right adjustment of
the members all together delights us far
more. For thus they seem to be united
and fitted in one harmonious whole.
CHAPTER XLVn.
What is seemly should always shine forth in our life.
What passions, then, ought we to allow to come to a
head, and which should we restrain ?
234. If any one preserves an even tenor in
the whole of life, and method in all that he
does, and sees there is order and consistency
in his words and moderation in his deeds,
then what is seemly stands forth conspicu-
ous in his life and shines forth as in some
mirror.
235. There should be besides a pleasant
way of speaking, so that we may win the
good-will of those who hear us, and make
ourselves agreeable to all our friends and
fellow-citizens, if possible. Let none show
himself to be given to flattery, nor to be
desirous of flattery from any one. The one
is a mark of artfulness, the other of vanity.
236. Let no one ever look down on what
another, least of all a good man, thinks of
him, for thus he learns to give regard to
the good. For to disregard the judgment of
good men is a sign of conceitedness or of
weakness. One of these arises from pride,
the other from carelessness.
237. We must also guard against the mo-
tions of our soul. The soul must always
watch and look after itself, so as to guard
itself against itself For there are motions
in which there is a kind of passion that
1 Prov. viii 30, 31 [LXX.].
breaks forth as it were in a sort of rush.
Wherefore in Greek it is called op,'j.rj, be-
cause it comes out suddenly with some force.
In these there lies no slight force of soul or
of nature. Its force, however, is twofold:
on the one side it rests on passion, on the
other on reason, which checks passion, and
makes it obedient to itself, and leads it
whither it will, and trains it by careful
teaching to know what ought to be done,
and what ought to be avoided, so as to
make it submit to its kind tamer.
238. For we ought to be careful never to
do anything rashly or carelessly, or any-
thing at all for which we cannot give a
reasonable ground. For though a reason
for our action is not given to every one, yet
everybody looks into it. Nor, indeed, have
we anything whereby we can excuse our-
selves. For though there is a sort of natural
force in every passion of ours, yet that same
passion is subject to reason by the law of
nature itself, and is obedient to it. ' Where-
fore it is the duty of a careful watchman so
to keep a lookout, that passion may not
outrun reason nor utterly forsake it, lest by
outstripping it confusion be caused, and
reason be shutout, and come to nothing by
such desertion. Disquiet destroys consis-
tency. Withdrawal shows cowardice and
implies indolence. For when the mind is
disquieted passion spreads wide and far, and
in a fierce outburst endures not the reins of
reason and feels not the management of its
driver so as to be turned back. Wherefore
as a rule not only is the soul perturbed and
reason lost, but one's countenance gets in-
flamed by anger or by lust, it grows pale
with fear, it contains not itself in pleasure,
and cannot bear joy.
239. When this happens, then that natural
judgment and weight of character is cast
aside, and that consistency which alone in
deed and thought can keep up its own author-
ity and what is seemly, can no longer be
retained.
240. But fiercer passion springs from ex-
cessive anger, 2 which the pain of some
wrong received kindles within us. The
monitions of the psalm which forms the
opening of our subject instruct us on this
point. Beautifully, then, has it come about
that, in writing on duties, we used that
declaration of our opening passage which
also itself has to do with' the direction of
duty.
241. But since (as was but right) we there
only touched upon the matter, as to how
? Cic. de Off. I. 29, § 102.
Cic. de Off. I. 38, § 137,
DUTIES OF THE CLERGY.— BOOK I.
39
each one ought to take care not to be dis-
turbed when wrong is done him, for fear
that our preliminary remarks should run to
too great length, I think that I will now
discuss it a little more fully. For the oc-
casion is opportune, as we are speaking on
the different parts of temperance, to see how
anger may be checked.
CHAPTER XLVIII.
The argument for restraining anger is given again.
Then the three classes of those who receive wrongs
are set forth ; to the most perfect of which the
Apostle and David are said to have attained. He
takes the opportunity to state the difference between
this and the future life.
242. We wish if we can to point out three
classes of men who receive wrongs in holy
Scripture. One of these forms the class of
those whom the sinner reviles, abuses, rides
over rough-shod. ' And just because justice
fails them, shame grows, pain increases.
Very many of my own order, of my own
nuniber, are like these. For if any one does
me, who am weak, an injury, perhaps,
though I am weak, I may forgive the wrong
done me. If he charges me with an offence,
I am not such an one as to be content with
the witness of my own conscience, although
I know I am clear of what he brings against
me ; but I desire, just because I am weak,
to wash out the mark of my inborn shame.
Therefore I demand eye for eye, and tooth
for tooth, and repay abuse with abuse.
243. If, however, I am one who is ad-
vancing, although not yet perfect, I do not
return the reproaches ; and if he breaks out
into abuse, and fills my ears with reproaches,
I am silent and do not answer.
244. But if I am perfect (I say this only
by way of example, for in truth I am weak),
if, then, I arn perfect, I bless him that curses
me, as Paul also blessed, for he says :
"Being reviled we bless." ^ He had heard
Him Who says : ' ' Love your enemies, pray
for them which despitefully use you and
persecute you. "^ And so Paul suffered
persecution and endured it, for he conquered
and calmed his human feelings for the sake
of the reward set before him, namely, that
he should become a son of God if he loved
his enemies.
245. We can show, too, that holy David
was like to Paul in this same class of virtue.
When the son of Shimei cursed him, and
charged him with heavy offences, at the first
1 " ineguitat."
- I Cor. iv. 12.
Ed. Med. has " inquietat."
3 S. Matt. V. 44.
he was silent and humbled himself, and was
silent even about his good deeds, that is,
his knowledge of good works. Then he
even asked to be cursed ; for when he was
cursed he hoped to gain divine pity.'
246. But see how he stored up humility
and justice and prudence so as to merit
grace from the Lord ! At first he said :
" Therefore he cursed me, because the Lord
hath said unto him that he should curse. " ==
Here we have humility ; for he thought that
those things which are divinely ordered
were to be endured with an even mind, as
thougfh he were but some servant lad. Then
he said: "Behold my son, which came
forth of my bowels, seeketh my life. " ^ Here
we have justice. For if we suffer hard
things at the hand of our own family, why
are we angry at what is done to us by
strangers } Lastly he says : ' ' Let him alone
that he may curse, for the Lord hath bidden
him. It may be that the Lord will look on
my humiliation and requite me good for
this cursing."-* So he bore not only the
abuse, but left the man unpunished when
throwing stones and following him. Nay,
more ! After his victory he freely granted
him pardon when he asked for it.
247. I have written this to show that holy
David, in true evangelical spirit, was not
only not offended, but was even thankful to
his abuser, and was delighted rather than
angered by his wrongs, for which he thought
some return would be granted to him. But,
though perfect, he sought something still
more perfect. As a man he grew hot at the
pain of his wrongs, but like a good soldier
he conquered, he endured like a brave
wrestler. The end and aim of his patience
was the expectation of the fulfilment of the
promises, and therefore he said: "Lord,
make me to know mine end and the measure
of my days, what it is : that I may know
what is wanting to me. "5 He seeks, then,
that end of the heavenly promises, when
each one shall arise in his own order :
"Christ the firstfruits, then they that are
Christ's who have believed in His coming.
Then cometh the end."^ For when the
kingdom is delivered up to God, even the
Father, and all the powers are put down, as
the Apostle says, then perfection begins.
Here, then, is the hindrance, here the weak-
ness of the perfect ; there full perfection.
Thus it is he asks for those days of eternal life
which are, and not for those which pass away,
so that he may know what is wanting to
'^ 2 Sam. [2 Kings] xvi. 12.
^ 2 Sam. [2 Kings] xvi. 11.
^ Ps. xxxix. [xxxviii.J 4.
- 2 Sam. \2 Kings] xvi. 10.
^ 2 Sam. [2 Kings] xvi. 11, 12.
* I Cor. XV. 23.
40
ST. AMBROSE.
him, what is the land of promise that bears
everlasting fruits, which is the tirst mansion
in his Father's house, which the second,
wliich the third, wherein each one will rest
according- to his merits.
248. We then must strive for that wherein
is perfection and wherein is truth. Here is
the shadow, here the image ; ■ there the
truth. The shadow is in the law, the image
in the Gospel, the truth in heaven. In old
times a lamb, a calf was offered ; now Christ
is offered. But He is offered as man and as
enduring suffering. And He offers Himself
as a priest to take away our sins, here in
an image, there in truth, ^ where with the
Father He intercedes for us as our Advocate.
Here, then, we walk in an image, we see in
an image ; there face to face where is full
perfection. For all perfection rests in the
truth.
CHAPTER XLIX.
We must preserve the likeness of the virtues in our-
selves. The likeness of the devil and of vice must
be got rid of, and especially that of avarice ; for
this deprives us of liberty, and despoils those who are
in the midst of vanities of the image of God.
249. Whilst, then, we are here let us pre-
serve the likeness, that there we may attain
to the truth. Let the likeness of justice
exist in us, likewise that of wisdom, for we
shall come to that day and shall be rewarded
according to our likeness.
250. Let not the adversary find his image
in thee, let him not find fury nor rage ; for
in these exists the likeness of wickedness.
"Our adversary the devil as a roaring lion
seeketh whom he may kill, whom he may
devour." 3 Let him not find desire for gold,
nor heaps of money, nor the appearance of
vices, lest he take from thee the voice of lib-
erty. For the voice of true liberty is heard,
when thou canst say : " The prince of this
world shall come, and shall find no part in
me. "4 Therefore, if thou art sure that he
will find nothing in thee, when he comes to
search through thee, thou wilt say, as the
patriarch Jacob did to Laban : " Know now
if there is aught of thine with me. '"s
Rightly do we account Jacob blessed with
whom Laban could find naught of his. For
Rachel had hidden the gold and silver
images of his gods.
251. If, then, wisdom, and faith, and con-
tempt of the world, and spiritual grace, ex-
clude all faithlessness, thou wilt be blessed ;
for thou regardest not vanity and folly and
lying. Is it a light thing to take away from
thy adversary the opportunity to speak, so
that he can have no ground to make his
complaint against thee .'' Thus he who looks
not on vaiiity is not perturbed ; but he who
looks upon it is perturbed, and that, too,
all to no purpose. Is it not a vain thing to
heap up riches ? for surely to seek for fleet-
ing things is vain enough. And when thou
hast gathered them, how dost thou know
that thou shalt have them in possession ?
252. Is it not vain for a merchant to jour-
ney by night and by day, that he may be
able to heap up treasures .-* Is it not vain
for him to gather merchandise, and to be
much perturbed about its price, for fear he
might sell it for less than he gave ? that he
should strive everywhere for high prices, and
thus unexpectedly call up robbers against
himself through their envy at his much-
vaunted business ;or that, without waiting for
calmer winds, impatient of delays, he should
meet with shipwreck whilst seeking for gain .'
253. And is not he, too, perturbed in vain
who with great toil amasses wealth.
though
1 Heb. X. I.
* Cf. St. Amb. Enarr. in Ps. xxxix. [xxxviii.].
^ I Pet. V. 8. * S. John xiv. 30.
^ Gen. xxxi. 32.
he knows not what heir to leave it to .''
Often and often all that an avaricious man
has got together with the greatest care, his
spendthrift heir scatters abroad with head-
long prodigality. The shameless prodigal,
blind to the present, heedless of the future,
swallows up as in an abyss what took so
long to gather. Often, too, the desired suc-
cessor gains but enA'^y for his share of the
inheritance, and by his sudden death hands
over the whole amount of the succession,
which he has hardly entered upon, to
strangers.
254. Why, then, dost thoii idly spin a web
which is worthless and fruitless.'' And why
dost thou build up useless heaps of treasures
like spiders' webs .-* For though they over-
flow, they are no good ; nay, they denude
thee of the likeness of God, and put on thee
the likeness of the earthy. If any one has
the likeness of the tyrant, is he not liable to
condemnation .'' Thou layest aside the like-
ness of the Eternal King, and raisest in thy-
self the image of death. Rather cast out of
the kingdom of thy soul the likeness of the
devil, and raise up the likeness of Christ.
Let this shine forth in thee ; let this glow
brightly in thy kingdom, that is, thy soul,
for it destroys the likeness of all vices.
David says of this : " O Lord, in Thy king-
dom thou bringest their images to nothing." '
» Ps. Ixxii. 20 [LXX.].
DUTIES OF THE CLERGY.— BOOK I.
41
For when the Lord has adorned Jerusalem
according to His own Hkeness, then every
likeness of the adversary is destroyed.
CHAPTER L
The Levites ought to be utterly free from all earthly
desires. What their virtues should be on the
Apostle's own showing, and how great their purity
must be. Also what their dignity and duty is, for
the carrying out of which the chief virtues are neces-
sary. He states that these were not unknown to the
philosophers, but that they erred in their order.
Some are by their nature in accordance with duty,
which yet on account of what accompanies them be-
come contrary to duty. From whence he gathers
what gifts the office of the Levites demands. To
conclude, he adds an exposition of Moses' words
when blessing the tribe of Levi.
255. If, then, in the Gospel of the Lord the
people themselves were taught and led to
despise riches,^ how much more ought ye
Levites no longer to be bound down by
earthly desires. For your portion is God.
For when their earthly possessions were
portioned out by Moses to the people of our
fathers, the Lord suffered not the Levites to
have a share in that earthly possession,^ for
He Himself would be the strensfth of their
inheritance. Wherefore David says : "The
Lord is the portion of mine inheritance and
of my cup. "3 Whence we get the name
" Levite," which means : " Himself is mine,"
or "Himself forme.'' Great, then, is his
honour, that God should say of him : Him-
self is Mine. Or, as was said to Peter about
the piece of money found in the fish's mouth :
"Give to them for Me and for thee."-*
Wherefore the Apostle, when he said: "A
bishop should be sober, modest, of good be-
haviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach,
not covetous, nor a brawler, one that rules
well his own house," also added: "Like-
wise must the deacons be grave, not double-
tongued, not given to much wine, not
greedy of filthy lucre, holding the mystery
of the faith in a pure conscience. And let
them also first be proved, and so let them
serve, being found blameless, "s
256. We note how much is required of
us. The minister of the Lord should
abstain from wine, so that he may be up-
held by the good witness not only of the
faithful but also by those who are without.
For it is right that the witness to our acts
and works should be the opinion of the pub-
lic at large, that the office be not disgraced.
Thus he who sees the minister of the altar
' S. Mark x. 23.
* S. Matt. xyii. 27
- Num. xviii. 23.
'' I Tim. iii. 2-10.
^ Ps. xvi. 5.
adorned with suitable virtues may praise
their Author, and reverence the Lord Who
has such servants. The praise of the Lord
sounds forth where there is a pure posses-
sion and an innocent rule at home.
257. But what shall I say about chastity,
when only one and no second union is
allowed ? As regards marriage, the law is,
not to marry again, nor to seek union with
another wife. It seems strange to many
why impediment should be caused by a sec-
ond marriage entered on before baptism, so
as to prevent election, to the clerical office,
and to the reception of the gift of ordina-
tion ; seeing that even crimes are not wont
to stand in the w^ay, if they have been put
away in the sacrament of baptism.' But
we must learn, that in baptism sin can be
forgiven, but law cannot be abolished.
In the case of marriage there is no sin, but
there is a law. Whatever sin there is can
be put away, whatever law there is cannot
be laid aside in marriage. How could he
exhort to widowhood who himself had
married more than once ?
258. But ye know that the ministerial
office must be kept pure and unspotted, and
must not be defiled by conjugal intercourse ;
ye know this, I say, who have received the
gifts of the sacred ministry, with pure bodies,
and unspoilt modesty, and without ever
having enjoyed conjugal intercourse. I am
mentioning this, because in some out-of-the-
way places, when they enter on the minis-
try, or even when they become priests, they
have begotten children. They defend this
on the ground of old custom, when, as it
happened, the sacrifice was offered up at
long intervals. However, even the people
had to be purified two or three days before-
hand, so as to come clean to the sacrifice,
as w^e read in the Old Testament.^ They
even used to wash their clothes. If such
regard was paid in what was only the figure,
how much ought it to be shown in the
reality ! Learn then, Priest and Levite, what
it means to wash thy clothes. Thou must
have a pure body wherewith to offer up the
sacraments. If the people were forbidden
to approach their victim unless they washed
their clothes, dost thou, while foul in heart
and body, dare to make supplication for
others ? Dost thou dare to make an offering
for them ?
' The question kept coming up from time to time : Did Baptism
annul all previous impedimenta ordiiiatioiiis ? Even in the fifth
century, as Pope Innocent I. (Ep. XXIX.) shows, some maintained
that as Baptism puts away all sins committed previous to its recep-
tion, so also it removes all impediments to ordination. This same
idea St. Ambrose combats here.
- Ex. xix. 10.
42
ST. AMBROSE.
259. The duty of the Levites is no light
one, for the Lord says of them : " Behold I
have taken the Levites from among the chil-
dren of Israel, instead of every first-born
that openeth the matrix among the children
of Israel. These shall be their redemption,
and the Levites shall be IMine. For 1 hal-
lowed unto Me all the first-born in the land
of Egypt.'' ' We know that the Levites are
not reckoned among the rest, but are pre-
ferred before all, for they are chosen out of
all, and are sanctified like the firstfruits and
the firstlings which belong to the Lord,
since the payment of vows and redemption
for sin are offered by them. " Thou shalt
not receive them," He says, " among the
children of Israel, but thou shalt appoint the
Levites over the tabernacle of testimony,
and over all the vessels thereof, and over all
things that belong to it. They shall bear
the tabernacle and all the vessels thereof,
and they shall minister in it, and shall en-
camp round about the tabernacle. And
when the tabernacle setteth forward the
Levites shall take it down, and when the
camp is pitched they shall set up the taber-
nacle again. And the stranger that cometh
nigh shall surely be put to death. "^
260. Thou, then, art chosen out of the
whole number of the children of Israel, re-
garded as the firstfruits of the sacred offer-
ings, set over the tabernacle so as to keep
guard in the camp of holiness and faith, to
.JVi'hich if a stranger approach, he shall sure-
ly die. Thou art placed there to watch over
, the ark of the covenant. All do not see the
depths of the mysteries, for they are hid
from the Levites, lest they should see who
ought not to see, and they who cannot
serve should take it up. Moses, indeed,
saw the circumcision of the Spirit, but
veiled it, so as to give circumcision only in
an outward sign. He saw the unleavened
bread of sincerity and truth ; he saw the
sufferings of the Lord, but he veiled the
unleavened bread of truth in the material
unleavened bread, he veiled the sufferings
of the Lord in the sacrifice of a lamb or a
calf. Good Levites have ever preserved the
mystery entrusted to them under the protec-
tion of their own faith, and yet dost thou
think little of what is entrusted to thee.'
First, thou shalt see the deep things of God,
which needs wisdom. Next, thou must
keep watch for the people ; this requires
justice. Thou must defend the camp and
guard the tabernacle, which needs fortitude.
* Num. iii. 12, 13.
^ Num. i. 49-51.
Thou must show thyself continent and sober,
and this needs temperance.,
261. These chief virtues, they who are
without have recognized,' but they con-
sidered that the order resting -on society
wsa higher than that resting on wisdom ;
though wisdom is the foundation, and justice
the building which cannot stand unless
it have a foundation. The foundation is
Christ.^
262. First stands faith, which is a sign of
wisdom, as Solomon says, in following his
father : " The fear of the Lord is the begin-
ning of wisdom."^ And the law says :
" Thou shalt love the Lord thy God, thou
shalt love thy neighbour. "4 It is a noble
thing to do one's kindnesses and duties
towards the whole of the human race. But
it is ever most seemly that thou shouldst
give to God the most precious thing thou
hast, that is, thy mind, 5 for thou hast noth-
ing better than that. When thou hast paid
thy debt to thy Creator, then thou mayest
labour for men, to show them kindness, and
to give help ; then thou mayest assist the
needy with money, or by some duty, or
some service that lies in the way of thy
ministry ; by money to support him ; by
paying a debt, so as to free him that is
bound ; by undertaking a duty, so as to
take charge of a trust, which he fears to
lose, who has put it by in trust.
263. It is a duty, then, to take care of and
to restore what has been entrusted to us.
But meanwhile a change comes, either in
time or circumstances,^ so that it is no longer
a duty to restore what one has received. As,
for instance, when a man demands back his
money as an open enemy, to use it against
his country, and to offer his wealth to bar-
barians. Or, if thou shouldst have to re-
store it, whilst another stood by to extort it
from him by force. If thou restore money
to a raving lunatic when he cannot keep it ;
if thou give up to a madman a sword
once put by with thee, whereby he may kill
himself, is it not an act contrary to duty to
pay the debt .'' Is it not contrary to duty to
take knowingly what has been got by a
thief, so that he who has lost it is cheated
out of it ?
264. It is also sometimes contrary to
duty to fulfil a promise,? or to keep an
oath. As was the case with Herod, who
swore that whatever was asked he would
give to the daughter of Herodias, and so
» Cic. de Off. I. 4^.
' Prov. ix. 10, and Ps. cxi. [ex.] lo.
«Cic. de Off. I. 45.
' Cic. de Off. I. 10, § 32.
- I Cor. iii. ii.
■• Deut. vi. 5.
• Cic. de Off. I. 10.
DUTIES OF THE CLERGY.— BOOK II.
43
allowed the death of John, that he might not
break his word. ' And what shall I say of
Jephthah,- wlio offered up his daughter in
sacritace, she having been the first to meet
him as he returned home victorious ; where-
by he fulfilled the vow which he had made
that he would offer to God whatever should
meet him first. It would have been better
to make no promise at all, than to fulfil it
in the death of his daughter.
265. Ye are not ignorant how
is to look to this. And so a
It
chosen to guard the sanctuary.
miportant
Levite is
one who
shall never fail in counsel, nor forsake the
faith, nor fear death, nor do anything ex-
travagant, so that in his whole appearance
he may give proof of his earnestness. For
he ought to have not only his soul but
even his eyes in restraint, so that no chance
mishap may bring a blush to his forehead.
For " whosoever looketh on a woman to
desire her hath already committed adultery
with her in his heart. "^ Thus adultery is
committed not only by actual committal of
the foul deed, but even by the desire of the
ardent gaze.
266. This seems high and somewhat
severe, but in a high office it is not out
of place. For the grace of the Levites
is such that Moses spoke of them as
follows in his blessing: "Give to Levi
his men, give Levi his trusted ones, give
Levi the lot of his inheritance, and his
truth to the holy men whom they tempted
in temptation, and reviled at the waters of
contradiction. Who said to his father and
mother, I know thee not, and knew not his
brethren, and renounced his children. He
guarded Thy word and kept Thy testimony."'
267. They, then, are His men. His trusty
ones, who have no deceit in their hearts,
hide no treachery within them, but guard
His words and ponder them in their heart,
as Mary pondered them;^ who know not
their parents so as to put them before their
duty ; who hate the violators of chastity,
and avenge the injury done to purity ; and
know 'the times for the fulfilling of their
duty, as also which duty is the greater,
which the lesser, and to what occasion each
is suited. In all this they follow that alone
which is virtuous. And who, where there
are two virtuous duties, think that which is
the more virtuous must come first. These
are in truth rightly blessed.
268. If any one makes known the just
works of the Lord, and offers Him incense,
then : "Bless, O Lord, his strength ; ac-
cept the work of his hands." 3 that he may
find the grace of the prophetic blessing with
Him Who liveth and reigneth for ever and
ever. Amen.
BOOK II.
CHAPTER L
Happiness in life is to be gained by living virtuously,
inasmuch as thus a Christian, whilst despising glory
and the favour of men, desires to please God alone
in what he does.
u.
In the first book we spoke of the duties 4
which we thought befitted a virtuous life,
whereon no one has ever doubted but that
a blessed life, which the Scripture calls
eternal life, depends. So great is the splen-
dour of a virtuous life that a peaceful con-
science and a calm innocence work out a
happy life. And as the risen sun hides the
globe of the moon and the light of the stars,
so the brightness of a virtuous life, where it
glitters in true pure glory, casts into the
shade all other things, which, according to
the desires of the body, are considered to be
» S. Matt. xiv. 6 £E.
3 S. Matt. V. 28.
^ Jud. xi. 30 ff.
* Cic. de Off. II. I.
good, or are reckoned in the eyes of the
world to be great and noble.
2. Blessed, plainly, is that life which is not
valued at the estimation of outsiders, but is
known, as judge of itself, by its own inner
feelings. It needs no popular opinion as
its reward in any way ; nor has it any fear
of punishments. Thus the less it strives
for glory, the more it rises above it. For to
those who seek for glory, that reward in the
shape of present things is but a shadow of
future ones, and is a hindrance to eternal
life, as it is written in the Scriptures :
"Verily, I say unto you, they have received
their reward." 4 This is said of those who,
as it were, with the sound of a trumpet
desire to make known to all the world the
liberality they exercise towards the poor.
It is the same, too, in the case of fasting,
1 Deut. xxxiii. 8, 9.
^ Deut. xxxiii. 11.
^ S. Luke ii. tp.
* S. Matt. vi. 2.
44
ST. AMBROSE.
which is done but for outward show.
" They have," he says, "their reward.''
3. It therefore belongs to a virtuous life to
show mercy and to fast in secret ; that thou
mayest seem to be seeking a reward from
thy God alone, and not from men. For he
who seeks it from man has his reward, but
he who seeks it from God has eternal life,
which none can "-ive but the Lord of
Eternity, as it is said : "Verily, I say unto
thee, to-day shalt thou be with Me in Para-
dise."' Wherefore the Scripture plainly has
called that life which is blessed, eternal life.
It has not been left to be appraised accord-
ing to man's ideas on the subject, but has
been entrusted to the divine judgment.
CHAPTER II.
The different ideas of philosophers on the subject of
happiness. He proves, first, from the Gospel that it
rests on the knowledge of (iod and the pursuit of
good works ; ne.xt, that it may not be thought that
this idea was adopted from the philosophers, he adds
proofs from the witness of the prophets.
4. The philosophers have made a happy
life to depend, either (as Hieronymus^) on
freedom frorn pain, or (as Herillus^) on
knowledge. For Herillus, hearing know-
ledge very highly praised by Aristotle* and
Theophrastus,5 made it alone to be the chief
good, when they really praised it as a good
thing, not as the only good ; others, as Epi-
curus,*^ have called pleasure such ; others, as
Callipho,7 and after him Diodorus,^ under-
stood it in such a way as to make a
virtuous life eo in union, the one with
pleasure, the other with freedom from pain,
since a happy life could not exist without it.
Zeno,9 the Stoic, thought the highest and
only good existed in a virtuous life. But
Aristotle and Theophrastus and the other
Peripatetics maintained that a happy life
' S. Luke xxiii. 4-5.
2 Hieronymus, often mentioned by Cicero. Cf. Cic. li^Finib. II.
3. — He lived about B.C. 300, at Rhodes. He lield thai ilie liighest
good consisted in freedom from pain and trouble.
3 Herillus. Cf. Cic. rt> /Vw//'. V. 25. < )f Cartilage ; a .Stoic. The
chief good, according to him, consisted in knowledge.
* Aristotle, the famous philosopher and writer. Bom n.c. 3S4.
Taught chiefly at Athens, where Theophrastus was his pupil.
" Theophrastus of Eresus in Lesbos, also a voluminous writer. He
is mentioned by Cicero thus : " Scepe ab Aristotele, a 'rheoplirnsto
mirabiliter caudatiir scietiiia, hoc lino captus Herillus scioitiam
summum boniini esse defend it. '''' (de Fin. V, 25.)
" Epicurus. Cf. Cic. Tuscul. V. 30. Rom n.c. 342 in Samos. The
founder of the Epicurean School of Philosophy. With him jilea-
sure constituted the highest happiness, but probably not sensual
pleasures. Cf. note on L 50.
' Callipho. Cic. Acad. II. 42. A disciple of Epicurus. The
chief good of man he said consisted in the union of a virtuous life
with bodily pleasure, or, as Cicero puts it, in the union of the man
with the beast. (Cic. dc Off. III. 33.)
* Diodorus living about B.C. 1 10, at Tyre. His view was as stated
above by St. .•\mbrose, whereby an attempt was made to reconcile
the Stoics and Epicureans.
* Zeno of Citium, the founder of the Stoic School.
consisted in virtue, that is, in a virtuous life,
but that its happiness was made complete by
the advantages of the body and other external
good things.
5. But the sacred Scriptures say that eter-
nal life rests on a knowledge of divine
things and on the fruit of good works. The
Gospel bears witness to both these state-
ments. For the Lord Jesus spoke thus of
knowledge : "This is eternal life, to know
Thee, the only true God, and Jesus Christ
Whom Thou hast sent." ' About works He
gives this answer: " Every one that hath
forsaken house, or brethren, or sisters, or
father, or mother, or wife, or children, or
lands, for My Name's sake, shall receive an
hundred-fold, and shall inherit everlasting
life."^
6. Let no one think that this was but
lately said, and that it was spoken of by the
philosophers before it was mentioned in the
Gospel. For the philosophers, that is to say,
Aristotle and Theophrastus, as also Zeno
and Hieronymus, certainly lived before the
time of the Gospel ; but they came after the
prophets. Let them rather think how long
before even the names of the philosophers
were heard of, both of these seem to have
found open expression through the mouth
of the holy David ; for it is written :
" Blessed is the man whom Thou instructest,
O Lord, and teachest him out of Thy law."^
We find elsewhere also: "Blessed is the
man that feareth the Lord, he will rejoice
greatly in His commandments. "4 We have
proved our point as regards knowledge, the
reward for which the prophet states to be
the fruit of eternity, adding that in the house
of the man that feareth the Lord, or is in-
structed in His law and rejoices greatly in
the divine commandments, "is glory and
riches ; and his justice abideth for ever and
ever." 5 He has further also in the same
psalm stated of good works, that they gain
for an upright man the gift of eternal life.
He speaks thus : " Blessed is the man that
showeth pity and lendeth, he will guide his
affairs with discretion, surely he shall not be
moved for ever, the righteous shall be in
everlasting remembrance."^ And further:
" He hath dispersed, he hath given to the
poor, his justice endureth for ever. "7
7. Faith, then, has [the promise of] eternal
life, for it is a good foundation. Good
works, too, have the same, for an upright
man is tested by his words and acts. For
' S. John xvii. 3.
^ Ps. xciv. [xciii.] 12.
" Ps. cxii. [cxi.] 3.
' Ps. cxii. [cxi.] 9.
2 S. Matt. xix. 29.
^ Ps. cxii. [cxi.] I.
' Ps. cxii. [cxi.] 5, 6.
DUTIES OF THE CLERGY.— BOOK II.
45
if a man is always busy talking- and yet is
slow to act, he shows by his acts how
worthless his knowledge is : besides it is
much worse to know what one ought to do,
and yet not to do what one has learnt should
be done. On the other hand, to be active
in eood works and unfaithful at heart is as
idle as though one wanted to raise a beauti-
ful and lofty dome upon a bad foundation.
The higher one builds, the greater is the fall ;
for without the protection of faith good
works cannot stand. A treacherous anchor-
age in a harbour perforates a ship, and a
sandy bottom quickly gives way and cannot
bear the weight of the building placed upon
it. There then will be found the fulness of
reward, where the virtues are perfect, and
where there is a reasonable agreement be-
tween words and acts.
CHAPTER III.
The definition of blessedness as drawn from the Scrip-
tures is considered and proved. It cannot be en-
hanced by external good fortune, nor can it be
weakened by misfortune.
8. As, then, knowledge, so far as it stands
alone, is put aside either as worthless, ac-
cording to the superfluous discussions of the
philosophers, ' or as but an imperfect idea,
let us now note how clearly the divine
Scriptures explain a thing about which we
see the philosophers held so many involved
and perplexing ideas. For the Scriptures
state that nothing is good but what is vir-
tuous, and declare that virtue is blessed in
every circumstance, and that it is never en-
hanced by either corporal or other external
good fortune, nor is it weakened by adversity.
No state is so blessed as that wherein one is
free from sin, is filled with innocence, and
is fully supplied with the grace of God. For
it is written: "Blessed is the man that
hath not walked in the counsel of the ungod-
ly, and hath not stood in the way of sinners,
and hath not sat in the seat of pestilence,
but in the law of the Lord was his delight." ^
And again: "Blessed are the undefiled in
the way, who walk in the law of the Lord. " ^
9. Innocence, then, and knowledge make
a man blessed. We have also noted already
that the blessedness of eternal life is the
reward for good works. It remains, then, to
show that when the patronage of pleasure
or the fear of pain is despised (and the first
of these one abhors as poor and effeminate,
and the other as unmanly and weak), that
^ See St. Augustine, De Civit. Dei. XIX. i.
' Ps. i. I, 2. 2 Ps. cxix. I.
then a blessed life can rise up in the midst
of pain. This can easily be shown when
we read : " Blessed are ye when men shall
revile you and persecute you and shall say all
manner of evil against you for righteousness'
sake. Rejoice and be exceeding glad, for
great is your reward in heaven ; for so per-
secuted they the prophets which were before
you."' And again: "He that will come
after Me, let him take up his cross and
follow Me."^
CHAPTER IV.
The same argument, namely, that blessedness is not
lessened or added to by e.xternal matters, is illustrated
by the example of men of old.
^-v^. There is, then, a blessedness even in
pains and griefs. All which virtue with its
sweetness checks and restrains, abounding
as it does in natural resources for either
soothing conscience or increasing grace.
For Moses was blessed in no small deeree
when, surrounded by the Egyptians and shut
in by the sea, he found by his merits a way
for himself and the people to go through the
waters.^ When was he ever braver than at
the moment when, surrounded by the great-
est dangers, he gave not up the hope of
safety, but besought a triumph }
-'II. What of Aaron.? When did he ever
think himself more blessed than when he
stood between the living and the dead, and
by his presence stayed death from passing
from the bodies of the dead to the lines of
the living .' 4 What shall I say of the youth
Daniel, who was so wise that, when in the
midst of the lions enraged with hunger, he
was by no means overcome with terror at
the fierceness of the beasts. So free from
fear was he, that he could eat, and w^as not
afraid he might by his example excite the
animals to feed on him. 5
12. There is, then, in pain a virtue that
can display the sweetness of a good con-
science, and therefore it serves as a proof
that pain does not lessen the pleasure of
virtue. As, then, there is no loss of blessed-
ness to virtue through pain, so also the
pleasures of the body and the enjoyment
that benefits give add nothing to it. On
this the Apostle says well: "What things
to me were gain, those I counted loss for
Christ," and he added : "Wherefore I count
all things but loss, and do count them but
dung, that I may win Christ."^
' S. Matt. V. II, 12.
* Num. xvi. 48.
- S. Matt. xvi. 24.
'' Bel V. 39.
^ Ex. xiv.
6 PhU. iu. 7, :
46
ST. AMBROSE.
13. ]\Ioses, too, thought the treasures of
Egypt to be his loss, and thus showed forth
in his life the reproach of the Cross of the
Lord. He was not rich when he had abun-
dance of money, nor was he afterwards poor
when he was in want of food, unless, per-
chance, there is any one who thinks he was'
less happy when daily food was wanting to
him and his people in the wilderness. But
yet manna, that is, angels' food, which surely
none will dare deny to be a mark of the
greatest good and of blessedness, was given
him from heaven ; also the daily shower of
meat was sufficient to feed the whole multi-
tude. '
14. Bread for food also failed Elijah, that
holy man, had he sought for it ; but it
seemed not to fail him because he sought it
not. Thus by the daily service of the ravens
bread was brought to him in the morning,
meat in the evening. ^ Was he any the less
blessed because he was poor to himself ?
Certainly not. Nay, he was the more
blessed, for he was rich toward God. It is
better to be rich for others than for oneself.
He was. so, for in the time of famine he
asked a widow for food, intending to repay
it, so that the barrel of meal failed not for
three years and six months, and the oil jar
sufficed and served the needy widow for her
daily use all that time also. ^ Rightly did
Peter wish to be there where he saw them.
Rightly did they appear in the mount with
Christ in glory, 4 for He Himself became
poor when He was rich.
15. Riches, then, give no assistance to
living a blessed life, a fact that the Lord
clearly shows in the Gospel, saying :
"Blessed are ye poor, for yours is the king-
dom of God. Blessed are they that hunger
and thirst now, for they shall be filled.
Blessed are ye that weep now, for ye shall
laugh. "5 Thus it is stated as plainly as
possible that poverty, hunger, and pain,
which are considered to be evils, not only
are not hindrances to a blessed life, but are
actually so many helps toward it.
CHAPTER V.
Those things which are generally looked on as good
are mostly hindrances to a blessed life, and those
which are looked on as evil are the materials out of
which virtues grow. What belongs to blessedness is
shown by other examples.
16. But those things which seem to be
good, as riches, abundance, joy without
' Ex. xvi. 13.
* S. Matt. xvU. 3.
[3] Kings xvii. 6.
•'' I [3! Kings xvii. 14.
" S. Luke vi. 20, 21.
pain, are a hindrance to the fruits of blessed-
ness, as is clearly stated in the Lord's own
words, when He said : "Woe to you rich,
for ye have received your consolation !
Woe unto you that are full, for ye shall
hunger, and to those who laugh, for they
shall mourn ! " ' So, then, corporal or exter-
nal good things are not only no assistance
to attaining a blessed life, but are even a
hindrance to it.
17. Wherefore Naboth was blessed, even
though he was stoned by the rich ; weak and
poor, as opposed to the royal resources, he
was rich in his aim and his religion ; so rich,
indeed, that he would not exchange the in-
heritance of the vineyard received from his
father for the king's money ; and on this ac-
count was he perfect, for he defended the
rights of his forefathers with his own blood.
Thus, also, Ahab was wretched on his own
showing, for he caused the poor man to be
put to death, so as to take possession of his
vineyard himself^
18. It is quite certain that virtue is the
only and the highest good ; that it alone
richly abounds in the fruit of a blessed life ;
that a blessed life, by means of which eternal
life is won, does not depend on external or
corporal benefits, but on virtue only. A
blessed life is the fruit of the present, and
eternal life is the hope of the future.
19. Some, however, there are who think
a blessed life is impossible in this body,
weak and fragile as it is. For in it one
must suffer pain and grief, one must weep,
one must be ill. So I could also say that a
blessed life rests on bodily rejoicing, but not
on the heights of wisdom, on the sweetness
of conscience, or on the loftiness of virtue.
It is not a blessed thing to be in the midst
of suffering ; but it is blessed to be victori-
ous over it, and not to be cowed by the
power of temporal pain.
20. Suppose that things come which are
accounted terrible as regards the grief they
cause, such as blindness, exile, hunger, vio-
lation of a daughter, loss of children. \\'ho
will deny that Isaac was blevSsed, who did
not see in his old age. and yet gave bless-
ings with his benediction .'' ^ Was not Jacob
blessed who, leaving his father's house, en-
dured exile as a shepherd for pay,4 and
mourned for the violated chastity of his
daughter,? and suffered himger.?^ Were
they not blessed on whose good faith God
received witness, as it is written: "The
God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the
' S. Luke vi. 24, 25. - i [3] Kings xxi. 13-16. '' Gen. xxvii. 28
* Gen. xxxi. 41. ^ Qgu xxxiv. s- ® Gen. xlii. 2.
DUTIES OF THE CLERGY.— BOOK II.
47
God of Jacob " ? ' A wretched thing is
slavery, but Joseph was not wretched ; nay,
* clearly he vvas blessed, when he whilst in
slavery checked the lusts of his mistress.^
What shall I say of holy David who be-
wailed the death of three sons,* and, what
was even worse than this, his daughter's
incestuous connection ? ■♦ How could he be
unblessed from whom the Author of blessed-
ness Himself sprung, Who has made many
blessed? For: "Blessed are they who have
not seen yet have believed."' 5 All these felt
their own weakness, but they bravely pre-
vailed over it. What can we think of as
more wretched than holy Job, either in the
burning of his house, or the instantaneous
death of his ten sons, or his bodily pains ? ^
Was he less blessed than if he had not en-
dured those things whereby he really showed
himself approved ?
2 1. True it is that in these sufferings there
is something bitter, and that strength of
mind cannot hide this pain. I should not
deny that the sea is deep because inshore it
is shallow, nor that the sky is clear because
sometimes it is covered with clouds, nor that
the earth is fruitful because in some places
there is but barren ground, northatthe crops
are rich and full because they sometimes
have wild oats mingled with them. So, too,
count it as true that the harvest of a happy
conscience may be mingled with some bitter
feelino^s of erief. In the sheaves of the
whole of a blessed life, if by chance any
misfortune or bitterness has crept in, is it not
as though the wild oats were hidden, or as
thousfh the bitterness of the tares was con-
cealed by the sweet scent of the corn ? But
let us now proceed again with our subject.
CHAPTER VI.
On what is useful : not that which is advantageous,
but that which is just and virtuous. It is to be
found in losses, and is divided into what is useful
for the body, and what is useful unto godliness.
2 2. In the first book we made our division
in such a way as to set in the first place
what is virtuous and what is seemly ; for all
duties are derived from these. In the second
place we set what is useful. But as at the
start we said that there was a difference be-
tween what is virtuous and what is seemly
— which one can comprehend more easily
than one can explain — so also when we are
thinking of what is useful, we have to give
considerable thought to what is the more
useful. '
23. But we do not reckon usefulness by
the value of any gain 'in money, but in
acquiring godliness, as the Apostle says :
" But godliness is profitable unto all things,
having promise of the life that now is, and
of that which is to come."^ Thus in the
holy Scriptures, if we look carefully we shall
often find that what is virtuous is called
useful : " All things are lawful unto me, but
all things are not profitable" [useful].^ Be-
fore that he was speaking of vices, and so
means : It is lawful to sin, but it is not
seemly. Sins rest in one's own power, but
they are not virtuous. To live wantonly is
easy, but it is not right. For food serves
not God but the belly.
24. Therefore, because what is useful is
also just, it is just to serve Christ, W'ho re-
deemed us. They too are just who for His
Name's sake have given themselves up to
death, they are unjust who have avoided it.
Of them it says : What profit is there in my
blood ? 4 that is : what advance has my
justice made ? Wherefore they also say :
" Let us bind the just, for he is useless to
us, ".5 that is : he is unjust, for he complains
of us, condemns and rebukes us. This
could also be referred to the greed of im-
pious men, which* closely resembles trea-
chery ; as we read in the case of the traitor
Judas, who in his longing for gain and his
desire for money put his head into the noose
of treachery and fell.
25. We have then to speak of that useful-
ness which is full of what is virtuous, as the
Apostle himself has laid it doMm in so many
words, saying : " And this I speak for your
own profit, not that I may cast a snare
upon you, but for that which is comely." ^
It is plain, then, that what is virtuous is use-
ful, and what is useful is virtuous ; also that
what is useful is just, and what is just is
useful. I can say this, for I am speaking,
not to merchants who are covetous from a
desire to make gain, but to my children.
And I am speaking of the duties which I
wish to impress upon and impart to you,
whom I have chosen for the service of the
Lord ; so that those things which have been
already implanted and fixed in your minds
and characters by habit and training may
now be further unfolded to you by explana-
tion and instruction.
26. Therefore as I am about to speak of
what is useful, I will take up those words of
' Ex. iii. 6. ' Gen. xxxix. 7.
" 2 Sam. [2 Kings] xii. 16; xiii. 31 ; xviii. 33.
* 2 Sam. [2 Kings] xiii. 21. ^ S. John xx. 29. *< Job i.
14
ff.
1 Cic. de Off. II. 3.
* Ps. XXX. [xxix.] 9.
- r Tim. iv. 8.
= Isa. iii. 10 [LXX.].
^ I Cor. vi. 12.
* I Cor. vii. 35.
48
ST. AMBROSE.
the Prophet : " Incline my heart unto Thy
testimonies and not to covetousness, " ' that
the sound of the word " useful " may not
rouse in us the desire for money. Some
indeed put it thus : " Incline my heart unto
Thy testimonies and not to what is useful,"
that is, that kind of usefulness which is
always on the watch for making gains in
business, and has been bent and diverted by
the habits of men to the pursuit of money.
For as a rule most people call that only useful
which is profitable, but we are speaking of
that kind of usefulness which is sought in
earthly loss "that we may gain Christ,"'^
whose gain is "godliness with content-
ment. " ^ Great, too, is the gain whereby we
attain to godliness, which is rich with God,
not indeed in fleeting wealth, but in eternal
gifts, and in which rests no uncertain trial
but grace constant and unending.
27. There is therefore a usefulness con-
nected with the body, and also one that has
to do with godliness, according to the
Apostle's division : ' ' Bodily exercise profiteth
a little, but godliness is profitable unto all
things. "4 And what is so virtuous as in-
tegrity .-' what so seemly as to preserve the
body unspotted and undefiled, and its purity
unsullied.'' What, again, is so seemly as that
a widow should keep her plighted troth to
her dead husband ? What more useful than
this whereby the heavenly kingdom is at-
tained.'' For "there are some who have
made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom
of heaven's sake. "5
CHAPTER Vn.
What is useful is the same as what is virtuous ; nothing
is more useful than love, which is gained by gentle-
ness, courtesy, kindness, justice, and the other vir-
tues, as we are given to understand from the histories
of Moses and David. Lastly, confidence springs from
love, and again love from confidence.
28. There is therefore not only a close
intercourse between what is virtuous and
what is useful, but the same thing is both
useful and virtuous. Therefore He Who
willed to open the kingdom of heaven to all
sought not what was useful to Himself, but
what was useful for all. Thus we must
have a certain order and proceed step by
step from habitual or comn'ion acts to those
which are more excellent, so as to show by
many examples the advancement of what is
useful.
^29. And first we may know there is noth-
1 Ps. cxix. [cxviii.] 36.
* I Tim. iv. S.
- Phil. iii. 8. ■■> i Tim. vi. 6.
'' S. Matt. xix. 12.
ing so useful as to be loved,' nothing so use-
less as not to be loved ; for to be hated in
my opinion is simply fatal and altogether
deadly. We speak of this, then, in order
that we may take care to give cause for a
good estimate and opinion to be formed of
us, and may try to get a place in others' af-
fections through our calmness of mind and
kindness of soul. For goodness is agreeable
and pleasing to all, and there is nothing that
so easily reaches human feelings. And if
that is assisted by gentleness of character
and willingness, as well as by moderation
in giving orders and courtesy of speech, by
honour in word, by a ready interchange of
conversation and by the grace of modesty, it
is incredible how much all this tends to an
increase of love. ^
30. We read, not only in the case of pri-
vate individuals but even of kings, what is
the effect of ready and willing courtesy, and
what harm pride and great swelling words
have done, so far as to make even kingdoms
to totter and powers to be destroyed. If
any one gains the people's favour by advice
or service, by fulfilling the duties of his
ministry or office, or if he encounters danger
for the sake of the whole nation, there is no
doubt but that such love will be shown him
by the people that they all will put his safety
and welfare before their own.
31. What reproaches IMoses had to bear
from his people ! But when the Lord would
have aveng-ed him on those who reviled
him, he often used to offer himself for the
people that he might save them from the
divine anger. ^ With what gentle words
used he to address the people, even after he
was wronged ! He comforted them in their
labours, consoled them by his prophetic
declarations of the future, and encouraged
them by his works. And though he often
spoke with God, yet he was wont to address
men gently and pleasantly. Worthily was
he considered to stand above all men. For
they could not even look on his face,-* and
refused to believe that his sepulchre was
found. 5 He had captivated the minds of all
the people to such an extent, that they loved
him even more for his gentleness than they
admired him for his deeds.
32. There is David too who followed his
steps, who was chosen from among all to
rule the people. How gentle and kindly he
was, humble in spirit too, how diligent and
ready to show affection. Before he came to
the throne he offered himself in the stead of
■> Cic. i/eOJ'. II. 7.
" Kx. xxxii. 32.
^ Deut. xxxiv. 6.
2 Cic. de Off. II. 14.
* Ex. xxxiv. 30.
DUTIES OF THE CLERGY.— BOOK II.
49
all.' As king he showed himself an equal
to all in warfare, and shared in their labours.
He was brave in battle, gentle in ruling,
patient under abuse, and more ready to bear
than to return wrongs. So dear was he to
all, tliat though a youth, he was chosen
even against his will to rule over them, and
was made to undertake the duty though he
withstood it. When old he was asked by
his people not to engage in battle, because
they all preferred to incur danger for his
sake rather than that he should undergo it
for theirs.
^^. He had bound the people to himself
freely in doing his duty ; iirst,- when he dur-
ing the division among the people preferred
to live like an exile at Hebron - rather than
to reign at Jerusalem ; next, when he showed
that he loved valour even in an enemy. He
had also thought that justice should be
shown to those who had borne arms against
himself the same as to his own men. Again,
he admired Abner, the bravest champion of
the opposing side, whilst he was their leader
and was yet waging war. Nor did he
despise him when suing for peace, but
honoured him by a banquet.^ When killed
by treachery, he mourned and wept for him.
He followed him and honoured his obse-
quies, and evinced his good faith in desiring
vengeance for the murder ; for he handed on
that duty to his son in the charge that he
gave him,-* being anxious rather that the
death of an innocent man should not be left
unavenged, than that any one should mourn
for his own.
34. It is no small thing, especially in the
case of a king, so to perform humble duties
as to make oneself like the very lowest. It
is nolile not to seek for food at another's
risk and to refuse a drink of water, to con-
fess a sin, and to offer oneself to death for
one's people. This latter David did, so that
the divine anger might be turned against
himself, when he offered himself to the de-
stroying angel and said : ' ' Lo I have sinned :
I the shepherd have done wickedly, but this
flock, what hath it done ? Let Thy hand be
against me." s
35. What further should I say.? He
opened not his mouth to those planning
deceit, and, as though hearing not, he
thought no word should be returned, nor
did he answer their reproaches. When he
was evil spoken of, he prayed, when he was
cursed, he blessed. He walked in simplicity
of heart, and fled from the proud. He Was
* I Sam. [i Kings] xvii. 32.
" 2 Sam. I2 Kings] iii. 20.
^ 2 Sam. [2 Kings] xxiv 17.
^ 2 Sam. [2 Kings] ii. 3.
* I [3] Kings ii. 5.
a follower of those unspotted from the world,
one who mixed ashes with his food when
bewailing his sins, and mingled his drink
with weeping. • Worthily, then, was he
called for by all the people. All the tribes
of Israel came to him saying : " Behold, we
are thy bone and thy flesh. Also yesterday
and the day before when Saul lived, and
reigned, thou wast he that leddest out and
broughtest in Israel. And the Lord said to
thee, Thou shalt feed My people!"^ And
why should I say more about him of whom
the word of the Lord has gone forth to
say :"I have found David according to IVIy
heart " ? ^ Who ever walked in holiness of
heart and in justice as he did. so as to fulfil
the will of God ; for whose sake pardon was
granted to his children when they sinned,
and their rights were preserved to his heirs ? *
36. Who would not have loved him, when
they saw how dear he was to his friends ?
For as he truly loved his friends, so he
thought that he was loved as much in return
by his own friends. Nay, parents put him
even before their own children, and children
loved him more than their parents. Where-
fore Saul was very angry and strove to strike
Jonathan his son with a spear because he
thought that David's friendship held a higher
place in his esteem than either filial piety or
a father's authority, s
37. It gives a very great impetus to mutual
love if one shows love in return to those
who love us and proves that one does not
love them less than oneself is loved, espe-
cially if one shows it by the proofs that a
faithful friendship gives. What is so likely
to win favour as gratitude ? What more
natural than to love one who loves us.''
What so implanted and so impressed on
men's feelings as the wish to let another, by
whom we want to be loved, know that we
love him ? Well does the wise man say :
"Lose thy money for thy brother and thy
friend."^ And again: "I will not be
ashamed to defend a friend, neither will I
hide myself from him." 7 If, indeed, the
words in Ecclesiasticus testify that the medi-
cine of life and immortality is in a friend ;^
yet none has ever doubted that it is in love
that our best defence lies. As the Apostle
says : "It beareth all things, believeth all
things, hopeth all things, endureth all things ;
love never faileth."9
38. Thus David failed not, for he was
Ps. cii. [ci.] g.
Ps. Ixxxix [ixxxviii.] 20.
I Sam. [i Kings] xx. 34.
Eccliis. xxii. 31.
'•" I Cor. xiii. 7, S.
'■' 2 Sam. [2 Kings] v.
\ I [3] Kings xi. 34.
* Ecclus. xxix. lo.
* Ecclus. \'i. 16.
50
ST. AMBROSE.
dear to all, and wished to be loved rather
than feared by his subjects. Fear keeps the
watch of temporal protection, but knows
not how to keep guard permanently.' And
so where fear has departed, boldness often
creeps in ; for fear does not force confidence,
but affection calls it forth.
39. Love, then, is the first thing to give
us a recommendation. It is a good thing
therefore to have our witness in the love of
many. 2 Then arises confidence, so that
even strangers are not afraid to trust them-
selves to thy kindness, when they see thee
so dear to many. So likewise one goes
through confidence to love, so that he who
has shown good faith to one or two has an
influence as it were on the minds of all, and
wins the good-will of all.
CHAPTER VIII.
Nothing has greater effect in gaining good-will than
giving advice ; but none can trust it unless it rests on
justice and prudence. How conspicuous these two
virtues were in Solomon is shown by his well-known
judgment.
40. Two things, therefore, love and confi-
dence, are the most efficacious in commend-
ing us to others ; also this third quality if
thou hast it, namely, what many consider to
be worthy of admiration in thee, and think
to be rightly worthy of honour 3 [the power,
in fact, of giving good advice].
41. Since the giving of good advice is a
great means of gaining men's affections,
prudence and justice are much needed in
every case. These are looked for by most,
so that confidence at once is placed in him
in whom they exist, because he can give
useful and trustworthy advice to whoever
wants it. Who will put himself into the
hands of a man whom he does not think to
be more wise than himself who asks for
advice .'' It is necessary therefore that he of
whom advice is asked should be superior to
him who asks it. For why should we con-
sult a man when we do not think that he
can make anything more plain than we our-
selves see it .-*
42. But if we have found a man that by
the vigour of his character, by his strength
of mind and influence, stands forth above all
others, and further, is better fitted by example
and experience than others ; that can put
an end to immediate dangers, foresee future
ones, point out those close at hand, can ex-
plain a subject, bring relief in time, is ready
not only to give advice but also to give
help, — in such a man confidence is placed,
so that he who seeks advice can say :
" Though evil should happen to me through
him, I will bear it." '
43. To a man of this sort then we entrust
our safety and our reputation, for he is, as
we said before, just and prudent. Justice
causes us to have no fear of deceit, and
prudence frees us from having any suspi-
cions of error. However, we trust ourselves
more readily to a just than to a prudent
man, to put it in the way people generally
do. But, according to the definition of the
philosophers, where there is one virtue,
others exist too,^ whilst prudence cannot
exist without justice. We find this stated
also in our writers, for David says: "The
just showeth mercy and lendeth.''3 What
the just lends, he says elsewhere : "A good
man is he that showeth mercy and lendeth,
he will guide his words with discretion. "4
44. Is not that noble judgment of Solomon
full of wisdom and justice ? Let us see
whether it is so.s " Two women," it says,
" stood before King Solomon, and the one
said to him. Hear me, my lord, I and this
woman dwell in one house, and before the
third day we gave birth and bore a son
apiece, and were together, there was no wit-
ness in the house, nor any other woman
with us, only we two alone. And her son
died this night, because she overlaid it,
and she arose at midnight, and took my
son from my breast, and laid it in her bosom,
and her dead child she laid at my breast.
And I arose in the morning to give my
child suck, and found him dead. And I
considered it at dawn, and behold it was not
my son. And the other woman said. Nay,
but the living is my son, and the dead is thy
son."
45. This was their dispute, in which either
tried to claim the living child for herself, and
denied that the dead one was hers. Then
the king commanded a sword to be brought
and the infant to be cut in half, and either
piece to be given to one, one half to the one,
and one half to the other. Then the woman
whose the child really was, moved by her
feelings, cried out : " Divide not the child,
my lord ; let it rather be given to her and
live, and do not kill it." But the other an-
swered : " Let it be neither mine nor hers,
divide it." Then the king ordered that the
1 Cic.de O^. II. 7. §23-
= Cic. de Of.W. 9.
« Cic. de Off. II. 8, § 30.
' Ecclus. xxii. 31.
^ Ps. xxxvii. [xxxvi.] 21.
^ I [3J Kings iii. 26 ff.
* Cic. de Off. II. 10.
* Ps. cxii. [cxi.] 5.
DUTIES OF THE CLERGY.— BOOK II.
51
infant should be given to the woman who
had said : Do not kill it, but give it to that
woman ; " For," as it says, " her bowels
yearned upon her son." '
46. It is not wrong to suppose that the
mind of God was in him ; for what is hid-
den from God.' What can be more hidden
than the witness that lies deep within ; into
which the mind of the wise king entered as
though to judge a mothers feelings, and
elicited as it were the voice of a mother's
heart. For a mother's feelings were laid
bare, when she chose that her son should
live with another, rather than that he should
be killed in his mother's sight.
47. It was therefore a sign of wisdom to
distinguish between secret heart-thoughts,
to draw the truth from hidden springs, and
to pierce as it were with the sword of the
Spirit not only the inward parts of the body,
but even of the mind and soul. It was the
part of justice also that she who had killed
her own child should not take away an-
other's, but that the real mother should have
her own back again. Indeed the Scriptures
have declared this. " All Israel," it says,
" heard of the judgment which the king
had judged, and they feared the king, for
they saw that the wisdom of God was in
him to do judgment."^ Solomon also him-
self had asked for wisdom, so that a prudent
heart might be given him to hear and to
judge with justice.3
CHAPTER IX.
Though justice and prudence are inseparable, we must
have respect to the ideas of people in general, for they
make a distinction between the different cardinal
virtues.
48. It is clear also, according to the
sacred Scriptures, which are the older, that
wisdom cannot exist without justice, for
where one of these two is, there the other
must be also. With what wisdom did
Daniel expose the lie in the false accusation
brought against him by his thorough exami-
nation, so that those false informers had no
answer ready to hand ! -* It was a mark of
prudence to convict the criminals by the
witness of their ow^n words, and a sign of
justice to give over the guilty to punish-
meirt, and to save the innocent from it.
>(9. There is therefore an inseparable
union between wisdom and justice ; but,
generally speaking, 5 the one special form of
^ I [3] Kings iii. 26.
* I [3I Kings iii. 9.
«Cic. <&£?^. II. 10, §35.
^ I [3] Kings iii. 28.
* Bel and the Dragon v. 44
virtue is divided up. Thus temperance lies
in despising pleasures, fortitude may be seen
in undergoing labours and dangers, prudence
in the choice of what is good, by knowing
how to distinguish between things useful
and the reverse; justice, in being a good
guardian of another's rights and protector
of its own, thus maintaining for each his
own. We can make this fourfold division in
deference to commonly received ideas ; and
so, whilst deviating from those subtle dis-
cussions of philosophic learning which are
brought forth as though from some inner re-
cess for the sake of investigating the truth,
can follow the commonly received use and
their ordinary meaning. Keeping, then, to
this division, let us return to our subject.
CHAPTER X.
Men entrust their safety rather to a just than to a
, prudent man. But every one is wont to seek out
the man who combines in himself the qualities of
justice and prudence. Solomon gives us an example
of this. (The words which the queen of Sheba spoke
of him are explained.) Also Daniel and Joseph.
50. We entrust our case to the most pru-
dent man we can find, and ask advice from
him more readily than we do from others.
However, the faithful counsel of a just ' man
stands first and often has more weight than
the great abilities of the wisest of men :
' ' For better are the wounds of a friend than
the kisses of others. ''^ And just because it
is the judgment of a just man, it is also the
conclusion of a wise one : in the one lies the
result of the matter in dispute, in the other
readiness of invention.
51. And if one connects the two, there
will be great soundness in the advice given,
which is regarded by all with admiration
for the wisdom shown, and with love for its
justice. And so all will desire to hear the
wisdom of that man in whom those two
virtues are found together, as all the kings
of the earth desired to see the face of Solo-
mon and to hear his wisdom. Nay, even
the queen of Sheba came to him and tried
him with questions. She came and spoke
of all the things that were in her heart, and
heard all the wisdom of Solomon, nor did
any word escape her. 3
52. Who she was whom nothing escaped,
and that there was nothing which the truth-
loving Solomon did not tell her, learn, O
man, from this which thou hearest her say-
ing: "It was a true report that I heard in
1 Cic. de Off. II. 9, § 34.
* I [3] Kings X. 2, 3.
* Prov. xxvii. 6.
52
ST. AMBROSE.
mine own land of thy words and of thy
prudence, yet I did not believe those that
told it me until I came, and mine eyes had
seen it ; and behold the half was not told
me. Thou hast added good things over
and above all that I heard in mine own
land. Blessed are thy women and blessed
thy servants, which stand before thee, and
that hear all thy prudence." ' Recognize
the feast of the true Solomon, and who are
set down at that feast ; recognize it wisely
and think in what land all the nations shall
hear the fame of true wisdom and justice,
and with what eyes they shall see Him,
beholding those thinsfs which are not seen.
*' For the things that are seen are temporal,
but the things which are not seen are eter-
nal." ^
53. What women are blessed but those of
whom it is said "that many hear the word
of God and bring forth fruit ".'^ And again :
"Whosoever doeth the word of God is My
father and sister and mother. "■» And who
are those blessed servants, who stand before
Him, but Paul, who said: "Even to this
day I stand witnessing both to great and
small ; " s or Simeon, who was waiting in
the temple to see the consolation of Israel.?^
How could he have asked to be let depart,
except that in standing before the Lord he
had not the power of departing, but only
according to the will of God .'' Solomon is
put before us simply for the sake of example,
of whom it was eagerly expected that his
wisdom should be heard.
54. Joseph also when in prison was not
free from being consulted about matters of
uncertainty. His counsel 7 was of advan-
tage to the whole of Egypt, so that it felt
not the seven years' famine, and he was
able even to relieve other peoples from their
dreadful hunger.
55. Daniel, though one of the captives,
was made the head of the royal counsellors.
By his counsels he improved the present
and foretold the future.^ Confidence was
put in him in all things, because he had
frequently interpreted things, and had shown
that he had declared the truth.
. CHAPTER XI.
A third element which tends to gain any one's confi-
dence is shown to have been conspicuous in Moses,
Daniel, and Joseph.
56. But a third point seems also to have
1 I fj] Kings X. 6-8.
•* S. Matt. xii. 50.
' Gen. xli. y ff.
- 2 Cor. iv. 18.
*■ .Acts xxvi. 22.
' Dan. ii.
» S. I.iike xi. 28.
" S. Luke ii. 25.
been noted in the case of those who were
thought worthy of admiration ' after the ex-
ample of Joseph, Solomon, and Daniel. For
what shall I say of Moses whose advice
all Israel always waited for,^ whose life
caused them to trust in his prudence and
increased their esteem for him .? Who would
not trust to the counsel of INIoses, to whom
the elders reserved for decision whatever
they thought beyond their understanding
and powers .?
57. Who would refuse the counsel of
Daniel, of whom God Himself said : "Who
is wiser than Daniel } " 3 How can men
doubt about the minds of those to whom
God has given such grace ^ By the counsel
of Moses wars were brought to an end, and
for his merit's sake food came from heaven
and drink from the rock.
58. How pure must have been the soul of
Daniel to soften the character of barbarians
and to tame the lions ! ■» What temperance
was his, what self-restraint in soul and
body ! Not unworthily did he become an
object of admiration to all, when — and all
men do admire this, — though enjoying royal
friendships, he sought not for gold, nor
counted the honour given him as more pre-
cious than his faith. For he was willing to
endure danger for the law of God rather
than to be turned from his purpose in order
to gain the favour of men.
59. And what, again, shall I say of the
chastity and justice of Joseph, whom I had
almost passed by, whereby on the one
hand he rejected the allurements of his
mistress and refused rewards, on the other
he mocked at death, repressed his fear, and
chose a prison .'' Who would not consider
him a fit person to give advice in a private
case, whose fruitful spirit and fertile mind
enriched the barrenness of the time with the
wealth of his counsels and heart } s
CHAPTER XII.
No one asks counsel from a man tainted with vice, or
from one who is morose or impracticable, but rather
from one of whom we have a pattern in the Scrip-
tures.
60. We note therefore that in seeking for
counsel, uprightness of life, excellence m
virtues, habits of benevolence, and the charm
of good-nature have very great weight.
Who seeks for a spring in the mud .' Who
wants to drink from muddy water.'' So
'Cic. deOJ^.U. 10, §36.
^ Ezek. xxviii. j.
'' Cie'n. xli. 33 ff.
^ Ex. xviii. 13.
* Bel and the Dragon v. 39.
DUTIES OF THE CLERGY.— BOOK II.
53
where there is luxurious living, excess, and a
union of vices, who will think that he ought
to draw from that source ? Who does not
despise a foul life ? Who will think a man
to be useful to another's cause whom he sees
to be useless in his own life ? Who, again,
does not avoid a wicked, ill-disposed, abu-
sive person, who is always ready to do
harm ? Who would not be only too eager
to avoid him ? '
6 1. And who will come to a man how-
ever well fitted to give the best of advice,
who is nevertheless hard to approach ? It
goes with him as with a fountain whose
waters are shut off. What is the advantage
of having wisdom, if one refuses to give
advice? If one cuts off the opportunities of
giving advice, the source is closed, so as no
longer to flow for others or to be of any
good to oneself.
62. Well can we refer this to him who,
possessing prudence, has defiled it with the
foulness of a vicious life and so pollutes the
water at the source. His life is a proof of a
degenerate spirit.^ How can one judge him
to be eood in counsel whom one sees to be
evil in character ? He ought to be superior
to me, if I am ready to trust myself to him.
Am I to suppose that he is fit to give me
advice who never takes it for himself, or
am I to believe that he has time to give to me
when he has none for himself, when his
mind is filled with pleasures, and he is over-
come by lust, is the slave of avarice, is
excited by greed, and is terrified with
fright .'' How is there room for counsel here
where there is none for quiet .''
63. That man of counsel whom I must
admire and look up to, whom the gracious
Lord gave to our fathers, put aside all that
was offensive. His follower he ought to
be, who can give counsel and protect an-
other's prudence from vice ; for nothing foul
can mingle with that.
CHAPTER XIII.
The beauty of wisdom is made plain by the divine testi-
mony. From this he goes on to prove its connection
with the other virtues.
64. Is there any one who would like to
be beautiful in face and at the same time to
have its charm spoilt by a beast-like body
and fearful talons ? Now the form of virtues
is so wonderful and glorious, and especially
' Cic. deOf. ir. 10, § 36.
* Kwif Virg. /£■«. IV, 13: " degetieres attimostimor arguit."
the beauty of wisdom, as the whole of the
Scriptures tell us. For it is more brilliant
than the sun, and when compared with the
stars far outshines any constellation. Night
takes their light away in its train, but
wickedness cannot overcome wisdom.'
65. We have spoken of its beauty, and
proved it by the witness of Scripture. It
remains to show on the authority of Scrip-
ture ^ that there can be no fellowship be-
tween it and vice, but that it has an insepar-
able union with the rest of the virtues.
" It has a spirit sagacious, undefiled, sure,
holy, loving what is good, quick, that never
forbids a kindness, kind, steadfast, free
from care, having all power, overseeing all
things." And again : ^ " She teacheth tem-
perance and justice and virtue."
CHAPTER XIV.
Prudence is combined with all the virtues, especially
with contempt of riches.
66. Prudence, therefore, works through all
things, she has fellowship with all that
is good. For how ■^ can she give good
advice unless she have justice too, so that
she may clothe herself in consistency, not
fear death, be held back by no alarm, no
fear, nor think it right to be turned aside
from the truth by any flattery, nor shun
exile, knowing that the world is the father-
land of the wise man. She fears not want,
for she knows that nothing is wanting to
the wise man, since the whole world of
riches is his. What is greater than the man
that knows not how to be excited at the
thought of money, and has a contempt for
riches, and looks down as from some lofty
vantage-ground on the desires of men .?
Men think that one who acts thus is more
than man : "Who is. this,'" it says, " and
we will praise him. For wonderful things
hath he done in his life.'' s Surely he ought
to be admired who despises riches, seeing
that most place them even before their own
safety.
67. The rule of economy and the author-
ity of self-restraint befits all, and most of all
him who stands highest in honour ; so that
no love for his treasures may seize upon
such a man, and that he who rules over free
men may never become a slave to money.
It is more seemly that in soul he should be
superior to treasures, and in willing service
be subject to his friends. For humility in-
* Wisd. vii. 2Q, 30.
* Cic. de Off. li. XI.
* Wisd. vii. 22, 23.
'' Ecclus. xxxi. 9.
3 Wisd. viii, 7.
54
ST. AMBROSE.
creases the regard in which one is held. It
is praiseworthy and right for the chief of
men to have no desire for filthy lucre in
common with Syrian traders and Gilead
merchants, nor to place all their hope of
good in money, or to count up their daily
gains and to calculate their savings like a
hireling.
CHAPTER XV.
Of liberality. To whom it must chiefly be shown, and
how men of slender means may show it by giving
their service and counsel.
68. But if it is praiseworthy to have one's
soul free from this failing, how much more
glorious is it to gain the love of the people
by liberality which is neither too freely
shown to those who are unsuitable, nor too
sparingly bestowed upon the needy.
69. There are many kinds of liberality.'
Not only can we distribute and give away
food to those who need it from our own
daily supply, so that they may sustain life ;
but we can also give advice and help to
those who are ashamed to show their want
openly, so long as the common supplies of
the needy are not exhausted. I am now
speaking of one set over some office. If he
is a priest or almoner, let him inform the
bishop of them, and not withhold the name
of any he knows to be in any need, or to
have lost their wealth and to be now reduced
to want ; especially if they have not fallen
into this trouble owing to wastefulness in
youth, but because of another's theft, or
through loss of their inheritance from no
fault of their own, so that they cannot now
earn their daily bread.
70. The highest kind of liberality is, to
redeem captives, to save them from the
hands of their enemies, to snatch men from
death, and, most of all, women from shame,
to restore children to their parents, parents
to their children, and. to give back a citizen
to his country. This was recogni/ccd when
Thrace and Illyria were so terribly devas-
tated.^ How many captives were then for
sale all over the world ! Could one but call
them together, their number would have
surpassed that of a whole province. Yet
there were some who would have sent back
into slavery those whom the Church had
^Cic.de Off. II. 9, §32.
* This was in the year 378. These provinces were invaded by
the Goths, who after the defeat and death of Valens at Hadrianople
ravaged the whole country, and carried away with them a vast num-
ber of captives and afterwards sold them into slavery. St. Am-
brose busied himself in redeeming all he could. He tells us Iiiin-
self how his efforts were met by the Arian pany.
redeemed. They themselves were harder
than slavery itself to look askance at an-
other's mercy. If they themselves (they
said) had come to slavery, they would be
slaves freely. If they had been sold, they
would not refuse the service of slavery.
They wished to undo the freedom of others,
though they could not undo their own
slavery, unless perchance it should please
the buyer to receive his price again, where-
by, however, slavery would not be simply
undone but redeemed.
71. It is then a special quality of liber-
ality to redeem captives,' especially from
barbarian enemies who are moved by no
spark of human feeling to show mercy,
except so far as avarice has preserved it with
a view to redemption. It is also a great
thing to take upon oneself another's debt,
if the debtor cannot pay and is hard pressed
to do so, and where the money is due by
right and is only left unpaid through want.
So, too, it is a sign of great liberality to
bring up children, and to take care of or-
phans.
72. There are others who place in mar-
riage maidens that have lost their parents,
so as to preserve their chastity, and who
help them not only with good wishes but
also by a sum of money. There is also
another kind of liberality which the Apostle '
teaches : "If any that believeth hath wid-
ows let him relieve them, that the Church
be not burdened by supplying them, that it
may have enough for those that are widows
indeed." ^
73. Useful, then, is liberality of this sort ;
but it is not common to all. For there are
many good men who have but slender
means, and are content with little for their
own use, and are not able to give help to
lighten the poverty of others. However,
another sort of kindness is ready to their
hand, whereby they can help those poorer
still. For there is a twofold liberality : ^
one that gives actual assistance, that is, in
money ; the other, which is busy in offer-
ing active help, is often much grander and
nobler.
74- How much grander it was for Abra-
ham to have recovered his captured son-in-
law by his victorious arms, 4 than if he had
ransomed him ! How much more usefully
did holy Joseph help King Pharaoh by his
counsel to provide for the future, than if he
had offered him money ! For money would
not have bought back'the fruitfulness of any
J Cic. de Off. IT. i6.
= Cic. de Off. II. 15, § 52.
- I Tim. v. 16.
* Gen. xjv. 16.
DUTIES OF THE CLERGY.— BOOK 11.
55
one state ; whilst he by his foresight kept
the famine for live years ' from the whole
of Egypt.
75. Money is easily spent ; counsels can
never be exhausted. They only grow the
stronger by constant use. Money grows
less and quickly comes to an end, and has
failed even kindness itself ; so that the niore
there are to whom one wants to give, the
fewer one can help ; and often one has not
got what one thinks ought to be given to
others. But as regards the offer of advice
and active help, the more there are to spend
it on, the more there seems to be, and the
more it returns to its own source. The rich
stream of prudence ever flows back upon
itself, and the more it has reached out to,
so much the more active becomes all that
remains.
CHAPTER XVI.
Due measure must be observed in liberality, that it
may not be expended on worthless persons, when it
is needed by worthier ones. However, alms are not
to be given in too sparing and hesitating a way. One
ought rather to follow the example of the blessed
Joseph, whose prudence is commended at great length.
76. It is clear, then,^ that there ought to
be due measure in our liberality, that our
gifts may not become useless. ^loderation
must be observed, especially by priests, for
fear that they should give away for the sake
of ostentation, and not for justice' sake.
Never was the greed of beggars greater than
it is now. They come in full vigour, they
come with no reason but that they are on
the tramp. They want to empty the purses
of the poor — to deprive them of their means
of support. Not content with a little, they
ask for more. In the clothes that cover
them they seek a ground to urge their de-
mands, and with lies about their lives they
ask for further sums of money. If any one
were to trust their tale too readily, he would
quickly drain the fund which is meant to
serve for the sustenance of the poor. Let
there be method in our giving, so that the
poor may not go away empty nor the sub-
sistence of the needy be done away and
become the spoil of the dishonest. Let
there be then such due measure that kind-
ness may never be put aside, and true need
never be left neglected.
77. ]Many pretend they have debts. Let
the truth be looked into. They bemoan
the fact that they have been stripped of
* Gen. xlL. 53-57.
"^CK.deOjT. 11. IS, S.S?-
everything by robbers. In such a case give
credit only if the misfortune is apparent, or
the person is well known ; and then readily
give help. To those rejected by the Church
supplies must be granted if they are in want
of food. He, then, that observes method in
his giving is hard towards none, but is free
towards all. We ought not only to lend our
ears to hear the voices of those who plead,
but also our eyes to look into their needs.
Weakness calls more loudly to the good dis-
penser than the voice of the poor. It cannot
always be that the cries of an importunate
beggar will never extort more, but let us not
always give way to impudence. He must
be seen who does not see thee. He must
be sought for who is ashamed to be seen.
He also that is in prison must come to thy
thoughts ; another seized with sickness must
present himself to thy mind, as he cannot
reach thy ears.
78. The more people see thy zeal in show-
ing mercy, the more will they love thee. I
know many priests who had the more, the
more they gave. For they who see a good
dispenser give him something to distribute
in his round of duty, sure that the act of
mercy will reach the poor. If they see him
giving away either in excess or too spar-
ingly, they contemn either of these ; in the
one case because he wastes the fruits of
another's labours by unnecessary payments,
on the other hand because he hoards them
in his money bags. As, then, method ' must
be observed in liberality, so also at times it
seems as though the spur must be applied.
Method, then, so that the kindness one shows
may be able to be shown day by day, and
that we may not have to withdraw from a
needful case what we have freely spent on
waste. A spur, because money is better
laid out in food for the poor than on a purse
for the rich. We must take care lest in our
money chests we shut up the welfare of the
needy, and bury the life of the poor as it
were in a sepulchre.
79. Joseph could have given away all the
wealth of Egypt, and have spent the royal
treasures ; but he would not even seem to
be wasteful of what was another's. He pre-
ferred to sell the corn rather than to give it
to the hungry. For if he had given it to a
few there would have been none for most.
He gave good proof of that liberality where-
by there was enough for all. He opened
the storehouses that all might buy their
corn supply, lest if they received it for
nothing, they should give up cultivating the
» Cic. de Off. II. 15, § 54.
56
ST. AMBROSE.
ground. For he who has the use of what is
another's often neglects his own.
80. First of all, then, he gathered up their
money, then their implements, last of all
he acquired for the king all their rights to
the ground.' He did not wish to deprive
all of them of their property, but to support
them in it. He also imposed a general tax, ^
that they might hold their own in safety.
So pleasing was this to all from whom he
had taken the land, that they looked on it,
not as the selling of their rights, but as the
recovery of their welfare. Thus they spoke :
"Thou hast saved our lives, let us find
grace in the sight of our Lord."^ For they
had lost nothing of their own, but had re-
ceived a new right. Nothing of what was
useful to them had failed, for they had now
gained it in perpetuity.
81. O noble man ! * who sought not for the
fleeting glory of a needless bounty, but set
up as his memorial the lasting benefits of
his foresight. He acted so that the people
should help themselves by their payments,
and should not in their time of need seek
help from others. For it was surely better
to give up part of their crops than to lose the
whole of their rights. He fixed the impost
at a fifth of their whole produce, and thus
showed himself clear-sighted in making
provision for the future, and liberal in the
tax he laid upon them. Never after did
Egypt suffer from such a famine.
82. How splendidly he inferred the
future. First, how acutely, when interpret-
ing the royal dream, he stated the truth.
This was the king's first dream, s Seven
heifers came up out of the river well-
favoured and fat-fleshed, and they fed at the
banks of the river. And other bullocks ill-
favoured and lean-fleshed came ' up out of
the river after the heifers, and fed near them
on the very edge of the river. And these
thin and wretched bullocks seemed to devour
those others which were so fat and well-
favoured. And this was the second dream. ^
Seven fat ears full and good came up from
the ground. And after them seven wretched
ears, blasted with the wind and withered,
endeavoured to take their place. And it
seemed that the barren and thin ears
devoured the rich and fruitful cars.
83. This dream Joseph unfolded as fol-
lows : that the seven heifers were seven
1 Gen. xlvii. 14-20.
^ Gen. xlvii. 25.
• Gen. xli. 17 ff.
2 Cic. e/e Off. II. 21.
*C\c.deOff H- 23i 83.
^ Gen. xli. 22 &.
years, and the seven ears likewise were seven
years, — interpreting the times by the pro-
duce of cattle and crops. For both the
calving of a heifer takes a year, and the
produce of a crop fills out a whole year.
And they came up out of the river just as
days, years, and times pass by and flow
along swiftly like the rivers. He therefore
states that the seven earlier years of a rich
land will be fertile and fruitful ; but the
latter seven years will be barren and unfruit-
ful, whose barrenness will eat up the rich- .
ness of the former time. Wherefore he
warns them to see that supplies of corn are
got together in the fruitful years that they
may help out the needs of the coming
scarcity.
84. What shall we admire first.? His
powers of mind, with which he descended
to the very resting-place of truth .? Or his
counsel, whereby he foresaw so great and
lasting a need.'' Or his watchfulness or
justice.'' By his watchfulness, when so high
an office was given him, he gathered to-
gether such vast supplies ; and through his
justice he treated all alike. And what am I
to say of his greatness of mind .'' For though
sold by his brothers into slavery, 'he took
no revenge for this wrong, but put an end
to their want. What of his gentleness,
whereby by a pious fraud he sought to gain
the presence of his beloved brother whom,
under pretence of a well-planned theft, he
declared to have stolen his property, that he
might hold him as a hostage of his love .-* ^
85. Whence it was deservedly said to him
by his father : "My son Joseph is enlarged,
my son is enlarged, my younger son,
my beloved. INIy God hath helped thee
and blessed thee with the blessing of
heaven above and the blessing of the
earth, the earth that hath all things, on
account of the blessings of thy father and
thy mother. It hath prevailed over the
blessings of the everlasting hills and the
desires of the eternal hills." 3 And in Deu-
teronomy : " Thou Who wast seen in the
bush, that Thou mayest come upon the head
of Joseph, upon his pate. Honoured among
his brethren, his glory is as the firstling of
his bullocks ; his horns are like the horns of
unicorns. With his horn he shall push the
nations even to the ends of the earth. They
are the ten thousands of Ephraim and the
thousands of Manasseh. " ^
* Gen. xxxvii. 28.
^ Gen. xlix. 22, 25, 26.
^ Gen. xliv. 2 ff.
* Deut. xxxiii. 16, 17.
I
I
I
I
DUTIES OF THE CLERGY.— BOOK II.
57.
chaptp:r XVII.
What virtues ought to exist in him whom we consult.
How Joseph and Paul were equipi:>ed with them.
86. Such, then, ought he to be who gives
counsel to another, in order that he may
offer him.self as a pattern in all good works,
in teaching, in truencss of character, in
seriousness. Thus his words will be whole-
some and irreproachable, his counsel useful,
hisiife virtuous, and his opinions seemly.
\^7. Such was Paul, who gave counsel to
virgins,' guidance to priests, ^ so as to offer
himself as a pattern for us to copy. Thus
he knew how to be humble, as also Joseph
did, who, though sprung from the noble
family of the patriarchs, was not ashamed
of his base slavery ; rather he adorned it
with his ready service, and made it glorious
by his virtues. He knew how to be humble
who had to go through the hands of both
buyer and seller, and called them, Lord.
. Hear him as he humbles himself : "My
lord on my accoimt knoweth not^ what
is in his house, and he hath committed all
that he hath to my hand, neither hath he
kept back anything from me but thee, be-
cause thou art his wife ; how, then, can I
do this great wickedness, and sin against
God ? " ^ Full of humility are his words, full,
too, of chastity. Of humility, for he was
obedient to his Lord ; of an honourable spirit,
for he was grateful ; s full, also, of chastity,
for he thought it a terrible sin to be defiled
by so great a crime.
88. Such, then, ought the man of counsel
to be. He must have nothing dark, or de-
ceptive, or false about him, to casta shadow
on his life and character, nothing wicked or
evil to keep back those who want advice.
For there are some things which one flies
from, others which one despises.^ We fly
from those things which can do harm, or can
perfidiously and quietly grow to do us hurt,
as when he whose advice we ask is of
doubtful honour, or is desirous of money,
so that a certain sum can make him chansre
his mind. If a man acts unjustly, we fly
from him and avoid him. A man that is a
pleasure seeker and extravagant, although
he does not act falsely, yet is avaricious and
too fond of filthy lucre ; such an one is de-
spised. What proof of hard work, what fruits
* I Cor. vii. 25. - I Tim. iv. 12 £f.
•■> "p}-opter jne." Cod. Dresd., Ed. Med. have " pmter vie.''''
* Gen. xxxix. 8, 9.
•'' " kutitilitatis, qjiia domuto deferebat ; honor ificenti(E , quia re-
ferebat gratiam." Others read :" humiiiiaiis . . , deferebat hono-
Tificeniiam, quia" etc.
"Cic, deOf. II. 10, §36.
of labour, can he give who gives himself up
to a sluggish and idle life, or what cares and
anxieties ever enter his mind .''
89. Therefore the man of good counsel
says: " I have learnt in whatsoever state
I am therewith to be content."' For he
knew that the root of all evils is the love of
money, ^ and therefore he was content with
what he had, without seeking for what was
another's. Sufficient for me, he says, is what
I have ; whether I have little or much, to
me it is much. It seems as though he
wanted to state it as clearly as possible.
He makes use of these words : "I am con-
tent," he says, " with what I have. " That
means : "I neither have want, nor have I
too much. I have no want, for I seek no-
thing more. I have not too much, for I have
it not for myself, but for the many." This
is said with reference to money.
90. But he could have said these words
about everything, for all that he had at the
moment contented him ; that is, he wanted
no greater honour, he sought for no further
services, he was not desirous of vainglory,
nor did he look for gratitude where it was
not due ; but patient in labours, sure in his
merits, he waited for the end of the strujrele
that he must needs endure. " I know," he
says, " how to be abased." 3 An untaught
humility has no claim to praise, but only
that which possesses modesty and a know-
ledge of self. For there is a humility that
rests on fear, one, too, that rests on want of
skill and ignorance. Therefore the Scrip-
ture says : " He will save the humble in
spirit. "4 Gloriously, therefore, does he say :
" I know how to be abased ; " that is to say,
where, in what moderation, to what end, in
what duty, in which office. The Pharisee
knew not how to be abased, therefore he
was cast down. The publican knew, and
therefore he was justified. 5
91. Paul knew, too, how to abound, for
he had a rich soul, though he possessed not
the treasure of a rich man. He knew how
to abound, for he sought no gift in money,
but looked for fruit in grace. We can under-
stand his words that he knew how to abound
also in another way. For he could say
again: "O ye Corinthians, our mouth is
open unto you, our heart is enlarged."^
92. In all things he was accustomed both
to be full and to be hungry. Blessed is he
that knows how to be full in Christ. Not
corporal, but spiritual, is that satiety which
knowledge brings about. And rightly is
» Phil.iv. II.
3 Phil. iv. 12.
^ S. Luke xviii. it.
" I Tim. vi. 10.
* Ps. xxxiv. [.\xxiii.] 18.
* 2 Cor, vL 14.
ST. AMBROSE.
there need of knowledge : "For man lives
not by bread alone, but by every word of
God."' For he who knew how to be full
also knew how to be hungry, so as to be
always seeking something new, hungering
after God, thirsting for the Lord. He
knew how to hunger, for he knew that the
hungry shall eat. ^ He knew, also, how to
abound, and was able to abound, for he had
nothing and yet possessed all things. 3
CHAPTER XVni.
We learn from the fact of the separation of the ten
tribes from King Rehoboam what harm bad coun-
sellors can do.
93. Justice, then, especially graces men
that are set over any otSce ;4 on the other
hand, injustice fails them and fights against
them. Scripture itself gives us an example,
where it says, that when the people of
Israel, after the death of Solomon, had asked
his son Rehoboam to free their neck from
their cruel yoke, and to lighten the harsh-
ness of his father's rule, he, despising the
counsel of the old men, gave the following
answer at the suggestion of the young men :
" He would add a burden to the yoke of his
father, and change their lighter toils for
harder. " s
94. Angered by this answer, the people
said: "We have no portion in David, nor
inheritance in the son of Jesse. Return to
your tents, O Israel. For we will not have
this man for a prince or a leader over us. " ^
So, forsaken and deserted by the people, he
could keep with him scarce two of the ten
tribes for David's sake.
CHAPTER XIX.
Many are won by justice and benevolence and courtesy,
but all this must be sincere.
J
95. It is plain, then, that equity- strength-
ens empires, and injustice destroys them.
How could wickedness hold fast a kingdom
when it cannot even rule over a single
family ? There is need, therefore, of the
greatest kindness, so that we may preserve
not only the government of affairs in general,
but also the rights of individuals. Benevo-
lence is of the greatest value ; for it seeks to
embrace all in its favours, to bind them to
* Deut. viii. 3.
•' 2 Cor. vi. 10.
•^ I [3] Kings xii. 4
= S. Matt. V. 6.
* Cic. e/eOjf. II. 22, § 77.
" I [3I Kings xii. 16.
itself by fulfilling duties, and to pledge them
to itself by its cliarm.
96. We have also said that courtesy ot
speech has great effect in winning favour.
But we want it to be sincere and sensible,
without flattery, lest flattery should disgrace
the simplicity and purity of our address.
We ought to be a pattern to others not only
in act but also in word, in purity, and in
faith. What we wish to be thought, such let
us be ; ' and let us show openly such feel-
ings as we have within us. Let us not say
an unjust'word in our heart that we think
can be hid in silence, for He hears things
said in secret Who made things secret, and
knows the secrets of the heart, and has
implanted feelings within. Therefore as
though under the eyes of the Judge let us
consider all we do as set forth in the light,
that it may be manifest to all.
CHAPTER XX.
Familiarity with good men is very advantageous to all,
especially to the young, as is shown by the example
of Joshua and Closes and others. Further, those
who are unlike in age are often alike in virtues, as
Peter and John prove.
97. It is a very good thing to unite one-
self to a good man. It is also very useful
for the young ^ to follow the guidance of
great and wise men. For he who lives in
company with"" wise men is wise himself ;
but he who clings to the foolish is looked
on as a fool too. This friendship with the
wise is a great help in teaching us, and also
as giving a sure proof of our uprightness.
Young men show very soon that they imi-
tate those to whom they attach themselves.
And this idea gains ground from the fact
that in all their daily life they grow to be
like those with whom they have enjoyed
intercourse to the full.
98. Joshua the son of Nun became so
great, because his union with INIoses was the
means not only of instructing him in a
knowledge of the law, but also of sanctify-
ing him to receive grace. When in His
tabernacle the majesty of the Lord was seen
to shine forth in its divine Presence, Joshua
alone was in the tabernacle. When Moses
spoke with God, Joshua too was covered
by the sacred cloud. 3 The priests and
people stood below, and Joshua and Moses
went up the mount to receive the law.
All the people were within the camp ;
' Cic. de Off. II. 12, §43.
'' E.x. xsiv. 12 ^.
2 Cic. de Off. II. 13, § 46.
DUTIES OF THE CLERGY.— BOOK II.
59
Joshua was without the camp in the tab-
ernacle of witness. When the pillar of a
cloud came down, and God spoke with
Moses, he stood as a trusty servant beside
him ; and he, a young man. did not go out
of the tabernacle, though the old men who
stood afar off trembled at these divine
wonders.
99. Everywhere, therefore, he alone kept
close to holy Moses amid all these wondrous
works and dread secrets. Wherefore it hap-
pens that he who had been his companion
in this intercourse with God succeeded to his
power.' Worthy surely was he to stand
forth as a man who might stay the course
of the river, ^ and who might say: "Sun,
stand still,"' and delay the night and
lengthen the day, as though to witness his
victory. 3 Why.? — a blessing denied to
Moses — he alone was chosen to lead the
people into the promised land. A man he
was, great in the wonders he wrought by
faith, great in his triumphs. The works of
Moses were of a higher type, his brought
greater success. Either of these then aided
by divine grace rose above all human stand-
ing. The one ruled the sea, the other
heaven. "*
100. Beautiful, therefore, is the union be-
tween old and young. The one to give
witness, the other to give comfort ; t'he one
to give guidance, the other to give pleasure.
I pass by Lot, who when young clung
to Abraham, as he was setting out. 5 For
some perhaps might say this arose rather
owing to their relationship than from any
voluntary action on his part. And what are
we to say of Elijah and Elisha ? ^ Though
Scripture has not in so many words stated
that Elisha was a young man, yet we
gather from it that he was the younger. In
the Acts of the Apostles, Barnabas took
INIark with him, and Paul took Silas 7 and
Timothy^ and Titus. 9
10 1. We see also that duties were divided
amongst them according to their superiority
in anything. The elders took the lead in
giving counsel, the younger in showing
activity. Often, too, those who were alike
in virtue but unlike in years were greatly re-
joiced at their union, as Peter and John were.
We read in the Gospel that John was a young
man, even in his own words, though he was
behind none of the elders in merits and wis-
dom. For in him there was a venerable
' Deut. xxxiv. 9.
^ Josh. X. 12, 13.
^ Gen. xii. 5.
' Acts XV. 39, 40.
» Tit. i. 5.
- Josh. iii. 15 ff.
* Ex. xiv. 21. Cf. also
" I [3] Kings xix. 21.
* Acts x\-i. 3.
Josh. :
ripeness of character and the prudence of
the hoarhead. An unspotted life is the due
of a good old age.
CHAPTER XXI.
To defend the weak, or to help strangers, or to perform
similar duties, greatly adds to one's worth, especially
in the case of tried men. Whilst one gets great
blame for love of money ; wastefulness, also, in the
case of priests is very much condemned.
102. The regard in which one is held is
also very. much enhanced when one rescues
a poor man out of the hands of a powerful
one, or saves a condemned criminal from
death ; so long as it can be done without
disturbance, for fear that we might seem to
be doing it rather for the sake of showing off
than for pity's sake, and so might inflict
severer wounds whilst desiring to heal
slighter ones. But if one has freed a man
who is crushed down by the resources and
faction of a powerful person,' rather than
overwhelmed by the deserts of his own
wickedness, then the witness of a great and
high opinion grows strong.
10^. Hospitality also serves to recommend
many. ^ For it is a kind of open display of
kindly feelings : so that the stranger may not
want hospitality, but be courteously re-
ceived, and that the door may be open to
him when he comes. It is most seemly
in the eyes of the whole world that the
stranger should be received with honour ;
that the charm of hospitality should not fail
at our table ; that we should meet a guest
with ready and free service, and look out for
his arrival.
104. This especially was Abraham's praise,^
for he watched at the door of his tent, that
no stranger by any chance might pass by.
He carefully kept a lookout, so as to meet
the stranger, and anticipate him, and ask
him not to pass by, saying: ''My lord, if I
have found favour in thy sight, pass not by
^thy servant." 4 Therefore as a reward for
his hospitality, he received the gift of pos-
terity.
105. Lot also, his nephew, s who was near
to him not only in relationship but also in
virtue, on account of his readiness to show
hospitality, turned aside the punishment of
Sodom from himself and his family.
106. A man ought therefore to be hospi-
table, kind, upright, not desirous of what
belongs to another, willing to give up some
1 Cic. de Off. II. 14, § 51. = Cic. de Off. II. 18, § 64.
3 Gen. xviii. i ff. * Gen. xviii. 3.
I 5 Gen. xix. 2»
6o
ST. AMBROSE.
of his own rights if assailed, rather than to
take away another's. He ought to avoid
disputes, to hate quarrels. He ought to
restore unity and the grace of quietness.
When a good man gives up any of his own
rights, it is not only a sign of liberality, but
is also accompanied by great advantages.
To start with, it is no small gain to be free
from the cost of a lawsuit. Then it also
brings in good results, by an increase of
friendship, from which many advantages
rise. These become afterwards most use-
ful to the man that can despise a little some-
thing at the time.
107. In all the duties of hospitality kindly
feeling must be shown to all, but greater re-
spect must be given to the upright. ' For :
"Whosoever receiveth a righteous man, in
the name of a righteous man, shall receive a
righteous man's reward,"^ as the Lord has
said. Such is the favour in which hospi-
tality stands with God, that not even the
draught of cold water shall fail of getting a
reward. 3 Thou seest that Abraham, in look-
ing for guests, received God Himself to en-
tertain. 4 Thou seest that Lot received the
angels. 5 And how dost thou know that
when thou receivest men, thou dost ncft re-
ceive Christ .'' Christ may be in the stranger
that comes, for Christ is there in the person
of the poor, as He Himself says : "I was
in prison and thou camest to Me, I was
naked and thou didst clothe Me." ^
108. It is sweet, then, to seek not for
money but for grace. It is true 7 that this
evil has long ago entered into human hearts,
so that money stands in the place of honour,
and the minds of men are filled with admi-
ration for wealth. Thus love of money
sinks in and as it were dries up every
kindly duty ; so that men consider every-
thing a loss which is spent beyond the usual
amount. But even here the holy Scriptures
have been on the watch against love of
money, that it might prove no cause of hin-
drance, saying : " Better is hospitality, even
though it consisteth only of herbs. "^ And
again : ' ' Better is bread in pleasantness with
peace." 9 For the Scriptures teach us not to
be wasteful, but liberal.
109. There are two kinds of free-giving,
one arising from liberality, the other from
wasteful extravagance.'" It is a mark of
liberality to receive the stranger, to clothe
the naked, to redeem the captives, to help
1 Cic. de Off.W. 20.
3 S. Matt. X. 42.
^ Gen. xix. 3.
' Cic. dc Off. II. 20, § 69.
^ Prov. xvii. I.
' S. Matt. X. 41.
* Gen. xviii. r ff.
• S. Matt. XXV. 36.
' Prov. XV. 17.
» Cic. de Off. II. 16.
the needy. It is wasteful to spend money
on expensive banquets and much wine.
Wherefore one reads: "Wine is wasteful,
drunkenness is abusive.'"' It is wasteful to
spend one's own wealth merely for the sake
of gaining the favour of the people. This
they do who spend their inheritance on the
games of the circus, or on theatrical pieces
and gladiatorial shows, or even a combat of
wild beasts, just to surpass the fame of their
forefathers for these things. All this that
they do is but foolish, for it is not right to
be extravagant in spending money even on
good works.
1 10. I*t is a right kind of liberality to keep
due measure towards the poor themselves,
that one may have enough for more ; and not
to go beyond the right limit for the sake of
winning favour. Whatever comes forth out
of a pure sincere disposition, that is seemly.
It is also seemly not to enter on unnecessary
undertakings, nor to omit those that are
needed.
111. But it befits the priest especially to
adorn the' temple of God with fitting splen-
dour, so that the court of the Lord may be
made glorious by his endeavours. He ought
always to spend money as mercy demands.
It behoves him to give to strangers what is
right. This must not be too much, but
enough ; not more than, but as much as,
kindly feeling demands, so that he may
never seek another's favour at the expense
of the poor, nor show himself as either too
stingy or too free to the clergy. The one
act is unkind, the other wasteful. It is un-
kind if money should be Avanting for the
necessities of those whom one ought to win
back from their wretched employments. It
is wasteful if there should be too much over
for pleasure.
CHAPTER XXIL
We must ob.serve a right standard between too great
mildness and excessive harshness. They who en-
deavour to creep into the hearts of others by a false
show of mildness gain nothing substantial or lasting.
This the example of Absaloin plainly enough shows.
112. Moreover, due measure befits even
our words and instructions, that it may not
seem as though there was either too great
mildness or too much harshness. Many
prefer to be too mild, so as to appear to be
good. But it is certain that nothing feigned
or false can bear the form of true virtue ;
nay, it cannot even last. At first it flour-
* Prov. XX. f
DUTIES OF THE CLERGY.— BOOK 11.
6i
ishes, then, as time goes on, like a floweret
it fades and passes away, but what is true
and sincere has a deep root. '
113. To prove by examples our assertion
that what is feigned cannot last, but flour-
ishing just for a time quickly fails, we will
take one example of pretence and falsehood
from that family, from which we have
already drawn so many examples to show
their growth in virtue.
114. Absalom was King David's son,
known for his beauty, of splendid appear-
ance and in the heyday of youth ; so that
no other such man as he was found in
Israel.^ He was without a blemish from
the sole of his foot to the crown of his head.
He had for himself a chariot and horses and
fifty men to run before him. He rose at
early dawn and stood before the gate in the
way, and whoever he knew to be seeking
the judgment of the king, he called to him-
self, saying : "From what city art thou?"
And he answered: "I thy servant am of
one of the tribes of Israel." And Absalom
answered : ' ' Thy words are good and right.
Is there none given thee by the king to hear
thee.? Who will make me a judge.? And
whosoever will come unto me, that hath
need of judgment, I will give him justice. "
With such words he cajoled them. And
when they came to make obeisance to him,
stretching forth his hand he took hold of
them and kissed them. 3 So he turned the
hearts of all to himself. For flattery of this
sort quickly finds its way to touch the very
depths of the heart.
115. Those spoilt and ambitious men
chose what for a time seemed an honour to
them, and was pleasing and enjoyable. But
whilst that delay took place, which the
prophet,^ being prudent above all, thought
ought to intervene, they could no longer
hold out or bear it. Then David having no
doubt about the victory commended his son
to those who went out to fight, so that they
should spare him. s He would not engage
in the battle himself lest he should seem to
be taking up arms against one who was still
his son, though attempting to destroy his
father.
116. It is clear, then, that those things are
lasting and sound, which are true and grow
out of a sincere and not a false heart. Those,
however, which are brought about by pre-
tence and adulation can never last for long.
iCic. deOff. 11. 12, §43-
2 2 Sam. [2 Kings] xiv. 25.
2 2 Sam. [2 Kings] xv. 1-6.
* Hushai is probably meant by this, who advised Absalom to
delay his attack on the king.
'•" 2 Sam. [2 Kings] xviii. 5.
CHAPTER XXIII.
The good faith of those who are easily bought over
with money or flattery is a frail thing to trust to.
117. Who would suppose that those who
are bought over to obedience by money,'
or those who are allured by adulation, would
ever be faithful to them 1 For the former
are ever ready to sell themselves, whilst the
latter cannot put up with a hard rule. They
are easily won with a little adulation, but if
one reproves them by a word, they murmur
against it, they give one up, they go away
with hostile feelings, they forsake one in
anger. They prefer to rule rather than to
obey. They think that those whom they
ought to have placed over them ought to be
subject to themselves, as though indebted to
them by their kindness.
1 1 8. What man is there that thinks those
will be faithful to himself, whom he believes
he will have to bind to himself by money or
flattery .? For he who takes thy money sup-
poses that he is cheaply held, and looked
down upon, unless the money is paid again
and again. So he frequently expects his
price ; whilst the other, who is met with
prayer and flattery, is always wanting to be
asked.
CHAPTER XXIV.
We must strive for preferment only by right means.
An office undertaken must be carried out wisely and
with moderation. The inferior clergy should not de-
tract from the bishop's reputation by feigned virtues ;
nor again, should the bishop be jealous of a cleric,
but he .should be just in all things and especially in
giving judgment.
119. I THINK, then, that one should strive
to win preferment, especially in the Church,
only by good actions and with a right aim ;
so that there may be no proud conceit, no
idle carelessness, no shameful disposition of
mind, no unseemly ambition. A plain sim-
plicity of mind is enough for everything,
and commends itself quite sufficiently.
120. When in office, again, it is not right
to be harsh and severe, nor may one be too
easy ; lest on the one hand we should seem
to be exercising a despotic power, and on
the other to be by no means filling the
offic^ve had taken up.
^-^I. We must strive also to win many by
kindnesses and duties that we can do, and
to preserve the favour already shown us.
For they will with good reason forget the
^ Cic.de Off. n.b,%2\.
62
ST. AMBROSE.
benefits of former times if they are now
vexed at some great wrong. For it often
enough happens that those one has shown
favour to and allowed to rise step by step,
are driven away, if one decides in some
unworthy way to put another before them.
But it is seemly for a priest to show such
favour in his kindnesses and his decisions as
to guard equity, and to show regard to the
other clergy as to parents.
122. Those who once stood approved
should not now become overbearing, but
rather, as mindful of the grace they have
received, stand firm in their humility. A
priest ought not to be offended if either
cleric or attendant or any ecclesiastic should
win regard for himself, by showing mercy,
or by fasting, or by uprightness of life, or
by teaching and reading. For the grace
of the Church is the praise of the teacher.
It is a good thing that the work of another
should be praised, if only it be done with-
out any desire to boast. For each one
should receive praise from the lips of his
neighbour, and not from *his own mouth,
and each one should be commended by the
work he has done, not merely by the wishes
he had.
123. But if any one is disobedient to his
bishop and wishes to exalt and upraise him-
self, and to overshadow his bishop's merits
by a feigned appearance of learning or
humility or mercy, he is wandering from the
truth in his pride ; for the rule of truth is, to
do nothing to advance one's own cause
whereby another loses ground, nor to use
whatever good one has to the disgrace or
blame of another.
124. Never protect a wicked man, nor
allow the sacred things to be given over to
an unworthy one ; on the other hand, do not
harass and press hard on a man whose fault
is not clearly proved. Injustice quickly
gives offence in every case, but especially in
the Church, where equity ought to exist,
where like treatment should be given to all,
so that a powerful person may not claim the
more, nor a rich man appropriate the more.
For whether we be poor or rich, we are one
in Christ. Let him that lives a holier life
claim nothing more thereby for himself ; for
he ought rather to be the more humble for it.
125. In giving judgment let us have no
respect of persons. Favour must be put out
of sight, and the case be decided on its
merits. Nothing is so great a strain on
another's good oj^inion or confidence, as the
fact of our giving away the cause of the
weaker to the more pov/erful in any case
that comes before us. The same happens if
we are hard on the poor, whilst we make
excuses for the rich man when guilty. jMen
are ready enough to flatter those in high
positions, so as not to let them think them-
selves injured, or to feel vexed as though
overthrown. But if thou fearest to give of-
fence then do not undertake to give judg-
ment. If thou art a priest or some cleric do
not urge it. It is allowable for thee to be
silent in the matter, if it be a money affair,
though it is always due to consistency to be
on the side of equity. But in the cause of
God, where there is danger to the whole
Church, it is no small sin to act as though
one saw nothing.
CHAPTER XXV.
Benefits should be conferred on the poor rather than
on the rich, for these latter either think a return is
expected from them, or else they are angry at seem-
ing to be indebted for such an action. But the poor
man makes God the debtor in his place, and freely
owns to the benefits he has received. To these re-
marks is added a warning to despise riches.
126. But what advantage is it to thee to
show favour to a rich man ? Is it that he is
more ready to repay one who loves him ? '
For we generally show favour to those from
whom we expect to receive a return of
favour. But we ought to think far more of
the weak and helpless, because we hope to
receive, on behalf of him who has it not, a
recompense from the Lord Jesus, Who in the
likeness of a marriage feast ^ has given us a
general representation of virtue. By this He
bids us confer benefits rather on those who
cannot give them to us in return, teaching
us to bid to our feasts and meals, not those
who are rich, but those that are poor. For
the rich seem to be asked that they may pre-
pare a banquet for us in return ; the poor, as
they have nothing wherewith to make re-
turn, when they receive anything, make the
Lord to be our recompense Who has offered
Himself as surety for the poor.
127. In the ordinary course of things, too,
the conferring of a benefit on the poor is of
more use than when it is conferred on the
rich. The rich man scorns the benefit and
is ashamed to feel indebted for a favour.
Nay, moreover, whatever is offered to him
he takes as due to his merits, as though only
a just debt were paid him ; or else he thinks
it was but given because the giver expected
a still greater return to be made him by the
rich man. So, in accepting a kindness, the
' Cic.dc Ojr. 11. 20, §69.
S. Luke xiv. 12, 13.
DUTIES OF THE CLERGY.— BOOK II.
63
rich man, on that very ground, thinks that he
has eivcn more than he ever received. The
poor man, however, though he has no money
wherewith he can repay, at least shows his
grratitude. And herein it is certain that he
returns more than he received. For money
is paid in coins, but gratitude never fails ;
money grows less by payment, but grati-
tude fails when held back, and is preserved
when given to others. Next — a thing the
rich man avoids — the poor man owns that
he feels bound by the debt. He really
thinks help has been given him, not that it
has been offered in return for his honour.
He considers that his children have been
again given him, that his life is restored and
his family preserved. How much better,
then, is it to confer benefits upon the good
than on the uno^rateful.
128. Wherefore the Lord said to His dis-
ciples : "Take neither gold nor silver nor
money.'' ' Whereby as with a sickle He
cuts off the love of money that is ever grow-
ing up in human hearts. Peter also said to
the lame man, who was always carried
even from his mother's womb : " Silver
and gold have I none, but what I have give
I thee. Li the Name of Jesus Christ of
Nazareth, arise and walk." ^ So he gave
not money, but he gave health. How
much better it is to have health without
money, than money without health ! The
lame man rose ; he had not hoped for that :
he received no money ; though he had hoped
for that. But riches are hardly to be found
among the saints of the Lord, so as to be-
come objects of contempt to them.
CHAPTER XXVI.
How long standing an evil love of money is, is plain
from many examples in the Old Testament. And
yet it is plain, too, how idle a thing the possession of
money is.
129. But man's habits have so long
applied themselves to this admiration of
money, that no one is thought worthy of
honour unless he is rich. 3 This is no new
habit. Nay, this vice (and that makes the
matter worse) grew long years ago in the
hearts of men. When the city of Jericho fell
at the sound of the priests' trumpets, and
Joshua the son of Nun gained the victory,
he knew that the valour of the people was
weakened through love of money and desire
for gold. For when Achan had taken a
1 S. Matt. X. 9.
^Cic.de Off. 11.20, §71.
2 Acts iii. 6.
garment of gold and two hundred shekels
of silver and a golden ingot ' from the spoils
of the ruined city, he was brought before
the Lord, and could not deny the theft, but
owned it.^
130. Love of money, then, is an old, an
ancient vice, which showed itself even at
the declaration of the divine law ; for a law
was given to check it. 3 On account of love
of money Balak thought Balaam could be
tempted by rewards to curse the people of
our fathers. •♦ Love of money would have
won the day too, had not God bidden him
hold back from cursing. Overcome by love
of money Achan led to destruction all the
people of the fathers. So Joshua the son of
Nun, who. could stay the sun from setting,
could not stay the love of money in man
from creeping on. At the sound of his
voice the sun stood still, but love of money
stayed not. When the sun stood still Joshua
completed his triumph, but when love of
money went on, he almost lost the victory.
131. Why.? Did not the woman Delilah's
love of money deceive Samson, the bravest
man of all.? 5 So he who had torn asunder
the roaring lion with his hands ; ^ who, when
bound and handed over to his enemies,
alone, without help, burst his bonds and
slew a thousand of them; 7 who broke the
cords interwoven with sinews as though
they were "but the slight threads of a net ;
he, I say, having laid his head on the wo-
man's knee, was robbed of the decoration
of his victory-bringing hair, that which gave
him his might. Money flowed into the lap
of the woman, and the favour of God for-
sook the man.^
132. Love of money, then, is deadly.
Seductive is money, whilst it also defiles
those who have it, and N%lps not those who
have it not. Supposing that money some-
times is a help, yet it is only a help to a
poor man who makes his want known.
What good is it to him who does not long
for it, nor seek it ; who does not need its
help and is not turned aside by pursuit of
it } What good is it tcT others, if he who
has it is alone the richer for it .? Is he
therefore more honourable because he has
that whereby honour is often lost, because
he has what he must guard rather than pos-
sess } We possess what we use, but what
is beyond our use brings us no fruit of pos-
session, but only the danger of watching.
1 " Ihtguam aureamV Other readings are : " lineaiK auream,''
or" regulam a7ireant." - Josh. vii. 21.
^ Ex. XX. 17. * Num. xxii. 17.
^ Judg. xvi. 6. " Judg. xiv. 6.
' Judg. XV. 14, 15. * Judg. xvi. 20.
64
ST. AMBROSE.
CHAPTER XXVII.
In contempt of money there is the pattern of justice,
which virtue bishops and clerics ought to aim at
together with some others. A few words are added
on the duty of not bringing an excommunication too
quickly into force.
133. To come to an end ; we know that
contempt of riches is a form of justice,
therefore we ought to avoid love of money,
and strive with all our powers never to do
anything' against justice, but to guard it in
all our deeds and actions.
134. If we would please God, we must
have love, we must be of one mind, we
must follow humility, each one thinking
the other higher than himself. This is true
humility, when one never claims anything
proudly for oneself, but thinks oneself to be
the inferior. The bishop should treat the
clerics and attendants, who are indeed his
sons, as members of himself, and give to
each one that duty for which he sees him to
be fit.
135. Not without pain is a limb of the
body cut off which has become corrupt. It
is treated for a long time, to see if it can be
cured with various remedies. If it cannot
be cured, then it is cut off by a good physi-
cian. Thus it is a good bishops desire to
wish to heal the weak, to remove the
spreading ulcers, to burn some parts and
not to cut them off ; and lastly, when they
cannot be healed, to cut them off with pain
to himself Wherefore that beautiful rule
of the Apostle stands forth brightly, that
we should look each one, not on his own
things, but on the things of others. ' In this
way it will never come about that we shall
in anger give way to our own feelings, or
concede more than is right in favour to our
own wishes.
CHAPTER XXVIII.
Mercy must be freely shown even though it brings an
odium of its own. With regard to this, reference is
made to the well-known story about the sacred ves-
sels which were broken up by Ambrose to pay for
the redemption of captives ; and very beautiful ad-
vice is given about the right use of the gold and
silver which the Church possesses. Next, after
showing from the action of holy Lawrence what are
the true treasures of the Church, certain rules are
laid down which ought to be observed in melting
down and employing for such uses the consecrated
' vessels of the Church.
136. It is a very great incentive to mercy
» Phil. ii. 4.
to share in others' misfortunes, to help the
needs of others as far as our means allow,
and sometimes even beyond them. For it
is better for mercy's sake to take up a case,
or to suffer odium rather than to show hard
feeling. So I once brought odium on my-
self because I broke up the sacred vessels to
redeem captives — a fact that could displease
the Arians. Not that it displeased them as
an act, but as being a thing in which they
could take hold of something for which to
blame me. Who can be so hard, cruel,
iron-hearted, as to be displeased because a
man is redeemed from death, or a woman
from barbarian impurities, things that are
worse than death, or boys and girls and in-
fants from the pollution of idols, whereby
through fear of death they were defiled ?
137. Although we did not act thus with-
out good reason, yet we have followed it up
among the people so as to confess and to
add again and again that it was far better to
preserve souls than gold for the Lord. For
He Who sent the apostles without gold'
also brought together the churches without
gold. The Church has gold, not to store up,
but to lay out, and to spend on those who
need. What necessity is there to guard
what is of no good .'' Do we not know how
much gold, and silver the Assyrians took out
of the temple of the Lord ? ^ Is it not much
better that the priests should melt it down
for the sustenance of the poor, if other sup-
plies fail, than that a sacrilegious enemy
should carry it off and defile it .' Would not
the Lord Himself say : Why didst thou suffer
so many needy to die of hunger.? wSurely
thou hadst gold ? Thou shouldst have
given them sustenance. Why are so many
captives brought on the slave market, and
why are so many unredeemed left to be
slain by the enemy ? It had been better to
preserve living vessels than gold ones.
138. To this no answer could be given.
For what wouldst thou say : I feared that
the temple of God would need its ornaments .''
He would answer : The sacraments need
not gold, nor are they proper to gold only —
for they are not bought with gold. The
glory of the sacraments is the redemption of
captives. Truly they are precious vessels,
for they redeem men from death. That, in-
deed, is the true treasure of the Lord which
effects what His blood effected. Then, in-
deed, is the vessel of the Lord's blood recog-
nized, when one sees in either redemption,
so that the chalice redeems from the enemy
those whom His blood redeemed from sin.
1 S. Matt X. 9.
2 [4! Kings xxiv. 13.
DUTIES OF THE CLERGY.— BOOK II.
65
How beautifully it is said, when lon^;' lines
of captives are redeemed by the Church :
These Christ has redeemed. Behold the gold
that can be tried, behold the useful gold,
behold the gold of Christ which frees from
death, behold the gold whereby modesty is
redeemed and chastity is preserved.
139. These, then, I preferred to handover
to you as free men, rather than to store up
the gold. This crowd of captives, this com-
pany surely is more glorious than the sight
of cups. The gold of the Redeemer ought
to contribute to this work so as to redeem
those in danger. I recognize the fact that
the blood of Christ not only glows in cups
of gold, but also by the office of redemption
has impressed upon them the power of the
divine operation.
140. Such gold the holy martyr Lawrence
preserved for the Lord. For when the
treasures of the Church were demanded from
him, he promised that he would show them.
On the following day he brought the poor
together. When asked where the treasures
were which he had promised, he pointed to
the poor, saying : "These are the treasures
of the Church. " And truly they were trea-
sures, in whom Christ lives, in whom there
is faith in Him. So, too, the Apostle says :
" We have this treasure in earthen vessels." '
What greater treasures has Christ than those
in whom He says He Himself lives.? For
thus it is written : "I was hungry and ye
gave Me to eat, I was thirsty and ye gave
Me to drink, I was a stranger and ye took
Me in. ''2 And again: "What thou didst
to one of these, thou didst it unto Me. "^
What better treasures has Jesus than those
in which He loves to be seen .''
141. These treasures Lawrence pointed
out, and prevailed, for the persecutors could
not take them away. Jehoiachim,+ who
preserved his gold during the siege and
spent it not in providing food, saw his gold
carried off, and himself led into captivity.
Lawrence, who preferred to spend the gold
of the Church on the poor, rather than to
keep it in hand for the persecutor, received
the sacred crown of martyrdom for the
unique and deep-sighted vigour of his
meaning. Or was it perhaps said to holy
Lawrence : "Thou shouldst not spend the
treasures of the Church, or sell the sacred
vessels " ?
142. It is necessary that every one should
fill this office, with genuine good faith and
clear-sighted forethought. If any one de-
^ 2 Cor. iv. 7.
* S. Matt. XXV. 40.
* S. Matt. XXV. 35.
* 2 [4] Kings xxiii. 35.
rives profit from it for himself it is a crime,
but if he spends the treasures on the poor,
or redeems captives, he shows mercy. For
no one can say : Why does the poor man
live .-* None can complain that captives are
redeemed, none can find fault because a
temple of the Lord is built, none can be
angry because a plot of ground has been en-
larged for the burial of the bodies of the
faithful, none can be vexed because in the
tombs of the Christians there is rest for the
dead. In these three ways it is allowable
to break up, melt down, or sell even the
sacred vessels of the Church.
143. It is necessary to see that the mystic
cup does not go out of the Church, lest the
service of the sacred chalice should be
turned over to base uses. Therefore vessels
were first sought for in the Church which
had not been consecrated to such holy uses.
Then broken up and afterwards melted
down, they were given to the poor in small
payments, and were also used for the ran-
som of captives. But if new vessels fail, or
those which never seem to have been used
for such a holy purpose, then, as I have al-
ready said, I think that all might be put to
this use without irreverence.
CHAPTER XXIX.
The property of widows or of all the faithful, that has
been entrusted to the Church, ought to be defended
though it brings danger to oneself. This is illus-
trated by the e.xample of Onias the priest, and of
Ambrose, bishop of Ticinum.
144. Great care must be taken that the
property entrusted by widows remains in-
violate. It should be guarded without
causing complaint, not only if it belongs to
widows, but to any one at all. For good
faith must be shown to all, though the cause
of the widow and orphans comes first.
145. So everything entrusted to the temple
was preserved in the name of the widows
alone, as we read in the book of the Macca-
bees. ' For when information was given of
the money, which Simon treacherously had
told King Antiochus could be found in large
quantities in the temple at Jerusalem, Helio-
dorus was sent to look into the matter. He
came to the temple, and made known to the
high priest his hateful information and the
reason of his coming.
146. Then the priest said that only means
for the maintenance of the widows and or-
phans was laid up there. And when Helio-
^2 Mace. iii.
66
ST. AMBROSE.
dorus would have gone to seize it, and to
claim it on the king's behalf, the priests cast
themselves before the altar, after putting on
their priestly robes, and with tears called on
the living God Who had given them the law
concerning trust-money to show Himself
as guardian of His own commands. The
changed look and colour of the high priest
showed what grief of soul and anxiety and
tension of mind were his. All wept, for the
spot would fall into contempt, if not even
in the temple of God safe and faithful guar-
dianship could be preserved. Women with
breasts girded, and virgins who usually were
shut in, knocked at the doors. Some ran to
the walls, others looked out of the windows,
all raised their hands to heaven in prayer
that God would stand by His laws.
147. But Heliodorus, undeterred by this,
was eager to carry out his intention, and had
already surrounded the treasury with his fol-
lowers, when suddenly there appeared to him
a dreadful horseman all glorious in golden
armour, his horse also being adorned with
costly ornaments. Two other youths also
appeared in glorious might and wondrous
beauty, in splendour and glory and beaute-
ous array. They stood round him, and on
either side beat the sacrilegious wretch, and
gave him stroke after stroke without inter-
mission. What more need I say .'' Shut in
by darkness he fell to the ground, and lay
there nearly dead with fear at this plain
proof of divine power, nor had he any hope
of safety left within him. Joy returned to
those who were in fear, fear fell on those
who were so proud before. And some of
the friends of Heliodorus in their trouble be-
sought Onias, asking life for him, since he
was almost at his last breath.
148. When, therefore, the high priest asked
for this, the same youths again appeared to
Heliodorus, clad in the same garments, and
said to him : Give thanks to Onias the high
priest, for whose sake thy life is granted
thee. But do thou, having experienced the
scourge of God, go and tell thy friends how
much thou hast learnt of the sanctity of the
temple and the power of God. With these
words they passed out of sight. Heliodorus
then, his life having come back to him, of-
fered a sacrifice to the Lord, gave thanks to
the priest Onias, and returned with his army
to the king, saying: "If thou hast an
enemy or one who is plotting against thy
power, send him thither and thou wilt re-
ceive him back well scourged."
149. Therefore, my sons, good faith must
be preserved in the case of trust-money, ami
care, too, must be shown. Your service will
glow the brighter if the oppression of a
powerful man, which some widow or orphan
cannot withstand, is checked by the assist-
ance of the Church, and if ye show that the
command of the Lord has more weight with
you than the favour of the rich.
150. Ye also remember how often we en-
tered on a contest against the royal attacks.
on behalf of the trust-money belonging to
widows, yea, and to others as well. You
and I shared this in common. I will also
mention the late case of the Church at
Ticinum, which was in danger of losing the
widow's trust-money that it had received.'
For when he who wanted to claim it on some
imperial rescript demanded it, the clergy
did not maintain their rights. For they
themselves, having once been called to office
and sent to intervene, now supposed that
they could not oppose the emperor's orders.
The plain words of the rescript were read,
the orders of the chief officer of the court
were there, he who was to act in the matter
was at hand. What more was to be said ?
It was handed over.
151. However, after taking counsel with
me, the holy bishop took possession of the
rooms to which he knew that the widow's
property had been carried. As it could not
he carried away, it was all set down in
writing. Later on it was again demanded
on proof of the document. The emperor re-
peated the order, and would meet us himself
in his own person. We refused. And when
the force of the divine law, and a long list
of passages and the danger of Heliodorus
was explained, at length the emperor be-
came reasonable. Afterwards, again, an
attempt was made to seize it, but the good
bishop anticipated the attempt and restored
to the widow all he had received. So faith
was preserved, but the oppression was no
longer a cause for fear ; for now it is the
matter itself, not good faith, that is in danger.
CHAPTER XXX.
The ending of the book brings an exhortation to avoid
ill-will, and to seek prudence, faith, and the other
virtues.
152. My sons, avoid wicked men, guard
against the envious. There is this difference
l)etween a wicked and an envious man : the
wicked man is delighted at his own good
fortune, but the envious is tortured at the
' This was attempted by the Emperor Valentinian II., who was in-
duced to act ill this way by his mother Justina. She being an Arian
was only too ready to harass in every possible way a Catholic bishop
sucli as Ambrose of Ticinum was.
DUTIES OF THE CLERGY.— BOOK III.
67
\ thoug-ht of another's. The former loves evil,
the latter hates good. So he is almost more
bearable who desires good for himself alone,
than he who desires evil for all.
153. My sons, think before you act, and
when you have thought long then do what
you consider right. When the opportunity
of a praiseworthy death is given let it be
seized at once. Glory that is put off flies
away and is not easily laid hold of again.
154. Love faith. For by his devotion and
faith Josiah ' won great love for himself
from his enemies. For he celebrated the
Lord's passover when he was eighteen years
old, as no one had done it before him. As
then in zeal he was superior to those who
went before him, so do ye, my sons, show
zeal for God. Let zeal for God search you
through, and devour you, so that each one
of you may say : ' ' The zeal of thine house
hath eaten me up."'
was called the zealot.^
of
An apostle of Christ
But why do I speak
apostle.'* The Lord Himself said:
zeal of thine house hath eaten Me
Let it then be real zeal for God, not
earthy zeal, for that causes jea-
an
"The
up. 3
mean
lousy.
155. Let there be peace among you, which
passeth all understanding. Love one another.
Nothing is sweeter than charity, nothing
more blessed than peace. Ye yourselves
know that I have ever loved you and do now
love you above all others. As the children
of one father ye have become united under
the bond of brotherly affection.
156. Whatsoever is good, that hold fast;
and the God of peace and love be with you
in the Lord Jesus, to W^hom be honour and
glory, dominion and might, together with
the Holy Spirit, for ever and ever. Amen.
BOOK III.
CHAPTER I.
We are taught by David and Solomon how to take
counsel with our own heart. Scipio is not to be ac-
counted prime author of the saying which is ascribed
to him. The writer proves what glorious things the
holy prophets accomplished in their time of quiet,
and shows, by examples of their and others' leisure
moments, that a just man is never alone in trouble.
1. The prophet David taught us that we
should go about in our heart as though in a
large house ; that we should hold converse
with it as with some trusty companion. He
spoke to himself, and conversed with him-
self, as these words show : "I said, I will
take heed to my ways."^ Solomon his son
also said : " Drink water out of thine own
vessels, and out of the springs of thy wells ; " -5
that is : use thine own counsel. For :
' ' Counsel in the heart of a man is as deep
waters."'* "Let no stranger," it says,
" share it with thee. Let the fountain of
thy water be thine own, and rejoice with thy
wife who is thine from thy youth. Let the
loving hind and pleasant doe converse with
thee. "5
2. Scipio, ^ therefore, was not the first to
1 2 [4] Kings xxiii. 21 S. * Ps. xxxix. [xxxviii.] i.
■■' Prov. V. 15. * Prov. xx. 5. * Prov. v. 17-19.
'■' Cic. tfe Off. III. I. Scipio, bom B.C. 234. He was the greatest
Roman of his time, a famous general and the conqueror of Hanni-
bal. His exploits in Africa won him the surname of Africanus.
Owing to jealous intrigues he in B.C. 185 left Rome and retired to
his estate, where he passed the rest of his days in peaceful employ-
know that he was not alone when he was
alone, or that he was least at leisure when
he was at leisure. For Moses knew it be-
fore him, who, when silent, was crying out ; *
who, when he stood at ease, was fighting,
nay, not merely fighting but triumphing over
enemies whom he had not come near. So
much was he at ease, that others held up his
hands ; yet he was no less active than
others, for he with his hands at ease was
overcoming the enemy, whom they that
were in the battle could not conquer, s Thus
Moses in his silence spoke, and in his ease
laboured hard. And were his labours greater
than his times of quiet, who, being in the
mount for forty days, received the whole
law .' ^ And in that solitude there was One
not far away to speak with him. Whence
also David says: "I will hear what the
Lord God will say within me. " 7 How much
greater a thing is it for God to speak with
any one, than for a man to speak with him-
self !
3. The apostles passed by and their
shadows cured the sick.^ Their garments
were touched and health was granted.
ments. Cicero (de Off. III. i) relates on Cato's authority that he
used to say : " Nunqiiam se viiims otiostiin esse guam cum otiosus,
nee 7ninsolum quaiti ciitii solus essei."
1 Ps. Ixix. [Ixviii.J 9. - S. Luke vi. 15.
2 S. John ii. 17. St. John, however, only says: "The disciples
remembered that it was written." ■* Ex. xiv. i6.
5 Ex. xvii. II. " Ex. xxiv. 17.
' Ps.. Ixxxv. [Ixxxiv.] 8. * Acts v. 15, 16.
68
ST. AMBROSE.
4. Elijah spoke the word, and the rain
ceased and fell not on the earth for three
years and six months." Again he spoke,
and the barrel of meal failed not, and the
cruse of oil wasted not the whole time of
that long- famine.^
5. But — as many
delight
which is the most glorious
in warfare —
to bring a battle
to an end by the strength of a great army,
or, by merits before God alone? Elisha
rested in one place while the king of Syria
waged a great war against the people of our
fathers, and was adding to its terrors by
various treacherous plans, and was en-
deavouring to catch them in an ambush.
But the prophet found out all their prepara-
tions, and being by the grace of God present
everywhere in mental vigour, he told the
thoughts of their enemies to his countrymen,
and warned them of what places to beware.
And when this was known to the king of
Syria, he sent an army and shut in the
prophet. Elisha prayed and caused all of
them to be struck with blindness, and made
those who had come to besiege him enter
Samaria as captives. ^
6. Let us compare this leisure of his with
that of others.-* Other men for the sake of
rest are wont to withdraw their minds from
business, and to retire from the company
and companionship of men ; to seek the re-
tirement of the country or the solitude of the
fields, or in the city to give their minds a
rest and to enjoy peace and quietness. But
Elisha was ever active. In solitude he
divided Jordan on passing over it, so that
the lower part flowed down, whilst the
upper returned to its source. On Carmel he
promises the woman, who so far had had
no child, that a son now unhoped for should
be born to her. s He raises the dead to
life,^ he corrects the bitterness of the food,
and makes it to be sweet by mixing meal
with it. 7 Having distributed ten loaves to
the people for food, he gathered up the frag-
ments that were left after they had been
filled.^ He makes the iron head of the axe,
which had fallen off and was sunk deep in the
river Jordan, to swim by putting the wooden
handle in the water. 9 He changes leprosy
for cleanness,'" drought for rain," famine for
plenty.'^
7. When can the upright man be alone,
since he is always with God ? When is he
left forsaken who is never separated from
' I [■?! Kings xvii. i.
^ 2 [4] Kings vi. .S ff.
'' 2 [4] Kings iv. i6,
' 2 [4] Kings iv. 41.
" 2 [4] Kings vi. 6.
" 2 [4I Kings iii. 17.
- I [3] Kings xvii. 16 ff.
< Cic. <fe Off. III. I, §2.
« 2 [4] Kings iv. 34.
" 2 [4] Kings iv. 44.
'" 2 [4] Kings V. 10.
'-- 2 [4] Kings vii. \.
Christ } ' ' Who, " it says, ' ' shall separate us
from the love of Christ .'* I am confident
that neither death nor life nor angel shall do
so."' And when can he be deprived of
his labour who never can be deprived of
his merits, wherein his labour receives its
crown.'* By what places is he limited to
whom the whole world of riches is a posses-
sion .'' By what judgment is he confined
who is never blamed by any one ? For he
is "as unknown yet well known, as dying
and behold he lives, as sorrowful yet always
rejoicing, as poor yet making many rich,
as having nothing and yet possessing all
things."^ For the upright man regards no-
thing but what is consistent and virtuous.
And so although he seems poor to another,
he is rich to himself, for his worth is taken
not at the value of the things which are
temporal, but of the things which are eter-
nal.
CHAPTER H.
The discussions among philosophers about the com-
parison between what is virtuous and what is useful
have nothing to do with Christians. For with them
nothing is useful which is not just. What are the
duties of perfection, and what are ordinary duties ?
The same words often suit different things in dif-
ferent ways. Lastly, a just man never seeks his own
advantage at the cost of another's disadvantage, but
rather is always on the lookout for what is useful to
others.
8. As we have already spoken about the
two former subjects, wherein we discussed
what is virtuous and what is useful, there
follows now the question whether we ought
to compare what is virtuous and useful to-
gether, and to ask which we must follow.
For, as we have already discussed the mat-
ter as to whether a thing is virtuous or
wicked, and in another place whether it is
useful or useless, so here some think we
ought to find out whether a thing is virtuous
or useful. ^
9. I am induced to do this, lest I should
seem to be allowing that these two are
mutually opposed to one another, when I
have already shown them to be one. For
I said that nothing can be virtuous but what
is useful, and nothing can be useful but
what is virtuous. ■♦ For we do not follow
the wisdom of the flesh, whereby the useful-
ness that consists in an abundance of money
is held to be of most value, but we fol^
low that wisdom which is of God, whereby
' Rom. viii. 35, 38. - 2 Cor. vi. q ff.
'■^ " utile." Sonie read " inutile:'' * Cic. de Off. III. 3, § 11.
DUTIES OF THE CLERGY.— BOOK III.
69
those things which are greatly valued in this
world are counted but as loss.
10. For this xazopdwim, which is duty car-
ried out entirely and in perfection, starts
from the true source of virtue.' On this
follows another, or ordinary duty. This
shows by its name that no hard or extra-
ordinary practice of virtue is involved, for
it can be common to very many. The
desire to save money is the usual practice
with many. To enjoy a well-prepared ban-
quet and a pleasant meal is a general habit ;
but to fast or to use self-restraint is the
practice of but few, and not to be desirous
of another's goods is a virtue rarely found.
On the other hand, to wish to deprive
another of his property — and not to be con-
tent with one's due — here one will find
many to keep company with one. Those
(the philosopher would say) are primary
duties — these ordinary.- The primary are
found but with few, the ordinary with the
many.
1 1. Again, the same words often have a dif-
ferent meaning. For instance, we call God
good and a man good ; but it bears in each
case quite a different meaning. ^ We call God
just in one sense, man in another. So, too,
there is a difference in meaning when we
call God wise and a man wise. This we
are taught in the Gospel: "Be ye perfect
even as your Father Who is in heaven is
perfect. "•♦ I read again that Paul was per-
fect and yet not perfect. For when he said :
"Not as though I had already attained,
either were already perfect ; but I follow
after, if that I may apprehend it. " s Immedi-
ately he added: "We, then, that are per-
fect. " ^ There is a twofold form of perfec-
tion, the one having but ordinary, the other
the highest worth. The one availing here,
the other hereafter. The one in accordance
with human powers, the other with the per-
fection of the world to come. But God is
just through all, wise above all, perfect in all.
12. There is also diversity even among
men themselves. Daniel, of whom it was
said: "Who is wiser than Daniel .''" 7 was
wise in a different sense to what others are.
The same may be said of Solomon, who was
filled with wisdom, above all the wisdom of
the ancients, and more than all the wise
men of Egypt. '^ To be wise as men are in
general is quite a different thing to being
really wise. He who is ordinarily wise
is wise for temporal matters, is wise for
1 Cic. de Off. III. 3, § 13.
^Cxc.deOff. III.4, § 16.
° Phil. iii. 12.
' Ezek. xxviii. 3.
« Cic. de Off. III. 3, § 14-
* S. Matt. V. 48.
« Phil. iii. 15.
* I [3] Kings iv. 29, 30.
himself, so as to deprive another of some-
thing and get it for himself. He who is
really wise does not know how to regard
his own advantage, but looks with all his
desire to that which is eternal, and to that
which is seemly and virtuous, seeking not
what is useful for himself, but for all.
13. Let this, then, be our rule,' so that we
may never go wrong between two things,
one virtuous, the other useful. The upright
man must never think of depriving another
of anything, nor must he ever wish to in-
crease his own advantage to the disadvan-
tage of another. This rule the Apostle gives
thee, saying: "All things are lawful, but
all things are not expedient ; all things are
lawful, but all things edify not. Let no
man seek his own, but each one another's."*
That is : Let no man seek his own advan-
tage, but another's ; let no man seek his
own honour, but another's. Wherefore he
says in another place: "Let each esteem
other better than themselves, looking not
each one to his own things, but to the things
of others." ^
14. And let no one seek his own favour
or his own praise, but another's. This we
can plainly see declared in the book of
Proverbs, where the Holy Spirit says through
Solomon : "My son, if thou be wise, be
wise for thyself and thy neighbours ; but if
thou turn out evil, thou alone shalt bear it." ^
The wise man gives counsel to others, as
the upright man does, and shares with him
in wearing the form of either virtue.
CHAPTER III.
The rule given about not seeking one's own gain is
established, first by the examples of Christ, next by
the meaning of the word, and lastly by the very form
and uses of our limbs. Wherefore the writer shows
what a crime it is to deprive another of what is
useful, since the law of nature as well as the divine
law is broken by such wickedness. Further, by its
means we also lose that gift which makes us superior
to other living creatures; and lastly, through it civil
laws are abused and treated with the greatest con-
tempt.
15. If, then, any one wishes to please all,
he must strive in everything to do, not what
is useful for himself, but what is useful for
many, as also Paul strove to do. For this
is "to be conformed to the image of
Christ, "5 namely, when one does not strive
for what is another's, and does not deprive
another of something so as to gain it for
1 Cic. de Off. III. 4, § 19.
8 Phil. ii. 3, 4.
'' Rom. viii. 29.
* I Cor. X. 23, 24.
* Prov. ix. 12.
/O
ST. AMBROSE.
oneself. For Christ our Lord, ' though He
was in the form of God, emptied Himself so
as to take on Himself the form of man, which
He wished to enrich with the virtue of His
works. Wilt thou, then, spoil him whom
Christ has put on ? Wilt thou strip him
whom Christ has clothed .'' For this is what
thou art doing when thou dost attempt to
increase thine own advantage at another's
loss.
1 6. Think, O man, from whence thou hast
received thy name — even from the earth, ^
which takes nothing from any one, but
gives freely to all, and supplies varied pro-
duce for the use of all living things. Hence
humanity is called a particular and innate
virtue in man, for it assists its partner.
17. The very form of thy body and the
uses of thy limbs teach thee this. Can one
limb claim the duties of another.? Can the
eye claim for itself the duties of the ear ; or
the mouth the duties of the eye ; or the hand
the service of the feet ; or the feet that of the
hands ? Nay, the hands themselves, both
left and right, have different duties to do, so
that if one were to change the use of either,
one would act contrary to nature. We
should have to lay aside the whole man be-
fore we could change the service of the vari-
ous members : as if, for instance, we were to
try to take food with the left hand, or to
perform the duties of the left hand with the
right, so as to remove the remains of food —
unless, of course, need demanded it.
18. Imagine for a moment, and give to
the eye the power to withdraw the under-
standing from the head, the sense of hearing
from the ears, the power of thought from
the mind, the sense of smell from the nose,
the sense of taste from the mouth, and then
to assume them itself, would it not at once
destroy the whole order of nature ? Where-
fore the Apostle says well: "If the whole
body were an eye, where were the hearing ?
If the whole were hearing, where were the
smelling?" 3 So, then, we are all one body,
though with many members, all necessary to
the body. For no one member can say/ of
another: "I have no need of thee. " For
those members which seem to be more
feeble are much more necessary and require
<rreater care and attention. And if one
member suffers, all the members suffer
with it. •♦
19. So we see how grave a matter it is
to deprive another, with whom we ought
» Phil. ii. 6, 7.
- The text here runs as follows : " Considera, O homo, unde no-
men sitviscris ; ab huvio uiigue"
^ I Cor. xii. 17. * I Cor. xii. 26.
rather to suffer, of anything, or to act un-
fairly or injuriously towards one to whom we
ought to give a share in our services. This
is a true law of nature, which binds us to
show all kindly feeling, so that we should
all of us in turn help one another, as parts
of one body, and should never think of
depriving another of anything, seeing it is
against the law of nature even to abstain
from giving help. We are born in such a
way that limb combines with limb, and one
works with another, and all assist each
other in mutual service. But if one fails in
its duty, tlie rest are hindered. If, for in-
stance, the hand tears out the eye, has it
not hindered the use of its work .? If it
were to wound the foot, how many actions
would it not prevent .'' But how much worse
is it for the whole man to be drawn aside
from his duty than for one of the mem-
bers only ! If the whole body is injured in
one member, so also is the whole com-
munity of the human race disturbed in one
man. The nature of mankind is injured, as
also is the society of the holy Church, which
rises into one united body, bound together
in oneness of faith and love. Christ the
Lord, also. Who died for all, will grieve
that the price of His blood was paid in vain.
20. Why, the very law of the Lord teaches
us that this rule must be observed, so that
we may never deprive another of anything
for the sake of our own advantage. For it
says: "Remove not the bounds which thy
fathers have set. " ' It bids a neighbour's ox
to be brought back if found wandering.^ It
orders a thief to be put to death. ^ It forbids
the labourer to be deprived of his hirct and
orders money to be returned without usury. s
It is a mark of kindly feeling to help him
who has nothing, but it is a sign of a hard
nature to extort more than one has given.
If a man has need of thy assistance because
he has not enough of his own wherewith to
repay a debt, is it not a wicked thing to de-
mand under the guise of kindly feeling a
larger sum from him who has not the means
to pay off a less amount? Thou dost but M
free him from debt to another, to bring him "
under thy own hand ; and thou callest that
human kindliness which is but a further
wickedness.
21. It is in this very matter that we stand
before all other living creatures, for they do
not understand how to do sfood. Wild beasts
snatch away, men share with others. Where-
fore the Psalmist says : "The righteous show-
' Prov. xxii. 28.
* Lev. xix. 13.
- Ex. xxiii. 4.
^ Deut. xxiii. ly.
DUTIES OF THE CLERGY.— BOOK III.
71
eth mercy and giveth." ' There are some,
however, to whom the wild beasts do good.
They feed their young with what they get,
and the birds satisfy their brood with food;
but to men alone has it been given to feed
all as though they were their own. That
is so in accordance with the claims of
nature. And if it is not lawful to refuse to
give, how is it lawful to deprive another.''
And do not our very laws teach us the same.''
They order those tilings which have been
taken from others with injury to their per-
sons or property to be restored with addi-
tional recompense ; so as to check the thief
from stealing by the penalty, and by the fine
to recall him from his ways.
22. Suppose, however, that some one did
not fear the penalty, or laughed at the fine,
would that make it a worthy thing to deprive
another of his own .'' That would be a mean
vice and suited only to the lowest of the low.
So contrary to nature is it, that while want
might seem to drive one to it, yet nature
could never urge it. And yet we find secret
theft among slaves, open robbery among
the rich.
23. But what so contrary to nature as to
injure another for our own benefit.'' The
natural feelings of our own hearts urge us to
keep on the watch for all, to undergo trouble,
to do work for all. It is considered also a
glorious thing for each one at risk to himself
to seek the quiet of all, and to think it far
more thankworthy to have saved his country
from destruction than to have kept danger
from himself. We must think it a far more
noble thing to labour for our country than
to pass a quiet life at ease in the full enjoy-
ment of leisure.
CHAPTER IV.
As it has been shown that he who injures another for
the sake of his own advantage will undergo terrible
punishment at the hand of his own conscience, it is
inferred that nothing is useful to one which is not in
the same way useful to all. Thus there is no place
among Christians for the question propounded by the
philosophers about two shipwrecked persons, for they
must show love and humility to all.
24. Hen'ce we infer ^ that a man who guides
himself according to the ruling of nature,
so as to be obedient to her, can never injure
another. If he injures another, he violates
nature, nor will he think that what he has
gained is so much an advantage as a disad-
vantage. And what punishment is worse
than the wounds of the conscience within .'
* Ps. xxxvii. [xxxvi.] 21.
- Cic. de Off. III. 5, § 25.
What judgment harder than that of our
hearts, whereby each one stands convicted
and accuses himself of the injury that he has
wrongfully done against his brother.' This
the Scriptures speak of very plainly, saying :
" Out of the mouth of fools there is a rod for
wrong-doing.''' Folly, then, is condemned
because it causes wrong-doing. Ought we
not rather to avoid this, than death, or loss,
or want, or exile, or sickness.' Who would
not think some blemish of body or loss of
inheritance far less than some blemish of
soul or loss of reputation .'
25. It is clear, then,- that all must consider
and hold that the advantage of the individual
is the same as that of all, and that nothing
must be considered advantageous except
what is for the general good. For how can
one be benefited alone.' That which is
useless to all is harmful. I certainly cannot
think that he who is useless to all can be of
use to himself. For if there is one law of
nature for all, there is also one state of use-
fulness for all. And we are bound by the
law of nature to act for the good of all. It /
is not, therefore, right for him who wishes
the interests of another to be considered
according to nature, to injure him against
the law of nature.
26. For if those wh,o run in a race^ are, as
one hears, instructed and warned each one
to win the race by swiftness of foot and not
by any foul play, and to hasten on to victory
by running as hard as they can, but not to
dare to trip up another or push him aside
with their hand, how much more in the
course of this life ought the victory to be
won by us, without falseness to another
and cheating?
27. Some ask 4 whether a wise man ought
in case of a shipwreck to take away a plank
from an ignorant sailor.' Although it seems
better for the common good that a wise
man rather than a fool should escape from
shipwreck, yet I do not think that a Chris-
tian, a just and a wise man, ought to save
his owiTo life by the death of another; just as
when he meets with an armed robber he
cannot return his blows, lest in defending-
his life he should stain his love toward his
neighbour. The verdict on this is plain and
clear in the books of the Gospel. "Put up
thy sword, for every one that taketh the
sword shall perish with the sword, "s What
robber is more hateful than the persecutor
who came to kill Christ .' But Christ would
* Prov. xiv. 3.
=* Cic. de Off. III. 10, § 42.
^ S. Matt. xxvi. 52.
2 Cic. de Off. III. 6.
« Cic. de Off. 23, § 89.
72
ST. AMBROSE.
not be defended from the wounds of the
persecutor, for He willed to heal all by His
wounds.
28. Why dost thou consider thyself
greater than another, when a Christian man
ought to put others before himself, to claim
nothing for himself, usurp no honours, claim
no reward for his merits ? Why, next, art
thou not wont to bear thy own troubles
rather than to destroy another's advantage ?
For what is so contrary to nature as not to
be content with what one has or to seek what
is another's, and to try to get it in shameful
ways. For ifa virtuous life is in accordance
with nature — for God made all things very
good — then shameful living must be opposed
to it. A virtuous and a shameful life cannot
go together, since they are absolutely sev-
ered by the law of nature.
CHAPTER V.
The upright does nothing that is contrary to duty, even
though there is a hope of keeping it secret. To point
this out the tale about the ring of Gyges was invented
by the philosophers. Exposing this, he brings for-
ward known and true examples from the life of David
and John the Baptist.
29. To lay down here already the result
of our discussion, as though we had already
ended it, we declare it a * fixed rule, that
we must never aim at anything but what is
virtuous. ' The wise man does nothing but
what can be done openly and without false-
ness,^ nor does he do anything whereby he
may involve himself in any wrong-doing,
even where he may escape notice. For he
is guilty in his own eyes, before being so
in the eyes of others ; and the publicity of
his crime does not bring him more shame
than his own consciousness of it. This we
can show, not by the made-up stories which
philosophers use, but from the true examples
of good men.
30. I need not, therefore, imagine a great
chasm in the earth, which had been loosened
by heavy rains, and had afterwards burst
asunder, as Plato does. ^ For he makes Gyges
descend into that chasm, and to meet there
that iron horse of the fable that had doors in
its sides. When these doors were opened,
he found a gold ring on the finger of a dead
man, whose corpse lay there lifele'ss. He
desiring the gold took away the ring. But
when he returned to the king's shepherds,
to whose number he belonged, by chance
^Cxc.deOff. III. 7, §33.
^ (:ic. de OJjT. III. 9.
2 Cic.de Off. III. 7, §37.
having turned the stone inwards towards the
palms of his hands, he saw all, yet was seen
by none. Then when he turned the ring to
its proper position, he was again seen by
all. On becoming conscious of this strange
power, by the use of the ring he committed
adultery with the queen, killed the king, and
took possession of the kingdom after slaying
all the rest, who he thought should be put
to death, so that they might be no hindrance
to him.
31. Give, says Plato, this ring to a wise
man, that when he commits a fault he may
by its help remain unnoticed ; yet he will
be none the more free from the stain of sin
than if he could not be hid. The hiding-
place of the wise lies not in the hope of im-
punity but in his own innocency. Lastly,
the law is not laid down for the just but for
the unjust.' For the just has within himself
the law of his mind, and a rule of equity and
justice. Thus he is not recalled from sin
by fear of punishment, but by the rule of a
virtuous life.
32. Therefore, to return to our subject, I
will now bring forward, not false examples
for true, but true examples in place of false.
For why need I imagine a chasm in the
earth, and an iron horse and a gold ring
found on the fingers of a dead man ; and say
that such was the power of this ring, that he
who wore it could appear at his own will,
but if he did not wish to be seen, he could
remove himself out of the sight of those
who stood by, so as to seem to be away.
This story, of course, is meant to answer the
question whether a wise man, on getting the
opportunity of using that ring so as to be
able to hide his crimes, and to obtain a
kingdom, — whether, I say, a wise man would
be unwilling to sin and would consider the
stain of sin far worse than the pains of
punishment, or whether he would use it for
doing wickedness in the hope of not being
found out .? Why, I say, should I need the
pretence of a ring, when I can show from
what has been done that a wise man, on
seeing he would not only be undetected in
his sin, but would also gain a kingdom if he
gave way to it, and who, on the other hand,
noted danger to his own safety if he did not
commit the crime, yet chose to risk his own
safety so as to be free from crime, rather
than to commit the crime and so gain the
kingdom.
ZZ- When David fled from the face of King
Saul, 2 because the king was seeking him" in
the desert with three thousand chosen men
* I Tim. i. 9.
* I Sam. [i Kings] xxvi. 2.
DUTIES OP^ THE CLERGY.— BOOK TTI.
n
to' put him to death, he entered the king's
camp and found him sleeping. There he
not only did him no injury, but actually
guarded him from being slain by any who had
entered with him. For when Abishai said
to him : "The Lord hath delivered thine
enemy into thine hand this day, now there-
fore I will slay him," he answered : " De-
stroy him not, for who can stretch forth his
hand against the Lord's anointed, and be
guiltless .'* " And he added : "As the Lord
liveth, unless the Lord shall smite him, or
his day shall come to die, or he shall die in
battle, and it be laid to me, the Lord forbid
that I should stretch out my hand against
the Lord's anointed." '
34. Therefore he did not suffer him to be
slain, but removed only his spear, which
stood by his head, and his cruse of water.
Then, whilst all were sleeping, he left the
camp and went across to the top of the hill,
and began to reproach the royal attendants,
and especially their general Abner, for not
keeping faithful watch over their lord and
king. Next, he showed them where the king's
spear and cruse were which had stood at
his head. And when the king called to him,
he restored the spear, and said : "The Lord
render to every man his righteousness and
faithfulness, for the Lord delivered thee into
my hand, but I would not avenge myself on
the Lord's anointed." ^ Even whilst he said
this, he feared his plots and fled, changing
his place in exile. However, he never put
safety before innocency, seeing that when a
second opportunity was given him of killing
the king, he would not use the chance that
came to him, and which put in his reach
certain safety instead of fear, and a kingdom
instead of exile.
35. Where was the use of the ring in
John's case, 3 who would not have been put
to death by Herod if he had kept silence .?
He could have kept silence before him so as
to be both seen and yet not killed. But be-
cause he not only could not endure to
sin himself to protect his own safety, but
could not bear and endure even another's
sin, he brought about the cause of his own
death. Certainly none can deny that he
might have kept silence, who in the case of
Gyges deny that he could have remained in-
visible by the help of the ring.
36. But although that fable has not the
force of truth, yet it has this much to go
upon, that if an upright man could hide him-
self, yet he would avoid sin just as though
' I Sam. [i Kings] xxvi. 8-10. - i Sam. [i Kings] xxvi. 23.
* S. Matt. xiv. 3.
he could not conceal himself ; and that he
would not hide his person by putting on a
ring, but his life by putting on Christ. As
the Apostle says: "Our life is hid with
Christ in God."' Let, then, no one here
strive to shine, let none show pride, let none
boast. Christ willed not to be known here,
He would not that His Name should be
preached in the Gospel whilst He lived on
earth." He came to lie hid from this world.
Let us therefore likewise hide our life after
the example of Christ, let us shun boast-
fulness, let us not desire to be made known.
It is better to live here in humility, and there
in glory. "When Christ," it says, "shall
appear, then shall we also appear with Him
in glory. "2
CHAPTER VI.
We ought not to allow the idea of profit to get hold of
us. What excuses they make who get their gains by
selling corn, and what answer ought to be made to
them. In connection with this certain parables from
the Gospels and some of the sayings of Solomon are
set before our eyes.
■^']. Let not, therefore, expediency get the
better of virtue, but virtue of expediency. By
expediency here I mean what is accounted
so by people generally. Let love of money
be destroyed, let lust die. The holy man
says that he has never been engaged in
business. 3 For to get an increase in price
is a sign not of simplicity but of cunning.
Elsewhere it says: "He that seeketh a
high price for his corn is cursed among the
people." 4
38. Plain and definite is the statement,
leaving no room for debate, such as a dis-
putatious kind of speaking is wont to give,
when one maintains that agriculture is con-
sidered praiseworthy by all ; that the fruits
of the earth are easily grown ; that the more a
man has sown, the greater will be his meed
of praise ; further, that the richer returns of
his active labours are not gained by fraud,
and that carelessness and disregard for an
uncultivated soil are wont to be blamed.
39. I have ploughed, he says, carefully.
I have sown freely. I have tilled actively.
I have gathered good increase. I have stored
it anxiously, saved it faithfully, and guarded
it with care. Now in a time of famine I
* Col. ill. 3. ^ Col. iii. 4.
^ Ps. Ixxi. 15 [LXX.]. " Sanctus in tiegotiationein introisse se
negat," says St. Ambrose, from Ps. Ixxi. 15. According to the Sep-
tuagint, " OVK iyviav TrpayfiaTct'a?,"' which in the old Latin versions
became " quoniam non cogttoii negotiatio7tes" (the Vulgate has
^' liter atnr am " for " negotiatioues").
- Prov. xi. 26.
74
ST. AMBROSE.
sell it, and come to the help of the hungry.
I sell my own corn, not another's. And for
no more than others, nay, even at a less price.
What fraud is there here, when many would
come to s^reat danger if they had nothing to
buy.'' Is industry to be made a crime.'' Or
diligence to be blamed .'' Or foresight to be
abused .'' Perhaps he may even say : Joseph
collected corn in a time of abundance, and
sold it when it was dear. Is any one
forced to buy it at too dear a price .■* Is
force employed against the buyer .-* The
opportunity to buy is afforded to all, injury
is inflicted on none.
40. When this has been said, and one
man's ideas have carried him so far, an-
other rises and says : Agriculture is good
indeed, for it supplies fruits for all, and by
simple industry acids to the richness of the
earth without any cheating or fraud. If
there is any error, the loss is the greater,
for the better a man sows, the better he will
reap. If he has sown the pure grain of
wheat, he gathers a purer and cleaner har-
vest. The fruitful earth returns what she
has received in manifold measure. A good
field returns its produce with interest.
41. Thou must expect payment for thy
labour from the crops of the fruitful lantl,
and must hope for a just return from the
fruitfulness of the rich earth. Why dost
thou use the industry of nature and make a
cheat of it .'' Why dost thou grudge for the
use of men what is grown for all ? Why
lessen the abundance for the people .'* Why
make want] thy aim ? Why make the poor
long for a barren season ? For when they
do not feel the benefits of a fruitful season,
because thou art putting up the price, iind
art storing up the corn, they would far
rather that nothing should be produced,
than that thou shouldst do business at the
expense of other people's hunger. Thou
makest much of the want of corn, the small
supply of food. Thou groanest over the
rich crops of the soil ; thou mournest the
general plenty, and bewailest the garners
full of corn ; thou art on the lookout to see
when the crop is poor and the harvest fails.
Thou rejoicest that a curse has smiled upon
thy wishes, so that none should have their
produce. Then thou rejoicest that thy har-
vest has come. Then thou collcctest wealth
from the misery of all, and callest this in-
dustry and diligence, when it is but cunning
shrewdness and an adroit trick of the trade.
Thou callest it a remedy, when it is but a
wicked contrivance. Shall I call this rob-
bery or only gain ? These opportunities
are seized as though seasons for plunder,
wherein, like some cruel waylayer, thou
mayest fall upon the stomachs of men.
The price rises higher as though by the
mere addition of interest, but the danger to
life is increased too. For then the interest
of the stored-up crops grows higher. As a
usurer thou hidest up thy corn, as a seller
thou puttest it up for auction. Why dost
thou wish evil to all, because the famine
will grow worse, as though no corn should
be left, as though a more unfruitful year
should follow .'' Thy gain is the public loss.
42. Holy Joseph opened the garners to
all ; he did not shut them up. He did not
try to get the full price of the year's produce,
but assigned it for a yearly payment. He
took nothing for himself, but, so far as
famine could be checked for the future, he
made his arrangements with careful fore-
sight.
43. Thou hast read how the Lord Jesus
in the Gospel speaks of that corn-dealer
who was looking out for a high price, whose
possessions brought him in rich fruits, but
who, as though still in need, said : "What
shall I do .? I have no room where to be-
stow my goods. I will pull down my barns
and build greater,'" ' though he could not
know whether in the following night his
soul would not be demanded of him. He
knew not what to do, he seemed to be in
doubt, just as though he were in want of
food. His barns could not take in the
year's supply, and yet he thought he was in
need.
44. Rightly, therefore, Solomon says :
" He that withholdeth corn shall leave it
for the nations,"^ not for his heirs, for the
gains of avarice have nothing to do with
the rights of succession. That which is not
rightfully got together is scattered as though
by a wind by outsiders that seize it. And
he added : " He who graspeth at the year's
produce is cursed among the people, but
blessing shall be his that imparteth it. " Thou
seest, then, what is said of him who distri-
butes the corn, but not of him that seeks for
a high price. True expediency does not
therefore exist where virtue loses more than
expediency gains.
' S. Luke xii. 17.
^ Prov. xi. 26. .St. Ambrose cites the same verse each time, but
the first time according to LXX. The second time he varies the
commencement.
DUTIES OF THE CLERGY.— BOOK III.
75
CHAPTER VII.
Strangers must never be expelled the city in a time of
famine. In this matter the noble advice of a Chris-
tian sage is adduced, in contrast to which the shame-
ful deed committed at Rome is given. By com])aring
the two it is shown that the former is coml^ined with
what is virtuous and useful, but the latter with
neither.
45. But they, too, who would forbid the
city to strangers ' cannot have our approval.
They would expel them at the very time
when they ought to help, and separate them
from the trade of their common parent.
They would refuse them a share in the pro-
duce meant for all, and avert the intercourse
that has already begun ; and they are un-
willing, in a time of necessity, to give those
with whom they have enjoyed their rights
in common, a share in what they them-
selves have. Beasts do not drive out beasts,
yet man shuts out man. Wild beasts and
animals consider food which the earth sup-
plies to be common to all. They all give
assistance to those like themselves ; and
man, who ought to think nothing human
foreign to himself, fights against his own.
46. How much better did he act who,
having already reached an advanced age,
when the city was suffering from famine,
and, as is common in such cases, the people
demanded that strangers should be forbid-
den the city, having the office of the pre-
fectship ^ of the city, which is higher than
the rest, called together the officials and
richer men, and demanded that they should
take counsel for the public welfare. He
said that it was as cruel a thing for the
strangers to be expelled as for one man to
be cast off by another, and to be refused
food when dying. We do not allow our
dogs to come to our table and leave them
unfed, yet we shut out a man. How unpro-
fitable, again, it is for the world that so many
people perish, whom some deadly plague
carries off. How unprofitable for their city
that so large a number should perish, who
were wont to be helpful either in paying
contributions or in carrying on business.
Another's hunger is profitable to no man,
nor to put off the day of help as long as
possible and to do nothing to check the
want. Nay more, when so many of the
»Cic. de Off. III. II, §67.
2 It is not certain to what date the famine mentioned by St. Am-
brose is to be referred, nor is the name of the prefect of the city
certainly known. The Prajfectus Urbis was at this time the highest
officer of the city, directly representing the emperor, and except to
the latter there was no appeal from his decisions. Amongst other
duties he exercised a supervision over the importation, exportation,
and prices of provisions. As St. Ambrose, § 48, calls him " sanc-
iissiiiius senex,'" he was probably a Christian.
cultivators of the soil are gone, when so
many labourers are dying, the corn supplies
will fail for the future. Shall we then expel
those who are wont to supply us with food,
are we unwilling to feed in a time of need
those who have fed us all along.? How
great is the assistance which they supply
even at this time. "Not by bread alone
does man live.'' They are even our own
family ; many of them even are our own
kindred. Let us make some return for
what we have received.
47. But perhaps we fear that want may
increase. First of all, I answer, mercy
never fails, but always finds means of help.
Next, let us make up for the corn supplies
which are to be granted to them, by a sub-
scription. Let us put that right with our
gold. And, again, must we not buy other
cultivators of the soil if we lose these 1 How
much cheaper is it to feed than to buy a
working-man. Where, too, can one obtain,
where find a man to take the place of the
former .? And suppose one finds him, do
not forget that, with an ignorant man used
to different ways, one may fill up the place
in point of numbers, but not as regards the
work to be done.
48. Why need I say more .? When the
money was supplied corn was brought in.
So the city's abundance was not diminished,
and yet assistance was given to the stran-
gers. What praise this act won that holy
man from God ! What glory among men !
He, indeed, had won an honoured name,
who, pointing to the people of a whole
province, could truly say to the emperor :
All these I have preserved for thee ; these
live owing to the kindness of the senate ;
these thy council- has snatched from death !
49. How much more expedient was this
than that which was done lately at Rome.
There from that widely extended city were
those expelled who had already passed
most of their life in it. In tears they went
forth with their children, for whom as being
citizens they bewailed the exile, which, as
they said, ought to be averted ; no less did
they grieve over the broken bonds of union,
the severed ties of relationship. And yet a
fruitful year had smiled upon us. The city
alone needed corn to be brought into it. It
could have got help, if it had sought corn
from the Italians whose children they were
driving out. Nothing is more shameful
than to expel a man as a foreigner, and yet
to claim his services as though he belonged
* Deut. viii. 3.
- tua curia. Ed. Med. has " tiia aira.
7^
ST. AMBROSE.
to us. How canst thou expel a man who
Hves on his own produce? How canst
thou expel him who supplies thee with
food ? Thou retainest thy servant, and
thrustest out thy kindred ! Thou.takest the
corn, but showest no good feeling ! Thou
takest food by force, but dost not show
gratitude !
50. How wretched this is, how useless !
For how can that be expedient which is not
seemly. Of what great supplies from her
corporations has Rome at times been de-
prived, yet she could not dismiss them and
yet escape a famine, while waiting for a
favourable breeze, and the provisions in the
hoped-for ships.
51. How far more virtuous and expedi-
ent was that first-mentioned management !
For what is so seemly or virtuous as when
the needy are assisted by the gifts of the
rich, when food is supplied to the hungry,
when daily bread fails none.? What so ad-
vantageous as when the cultivators are kept
for the land, and the country people do not
perish .'
52. What is virtuous, then, is also expe-
dient, and what is expedient is virtuous.
On the other hand, what is not expedient is
unseemly, and what is unseemly is also not
expedient.
CHAPTER Vni.
That those who put what is virtuous before what is
useful are acceptable to God is shown by the exam-
ple of Joshua, Caleb, and the other spies.
53. When could our fathers ever have
thrown off their servitude, unless they had
believed that it was not only shameful but
even useless to serve the king of Egypt .''
54- Joshua, also, and Caleb, when sent
to spy out the land, brought back the news
that the land was indeed rich, but that it
was inhabited by very fierce nations.' The
people, terrified at the thought of war, re-
fused to take possession of their land.
Joshua and Caleb, who had been sent as
spies, tried to persuade them that the land
was fruitful. They thought it unseemly to
give way before tlic heathen ; they chose
rather to be stoned, wliich is what the peo-
ple threatened, than to recede from their
virtuous standpoint. The others kept dis-
suading, the people exclaimed against it,
saying they would have to fight against
cruel and terrible nations ; that they would
^ Num. xiii. 27, 28.
fall in battle, and their wives and children
would be left for a prey.'
55. The anger of the Lord burst forth, ^ so
that He would kill all, but at the prayer of
Moses He softened His judgment and put
off His vengeance, knowing that He had
already sufficiently punished those who
were faithless, even if He spared them
meanwhile and did not slay the unbelievers.
However, He said 3 they should not come to
that land which they had refused, as a pen-
alty for their unbelief; but their children and
wives, who had not murmured, and who,
owing to their sex and age, were guiltless,
should receive the promised inheritance of
that land. So the bodies of those of twenty
years old and upwards fell in the desert.
The punishment of the rest was put aside.
But they who had gone up with Joshua, and
had thought fit to dissuade the people, died
forthwith of a great plague. ■♦ Joshua and
Caleb 5 eiiiered the land of promise together
with those who were innocent by reason of_
age or sex.
56. The better part, therefore, preferred
glory to safety ; the worse part safety to
virtue. But the divine judgment approved
those who thought virtue was above what
is useful, whilst it condemned those who
preferred what seemed more in accordance
with safety than with what is virtuous.
CHAPTER IX.
Cheating and dishonest ways of making money are
utterly unfit for clerics whose duty is to serve all.
They ought never to be involved in a money affair,
unless it is one affecting a man's life. For them the
example of David is given, that they should injure
none, even when provoked ; also the death of Naboth,
to keep them from preferring life to virtue.
57. Nothing is more odious than for a man
to have no love for a virtuous life, but in-
stead to be kept excited by an unworthy
business in following out a low line of trade,
or to be inflamed by an avaricious heart,
and by day and by night to be eager to
damage another's property, not to raise the
soul to the splendour of a virtuous life, and
not to regard the beauty of true praise.
58. Hence rise inheritances sought by
cunning words and gained under pretence
of being self-restrained and serious. But
this is absolutely abhorrent to the idea of a
Christian man. For everything gained by
craft and got together by cheating loses the
merit of openness. Even amongst those
Num. xiv. 3.
Num. xiv. 37.
Num. xiv. 1 1 t'f.
Josh. xiv. o.
■* Num. xiv. 29.
DUTIES OF THE CLERGY.— BOOK III.
7/
.who have undertaken no duty in the ranks
of the clerg-y it is considered unfitting to seek
for the inheritance of another. Let those
who are reaching the end of their life use
their own judgment, so that they may freely
make their wills as they think best, since
they will not be able to amend them later.
For it is not honourable to divert the savings
that belong to others or have been got to-
gether for them. It is further the duty of
the priest or the cleric to be of use if pos-
sible to all and to be harmful to none.'
59. If it is not possible to help one with-
out injuring another, it is better to help
neither than to press hard upon one.
Therefore it is not a priest's duty to inter-
fere in money affairs. For here it must
often happen that he who loses his case re-
ceives harm ; and then he considers that he
has been worsted through the action of the
intervener. It is a priest's duty to hurt no
one, to be ready to help all. To be able to
do this is in God's power alone. In a case
of life and death, without doubt it is a grave
sin to injure him whom one ought to help
when in danger. But it is foolish to gain
others' hate in taking up money matters,
though for the sake of a man's safety great
trouble and toil may often be undertaken.
It is glorious in such a case to run risks.
Let, then, this be firmly held to in the priestly
duties, namely, to injure none, not even when
provoked and embittered by some injury. ^
Good was the man who said: " If I have
rewarded evil to those who did me good." ^
For what glory is it if we do not injure him
who has not injured us.? But it is true vir-
tue to forgive when injured.
60. What a virtuous action was that, when
David wished rather to spare the king his
enemy, though he could have injured him ! ■♦
How useful, too, it was, for it helped him
when he succeeded to the throne. For all
learnt to observe faith to their king and
not to seize the kingdom, but to fear and
reverence him. Thus what is virtuous was
preferred to what was useful, and then use-
fulness followed on what was virtuous.
61. But that he spared him was a small
matter ; he also grieved for him when slain in
war, and mourned for him with tears, say-
ing : " Ye mountains of Gilboa, let neither
dew nor rain fall upon you ; ye mountains
of death, for there the shield of the mighty
is cast away, the shield of Saul. It is not
anointed with oil, but with the blood of
the woimded and the fat of the warriors.
^CXc.deOff. III. 19, §75.
•'' Ps. vii. 4.
^ Cic.de Off. III. 15, §64.
* I Sam. [i Kings] xxiv. 10.
The bow of Jonathan turned not back and
the sword of Saul returned not empty. Saul
and Jonathan were lovely and very dear,
inseparable in life, and in death they were
not divided. They were swifter than eagles,
they were stronger than lions. Ye daughters
of Israel, weep over Saul, who clothed you
in scarlet with your ornaments, who put
on gold upon your apparel. How are the
mighty fallen in the midst of the battle !
Jonathan was wounded even to death. I am
distressed for thee, my brother Jonathan ;
very pleasant hast thou been unto me. Thy
love came to me like the love of women.
How have the mighty fallen and the longed-
for weapons perished ! '
62. What mother could weep thus for her
only son as he wept here for his enemy .''
Who could follow his benefactor with such
praise as that with which he followed the
man who plotted against his life .'' How
affectionately he grieved, with what deep
feeling he bewailed him ! The mountains
dried up at the prophet's curse, and a divine
power filled the judgment of him who spoke
it. Therefore the elements themselves paid
the penalty for witnessing the king's death.
63. And what, in the case of holy Naboth,
was the cause of his death, except his regard
for a virtuous life .'' For when the (king
demanded the vineyard from him, promising
to give him money, he refused the price for
his father's heritage as unseemly, and pre-
ferred to shun such shame by dying. "The
Lord forbid it me, that I should give the in-
heritance of my fathers unto thee ; " == that
is, that such reproach may not fall on me,
that God may not allow such wickedness
to be attained by force. He is not speaking
about the vines — nor has God care for vines
or plots of ground — but he says it of his
fathers' rights. He could have received
another of the king's vineyards and been his
friend, wherein men think there is no small
usefulness so far as this world is concerned.
But because it was base he thought it could
not be useful, and so he preferred to endure
danger with honour intact, rather than gain
what was useful to his own disgrace. I
am here again speaking of what is com-
monly understood as useful, not that in
which there is the grace of virtuous life.
64. The king could himself have taken it
by force, but that he thought too shame-
less ; then when Naboth was dead he
grieved. 3 The Lord also declared that the
woman's cruelty should be punished by a
2 Sam. [2 Kings] i. 21-27. " • [3] Kings xxi. 3.
' This hardly agrees with i [3] Kings xxi. j6.
78
ST. AMBROSE.
fitting- penalty, because she was unmindful
of virtue and preferred a shameful gain.'
65. Every kind of unfair action is shame-
ful. Even in common things, false weights
and unjust measures are accursed. And if
fraud in the market or in business is pun-
ished, can it seem free from reproach if
found in the midst of the performance of the
duties of virtue .' Solomon says : "A great
and a little weight and divers measures are
an abomination before the Lord. "^ Before
that it also says : "A false balance is abomi-
nation to the Lord, but a just weight is
acceptable to Him." 3
CHAPTER X.
We are warned not only in civil law, but also in the
holy Scriptures, to avoid fraud in every agreement,
as is clear from the example of Joshua and the Gib-
eonites.
66. In everything, therefore, good faith is
seemly, justice is pleasing, due measure in
equity is delightful. But what shall I say
about contracts, and especially about the
sale of land, or agreements, or covenants.'
Are there not rules just for the purpose of
shutting out all false deceit,* and to make
him whose deceit is found out liable to
double punishment.'' Everywhere, then.
does regard for what is virtuous take the
lead ; it shuts out deceit, it expels fraud.
Wherefore the prophet David has rightly
stated his judgment in general, saying :
"He hath done no evil to his neiirhbour. " 5
Fraud, then, ought to be wanting not only
in contracts, in which the defects of those
things which are for sale are ordered to be
recorded (which contracts, unless the vendor
has mentioned the defects, are rendered
void by an action for fraud, although he has
conveyed them fully to the purchaser), but
it ought also to be absent in all else. Can-
dour must be shown, the truth must be
made known.
67. The divine Scriptures have plainly
stated (not indeed a legal rule of the law-
yers but) the ancient judgment of the patri-
archs on deceit, in that book of the Old
Testament which is ascribed to Joshua the
son of Nun. When the report had gone
forth among the various peoples that the sea
was dried up at the crossing of the Hebrews ;
that water had Mowed from the rock ; that
food was supplied daily from heaven in
quantities large enough for so many tliou-
' I fj] Kings xxi. 23. - Prov, xx. 10. ' Prov. xi. i.
< Cic. de Off. III. 15, § 61. ■'•• Ps. xv. [xiv.j 3.
sands of the people ; that the walls of Jericho
had fallen at the sound of the holy trumpets,
being overthrown by the noise of the shouts
of the people ; also, that the king of Ai was
conquered and had been hung on a tree
until the evening ; then the Gibeonites, fear-
ing his strong hand, came with guile, pre-
tending that they were from a land very far
away, and by travelling so long had rent
their shoes and worn out their clothing, of
which they showed proofs that it was grow-
ing old. They said, too, that their reason
for undergoing so much labour was their
desire to obtain peace and to form friend-
ship with the Hebrews, and began to ask
Joshua to form an alliance with them. And
he, being as yet ignorant of localities, and
not knowing anything of the inhabitants,
did not see through their deceit, nor did he
enquire of God, but readily believed them. ■
68. So sacred was one's plighted word
held in those days that no one would believe
that others could try to deceive. Who could
find fault with the saints in this, namely,
that they should consider others to have the
same feelings as themselves, and suppose
no one would lie because truth was their
own companion .? They know not what
deceit is, they gladly believe of others what
they themselves are, whilst they cannot
suspect others to be what they themselves
are not. Hence Solomon says : " An inno-
cent man believeth every word."- We
must not blame his readiness to believe, but
should rather praise his goodness. To know
nothing of aught that may injure another,
this is to be innocent. And although he is
cheated by another, still he thinks well of
all, for he thinks there is good faith in
all.
69. Induced, therefore, by such considera-
tions tobelieve them,he madean agreement,
he gave them peace, and formed a union with
them. But when he came to their country
and the deceit was found out, — for though
they lived quite close they pretended to be
strangers, — the people of our fathers began
to be angry at having been deceived.
Joshua, however, thought the peace they
had made could not be broken (for it had
been confirmed by an oath), for fear that, in
punishing the treachery of others, he should
be breaking his own pledge. He made
them pay the penalty, however, by forcing
them to undertake the lowest kind of work.
The judgment was mild indeed, but it was
a lasting one, for in their duties there abides
the punishment of their ancient cunning,
^ Josh. ix. 3 ff .
Prov. xiv. 15.
DUTIES OF THE CLERGY.— BOOK TIL
79
handed down to this day ' in their hereditary
service.
CHAPTER XI.
Having adduced examples of certain frauds found in
a few passages of the rlietoricians, he shows that
these and all others are more fully and plainly con-
demned in Scripture.
70. I SH.vLL say nothing- of the snapping
of fingers, or the naked dancing of the heir,
at entering on an inheritance.^ These are
well-known things. Nor will I speak of the
mass of fishes gathered up at a pretended
fishing expedition to excite the buyer's
desires. For why ditl he show himself so
eager for luxuries and delicacies as to allow
a fraud of this character .-*
71. What need is there for me to speak of
that well-known story of the pleasant and
quiet retreat at Syracuse and of the cunning
of a Sicilian.? 3 For he having found a
stranger, and knowing that he was anxious
to buy an estate, asked him to his grounds
for a meal. He accepted, and on the fol-
lowing day he came. There the sight of a
great number of fishermen met his eyes,
and a banquet laid out in the most splendid
profusion. In the sight of the guests,
fishers were placed in the garden-grounds,
where no net had ever been laid before.
Each one in turn presented to the guests
what he had taken, the fish were placed
upon the table, and caught the glance of
those who sat there. The stranger won-
dered at the large quantity of fish and the
number of boats there were. The answer
given was, that this was the great water
supply, and that great numbers offish came
there because of the sweetness of the water.
To be brief, he drew on the stransrer to be
urgent in getting the grounds, he willingly
allows himself to be induced to sell them,
and seemingly with a heavy heart he re-
ceives the money.
72. On the next day the purchaser comes
to the grounds with his friends, but finds no
boat there. On asking whether perhaps
the fishermen were observing a festival on
that day, he is told that, with the excep-
tion of yesterday, they were never wont to
fish there ; but what power had he to pro-
ceed against such a fraud, who had so
1 Josh. ix. 27. 2 Qc. de Off. HI. ig.
■' Cic. de Off. Ill 14. This story is related by Cicero as a dear
example of downright fraud, against which in his time there was
no remedy at law.
shamefully grasped at such luxuries .' For
he who convicts another of a fault ought
himself to be free from it. I will not there-
fore include such trifles as these under the
power of ecclesiastical censure, for that
altogether condemns every desire for dis-
honourable gain, and briefly, with few words,
forbids every sharp and cunning action.
•]■>,. And what shall I say of him who
claims to be the heir or legatee, on the proof
of a will ' which, though falsified by others,
yet was known to be so by hirn, and who
tries to make a gain through another's crime,
though even the laws of the state convict
him who knowingly makes use of a false
will, as guilty of a wrong action. But the
law of justice is plain, namely, that a good
man ought not to go aside from the truth,
nor to inflict an unjust loss on anyone, nor
to act at all deceitfully or to take part in any
fraud.
74. What is clearer, however, on this
point than the case of Ananias } He acted
falsely as regards the price he got for his
land, for he sold it and laid at the apostles'
feet part of the price, pretending it was the
whole amount.^ For this he perished as
guilty of fraud. He might have off'ered
nothing and have acted so without commit-
ting a fraud. But as deceit entered into his
action, he gained no favour for his liberality,
but paid the penalty for his artifice.
75. The Lord also in the Gospel rejected
those coming to Him with guile, saying :
"The foxes have holes," 3 for He bids us
live in simplicity and innocency of heart.
David also says : "Thou hast used deceit
as a sharp razor, "•♦ pointing out by this the
treacherous man, just as an implement of
this kind is used to help adorn a man,
yet often wounds him. If any one makes a
show of favour and yet plans deceit after
the example of the traitor, so as to give up
to death him whom he ought to guard, let
him be looked on in the light of that instru-
ment which is wont to wound owing to the
vice of a drunken mind and a trembling
hand. Thus that man drunk with the wine
of wickedness brought death on the high
priest Ahimelech,5 through a terrible act of
treachery, because he had received the
prophet with hospitality when the king,
roused by the stings of envy, was following
him.
1 Cic. deOff. III.
' S. Matt. viii. 20.
18.
I Sam. [i Kings] xxii. 9.
- Acts V. 2.
* Ps. lii. [li.]2.
So
ST. AMBROSE.
CHAPTER XII.
We may make no promise that is wrong, and if we have
made an unjust oath, we may not keep it. It is
shown that Herod smned in this respect. The vow
taken by Jephtha is condemned, and so are all others
which God does not desire to have paid to Him.
Lastly, the daughter of Jephtha is compared with the
two Pythagoreans and is placed before them.
76. A man's disposition ought to be un-
defiled and sound, so that he may utter
words without dissimulation and possess
his vessel in sanctification ; ' that he may
not delude his brother with false words nor
promise aught dishonourable. If he has
made such a promise it is far better for him
not to fulfil it, rather than to fulfil what is
shameful. ^
77. Often people bind themselves by a
solemn oath, and, though they come to
know that they ought not to have made the
promise, fulfil it in consideration of their
oath. This is what Herod did, as we men-
tioned before. 3 For he made a shameful
promise of reward to a dancer — and cruelly
performed it. It was shameful, for a king-
dom was promised for a dance ; and it was
cruel, for the death of a prophet is sacrificed
for the sake of an oath. Plow much better
perjury would have been than the keeping
of such an oath, if indeed that could be
called perjury which a drunkard had sworn
to in his wine-cups, or an effeminate pro-
fligate had promised whilst the dance was
going on. The prophet's head was brought
in on a dish,^ and this was considered an
act of good faith when it really was an act
of madness !
78. Never shall I be led to believe that
the leader Jephtha made his vow otherwise
than without thought, s when he promised
to offer to God whatever should meet him
at the threshold of his house on his return.
For he repented of his vow, as afterwards
his daughter came to meet him. He rent
his clothes and said : "Alas, my daughter,
thou hast entangled me, thou art become a
source of trouble unto me. "^ And though
with pious fear and reverence he took upon
himself the liitter fulfilment of his cruel task,
yet he ordered and left to be observed an
annual period of grief and mourning for
future times. It was a hard vow, but far
more bitter was its fulfilment, whilst he
who carried it out had the greatest cause to
mourn. Thus it became a rule and a law
in Israel from year to year, as it says :
"that the daughters of Israel went to la-
ment the daughter of Jephtha the Gileadite
four days in a year." ' I cannot blame the
man for holding it necessary to fulfil his
vow, but yet it was a wretched necessity
which could only be solved by the death of
his child.
79. It is better to make no vow than to
vow what God does not wish to be paid to
Him to Whom the promise was made. In
the case of Isaac we have an example, for
the Lord appointed a ram to be offered up
instead of him. ^ Therefore it is not always
every promise that is to be fulfilled. Nay,
the Lord Himself often alters His determina-
tion, as the Scriptures point out. For in the
book called Numbers He had declared that
He would punish the people with death and
destroy them,^ but afterwards, when be-
sought by Moses, He was reconciled again
to them. And again, He said to Moses and
Aaron : "Separate yourselves from among
this congregation that I may consume them
in a moment. "4 And when they separated
from the assembly the earth suddenly clave
asunder and opened her mouth and swal-
lowed up Dathan and Abiram.
80. That example of Jephtha's daughter
is far more glorious and ancient than that
of the two Pythagoreans, 5 which is ac-
counted so notable among the philosophers.
One of these, when condemned to death by
the tyrant Dionysius, and when the day of
his death was fixed, asked for leave to be
granted him to go home, so as to provide
for his family. But for fear that he might
break his faith and not return, he offered a
surety for his own death, on condition that
if he himself were absent on the appointed
day, his surety would be ready to die in his
stead. The other did not refuse the con-
ditions of suretyship which were proposed
and awaited the day of death with a calm
mind. So the one did not withdraw himself
and the other returned on the day appointed.
This all seemed so wonderful that the tyrant
sought their friendship whose destruction he
had been anxious for.
81. What, then, in the case of esteemed
and learned men is full of marvel, that in
the case of a virgin is found to be far more
splendid, far mofe glorious, as she says to
her sorrowing father : " Do to me according
to that which hath proceeded out of thy
mouth. " ^ But she asked for a delay of two
months in order that she might go about
1 I Thess. iv. 6.
^ c. 5, § 35-
"Cic. de Off. III. 2.;.
■^ Cxc. de Off. III. 24, §93-
* S. Mark vi. 28.
6 Judg. xi. 3S.
' Judg. xi. 40.
■' Num. xiv. 12.
5 Cic. de Off. III. 10, § 45-
- (len. xxu. 13.
* Num. xvi. 21
•^ Judg. xi. 36.
DUTIES OF THE CLERGY.— BOOK III.
8i
with her companions upon the mountains
to bewail fitly and dutifully her virginity
now given up to death. The weeping ot
her companions did not move her, their
grief prevailed not upon her, nor did their
famentations hold her back. She allowed
not the day to pass, nor did the hour escape
her notice. She returned to her father as
though returning according to her own
desire, and of her own will urged him on
when he was hesitating, and acted thus of
her own free choice, so that what was at
first an awful chance became a pious sacri-
fice.
CHAPTER XIII.
Judith, after enduring many dangers for virtue's sake,
gained very many and great benefits.
82. See ! Judith presents herself to thee
as worthy of admiration. She approaches
Holophernes, a man feared by the people,
and surrounded by the victorious troops of
the Assyrians. At first she makes an im-
pression on him by the grace of her form
and the beauty of her countenance. Then
she entraps him by the refinement of her
speech. Her first triumph was that she
returned from the tent of the enemy with
her purity unspotted.' Her second, that
she gained a victory over a man, and put
to flight the people by her counsel.
83. The Persians were terrified at her
daring.^ And so what is admired in the
case of those two Pythagoreans deserves
also in her case our admiration, for she
trembled not at the danger of death, nor even
at the danger her modesty was in, which is
a matter of greater concern to good women.
She feared not the blow of one scoundrel,
nor even the weapons of a whole army.
She, a woman, stood betv/een the lines of the
combatants — right amidst victorious arms —
heedless of death. As one looks at her over-
whelming danger, one would say she went
out to die ; as one looks at her faith, one
says she went but out to fight.
84. Judith then followed the call of virtue,
and as she follows that, she wins great bene-
fits. It was virtuous to prevent the people
of the Lord from giving themselves up to
the heathen ; to prevent them from betray-
ing their native rites and mysteries, or from
yielding up their consecrated virgins, their
venerable widows, and modest matrons to
barbarian impurity, or from ending the siege
by a surrender. It was virtuous for her to
be willing to encounter danger on behalf of
all, so as'to deliver all from danger.
85. How great must have been the power
of her virtue, that she, a woman, should
claim to give counsel on the chiefest matters
and not leave it in the hands of the leaders
of the people ! How great, again, the power
of her virtue to reckon for certain upon God
to help her ! How great her grace to find
His help !
CHAPTER XIV.
How virtuous and useful was that which Elisha did.
This is compared with that oft-recounted act of the
Greeks. John gave up his life for virtue's sake, and
Susanna for the same reason exposed herself to the
danger of death.
86. What did Elisha follow but virtue,
when he brought the army of Syria who had
come to take him as captive into Samaria,
after having covered their eyes with blind-
ness.? Then he said: "O Lord, open their
eyes that they may see." ' And they saw.
But when the king of Israel wished to slay
those that had entered and asked the prophet
to give him leave to do so, he answered that
they whose captivity was not brought about
by strength of hand or weapons of war must
not be slain, but that rather he should help
them by supplying food. Then they were
refreshed with plenty of food. And after
that those Syrian robbers thought they must
never again return to the land of Israel
87. How much nobler was this than that
which the Greeks once did ! ^ For when two
nations strove one with the other to gain
glory and supreme power, and one of them
had the opportunity to burn the ships of the
other secretly, they thought it a shameful
thing to do so, and preferred to gain a less
advantage honourably than a greater one in
shameful wise. They, indeed, could not act
thus without disgrace to themselves, and
entrap by this plot those who had banded
together for the sake of ending the Persian
war. Though they could deny it in word,
yet they could never but blush at the thought
of it. Elisha, however, wished to save, not
destroy, those who were deceived indeed,
though not by some foul act, and had been
struck blind by the power of the Lord. For
it was seemly to spare an enemy, and to
grant his life to an adversary when indeed he
could have taken it, had he not spared it.
88. It is plain, then, that whatever is
1 Judith xii. 20.
- Judith XV. I ff.
1 2 [4] Kings vi. 20.
^Cic.de Off. in. ",§49-
82
ST. AMBROSE.
seemly is always useful. For holy Judith
by seemly disregard for her own safety put
an end to the dangers of the siege, and by
her own virtue won what was useful to all
in common. And Elisha gained more re-
nown by pardoning than he would have
done by slaying, and preserved those ene-
mies whom he had taken for greater useful-
ness.
89. And what else did John have in mind
but what is virtuous, so that he could not
endure a wicked union even in the king's
case, saying: "It is not lawful fur thee to
have her to wife." ' He could have been
silent, had he not thought it unseemly for
himself not to speak the truth for fear of
death, or to make the prophetic office yield
to the king, or to indulge in flattery. He
knew well that he would die as he was
against the king, but he preferred virtue to
safety. Yet what is more expedient than
the suffering which brought glory to the
saint.
90. Holy Susanna, too, when threatened
with the fear of false witness, seeing her-
self hard pressed on one side by danger, on
the other by disgrace, preferred to avoid dis-
grace by a virtuous death rather than to en-
dure and live a shameful life in the desire to
save herself.^ So while she fixed her mind ,
on virtue, she also preserved her life. But
if she had preferred what seemed to her to
be useful to preserve life, she would never
have gained such great renown, nay, per-
haps— and that would have been not only
useless but even dangerous — she might even
not have escaped the penalty for her crime.
We note, therefore, that whatsoever is
shameful cannot be useful, nor, again, can
that which is virtuous be useless. For use-
fulness is ever the double of virtue, and
virtue of usefulness.
CHAPTER XV.
After mentioning a nol)le action of the Romans, the
writer shows from the deeds of Moses that he had
the greatest regard for what is virtuous.
91. It is related as a memorable deed of
a Roman general,' that when the physician
of a hostile king came to him and promised
to give him poison, he sent him back bound
to the enemy. In truth, it is a noble thing
for a man to refuse to gain the victory by
foul acts, after he has entered on the struggle
> S. Matt. xiv. 4. 2 Siis. v. 25.
^ This .affair happened in the war which Pyirhus waged against
the Roman people. Gains Fabricius was the general who refused
to take advantage of the base offer.
for power. He did not consider virtue to
lie in victory, but declared that to be a
shameful Auctory unless it was gained with
honour.'
92. Let us return to our hero Moses, and
to loftier deeds, to show they were both
superior as well as earlier. The king of
Egypt would not let the people of our
fathers go. Then Moses bade the priest
Aaron to stretch his rod over all the waters
of Egypt. Aaron stretched it out, and the
water of the river was turned into blood. ^
None could drink the water, and all the
Egyptians were perishing with thirst ; but
there was pure water flowing in abundance
for the fathers. They sprinkled ashes to-
ward heaven, and sores and burning boils
came upon man and beast. 3 They brought
down hail mingled with flaming fire, and
all things were destroyed upon the land. 4
]Moses prayed, and all things were restored
to their former beauty. The hail ceased,
the sores were healed, the rivers gave their
wonted draught, s
93. Then, again, the land was covered
with thick darkness for the space of three
days, because JMoses had raised his hand
and spread out the darkness.^ All the first-
born of Egypt died, whilst all the offspring
of the Hebrews was left unharmed. 7 INIoses
was asked to put an end to these horrors,
and he prayed and obtained his request.
In the one case it was a fact worthy of
praise that he checked himself from joining
in deceit ; in the other it was noteworthy
how, by his innate goodness, he turned aside
from the foe those divinely ordered pun-
ishments. He was indeed, as it is written,
gentle and meek.^ He knew that the king
would not keep true to his promises, yet he
thought it right and good to pray when
asked to do so, to bless when wronged, to
forgive when besought.
94. He cast down his rod and it became
a serpent which devoured the serpents of
Egypt ; 9 this signifying that the Word
should become Flesh to destroy the poison
of the dread serpent by the forgiveness and
pardon of sins. For the rod stands for the
Word that is true — royal — filled with power
— and glorious in ruling. The rod became
a serpent ; so He Who was the Son of
God begotten of the Father became the
Son of man born of a woman, and lifted,
like the serpent, on the cross, poured His
healing medicine on the wounds of man.
Wherefore the Lord Himself says: "As
' C\<i.deOff. III. 22.
■* Kx. ix. 23.
" Kx. xii. 29.
2 Ex. vii. 19.
^ Ex. ix. 29.
® Num. xii. 3.
* Ex. ix. 10.
" Ex. X. 22.
" Ex. vii. 12.
DUTIES OF THE CLERGY.— BOOK III.
83
Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilder-
ness, so must the Son of Man be lifted up." '
95. Again, another sig-n which Moses
gave points to our Lord Jesus Christ. He
put his hand into his bosom, and drew it
out again, and his hand was become as
snow. A second time he put it in and drew
it out, and it was again like the appearance
of human flesh. ^ This signified first the
original glory of the Godhead of the Lord
lesus, and then the assumption of our flesh,
in which truth all nations and peoples must
believe. So he put in his hand, for Christ
is the right hand of God : and whosoever does
not believe in His Godhead and Licarnation
is punished as a sinner ; like that king who,
whilst not believing open and plain signs,
yet afterwanls, when punished, prayed that
he might find mercy. How great, then,
Moses' reeard for virtue must have been is
shown by these proofs, and especially by
the fact that he offered himself on behalf of
the people, praying that God would either
forgive the people or blot him out of the
book of the living. ^
CHAPTER XVI.
After saying a few words about Tobit he demon-
strates that Raguel surpassed the philosophers in
virtue.
96. ToBiT also clearly portrayed in his
life true virtue, when he left the feast and
buried the dead,'* and invited t;he needy to
the meals at his own poor table. And
Raguel is a still brighter example. For he,
in his regard for virtue, when asked to give
his daughter in marriage, was not silent re-
garding his daughter's faults, for fear of
seeming to get the better of the suitor by
silence. So when Tobit the son of Tobias
asked that his daughter might be given him,
he answered that, according to the law, she
ought to be given him as near of kin, but
that he had already given her to six men,
and all of them were dead, s This just man,
then, feared more for others than for him-
self, and wished rather that his daughter
should remain unmarried than that others
should run risks in consequence of their
union with her.
97. How simply he settled all the ques-
tions of the philosophers ! They talk about
the defects of a house, whether they ought
to be concealed or made known by the
^ S. John iii.
* Tob. ii. 4.
' Ex. iv. 6, 7.
' Tob. vii. II.
Ex. xxxii. 32.
vendor. ' Raguel was quite certain that his
daughter's faults ought not to be kept secret.
And, indeed, he had not been eager to give
her up — he was asked for her. We can have
no doubt how much more nobly he acted
than those philosophers, when we consider
how much more important a daughter's
future is than some mere money affair.
CHAPTER XVII.
With what virtuous feelings the fathers of old hid the
sacred fires when on the point of going into captivity.
98. Let us consider, again, that deed done
at the time of the captivity, which has at-
tained the highest degree of virtue and glory.
Virtue is checked by no adversities, for it
rises up among them, and prevails here
rather than in prosperity. 'Mid chains or
arms, 'mid flames or slavery (which is
harder for freemen to bear than any punish-
ment), 'midst the pains of the dying, the
destruction of their country, the fears of the
living, or the blood of the slain, — amidst all
this our forefathers failed not in their care
and thought for what is virtuous. Amidst
the ashes and dust of their fallen country it
glowed and shone forth brightly in pious
efforts.
99. For when our fathers were carried
away into Persia,^ certain priests, who then
were in the service of Almighty God, se-
cretly buried in the valley the fire taken
from the altar of the Lord. There was there
an open pit, with no water in it, and not
accessible for the wants of the people, in
a spot unknown and free from intruders.
There they sealed the hidden fire with the
sacred mark and in secret. They were not
anxious to bury gold or to hide up silver to
preserve it for their children, but in their own
great peril, thinking of all that was virtu-
ous, they thought the sacred fire ought to be
preserved so that impure men might not de-
file it, nor the blood of the slain extinguish
it, nor the heaps of miserable ruins cover it.
100. So they went to Persia, free only in
their religion ; for that alone could not be
torn from them by their captivity. After a
length of time, 3 indeed, according to God's
good pleasure. He put it into the Persian
king's heart to order the temple in Judea to
be restored, and the regular customs to be
again rebuilt at Jerusalem. To carry out
this work of his the Persian king appointed
' Cec. de Off. III. 13. * 2 Mace. i. 19. ^ 2 Mace. i. 20 ff.
84
ST. AMBROSE.
the priest Nehemiah. He took with him the
grandchildren of those priests who on leav-
ino- their native soil had hidden the sacred
tire to save it from perishing. But on arriv-
ing, as we are told in the history of the
fathers, they found not fire but water. And
when tire was wanting to burn upon the
altars, the priest Nehemiah bade them draw
the water, to bring it to him, and to sprinkle it
upon the wood. Then, O wondrous sight I
though the sky had been overcast with
clouds, suddenly the sun shone forth, a great
fire tlamcd forth, so that all, wonder-stricken
at such a clear sign of the favour of the
Lord, were filled with joy. Nehemiah
prayed ; the priests sang a hymn of praise
to God, when the sacrifice was completed.
Nehemiah again bade the remainder of the
water to be poured upon the larger stones.
And when this was done aflame burst forth,
whilst the light shining from off the altar
shone more brightly yet.
loi. When this sign became known, the
king of Persia ordered a temple to be built
on that spot where the fire had been hidden
and the water afterwards found, to which
many gifts were made. They who were
with holy Nehemiah called it Naphthar, '
— which means cleansing — by many it is
called Nephi. It is to be found also in the
history of the prophet Jeremiah,- that he
bade those who should come after him to
take of the fire. That is the fire which fell
on Moses' sacrifice and consumed it, as it is
written: "There came a fire out from the
Lord and consumed upon the altar all the
whole burnt-offering." ^ The sacrifice must
be hallowed with this fire only. There-
fore, also, fire went out from the Lord upon
the sons of Aaron who wished to offer
strange fire, and consumed them, so that
their dead bodies were cast forth without
the camp.-*
loi. Jeremiah coming to a spot found
there a house like a cave, and brought into
it the tabernacle, the ark, and the altar of
incense, and closed up the entrance. And
when those who had come with him ex-
amined it rather closely to mark the spot,
they could not discover nor find it. When
Jeremiah understood what they wanted he
said : "The spot will remain unknown until
God shall gather His people together and
be gracious to them. Then God shall reveal
these things and the majesty of the Lord
shall appear." ^
CHAPTER XVHL
In the narration of that event already mentioned, and
especially of the sacrifice offered by Nehemiah, is
typified the Holy Spirit and Christian baptism. The
sacrifice of Moses and Elijah and the history of Noah
are also referred to the same.
1 02. We form the congregation of the
Lord. We recognize the propitiation of our
Lord God, which our Propitiator wrought
in His passion. I think, too, we cannot
leave out of sight that fire when we read
that the Lord Jesus baptizes with the Holy
Spirit and with fire,' as John said in his
Gospel. Rightly was the sacrifice con-
sumed, for it was for sin. But that fire was
a type of the Holy Spirit Who was to come
down after the Lord's ascension, and for-
give the sins of all, and Who like fire in-
flames the mind and faithful heart. Where-
fore Jeremiah, after receiving the Spirit,
says : "It became in my heart as a burn-
ing fire flaming in my bones, and I am vile
and cannot bear it."^ In the Acts of the
Apostles, also, when the Holy Spirit de-
scended upon the apostles and those others
who were waiting for the Promise of the
Father, w^e read that tongues as of fire were
distributed amontj them. 3 The soul of each
one was so uplifted by His influence that
they were supposed to be full of new wine,-*
who instead had received the gift of a diver-
sity of tongues.
103. What else can this mean — namely,
that fire became water and water called
forth fire — but that spiritual grace burns out
our sins through fire, and through water
cleanses them ? For sin is washed away
and it is burnt away. Wherefore the Apos-
tle says : "The fire shall try every mans
work of what sort it is." s And further on :
"If any man's work shall be burned, he
shall suffer loss : but he himself shall be
saved ; yet so as by fire. " ^
104. This, then, we have stated, so as to
prove that sins are burnt out by means of
fire. We kno\v now that this is in truth
the sacred fire which then, as a type of the
future remission of sins, came down upon
the sacrifice.
105. This fire is hidden in the time of
captivity, during which sin reigns, but in
the time of liberty it is brought forth. And
though it is changed into the appearance of
water, yet it preserves its natiu-e as fire so
as to consume the sacrifice. Do not won-
der when thou readest that God the Father
^ 2 Mace. i. 36.
' Lev. ix. 24.
* 2 Mace. u. 5.
- 2 Mace. ii. i ff.
* Lev. X. 2.
' S. John i. 33.
* Acts ii. 13.
- Jer. XX. 9.
'' I Cor. iii. 13.
•^ Acts ii. 3.
" I Cor. iii. 15.
DUTIES OF THE CLERGY.— BOOK III.
85
said : "I am a consuming fire. " ' And
ag-ain : "They have forsaken IVIe, the foun-
tain of living- water. " - The Lord Jesus, too,
like a fire inflamed the hearts of those who
heard Him, and like a fount of waters
cooled them. For He Himself said in His
Gospel that He came to send tire on the
earth 3 and to supply a draught of living
waters to those who thirst. •*
106. In the time of Elijah, also, fire came
down when he challenged the prophets of
the heathen to light up the altar without
fire. When they could not do so, he
poured water thrice over his victim, so that
the water ran round about the altar ; then
he cried out and the fire fell from the Lord
from heaven and consumed the burnt-offer-
ing, s
107. Thou art that victim. Contemplate
in silence each single point. The breath of
the Holy Spirit descends on thee, He seems
to burn thee when He consumes thy sins.
The sacrifice which was consumed in the
time of Moses was a sacrifice for sin,
wherefore Moses said, as is written in the
book of the Maccabees : " Because the sac-
rifice for sin was not to be eaten, it was
consumed.'"^ Does it not seem to be con-
sumed for thee when in the sacrament of
baptism the whole outer man perishes ?
"Our old man is crucified,"? the Apostle
exclaims. Herein, as the example of the
fathers teaches us, the Egyptian is swal-
lowed up — the Hebrew arises renewed by
the Holy Spirit, as he also crossed the Red
Sea dryshod — where our fathers were bap-
tized in the cloud and in the sea.^
108. In the flood, too, in Noah's time all
flesh died, though just Noah was preserved
together wath his family. 9 Is not a man
consumed when all that is mortal is cut off
from life .'' The outer man is destroyed, but
the inner is renevv^ed. Not in baptism
alone but also in repentance does this de-
struction of the flesh tend to the growth of
the spirit, as we are taught on the Apostle's
authority, when holy Paul says: " I have
judged as though I were present him that
hath so done this deed, to deliver him unto
Satan for the destruction of the flesh, that
the spirit may be saved in the day of our
Lord Jesus Christ." '°
109. We seem to have made a somewhat
lengthy digression for the sake of regarding
this wonderful mystery, in desiring to un-
* Deut. iv. 24.
^ S. Luke- xii. 49.
^ I [3] Kings xviii. 30 S,
^ Rom. vi. 6.
' Gen. vij. 23.
» Jer. u. 13.
* S. John vii. 37, 38.
* 2 Mace. ii. 11.
* I Cor. X. I, 2.
»o I Or. V. 3, 5.
fold more fully this sacrament which has
been revealed to us, and which, indeed, is
as full of virtue as it is full of religious awe.
CHAPTER XIX.
The crime committed by the inhabitants of Gibeah
against the wife of a certain Levite is related, and
from the vengeance taken it is inferred how the idea
of virtue must have filled the heart of those people
of old.
no. Wh.at regard for virtue our fore-
fathers had to avenge by a war the wrongs
of one woman which had been brought on
her by her violation at the hands of profli-
gate men ! Nay, when the people were
conquered, they vowed that they would not
give their daughters in marriage to the tribe
of Benjamin 1 That tribe had remained
without hope of posterity, had they not re-
ceived leave of necessity to use deceit.
And this permission does not seem to fail
in giving fitting punishment for violation,
since they were only allowed to enter on a
union by a rape, and not through the sacra-
ment of marriage. And indeed it was right
that they who had broken another's inter-
course should themselves lose their mar-
riage rites.
111. How full of pitiful traits is this story!
A man, it says, ' a Levite, had taken to him-
self a wife, who I suppose was called a
concubine from the word " concubitus."
She some time afterwards, as is wont to
happen, offended at certain things, betook
herself to her father, and was with him four
months. Then her husband arose and went
to the house of his father-in-law, to reconcile
himself with his wife, to win her back and
take her home again. The woman ran to
meet him and brought her husband into her
father's house.
112. The maiden's^ father rejoiced and
went to meet him, and the man stayed with
him three days, and they ate and rested.
On the next day the Levite arose at daybreak,
but was detained by his father-in-law, that
he might not so quickly lose the pleasure of
his company. Again on the next and the
third day the maiden's father did not suffer
his son-in-law to start, until their joy and
mutual regard was complete. But on the
seventh day, when it was already drawing
to a close, after a pleasant meal, having
urged the approach of the coming night, so
as to make him think he ought to sleep
amongst friends rather than strangers, he
Judg. xix. 1-3.
* Judg. 4-9.
86
ST. AMBROSE.
was unable to keep him, and so let him go
together with his daughter.
113. When some little progress ' was made,
though night was threatening to come on,
and they were close by the town of the
Jebusites, on the slave's request that his lord
should turn aside there, he refused, because
it was not a city of the children of Israel.
He meant to get as far as Gibeah, which was
inhabited by the people of the tribe of Ben-
jamin. But when they arrived there was
no one to receive them with hospitality, ex-
cept a stranger of advanced age — When he
had looked upon them he asked the Levite :
Whither goest thou and whence dost thou
come? On his answering that he was tra-
velling and was making for Mount Ephraim
and that there was no one to take him in,
the old man offered him hospitality and
prepared a meal.
114. And when they were satisfied- and
the tables were removed, vile men rushed
up and surrounded the house. Then the
old man offered these wicked men his
daughter, a vircrin, and the concubine with
whom she shared her bed, only that violence
might not be inflicted on his guest. But
when reason did no good and violence
prevailed, the Levite parted from his wife,
and they knew her and abused her all that
night. Overcome by this cruelty or by
grief at her wrong, she fell at the door of
their host where her husband had entered,
and gave up the ghost, with the last effort
of her life guarding the feelings of a good
wife so as to preserve for her husband at least
her mortal remains.
115. When this became known ^ (to be
brief) almost all the people of Israel broke
out into war. The war remained doubtful
with an uncertain issue, but in the third
engagement the people of Benjamin were
delivered to the people of Israel, •♦ and being
condemned by the divine judgment paid the
penalty for their profligacy. The sentence,
further, 5 was that none of the people of the
fathers should give his daughter in marriage
to them. This was confirmed by a solemn
oath. But relenting at having laid so hard
a sentence on their brethren, they moderated
their severity so as to give them in marriage
those maidens that had lost their parents,
whose fathers had been slain for their sins,
or to give them the means of finding a wife
by a raid. Because of the villainy of so
foul a deed, they who have violated another's
marriage rights were shown to be unworthy
^ Judg. xix. 10-21.
* Judg. XX. 48.
2 Judg. xix. 22-26.
** Judg. xxi. I ff.
' Judg. XX. I ff.
to ask for marriage. But for fear that one
tribe might perish from the people, they
connived at the deceit.
116. What great regard our forefathers
had for virtue is shown by the fact that forty
thousand men drew the sword against their
brethren of the tribe of Benjamin in their
desire to avenge the wrong done to modesty,
for they would not endure the violation of
chastity. And so in that war on both
sides there fell sixty-five thousand warriors,
whilst their cities were burnt. And when
at first the people of Israel were defeated,
yet unmoved by fear at the reverses of the
war, they disregarded the sorrow the aveng-
ing of chastity cost them. They rushed into
the battle ready to wash out with their own
blood the stains of the crime that had been
committed.
CHAPTER XX.
After the terrible siege of Samaria was ended in
accordance with Elisha's prophecy, he relates what
regard the four lepers showed for what was virtuous.
1 1 7. Why need we wonder that the people
of the Lord had regard for what was seemly
and virtuous when even the lepers — as we
read in the books of the Kings — showed con-
cern for what is virtuous ?
1 1 8. There was a great famine in Samaria, '
for the army of the Syrians was besieging it.
The king in his anxiety was making the
round of the guards on the walls when
a woman addressed him, saying : This
woman persuaded me to give up my son —
and I gave him up, and we boiled him and
did eat him. And she promised that she
would afterwards bring her son and that
we should eat his flesh together, but now
she hath hidden her son and will not
bring him. The king was troubled because
these women seemed to have fed not merely
on human bodies, but on the bodies of their
own children ; and being moved by an ex-
ample of such awful misery, threatened the
prophet Elisha with death. For he believed
it was in his power to break up the siege
and to avert the famine ; or else he was
angry because the prophet had not allowed
the king to smite the Syrians whom he had
struck with blindness. -
119. Elisha sat^ with the elders at Bethel,
and before the king's messenger came to
him he said to the elders : "See ye how
the son of that murderess hath sent to take
away mine head.-'" Then the
messenger
* 2 [4] Kings vi. 25-31. ^ 2 [4] Kings vi. 22. ' 2 [4] Kings vi. 32,
DUTIES OF THE CLERGY.— BOOK Hi.
87
entered aiul brought the king-'s command,
threatening- instant danger to his life. Him
the prophet answered : ' "To-morrow about
this time shall a measure of fine flour be
sold for a shekel, and two measures of
barley for a shekel in the gate of Samaria. "
Then when the messenger sent by the king
would not believe it, saying : "If the Lord
would rain abundance of corn from heaven,
not even so would that come about,"
Elisha said to him: "Because thou hast
not believed, thou shalt see it with thine
eyes, but shalt not eat of it."
120. And suddenly- in the camp of Syria
was there heard, as it were, a sound of
chariots and a loud noise of horses and the
noise of a great host, and the tumult of
some vast battle. And the Syrians thought
that the king of Israel had called to his help
in the battle the king of Egypt and the king
of the Amorites, and they tied at dawn
leaving their tents, for they feared that they
might be crushed by the sudden arrival of
fresh foes, and would not be able to with-
stand the united forces of the kings. This
was unknown in Samaria, for they dared not
go out of the town, being overcome with
fear and also being weak through hunger.
121. But there were four lepers 3 at the
gate of the city to whom life was a misery,
and to die would be gain. And they said
one to another: " Behold we sit here and
die. If we enter into the city, we shall die
with hunger ; if we remain here, there are
no means of living at hand for us. Let us
go to the Syrian camp, either they will
quickly kill us or grant us the means of
safety." So they went and entered into the
camp, and behold, all was forsaken by the
enemy. Entering 4 the tents, first of all on
finding food they satisfied their hunger,
then they laid hold of as much gold and
silver as they could. But whilst they were
intent on the booty alone, they arranged to
announce to the king that the Syrians had
fled, for they thought this more virtuous
than to withhold the information and keep
for themselves the plunder gained by deceit.
122. At this information the peoples went
forth and plundered the Syrian camp. The
supplies of the enemy produced an abun-
dance, and brought about cheapness of
corn according to the prophet's word : "A
measure of fine flour for a shekel, and two
measures of barley for a shekel." In this
rejoicing of the people, that officer on
whose hand the king leaned died, being
•2 [4! Kings vii. I, 2. ^ 2 [4] Kings v-ii. 6, 7. ' 2 [4I Kings vii.3, 4.
* 2 [4J Kings vii. S, 9. •'2 [4J Kings vii. 16-20.
crushed and trodden under foot by the peo-
ple as the crowds kept hurrying to go out
or returned with great rejoicing.
CHAPTER XXI.
Esther in danger of her life followed the grace of vir-
tue; nay, even a heathen king did so, when death was
threatened to a man most friendly to him. For
friendship must ever be combined with virtue, as the
examples of Jonathan and Ahimelech show.
123. Why did Queen Esther ' expose her-
self to death and not fear the wrath of a
fierce king ? Was it not to save her people
from death, an act both seemly and vir-
tuous ? The king of Persia himself also,
though fierce and proud, yet thought it
seemly to show honour to the man who had
given information about a plot which had
been laid against himself,^ to save a free
people from slavery, to snatch them from
death, and not to spare him who had
pressed on such unseemly plans. So finally
he handed over to the gallows 3 the man
that stood second to himself, and whom he
counted chief among all his friends, because
he considered that he had dishonoured him
by his false counsels.
124. For that commendable friendship
which maintains virtue is to be preferred
most certainly to wealth, or honours, or
power. It is not wont to be preferred to
virtue indeed, but to follow after it.* So it
was with Jonathan, s who for his affection's
sake avoided not his father's displeasure nor
the danger to his own safety. So, too, it
was with Ahimelech, who, to preserve the
duties of hospitality, thought he must en-
dure death rather than betray his friend
when fleeing.^
CHAPTER XXII.
Virtue must never be given up for the sake of a friend.
If, however, one has to bear witness against a friend,
it must be done with caution. Between friends what
candour is needed in opening the heart, what mag-
nanimity in suffering, what freedom in finding fault !
Friendship is the guardian of virtues, which are not
to be found but in men of like character. It must
be mild in rebuking and averse to seeking its own
advantage ; whence it happens that true friends are
scarce among the rich. What is the dignity of
friendship? The treachery of a friend, as it is worse,
so it is also more hateful than another's, as is recog-
nized from the example of Judas and of Job's friends.
125. Nothing, then, must be set before
* Ksther iv. i6.
•* Esther vii. g, lo.
■'' 1 Sam. [i Kings] xx. 27.
* Esther vi. 10.
* Cic. de Off. III. 10, § 43-
* I Sam. [i Kings] xxii. 17.
S8
ST. AMBROSE.
virtue ; and that it may never be set aside
by the desire for friendship, Scripture also
gives us a warning on the subject of friend-
ship. There are, indeed, various questions
raised among philosophers ; ' for instance,
whether a man ought for the sake of a friend
to plot against his country or not, so as to
serve his friend ? Whether it is right to
break one's faith, and so aid and maintain a
friend's advantage ?
126. And Scripture also says : "A maul,
and a sword, and a sharp arrow, so is a
man that beareth false witness against his
friend." ^ But note what it adds. It blames
not witness given against a friend, but false
witness. For what if the cause of God or
of one's country compels one to give wit-
ness? Ought friendship to take a higher
place than our religion, or our love for our
fellow-citizens ? In these matters, however,
true witness is required so that a friend may
not be assailed by the treachery of a friend,
by whose good faith he ought to be acquit-
ted. A man, then, ought never to please a
friend who desires evil, or to plot against
one who is innocent.
127. Certainly, if it is necessary to give
witness, then, when one knows of any fault
in a friend, one ought to rebuke him secretly
— if he does not listen, one must do it
openly. For rebukes are good, 3 and often
better than a silent friendship. Even if a
friend thinks himself hurt, still rebuke him ;
and if the bitterness of the correction wounds
his mind, still rebuke him and fear not.
"The wounds of a friend are better than
the kisses of flatterers." ^ Rebuke, then, thy
erring friend ; forsake not an innocent one.
For friendship ought to be steadfast 5 and to
rest firm in true affection. We ought not
to change our friends in childish fashion at
some idle fancy.
128. Open thy breast to a friend that he
may be faithful to thee, and that thou
mayest receive from him the delight of thy
life. . " For a faithful friend is the medicine
of life and the grace of immortality."''
Give way to a friend as to an equal, and be
not ashamed to be beforehand with thy
friend in doing kindly duties. For friend-
ship knows nothing of pride. So the wise
man says : " Do not blush to greet a friend." 7
Do not desert a friend in time of need, nor
forsake him nor fail him, for friendship is
the support of life. Let us then bear our
burdens as the Apostle has taught : ^ for he
1 Cic. de Off. III. JO.
^Cic.deOff. I. 17.
* Cic. de A mic. 19, § 67.
' £cclu8. ;uui> 2^1
* Prov. XXV. 18.
* Prov. xxvii. 6.
* Ecclus. vi. 16.
* Gal. vi. 2.
spoke to those whom the charity of the
same one body had embraced together. If
friends in prosperity help friends, why do
they not also in times of adversity offer
their support } Let us aid by giving counsel,
let us offer our best endeavours, let us sym-
pathize with them with all our heart.
129. If necessary, let us endure for a
friend even hardship. Often enmity has to
be borne for the sake of a friend's innocence ;
oftentimes revilings, if one defends and
answers for a friend who is found fault with
and accused. Do not be afraid of such dis-
pleasure, for the voice of the just says :
"Though evil come upon me, I will endure
it for a friend's sake." ' In adversity, too, a
friend is proved, for in prosperity all seem
to be friends. But as in adversity patience
and endurance are needed, so in prosperity
strong influence is wanted to check and
confute the arrogance of a friend who be-
comes overbearing.
130. How nobly Job when he was in
adversity said : " Pity me, my friends, pity
me."^ That is not a cry as it were of
misery, but rather one of blame. For when
he was unjustly reproached by his friends,
he answered: "Pity me, my friends," that
is, ye ought to show pity, but instead ye
assail and overwhelm a man with whose
sufferings ye ought to show sympathy for
friendship's sake.
131. Preserve, then, my sons, that friend-
ship ye have begun with your brethren, for
nothing in the world is more beautiful than
that. It is indeed a comfort in this life to
have one to whom thou canst open thy
heart, 3 with whom thou canst share confi-
dences, and to whom thou canst entrust the
secrets of thy heart. It is a comfort to have
a trusty man by thy side, who will rejoice
with thee in prosperity, sympathize in
troubles, encourage in persecution. What
good friends those Hebrew children were
whom the flames of the fiery furnace did
not separate from their love of each other ! ■♦
Of them we have already spoken. Holy
David says well : "Saul and Jonathan were
lovely and pleasant, inseparable in their
life, in death they were not divided. "5
132. This is the fruit of friendship; and
so faith ^ may not be put aside for the sake
of friendship. He cannot be a friend to
a man who has been unfaithful to God.
Friendship is the guardian of pity and the
teacher of equality, so as to make the su-
perior equal to the inferior, and the inferior
* Ecclus. xxii. 26.
* Cic. de A mic. 6, § 22.
' 2 Sam. U KiDgsJ 1. 23.
* Job. xix. 21.
* Dan. iii. 16 ff.
*^JiZ.deOff. lU. 10, §44.
DUTIES OF THE CLERGY.— BOOK III.
89
to the superior. ' For there can be no friend-
ship between diverse characters,^ and so the
good-will of either ought to be mutually
suited to the other. Let not authority be
wantinsf to the inferior if the matter demands
it, nor humility to the superior. Let him
listen to the other as though he were of like
position — an equal, and let the other warn
and reprove like a friend, not from a desire
to show off, but with a deep feeling of love.
Vi^4. Let not thy warning be harsh, nor
thy rebuke bitter, 3 for as friendship ought to
avoid flattery, so, too, ought it to be free
from arrogance. For what is a friend but a
partner in love, 4 to whom thou unitest and
attachest thy soul, and with whom thou
blendest so as to desire from being two to
become one ; to whom thou entrustest thy-
self as to a second self, from whom thou
fearest nothing, and from whom thou de-
mandest nothing dishonourable for the sake
of thine own advantage. Friendship is not
meant as a source of revenue, s but is full of
seemliness, full of grace. Friendship is a
virtue, not a way of making money. It is
produced, not by money, but by esteem ; not
by the offer of rewards, but by a mutual
rivalry in doing kindnesses.
134. Lastly, the friendships of the poor
are generally better than those of the rich,^
and often the rich are without friends,
whilst the poor have many. For true
friendship cannot exist where there is lying
flattery. Many try fawningly to please the
rich, but no one cares to make pretence to
a poor man. Whatsoever is stated to a
poor man is true, his friendship is free from
envy.
\j^5. What is more precious than friend-
ship which is shared alike by angels and by
men ? Wherefore the Lord Jesus says :
"Make to yourselves friends of the mam-
mon of unrighteousness, that they may
receive you into eternal habitations." 7 God
Himself makes us friends instead of ser-
vants, as He Himself says : "Ye are My
friends if ye do whatsoever I command
you."^ He gave us a pattern of friendship
to follow^. We are to fulfil the wish of a
friend, to unfold to him our secrets which
we hold in our own hearts, and are not to
disregard his confidences. Let us show
him our heart and he will open his to us.
Therefore He says : "I have called you
* Cic. de A mic. 19, § 69.
' Cic. de Off. I. 38, § .37.
^ Cic. de Amic. 15, § 51.
' S. Luke xvi. 9,
^ Cic. de A »iic. 14, § 50.
* Cic. de Antic. 21, § 80.
« Cic. Loci. 15, § 53.
'' S. John XV, 14.
friends, for I have made known unto you
all things whatsoever I have heard of My
Father." ■ A friend, then, if he is a true
one, hides nothing ; he pours forth his soul
as the Lord Jesus poured forth the mysteries
of His Father.
136. So he who does the will of God is
His friend and is honoured with this name.
He who is of one mind with Him, he too is
His friend. For there is unity of mind in
friends, and no one is more hateful than the
man that injures friendship. Hence in the
traitor the Lord found this the worst point
on which to condemn his treachery, namely,
that he gave no sign of gratitude and had
mingled the poison of malice at the table of
friendship. So He says : "It was thou, a
man of like mind. My guide and Mine ac-
quaintance, who ever didst take pleasant
meals with INIe. "^ That is : it could not be
endured, for thou didst fall upon Him Who
granted grace to thee. " For if My enemy
had reproached Me I could have borne it, 3
and I would have hid Myself from him who
hated Me." An enemy can be avoided; a
friend cannot, if he desires to lay a plot.
Let us guard against him to whom we do
not entrust our plans ; we cannot guard
against him to whom we have already en-
trusted them. And so to show up all the
hatefulness of the sin He did not say :
Thou, ]\Iy servant. My apostle ; but thou,
a man of like mind with Me ; that is : thou
art not My but thy own betrayer, for thou
didst betray a man of like mind with thy-
self.
-137. The Lord Himself, when He was
displeased with the three princes who had
not deferred to holy Job, wished to pardon
them through their friend, so that the prayer
of friendship might win remission of sins.
Therefore Job asked and God pardoned.
Friendship helped them whom arrogance
had harmed. 4
^38. These things I have left with you,
my children, that you may gviard them
in your minds — you yourselves will prove
whether they will be of any advantage.
]\Ieanwhile they offer you a large number
of examples, for almost all the examples
drawn from our forefathers, and also many
a word of theirs, are included within these
three books ; so that, although the language
may not be graceful, yet a succession of
old-time examples set down in such small
compass may offer much instruction.
* S. John XV. 15.
» Ps. liv. [Iv.] 12.
2 Ps. liv. [Iv.] 13, 14.
* Job xlii. 7, 8.
I
I
I
INTRODUCTION TO THE THREE BOOKS OF ST. AMBROSE
ON THE HOLY SPIRIT.
The three books on the Holy Spirit are, as St. Ambrose says himself, a sequel to those
on the Faith, and the two treatises together have been sometimes quoted as if one, with
the title, De Trinitate. But we see from Gratian's letter to St. Ambrose, and from the
reply, that each treatise is separate, and the De Spiriiu Sancto was written some years
later, a. n. 381.
In the first book St. Ambrose commences by allegorizing the history of Gideon and the
fleece, seeing in the drying of the fleece and the moistening of the threshing-floor a type of
the Holy Spirit leaving the Jews and being poured out on the Gentiles. Passing to his
more immediate subject, he proves that the Holy Spirit is above the whole Creation and is
truly God, alleging as a special argument that the sin against the Holy Spirit can never be
forgiven, here or hereafter. He shows how the Holy Spirit is in Scripture called the Spirit
of God ; that He spake by the prophets and apostles ; that He sanctifies men, and is typi-
fied by the mystical ointment spoken of in Scripture. Next, St. Ambrose treats of His
oneness with the other two Persons of the Holy Trinity, and shows that His mission in
no way detracts from this oneness, but that there is in all the Divine Persons a perfect
unity of peace, love, and other virtues.
The second book commences with a treatment of the history of Samson in the same
way as that of Gideon in Book I. Samson always succeeded so long as the Holy Spirit
was with him, but fell into misfortune so soon as he was forsaken. It is shown that the
power of the Holy Spirit is the same as that of the Father and the Son, and that there is an
agreement in design and working, and in vivifying man. He is Creator and therefore to be
worshipped, and He worked wnth the Father and the Son in founding the Church, and in
conclusion is proved the unity of operation in the Three Persons.
The third book continues the same argument, showing that the mission of prophets and
apostles, and even of the Son Himself, is to be referred to the Spirit, yet without any sub-
jection on the part of the Son, seeing that the Spirit also receives His mission from the
Father and the Son. The Godhead of the Holy Spirit is next taken up and proved, when
occasion is taken also to show that there are not three Gods or three Lords, for the Three
Divine Persons are one in holiness and nature ; and the work is concluded with a summary
of some of the principal arguments.
There can be but little doubt that this is the work, and St. Ambrose the author, bitterly
attacked by St. Jerome ; the whole passage may be read in the Apology of Rufinus, p. 470,
in vol. iii. of this series. St. Ambrose is compared to a daw decked in another bird's plu-
mage, and charged with writing "bad things in Latin taken from good things in Greek,"
and St. Jerome even took the trouble to translate a work of St. Didymus on the Holy
Spirit (from the preface to which the above extracts are taken), in order that those who did
not know Greek might, St. Jerome hoped, recognize the plagiarisms.
Rufinus vigorously defends St. Ambrose, and, pointing out many inconsistencies in his
opponent, says : "The saintly Ambrose wrote his book on the Holy Spirit not in words
only but with his own blood, for he offered his life-blood to his persecutors, and shed it
within himself, though God preserved his life for future labours." '
* See vol. iii. p. 471, of this series.
92 ST. AMBROSE.
The truth is that St. Ambrose being a good Greek scholar, and having undertaken to
write on the HolySpirit, studied what others had written before him, and made use of what
had been urged by SS. Basil, Didymus, ancL others. The opinion of the great St. Augus-
tine concerning this treatise may be set against that of St. Jerome. "St. Ambrose when
treating of the deep subject of the Holy Spirit, and showing ^that He is equal with the
Father and the Son, yet makes use of a simple style of discourse ; inasmuch as his subject
required not the embellishments of language, but proofs to move the minds of his readers."'
^ De doei. Christ. IV. c. zi.
i
THREE BOOKS OF ST. AMBROSE, BISHOP OF MILAN,
ON THE HOLY SPIRIT.
TO THE EMPEROR GRATIAN.
BOOK I.
The choice of Gideon was a figure of our Lord's In-
carnation, the sacrifice of a kid, of the satisfaction for
sins in the body of Christ ; that of the bullock, of
the abolition of profane rites ; and in the three hun-
dred soldiers was a type of the future redemption
through the cross. The seeking of various signs by
Gideon was also a mystery, for by the dryness and
moistening of the fleece was signified the falling
away of the Jews and the calling of the Gentiles, by
the water received in a basin the washing of the
apostles' feet. St. Ambrose prays that his own pol-
lution may be washed away, and praises the loving-
kindness of Christ. The same water sent forth by
the Son of God effects marvellous conversions ; it
cannot, however, be sent by any other, since it is the
pouring forth of the Holy Spirit, Who is subject to
no external power.
I. When Jerubbaal, as we read, was beat-
ing- out wheat ' under an oak, he received
a message from God in order that he might
bring the people of God from the power of
strangers into liberty. Nor is it a matter of
wonder if he was chosen for grace, seeing
that even then, being appointed under the
shadow of the holy cross and of the ador-
able Wisdom in the predestined mystery of
the future Incarnation, he was bringing
forth the visible grains of the fruitful corn
from their hiding places, and was [mysti-
cally] separating the elect of the saints from
the refuse of the empty chaff. For these
elect, as though trained with the rod of
truth, laying aside the superfluities of the
old man together with his deeds, are
gathered in the Church as in a winepress.
For the Church is the winepress of the
eternal fountain, since from her wells forth
the juice of the heavenly Vine.
2. And Gideon, moved by that message,
when he heard that, though thousands of
the people failed, God would deliver His
own from their enemies by means of one
man,' offered a kid, and according to the
word of the Angel, laid its flesh and the un-
leavened cakes upon the rock, and poured
the broth upon them. And as soon as the
Angel touched them with the end of the
staff which he bore, fire burst forth out of
the rock, and so the sacrifice which he was
offering was consumed.^ By which it
seems clear that that rock was a figure of
the Body of Christ, for it is written : "They
drank of that rock that followed them, and
that rock was Christ. "' 3 Which certainly
refers not to His Godhead, but to His Flesh,
which watered the hearts of the thirsting
people with the perpetual stream of His
Blood.
3. Even at that time was it declared in a
mystery that the Lord Jesus in His Flesh
would, when crucified, do away the sins of the
whole world, and not only the deeds of the
body, but the desires of the soul. For the
flesh of the kid refers to sins of deed,_ the
broth to the enticements of desire, as it is
written : "For the people lusted an evil
lust, and said. Who shall give us flesh to
eat ? " * That the Angel then stretched forth
his staff, and touched the rock, from which
fire went out,s shows that the Flesh of
the Lord, being filled with the Divine Spirit,
would burn away all the sins of human
frailty. Wherefore, also, the Lord says :
" I am come to send fire upon the earth. "^
4. Then the man, instructed and fore-
knowing what was to be, observes the
heavenly mysteries, and therefore, accord-
ing to the warning, slew the bullock de-
' Judg. vi. II.
^ Judg. VI. 14.
3 I Cor. X. 4.
^ Judg. vi. ji.
- Judg. vi. 19-21.
■• Num. xi. 4.
6 S. Luke xii. 49.
93
94
ST. AMBROSE.
stined by his father to idols, and himself
offered to God another bullock seven years
old. ' By doing which he most plainly
showed that after the coming of the Lord
all Gentile sacrifices should be done away,
and that only the sacrifice of the Lord's
passion should be offered for the redemption
of the people. For that bullock was, in a
type, Christ, in Whom, as Esaias said,
dwelt the fulness of the seven gifts of the
Spirit.^ This bullock Abraham also offered
when he saw the day of the Lord and was
glad. ^ He it is Who was offered at one
time in the type of a kid, at another in that
of a sheep, at another in that of a bullock.
Of a kid, because He is a sacrifice for sin ;
of a sheep, because He is an unresisting
victim; of a bullock, because He is a victim
without blemish.
5. Holy Gideon then saw the mystery
beforehand. Next he chose out three hun-
dred for the battle, so as to show that the
world should be freed from the incursion
of worse enemies, not l)y the multitude
of their number, but by the mystery of the
cross. And yet, though he was brave and
faithful, he asked of the Lord yet fuller
proofs of future victory, saying : "If Thou
wilt save Israel by mine hand, O Lord, as
Thou hast said, behold I will put a fleece
of wool on the threshing-floor, and if there
shall be dew on the fleece and dryness on
all the ground, I shall know that Thou wilt
deliver the people by my hand according
to Thy promise. And it was so. "^ After-
wards he asked in addition that dew should
descend on all the earth and dryness be on
the fleece.
6. Some one perhaps will enquire whe-
ther he does not seem to have been wanting
in faith, seeing that after being instructed
by many signs he asked still more. But
how can he seem to have asked as if doubt-
ing or wanting in faith, who was speaking
in mysteries ? He was not then doubtful,
but careful that we should not doubt. For
how could he be doubtful whose prayer was
effectual .'' And how could he have begun
the battle without fear, unless he had under-
stood the message of God .'' for the dew on
the fleece signified the faith among the
Jews, because the words of God come down
like the dew.
7. So when the whole world was parched
with the drought of Gentile superstition,
then came that dew of the heavenly visits
on the fleece. But after that the lost sheep
' Judg. vi. 26.
* S. John viii. 56.
' Isa. xi. 2.
* Judg. vi. 36.
of the house of Israel ' (whom I think tliat
the figure of the Jewish fleece shadowed
forth), after that those sheep, I say,^ "had
refused the fountain of living water," the
dew of moistening faith dried up in the
breasts of the Jews, and that divine Foun-
tain turned away its course to the hearts of
the Gentiles. Whence it has come to pass
that now the whole world is moistened with
the dew of faith, but the Jews have lost
their prophets and counsellors.
8. Nor is it strange that they should suffer
the drought of vmbelief, whom the Lord de-
prived of the fertilising of the shower of
prophecy, saying: "I will command My
clouds that they rain not upon that vine-
yard. " 3 For there is a health-giving shower
of salutary grace, as David also said : " He
came down like rain upon a fleece, and like
drops that drop upon the earth. '" 4 The
divine Scriptures promised us this rain upon
the whole earth, to water the world with
the dew of the Divine Spirit at the coming
of the Saviour. The Lord, then, has now
come, and the rain has come ; the Lord has
come bringing the heavenly drops with Him,
and so now we drink, who before were
thirsty, and with an interior draught drink in
that Divine Spirit.
9. Holy Gideon, then, foresaw this, that
the nations of the Gentiles also would drink
by the reception of faith, and therefore he
enquired more diligently, for the caution of
the saints is necessary. Insomuch that
also Joshua the son of Nun, when he saw
the captain of the heavenly host, enquired :
"Art thou for us, or for our adversaries ? '" s
lest, perchance, he might be deceived by
some stratagem of the adversary.
10. Nor was it without a reason that he
put the fleece neither in a field nor in a
meadow, but in a threshing-floor, where is
the harvest of the wheat : ' ' For the harvest
is plenteous, but the labourers are few ; "" ^
because that, through faith in the Lord,
there was about to be a harvest fruitful in
virtues.
11. Nor, again, was it without a reason
that he dried the fleece of the Jews, and put
the dew from it into a basin, so that it
was filled with water, yet he did not himself
wash his feet in that dew. The prerogative
of so great a mystery was to be given to
another. He was being waited for Who
alone could wash away the filth of all.
Gideon was not great enough to claim this
mystery for himself, but "the Son of Man
' S. Matt. XV. 24.
* Ps. Ixxii. [Ixxi.] 6.
- Jer. ii. ij.
'' Josh. V. 13.
' Isa. V. 6.
" S. Luke X. 2.
I
OF THE HOLY SPIRIT.— BOOK I.
95
came not to be ministered unto, but to
minister."' Let us, then, recognize in
Whom these mysteries are seen to be ac-
complished. Not in holy Gideon, for they
were still at their commencement. Therefore
the Gentiles were surpassed, for dryness was
still upon the Gentiles, and therefore did
Israel surpass them, for then did the dew
remain on the fleece.
12. Let us come now to the Gospel of
God. I find the Lord stripping- Himself of
His irarments, and orirdin<r Himself with a
towel, pouring water into a basin, and wash-
ing the disciples' feet. ^ That heavenly dew
was this water, this was foretold, namely,
that the Lord Jesus Christ would wash the
feet of His disciples in that heavenly dew.
And now let the feet of our minds be
stretched out. The Lord Jesus wills also to
wash our feet, for He says, not to Peter
alone, but to each of the faithful : "If I
wash not thy feet thou wilt have no part
with Me." 3
13. Come, then. Lord Jesus, put off Thy
garments, which Thou didst put on for my
sake ; be Thou stripped that Thou mayest
clothe us with Thy mercy. Gird Thyself
for our sakes with a towel, that Thou may-
est gird us with Thy gift of immortality.
Pour water into the basin, wash not only
our feet but also the head, and not only of
the body, but also the footsteps of the soul.
I wish to put off all the filth of our frailty, so
that I also may say: "By night I have
put off my coat, how shall I put it on ? I
have washed my feet, how shall I defile
them.'' " ■*
14. How great is that excellence ! As a
servant. Thou dost wash the feet of Thy
disciples ; as God, Thou sendest dew from
heaven. Nor dost Thou wash the feet only,
but also invitest us to sit down with Thee,
and by the example of Thy dignity dost ex-
hort us, saying: "Ye call Me Master and
Lord, and ye do well, for so I am. If, then, I
the Lord and Master have washed your feet,
ye ought also to wash one another's feet." 5
15. I, then, wish also myself to wash the
feet of my brethren, I wish to fulfil the
commandment of my Lord, I will not be
ashamed in myself, nor disdain what He
Himself did first. Good is the mystery of
humility, because while washing the pollu-
tions of others I wash away my own. But
all were not able to exhaust this mystery.
Abraham was, indeed, willing to wash feet,^
but because of a feeling of hospitality.
* S. Matt. XX. 28.
^ S. John xiii. 8.
* S. John xiii. 13, 14.
^ S. John xiii. 4.
* Cant. V. 3.
*• Gen. xviii.4.
Gideon, too, was willing to wash the feet of
the Angel of the Lord M'ho appeared to him, '
but his willingness was confined to one ; he
was willing as one who would do a service,
not as one who would confer fellowship
with himself This is a great mystery which
no one knew. Lastly, the Lord said to
Peter : " What I do thou knowest not now,
but shalt know hereafter."^ 7"his, I say, is
a divine mystery which even they who wash
will enquire into. It is not, then, thesimple
water of the heavenly mystery whereby we
attain to be found worthy of having part
with Christ.
16. There is also a certain water which
we put into the basin of our soul, water
from the fleece and from the Book of Judges ;
water, too, from the Book of Psalms.^ It is
the water of the message from heaven.
Let, then, this water, O Lordjesus, come into
my soul, into my flesh, that through the
moisture of this rain ■♦ the valleys of our
minds and the fields of our hearts may grow
green. May the drops from Thee come
upon me, shedding forth grace and immor-
tality. Wash the steps of my mind that I
may not sin again. Wash the heels of my
soul, that I may be able to efface the curse,
that I feel not the serpent's bite^ on the foot
of my soul, but, as Thou Thyself hast bidden
those who follow Thee, may tread on ser-
pents and scorpions 7 with vminjured foot.
Thou hast redeemed the world, redeem the
soul of a single sinner.
17. This is the special excellence of Thy
loving-kindness, wherewith Thou hast re-
deemed the whole world one by one. Elijah
was sent to one widow ;^ Elisha cleansed
one; 9 Thou, O Lord Jesus, hast at this day
cleansed a thousand. How many in the
city of Rome, how many at Alexandria, how
many at Antioch, how many also at Con-
stantinople ! For even Constantinople has
received the word of God, and has received
evident proofs of Thy judgment. For so
long as she cherished the Arians' poison in
her bosom, disquieted by neighbouring
wars, she echoed with hostile arms around.
But so soon as she rejected those who were
' Whence this statement is derived cannot be ascertained. Pos-
sibly it is merely an assumption of St. Ambrose founded on his es-
timate of Gideon's character.
- S. John xiii. 7. 3 p^ Ji^.^iJi [xxii.] 2.
■• Ps. Ixxv. [Ixxiv.] II.
^ " Alia est ini^uitas nostra, alia calcatiei 7iostri, in quo Adam
dente serpent is est vu/neratiis et obnoxiam hereditatem successionis
kumaniE sno vulnere dereliquit, lit onines illo vuhiere claudiceinits."
St. Aug. Exp. Psal. xlviii. 6, and St. Ambrose, Enar. inPs. xlviii.
9 : " Unde reor iniquitatetn calcaiiei magis hd>ricnm delinque?idi
quavi reatitm aliqiiem nostri esse delicti." This Inbricum deliii-
quendi, the wound of Adam's heel, seems to have been understood
of concupiscence, which has the nature of sin, and is called sin bv
St. Paul. '
" Gen. iii. 15. 7 g. Luke x. ig.
* I [3] Kings xvii. 9. » 2 [4J Kings v. 14.
96
ST. AMBROSE.
alien from the faith she received as a sup-
pliant the enemy himself, the judge of kings,
whom she had always been wont to fear,
she buried him when dead, and retains him
entombed.' How many, then, hast Thou
cleansed at Constantinople, how many,
lastly, at this day in the whole world !
1 8. Damasus cleansed not, Peter cleansed
not, Ambrose cleansed not, Gregory cleansed
not ; ^ for ours is the ministry, but the
sacraments are Thine. For it is not in
man's power to confer what is divine, but
it is, O Lord, Thy gift and that of the Father,
as Thou hast spoken by the prophets, say-
ing: "I will pour out of My Spirit upon all
flesh, and their sons and their daughters
shall prophesy. "3 This is that typical dew
from heaven, this is that gracious rain, gs
we read : "A gracious rain, dividing for His
inheritance. "4 For the Holy Spirit is not
subject to any foreign power or law, but is
the Arbiter of His own freedom, dividing all
things according to the decision of His own
will, to each, as we read, severally as He
wills. 5
CHAPTER I.
St. Ambrose commences his argument by compliment-
ing the Emperor, both for his faith and for the
restitution of the Basilica to the Church ; then hav-
ing urged that his opponents, if they affirm that the
Holy Spirit is not a servant, cannot deny Him to be
above all, adds that the same Spirit, when He said,
^^ All things serve T/iee," showed plainly that He
was distinct from creatures ; which point he also
establishes by other evidence.
19. The Holy Spirit, then, is not amongst
but above all things. For (since you, most
merciful Emperor, are so fully instructed
concerning the Son of God as to be able
yourself to teach others) I will not detain
you longer, as you desire and claim to be
told something more exactly [concerning
Him], especially since you lately showed
yourself to be so pleased by an argument of
this nature, as to command the Basilica to
be restored to the Church without any one
urging you.
20. So, then, we have received the grace of
your faith and the reward of our own ; for
we cannot say otherwise than that it was of
* Athanaricus, king or judex of the West Goths in Dacia, de-
feated in 369 by the Emperor Valens. Subsequently, in 380, being
defeated by the Huns and some Gothic chiefs, he was forced to
take refuge in Constantinople, when he was received with all the
honour due to his rank. He died the next year.
- Damasus of Rome, Peter of Alexandria, Gregory of Constanti-
nople, and St. Ambrose himself. Peter had died by this time, but
the fact was probably not yet known at Milan.
■' Joel ii. 2.S. \^ Ps. Ixviii. [Ixvii.] 9.
'' I Cor. xii. II
the grace of the Holy Spirit, that when all
were unconscious of it, you suddenly re-
stored the Basilica. This is the gift, I say,
this the work of the Holy Spirit, Who indeed
was at that time preached by us, but was
working in you.
21. And I do not regret the losses of the
previous time, since the sequestration of
that Basilica resulted in the gain of a sort of
usury. For you sequestrated the Basilica,
that you might give proof of your faith.
And so your piety fulfilled its intention,
which had sequestered that it might give
proof, and so gave proof as to restore. I
did not lose the fruit, and I have your judg-
ment, and it has been made clear to all that,
with a certain diversity of action, there was
in you no diversity of opinion. It was
made clear, I say, to all, that it was not of
yourself that you sequestrated, that it was
of yourself when you restored it.
22. Now let us establish by evidence what
we have said. The first point in the dis-
cussion is that all things serve. Now it is
clear that all things serve, since it is writ-
ten : "All things serve Thee."' This the
Spirit said through the prophet. He did
not say. We serve, but, "serve Thee," that
you might believe that He Himself is ex-
cepted from serving. So, then, since all
things serve, and the Spirit does not serve,
the Holy Spirit is certainly not included
amongst all things.
23. For if we say that the Holy Spirit is
included amongst all things, certainly when
we read that the Spirit searches the deep
things of God, ^ we deny that God the
Father is over all. For since the Spirit is
of God, and is the Spirit of His mouth, how
can we say that the Holy Spirit is included
amongst all things, seeing that God, Whose
is the Spirit, is over all, possessing certainly
fulness of perfection and perfect power.
25. But lest the objectors should think
that the Apostle was in error, let them
learn whom he followed as his authority for
his belief The Lord said in the Gospel :
" When the Paraclete is come, Whom I will
send to you from My Father, even the
Spirit of Truth which proceedeth from the
Father, He shall bear witness oflMe. "^ So
the Holy Spirit both proceeds from the
Father, and bears witness of the Son. For
the witness Who is both faithful and true
bears witness of the Father, than which
witness nothing is more full for the expres-
sion of the Divine Majesty, nothing more
clear as to the Unity of the Divine Power,
' Ps. cxix. [cxviii.J 91. ^ r Cor. ii. 10. ' S. John xv. 26.
OF THE HOLY SPIRIT.— BOOK I.
97
since the Spirit has the same knowledge as
the Son, Who is the witness and inseparable
sharer of the Father's secrets.
26. He excludes, then, the fellowship and
number of creatures from the knowledge of
God, but by not excluding the Holy Spirit,
He shows that He is no't of the fellowship
of creatures. So that the passage which is
read in the Gospel: "For no man hath
seen God at any time, save the Only-begot-
ten Son Who is in the bosom of the Father,
He hath declared Him," also pertains to the
exclusion of the Holy Spirit. For how has
He not seen God Who searches even the
deep things of God.'' How has He not seen
God Who knows the things which are of
God.'' How has He not seen God Who is
of God .'' So, since it is laid down that no
one has seen God at any time, whereas the
Holy Spirit has seen Him, clearly the Holy
Spirit is excepted. He, then, is above all
Who is excluded from all.
CHAPTER 11.
The words, " All t/uiii^s were i/iade by Him,'' are not a
proof that the Holy Spirit is included amongst all
things, since He was not made. For otherwise it
could be proved by other passages that the Son, and
even the Father Himself, must be numbered amongst
all things, which would be similar irreverence.
27. This seems, gracious Emperor, to be
a full account of our right feeling, but to
the impious it does not seem so. Observe
what they are striving after. For the here-
tics are wont to say that the Holy Spirit is
to be reckoned amongst all things, because
it is written of God the Son : "
were made by Him."'
28. How utterly confused is a course of
.\11 things
argument which does not hold to the truth,
and is involved in an inverted order of
statements. For this argument would be of
value for the statement that the Holy Spirit
is amongst all things, if they proved that
He was made. For Scripture says that all
things which were made were made by the
Son ; but since we are not taught that the
Holy Spirit was made, He certainly cannot
be proved to be amongst all things Who
was neither made as all things are, nor
created. To me this testimony is of use for
establishing each point ; firstly, that He is
proved to be above all things, because He
was not made ; and secondly, that because
He is above all things, He is seen not to
S. John i. 3.
have been made, and is not to be numbered
amongst those things which were made.
29. But if any one, because the Evange-
list stated that all things were made by the
Word, making no exception of the Iloly
Spirit (although the Spirit of God speaking
in John said: "All things were made by
Him, " and said not we were all things which
were made ; whilst the Lord Himself dis-
tinctly showed that the Spirit of God spoke
in the Evangelists, saying, "For it will not
be you that speak, but the Spirit of your
Father that speaketh in you"),' yet if any
one, as I said, does not except the Holy
Spirit in this place, but numbers Him
amongst all, he consequently does not ex-
cept the Son of God in that passage where
the Apostle says : " Yet to us there is one
God the Father, of Whom are all things,
and we by Him." - But that he may know
that the Son is not amongst all things, let
him read what follows, for when he says :
"And one Lord Jesus Christ, by Whom are
all things, "3 he certainly excepts the Son
of God from all, who also excepted the
Father.
30. But- it is equal irreverence to detract
from the dignity of the Father, or the Son,
or the Holy Spirit. For he believes not in
the Father who does not believe in the
Son, nor does he believe in the Son of God
who does not believe in the Spirit, nor can
faith stand without the rule of truth. For
he who has begun to deny the oneness of
power in the Father and the Son and the
Holy Spirit certainly cannot prove his
divided faith in points where there is no
division. So, then, since complete piety is
to believe rightly, so complete impiety is to
believe wrongly.
31. Therefore they who think that the
Holy Spirit ought to be numbered amongst
all things, because they read that all things
were made by the Son, must needs also think
that the Son is to be numbered amongst all
things, because they read : "-All things are
of God. "4 But, consequently, they also do
not separate the Father from all things, who
do not separate the Son from all creatures,
since, as all things are of the Father, so,
too, all things are by the Son. And the
Apostle, because of his foresight in the
Spirit, used this very expression, lest he
should seem to the impious who had heard
that the Son had said, "That which My
Father hath given Me is greater than all, "5
to have included the Son amongst all.
1 S. Matt. X. 20.
* 2 Cor. V. i8.
2 I Cor. viii. 6.
^ S. John X. 29.
* I Cor. viii. 6,
98
ST. AMBROSE.
CHAPTER III.
The statement of the Apostle, that all things are of the
Father by the Son, does not separate the Spirit from
Their company, since what is referred to one Person
is also attributed to each. So those baptized in the
Name of Christ are held to be baptized in the Name
of the P'ather and of the Holy Spirit, if, that is, there
is belief in the Three Persons, otherwise the baptism
will be null. This also applies to baptism in the
Name of the Holy Spirit. If because of one passage
the Holy Spirit is separated from the Father and the
Son, it will necessarily follow from other passages
that the Father \yill be subordinated to the Son.
The Son is worshipped by angels, not by the Spirit,
for the latter is His witness, not His servant. Where
the Son is spoken of as being before all, it is to be
understood of creatures. The great dignity of the
Holy Spirit is proved by the absence of forgiveness
for the sin against Him. How it is that such sin
cannot be forgiven, and how the -Spirit is one.
32. But perhaps some one may say that
there was a reason why the writer said that
all things were of the Father, and all things
through the Son," but made no mention
of the Holy Spirit, and would obtain the
foundation of an argument from this. But
if he persists in his perverse interpretation,
in how many passages will he find the power
of the Holy Spirit asserted, in which Scrip-
ture has stated nothing concerning either the
Father or the Son, but has left it to be un-
derstood ?
40. Where, then, the grace of the Spirit is
asserted, is that of God the Father or of the
Only-begotten Son denied.? By no means ;
for as the Father is in the Son, and the Son
in the Father, so, too, "the love of God is
shed abroad in our hearts by the Holy Spirit,
Who hath been given us. " ^ And as he who
is blessed in Christ is blessed in the Name
of the Father, and of the Son, and of the
Holy Spirit, because the Name is one and
the Power one ; so, too, when any divine
operation, whether of the Father, or of the
Son, or of the Holy Spirit, is treated of, it is
not referred only to the Holy Spirit, but also
to the Father and the Son, and not only to
the Father, but also to the Son and the
Spirit.
41. Then, too, the Ethiopian eunuch of
Queen Candace, when baptized in Christ,
obtained the fulness of the sacrament. And
they who said that they knew not of any
Holy Spirit, although they said that they
had been baptized with John's baptism,
were baptized afterwards, because John
baptized for the remission of sins in the
Name of the coming Jesus, not in his own.
And so they knew not the Spirit, because
' I Cor. viii, 6.
' Rom. V. 5.
in the form in which John baptized they
had not received baptism in the Name of
Christ. For John, though he did not baptize
in the Spirit, nevertheless preached Christ
and the Spirit. And then, when he was
questioned whether he were perchance him-
self the Christ, he answered: "I baptize
you with water, but a stronger than I shall
come. Whose shoes I am not worthy to bear.
He shall baptize you with the Holy Spirit
and with fire."' They therefore, because
they had been baptized neither in the Name
of Christ nor with faith in the Holy Spirit,
could not receive the sacrament of baptism.
42. So they were baptized in the Name of
Jesus Christ,^ and baptism was not repeated
in their case, but administered differently,
for there is but one baptism. But where
there is not the complete sacrament of bap-
tism, there is not considered to be a com-
mencement nor any kind of baptism. But
baptism is complete if one confess the Father,
the Son, and the Holy Spirit. If you deny
One you overthrow the whole. And just as
if you mention in words One only, either
the Father, or the Son, or the Holy Spirit,
and in your belief do not deny either the
Father, the Son, or the Holy Spirit, the
mystery of the faith is complete, so, too,
although you name the Father, Son, and
Holy Spirit, and lessen the power of either
the Father, the Son, or the Holy Spirit, the
whole mystery is made empty. And, lastly,
they who had said : "We have not heard if
there be any Holy Spirit, were baptized
afterwards in the Name of the Lord Jesus
Christ. "3 And this was an additional abun-
dance of grace, for now through PauTs
preaching they knew the Holy Spirit.
43. Nor ought it to seem opposed to this,
that although subsequently mention is not
made of the Spirit, He is yet believed in, and
what had not been mentioned in words is
expressed in belief. For when it is said,
"In the Name of our Lord Jesus Christ,"
the mystery is complete through the oneness
of the Name, and the Spirit is not separated
J S. Matt. iii. 11 : S. Luke iv. 16; S. John i. 26, 27.
- This passage has given rise to the question whether St. Ambrose
taught, as some others certainly did (probably on his authority), that
baptism in the Name of Christ alone, without mention of the other
Persons, is valid. But it is difficult to believe that St. Ambrose
meant more than to refer to the passage in the Acts as imphnng
Christian baptism. He says Just below that baptism is not com-
plete unless one confess the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, which
would seem to imply the full foniiula, and he would hardly dissent
from St. l?asil, who 'distinctly asserts [De S/i. Saiict. XII. J that bap-
tism without mention of the Three Persons is invalid; and St. Au-
gustine [De Bapt. lib. vi. c. xxv. 47] says that it is more easy to find
heretics who reject baptism altogether, than such as omit the right
form. Compare also St. Ambrose on .St. Luke vi. 67; Dc Mys-
ieriis, IV. 20; De Sacranientis, II. sand 7, especially the latter when
he says : In uno nomine . . . Iioc est hi nomine Patris et Filii, et
Spiritus Sancii.
^ Acts xix. 5 ff.
OF THE HOLY SPIRIT.— BOOK I.
99
from the baptism of Christ, since John bap-
tized unto repentance, Christ in the Spirit.
44. Let us now consider whether as we
read that the sacrament of baptism in the
Name of Christ was complete, so, too, when
the Holy Spirit alone is named, anything- is
wanting- to the completeness of the mystery.
T>et us follow out the argument that he who
has named One has signified the Trinity.
If you name Christ, you imply both God the
feather by Whom the Son was anointed, and
the Son Himself Who was anointed, and the
Holy Spirit with Whom He was anointed.
For it is written : "This Jesus of Nazareth,
Whom God anointed with the Holy Spirit. " '
And if you name the Father, you denote
equally His Son and the Spirit of His mouth,
if, that is, you apprehend it in your heart.
And if you speak of the Spirit, you name
also God the Father, from Whom the Spirit
proceeds, and the Son, inasmuch as He is
also the Spirit of the Son.
45. W^herefore that authority may also be
joined to reason Scripture indicates that we
can also be rightly baptized in the Spirit,
when the Lord says : " But ye shall be
baptized in the Holy Spirit. "' - x\nd in an-
other place the Apostle says : "For we
were all baptized in the body itself into one
Spirit. "3 The work is one, for the mystery
is one ; the baptism one, for there was one
death on behalf of the world ; there is, then,
a oneness of working-, a oneness of settine
forth, which cannot be separated.
46. But if in this place the Spirit be sepa-
rated from the operation of the Father and
the Son, because it is said. All things are of
God, and all things are through the Son,4
then, too, when the Apostle says of Christ,
"Who is overall, God blessed for ever, "5
He set Christ not only above all creatures,
but (which it is impious to say) above the
Father also. But God forbid, for the Father
is not amongst all things, is not amongst a
kind of crowd of His own creatures. The
whole creation is below, over all is the God-
head of the Father, the Son, and the Holy
Spirit. The former serves, the latter rules ;
the former is subject, the latter reigns ; the
former is the work, the latter the author of
the work ; the former, without exception,
worships, the latter is worshipped by all
without exception.
47. Lastly, of the Son it is written : "And
let all the angels of God worship Him. "^
You do not find. Let the Holy Spirit worship.
And farther on : "To which of the aneels
o
said He at any time. Sit thou on My right
hand till I make thine enemies the footstool
of thy feet ? Are they not all," says he,
" ministering spirits who are sent to minis-
ter ? " ' When he says A//, does he include
the Holy Spirit ? Certainly not, because
Angels and the other Powers are destined
to serve in ministering and obedience to the
Son of God.
48. But in truth the Holy Spirit is not a
minister but a witness of the Son, as the
Son Himself said of Him : " He shall bear
witness of Me."^ The Spirit, then, is a wit-
ness of the Son. He who is a witness
knows all things, as God the Father is a
witness. For so you read in later passages,
for our salvation was confirmed to us by
God bearing witness by signs and wonders
and by manifold powers and by distributions
of the Holy Spirit. ^ He who divides as he
will is certainly above all, not amongst all,
for to divide is the gift of the worker, not
an innate part of the work itself.
49. If the Son is above all, through Whom
our salvation received its commencement,
so that it might be preached, certainly God
the Father also, Who testifies and gives con-
firmation concerning our salvation by signs
and wonders, is excepted from all. In like
manner the Spirit, Who bears witness to our
salvation by His diversities of gifts, is not
to be numbered with the crowd of creatures,
but to be reckoned with the Father and the
Son ; Who, when He divides, is not Him-
self divided by cutting off Himself, for being
indivisible He loses nothing M^hen He gives
to all, as also the Son, when the Father
receives the kingdom, 4 loses nothing, nor
does the Father, when He gives that which
is His to the Son, suffer loss. We know,
then, by the testimony of the Son that there
is no loss in the division of spiritual grace ;
for He Who breathes where He wills 5 is
everywhere free from loss. Concerning
which power we shall speak more fully
farther on.
50. In the meanwhile, since our intention
is to prove in due order that the Spirit is not
to be reckoned amongst all things, let us
take the Apostle, whose words they call in
question, as an authority for this position.
For what "all things" would be, whether
visible or invisible, he himself declared
when he said : " For in Him were all things
created in the heavens and in earth. "^ You
see that "all things" is spoken of things in
the heavens, and of things in earth, for in
' Acts X. 38.
* I Cor. viii. 6.
Acts i. 5.
Rom. ix. 5.
^ I Cor. xii. 13.
« Heb. i. 6.
1 Heb. i. 14.
* I Cor. XV. 24.
- S. John XV. 26.
6 S. John iii. 8.
' Heb. ii. 3, 4.
« Col. i. 16.
lOO
ST. AMBROSE.
the heavens are also invisible things which
were made.
51. But that no one should be ignorant of
this he added those of whom he was speak-
ing : "Whether thrones or dominions or
principalities or powers, all things were
created by Him and in Him, and He is
before all, and in Him all things consist." '
Does he, then, include the Holy Spirit here
amongst creatures ? Or when he says that
the Son of God is before all things, is he to
be supposed to have said that He is before
the Father .' Certainly not ; for as here he
says that all things were created by the Son,
and that all things in the heavens consist in
Him, so, too, it cannot be doubted that all
things in the heavens have their strength in
the Holy Spirit, since we read : "By the
word of the Lord were the heavens estab-
lished and all the strength of them by the
Spirit of His mouth." ^ He, then, is above
all, from Whom is all the strength of things
in heaven and things on earth. He, then,
Who is above all things certainly does not
serve ; He Who serves not is free ; He Who
is free has the prerogative of lordship.
52. If I were to say this at first it would
be denied. But in the same manner as
they deny the less that the greater may not
be believed, so let us set forth lesser matters
first that either they may show their perfidy
in lesser matters, or, if they grant the lesser
matters, we may infer greater from the
lesser.
53. I think, most merciful Emperor, that
they are most fully confuted who dare to
reckon the Holy Spirit amongst all things.
But that they may know that they are
pressed not only by the testimony of the
apostles, but also by that of our Lord; how
can they dare to reckon the Holy Spirit
amongst all things, since the Lord Himself
said : " He who shall blaspheme against
the Son of Man, it shall be forgiven him ;
but he who shall blaspheme against the
Holy Ghost shall never be forgiven, either
here or hereafter. "3 How, then, can any
one dare to reckon the Holy Spirit amongst
creatures .-* Or who will so blind himself as
to think that if he have injured any creature
he cannot be forgiven in any wise .-* For if
the Jews because they worsliipped the host
of heaven were deprived of divine protection,
whilst he who worships and confesses the
Holy Spirit is accepted of God, but he who
confesses Him not is convicted of sacrilege
without forgiveness ; certainly it follows
from this that the Holy Spirit cannot be
* Col. i. j6, 17. - Ps. xxxiii. [xxxii.J 6, '' S. Matt. xii. 32.
reckoned amongst all things, but that He is
above all things, an offence against Whom
is avenged by eternal punishment.
54. But observe carefully why the Lord
said: "He who shall blaspheme agamst
the Son of Man it shall be forgiven him, but
he who shall blaspheme against the Holy
Ghost shall never be forgiven, either here or
hereafter."' Is an offence against the Son
different from one against the Holy Spirit ?
For as their dignity is one, and common to
both, so too is the offence. But if any one,
led astray by the visible human body, should
think somewhat more remissly than is
fitting concerning the Body of Christ (for it
ought not to appear of little worth to us,
seeing it is the palace of chastity, and the
fruit of the Virgin), he incurs guilt, but he is
not shut out from pardon, which he may
attain to by faith. But if any one should
deny the dignity, majesty, and eternal power
of the Holy Spirit, and should think that
devils are cast out not in the Spirit of God,
but in Beelzebub, there can be no attaining
of pardon there where is the fulness of
sacrilege ; for he who has denied the Spirit
has denied also the Father and the Son, since
the same is the Spirit of God Who is the
Spirit of Christ.
CHAPTER IV.
The Holy Spirit is one and the same Who spake in the
prophets and apostles, Who is the Spirit of (}od and
of Christ; Whom, further, .Scripture designates the
Paraclete, and the Spirit of life and truth.
55. But no one will doubt that the Spirit
is one, although very many have doubted
whether God be one. For many heretics
have said that the God of the Old Testament
is one, and the God of the New Testament
is another. But as the Father is one Who
both spake of old, as we read, to the fathers
by the prophets, and to us in the last days
by His Son ; ^ " and as the Son is one, Who
according to the tenour of tlie Old Testament
was offended by Adam, 3 seen by Abraham,-*
worshi])pedby Jacob; s so, too, the Holy Spirit
is one, who energized in the prophets,^ was
breathed upon the apostles, 7 and was joined
to the Father and the Son in the sacrament
of baptism.^ For David says of Him :
" And take not Thy Holy Spirit from me."'-'
And in another place he said of Him :
"Whither shall I go from Thy Spirit ? " '°
' S. Matt. xii. 32. ^ Heb. i. i, 2. » Gen. iii. 17.
* Gen. xviii. 22, 23. ^ Gen. xxviii. 17. '' 2 Pet. i. 21.
' S. John XX. 22. * S. Matt, xxviii. 19. '■' Ps. 11. [1.] 11.
^* Ps. cxxxix. [c.xxxviii.l 7.
OF THE HOLY SPIRIT.— BOOK I.
lOI
56. That you may know that the Spirit of
(lod is the same as the Holy Spirit, as we
read also in the Apostle : " No one speaking-
in the Spirit of God says Anathema to Jesus ;
and no one can say. Lord Jesus, but in the
Holy Spirit,"' the Apostle calls Him the
I Spirit of God. He called Him also the
Spirit of Christ, as you read: "But ye are
not in the flesh but in the Spirit, if so be that
tlie Spirit of God dwclleth in you."- And
farther on : " But if the Spirit of Him Who
raised Jesus from the dead dwelleth in
you. "-^ The same is. then, the Spirit of God,
Who is the Spirit of Christ.
57. The same is also the Spirit of Life, as
tlie Apostle says : " For the law of the Spirit
of Life in Christ Jesus hath delivered me from
the law of sin and death. "4
58. Him, then. Whom the Apostle called
the Spirit of Life, the Lord in the Gospel named
the P.araclete, and the Spirit of Truth, as you
find: "And I will ask the feather, and He
will give you another Comforter [Paraclete],
that He may be with you for ever, even the
Spirit of Truth, Whom this world cannot
receive ; because it seeth Him not, neither
kno weth Him. " s You have, then, theParaclete
Spirit, called also the Spirit of Truth, and the
invisible Spirit. How, then, do some think
that the Son is visible in His Divine Nature,
when the world cannot see even the Spirit ?
59. Receive now the saying- of the Lord,
that the same is the Holy Spirit Who is the
Spirit of Truth, for you read in the end of
this book: "Receive the Holy Spirit."'^
And Peter teaches that the same is the Holy
Spirit Who is the Spirit of the Lord, when he
says : "Ananias, why has it seemed good
to thee to tempt and to lie to the Holy
Spirit? ''7 And immediately after he says
again to the wife of Ananias : "Why has it
seemed good to you to tempt the Spirit of
the Lord.'"^ When he says "to you," he
shows that he is speaking of the same Spirit
of Whom he had spoken to Ananias. He
Himself is, then, the Spirit of the Lord Who is
the Holy Spirit.
60. And the Lord Himself made clear that
the same Who is the Spirit of the Father is
the Holy Spirit, when according to Matthew
He said that we ous:ht not to take thoug^ht
in persecution what we should say : "For
it is not ye that speak, but the Spirit of your
Father that speaketh in you." 9 Again He
says according to St. Luke : " Be not anxious
how ye shall answer or speak, for the Holy
Spirit of God shall teach you in that hour
^ 1 Cor. xii. 3.
* Rom. viii. 2.
' Acts V. 3.
^ Rom. viii. 9.
" S. John xiv. 16, 17.
* Acts V. 9.
3 Rom. viii. 11.
^ S. John XX. 22.
X. 20,
what ye ought to say. '' ' So, although many
are called spirits, as it is said : "Who
maketh His Angels spirits," yet the Spirit of
God is but one.
61. Both apostles and prophets received
that one Spirit, as the vessel of election, the
Doctor of the Gentiles, says : " For we have
all drunk of one Spirit ; " ^ Him, as it were,
Who cannot be divided, but is poured into
souls, and flows into the senses, that He
may quench the burning of this world's
thirst.
CHAPTER V.
The Holy Spirit, since He sanctifies creatures, is neither
a creature nor subject to change. He is always good,
since He is given by the Father and the Son ; neither
is He to be numbered amongst such things as are
said to fail. He must be acknowledged as the source
of goodness. The Spirit of God's mouth, the
amender of evils, and Himself good. Lastly, as He
is said in Scripture to be good, and is joined to the
Father and the Son in baptism. He cannot possibly
be denied to be good. He is not, however, said to
progress, but to be made perfect in goodness, which
distinguishes Him from all creatures.
62. The Holy Spirit is not, then, of the
substance of things corporeal, for He sheds
incorporeal grace on corporeal things ; nor,
again, is He of the substance of invisible
creatures, for they receive His sanctification,
and through Him are superior to the other
works of the universe. Whether you speak
of Angels, or Dominions, or Powers, every
creature waits for the grace of the Holy
Spirit. For as we are children through the
Spirit, because "God sent the Spirit of His
Son into our hearts crying, Abba, Father ;
so that thou art now not a servant but a
son ; " 3 in like manner, also, every creature
is waiting for the revelation of the sons of
God, whom in truth the grace of the Holy
Spirit made sons of God. Therefore, also,
every creature itself shall be changed by the
revelation of the grace of the Spirit, "and
shall be delivered from the bondag-e of cor-
ruption into the liberty of the glory of the
children of God. " ^
6^. Every creature, then, is subject to
change, not only such as has been changed
by some sin or condition of the outward
elements, but also such as can be liable to
corruption by a fault of nature, though by
careful discipline it be not yet so ; for, as we
have shown in a former treatise, s the
nature of Angels evidently can be changed.
It is certainly fitting to judge that such as is
S. Matt.
1 S. Luke xii. 11, 12.
" Gal. iv. 6, 7.
^ De Fid. III. 3.
^ I Cor. xii. 13.
* Rom. viii. 19,
I02
ST. AMBROSE.
the nature of one, such also is that of others.
The nature of the rest, then, is capable of
change, but the discipline is better.
64. Every creature, therefore, is capable
of change, but the Holy Spirit is good and
not capable of change, nor can He be
changed by any fault, Who does away the
faults of all and pardons their sins. How,
then, is He capable of change. Who by sanc-
tifying works in others a change to grace,
but is not changed Himself.
65. How is He capable of change Who is
always good.' For the Holy Spirit, through
Whom the things that are good are minis-
tered to us, is never evil. Whence two evan-
gelists in one and the same place, in words
in differing from each other, have made the
same statement, for you read in INIatthew :
" If you, being evil, know how to give good
gifts to your children ; how much more shall
your Father, Who is in heaven, give good
things to them that ask Him. " ' But accord-
ing to Luke you will tintl it thus written :
"How much more shall your heavenly
Father give the Holy Spirit to them that ask
Him .' " ^ We observe, then, that the Holy
Spirit is good in the Lord's judgment by the
testimony of the evangelists, since the one
has put good things in the place of the Holy
Spirit, the other has named the Holy Spirit
in the place of good things. If, then, the
Holy Spirit is that which is good, how is He
not good .''
66. Nor does it escape our notice that
some copies have likewise, according to St.
Luke : " How much more shall your heav-
enly Father give a good gift to them that ask
Him." This good gift is the grace of the
Spirit, which the Lord Jesus shed forth from
heaven, after having been fixed to the gibbet
of the cross, returning with the triumphal
spoils of death deprived of its power, as you
find it written : "Ascending up on high He
led captivity captive, and gave good gifts to
men. "3 And well does he say "gifts," for
as the Son was given, of Whom it is written :
"Unto us a Child is born, unto us a Son is
given ; " ■* so, too, is the grace of the Spirit
given. But why should I hesitate to say
that the Holy Spirit also is given to us, since
it is written : "The love of God is shed forth
in our hearts by the Holy Spirit, Who is
given to us. "5 And since captive breasts
certainly could not receive Him, the Lord
Jesus first led captivity captive, that our
affections being set free, He might pour forth
the gift of divine grace.
1 S. Matt. vii. II.
* Ps. Ixviii. [l.wii.] i8.
<> Rom. V. 5.
' S. Luke xi. 13.
* Isa. ix. 6.
67. And He said well "led captivity cap-
tive. " For the victory of Christ is the vic-
tory of liberty, which won grace for all, and
inflicted wrong on none. So in the settine
free of all no one is captive. And because
in the time of the Lord's passion wrong
alone had no part, which had made captive
all of whom it had gained possession, cap-
tivity itself turning back upon itself was
made captive, not now attached to Belial
but to Christ, to serve Whom is liberty.
" For he who is called in the Lord as a ser-
vant is the Lords freedman. " '
68. But to return to the point. "All,"
says He, " have gone aside, all together are
become unprofitable. There is none that
doeth good, not even one. "^ If they ex-
cept the Holy Spirit, even they themselves
confess that He is not amongst all ; if they
do not except Him, then they, too, acknow-
ledge that He has gone aside amongst all.
69. But let us consider whether He has
goodness in Himself, since He is the Source
and Principle of goodness. For as the
Father and the Son have, so too the Holy
Spirit also has goodness. And the Apostle
also taught this when he said : " Now the
fruit of the Spirit is peace, love, joy, patience,
goodness. "3 For who doubts that He is
good Whose fruit is goodness.' For "a
good tree brings forth good fruit. " ■*
70. And so if God be good, how shall He
Who is the Spirit of His mouth not be
good, Who searcheth even the deep things
of God.? Can the infection of evil enter into
the deep things of God .' And from this it
is seen how foolish they are who deny that
the Son of God is good, when they cannot
deny that the Spirit of Christ is good, of
Whom the Son of God says: "Therefore
said I that He shall receive of ^line. " s
71. Or is the Spirit not good. Who of the
worst makes good men, does away sin,
destroys evil, shuts out crime, pours in
good gifts, makes apostles of persecutors,
and priests of sinners.' "Ye were," it is
said, "sometime darkness, but now are ye
light in the Lord."^
72. But why do we put them off? And
if they ask for statements since they do not
deny facts, let them hear that the Holy
Spirit is good, for David said: "Let Thy
good Spirit lead me forth in the right way." 7
For what is the Spirit but full of goodness .'
Who though because of His nature He cannot
be attained to, yet because of His goodness
' I Cor. vii. 22.
^ Gal. V. 22.
'■ S. John xvi. 15.
' Ps. cxliii. [cxlii.] 10.
- Ps. xiv. [xiii.] 3.
■* S. Matt. vii. 17.
'^ Eph. V. 8.
OF THE HOLY SPIRIT.— BOOK I.
103
can be received bj"- us, filling all things by
His power, but only partaken of by the
just, simple in substance, rich in virtues,
present to each, dividing of His own to
every one, and Himself whole everywhere.
73. And with good cause did the Son of
God say : "Go and baptize all nations in
the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and
of the Holy Spirit," ' not disdaining associ-
ation with the Holy Spirit. Why, then, do
some take it ill that He Whom the Lord dis-
dained not in the sacrament of baptism,
should be joined in our devotion with the
Father and the Son .''
74. Good, then, is the Spirit, but good, not
as though acquiring but as imparting good-
ness. For the Holy Spirit does not receive
from creatures but is received ; as also He
is not sanctified but sanctifies ; for the
creature is sanctified, but the Holy Spirit
sanctifies. In which matter, though the
word is used in common, there is a differ-
ence in the nature. For both the man who
receives and God Who gives sanctity are
called holy, as we read: "Be ye holy, for
I am holy. "^ Now sanctification and cor-
ruption cannot share the same nature, and
therefore the grace of the Holy Spirit and
the creature cannot be of one substance.
75. Since, then, the whole invisible crea-
tion (whose substance some rightly believe
to be reasonable and incorporeal), with the
exception of the Trinity, does not impart
but acquires the grace of the Spirit, and does
not share in it but receives it, the whole
commonalty of creation is to be sepa-
rated from association with the Holy Spirit.
Let them then believe that the Holy Spirit
is not a creature ; or, if they think Him a
creature, why do they associate Him with
the Father ? If they think Him a creature,
why do they join Him with the Son of
God ? But if they do not think that He
should be separated from the Father and
the Son, they do not consider Him to be a
creature, for where the sanctification is one
the nature is one.
CHAPTER VI.
Although we are baptized with water and the Spirit,
the latter is much superior to the former, and is not
therefore to be separated from the Father and the
Son.
76. There are, however, many who, be-
cause we are baptized with water and the
Spirit, think that there is no difference in
' S. Matt, xxviii. 19.
- Lev. xix. 2.
the offices of water and the Spirit, and
therefore think that they do not differ in
nature. Nor do they observe that we are
buried in the element of water that we may
rise again renewed by the Spirit. For in
the water is the representation of death, in
the Spirit is the pledge of life, that the body
of sin may die through the water, which
encloses the body as it were in a kind of
tomb, that we, by the power of the Spirit,
may be renewed from the death of sin,
being born again in God.
77. And so these three witnesses are one,
as John said: "The water, the blood, and
the Spirit."' One in the mystery, not in
nature. The water, then, is a witness of
burial, the blood is a witness of death, the
Spirit is a witness of life. If, then, there be
any grace in the water, it is not from the
nature of water, but from the presence of
the Holy Spirit.
78. Do we live in the water or in the
Spirit .'' Are we sealed in the water or in
the Spirit. For in Him we live and He
Himself is the earnest of our inheritance, as
the Apostle says, writing to the Ephesians :
"In Whom believing ye were sealed with
the Holy Spirit of promise. Who is an ear-
nest of our inheritance."- So we were
sealed by the Holy Spirit, not by nature,
but by God, for it is written : " He Who
anointed us is God, Who also sealed us, and
gave the earnest of the Spirit in our hearts."
79. We were then sealed with the Spirit
by God. For as we die in Christ, in order
to be born again, so, too, we are sealed with
the Spirit, that we may possess His bright-
ness and image and grace, which is un-
doubtedly our spiritual seal. For although
we were visibly sealed in our bodies, we are
in truth sealed in our hearts, that the Holy
Spirit may portray in us the likeness of the
heavenly image.
80. Who, then, can dare to say that the
Holy Spirit is separated from the Father
and the Son, since through Him we attain
to the image and likeness of God, and
through Him, as the Apostle Peter says, are
partakers of the divine nature.' In which
there is certainly not the inheritance of
carnal succession, but the spiritual connec-
tion of the grace of adoption. And in order
that we may know that this seal is rather
on our hearts than on our bodies, the
prophet says : "The light of Thy counte-
nance has been impressed upon us, O Lord,
Thou hast put gladness in my heart." ^
' I John V. 8.
^ Ps. iv. 6, 7,
Eph. i. 13, 14.
104
ST. AMBROSE.
CHAPTER Vn.
The Holy Spirit is not a creature, seeing that He is
infinite, and was shed upon the apostles dispersed
through all countries, and moreover sanctifies the
Angels also, to whom He makes us equal. Mary was
full of the same likewise, so too, Christ the Lord,
and so far all things high and low. And all benedic-
tion has its origin from His operation, as was signified
in the moving of the water at Bethesda.
8 1. SiNXE then, every creature is confined
within certain limits of its own nature, and
inasmuch as those invisible operations,
which cannot be circumscribed by place and
bounds, yet are closed in by the property of
their own substance ; how can any one dare
to call the Holy Spirit a creature, Who has
not a limited and circumscribed power ?
because He is always in all things and
everywhere, which assuredly is the property
of Divinity and Lordship, for: "The earth
is the Lord's and the fulness thereof."'
8 1. And so, when the Lord appointed His
servants the apostles, that we might recog-
nize that the creature was one thing and the
grace of the Spirit another. He appointed
them to different places, because all could
not be everywhere at once. But He gave
the Holy Spirit to all, to shed upon the
apostles though separated the gift of indi-
visible grace. The persons, then, were dif-
ferent, but the accomplishment of the
working was in all one, because the Holy
Spirit is one of Whom it is said : " Ye shall
receive power, even the Holy Spirit coming
upon you, and ye shall be witnesses to Me
in Jerusalem and in all Judea and Samaria,
and unto the ends of the earth.'" ^
82. The Holy Spirit, then, is uncircum-
scribed and infinite. Who infused Himself
into the minds of the disciples throughout the
separate divisions of distant regions, and the
remote bounds of the whole world. Whom
nothing is able to escape or to deceive.
And therefore holy David says : " Whither
shall I go from Thy Spirit, or whither shall
I flee from Thy face. " ^ Of what Angel does
the Scripture say this .'' of what Dominion ?
of what Power.? of what Angel do we find
the power diffused over many .'* For Angels
were sent to few, but the Holy Spirit was
poured upon whole peoples. Who, then, can
doubt that that is divine which is shed u]")on
many at once and is not seen ; but that that
is corporeal which is seen and held by in-
dividuals .''
83. But in like manner as the Spirit sanc-
tifying the apostles is not a partaker of
* Ps. xxiv. [xxiii.] i.
* Ps. cxxxix. [cxxviii.] 7.
2 Acts i. 8.
human nature; so, too. He sanctifying An-
gels, Dominions, and Powers, has no part-
nership with creatures. But if any think
that the holiness of the Angels is not spir-
itual, but some other kind of grace belong-
ing to the property of their nature, they will
forsooth judge Angels to be inferior to men.
For since themselves also confess that they
would not dare to compare Angels to the
Holy Spirit, and they cannot deny that the
Holy Spirit is shed upon men ; but the sanc-
tification of the Spirit is a divine gift and
favour, men who possess a better kind of
sanctification will certainly be found to be
preferred to the Angels. But since Angels
come down to men to assist them, it must
be understood that the nature of Angels is
higher as it receives more of the grace of the
Spirit, and that the favour awarded to us
and to them comes from the same author.
84. But how great is that grace which
makes even the lower nature of the lot of
men equal to the gifts received by Angels, as
the Lord Himself promised, saying: "Ye
shall be as the Angels in heaven." Nor is it
difficult, for He Who made those Angels in
the Spirit will by the same grace make men
also equal to the Angels.
85. But of what creature can it be said
that it fills all things, as is written of the
Holy Spirit : "I will pour My Spirit upon
all flesh." ' This cannot be said of an
Angel. Lastly, Gabriel himself, when sent
to INIary, said : " Hail, full of grace, "- plainly
declaring the grace of the Spirit which was
in her, because the Holy Spirit had come
upon her, and she was about to have her
womb full of grace with the heavenly Word.
86. For it is of the Lord to fill all things.
Who says : "I fill heaven and earth. " 3 If,
then, it is the Lord Who fills heaven and
earth, W^ho can judge the Holy Spirit to be
without a share in the dominion and divine
power, seeing that He has filled the world,
and what is beyond the whole world, filled
Jesus the Redeemer of the whole world.-*
For it is written : "But Jesus, full of the Holy
Spirit, departed from Jordan. "4 Who, then,
except one who possessed the same fulness
could fill Him Who fills all things ?
87. But lest they should object that this
was said according to the flesh, though He
alone from Whose flesh went forth virtue
to heal all. was more than all ; yet, as the
Lord fills all things, so, too, we read of the
Spirit : " For the Spirit of the Lord filled the
whole world, "s And you find it said of all
' Joel ii. 28.
* S. Luke iv. i.
2 S. Luke i. 28
" Wisd. i. 7.
^ Jer. xxiii. 24.
OF THE ITOLY SPIRIT.— ROOK I.
105
who had consorted with the Apostles that,
" tilled with the Holy Spirit they spoke the
word of God with boldness. "' ' You see that
the Spirit g-ives both fulness and boldness,
Whose operation the archangel announces to
Mary, saying: "The Holy Spirit shall come
on thee." ^
88. You read, too, in the Gospel that the
Angel descended at the appointed time into
the pool and troubled the water, and he who
first went down into the pool was matle
whole. 3 What did the Angel declare in this
type but the descent of the Holy Spirit,
which was to come to pass in our day, and
should consecrate the waters when invoked
by the prayers of the priest .'* That Angel,
then, was a herald of the Holy Spirit, inas-
much as by means of the grace of the Spirit
medicine was to be applied to our infirmities
of soul and mind. The Spirit, then, has the
same ministers as God the Father and Christ.
He fills all things, possesses all things,
works all and in all in the same manner as
God the Father and the Son w^ork.
89. What, then, is more divine than the
working of the Holy Spirit, since God Him-
self testifies that the Holy Spirit presides
over His blessings, saying : "I will put ^ly
Spirit upon thy seed and My blessings upon
thy children. "4 For no blessing can be full
except through the inspiration of the Holy
Spirit. Wherefore, too, the Apostle found
nothing better to wish us than this, as He
himself said : "We cease not to pray and
make request for you that ye may be filled
with the knowledge of His will, in all wisdom
and spiritual understanding walking worth-
ily of God. "s He taught, then, that this was
the will of God, that rather by walking in
good works and words and affections, we
should be filled with the will of God, Who
puts His Holy Spirit in our hearts. There-
fore if he who has the Holy Spirit is filled
with the will of God, there is certainly no
difference of will between the P'ather and
the Son.
CHAPTFR VIII.
The Holy Spirit is given by God alone, yet not wholly
to each person, since there is no one besides Christ
capable of receiving Him wholly. Charity is shed
abroad by the Holy Spirit, Who, prefigured by the
mystical ointment, is shown to have nothing common
with creatures ; and He, inasmuch as He is said to
proceed from the mouth of God, must not be classed
with creatures, nor with things divisible, seeing He is
eternal.
90. Observe at the same time that God
' Acts iv. 31.
* Isa. xliv. 3.
- S. Luke i. 35.
» Col. i. 9.
S. John V. 4.
gives the Holy Spirit. For this is no work
of man, nor gift of man ; but He Who is
invoked by the priest is given by God,
wherein is the gift of God and the ministry
of the priest. For if the Apostle Paul judged
that he was not able to give the Holy Spirit
himself by his own authority, and considered
himself so far unequal to this office that he
wished us to be filled by God with the
Spirit, ' who is sufficient to dare to arrogate
to himself the conferring of this gift ? So
the Apostle uttered this wish in prayer, and
did not claim a right by any authority of his
own ; he desired to obtain, he did not presume
to command. Peter, too, says that he is not
capable of compelling or restraining the
Holy Spirit. For he spoke thus : " Where-
fore if God has granted them the same grace
as to us, who was I that I could resist
God ? " ^
91. But perchance they would not be
moved by the example of apostles, and so
let us use divine utterances ; for it is
written : "Jacob is My servant, I will up-
hold him ; Israel is My elect, My soul hath
upheld him, I put My Spirit upon him."^
The Lord also said by Isaiah : "The Spirit
of the Lord is upon Me, because He hath
anointed Me." ^
92. Who, then, can dare to say that the
substance of the Holy Spirit is created, at
Whose shining in our hearts we behold the
beauty of divine truth, and the distance
between the creature and the Godhead, that
the work may be distinguished from its
Author.? Or of what creature has God so
spoken as to say : " I will pour out of My
^irit".'5 He said not Spirit, but "of My
Spirit," for we are not able to receive the
fulness of the Holy Spirit, but we receive as
much as our Master divides to us of His own
according to His will. ^ For as the Son of
God thought it not robbery that He should
be equal to God, but emptied Himself, that
we might be able to receive Him in our
minds ; but He emptied Himself not that
He was void of His own fulness, but in order
that He, Whose fulness I could not endure,
might infuse Himself into me according to
the measure of my capacity, in like manner
also the Father says that He pours out of the
Spirit upon all flesh ; for He did not pour
Him forth v/holly, but that which He poured
forth abounded for all.
93. There was therefore a pouring out upon
us of the Spirit, but upon the Lord Jesus,
when He was in the form of man, the
' Eph. V. 18.
* Isa. Ixi. I.
* Acts xi. 17.
8 Joel ii. 28.
' Isa. xlii. I.
8 Phil. ii. 6.
io6
ST. AMBROSE.
Spirit abode, as it is written : " Upon Whom
thou shall see the Spirit descending from
heaven, and abiding upon Him, He it is Who
baptizeth in the Holy Spirit. '' ' Around us
is the liberality of the Giver in abundant
provision, in Him abides for ever the fulness
of the Spirit. He shed forth then what He
deemed to be sufficient for us, and what was
shed forth is not separated nor divided ; but
He has a unity of fulness wherewith He
may enlighten the sight of our hearts
according to what our strength is capable
of. Lastly, we receive so much as the
advancing of our mind acquires, for the
fulness of the grace of the Spirit is indivisible,
but is shared in by us according to the
capacity of our own nature.
94. God, then, sheds forth of the Spirit, and
the love of God is also shed abroad through
the Spirit ; in which point we ought to
recognize the unity of the operation and of
the grace. For as God shed forth of the
Holy. Spirit, so also "the love of God is
shed abroad in our hearts through the Holy
Spirit ; " ^ in order that we may understand
that the Holy Spirit is not a work. Who is
the dispenser and plenteous Fount of the
divine love.
95. In like manner that you may believe
that that which is shed abroad cannot be
common to the creatures but peculiar to the
Godhead, the name of the Son is also
poured forth, as you read ; •' Thy Name is as
ointment poured forth. " 3 Of which saying
nothing can surpass the force. For as oint-
ment closed up in a vase keeps in its
perfume, so long as it is confined in the
narrow space of that vase, though it cannot
reach many, it yet preserves its strength. But
when the ointment has been poured out of
that vase wherein it was enclosed, it spreads
far and wide ; so, too, the Name of Christ
before His coming amongst the people of
Israel was enclosed in the minds of the
Jews as in some vase. For "God is known
in Judah, His Name is great in Israel; ' •»
that is, the Name which the vases of the
Jews held confined in their narrow limits.
96. Even then that Name was indeed
great, when it remained in the narrow limits
of the weak and few, but it had not yet
poured forth its greatness throughout the
hearts of the Gentiles, and to the ends of
the whole world. But after that He by His
coming had shone throughout the whole
world. He spread abroad that divine Name
of His throughout all creatures, not filled up
' S. John i. 33.
^ Cant. i. 3.
2 Rom. V. 5.
* Ps. Ixxvi. llxxv.J 1.
by any addition (for fulness admits not of
increase), but filling up the empty spaces,
that His Name might be wonderful in all the
world. The pouring forth, then, of His Name
signifies a kind of abundant exuberance of
graces and copiousness of heavenly goods,
for whatever is poured forth flows over from
abundance.
97. So as wisdom which proceeds from
the mouth of God cannot be said to be
created, nor the Word Which is uttered
from His heart, nor the power in which is
the fulness of the eternal Majesty ; so, too,
the Spirit which is poured forth from the
mouth of God cannot be considered to be
created, since God Himself has shown their
unity to be such that He speaks of His
pouring forth of His Spirit. By which we
understand that the grace of God the Father
is the same as that of the Holy Spirit, and
that without any division or loss it is divided
to the hearts of each. That, then, which is
shed abroad of the Holy Spirit is neither
severed, nor comprehended in any corporeal
parts, nor divided.
98. For how can it be credible that the
Spirit should be divided by any parcelling
out.' John says of God: "Hereby know
we that He abides in us by the Spirit wjiich
He hath given us." ' But that which abides
always is certainly not changed, therefore
if it suffers no change it is eternal. And so
the Holy Spirit is eternal, but the creature
is liable to fault, and therefore subject to
change. But that which is subject to change
cannot be eternal, and there cannot therefore
be anything in common between the Spirit
and the creature, because the Spirit is eter-
nal, but every creature is temporal.
99. But the Apostle also shows that the
Holy Spirit is eternal, for : " If the blood of
bulls and of goats, and the sprinkling the
ashes of an heifer sanctifieth to the purify-
ing of the flesh, how much more the blood
of Christ, Who through the eternal Spirit
offered Himself without spot to God ? " -
Therefore the Spirit is eternal.
CHAPTER IX.
The Holy Spirit is rightly called the ointment of Christ,
and the oil of gladness; and why. Christ Himself is
not the ointment, since He was anointed with the
Holy Spirit. It is not strange that the Spirit should
be called Ointment, since the Father and the Son are
also called Spirit. And there is no confusion be-
tween them, since Christ alone suffered death, Whose
saving cross is then spoken of.
100. Now many have thought that the
' I John iii. 24.
^ Heb. ix. 13, 14.
OF THE HOLY SPIRIT.— BOOK I.
107
Holy Spirit is the ointment of Christ. And
well it is said ointment, because He is called
the oil of gladness, the joining- together of
gf a sweet frag:rance.
graces
givin^
many
Rut God the Almighty Father anointed Him
the Prince of priests. Who was not like
others anointed in a type under the Law,
but was both according to the Law anointed
in the body, and in truth was full with the
virtue of the Holy Spirit from the Father
above the Law.
loi. This is the oil of gladness, of which
the prophet says : " God, even Thy God,
hath anointed Thee withthe oil of gladness
above Thy fellows. " ' Lastly, Peter says that
Jesus was anointed with the Spirit, as you
read: "Ye know that word which went
through all Judea, beginning from Galilee
after the baptism which John preached, even
Jesus of Nazareth, how God anointed Him
with the Holy Spirit." ^ The Holy Spirit is,
then, the oil of gladness.
102. And well did he say oil of gladness,
lest you should think Him a creature ; for
it is the nature of this sort of oil that it will
by no means mingle with moisture of an-
other kind. Gladness, too, does not an®int
the body, but brightens the inmost heart, as
the prophet said : "Thou hast put gladness
in my heart. "^ So as he loses his pains who
wishes to mix oil with moister matter, be-
cause since the nature of oil is lighter than
others, when the others settle, it rises and
is separated. How do those wretched ped-
lars think that the oil of gladness can by
their tricks be mingled with other creatures,
since of a truth corporeal things cannot be
mingled with incorporeal, nor things created
with uncreated ?
102. And well is that called oil of glad-
ness wherewith Christ was anointed ; for
neither was usual nor common oil to be
sought for Him, wherewith either wounds
are dressed or heat assuaged ; since the
salvation of the world did not seek allevia-
tion for His wounds, nor the eternal might
of His wearied Body demand refreshment.
103. Nor is it wonderful if He have the
oil of gladness. Who made those about to
die rejoice, put off sadness from the world,
destroyed the odour of sorrowful death.
And so the Apostle says : " For we are the
good odour of Christ to God ; "' ■♦ certainly
that he is speaking of spiritual
But when the Son of God Himself
says : "The Spirit of the Lord is upon Me,
because He hath anointed jMe, " s He points
showing
things.
out the ointment of the Spirit. Therefore
the Spirit is the ointment of Christ.
104. Or since the Name of Jesus is as
ointment poured out, if they wish to under-
stand Christ Himself, and not the Spirit of
Christ to be expressed under the name of
ointment, certainly when the Apostle Peter
says that the Lord Jesus was anointed with
the Holy Spirit, it is without doubt plain
that the Spirit also is called ointment.
105. But what wonder, since both the
Father and the Son are said to be Spirit. Of
which we shall speak more fully when we
begin to speak of the Lhiity of the Name.
Yet since most suitable place occurs here,
that we may not seem to have passed on
without a conclusion, let them read that
both the Father is called Spirit, as the Lord
said in the Gospel, "for God is Spirit;"'
and Christ is called Spirit, for Jeremiah said :
" The Spirit before our face, Christ the
Lord. " -
106. So, then, both the Father is Spirit and
Christ is Spirit, for that which is not a
created body is spirit, but the Holy Spirit is
not commingled with the Father and the
Son, but is distinct from the Father and from
the Son. For the Holy Spirit did not die.
Who could not die because He had not
taken fiesh upon Him, and the eternal God-
head was incapable of dying, but Christ died
according to the flesh.
107. For of a truth He died in that which
He took of the Virgin, not in that which He
had of the Father, for Christ died in that
nature in which He was crucified. But the
Holy Spirit could not be crucified. Who had
not flesh and bones, but the Son of God was
crucified. Who took flesh and bones, that on
that cross the temptations of our flesh might
die. For He took on Him that which He
was not that He might hide that which He
was : He hid that which He was that He
might be tempted in it, and that that which
He was not might be redeemed, in order
that He might call us by means of that
which He was not to that which He was.
108. O the divine mystery of that cross,
on which weakness hangs, might is free,
vices are nailed, and triumphal trophies
raised. So that a certain saint said :
" Pierce my flesh with nails for fear of
Thee ;" ^ he says not with nails of iron, but
of fear and faith. For the bonds of virtue
are stronger than those of punishment.
Lastly, his faith bound Peter, when he had
followed the Lord as far as the hall of the
high priest, whom no one had bound,
1 Ps. xlv. [xliv.] 8.
* 2 Cor. ii. 15.
' Acts X. 37, 38.
' S. Luke iv. 18.
' Ps. iv. 7.
* S. John iv. 24.
' Lam.
' Ps. cxix. [cxviii.] 120.
io8
ST. AMBROSE.
and punishment loosened not him, whom
faith bound. Again, when he was bound
by the Jews, prayer loosed him, punishment
did not hold him, because he had not gone
back from Christ.
109. Therefore do you also crucify sin,
that you may die to sin ; he who dies to sin
lives to God ; do you live to Him Who
spared not His own Son, that in His body
He might crucify our passions. For Christ
died for us, that we might live in His
revived Body. Therefore not our life
but our guilt died in Him, "Who," it is said,
" bare our sins in His own Body on the tree ;
that being set free from our sins we might
live in righteousness, by the wound of Whose
stripes we are healed."' '
1 10. That wood of the cross is, then, as it
were a kind of ship of our salvation, our
passage, not a punishment, for there is no
other salvation but the passage of eternal
salvation. Whilst expecting death I do not
feel it; whilst thinking little of punishment I
do not suffer ; whilst careless of fear I know
it not.
111. Who, then, is He by the wound of
Whose s'tripes we are healed but Christ the
Lord .'' of Whom the same Isaiah prophe-
sied His stripes were our healing,^ of Whom
Paul the Apostle wrote in his epistle :
" Who knew no sin, but was made sin for
us. "3 This, indeed, was divine in Him,
that His Flesh did no sin, nor did the
creature of the body take in Him sin. For
what wonder would it be if the Godhead
alone sinned not, seeing It had no incentives
to sin ? But if God alone is free from sin,
certainly every creature by its own nature
can be, as we have said, liable to sin.
CHAPTER X.
That the Spirit forgives sin is common to Him with
the Father and the Son, but not with the Angels.
112. Tell me, then, whoever you are who
deny the Godhead of the Holy Spirit. The
Spirit could not be liable to sin, Who rather
forgives sin. Does an Angel forgive .'' Does
an Archangel.' Certainly not, but the
Father alone, the Son alone, and the Holy
Spirit alone. Now no one is unable to
avoid that which he has power to for-
give.
113. But perhaps some one will say that
the Seraph said to Isaiah: "Behold, this
hath touched thy lips, and shall take away
' I Pet. ii. 24.
* Is. liii. 5.
Cor. V. 21.
thine iniquities, and purge away thy sins." '
Shall take away, he says, and shall purge,
not I will take away, but that fire from the
altar of God, that is, the grace of the Spirit.
For what else can we piously understand to
be on the altar of God but the grace of the
Spirit ? Certainly not the wood of the
forests, nor the soot and coals. Or what is
so in accordance with piety as to under-
stand according to the mystery that it was
revealed by the mouth of Isaiah that all men
should be cleansed by the passion of Christ,
Who as a coal according to the flesh burnt
up our sins, as you read in Zechariah : "Is
not this a brand cast forth from the fire .-*
And that was Joshua clothed in filthy gar-
ments." 2
114. Lastly, that we may know that this
mystery of the common redemption was
most clearly revealed by the prophets, you
have also in this place : " Lo, it hath taken
away thy sins ; " ^ not that Christ put aside
His sins Who did no sin, but that in the
flesh of Christ the whole human race should
be loosed from their sins.
115. But even if the Seraph had taken
away sin, it would have been as one of the
ministers of God appointed to this mystery.
For thus said Isaiah: "For one of the
Seraphim was sent to me. "^
CHAPTER XL
The Spirit is sent to all, and passes not from place to
place, for He is not limited either by time or space.
He goes forth from the Son, as the Son from the
Father, in Whom He ever abides : and also comes to
us when we receive. He comes also after the same
manner as the Father Himself, from Whom He can
by no means be separated.
116. The Spirit, also, is indeed said to be
sent, but the Seraph to one, the Spirit to all.
The Seraph is sent to minister, the Spirit
works a mystery. The Seraph performs
what is commanded, the Spirit divides as He
wills. The Seraph passes from place to
place, for he does not fill all things, but is
himself filled by the Spirit. The Seraph
comes down with a certain mode of passage
according to his nature, hut we cannot think
this of the Spirit, of Whom the Son of God
says: "When the Paraclete shall come,
even the Spirit of Truth, Whom I send unto
you, Who proceedeth from the Father. "5
1 17. For if the Spirit proceeds from a place
and passes to a place, both the Father
Himself will be found in a place, and the
' Is. vi. 7.
* Is. vi. 6.
' Zech. iii. 2, 3.
* S. John XV. 26.
' Ibid.
OF THE HOLY SPIRIT.— BOOK I.
109
Son likewise. If He goes forth from a place,
Whom the Father or the Son sends, cer-
tainly the Spirit passing- from a place, and
making progress, seems to leave, according
to those impious interpretations, both the
Father and the Son like some material body.
118. I am saying this with reference to
those who say that the Spirit comes down
by movement. But neither the Father, Who
is above all not only of corporeal nature,
but also of the invisible creation, is circum-
scribed in any place ; nor is the Son, Who,
as the Worker of all creation, is above every
creature, enclosed by the places or times of
His own works ; nor is the Spirit of Truth,
as being the Spirit of God, circumscribed by
any corporeal limits. Who since He is in-
corporeal is far above the whole rational
creation through the ineffable fulness of His
Godhead, having over all things the power
of breathing where He wills, and of inspiring
as He wills. '
119. The Spirit is not, then, sent as it
were from a place, nor does He proceed
as from a place, when He proceeds from
the Son, as the Son Himself, when He
says, "I came forth from the Father, and
am come into the world, "^ destroys all
fancies, which can be reckoned as from place
to place. In like manner, also, when we
read that God is within or without, we cer-
tainly do not either enclose God within any-
body or separate Him from anybody, but
weighing these things in a deep and ineffable
estimation, we comprehend the hiddenness
of the divine nature.
120. Lastly, Wisdom so says that she
came forth from the mouth of the Most
High, 3 as not to be external to the Father,
but with the Father; for "the Word was
with God : " ■♦ and not only with God but
also in God; for He says : "I am in the
Father and the Father is in Me."5 But
neither when He goes forth from the Father
does He retire from a place, nor is He
separated as a body from a body ; nor when
He is in the Father is He as if a body en-
closed as it were in a body. The Holy
Spirit also, when He proceeds from the
Father and the Son, is not separated from
the Father nor separated from the Son.
For how could He be separated from the
Father Who is the Spirit of His mouth .''
Which is certainly both a proof of His
eternity, and expresses the Unity of this
Godhead.
' S. John iii. 8,
* b. John i. 1,
- Ibid. xvi. 28.
*• Ibid. xiv. 10.
■^ Eccles. x\iv. 5.
12 1. He exists then, and abides always.
Who is the Spirit of His mouth, but He seems
to come down when we receive Him, that
He may dwell in us, that we may not be
alien from His grace. To us He seems to
come down, not that He does come down,
but that our mind ascends to Him. Of
which we would speak more fully did we
not remember that in the former treatise '
there was set forth that the Father said :
" Let us go down and confound their lan-
guage,"- and that the Son said : " He that
loveth ]\Ie will keep IVIy saying, and My
Father will love him, and V\'e will come to
Him and make Our abode with Him." ^
122. The Spirit, then, so comes as does
the Father, for where the Father is there is
also the Son, and where the Son is there is
the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit, therefore,
is not to be supposed to come separately.
But He comes not from place to place, but
from the disposition of the order to the
safety of redemption, from the grace of
giving life to that of sanctification, to
translate us from, earth to heaven, frorn
wretchedness to glory, from slavery to a
kingdom.
123. The Spirit comes, then, as the Father
comes. For the Son said, " I and the Father
will come, and will make Our abode with
Him. "-♦ Does the Father come in a bodily
fashion .? Thus, then, comes the Spirit in
Whom, when He comes, is the full presence
of the Father and the Son.
124. But who can separate the Spirit from
the Father and the Son, since we cannot
even name the Father and the Son without
the Spirit .' " For no one saith Lord Jesus,
except in the Holy Spirit .'"5 If, then, we
cannot call Jesus Lord except in the Holy
Spirit, we certainly cannot proclaim Him
without the Spirit. But if the Angels also
proclaim Jesus to be Lord, Whom no one
can proclaim except, in the Spirit, then in
them also the office of the Holy Spirit ope-
rates.
125. We have proved, then, that the pre-
sence and the grace of the Father, the Son, and
the Holy Spirit are one, which is so heaven-
ly and divine that the Son gives thanks
therefore to the Father, saying, "I give
thanks to Thee, O Father, Lord of heaven
and earth, because Thou hast hidden these
things from the wise and prudent, and hast
revealed them unto babes."''
1 De Fide, V. 7.
" S. John xiv. 23.
* I Cor. xii. 3.
'^ Gen. xi. 7.
* S. John xiv. 23.
•-b. Matt. xi. 25.
I lO
ST. AMBROSE.
CHAPTER XII.
The peace and grace of the Father, the Son, and the
Holy Spirit are one, so also is Their charity one,
which showed itself chiefly in the redemption of man.
Their communion with man is also one.
126. Therefore since the calling is one,
the grace is also one. Lastly, it is written :
" Grace unto you and peace from God our
Father, and from the Lord Jesus Christ."'
You see, then, that we are told that the grace
of the Father and the Son is one, and the
peace of the Father and the Son is one, but
this grace and peace is the fruit of the Spirit,
as the Apostle taught us himself, saying :
" But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace,
patience."^ And peace is good and neces-
sary that no one be troubled with doubtful
disputations, nor be shaken by the storm of
bodily passions, but that his affections may
remain quietly disposed as to the worship of
God, with simplicity of faith and tranquillity
of mind.
127. As to peace we have proved the
point ; but as to grace the prophet Zechariah
says, that God promised to pour upon Jeru-
salem the spirit of grace and mercy, ^ and the
Apostle Peter says : ' ' Repent and be baptized
every one of you in the Name of the Lord
Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye
shall receive the grace of the Holy Spirit." +
So grace comes also of the Holy Spirit as of
the Father and the Son. For how can there
be grace without the Spirit, since all divine
grace is in the Spirit ?
128. Nor do we read only of the peace and
grace of the Father, the Son, and the Holy
Spirit, but also, faithful Emperor, of the love
and communion. For of love it has been
said : "The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ,
and the love of God. " 5 We have heard of the
love of the Father. The same love which
is the Father's is also the Son's. For He
Himself said: "He that loveth INIe shall
be loved of My Father, and I will love
him. "^ And what is the love of the Son,
but that He offered Himself for us, and
redeemed us with His own blood. 7 But the
same love is in the Father, for it is written :
" (jod so loved the world, that He gave His
Only-begotten Son."**
129. So, then, the Father gave the Son,
and the Son gave Himself Love is pre-
served and due affection is not wronged, for
affection is not wron<red where there is no
distress in the giving up. He gave one Who
' Rom. i. 7.
■• Acts ii. .-^S.
' Eph. V. 2.
- Gal. V. 22.
" 2 Cor. xiii. 14.
* S. John ill. 16.
^ Zech. xii. 10.
" S. John xiv. 21.
was willing, He gave One Who offered Him-
self, the Father did not give the Son to pun-
ishment but to grace. If you enquire into
the merit of the deed, enquire into the
description of the affection. The vessel of
election shows plainly the unity of this
divine love, because both the Father gave
the Son and the Son gave Himself The
Father gave, Who " spared not His own Son,
but gave Him up for us all."' And of the
Son he also says : "Who gave Himself for
me."^ " Gave Himself " he says. If it be
of grace, what do I find fault with. If it be
that He suffered wrong, I owe the more.
130. But learn that in like manner as the
Father gave the Son, and the Son trave Him-
self so, too, the Holy Spirit gave Him.
For it is written : " Then was Jesus led by
the Spirit into the wilderness to be tempted
by the devil. "3 So, too, the loving Spirit
gave the Son of God. For as the love of
the Father and the Son is one, so, too, we
have shown that this love of God is shed
abroad by the Holy Spirit, and is the fruit
of the Holy Spirit, because " the fruit of the
Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience."'*
131. And that there is communion be-
tween the Father and the Son is plain, for
it is written : "And our communion is with
the Father and with His Son Jesus Christ. "5
And in another place : "The communion of
the Holy Spirit be with you all." '^ If, then,
the peace of the Father, the Son, and the
Holy Spirit is one, the grace one, the love
one, and the communion one, the working
is certainly one, and where the working is
one, certainly the power cannot be divided
nor the substance separated. For, if so,
how could the grace of the same working
agree .-*
CHAPTER XIII.
St. Ambrose shows from the Scriptures that the Name
of the Three Divine Persons is one, and first the unity
of the Name of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, in-
asmuch as each is called Paraclete and Truth.
132. Who, then, would dare to deny the
oneness of Name, when he sees the oneness
of the working. But why should I maintain
the unity of the Name by arguments, when
there is the plain testimonj'- of the Divine
Voice that the Name of the Father, the
Son, and the Holy Spirit is one.'* For it is
written : "Go, baptize all nations in the
Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of
' Rom. viii. 32.
* Gal. V. 22.
- Gal. ii. 20.
'^ I John i. 3.
^ S. Matt. iv. I.
'' 2 Cor. xiii. 14.
OF THE HOLY SPIRIT.— BOOK I.
Ill
the Holy Spirit. " ' Hesaid, " in the Name,"
not "in the Names."' So, tlien, the Name
of the Father is not one, that of the Son
another, and that of the Holy Spirit another,
for God is one ; the Names arc not more
than one, for there arc not two Gods, or
three Gods.
132. And that He might reveal that the
Godhead is one and the Majesty one, be-
cause the Name of the Father, the Son, and
the Holy Spirit is one, and the Son did not
come in one Name and the Holy Spirit in
another, the Lord Himself said : "I am
come in INIy Father's Name, and ye did not
receive Me, if another shall come in his own
name ye will receive him." -
133. And Scripture makes clear that that
which is the Fathers Name, the same is
also that of the Son, for the Lord said in
Exodus : "I will go before thee in INIy
Name, and will call by My Name the Lord
before thee. " ^ So, then, the Lord said that
He would call the Lord by His Name. The
Lord, then, is the Name of the Father and of
the Son.
134. But since the Name of the Father
and of the Son is one, learn that the same
is the Name of the Holy Spirit also, since
the Holy Spirit came in the Name of the
Son, as it is written : " But the Paraclete,
even the Holy Spirit, Whom the Father will
send in My Name, He shall teach you all
things." * But He Who came in the Name
of the Son came also certainly in the Name
of the Father, for the Name of the Father
and of the Son is one. Thus it comes to
pass that the Name of the Father and of the
Son is also that of the Holy Spirit. For
there is no other Name given under heaven
wherein we must be saved. 5
155. At the same time He showed that the
oneness of the Divine Name must be taught,
not the difference, since Christ came in the
oneness of the Name, but Antichrist will
come in his own name, as it is written : "I
am come in My Father's Name, and ye did
not receive Me, if another shall come in his
own name, ye will receive him." ^^
156. We are, then, clearly taught by these
passages that there is no difference of Name
in the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit ;
and that that which is the Name of the
Father is also the Name of the Son, and
likewise that which is the Name of the Son
is also that of the Holy Spirit, when the
Son also is called Paraclete, as is the Ploly
' S. ^^att. xxviii. 19.
•* Ex. xxxiii. 19.
^ Acts iv. 12.
* S. John V. 43.
* S. John xiv. 26.
^ S. John V. 43.
Spirit. And therefore does the Lord Jesus
say in the (lOspel : "I will ask My Father,
and He shall give you another Paraclete, to
be with you for ever, even the Spirit of
Truth." ' And He said well " another," that
you might not suppose that the Son is also
the Spirit, for oneness is of the Name, not a
Sabellian confusion of the Son and of the
Spirit.^
157. So, then, the Son is one Paraclete,
the Holy Spirit another Paraclete ; for John
called the Son a Paraclete, as you find :
" If any man sin, we have ii Paraclete
[Advocate] with the Father, Jesus Christ.'' ^
So in like manner as there is a oneness of
name, so, too, is there a oneness of power,
for where the Paraclete Spirit is, there is
also the Son.
158. For as the Lord says in this place
that the Spirit will be forever with the faith-
ful, so, too, does He elsewhere show that
He will Himself be forever with the apostles,
saying : " Lo, I am with you ahvays, even
to the end of the world. "■♦ Therefore the
Son and the Spirit are one, the Name of the
Trinity is one, and the Presence one and
indivisible.
1 59. But as we show that the Son is called
the Paraclete, so, too, do we show that the
Spirit is called the Truth. Christ is the
Truth, the Spirit is the Truth, for you find
in John's epistle : "For the Spirit is Truth. "5
Not only, then, is the Spirit called the Spirit
of Truth, but also the Truth, as the Son is
also declared to be the Truth, Who says :
" I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life." ^
CHAPTER XIV.
Each Person of the Trinity is said in the sacred writ-
ings to be Light. The Spirit is designated Hre by
Isaiah, a figure of which Fire was seen in the bush
by Moses, in the tongues of fire, and in Gideon's
pitchers. And the Godhead of the same Spirit can-
not be denied, since Ilis operation is the same as
that of the Father and of the Son, and He is also
called the light and fire of the Lord's countenance.
1 60. But why should I argue that as the
Father is light, so, too, the Son is light, and
the Holy Spirit is light ? Which certainly
pertains to the power of God. For God is
Light, as John said : " For God is Light,
and in Him is no darkness." 7
161. But the Son, too, is Light, because
* .S. John xiv. i6.
^ The Sabellians, anxious to maintain the Unity of God, denied
the distinction of Persons, identifying the Father and the Son. .See
Z). Chr. B. III. 568, and Bkint, Diet, of Sects, etc., sub voc.
^ I John ii. I. ■* S. Matt, xxviii. 20. " i John v. 7,
•> S. John xiv. 6. ' i John i. 5.
112
ST. AMBROSE.
"the Life was the Light of men." ' And
the Evangelist, that he might show that he
was speakjng of the Son of God, says of
John the Baptist : "He was not Hght, but
[was sent] to be a witness of the Light.
That was the true Light, which hghteth
every man that cometh into this world." ^
So, then, since God is Light, and the Son of
God the true Light, without doubt the Son
of God is true God.
162. And you find elsewhere that the Son
of God is Light : "The people that sat in
darkness and in the shadow of death have
seen a great light." 3 But, which is still
more clear, it is said : " For with Thee is
the fount of Life, and in Thy light we shall
see light," •♦ which means that with Thee,
O God the Father Almighty, Who art the
Fount of Life, in Thy Son Who is the Light,
we shall see the light of the Holy Spirit.
As the Lord Himself shows, saying : " Re-
ceive ye the Holy Spirit," 5 and elsewhere :
"Virtue went out from Him." ^
163. But who can doubt that the Father
is Light, when we read of His Son that He
is the Brightness of eternal Light ? For of
Whom but of the Father is the Son the
Brightness, Who both is always with the
Father, and always shines, not with unlike
but with the same radiance.
164. And Isaiah shows that the Holy
Spirit is not only Light but also Fire, say-
ing : " And the light of Israel shall be for a
fire." 7 So the prophets called Him a burn-
ing Fire, because in those three points we
see more intensely the majesty of the God-
head ; since to sanctify is of the Godhead,
to illuminate is the property of fire and light,
and the Godhead is wont to be pointed out
or seen in the appearance of fire : '• For our
God is a consuming Fire," as Moses said.**
165. For he himself saw the fire in the
bush, and had heard God v.^hen the voice
from the flame of fire came to him saying :
" I am the God of .\braham, and the God of
Isaac, and the God of Jacob. "•'> The voice
came from the fire, and the voice was in the
bush, and the fire did no harm. For the
bush was burning but was not consumed,
because in that mystery the Lord was show-
inof that He would come to illuminate the
thorns of our body, and not to consume
those who were in misery, but to alleviate
their misery ; Who would baptize with the
Holy Spirit and with fire, that He might give
grace and destroy sin. '° So in the symbol
of fire God keeps His intention.
^ S. John i. 8. - S. Jolin i. 9. ^ Isa. ix. 2.
' S. John XX. 22. " S. Luke vi. 19.
* Dcut. iv. 24.
" Kx. iii. 6.
* Ps. xxxvi. [xxxv.] 9.
' Isa. X. 17.
^"S- Matt. iii. 11.
166. In the Acts of the Apostles, also,
when the Holy Spirit had descended upon
the faithful, the appearance of fire was seen,
for you read thus: "And suddenly there
was a sound from heaven, as though the
Spirit were borne with great vehemence,
and it filled all the house where they were
sitting, and there appeared unto them cloven
tongues like as of fire." '
167. For the same reason was it that
when Gideon was about to overcome the
INIidianites, he commanded three hundred
men to take pitchers, and to hold lighted
torches inside the pitchers, and trumpets
in their right hands. Our predecessors
have preserved the explanation received
from the apostles, that the pitchers are our
bodies, fashioned of clay, which know not
fear if they burn with the fervour of the
grace of the Spirit, and bear witness to the
passion of the Lord Jesus with a loud con-
fession of the voice.
168. Who, then, can doubt of the Godhead
of the Holy Spirit, since where the grace of
the Spirit is, there the manifestation of the
Godhead appears. By which evidence we
infer not a diversity but the unity of the
divine power. For how can there be a sever-
ance of power, -where the eff'ect of the work-
ing in all is one .''
1 69. What, then, is that fire ? Not certainly
one made up of common twigs, or roaring
with the burning of the reeds of the woods,
but that fire which improves good deeds like
gold, and consumes sins like stubble. This
is undoubtedly the Holy Spirit, Who is called
both the fire and light of the countenance of
God; light as we said above : "The light of
Thy countenance has been sealed upon us,
O Lord. " - What is, then, the light that is
sealed, but that of the seal of the Spirit,
believing in ^^'hom, "ye were sealed,"
he says, " with the Holy Spirit of pro-
mise." 3
170. And as there is a light of the divine
countenance, so, too, does fire shine forth
from the countenance of God, for it is writ-
ten : "A fire shall burn in His sight. " t For
the grace of the day of judgment shines
beforehand, that forgiveness may follow
to reward the service of the saints. O the
great fulness of the Scriptures, which no one
can comprehend Vv'ith human genius ! O
greatest proof of the Divine Unity ! For how
many things are pointed out in these two
verses !
I
' Acts ii. 2, 3.
'•' Eph. i. 13.
2 Ps. iv. 6.
*Ps. 1. [xlix.]3.
OF THE HOLY SPHIIT.— BOOK I.
113
CHAPTER XV.
The Holy Spirit is Life equally with the Father and the
Son, in truth whether the Father be mentioned, with
Whom is the Fount of Life, or the Son, that Fount
can be none other than the Holy Spirit.
171. We have said that the Father is
Light, the Son is Light, and the Holy Spirit
is Light ; let us also learn that the Father
is Life, the Son Life, and the Holy Spirit
Life. For John said: "That which was
from the beginning, that which we have
heard, and which we have seen, and have
beheld with our eyes, and our hands have
handled concerning the Word of Life ; and
the Life appeared, and we saw and testify,
and declare to you of that Life which was
with the Father." ' He said both Word of
Life and Life that he might signify both the
Father and the Son to be Life. For what is
the Word of Life but the Word of God.^
And by this phrase both God and the Word
of God are shown to be Life. And as it is
said the Word of Life, so, too, the Spirit of
Life. Therefore, as the Word of Life is Life,
so, too, the Spirit of Life is Life.
172. Learn now that as the Father is the
Fount of Life, so, too, many have stated that
the Son is signified as the Fount of Life ; ^
so that, he says, with Thee, Almighty God,
Thy Son is the Fount of Life. That is the
Fount of the Holy Spirit, ^ for the Spirit is
Life, as the Lord says : "The words which
I speak unto you are Spirit and Life," •♦ for
where the Spirit is, there also is Life ; and
where Life is, is also the Holy Spirit.
173. Many, however, consider that in this
passage the Father only is signified by the
Fount. Let them, however, notice what
the Scripture relates: "With Thee is the
Well of Life." That is, the Son is with the
Father ; since the Word was with God, Who
was in the beginning, aiid was with God.
174. But whether in this place one under-
stands the Fount to be the Father or the Son,
we certainly do not understand a fount of
that water which is created, but the Fount
of that divine grace, that is, of the Holy
Spirit, for He is the living water. Where-
fore the Lord said: "If thou knowest the
gift of God, and Who He is that saith to
thee, Give me to drink, thou wouldst have
asked Him, and He would have given thee
living water." s
1 I John i. I, 2. - Ps. xxxvi. [xxxv.] 9.
^ In these words St. Ambrose appears plainly to set forth the
procession of the Holy Spirit from the Son, though he admits that
some consider the Father to be the Fount of Life, but he argues
even in this case the Son was with Him.
* S. John vi. 64. s S. John iv. 10.
8
175. This was the water for which the
soul of David thirsted. The hart desires the
fountain of these waters, 'not thirsting for
the poison of serpents. For the water of the
grace of the Spirit is living, that it may
purify the inner parts of the mind, and wash
away every sin of the soul, and purify the
transgression of hidden faults.
CHAPTER XVL
The Holy Spirit is that large river by which the mystical
Jerusalem is watered. It is equal to its Fount, that
is, the Father and the Son, as is signified in holy
Scripture. St. Ambrose himself thirsts for that water,
and warns us that in order to preserve it within us,
we must avoid the devil, lust, and heresy, since our
vessels are frail, and that broken cisterns must be
forsaken, that after the example of the Samaritan
woman and of the patriarchs we may find the water
of the Lord.
176. But lest perchance any one should
speak against as it were the littleness of the
Spirit, and from this should endeavour to
establish a difference in greatness, arguing
that water seems to be but a small part of a
Fount, although examples taken from crea-
tures seem by no means suitable for appli-
cation to the Godhead ; yet lest they should
judge anything injuriously from this com-
parison taken from creatures, let them learn
that not only is the Holy Spirit called Water,
but also a River, as we read: " From his
belly shall flow rivers of living water. But
this He said of the Spirit, Whom they were
beginning to receive, who were about to
believe in Him." ^
177. So, then, the Holy Spirit is the River,
and the abundant River, which according to
the Hebrews flowed from Jesus in the lands,
as we have received it prophesied by the
mouth of Isaiah. 3 This is the great River
which flows always and never fails. And
not only a river, but also one of copious
stream and overflowing greatness, as also
David said : " The stream of the river makes
glad the city of God. " ^
178. For neither is that city, the heavenly
Jerusalem, watered by the channel of any
earthly river, but that Holy Spirit, proceeding
from the Fount of Life, by a short draught of
Whom we are satiated, seems to flow more
abundantly among those celestial Thrones,
Dominions and Powers, Angels and Arch-
angels, rushing in the full course of the seven
virtues of the Spirit. For if a river rising
above its banks overflows, how much more
1 Ps. xlii. [xli.] 3.
^ Is. Ixvi. 12.
= S. John vii.. 38, 39.
* Ps. xlvi. [xlv.] 4.
114
ST. AMBROSE.
larger
does the Spirit, rising above every creature,
when He touches the as it were low-lying
fields of our minds, make glad that heavenly
nature of the creatures with the
fertility of His sanctification.
179. And let it not trouble you that either
here it is said "rivers,"' or elsewhere
"seven Spirits," - for by the sanctification of
these seven gifts of the Spirit, as Isaiah said,^
is signified the fulness of all virtue ; the Spirit
of wisdom and understanding, the Spirit of
counsel and strength, the Spirit of knowledge
and godliness, and the Spirit of the fear of
God. One, then, is the River, but many the
channels of the gifts of the Spirit. This
River, then, goes forth from the Fount of
Life.
180. And here, again, you must not turn
aside your thoughts to lower things, because
there seems to be some difference between
a Fount and a River, and yet the divine
Scripture has provided that the weakness of
human understanding should not be injured
by the lowliness of the language. Set
before yourself any river, it springs from its
fount, but is of one nature, of one brightness
and beauty. And do you assert rightly that
the Holy Spirit is of one substance, brightness,
and glory with the Son of God and with
God the Father. I will sum up all in the
oneness of the qualities, and shall not be
afraid of any question as to difference of
greatness. For in this point also Scripture
has provided for us ; for the Son of God
says : " He that shall drink of the water
which I will give him, it shall become in
him a well of water springing up unto ever-
lasting life. "4 This well is clearly the grace
of the Spirit, a stream proceeding from the
living Fount. The Holy Spirit, then, is also
the Fount of eternal life.
181. You observe, then, from His words
that the unity of the divine greatness is
pointed out, and that Christ cannot be
denied to be a Fount even by heretics, since
the Spirit, too, is called a Fount. And as the
Spirit is called a river, so, too, the Father
said : " Behold, I come down upon you like
a river of peace, and like a stream over-
flowing the glory of the Gentiles. "5 And
who can doubt that the Son of God is the
River of life, from Whom the streams of
eternal life flowed forth .''
182. Good, then, is this water, even the
grace of the Spirit. Who will give this Fount
to my breast .'' Let it spring up in me, let
that which gives eternal life flow upon me.
' S. John, vii
* S. John iv
38.
' Rev. V. 6.
' Isa. Ixvi. 12.
' Isa. xi. 2.
Let that Fount overflow upon us, and not
flow away. For Wisdom says: "Drink
water out of thine own vessels, and from the
founts of thine own wells, and let thy waters
flow abroad in thy streets." ' How shall I
keep this water that it flow not forth, that it
glide not away? How shall I preserve my
vessel, lest any crack of sin penetrating it,
should let the water of eternal life exude ?
Teach us, Lord Jesus, teach us as Thou
didst teach Thine apostles, saying: "Lay
not up for yourselves treasures upon the
earth, where rust and moth destroy, and
where thieves break through and steal. "^
182. For He intimates that the thief is the
unclean spirit, who cannot find entrance into
those who walk in the light of good works,
but if he has caught any one in the dark-
ness of earthly desires, and in the midst of
the enjoyment of earthly pleasures, he spoils
them of all the flower of eternal virtue.
And therefore the Lord says : ' ' Lay up for
yourselves treasures in heaven, where
neither rust nor moth destroy, and where
thieves do not break through and steal. For
where thy treasure is, there will thy heart
be also."
183. Our rust is wantonness, our rust is
lust, our rust is luxury, which dim the keen
vision of the mind with the filth of vices.
Again, our moth is Arius, our moth is Pho-
tinus, who rend the holy vesture of the
Church with their impiety, and desiring to
separate the indivisible unity of the divine
power, gnaw the precious veil of faith with
sacrilegious tooth. The water is spilt if
Arius has imprinted his tooth, it flows away
if Photinus has planted his sting in any one's
vessel. We are but of common clay, we
quickly feel vices. But no one says to the
potter, "Why hast Thou made me thus .''"3
For though our vessel be but common, yet
one is in honour, another in dishonour. ■» Do
not then lay open thy pool, dig not with
vices and crimes, lest any one say: "He
hath opened a pool and digged it, and is
fallen into the pit which he made. "5
184. If you seek Jesus, forsake the broken
cisterns, for Christ was wont to sit not by a
pool but by a well. There that Samaritan
woman ^ found Him, she who believed, she
who wished to draw water. Although you
ought to have come in early
mornmg.
nevertheless if you come later, even at the
sixth hour, you will find Jesus wearied with
His journey. He is weary, but it is through
thee, because He has long sought thee, thy
' Prov. V. 15, 16.
* Rom. ix. 21.}
- S. Matt. vi. 19.
* Ps. vii. 15.
' Rom. ix. 20.
« S. John iv. 6.
OF THE HOLY SPIRIT.— BOOK H.
115
unbelief has long wearied Him. Yet He is
not offended if thou only comest, He asks
to drink Who is about to give. But He
drinks not the water of a stream flowing
by, but thy salvation ; He drinks thy good
dispositions, He drinks the cup, that is, the
Passion which atoned for thy sins, that thou
drinking of His sacred blood mightest
quench the thirst of this world.
185. So Abraham gained God after he had
dug the well.' So Isaac, while walking by
the well, received that wife ^ who was coming
to him as a type of the Church. Faithful he
was at the well, unfaithful at the pool.
Lastly, too, Rebecca, as we read, found him
who sought her at the well, and the harlots
washed themselves in the blood in the pool
of Jezebel. 3
BOOK IL
INTRODUCTION.
The Three Persons of the Godhead were not unknown
to the judges of old nor to Moses, for the equality of
the Son with the Father, as well as of the Three ;
Persons amongst Themselves, is laid down both else-
where and by him. Samson also enjoyed the assist-
ance of the Holy Spirit, his history is touched upon
and shown to be in some points typical of the Church
and her mysteries. When the Holy Spirit left Sam-
son he fell into various calamities, and St. Ambrose
exp\ains the spiritual significance of his shorn locks.
1. Even in reading the first book of the
ancient history it is made clear both that
the sevenfold grace of the Spirit shone forth
in the judges themselves of the Jews, and
that the mysteries of the heavenly sacra-
ments were made known by the Spirit, of
Whose eternity Moses was not ignorant.
Then, too, at the very begining of the world,
and indeed before its beginning, he con-
joined Him with God, Whom he knew to be
eternal before the beginning of the world.
For if any one takes good heed he will re-
cognize in the beginning both the Father, the
Son, and the Spirit. For of the Father it is
written: "In the beginning God created
the heaven and the earth. " ' Of the Spirit
it is said : " The Spirit was borne upon the
waters."^ And well in the beginning of
creation is there set forth the figure of bap-
tism whereby the creature had to be purified.
And of the Son we read that He it is Who
divided light from darkness, for there is one
God the Father Who speaks, and one God
the Son Who acts.
2. But, again, that you may not think that
there was assumption in the bidding of Him
Who spoke, or inferiority on the part of Him
Who carried out the bidding, the Father
acknowledges the Son as equal to Himself
in the execution of the work, saying : " Let
Gen.
- Gen. i. 4.
Us make man after Our image and like-
ness." * For the common image and the
working and the likeness can signify nothing
but the oneness of the same Majesty.
3. But that we may more fully recognize
the equality of the Father and the Son, as the
Father spoke, the Son made, so, too, the
Father works and the Son speaks. The
Father works, as it is written : "My Father
worketh hitherto, "s You find it said to the
Son: "Say the word and he shall be
healed." ^ And the Son says to the Father :
"I will that where I am, they too shall be
with Me. "7 The Father did what the Son
said.
4. But neither was Abraham ignorant of
the Holy Spirit ; he saw Three and wor-
shipped One, for there is one God, one Lord,
and one Spirit. And so there is a oneness
of honour, because there is a oneness of
power.
5. And why should I speak of all one by
one .'' Samson, born by the divine promise,
had the Spirit accompanying him, for we
read: "The Lord blessed him, and the
Spirit of the Lord began to be with him in
the camp." ^ And so foreshadowing the
future mystery, he demanded a wife of the
aliens, which, as it is written, his father
and mother knew not of, because it was
from the Lord. And rightly was he
esteemed stronger than others, because the
Spirit of the Lord guided him, under Whose
guidance he alone put to flight the people
of the aliens, and at another time inacces-
sible to the bite of the lion, he, unconquer-
able in his strength, tore him asunder with
his hands. Would that he had been as
careful to preserve grace, as strong to over-
come the beast !
* Gen. xxi. 30.
* Gen. i. 26.
' S. John xvii. 24.
'' Gen. xxiv. 62.
'' .S. John V. 17.
* Judg. xiii. 25.
3 I [3] Kings xxii. 36
0 S. Matt. viii. 8.
ii6
ST. AMBROSE.
6. And perhaps this was not only a
prodigy of valour, but also a mystery of
wisdom, an utterance of prophecy. For it
does not seem to have been without a pur-
pose that, as he was going to his marriage,
a roaring lion met him, which he tore
asunder with his hands, in whose body,
when about to enjoy the wished-for wed-
lock, he found a swarm of bees, and took
honey from its mouth, which he gave to his
father and mother to eat. The people of
the Gentiles which believed had honey, the
people which was before savage is now the
people of Christ.
7. Nor is the riddle without mystery,
which he set forth to his companions : "Out
of the eater came forth meat, and out of
the strong came forth sweetness." ' And
there was a mystery up to the point of the
three days in which its answer was sought
in vain, which could not be made known
except by the faith of the Church, on the
seventh day, the time of the Law being
completed, after the Passion of the Lord.
For thus you find that the apostles did not
understand, " because Jesus was not yet
glorified." -
8. "What," answer they, "is sweeter
than honey, and what is stronger than a
lion ? " To which he replied : "If ye had
not farmed with my heifer, you would not
have found out my riddle. "^ O divine
mystery ! O manifest sacrament I we have
escaped from the slayer, we have overcome
the strong one. The food of life is now
there, where before was the hunger of a
miserable death. Dangers are changed into
safety, bitterness into sweetness. Grace
came forth from the offence, power from
weakness, and life from death.
Q. There are, however, who think on the
other hand that the wedlock could not have
been established unless the lion of the tribe of
Judah had been slain ; and so in His body,
that is, the Church, bees were found who
store up the honey of wisdom, because
after the Passion of the Lord the apostles
believed more fully. This lion, then, Sam-
son as a Jew slew, but in it he found
honey, as in the figure of the heritage
which was to be redeemed, that the rem-
nant might be saved according to the elec-
tion of grace. 4
10. "And the Spirit of the Lord," it is
said, "came upon him, and he went down
to Ascalon, and smote thirty men of
them." 5 For he could not fail to carry off
* Judg. xiv. 14.
* Rom. xi. 5.
■ S. John vii. 39.
' Judg. xiv. 19.
2 Judg. xiv. 18.
the victory who saw the mysteries. And
so in the garments they receive the reward
of wisdom, the badge of intercourse, who
resolve and answer the riddle.
11. Here, again, other mysteries come
up, in that his wife is taken away, and for
this foxes set fire to the sheaves of the aliens.
For their own cunning often deceives those
who contend against divine mysteries.
Wherefore it is said again in the Song of
Songs: "Take us the little foxes which
destroy the vineyards, that our vineyards
may flourish." ' He said well " little," be-
cause the larger could not destroy the vine-
yards, though to the strong even the devil
is weak.
12. So, then, he (to sum up the story
briefly, for the consideration of the whole
passage is reserved for its own season)
was unconquered so long as he kept the
grace of the Spirit, as was the people of
God chosen by the Lord, that Nazarite
under the Law. Samson, then, was uncon-
quered, and so invincible as to be able to
smite a thousand men with the jawbone of
an ass ; ^ so full of heavenly grace that when
thirsty he found even water in the jawbone
0/ an ass, whether you consider this as a
miracle, or turn it to a mystery, because in
the humility of the people of the Gentiles
there would be both rest and triumph ac-
cording to that which is written : " He that
smiteth thee on the cheek, turn to him also
the other. "3 For by this endurance of
injuries, which the sacrament of baptism
teaches, we triumph over the stings of
anger, that having passed through death we
may attain to the rest of the resurrection.
13. Is that, then, Samson who broke ropes
twisted with thongs, and new cords like
weak threads ? Is that Samson who did
not feel the bonds of his hair fastened to
the beam, so long as he had the grace of
the Spirit .'' He, I say, after the Spirit of
God departed from him, was greatly changed
from that Samson who returned clothed in
the spoils of the aliens, but fallen from his
greatness on the knees of a woman, car-
essed and deceived, is shorn of his hair. ■♦
14. Was, then, the hair of his head of such
importance that, so long as it remained, his
strength should endure unconquered, but
when his head was shorn the man should
suddenly lose all his strength.-' It is not so,
nor ma)'- we think that the hair of his head
has such power. There is the hair of
religion and faith ; the hair of the Nazarite
1 Cant. ii. 15.
'■^ S. Matt. V. 39.
= Judg. XV. 15.
* Judg. xvi. 7, II, 19.
OF THE HOLY SPIRIT.— BOOK II.
117
perfect in the Law, consecrated in sparing-
ness and abstinence, with which she (a type
of the Chiircli), who poured ointment on
the feet of the Lord, wiped the feet of the
heavenly Word, for then she knew Christ
also after the flesh. That hair it is of
which it is said : " Thy hair is as flocks of
goats,"' growing on that head of which it
is said : " The head of the man is Christ,"' ^
and in another place : " His head is as fine
gold, and his locks like black pine-trees. " ^
15. And so, also, in the Gospel our Lord,
pointing out that some hairs are seen and
known, says : "But even the hairs of your
head are all numbered,"* implying, indeed,
acts of spiritual virtues, for God does not take
care for our hair. Though, indeed, it is not
absurd to believe that literally, seeing that
according to His divine INIajesty nothing
can be hidden from Him.
16. But what does it profit me, if God
Himself knows all my hairs ? That rather
abounds and profits me, if the watchful
witness of good works reward me with the
gift of eternal life. And, in fine, Samson
himself, declaring that these hairs are not
mystical, says : " If I be shorn my strength
will depart from me. "5 So much concern-
ing the mystery, let us now consider the
order of the passage.
CHAPTER I.
The Spirit is the Lord and Power ; and in this is not
inferior to the Father and the Son.
17. Above, you read that "the Lord
blessed him, and the Spirit of the Lord be-
gan to go with him."*^ Farther on it is
said: "And the Spirit of the Lord came
upon him. "7 Again he says: "If I be
shaven, my strength will depart from me. '"^
After he was shaven, see what the Scripture
says: "The Lord," he says, "departed
from him." 9
18. You see, then, that He Who went
with him, Himself departed from him. The
Same is, then, the Lord, Who is the Spirit of
the Lord, that is, he called the Spirit of God,
Lord, as also the Apostle says : " The Lord
is the Spirit, now where the Spirit of the
Lord is, there is liberty." You find, then,
the Holy Spirit called the Lord ; for the
Holy Spirit and the Son are not one Person
[uiius] but one Substance [unum].
19. In this place he used the word Power,
* Cant. iv. I.
* S. Matt. X. 30.
' Judg. xiv. 6.
^ I Cor. xi. 3.
'■' Judg. xvi. 17.
* Judg. xvi. 17.
' Cant. V. II.
* Judg. xiii. 25.
* Judg. xvi. 20.
and implied the Spirit. For as the Father is
Power, so, too, the Son is Power, and the
Holy Spirit is Power. Of the Son you have
read that Christ is "the Power of God and
the Wisdom of God." ' We read, too, that
the Father is Power, as it is written : "Ye
shall see the Son of INIan sitting at the right
hand of the Power of God." ^ He certainly
named the P'ather Power, at Whose right
hand the Son sits, as you read : "The Lord
said unto My Lord, Sit Thou on My right
hand." ^ And the Lord Himself named the
Holy Spirit Power, when He said: "Ye
shall receive Power when the Holy Spirit
cometh upon you. " 4
CHAPTER II.
The Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit are One in
counsel.
20. For the Spirit Himself is Power, as
you read: "The Spirit of Counsel and of
Power (or might)." 5 And as the Son is the
Angel of great counsel, so, too, is the Holy
Spirit the Spirit of Counsel, that you may
know that the Counsel of the Father, the Son,
and the Holy Spirit is One. Counsel, not
concerning any doubtful matters, but con-
cerning those foreknown and determined.
21. But that the Spirit is the Arbiter of the
Divine Counsel, you may know even from
this. For when above ^ we showed that the
Holy Spirit was the Lord of baptism, and
read that baptism is the counsel of God, as
you read, " But the Pharisees despised the
counsel of God, not being baptized of
Him," 7 it is quite clear that as there can be
no baptism without the Spirit, so, too, the
counsel of God is not without the Spirit.
22. And that we may know more com-
pletely that the Spirit is Power, we ought to
know that Fle was promised when the Lord
said : "I will pour out of My Spirit upon all
flesh. "^ He, then. Who was promised to us
is Himself Power, as in the Gospel the same
Son of God declared when He said : "And
I will send the promise of the Father upon
you, but do you remain in the city until ye be
endued with power from on high. "9
23. And the Evangelist so far shows that
the Spirit is Power, that St. Luke relates that
He came down with great power, when he
says : "And suddenly there was a sound
from heaven, as though the Spirit were
borne with great power." '°
* I Cor. i. 24.
* Acts i. 8.
' S. Luke vii.
" Actsii. 2.
30.
= S. Matt. xxvi.
" Isa. xi. 2.
» Joel ii. 28,
64.
^ Ps. ex. [cix.] I.
« Book I. vi.
* S. Luke xxiv. 49,
ii8
ST. AMBROSE.
24. But, again, that you may not suppose
that this is to be referred to bodily things and
perceptible to the senses, learn that the Spirit
so descended as Christ is to descend, as
you find: "They shall see the Son of Man
coming in the clouds with great power and
majesty. " '
25. For how should not the power and
might be one, when the work is one, the
judgment one, the temple one, the life-
giving one, the sanctification one, and the
kingdom also of the Father, Son, and Holy
Spirit one .''
CHAPTER HI.
As to know the Father and the Son is life, so is it life
to know the Holy Spirit ; and therefore in the God-
head He is not to be separated from the Father.
26. Let them say, then, wherein they
think that there is an unlikeness in the
divine operation. Since as to know the
Father and the Son is life, as the Lord Him-
self declared, saying: " This is life eternal
to know Thee the only true God, and Jesus
Christ, Whom Thou hast sent,"^ so, too, to
know the Holy Spirit is life. For the Lord
said : "If ye love Me, keep My command-
ments, and I will ask the Father and He
shall give you another Paraclete, that He
may abide with you for ever, even the
Spirit of Truth, Whom the world cannot re-
ceive, because it seeth Him not, neither
knoweth Him, but ye know Him, for He is
with you, and in you.'"'^
27. So, then, the world had not eternal
life, because it had not received the Spirit ;
for where the Spirit is, there is eternal life ;
for the Spirit Himself it is Who effects
eternal life. Wherefore I wonder why the
Arians stir the question as to the only true
God. For as it is eternal life to know the
only true God, so, too, is it eternal life to
know Jesus Christ ; so, again, it is eternal
life to know the Holy Spirit, Whom, as also
the Father, the world does not see, and, as
also the Son, does not know. But he who
is not of this world has eternal life, and
the Spirit, Who is the Light of eternal life,
remains with him for ever.
28. If the knowledge of the only true God
confers the same benefit as the knowledge
of the Son and of the Spirit, why do you
sever the Son and the Spirit from the honour
of the true God, when you do not sever Him
from conferring the benefit .'' For of neces-
1 S. Matt, xxiv, 30. * S. John xvii. 3. ' S. John xvii. 14, 15.
sity you must either believe that this is the
greatest gift of the only true Godhead, and
will confess the only true Godhead as of the
Father, so also of the Son and of the Holy
Spirit ; or if you say that he, too, can give life
eternal who is not true God, it will happen
that you derogate rather from the Father,
Whose work you do not consider to be the
chief work of the only true Godhead, but
one to be compared to the work of a creature.
CHAPTER IV.
The Holy Spirit gives life, not in a different way from
the Father and the Son, nor by a different working.
29. And what wonder is it the Spirit
works Life, Who quickens as does the Father
and as does the Son ? And who can deny
that quickening is the work of the Eternal
Majesty ? For it is written : " Quicken Thy
servant.""' He, then, is quickened who is
a servant, that is, man, who before had not
life, but received the privilege of having it.
30. Let us then see whether the Spirit is
quickened, or Himself quickens. Now it is
written: "The letter killeth, but the Spirit
giveth life." ^ So, then, the Spirit quickens.
31. But that you may understand that the
quickening of the Father, Son, and Holy
Spirit is no separate work, read how there
is a oneness of quickening also, since God
Himself quickens through the Spirit, for Paul
said : " He W^ho raised up Christ from the
dead shall also quicken your mortal bodies
because of His Spirit Who dwelleth in you." 3
CHAPTER V.
The Holy Spirit, as well as the Father and the Son, is
pointed out in holy Scripture as Creator, and the
same truth was shadowed forth even by heathen
writers, but it was shown most plainly in the Mystery of
the Incarnation, after touching upon which, the writer
maintains his argument from the fact that worship
which is due to the Creator alone is paid to the Holy
Spirit.
32. But who can doubt that the Holy
Spirit gives life to all things : since both
He, as the Father and the Son, is the Creator
of all things ; and the Almighty Father is
understood to have done nothing without
the Holy Spirit ; and since also in the
beginning of the creation the Spirit moved
upon the water.
33. So when the Spirit was moving upon
the water, the creation was without grace ;
' Ps. cxix. [cxviii.] 17.
- Rom. viii. 11.
OF THE HOLY SPIRIT.— BOOK II.
119
but after this world being- created underwent
the operation of the Spirit, it gained all the
beauty of that grace, wherewith the world
is illuminated. And that the grace of the
universe cannot abide without the Holy
Spirit the prophet declared when he said :
"Thou wilt take away Thy Spirit, and they
will fail and be turned again into their dust.
Send forth Thy Spirit, and they shall be
made, and Thou wilt renew all the face of
the earth."' Not only, then, did he teach
that no creature can stand without the Holy
Spirit, but also that the Spirit is the Creator
of the whole creation.
34. And who can deny that the creation
of the earth is the work of the Holy Spirit,
Whose work it is that it is renewed .'* For if
they desire to deny that it was created by
the Spirit, since they cannot deny that it
must be renewed by the Spirit, they who
desire to sever the Persons must maintain
that the operation of the Holy Spirit is
superior to that of the Father and the Son,
which is far from the truth ; for there is no
doubt that the restored earth is better than
it was created. Or if at first, without the
operation of the Holy Spirit, the Father and
the Son made the earth, but the operation
of the Holy Spirit was joined on afterwards,
it will seem that that which was made
required His aid, which was then added.
But far be it from any one to think this,
namely, that the divine work should be
believed to have a change in the Creator, an
error brought in by Manicheus. ^
35. But do we suppose that the substance
of the earth exists without the operation of
the Holy Spirit, without Whose work not
even the expanse of the sky endures .-' For
it is written : "By the Word of the Lord
were the heavens established, and all the
strength of them by the Spirit of His Mouth. '" ^
Observe what he says, that all the strength
of the heavens is to be referred to the Spirit.
For how should He Who was moving 4
before the earth was made, be resting when
it was being made ?
36. Gentile writers, following ours as it
w^ere through shadows, because they could
not imbibe the truth of the Spirit, have
pointed out in their verses that the Spirit
within nourishes heaven and earth, and the
glittering orbs of moon and stars, s So they
deny not that the strength of creatures exists
1 Ps. civ. [ciii.] 29, 30.
- Manes, or Manicheus, bom about AD. 240, seems to have de-
sired to blend Christianity and Zoroastrianism. The fundamental
point of his teaching was the recognition of a good and an evil
creator. For a full account, see art. " Manicheans," in Did. Ch.
Hiog. ■■' Ps. xxxiii. [xxxii.] 6.
Gen. i. i. ^ Virg. Ain. VI. 724.
through the Spirit, are we who read this to
deny it.'' But you think that they refer to
a Spirit produced of the air. If they de-
clared a Spirit of the air to be the Author of
all things, do we doubt that the Spirit of God
is the Creator of all things ?
I']. But why do I delay with matters not to
the purpose .? Let them accept a plain proof
that there can be nothing which the Holy
Spirit can be said not to have made ; and
that it cannot be doubted that all subsists
through His operation, whether Angels,
Archangels, Thrones, or Dominions ; since
the Lord Himself, Whom the Angels serve,
was begotten by the Holy Spirit coming
upon the Virgin, as, according to IMatthew,
the Angel said to Joseph : "Joseph, thou
son of David, fear not to take Mary thy
wife, for that which shall be born of her is
of the Holy Spirit." ' And according to
Luke, he said to Mary : "The Holy Spirit
shall come upon thee." ^
38. The birth from the Virgin was, then,
the work of the Spirit. The fruit of the
womb is the work of the Spirit, according
to that which is written : " Blessed art thou
among women, and blessed is the Fruit of
thy womb." ^ The flower from the root is
the work of the Spirit, that flower, I say, of
which it was well prophesied : "A rod shall
go forth from the root of Jesse, and a flower
shall rise from his rooft The root of Jesse
the patriarch is the family of the Jews, Mary
is the rod, Christ the flower of Mary, Who,
about to spread the good odour of faith
throughout the whole world, budded forth
from a virgin womb, as He Himself said :
" I am the flower of the plain, a lily of the
valley." 5
39. The flower, when cut, keeps its odour,
and when bruised increases it, nor if torn
off does it lose it ; so, too, the Lord Jesus,
on the gibbet of the cross, neither failed
when bruised, nor fainted when torn ; and
when He was cut by that piercing of the
spear, being made more beautiful by the col-
our of the outpoured Blood, He, as it were,
grew comely again, not able in Himself to
die, and breathing forth upon the dead the
gift of eternal life. On this flower, then, of
the royal rod the Holy Spirit rested.
40. A good rod, as some think, is the Flesh
of the Lord, which, raising itself from its
earthly root to heaven, bore around the
whole world the sweet-smelling fruits of re-
ligion, the mysteries of the divine genera-
tion, pouring grace on the altars of heaven.
1 S. Matt. i. 20.
* Isa. xi. I.
- S. Luke i. 35.
^ Cant, ii. i.
* S. Luke i. 42.
120
ST. AMBROSE.
41. So, then, we cannot doubt that the
Spirit is Creator, Whom we know as the
Author of the Lord's Incarnation. For who
can doubt when you find in the commence-
ment of the Gospel that the generation of
Jesus Christ was on this wise : " When
Mary was espoused to Joseph, before they
came together she was found with child of
[ex] the Holy Spirit." '
42. For although most authorities read
"de Spin'/u/' yet the Greek from which the
Latins translated have " =x -vs'Va-o? dyiou,"
that is, ' ' ex Spiritii Sancto. " For that which
is " of " [ex] any one is either of his substance
or of his power. Of his substance, as the
Son, Who says : "I came forth of the
Mouth of the Most High ; " ^ as the Spirit,
" Who proceedeth from the Father ; " 3 of
Whom the Son says : " He shall glorify
Me, for He shall receive of Mine." ■♦ But
of the power, as in the passage : " One
God the Father, of Whom are all things, "s
43. How, then, was Mary with child of
the Holy Spirit ? If as of her substance,
was the Spirit, then, changed into flesh and
bones ? Certainly not. But if the Virgin
conceived as of His operation and power,
who can deny that the Holy Spirit is Creator ?
44. How is it, too, that Job plainly set
forth the Spirit as his Creator, saying :
" The Spirit of God hath made me " .-* ^ In
one short verse he showed Him to be both
Divine and Creator. If, then, the Spirit is
Creator, He is certainly not a creature, for
the Apostle has separated the Creator and
the creature, saying : " They served the
creature rather than the Creator." 7
45. He teaches that the Creator is to be
served by- condemning those who serve the
creature, whereas we owe our service to
the Creator. And since he knew the Spirit
to be the Creator, he teaches that we ought
to serve Him, saying : " Beware of the dogs,
beware of the evil workers, beware of tlie
concision, for we are the circumcision who
serve the Spirit of God. " ^
46. But if any one disputes because of
the variations of the Latin codices, some of
which heretics have falsified, let him look
» S. Matt. i. 18. 2 Ecclus. xxiv. 3.
* S. John XV. 26. * S. John xvi. 14.
" I Cor. viii. 6. The argument from the exact force of preposi-
tions is often urged by the Fathers, as by St. Athanasius and St.
Basil among the (ireelcs. The Latins also use it, as .St. Ambrose
here, but occasionally the same Greek prepositions are variously
rendered, which destroys the force of the argument. With regard
to the two prepositions ejc and de St. Augustine gives a very good
explanation, /)e Nat7ira Bon, c. 27 : " Ex ipso fof Him] does not
always mean the same as de ipso [from Him]. That which is from
Him can be said to be of Him, but not everything which is of Him
is rightly said to be from Him. Of Him are the heavens and the
earth, for He made them, but not from Him, because not of His
substance." Rut neither the Vulgate nor even St. Ambrose him-
self is quite consistent in this matter.
« Job xxxiii. 4. ' Rom. i. 25. 8 phil. jii. 2, 3.
at the Greek codices, and observe that it is
there written : " ot 7ri/c'Varc 0£oy /ar/zcuo^rc?,"
which is, being translated, "who serve the
Spirit of God. "
47. So, then, when the same Apostle says
that we ought to serve the Spirit, who asserts
that we must not serve the creature, but the
Creator ; without doubt he plainly shows
that the Holy Spirit is Creator, and is to be
venerated with the honour due to the eternal
Godhead ; for it is written : "Thou shalt
worship the Lord thy God, and Him only
shalt thou serve." '
CHAPTER VL
To those who object that according to the words of
Amos the Spirit is created, the answer is made that
the word is there understood of the wind, which is
often created, which cannot be said of the Holy
Spirit, since He is eternal, and cannot be dissolved
in death, or by an heretical absorption into the
Father. But if they pertinaciously contend that this
passage was written of the Holy Spirit, St. Ambrose
points out that recourse must be had to a spiritual
interpretation, for Christ by His coming established
the thunder, that is, the force of the divine utter-
ances, and by Spirit is signified the human soul as
also the flesh assumed by Christ. And since this
was created by each Person of the Trinity, it is
thence argued that the Spirit, Who has before been
affirmed to be the Creator of all things, was the
Author of the Incarnation of the Lord.
48. Nor does it escape my notice that
heretics have been wont to object that the
Holy Spirit appears to be a creature, be-
cause many of them use as an argument for
establishing their impiety that passage of
Amos, where he spoke of the blowing of the
wind, as the words of the prophet made
clear. For you read thus: "Behold, lam
He that establish the thunders, and create
the wind [spirit],^ and declare unto man
his Christ, that make light and mist, and
ascend upon high places, the Lord God
Almighty is His Name. "^
49. If they make an argument of this,
that he said "spirit" was created, Esdras
taught us that spirit is created, saying in the
fourth book : "And upon the second day
Thou madest the spirit of the firmament," 4
yet, that we may keep to our point, is it not
evident that in what Amos said the order of
the passage shows that the prophet was
speaking of the creation of this world }
50. He begins as follows: "I am the
Lord that establish the thunders and create
the wind [spirit]." The order of the words
* S. Matt. iv. 10.
* Spiritus is Latin for wind and spirit. .See note on § 63 of this
book.
8 Amos iv. 13, « 2 [4] Esdras vi. 41.
OF THE HOLY SPIRIT.— BOOK II.
121
itself teaches us ; for if he had wished to
speak of the Holy Spirit, he would certainly
not have put the thuntlers in the first place.
For thunder is not more ancient than the
Holy Spirit ; though they be ungodly, they
still dare not say that. And then when we
see what follows concerning light and mist,
is it not plain that what is said is to be un-
derstood of the creation of this world ? For
we know by every-day experience, that
when we have storms on this earth, thun-
ders come first, blasts of wind follow on,
the sky grows black with mists, and light
shines agfain out of the darkness. For the
blasts of wind are also called "spirits, as
it is written : " Fire and brimstone and the
spirit of storm." '
51. And that you might know that he
called this "spirit," he says : " establishing
thunders and creating the wind [spirit]."
For these are often created, when they take
place. But the Holy Spirit is eternal, and
if any one dares to call Him a creature,
still he cannot say that He is daily created
like the blast of the wind. Then, again,
Wisdom herself, speaking after the mystery
of the assumed Body, says: "The Lord
created Me. "^ Although prophesying of
things to come, yet, because the coming of
the Lord was predestined, it is not said
' ' creates " but ' ' created Me ; " that men
might believe that the Body of Jesus was
begotten of the Virgin Mary, not often, but
once only.
52. And so, as to that which the prophet
declared as it were of the daily working of
God in the thunder and the creation of
the wind, it would be impious to understand
any such thing of the Holy Spirit, Whom
the ungodly themselves cannot deny to exist
from before the world. Whence with pious
asseveration we testify that He always
exists, and abides ever. For neither can
He Who before the world was moving upon
the waters begin to be visible after the
world's creation ; or else it would be allow-
able to suppose that there are many Holy
Spirits, Who come into being by as it w^ere
a daily production. Far be it from any one
to pollute himself with such impiety as to
say that the Holy Spirit is frequently or ever
created. For I do not understand why He
should be frequently created, unless per-
chance they believe that He dies frequently
and so is frequently created. But how can
the Spirit of life die.' If, then. He cannot
die. there is no reason why He should be
often created.
1 Ps. xi. [x.] 6.
* Prov. viii,22.
53. But they who think otherwise fall into
this sacrilege, that they do not distinguish
the Holy Spirit ; who think that the Word
Which was sent forth returns to the Father,
and the Spirit Which was sent forth is re-
absorbed into God, so that there should be
a reabsorption ' and a kind of alternation of
one changing himself into various forms ;
whereas the distinction between the Father,
Son, and Holy Spirit always abiding and un-
changeable, preserves the Unity of its power.
54. But if any one thinks that the word of
the prophet is to be explained with reference
to the Holy Spirit, because it is said,
" declaring unto men His Christ,"^ he will
explain it more easily of the Lord's Incar-
nation. For if it troubles you that he said
Spirit, and therefore you think that this can-
not well be explained of the mystery of the
taking of human nature, read on in the
Scriptures and you will find that all agrees
most excellently with Christ, of Whom it is
thoroughly fitting to think that He estab-
lished the thunders by His coming, that is,
the force and sound of the heavenly Scrip-
tures, by the thunder, as it were, of which
our minds are struck with astonishment, so
that we learn to be afraid, and pay respect
to the heavenly oracles.
55. Lastly, in the Gospel the brothers of
the Lord were called Sons of Thunder; and
when the voice was uttered of the Father,
saying, "I have both glorified it and will
glorify it again, "3 the Jews said that it
thundered on Him. For although they
could not receive the grace of the truth, yet
they confessed unwillingly, and in their
ignorance were speaking mysteries, so that
there resulted a great testimony of the
Father to the Son. And in the Book of Job,
too, the Scripture says : "And who knows
when He will make the power of His thun-
der .''"■♦ Certainly if these words pertained
to the thunders of the heavens, he would
have said that their force was already made,
not about to be made.
56. Therefore he referred the thunders to
the words of the Lord, the sound of which
went out into all the earth, and we under-
stand the word "spirit" in this place of the
soul, which He took endowed with reason
and perfect ; ^ for Scripture often designates
' St. Ambrose would seem to be alluding to a certain party
amongst the Sabellians, who, to avoid the charge of being Patripas-
sians, maintained that Christ before His Incarnation was one with
the Father, from Whom He then emanated, in Whom after His Pas-
sion He was again reabsorbed. Cf. De Pide, V. 162.
'^ Amos iv. 13. ^ S. John xii. 2S. * Job xxvi. 14 [LXX.].
^ It has been generally held that our Lord's Soul was from the
first endowed with all the fulness of which a human soul is capable,
having, for instance, perfect knowledge of all things past, present,
and to come : the only limit being that a finite nature 'cannot possess
the infinite attributes of the Godhead.
122
ST. AMBROSE.
the soul of man by the word spirit, as you
read : " Who creates the spirit of man with-
in him.'" ' So, too, the Lord signified His
Soul by the word Spirit, when He said :
"Into Thy hands I commend My Spirit.'' ^
57. And that you might know that he
spoke of the coming down of Jesus, he
added that He declared His Christ to men,
for in His baptism He declared Him, say-
ing : "Thou art My beloved Son, in Whom
I am well pleased."' ^ He declared Him on
the mount, saying: "This is My beloved
Son, hear ye Him. "•♦ He declared Him in
His Passion, when the sun hid itself, and
sea and earth trembled. He declared Him
in the Centurion, who said: "Truly this
was the Son of God. " 5
58. We ought, then, to take this whole
passage either to be simply to be under-
stood of that state in which we here live
and breathe, or of the mystery of the Lord's
Body ; for if here it had been stated that
the Holy Spirit was created, undoubtedly
Scripture would elsewhere have declared
the same, as we often read of the Son of
God, Who according to the flesh was both
made and created.
59. But it is fitting that we should con-
sider His Majesty in the very fact of His
taking flesh for us, that we may see His
divine power in the very taking of the
Body. For as we read that the Father
created the mystery of the Lord's Licarna-
tion, the Spirit too created it ; and so too
we read that Christ Himself created His
own Body. For the Father created it, as it
is written: "The Lord created Me, "^ and
in another place, "God sent His Son, made
of a woman, made under the law. "7 And
the Spirit created the whole mystery, ac-
cording to that which we read, for " Mary
was found with child of the Holy Spirit." ^
60. You find, then, that the Father created
and the Spirit created ; learn, too, that the
Son of God also created, when Solomon
says : " Wisdom hath made herself a
house." 9 How, then, can the Holy Spirit
Who created the mystery of the Lord's Li-
carnation, which is above all created things,
be Himself a creature .'*
61. As we have shown above '° gener-
ally that the Holy Spirit is our Creator
according to the flesh in the outer man, let
us now show that He is our Creator also
according to the mystery of grace. And as
the Father creates, so too does the Son
' Zech. xii, I.
^ S. Mark ix.
' (^lal. iv. 4.
1" Ch. V.
' S. Luke xxiii. 46.
" S. Mark xv. 39.
* S. Matt. i. 18.
•'' S. Matt. iii. 17.
" Prov. viii. 12.
® Prov. ix. i.
create, and so too the Holy Spirit creates,
as we read in the words of Paul : " For it
is the gift of God, not of works, lest any
one should boast. For we are His work-
manship created in Christ Jesus in good
works." '
CHAPTER VH.
The Holy Spirit is no less the author of spiritual crea-
tion or regeneration than the Father and the Son.
The excellence of that creation, and wherein it con-
sists. How we are to understand holy Scripture,
when it attributes a body or members to God.
62. So, then, the Father creates in good
works, and the Son also, for it is written :
"But as many as received Him, to them
gave He power to become the sons of (jod,
even to them who believe on His Name ;
who were born not of blood, nor of the
will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but
of God." ^
63. In like manner the Lord Himself
also testifies that we are born again of the
Spirit according to grace, saying: "That
which is born of the flesh is flesh, because
it is born of flesh : and that which is born
of the Spirit is spirit, because God is Spirit.
Marvel not that I said unto you. Ye must
be born again. The Spirit breatheth 3
where He willeth, and thou hearest His
voice, but knowest not whence He cometh
or whither He goeth, so is every one who
is born of the Spirit. "
64. It is then clear that the Holy Spirit is
also the Author of the grace of the Spirit,
since we are created according to God, that
we may be made the sons of God. So
when He has taken us into His kingdom
by the adoption of holy regeneration, do
we deny Him that which is His.? He has
made us heirs of the new birth from above,
do we claim the heritage and reject its
Author ? But the benefit cannot remain
' Eph. ii. S ff. - S. John i. 12, 13.
•'' It has been thought well in translating this verse to keep the
words "spirit" and "breath" as suiting tlie argument of St.
Ambrose. But there can be little doubt that the ordinary transla-
tion is the correct one. Bp. W'estcott has the foUowing note :
" In Hebrew, Syriac, and Latin the words ffor spirit and wind]
are identical, and Wiclif and the Rhemish version keep " spirit " in
both cases, after the Latin. But at present the retention of one
word in both places could only create confusion, since the separa-
tion between the material emblem and the power which it wasused
to describe is complete. The use of the correlative verb (iri'«<, ch.
vi. 18; Rev. vii. i ; Matt. vii. 25, 27: Luke xii. 55; .'Vets xxvii. 40)
and of the word soioiii (voice) is quite decisive for tlie literal use of
the noun (Tri'tO/no), and still at the same time the whole of the phrase-
ology is inspired by the higher meaning. Perhaps also the unusual
word (nrtOfta, i Kings xviii. 45: xix. 11: 2 Kings iii. 17) is em-
ployed to suggest this. The comparison lies between the obvious
physical properties of the wind and the mysterious action of that
spiritual influence to which the name "spirit." "wind," was in-
stinctively applied. The laws of both are practically unknown, both
are unseen, the presence of both is revealed in their effects." — West-
cott on .S. John iii. 8.
OF THE HOLY SPIRIT.— BOOK II.
123
when its Author is shut out ; the Author is
not without tlie gift, nor the gift without
the Author. If you claim the grace, be-
lieve the power ; if you reject the power, do
not ask for the grace. He who has denied
the Spirit has at the same time denied tlie
jrift. I'or if tlic Author be of no account
how can His gifts be precious ? Why do
we grutlge the gifts we ourselves receive,
diminish our hopes, repudiate our dignity,
and denyour Comforter ?
65. But we cannot deny Him. Far be it
from us to deny that which is so great, since
the Apostle says: "But ye brethren, like
Isaac, are the children of promise, but as
then, he that is born after the flesh per-
secutes him that is after the Spirit."'
Again certainly is understood from what
has gone before, is born after the Spirit.
He then who is born after the Spirit is born
after God. Now we are born ugain when
we are renewed in our inward affections,
and lay aside the oldness of the outer man.
And so the Apostle says again : "But be
ye renewed in the spirit of your mind, and
put on the new man which is created ac-
cording to God in truth and righteousness
and holiness. " ^ Let them hear how the
Scripture has signified the unity of the
divine operation. He who is renewed in
the spirit of his mind has put on the new
man, which is created according to God.
66. That more excellent regeneration is
then the work of the Holy Spirit ; and the
Spirit is the Author of that new man which
is created after the image of God, which no
one will doubt to be better than this outer
man of ours. Since the Apostle has pointed
out that the one is heavenly, the other
earthly, when he says : " As is the heaven-
ly, such also are the heavenly. " ^
67. Since, then, the grace of the Spirit
'.-lakes that to be heavenly which it can
create earthy, we ought to observe by
reason though we be without instances. For
in a certain place holy Job says : "As the
Lord liveth. Who thus judgeth me, and the
Almighty, Who hath brought my soul to
bitterness (for the Spirit of God which is in
my nostrils). "4 He certainly did not here
signify by His Spirit the vital breath and
bodily breathing passages, but signifies the
nostrils of the inner man within him, where-
with he gathered in the fragrance of eternal
life, and drew in the grace of the heavenly
ointment as with a kind of twofold sense.
68. For there are spiritual nostrils, as we
' Gal. iv. 28, 29.
' I Cor. XV. 48.
- Eph. iv. 23, 24.
* Job xxvii. 2, 3.
read, which the spouse of the Word has, to
whom it is said: "And the smell of thy nos-
trils ; " ' and in another place : "The Lord
smelled a smell of sweetness. "^ There are,
then, as it were, inward members of a man,
whose hands are considered to be in action,
his ears in hearing, his feet in a kind of pro-
gress in a good work. And so from what
is done we gather as it were figures of the
members, for it is not suitable for us to
imagine anything in the inner man after a
fleshly manner.
69. And there are some who suppose that
God is fashioned after a bodily manner,
when they read of His hand or finger, and
they do not observe that these things are
written not because of any fashion of a body,
since in the Godhead are neither members
nor parts, but are expressions of the one-
ness of the Godhead, that we may believe
that it is impossible for either the Son or the
Holy Spirit to be separated from God the
Father ; since the fulness of the Godhead
dwells as it were bodily in the substance of
the Trinity. For this reason, then, is the
Son also called the Right Hand of the
Father, as we read : "The Right Hand of
the Lord hath done mighty things, the Right
Hand of the Lord hath exalted me."^
CHAPTER VIII.
St. Ambrose examines and refutes the heretical argu-
ment that because God is said to be glorified /n the
Spirit, and not w///i the Spirit, the Holy Spirit is
therefore inferior to the Father. He shows that the
particle i>i can be also used of the Son and even of
the Father, and that on the other hand 7CJit/i may be
said of creatures without any infringement on the
prerogatives of the Godhead ; and that in reality
these prepositions simply imply the connection of the
Three Divine Persons.
70. But what wonder is it if foolish men
question about words, when they do so
even about syllables ? For some think that
a distinction should be made and that God
should be praised /;/. the Spirit, but not zv/'/h
the Spirit, and consider that the greatness
of the Godhead is to be estimated from one
syllable or some custom, arguing that if
they consider that God should be glorified
m the Spirit, they point to some office ofthe
Holy Spirit, but that if they say that God
receives glory or power w//h the Spirit, they
seem to imply some association and com-
munion ofthe Father, the Son, and the Holy
Spirit.
71. But who can separate what is in-
' Cant. vii. S.
- Gen. viii. 21.
Ps. cxviii. [cxvii.] 16.
124
ST. AMBROSE.
capable of separation ? who can divide that
association which Christ shows to be in-
separable? "Go, "says He, " baptize all na-
tions in the Name of the Father and of the
Son and of the Holy Spirit."' Has He
changed either a word or a syllable here
concerning- the Father or the Son or the
Holy Spirit? Certainly not. But He says, in
the Name of the Father and of the Son and
of the Holy Spirit. The expression is the
same for the Spirit as for the Father and for
Himself From which is inferred not any
office of the Holy Spirit, but rather a sharing
of honour or of working when we say "in the
Spirit. "
72. Consider, too, that this opinion of yours
tends to the injury of the Father and the
Son, for the latter did not say, ^'with the
Name of the Father and of the Son, and of
the Holy Spirit, '' but iti the Name, and yet not
any office but the power of the Trinity is
expressed in this syllable,
73. Lastly, that you may know that it is
not a syllable which prejudices faith, but
faith which commends a syllable, Paul also
speaks in Christ. Christ is not less, because
Paul spoke in Christ, as you find: "We
speak before God in Christ." ^ As, then, the
Apostle says that we speak in Christ, so, too,
is that which we speak in the Spirit ; as the
Apostle himself said : "Nomansaith Lord
Jesus, except in the Holy Spirit. " 3 So, then,
in this place not any subjection of the Holy
Spirit, but a connection of grace is signified.
74. And that you may know that dis-
tinction does not depend upon a syllable, he
says also in another place : " And these in-
deed were you, but ye are washed, but ye
are sanctified, but ye are justified in the
Name of the Lord Jesus Christ, and in the
Spirit of our God. " 4 How many instances
of this I can bring forward. For it is written :
" Ye are all one in Christ Jesus," 5 and else-
where : "To those sanctified inChrist Jesus, "^
and again : ' ' That we might be the right-
eousness of God in Him, "7 and in another
place : "Should fall from the chastity which
is in Christ Jesus." ^
75. But what am I doing? For while I
say that like things are written of the Son as
of the Spirit, I am rather leading on to this,
not that because it is written of the Son,
therefore it would appear to be reverently
written of the Holy Spirit, but that because
the same is written of the Spirit, therefore
men allege that the Son's honour is lessened
* S. Matt, xxviii.
* I Cor. vi. II.
' 2 Cor. V. 21.
19.
^ 2 Cor. ii. 17.
^ Gal. iii. 28.
* 2 Cor, xi. 3.
' I Cor. xii. 3.
" I Cor. i. 2.
because of the Spirit. For say they, Is it
written of God the Father ?
76. But let them learn that it is also said
of God the Father: "In the Lord I will
praise the word ;" ' and elsewhere : "In God
we will do mighty deeds ;"^ and "INIy re-
membrance shall be ever in Thee ;" 3 and
' ' In Thy Name will we rejoice ; " 4 and again
in another place : "That his deeds may be
manifested, that they are wrought in God ;" 5
and Paul : " In God Who created all thing-s :" ^
and agam : "Paul and Silvanus and Timo-
theus to the Church of the Thessalonians in
God the Father and the Lord Jesus Christ ;" ^
and in the Gospel : "I in the Father and the
Father in Me," and "the Father that dwelleth
in Me."^ It is also written : "He that
glorieth let him glory in the Lord ; ''9 and in
another place : ' ' Our life is hid with Christ in
God." '° Did he here ascribe more to the Son
than to the Father in saying that we are with
Christ in God ? or does our state avail more
than the grace of the Spirit, so that we can
be with Christ and the Holy Spirit cannot?
And when Christ wills to be with us, as He
Himself said : "Father, I will that they whom
Thou hast given Me be with Me where I
am,"" would He disdain to be with the
Spirit? For it is written: "Ye coming
together and my spirit with the power of the
Lord Jesus. " '^ Do we then come together in
the power of the Lord, and dare to say that
the Lord Jesus would not be willing to come
together with the Spirit Who does not disdain
to come together with us ?
77. So the Apostle thinks that it makes no
difference which particle you use. For each
is a conjunctive particle, and conjunction
does not cause separation, for if it divided it
would not be called a conjunction.
78. What, then, moves you to say that to
Gofi the Father or to His Christ there is
glory, life, greatness, or power, in the Holy
Spirit, and to refuse to say ivith the Holy
Spirit ? Is it that you are afraid of seeming
to join the Spirit with the Father and the
Son ? But hear what is written of the Spirit :
' ' For the law of the Spirit is life in Christ
Jesus." '3 And in another place God the
Father says: "They shall worship Thee,
and in Thee they shall make supplication. " '4
God the Father says that we ought to pray
in Christ; and do you think that it is any
derogation to the Spirit if the glory of Christ
is said to be in Him ?
' Ps. Ivi. riv.]4. = Ps. Ix. flix.] 12.
^ Ps. Ixxxix. [l.xxxviii.] i^i.
" Eph. iii. 9. '2 Thess. i 2.
" 2 Cor. X. 17. '" Col. iii. 3.
^- I Cor. V. 4. *^ Rom. viii. z.
■■' Ps. Ixxi. [Ixx.] 6.
'' S. John iii. 21.
' S. John xiv. 10.
" S. John xvii. 24,
»* Isa. xlv. 14 [LXX.J.
p
OF THE HOLY SPIRIT.— BOOK II.
125
79. Hear that what you are afraid to
acknowledge of the Spirit, the Apostle did
not fear to claim for himself, for he says:
" To be dissolved and to be with Christ is
much better." ' Do you deny that the Spirit,
through Whom the Apostle was made worthy
of being with Christ, is with Christ ?
80. What, then, is the reason that you pre-
fer saying that God or Christ is glorified in the
Spirit rather than with the Spirit ? Is it be-
cause if you say in the Spirit, the Spirit is
declared to be less than Christ ? Although
your making the Lord greater or less is a
matter which can be refuted, yet since we
read, ' ' For Christ was made sin for us, that
we might be the righteousness of God in
Him,"- He is found chiefest in Whom we
are found most low. So, too, elsewhere
you read, " For in Him all things consist, "^
that is, in His power. And the things which
consist in Him cannot be compared to Him,
because they receive from His power the
substance whereby they consist.
81. Do you then understand that God so
reigns in the Spirit that the power of the
Spirit, as a kind of source of substance, im-
parts to God the origin of His rule.^ But
this is impious. And so our predecessors ^
spoke of the unity of power of the Father,
the Son, and the Holy Spirit, when they said
that the glory of Christ was with the Spirit,
that they might declare their inseparable
connection.
82. For how is the Holy Spirit separated
from the Son, since " the Spirit Himself
beareth witness with our spirit that we are
sons of God, and if sons, also heirs, heirs,
indeed, of God and joint-heirs with Christ." 5
Who, then, is so foolish as to wish to dissever
the eternal conjunction of the Spirit and
Christ, when the Spirit by Whofti we are
made joint-heirs with Christ conjoins even
what is severed.
83. "If so be," he says, " we suffer with
Him, that we may be also glorified to-
gether."^ If we then shall be glorified to-
gether with Christ through the Spirit, how
do we refuse to admit that the Spirit Him-
self is glorified together with Christ.' Do
we dissociate the life of Christ and of the
Holy Spirit when the Spirit says that we
shall live together with the Son of God.?
For the Apostle says : "If we be dead with
Christ we believe that we shall also live
with Him ;" and then again : " For if we
suffer with Him we shall also live with Him,
and not only shall we live with Him, but
' Phil. i. 2^. - 2 Cor. V. 21.
* See St. Basil, De Sp. Sancto, III. 29.
'' Rom. viii. 16; 17.
^ Col. i. 17.
' Rom. viii. 16, 17.
shall be also glorified with Him, and not
only be glorified but shall also reign with
Him."'
84. No division, then, is implied in those
particles, for each is a particle of conjunc-
tion. And lastly, we often find in holy
Scripture the one inserted and the other
understood, as it is written : "I will enter
into Thy house in whole burnt-offerings, "^
that is, "with whole burnt-offerings ;" and
in another place : " He brought them forth
in silver and gold, "3 that is, "with silver
and gold." And elsewhere the Psalmist
says : " Wilt Thou not go forth with us in
our hosts ."'"'♦ for that which is really meant,
"with our hosts." So, then, in the use of
the expression no lessening of honour can
be implied, and nothing ought to be deduced
derogatory to the honour of the Godhead, it is
necessary that with the heart man should
believe unto righteousness, and that out of
the faith of the heart confession should be
made in the mouth unto salvation. But
they who believe not with the heart spread
what is derogatory with their mouth.
CHAPTER IX.
A passage of St. Paul abused by heretics, to prove a
distinction between the Divine Persons, is explained,
and it is proved that the whole passage can be rightly
said of each Person, though it refers specially to the
Son. It is then proved that each member of the
passage is applicable to each Person, and as to say,
of Him are all things is applicable to the Father, so
may all things are through Hitn and in Jlitn also be
said of Him.
85. Another similar passage is that w^hich
they say implies difference, where it is writ-
ten : "But to us there is one Father, of
Whom are all things and we unto Him,
and one Lord Jesus Christ, through Whom
are all things, and we through Him." s For
they pretend that when it is said "of Him,"
the matter is signified, when " through
Him,*'' either the instrument of the work or
some office, but when it is said "in Him,"
either the place or the time in which all
things that are made are seen.
86. So, then, their desire is to prove that
there is some difference of substance, being
anxious to make a distinction between as it
were the instrument, and the proper worker
or author, and also between time or place
and the instrument. But is the Son, then,
alien as regards His Nature from the Father,
because an instrument is alien from the
* 2 Tim. ii. ii, 12.
* Ps. xliv. [xliii.] 10.
* Ps. Ixvi. [Ixv.] 13.
^ Ps. cv. [civ.] 37.
•'' I Cor. viii. 6.
126
ST. AMBROSE.
worker or author ? or is the Son alien from
the Spirit, because either time or place is
not of the same class as an instrument ?
87. Compare now our assertions. They
will have it that matter is of God as though
of the nature of God, as when you say that
a chest is made of wood or a statue of stone ;
that after this fashion matter has come forth
from God, and that the same matter has
been made by the Son as if by some sort of
instrument ; so that they declare that the
Son is not so much the Artificer as the
instrument of the work ; and that all things
have been made in the Spirit, as if in some
place or time ; they attribute each part
severally to each Person severally and deny
that all are in common.
88. But we show that all things are so of
God the Father, that God the Father has
suffered no loss because all things are either
through Him or in Him, and yet all things
are not of Him as if of matter ; then, too,
that all things are through the Lord the Son,
so that He is not deprived of the attribute
that all thinsfs are of the Son and in Him ;
and that all things are in the Spirit, so that
we may teach that all things are through
the Spirit, and all things from the Spirit.
89. For these particles, like those of which
we have spoken before, imply each other.
For the Apostle did not so say, All things are
of God, and all things are through the Son,
as to signify that the substance of the
Father and the Son could be severed, but
that he might teach that by a distinction
without confusion the Father is one, the
Son another. Those particles, then, are not
as it were in opposition to each other, but
arc as it were allied and agreed, so as often
to suit even one Person, as it is written :
"For of Him, and through Him, and in
Him are all things."'
90. But if you really consider whence the
passage is taken you will have no doubt
that it is said of the Son. For the Apostle
says, according to the prophecy of Isaiah,
"Who hath known the mind of the Lord, or
who hath been His counsellor .'' " - And he
adds: "For of Him and in Him are all
things." Which Isaiah had said of the
Artificer of all, as you read: "Who hath
ineasured out the water with his hand, and
the heaven with a span, and all the earth
with his closed hand .•' Who hath placed the
mountains in scales and the hills in a balance .'
Who hath known the mind of the Lord
who hath been His counsellor.'' " ^
or
' Rom. xi. 36.
" Isa. xl. 12
Isa. xl. 13.
91. And the Apostle added: "For of Him,
and through Him, and in Him are all things. "
What is "of Him"'.? That the nature of
everything is of His will, and He is the
Author of all things which have come into
being. "Through Him " means what.'
That the establishment and continuance of
all things is His gift. What is "in Him".?
That all things by a wonderful kind of
longing and unspeakable love look upon the
Author of their life, and the Giver of their
graces and functions, according to that which
is written : ' ' The eyes of all look unto Thee,"
and "Thou openest Thine hand and fillest
every living creature with Thy good plea-
sure. "
92. And of the Father, too, you may
rightly say "of Him," for of Him was the
operative Wisdom, Which of His own and
the Father's will gave being to all things
which were not. " Through Him," because
all things were made through His Wisdom.
"In Him," because He is the Fount of
substantial Life, in Whom we live and move
and have our being.
93. Of the Spirit also, as being formed
by Him, strengthened by Him, established
in Him, we receive the gift of eternal life.
94. Since, then, these expressions seem
suitable either to the Father or the Son or
the Holy Spirit, it is certain that nothing
derogatory is spoken of in them, since we
both say that many things are of the Son,
and many through the Father, as you find
it said of the Son: "That we may be
increased through all things in Him, Who is
Christ the Head, from Whom," says he,
"the whole body, framed and knit together
through every joint of the supply for the
measure of every part, maketh increase of the
body unto the building up of itself in love. " ^
And again, writing to the Colossians of those
who have not the knowledge of the Son
of God, he says : "Because they hold not
the Head, from Whom all the body being
supplied and joined together through jomts
and bands, increaseth to the increase of
God. " 3 For we said above that Christ is the
Head of the Church. And in another place
you read : "Of His fulness have all we
received. "•» And the Lord Himself said :
" He shall take of Mine and show it unto
you. "5 And before. He said: "I perceive
that virtue is gone out of Me. "^
95. In like manner that you may recognize
the Unity, it is also said of the Spirit : " For
he that soweth in the Spirit shall of the Spirit
' Ps. cxlv. [cxliv.] 15, 16.
* S. John i. 16.
- Eph. iv. 15, 16.
° .S. John xvi. 14.
^ Col. ii. 19.
" S. Luke viii. 46.
OF THE HOLY SPH^IT.— BOOK H.
127
reap eternal life. " ' And John says : "Here-
by we know that Ho is in us because He
hath given us of His Spirit."'- And the
Angel says : '• That Which shall be born of
her is of the Holy Spirit."-' And the Lord
says: "That which is born of the Spirit is
Spirit. " ■♦
96. So, then, as we read that all things
are of the Father, so, too, that all things can
be said to be of the Son, through Whom
are all things ; and we are taught by proof
that all things are of the Spirit in Whom are
all things.
97. Now let us consider whether we can
teach that anything is through the Father.
But it is written : " Paul the servant. of Christ
through the will of God ; " s and elsewhere :
"Wherefore thou art now not a servant but a
son, and if a son an heir also through God ; " ^
and agfain : "As Christ rose from the dead
by the glory of God." ^ And elsewhere God
the Father says to the Son : "Behold
proselytes shall corne to Thee through
Me."«
98. You will find many other passages, if
you look for things done through the Father.
Is, then, the Father less because we read that
many things are in the Son and of the Son,
and find in the heavenly Scriptures very
many things done or given through the
Father }
99. But in like manner we also read of
many things done through the Spirit, as you
tind : " But God hath revealed them to us
through His Spirit ; '' ^> and in another place :
" Keep the good deposit through the Holy
Spirit ;" '° and to the Ephesians : "to be
strengthened through His Spirit ; " " and
to the Corinthians: "To another is given
through the Spirit the word of wis-
dom ; " ■- and in another place : " But if
through the Spirit ye mortify the deeds of
the flesh, ye shall live ; " '^ and above : "He
Who raised Christ from the dead shall also
quicken your mortal bodies through the
indwelling of His Spirit in you." '->
100. But perhaps some one may say. Show
me that we can read expressly that all things
are of the Son, or that ail things are of the
Spirit. But I reply. Let them also show that
it is written that all things are through the
Father. But since we have proved that these
expressions suit either the Father or the Son or
the Holy Spirit, and that no distinction of the
divine power can arise from particles of this
I Gal. vi. 8.
* S. John iii. 6.
' Rom. vi. 4.
'" I Tim. vi. 20.
'^ Rom. viii. 13.
^ I John iv. 13.
^ I Cor. i. I.
' Isa. liv. 15 [LXX.],
'' Eph. iii. 16.
'■* Rom. viii. 11.
» S. Matt. i. 20.
'■■ Gal. iv. 7.
" I Cor. ii. 10.
'- 1 Cor. xii. 8.
kind, there is no doubt but that all things
are of Him through Whom all things are ;
and that all things are through Him through
Whom all are ; and that we must understand
that all things are through Him or of Him in
Whom all are. For every creature exists
both of the will and through the operation
and in the power of the Trinity, as it is
written: "Let Us make man after Our
image and likeness ; " ' and elsewhere :
" By the word of the Lord were the heavens
established, and all their power by the Spirit
of His mouth." ^
CHAPTER X.
Being about to prove that the will, the calling, and the
commandment of the Trinity is one, St. Ambrose
shows that the Spirit called the Church exactly as
the Father and the Son did, and proves this by the
selection of SS. Paul and Barnabas, and especially
by the mission of St. Peter to Cornelius. And by
the way he points out how in the Apostle's vision
the calling of the Gentiles was shadowed forth, who
having been before like wild beasts, now by the opera-
tion of the Spirit lay aside that wildness. Then hav-
ing quoted other passages in support of this view, he
shows that in the case of Jeremiah cast into a pit by
Jews, and rescued by Abdemelech, is a type of the
slighting of the Holy Spirit by the Jews, and of His
being honoured by the Gentiles.
loi. And not only is the operation of the
Father, Son, and Holy Spirit everywhere one
but also there is one and the same will, call-
ing, and giving of commands, which one
may see in the great and saving mystery of
the Church. For as the Father called the
Gentiles to the Church, saying: " I will
call her My people which was not My peo-
ple, and her beloved who was not be-
loved ; " 3 and elsewhere : " My house shall
be called a house of prayer for all nations, " •*
so, too, the Lord Jesus said that Paul was
chosen by Him to call forth and gather to-
gether the Church, as you find it said by the
Lord Jesus to Ananias: "Go, for he is a
chosen vessel unto Me to bear My name be-
fore all nations." 5
I02. As, then, God the Father called the
Church, so, too, Christ called it, and so, too,
the Spirit called it, saying: "Separate Me
Paul and Barnabas for the work to which I
have called them. " ' ' So, " it is added, ' ' hav-
ing fasted and prayed, they laid hands on
them and sent them forth. And they, being
sent forth by the Holy Spirit, went down to
Seleucia."^ So Paul received the apostle-
^ Gen. i. 26.
* Isa. Ivi. 7.
- Ps. xxxiii. 6.
* Acts ix. 15.
* Hos. ii. 23.
•" Acts xiii. 2 ff.
128
ST. AMBROSE.
ship by the will not only of Christ, but also
of the Holy Spirit, and hastened to gather
together the Gentiles.
103. And not only Paul, but also, as we
read in the Acts of the Apostles, Peter. For
when he had seen in his prayer heaven
opened and a certain vessel tied at the four
corners, as it were a sheet in which were
all kinds of four-footed beasts and wild beasts
and fowls of the air, " a voice came to him
saying. Arise, Peter, kill and eat. And Peter
said, Be it far from me, Lord, I have never
eaten anything common or unclean. And
again a voice came to him, saying. What
God hath cleansed call not thou common.
And this was done three times, and the ves-
sel was received back into heaven." ' And
so when Peter was silently thinking over
this with himself, and the servants of Cor-
nelius appointed by the Angel had come to
him, the Spirit said to him, " Lo, men are
seeking thee, rise therefore, and go down
and go with them ; doubt not, for I have
sent thee. "^
104. How clearly did the Holy Spirit ex-
press His own power ! First of all in that
He inspired him who was praying, and was
present to him who was entreating ; then
when Peter, being called, answered,
"Lord," and so was found worthy of a
second message, because he acknowledged
the Lord. But the Scripture declares Who
that Lord was, for He Whom he had an-
swered spoke to him when he answered.
And the following words show the Spirit
clearly revealed, for He Who formed the
mystery made known the mystery.
105. Notice, also, that the appearance of
the mystery three times repeated expressed
the operation of the Trinity. And so in the
mysteries 3 the threefold question is put, and
the threefold answer made, and no one can
be cleansed but by a threefold confession.
For which reason, also, Peter in the Gospel
is asked three times whether he loves the
Lord, that by the threefold answer the bonds
of the guilt he had contracted by denying
the Lord might be loosed.
106. Then, again, because the Angel is
sent to Cornelius, the Holy Spirit speaks to
Peter : " For the eyes of the Lord are over
the faithful of the earth.'' * Nor is it without
a purpose that when He had said before,
"What God hath cleansed call not thou
^ Acts X. n ff. 2 Acts X. 19, 20.
■' The " mysteries " are the sacrament of baptism, and the '' three-
fold question " those which preceded baptism, viz. : Dost thou be-
lieve in (Jod the Father Almighty? Dost thou believe in our Lord
Jesus Christ, and in His cross? and Dost thou believe in the Holy
Spirit? witli the answer, " I believe," to eacli, as mentioned by the
author of De Sacratnentis, II. 7 (written probably in the sth or 6th
century). ■" Ps. ci. Ic.J 6.
common,"' the Holy Spirit came upon the
Gentiles to purify them, when it is mani-
fest that the operation of the Spirit is a
divine operation. But Peter, when sent by
the Spirit, did not wait for the command of
God the Father, but acknowledged that that
message was from the Spirit Himself, and
the grace that of the Spirit Himself, when he
said : "If, then, God has granted them the
same grace as to us, who was I that I
should resist God } "
107. It is, then, the Holy Spirit Who has
delivered us from that Gentile impurity.
For in those kinds of four-footed creatures
and wild beasts and birds there was a fig--
ure of the condition of man, which appears
clothed with the bestial ferocity of wild
beasts unless it grows gentle by the sanctifi-
cation of the Spirit. Excellent, then, is that
grace which changes the rage of beasts into
the simplicity of the Spirit : " For we also
were aforetime foolish, unbelieving, erring,
serving divers lusts and pleasures. But
now by the renewing of the Spirit we begin
to be heirs of Christ, and joint-heirs with
the Angels." ^
108. Therefore the holy prophet David,
seeing in the Spirit that we should from
wild beasts become like the dwellers in
heaven, says^ "Rebuke the wild beasts of
the wood," 3 evidently signifying, not the
wood disturbed by the running of wild
beasts, and shaken with the roaring of
animals, but that wood of which it is writ-
ten : " We found it in the tields of the
wood. " "♦ In which, as the prophet said :
"The righteous shall flourish as the palm-
tree, and shall be multipled as the cedar
which is in Libanus." 5 That wood which,
shaken in the tops of the trees spoken of
in prophecy, shed forth the nourishment of
the heavenly Word. That wood into which
Paul entered indeed as a ravening wolf, but
went forth as a shepherd, for " their sound
is gone out into all the earth." ^
109. We then were wild beasts, and there-
fore the Lord said : " Beware of false
prophets, which come in sheep's clothing,
but inwardly are ravening wolves." ^ But
now, through the Holy Spirit, the rage of
lions, the spots of leopards, the craft of
foxes, the rapacity of wolves, have passed
away from our feelings ; great, then, is the
grace which has changed earth to heaven,
that the conversation of us, who once were
wandering as wild beasts in the woods,
might be in heaven.^
' Acts X. 15. ? Tit. iii. 3-7. •'' Ps. Ixviii. flxvii.) 30.
■* Ps. cxxxii. Fcxxxi.] 6. •'' Ps. xcii. fxci.] iz.
'• Ps. xix. [xviii.] 4. ' S. Matt. vii. 15. * Phil. iii. 20.
OF THE HOLY SPIRIT.— BOOK II.
129
1 10. And not only in this place, but also
elsewhere in the same book, the Apostle Peter
declared that the Church was built by the
Holy Spirit. Por you read that he said :
"God, Which knoweth the hearts of men,
bare witness, giving- them the Holy Spirit,
even as also to us ; and He made no dis-
tinction between us and them, purifying
their hearts by faith.'' ' In which is to be
considered, that as Christ is the Corner-
stone, Who joined together both peoples
into one, so, too, the Holy Spirit made no
distinction between the hearts of each peo-
ple, but united them.
111. Do not, then, like a Jew, despise the
Son, Whom the prophets foretold ; for you
would despise also the Holy Spirit, you
would despise Isaiah, you would despise
Jeremiah, whom he who was chosen of the
Lord raised with rags and cords from the
pit of that Jewish abode.- For the people
of the Jews, despising the word of prophecy,
had cast him into the pit. Nor was there
found any one of the Jews to draw the
prophet out, but one Ethiopian Abdemelech,
as the Scripture testifies.
112. In which account is a very beauti-
ful figure, that is to say, that we, sinners
of the Gentiles, black beforehand through
our transgressions, and aforetime fruitless,
raised from the depth the word of prophecy
which the Jews had thrust down, as it were,
into the mire of their mind and carnality.
And therefore it is written : " Ethiopia
shall stretch out her hand unto God." ^ In
which is signified the appearance of holy
Church, who says in the Song of Songs :
" I am black and comely, O daughters of
Jerusalem ; " '^ black through sin, comely
through grace ; black by natural condition,
comely through redemption, or certainly,
black with the dust of her labours. So she
is black while fighting, is comely when
she is crowned with the ornaments of
victory.
113. And fittingly is the prophet raised
by cords, for the faithful writer said : ' ' The
lines are fallen unto me in pleasant places. "5
And fittingly with rags ; for the Lord Him-
self, when those who had been first invited
to the marriage made excuse, sent to the
partings of the highw^ays, that as many as
were found, both bad and good, should be
invited to the marriage. With these rags,
then, He lifted the word of prophecy from
the mire.
^ Acts XV. 8, 9.
^ Ps. Ixviii. llxvii.] 31.
* Ps. xvi. [xv.] 6.
* Jer. xxxviii. 11,
* Cant. i. 5.
CHAPTER XI.
We shall follow the example of Abdemelech, if we
believe that the Son and Holy Spirit know all things.
This knowledge is attributed in Scripture to the
Spirit, and also to the Son. The Son is glorified by
the Spirit, as also the Spirit by the Son. Also, inas-
much as we read that the Father, the Son, and the
Spirit say and reveal the same things, we must
acknowledge in Them a oneness of nature and
knowledge. Lastly, that the Spirit searcheth the deep
t/iiiigs of God is not a mark of ignorance, since the
Father and the Son are likewise said to search, and
Paul, although chosen by Christ, yet was taught by
the Spirit.
114. And you, too, shall be Abdemelech,'
that is, chosen by the Lord, if you raise the
Word of God from the depth of Gentile
ignorance ; if you believe that the Son of
God is not deceived, that nothing escapes
His knowledge, that He is not ignorant of
what is going to be. And the Holy Spirit
also is not deceived, of Whom the Lord
says : "But when He, the Spirit of Truth,
shall come, He shall lead you into all
truth." ^ He Who says all passes by no-
thing, neither the day nor the hour, neither
things past nor things to come.
115. And that you may know that He
both knows all things, and foretells things
to come, and that His knowledge is one
with that of the Father and the Son, hear
what the Truth of God says concerning
Him : " For He shall not speak from Him-
self, but what things He shall hear shall
He speak, and He shall declare unto you
the things that are to come." ^
116. Therefore, that you may observe
that He knows all things, when the Son
said : " But of that day and hour knoweth
no one, not even the Angels of heaven, ''4
He excepted the Holy Spirit. But if the
Holy Spirit is excepted from ignorance,
how is the Son of God not excepted .•*
117. But you say that He numbered the
Son of God also with the Angels. He
numbered the Son indeed, but He did not
number the Spirit also. Confess, then,
either that the Holy Spirit is greater than
the Son of God, so as to speak now not
only as an Arian, but even as a Photinian.s
or acknowledge to what you ought to refer
it that He said that the Son knew not.
For as man He could [in His human nature]
be numbered with creatures Who were
created.
' Ebedmelech means " servant of the king."
- S. John xvi. 13. ■' .S. John xvi. 13. * S. Mark xiii. 32.
° There is some little difficuhy in ascertaining exactly what w'ere
the tenets of Photinus, but it would appear that St. Ambrose con-
sidered that he held our Lord to be mere man, and so was worse
than the Arians. See Diet. Chr. Bioe^. art. " Photinus," and
Blunt, Diet, of Sects and Heresies, art. " Photinians."
I ^o
ST. AMBROSE.
1 1 8. But if you are willing to learn that
the Son of God knows all things, and has
foreknowledge of all, see that those very-
things which you think to be unknown to
the Son, the Holy Spirit received from the
Son. He received them, however, through
Unity of Substance, as the Son received
from the Father. "He," says He, "shall
glorify Me, for He shall receive of Mine and
shall declare it unto you. All things what-
soever the Father hath are Mine, therefore
said I, He shall receive of Mine, and shall
declare it unto you." ' What, then, is more
clear than this Unity ? What things the
Father hath pertain to the Son ; what things
the Son hath the Holy Spirit also has re-
ceived.
119. Yet learn that the Son knows the day
of judgment. We readin Zechariah : "And
the Lord my God shall come, and all the
saints with Him. In that day there shall
not be light, but cold and frost, and it shall
be one day, and that day is known unto the
Lord." 2 This day, then, was known unto
the Lord, Who shall come with His saints,
to enlighten us by His second Advent.
120. But let us continue the point which
we have commenced concerning the Spirit.
For in the passage we have brought forward
you find that the Son says of the Spirit :
"He shall glorify Me." So, then, the Spirit
glorifies the Son, as the Father also glorifies
Him, but the Son of God also glorifies the
Spirit, as we said above. He, then, is not
weak who is the cause of the mutual glory
through the Unity of the Eternal Light, nor
is He inferior to the Spirit, of Whom this is
true that He is glorified by the Spirit.
122. And you too shall be chosen, if you
believe that the Spirit spoke that which the
Father spoke, and which the Son spoke.
Paul, in fine, was therefore chosen because
he so believed and so taught, since, as it is
written, God "hath revealed to us by His
Spirit that which eye hath not seen, nor ear
heard, nor hath entered into the heart of
man, the things which God hath prepared
for them that love Him." 3 And therefore
is He called the Spirit of revelation, as you
read : " For God givcth to those who thus
prepare themselves the Spirit of wisdom and
revelation, that He may be known. "^
123. There is, then, a Unity of knowledge,
since, as the Father, Who gives the Spirit of
revelation, reveals, so also the Son reveals,
for it is written : "No one knoweth the Son
save the P'ather, neither doth any one know
1 S. John xvi. 14, 15.
^ I Cor. ii. 9, 10.
= Zech. xiv. 5, 6, 7 [LXX.].
* Isa. Ixiv. 4.
the Father save the Son, and he to whom
the Son shall will to reveal Him."' He
said more concerning the Son, not because
He has more than the Father, but lest He
should be supposed to have less. And not
unfittingly is the Father thus revealed by
the Son, for the Son knows the Father even
as the Father knows the Son.
124. Learn now that the Spirit too knows
God the Father, for it is written that, "As
no one knoweth the things of a man, save ■
the spirit which is in him, so too the things 1
of God no one knoweth save the Spirit of
God." "No one," he says, "knoweth
save the Spirit of God." ^ Is, then, the Son
of God excluded.? Certainly not, since
neither is the Spirit excluded, when it is
said : " And none knoweth the Father, save
the Son. "
125. Therefore the Father, Son, and Holy
Spirit are of one nature and of one know-
ledge. And the Spirit is not to be numbered
with all things which were made by the Son,
since He knew the Father, Whom (as it is
written) who can know save the Son ? But
the Holy Spirit knows also. What then ?
When the totality of created things is spoken
of, it follows that the Holy Spirit is not
included.
126. Now I should like them to answer
what it is in man which knows the things
of a man. Certainly that must be reason-
able which surpasses the other powers of
the soul, and by which the highest nature
of man is estimated. What, then, is the
Spirit, Who knows the deep things of God,
and through Whom Almighty God is re-
vealed .'' Is He inferior in the fulness of the
Godhead Who is proved even by this in-
stance to be of one substance with the
Father.? Or is He ignorant of anything
Who knows the counsels of God, and His
mysteries which have been hidden ^ from the
beginning.? What is there that He knows
not Who knows all things that are of God .?
For "the Spirit searcheth even the deep
things of God."-*
127. But lest you should think that He
searches things unknown, and so searches
that He may learn that which He knows
not, it is stated first that God revealed them
to us through His Spirit, and at the same
time in order that you may learn that the
Spirit knows the things which are revealed
to us through the Spirit Himself, it is said
subsequently: "For who among men
knoweth the things of a man, save the
' S. Matt. xi. 27.
'' 1 Cor. ii. lo.
I Cor. ii. II.
I Cor. ii. 7 ff.
OF THE HOLY SPIRIT.— BOOK II.
131
spirit of the man which is in him ? so, too,
the things of God knoweth no one save the
Spirit ofGod." ■ If, then, the spirit of a man
knows the things of a man, and knows them
before it searches, can there be anything of
God which the Spirit of God knows not ?
Of Whom the Apostle said not without a
purpose, "The things of God knoweth no
one, save the Spirit of God ; " not that He
knows by searching, but knows by nature ;
not that the knowledge of divine things is
an accident in Him, but is His natural
knowledge.
128. But if this moves you that He said
"searcheth," learn that this is also said of
God, inasmuch as He is the searcher of
hearts and reins. For Himself said : "I am
He that searcheth the heart and reins. " ^
And of the Son of God you have also in the
Epistle to the Hebrews: "Who is the
Searcher of the mind and thoughts." ^
Whence it is clear that no inferior searches
the inward things of his superior, for to know
hidden things is of the divine power alone.
The Holy Spirit, then, is a searcher in like
manner as the Father, and the Son is a
searcher in like manner, by the proper sig-
nification of which expression this is implied,
that evidently there is nothing which He
knows not. Whom nothing escapes.
129. Lastly, he was chosen by Christ, and
taught by the Spirit. For as he himself
witnesses, having obtained through the
Spirit knowledge of the divine secrets, he
shows both that the Holy Spirit knows God,
and has revealed to us the things which are
of God, as the Son also has revealed them.
And he adds: "But we received, not the
spirit of this world, but the Spirit which is of
God, that we might know the things that
are given to us by God, which we also
speak, not in persuasive words of man's
wisdom, but in manifestation of the Spirit
and in the power of God." ■*
CHAPTER XII.
After proof that the Spirit is the Giver of revelation
equally with the Father and the Son, it is explained
how the same Spirit does not speak of Himself; and it
is shown that no bodily organs are to be thought of in
Him, and that no inferiority is to be supposed from
the fact of our reading that He hears, since the same
would have to be attributed to the Son, and indeed
even to the Father, since He hears the Son. The
Spirit then hears and glorifies the Son in the sense
that He revealed Him to the prophets and apostles,
by which the Unity of operation of the Three Persons
is inferred ; and, since the Spirit does the same works
as the Father, the substance of each is also declared
to be the same.
130. It has then been proved that like as
God has revealed to us the things which are
His, so too the Son, and so too the Spirit,
has revealed the things of God. For our
knowledge proceeds from one Spirit, through
one Son to one Father ; and from one Father
through one Son to one Holy Spirit is de-
livered eoodness and sanctification and the
sovereign right of eternal power. Where,
then, there is a manifestation of the Spirit,
there is the power of God, nor can there be
any distinction where the work is one.
And therefore that which the Son says the
Father also says, and that which the Father
says the Son also says, and that which the
Father and the Son say the Holy Spirit
also says.
131. Whence also the Son of God said
concerning the Holy Spirit : " He shall not
speak from Himself," ' that is, not without
the participation of the Father and Myself
For the Spirit is not divided and separated,
but speaks what He hears. He hears, that
is to say, by unity of substance and by the
property of knowledge. For He receives
not hearing by any orifices of the body,
nor does the divine voice resound with any
carnal measures, nor does He hear what He
knows not ; since commonly in human mat-
ters hearing produces knowledge, and yet
not even in men themselves is there always
bodily speech or fleshly hearing. For "he
that speaketh in tongues," it is said, "speak-
eth not to men but to God, for no one hear-
eth, but in the Spirit he speaketh mysteries. " ^
132. Therefore if in men hearing is not
always of the body, do you require in God
the voices of man's weakness, and certain
organs of fleshly hearing, when He is said
to hear in order that we may believe that
He knows ? For we know that which we
have heard, and we hear beforehand that we
may be able to know ; but in God Who
knows all things knowledge goes before
hearing. So in order to state that the Son
is not ignorant of what the Father wills, we
say that He has heard ; but in God there is
no sound nor syllable, such as usually sig-
nify the indication of the will ; but oneness
of will is comprehended in hidden ways in
God, but in us is shown by signs.
133. What means, then, "He shall not
speak from Himself".? This is. He shall
not speak without Me ; for He speaks the
' I Cor. ii. II. ' Jer. xvii.
Heb.
12. * I Cor. ii. 12 13.
^ S. John xvl. 13.
I Cor. xiv. 2.
132
ST. AMBROSE.
truth, He breathes wisdom. He speaks not
without the Father, for He is the Spirit of
God ; He hears not from Himself, for all
things are of God.
134. The Son received all thinijs from the
Father, for He Himself said: "All thinj^s
have been delivered unto Me from My
Father. " ' All that is the Father's the Son
also has, for He says again : "All things
which the Father hath are INIine."^ And
those things which He Himself received by
Unity of nature, the Spirit by the same
Unity of nature received also from Him, as
the Lord Jesus Himself declares, when
speaking of His Spirit: "Therefore said I,
He shall receive of Mine and shall declare it
unto you. "^ Therefore what the Spirit says
is the Son's, what the Son hath given is the
Father's. So neither the Son nor the Spirit
speaks anything of Himself For the Trinity
speaks nothing external to Itself
135. But if you contend that this is an
argument for the weakness of the Holy
Spirit, and for a kind of likeness to the low-
liness of the body, you will also make it an
argument to the injury of the Son, because
the Son said of Himself: "As I hear I
judge, "4 and " The Son can do nothing else
than what He seeth the Father doing. "5 For
if that be true, as it is, which the Son
said : "All things which the Father hath
are INIine,"'' and the Son according to the
Godhead is One with the Father, One by
natural substance, not according to the
Sabellian 7 falsehood ; that which is one
by the property of substance certainly cannot
be separated, and so the Son cannot do
anything except what He has heard of the
Father, for the Word of God endures for-
ever,^ nor is the Father ever separated from
the operation of the Son ; and that which
the Son works He knows that the Father
wills, and what the Father wills the Son
knows how to work.
136. Lastly, that one may not think that
there is any difference of work either in time
or in order between the Father and the Son,
but may believe the oneness of the same
operation, He says: "The works which I
do He doeth. "9 And again, that one may
not think that there is any difference in the
distinction of the works, but may judge that
the will, the working, and the power of the
Father and the Son are the same. Wisdom
1 S. Matt. xi. 27. 2 S. John xv. 15. ' S. John xv. 15.
* S. John V. ^o. ^ S. John v.' 19. " S. John xvi. 15.
' Sabelhanism denied the doctrine of the Trinity, maintaining tliat
God is One Person only, manifesting Himself in llirce characters.
See Did. Clir. Biog. art. " Sabellius^" and Blunt, Diet 0/ Sects, etc.
* Ps. cxix. [cxviii.) 89.
" Either S. John v. 17 modified, or a reminiscence of v. 19.
says concerning the Father : "For whatso-
ever things He doeth, the Son likewise doeth
the same. "' ' So that the action of neither
Person is before or after that of the Other, but
the same result of one operation. And for
this reason the Son says that He can do noth-
ing of Himself, because His operation cannot
be separated from that of the Father. In
like manner the operation of the Holy Spirit
is not separated. Whence also the things
which He speaks, He is said to hear from
the Father.
137. What if I demonstrate that the
Father also hears the Son, as the Son too
hears the Father.? For you have it written
in the Gospel that the Son says : " Father,
I thank Thee that Thou heardest Me."^
How did the Father hear the Son, since in
the previous passage concerning Lazarus
the Son spoke nothing to the Father.'' And
that we might not think that the Son was
heard once by the Father, He added : "And
I knew that Thou hearest Me always. "3
Therefore the hearing is not that of subject
obedience, but of eternal L'nity.
138. In like manner, then, the Spirit is said
to hear from the Father, and to glorify the
Son. To glorify, because the Holy Spirit
taught us that the Son is the Image of the
invisible God,* and the brightness of His
glory, and the impress of His substance. 5
The Spirit also spoke in the patriarchs and
the prophets, and, lastly, the apostles began
then to be more perfect after that they had
received the Holy Spirit. There is therefore
no separation of the divine power and grace,
for although ' ' there are diversities of gifts,
yet it is the same Spirit^- and diversities of
ministrations, yet the same Lord ; and
diversities of operations, yet the same God
Who worketh all in all.'"*' There are diver-
sities of offices, not severances of the Trinity.
139. Lastly, it is the same God Who work-
eth all in all, that you may know that there
is no diversity of operation between God the
Father and the Holy Spirit ; since those
things which the Spirit works, God the
Father also works, "Who worketh all in
all." For while God the Father worketh all
in all, yet "to one is given through the
Spirit the word of wisdom ; to another the
word of knowledge, according to the same
Spirit ; to another faith, in the same Spirit ;
to another the gift of healings, in the one
Spirit ; to another the working of miracles ;
to another prophecy : to another discerning
of spirits ; to another divers kinds of
S. JollM V
Cul. i. 15.
'9-
° S. JoliM xi. 41.
* Heb. i. 3.
•'' S. Jolm .xi. 42.
"' 1 Cor. xii. 4, 5, 6.
OF THE HOLY SPIRIT. ROOK II.
133
tongues ; to another the interpretation of
sayings : but all these workcth one and
the same Spirit, dividing to each one as He
will." ■
140. There is then no doubt but that those
things which the Father workcth, the Spirit
worketh also. Nor does He work in ac-
cordance with a command, as he who hears
in bodily fashion, but voluntarily, as being
free in His own will, not the servant of the
power of another. For He docs not obey as
being bidden, but as the giver He is the
controller of His own gifts.
141. Consider meanwhile whether you
can say that the Spirit effects all things
which the Father effects ; for you cannot
deny that the Father effects those things
which the Holy Spirit effects ; otherwise the
Father does not effect all things, if He
effects not those things which the Spirit also
effects. But if the Father also effects those
things which the Spirit effects, since the
Spirit divides His operations, according to
His own will, you must of necessity say,
either that what the Spirit divides He
divides according to His own will, against
the will of God the Father ; or if you say
that the Father wills the same that the Holy
Spirit wills, you must of necessity confess
the oneness of the divine will and opera-
tion, even if you do it unwillingly, and, if
not with the heart, at least with the mouth.
142. But if the Holy Spirit is of one will
and operation with God the Father, He is
also of one substance, since the Creator is
known by His works. So, then, it is the same
Spirit, he says, the same Lord, the same God. ^
And if you say Spirit, He is the same ; and
if you say Lord, He is the same ; and if you
say God, He is the same. Not the same, so
that Himself is Father, Himself Son, Him-
self Spirit [one and the selfsame Person];
but because both the Father and the Son are
the same Power. He is, then, the same in
substance and in power, for there is not in
the Godhead either the confusion of Sabel-
lius nor the division of Arius, nor any
earthly and bodily change.
CHAPTER XIH.
Prophecy was not only from the Father and the Son,
but also from the Spirit ; the authority and operation
of the latter on the apostles is signified to be the same
as Theirs ; and so we are to understand that there
is unity in the three points of authority, rule, and
bounty ; yet need no disadvantage be feared from
that participation, since such does not arise in human
friendship. Lastly, it is established that this is the
inheritance of the apostolic faith from the f ict that
the apostles are described as having obeyed the Holy
Spirit.
143. Take, O sacred Emperor, another
strong instance in this question, and one
known to you : "In many ways and in
divers manners, God spake to the fathers in
the prophets."' And the Wisdom of God
said : "I will send prophets and apostles."^
And "To one is given,' as it is written,
"through the Spirit, the word of wisdom ; to
another, the word of knowledge, according
to the same Spirit ; to another faith, in the
same Spirit ; to another, the gift of healings,
in the one Spirit ; to another, the working of
miracles; to another, prophecy. "^ There-
fore, according to the Apostle, prophecy is
not only through the Father and the Son,
but also through the Holy Spirit, and there-
fore the office is one, and the grace one.
So you find that the Spirit also is the author
of prophecies.
144. The apostles also said : " It seemed
good to the Holy Spirit and to us." 4 And
when they say, "It seemed good," they
point out not only the Worker of the grace,
but also the Author of the carrying out of
that which was commanded. For as we
read of God : "It pleased God;" so, too,
when it is said that, " It seemed good to the
Holy Spirit," one who is master of his own
power is portrayed.
145. And how should He not be a master
Who speaks what He wills, and commands
what He wills, as the Father commands and
the Son commands ? For as Paul heard
the voice saying to him, " I am Jesus,
Whom thou persecutest," s so, too, the Spirit
forbade Paul and Silas to go into Bithynia.
And as the Father spake through the pro-
phets, so, too, Agabus says concerning the
Spirit : " Thus saith the Holy Spirit, Thus
shall the Jews in Jerusalem bind the man.
whose is this girdle. " ^ And as Wisdom sent
the apostles, saying, "Go ye into all the
world and preach the Gospel," 7 so, too, the
Holy Spirit says: "Separate Me Barnabas
and Saul for the work whereunto I have
called them."^ And so being sent forth by
the Holy Spirit, as the Scripture points out
farther on, they were distinguished in no-
thing from the other apostles, as though they
were sent in one way by God the Father, in
another way by Spirit.
146. Lastly, Paul having been sent by
the Spirit, was both a vessel of election on
1 I Cor. xii. S ff.
Cor. xii. 5.
1 Heb. i. I. * S. Luke xi. 49.
* Acts XV. 28. ^ Acts ix. 5.
' S. Mark xvi. :;.
* I Cor. xii. 8, 9, 10.
" Acts x-xi. II.
* Acts xiii. 2.
134
ST. AMBROSE.
Christ's part, and himself relates that God
wrought in him, saying: "For He that
wrought for Peter unto the apostleship of
the circumcision, wrought for me also unto
the Gentiles.'" ' Since, then, the Same
wrought in Paul Who wrought in Peter, it
is certainly evident that, since the Spirit
wrought in Paul, the Holy Spirit wrought
also in Peter. But Peter himself testifies
that God the Father wrought in him, as it is
stated in the Acts of the Apostles that Peter
rose up and said to them: "Men and
brethren, ye know that a good while ago
God made choice amongst us that the Gen-
tiles should hear the word of the Gospel
from my mouth." See, then, in Peter God
wrought the grace of preaching. And who
would dare to deny the operation of Christ
in him, since he was certainly elected and
chosen by Christ, when the Lord said :
"Feed My lambs. "^
147. The operation, then, of the Father, the
Son, and the Holy Spirit is one, unless per-
chance you, who deny the oneness of the
same operation upon the Apostle, think
this ; that the Father and the Spirit wrought
in Peter, in whom the Son had wrought, as
if the operation of the Son by no means suf-
ficed for him to the attainment of the grace.
And so the strength of the Father, of the
Son, and of the Holy Spirit being as it were
joined and brought together, the work was
manifold, lest the operation of Christ alone
should be too weak to establish Peter.
148. And not only in Peter is there found
to be one operation of the Father, the Son,
and the Holy Spirit, but also in all the
apostles the unity of the divine operation,
and a certain authority over the dispensa-
tions of heaven. For the divine operation
works by the power of a command, not in
the execution of a ministry ; for God, when
He works, does not fashion anything by
toil or art, but " He spake and they were
made. "3 He said, " Let there be light, and
there was light,"'* for the effecting of the
work is comprised in the commandment of
God.
149. We can, then, easily find, if we will
consider, that this royal power is by the wit-
ness of the Scriptures attributed to the Holy
Spirit ; and it will be made clear that all the
apostles were not only disciples of Christ,
but also ministers of the Father, the Son,
and the Holy Spirit. As also the teacher of
the Gentiles tells us, when he says : "God
hath set some in the Church, first apostles.
1 Gal. ii. R.
" Ps. xxxiii. [xx.xii.] 9.
* S. John xxi. 15.
* Gen. i. 3.
secondarily prophets, thirdly teachers ; then
miracles, the gift of healings, helps, govern-
ments, divers kinds of tongues." '
150. See, God set apostles, and set
prophets and teachers, gave the gift of heal-
ings, which you find above to be given by
the Holy Spirit ; gave divers kinds of
tongues. But yet all are not apostles, all
are not prophets, all are not teachers. Not
all, says he, have the gift of healings, nor
do all, says he, speak with tongues.^ For
the whole of the divine gifts cannot exist in
each several man ; each, according to his
capacity, receives that which he either desires
or deserves. But the power of the Trinity,
which is lavish of all graces, is not like this
weakness.
151. Lastly, God set apostles. Those
whom God set in the Church, Christ chose
and ordained to be apostles, and sent them
into the world, saying : "Go ye into all the
world, and preach the Gospel to the whole
creation. He that shall believe and be bap-
tized shall be saved, but he that believeth
not shall be damned. And these signs shall
follow them that believe. In My Name
shall they cast out devils, they shall speak
with new tongues, they shall take up ser-
pents, and if they shall drink any deadly
thing, it shall not hurt them, they shall lay
hands on the sick, and they shall recover. '"3
You see the Father and Christ also set
teachers in the Churches ; and as the Father
gives the gift of healings, so, too, does the
Son give ; as the Father gives the gift of
tongues, so, too, has the Son also granted it.
152. In like manner we have heard also
above concerning the Holy Spirit, that He
too grants the same kinds of graces. For
it is said: "To one is given through the
Spirit the gift of healings, to another divers
kinds of tongues, to another prophecy. "*
So, then, the Spirit gives the same gifts as
the Father, and the Son also gives them.
Let us now learn more expressly vv^hat we
have touched upon above, that the Holy
Spirit entrusts the same office as the Father
and the Son, and appoints the same persons ;
since Paul said : "Take heed to yourselves,
and to all the flock in the which the Holy
Spirit has made you overseers to rule the
Church of God. " 5
1 53. There is, then, unity of authority, unity
of appointment, unity of giving. For if you
separate appointment and power, what cause
was there [for maintaining] that those whom
Christ appointed as apostles, God the Father
' I Cor. xii. 28. 2 I Cor. xii. 30.
* I Cor. xii. 8, g.
' S. Mark xvi. 15 ff.
'' Acts XX. 28.
OF THE HOLY SPIRIT.— BOOK III.
135
appointed, and the Holy Spirit appointed?
unless, perhaps, as if sharing a possession or
a right. They, like men, were afraid of legal
prejudice, and therefore the operation was
divided, and the authority distributed.
154. These things are narrow and ])altry,
even between men, who for the most part,
although they do not agree in action, yet
agree in will. So that a certain person being
asked what a friend is, answered, " A second
self." If, then, a man so defined a friend as
to say, he was a second self, that is to say,
through a oneness of love and good-will,
how much more ought we to esteem the
oneness of Majesty, in the Father, the Son,
and the Holy Ghost, when by the same
operation and divine power, either the
unity, or certainly that which is more, the
rauTorri';, as it is called in Greek, is ex-
pressed, for rauTo signifies "the same, " so
that the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit
have the same ; so that to have the same
will and the same power does not arise
from the affection of the will, but inheres
in the substance of the Trinity.
155. This is the inheritance of apostolic
faith and devotion, which one may observe
also in the Acts of the Apostles. Therefore
Paul and Barnabas obeyed the commands
of the Holy Spirit. And all the apostles
obeyed, and forthwith ordained those whom
the Spirit had ordered to be separated : " Sep-
arate Me,'' said He, "Barnabas and Saul." ■
Do you see the authority of Him Who com-
mands.'' Consider the merit of those who
obey.
156. Paul believed, and because he be-
lieved he cast off the zeal of a persecutor,
and gained a crown of righteousness. He
believed who used to make havoc of the
Churches ; but being converted to the faith,
he preached in the Spirit that which the
Spirit commanded. ' The Spirit anointed His
champion, and having shaken off the dust
of unbelief, presented him as an insuperable
conqueror of the unbelievers to various
assemblies of the ungodly, and trained him
by many sufferings for the prize of his high
calling in Christ Jesus.
157. Barnabas also believed, and obeyed
because he believed. Therefore, being
chosen by the authority of the Holy Spirit,
Which came on him abundantly, as a
special sign of his merits, he was not un-
worthy of so great a fellowship. For one
grace shone in these whom one Spirit had
chosen.
158. Nor was Paul inferior to Peter, though
the latter was the foundation of the Church,
and the former a wise builder knowing how
to make firm the footsteps of the nations
who believed ; Paul was not, I say, un-
worthy of the fellowship of the apostles, but
is easily comparable with the first, and
second to none. For he who knows not
that he is inferior makes himself equal.
BOOK III.
CHAPTER I.
Not only were the prophets and apostles sent by the
Spirit, but also the Son of God. This is proved
from Isaiah and the evangelists, and it is explained
why St. Luke wrote that the same Spirit descended
like a dove upon Christ and abode upon Him.
Next, after establishing this mission of Christ, the
writer infers that the Son is sent by the Father and
the Spirit, as the Spirit is by the Father and the
Son.
I. In the former book^ we have shown
by the clear evidence of the Scriptures that
the apostles and prophets were appointed,
the latter to prophesy, the former to preach
the Gospel, by the Holy Spirit in the same
way as by the Father and the Son ; now
we add what all will rightly wonder at, and
not be able to doubt, that the Spirit was
1 Acts xiii. 2.
-Bk. II. 12.
upon Christ ; and that as He sent the Spirit,
so the Spirit sent the Son of God. For the
Son of God says : "The Spirit of the Lord
is upon Me, because He hath anointed Me,
He hath sent Me to preach the Gospel to
the poor, to proclaim liberty to the captives,
and sight to the blind. "^ And having read
this from the Book of Isaiah, He says in
the Gospel: "To-day hath this Scripture
been fulfilled in your ears ; "^ that He might
point out that it was said of Himself.
2. Can we, then, wonder if the Spirit sent
both the prophets and the apostles, since
Christ said : "The Spirit of the Lord is upon
Me".? And rightly did He say "upon Me,"
because He was speaking as the Son
of Man. For as the Son of Man He
* Acts ix. 20.
^ S. Luke iv. 21
2 Isa. Ixi. I [LXX.].
136
ST. AMBROSE.
was anointed and sent to preach the
Gospel.
3. But if they believe not the Son, let
them hear the feather also saying that the
Spirit of the Lord is upon Christ. For He
says to John : " Upon whomsoever thou
shalt see the Spirit descending from heaven
and abiding upon Him, He it is Who bap-
tizeth with the Holy Spirit." ' God the
Father said this to John, and John heard
and saw and believed. He heard from
God, he saw in the Lord, he believed that
it was the Spirit Who was coming down
from heaven. For it was not a dove that
descended, but the Holy Spirit as a dove ;
for thus it is written : "I saw the Spirit
descending from heaven as a dove. '" ^
4. As John says that he saw, so, too,
wrote Mark ; Luke, however, added that the
Holy Spirit descended in a bodily form as a
dove ; you must not think that this was an
incarnation, but an appearance. He, then,
brought the appearance before him, that by
means of the appearance he might believe
who did not see the Spirit, and that by the
appearance He might manifest that He had
a share of the one honour in authority, the
one operation in the mystery, the one gift
in the bath, together with the Father and
the Son ; unless perchance we consider
Him in Whom the Lord was baptized too
weak for the servant to be baptized in Him.
5. And he said fittingly, "abiding upon
Him,'"^ because the Spirit inspired a saying
or acted upon the prophets as often as He
would, but abod^e always in Christ.
6. Nor, again, let it move you that he said
"upon Him,"' for he was speaking of the
Son of ,?klan, because he was baptized as the
Son of Man. For the Spirit is not upon
Christ, according to the Godhead, but in
Christ ; for, as the Father is in the Son, and
the Son in the Father, so the Spirit of God
and the Spirit of Christ is both in the Father
and in the Son, for He is the Spirit of His
mouth. For He Who is of God abides in
God, as it is written : "But we received not
the spirit of this world, but the Spirit which
is of God. "+ And He abides in Christ, Who
has received from Christ ; for it is written
again : " He shall take of Mine ;"'5 and
elsewhere : "The law of the Spirit of life
in Christ Jesus made me free from the law
of sin and death." ^ He is, then, not over
Christ according to the Godhead of Christ,
for the Trinity is not over Itself, but over
all thinsfs : It is not over Itself but in Itself.
1 S. John i. 33.
* I Cor. ii. 12.
- S. John i. 32.
'' S. John xvi. 14.
^ S. John i. 33.
" Rom. viii. 2.
7. Who, then, can doubt that the Spirit
sent the prophets and apostles, since the
Son of God says : "The Spirit of the Lord
is upon Me."' And elsewhere : "I am the
First, and I am also for ever, and Mine hand
hath founded the earth, and My right hand
hath established the heaven ; I will call
them and they shall stand up together, and
shall all be gathered together and shall
hear. Who hath declared these things to
them ? Because I loved thee I performed
thy pleasure against Babylon, that the seed
of the Chaldaeans might be taken away. I
have spoken, and I have called, I have
brought him and have made his way pros-
perous. Come unto Me and hear ye this.
From the beginning I have not spoken in
secret, I was there when those things were
done ; and now the Lord God hath sent Me
and His Spirit."^ Who is it Who says : The
Lord God hath sent Me and His Spirit, ex-
cept He Who came from the Father that He
might save sinners .'' And, as you hear, the
Spirit sent Him, lest when you hear that the
Son sends the Spirit, you should believe the
Spirit to be of inferior power.
8. So both the Father and the Spirit sent
the Son ; the Father sent Him, for it is writ-
ten : " But the Paraclete, the Holy Spirit,
Whom the Father will send in My Name." 3
The Son sent Him, for He said : "But
when the Paraclete is come, Whom I will
send unto vou from the Father, even the
Spirit of Truth." 4 If, then, the Son and the
Spirit send each other, as the Father sends,
there is no inferiority of subjection, but a
community of power.
CHAPTER II.
The Son and the Spirit are aUke given ; whence not
subjection but one Godhead is showTi by Its work-
9. A\u not only did the Father send the
Son, but also gave Him, as the Son Himself
gave Himself. For we read: "Grace to
you from God our Father and the Lordjesus
Christ, Who gave Himself for our sins."s
If they think that He was subject in that
He was sent, they cannot deny that it was
of grace that He was given. But He was
given by the Father, as Isaiah said : " Unto
us a Child is born, unto us a Son is given ;" ^
but He was given, I dare to say it, by the
Spirit also, Who was sent by the Spirit. For
since the prophet has not defined by whom
> S. Luke iv. i8.
' S. John XV. 26.
2 Isa, xlii. 12 ff. [LXX.].
^ Gal. i. 3, 4.
* S. John xiv. 26.
^ las. ix. 6.
OF THE HOLY SPIRIT.— BOOK III.
137
He was given, he shows that He was given
by the grace of the Trinity ; and inasmuch
as the Son Himself gave Himself, He could
not be subject to Himself according to His
Godhead. Therefore that He was given
■ could not be a sign of subjection in the
God-head.
10. But the Holy Spirit also was given, for
it is written : "I will ask the Father, and
He shall give you another Paraclete." ' And
the Apostle says : " Wherefore he that
despiseth these things despiseth not man
but God, Who hath given us His Holy
Spirit."'" Isaiah, too, shows that both the
Spirit and the Son are given: " Thus, "says he,
"saith the Lord God, Who made the heaven
and fashioned it. Who stablished the earth,
nnd the things which are in it, and giveth
breath to the people upon it, and the Spirit
to them that walk upon it." ^ And to the
Son ; "I am the Lord God, Who have called
Thee in righteousness, and will hold Thine
hand, and will strengthen Thee ; and I have
given Thee for a covenant of My people,
for a light of the Gentiles, to open the eyes
of the blind, to bring out of their fetters
those that are bound. "* Since, then, the
Son is both sent and given, and the Spirit
also is both sent and given, They have
assuredly a oneness of Godhead Who have a
oneness of action.
CHAPTER III.
The same Unity may also be recognized from the fact
that the Spirit is called Finger, and the Son Right
Hand; for the understanding of divine things is
assisted by the usage of human language. The tables
of the law were written by this Finger, and they
were afterwards broken, and the reason. Lastly,
Christ wrote with the same Finger ; yet we must not
admit any inferiority in the Spirit from this bodily
comparison.
II. So, too, the Spirit is also called the
Finger of God, because there is an indivis-
ible and inseparable communion between
the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.
For as the Scripture called the Son of God
the Right Hand of God, as it is said : " Thy
Right Hand, O Lord, is made glorious in
power. Thy Right Hand, O Lord, hath
dashed in pieces the enemy ; " 5 so the Holy
Spirit is called the Finger of God, as the
Lord Himself says : " But if I by the
Finger of God cast out devils."^ For in the
same place in another book of the Gospel
He named the Spirit of God, as you find:
' S. John xiv. i6.
* Isa. xlii. 6, 7.
I Thess. iv.
Ex. XV. 6.
^ Isa. xlii. 5.
^ S. Luke xi. 20.
"But if I by the Spirit of God cast out
devils." '
12. What, then, could have been said
to signify more expressly the luiity of the
Godhead, or of Its working, which Unity
is according to the Godhead of the Father,
or of the Son, or of the Holy Spirit, than that
we should understand that the fulness of
the eternal Godhead would seem to be
divided far more than this body of ours, if
any one were to sever the unity of Substance,
and multiply Its powers, whereas the etern-
ity of the same Godhead is one ?
13. For oftentimes it is convenient to
estimate from our own words those things
which are above us, and because we cannot
see those things we draw inferences from
those which we can see. " For the invisible
things of Him," says the Apostle, "from
the creation of the world are clearly seen,
being understood by those things which are
made."^ And he adds : "His eternal power
also and Godhead. '"^ Of which one thing
seems to be said of the Son, and another of
the Holy Spirit ; that in the same manner
as the Son is called the eternal Power of
the Father, so, also, the Spirit, because He
is divine, should be believed to be His
eternal Godhead. For the Son, too, because
He ever lives, is eternal life. This Finger,
then, of God is both eternal and divine.
For what is there belonging to God which
is not eternal and divine .''
14. With this Finger, as we read. God
wrote on those tables of stone which jMoses
received. For God did not with a finger of
flesh write the forms and portions of those
letters which we read, but gave the law by
His Spirit. And so the Apostle says : " For
the Law is spiritual, which, indeed, is writ-
ten not with ink, but with the Spirit of the
living God ; not in tables of stone, but on
fleshy tables of the heart."'* For if the
letter of the Apostle is written in the Spirit,
what hinders us from believing that the Law
of God was written not with ink, but with
the Spirit of God, which certainly does not
stain but enlightens the secret places of our
heart and mind ?
14. Now it was written on tables of
stone, because it was written in a type, but
the tables were first broken and cast out of
the hands of Moses, because the Jews fell
away from the works of the prophet. And
fitly were the tables broken, not the writing
erased. And do you see that your table be
not broken, that your mind and soul be not
' S. Matt. xii. 28.
" Rom. i. 20.
^ Rom. i. 20.
* 2 Cor. iii. 3.
138
ST. AMBROSE.
divided. Is Christ divided .-' He is not
divided, but is one with the Father ; and let
no one separate you from Him. If your
faith fails, the table of your heart is broken.
The coherence of your soul is lessened if
you do not believe the unity of Godhead in
the Trinity. Your faith is written, and
your sin is written, as Jeremiah said : " Thy
sin, O Judah, is written with a pen of iron
and the point of a diamond. And it is
written," he says, "on thy breast and on
thy heart."' The sin, therefore, is there
where grace is, but the sin is written with a
pen, grace is denoted by the Spirit.
15. With this Finger, also, the Lord Jesus,
with bowed head, mystically wrote on the
ground, when the adulteress was brought
before Him by the Jews, signifying in a
figure that, when we judge of the sins of
another, we ought to remember our own.
16. And lest, a^ain, because God wrote
the Law by His Spirit, we should believe
any inferiority, as it were, concerning the
ministry of the Spirit, or from the considera-
tion of our own body should think the Spirit
to be a small part of God, the Apostle
says, elsewhere, that he does not speak with
words of human wisdom, but in words
taught by the Spirit, and that he compares
spiritual things with spiritual ; but that the
natural man receiveth not the things which
pertain to the Spirit of God.- For he knew
that he who compared divine with carnal
things was amongst natural things, and not
to be reckoned amongst spiritual men ; " for
they are foolishness, " he says, ' ' unto him. " 3
And so, because he knew that these ques-
tions would arise amongst natural men,
foreseeing the future he says: "For who
hath known the mind of the Lord, that he
may instruct Him ? But we have the
mind of Christ." 'f
CHAPTER IV.
To those who contend that the Spirit because He is
called the Finger is less than the Father, St. Am-
brose replies that this would also tend to the lessen-
ing of the Son, Who is called the Right Hand. That
these names are to be referred only to the Unity,
for which reason Moses proclaimed that the whole
Trinity worked in the passage of the Red Sea. And,
indeed, it is no wonder that the operation of the
Spirit found place there, where there was a figure of
baptism, since the Scripture teaches that the Three
Persons equally sanctify and are operative in that
sacrament.
17. But if any one is still entangled in
carnal doubts, and hesitates because of
^ Jer. xvii. i.
•* I Cor. ii. 13, 14.
^ I Cor. ii. 13, 14.
* I Cor. ii. 16.
bodily figures, let him consider that he can-
not think rightly of the Son who can think
wrongly of the Spirit. For if some think
that the Spirit is a certain small portion of
God, because He is called the Finger of
God, the same persons must certainly main-
tain that a small portion only is in the Son
of God, because He is called the Right Hand
of God.
18. But the Son is called both the Right
Hand and the Power of God ; if, then, we
consider our words, there can be no per-
fection without power ; let them therefore
take care lest they think that which it is im-
pious to say, namely, that the Father being
but half perfect in His own Substance re-
ceived perfection through the Son, and let
them cease to deny that the Son is co-eternal
with the Father. For when did the Power
of God not exist .'' But if they think that
at any time the Power of God existed not,
they will say that at some time Perfection
existed not in God the Father, to Whom they
think that Power was at some time wanting.
19. But, as I said, these things are written
that we may refer them to the Unity of the
Godhead, and believe that which the Apos-
tle said, that the fulness of the Godhead
dwells bodily in Christ, ' which dwells also
in the Father, and dwells in the Holy Spirit ;
and that, as there is a unity of the Godhead,
so also is there a unity of operation.
20. And this may also be gathered from
the Song of Moses, for he, after leading the
people of the Jews through the sea, ac-
knowledged the operation of the Father, the
Son, and the Holy Spirit, saying: "Thy
Right Hand, O Lord, is glorious in power,
Thy Right Hand, O Lord, hath dashed in
pieces the enemy. "^ Here you have his
confession of the Son and of the Father,
Whose Right Hand He is. And farther on,
not to pass by the Holy Spirit, He added :
"Thou didst send Thy Spirit and the sea
covered them, and the water was divided by
the Spirit of Thine anger. "3 By which is
signified the unity of the Godhead, not an
inequality of the Trinity.
21. You see, then, that the Holy Spirit also
co-operated with the Father and the Son, so
that just as if the waves were congealed in
the midst of the sea, a wall as it were of
water rose up for the passage of the Jews,
and then, poured back again by the Spirit,
overwhelmed the people of the Egyptians.
And many think that from the same origin
the pillar of cloud went before the people of
the Jews by day, and the pillar of fire by
Col. ii. g.
* Ex. XV. 6.
* Ex. XV. 10.
OF THE HOLY SPIRIT.— BOOK III.
139
night, that the grace of the Spirit might
protect His people.
22. Now that this operation of God. which
the whole world rightly wonders at, did not
take place without the work of the Holy
Spirit, the Apostle also declared when he
said that the truth of a spiritual mystery was
prefigured in it, for we read as follows :
■ • For our fathers were all under the cloud,
and all passed through the sea, and were all
baptized in IMoses in the cloud and in the
sea, and did all eat the same spiritual meat,
and did all drink the same spiritual drink." '
23. For how without the operation of the
Holy Spirit could there be the type of a
sacrament, the whole truth of which is in
the Spirit ? As the Apostle also set forth,
saying : "But ye were washed, but ye were
sanctified, but ye were justified in the Name
of our Lord Jesus Christ, and in the Spirit of
our God." ^
24. You see, then, that the Father works
in the Son, and that the Son works in the
Spirit. And therefore do not doubt that,
according to the order of Scripture, there was
in the figure that which the Truth Himself
declared to be in the truth. For who can
deny His operation in the Font, in which we
feel His operation and grace ?
25. For as the Father sanctifies, so, too,
the Son sanctifies, and the Holy Spirit sanc-
tifies. The Father sanctifies according to
that which is written : ' ' The God of peace
sanctify you, and may your spirit, soul, and
body be preserved entire without blame in
the day of our Lord Jesus Christ. " 3 And
elsewhere the Son says: "Father, sanctify
them in the truth. " ■♦
26. But of the Son the same Apostle said :
"Who was made unto us wisdom from
God, and righteousness, and sanctification,
and redemption. " s Do you see that He was
made sanctification ? But He was made so
unto us, not that He should change that
which He was, but that He might sanctify
us in the flesh.
27. And the Apostle also teaches that the
Holy Spirit sanctifies. For he speaks thus :
" We are bound to give thanks to God
always for you, brethren dearly beloved of
the Lord ; because God chose you as first-
fruits unto salvation, in sanctification of the
Spirit, and belief of the truth." ^
28. So, then, the Father sanctifies, the Son
also sanctifies, and the Holy Spirit sanctifies ;
but the sanctification is one, for baptism is
one, and the grace of the sacrament is one.
CHAPTER V.
The writer su.ns up the argument he had commenced,
and confirms the .statement that unity is signified by
the terms finger and riglu hand, from the fact that
the works of Cod are the same as are the works of
hands ; and that those of hands are the same as
those of fingers ; and lastly, that the term hand
applies equally to the Son and the Spirit, and that
of finger applies to the Spirit and the Son.
29. But what wonder is it if He Who
Himself needs no sanctification, but abounds
therewith, sanctifies each man ; since, as I
said, we have been taught that His Majesty
is so great, that the Holy Spirit seems to be
as inseparable from God the Father as the
finger is from the body .''
30. But if any one thinks that this should
be referred not to the oneness of power, but
to its lessening, he indeed will fall into such
madness as to appear to fashion the Father,
Son, and Holy Spirit as it were into one
bodily form, and to picture to himself certain
distinctions of its members.
31. But let them learn, as I have often
said, that not inequality but unity of power
is signified by this testimony ; inasmuch as
things which are the works of God are also
the works of hands, and we read that the
same are the works of fingers. For it is
written : " The heavens declare the glory of
God, and the firmament showeth the work
of His hands ;"^ and elsewhere: "In the
beginning Thou didst found the earth, O
Lord ; and the heavens are the works of
Thy hands. "^ So, then, the works of the
hands are the same as the works of God.
There is not therefore any distinction of the
work according to the kind of bodily mem-
bers, but a oneness of power.
32. But those which are the works of the
hands are also the works of the fingers, for
it is equally written: "For I will behold
Thy heavens, the works of Thy fingers, the
moon, and the stars, which Thou hast
established." 3 What less are the fingers
here said to have made than the hands,
since they made the same as the hands, as
it is written : " For Thou, Lord, hast made
me glad through Thy work, and in the
works of Thy hands will I rejoice. "4
^2. And yet since we read that the Son
is the hand (for it is written : " Hath not
My Hand made all these things ? " s and else-
where : " I will place thee in the cleft of the
rock, and I will cover thee with Mine hand,
I have placed My hand under the covering
of the rock," ^ which refers to the mystery of
* I Cor. X. I, 2, 3, 4.
* S. John xvii. 17.
2 I Cor. vi. II
'' I Cor. i. 30.
^ I Thess. V. 23.
^ 2 Thess. ii. 13.
1 Ps. xix. [xviii.] i.
* Ps. xcii. [xci.] 4.
2 Ps. cii. [ci.] 26.
5 Isa. Ixvi. 2.
^ Ps. viii. 3.
" Ex. xxxiii. 22.
HO
ST. AMBROSE.
the Incarnation, because the eternal Power
of God took on Itself the covering of a body),
it is certainly clear that Scripture used the
term hand both of the Son and of the Holy
Spirit.
34. And again, since we read that the
Spirit is the finger of God, we think that
fingers [in the plural] are spoken of to
signify the Son and Spirit. Lastly, that he
may state that he received thesanctification
both of the Son and of the Spirit, a certain
saint says : " Thy hands have made me and
fashioned me. " '
CHAPTER VI.
The .Spirit rebukes just a.s do the Father and the Son ;
and indeed judges could not judge without Him, as
is shown by the judgments of Solomon and Daniel,
which are explained in a few words, by the way ; and
no other than the Holy Spirit inspired Daniel.
35. Why do we reject like words when
we assert the oneness of power, since the
oneness of power extends so far that the
Spirit rebukes, as the Father rebukes, and as
the Son rebukes. For so it is written : " O
Lord, rebuke me not in Thine anger, neither
chasten me in Thy displeasure."^ Then in
the forty-ninth [fiftieth] Psalm, the Lord
speaks thus : "I will rebuke thee, and will
set thy sins before thy face. "^ And in like
manner the Son said of the Holy Spirit :
" When I go away, I will send the Paraclete
to you. And He, when He is come, will
rebuke the world, concerning sin, and
concerning righteousness, and concerning
judgment.'' ■»
36. But whither is the madness of faithless
men leading us, so that we appear to be prov-
ing, as if it were a matter of doubt, that the
Holy Spirit rebukes, whereas judges them-
selves are unable to judge, except through
the Spirit. Lastly, that famous judgment
of Solomon, when, amongst the difficulties
arising from those who were contending,
as one, having overlain the child which she
had borne, wished to claim the child of an-
other, and the other was protecting her own
son, he both discovered deceit in the very
hidden thoughts, and affection in the
mother's heart, was certainly so admirable
only by the gift of the Holy Spirit. For no
other sword would have penetrated the
hidden feeling of those women, except the
sword of the Spirit, of which the Lord says :
" I am not come to send peace but a sword.'' s
' Ps. cxix. fcxviii.] 73.
* S. John xvi. 7, 8.
' Ps. vi. I.
3 Ps. 1. [xlix.J 21.
"^ S. Matt. X..34.
For the inmost mind cannot be penetrated _
by steel, but by the Spirit : ' ' For the Spirit %
of understanding is holy, one only, mani-
fold, subtle, lively," and, farther on, "over-
seeing all things.'"'
37. Consider what the prophet says, that
He oversees all things. And so Solomon
also oversaw, so that he ordered that sword
to be brought, because while pretending
that he intended to divide the infant, he re-
flected that the true mother would have
more regard for her son than for her comfort,
and would set kindness before right, not
right before kmdness. But that she who
feigned the feelings of a mother, blinded by
the desire of gaining her end, would think
little of the destruction of him in regard to
whom she felt no outgoing of tenderness.
And so that spiritual man, that he might
judge all things (for he that is spiritual
judgeth all things),- sought in the feelings
the natural disposition which was con-
cealed in the language, and questioned
tenderness that he migfht set forth the truth.
So the mother overcame by the affection of
love, which is a fruit of the Spirit.
38. He judges in a prophet, for the word
of wisdom is given by the Spirit ; ^ how,
then, do men deny that the Spirit can rebuke
the world concerning judgment, Who re-
moves doubt from judgment, and grants the
successful issue .''
39. Daniel also, unless he had received the
Spirit of God, would never have been able
to discover that lustful adultery, that fraudu-
lent lie. For when Susanna, assailed by the
conspiracy of the elders, saw that the mind of
the people was moved by consideration for
the old men, and destitute of all help, alone
amongst men, conscious of her chastity she
prayed God to judge ; it is written: "The
Lord heard her voice, when she was being
led to be put to death, and the Lord raised
up the Holy Spirit of a young youth, whose
name was Daniel. "^ And so according to
the grace of the Holy Spirit received by him,
he discovered the varying evidence of the
treacherous, for it was none other than the
operation of divine power, that his voice
should make them whose inward feelings
were concealed to be known.
41. Understand, then, the sacred and
heavenly miracle of the Holy Spirit. She
who preferred to be chaste in herself, rather
than in the 'opinion of the people, she who
preferred to hazard [the reputation of] her
innocence, rather than her modesty, who
* Wisd. vii. 22, 23. - I Cor.
■* Hist. .Sus. [Dan. iii.] 44, 45.
» I Cor. xii. 8.
OF THE HOLY SPIRIT.— BOOK III.
141
when she was accused was silent, when she
was condemed held her peace, content with
the judgment of her own conscience, who
preserved regard for her modesty even in
])cril, that they who were not able to force
lier chastity might not seem to have forced
her to petulance ; when she called upon the
Lord, she obtained the Spirit, Who made
known the hidden consciousness of the
elders.
42. Let the chaste learn not to dread
calumny. For she who preferred chastity
to life did not suffer the loss of life, and re-
tained the glory of chastity. So, too, Abra-
ham, once bidden to go to foreign lands,
and not being held back either by the dan-
ger to his wife's modesty, nor by the fear of
death before him, preserved both his own
life and his wife's chastity.' So no one
has ever repented of trusting God, and
chastity increased devotion in Sarah, and
devotion chastity.
43. And lest any one should perhaps
think that, as the Scripture says, "Godraised
up the Holy Spirit of a young youth," the
Spirit in him was that of a man, not the
Holy Spirit, let him read farther on, and he
will find that Daniel received the Holy
Spirit, and therefore prophesied. Lastly, too,
the king advanced him because he had the
grace of the Spirit. For he speaks thus :
"Thou, O Daniel, art able, forasmuch as
the Holy Spirit of God is in thee. "^ And
farther on it is written : "And Daniel was
set over them, because an excellent Spirit
was in him.'' ^ And the Spirit of Moses also
was distributed to those who were to be
judges.*
CHAPTER VH.
The Son Himself does not judge or punish without
the Spirit, so that the same Spirit is called the Sword
of the Word. But inasmuch as the Word is in turn
called the Sword of the Spirit, the highest unity of
power is thereby recognized in each.
44. But what should we say of the other
points ? We have heard that the Lord Jesus
not only judges in the Spirit but punishes
also. For neither would He punish Anti-
christ, whom, as we read, ''the Lord Jesus
shall slay with the Spirit of His mouth, "'5
unless He had before judged of his deserts.
Yet here is not a grace received, but the
unity remams undivided, since neither can
Christ be without the Spirit, nor the Spirit
* Gen. XX. i ff.
* Mum. xi. 25.
- Dan. V. 14.
•'' Dan. vi. 3.
" 2 Thess. ii. S.
without Christ. For the unity of the divine
naturecannot be divided.
45. And since that instance comes before
us, that the Lord Jesus shall slay with the
Spirit of His mouth, the Spirit is understood
to be as it were the Sword of the Word.
Lastly, in the Gospel also the Lord Jesus
Himself says: "I came not to send peace
but a sword." ' For Lie came that He
might give the Spirit ; and so there is in
His mouth a two-edged sword, ^ which is in
truth the grace of the Spirit. So the Spirit
is the Svv'ord of the Word.
46. And that you may know that there is
no inequality but unity of nature, the Word
also is the Sword of the Holy Spirit, for it is
written : " Taking the shield of faith, where-
with ye may be able to quench all the fiery
darts of the wicked one. And take the hel-
met of Salvation, and the sword of the Spirit,
which is the Word of God." ^
47. Since, then, the Sword of the Word is
the Holy Spirit, and the Sword of the Holy
Spirit is the W' ord of God, there is certainly
in Them oneness of power.
CHAPTER VIII.
The aforesaid unity is proved hereby, that as the
Father is said to be grieved and tempted, so too the
Son. The Son was also tempted in the wilderness,
where a figure of the cross was set up in the brazen
serpent : but the Apostle says that the Spirit also was
there tempted. St. Ambrose infers from this that the
Israelites were guided into the promised land by the
same Spirit, and that His will and power are one with
those of the Father and the Son.
48. And we may behold this unity also in
other passages of the Scriptures. For where-
as Ezekiel says to the people of the Jews :
"And thou hast grieved ^le in all these
things, saith the Lord ; " 4 Paul says to the
new people in his Epistle : "Grieve not the
Holy Spirit of God, in Whom ye were
sealed. " 5 Again, whereas Isaiah says of the
jews themselves : "But they believed not,
but grieved the Holy Spirit ; " '^ David says
of God : "They grieved the Most High'in
the desert, and tempted God in their hearts. " ?
49. Understand also that whereas Scrip-
ture in other places says that the Spirit was
tempted, and that God was tempted, it says
also that Christ was tempted ; for you have
the Apostle saying to the Corinthians :
"Neither let us tempt Christ, as some of
them tempted, and perished by serpents."^
' S. Matt. X. 34.
* Ezek. xvi. 43.
' Ps. Ixxviii. [ixvii.J 17, 18
^ Rev. xix. 15.
Eph. iv. 30.
^ Eph. vi. 16, 17.
* Isa. Ixiii. 10.
* I Cor. X. 9.
142
ST. AMBROSE.
4
Just was the punishment that the adver-
saries should feel the venom, who had not
venerated the Maker.
50. And well did the Lord ordain that by
the lifting up of the brazen serpent the
wounds of those who were bitten should be
healed ; for the brazen serpent is a type of
the Cross ; for although in His flesh Christ
was lifted up, yet in Him was the Apostle
crucified to the world and the world to him ;
for he says : "The world hath been cruci-
fied unto me, and I unto the world." ' "So
the world was crucified in its allurements,
and therefore not a real but a brazen ser-
pent was hanged ; because the Lord took on
Him the likeness of a sinner, in the truth,
indeed, of His Body, but without the truth of
sin, that imitating a serpent through the
deceitful appearance of human weakness,
having laid aside the slough of the flesh, He
might destroy the cunning of the true ser-
pent. And therefore in the Cross of the Lord,
which came to man's help in avenging
temptation, I, who accept the medicine of
the Trinity, recognize in the wicked the of-
fence against the Trinity.
51. Therefore when you find in the book
of Moses, that the Lord being tempted sent
serpents on the people of the Jews, it is
necessary that you either confess the Unity
of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit in the
Divine Majesty, or certainly when the writ-
ing of the Apostle says that the Spirit was
tempted, it undoubtedly pointed out the
Spirit by the name of Lord. But the Apos-
tle writing to the Hebrews says that the
Spirit was tempted, for you find this :
" Wherefore the Holy Ghost saith this : To-
day if ye shall hear His voice, harden not
your hearts, like as in the provocation in the
day of temptation in the wilderness, where
your fathers tempted Me, proved iNIe, and
saw My works. Forty years was I near to
this generation and said : They do alway
err in their heart ; but they did not know
My ways, as I sware in My wrath, If they
shall enter into JMy rest. '" ^
52. Therefore, according to the Apostle,
the Spirit was tempted. If He was tempted,
He also certainly was guiding the people of
the Jews into the land of promise, as it is
written: "For He led them through the
deep, as a horse through the wilderness, and
they laboured not, and like the cattle through
the plain. The Spirit came down from the
Lord and guided them." ^ And He certainly
ministered to them the calm rain of heaven-
ly food, He with fertile shower made fruitful
* Gal. vi. 14.
Heb. iii. 7-1 1.
^ Isa. Ixiii. 13, 14.
that daily harvest which earth had not J
brought forth, and husbandman had not "
sown.
53. Now let us look at these points one
by one. God had promised rest to the
Jews ; the Spirit calls that rest His. God the
Father relates that He was tempted by the
unbelieving, and the Spirit says that He was
tempted by the same, for the temptation is
one wherewith the one Godhead of the Trin-
ity was tempted by the unbelieving. God
condemns the people of the Jews, so that
they cannot attain to the land flowing with
milk and honey, that is, to the rest of the
resurrection ; and the Spirit condemns them
by the same decree: "If they shall enter
into My rest." It is, then, the decree of
one Will, the excellency of one Power.
CHAPTER IX.
That the Holy Spirit is provoked is proved by the
words of St. Peter, in which it is shown that the
Spirit of God is one and the same as the Spirit of
the Lord, both by other passages and by reference to
the sentence of the same Apostle on Ananias and
Sapphira, whence it is argued that the union of the
Holy Spirit with the Father and the Son, as well as
His own Godhead, is proved.
54. Perhaps, however, some one might
say that this passage cannot be specially
applied to the Holy Spirit, had not the same
Apostle Peter taught us in another place
that the Holy Ghost can be tempted by our
sins, for you find that the wife of Ananias is
thus addressed: " Why have ye agreed to-
gether to tempt the Spirit of the Lord ? " '
For the Spirit of the Lord is the very Spirit
of God ; for there is one Holy Spirit, as
also the Apostle Paul taught, saying : " But
ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if
so be that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you.
But if any man hath not the Spirit of Christ,
he is none of His. "^ He first mentioned
the Spirit of God and immediately adds tliat
the Same is the Spirit of Christ. And having
spoken of the Spirit, that we might under-
stand that where the Holy Spirit is there is
Christ, he added: "But if Christ be in
you. " 3
55. Then, in the same way as we here
understand that where the Spirit is there
also is Christ ; so also, elsewhere, he shows
that where Christ is, there also is the Holy
Spirit. For having said : "Do ye seek a
proof of Christ Who speaketh in me ? " •♦ he
says elsewhere : " For I think that I also
' .Acts V. 9.
■' Rom. viii. 10.
^ Rom. viii. 9.
* 2 Cor. xiii. 3.
OF THE HOLY SPIRIT.— BOOK TIL
143
have the Spirit of God." ' The Unity, then,
is inseparable, for by the testimony of
Scripture where either the Father or the Son
or the Holy Spirit is designated, there is all
the fulness of the Trinity.
56. But Peter himself in the instance we
have brought forward spoke first of the
Holy Spirit, and then called Him the Spirit
of the Lord, for you read as follows :
" Ananias, why hath Satan filled thine
heart to lie to the Holy Spirit, and to deal
fraudulently concerning the price of the
held .' While it remained did it not continue
thine own, and when sold was it not in thy
power ? Why hast thou conceived this
wickedness in thy heart ? Thou hast not
lied unto men but unto God." ^ And below
he says to the wife : " Why have ye agreed
together to tempt the Spirit of the Lord ? " 3
57. First, we understand that he called
the Holy Spirit the Spirit of the Lord. Then,
since he mentioned first the Holy Spirit and
added: "Thou hast not lied unto men but
unto God," you must necessarily either
understand the oneness of the Godhead in
the Holy Spirit, since when the Holy Spirit
is tempted a lie is told to God ; or, if you
endeavour to exclude the oneness of the
Godhead, you yourself according to the
words of Scripture certainly believe Him to
be God.
58. For if we understand that these ex-
pressions are used both of the Spirit and of
the Father, we certainly observe the unity
of truth and knowledge in God the Father
and the Holy Spirit, for falsehood is dis-
covered alike by the Holy .Spirit and by
God the Father. But if we have received
each truth concerning the Spirit, why do
you, faithless man, attempt to deny what
you read ? Confess, then, either the one-
ness of the Godhead of the Father, of the
Son, and of the Holy Spirit, or the Godhead
of the Holy Spirit. Whichever you say,
you will have said each in God, for both
the Unity upholds the Godhead and the
Godhead the Unity.
CHAPTER X.
The Divinity of the Holy Spirit is supported by a pas-
sage of St. John. This passage was, indeed, erased
by heretics, but it is a vain attempt, since their faith-
lessness could thereby more easily be convicted.
The order of the context is considered in order that
this passage may be shown to refer to the Spirit. He
is born of the Spirit who is born again of the same
Spirit, of Whom Christ Himself is believed to have
: Cor. vii. 40.
2 Acts V. 3, 4.
•' Acts V. 5.
been born and l)orn again. Again, the Godhead of
the Spirit is inferred from two testimonies of St.
John ; and lastly, it is explained how the Spirit, the
water, and the blood are called witnesses.
59. Nor does the Scripture in this place
alone bear witness to the Hiurrj-, that is, the
Godhead of the Holy Spirit ; but also the
Lord Himself said in the Gospel : " The
Spirit is God. '" ' Which passage you, Arians,
so expressly testify to be said concerning the
Spirit, that you remove it from your copies,*
and would that it were from yours and not
also from those of the Church ! For at the
time when Auxentius 3 had seized the Church
of Milan with the arms and forces of im-
pious unbelief, the Church of Sirmium 4 was
attacked by Valens and Ursatius, when their
priests [i.e. bishops] failed in faith ; this
falsehood and sacrilege of yours was found
in the ecclesiastical books. And it may
chance that you did the same in the past.
60. And you have indeed been able to
blot out the letters, but could not remove
the faith. That erasure betrayed you more,
that erasure condemned you more ; and
you were not able to obliterate the truth,
but that erasure blotted out your names
from the book of life. Why was the pas-
sage removed, " For God is a Spirit," if it
did not pertain to the Spirit } For if you
will have it that the expression is used of
God the Father, you, who think it should
be erased, deny, in consequence, God the
Father. Choose which you will, in each
the snare of your own impiety will bind
you if you confess yourselves to be heathen
by denying either the Father or the Spirit
to be God. Therefore your confession
wherein you have blotted out the Word of
God remains, while you fear the original.
61. You have blotted it out, indeed, in
your breasts and minds, but the Word of
^ S. John iii. 6. See below § 63, n. 4.
^ " The charge is an admirable illustration of the groundlessness
of such accusations of wilful corruption of Scripture. The words
in question have no Greek authority at all, and are obviously a com-
ment." Westcott on S. John v. 6.
3 Auxentius, a Cappadocian, was ordained priest a.d. 343 by
Gregory, the violent opponent of St. Athanasius. After the synod
of Milan a.d. 355, when the bishop of that see, Dionysius, having
refused to renounce Athanasius and the Nicene faith, was banished,
Auxentius was forcibly intruded as bishop, and, in spite of the
efforts of St. Hilary of Poitiers and other Catholics, .maintained his
position till his death in 374.
* The reference must be to the synods of Sirmium. In one held
A.D. 351, against Photinus, there was a great attempt to make the
semi-Arians appear orthodox, and St. Hilai-y accepted, while St.
."Athanasius rejected, their formula. Another synod was held a.d.
357, when the aged Hosius was tormented into accepting a formula,
called by St. Hilary the " .Sirmian blasphemy." Another, no less
injurious to the faith, was held in 35S, by the desire of Constantius.
During this time — but forgeries and the loss of some patristic writ-
ings make the history of the whole period somewhat uncertain — dates
the weakness of Liberius, so that St. Ambrose may well speak of
mda7ititnts sacerdotibus. See Hefele, Coiic. Geschichte, I. on the
Sirmian synods; Athanasius, Vol. IV. in this series, p. 464 ff. ;
Diet. Chr. Biog. III. 171, art. " Hosius; " Socrates, H. E ■, in this
series, Vol. II. pp. 56, 57, 58.
144
ST. AMBROSE.
God is not blotted out, the Holy Spirit is
not blotted out, but turns away from im-
pious minds ; not grace but iniquity is
blotted out ; for it is written : "I am He,
I am He that blot out thine iniquities." '
Lastly, Moses, making request for the peo-
ple, says : " Blot me out of Thy book, if
Thou sparest not this people." ^ And yet
he was not blotted out, because he had no
iniquity, but grace flowed forth.
62. You are, then, convicted b)'^ your own
confession that you cannot say it was done
with wisdom but with cunning. For by
cunning you know that you are convicted
by the evidence of that passage, and that
your arguments cannot apply against that
testimony. For whence else could the
meaning of that place be derived, since the
whole tenour of the passage is concerning
the Spirit ?
63. Nicodemus enquires aboiit regenera-
tion, and the Lord replies : "Verily, verily,
I say unto thee, except a man be born again
by water and the Spirit, he cannot enter
into the kingdom of God." 3 And that He
might show that there is one birth accord-
ing to the flesh, and another according to
the Spirit, He added : "That which is born
of the flesh is flesh, because it is born of the
flesh ; and that which is born of the Spirit
is Spirit, because the Spirit is God."' * Fol-
low out the whole course of the passage,
and you will find that God has shut out
your impiety by the fulness of His state-
ment : "Marvel not," says He, "that I
said. Ye must be born again. The Spirit
breatheth where He listeth, and thou hearest
His voice, but knowest not whence He
cometh or whither He goeth, so is every
one who is born of the Spirit." 5
64. Who is he who is born of the Spirit,
and is made Spirit, but he who is renewed
in the Spirit of his mind.'' ^ This certainly
is he who is regenerated by water and the
Holy Spirit, since we receive the hope of
eternal life through the laver of regeneration
and renewing of the Holy Spirit. 7 And
elsewhere the Apostle Peter says : "Ye
shall be baptized with the Holy Spirit."'^
For who is he that is baptized with the Holy
Spirit but he who is born again through
water and the Holy Spirit ? Therefore the
Lord said of the Holy Spirit, Verily, verily,
I say unto thee, except a man be born again
' Isa. xliii. 25. ^ p_x. xxxii. 32. ^ S. John iii. 5.
* S. John iii. 6. This is the full reading of the passage according
to St. Ambrose, referred to above in § 59. •"' S. John iii. 7, 8.
* Eph. iv. 23. ' Til. iii. 5. » Acts xi. 16.
by water and the Spirit, he cannot enter
into the kingdom of God. And therefore
He declared that we are born of Him in the
latter case, through Whom He said that we
were born in the former. This is the sen-
tence of the Lord ; I rest on what is written,
not on argument.
65. I ask, however, why, if there be no
doul)t that we are born again by the Holy
Spirit, there should be any doubt that we
are born of the Holy Spirit, since the Lord
Jesus Himself was both born and born
again of the Holy Spirit. And if you con-
fess that He was born of the Holy Spirit,'
because you are not able to deny it, but
deny that He was born again, it is great
folly to confess what is peculiar to God, and
deny what is common to men. And there-
fore that is well said to you which was said
to the Jews : " If I told you earthly things
and ye believe not, how shall ye believe if
I tell you heavenly things ? " '
66. And yet we find each passage so
written in Greek, that He said not, through
the Spirit, but of the Spirit. For it stands
thus : a/Ji5j'>, aiJ-r/y^ Xiyuj (tdc^ la.' /j.rj rf} ^ci/viji'/jj" t^
fiuaro'} y.ac Jlwsu/j.aTU'g, that is, o/" water and the
Spirit. Therefore, since one ought not to
doubt that "that which is born of the
Spirit" is written of the Holy Spii^it ; there
is no doubt but that the Holy Spirit also is
God, according to that which is written,
"the Spirit is God."
d']. But the same Evangelist, that he
might make it plain that he wrote this con-
cerning the Holy Spirit, says elsewhere :
"Jesus Christ came by water and blood,
not in the water only, but by water and
blood. And the Spirit beareth witness, be-
cause the Spirit is truth ; for there are three
witnesses, the Spirit, the water, an ^">e
blood ; and these three are one." -
68. Hear how they are witness
Spirit renews the mind, the water is st-
able for the laver, and the blood refers
the price. For the Spirit made us children
by adoption, the water of the sacred Font
washed us, the blood of the Lord redeemed
us. So we obtain one invisible and one
visible testimony in a spiritual sacrament,
for "the Spirit Himself beareth witness to
our spirit." 3 Though the fulness of the
sacrament be in each, yet there is a distinc-
tion of office; so where there is distinction
of office, there certainly is not equality of
witness.
^ S. John iii. 12.
^ I John V. 6, 7, 8. ^ Rom. viii. 16.
OF THE HOLY SPIRIT.— BOOK III.
145
CHAPTER XI.
The objection has been made, that the words of St.
John, "The Spirit is God," are to be referred to God
the Father; since Christ afterwards declares that
God is to be worshipped in Spirit and in truth. The
answer is, first, tliat by the word Spirit is sometimes
meant spiritual grace ; next, it is shown that, if they
insist that the Person of the Holy Spirit is signified
by the words "in Spirit," and therefore deny that
adoration is due to Him, the argument tells equally
against the Son; and since numberless passages
prove that He is to be worshipped, we understand
from this that the same rule is to be laid down as re-
gards the Spirit. Why are we commanded to fall down
before His footstool ? Because by this is signified
the Lord's Body, and as the Spirit was the Maker of
this, it follows that He is to be worshipped, and yet
it does not accordingly follow that Mary is to be
worshipped. Therefore the worship of the Spirit is
not done away with, but His union with the Father
is expressed, when it is said that the Father is to be
worshipped in Spirit, and this point is supported by
similar expressions.
69. But perhaps reference may be made
to the fact that in a later passage of the
same book, the Lord again said that God is
Spirit, but spoke of God the Father. For
you have this passage in the Gospel : "The
hour now is, when the true worshippers
shall worship the Father in Spirit and truth,
for such also doth the Father seek. God is
Spirit, and they that worship Him must
worship in Spirit and truth. " ' By this pas-
sage you wish not only to deny the divinity
of the Holy Spirit, but also, from God being
worshipped in Spirit, deduce a subjection of
the Spirit.
70. To which point I will briefly answer
that Spirit is often put for the grace of the
Spirit, as the Apostle also said: "For the
Spirit Himself intercedeth for us with groan-
ines which cannot be uttered ; " ^ that is, the
grace of the Spirit, unless perchance you
have been able to hear the groanings of the
Holy Spirit. Therefore here too God is
worshipped, not in the wickedness of the
heart, but in the grace of the Spirit. " For
into a malicious soul wisdom does not
enter," 3 because "no one can call Jesus
Lord but in the Holy Spirit. "•♦' And imme-
diately he adds : " Now there are diversities
of gifts." -5
71. Now this cannot pertain to the fulness,
nor to the dividing of the Spirit ; for neither
does the mind of man grasp His fulness, nor
is He divided into any portions of Himself ;
but He pours into [the soul] the gift of
spiritual grace, in which God is worshipped
as He is also worshipped in truth, for no one
^ S. John iv. 23, 24.
■* I Cor. xii. 3.
10
^ Rom. viii. 26.
" I Cor. xii. 4.
Wisd. i. 4.
worships Him except he who drinks in the
truth of His Godhead with pious affection.
And he certainly does not apprehend Christ
as it were personally, nor the Holy Spirit
personally.
72. Or if you think that this is said as it
were personally of Christ and of the Spirit,
then God is worshipped in truth in like
manner as He is worshipped in Spirit.
There is therefore either a like subjection,
which God forbid that you should believe,
and the Son is not worshipped ; or, which
is true, there is a like grace of Unity, and
the Spirit is worshipped.
73. Let us then here draw our inferences
and put an end to the impious questionings
of the Arians. For if they say that the Spirit
is therefore not to be worshipped because
God is worshipped in Spirit, let them then
say that the Truth is not to be worshipped,
because God is worshipped in truth. For
although there be many truths, since it is
written: "Truths are minished from the
sons of men ; " ' yet they are given by the
Divine Truth, which is Christ, Who says :
"I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life."^
If therefore they understand the truth in this
passage from custom, let them also under-
stand the grace of the Spirit, and there is no
stumbling ; or if they receive Christ as the
Truth, let them deny that He is to be wor-
shipped.
74. But they are refuted by the acts of the
pious, and by the course of the Scriptures.
For Mary worshipped Christ, and therefore
is appointed to be the messenger of the
Resurrection to the apostles, 3 loosening the
hereditary bond, and the huge offence of
womankind. For this the Lord wrought
mystically, ' ' that where sin had exceedingly
abounded, grace might more exceedingly
abound." ■♦ And rightly is a woman appoint-
ed [as messenger] to men ; that she who
first had brought the message of sin to man
should first bring the message of the grace
of the Lord.
75. And the apostles worshipped ; and
therefore they who bore the testimony of
the faith received authority as to the faith.
And the angels worshipped, of whom it is
written: "And let all His angels worship
Him."s
76. But they worship not only His God-
head but also His Footstool, as it is written :
" And worship His footstool, for it is holy," ^
Or if they deny that in Christ the mysteries
also of His Incarnation are to be worshipped,
' Ps. xii. [xi.]
■* Rom. V. 20.
- S. John xiv. 6.
5 Heb. i. 6.
^ S. John XX. 17 18.
" Ps. xcix. [xcviii.] 5,
146
ST. AMBROSE.
in which we observe as it were certain
express traces of His Godhead, and certain
ways of the Heavenly Word ; let them read
that even the apostles worshipped Him
when He rose again in the glory of His
Flesh. •
77. Therefore if it do not at all detract
from Christ, that God is worshipped in
Christ, for Christ too is worshipped ; ^ it
certainly also detracts nothing from the
Spirit that God is worshipped in the Spirit,
for the Spirit also is worshipped, as the
Apostle has said : "We serve the Spirit of
God," 3 for he who serves worships also, as
it is said in an earlier passage : "Thou shalt
worship the Lord thy God, and Him only
shalt thou serve. " *
78. But lest any one should perchance
seem to elude the instance we have adduced,
let us consider in what manner that which
the prophet says, " Worship His Footstool,"
appears to refer to the mystery of the divine
Incarnation, for we must not estimate the
footstool from the custom of men. For
neither has God a body, neither is He other
than beyond measure, that we should think
a footstool was laid down as a support for
His feet. And we read that nothing besides
God is to be worshipped, for it is written :
" Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and
Him only shalt thou serve." How, then,
should the prophet, brought up under the
Law, and instructed in the Law, give a
precept against the Law .-* The question,
then, is not unimportant, and so let
us more diligently consider what the
footstool is. For we read elsewhere :
"The heaven is My throne, and the earth
the footstool of My feet." 5 But the earth is
not to be worshipped by us, for it is a crea-
ture of God.
79. Let us, however, see whether the
prophet does not say that that earth is to be
worshipped which the Lord Jesus took upon
Him in assuming flesh. And so, by foot-
* S. Matt, xxviii. 17.
' St. Ambrose here argues against Apollinarianism, who separated
the two natures in Christ and taught that He should not be adored
except in His Godhead, giving to the orthodox the nickname of
a.i/6puivo\6iTpai. The Apollinarians held that Christ was ©eb?
(TapKo<j>6po<;, as Nestorians made Him avBpM-nos ©«oi|>6po?, instead
of the proper Weai'SpujTro?. Apollinaris said Christ is oire
aj'OptoTTOs ctTrAo?, oure ©eb?, aWi ©eoO Kai an'BpioiTov /.ti'^i?. He de-
nied the complete human nature of our Lord, saying that the Logos
supplied the place of the a>ii»ia rationalis. This stunted human-
ity could not be accepted by the Church, as it would involve a
merely partial redemption. Christ must be a perfect man, in order
to be a perfect Redeemer.
The heresy was opposed by .St. Athanasius, St. Basil, and others,
condemned in synods at Alexandria 362, Rome 373 and probably
3S2, Antioch 378 or 379, and decisively at Constantinople in the
second oecumenical council. See Diet. Clir. Biog. : I'lunt, Dicf. of
Sects, etc. ; Hefele on Council of Constantinople : St. C.regory of
Nazianzus' Letters on the Apollinarian controversy in this series,
P- A^7 ff-
' Phil. iii. 3. ■* Deut. vi. 13. ^ Isa. Ixvi. 1.
Stool is understood earth, but by the earth
the Flesh of Christ, which we this day also
adore ' in the mysteries, and which the
apostles, as we said above, adored in the
Lord Jesus ; for Christ is not divided but is
one ; nor, when He is adored as the Son of
God, is He denied to have been born of the
Virgin. Since, then, the mystery of the
Incarnation is to be adored, and tlie Incar-
nation is the work of the Spirit, as it is
written, "The Holy Spirit shall come upon
thee, and the power of the Most High shall
overshadow thee, and that Holy Thing
Which shall be born of thee shall be called
the Son of God,"^ without doubt the Holy
Spirit also is to be adored, since He Who
according to the flesh was born of the Holy
Spirit is adored.
80. And let no one divert this to the
Virgin Mary ; Mary was the temple of God,
not the God of the temple. And therefore He
alone is to be worshipped Who was working
in His temple.
81. It makes, then, nothing against our
argument that God is worshipped in Spirit,
for the Spirit also is worshipped. Although
if we consider the words themselves, what
else ought we to understand in the Father,
the Son, and the Holy Spirit, but the unity
of the same power. For what is "must
worship in Spirit and in truth ** .'* If, however,
you do not refer this to the grace of the
Spirit, nor the true faith of conscience ; but,
as we said, personally (if indeed this word
person is fit to express the Divine Majesty),
you must take it of Christ and of the Spirit.
82. What means, then, the Father is wor-
shipped in Christ, except that the Father is
in Christ, and the Father speaks in Christ,
and the Father abides in Christ. Not, indeed,
as a body in a body, for God is not a body ;
nor as a confused mixture [confusus in con-
fuso\, but as the true in the true, God in God,
Light in Light ; as the eternal Father in the
co-eternal Son. So not an ingrafting of a
body is meant, but unity of power. There-
fore, by unity of power, Christ is jointly
worshipped in the Father when God the
Father is worshipped in Christ. In like
manner, then, by unity of the same power
' There can be no doubt that St. Ambrose held what is known as
the Real Presence in the Sacrament of the Eucharist, and is here
asserting the custom of liis day, viz., that Christ was worshipped as
indivisibly Cod and Man in that .Sacrament. Similar expressions
are to be found in other Fathers, and in St. ."Ambrose elsewhere ; e.g.
DeFidc,\. 10; De Mysteriis, §§ 52-54,58. Bishop Andrewes,
formerly of Winchester (ob. a.d. 1626), refers to St. Ambrose as
follows : " Nos vera et in Mysteriis Carnetn Christi adoramus cum
A tiibrosio, et non id, sed ei47n q7ii super altare colitur. Nee Cnr-
vem manducanuis giii>i adorctmis friiis cum A ugustifio • . • • f"^^
Sacrav!e?itnin tiivten nulli adoreutus." Kesp. ad Bellarmin, p.
,J95-
- .S. Luke i. 35.
OF THE HOLY SPIRIT.— BOOK III.
147
the "Spirit is jointly worshipped in God,
when God is worshipped in the Spirit.
83. Let us investigate the force of that
word and expression more dilig-ently, and
deduce its proper meaning- from other
passages. " Thou hast, " it is said, "made
them all in wisdom. " ' Do we here under-
stand that Wisdom was without a share in
the things that were made? But "all
things were made byHim. "^ And David
says : "By the Word of the Lord were the
heavens established. ''3 So, then, he himself
who calls the Son of God the maker even of
heavenly things, has also plainly said that
all things were made in the Son, that in the
renewal of His works He might by no
means separate the Son from the Father,
but unite Him to the Father.
84. Paul, too, says: "For in Him were
all things created in the heavens and in the
earth, visible and invisible. " '^ Does he, then,
when he says, "in Him," deny that they
were made through Him .-' Certainly he
did not deny but affirmed it. And further
he says in another place: "One Lord
Jesus, through Whom are all things, "s In
saying, then, " through Him," has he denied
that all things were made in Him, through
Whom he says that all things exist ? These
words, "in Him " and " with Him," have
this force, that by them is understood one
and like in all respects, not contrary.
Which he also made clear farther on, say-
ing : " All things have been created through
Him and in Him ;"^ for, as we said above,
Scripture witnesses that these three expres-
sions, "with Him," and "through Him,"
and "in Him," are equivalent in Christ.7
For you read that all things were made
through Him and in Him.
85. Learn also that the Father was with
Him, and He with the Father, when all
things were being made. Wisdom says :
"When He was preparing the heavens I
was with Him, when He was making the
fountains of waters."^ And in the Old
Testament the Father, by saying, " Let Us
make, "9 showed that the Son was to be
worshipped with Himself as the Maker of
all things. As, then, those things are said
to have been created in the Son, of which
the Son is received as the Creator ; so, too,
when God is said to be worshipped in truth
by the proper meaning of the word itself
often expressed after the same manner it
ought to be understood, that the Son too is
worshipped. So in like manner is the Spirit
' Ps. civ. [ciii.] 24.
* Col. i. 16.
' Bk. 11.8,9.
- S. John i. 3.
" I Cor. viii. 6.
" Prov. viii. 27.
'•' Ps. xx.\iii. [xxxii.J 6.
" Col. i. 16.
'■' Gen. i. 26.
also worshipped because God is worshipped
in Spirit. Therefore the Father is wor-
shipped both with the Son and with the
Spirit, because the Trinity is worshipped.
CHAPTER XII.
From the faCt that St. Paul has shown that the light of
the Godhead which the three apostles worshipped in
Christ is in the Trinity, it is made clear that the
Spirit also is to be worshipped. It is shown from
the words themselves that the Spirit is intended by
the apostles. The Godhead of the same Spirit is
proved from the fact that He has a temple wherein
He dwells not as a priest, but as God : and is wor-
shipped with the Father and the Son ; whence is
understood the oneness of nature in Them.
86. But does any one deny that the God-
head of the eternal Trinity is to be wor-
shipped.? whereas the Scriptures also ex-
press the inexplicable Majesty of the Divine
Trinity, as the Apostle says elsewhere :
"Since God, Who said that light should
shine out of darkness, shined in our hearts
to give the light of the knowledge of the
glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ. " '
87. The apostles truly saw this glory,
when the Lord Jesus on the mount shone
with the light of His Godhead: "The
apostles," it says, "saw it and fell on their
face." ^ Do not you think that they even, as
they fell, worshipped, when they could not
with their bodily eyes endure the brightness
of the divine splendour, and the glory of
eternal light dulled the keenness of mortal
sight ? Or what else did they w^ho saw His
glory say at that time, except, "O come
let us worship and fall down before Him " ? 3
For "God shined in our hearts to give the
light of the knowledge of the glory of God
in the face of Jesus Christ."'*
88. Who is He, then. Who shined that we
might know God in the face of Jesus Christ .-'
For he said, "God shined," that the glory
of God might be known in the face of Jesus
Christ. Whom else do we think but the
manifested Spirit ? Or who else is there be-
sides the Holy Spirit to Whom the power of
the Godhead may be referred .'' For they
who exclude the Spirit must necessarily bring
in another, who may with the Father and
the Son receive the glory of the Godhead.
89. Let us then go back to the same
words: "It is God Who shined in our
hearts to give the light of the knowledge of
the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ."
You have Christ plainly set forth. For
Whose glory is said to give light but that of
^ 2 Cor. iv. 6.
^ Ps. xcv. [.xciv.] 6.
2 S. Matt. xvii. 6.
* 2 Cor. iv. 6.
148
ST. AMBROSE.
the Spirit ? So, then, he set forth God Hini-
self, since he spoke of the glory of God ; if
of the Father, it remains that "He who
said that Ught should shine out of darkness,
and shine in our hearts," be understood to
be the Holy Spirit, for we cannot venerate
any other with the Father and the Son. If,
then, you understand the Spirit, Him also
has the Apostle called God; it is necessary,
then, that you also confess the Godhead
of the Spirit, who now deny it.
90. But how shamelessly do you deny
this, since you have read that the Holy
Spirit has a temple. For it is written : "Ye
are the temple of God, and the Holy Spirit
dwelleth in you. "' ' Now God has a temple,
a creature has no true temple. But the
Spirit, Who dwelleth in us, has a temple.
For it is written : "Your members are
temples of the Holy Spirit." ^
91. But He does not dwell in the temple
as a priest, nor as a minister, but as God,
since the Lord Jesus Himself said : "I will
dwell in them, and will walk among them,
and will be their God, and they shall be My
people. "3 And David says : "The Lord is
in His holy temple. "^ Therefore the Spirit
dwells in His holy temple, as the Father
dwells and as the Son dwells. Who says : "I
and the Father will come, and will make
Our abode with him."s
92. But the Father abides in us through
the Spirit, Whom He has given us. How,
then, can different natures abide together ?
Certainly it is impossible. But the Spirit
abides with the Father and the Son.
Whence, too, the Apostle joined the Com-
munion of the Holy Spirit with the grace of
Jesus Christ and the love of God, saying :
"The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, and
the love of God, and the Communion of
the Holy Spirit be with you all."''
91. We observe, then, that the Father, the
Son, and the Holy Spirit abide in one and
the same [subject] through the oneness of
the same nature. Therefore, He Who
dwells in the temple has divine power, for
as of the Father and of the Son, so are we
also the temple of the Holy Spirit ; not many
temples, but one temple, for it is the temple
of one Power.
CHAPTER XHL
To those who object that Catholics, when they ascribe
Godhead to the Holy Spirit, introduce three (lods, it
is answered, that by the same argument they them-
1 I Cor. iii. 16.
* Ps. xi. Ix.] 4.
I Cor. vi. 19.
S. John xiv. 23.
' Lev. xxvi. 12.
" 2 Cor. xiii. 14.
selves bring in two Gods, unless they deny Godhead
to the Son; after which the orthodox doctrine is set
forth.
92. But what do you fear.? Is it that
which you have been accustomed to carp
at .'' lest you should make three Gods. God
forbid ; for where the Godhead is under-
stood as one, one God is spoken of. For
neither when we call the Son God do we
say there are two Gods. For if, when you
confess the Godhead of the Spirit, you think
that three Gods are spoken of, then, too,
when you speak of the Godhead of the Son
because you are not able to deny it, you
bring in two Gods. For it is necessary ac-
cording to your opinion, if you think that
God is the name of one person, not of one
nature, that you either say that there are
two Gods, or deny that the Son is God.
93. But let us free you from the charge of
ignorance, though we do not excuse you
from fault. For according to our opinion,
because there is one God, one Godhead and
oneness of power is understood. For as
we say that there is one God, confessing
the Father, and not denying the Son under
the true Name of the Godhead ; so, too, we
exclude not the Holy Spirit from the Unity
of the Godhead, and do not assert but deny
that there are three Gods, because it is not
unity but a division of power which makes
plurality. For how can the Unity of the
Godhead admit of plurality, seeing that
plurality is of numbers, but the Divine
Nature does not admit numbers .''
CHAPTER XIV.
Besides the evidence adduced above, other passages
can be brought to prove the sovereignty of the Three
Persons. Two are quoted from the Epistles to the
Thessalonians, and by collating other testimonies of
the Scriptures it is shown that in them dominion is
claimed for the Spirit as for the other Persons.
Then, by quotation of another still more express
passage in the second Epistle to the Corinthians, it
is inferred both that the Spirit is Lord, and that
where the Lord is, there is the Spirit.
94. God, then, is One, without violation
of the majesty of the eternal Trinity, as is
declared in the instance set before us. And
not in that place alone do we see the Trinity
expressed in the Name of the Godhead ; but
both in many places, as we have said also
above, and especially in the epistles which
the Apostle wrote to the Thessalonians, he
most clearly set forth the Godhead and
sovereignty of the Father, the Son, and the
Holy Spirit. For you read as follows :
OF THE HOLY SPIRIT.— BOOK III.
149
" The Lord make you to increase and
abound in love one toward another, and
toward all men, as we also do toward you,
to the stablishing of your hearts without
blame in holiness before God and our Father
at the coming- of the Lord Jesus." '
95. Who, then, is the Lord Who makes
us to increase and abound before God and
our Father at the coming of the Lord Jesus ?
He has named the Father and has named
the vSon ; Whom, then, has he joined with
the Father and the Son except the Spirit ?
Who is the Lord Who establishes our hearts
in holiness. For holiness is a grace of the
Spirit, as, too, is said farther on : " In holi-
ness of the Spirit and belief. of the truth." ^
96. Who, then, do you think is here
named Lord, except the Spirit ? And has
not God the Father been able to teach you.
Who says : " Upon Whomsoever thou shalt
see the Spirit descending and abiding upon
Him, this is He Who baptizcth in the Holy
Spirit " ? 3 For the Spirit descended in the
likeness of a dove,^ that He might both
bear witness to His wisdom, and perfect
the sacrament of the spiritual laver, and
show that His working is one with that of
the Father and the Son.
97. And that you should not suppose that
anything had fallen from the Apostle by
oversight, but that he knowingly and de-
signedly and inspired by the Spirit desig-
nated Him Lord, Whom he felt to be God,
• he repeated the same in the second Epistle
to the Thessalonians, saying : " But the
Lord direct your hearts in the love of God
and in the patience of Christ." s If love be
of God and patience of Christ, it ought to
be shown Who is the Lord Who directs, if
we deny that the direction is of the Holy
Spirit.
98. But we' cannot deny it, since the Lord
said of Him : "I have yet many things to
say unto you, but ye cannot bear them
now. But when He, the Spirit of Truth,
shall come, He will lead you into all
truth.'" ^ And David says of Him : " Thy
good Spirit shall lead me into the right
way." 7
99. See what the voice of the Lord uttered
concerning the Holy Spirit. The Son of
God came, and because He had not yet
shed forth the Spirit, He declared that we
were living like little children without the
Spirit. He said that the Spirit was to come
1 I Thess. iii. 12, 13. ^ 2 Thess. ii. 13.
* S. Luke iii. 22. '' 2 Thess. iii. 5.
' Ps. cxliii. [cxlii.] 10.
' S. John i. 33 .
* S. John xvi. 12, 13.
Who should make of these little children
stronger men, by an increase, namely, of
spiritual age. And this He laid down not
that He might set the power of the Spirit in
the first place, but that He might show that
the fulness of strength consists in the know-
ledge of the Trinity.
100. It is therefore necessary either that
you mention some fourth person besides the
Spirit of whom you ought to be conscious,
or assuredly that you do not consider an-
other to be Lord, except the Spirit Who has
been pointed out.
loi. But if you require the plain statement
of the words in which Scripture has spoken of
the Spirit as Lord, it cannot have escaped
you that it is written : "Now the Lord is
the Spirit." ' Which the course of the whole
passage shows to have been certainly said
of the Holy Spirit. And so let us consider
the apostolic statement : "As often as
jMoses is read," says he, "a veil is laid over
their heart ; but when they shall be turned
to the Lord, the veil shall be taken away.
Now the Lord is the Spirit ; but where the
Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty." ^
102. So he not only called the Spirit Lord,
but also added: "But where the Spirit of
the Lord is, there is liberty. So we all
with unveiled face, reflecting the glory of
the Lord, are formed anew into the same
image from glory to glory, as from the Lord
the Spirit ; "' ^ that is, we who have been
before converted to the Lord, so as by
spiritual understanding to see the glory of
the Lord, as it were, in the mirror of the
Scriptures, are now being transformed from
that glory which converted us to the Lord,
to the heavenly glory. Therefore since it is
the Lord to Whom we are converted, but
the Lord is that Spirit by Whom we are
formed anew, who are converted to the
Lord, assuredly the Holy Ghost is pointed
out, for He Who forms anew receives those
who are converted. For how should He
form again those whom He had not received.
103. Though why should we seek for the
expression of words, where we see the
expression of unity .'' For although you may
distinguish between Lord and Spirit, you
cannot deny that where the Lord is, there
too is the Spirit, and he who has been
converted to the Lord will have been
converted to the Spirit. If you cavil at the
letter, you cannot injure the Unity ; if you
wish to separate the Unity, you confess the
Spirit Himself as the Lord of power.
* 2 Cor. iii. 17.
2 Cor. iii. 15-17. ' 2 Cor. iii. 17, 18
ISO
ST. AMBROSE,
CHAPTER XV.
Though the Spirit be called Lord, three Lords are not
thereby implied ; inasmuch as two Lords are not
implied by the fact that the Son in the same manner
as the Father is called Lord in many passages of
Scripture ; for Lordship exists in the Godhead, and
the Godhead in Lordship, and these coincide without
division in the Three Persons.
104. But perhaps, again, you may say :
If I call the Spirit Lord, I shall set forth
three Lords. Do you then when you call
the Son Lord either deny the Son or confess
two Lords ? God forbid, for the Son Him-
self said: "Do not serve two lords."'
But certainly He denied not either Himself
or the Father to be Lord ; for He called the
Father Lord, as you read : "I thank Thee,
O Father, Lord of heaven and earth."*
And the Lord spoke of Himself, as we read
in the Gospel: "Ye call Me Master and
Lord, and ye do well, for so I am. "3 But
He spoke not of two Lords ; indeed He shows
that He did not speak of two Lords, when
He warns them : " Do not serve two lords."
For there are not two Lords where the
Lordship is but one, for the Father is in the
Son and the Son in the Father, and so there
is one Lord.
105. Such, too, was the teaching of the Law :
"Hear, O Israel, the Lord thy God is one
Lord,"'* that is, unchangeable, always
abiding in unity of power, always the
same, and not altered by any accession or
diminution. Therefore Moses called Him
One, and yet also relates that the Lord
rained down fire from the Lord. 5 The
Apostle, too, says: " The Lord grant unto
him to find mercy of the Lord," ^ The Lord
rains down from the Lord ; the Lord grants
mercy from the Lord. The Lord is neither
divided when He rains from the Lord, nor
is there a separation when He grants mercy
from the Lord, but in each case the oneness
of the Lordship is expressed.
106. In the Psalms, too, you find : "The
Lord said unto my Lord." 7 And he did not
therefore deny that the Father was his Lord,
because he spoke of the Son as his Lord ;
but therefore called the Son his Lord, that
you might not think Him to be the Son, but
the Lord of the prophet, as the Lord Him-
self showed in the Gospel, when He said :
" If David in the Spirit called Him Lord,
how is he his Son.?"^ David, not the
Spirit, calls Him Lord in the Spirit. Or if
» S. Matt. vi. 24.
* Deut. vi. 4.
' Ps. ex. [cix.j I.
* S. Matt. xi. 25.
"I'len. xix. 24.
' S. Matt. xxii. 43, 45.
' S. John xiii. 13.
«2 Tim. i. 18.
they falsely infer from this that the Spirit
called Him Lord, they must necessarily by
a like sacrilege seem to assert that the Son
of God is also the Son of the Spirit.
107. So, as we do not say that there are
two Lords, when we so style both the
Father and the Son, so, too, we do not say
that there are three Lords, when we confess
the Spirit to be Lord. For as it is profane
to say that there are three Lords or three
Gods, so, too, is it utter profanity to speak
of two Lords or two Gods ; for there is one
God, one Lord, one Holy Spirit ; and He
Who is God is Lord, and He Who is Lord is
God, for the Godhead is in the Lordship,
and the Lordship is in the Godhead.
108. Lastly, you have read that the Father
is both Lord and God : " O Lord my God,
I will call upon Thee, hear Thou me." '
You find the Son to be both Lord and God,
as you have read in the Gospel, that, when
Thomas had touched the side of Christ, he
said, " My Lord and my God." ^ So in like
manner as the Father is God and the Son
Lord, so too the Son is God and the Father
Lord. The holy designation changes from
one to the other, the divine nature changes
not, but the dignity remains unchangeable.
For they are not [as it were] contributions
gathered from bounty, but free-will gifts of
natural love ; for both Unity has its special
property, and the special properties are
bound together in unity.
CHAPTER XVI.
The Father is holy, and likewise the Son and the Spirit,
and so They are honoured in the same Trisagion :
nor can we speak more worthily of God than by call-
ing Him Holy ; whence it is clear that we must not
derogate from the dignity of the Holy Spirit. In
Him is all which pertains to God, since in baptism
He is named with the Fathur and the Son, and the
Father has given to Him to be greater than all, nor
can any one deprive Him of this. And so from the
very passage of St. John which heretics used against
His dignity, the equality of the Trinity and the
Unity of the Godhead is established. Lastly, after
explaining how the Son receives from the Father, St.
Ambrose shows how various heresies are refuted by
the passage cited.
109. So, then, the Father is holy, the Son
is holy, and the Spirit is holy, but they are
not three Holies ; ^ for there is one Holy
' Ps. xxx. fxxix.] 2. ^ S. John xx. 28.
' This is, of course, to be understood as in the Athanasian Creed.
The attributes of eternity, omnipotence, etc., are ascribed to each of
the Three Persons, and we are then told that there are not three
Eternals, etc. Each Person of the Holy Trinity possesses each at-
tribute, but the attributes are all one and cannot be divided any
more than the Godhead. Each Person is holy, but there are not, so
to say, three separate Holinesses.
OF THE HOLY SIMRIT.— BOOK HI.
151
God, one Lord. For the true holiness is
one, as the true Godhead is one, as that true
hohness belonging to the Divine Nature is
one.
no. So everything- which we esteem holy
proclaims that Sole Holiness. Cherubim
and Seraphim with unwearied voices praise
Him and say: "Holy, Holy, Holy, is the
Lord God of Sabaoth. " ' They say it, not
once, lest you should believe that there is
but one ; not twice, lest you should exclude
the Spirit ; they say not holies [in the
plural], lest you should imagine that there is
plurality, but they repeat thrice and say the
same word, that even in a hymn you may
understand the distinction of Persons in the
Trinity, and the oneness of the Godhead,
and while they say this they proclaim God.
111. We too find nothing of more worth,
whereby we are able to proclaim God, than
the calling Him holy. Everything is too low
for God, too low for the Lord. And there-
fore consider from this fact also whether
one ought at all to derogate from the Holy
Spirit, whose Name is the praise of God.
For thus is the Father praised, thus is the
Son also praised, in the same manner as the
Spirit also is named and praised. The Sera-
phim utter praise, the whole company of the
blessed utter praise, inasmuch as they call
God holy, the Son holy, the Spirit holy.
112. How, then, does He not possess all
that pertains to God, Who is named by
priests in baptism with the Father and the
vSon, and is invoked in the oblations, is pro-
claimed by the Seraphim in heaven with the
Father and the Son, dwells in the Saints
with the Father and the Son, is poured upon
the just, is given as the source of inspiration
to the prophets ? And for this reason in the
divine Scripture all is called Seo-vsoffzd'i,
because God inspires what the Spirit has
spoken.
113. Or if they are unwilling to allow that
the Holy Spirit has all things which pertain
to God, and can do all things, let them say
what He has not, and what He cannot do.
For like as the Son has all things, and the
Father grudges not to give all things to the
Son according to His nature, having given
to Him that which is greater than all, as the
Scripture bears witness, saying: "That
which ]\Iy Father hath given unto Me is
greater than all. "^ So too the Spirit has
of Christ that which is greater than all, be-
cause righteousness knows not grudging.
114. So, then, if we attend diligently, we
comprehend here also the oneness of the
* Isa. vi. 3-
S. John X. 29.
Divine Power. He says : "That which My
Father hath given unto Me is greater than
all, and no one is able to snatch them out
of My Father's hand. I and the Father are
One."' For if we rightly showed above
that the Holy Spirit is the Hand of the
Father, the same is certainly the Hand of
the Father which is the Hand of the Son,
since the Same is the Spirit of the Father
Who is the Spirit of the Son. Therefore
whosoever of us receives eternal life in this
Name of the Trinity, as he is not torn from
the Father, so he is not torn from the Son,
so too he is not torn from the Spirit.
115. Again, from the very fact that the
Father is said to have given to the Son, and
the Spirit to have received from the Son, as
it is written : " He shall glorify Me, for He
shall take of Mine, and shall declare it unto
you"^ (which He seems to have said rather
of the office of distributing, than of the pre-
rogative of Divine Power, for those whom
the Son redeemed the Spirit also, Who was
to sanctify them, received), from those very
words, I say, from which they construct
their sophistry, the Unity of the Godhead is
perceived, not the need of a gift.
116. The P'ather gave by begetting, not
by adoption ; He gave as it were that which
was contained in the very prerogative of the
Divine Nature, not what was lacking as it
were by favour of His bounty. And so be-
cause the Son acquires persons to Himself
as the Father does ; so gives life as does the
Father, He expressed His equality with the
Father in the Unity of Power, saying: "I
and the Father are One." For when He
says, "I and the Father," equality is re-
vealed ; when He says, "are One," Unity
is asserted. Equality excludes confusion ;
Unity excludes separation. Equality dis-
tinguishes between the Father and the Son ;
Unity does not separate the Father and the
Son.
117. Therefore, when He says, "I and
the Father," He rejects the Sabellian, for
He says that He is one, the Father another;
He rejects the Photinian, for He joins Him-
self with God the Father. With the former
words He rejects those, for He said: " I and
the Father; " with the latter words He rejects
the Arians, for He says: " are One. " Yet
in both the former and the latter words He
refutes the heretical violence (i) oftheSabel-
lians, for He said: "We are One [Sub-
stance]," not "We are One [Person]."
And (2) of the Arians, for He said : " I and the
Father," not "the Father and I." Which
S. John X. 29, 30.
- S. John xvi. 14.
152
ST. AMBROSE.
was certainly not a sign of rudeness, but of
dutifulness and foreknowledge, that we
might not think wrongly from the order of
the words. For unity knows no order,
equality knows no gradation ; nor can it be
laid to' the Son of God that the Teacher
Himself of dutifulness should offend against
dutifulness by rudeness.
CHAPTER XVII.
.St. Ambrose shows by instances that the places in
which those words were spoken helj) to the under-
standing of the words of the Lord ; he shows that
Christ uttered the passage quoted from St. John in
Solomon's porch, by which is signified the mind of a
wise man, for he says that Christ would not have
uttered this saying in the heart of a foolish or con-
tentious man. He goes on to say that Christ is
stoned by those who believe not these words, and as
the keys of heaven were given to Peter for his con-
fession of them, so Iscariot, because he believed not
the same, perished evilly. He takes this opportunity
to inveigh against the Jews who bought the Son of
Crod and sold Joseph. He explains the price paid
for each mystically ; and having in the same manner
expounded the murmuring of the traitor concerning
Magdalene's ointment, he adds that Christ is bought
in one way by heretics, in another way by Catholics,
and that those in vain take to themselves the name
of Christians who sever the Spirit from the Father.
ii8. Iris worth while to notice in what
place the Lord held this discussion, for His
utterances are often [better] estimated by
the kind of places in which He conversed.
When about to fast, He is led (as we read)
into the wilderness to render vain the devil's
temptations. For although it deserves
praise to have lived temperately in the midst
of abundance, yet the enticements of tempta-
tion are more frequent amongst riches and
pleasures. Then the tempter, in order to
try Him, promises Him abundance, and the
Lord in order to overcome cherishes hunger.
Now I do not deny that temperance can
exist in the midst of riches ; but although
he who navigates the sea often escapes, yet
he is more exposed to peril than he who will
not go to sea.
119. Let us consider some other points.
When about to promise the kingdom of
heaven, Jesus went up into a mountain.
At another time He leads His disciples
through the corn-fields, when al)()ut to sow
in their minds the crop of heavenly precepts,
so that a plentiful harvest of souls should
ripen. When about to consummate the work
of the flesh which He had taken, having now
seen perfection in His disciples, whom He
had established upon the root of His words,
He enters a garden, that He might plant
the young olive-trees ' in the house of the
Lord, and that He might water the just
flourishing like a palm-tree,^ and the fruit-
ful vine with the stream of His Blood.
120. In this passage too He was walking,
as we read, in Solomon's porch on the day
of the dedication, that is, Christ was walk-
ing in the breast of the wise and prudent, to
dedicate his good affection to Himself.
What that porch was the prophet teaches,
saying : "T will walk in the midst of Thy
house in the innocency of my heart. "^ So,
then, we have in our own selves the house
of God, we have the halls, we have also the
porches, and we have the courts, for it is
written : " Let thy waters flow abroad in
thy courts. "4 Open, then, this porch of thy
heart to the Word of God, Who says to thee :
'■Open thy mouth wide and I will fill it."s
121. Let us, therefore, hear what the
Word of God, walking in the heart of the
wise and peaceful, says : "I and My
Father are One." ^ He will not say this in
the breast of the unquiet and foolish, for
" the natural man receiveth not the things
of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness
unto him.'" ^ The narrow breasts of sinners
do not take in the greatness of the faith.
Lastly, the Jews hearing, •' I and the
Father are One, took up stones to stone
Him. "8
122. He who cannot listen to this is a
Jew ; he who cannot listen to this stones
Christ with the stones of his treachery,
rougher than any rock, and if you believe
me, he wounds Christ. For although He
cannot now feel a wound: "For now
henceforth we know not Christ after the
flesh," 9 yet He Who rejoices in the love of
the Church is stoned by the impiety of the
Arians.
123. " The law of Thy mouth, O Lord,
is good unto me, I keep Thy command-
ments."'" Thou hast Thyself said that
Thou art one with the Father. Because
Peter believed this, he received the keys of
the kingdom of heaven, and without
anxiety for himself forgave sins. Judas,
because he believed not this, strangled him-
self with the cord of his own wickedness.
O the hard stones of unbelieving words !
O the unseemly cord of the betrayer, and
the still more hideous purchase-money of
the Jews ! O hateful money wherewith
either the just is bought for death, or sold !
Joseph was sold, Jesus Christ was bought,
' Ps. cxxviii. [cxxvii.] 3. - Ps. xcii. [xci] 12. ' Ps. ci. [c] 2.
\ Prov. V. 16. B Ps. Ixxxi. [Ixxx.] 10. " S. John x. 30.
'2Cor. ii. 14. 'S. John X. 31. " 3 Cor, v. 16.
^° Ps. cxix, [cxviii.] 72, 73.
OF THE HOLY SPIRIT.— BOOK 111
D.-)
the one to slavery, the Other to death. O
detestable inheritance, O deadly sale, which
either sells a brother to suffering- or sets a
price on the Lord to destroy Him, the
Purchaser of the salvation of all.
124. The Jews did violence to two things
w^hich are chief of all, faith and duty, and
in each to Christ the Author of faith and
duty. For both in the patriarch Joseph was
there a type of Christ, and Christ Himself
came in the truth of His Body, "Who
counted it not robbery that He should be
equal with God, but took on Him the form
of a servant," ' because of our fall, that is to
say, taking slavery upon Himself and not
shrinking from suffering.
125. In one place the sale is for twenty
pieces, in the other for thirty. For how
could His true price be apprehended,
Whose value cannot be limited.? There is
error in the price because there is error in
the inquiry. The sale is for twenty pieces
in the Old Testament, for thirty in the New ;
for the Truth is of more value than the type,
Grace is more generous than training, the
Presence is better than the Law, for the Law
promised the Coming, the Coming fulfilled
the Law.
126. The Ishmaelites made their purchase
for twenty pieces, the Jews for thirty. And
this is no trivial figure. The faithless are
more lavish for iniquity than the faithful
for salvation. It is, however, fitting to
consider the quality of each agreement.
Twenty pieces are the price of him sold to
slavery, thirty pieces of Him delivered to the
Cross. For although the Mysteries of the
Incarnation and of the Passion must be in
like manner matters of amazement, yet the
fulfilment of faith is in the Mystery of the
Passion. I do not indeed value less the
birth from the holy Virgin, but I receive
even more gratefully the Mystery of the
sacred Body. What is more full of mercy
than that lie should forgive me the wrongs
done to Himself.? But it is even fuller
measure that He gave us so great a gift, that
He Who was not to die because He was
God, should die by our death, that we might
live by His Spirit.
127. Lastly, it was not without meaning
that Judas Iscariot valued that ointment at
three hundred pence, which seems certainly
by the statement of the price itself to -set
forth the Lord's cross. Whence, too, the
Lord says : " For she, pouring this ointment
on My body, did it for My burial."^ Why,
then, did Judas value this at so high a rate ?
I Phil. ii. 6, 7.
* S. Matt. xxvi. 12.
Because remission of sins is of more value
to sinners, and forgiveness seems to be more
precious. Lastly, you find it written : "To
whom much is forgiven the same loveth
more."' ' Therefore sinners themselves also
confess the grace of the Lord's Passion
which they have lost, and they bear witness
to Christ who persecuted Him.
128. Or because, " into a malicious soul
wisdom does not enter, "^ the evil disposi-
tion of the traitor uttered this, and he valued
the suffering of the Lord's body at a dearer
rate, that by the immensity of the price he
might draw all away from the faith. And
therefore the Lord offered Himself without
price, that the necessity of poverty might
hold no one back from Christ. The
patriarchs sold Him for a small price that all
might buy. Isaiah said : "Ye that have no
money, go buy and drink ; eat ye without
money," ^ that he might gain him who had
no money. O traitor Judas, thou valuest
the ointment of His Passion at three hundred
pence, and sellest His Passion for thirty
pence.'* Profuse in valuing, mean in selling.
129. So, then, all do not buy Christ at the
same price ; Photinus, who buys Him for
death, buys Him at one price ; the Arian,
who buys Him to wrong Him, at another
price ; the Catholic, who buys Him to glorify
Him, at another. But he buys Him without
money according to that which is written :
" He that hath no money let him buy with-
out price. "'5
130. "Not all," says Christ, "that say
unto Me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the
kingdom of heaven ! " ^ Although many call
themselves Christians, and make use of the
name, yet not all shall receive the reward.
Both Cain offered sacrifice, and Judas re-
ceived the kiss, but it was said to him, "Judas,
betrayest thou the Son of ]\Ian with a kiss ? ''7
that is, thou fillest up thy wickedness with
the pledge of affection, and sowest hatred
with the implement of peace, and inflictest
death with the outward token of love.
131. Let not, then, the Arians flatter them-
selves with the employment of the name,
because they call themselves Christians.
The Lord will answer them : You set for-
ward I\Iy Name, and deny INIy Substance,
but I do not recognize My Name where My
eternal Godhead is not. That is not IMy
Name which is divided from the Father, and
» S. Luke vii. 47. = Wisd. i. 4. » Isa. Iv. _i.
^ .St. Ambrose is not quite accurate here in his proportions, though
the point is in itself immaterial. The detiariiis, or " penny," was
worth about ninepence, and was the day wage of a labourer ; the
shekel, or " piece of silver," was w^orth more, being of the value of
four denarii. Thirty shekels was the price of a slave.
■"' Isa. Iv. I, 2. ^ S. Matt. vii. 21. ' S. Luke xxii. 48.
154
ST. AMBROSE.
separated from the Spirit ; I do not recog-
nize My Name where I do not recognize My
doctrine ; I do not recognize My Name
where I do not recognize My Spirit. For he
knows not that he is comparing the Spirit of
the Father to those servants whom He
created. Concerning which point we have
already spoken at length. '
CHAPTER XVHI.
As he purposes to establish the Godhead of the Holy
Spirit by the points already discussed, St. Ambrose
touches again on some of them ; for instance, that He
does not commit but forgives sin ; that He is not a
creature but the Creator ; and lastly, that He does not
offer but receives worship.
132. But to sun-i up, in order at the end
more distinctly to gather up the arguments
which have been used here and there, the
evident glory of the Godhead is proved both
by other arguments, and most especially by
these four. God is known by these marks :
either that He is without sin ; or that He for-
gives sin ; or that He is not a creature but
the Creator ; or that He does not give but
receives worship.
133. So, then, no one is without sin except
God alone, for no one is without sin except
God.^ Also, no one forgives sins except God
alone, for it is also written : ' ' Who can for-
give sins but God alone.-* "^ And one cannot
be the Creator of all except he be not a crea-
ture, and he who is not a creature is without
doubt God ; for it is written : "They wor-
shipped the creature rather than the Creator,
Who is God blessed for ever. "' ■» God also
does not worship, but is worshipped, for it
is written : "Thou shalt worship the Lord
thy God, and Him only shalt thou serve." 5
134. Let us therefore consider whether
the Holy Spirit have any of these marks
which may bear witness to His Godhead.
And first let us treat of the point that none
is without sin except God alone, and demand
that they prove that the Holy Spirit has sin.
135. But they are unable to show us
this, and demand our authority from us,
namely, that we should show by texts that
the Holy Spirit has not sinned, as it is said
of the Son that He did no sin.^ Let them
learn that we teach by authority of the Scrip-
tures ; for it is written : " For in Wisdom is a
Spirit of understanding, holy, one only, mani-
fold, subtle, easy to move, eloquent, unde-
filed." "^ The Scripture says He is undefiled,
1 Book I. I.
* Rom. i. 25.
" Wisd. vii. 22.
2 S. Matt. xix. 17.
' Deut. vi. 13.
" S. Luke V. 21.
" I Pet. ii. 22.
has it lied concerning the Son, that you
should believe it to have lied concerning the
Spirit.-* For the prophet said in the same
place concerning Wisdom, that nothing that
defiles enters into her. She herself is un-
defiled, and her Spirit is undefiled. There-
fore if the Spirit have not sin, He is God.
136. But how can He be guilty of sin
Who Himself forgives sins.? Therefore He
has not committed sin, and if He be without
sin He is not a creature. For every creature
is exposed to the capability of sin, and the
eternal Godhead alone is free from sin and
undefiled.
137. Let us now see whether the Spirit
forgives sins. But on this point there can
be no doubt, since the Lord Himself said:
" Receive ye the Holy Spirit. Whosesoever
sins ye forgive they shall be forgiven."'
See that sins are forgiven through the Holy
Spirit. But men make use of their ministry
for the forgiveness of sins, they do not exer-
cise the right of any power of their own.
For they forgive sins not in their own name
but in that of the Father and of the Son and
of the Holy Spirit. They ask, the Godhead
gives, the service is of man, the gift is of the
Power on high.
138. And it is not doubtful that sin is for-
given by means of baptism, but in baptism
the operation is that of the Father and of
the Son and of the Holy Spirit. If, there-
fore, the Spirit forgives sin, since it is writ-
ten, "Who can forgive sins except God
alone ? " ^ certainly He Who cannot be
separated from the oneness of the name of
the Nature is also incapable of being severed
from the power of God. Now if He is not
severed from the power of God, how is He
severed from the name of God.
139. Let us now see whether He be a
creature or the Creator. But since we have
above 3 most clearly proved Him to be the
Creator, as it is written : " The Spirit of
God Who hath made me ; " ■» and it has been
declared that the face of the earth is renewed
by the Spirit, and that all things languish
without the Spirit, 5 it is clear that the Spirit
is the Creator. But who can doubt this,
since, as we have shown above, not even
the generation of the Lord from the Virgin,
which is more excellent than all creatures, is
without the operation of the Spirit .-*
140. Therefore the Spirit is not a creature,
but the Creator, and He Who is Creator is
certainly not a creature. And because He
is not a creature, without doubt He is the
' S. John XX. 22. !S. Markii. 7. ^ Cp. B. II. s, 6.
* Job xxxiii. 4. ' Ps. civ. [ciii.) 29 30.
OF THE HOLY SPIRIT.— BOOK III.
155
Creator Who produces all things together
with the Father and the Son. But if He be
the Creator, certainly the Apostle, by say-
ing in condemnation of the Gentiles, " Who
served the creature rather than the Creator,
Who is God blessed for ever, " ' and by
warning men, as I said above, that the
Holy Spirit is to be served, both showed
Him to be the Creator, and because He is
the Creator demonstrated that He ought to
be called God. Which he also sums up in
the Epistle written to the Hebrews, saying :
" For He that created all things is God. "^
Let them, therefore, either say what it is
which has been created without the Father,
Son, and Holy Spirit, or let them confess
that the Spirit also is of one Godhead with
the Father and the Son.
141. The writer taught also that He was
to be worshipped. Whom he called Lord and
God. For He Who is the God and Lord of
the Universe is certainly to be worshipped
by all, for it is thus written : "Thou shalt
worship the Lord thy God, and Him only
shalt thou serve."' ^
142. Or let them say where they have
read that the Spirit worships. For it is said
of t.ie Son of God : " Let all the Angels of
God worship Him ; "" ■♦ we do not read. Let
the Spirit worship Him. For how can He
worship Who is not amongst servants and
ministers, but, together with the Father and
the Son, has the service of the just under
Him, for it is written : "We serve the Spirit
of God. "s He is, therefore, to be wor-
shipped by us. Whom the Apostle taught
that we must serve, and Whom we serve
we also adore, according to that which
is written, to repeat the same words again :
" Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and
Him only shalt thou serve."
143. Although the Apostle has not omitted
even this point, so as to omit to teach us that
the Spirit is to be worshipped. For since we
have demonstrated that the Spirit is in the
prophets, no one can doubt that prophecy is
given by the Spirit, and plainly when He
Who is in the prophets is worshipped, the
same Spirit is worshipped. And so you
find : "If the whole Church be assembled
together, and all speak with tongues, and
there come in one unlearned or unbelieving,
will he not say that ye are mad ? But if
all prophesy, and there come in one un-
learned and unbelieving, he is convicted
by all, he is judged by all. For the
secrets of his heart are made mani-
* Rom. i. 25.
* Heb. i. 6.
2 Heb. iii. 4.
'' Phil. iii. 3.
* Deut. vi. 13.
fest, and so falling down on his face he will
worship (jod, declaring that (jod is in truth
among you." ' It is, therefore, God Who
is worshipped, God Who abides and Who
speaks in the prophets ; but the Spirit thus
abides and speaks, therefore, also, the Spirit
is worshipped.
CHAPTER XIX.
Having proved above that the Spirit abides and .speaks in
the prophets, St. Ambrose infers that He knows all
things which are of God, and therefore is One with
the Father and the Son. This same point he estab-
lishes again from the fact that He possesses all that
God possesses, namely, Godhead, knowledge of the
heart, truth, a Name above every name, and power
to raise the dead, a.s is proved from Ezekiel, and in
this He is equal to the .Son.
144. And so as the Father and the Son are
One, because the Son has all things which
the Father has, so too the Spirit is one with
the Father and the Son, because He too
knows all the things of God. For He did
not obtain it by force, so that there should
be any injury as of one who had suffered
loss ; He did not seize it, lest the loss should
be his from whom it might seem to have
been plundered. For neither did He seize
it through need, nor through superiority of
greater power did He take it by force, but
He possesses it by unity of power. There-
fore, if He works all these things, for one
and the same Spirit worketh all, ^ how is He
not God Who has all things which God has.?
145. Or let us consider what God may
have which the Holy Spirit has not. God
the Father has Godhead, and the Son, too,
in Whom dwells the fulness of the Godhead,
has it, and the Spirit has it, for it is written :
" The Spirit of God is in my nostrils." ^
146. God, again, searches the hearts and
reins, for it is written : " God searcheth the
hearts and reins. "4 The Son also has this
power. Who said, " Why think ye evil in
your hearts ? " s For Jesus knew their
thoughts. And the Spirit has the same
power. Who manifests to the prophets also
the secrets of the hearts of others, as we
said above : " for the secrets of his heart are
made manifest." And why do we wonder
if He searches the hidden things of man
Who searches even the deep things of God ?
147. God has as an attribute that He is
true, for it is written : " Let God be true
and every man a liar." ^ Does the Spirit lie
Who is the Spirit of Truth ? ? and Whom we
' I Cor. xiv. 23-25.
* Ps. vii. g.
' S. John xvi. 13.
- I Cor. xii. II.
^ S. Matt. ix. 4.
* Job xxvii. 3.
•" Rom. iii. 4.
156
ST. AMBROSE.
have shown to be called the Truth, since
John called Ilim too the Truth, as also the
Son ? And David says in the psalm :
" Send out Thy light and Thy truth, they
have led me and brought me to Thy holy
hill and to Thy tabernacles." ' If you con-
sider that in this passage the Son is the
light, then the Spirit is the Truth, or if you
consider the Son to be the Truth, then the
Spirit is the light.
148. God has a Name which is above
every name, and has given a name to the
Son, as we read that in the Name of Jesus
knees should bow. Let us consider whether
the Spirit has this Name. But it is written :
" Go, baptize the nations in the Name of
the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy
Spirit.'' ^ He has, then, a Name above
every name. What, therefore, the Father
and the Son have, the Holy Spirit also has
through the oneness of the Name of His
nature.
149. It is a prerogative of God to raise
the dead. " For as the Father raiseth the
dead and quickeneth them, so the Son also
quickeneth whom He will. "^ But the Spirit
also (by Whom God raiseth) raiseth them,
for it is written : " He shall quicken also
your mortal bodies through His Spirit that
dwelleth in you."^ But that you may not
think this a trivial grace, learn that the
Spirit also raises, for the prophet Ezekiel
says : " Come, O Spirit, and breathe upon
these dead, and they shall live. And I
prophesied as He commanded me, and the
Spirit of life entered into them, and they
lived, and stood up on their feet an exceed-
ing great company." 5 And farther on God
says : " Ye shall know that I am the Lord,
when I shall open your graves, that I may
bring My people out of their graves, and I
will give you My Spirit, and ye shall live."^
150. When He spoke of His Spirit, did
He mention any other besides the Holy
Spirit ? For He would neither have spoken
of His Spirit as produced by blowing, nor
could this Spirit come from the four quarters
of the world, for the blowing of these winds,
which we experience, is partial, not univer-
sal ; and this spirit by which we live is also
individual, not universal. But it is the
nature of the Ploly Spirit to be both over
all and in all. Therefore from the words
of the prophet wc may see how (the frame-
work of the members long since fallen asun-
der being scattered) the bones may come
together again to the form of a revived
1 Ps. xliii. [xlii.] 3. - S. Matt, xxviii. ig. » S. John v. 21.
♦ Rom. viii. 11. '' Kzek. .vjcwii. g, 10. " Ezek. xxxvii. 13, 14.
body, when the Spirit quickens them ; and
the ashes may come together on the limbs
belonging to them, animated by a disposi-
tion to come together before being formed
anew in the appearance of living.
151. Do we not in the likeness of what is
done recognize the oneness of the divine
power ? The Spirit raises after the same
manner as the Lord raised at the time of
His own Passion, when suddenly in the
twinkling of an eye the graves of the dead
were opened, and the bodies living again
arose from the tombs, and the smell of
death being removed, and the scent of life
restored, the ashes of those who were dead
took again the likeness of the living.
152. So, then, the Spirit has that which
Christ has, and therefore what God has,
for all things which the Father has the
Son also has, and therefore He said : "All
things which the Father hath are Mine." '
CHAPTER XX.
The river flowing from the Throne of God is a figure of
the Holy Spirit, but by the waters spoken of by
David the powers of heaven are intended. The
kingdom of God is the work of the Spirit ; and it is
no matter for wonder if He reigns in this together
with the Son, since St. Paul promises that we too
sliall reign with the Son.
153. And this, again, is not a trivial mat-
ter that we read that a river goes forth from
the throne of God. For you read the words
of the Evangelist John to this purport:
' ' And He showed me a river of living water,
bright as crystal, proceeding out of the
throne of God and of the Lamb. In the
midst of the street thereof, and on either
side, was the tree of life, bearing twelve
kinds of fruits, yielding its fruit every month,
and the leaves of the tree were for the heal-
ing of all nations." ^
154. This is certainly the River proceeding
from the throne of God, that is, the Holy
Spirit, Whom he drinks who believes in
Christ, as He Flimself says : "If any man
thirst, let him come to Me and drink. He
that believeth on Me, as saith the Scripture,
out of his belly shall flow rivers of living
water. But this spoke He of the Spirit. "^
Therefore the river is the Spirit.
155. This, then, is in the throne of God,
for the water washes not the throne of God.
Then, whatever you may understand by
that water, David said not that it was above
the throne of God, but above the heavens,
* S. John x^^. 13. * Rev. xxii. i, 2. ^ S. John vii. 37, 38.
OF THE HOLY SPIRIT.— BOOK III.
157
for it is written : "Let the waters which
are above the heavens praise the Name of
the Lord."' Let them praise, lie says, not
let // praise. For if he had intended us to
understand the element of water, he would
certainly have said, Let it praise, but by
usini!^ the plural he intended the Powers to
be understood.
156. And what wonder is it if the Holy
Spirit is in the throne of God, since the
king-dom of God itself is the work of the
Holy Spirit, as it is written: "For the
kingdom of God is not meat and drink, but
righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy
Spirit."- And when the Saviour Himself
says, "Every kingdom divided against it-
self shall be destroyed, "3 by adding after-
wards, " But if I, by the Spirit of God, cast
out devils, without doubt the kingdom of
God is come upon you. "^ He shows that
the kingdom of God is held undivided by
Himself and by the Spirit.
157. But what is more foolish than for
any one to deny that the Holy Spirit reigns
together with Christ, when the Apostle says
that even we shall reign together with
Christ in the kingdom of Christ: "If we
are dead with Him, we shall also live with
Him ; if we endure, we shall also reign
with Him. "5 But we by adoption, He by
power ; we by grace. He by nature.
r58. The Holy Spirit, therefore, shares in
the kingdom with the Father and the Son,
and He is of one nature with Them, of one
Lordship, and also of one power.
CHAPTER XXI.
Isaiah was sent by the Spirit, and accordingly the same
Spirit was seen by him. What is meant by the re-
volving wheels, and the divers wings, and how since
the Spirit is proclaimed Lord of Sabaoth by the Sera-
phim, certainly none but impious men can deny Him
this title.
159. Since, then, He has a share in the
kingdom, what hinders us from understand-
ing that it was the Holy Spirit by Whom
Isaiah was sent } For on the authority of
Paul we cannot doubt, whose judgment the
Evangelist Luke so much approved in the
Acts of the Apostles as to write as follows
in Paul's words: "Well spake the Holy
Spirit through Isaiah the prophet to our
fathers, saying : Go to this people and say,
Ye shall hear with the ear and shall not
understand, and seeing ye shall see and
shall not perceive." ^
' Ps. cxlviii. 4.
■• S. Matt. xii. 27.
^ Rom. xiv. 17
* 2 Tim. ii. II, 12.
° S. Matt. xii. 25.
'' Acts xxviii. 25, 26.
160. It is, then, the Spirit Who sent Isaiah.
If the Spirit sent him, it is certainly the
Spirit Whom, after Uzziah's death, Isaiah
saw, when he said : "I saw the Lord of
Sabaoth sitting upon a throne, high and
lifted up, and the house was full of His
majesty. And the Seraphim stood round
about Him, each one had six wings, and
with two they were covering His face, and
with two they were covering His feet, and
with two they were flying ; and they cried
out one to the other, and said. Holy, holy,
holy is the Lord of Sabaoth, the whole earth
is full of His majesty." '
161. If the Seraphim were standing, how
were they flying.? If they were flying, how
were they standing.? If we cannot under-
stand this, how is it that we want to under-
stand God, Whom we have not seen .?
162. But as the prophet saw a wheel run-
ning within a wheel ^ (which certainly does
not refer to any appearance to the bodily
sight, but to the grace of each Testament ;
for the life of the saints is polished, and so
consistent with itself that later portions agree
with the former). The wheel, then, within
a wheel is life under the Law, life under
grace ; inasmuch as Jews are within the
Church, the Law is included in grace. For
he is within the Church who is a Jew se-
cretly ; and circumcision of the heart is a
sacrament within the Church. But that
Jewry is within the Church of which it is
written: "In Jewry is God known;" 3 there-
fore as wheel runs within wheel, so in like
manner the wings were still, and the wings
were flying.
163. In like manner, too, the Seraphim
were veiling His face with two wings, and
with two were veiling His feet, and
with two were flying. For here also is a
mysteryof spiritual wisdom. Seasons stand,
seasons fly ; the past stand, the future are
flying, and like the wings of the Seraphim,
so they veil the face or the feet of God ; in-
asmuch as in God, Who has neither begin-
ning nor end, the whole course of times and
seasons, from this knowledge of its begin-
ning and its end, is at rest. So, then, times
past and future stand, the present fly. Ask
not after the secrets of His beginning or His
end, for there is neither.. You have the
present, but you must praise Him, not
question.
164. The Seraphim with unwearied voices
praise, and do yovi question .^ And certainly
when they do this they show us that we
must not sometimes question about God,
Usa.
VI. 1-3.
- Ezek. i. 16.
^ Ps. Ixxvi. [Ixxv] I.
158
ST. AMBROSE.
but always praise Him. Therefore the Holy
Spirit is also the Lord of Sabaoth. Unless
perchance the Teacher Whom Christ chose
pleases not the impious, or they can deny
that the Holy Spirit is the Lord of powers,
Who gives whatever powers He Himself
wills.
CHAPTER XXH.
In proof of the Unity in Trinity the passage of Isaiah
which has been cited is considered, and it is shown
that there is no difference as to its sense amongst
those who expound it of the Father, or of the Son, or
of the Spirit. If He Who was crucified was Lord of
glory, so, too, is the Holy Spirit equal in all things
to the Father and the Son, and the Arians will never
be able to diminish His glory.
165. It is now possible to recognize the
oneness of the majesty and rule in the
Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. For
many say that it was God the Father Who
was seen at that time by Isaiah. Paul says
it was the Spirit, and Luke supports him.
John the Evangelist refers it to the Son.
For thus has he written of the Son :
" These things spake Jesus, and departed
and hid Himself from them. But though He
had done so great signs before them, they
did not believe on Him, that the word of
Isaiah might be fulfilled which he spake,
Lord, who hath believed our report, and to
whom hath the Arm of the Lord been re-
vealed.-' ' Therefore, they could not believe,
because Isaiah said again, He hath blinded
their eyes and hardened their heart, that
they might not see with their eyes and
understand with their heart and be con-
verted, and I should heal them.- These
things said Isaiah when he saw His glory,
and spake of Him." ^
166. John says that Isaiah spoke these
words, and revealed most clearly that the
glory of the Son appeared to him. Paul,
however, relates that the Spirit said these
things. Whence, then, is this difference ?
167. There is, indeed, a difference of
words, not of meaning. For though they
^ Isa. liiL I.
^ Isa, vi. 10.
^ S. John xii. 36-41.
said different things, neither was in error,
for both the Father is seen in the Son, Who
said, " He that seeth Me seeth the Father
also,"' and the Son is seen in the Spirit; for
as "no man says Lord Jesus, except in
the Holy Spirit,"^ so Christ is seen not by
the eye of flesh, but by the grace of the
Spirit. Whence, too, the Scripture says :
" Rise, thou that sleepest, and arise from
the dead, and Christ shall shine upon
thee. "3 And Paul, when he had lost his
eyesight, how did he see Christ except in
the Spirit .'' 4 Wherefore the Lord says :
" For to this end I have appeared unto
thee, to appoint thee a minister and a wit-
ness of the things wherein thou hast seen
Me, and of the things wherein thou shalt see
Me. "s For the prophets also received the
Spirit and saw Christ.
1 68. One, then, is the vision, one the
right to command, one the glory. Do we
deny that the Holy Spirit is also the Lord of
glory, when the Lord of glory was crucified
Who was born from the Holy Spirit of the
Virgin INIary ? For Christ is not one of two,
but is one, and was born as Son of God of
the Father before the world ; and in the
world born as man by taking flesh.
169. And why should I say that, as the
Father and the Son, so, too, the Spirit is
free from stain and Almighty, for Solomon
called Him in Greek iza-^radu^a/Mr^, r^wArudxa-ov,
because He is Almighty and beholds all
things,^ as we showed above to be, 7 is read
in the Book of Wisdom. Therefore the Spirit
enjoys honour and glory.
170. Consider now lest perchance some-
thing may not beseem Him, or if this dis-
please thee, O Arian, drag Him down from
His fellowship with the Father and the Son.
But if thou choose to drag Him down thou
wilt see the heavens reversed above thee,
for all their strength is from the Spirit.*^ If
thou choose to drag Him down, thou must
first lay hands on God, for the Spirit is God.
But how wilt thou drag Him down. Who
searcheth the deep things of God 1
* S. John xiv. 9.
* Acts ix. 8.
'B. III. 18.
^ I Cor. xii. 3.
^ Acts xxvi. 16.
" Ps. xxxiii. [xxxii.J 6.
^ Eph. V. 14.
" Wisd. vii. 2a.
THE TWO BOOKS OF ST. AMBROSE, BISHOP OF MILAN, ON THE
DECEASE OF HIS BROTHER SAYTRUS.
INTRODUCTION.
Besides his elder sister Marcellina, whio received the veil at the hands of Pope Liberius,
at Christmas [perh. 353 a.d.], St. Ambrose had also a brother named Satyrus, to which
name, in the epitaph on him ascribed to the bishop, is added Uranius. This is probably,
however, merely in reference to his translation from earth to heaven.
Satyrus had in his earlier years, as well as St. Ambrose, practised as an advocate, and
had held office. But when his brother was appointed Bishop of Milan, Satyrus at once
gave up his appointment, and devoted his life to managing St. Ambrose's secular affairs,
that nothing might distract him from his episcopal duties. After, however, a few short
years of devotion to this task, he succumbed to a severe illness October 17, a.d. 379.
The grief of St. Ambrose at the loss of his absolutely like-minded brother was intense,
and to it we owe the exquisite discourse delivered at the funeral of Satyrus, and the second,
on the Resurrection, delivered a week later.
St. Ambrose subsequently revised these two addresses, and they have come down to us
as the " two books of St. Ambrose on the decease of Satyrus," some MSS. adding, " and the
resurrection of the dead.''
The epitaph on Satyrus, said to be by St. Ambrose, is as follows :
Uranio Satyro supremum frater honorem
Martyris ' ad Irevam detulit Ambrosius.
Hasc meriti merces, ut sacri sanguinis humor
Finitimas penetrans adluat exuvias.
^ i.e. St. Victor.
THE TWO BOOKS OF ST. AMBROSE, BISHOP OF MILAN, ON THE
DECEASE OF HIS BROTHER SATYRUS.
BOOK I.
1. We have brought hither, dearest bre-
thren, my sacrifice, a sacrifice undefiled, a
sacrifice well pleasing to God, my lord and
brother Satyrus. I did not forget that he
was mortal, nor did my feelings deceive me,
but grace abounded more exceedingly. And
so I have nothing to complain of, but have
cause for thankfulness to God, for I always
desired that if any troubles should await
either the Church or myself, they should
rather fall on me and on my house. Thanks,
therefore, be to God, that in this time of
common fear, when everything is dreaded
from the barbarian movements, I ended the
trouble of all by my personal grief, and that
I dreaded for all which was turned upon me.
And may this be fully accomplished, so that
my grief may be a ransom for the grief of
all.
2. Nothing among things of earth, dearest
brethren, was more precious to me, nothing
more worthy of love, nothing more dear
than such a brother, but public matters come
before private. And should any one enquire
what was his feeling ; he would rather be
slain for others than live for himself, because
Christ died according to the flesh for all, that
we might learn not to live for ourselves
alone.
3. To this must be added that I cannot be
ungrateful to God ; for I must rather rejoice
that I had such a brother than grieve that I
had lost a brother, for the former is a gift,
the latter a debt to be paid. And so, as long
as I might, I enjoyed the loan entrusted to
me, now He Who deposited the pledge has
taken it back. There is no difference be-
tween denying that a pledge has been de-
posited and grieving at its being returned.
In each there is untrustworthiness, and in
each [eternal] life is risked. It is a fault if
you refuse repayment, and piety if you re-
fuse a sacrifice. Since, too, the lender of
money can be made a fool of, but the Author
n
of nature, the Lender of all that we need,
cannot be cheated. And so the larger the
amount of the loan, so much the more grati-
tude is due for the use of the capital.
4. Wherefore, I cannot be ungrateful con-
cerning my brother, for he has given back
that which was common to nature, and has
gained what is peculiar to grace alone. For
who would refuse the common lot.-* Who
would grieve that a pledge specially en-
trusted to him is taken away, since the
Father gave up His only Son to death for us ?
Who would think that he ought to be ex-
cepted from the lot of dying, who has not
been excepted from the lot of being born ?
It is a great mystery of divine love, that not
even in Christ was exception made of the
death of the body ; and although He was the
Lord of nature. He refused not the law of the
flesh which He had taken upon Him. It is
necessary for me to die, for Him it was not
necessary. Could not He Who said of His
servant, " If I will that he tarry thus until
I come, what is that to thee.?'' ' not have re-
mained as He was, if so He willed ? But by
continuance of my brother's life here, he
would have destroyed his reward and my
sacrifice. What is a greater consolation to
us than that according to the flesh Christ
also died.'' Or why should I weep too vio-
lently for my brother, knowing as I do that
that divine love could not die.
5. Why should I alone weep more than
others for him for whom you all weep .-* I
have merged my personal grief in the grief
of all, especially because my tears are of no
use, whereas yours strengthen faith and
bring consolation. You who are rich weep,
and by weeping prove that riches gathered
together are of no avail for safety, since
death cannot be put off by a money pay-
ment, and the last day carries off alike the
* S. John xxi. 22.
1 62
ST. AMBROSE.
rich and the poor. You that are old weep,
because in him you fear that you see the lot
of your own children ; and for this reason,
since you cannot prolong the life of the body,
train your children not to bodily enjoyment
but to virtuous duties. And you that are
young weep too, because the end of life is
not the ripeness of old age. The poor too
wept, and, which is of much more worth,
and much more fruitful, washed away his
transgressions with their tears. Those are
redeeming tears, those are groanings which
hide the grief of death, that grief which
through the plenteousness of eternal joy
covers over the feeling of former grief.
And so, though the funeral be that of a
private person, yet is the mourning public ;
and therefore cannot the weeping last long
which is hallowed by the affection of all.
6. For why should I weep for thee, my
most loving brother, who wast thus torn
from me that thou mightest be the brother
of all ? For I have not lost but changed my
intercourse with thee ; before we were inse-
parable in the body, now we are undivided
in affection ; for thou remainest with me,
and ever wilt remain. And, indeed, whilst
thou wast living with me, our country never
tore thee from me, nor didst thou thyself
ever prefer our country to me ; and now
thou art become surety for that other coun-
try, for I begin to be no stranger there
where the better portion of myself already
is. I was never wholly engrossed in my-
self, but the greater part of each of us was
in the other, yet we were each of us in
Christ, in Whom is the whole sum of all,
and the portion of each severally. This
grave is more pleasing to me than thy natal
soil, in which is the fruit not of nature but
of grace, for in that body which now lies
lifeless lies the better work of my life, since
in this body, too, which I bear is the richer
portion of thyself.
7. And would that, as memory and gra-
titude are devoted to thee, so, too, what-
ever time I have still to breathe this air, I
could breathe it into thy life, and that half
of my time might be struck off from me and
be added to thine ! For it had been just
that for those, whose use of hereditary
property was always undivided, the period
of life should not have been divided, or at
least that we, who always without difference
shared everything in common during life,
should not have a difference in our deaths.
8. But now, brother, whither shall I ad-
vance, or whither shall I turn ? The ox
seeks his fellow, and conceives itself incom-
plete, and by frequent lowing shows its
tender longing, if perchance that one is
wanting with whom it has been wont to
draw the plough. And shall I, my brother,
not long after thee.'' Or can I ever forget
thee, with whom I always drew the plough
of this life.? In work I was inferior, but in
love more closely bound ; not so much fit
through my strength, as endurable through
thy patience, who with the care of anxious
affection didst ever protect my side with
thine, as a brother in thy love, as a father
in thy care, as older in watchfulness, as
younger in respect. So in the one degree
of relationship thou didst expend on me the
duties of many, so that I long after not one
only but many lost in thee, in whom alone
flattery was unknown, dutifulness was por-
trayed. For thou hadst nothing to which to
add by pretence, inasmuch as all was com-
prised in thy dutifulness, so as neither to
receive addition nor await a change.
9. But whither am I going, in my immo-
derate grief, forgetful of my duty, mindful
of kindness received.' The Apostle calls
me back, and as it were puts a bit upon my
sorrow, saying, as you heard just now :
" We would not that ye should be ignorant,
brethren, concerning them that sleep, that
ye be not sorrowful, as the rest which have
no hope.'"' Pardon me, dearest brethren.
For we are not all able to say: "Be ye
imitators of me, as I also am of Christ."^
But if you seek one to imitate, you have One
Whom you may imitate. All are not fitted
to teach, would that all were apt to learn.
ID. But we have not incurred any griev-
ous sin by our tears. Not all weeping pro-
ceeds from unbelief or weakness. Natural
grief is one thing, distrustful sadness is an-
other, and there is a very great difference
between longing for what you have lost
and lamenting that you have lost it. Not
only grief has tears, joy also has tears of
its own. Both piety excites weeping, and
prayer waters the couch, and supplication,
according to the prophet's saying, washes
the bed. ^ Their friends made a great
mourning when the patriarchs were buried.
Tears, then, are marks of devotion, not pro-
ducers of grief •♦ I confess, then, that I too
wept, but the Lord also wept. He wept for
one not related to Him, I for my brother.
He wept for all in weeping for one, I will
weep for thee in all, my brother.
II. He wept for what affected us, not
Himself ; for the Godhead sheds no tears ;
' I Thess. iv. 14, - i Cor. iv. 16. ' Ps. vi. 7.
■* As in many other passages, a play upon words cannot be trans-
lated. The Latin is: Laerytnee ergo J>ietatis indices, no?i il/ices
sunt doloris.
BOOK I.— ON THE DECEASE OF SATYRUS.
163
but He wept in that nature in which He
was sad ; He wept in that in which He was
crucified, in that in which He died, in that
in which He was buried. He wept in that
which the prophet this day brought to our
minds : " Mother Sion shall say, A man,
yea, a man was made in her, and the IMost
High Himself established her." ' He wept
in that nature in which He called Sion
Mother, born in Judaea, conceived by the Vir-
gin. But according to His Divine Nature He
could not have a mother, for He is the Creator
of His mother. So far as He was made, it
was not by divine but by human generation,
because He was made man, God was born.
12. But you read in another place : "Unto
us a Child is born, unto us a Son is given. "^
In the word Child is an indication of age,
in that of Son the fulness of the Godhead.
Made of His mother, born of the Father,
yet the Same Person was both born and
given, you must not think of two but of
one. For one is the Son of God, both born
of the Father and sprung from the Virgin,
differing in order, but in name agreeing in
one, as, too, the lesson just heard teaches,
for ' ' a man was made in her and the Most
High Himself established her ; " ^ man in-
deed in the body, the Most High in power.
And though He be God and man in diver-
sity of nature, yet is He at the same time
one in each nature. One property, then, is
peculiar to His own nature, another He has
in common with us, but in both is He one,
and in both is He perfect.
13. Therefore it is no subject of wonder
that God made Him to be both Lord and
Christ. He made Him Jesus, Him, that
is. Who received the name in His bodily
nature ; He made Him of Whom also the
patriarch David writes : " iNIother Sion shall
say, A man, yea, a man is made in her."
But being made man He is unlike the
Father, not in Godhead but in His body ;
not separated from the Father, but differing
in office, abiding united in power, but sepa-
rated in the mystery of the Passion.
14. The treatment of this topic demands
more arguments, by which to demonstrate
the authority of the Father, the special pro-
perty of the Son, and the Unity of the whole
Trinity ; but to-day I have undertaken the
office of consolation, not of discussion, al-
though it is customary in consoling to draw
away the mind from its grief by application
to discussion. But I would rather moderate
the grief than alter the affection, that the
longing may rather be assuaged than lulled
1 Ps. Ixxxvii. [Ixxxvi.] 5. ^ Is. ix. 6. ^ Ps. Ixxxvii. [Ixxxvi.] 5.
to sleep. For I have no wish to turn away
too far from my brother, and to be led off
by other thoughts, seeing that this discourse
has been undertaken, as it were, for the
sake of accompanying him, that I might
follow in affection him departing, and em-
brace in mind him whom I see with my
eyes. For it gives me pleasure to fix the
whole gaze of my eyes on him, to encom-
pass him with kindly endearments ; whilst
my mind is stupefied, and I feel as though
he were not lost whom I am able still to
see present ; and I think him not dead, my
services to whom I do not as yet perceive
to be wanting, services to which I had de-
voted the whole of my life and the drawing
of every breath.
15. What, then, can I pay back in return
for such kindness and such pains ? I had
made thee, my brother, my heir ; thou hast
left me as the heir ; I hoped to leave thee as
survivor, and thou hast left me. I, in return
for thy kindnesses, that I might repay thy
benefits, gave wishes ; now 1 have lost my
wishes yet not thy benefits. What shall I,
succeeding to my own heir, do .-* What
shall I do who outlive my own life ? What
shall I do, no longer sharing this light
which yet shines on me ? What thanks,
what good offices, can I repay to thee .''
Thou hast nothing from me but tears. And
perchance, secure of thy reward, thou de-
sirest not those tears which are all that I
have left. For even when thou wast yet
alive, thou didst forbid me to weep, and
didst show that our grief was more pain to
thee than thine own death. Tears are bid-
den to flow no longer, and weeping is re-
pressed. And gratitude to thee forbids them
too, lest whilst we weep for our loss we
seem to despair concerning thy nierits.
i6. But for myself at least thou lessenest
the bitterness of that grief; I have nothing
to fear who used to fear for thee. I have
nothing which the world can now snatch
from me. Although our holy sister still
survives, venerable for her blameless life,
thy equal in character, and not falling short
in kindly offices ; yet we both used to fear
more for thee, we felt that all the sweetness
of this life was stored up in thee. To live
for thy sake was a delight, to die for thee
were no cause of sorrow, for we both used
to pray that thou mightest survive, it was
no pleasure that we should survive thee.
When did not our very soul shudder when a
dread of this kind touched us .'* How were
our minds dismayed by the tidings of thy
sickness !
17. Alas for our wretched hopes ! We
164
ST. AMBROSE.
thought that he was restored to us whom we
see carried off, and we now recognize that
thy departure hence was obtained by thy
vows to the holy martyr Lawrence ! ' And
indeed I would that thou hadst obtained not
only a safe passage hence, but also a longer
time of life ! Thou couldst have obtained
many years of life, since thou wast able to
obtain thy departure hence. And 1 indeed
thank Thee, Almighty Everlasting God, that
Thou hast not denied us at least this last
comfort, that Thou hast granted us the
longed-for return of our much loved brother
from the regions of Sicily and Africa ; for
he was snatched away so soon after his
return as though his death were delayed for
this alone, that he might return to his
brethren.
18. Now, I clearly have my pledge which
no change can any more tear from me ; I
have the relics which I may embrace, I have
the tomb which I may cover with my body,
I have the grave on which I may lie, and I
shall believe that I am more acceptable
to God, because I shall rest upon the bones
of that holy body. Would that I had been
able in like manner to place my body in the
way of thy death ! Hadst thou been at-
tacked with the sword, I would have rather
offered myself to be pierced for thee ; had I
been able to recall thy life as it was passing
away, I would have rather offered my own.
19. It profited me nothing to receive thy
last breath, nor to have breathed into the
mouth of thee dying, for I thought that
either I myself should receive thy death, or
should transfer my life to thee. O that sad,
yet sweet pledge of the last kiss ! O the
misery of that embrace, in which the life-
less body began to stiffen, the last breath
vanished ! I tightened my arms indeed, but
had already lost him whom I was holding ;
I drew in .thy last breath with my mouth,
that I might share thy death. But in some
way that breath became lifegiving to me,
and even in death diffused an odour of
greater love. And if I was unable to length-
en thy life by my breath, would that at
least the strength of thy last breath might
have been transfused into my mind, and
that our affection might have inspired me
with that jiurity and innocence of thine.
Thou wouldst have left me, dearest brother,
this inheritance, which would not smite the
affections with tears of grief, but commend
thine heir by notable grace.
20. What, then, shall I now do, since all
' On the subject of vows to the martyrs, comp. Exiiort. J 'irg.
111. 15 ; also see, De Viduis, ix. 55.
the sweetness, all the solace, in fine, all the
charms of that life are lost to me t For
thou wast alone my solace at home, my
charm abroad ; thou, I say, my adviser in
counsel, the sharer in my cares, the averter
of anxiety, the driver away of sorrow ; thou
wast the protector of my acts and the
defender of my thoughts ; thou, lastly, the
only one on whom rested care of home and
of public matters. I call thy holy soul
to witness that, in the building of the
church,' I often feared lest I might dis-
please thee. Lastly, when thou earnest back
thou didst chide thy delay. So wast thou,
at home and abroad, the instructor and
teacher of the priest, that thou didst not
suffer him to think of domestic matters, and
didst take thought to care for public matters.
But I may not fear to seem to speak boast-
ingly, for this is thy meed of praise, that
thou, without displeasing any, both didst
manage thy brothers house and recommend
his priesthood.
21. I feel, indeed, that my mind is touched
by the repetition of thy services and the
enumeration of thy virtues, and yet in being
thus affected I find my rest, and although
these memories renew my grief, they never-
theless bring pleasure. Am I able either
not to think of thee, or ever to think of thee
without tears .' And shall I ever be able
either not to remember such a brother, or
to remember him without tearful gratitude }
For what has ever been pleasant to me that
has not had its source in thee .' What, I say,
has ever been a pleasure to me without
thee, or to thee without me.? Had we not
every practice in common, almost to our
very eyesight and our sleep } Were our
wills ever at variance.'' And what step did
we not take in common } So that we almost
seemed in raising our feet to move each
other's body.
22. But if ever either had to eo forth with-
out the other, one would think that his side
was unprotected, one could see his counte-
nance troubled, one would suppose that his
soul was sad, the accustomed grace, the
usual vigour did not shine forth, the loneli-
ness was a subject of dread to all, and made
them fearful of some sickness. Such a
strange thing it seemed to all that we were
separated. I certainly, impatient at my
brother's absence, and having it constantly in
mind, kept on turning my head seeking him,
as it were, present, and seemed to myself
then to see him and speak to him. But if I
' I^robably the Basilica built at Milan by St. Ambrose.
BOOK I.— ON THE DFXEASE OF SATYRUS.
ir.^
was disappointed in my hope, I seemed to
myself, as it were, to be dragging a yoke on
my bowed down neck, to advance with diffi-
culty, to meet others with diffidence, and to
return home hurriedly, since it gave me no
pleasure to go farther without thee.
23. But when we both had to go forth,
there were not more steps on the way than
words, nor was our pace quicker than our
talk, and it was less for the sake of walking
than for the pleasure of conversing, for each
of us hung on the lips of the other. We
thought not of gazing intently on the view
as we passed along, but listened to each
others anxious talk, drank in the kindly ex-
pression of the eyes, and inhaled the delight
of the brother's appearance. How I used
silently to admire within myself thy virtues,
how I congratulated myself that God had
given me such a brother, so modest, so
capable, so innocent, so simple, so that
when I thought of thy innocence I began to
doubt thy capability, when I saw thy capa-
bility I could hardly imagine thy innocence !
But thou didst combine both with wonderful
perfection.
24. Lastly, what we both had been un-
able to effect, thou didst accomplish alone.
Prosper, as I hear, congratulated himself be-
cause he thought that on account of my
priesthood he need not restore what he had
purloined, but he found thy power alone to
be greater than that of us both together.
And so he paid all, and was not ungrateful
for thy moderation, and did not scoff at thy
modesty. But for whom, brother, didst thou
seek to gain that .' We wished that that
should be the reward of thy labours which
was the proof of them. Thou didst accom-
plish everything, and when having done all
thou didst return, thou alone, who art to be
preferred to all, art torn from us ; as if thou
hadst put off death for this end, that thou
mightest fulfil the office of affection, and
then carry off the palm for capability.
25. How little, dearest brother, did the
honours of this world delight us, because
they separated us from one another! And
we accepted them, not because the acquisi-
tion of them was to be desired, but that
there might be no appearance of paltry dis-
simulation. Or perhaps they were therefore
granted to us, that, inasmuch as by thy
early death thou wast about to shatter our
pleasure, we might learn to live without
each other.
26. And indeed I recognize the foreboding
dread of my mind, when I often go again
through what I have written. I endeavoured
to restrain thee, brother, from visiting Africa
thyself, and wished thee rather to send some
one. I was afraid to let thee go that jour-
ney, to trust thee to the waves, and a greater
fear than usual came over my mind ; but
thou didst arrange the journey, and order
the business, and, as I hear, didst entrust
thyself again to the waves in an old and
leaky vessel. For since thou wast aiming
at speed, thou didst set caution aside ; eager
to do me a kindness, thou madest nothing
of thy danger.
27. O deceitful joy ! O the uncertain
course of earthly affairs ! We thought that
he who was returned from Africa, restored
from the sea, preserved after shipwreck,
could not now be snatched from us ; but,
though on land, we suffered a more griev-
ous shipwreck, for the death of him whom
shipwreck at sea owing to strong swimming
could not kill is shipwreck to us. For what
enjoyment remains to us, from whom so
sweet an ornament has been taken, so
bright a light in this worlds darkness has been
extinguished ? For in him an ornament
not only of our family but of the whole
fatherland has perished.
28. I feel, indeed, the deepest gratitude to
you, dearest brethren, holy people, that you
esteem my grief as no other than your own,
that you feel this bereavement as having
happened to yourselves, that you offer me
the tears of the whole city, of every age, and
the good wishes of every rank, with unusual
affection. For this is not the grief of private
sympathy, but as it were a service and offer-
ing of public good-will. And should any
sympathy with me because of the loss of
such a brother touch you, I have abundant
fruit from it, I have the pledge of your affec-
tion. I might prefer that my brother were
living, but yet public kindness is in pro-
sperity very pleasant, and in adversity very
grateful.
29. And, indeed, so great kindness seems
to me to merit no ordinary gratitude. For
not without a purpose are the widows in the
Acts of the Apostles described as weeping
when Tabitha was dead, ' or the crowd in
the Gospel, moved by the widow's tears and
accompanying the funeral of the young man
who was to be raised again. ^ There is,
then, no doubt that by your tears the pro-
tection of the apostles is obtained ; no doubt,
I say, that Christ is moved to mercy, seeing
you weeping. Though He has not now
touched the bier, yet He has received the
spirit commended to Him, and if He have
not called the dead by the bodily voice, yet
' Acts ix. 39.
^ S. Luke vii. 12.
i66
ST. AMBROSE.
He has by the authority of His divine power
delivered my brother's soul from the pains of
death and from the attacks of wicked spirits.
And though he that was dead has not sat
up on the bier, yet he has found rest in
Christ ; and if he have not spoken to us, yet
he sees those things which are above us, and
rejoices in that he now sees higher things
than we. For by the things which we read
in the Gospels we understand what shall be,
and what we see at present is a sign of what
is to be.
30. He had no need of being raised again
for time, for whom the raising again for eter-
nity is waiting. For why should he fall
back into this wretched and miserable state
of corruption, and return to this mournful
life, for whose rescue from such imminent
evils and threatening dangers we ought
rather to rejoice ? For if no one mourns for
Enoch, who was translated ' when the world
was at peace and wars were not raging,
but the people rather congratulated him, as
Scripture says concerning him: "He was
taken away, lest that wickedness should
alter his understanding," ^ with how much
greater justice must this now be said, when
to the dangers of the world is added the un-
certainty of life. He was taken away that
he might not fall into the hands of the bar-
barians ; he was taken away that he might
not see the ruin of the whole earth, the end
of the world, the burial of his relatives, the
death of fellow-citizens ; lest, lastly, which is
more bitter than any death, he should see
the pollution of the lioly virgins and widows.
31. So then, brother, I esteem thee happy
both in the beauty of thy life and in the op-
portuneness of thy death. For thou wast
snatched away not from us but from dan-
gers ; thou didst not lose life but didst escape
the fear of threatening troubles. For with
the pity of thy holy mind for those near to
thee, if thou knewest that Italy was now op-
pressed by the nearness of the enemy, how
wouldst thou groan, how wouldst thou
grieve that our safety wholly depended on
the barrier of the Alps, and that the protec-
tion of purity consisted in barricades of
trees ! With what sorrow wouldst thou
mourn that thy friends were separated from
the enemy by so slight a division, from an
enemy, too, both impure and cruel, who
spares neither chastity nor life.
32. How, I say, couldst thou bear these
things which we are compelled to endure,
and perchance (which is more grievous) to
behold virgins ravished, little children torn
iGen.
V. 24.
' Wisd. iv. II.
from the embrace of their parents and tossed
on javelins, the bodies consecrated to God
detiled, and even aged widows polluted .''
How, I say, couldst thou endure these
things, who even with thy last breath, for-
getful of thyself, yet not without thought for
us, didst warn us concernins: the invasion of
the barbarians, saynig that not in vain hadst
thou said that we ought to flee. Perchance
was it because thou didst see that we were
left destitute by thy death, and thou didst it,
not out of weakness of spirit, but from affec-
tion, and wast weak with respect to us, but
strong with respect to thyself. For when
thou wast summoned home by the noble
man Symmachus thy parent,' because Italy
was said to be blazing with war, because
thou wast going into danger, because thou
wast likely to fall amongst enemies, thou
didst answer that this was the cause of thy
coming, that thou mightest not fail us in
danger, that thou mightest show thyself a
sharer in thy brother's peril.
^^. Happy, then, was he in so opportune a
death, because he has not been preserved
for this sorrow. Certainly thou art happier
than thy holy sister, deprived of thy com-
fort, anxious for her own modesty, lately
blessed with two brothers, now wretched
because of both, being: able neither to follow
the one nor to leave the other ; for whom
thy tomb is a lodging, and the burying-place
of thy body a home. And would that even
this resting-place were safe ! Our food is
mingled with weeping and our drink with
tears, for thou hast given us the bread of
tears as food, and tears to drink in large
measure,^ nay, even beyond measure.
34. What now shall I say of myself, who
may not die lest I leave my sister, and
desire not to live lest I be separated from
thee .' For what can ever be pleasant to
me without thee, in whom was always my
whole pleasure.'' or what satisfaction is it to
remain longer in this life, and to linger on
the earth where we lived with pleasure so
long as we lived together? If there were
anything which could delight us here, it
could not delight without thee ; and if ever
we had earnestly desired to prolong our
life, now at any rate Vv-e would not exist
without thee.
35. This is indeed unendurable. For
what can be endured without thee, such a
companion of my life, such a sharer of my
toil and partaker of my duties ? And I could
* Symmachus is called parois of Satyrus here and elsewhere
by St. Ambrose. The title does not imply blood relationship, but
friendship and patronage.
- Ps. Ixxx. [Ixxix.J 5.
BOOK I.— ON THE DECEASE OF SATYRUS.
i(>7
not even make his loss more endurable by
dwelling on it beforehand, so much did my
mind fear to think of any such thing con-
cerning him ! Not that I was ignorant of
his condition, but a certain kind of prayers
and vows had so clouded the sense of com-
mon frailty, that I knew not how to think
anything concerning him except entire pro-
sperity.
36. And then lately, when I was op-
pressed by a severe attack (would that it
had been fatal), I grieved only that thou
wast not sitting by my couch, and sharing
the kindly duty with my holy sister might-
est with thy fingers close my eyes when
dead. What had I wished ? What am I
now pondering ? What vows are wanting ?
What services are to succeed ? 1 was pre-
paring one thing, I am compelled to set
forth another ; not being the subject of the
funeral rites but the minister. O hard eyes,
which could behold my brother dying ! O
cruel and unkind hands, which closed those
eyes in which I used to see so much ! O
still harder neck, which could bear so sad a
burden, though it were in a service full of
consolation.
37. Thou, my brother, hadst more justly
done these things for me. I used to expect
these services at thy hands, I used to long
for them. But now, having survived my
own life, what comfort can I find without
thee, who alone usedst to comfort me when
mourning, to excite my happiness and drive
away my sorrow ? How do I now behold
thee, my brother, who now addressest no
words to me, offerest me no kiss ? Though,
indeed, our mutual love was so deeply seated
in each of us, that it was cherished rather
by inward affection than made public by
open caresses, for we who professed such
mutual trust and love did not seek the
testimony of others. The strong spirit of
our brotherhood had so infused itself into
each of us, that there was no need to prove
our love by caresses ; but our minds being
conscious of our affection, we, satisfied with
our inward love, did not seem to require
the show of caresses, whom the very appear-
ance of each other fashioned for mutual
love ; for we seemed, I know not by what
spiritual stamp or bodily likeness, to be
the one in the other.
38. Who saw thee, and did not think that
he had seen me .'' How often have I saluted
those who, because they had previously
saluted thee, said that they had been already
saluted by me .'' How many said something
to thee, and related that they had said it to
me ? What pleasure, what amusement often
was given me by this, because I saw that
they were mistaken in us .-' What an agree-
able mistake, what a pleasant slip, how in-
nocent a deceit, how sweet a trick ! For
there was nothing for me to fear in thy
words or acts, and I rejoiced when they
were ascribed to me.
39. But if they insisted all too vehemently
that they had given me some information,
I used to smile and answer with delight :
Take care that it w^as not my brother whom
you told. For since we had everything in
common, one spirit and one disposition,
yet the secrets of friends alone were not
common property, not that we were afraid
of danger in the communication, but that
we might keep faith by withholding it.
Yet if we had a matter to be consulted about,
our counsel was always in common, though
the secret was not always made common.
For although our friends spoke to either of
us, so that what they said might reach the
other ; yet I know that secrets were for the
most part kept with such good faith that
they were not imparted even to the other
brother. For this is a convincing proof that
that was not betrayed without which had
not been imparted to the brother.
40. I confess, then, that being raised by
these so great and excellent benefits to a
kind of mental ecstasy, I had ceased to fear
that I might be the survivor, because I
thought him more worthy to live, and there-
fore received the blow which I am unable
to endure, for the wounds of such pain are
more easily borne when dwelt upon before-
hand than when unexpected. Who will
now console me full of sorrows .'' Who will
raise up him that is smitten down ? With
whom shall I share my cares ? Who
will set me free from the business of this
world ? For thou wast the manager of our
affairs, the censor of the servants, the
decider between brother and sister, the
decider not in matters of strife but of affec-
tion.
41. For if at any time there was a discus-
sion between me and my holy sister on any
matter, as to which was the preferable
opinion, we used to take thee as judge,
who wouldst hurt no one, and anxious to
satisfy each, didst keep to thy loving affec-
tion and the right measure in deciding, so
as to let each depart satisfied, and gain for
thyself the thanks of each. Or if thou thy-
self broughtest anything for discussion, how
pleasantly didst thou argue ! and thy very
indignation, how free from bitterness it was !
how was thy discipline not unpleasant to
the servants themselves ! since thou didst
1 68
ST. AMBROSE.
strive rather to blame thyself before thy
brethren than to punish through excitement !
For our profession restrained in us the zeal
for correction, and, indeed, thou, my
brother, didst remove from us every inclina-
tion to correct, when thou didst promise to
punish and desire to alleviate.
42. That is, then, evidence of no ordinary
prudence, which virtue is thus defined by
the wise. The first of good things is to
know God, and with a pious mind to rev-
erence Him as true and divine, and to
delight in that loveable and desirable beauty
of the eternal Truth with the whole affection
of the mind. And the second consists in
deriving from that divine and heavenly
source of nature, love towards our neigh-
bours, since even the wise of this world
have borrowed from our laws. For they
never could have obtained those points for
the discipline of men, except from that
heavenly fount of the divine law.
43. What, then, shall I say of his rever-
ence in regard to the worship of God ? He,
before being initiated in the more perfect
mysteries, being in danger of shipwreck
when the ship that bore him, dashed upon
rocky shallows, was being broken up by
the waves tossing it hither and thither,
fearing not death but lest he should depart
this life without the Mystery, asked of those
whom he knew to be initiated the divine
Sacrament of the faithful ; not that he might
gaze on secret things with curious eyes, but
to obtain aid for his faith. For he caused it
to be bound in a napkin, and the napkin
round his neck, and so cast himself into the
sea, not seeking a plank loosened from the
framework of the ship, by floating on which
he might be rescued, for he sought the
means of faith alone. And so believing
that he was sufficiently protected and de-
fended by this, he sought no other aid.
44- One may consider his courage at the
same time, for he, when the vessel was
breaking up, did not as a shipwrecked man
seize a plank, but as a brave man found in
himself the support of his courage, nor did
his hope fail nor his expectation deceive
him. And then, when preserved from the
waves and brought safe to land in the port,
he first recognized his Leader, to Whom he
had committed himself, and at once after
either himself rescuing the servants, or see-
ing that they were rescued, disregarding his
goods, and not longing for what was lost,
he sought the Church of God, that he might
return thanks for his deliverance, and
acknowledge the eternal mysteries, declar-
ing that there was no greater duty than
thanksgiving. But if not to be grateful to
man has been judged like to murder, how
enormous a crime is it not to be grateful to
God!
45. Now it is the mark of a prudent man
to know himself, and, as it has been defined
by the wise, to live in accordance with
nature. What, then, is so much in accord-
ance with nature as to be grateful to the
Creator ? Behold this heaven, does it not
render thanks to its Creator when He is
seen ? For ' ' the heavens declare the glory
of God, and the firmament proclaims His
handywork. "' The sea itself when it is
quiet and at rest sets forth a representation
of the Divine Quiet ; when it is stirred up,
it shows that the wrath on high is terrible.
Do we not all rightly admire the grace of
God, when we observe that senseless nature
restrains its waves as it were with sense and
reason, and that the waves know their own
limit .'' And what shall I say of the earth,
which in obedience to the divine command
freely supplies food to all living things ; and
the fields restore what they have received
multiplied as it were by accumulating in-
terest, and heaped up.
46. So he who by the guidance of nature
had grasped the methods of the divine work
in the ardent vigour of his mind, knew that
thanks should be paid first of all to the
Preserver of all ; but inasmuch as he could
not repay, he could at least feel grateful.
For the essence of this thankfulness is that
when it is offered it is felt, and by being
felt is offered. So he offered thanks and
brought away faith. For he who had felt
such protection on the part of the heavenly
Mystery wrapped in a napkin, how much
did he expect if he received it with his mouth
and drew it to the very depth of his bosom ?
How much more must he have been expect-
ing of that, when received into his breast,
which had so benefited him when covered
with a napkin ?
47. But he was not so eager as to lay
aside caution. He called the bishop to him,
and esteeming that there can be no true
thankfulness except it spring from true faith,
he enquired whether he agreed with the
Catholic bishops, that is, with the Roman
Church.?- And possibly at that place the
Church of the district was in schism. F(jr
at that time Lucifer had withdrawn from
our communion, and although he had been
an exile for the faith, and had left inheritors
^ Ps. xix. [xviii.] i.
^ At tliis time there was no doubt concerning the faitli of the
Roman Church, as there would have tieen later under Liberius and
Honorius. Consequently Satyrus instances it, as being the chief
and best known see.
BOOK L— ON THE DECEASE OF SATYRUS.
169
of his own faith.' yet my brother did not
think that there could be true faith in schism.
For though schismatics kept the faith to-
wards God, yet they kept it not towards
the Church of God, certain of whose Umbs
they suffered as it were to be divided, and
her members to be torn. For since Christ
suffered for the Church, and the Church is the
body of Christ, it does not seem that faith
in Christ is shown by those by whom His
Passion is made of none effect, and His body
divided.
48. And so though he retained the deposit
of faith, and feared to voyage as debtor of
so vast an amount, yet he preferred to cross
over to a place where he could make his
payment in safety, for he was convinced
that the payment of thankfulness to God
consists in dispositions and faith, which
payment, so soon as he had free access to
the Church, he delayed not to make. ^ And
he both received the grace of God which he
longed for, and preserved it when received.
Nothing, then, can be wiser than that pru-
dence which distinguishes between divine
and human matters.
49. Why should I speak of his well-known
eloquence in his forensic duties ? What
incredible admiration did he excite in the
hall of justice of the high prefecture ! But
I prefer to speak of those things which he
esteemed, through consideration of the mys-
teries of God, to be preferable to human
matters.
50. And should any one wish more fully
to regard his fortitude, let him consider how
often after his shipwreck with invincible dis-
regard of this life he crossed the sea and
travelled through widespread regions in his
journeys, and at last that at this very time
he did not shrink from danger, but met it.
Patient under injustice, regardless of cold,
would that he had been equally thoughtful
in taking precautions. But exactly herein
was he blessed, that he, so long as his bodily
strength allowed, spent his life fulfilling the
work of youth, uninterruptedly carrying out
^ Lucifer was Bishop of Cagliari in Sardinia. At the synod of
Aries, A.D 353, he had strenuously resisted the condemnation of St.
Athanasius, though it was urged by the Emperor Constantius, main-
taining that the Nicene faith was opposed in the person of Athana-
sius. Against the synod of Milan, a.d. 355, he was equally resolute
in defence of the belief of Nicaea, for which the emperor banished
him to Syria. But when the synod of Alexandria, a.d. 362, de-
termined on the restoration of certain Arians after repentance, he
withdrew from Catholic Communion.
^ It is plain from various passages that Satyrus, when be under-
took his voyage to Africa, was only a catechumen, i.e. not yet bap-
tized. Many holy men postponed baptism, not out of contempt or
carelessness, but through fear, in all the dangers of the period, of
losing baptismal grace, sin after baptism and grace received being
then estimated at its true awfulness. Satyrus having been, as he
believed, saved from death by the Holy Eucharist, determined to
be at cnce baptized, so soon as he could find a Catholic bishop.
It must be noted that the Fathers condemn nothing more severely
than postponing baptism, in order to continue in sin.
what he wished to do, and paid no attention
to his weakness.
51. But in what words can I set forth his
simplicity ? By this I mean a certain mode-
ration of character and soberness of mind.
Pardon me, I beseech you, and attribute it to
my grief, if I allow myself to speak some-
what fully about him with whom I am no
longer permitted to converse. And cer-
tainly it is an advantage for you to see that
you have performed this kindly office not
led by weak feelings, but by sound judg-
ment ; not as impelled by pity for his death,
but moved by desire to do honour to his
virtues ; for every simple soul is blessed.
And so great was his simplicity, that, con-
verted as it were into a child, he was con-
spicuous for the simplicity belonging to that
guileless age, for the likeness of perfect vir-
tue, and for reflecting as in a mirror inno-
cence of character. Therefore he entered
into the kingdom of heaven, because he be-
lieved the word of God, because he, like a
child, rejected the artifices of flattery, and
chose rather to accept with gentleness the
pain of injustice than to avenge himself
sharply ; he was more ready to listen to
complaints than to guile, ready for concilia-
tion, inaccessible to ambition, holy in
modesty, so that in him one would rather
speak of excess of bashfulness than have to
seek for such as is needful.
52. But the foundations of virtue are
never in excess, for modesty does not hin-
der but rather commends the discharge of
duty. And so was his face suffused with
a certain virginal modesty, showing forth
his inward feeling in his countenance, if per-
chance he had, coming on a sudden, met
some female relative, he was as it were
bowed down and sunk to the earth, though
he was not different in company with men,
he seldom lifted up his face, raised his eyes,
or spoke ; when he did one of these things,
it was with a kind of bashful modesty of
heart, with which, too, the chastity of his
body agreed. For he preserved the gifts of
holy baptism inviolate, being pure in body
and still more pure in heart ; fearing not less
the shame of impurity in conversation than
in his body ; and thinking that no less re-
gard was to be paid to modesty in purity of
words than in chastity of body.
53. In fine, he so loved chastity as never
to seek a wife, although in him it was not
merely the desire of chastity, but also the
grace of his love for us. But in a wonderful
manner he concealed his feeling as to mar-
riage, and avoided all boastfulness ; and so
carefully did he conceal his feeling, that even
I/O
ST. AMBROSE.
when we pressed it on him, he appeared
rather to postpone wedloclv than to avoid it.
So this was the one point with which he did
not trust his brother and sister, not through
any doubtful hesitation, but simply through
virtuous modesty.
54. Who, then, could refrain from wonder-
ing that a man in age between a brother
and a sister, the one a virgin, the other a
priest, yet in greatness of soul not below
either, should so excel in two great gifts, as
to reflect the chastity of one vocation and
the sanctity of the other, being bound not
by profession but by the exercise of virtue.
If, then, lust and anger bring forth other
vices, I may rightly call chastity and
gentleness as it were the parents of vir-
tues ; although, as it is the origin of all good
things, so too is piety the seed-plot of other
virtues.
55. What, then, shall I say of his economy,
a kind of continence regarding possessions ?
For he who takes care of his own does not
seek other men's goods, nor is he puffed up
by abundance who is contented with his
own. For he did not wish to recover any-
thing except his own, and that rather that
he might not be cheated than that he might
be richer. For he rightly called those who
seek other men's goods hawks of money.
But if avarice be the root of all evils,' he
who docs not seek for money has certainly
stripped himself of vices.
56. Nor did he ever delight in more care-
fully prepared feasts or many dishes, except
when he invited friends, wishing for what
was sufficient for nature, not for supera-
bundance for pleasure's sake. And, indeed,
he was not poor in means, but was so in
spirit.^ Certainly we ought by no means to
doubt of his happiness, who neither as a
wealthy man delighted in riches, nor as a
poor man thought that what, he had was
scanty.
57. It remains that, to come to the end of
the cardinal virtues, we should notice in
him the constituents of justice. For
although virtues are related to each other
and connected, still as it were a more dis-
tinct sketch of each is wanted, and espe-
cially of justice. For it being somewhat
niggardly towards itself is wholly devoted
to what is without, and whatever it has
through a certain rigour towards self, being
carried away by love for all, it pours forth
on its neighbours.
58. But there are many kinds of this vir-
tue. One towards friends, another towards
1 I Tim. vi. 10.
* S. Matt. V. 3.
all men, another with respect to the worship
of God or the relief of the poor. So what
he was towards all, the affection of the peo-
ple of the province over which he was set
shows ; who used to say that he was rather
their parent than a judge, a kind umpire for
loving clients, a steadfast awarder of just
law.
59. But what he was with his brother and
sister, though all men were embraced in his
good-will, our undivided patrimony testifies,
and the inheritance neither distributed nor
diminished, but preserved. For he said that
love was no reason for making a will. This,
too, he signified with his last words, when
commending those whom he had loved, say-
ing that it was his choice never to marry a
wife, that he might not be separated from
his brother and sister, and that he would not
make a will, lest our feelings should in any
point be hurt. Lastly, though begged and
entreated by us, he thought that nothing
ought to be determined by himself, not,
however, forgetting the poor, but only ask-
ing that so much should be given to them as
should seem just to us.
60. By this alone he gave a sufficient proof
of his fear of God, and set an example of re-
ligious feeling as regards men. For what he
gave to the poor he offered to God, since
"he that distributeth to the poor lendeth
uiito God ; " ' and by requiring what was
just, he left them not a little, but the whole.
For this is the total sum of justice, to sell
what one has and give to the poor. For he
who "hath dispersed, and hath given to the
poor, his righteousness endureth for ever." ^
So he left us as stewards, not heirs ; for the
inheritance is to the heirs a matter of ques-
tion, the stewardship is a duty to the
poor.
61. So that one may rightly say that the
Holy Spirit has this day told us by the voice
of the boy reader : " He that is innocent in
his hands and of a clean heart, who hath not
lifted up his soul to vanity, nor used deceit
unto his neighbour, this is the generation of
them that seek the Lord." ^ He, then, shall
both ascend into the hill of the Lord and
dwell in the tabernacle of God ; because "he
hath walked without spot, he hath worked
righteousness, he hath spoken truth, he hath
not deceived his neighbour ;" ■» nor did he lend
his money for usury, who always wished
[no more than] to retain that which was in-
herited.
62. Why should I relate that in his piety
' Prov. xix. 17.
* Ps. xxiv. [xxiii.J 4, 6.
* Ps. cxii. [cxi.] 9.
* Ps. XV. [xiv.] 2, 3.
BOOK I.— ON THE DECEASE OF SATYRUS.
171
he went beyond mere justice, when he, hav-
inq- thousfht that in consideration of my office
something- ought to be given to the unlaw-
ful possessor of our property, declared that 1
was the author of the bounty, but made
over the receipts of his own share to the
common fund.
6^. These and other matters, which were
then a pleasure to me, now sharpen the re-
membrance of my grief. They abide, how-
ever, and always will do so, nor do they ever
pass away like a shadow ; for the grace of
virtue dies not with the body, nor do natural
life and merits come to an end at the same
time, although the use of natural life does not
perish for ever, but rests in a kind of exemp-
tion for a time.
64. For one, then, who has performed
such good deeds, and is rescued from perils,
I shall weep rather from longing for him
than for the loss. For the very opportune-
ness of his death bids us bear in mind that we
must follow him rather with grateful venera-
tion than grieve for him, for it is written that
private grief should cease in public sorrow.
This is said in the prophetical language,' not
only to that one woman , who is figured there,
but to each, since it seems to be said to the
Church.
65. To me, then, does this message come,
and Holy Scripture says : " Dost thou teach
this, is it thus that thou instructest the peo-
ple of God .'' Knowest thou not that thy ex-
ample is a danger to others .-• save that per-
chance thou complainest that thy prayer is
not heard. First of all this is shameless ar-
rogance, to desire to obtain for thyself what
thou knowest to have been denied to many,
even saints, when thou art aware that God
is no respecter of persons ? "' ^ For although
God is merciful, yet if He always heard all,
He would appear to act no longer of His
own free will, but by a kind of necessity.
Then, since all ask, if He were to hear all,
no one would die. For how much dost thou
daily pray.? Is, then, God's appointment to
be made void in consideration of thee.''
Why, then, dost thou lament that that is
sometimes not obtained, which thou know-
est cannot always be obtained.''
66. " Thou fool," it says, " above all
women, seest thou not our mourning, and
what hath happened to us, how that Sion
our mother is saddened with all sadness,
' 2 [4] Esdr. X. 6. In the Vulgate, as in the older Latin Version
used by St. Ambrose, there are four books of Esdras, the first and
second answering respectively to the Anglican books of Ezra and
Nehemiah. Esdras iii. and iv. are counted apocryphal, but are
quoted as canonical by St. Ambrose, St. Augustine, and the third
Council of Carthage.
- Acts X. 34.
and humbled with humbling. Mourn now
also very sore, since we all mourn, and be
sad since we all are sad, and thou art
erieved for a brother. Ask the cartli and
she shall tell thee that it is she which ought
to mourn, outliving so many that grow
upon her. And out of her," it says, " were
all born in the beginning, and out of her
shall others come, and, behold, they walk
almost all into destruction, and a multitude
of them is utterly rooted out. Who, then,
ought to make more mourning than she that
hath lost so great a multitude, and not thou,
which art sorry but for one ? " '
67. Let, then, the common mournings
swallow up ours and cut off the bitterness
of our private sorrow. For we ought not
to grieve for those whom we see to be set
free, and we bear in mind that so many
holy souls are not without a purpose at this
time loosed from the chains of the body.
For we see, as if by God's decree, such
reverend widows dying so closely at one
time, that it seems to be a sort of setting
out on a journey, not a sinking in death,
lest their chastity in which they have served
God their full time should be exposed to
peril. What groans, what mourning, does
so bitter a recollection stir up in me ! And
if I had no leisure for mourning, yet in my
own personal grief, in the loss of the very
flower of so much merit, the common lot of
nature consoled me ; and my grief in con-
sideration of one alone vpiled the bitterness
of the public funeral by the show of piety
at home.
68. I seek again, then, O sacred Scripture,
thy consolations, for it delights me to dwell
on thy precepts and on thy sentences.
How far more easy is it for heaven and
earth to pass away, than for one tittle of the
law to fail ! But let us now listen to what
is written : " Now," it says, " keep thy sor-
row to thyself, and bear with a good cour-
age the things which have befallen thee.
For if thou shalt acknowledge the determi-
nation of (jod to be just, thou shalt both re-
ceive thy son in time, and shalt be praised
among women." ^ If this is said to a wo-
man, how much more to a priest ! If such
words are said of a son it is certainly not
unfitting- that they should be uttered also
concerning the loss of a brother ; though if
he had been my son I could never have
loved him more. For as in the death of
children, the lost labour and the pain borne
to no purpose seem to increase the sorrow ;
so, too, in the case of brothers the habits of
' 2 [4] Esdr. X. 6-11.
' 2 [4] Esdr. 15, 16.
172
ST. AMBROSE.
intercourse and joint occupations inflame
the bitterness of grief.
69. But, lo ! I hear the Scripture saying :
" Do not continue this discourse, but allow
thyself to be persuaded. For how great are
the misfortunes of Sion ! Be comforted in
regard of the sorrow of Jerusalem. For
thou seest that our holy places are polluted
and the name that was called upon us is
almost profaned, they that are ours have
suffered shame, our priests are burnt, our
Levites gone into captivity, our wives are
polluted, our virgins suffer violence, our
righteous men are carried away, our little
ones given up, our young men brought in
bondage, and our strong men become weak.
And, which is the greatest of all, the seal of
Sion hast lost her glory, since now she is
delivered into the hands of them that hate
us. Do thou, then, shake off thy great
heaviness, and put from thee the multitude
of sorrows, that the Mighty may be merciful
to thee again, and the Highest shall give
thee rest by easing thy labours.'' '
70. So, then, my tears shall cease, for one
must yield to healthful remedies, since there
ought to be some difference between believ-
ers and unbelievers. Let them, therefore,
weep who cannot have the hope of the
resurrection, of which not the sentence of
God but the strictness of the faith deprives
them. Let there be this difference between
the servants of Christ and the worshippers
of idols, that the latter weep for their friends,
whom they suppose to have perished for
ever ; that they should never cease from
tears, and gain no rest from sorrow, who
think that the dead have no rest. But from
us, for whom death is the end not of our
nature but of this life only, since our nature
itself is restored to a better state, let the
advent of death wipe away all tears.
71. And certainly if they have ever found
any consolation who have thought that
death is the end of sensation and the failing*
of our nature, how much more must we find
it so to whom the consciousness of good
done brings the promise of better rewards !
The heathen have their consolation, because
they think that death is a cessation of all
evils, and as they are without the fruit of
life, so, too, they think that they have
escaped all the feeling and pain of those
severe and constant sufferings which we
have to endure in this life. We, however,
as we are better supported by our rewards,
so, too, ought we to be more patient through
our consolation, for they seem to be not lost
' 2 [4] Esdr. X. 20-24.
but sent before, whom death is not going to
swallow up, but eternity to receive.
72. My tears shall therefore cease, or if
they cannot cease, I will weep for thee, my
brother, in the common sorrow, and will
hide my private groaning in the public grief
For how can my tears wholly cease, since
they break forth at every utterance of thy
name, or when my very habitual actions
arouse thy memory, or when my affection
pictures thy likeness, or w^hen recollection
renews my grief For how canst thou be
absent who art again made present in so
many occupations.' Thou art present, I
say, and art always brought before me, and
with my whole mind and soul do I embrace
thee, gaze upon thee, address thee, kiss
thee ; I grasp thee whether in the gloomy
night or in the clear light, when thou vouch-
safest to revisit and console me sorrowine.
And now the very nights which used to
seem irksome in thy lifetime, because they
denied us the power of looking on each
other ; and sleep itself, lately, the odious
interrupter of our converse, have com-
menced to be sweet, because they restore
thee to me. They, then, are not wretched
but blessed whose mutual presence fails
not, whose care for each other is not
lessened, whose mutual esteem is increased.
For sleep is a likeness and image of death.
73. But if, in the quiet of night, our souls
still cleaving to the chains of the body, and
as it were bound within the prison bars of
the limbs, yet are able to see higher and
separate things, how much more do they see
these, when in their pure and heavenly
senses they suffer from no hindrances of
bodily weakness. And so when, as a cer-
tain evening was drawing on, I was com-
plaining that thou didst not revisit me when
at rest, thou wast wholly present always.
So that, as I lay with my limbs bathed in
sleep, while I was [in mind] awake for thee,
thou wast alive to me, I could say, " What is
death, my brother.-"" For certainly thou
wast not separated from me for a single
moment, for thou wast so present with me
everywhere, that that enjoyment of each
other, which we were unable to have in the
intercourse of this life, is now always and
everywhere with us. For at that time cer-
tainly all things could not be present, for
neither did our physical constitution allow
it, nor could the sight of each other, nor the
sweetness of our bodily embraces at all
times and in all places be enjoyed. But the
pictures in our souls were always present
with us, even when we were not together,
and these have not come to an end. but
BOOK L— ON THE DECEASE OF SATYRUS.
173
constantly come back to us, and the greater
tlie longing- the greater abundance have we
of them.
74. So, then, I hold thee, my brother, and
neither death nor time shall tear thee from
me. Tears themselves are sweet, and weep-
ing itself a pleasure, for by these the eager-
ness of the soul is assuaged, and affection
being eased is quieted. For neither can I
be without thee, nor ever forget thee, or
think of thee without tears. O bitter days,
which show that our union is broken ! O
nights worthy of tears, which have lost for
me so good a sharer of my rest, so insepa-
rable a companion ! What sufferings would
ye cause me, unless the likeness of him
present offered itself to me, unless the vis-
ions of my soul represented him whom my
bodily sight shows me no more !
75. Now, now, O brother, dearest to my
soul, although thou art gone by too early a
death, happy at least art thou, who dost not
endure these sorrows, and art not compelled
to mourn the loss of a brother, separation
from whom thou couldst not long endure,
but didst quickly return and visit him again.
But if then thou didst hasten to banish the
weariness of my loneliness, to lighten the
sadness of thy brother's mind, how much
more often oughtest thou now to revisit my
afflicted soul, and thyself lighten the sorrow
which has its origin from thee !
76. But the exercise of my office now bids
me rest awhile, and attention to my priestly
duties draws my mind away ; but w' hat will
happen to my holy sister, who though she
moderates her aff'ection by the fear of God,
yet again kindles the grief itself of the affec-
tion by the zeal of her devotion .-* Prostrate
on the ground, embracing her brother's
tomb, wearied with toilsome walking, sad
in spirit, day and night she renews her grief.
For though she often breaks off her weeping
by speech, she renews it in prayer ; and
although in her knowledge of her Scriptures
she excels those who bring consolation, she
makes up for her desire of weeping by the
constancy of her prayers, renewing the
abundance of her tears then chiefly, when
no one can interrupt her. So thou hast
that which thou mayest pity, not what thou
mayest blame, for to weep in prayer is a
sign of virtue. And although that be a com-
mon thing with A'irgins, whose softer sex
and more tender affection abound in tears
at the sight of the common weakness, even
without the feeling of family grief, yet when
there is a greater cause for sorrowing, no
limit is set to that sorrow.
77. The means of consolation, then, are
wanting since excuses abound. For thou
canst not forbid that which thou teachest,
especially when she attributes her tears to
devotion, not to sorrow, and conceals the
course of the common grief for fear of
shame. Console her, therefore, thou who
canst approach her soul, and penetrate her
mind. Let her perceive that thou art
present, feel that thou art not departed,
that having enjoyed his consolation of
whose merit she is assured, she may learn
not to grieve heavily for him, who warned
her that he was not to be mourned for.
78. But why should I delay thee, brother,
why should 1 w^ait that my address should
die and as it were be buried wath thee.'
Although the sight and form of thy lifeless
body, and its remaining comeliness and
figure abiding here, comfort the eyes, I
delay no longer, let us go on to the tomb.
But first, before the people I utter the last
farewell, declare peace to thee, and pay the
last kiss. Go before us to that home, com-
mon and w^aiting for all, and certainly now
longed for by me beyond others. Prepare
a common dwelling for him with whom
thou hast dwelt, and as here we have had
all things in common, so there, too, let us
know no divided rights.
79. Do not, I pray thee, long put off him
who is desirous of thee, expect him who is
hastening after thee, help him who is hur-
rying, and if I seem to thee to delay too
long, summon me. For we have not ever
been long separated from each other, but
thou w^ast always w^ont to return. Nor since
thou canst not return again, I will go to
thee ; it is just that I should repay the kind-
ness and take my turn. Never was there
much difference in the condition of our
life ; whether health or sickness, it was
common to both, so that if one sickened the
other fell ill, and when one began to recover,
the other, too, was convalescent. How
have we lost our rights ? This time, too,
we had our sickness in common, how is it
that death was not ours in common ?
80. xVnd now to Thee, Almighty God, I
commend this guileless soul, to Thee I
offer my sacrifice ; accept favourably and
mercifully the gift of a brother, the offering
of a priest. I offer beforehand these first
libations of myself I come to Thee with
this pledge, a pledge not of money but of
life, cause me not to remain too long a
debtor of such an amount. It is not the
ordinary interest of a brother's love, nor the
common course of nature, w^hich is increased
by such an amount of virtue. I can bear
it, if I shall be soon compelled to pay it
174
ST. AMBROSE.
BOOK II.
OX THE BELIEF IN THE RESURRECTION.
1. In the former book I indulged my long-
ing to some extent, lest too sharp remedies
applied to a burning wound might rather
increase than assuage the pain. And as at
the same time 1 often addressed my brother,
and had him before my eyes, it was not out
of place to let natural feelings have a little
play, since they are somewhat satisfied by
tears, soothed by weeping, and numbed by
a shock. For the outward expression of
affection is of a soft and tender nature, it
loves nothing extravagant, nothing stern,
nothing hard ; and patience is proved by
enduring rather than by resisting.
2. So, since the death-day might well,
lately, by the sad spectacle draw aside the
mind of a brother, because it occupied him
wholly, now, inasmuch as on the seventh
day, the symbol of the future rest, we return
to the grave, it is profitable to turn our
thoughts somewhat from my brother to a
general exhortation addressed to all, and to
give our attention to this ; so as neither to
cling to my brother with all our minds, lest
our feelings overcome us, nor forgetting
such devotion and desert, to turn wholly \
away from him ; and in truth we should
but increase the suffering of our intense
grief, if his death were again the subject of
to-day s address.
3. Wherefore we propose, dearest breth-
ren, to console ourselves with the common
course of nature, and not to think anything
hard which awaits all. And therefore we
deem that death is not to be mourned
over ; firstly, because it is common and due
to all ; next, because it frees us from the
miseries of this lie and, lastly, because
when in the likeness of sleep we are at rest
from the toils of this world, a more lively
vigour is shed upon us. What grief is there
which the grace of the Resurrection does
not console .-^ What sorrow is not excluded
by the belief that nothing perishes in death .''
nay, indeed, that by the hastening of
death it comes to pass that much is pre-
served from perishing. So it will happen,
dearest brethren, that in our general exhor-
tation we shall turn our affections to my
brother, and shall not seem to have wan-
dered too far from him, if through hope of
the Resurrection and the sweetness of future
glory even in our discourse he should live
again for us.
4. Let us then begin at this point, that
we show that the departure of our loved
ones should not be mourned by us. For
what is more absurd than to deplore as
though it were a special misfortune, what
one knows is appointed unto all .? This
were to lift up the mind above the condition
of men, not to accept the common law, to
reject the fellowship of nature, to be puffed
up in a fleshly mind, and not to recognize
the measure of the flesh itself. What is
more absurd than not to recognize what one
is, to pretend to be what one is not } Or
what can be a sign of less forethought than
to be unable to bear, when it has happened,
what one knew was going to happen .-*
Nature herself calls us back, and draws us
aside from sorrow of this sort by a kind
of consolation of her own. For what so
deep mourning is there, or so bitter grief, in
which the mind is not at times relieved .?
For human nature has this peculiarity, that
although men maybe in sad circumstances,
yet if only they be men, they sometimes
turn their thoughts a little away from sadness.
5. It is said, indeed, that there have been
certain tribes who mourned at the birth of
human beings, and kept festival at their
deaths, and this not without reason, for they
thought that those who had entered upon
this ocean of life should be mourned over,
but that they who had escaped from the
waves and storms of this world should be
accompanied by rejoicing not without good
reason. And we too forget the birthdays of
the departed, and commemorate with festal
solemnity the day on which they died.^
6. Therefore, in accordance with nature,
excessive grief must not be yielded to, lest
we should seem either to claim for ourselves
either an exceptional superiority of nature,
or to reject the common lot. For death is
alike to all, without difference for the poor,
without exception for the rich. And so
' Not only the Martyrs and Saints, but ordinary Christians, are
meant here, for these used to be commemorated with special prayers
and offerings of the Holy Eucharist on their behalf, especially on
the anniversaries of their deaths.
BOOK IL— ON BELIEF IN THE RESURRECTION.
175
although through the sin of one alone, yet
it passed upon all ; ' that we may not refuse
to acknowledge Him to be also the Author of
death, Whom we do not refuse to acknow-
ledge as the Author of our race ; and that, as
through one death is ours, so should be also
the resurrection ; and that we should not
refuse the misery, that we may attain to the
gift. For, as we read, Christ " is come to
save that which was lost, "^ and "to be
Lord both of the dead and living. "3 In
Adam I fell, in Adam I was cast out of
Paradise, in Adam I died ; how shall the
Lord call me back, except He find me in
Adam ; guilty as I was in him, so now
justified in Christ. ■♦ If, then, death be the
debt of all, we must be able to endure the
payment. But this topic must be reserved
for later treatment.
7. It is now our purpose to demonstrate
that death ought not to cause too heavy
grief, because nature itself rejects this. And
so they say that there was a law among the
Lycians, commanding that men who gave
way to grief should be clothed in female
apparel, inasmuch as they judged mourning
to be soft and effeminate in a man. And it
is inconsistent that those who ought to offer
their breast to death for the faith, for religion,
for their country, for righteous judgment,
and the endeavour after virtue, should
grieve too bitterly for that in the case of
others which, if a fitting cause required, they
would seek for themselves. For how can
one help shrinking from that in ourselves
which one mourns with too little patience
when it has happened to others } Put aside
your grief, if you can ; if you cannot, keep it
to yourself.
8. Is, then, all sorrow to be kept within or
repressed .-• Why should not reason rather
than time lighten one's sadness ? Shall not
wisdom better assuage that which the pas-
sage of time will obliterate ? Further, it
seems to me that it is a want of due feeling
with regard to the memory of those whose
loss we mourn, when we prefer to forget
them rather than that our sorrow should be
lessened by consolation ; and to shrink from
the recollection of them, rather than remem-
ber them with thankfulness ; that we fear
the calling to mind of those whose image
in our hearts ought to be a delight ; that we
are rather distrustful than hopeful regarding
the acceptance of the departed, and think
of those we loved rather as liable to punish-
ment than as heirs of immortality.
* Rom. V. 13.
* Rom. xiv. 9.
' S. Luke xix. lo.
* S. Aug. De Pec. Orig. c. 41.
9. But you may say : We have lost those
whom we used to love. Is not this the
common lot of ourselves and the earth and
elements, that we cannot keep for ever what
has been entrusted to us for a time .'' The
earth groans under the plough, is lashed by
rains, struck by tempests, bound by cokl,
burnt by the sun, that it may bring forth its
yearly fruits ; and when it has clothed itself
with a variety of flowers, it is stripped and
spoiled of its own adornment. How many
plunderers it has ! And it does not complain
of the loss of its fruits, to which it gave
birth that it might lose them, nor thereafter
does it refuse to produce what it remembers
will be taken from it.
ID. The heavens themselves do not
always shine with the globes of twinkling
stars, wherewith as with coronets they are
adorned. They are not always growing
bright with the dawn of light, or ruddy with
the rays of the sun ; but in constant succes-
sion that most pleasing appearance of the
world grows dark with the damp chill of
night. What is more grateful than the light .'
what more pleasant than the sun } each of
which daily comes to an end ; yet we do
not take it ill that these have passed away
from us, because we expect them to return.
Thou art taught in these things what
patience thou oughtest to manifest with
regard to those who belong to thee. If
things above pass away from thee, and
cause no grief, why should the passing away
of man be mourned.''
11. Let, then, grief be patient, let there
be that moderation in advers;ty which is
required in prosperity. If it be not seemly
to rejoice immoderately, is it seemly so to
mourn } For want of moderation in grief
or fear of death is no small evil. How many
has it driven to the halter, in how many
hands has it placed the sword, that they
might by that very means demonstrate their
madness in not enduring death, and yet
seeking it; in adopting that as a remedy
which they flee from as an evil. And
because they were unable to endure and to
suffer what is in agreement with their nature,
they fall into that which is contrary to their
desire, being separated for ever from those
whom they desired to follow. But this is
not common, since nature herself restrains
although madness drives men on.
12. But it is common with women to
make public wailing, as though they feared
that their misery might not be known.
They affect soiled clothing, as though the
feeling of sorrow consisted therein ; they
moisten their unkempt hair with filth \ and
1/6
ST. AMBROSE.
lastly, which is done habitually in many-
places, with their clothing torn and their
dress rent in two, they prostitute their
modesty in nakedness, as if they were ready
to sacrifice that modesty because they have
lost that which was its reward. And so
wanton eyes are excited, and lust after those
naked limbs, which were they not mad ^
bare they would not desire. Would that
those filthy garments covered the mind
rather than the bodily form. Lasciviousness
of mind is often hidden under sad clothing,
and the unseemly rudeness of dress is used
as a covering to hide the secrets of wanton
spirits.
13. She mourns for her husband with suffi-
cient devotion who preserves her modesty
and does not give up her constancy. The
best duties to discharge to the departed are
that they live in our memories and continue
in our affection. She has not lost her hus-
band who manifests her chastity, nor is she
widowed as regards her union who has not
changed her husband's name. Nor hast
thou lost the heir when thou assistest the
joint-heir, but in exchange for a successor
in perishable things thou hast a sharer in
things eternal. Thou hast one to represent
thine heir, pay to the poor what was due to
the heir, that there may remain one to sur-
vive, not only the old age of father or
mother, but thine own life. Thou leavest
thy successor all the more, if his share con-
duce not to luxury in things present, but to
the purchasing of things to come.
14. But we long for those whom we have
lost. For two things specially pain us :
either the longing for those we have lost,
which I experience in my own case ; or
that we think them deprived of the sweet-
ness of life, and snatched away from the
fruits of their toil. For there is a tender
movement of love, which suddenly kindles
the affection, so as to have the effect rather
of soothing than of hindering the pain ; in-
asmuch as it seems a dutiful thing to long
for what one has lost, and so under an
appearance of virtue weakness increases.
15. But why dost thou think that she
who has sent her beloved to foreign parts,
and because of military service, or of under-
taking some office, or has discovered that
for the purpose of commerce he has crossed
the sea, ought to be more patient than
thou who art left, nut because of some
chance decision or desire of money, but by
the law of nature ? But, you say, the hope
of regaining him is shut out. As though
the return of any one were certain ! And
oftentimes doubt wearies the mind more
where the fear of danger is strong ; and it
is more burdensome to fear lest some-
thing should happen than to bear what one
already knows has happened. For the one
increases the amount of fear, the other
looks forward to the end of its grief
16. But masters have the right to transfer
their slaves whithersoever they determine.
Has not God this right.'' It is not granted
to us to look for their return, but it is
granted us to follow those gone before.
And certainly the usual shortness of life
seems neither to have deprived them of much
who have gone before, nor to delay very
long him who remains.
17. But if one cannot mitigate one's grief,
does it not seem unbecoming to wish that
because of our longing the whole course of
things should be upset ? The "longings of
lovers are certainly more intense, and yet
they are tempered by regard to what is
necessary ; and though they grieve at being
forsaken they are not wont to mourn, rather
being deserted they blush at loving too
hastily. And so patience in regret is all the
more manifested.
18. But what shall I say of those who
think that the departed are deprived of the
sweetness of life .-* There can be no real
sweetness in the midst of the bitternesses and
pains of this life, which are caused either by
the infirmity of the body itself, or by the
discomfort of things happening from with-
out. For we are always anxious and in
suspense as to our wishes for happier cir-
cumstances ; we weaver in uncertainty, our
hope setting before us doubtful things for
certain, inconvenient for satisfactory, things
that will fail for what is firm, and we have
neither any strength in our will nor cer-
tainty in our wishes. But if anything hap-
pens against our wish, we think we are
lost, and are rather broken down by pain
at adversity than cheered by the enjoyment
of prosperity. What good, then, are they
deprived of w^ho are rather freed from
troubles.''
19. Good health, I doubt not, is more
beneficial to us than bad health is hurtful.
Riches bring more delights than poverty
annoyance, the satisfaction in children's
love is greater than the sorrow at their loss,
and youth is more pleasant than old age is
sad. How often is the attainment of one's
wishes a weariness, and what one has longed
for a regret ; so that one grieves at having
obtained what one was not afraid of obtain-
ing. But what fatherland, what pleasures,
can compensate for exile and the bitterness
of other penalties ? For even when we have
BOOK II.— ON BELIEF IN THE RESURRECTION.
177
these, the pleasure is weakened either by
the disinclination to use or by the fear of
losing- them.
20. But suppose that some one remains
unharmed, free from grief, in uninterrupted
enjoyment of the pleasures of the whole
course of man's life, what comfort can the'
soul attain to, enclosed in the bonds of a,
body of such a kind, and restrained by the
narrow limits of the limbs? If our flesh
shrinks from prison, if it abhors everything
which denies it the power of roaming about ;
when it seems, indeed, to be always going
forth, with its little powers of hearing- or
seeing what is beyond itself, how much
more does our soul desire to escape from
that prison-house of the body, which, being
free with movement like the air, goes whi-
ther we know not, and comes whence we
know not.
21. We know, however, that it survives
the body, and that being set free from the
bars of the body, it sees with clear gaze
those things which before, dwelling in the
body, it could not see. And we are able to
judge of this by the instance of those who
have visions of things absent and even
heavenly in sleep (whose minds, whei:i the
body is as it were buried in sleep, rise to
higher things and relate them to the body).
So, then, if death frees us from the miseries
of this world, it is certainly no evil, inas-
much as it restores liberty and excludes
suffering.
22. At this point the right place occurs for
arguing that death is not an evil, because it
is the refuge from all miseries and all evils,
a safe harbour of security, and a haven of
rest. For what adversity is there which we
do not experience in this life.' What storms
and tempests do we not suffer ? by what
discomforts are we not harassed.? whose
merits are spared.?
23. The holy patriarch Israel fled from
his country, was exiled from his father,
relatives, and home, ' he mourned over the
shame of his daughter ^ and the death of
his son, he endured famine, when dead he
lost his own grave, for he entreated that
his bones should be translated, 3 lest even in
death he should find rest.
24. Holy Joseph experienced the hatred
of his brethren, •» the guile of those who
envied him, the service of slavery, the mas-
tership of merchantmen, the wantonness
of his mistress, the ignorance of her hus-
band, and the misery of prison, s
^ Gen xxviii. 5.
'' (leu. xxxvii. 4 ff.
12
- Gen. xxxiv. 2.
' Gen. xxxix. 12 if.
' Gen. xlix. 29.
25. Holy David lost two sons ; the one
incestuous,' the other a parricide. ^ To have
had them was a disgrace, to have lost them
a grief. And he lost a third, the infant
whom he loved. Him he wept for while
still alive, but did not long for when dead.
For so we read, that, while the child was
sick, David entreated the Lord for him, and
fasted and lay in sackcloth, and when the
elders came near to raise him from the
earth, he would neither rise nor eat. But
when he heard that the child was dead, he
changed his clothes, worshipped God, and
took food. When this seemed strange to
his servants, he answered that he had rightly
fasted and wept while the child was alive,
because he justly thought that God might
have mercy, and it could not be doubted that
He could preserve the life of one alive Who
could give life to the departed, but now,
when death had taken place, why should
he fast, for he could not now bring back
him that was dead, and recall him who was
lifeless. "I," said he, " shall go to him, but
he shall not return to me. "^
26. O greatest consolation for him who
mourns ! O true judgment of a wise man !
0 wonderful wisdom of one who is a bond-
man ! that none should take it ill that any-
thing adverse has happened to him, or com-
plain that he is afflicted contrary to his
deserts. For who art thou who before-
hand proclaimest thy deserts ? Why desirest
thou to anticipate Him Who takes cogni-
zance of all ? Why dost thou snatch away
the verdict from Him Who is going to judge ?
This is permitted not even to the saints, nor
has it ever been done by the saints with
impunity. David confesses that he was
scourged for this in his psalm : " Behold,
these are the ungodly, who prosper in the
world, they have obtained riches. There-
fore I have cleansed my heart in vain, and
washed my hands among the innocent ; and
1 was scourged all the day long, and my
accusation* came every morning," s
27. Peter also, though full of faith and
devotion, yet because, not yet conscious of
our common weakness, he had presump-
tuously said to the Lord, " I wall lay down
my life for Thy sake," ^ fell into the trial of
his presumption before the cock crowed
thrice. 7 Although, indeed, that trial was a
lesson for our salvation, that we might learn
not to think little of the weakness of the
• 2 Sam. xiii. 29. - 2 Sam. xviii. 14. ^ 2 Sam. xii. 18 ff.
■* St. Ambrose has index metis in mntutinuni ; some MSS. vin-
liex ; the Roman Psalter, y/<^e.r; the Vulgate, nearer the Hebrew,
Castigatio ; LXX. eAeyxo^- ^ Ps. Ixxiii. flxxii]. 12 if.
" S. John xiii. 37. ' S. Luke xxii. 60, 61.
178
ST. AMBROSE.
flesh, lest through thus thinking little of it
we should be tempted. If Peter was
tempted, who can presume .'' who can main-
tain that he cannot be tempted ? And with-
out doubt for our sakes was Peter tempted,
so that the proving of the temptation did
not take place in a stronger than he,' but
that in him we should learn how, resisting in
temptations, although tried even by care for
our lives, we might yet overcome the sting
of the temptation with tears of patience.
28. But that same David, that the differ-
ence of his actions may not perhaps disturb
those who cling to the words of Scripture ;
that same David, I say, who had not wept
for the innocent infant, wept for the parricide
when dead. For at the last, when he was
wailing and mourning, he said, "O my son
Absalom, my son Absalom ! Who will
grant me to die for thee 1 " ^ But not only
is Absalom the parricide wept over, Amnon
is wept over ; not only is the incestuous
wept over, but is even avenged ; the one by
the scorn of the kingdom, the other by the
exile of his brothers. The wicked is wept
over, not the innocent. What is the cause .'^
What is the reason ? There is no little de-
liberation with the prudent and confirmation
of results with the wise ; for there is great
consistency of prudence in so great a dif-
ference of actions, but the belief is one.
He wept for those who were dead, but did
not think that he ought to weep for the
dead infant, for he thought that they were
lost to him, but hoped that the latter would
rise agam.
29. But concerning the Resurrection more
will be said later on ; let us now return to
our immediate subject. We have set forth
that even holy men have without any con-
sideration for their merits, suffered many and
heavy things in this world, together with
toil and misery. So David, entering into
himself, says: "Remember, Lord, that we
are dust ; as for man, his days are but as
grass ; " 3 and in another place : ' ' Man is like
to vanity, his days pass away as a shadow. " 4
For what is more wretched than we, who
are sent into this life as it were plundered
and naked, with frail bodies, deceitful hearts,
weak minds, anxious in respect of cares,
slothful as to labour, prone to pleasures.
30. Not to be born is then by far the best,
* " Atque haud dubie pro fiobis tentatus est Petrus, ut infortiore
non esset te)ttamenti pericubtvi." A difficult passage, and the mean-
ing of it seems to be, that had a stronger than St. Peter been tried,
and had overcome, we should net have had the warning against
presumption, and the help of the example of one like ourselves.
^ 2 Sam. [2 Kings] xviii. 33 [LXX.j.
' Ps. ciii. [cii.] 15.
* Ps. cxliv. [cjdiii.J 4.
according to Solomon's sentence. For they
also who have seemed to themselves to ex-
cel most in philosophy have followed him.
For he, before these philosophers in time,
but later than many of our writers, spoke
thus in Ecclesiastes : "And I praised all the
departed, which are already dead, more than
the living, who are yet alive. And better
than both they is he who hath not yet
been born, and who hath not seen this evil
work which hath been done under the sun.
And I saw all travail, and all the good of
this labour, that for this a man is envied of
his neighbour. And, indeed, this is vanity
and vexation of spirit." '
31. And who said this but he who asked
for and obtained wisdom, to know how the
world was made, and the power of the
elements, the course of the year, and the
dispositions of stars, to be acquainted with
the natures of living creatures, the furies of
wild beasts, and the violence of winds, and
to understand the thoughts of man ! ^ How,
then, should mortal matters be hidden from
him, from whom heavenly things were not
hidden } He who penetrated the thoughts
of the woman who was claiming the child
of another, who by the inspiration of divine
grace knew the natures of living creatures
which he did not share ; could he err or
say what was untrue with regard to the cir-
cumstances of that nature, which he found
in his own personal experience.?
32. But Solomon was not the only person
who felt this, though he alone gave expres-
sion to it. He had read the words of holy
Job: "Let the day perish wherein I was
born. "3 Job had recognized that to be
born is the beginning of all woes, and there-
fore wished that the day on which he was
born might perish, so that the origin of all
troubles might be removed, and wished that
the day of his birth might perish that he
might receive the day of resurrection. For
Solomon had heard his father's saying :
"Lord, make me to know mine end, and
the number of my days, that I may know
what is lacking unto me. "^ For David
knew that what is perfect cannot be grasped
here, and therefore hastened on to those
things which are to come. For now we
know in part, and understand in part, but
then it will be possible for that which is per-
fect to be grasped, when not the shadow
but the reality of the Divine INIajesty and
eternity shall begin to shine so as to be
gazed upon by us with unveiled face.^
' Eccles. iv. 2 ff.
* Ps. xxxix. [xl.] 4.
2 Wisd. vii. 7, 17 £E.
^ I Cor. xiii. 12.
^ Job iii. 3.
BOOK II.— ON THE BELIEF IN THE RESURRECTION.
179
^^. But no one would hasten to the end,
except he were fleeing from the discomfort
of this Hfe. And so David also explained
why he hastened to the end, when he said :
"Behold Thou hast made my days old, and
my being is as nothing before Thee, surely
all things are vanity, even every man that
liveth. " ' Why, then, do we hesitate to flee
from vanity ? Or why docs it please us to
be troubled to no purpose in this world, to
lay up treasures, and not know for what
heir we are gathering them ? Let us pray
that troubles be removed from us, that we
be taken out of this foolish world, that we
may be free from our daily pilgrimage, and
return to that country and our natural home.
For on this earth we are strangers and
foreigners, we have to return thither whence
we have come down, we must strive and
pray not perfunctorily but earnestly to be
delivered from the guile and wickedness of
men full of words. And he who knew the
remedy groaned that his sojourn was pro-
longed, and that he must dwell with the un-
just and sinners.- What shall I do, who
both am sinful and know not the remedy.^
34. Jeremiah also bewails his birth in
these words: "Woe is me, my mother!
Why hast thou borne me a man of conten-
tion in all the earth ? I have not benefited
others, nor has any one benefited me, my
strength hath failed. '"^ If, then, holy men
shrink from life whose life, though profitable
to us, is esteemed unprofitable to themselves ;
what ought we to do who are not able to
profit others, and who feel that it, like money
borrowed at interest, grows more heavily
weighted every day with an increasing mass
of sins .''
35. "I die daily," 4 says the Apostle.
Better certainly is this saying than theirs
who said that meditation on death was true
philosophy, for they praised the study, he
exercised the practice of death. And they
acted for themselves only, but Paul, himself
perfect, died not for his own weakness but
for ours. But what is meditation on death
but a kind of separation of body and soul,
for death itself is defined as nothing else
than the separation of body and soul .'' But
this is in accordance with common opinion.
36. But according to the Scriptures we
have been taught that death is threefold. 5
One death is when we die to sin, but live to
God. Blessed, then, is that death which,
escaping from sin, and devoted to God,
separates us from what is mortal and
' Ps. xxxix. [xxxviii.] 5 [LXX.].
3 Jer. XV. 10 FLXX.J.
5 C/. S. Ambr. de Bo)io Mortis, c.
^ Ps. cxx. [cxix.] 5.
* I Cor. XV. 31.
9, and hi Luc. vii. 35.
consecrates us to Him Who is immortal.
Another death is the departure from this life,
as the patriareh Abraham died, and the
patriarch David, and were buried with their
fathers ; when the soul is set free from the
bonds of the body. The third death is that
of which it is said: "Leave the dead to
bury their own dead."' In that death not
only the flesh but also the soul dies, for ' ' the
soul that sinneth, it shall die." ^ For it dies
to the Lord, through the weakness not of
nature but of guilt. But this death is not
the discharge from this life, but a fall through
error.
37. Spiritual death, then, is one thing,
natural death another, a third the death of
punishment. But that which is natural is
not also penal, for the Lord did not inflict
death as a penalty, but as a remedy. And
to Adam when he sinned, one thing was
appointed as a penalty, another for a remedy,
w^hen it was said : " Because thou hast
hearkened unto the voice of thy wife, and
hast eaten of the tree of which I had com-
manded thee that of it alone thou shouldst
not eat, cursed is the ground in thy labor ;
in sorrow shalt thou eat its fruit all the days
of thy life. Thorns and thistles shall it
bring forth to thee, and thou shalt eat the herb
of the field. In the sweat of thy face shalt
thou eat thy bread, till thou return to the
earth from which thou wast taken. "3
38. Here you have the days of rest from
penalties, for they contain the punishment
decreed against the thorns of this life, the
cares of the world, and the pleasures of
riches which shut out the Word. Death is
given for a remedy, because it is the end of
evils. For God said not, "Because thou
hast hearkened to the voice of the woman
thou shalt return to the earth,'' for this would
have been a penal sentence, as this one
is, "The earth under curse shall bring forth
thorns and thistles to thee ; " but He said :
"In sweat shalt thou eat thy bread until
thou return to the earth." You see that
death is rather the goal of our penalties, by
which an end is put to the course of this
life.
39. So, then, death is not only not an evil,
but is even a good thing. So that it is
sought as a good, as it is w^ritten : ' ' Men
shall seek death and shall not find it. "4 They
will seek it who shall say to the mountains :
" Fall on us, and to the hills. Cover us. "5
That soul, too, shall seek it which has sinned.
That rich man lying in hell shall seek it.
' S. Matt. viii. 22. * Ezek. xviii. 4.
3 Gen. ill. 17 ff. [LXX.]. * Rev. ix. 6. '" S. Luke xxiii. 30.
i8o
ST. AMBROSE.
who wishes that his tongue should be cooled
with the finger of Lazarus. '
40. We see, then, that this death is a gain
and life a penalty, so that Paul says : "To
me to live is Christ and to die is gain."'
What is Christ but the death of the body,
the breath of life.' And so let us die with
Him, that we may live with Him. Let
there then be in us as it were a daily prac-
tice and inclination to dying, that by this
separation from bodily desires, of which we
have spoken, our soul may learn to with-
draw itself, and, as it were placed on high,
when earthly lusts cannot approach and
attach it to themselves, may take upon her-
self the likeness of death, that she incur not
the penalty of death. For the law of the
flesh wars against the law of the mind, and
makes it over to the law of error, as the
Apostle has made known to us, saying :
"For I see a law of the flesh in my mem-
bers warring against the law of my mind,
and bringing me into captivity in the law of
sin. ■' 3 We are all attached, we all feel this ;
but we are not all delivered. And so a mis-
erable man am I, unless I seek the remedy.
41. But what remedy.? "Who shall de-
liver me out of the body of this death.'
Thanks be to God through Jesus Christ our
Lord. "4 We have a physician, let us use
the remedy. Our remedy is the grace of
Christ, and the body of death is our body.
Let us therefore be as strangers to our body,
lest we be strangers to Christ. Though we
are in the body, let us not follow the things
which are of the body, let us not reject the
rightful claims of nature, but desire before
all the gifts of grace : " For to be dissolved
and to be with Christ is far better; yet to abide
in the flesh is more needful for your sakes." 5
42. But this need is not the case of all.
Lord Jesus ; it is not so with me, who am
profitable to none ; for to me death is a
gain, that I may sin no more. To die is
gain to me, who, in the very treatise in
which I comfort others, am incited as it
were by an intense impulse to the longing
for my lost brother, since it suffers me not
to forget him. Now I love him more, and
long for him more intensely. I long for him
when I speak, I long for him when I read
again what I have written, and I think that
I am more impelled to write this, that I may
not ever be without the recollection of him.
And in this I am not acting contrary to
Scripture, but I am of the same mind
with Scripture, that I may grieve with
' S. Luke xvi. 24.
* Kom. vii. 24, 25.
- Phil, i, 21.
'- Phil. i. 23, 24.
•" Rom. vii. 23.
more patience, and long with greater in-
tensity.
43. Thou hast caused me, my brother,
not to fear death, and I only would that my
life might die with thine ! This Balaam
wished for as the greatest good for himself,
when, inspired by the spirit of prophecy, he
said : " Let my soul die in the souls of the
righteous, and let my seed be like the seed
of them."' And in truth he wished this
according to the spirit of prophecy, for as
he saw the rising of Christ, so also he saw
His triumph, he saw His death, but saw also
in Him the everlasting resurrection of men,
and therefore feared not to die as he was to
rise again. Let not then my soul die in sin,
nor admit sin into itself, but let it die in the
soul of the righteous, that it may receive his
righteousness. Then, too, he who dies in
Christ is made a partaker of His grace in the
Font.
44. Death is not, then, an object of dread,
nor bitter to those in need, nor too bitter to
the rich, nor unkind to the old, nor a mark
of cowardice to the brave, nor everlasting to
the faithful, nor unexpected to the wise.
For how many have consecrated their life
by the renown of their death alone, how
many have been ashamed to live, and have
found death a gain ! We have read how
often by the death of one great nations have
been delivered ; the armies of the enemy
have been put to flight by the death of the
general, who had been unable to conquer
them when alive.
45. By the death of martyrs religion has
been defended, faith increased, the Church
strengthened ; the dead have conquered,
the persecutors have been overcome. And
so we celebrate the death of those of whose
lives we are ignorant. So, too, David re-
joiced in prophecy at the departure of his
own soul, saying: "Precious in the sight
of the Lord is the death of His saints. "^
He esteemed death better than life. The
death itself of the martyrs is the prize of
their life. And again, by the death of those
at variance hatred is put an end to.
46. Why should more be said.' By the
death of One the world was redeemed. For
Christ, had He willed, need not have died,
but He neither thought that death should
be shunned as though there were any cow-
ardice in it, nor could He have saved us
better than by dying. And so His death is
the life of all. We are signed with the sign ^
' Num. xxiii. 10 [LXX.]. ' Ps. cxvi. [cxv.] 15.
^ The reference of course is to the sign of the Cross, which, as we
know from various authorities, the early Christians constantly used,
at rising, lying down, going in or out, at prayers, etc., etc.
BOOK II.— ON BELIEF IN THE RESURRECTION.
i8i
of His death, we show forth His death when
we pray ; when we offer the Sacrifice we
declare His death, for His death is victory,
His death is our mystery, His death is the
yearly recurring- solemnity of the world.
What now should we say concerning- His
death, since we prove by this Divine Ex-
ample that death alone found immortality,
and that death itself redeemed itself. Death,
then, is not to be mourned over, for it is the
cause of salvation for all ; death is not to be
shunned, for the Son of God did not think it
unworthy of Him, and did not shun it. The
order of nature is not to be loosed, for what
is common to all cannot admit of exception
in individuals.
47. And, indeed, death was no part of
mans nature, but became natural ; for God
did not institute death at first, but gave it
as a remedy. Let us then take heed that
it do not seem to be the opposite. For if
death is a good, why is it written that "God
made not death,' but by the malice of men
death entered into the world " ? For of a
truth death was no necessary part of the
divine operation, since for those who were
placed in paradise a continual succession of
all good things streamed forth ; but because
of transgression the life of man, condemned
to lengthened labour, began to be wretched
with intolerable groaning ; so that it was
fitting that an end should beset to the evils,
and that death should restore what life had
lost. For immortality, unless grace breathed
upon it, would be rather a burden than an
advantage.
48. And if one consider accurately, it is
not the death of our being, but of evil, for
being continues, it is evil that perishes.
That which has been rises again ; would
that as it is now free from sinning, so it
were without former guilt ! But this very
thing is a proof that it is not the death of
being, that we shall be the same persons as
we were. And so we shall either pay the
penalty of our sins, or attain to the reward
of our good deeds. For the same being
will rise again, now more honourable for
having paid the tax of death. And then
"the dead who are in Christ shall rise
first ; then, too, we who are alive," it is said,
"shall together with them be caught up in
the clouds into the air to meet the Lord,
and so we shall always be with the Lord. " ^
They first, but those that are alive second.
They with Jesus, those that are alive
through Jesus. To them life will be sweeter
after rest, and though the living will have a
» Wisd. i. 13 ff.
* I Thess. iv. 16, 17.
delightful gain, yet they will be without ex-
perience of the remedy.
49. There is, then, nothing for us to fear
in death, nothing for us to mourn, whether
life which was received from nature be
rendered up to her again, or whether it be
sacrificed to some duty which claims it, and
this will be either an act of religion or the
exercise of some virtue. And no one ever
wished to remain as at present. This has
been supposed to have been promised to
John, but it is not the truth. We hold fast
to the words, and deduce the meaning from
them. He himself in his own writing'
denies that there was a promise that he
should not die, that no one from that in-
stance might yield to an empty hope. But
if to wish for this would be an extravagant
hope, how much more extravagant were it
to grieve without rule for what has happened
according to rule !
50. The heathen mostly console them-
selves with the thought, either of the com-
mon misery, or of the law of nature, or of
the immortality of the soul. And would
that their utterances were consistent, and
that they did not transmit the wretched
soul into a number of ludicrous monstrosi-
ties and figures ! But what ought we to do,
whose reward is the resurrection, though
many, not being able to deny the greatness
of this gift, refuse to believe in it .'' And for
this reason will we maintain it, not by one
casual argument only, but by as many as
we are able.
51. All things, indeed, are believed to be,
either because of experience, or on grounds
of reason, or from similar instances, or
because it is fitting that they be, and each
of these supports our belief. Experience
teaches us that we are moved ; reason, that
that which moves us must be considered
the property of another power ; similar in-
stances show that the field has borne crops,
and therefore we expect that it wnll continue
to bear them. Fitness, because even where
we do not think that there will be results,
yet we believe that it is by no means fitting-
to give up the works of virtue.
52. Each, then, is supported by each.
But belief in the resurrection is inferred
most clearly on three grounds, in which all
are included. These are reason, analogy
from universal example, and the evidence of
what has happened, since many have risen.
Reason is clear. For since the whole course
of our life consists in the union of body and
soul, and the resurrection brings with it
— — ■' ■ ■ ■■ ■ — ■— ... . - 1 ■ I - . ■■ ^
* S. John xxi. 23.
l82
ST. AMBROSE.
either the reward of good works, or the
punishment of wicked ones, it is necessary
that the body, whose actions are weighed,
rise again. For how shall the soul be sum-
moned to judgment without the body,
when account has to be rendered of the
companionship of itself and the body ?
53. Rising again is the lot of all, but there
is a difficulty in believing this, because it is
not due to our deserts, but is the gift of God.
The first argument for the resurrection is
the course of the world, and the condition
of all things, the series of generations, the
changes in the way of succession, the setting
and rising of constellations, the ending of
day and night, and their daily succession
coming as it were again to life. And no
other reason can exist for the fertile tempera-
ment of this earth, but that the di^dne order
restores by the dews of night as much of
that moisture from which all earthly things
are produced, as the heat of the sun dries up
by day. Why should 1 speak of the fruits
of the earth .'' Do they not seem to 'die
when they fall, to rise again when they
grow green once more ? That which is
sown rises again, that which is dead rises
again, and they are formed once more into
the same classes and kinds as before. The
earth first gave back these fruits, in these
first our nature found the pattern of the
resurrection.
54. Why doubt that body shall rise again
from body .-' Grain is sown, grain comes up
again : fruit is sown, fruit comes up again ;
but the grain is clothed with blossom and
husk. "And this mortal must put on im-
mortality, and this corruptible must put on
incorruption. " ^ The blossom of the resur-
rection is immortality, the blossom of the
resurrection is incorruption. For what is
more fruitful than perpetual rest .' what
supplied with richer store than everlasting
security.'' Here is that abundant fruit, by
whose increase man's nature shoots forth
more abundantly after death.
55. But you wonder how what has yielded
to putrefaction can again become solid, how
scattered particles can come together, those
that are consumed be made good : you do
not wonder how seeds broken up under the
moist pressure of the earth grow green.
For certainly they too, rotting under contact
with the earth, are broken up, and when
the fertilising moisture of the soil gives life
to the dead and hidden seeds, and, by the
vital warmth, as it were breathes out a kind
of soul of the green herb. Then by little
^ I Cor. XV. 53.
and little nature raises from the ground the
tender stalk of the growing ear, and as a
careful mother folds it in certain sheaths,
lest the sharp ice should hurt it as it grows,
and to protect it from too great heat of the
sun ; and lest after this the rain should
break down the fruit itself escaping as it
were from its first cradle and just grown up,
or lest the wind should scatter it, or small
birds destroy it, she usually hedges it around
with a fence of bristling awn.
56. Why should one, then, be surprised if
the earth give back those bodies of men
which it has received, seeing that it gives
life to, raises, clothes, protects, and defends
whatsoever bodies of seeds it has received ?
Cease then to doubt that the trustworthy
earth, which restores multiplied as it Avere
by usury the seeds committed to it, will
also restore the entrusted deposit of the race
of man. And why should I speak of the
kinds of trees, which spring up from seed
sown, and with revivified fruitfulness bear
again their opening fruits, and repeat the
old shape and likeness, and certain trees
being renewed continue through many
generations, and in their endurance over-
pass the very centuries.? We see the grape
rot, and the vine come up again : a graft
is inserted and the tree is born again. Is
there this divine foresight for restoring
trees, and no care for men.? And He Who
has not suffered to perish that which He gave
for man's use, shall He suffer man to perish,
whom he made after His own image ?
57. But it appears incredible to you that
the dead rise again.? "Thou foolish one,
that which thou thyself sowest, does it not
first die that it may be quickened? " ^ Sow
any dry seed you please, it is raised up.
But, you answer, it has the life-juice in
itself And our body has its blood, has its
own moisture. This is the life-juice of our
body. So that I think that the objection is
exploded which some allege that a dry twig
does not revive, and then endeavour to argue
from this to the prejudice of the flesh. For
the flesh is not dry, since all fiesh is of clay,
clay comes from moisture — moisture from
the earth. Then, again, many growing plants,
though always fresh, spring from dry and
sandy soil, since the earth itself supplies
sufficient moisture for itself Does the earth
then, which continually restores all things,
fail with regard to man .? From what has
been said it is clear that we must not doubt
that it is rather in accordance with than con-
trary to nature ; for it is natural that all
* I Cor. XV. 36.
I
BOOK II.— ON BELIEF IN THE RESURRECTION.
i8-
things living should rise again, but contrary
to nature that they should perish.
58. We come now to a point which much
troubles the heathen, how it can be that
the earth should restore those whom the sea
has swallowed up, wild beasts have torn to
pieces or have devoured. So, then, at last
we necessarily come to the conclusion that
the doubt is not as to belief in resurrection
in general, but as to a part. For, granted
that the bodies of those torn in pieces do
not rise again, the others do so, and the
resurrection is not disproved, but a certain
class is an exception. Yet I wonder why
they think there is any doubt even concern-
ing these, as though not all things which
are of the earth return to the earth, and
crumble again into earth. And the sea it-
self for the most part casts up on neighbour-
ing shores whatever human bodies it has
swallowed. And if this were not so, I sup-
pose we are to believe that it would not be
difficult for God to join together what was
dispersed, to unite what was scattered ; God,
Whom the universe obeys, to Whom the
dumb elements submit and nature serves ;
as though it were not a greater wonder to
give life to clay than to join it together.
59. That bird in the country of Arabia,
which is called the Phoenix, restored by the
renovating juices of its flesh, after being
dead comes to life again : shall we believe
that men alone are not raised up again ?
Yet we know this by common report and
the authority of writings, ' namely, that the
bird referred to has a fixed period of life of
five hundred years, and when by some
warning of nature it knows that the end of
its life is at hand, it furnishes for itself a
casket of frankincense and myrrh and other
perfumes, and its work and the time being
together ended, it enters the casket and
dies. Then from its juices a worm comes
forth, and grows by degrees into the fashion
of the same bird, and its former habits are
restored, and borne up by the oarage of its
wings it commences once more the course
of its renewed life, and discharges a debt of
gratitude. For it conveys that casket,
whether the tomb of its body or the cradle
of its resurrection, in which quitting life it
died, and dying it rose again, from Ethiopia
to Lycaonia ; and so by the resurrection of
this bird the people of those regions under-
stand that a period of five hundred years is
* Scripturaru7n. It is impossible to suppose that St. .Ambrose
here means Holy Scripture, but is referring to such writers as He-
rodotus, Tacitus, and Pliny. Other Fathers, Tertullian, St. Cyril
of Jerusalem, St. Basil, with several more, refer also to the fable of
the Phoenix in speaking of the Resurrection.
accomplished. So to that bird the five hun-
dredth is the year of resurrection, but to us
the thousandth :' it has its ' resurrection in
this world, we have ours at the end of the
world. Many think also that this bird
kindles its own funeral pile, and comes to
life again from its own ashes.
60. But perhaps nature if more deeply in-
vestigated will seem to give a deeper reason for
our belief; let our thoughts turn back to the
origin and commencement of the creation of
man. You are men and women, you are
not ignorant of the things which have to do
with human nature, and if any of you have
not this knowledge, you know that we are
born of nothing. But how small an origin
for being so great as we are ! And if I do
not speak more plainly, yet you understand
what I mean, or rather what I will not say.
Whence, then, is this head, and that wonder-
ful countenance, whose maker we see not .-*
We see the work, it is fashioned for various
purposes and uses. W^hence is this upright
figure, this lofty stature, this power of ac-
tion, this quickness of perception, this
capacity for walking upright .'' Doubtless
the organs of nature are not known to us,
but that which they effect is known. Thou
too wast once seed, and thy body is the
seed of that which shall rise again. Listen
to Paul and learn that thou art this seed :
"It is sown in corruption, it shall rise in in-
corruption ; it is sown in dishonour, it shall
rise in glory ; it is sown in weakness, it
shall rise in power ; it is sown a natural
body, it shall rise a spiritual body. " ^ Thou
also, then, art sown as are other things, why
wonderest thou if thou shalt rise again as
shall others .'' But thou believest as to them,
because thou seest ; thou believest not this,
because thou seest it not : " Blessed are they
that have not seen, and yet have believed."^
61. However, before the season comes,
those things also are not believed, for every
season is not suited for the raising of seeds.
Wheat is sown at one time, and comes up at
another ; at one time the vine is planted, at
another the budding twigs begin to shoot,
the foliage grows luxuriant, and the grape
is formed ; at one time the olive is planted,
at another time, as though pregnant and
loaded with its offspring of berries, it is bent
down by the abundance of its fruit. But
before its own period arrives for each, the
produce is restricted, and that which bears
has not the age of bearing in its own power.
' St. Ambrose may have believed that the world would end with
A.D. 1000, or possibly a thousand is simply taken as a number sig-
nifying completeness, as St. Augustine {De Civ. Dei, XX. 7) explains
the thousand years of Rev. xx. i.
^ I Cor. XV. 42 ff. 33. John xx. 29.
t84
ST. AMBROSE.
One may see the mother of all at one time
disfigured with mould, at another bare of
produce, at another green and full of flowers,
at another dried .up. Any spot which might
wish to be always clothed and never to lay
aside the golden dress of its seeds, or the
green dress of the meadows, would be bar-
ren in itself and unendowed with the gain
of its own produce which it would have
transferred to others.
62. So, then, even if thou wilt not believe
in our resurrection by faith nor by example,
thou wilt believe by experience. For many
products, as the vine, the olive, and differ-
ent fruits, the end of the year is the fit time
for ripening ; and for us also the consumma-
tion of the world, as though the end of the
year has set the fitting time for rising again.
And fitly is the resurrection of the dead at
the consummation of the world, lest after
the resurrection we should have to fall back
into this evil age. For this cause Christ
suffered that He might deliver us from this
evil world; lest the temptations of this world
should overthrow us again, and it should be
an injury to us to come again to life, if we
came to life again for sin.
63. .So then we have both a reason and a
time for the resurrection : a reason because
nature in all its produce remains consistent
with itself, and does not fail in the genera-
tion of men alone ; a time because all things
are produced at the end of the year. For the
seasons of the world consist of one year.
What wonder if the year be one since the
day is one. For on one day the Lord hired
the labourers to w^ork in the vineyard, when
He said, "Why stand ye here all the day
idle ? " ■
64. The causes of the beginnings of all
things are seeds. And the Apostle of the
Gentiles has said that the human body
is a seed. ^ And so in succession after sow-
ing there is the substance needful for the
resurrection. But even if there were no
substance and no cause, who could think it
difficult for God to create man anew whence
He will and as He wills. Who commanded
the world to come into being out of no mat-
ter and no substance .'' Look at the heaven,
behold the earth. Whence are the fires of
the stars? Whence the orb and rays of the
sun ? Whence the globe of the moon ?
Whence the mountain heights, the hard
rocks, the woody groves .'* \Vhencc are the
air diffused around, and the waters, whether
enclosed or poured abroad .'* But if God
made all these things out of nothing (for
1 S. Matt. XX. 6.
' 1 Cor. XV, 4j.
" He spake and they were made, He com-
manded and they were created"'), why
should we wonder that that which has been
should be brought to life again, since we see
produced that which had not been .-*
65. It is a cause for wonder that though
they do not believe in the resurrection, yet
in their kindly care they make provision
that the human race should not perish, ^ and
so say that souls pass and migrate into other
bodies that the world may not pass away.
But let them say which is the most difficult,
for souls to migrate, or to return ; comeback
to that which is their own, or seek for fresh
dwelling places.
66. But let those who have not been
taught doubt. For us who have read the
Law, the Prophets, the Apostles, and the
Gospel it is not lawful to doubt. For who
can doubt when he reads: "And in that
time shall all thy people be saved which is
written in the book ; and many of them that
sleep in the graves of the earth shall arise
with one opening, these to everlasting life,
and those to shame and everlasting con-
fusion. And they that have understanding
shall shine as the brightness of the firma-
ment, and of the just many shall be as the
stars for ever. " 3 Well, then, did he speak of
the rest of those that sleep, that one may
understand that death lasts not for ever,
which like sleep is undergone for a time,
and is put off at its time ; and he shows that
the progress of that life which shall be after
death is better than that which is passed in
sorrow and pain before death, inasmuch as
the former is compared to the stars, the
latter is assigned to trouble.
67. And why should I bring together what
is written elsewhere: "Thou shalt raise me
up and I will praise Thee. " Or that other
passage in which holy Job, after experienc-
ing the miseries of this life, and overcom-
ing all adversity by his virtuous patience,
promised himself a recompense for present
evils in the resurrection, saying: "Thou
shalt raise up this body of mine which has
suffered many evils. "■♦ Isaiah also, pro-
claiming the resurrection to the people, says
that he is the announcer of the Lord's mes-
sage, for we read thus: "For the mouth
of the Lord hath spoken, and they shall
say in that day. "s And what the mouth
' Ps. cxlviii. 5.
- The immortality of tlie soul may be believed by those who deny
the resurrection of the body, and was taught by many philosophers
amongst the heathen. The resurrection of the body is a matter of
divine revelation, and the very highest and best amongst the
heathen seem not to have admitted it even as a speculation.
"* Dan. xii. i, 2, ;?.
Job xix. 26. Somewhat loosely from the LXX.
* Is, XXV. 8, 9,
I
BOOK II.— ON BELIEF IN THE RESURRECTION.
185
of the Lord declared that the people
should say is set forth later on, where it is
written : "Because of Thy fear, O Lord, we
have been with child and have brought
forth the Spirit of I'hy Salvation, which
Thou hast poured forth upon the earth.
They that inhabit the earth shall fall, they
shall rise that are in the graves. For the
dew which is from Thee is health for them,
but the land of the wicked shall perish. Go,
O my people, and enter into thy chambers ;
hide thyself for a little until the Lord's wrath
pass by. ' '
68. How well did he by the chambers
point out the tombs of the dead, in which
for a brief space we are hidden, that we may
be better able to pass to the judgment of
God, which shall try us with the indignation
due for our wickednesses. He, then, is alive
who is hidden and at rest, as though with-
drawing himself from our midst and retiring,
lest the misery of this world should entangle
him with closer snares, for whom the
heavenly oracles aftirm by the voices of the
prophets that the joy of the resurrection is
reserved, and the soundness of their freed
bodies procured by the divine deed. And
dew is well used as a sign, since by it all
vital seeds of the earth are raised to growth.
What wonder is it, then, if the dust and ashes
also of our failing body grow vigorous by
the richness of the heavenly dew, and by the
reception of this vital moistening the shapes
of our limbs are refashioned and connected
again with each other.?
69. And the holy prophet Ezekiel teaches
and describes with a full exposition how
vigour is restored to the dry bones, the
senses return, motion is added, and the
sinews coming back, the joints of the human
body grow strong ; how the bones which
were very dry are clothed with restored
flesh, and the course of the veins and the
flow of the blood is covered by the veil of
the skin drawn over them. As we read, the
reviving multitude of human bodies seems
to spring up under the very words of the
prophet, and one can see on the widespread
plain the new seed shoot forth.
70. But if the wise men of old believed
that a crop of armed men sprang up in the
district of Thebes from the sowing of the
hydra's teeth, whereas it is certainly esta-
blished that seeds of one kind cannot be
changed into another kind of plant, nor
bring forth produce differing from its own
seeds, so that men should spring from ser-
pents and flesh from teeth ; how much
1 Is. xxvi. I8-2I [LXX.J.
more, indeed, is it to be believed that what-
ever has been sown rises again in its own
nature, and that crops do not differ from
their seed, that soft things do not spring
from hard, nor hard from soft, nor is poison
changed into blood ; but that flesh is restored
from flesh, bone from bone, blood from
blood, the humours of the body from
humours. Can ye then, ye heathen, who
are able to assert a change, deny a restora-
tion of the nature ? Can you refuse to be-
lieve the oracles of God, the (iospel, and the
prophets, who believe empty fables.-*
71. But let us now hear the prophet him-
self, who speaks thus : "The hand of the
Lord was upon me, and the Lord led me
forth in the Spirit, and placed me in the
midst of the plain, and it was full of men's
bones ; and He led me through them round
about, and, lo, there were very many bones
on the face of the plain, and they were
very dry. And He said unto me : Son of
man, can these bones live .'' And I said :
Lord, Thou knowest ; and He said to me :
Prophesy over these bones, and thou shalt
say unto them : O ye dry bones, hear the
word of the Lord. Thus saith the Lord to
these bones : Behold I bring upon you the
Spirit of life, and I will lay sinews upon
you, and will bring up flesh upon you, and
will stretch skin over you, and will put My
Spirit into you, and ye shall live, and know
that I am the Lord. And I prophesied as
He commanded me. And it came to pass
when I was prophesying all these things, lo,
there was a great earthquake."'
72. Note how the prophet shows that
there was hearing and movement in the
bones before the Spirit of life was poured
upon them. For, above, both the dry bones
are bidden to hear, as if they had the sense
of hearing, and that upon this each of them
came to its own joint is pointed out by the
words of the prophet, for we read as fol-
lows : "And the bones came together, each
one to its joint. And I beheld, and, lo,
sinews and flesh were forming upon them,
and skin came upon them from above, and
there was no Spirit in them." -
73. Great is the lovingkindness of the
Lord, that the prophet is taken as a witness
of the future resurrection, that we, too,
might see it with his eyes. For all could
not be taken as witnesses, but in that one
all we are witnesses, for neither does lying
come upon a holy man, nor error upon so
great a prophet.
74. Nor ought it to appear at all impro-
' Ezek. xxxvii, 1-7.
' Ezek.
V. 7.
1 86
ST. AMBROSE.
bable, that at the command of God the bones
were fitted again to their joints, since we
have numberless instances in which nature
has obeyed the commands of heaven ; as
the earth was bidden to bring forth the green
herb, ' and did bring it forth ; as the rock at
the touch of the rod gave forth water for the
thirsting people ; ^ and the hard stone poured
forth streams by the mercy of God for those
parched with heat. What else did the rod
changed into a serpent ^ signify, than that at
the will of God living things can be pro-
duced from those that are without life ? Do
you think it more incredible that bones
should come together when bidden, than
that streams should be turned back or the
sea flee .'' For thus does the prophet testify :
" The sea saw it and fled, Jordan was driven
back. "4 Nor can there be any doubt about
this fact, which was proved by the rescue of
one and the destruction of the other of two
peoples, that the waves of the sea stood
restrained, and at the same time surrounded
one people, and poured back upon the
other for their death, that they might over-
whelm the one, but preserve the other, s
And what do we find in the Gospel
itself.' Did not the Lord Himself prove
there that the sea grew calm at a word,
the clouds were driven away, the blasts
of the winds yielded, and that on the
quieted shores the dumb elements obeyed
God.'
75. But let us go on with the other points,
that we may observe how by the Spirit of
life the dead are quickened, they that lie in
the graves arise, and the tombs are opened:
"And He said unto me: Prophesy, son of
man, and say to the Spirit, Come from the
four winds of heaven, O Spirit, and breathe
upon these dead, that they may live. And
I prophesied as He commanded me, and the
Spirit of life entered into them, and they
lived, and stood up on their feet, an exceed-
ing great company. And the Lord spake
unto me, saying : Son of man, these bones
are the whole house of Israel. For they
say. Our bones are become dry, our hope is
lost, we shall perish. Therefore, prophesy
and say: Thus saith the Lord: Behold I
will open your graves, and will bring you
up out of your graves into the land of Israel,
and ye shall know that I am the Lord, when
I shall open your graves, and bring forth
My people out of the graves, and shall put My
Spirit in you, and place you in your own
land, and ye shall know that I am the Lord ;
* Gen. i. 11.
* Ps. cxiv. [cxiii.] 3.
- Num. XX. 1 1.
' Ex. xiv. 22 ff.
^ Ex. iv. 3.
I have spoken, and I will perform it. saith
the Lord."'
76. We notice here how the operations of
the Spirit of life are again resumed ; we know
after what manner the dead are raised from
the opening tombs. And is it in truth a
matter of wonder that the sepulchres of the
dead are unclosed at the bidding of the
Lord, when the whole earth from its utmost
limits is shaken by one thunderclap, the
sea overflows its bounds, and again checks
the course of its waves ? And finally, he
who has believed that the dead shall rise
again "in a moment, in the twinkling of an
eye, at the last trump (for the trumpet shall
sound), "^ "shall be caught up amongst the
first in the clouds to meet Christ in the air ; " 3
he who has not believed shall be left, and
subject himself to the sentence by his own
unbelief.
77. The Lord also shows us in the Gospel,
to come now to instances, after what man-
ner we shall rise again. "For He raised
not Lazarus alone, but the faith of all ; and
if thou believest, as thou readest, thy spirit
also, which was dead, revives with Lazarus."
For w^hat does it mean, that the Lord M-ent
to the sepulchre and cried with a loud voice,
"Lazarus, come forth, "•* except that He
would give us a visible proof, would set
forth an example of the future resurrection .'
Why did He cry with a loud voice, as though
He were not wont to work in the Spirit,
to command in silence, but only that He
might show that which is written : "In a
moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the
last trump the dead shall rise again incor-
ruptible " ? 5 For the raising of the voice
answers to the peal of trumpets. And He
cried, "Lazarus, come forth." Why is the
name added, except perchance lest one
might seem to be raised instead of another,
or that the resurrection were rather acci-
dental than commanded.
78. So, then, the dead man heard, and
came forth from the tomb, bound hand and
foot with grave cloths, and his face was
bound with a napkin. Conceive, if thou
canst, how he makes his way with closed
eyes, directs his steps with bound feet, and
moves as though free with fastened limbs. ^
The bands remained on him but did not
restrain him, his eyes were covered yet
they saw. So, then, he saw who was rising
again, who was walking, who was leaving
' Ezek. xxxvii. 9-14. ^ i Cor. xv. 52. ^ i Thess. iv. 17.
* S. John xi. 43. ^ I Cor. xv. 52.
" iKseparaii^i p-ressu, separabilique pro^ressu. A literal version
is impossible. His feet were bound, yet he as it were walked, the
usual mode of progress when the limbs are free.
BOOK II.— ON BELIEF IN THE RESURRECTION.
187
the sepulchre. For when the power of the
divine command was working-, nature did
not require its own functions, and brought,
as it were, into extremity, obeyed no longer
its own course, but the divine will. riie
bands of death were burst before those of
the grave. The power of moving- was ex-
ercised before the means of moving- were
supplied. '
79. If thou marvellest at this, consider
Who gave the command, that thou mayest
cease to wonder ; Jesus Christ, the Power
of God, the Life, the Lic^ht, the Resurrection
of the dead. The Power raised up him that
was lying prostrate, the Life produced his
steps, the Light drove away the darkness
and restored his sight, the Resurrection re-
newed the gift of life.
80. Perchance it may trouble thee that
the Jews took away the stone and loosened
the grave cloths, and thou mayest haply be
anxious as to who shall move the stone
from thy tomb. As though He Who could
restore the Spirit could not remove the
stone ; or He Who made the bound to walk
could not burst the bonds ; or He Who had
shed light upon the covered eyes could not
uncover the face ; or He Who could renew
the course of nature could not cleave the
stone ! But, in order that they may believe
their ej^es who will not believe with their
heart, they remove the stone, they see the
corpse, they smell the stench, they loose
the grave cloths. They cannot deny that
he is dead whom they behold rising again ;
they see the signs of death and the proofs
of life. What if, whilst they are busied,
they are converted by the very toil itself .-*
What if, while they hear, they believe their
own ears ? What if, while they behold,
they are instructed by their own eyes .'*
What if, while they loose the bonds, they
free their own minds .-* What if, while Laz-
arus is being unbound, the people is set
free, while they let Lazarus go, themselves
return to the Lord.' For, lastly, many who
had come to Mary, seeing what had taken
place, believed.
81. And this was not the only instance
which our Lord Jesus Christ set forth, but
He raised others also, that we might at any
rate believe more numerous instances. He
raised the young man again, moved by the
tears of his widowed mother, when He came
and touched the bier, and said: "Young
man, I say unto thee, arise, and he that was
dead sat up and began to speak. "' - As soon
' agebatur pritis grtam parabatur incessus.
^ S. Luke .\iv. 7, 8.
as he heard he forthwith sat up, he forth-
with spake. The working of power, then, is
one thing, the order of nature is another.
82. And what shall I say of the daughter
of the ruler of the synagogue, at whose
death multitudes were weeping and the
flute-players piping .? For the funeral solem-
nities were being performed because of the
conviction of death. How quickly at the
word of the Lord does the spirit return, the
reviving body rise up, and food is taken,
that the evidence of life may be believed ! '
^'^. And why should we wonder that the
soul is restored at the word of God, that
flesh returns to the bones, when we remem-
ber the dead raised by the touch of the pro-
phet's body .? * Flijah prayed, and raised the
dead child. ^ Peter in the name of Christ
bade Tabitha rise and walk,^ and the poor
rejoicing believed for the food's sake which
she ministered to them, and shall we not
believe for our salvation's sake .'' They pur-
chased the resurrection of another by their
tears, shall we not believe in the purchase
of ours by the Passion of Christ .' Who
when He gave up the ghost, in order to
show that He died for our resurrection,
worked out the course of the resurrection ;
for so soon as "He cried again with aloud
voice and gave up the ghost, the earth did
quake, and the rocks were rent, and the
tombs were opened, and many bodies of the
saints which slept arose, and, going forth
out of the tombs after His resurrection,
came into the holy city and appeared unto
many." 5
84. If these things happened when He
gave up the ghost, why should we think
them incredible when He shall return to
judgment.-* especially since this earlier re-
surrection is a pledge of that future resurrec-
tion, and a pattern of that reality which is
to come ; indeed, it is rather itself truth than
a pattern. Who, then, at the Lord's resur-
rection opened the graves, gave a hand to
those who were rising, showed them the
road to find the holy city .' If there was
no one, it was certainly the Divine Power
which was working in the bodies of the
dead. Shall one seek for the aid of man
where one sees the work of God.?
85. Divine action has no need of human
assistance. God commanded that the hea-
vens should come into existence, and it was
done ; He determined that the earth should
be created, and it was created.*^ Who carried
together the stones on his shoulders .' who
^ S. Mark v. 38-43. ^ 2 [4] Kings iv. 34 ; xiii. 21.
^ I [3] Kings xvii. 22. * Acts ix. 40.
° S. Matt, x.wii. 50-53. ^ Gen. i. 6 ff.
i88
ST. AMBROSE.
supplied the expenses ? who furnished assist-
ance to God as He toiled? These things
were made in a moment. Would you know
how quickly? "He spake and they were
made."' If the elements spring up at a
word, why should the dead not rise at a
word ? For though they be dead, yet they
once lived, once had the breath of life for
feeling, and strength for acting ; and there
is a very great difference between not having
been capable of life, and having remained
lifeless. The devil said: "Command this
stone that it become bread. " ^ He confesses
that at the command of God nature can be
transformed, dost thou not believe that at
the command of God nature can be re-
made ?
86. Philosophers dispute about the course
of the sun and the system of the heavens,
and there are those who think that these
should be believed when they are ignorant
of what they are talking about. For neither
have they climbed up into the heavens, nor
measured the sky, nor examined the universe
with their eyes ; for none of them was with
God in the beginning, none of them has
said of God : " When He was preparing the
heavens I was with Him, I was with Him
as a master workman, I was he in whom
He delighted. "3 If, then, they are believed,
is God not believed, Who says: "As the
new heavens and the new earth, which I
make to remain before Me, saith the Lord ;
so shall your name and your seed abide ;
and month shall be after month, and sab-
bath after sabbath, and all flesh shall come
in My sight to worship in Jerusalem, saith
the Lord God ; and they shall go forth, and
shall see the limbs of men who have trans-
gressed against Me. For their worm shall
not die and their fire shall not be quenched
and they shall be a sight to all flesh." 4
87. If the earth and heaven are renewed,
why should we doubt that man, on account
of whom heaven and earth were made, can
be renewed ? If the transgressor be reserved
for punishment, why should not the just be
kept for glory ? If the worm of sins does
not die, how shall the flesh of the just perish ?
For the resurrection, as the very form of the
word shows, is this, that what has fallen
should rise again, that which has died should
come to life again.
88. And this is the course and ground of
justice, that since the action of body and
soul is common to both (for what the soul
has conceived the body has carried out),
each should come into judgment, and each
should be either given over to punishment
or reserved for glory. For it would seem
almost inconsistent that, since the law of
the mind fights against the law of the flesh,
and the mind often, when sin dwelling in
man acts, does that which it hates ; the mind
guilty of a fault shared by another should
be subjected to penalty, and the flesh, the
author of the evil, should enjoy rest : and
that that should alone suffer which had not
sinned alone, or should alone attain to glory,
not having fought alone with the help of
grace.
89. The reason, unless I am mistaken, is
complete and just, but I do not require a
reason from Christ. If I am convinced by
reason I reject faith. Abraham believed
God,' let us also believe Him, that we who
are heirs of his race may also be heirs of his
faith. David likewise believed, and there-
fore did he speak ; - let us also believe that
we may be able to speak, knowing that
" He Who raised up the Lord Jesus shall
raise up us also with Jesus. "3 For God,
Who never lies, promised this ; the Truth
promised this in His Gospel, when He said :
" This is the will of Him that sent Me, that
of all that which He hath given Me I should
lose nothing, but should raise it up at the
last day."* And He thought it not suffi-
cient to have said this once, but marked it
by express repetition, for this follows :
" For this is the will of My Father, Who sent
]\Ie, that every one that seeth the Son and
believeth on Him should have eternal life,
and I will raise him up at the last day." 5
90. Who was He that said this? He in
truth ^^'ho when dead raised up many
bodies of the departed. If we believe not
God, shall we not believe evidence ? Do
we not believe what He promised, since He
did even that which He did not promise?
And what reason would He have had for
dying, had He not also had a reason for
rising again ? For, seeing that God could
not die, Wisdom could not die ; and inas-
much as that could not rise again which had
not died, flesh is assumed, which can die,
that whilst that, whose nature it is, dies,
that which had died should rise again. For
the resurrection could not be effected except
by man ; since, " as by man came death, so
too by man came the resurrection of the
dead. " ^
91. So, then, man rose because man died ;
man was raised again, but God raised him.
' Ps. xxxiii. [xxxii.] 9.
* Prov. viii. 27, 30,
* S. Luke iv. 3.
* Is. Ixvi. 22-24
' Gen. XV. 6.
* S. John vi. 39.
- Ps. cxvi.
6 Ibid. .
[cxv.]
' 2 Cor. iv. 14.
I Cor. XV. 2 1 04
BOOK II.— ON BELIEF IN THE RESURRECTION.
189
Then it was man according to the Flesh,
now God is all in all. ' For now we know
not Christ according- to the flesh,- but we
possess the grace of that Flesh, so that we
know Him the tirstfruits of them that rest, 3
the firstborn of the dead. 4 Now the first-
fruits are undoubtedly of the same nature
and kind as the remaining fruits, the first of
which are offered to God as a petition for a
richer increase, as a holy thank-offering for
all trifts, and as a kind of libation of that
nature which has been restored. Christ, then,
is the hrstfruits of them that rest. But is
this of His own who are at rest, who, as it
were, freed from death, are holden by akind
of sweet slumber, or of all those who are
dead .'' ' ' As in Christ all die, so too in
Christ shall all be made alive. " 5 So, then, as
the firstfruits of death were in Adam, so
also the firstfruits of the resurrection are in
Christ.
92. All men rise again, but let no one lose
heart, and let not the just grieve at the com-
mon lot of rising again, since he awaits the
chief fruit of his virtue. All indeed shall
rise again, ^ but, as says the Apostle, "each
in his own order. " The fruit of the Divine
Mercy is common to all, but the order of
merit differs. The day gives light to all,
the sun warms all, the rain fertilises the
possessions of all with genial showers.
93. We are all born, and we shall all rise
again, but in each state, whether of living or
of living again, grace differs and the condi-
tion differs. For, "in a moment, in the
twinkling of an eye, at the last trump, the
dead shall rise incorruptible and we shall be
changed." 7 Moreover, in death itself some
rest, and some live. Rest is good, but life
is better. And so the Apostle rouses him
that is resting to life, saying: "Rise, thou
that sleepest, and arise from the dead, and
Christ shall g:ive thee li^ht. '' ^ Therefore he
o o
is aroused that he may live, that he may be
like to Paul, that he may be able to say :
"For we that are alive shall not prevent
those that are asleep.""? He speaks not
here of the common manner of life, and the
breath which we all alike enjoy, but of the
merit of the resurrection. For, having
said, "And the dead which are in Christ
shall rise first," he adds further; "And we
that are alive shall together with them be
caught up in the clouds, to meet Christ in
the air." '°
94. Paul certainly is dead, and by his
1 I Cor. XV. 28.
* Col. i. 18.
" I Cor. XV. 52.
'" Thess. iv. 17.
- 2 Cor. V. 16.
" I Cor. XV. 22.
1^- Eph. V. 14.
^ I Cor. XV. 23.
® I Cor. XV. 23.
* I Thess. iv. 14.
honourable passion exchanged the life of the
body for everlasting glory ; did he then de-
ceive himself when he wrote that he should
be caught up alive in the clouds to meet
Christ .'* We read the same too of Enoch '
and of Elijah,^ and thou too shalt be caught
up in the Spirit. Lo the chariot of Elijah, lo
the fire, though not seen are prepared, that
the just may ascend, the innocent be borne
forth, and thy life may not know death.
For indeed the apostles knew not death, ac-
cording to that which was said: "Verily,
verily, I say unto you, many of those stand-
ing here shall not taste death until they see
the Son of man coming in His kingdom." 3
For he lives, who has nothing in him which
can die, who has not from Egypt any shoe
or bond, but has put it off before laying
aside the service of this body. And so not
Enoch alone is alive, for not he alone was
caught up ; Paul also was caught up to meet
Christ.
95. The patriarchs also live, for God could
not be called the God of Abraham, of Isaac,
and of Jacob, except the dead were living;
for He is not the God of the dead but of the
living. 4 And we, too, shall live if we be
willing to copy the deeds and habits of our
predecessors. We are astonished at the
rewards of the patriarchs, let us copy their
faithfulness ; we tell of their grace, let us
follow their obedience ; let us not, enticed
by appetite, fall into the snaresof the world.
Let us lay hold of the opportunity, of the
commandment of the Law, the mercy of
our vocation, the desire of suffering. The
patriarchs went forth from their own land,
let us go forth in purpose from the power of
the body ; let us go forth in purpose as they
in exile ; but they esteemed that not to be
exile which the fear of God caused, necessity
did not enforce. They changed their land for
another soil, let us change earth for heaven ;
they changed in earthly habitation, let us
change in spirit. To them Wisdom showed
the heaven illuminated with stars, s let it
enlighten the eyes of our heart. Thus does
the type agree with the truth, and the truth
with the type.
96. Abraham, ready to receive strangers,
faithful towards God, devoted in minister-
ing, quick in his service, saw the Trinity in
a type ; ^ he added religious duty to hospi-
tality, when beholding Three he worshipped
One, and preserving the distinction of the
Persons, yet addressed one Lord, he offered
to Three the honour of his gift, while
' Gen. V. 24. ^ 2 [4] Kings ii. it.
* S. Luke XX. 38. '• Gen. xv. 5.
^ S. Matt. xvi. 28.
" Gen. xviii. 2.
I go
ST. AMBROSE.
acknowledging one Power. It was not
learning but grace which spoke in him, and
he believed better what he had not learnt
than we who have learnt. No one had
falsified the representation of the truth, and
so he sees Three, but worships the Unity.
He brings forth three measures of fine meal,
and slays one victim,' considering that
one sacrifice is sufficient, but a triple gift ;
one victim, an offering of three. And in the
four kings, ^ who does not understand that
he subjected to himself the elements of the
material creation, and all earthly things in
a sign whereby the Lord's Passion was
prefigured ? Faithful in war, moderate in his
triumph, in that he preferred not to become
richer by the gifts of men, but by those of
God.
97. He believed that he when old could
beget a son,^ and judged himself when a
father able to sacrifice his son ; nor did his
fatherly affection tremble when duty aided
the right hand of the old man, 4 for he knew
that his son would be more acceptable to
God when sacrificed than when whole.
Therefore he brings his well-beloved son
to be sacrificed, and offered promptly him
whom he had received late ; nor is he re-
strained by being called by the name of
father, when his son called him "Father,"
and he replied, "My son." Dear pledges
of love are these names, but the commands
of God are loved still more. And so al-
though their hearts felt for each other, their
purpose remained firm. The father's hand
stretched out the knife over his son, and the
father's heart struck the blow that the sen-
tence might not fail of being carried out ;
he feared lest the stroke should miss, lest
his right hand should fail. He felt the
movings of fatherly affection, but did not
shrink from the work of submission, and
hastened his obedience, even when he heard
the voice from heaven. Let us then set God
before all those whom we love, father,
brother, mother, that He may preserve for
us those whom we love, as in the case of
Abraham we behold rather the liberal Re-
warder than the servant.
98. The father offered indeed his son, but
God is appeased not by blood but by dutiful
obedience. Lie showed the ram in the
thicket 5 in the stead of the lad, that He might
restore the son to his father, and yet the
victim not fail the priest. And so Abraham
was not stained with his son's blood, nor
was God deprived of the sacrifice. The
* Gen. XV. 6 ff.
* Gen. xxii. ii.
^ Gen. xiv. .
'' Gen. xxii. 13.
' Gen. XV. 6.
prophet spoke, and neither yielded to boast-
fulness nor continued obstinate, but took the
ram in exchange for the lad. And by this
is shown the more how piously he offered
him whom he now so gladly received back.
And thou, if thou offer thy gift to God, dost
not lose it. But we are tenacious of our
own; God gave His only Son for us,' we
refuse ours. Abraham saw this and recog-
nized the mystery, that salvation should be
to us from the Tree, nor did it escape his
notice that in one and the same sacrifice it
was One that seemed to be offered. Another
which could be slain.
99. Let us, then, imitate the devotion of
Abraham, let us imitate the goodness of
Isaac, let us imitate his purity. The man
was plainly good and chaste, full of devo-
tion towards God, chaste towards his wife.
He returned not evil for evil, yielded to
those who would thrust him out, received
them again on their repentance, neither
violent towards insolence, nor stubborn
towards kindness. Fleeing from strife when
he M^ent away from others, ready to forgive
when he received them again, and still more
lavish of goodness when he forgave them.
The fellowship of his company was sought,
he gave in addition a feast of pleasure.
100. In Jacob, too, let us imitate the type
of Christ, let there be some likeness of his
actions in ourselves. We shall have our
share with him, if we imitate him. He was
obedient to his mother, he yielded to his
brother, he served his father-in-law, he
sought his wages from the increase, not from
a division of the flocks. There was no
covetous division, where his portion brought
such gain. Nor was that sign without a
purpose, the ladder from earth to heaven,^
wherein was seen the future fellowship
between men and angels through the cross
of Christ, whose thigh was paralyzed, 3 that
in his thigh he might recognize the Heir of
his body, and foretell by the paralyzing of
his thigh the Passion of his Heir.
loi. We see, then, that heaven is open to
virtue, and that this is the privilege not only
of a few : " For many shall come from the
east and from the west, and the north and
the south, and shall sit down in the king-
dom of God, '4 giving expression to the
enjoyment of perpetual rest since the
motions of their souls are stilled. Let us
follow Abraham in our habits, that he may
receive us into his bosom, and cherish us
with loving embrace, like Lazarus the in-
' Rom. viii. 32.
•'' Gen. xxxii. 25.
- Gen. xxviii. 12.
* S. Matt. viii. n.
BOOK II.— ON BELIEF IN THE RESURRECTION.
191
heritor of his humility surrounded by his
own special virtues. The followers of the
holy patriarch, approved of God, cherish us
not in a bodily bosom, but in a clothing as
it were of good works. ' ' Be not deceived, "
says the Apostle, " God is not mocked." '
102. We have seen, then, how grave an
offence it is not to believe the resurrec-
tion ; for if we rise not again, then Christ
died in vain, then Christ rose not again. ^
For if He rose not for us, He certainly rose
not at all, for He had no need to rise for
Himself. The universe rose again in Him,
the heaven rose again in Him, the earth rose
again in Him, for there shall be a new heaven
and a new earth. ^ But where was the
necessity of a resurrection for Him Whom
the claims of death held not.-* For though
He died as man, yet was He free in hell it-
self.
103. Wilt thou know how free.? " I am
become as a man that hath no help, free
among the dead. "^ And well is He called
free. Who had power to raise Himself,
according to that which is written : " De-
stroy this temple, and in three days I will
raise it up. "s And well is He called free.
Who had descended to rescue others. For
He was made as a man, not, indeed, in ap-
pearance only, but so fashioned in truth, for
He is man, and who shall know Him ?
For, "being made in the likeness of men,
and being found in fashion as a man, He
humbled Himself, becoming obedient even
unto death," ^ in order that through that
obedience we might see His glory, " the
glory as of the Only-begotten of the Father," 7
according to Saint John. For thus is the
statement of Scripture preserved, if both the
glory of the Only-begotten and the nature
of perfect man are preserved in Christ.
104. And so He needed no helper. For
He needed none when He made the world,
so as to need none when He would redeem
it. No legate, no messenger, but the Lord
Himself made it whole. "He spake and
it was done. "^ The Lord Himself made
it whole. Himself in every part, be-
cause all things were by Him. For who
should help Him in Whom all things were
created and by Whom all things consist .' ^
Who should help Him Who makes all things
in a moment, and raises the dead at the last
trump .' '° The ' ' last, " not as though He could
not raise them at the first, or the second, or the
third, but an order is observed, not that a
1 Gal. vi. 7. ^ I Cor. xv. 13.
* Ps. Ixxxviii. [Ixxxvii.] 4, 5.
6 Phil, ii 7, 8. • S. John i. 14.
* Col. i. 17. 1" I Cor. XV. 52.
^ Rev. xxi. I.
^ S. John ii. 19.
^ Ps. xxxiii. [xxxii.] 9.
difficulty may be at last overcome, but that
the prescribed number be accomplished.
105. But it is now time, I think, to speak
of the trumpets since my discourse is near-
ing its end, that the trumpet may also be
the sign of the finishing of my address.
We read of seven trumpets in the Revela-
tion of John, which seven angels received.'
And there you read that when the seventh
angel sounded his trumpet, there was a
great voice from heaven, saying: "The
kingdom of this world is become the king-
dom of our God and of His Christ, and He
shall reign for ever and ever. "^ The word
trumpet is also used for a voice, as you read :
" Behold a door opened in heaven, and the
first voice which I heard, as of a trumpet
speaking with me and saying. Come up
hither, and I will show thee the things
which must come to pass. "^ We read also :
" Blow up the trumpet at the beginning of
the month [the new moon] ; ^ and again else-
where : "Praise Him with the sound of the
trumpet." 5
io6. Therefore we ought with all our
power to observe what is the signification
of the trumpets, lest, accepting them, like
old women, as part of the story, we should
be in danger if we were to think things un-
worthy of spiritual teaching, or not befit-
ting the dignity of the Scriptures. For when
we read that our warfare is not against flesh
and blood, but against spiritual hosts of
wickedness, which are in high places, '^ we
ought not to think of weapons of the flesh,
but of such as are mighty before God. 7 It is
not enough that one see the trumpet or hear
its sound, unless one understands the signi-
fication of the sound. For if the trumpet
give an uncertain sound, how shall one pre-
pare himself for war ? ^ Wherefore it is im-
portant that we understand the meaning of
the voice of the trumpet, lest we seem
barbarians, when we either hear or utter
trumpet-sounds of this sort. And therefore
when we speak, let us pray that the Holy
Spirit would interpret them to us.
107. Let us, then, investigate what we read
in the Old Testament concerning the kinds
of trumpets, considering that those festivals
which were enjoined on the Jews by the
Law are the shadow of joys above and of
heavenly festivals. For here is the shadow,
there the truth. Let us endeavour to attain
to the truth by means of the shadow. Of
which truth the figure is expressed in this
manner, where we read that the Lord said
' Rev. viii. 2.
* Ps. Ixxxi. [Ixxx.] 3.
IS-
: Cor.
X. 4.
- Rev. xi.
5 Ps. Cl. 3.
* I Cor. xiv. 8.
^ Rev. iv. I.
* Eph. \-i. 12.
192
ST. AMBROSE.
to Moses : '
Israel, saying:
Speak unto the children of
In the seventh month, on the
first day of the month, shall be a rest unto
you, a memorial of blowing- of trumpets, it
shall be called holy unto you. Ye shall not
do any servile work, and ye shall kindle a 1
whole burnt-offering- unto the Lord." ' And
in the Book of Numbers : " The Lord spake
unto INIoses, saying : Make thee two trum-
pets of beaten work, of silver shalt thou
make them, and they shall be to thee for
calling the assembly and for the journeying
of the camp. And thou shalt blow with
them, and all the congregation shall be
gathered tog-ether at the door of the taber-
nacle of witness. But if thou blow with one |
trumpet, all the princes and leaders of Israel
shall come to thee ; and ye shall blow a
signal with the trumpet the first time, and
they shall move the camp forward, and
place it on the east. And ye shall blow a
signal with the trumpet the second time,
and they shall move the camp forward, and i
place it towards Libanus. And ye shall
blow a signal with the trumpet the third
time, and they shall move the camp for- :
ward, which shall be placed towards the
north [Boream]. And ye shall blow a signal
with the trumpet the fourth time, and they
shall move the camp forward, which shall
be placed towards the north [Aquilonem].
They shall blow a sig-nal with the trumpet
when they move forward. And when ye
shall gather together the assembly, blow
with the trumpet, but not the signal. And
the sons of Aaron, the priests, shall blow
with the trumpets, and it shall be for you a
statute for ever throughout your generations.
But if ye shall go out to war into your own
land, against the adversaries who resist you,
ye shall sound a signal with the trumpets
and ye shall be remembered before the Lord,
and have deliverance from your dead. Also
in the days of your gladness, and on your
feast days, and on your new moons, ye
shall blow with the trumpets, and at your
whole burnt sacrifices and at your peace-
offering-s, and it shall be for you for your
memorial before the Lord, saith the Lord." ^ -^
108. What then ? shall we esteem festival
days by eating- and drinking.? But let no
man judge us in respect of eating ; "for we
know that the Law is spiritual. " '^ " Let no
* Lev. xxiii. 24, 25. ^ Num. x. i-io. |
^ St. -Ambrose translates the Septuagint as usual, but there are
some variations. Probably I.ibanus is a copyist's mistake for Liba
[\ipa] the W.S.W. wind. So, too, Boream perhaps should Ije
marc [iropa8aAa(T<Tai']. In ch. 115, St. Ambrose in explaining the
third trumpet speaks of the sea. The third and fourth trumpets
are not mentioned except in llio Sejituagint, and it may be noticed
that St. .Ambrose changes the description of the positions of the
camps \^i:a.pt\i.^6.K\ov<jo.i\, conMuta, into a direction, constiiiietitiir.
* Rom. vii. 14.
man therefore judge us in any meats or in
drink, or in respect of a feast day or new
moons, or a sabbath day, which are a sha-
dow of the things to come, but the body is
of Christ. *" ' Let us, then, seek the body of
Christ which the voice of the Father, from
heaven, as it were the last trumpet, has
shown to you at the time when the Jews
said that it thundered ; ^ the body of Christ,
which again the last trump shall reveal ; for
"the Lord Himself shall descend from
heaven at the voice of the Archangel, and
at the trump of God, and they that are dead
in Christ shall rise again ;"3 for "where
the body is, there too are the eagles, "^
where the body of Christ is, there is the
truth.
108. The seventh trumpet, then, seems to
signify the sabbath of the week, which is
reckoned not only in days and years and
periods (for which reason the number of
the jubilee is sacred), but includes also the
seventieth year, when the people returned to
Jerusalem, who had remained seventy years
in captivity. In hundreds also and in thou-
sands the observation of the sacred number
is by no means passed over, for not without
a meaning did the Lord say : "I have left
the seven thousand men, who have not bent
their knees before Baal. ''s Therefore the
shadow of the future rest is figured in time
in the days, months, and years of this world,
and therefore the children of Israel are com-
manded by Moses, that in the seventh
month, on the first day of the month, a
rest should be established for all at the
"memorial of the trumpets;" and that no
servile work should be done, but a sacrifice
be offered to God, because that at the end
of the week, as it were the sabbath of the
world, spiritual and not bodily work is re-
quired of us. For that which is bodily is
servile, for the body serves the soul, but
innocence makes free, guilt reduces to
slavery.
109. It was necessary, then, that spiritual
thingfs should be made known as in a mirror
and in a riddle ; ' ' For now we see by means
of a mirror, but then face to face. "^ Now
we war after the flesh, then in the Spirit we
shall see the divine mysteries. Let, then,
the character of the true law be expressed
in our manner of life, who walk in the
imasre of God, for the shadow of the Law
has now passed away. The carnal Jews
had the shadow, the likeness is ours, the
reality theirs who shall rise again. For we
' Col. ii. 16.
■* S. Luke xvii. 37.
^ S. John xii. 29.
'' I [3] Kings xix. iS.
^ I Thess. iv. 16.
'' I Cor. xiii. 12.
BOOK II.— ON BELIEF IN THE RESURRECTION.
193
know that accordincr to the Law there are i
these three, the shadow, the image or like-
ness, and the reality ; the shadow in the ,
Law, the image in the Gospel, the truth in 1
the judgment. But all is Christ's, and all is
in Christ, Whom now we cannot see accord-
ing to the reality, but we see Him, as it
were, in a kind of likeness of future things,
of which we have seen the shadow in the
Law. So, then, Christ is not the shadow
but the likeness of God, not an empty like-
ness but the reality. And so the Law was t
by Moses, for the shadow was through
man, the likeness was through the Law,
the reality through Jesus. For reality can-
not proceed from any other source than
from reality.
no. If, then, any one desires to see this
Image of God, he must love God, that he
may be loved by God ; and be no longer a
servant but a friend, because he has kept
the commandments of God, that he may
enter into the cloud where God is. '■ Let
him make to himself two reasonable trum-
pets of beaten work of proved silver, that is,
composed of precious words and adorned,
from which not a harsh shrill sound with
dread-inspiring voice may be uttered, but
high thanks to God may be poured forth
with continuous exultation. For by the
voice of such trumpets the dead are raised,
not indeed by the sound of the metal, but
aroused by the word of truth. And per-
chance it is those two trumpets by which
Paul, through the Divine Spirit, spake when
he said : "I will pray with the Spirit, and
I will pray with the understanding, I will
sing with the Spirit, and I will sing with the
understanding ; " ^ for the one without the
other seems by no means to have perfect
utterance.
111. Yet it is not every one's business to
sound each trumpet, nor every one's busi-
ness to call together the whole assembly,
but that prerogative is granted to the priests
alone, 3 and the ministers of God who sound
the trumpets, so that whosoever shall hear
and follow thither where the glory of the
Lord is, and shall with early determination
come to the tabernacle of witness, may be
able also to see the divine works, and merit
that appointed and eternal home for the
entire succession of his posterity. For then
is the war finished and the enemy put to
flight, when the grace of the Spirit and the
energy of the soul act together.
1 1 2. And these are salutary trumpets also,
if one believe with the heart, and confess
* Ex. xxiv. 15.
13
* I Cor. xiv. 15.
3 Num. X. 8.
with the mouth; " For with the heart man
believeth unto righteousness, and with the
mouth confession is made unto salvation."'
For with this twofold trumpet man arrives
at that holy land, namely, the grace of the
resurrection. Let them, then, ever sound
to thee, that thou mayest ever hear the
voice of God ; may the utterances of the
Angels and Prophets ever incite and move
thee, that thou mayest hasten to things
above.
113. David was thinking of this purpose
in his breast when he said: "For I will
pass into the place of the marvellous taber-
nacle, even to the house of God, with the
voice of exultation and thanksgiving, the
sound of one that feasts."^ For not only
are enemies overcome by the sound of
these trumpets ; but without them there
could not be rejoicings, and festivals or new
moons. For no one, unless he have re-
ceived the promises of the Divine Word,
and believes the message derived therefrom,
can keep festivals or new moons, in which
he desires to fill himself, freed from bodily
pleasure and secular occupation, with the
light of Christ. And sacrifices themselves
cannot be pleasing to Christ unless confes-
sion of the mouth accompanies them, which
according to custom stirs up the people to
implore the grace of God at the priestly
oblation.
114. Let us therefore be preachers of the
Lord, and praise Him in the sound of the
trumpet. 3 not thinking little or lightly of its
power, but such things as can fill the ear of
the mind, and enter into the depths of our
inmost consciousness, so that we think not
that what suits to the body is to be applied
to the Godhead, nor measure the greatness
of Divine Power by human might, so as to
enquire how any one can rise again, or
with what kind of body he will come, or
how that which has been dissolved can
azain coalesce, and what is lost be restored,
for all these things are accomplished as
soon as they are determined by the Divine
Will. And it is not a sound of a trumpet
distinguishable by the bodily senses which
is expected, but the invisible power of the
Majesty of heaven operates ; for with God
to will is to do ; nor need we enquire into
the force required for the resurrection, but
seek its fruit for ourselves. Which will be
accomplished all the more easily, if freed
from faults we attain to the fulness of the
spiritual mystery, and the renewed flesh
receives grace from the Spirit, and the soul
» Rom. X. 10. 2 Ps. xlu. [xli.] 4 [LXX.]. ^ pg. cl. 3.
194
ST. AMBROSE.
obtains from Christ the brightness of eternal
Hght.
115. But those mysteries pertain not to
individuals only, but to the whole human
race. For observe the order of grace accord-
ing to the type of the Law. When the first
trumpet sounds, it collects those towards the
east, as the chief and elect ; when the
second sounds, those nearly equal in merit,
who, being placed towards Libanus, have
abandoned the follies of the nations ; when
the third, those who as it were, tossed on the
sea of this world, have been driven hither
and thither by the waves of this life ; when
the fourth, those who have by no means
been able sufficiently to soften the hardness
of their hearts by the commandments of
spiritual utterance, and therefore are said
to be towards the north — for, according to
Solomon, the north is a hard wind.'
116. And so although all are raised again
in a moment, yet all are raised in the order
of their merits. And therefore they rise
first, who yielding early to the impulses of
devotion, and as it were going forth before
the rising dawn of faith, received the rays of
the eternal Sun. This one may rightly say
either of the patriarchs in the course of the
Old Testament, or of the apostles under the
Gospel. And the second are they who, for-
saking the rites of the Gentiles, passed from
unholy error under the training of theChurch.
So, then, those first were of the fathers, those
second of the Gentiles, for the light of faith
took its beginning from those, among these
it will remain to the end of the world. In
the third place and in the fourth, those are
raised who are in the south and in the north.
The earth is divided into these four, of these
four is the year made up, in these four is the
earth completed, and from these four is the
Church collected. For all who are consid-
ered to be joined to holy Church, by being
called by the Divine Name, shall obtain the
privilege of the resurrection and the grace
of eternal bliss, for "they shall come from
the east and west, and from the north and
south, and shall sit down in the kingdom of
God." ^
117. For it is no small light wherewith
Christ encompasses His world : since "His
going forth is from the height of heaven,
and His progress to the height thereof,
nor is there any who can hide himself from
His heat. "^ For with His Goodness He
enlightens all, and wills not to reject but to
amend the foolish, and desires not to exclude
» Prov. xxvii. 16 [LXX.].
^ Ps. xix. [xvLii.] 6.
* S. Luke xiii. 26.
the hard-hearted from the Church, but to
soften them. And so the Church in the Song
of Songs and Christ in the Gospel invites
them, saying : " Come unto Me, all ye who
labour and are heavy laden, and I will
refresh you ; take My yoke upon you and
learn of Me, for I am meek and lowly in
heart." '
118. And you may recognize also the
voice of the invitation of the Church, for she
says: "Awake, O north wind, and come,
thou south, blow upon my garden, and let
my ointment flow forth. Let my brother
come down into his garden and eat the fruit
of his precious trees. "^ For knowing even
then, O holy Church, that from those also
there would be fruitful works for thee,
thou didst promise to thy Christ fruit from
such as they, thou who didst first say that
thou wast brought into the King's chamber,
lovine His breast above wine, since thou
lovedst Him Who loved thee, soughtest Him
Who fed thee, and didst despise dangers for
religion's sake.
119. And then, O Bride, thou art called to
come from Libanus, being in the Lord's
judgment all fair and without fault. For
thus it is written : "Thou art all fair, my
love, and there is no fault in thee. Come
hither from Libanus, my bride, come hither
from Libanus." 3
1 20. Afterwards, thou, fearing no rushing
waters, no torrents commg down from Liba-
nus, callest the north andsouth winds, wish-
ing them to blow upon thy garden, that thy
ointment may flow forth upon others, and
that thou mayest offer to Christ in others
the manifold fruits of thy productiveness. ■
121. And therefore "blessed is he who
kecpeth the words of this prophecy, "4 which
has revealed the resurrection to us by
clearer testimony, saying : "And I saw the
dead, great and small, standing before the
throne, and they opened the books ; and an-
other book was opened, which is the book
of life : and the dead were judged out of the
things which were written in the books,
according to their works. And the sea gave
up the dead which were in it, and hell gave
up the dead which were in it. "5 We must,
then, not question how they shall rise again,
whom hell gives up and the sea restores.
122. Hear also when the future grace of
the just is promised: "And I heard," he
says, " a great voice from the throne saying :
Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men,
and He shall dwell with them, and they
' S. Matt. xii. 28, 29.
* Rev. xxi. 7.
^ Cant. iv. 16.
'' Rev. XX. 12, 13
^ Cant. iv. 7, S.
BOOK II.— ON BELIEF IN THE RESURRECTION.
195
shall be His people, and God Himself shall
be their God with them : and He shall wipe
away every tear from their eyes ; and death
shall be no more, nor mourning, nor crying,
nor pain, any more." '
123. Compare now, if you will, and con-
trast this life with that ; and choose, if you
then can, unen'ding bodily existence in toil,
and in the wretched misery of such changes
as we endure, in satiety when we have our
wishes, in that disgust which attends our
pleasures. If God were willing to let these
last for ever, would you choose them.? For
if on its own account life is to be escaped
from, that there may be an avoidance of
troubles and rest from miseries, how much
more is that rest to be sought for, which
shall be followed by the eternal pleasure of
the resurrection to come, where there is no
succession of faults, no enticement to sin ?
124. Who is so patient in suffering as not
to pray for death.'' who has such endurance
in weakness as not to wish rather to die
than to live in debility ? Who is so brave in
sorrow as not to desire to escape from it
even by death ? But if we ourselves are
dissatisfied while life lasts, although we
know that a limit is fixed for it, how much
more weary should we become of this life if
we saw that the troubles of the body would
be with us vvithout end ! For who is there
who would wish to be excepted from death ?
Or what would be more unendurable than
a miserable immortality.'' "If in this life
only,"' he says, "we hope in Christ, we are
more miserable than all men ; '' ^ not because
to hope in Christ is miserable, but because
Christ has prepared another life for those
who hope in Him. For this life is liable to
sin, that life is reserved for the reward.
124. And how much weariness do we find
that the short stages of our lives bring us !
The boy longs to be a young man ; the
youth counts the years leading to riper age ;
the young man, unthankful for the advan-
tage of his vigorous time of life, desires the
honour of old age. And so to all there
comes naturally the desire of change, because
we are dissatisfied with that which we now
are. And lastly, even the things we have
desired are wearisome to us ; and what we
have wished to obtain, when we have
obtained it, we dislike.
125. Wherefore holy men have not with-
out reason often lamented their lengthy
dwelling here : David 3 lamented it, Jere-
miah 4 lamented it, and Elijah s lamented it.
' Rev. xxi. 3.
* Jer. XX. 18
- I Cor. XV. 19.
^ I Kings xix. 4.
^ Ps. cxx. [cxix.] 5.
If we believe wise men, and those in whom
the Divine Spirit dwelt, they were hastening
to better things ; and if we enquire as to the
judgment of others, that we may ascertain
that all agree in one opinion, what great men
have preferred death to sorrow, what great
men have preferred it to fear ! esteeming
forsooth the fear of death to be worse than
death itself. So death is not feared on
account of evils which belong to it, but is
preferred to the miseries of life, since the
departure of the dying is desired and the
dread of the livinsf is avoided.
126. So be it, then, (jranted that the
Resurrection is preferable to this life. What !
have philosophers ' themselves found any-
thing with which we should have a greater
delight to continue than to rise again ? Even
those indeed who say that souls are im-
mortal do not satisfy me, seeing they only
allow me a partial redemption. What grace
can that be by which I am not wholly
benefited ? What life is that if the operation
of God dies out in me .'' What righteousness
is that which, if death is the end of natural
existence, is common to the sinner and the
just.? What is that truth, that the soul
should be considered immortal, because it
moves itself and is always in motion ? As
regards that which in the body is common
to us with beasts, it is perhaps uncertain what
happens before the body exists, and the
truth is not to be gathered from these differ-
ences but destroyed.
127. But is their opinion preferable, who^
say that our souls, when they have passed
out of these bodies, migrate into the bodies
of beasts, or of various other living crea-
tures ? Philosophers, indeed, themselves
are wont to argue that these are ridiculous
fancies of poets, such as might be produced
by draughts of the drugs of Circe ; ^ and
they say that not so much they who are
represented to have undergone such things,
as the senses of those who have invented
such tales are changed into the forms of
various beasts as it were by Circe's cup.
For w^hat is so like a marvel as to believe that
men could have been changed into the forms
of beasts ? How much greater a marvel,
however, would it be that the soul which
rules man should take on itself the nature of
a beast so opposed to that of man, and
being capable of reason should be able to
pass over to an irrational animal, than that
the form of the body should have been
1 Cicero, Tusc. Disp. I.; Plato, Phado.
2 From the Egyptians this opinion seemt to liave passed on to
Pythagoras and Plato.
3 Ovid, Metamoffh. XIV. i.
196
ST. AMBROSE.
changed ? You yourselves, who teach these
things, destroy what you teach. For you
have given up the production of these por-
tentous conversions by means of magic
incantations.
128. Poets say these things in sport, and
philosophers blame them, and at the same
time they imagine that those very things are
true of the dead which they consider ficti-
tious as regards the living. For they who
invented such tales did not intend to assert
the truth of their own fable, but to deride
the errors of philosophers, who think that
that same soul which was accustomed to
overcome anger by gentle and lowly pur-
pose, can now, inflamed by the raging
impulses of a lion, impatient with anger and
with unbridled rage, thirst for blood and
seek for slaughter. Or again, that that soul,
which as it were by royal counsel used to
moderate the various storms of the people,
and to calm them with the voice of reason,
can now endure to howl in pathless and
desert places after the fashion of a wolf; or
that that soul which, groaning under a heavy
burden, used to low in sad complaint over
the labours of the plough, now changed into
the fashion of a man, seeks for horns on his
smooth brow ; ' or that another, which used
of old to be borne aloft on rapid wing to the
heights of heaven, now thinks of flight* no
longer in its power, and mourns that it grows
sluggish in the weight of a human body.
129. Perchance you destroyed Icarus ^
through some such teaching, because the
youth, led on by your persuasion, imagined,
it may be, that he had been a bird. By
such means too have many old men been
deceived so as to submit to grievous pain,
having unhappily believed the fables about
swans, and thought that they, whilst sooth-
ing their pain with mournful strains, would
be able to transmute their gray hair into
downy feathers.
130. How incredible are these things!
how odious ! How much more fitting is it
to believe in accordance with nature, in
accordance with what takes place in every
kind of fruit ; to believe in accordance with
the pattern of what has happened, in accord-
ance with the utterances of prophets, and
the heavenly promise of Christ ! For what
is better than to be sure that the work of
God does not perish, and that those who are
made in the image and likeness of God can-
not be transformed into the shapes of beasts ;
since in truth it is not the form of the body
but of the spirit which is made after the
» Verg. Ed. VI. 51. = Ovid, Metam. II. 4. ^ Metam. VIII. 3.
likeness of God. For in what manner could
man, to whom are subjected the other kinds
of living creatures, migrate with the better
part of himself into an animal subjected to
himself.'' Nature does not suffer this, and if
nature did grace would not.
131. But I have seen what you. Gentiles,
think of each other, and indeed it ought not
to seem strange that you who worship beasts
should believe that you can be changed into
beasts. But I had rather that you judged
better concerning what is due to you, that
you may believe that you will be not in the
company of wild beasts, but in the com-
panionship of angels.
132. The soul has to depart from the sur-
roundings of this life, and the pollutions of
the earthly body, and to press on to those
heavenly companies, though it is for the
saints alone to attain to them, and to sing
praise to God (as in the prophet's words we
hear of those who are harping ' and saying :
"For great are Thy marvellous works, O
Lord God Almighty, just and true are Thy
ways. Thou King of the nations; who shall
not fear and magnify Thy Name, for Thou
only art holy, for all nations shall come and
worship before Thee " ),^ and to see Thy mar-
riage feast, O Lord Jesus, in which the Bride
is led from earthly to heavenly things, while
all rejoice in harmony, for "to Thee shall
all flesh come, "3 now no longer subject to
transitory things, but joined to the Spirit, to
see the chambers adorned with linen, roses,
lilies, and garlands. Of whom else is the
marriage so adorned.? For it is adorned
with the purple stripes of confessors, the
blood of martyrs, the lilies of virgins, and
the crowns of priests.
133. Holy David desired beyond all else
for himself that he might behold and
gaze upon this, for he says: "One thing
have I asked of the Lord, that will I seek
after ; that I may dwell in the house of the
Lord all the days of my life, and see the
pleasure of the Lord. " 4
134. It is a pleasure to believe this, a joy
to hope for it ; and certainly, not to have
believed it is a pain, to have lived in this
hope a grace. But if I am mistaken in this,
that I prefer to be associated after death
with angels rather than with beasts, I am
gladly mistaken, and so long as I live will
never suffer myself to be cheated of this
hope.
135. For what comfort have I left but that
I hope to come quickly to thee, my brother,
* Rev. xiv. 2.
^ Ps. Ixv. [Ixiv.] J.
»Rev. XV. 3, 4.
* Ps. xxvu. [zxvi.j 4.
BOOK II.— ON BELIEF IN THE RESURRECTION.
197
and that thy departure will not cause a long
severance between us, and that it may be
granted me, through thy intercessions, that
thou mayest quickly call me who long
for thee. For who is there who ought not
to wish for himself beyond all else that
"this corruptible should put on incorrup-
tion, and this mortal put on immortality "? '
that we who succumb to death through the
frailty of the body, being raised above na-
ture, may no longer have to fear death.
^(Cw.xv. a.
i
EXPOSITION OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH
BY
ST. AMBROSE, BISHOP OF MILAN,
PREFACE.
On the eve of setting- out for the East, to aid his uncle Valens in repelling- a Gothic
invasion, Gratian, the Emperor of the West, requested St. Ambrose to write him a treatise
in proof of the Divinity of Jesus Christ. Gratian 's object in making this request was to
secure some sort of preservative against the corrupting influence of Arianism, which at
that time (a. d. 378) had gained the upper hand of Orthodoxy in the Eastern provinces of
the Empire, owing to its establishment at the Imperial Court. In compliance with Gra-
tian's wish, the Bishop of Milan composed a treatise, which now forms the tirst two Books
of the De Fide. With this work the Emperor was so much pleased that on his return from
the East, after the death of Valens at Hadrianople, he wrote to St. Ambrose, begging for
a fresh copy of the treatise, and further, for its enlargement by the addition of a discourse
on the Divinity of the Holy Spirit. The original treatise was, indeed, enlarged by St.
Ambrose in 379, but the additional Books dealt, not with the Divinity of the Holy Spirit,
but rather with new objections raised by the Arian teachers, and points which had either
been passed over or not fully discussed already. In this way St Ambrose's Exposition
was brought into its present form.
The object of the Exposition is, as has already been indicated, to prove the Divinity of
Jesus Christ, and His co-eternity, co-equality, and consubstantiality, as God the Son, with
God the Father. This the author does by constant appeal to the Scriptures, both of the
Old and of the New Testament, which the Arians had in many cases forced into the mould
of false interpretation to make them fit their doctrine.
Besides the title of De Fide, that of De Trinitate was one by which this treatise was
largely known in after ages ; it is certain, though, that the former was that assigned by
St. Ambrose himself.
199
PREFATORY NOTE.
The notes to the first four books of the De Fide have in some instances been taken
over from those in Father Hurter's Edition of the treatise (Innsbruck : Wagner), which
has been used in preparing the translation of these books. These notes are distinguished
by the letter " H." placed at the end.
The citations from Scripture embodied in the text have been translated as they stood
in the original. This will account for any divergence from the renderings in the English
Bible and Prayer-book, whilst any agreement maybe set down to reminiscences of the
more familiar versions. It was thought best to adopt this treatment of St. Ambrose's cita-
tions, inasmuch as the divergences are worth noticing, and indeed, in some cases, the
argument rather turns upon them. The references are, throughout, made to chapters and
verses in the English Bible, and not to the Vulgate, unless especially stated so to be.
The Prefaces and Summaries of Contents are based on those in Father Hurter's
Edition.
200
ST. AMBROSE'S EXPOSITION OF THE CHRISTIAN
FAITH.
BOOK I.
PROLOGUE.
The author praises Gratian's zeal for instruction in the
Faith, and speaks lowly of his own merits. Taught of
God Himself, the Emperor stands in no need of
human instruction ; yet this his devoutness prepares
the way to victory. The task appointed to the
author is difficult : in the accomplishment whereof
he will be guided not so much by reason and argu-
ment as by authority, especially that of the Nicene
Council.
1. The Queen of the South, as we read in
the Book of the Kings, came to hear the
wisdom of Solomon. ' Likewise King- Hiram
sent to Solomon that he might prove him. ^
So also your sacred Majesty, following these
examples of old time, has decreed to hear
my confession of faith. But I am no Solo-
mon, that you should wonder at my wisdom,
and your INIajesty is not the sovereign of a
single people ; it is the Augustus, ruler of
the whole world, that has commanded the
setting forth of the Faith in a book, not for
your instruction, but for your approval.
2. For why, august Emperor, should
your Majesty learn that Faith which, from
your earliest childhood, you have ever
devoutly and lovingly kept.? "Before I
formed thee in thy mother's belly I knew
thee," saith the Scripture, "and before thou
camest forth out of the womb I sanctified
thee." 3 Sanctification, therefore, cometh
not of tradition, but of inspiration ; there-
fore keep watch over the gifts of God. For
that which no man hath taught you, God
hath surely given and inspired.
3. Your sacred Majesty, being about to
go forth to war, requires of me a book, ex-
pounding the Faith, since your Majesty
' I Kings X. I. * I Kings v. i.
^ " By santification is meant the grace of regeneration, which com-
prises virtues inspired, including both the habit of faith and the gifts
of the Holy Spirit. Now these support especially the innocent soul,
so that with pious affection it nurses the doctrine revealed to it, is
inclined thereto, loves it, takes it to itself, and advances in it."^
Hurter ad loc. The Emperor's constant zeal in defence of the Faith
against the Arians is to be regarded as due to his habit of faith and
to the gifts of the Spirit. The citation is from Jeremiah i. 5.
201
knows that victories are gained more by
faith in the commander, than by valour in
the soldiers. For Abraham led into battle
three hundred and eighteen men,' and
brought home the spoils of countless foes ;
and having, by the power of that which was
the sign of our Lord's Cross and Name,^
overcome the might of five kings and con-
quering hosts, he both avenged his neigh-
bour and gained victory and the ransom of
his brother's son. So also Joshua the son
of Nun, when he could not prevail against
the enemy with the might of all his army, 3
overcame by sound of seven sacred trum-
pets, in the place where he saw and knew
the Captain of the heavenly host. 4 For
victory, then, your Majesty makes ready,
being Christ's loyal servant and defender of
the Faith, which you would have me set
forth in writing.
4. Truly, I would rather take upon me
the duty of exhortation to keep the Faith,
than that of disputing thereon ; for the
former means devout confession, whereas
the latter is liable to rash presumption.
Howbeit, forasmuch as your Majesty has
no need of exhortation, whilst I may not
pray to be excused from the duty of loyalty,
I will take in hand a bold enterprise, yet
modestly withal, not so much reasoning and
disputing concerning the Faith as gathering
together a multitude of witness, s
5. Of the Acts of Councils, I shall let that
one be my chief guide which three hundred
and eighteen priests, appointed, as it were,
after the judgment of Abraham,^ made (so
' Gen. xiv. 14 ff.
2 The original form of the Cross was that of the letter T. The
numerical value of the sign T (Tau), in Greek arithmetic was 300.
Eighteen was represented by irj, the first two letters of the name
'I»)(rou9, Jesus. To St. Ambrose, therefore, it seemed that there
was some mysterious power in th« number ^i8, represented by the
sign of the Cross and the first two letters of the Saviour's name, thus
— TIH.
2 Joshua vi. 6. « Joshua vi. i^ f. " sc. from Scripture.
^ See the note 2 on § 3. St. Ambrose is here speaking of the
Oicumenical Council held at Nicsain Bitliynia, a.d. 325. Different
accounts are given of the numbers present. Eusebins says there
202
ST. AMBROSE.
to speak) a trophy raised to proclaim their
victory over the infidel throughout the world,
prevailing by that courage of the Faith,
wherein all agreed. Verily, as it seems to
me, one may herein see the hand of God,
forasmuch as the same number is our au-
thority in the Councils of the Faith, and an
example of loyalty in the records of old.
CHAPTER I.
The author distinguishes the faith from the errors of
Pagans,* Jews, and Heretics, and after explaining
the significance of the names " God " and " Lord,"
shows clearly the difference of Persons in Unity of
Essence.' In dividing the Essence, the Arians not
only bring in the doctrine of three Gods, but even
overthrow the dominion of the Trinity.
6. Now this is the declaration of our Faith,
that we say that God is One, neither dividing
His Son from Him, as do the heathen,^ nor
denying, with the Jews, that He was be-
gotten of the Father before all worlds,-* and
afterwards born of the Virgin ; nor yet, like
Sabellius,s confounding the Father with the
were 250 bishops in the Council; AtJuiJiasius and Socrates, "more
than 300; '' SozoDieti, " about 320." The number 318, however, is
also given by Athanasius as well as by Theodoret and Epiphanius.
See Robertson's History of tlie Church, Bk. II. ch. i. The victory
over the infidel is, of course, the victory of the orthodox Catholics
over Arius, and the Nicene Symbol may be regarded as the
" trophy " commemorating the victory, the reality of which lay in
getting the clause " of one substance with the Father " (onooiio-ioi/
TO) IlaTpi) subscribed to. The original Nicene Creed, it may be
useful to observe, was not exactly the same in form as the sym-
bol which now is generally known by that name, and which is part
of the Eucharistic office of the English Church. This latter is an
enlargement of the original, and it appears to have been in use for
a considerable time (not less than seventy years) before it was pro-
duced at the Council of Chalcedon in 451. It obtained general ac-
ceptance by the middle of the sixth century. Towards the end of
that century (589 a.d.) an additional clause, proclaiming the proces-
sion of the Holy Ghost from the .Son as well as the Father, was in-
serted at the Council of Toledo. This insertion was repudiated by
the Church in the East, and became one of the causes of the sepa-
ration of Eastern from Western Christendom.
' Or " Gentiles." The Christians regarded themselves as placed
in the world much as the Hebrews had been planted in the midst
of the " nations round about."
' The Latin word is natnra, which, at first sight, seems less ab-
struse and metaphysical than the Greek oixria, or uTroo-rao-i?, or the
Latin essentia and substatttia, though it is not really so. A man's
natura, nature, is what he is at and from the beginning; "change
of nature " means not an absolute change, but a reformation, a new
guidance and treatment of tendencies, passions, powers — some re-
ceiving a precedence denied them before, others being suppressed
and put in subjection. So God's " nature " is what He is from and
to all eternity, in Himself, unchangingly and unchangeably.
* Lit. " the nations " — gentes, to. eOyri. The Romans of the
Republic used to speak of foreign peoples — especially if subject to
kings — as getites exterce, in contradistinction to the Populus Ro-
tnanus. St. Ambrose of course means those who still clung to the
ancient religions, who were foreigners to the commonwealth (res
publico) of the Church.
* The original is ante tetitpora — " before the ages " — " before
time was.' Cf. 1 Cor. viii. 6; Phil. ii. 6-8; Col. i. 15 (ttpwtotoko?
7ra(7ir)9 /cTiVeo)? — "first-bom of all creation," which Justin Martyr
interprets as meaning wpb ■nh.vTuiv twi/ ktict/uotwi' — " before all
created things.") Hebrews i 1-12 ; Rev. i. 8, iS; John i. 1-3.
Justin Martyr, Apology, II. 6; Dialogue ivitk Tryphon, 61.
Tempora answers to the Greek oiwK:!, rendered "worlds" in
Heb. i. 2.
^ Sabellius was a presbyter in the Libyan Pentapolis (Barca), who
came to Rome and there ventilated his heretical teaching, early in
the third century, a.d. (about 210). He appears to have maintained
that there was no real distinction of Persons in the Godhead. God,
he said, was one indi\-idual Person : when different divine Persons
were spoken of, no more was meant than different aspects of, or
Word, and so maintaining that Father and
Son are one and the same Person ; nor again,
as doth Photinus, ' holding that the Son first
came into existence in the Virgin's womb :
nor believing, with Arius, ^^ in a number of
diverse Powers, ^ and so, like the benighted
heathen, making out more than one God.
For it is written : " Hear, O Israel : the Lord
thy God is one God. "^
7. For God and Lord is a name of majesty,
a name of power, even as God Himself
saith : "The Lord is My name,"s and as in
another place the prophet declareth : " The
Lord Almighty is His name. "^ God is He,
therefore, and Lord, either because His rule
is over all, or because He beholdeth all
things, and is feared by all, without differ-
ence. 7
8. If, then, God is One, one is the name,
the assumption of different parts by, the same subject. Sabellius
thus started from the ordinary usages of the term Trpocrion-oi' as de-
noting (i)a mask, (2) a characteror part in a drama. The Latin /t'r-
sona w-as used in the same way. Sabellianism never counted many
adherents ; its professors were called Patripassians, because their
doctrine was tantamount to asserting that God the Father was cru-
cified.
1 Photinus was a Galatian, who became Bishop of Sirmium (Mi-
tro\'itz in Slavonia) in the fourth century. He taught that Jesus
Christ did not exist before His mother Mary, but was begotten of
her by Joseph. The man Jesus, of a reasonable soul and human
flesh subsisting, was enlightened and guided by the influence of the
Logos, or Divine Reason, whereby He became the Son of God,
pre-eminent over all other prophets and teachers.
^ Arius was a presbyter of Alexandria; the origin of his heresy,
however, is, as Cardinal Newman has shown, to be sought in Syria
rather than in Egj-pt, in the sophistic method of the Antiochene
schools more than in the mysticism of the Alexandrian. It was in
the year 319 that Arius began to attract attention by his heterodox
teaching, which led eventually to his excommunication. He found
favour, however, with men of considerable importance in the
Church, such as Eusebius of Cassarea in Palestine, Eusebius of
Nicomedia, Athanasius of Anazarbus, and others. The question was
finally discussed in a synod of bishops convened, on the summons
of the Emperor Constantine, at Nicia in Bithynia. The acts of that
Council condemned Arianism — notwithstanding which, the heresy
prevailed in the East till the reign of Theodosius the Great (379-395
A.D.) ; and having won the acceptance of the Goths, it was predomi-
nant in Gaul and Italy during the fifth century, and in Spain till the
Council of Toledo (589 A.D ;, and its influence affected Christian
thought for centuries after\vards — possibly it is not even yet dead.
Arius urged the following dilemma: " Either the Son is an ori-
ginal Di\-ine Essence ; if so we must acknowledge two Gods. Or
He was created, formed, begotten ; if so. He is not God in the
same sense as the Father is God." Arius himself chose the latter
alternative, which St. Ambrose regarded as a lapse into paganism,
with its " gods many and lords many," dii viajores and dii mi-
nores, and di\'inities begotten of gods and goddesses.
Arius's errors are summarized in the anathema appended to the
original Nicene Creed. " But those who say that there was a time
when the Son of God was not, or that He had no existence before He
was begotten, or that He was formed of things non-existent, or who
assert that the Son of God is of a different substance or essence, or
is created, mutable, or variable, these men the Catholic and Apos-
tolic Church of God holds accursed."
^Compare Eph. i. 21; Col. i. 16. Hierarchies of "Thrones,
Dominations, Princedoms, Virtues, Powers," were characteristic
features of the Gnostic systems of the second century. The Gnostics
generally thought that the world had been created by an inferior,
secondary, limitary power, identified with the God of the Old Tes-
tament, whom they distinguished from the true Supreme God.
* The A.V. of 161 1 runs thus : " Hear, O Israel : the Lord our God
is one Lord " (Jahveh our God is one Jahveh).
'' Ex. iii. 15.
^ " Ego Dotnimis ; Jtoe est nomen vicuiiiV — Vulg., Is. xlii. 8. " I
am the Lord, that is My rmme." — A.V. 161 1, ibid.
' The word ©eds, " God," is derived by most authorities from
QioLdBai, which means "to look upon." Here we have another
derivation suggested, viz., from ieo?, " fear," on this ground that
God inspires fear. — H. Neither derivation is correct. The best
perhaps is given by Herodotus (II. 52), viz., from the verb rid-qfj-i,
to place, set, array, the idea being that God is the principal of all
I order and law.
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— BOOK I.
203
one is the power, of the Trinity. Christ
Himself, indeed, saith : " Go ye, baptize the
nations in the name of the Father, and of the
Son, and of the Holy Spirit." ' In the name,
mark you, not in the names." '^
9. Moreover, Christ Himself saith : "I
and the Father are One. "^ "One," said He,
that there be no separation of power and
nature ; but again, " We are," that you may
recognize Father and Son, forasmuch as the
perfect Father is believed to have begotten
the perfect Son, -* and the Father and the Son
are One, not by confusion of Person, but by
unity of nature. s
10. We say, then, that there is one God,
not two or three Gods, this being the error
into which the impious heresy of the Arians
doth run with its blasphemies. For it says
that there are three Gods, in that it divides the
Godhead of the Trinity ; whereas the Lord,
in saying, "Go, baptize the nations in the
name of the Father and of the Son and of
the Holy Spirit," hath shown that the Trinity
is of one power. We confess Father, Son,
and Spirit, understanding in a perfect Trinity
both fulness of Divinity and unity of power. ^
11. " Every kingdom divided against itself
shall quickly be overthrown," saith the
Lord. Now the kingdom of the Trinity is
not divided. If, therefore, it is not divided,
it is one ; for that which is not one is
divided. The Arians, however, would have
the kingdom of the Trinity to be such as may
easily be overthrown, by division against
itself But truly, seeing that it cannot be
overthrown, it is plainly undivided. For no
unity is divided or rent asunder, and there-
fore neither age nor corruption has any
power over it. 7
CHAPTER IL
The Emperor is exhorted to display zeal in the Faith.
Christ's perfect Godhead is shown from the unity of
will and working which He has with the Father.
The attributes of Divinity are shown to be proper to
Christ, Whose various titles prove His essential unity,
with distinction of Person. In no other way can the
unity of God be maintained.
12. "Not every one that saith unto Me
Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of
heaven,"^ saith the Scripture. Faith, there-
fore, august Sovereign, must not be a mere
matter of performance, for it is written, "The
* S. Matt, xxviii. 19. * A similar argument in Gal. iii. 16.
3 S. John X. 30. ■» Cf. S. Matt. v. 48.
* Athanasian Creed, clause 4.
* Or " perfect fulness of Divinity, and perfect unity of power."
^ S. Matt. xii. 25 ; Ps. cii. 25-27 ; Dan. iv. 3.
* S. Matt. vii. 21.
zeal of thine house hath devoured me."'
Let us then with faithful spirit and devout
mind call upon Jesus our Lord, let us
believe that He is God, to the end that what-
ever we ask of the Father, we may obtain in
His name. - For the Father's will is, that He
be entreated through the Son, the Son's that
the Father be entreated. 3
13. The grace of His submission makes
for agreement [with our teaching], and the
acts of His power are not at variance there-
with. For whatsoever things the Father
doeth, the same also doeth the Son, in like
manner. ■♦ The Son both doeth the same
things, and doeth them in like manner, but
it is the Father's will that He be entreated
in the matter of what He Himself proposeth
to do, that you may understand, not that
He cannot do it otherwise, but that there is
one power displayed. Truly, then, is the
Son of God to be adored and worshipped,
Who by the power of His Godhead hath laid
the foundations of the world, and by His
submission informed our affections, s
14. Therefore we ought to believe that
God is good, eternal, perfect, almighty, and
true, such as we find Him in the Law and
the Prophets, and the rest of the holy Scrip-
tures,^ for otherwise there is no God. >5^or
He Who is God cannot but be good, seeing
that fulness of goodness is of the nature of
God : 7 nor can God, Who made time, be in
time ; nor, again, can God be imperfect, for
a lesser being is plainly imperfect, seeing that
it lacks somewhat whereby it could be made
equal to a greater. This, then, is the teaching
of our faith — that God is not evil, that with
God nothing is impossible, that God exists
not in time, that God is beneath no being.
If I am in error, let my adversaries prove it. ^
15. Seeing, then, that Christ is God, He is,
by consequence, good and almighty and
eternal and perfect and true ; for these
attributes belong to the essential nature of
the Godhead. Let our adversaries, there-
fore, deny the Divine Nature in Christ, —
otherwise they cannot refuse to God what is
proper to the Divine Nature.
16. Further, that none may fall into error,
let a man attend to those signs vouchsafed
us by holy Scripture, whereby we may
know the Son. He is called the Word, the
Son, the Power of God, the Wisdom of God. 9
1 Ps. Ixix. g. Cf. S. John ii. 17.
* S. John XV. 16; S. Luke xi. 9, 10.
3 S. John xvi. 23,24,and xiv. 13; S. Matt. vii. 7, 8 ; S.Mark xi. 24.
* S. John V. ig, 30. ^ S. John i. 3 ; Heb v. 7-10.
6 Vide, e.g., Ps. xxv. 8; Jer. x. 10; James i. 17, 18; Dan. ix. 9,
10; S. Luke i. 37. ' Dan. ix. 7: Ex. xxxiv. 6.
* See James i. 13 ; S. Luke xviii. 27 ; Ps. xc. 2-4 ; Ixxxix. 6.
»S. JohnL 1, 14; XX. 31; Rom. i. 4; S. Matt, xxviii. i8; iCor.i.24;
Col. ii. 3.
204
ST. AMBROSE.
The Word, because He is without blemish ;
the Power, because He is perfect ; the Son,
because He is begotten of the Father ; the
Wisdom, because He is one with the Father,
one in eternity, one in Divinity. Not that
the Father is one Person with the Son ; be-
tween Father and Son is the plain distinction
that comes of generation ; ' so that Christ is
God of God, Everlasting of Everlasting, Ful-
ness of Fulness.^
17. Now these are not mere names, but
signs of power manifesting itself in works,
for while there is fulness of Godhead in the
Father, there is also fulness of Godhead in the
Son, not diverse, but one. The Godhead is
nothing confused, for it is an unity : nothing
manifold, for in it there is no difference.
18. Moreover, if in all them that believed
there was, as it is written, one soul and one
heart : ^ if every one that cleaveth to the Lord
is one spirit, 4 as the Apostle hath said : if a
man and his wife are one flesh : s if all we
mortal men are, so far as regards our general
nature, of one substance : if this is what the
Scripture saith of created men, that, being
many, they are one,^ who can in no way
be compared to Divine Persons, how much
more are the Father and the Son one in
Divinity, with Whom there is no difference
either of substance or of will !
19. For how else shall we say that God is
One? Divinity maketh plurality, but unity
of power debarreth quantity of number,
seeing that unity is not number, but itself is
the principle of all numbers.
CHAPTER HI.
By evidence gathered from Scripture the unity of
Father and Son is proved, and firstly, a passage,
taken from the Book of Isaiah, is compared with
others and expounded in such sort as to show that
in the Son there is no diversity from the Father's
nature, save only as regards the flesh ; whence it
follows that the Godhead of both Persons is One.
This conclusion is confirmed by the authority of
Baruch.
20. Now the oracles 7 of the prophets bear
witness what close unity holy Scripture
declares to subsist between the Father and
the Son as regards their Godhead. For thus
saith the Lord of ^abaoth : ^ "Egypt hath
' Acts iv. 32. * I Cor. vi. 17.
8. ^ Acts xvii. 26; Gal. iii. 28.
' Begetter and begotten mttst be personally distinct.
^ Col. i. 19 ; ii. 9.
" Gen. ii. 24; S. Matt. x.
' Rom. iii. 2 ; Acts vii. 38. The Hebrew word translated " bur-
den " in the A.V. — e.g-. Isa. xiii. i — may be rendered " oracle." The
" oracles" of the Hebrew prophets were of a different order from
those of Delphi or Lebadeia, which are rather comparable to the
" oracles " of such persons as the witch of Endor.
* Or " the Lord of Hosts." Cf. Isa. vi. 3, and the TV Deum,
verse 5 (the Trisagion).
laboured, and the commerce of the Ethio-
pians and Sabeans : mighty men shall come
over to thee, and shall be thy servants, and
in thy train shall they follow, bound in
fetters, and they shall fall down before thee,
and to thee shall they make supplication :
for God is in thee, and there is no God be-
side thee. For thou art God, and we knew
it not, O God of Israel."'
21. Hear the voice of the prophet : "In
Thee," he saith, "is God, and there is no God
beside Thee. " How agreeth this with the
Arians' teaching ? They must deny either
the Father's or the Son's Divinity, unless
they believe, once for all, unity of the same
Divinity.
22. " In Thee, " saith he, ' ' is God " — foras-
much as the Father is in the Son. For it is
written, "The Father, Who abideth in Me,
Himself speaketh," and "The works that I
do, He Himself also doeth."* And yet
again we read that the Son is in the Father,
saying, "I am in the Father, and the Father
in Me. "3 Let the Arians, if they can, make
away with this kinship 4 in nature and unity
in work.
23. There is, therefore, God in God, but
not two Gods ; for it is written that there is
one God, 5 and there is Lord in Lord,^ but
not two Lords, forasmuch as it is likewise
written: " Serve not two lords. " ? And the
Law saith : " Hear, O Israel ! The Lord
thy God is one God ; " ^ moreover, in the
same Testament it is written: "The Lord
rained from the Lord. "9 The Lord, it is
said, sent rain "from the Lord." So also
you may read in Genesis : "And God said,
— and God made,"'° and, lower down, "And
God made man in the image of God ; " " yet
it was not two gods, but one God, that made
[man]. In the one place, then, as in the
other, the unity of operation and of name
is maintained. For surely, when we read
"God of God,"" we do not speak of two
Gods.
24. Again, you may read in the forty-
fourth psalm '^ how the prophet not only
calls the Father "God" but also proclaims
the Son as God, saying: "Thy throne, O
God, is for ever and ever. "'•♦ And further
on : "God, even thy God, hath anointed
thee with the oil of gladness above thy fel-
lows."'5 This God XVho anoints, and God
^ Isa. xlv. 14. St. Ambrose's version differs somewhat from the
A.V. ^ S. John .\iv. lo.
* S. John xiv. lo. * Latin ^roprietas, Greek oi/ctidT?;?.
'' Isa. xlv. 18; I Cor. viii. 4, 6. '' or " Jehovah in Jehovah."
' S. Matt. vi. 24. * Deut. vi. 4. " Gen. xix. 24.
'" Gen. i. 6, 7. " Gen ■' -' 7. 12 Nicene Creed.
" Ps. xlv. in Bible and k. '* Ps. xlv. 6.
^^ Ps. xlv. 7.
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— BOOK I.
205
Who in the flesh is anointed, is the Son of
God. For what fellows in His anointing-
hath Christ, except such as are in the flesh ?
You see, then, that God is by God anointed,
but being anointed in taking- upon Him the
nature of mankind, He is proclaimed the
Son of God ; yet is the principle of the Law
not broken.
25. So again, when you read, "The Lord
rained from the Lord," acknowledge the
unity of Godhead, for unity in operation
doth not allow of more than one individual
God, even as the Lord Himself has shown,
saying: "Believe Me, that I am in the
Father, and the Father in Me : or believe
Me for the very works' sake."' Here, too,
we see that unity of Godhead is signified by
unity in operation,
26. The Apostle, careful to prove that
there is one Godhead of both Father and
Son, and one Lordship, lest we should run
into any error, whether of heathen or of
Jewish ungodliness, showed us the rule we
ought to follow, saying : " One God, the
Father, from Whom are all things, and we
in Him, and one Lord, Jesus Christ, by
Whom are all things, and we by Him. "^
For just as, in calling Jesus Christ "Lord,"
he did not deny that the Father was Lord,
even so, in saying, "One God, the Father,"
he did not deny true Godhead to the Son,
and thus he taught, not that there was more
than one God, but that the source of power
was one, forasmuch as Godhead consists in
Lordship, and Lordship in Godhead, as it is
written : " Be ye sure that the Lord, He is
God. It is He that hath made us, and not
we ourselves. " ^
27. "In thee," therefore, "is God," by
unity of nature, and "there is no God beside
Thee," by reason of personal possession of
the Substance, without any reserve or differ-
ence. ^
28. Again, Scripture speaks, in the Book
of Jeremiah, of One God, and yet acknow-
ledges both Father and Son. Thus we read :
"He is our God, and in comparison with
Him none other shall be accounted of. He
hath discovered all the way of teaching,
and given it to Jacob, His servant, and to
Israel, His beloved. After these things He
appeared upon earth, and conversed with
men."
^ S. John X. 38; xiv. 11.
^ I Cor. viii. 6. The Greek runs : " ete Se 6 ^offorrjp, ef o5 Ta navTa
KaX r/;aec? 515 auToi'." Vulg. — " Nobis tamemmus Deus Pater, ex
quo omnia et nos in ilium.
^ Ps. c. 3.
* The original is " 7ton est Dens prtpier te — per proprietatein snb-
stantice." It must be remembered St. Ambrose was a civil magis-
trate before he was made bishop. His mind would be disposed
therefore to regard things under a legal aspect.
29. The prophet speaks of the Son, for it
was the Son Himself Who conversed with
men, and this is what he says : " He is our
(iod, and in comparison with Him none
other shall be accounted of." Why do we
call Him in question, of Whom so great a
prophet saith that no other can be compared
with Him.? What comparison of another
can be made, when the Godhead is One .-*
This was the confession of a people set in
the midst of dangers ; reverencing religion,
and therefore unskilled in strife of argument.
30. Come, Holy Spirit, and help Thy pro-
phets, in whom Thou art wont to dwell, in
whom we believe. Shall we believe the
wise of this world, if we believe not the
prophets .^ But where is the wise man,
where is the scribe .'' When our peasant
planted figs, he found that whereof the
philosopher knew nothing, for God hath
chosen the foolish things of this world to
confound the strong.' Are we to believe
the Jews } for God was once known in
Jewry. Nay, but they deny that very thing,
which is the foundation of our belief, seeing
that they know not the Father, who have
denied the Son.^
CHAPTER IV.
The Unity of God is necessarily implied in the order
of Nature, in the Faith, and in Baptism. The gifts
of the Magi declare (i) the Unity of the Godhead;
(2) Christ's Godhead and Manhood. The truth of
the doctrine of the Trinity in Unity is shown in the
Angel walking in the midst of the furnace with
Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego.
31. All nature testifies to the Unity of
God, inasmuch as the universe is one. The
Faith declares that there is one God, seeing
that there is one belief in both the Old and
the New Testament. That there is one
Spirit, all holy, 3 grace witnesseth, because
there is one Baptism, in the Name of the
Trinity. The prophets proclaim, the apos-
tles hear, the voice of one God. In one God
did the Magi believe, and they brought, in
adoration, gold, frankincense, and myrrh to
Christ's cradle, confessing, by the gift of
gold. His Royalty, and with the incense
worshipping Him as God. For gold is the
sign of kingdom, incense of God, myrrh of
burial. 4
' I Cor. i. 27. The " peasant " is Jeremiah. See Jer. xxiv., but
the prophet is not there spoken of ?i.s, planting fi^s. The quotation
in § 28 is Baruch iii. 36-38.
^ " In Jewry is God known." — Ps. Ixxvi. i. Yet they deny the Son,
and therefore know not the Father. — Matt, xi.27. Cf. S. John i. 18.
•> The Spirit here spoken of is, according to Hurler's interpreta-
tion, not the Third Person of the Trinity, but the Triune God, Who
is a Spirit (John iv. 24 ; 2 Cor. iii. 17).
* Hy7>ins A ■ and M. 76, stanza 4.
2o6
ST. AMBROSE.
32. What, then, was the meaning of the
mystic offerings in the lowly cattle-stalls,
save that we should discern in Christ the
difference between the Godhead and the
flesh ? He is seen as man, ' He is adored
as Lord. He lies in swaddling-clothes, but
shines amid the stars ; the cradle shows His
birth, the stars His dominion ; - it is the
flesh that is wrapped in clothes, the God-
head that receives the ministry of angels.
Thus the dignity of His natural majesty is
not lost, and His true assumption of the
flesh is proved.
^^. This is our Faith. Thus did God will
that He should be known by all, thus be-
lieved the three children, ^ and felt not the
fire into the midst whereof they were cast,
which destroyed and burnt up unbelievers,-*
whilst it fell harmless as dew upon the faith-
ful, s for whom the flames kindled by others
became cold, seeing that the torment had
justly lost its power in conflict with faith.
For with them there was One in the form of
an angel,*" comforting them, 7 to the end that
in the number of the Trinity one Supreme
Power might be praised. God was praised,
the Son of God was seen in Gods angel,
holy and spiritual grace spake in the chil-
dren.^
CHAPTER V.
The various blasphemies uttered by the Arians against
Christ are cited. Before these are replied to, the
orthodox ' are admonished to beware of the captious
arguments of philosophers, forasmuch as in these
especially did the heretics put their trust.
34. Now let us consider the disputings of
the Arians concerning the Son of God.
1 Phil. ii. 7.
^ Rev. i. 16; xxii. i6: S. Matt. ii. Cf. Num. xxiv. 17.
^ Dan. iv. 17. * Dan. iv. 22. ^ Hosea xiv. 5.
" Dan. iv. 28. " S. Luke xxii. 43.
' Dan. iv. 25. In the number of the three children was shadowed
forth the number of Persons in the Trinity, whilst in the Angel, who
was one, was. shown the Unity of power or nature. In another way,
too, St. Ambrose points out, was the Trinity typified in that event,
inasmuch as God was praised, the Angel of God was present, and
the Spirit, or the Grace of God, spake in the children. — H.
" In the original Cai/ioh'c, i.e. " Cutholics." Heresies might be-
come widespread — the Arian heresy, indeed, counted numerous ad-
herents in the fourth, fifth, and sixth centuries — but they took their
rise in some member or other of the ecclesiastical body, in some one
of the many local churches which together made up the one oecu-
menical church. On the other hand, the primitive teaching, received
from the apostolic age, had been delivered without difference in
every place to which it had penetrated. It was acknowledged and
established before sects and heresies ; its original was divine, theirs
only human ; it rested on the rock of Christ's authority, speaking
through His apostles, whilst they were built on the sands of pre-
eminence in sophistry and captious interpretation ; it was for all
times and places, therefore, but they were only for a season. In
this belief those who clave to the teaching of the apostles claimed
for themselves the name of " Catholics," and for the oecumenical
church of which they were members that of " Catholic and Apos-
tolic." To avoid any misunderstanding, I have used the term " or-
thodox," which will stand very well for " Catholic," inasmuch as
" the right faith " is for all, without difference, to hold— in a word,
universal, or, as it is in Greek, icafl' oAou (whence KaSoAticd?, Cath-
olicus. Catholic).
35. They say that the Son of God is un-
like His Father. To say this of a man would
be an insult. '
-^^d. They say that the Son of God had a
beginning in time, ^ whereas He Himself is
the source and ordainer of time and all that
therein is. ^ We are men, and we would not
be limited to time. We began to exist once,
and we believe that we shall have a timeless
existence. We desire after immortality —
how, then, can we deny the eternity of God's
Son, Whom God declares to be eternal by
nature, not by grace .?
37. They say that He v.-as created.^ But
who would reckon an author with his
works, and have him seem to be what he
has himself made }
38. They deny His goodness. s Their
blaspheming is its own condemnation, and
so cannot hope for pardon.
39. They deny that He is truly Son of
God, they deny His omnipotence, in that
whilst they admit that all things are made by
the ministry of the Son, they attribute the
original source of their being to the power
of God. But what is power, save perfection
of nature } ^
40. Furthermore, the Arians deny that in
^ It would constitute an insult, as suggesting that the man was
a bastard, or supposititious.
- Thus the Arians were anathematized by the Nicene Council as
" those who say that there was a time when the Son of God was
not."
* The original was : "Cum condiior ipse sit ie7np<n~iim" which,
rendered more closely word for word, is, " whereas He Himself is
the ordainer of times," or " ages." The Latin teinpora is the equi-
valent of the Greek aiwce?, which is commonly rendered " worlds "
in the A.V. of the New Testament, e.g. Heb. i. 2; Rom. xii. 2 ;
I Cor. i. 20; ii. 6; 2 Cor. iv. 4; Gal.i. 4; 2 Tim. iv. 10. But aCiav
also means "age" — "for ever and ever" is the rendering of eis
aioii'a; (xiuivtov (" unto ages of ages") or e<s rbr aiuca. The term
denotes the world as a complex, the parts of which are presented to
us in succession of time, from which notion is derived its use to de-
note a selection of the parts so presented, collectively termed an
" age " or " time." Another word rendered " world "in the N.T.
is KO<r/i.os, which frequently occurs in St. John ; and St. Paul also has
it, in conjunction with aiMv in Eph. ii. 2. " According to the
course (aiojra) of this world (<cdcrnov)." Kd(riu.o! means the world as
an ordered ^\\o\&, as opposed to a chaos. The use of " world " to
translate both xdcrfio? and a.\l>v may be justified on the groimd that
we cannot think of time void of objects and events, whilst, on the
other hand, we know not — at least, have never obseiTed — any objects
and events not in time. For us " time " is a necessary form of
thought.
* The Arians asserted that the Son had no existence before He
was begotten and that He was " formed out of nothing " or " out
of things non-existent;" /.<?. that He owed His existence to the
Father's absolute fiat, just as much as the light (Gen. i. 3).
Furthermore, the Son's will was mutable; He might have fallen
like Satan. The F'ather, foreseeing that the Son would not fall, be-
stowed on Him the titles of " Son " and " Logos."
•'' Arius' arguments against believing in Christ as the Almighty
Power of God were based on the N.T. records of Christ's agony
and prayer in view of death, which he thought must imply, not
only changeableness of will, but also limitation of power. Had
Christ been omnipotent, like the Father, He would have had no
fears for Himself, but would rather have imparted strength to
others.
'' -Arius' teaching on this head appears to be fairly enough repre-
sented by Athanasius : "When God, being purposed to establish
created Nature, saw that it could not bear the immediate touch of
the Father's hand, and His operation. He in the first place made
and created a single Being only, and called Him Son' and
' Logos,' to the end that by His intermediate ministry all things
might henceforth be brought into existence." Contra Arianos,
Oratio II. § 24.
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— BOOK I.
207
Godhead He is One with the Father. ' Let
them annul the Gospel, then, and silence
the voice of Christ. For Christ Himself has
said: "I and the Father are one."^ It is
not I who say this : Christ has said it. Is
He a deceiver, that He should lie.''^ Is He
unrighteous, that He should claim to be
what He never was." But of these matters
we will deal severally, at greater length, in
their proper place.
41. Seeing, then, that the heretic says
that Christ is unlike His Father, and seeks
to maintain this by force of subtle disputa-
tion, we must cite the Scripture: "Take
heed that no man make spoil of you by
philosophy and vain deceit, according to
the tradition of men, and after the rudiments
of this world, not according to Christ ; for
in Him dwelleth all the fulness of Godhead
in bodily shape. " •♦
42. For they store up all the strength of
their poisons in dialectical disputation,
which by the judgment of philosophers is
defined as having no power to establish
aught, and aiming only at destruction. 5
But it was not by dialectic that it pleased
God to save His people ; " for the kingdom
of God consisteth in simplicity of faith, not
in wordy contention."^
CHAPTER VI.
By way of leading up to his proof that Christ is not
different from the Father, St. Ambrose cites the
■ Christ, according to the Arians, was not truly God, though He
was called God. Again, He was only so called in virtue of coin-
municatioa of grace from the Father. Thus He obtained His title
and dignity, though the name of God was used, in speaking of Him,
in a transference, such as we find in Ps. Ixxxii. 6 ; though Christ's
claim to such a title far transcended any other.
^ S. John X. 30. ^ Num. xxiii. 19.
* It would, I think, be unfair to construe this passage into an ab-
solute condemnation of all the results of human activity, arrived at
without any conscious dependence on what we mean by revelation.
We must remember, too, what " philosophy " was in the world into
which St. Paul was bom. It was no longer the golden age of philo-
sophic activity — with the exception of Stoicism, there was hardly a
school which exerted any elevating moral influence. Besides, the
" philosophy " of which St. Paul was especially thinking when he
wrote the passage cited (Col. iii. 8, 9) was hardly worthy of the
name. It was one of the earliest forms of Gnosticism, and among
other practices inculcated worship of angels, /.^. of created beings —
"Thrones, Dominations, Princedoms, Virtues, Powers." See Col.
i. 16-18; Eph. i. 20-23. Such "philosophies," falsely so-called,
would tend to bring philosophy in general into disfavour with the
teachers of the Church. Yet we find Eusebius. in the fourth cen-
tury, calling the Faith " the true philosophy " {H. E. IV. 8). The
adoption of the term to denote what St. Luke called "the way"
(Acts xix. 23) appears to have been due to the action of apologists
like Justin Martyr, who set themselves to meet the wise of this
world with their own weapons, on their own ground.
■^The original conception of Dialectic, as exhibited, for instance,
in Plato's Republic, hardly answers to this. According to Plato, the
aim of Dialectic, so far from being destructive, was distinctly edify-
ing. The Dialectic method, as its name implies, was one which
took the external fortn of question and answer. It had a definite,
positive object, viz., the attainment by force of pure reason to the
clear vision of the Absolute Good, the ultimate cause of knowledge
and existence. The sphere of Dialectic was pure reason, then, and
its object the ultimate truth of things. {Republic, VII. p. 532.)
The method which St. Ambrose here calls "Dialectic" would have
been more correctly entitled " Elenchus."
" I Cor. iv. 20. Cf. ii. 4, 5
more famous leaders of the Arian party, and explains
how little their witness agrees, and shows what de-
fence the Scriptures provide against them.
43. The Arians, then, say that Christ is
unlike the Father ; we deny it. Nay, in-
deed, we shrink in dread from the word.
Nevertheless 1 would not that your sacred
Majesty should trust to argument and our
disputation. Let us enquire of the Scriptures,
of apostles, of prophets, of Christ. In a
word, let us enquire of the Father, Whose
honour these men say they uphold, if the
Son be judged inferior to Him. But insult
to the Son brings no honour to the good
Father. It cannot please the good Father,
if the Son be judged inferior, rather than
equal, to His Father.
44. I pray your sacred Majesty to suffer
me, if for a little while I address myself par-
ticularly to these men. But whom shall I
choose out to cite .? Eunomius "? ' or Arius and
Aetius, ^ his instructors .? For there are many
names, but one unbelief, constant in wicked-
ness, but in conversation divided against it-
self ; without difference in respect of deceit,
but in common enterprise breeding dissent.
But wherefore they will not agree together I
understand not.
45. The Arians reject the person of Eu-
nomius, but they maintain his unbelief and
walk in the ways of his iniquity. They say
that he has too generously pubhshed the
writings of Arius. Truly, a plentiful lavish-
ing of error ! They praise him who gave
the command, and deny him who executed
it ! Wherefore they have now fallen apart
into several sects. Some follow after Eu-
nomius or Aetius, others after Palladius or
Demophilus and Auxentius, or the inheri-
tors of this form of unbelief 3 Others, again,
follow different teachers. Is Christ, then,
divided.'' * Nay ; but those who divide Him
from the Father do with their own hands
cut themselves asunder.
1 Eunomius, at one time Bishop of Cyzicus, came into prominence
about 355 A.D. Like Arius, he taught that the Son was a creature,
though the first and most perfect of God's creatures ; His office be-
ing to guide other creatures to knowledge of the source of their ex-
istence. Religion, then, in his view consisted in a right and com-
plete intellectual apprehension of a metaphysical principle, and no
more. The generation of the Son he regarded as an event in time,
not supra-temporal. The point where Eunomius went beyond
Arius was the assertion of the comprehensibility for the human
mind of the Divine Essence. Those, he said, who declared God
to be in His Essence incomprehensible, who taught that He could
only know in part and by token, preached an unknown God, and
denied all possible knowledge of God, and therefore, since without
knowledge of God there could be no Christianity, did not even de-
serve the name of Christians.
- Aetius was Eunomius' teacher. He became Bishop of Antioch,
the see of which was secured for him by the Arian Eudoxius, who
obtained Cyzicus for Eunomius. Aetius and Eunomius were, how-
ever, deposed about a.d. 360.
•* Demophilus was Bishop of Constantinople under Valens (d. 378
A.D.), but on the accession of Theodosius the Great he was com-
pelled to resign the see, which was given to Gregory of Nazianzus.
* I Cor. i. 13.
208
ST. AMBROSE.
46. Seeing, therefore, that men who agree
not amongst themselves have all alike con-
spired against the Church of God, I shall
call those w^hom I have to answer by the
common name of heretics. For heresy, like
some hydra of fable, hath waxed great from
its wounds, and, being ofttimes lopped
short, hath grown afresh, being appointed
to find meet destruction in fiames of fire.'
Or, like some dread and monstrous Scylla,
divided into many shapes of unbelief, she dis-
plays, as a mask to her guile, the pretence of
being a Christian sect, but those wretched
men whom she finds tossed to and fro in the
waves of her unhallowed strait, amid the
wreckage of their faith, she, girt with beastly
monsters, rends with the cruel fang of her
blasphemous doctrine.^
47. This monster's cavern, your sacred
Majesty, thick laid, as seafaring men do
say it is, with hidden lairs, and all the
neighbourhood thereof, where the rocks of
unbelief echo to the howling of her black
dogs, we must pass by with ears in a man-
ner stopped. For it is written : " Hedge
thine ears about with thorns ;"3 and again :
" Beware of dogs, beware of evil workers ;"■*
and yet again : " A man that is an heretic,
avoid after the first reproof, knowing that
such an one is fallen, and is in sin, being
condemned of his own judgment. "5 So then,
like prudent pilots, let us set the sails of our
faith for the course wherein we may pass
by most safely, and again follow the coasts
of the Scriptures. ^
CHAPTER VH.
The likeness of Christ to the Father is asserted on the
authority of St. Paul, the prophets, and the Gospel,
and especially in reliance upon the creation of man in
God's image.
48. The Apostle saith that Christ is the
image of the Father — for he calls Him the
image of the invisible God, the first-begotten
of all creation. First-begotten, mark you.
^ Hercules found it impossible to slay the Hydra (a monster water
snake; of the Lernean marshes by merely striking off its head, inas-
much as whenever one was cut off, two immediately grew in its
place. He was compelled to sear the wound with fire. One of the
heads was immortal, and Hercules could only dispose of it by crush-
ing it under a huge rock.
» For Scylla and Charybdis, see Homer, Otfyss. XI. ; Virgil, Aiii.
in. 424 f. The strait, bestrewed with wreckage of the faith (i Tim.
i. 19} corresponds to the strait between the rock of Scylla and the
whirlpool Charybdis. In order to avoid the latter, mariners were
compelled to pass close under the former, whereupon the monster
darted out and seized them, dragging them out of a ship as an angler
whips a fish out of water (Odyss. XI. 251-255). The language of
this passage shows plainly that St. Ambrose, in writing it, drew
freely upon Virgil.
* Ecclus. xxviii. 28.
* Phil. iii. 2. 8 Tit. iii. o, II.
8 Virgil, /En. III. 692 f. (^Eneas' coast-voyage round Sicily).
not first-created, in order that He may be
believed to be both begotten, in virtue of
His nature,' and first in virtue of His eter-
nity. In another place also the Apostle has
declared that God made the Son "heir of all
things, by Whom also He made the worlds.
Who is the brightness of His glory, and the
express image of His substance."^ The
Apostle calls Christ the image of the Father,
and Arius says that He is unlike the Father.
Why, then, is He called an image, if He
hath no likeness .-' INIen will not have their
portraits unlike them, and Arius contends
that the Father is unlike the Son, and would
have it that the Father has begotten one un-
like Himself, as though unable to generate
His like.
49. The prophets say : " In Thy light we
shall see light ;" 3 and again : "Wisdom is
the brightness of everlasting light, and the
spotless mirror of God's majesty, the image
of His goodness. "4 See what great names
are declared ! ' ' Brightness, " because in the
Son the Father's glory shines clearly :
"spotless mirror,'" because the Father is
seen in the Son : s "image of goodness,"
because it is not one body seen reflected in
another, but the whole power [of the God-
head] in the Son. The word "image"
teaches us that there is no difference ; "ex-
pression," that He is the counterpart of the
Father's form; and "brightness" declares
His eternity.^ The "image" in truth is not
that of a bodily countenance, not one made
up of colours, nor modelled in wax, but sim-
ply derived from God, coming out from the
Father, drawn from the fountainhead.
50. By means of this image the Lord
showed Philip the Father, saying, "Philip,
he that sees ^le, sees the Father also. How
then dost thou say, Show us the Father.?
Believest thou not that I am in the Father,
and the Father in Me .'' " 7 Yes, he who looks
upon the Son sees, in portrait, the Father.^
Mark what manner of portrait is spoken of
It is Truth, Righteousness, the Power of
God : 9 not dumb, for it is the Word ; not in-
sensible, for it is Wisdom ; not vain and
foolish, for it is Power ; not soulless, for it is
the Life ; not dead, for it is the Resurrection. '°
^ /. e., of His Sonship. St. Ambrose refers to Col. i. 15.
2 Heb. i. 2. ^ Ps. xxxvi. 9.
* Wis. vii. 26 .
^ Cf . S. John xii. 45.
*" The brightness or effulgence of a body lasts as long as that body
exists; seeing, then, that the Father is eternal, the Son, Who is His
brightness, must be eternal also (H.).
' S. John xiv. 9-10.
' Or " He who beholds the Father in the Son, beholds Him in a
portrait."
' Christ the Truth : S. John xiv. 6. Righteousness : Jer. xxxiii. 16;
xxiii. 6: i Cor. i. 30. Pmver of God: i Cor. i. 24.
1" Christ the Word: S. John i. 1-18. Wisdom: i Cor. i. 24, 30.
Li/e and Resurrection : S. John xi. 25.
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— BOOK I.
209
You see, then, that whilst an image is spoken
of, the meaning is that it is the Fatlier,
Whose image the Son is, seeing that no one
can be his own image.
51. More might I set down from the Son's
testimony ; howbeit, lest He perchance ap-
pear to have asserted Himself overmuch,
let us enquire of the Father. For the Father
said, "Let us make man in Our image and
likeness."' The Father saith to the Son,
"in Our image and likeness," and thou
sayest that the Son of God is unlike the
Father.
52. John saith, "Beloved, we are sons of
God, and it doth not yet appear what we
shall be : we know that if He be revealed,
we shall be like Him," ^ O blind madness !
0 shameless obstinacy ! We are men, and,
so far as we may, we shall be in the likeness
of God : dare we deny that the Son is like
God.?
53. Therefore the Father hath said : "Let
us make man in Our image and likeness."
At the beginning of the universe itself, as I
read, the Father and the Son existed, and I
see one creation. I hear Him that speaketh. 3
1 acknowledge Him that doeth : ■♦ but it is of
one image, one likeness, that I read. This
likeness belongs not to diversity but to
unity. What, therefore, thou claimest for
thyself, thou takest from the Son of God,
seeing, indeed, that thou canst not be in the
image of God, save by help of the image of
God.
CHAPTER VIIL
The likeness of the Son to the Father being proved.
It is not hard to prove the Son's eternity, though,
indeed, this may be established on the authority of
the Prophet Isaiah and St. John the Evangelist, by
which authority the heretical leaders are shown to be
refuted.
54. It is plain, therefore, that the Son is
not unlike the Father, and so we may con-
fess the more readily that He is also eternal,
seeing that He Who is like the Eternal must
needs be eternal. But if we say that the
Father is eternal, and yet deny this of the
Son, we say that the Son is unlike the
Father, for the temporal differeth from the
eternal. The Prophet proclaims Him eter-
nal, and :he Apostle proclaims Him eternal ;
the Testaments, Old and New alike, are full
of witness I0 the Son's eternity.
55. Let us take them, then, in their order.
In the Old Testament — to cite one out of a
1 Gen. i. 26.
« The Father.
' 2 John iii. 2.
*The Son.
multitude of testimonies — it is written :
" Before Me hath there been no other God,
and after Me shall there be none."' I will
not comment on this place, but ask thee
straight: "Who speaks these words, — the
Father or the Son ? " Whichever of the two
thou sayest, thou wilt find thyself convinced,
or, if a believer, instructed. Who, then,
speaks these words, the Father or the Son }
If it is the Son, Ho says, "Before Me hath
there been no other God ; " if the Father,
He says, " After Me shall there be none."
The One hath none before Him, the Other
none that comes after : as the Father is
known in the Son, so also is the Son known
in the Father, for whensoever you speak of
the Father, you speak also by implication of
His Son, seeing that none is his own father ;
and when you name the Son, you do also
acknowledge His Father, inasmuch as none
can be his own son. And so neither can
the Son exist without the Father, nor the
Father without the Son.^ The Father, there-
fore, is eternal, and the Son also eternal.
56. " In the beginning was the Word, and
the Word was with God, and the Word was
God. The same was in the beginning with
God. "3 "Was," mark you, "with God."
"Was" — see, we have "was" four times
over. Where did the blasphemer find it
written that He "was not." Again, John,
in another passage — in his Epistle — speak-
eth of "That which was in the beginning. "^
The extension of the "was" is infinite.
Conceive any length of time you will, yet
still the Son " was."s
1 Is. xliii. 10.
^ This holds good also of human fatherhood and sonship. The
terms of a relation involve each the existence of the other — no
father, no son, and equally, no son, no father.
^ S. John i. I f. St. Ambrose notices especially the quadruple
"was" as unmistakably signifying the Son's eternity. We may
also notice the climax "The Word was in the beginning .... was
with God .... was God.''^
■* I John i. I.
^ Hurter cites similar passages from the Fathers of the Church,
proving the Son's pre-existence and eternity. " What is the force
of those words ' In the beginning ' ? Centuries are o'erleaped, ages
are swallowed up. Take any beginning you will, yet you cannot
include it in time, for that, whence time is reckoned, already a/oj."
— Hilary.
" Although the word ' was ' contains the notion of time past, fre-
quently with a beginning, here it must be understood without the
thought of a beginning, inasmuch as the text runs 'was in the be-
ginning.' '■ — Victorinus.
If we render the Greek tV apxf? 3"^ the 'L^iin in priticipio by
" ai the beginning," in place of the phrase used in the A. V. " in the
beginning." we shall perhaps better apprehend its full force and un-
derstand these Patristic interpretations.
Other passages cited by Hurter are :
" Thought cannot escape the dominion of the word 'was.' nor can
the imagination pass beyond the ' beginning,' for however far back
you press in thought, you find no point where the ' was ' ceases to
hold sway, and however diligently you set yourself to see what is
beyond the Son, you, will not any the more be able to get to aught
above the beginning." — Basil.
" For this which was, without any beginning of existence, was truly
at the beginning, for if it had begun to be, it would not have been
'at the beginning,'' .hereas that in which absolute existence with-
out beginnin^j ;5 essential, is truly spoken of as existing ' at the be-
ginning, ' And 10 the Evangelist in saying ' In the beginning was
the Word ' said much the same as if he had said ' The Word was ijj
eternity.' " — Fulgentius.
2IO
ST. AMBROSE.
57. Now in this short passage our fisher-
man hath barred the way of all heresy.
For that which was "in the beginning " is
not comprehended in time, is not preceded
by any beginning. Let Arius, therefore,
hold his peace. ' Moreover, that which was
"with God " is not confounded and mingled
with Him, but is distinguished by the per-
fection unblemished which it hath as the
Word abiding with God ; and so letSabellius
keep silence.^ And "the Word was God."
This Word, therefore, consisteth not in ut-
tered speech, but in the designation of celes-
tial excellence, so that Photinus' teaching is
refuted. Furthermore, by the fact that in the
beginning He was with God is proven the in-
divisible unity of eternal Godhead in Father
and Son, to the shame and confusion of
Eunomius.3 Lastly, seeing that all things
are said to have been made by Him, He is
plainly shown to be author of the Old and
of the New Testament alike ; so that the
]Manichaean can find no ground for his
assaults. •♦ Thus hath the good fisherman
" If the Word was, the Word was not made: if the Word was
made. He was not " [absolutely existent]. " But since He 'was '
He was not made : for whatsoever already is and subsists and so
is ' iu the beginning ' cannot be said to become or to have been
made." — Cyril.
" Nothing before a beginning, so the beginning be one really and
truly, for of a beginning there can in no way be any beginning, and
if anything else before it is supposed or arises, it ceases to be a true
beginning
" If the Word was 'in the beginning,' what rnind, I would ask,
can prevail against the power of that verb ' was " ? When, indeed,
will that verb find its limit, and there, as it were, come to a halt,
seeing that it even eludes the pursuit of thought and outstrips the
fleetness of the mind." — Cyril.
^ The .A.rian teaching concerning the Son was — r\v nore ore ovk
fiv." " There was a time when He was not." This, St. Ambrose
says, is irreconcilable with St. John's cv dpxT v" o A670S.
" The Word was ' in ' or ' at the beginning.' "
^ Sabellianism reduced the distinction of three Persons in the God-
head to a distinction of several aspects of the same Person. They
did not " divide the substance," but they " confounded the
Persons."
^ No>i in prolatione sermonis hoc I'erbutn est. That is to say,
the Divine Word or Logos was not such in the sense of Aoyos
7rpo(|)opiK6s — i.e. uttered spoken word, and so a creature, but rather
in the sense of Aoyos ei'^iafleros — the inherent eternal object of the
Divine Consciousness.
Cf. Eunomius(v. s. § 44), was a leading Arian teacher. The argu-
ment levelled against "him here would also have been fitly directed
against Arius himself.
* The heresy of Manes or Mani made its first appearance in Persia,
in the reign of Shapur I. (2^0-272 a.d.). According to the Persian
historian Mirkhond, Mani was a member of an ancient priestly house
which had preserved the holy fire and the religion of Zoroaster dur-
ing the dark age of Parthian domination. He attracted the notice
of .Shapur by pretensions to visions and prophetic powers, and
sought to establish himself as another Daniel at the Persian Court.
When the king, however, discovered Mani's hostility to the estab-
lished Zoroastrianism and the Magian hierarchy, the prophet was
obliged to flee. Northern India appears to have been Mani's refuge
for a season, and thence, after some years of retirement, he reap-
peared, with an illustrated edition of his doctrines, composed and
executed, as he said, by divine hands. Shapur was now dead and
his successor Hormuz (272-274) was favourably disposed to Mani
But Hormuz only reigned two years, and was succeeded by a king
who was a sworn foe to the new doctrine. Mani was challenged to
a public disputation by the Magi. The king presided, so that Mani
doubtless knew from the first what the issue would be. He was
flayed alive, but he left numerous converts, and his death, which
cast a certain halo of martyrdom around him, and their sufferings in
persecution, really proved— as in the case of Christianity — con-
ducive to the spread of Manich.Tan doctrine. The fundamental
principle of Mani's system was Dualism — the opposition of mind
and matter, and the hypothesis of two co-eternal co-existent powers
of good and of evil. In opposition to the Divine Essence, the
caught them all in one net, to make them
powerless to deceive, albeit unprofitable fish
to take.
CHAPTER IX.
St. Ambrose questions the heretics and exhibits their
answer, which is, that the Son existed, indeed, before
all time, yet was not co-eternal with the Father,
whereat the Saint shows that they represent the God-
head as changeable, and further, that each Person
must be believed to be eternal.
58. Tell me, thou heretic, — for the sur-
passing clemency of the Emperor grants me
this indulgence of addressing thee for a short
space, not that I desire to confer with thee,
or am greedy to hear thy arguments, but
because I am willing to exhibit them, — tell
me, I say, whether there was ever a time
when God Almighty was not the Father,
and yet was God. "I say nothing about
time," is thy answer,
objected ! For if thou
the dispute, thou wilt
seeinof that thou must
there was a time when
whereas the Son is the ruler and creator of
time. ' He cannot have begun to exist after
His own work. Thou, therefore, must
needs allow Him to be the ruler and maker
of His work.
Well and"" subtly
bringest time into
condemn thyself,
acknowledge that
the Son was not,
59-
((
I do not say," answerest thou,
Good Principle, was placed uncreated Evil, and thus the problem
of sin and evil was solved. The purposes of creation and redemp-
tion were, in the Manichaan view, entirely self-seeking on the part
of the Deity. The world was created by God, not out of free love,
but out of the wish to protect Himself against evil, embodied in
matter, which in its essence is chaotic. Redemption was the rescue
of particles of the ethereal Light, buried amidst the gross darkness
of matter, and yet leavening and informing it. Christ was identified
with the Divine Principle and the sufferings of His members, the
particles of divine Light buried in matter, were the Crucifixion, thus
represented as an age-long agony. Jesus Christ was " crucified in
the whole world." Mani adopted the story of Eden, but he repre-
sented the eating of the fruit of the tree of knowledge not as the
cause of Man's fall, but as the first step in redemption, for Jehovah,
the God of the Old Testament, was not the true God, but the evil
Demon, from whose tyranny man had to be rescued. In order to
attain salvation, the body, material and therefore essentially evil,
must be mortified and starved. Man really fell when Eve tempted
him to indulge fleshly lust, not when he ate the forbidden fruit. The
stricter sort of the Manichsans practised a severe asceticism, ab-
staining from flesh meat and marriage. They would not even grind
corn or make bread, for in grain there was life — i.e. an emanation
of the Divine Light— though they would eat bread, quieting their
conscience, however, by saying before they took it, " It was not I
who reaped or ground the com to make this bread." -At the end
of time they held the world was to be destroyed by fire, but matter
being, on the Manichasan hypothesis, eternal, the proper inference
appears to be that the conflict of Light and Chaotic Darkness w-ould
recommence, and proceed usque ad ivfinitniii. The Manich^can
system was a strange eclectic farrago, embodying, in chimerical
monstrosity, features of Zoroastrianism, Judaism (in so far as the
story of Eden was taken over). Gnosticism (appearing in the theory
that Jehovah was the Demon and that the eating of forbidden fruit
did not cause the Fall), Christianity, and Pantheism (the last, doubt-
less, an importation from Hindostan). The disciples of the school
made their way into the Roman Empire, and we find them, 150 years
after the deatli of Mani, opposed by Augustine of Hippo, who in-
deed had at one time actually numbered himself amongst them.
• Time. We should take this term in its fullest meaning, as signi-
fying all that exists in time— the created universe, and all that therein
has been, and is, and is to come.
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— BOOK I.
211
' ' that the Son existed not before time ; " but
when I call Him "Son," I declare that His
Father existed before Him, for, as you say,
father exists before son. " ' But what
means this ? Thou denicst that time
was before the Son, and yet thou wilt
have it that something- preceded the
existence of the Son — some creature of time,
— and thou showest certain stages of genera-
tion intervening, whereby thou dost give us
to understand that the generation from the
Father was a process in time. For if He
began to be a Father, then, in the first
instance, He was God, and afterwards He
became a Father. How, then, is God un-
changeable .'' ^ For if He was first God, and
then the Father, surely He has undergone
change by reason of the added and later act
of generation.
60. But may God preserve us from this
madness; for it was but to confute the im-
piety of the heretics that we brought in this
question. The devout spirit affirms a gene-
ration that is not in time, and so declares
Father and Son to be co-eternal, and does
not maintain that God has ever suffered
change.
61. Let Father and Son, therefore, be
associated in worship, even as They are
associated in Godhead ; let not blasphemy
' The Arians fell into the popular error of supposhig that a father,
as a father, existed before his son. They also required men to ap-
ply to Divine Persons, what only holds good of human beings — to
impose on the Being of God those limits to which human existences
(as objective facts) are subjected. The existence of the Divine
Father and the Divine Son is without, beyond, above time — with
the Godhead there is neither past nor future, but an everlasting
present. But with man, time-categories are necessary forms of
thought — everything is seen as past, present, or to come — and to the
human consciousness all objects are presented in time, though the
spiritual principle in man, which perceives objects as related in suc-
cession, is itself supra-temporal, beholding succession, but not itself
in succession.
Now it can hardly be denied with any show of reason that a man
is not a father until his sou begins to exist, is born, though the
father, as a person distinct from his son, is in existence before the
latter. Again, father and son must be of the same nature — they
must both possess the elementary, essential attributes of humanity.
Otherwise there is no fatherhood, no sonship, properly speaking.
God has revealed Himself as a Father — even in the pagan mytho-
logies we see the idea of Fatherhood implicit in Godhead. If the
gods of the heathen did not beget after their kind, they begat heroes
and demigods. But created existences cannot claim to be the first
and proper object of the Divine Father's love. They are for a time
only, and with them Eternal Love could not be satisfied. If God
be a true Father, then. He must beget His Like — His Son must be
equal to Him in nature, that is, what is true of the Father, what is
essential in the Father, as God, must be true or essential in the Son
also. Therefore the son must be divine, eternal. But the genera-
tion (■ycVi'7)<ri?) of the Son is not an event in time. It is a fact, a
truth, out of, beyond time, belonging to the divine and eternal and
spiritual, not to the temporal and created, order. " To whom
amongst the angels does He ever say. Thou art My Son : this day
have I begotten Thee? and again, I will be a Father to Him, and
He shall be a Son to Me? when, again. He brings His first-be-
gotten into the world" (i.e., reveals Him to the created universe as
its King), He says : " And let all God's angels worship Him "
(Heb. i. 5-6). Since the Divine Son, then, is eternal, even as the
Divine Father, the one cannot be before or after the other; the two
Persons are co-existent, co-eternal, co-equal. And the mysterious
genesis, also, is not an event that happened once, taking place in
a series of events, it is ever happening, it is always and for ever.
^ i.e., how do you deal with such Scriptures as "Thou art the
same, and thy years shall not fail." — " I am the Lord: I change
not, therefore ye sons of Jacob are not consumed." — "'The Father
of lights, with Whom is no variableness, neither shadow of turning."
put asunder those whom the close bond of
generation hath joined together. Let us
honour the Son, that we may honour the
Father also, as it is written in the Gospel. '
The Son's eternity is the adornment of the
Father's majesty. If the Son hath not been
from everlasting, then the Father hath
suffered change ; but the Son is from all
eternity, therefore hath the Father never
changed, for He is always unchangeable.
And thus we see that they who would deny
the Son's eternity would teach that the
Father is mutable.
CHAPTER X.
Christ's eternity being proved from the Apostle's
teaching, St. Ambrose admonishes us that the
Divine Generation is not to be thought of after the
fashion of human procreation, nor to be too curious-
ly pried into. With the difficulties thence arising he
refuses to deal, saying that whats ever terms, taken
from our knowledge of body, are used in speaking of
this Divine Generation, must be understood with
a spiritual meaning.
62. Hear now another argument, showing
clearly the eternity of the Son. The Apostle
says that God's Power and Godhead are
eternal, and that Christ is the Power of God
— for it is written that Christ is " the Power of
God and the Wisdom of God."^ If, then,
Christ is the Power of God, it follows that,
forasmuch as God's Power is eternal,
Christ also is eternal.
d'iy. Thou canst not, then, heretic, build up
a false doctrine from the custom of human
procreation, nor yet gather the wherewithal
for such work from our discourse, for we
cannot compass the greatness of infinite
Godhead, " of Whose greatness there is no
end,'" ^ in our straitened speech. If thou
shouldst seek to give an account of a man's
birth, thou must needs point to a time. But
the Divine Generation is above all things ;
it reaches far and wide, it rises high above all
thought and feeling. For it is written : "No
man cometh to the Father, save by Me. "^
Whatsoever, therefore, thou dost conceive
concerning the Father — yea, be it even His
eternity — thou canst not conceive aught
concerning Him save by the Son's aid, nor
can any understanding ascend to the Father
save through the Son. " This is My dearly-
beloved Son,"s the Father saith. "Is"
' S. John V. 23.
' Rom. i. 20 — " His eternal power and Godhead." i Cor. i. 23-
24 — " We preach Christ crucified, to the Jews a stumbling-block
and to the Gentiles foolishness, but to those who are called, and to
none other, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God."
" Ps. cxlv. 3. * S. John xiv. 6.
^ S. Matt. xvii. 5 ; S. Mark ix. 7; S. Luke '.x. 35.
212
ST. AMBROSE.
mark you — He Who is, what He is, forever.
Hence also David is moved to say; "O
Lord, Thy Wordabideth for ever in heaven," '
— for what abideth fails neither in existence
nor in eternity.
64. Dost thou ask me how He is a Son, if
He have not a Father existing- before Him ?
I ask of thee, in turn, when, or how, thinkest
thou that the Son was begotten. For me the
knowledge of the mystery of His generation
is more than I can attain to,^ — the mind fails,
the voice is 'dumb — ay, and not mine alone,
but the angels' also. It is above Powers,
above Angels, above Cherubim, Seraphim,
and all that has feeling and thought, for it
is written : "The peace of Christ, which
passeth all understanding. " 3 If the peace
of Christ passes all understanding, how can
so wondrous a generation but be above all
understanding ?
65. Do thou, then (like the angels), cover
thy face with thy hands, 4 for it is not given
thee to look into surpassing mysteries ! We
are suffered to know that the Son is be-
gotten, not to dispute upon the manner of
His begetting. I cannot deny the one ; the
other I fear to search into, for if Paul says
that the words which he heard when caught
up into the third heaven might not be
uttered, 5 how can we explain the secret of
this generation from and of the Father, which
A^e can neither hear nor attain to with our
understanding ?
66. But if you will constrain me to the
rule of human generation, that you may be
allowed to say that the Father existed before
the Son, then consider whether instances,
taken from the generation of earthly crea-
tures, are suitable to show forth the Divine
Generation.'^ If we speak according to what
is customary amongst men, you cannot deny
that, in man, the changes in the father's
existence happen before those in the son's.
The father is the first to grow, to enter old
age, to grieve, to weep. If, then, the son is
after him in time, he is older in experience
than the son. If the child comes to be born,
the parent escapes not the shame of be-
getting. 7
* Ps. cxix. 89. 2 Ps. cxxxix. 5.
* Phil. iv. 7. The better-knnwn version " The peace of God" is
supported by stronger MS. authority.
* Cf . Is. vi. 2 ; Exod. iii. 6. Kut perhaps the reference is to Job
xxxi. 26-28 — " If I bclield tlie sun when it shined, or the moon
walking in brightness, and my heart hath been secretly enticed, and
my mouth hath kissed my hand, this also were an iniquity to be
punished by the judge, for I should have denied the God that is
above." Another passage to which reference may be made is Job
xl. 4 — " Behold, I am vile, what shall I answer thee ? I will lay
my hand on my mouth."
^ 2 Cor. xii. 2-5.
The analog^', as made by the Arians, certainly was open to St.
Ambrose's censure. We should remember, however, that a man is
not properly a father until his child is bom.
^ St. Ambrose perhaps thought that the curse laid upon human
67. Why take such delight in that rack of
questioning ? ' You hear the name of the
Son of God; abolish it, then, or acknowledge
His true nature. You hear speak of the
womb — acknowledge the truth of undoubted
begetting. 2 Of His heart — know that here
is God's word.3 Of His right hand — confess
His power. 4 Of His face — acknowledge
His wisdom. 5 These words are not to be
understood, when we speak of God, as when
we speak of bodies. The generation of the
Son is incomprehensible, the Father begets
impassibly,'^ and yet of Himself and in ages
inconceivably remote hath very God be-
gotten very God. The Father loves the
Son, 7 and you anxiously examine His
Person ; the Father is well. pleased in Him,^
you, joining the Jews, look upon Him -with
an evil eye ; the Father knows the Son, 9 and
you join the heathen in reviling Him.^°
CHAPTER XI.
It cannot be proved from Scripture that the Father
existed before the Son, nor yet caji arguments taken
from human reproduction avail to this end, since they
bring in absurdities without end. To dare to affirm
that Christ began to exist in the course of time is
the height of blasphemy.
68. You ask me whether it is possible
that He Who is the Father should not
be prior in existence. I ask you to tell
me when the Father existed, the Son as
yet being not ; prove this, gather it from
argument or evidence of Scripture. If
you lean upon arguments, you have
doubtless been taught that God's power is
eternal. Again, you have read the Scripture
that saith : " O Israel, if thou wilt hearken
unto Me. there shall be no new God in thee,
neither shalt thou worship a strange God." "
The first of these commands betokens [the
Son's] eternity, the second His possession of
an identical nature, so that we can neither
believe Him to have come into existence
after the Father, nor suppose Him the Son
of another Divinity. For if He existed not
always with the Father, He is a "new"
[God] ; if He is not of one Divinity with the
Father, He is a "strange " [God]. But He
conception and birth (Gen. iii. i6) displayed itself as well in the
initial as in the final stages.
' Qua-stioiniin iorvieitta. The use of racks and such-like machines
(tormettta, fr. torqueo — wist) was resorted to, in the old Roman
practice, in the examination (guo'stto) of slaves.
-The ref. is perhaDS to Is. xlix. 5.
•'* I .Sam xiii. 14; 2 Sam. \ii. 21.
■• Ps. xcviii. 2. 5 Ps. xxvii. 9.
" Without suffering any change in Himself. " S. John v. 20.
' S. Matt. iii. 17:8. lilark i. 11; S. Luke iii. 22.
" .S. John V. 22, 23 ; iii. 35; xvii. i, 2, 5.
" S. Luke xxiii. 36, 37 '' Ps. Ixxxi. 9, 10
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— BOOK I.
213
is not after the Father, for lie is not " a new
God;" nor is He "a strange God," for He
is bcf^otten of the Father, and because, as it
is written. He is "God above all, blessed
for ever. " '
69. But if the Arians believe Him to be a
strange God, why do they worship Him,
when it is written : "Thou shalt worship no
strange God " ? Else, if they do not worship
the Son, let them confess thereto, and the
case is at an end,— that they deceive no one
by their professions of religion. This, then,
we see, is the witness of the .Scriptures. If
you have any others to produce, it will be
your business to do so.
70. Let us now go further, and gather the
truth in conclusion from arguments. For
although arguments usually give place, even
to human evidence, ^ still, heretic, argue as
thou wilt. "Experience teaches us," you
say, " that the being which generates is prior
to that which is generated." I answer :
Follow our customary experience through
all its departments, and if the rest agree
herewith, I oppose not your claim that your
point be granted ; but if there be no such
agreement, how can you claim assent on
this one point, when in all the rest you lack
support.'' Seeing, then, that you call for
what is customary, it comes about that the
Son, when He was begotten of the Father,
was a little child. You have seen Him an
infant, crying in the cradle. As the years
passed, He has gone forward from strength
to strength — for if He was weak with the
weakness of things begotten. He must also
have fallen under the weakness, not only of
birth, but of life also.
71. But perchance you run to such a pitch
of folly as not to flinch from asserting these
things of the Son of God, measuring Him,
as you do, by the rule of human infirmity.
What, then, if, while you cannot refuse Him
the name of God, you are bent to prove
Him, by reason of weakness, to be a man ?
What if, whilst you examine the Person of
the Son, you are calling the Father in ques-
tion, and whilst you hastily pass sentence
upon the Former, you include the Latter in
the same condemnation !
72. If the Divine Generation has been
subject to the limits of time, — if we suppose
this, borrowing from the custom of human
generation, then it follows, further, that the
Father bare the Son in a bodily womb,
and laboured under the burden whilst ten
' Rom. ix. 5.
- i.e. h priori determinations respecting any matter cannot be
maintained if they are traversed by tlie statements of eye-witnesses
and participators in the affair.
months sped their courses. But how can
generation, as it commonly takes place, be
brought about without the help of the other
sex .'' You sec that the common order ofgen-
eration was not the commencement, and you
think that the courses of generation, which
are ruled by certain necessities whereunto
bodies are subject, have always prevailed.
You require the customary course, I ask for
difference of sex : you demand the supposi-
tion of time, I that of order : you enquire
into the end, I into the beginning. Now
surely it is the end that depends on the be-
ginning, not the beginning on the end.
73. " Everything, " say you, "that is be-
gotten has a beginning, and therefore
because the Son is the Son, He has a
beginning, and came first into existence
within limits of time. Let this be taken as
the word of their own mouth ; as for my-
self, I confess that the Son is begotten,
but the rest of their declaration makes me
shudder. Man, dost thou confess God, and
diminish His honour by such slander.''
From this madness may God deliver us.
CHAPTER XIL
Further objections to the Godhead of the Son are met
by the same answer — to wh, that they may equally be
urged against the Father also. The Father, then,
being in no way confined by time, place, or anything
else created, no such limitation is to be imposed
upon the Son, Whose marvellous generation is not
only of the Father, but of the Virgin also, and there-
fore, since in His generation of the Father no dis-
tinction of sex, or the like, was involved, neither was
it in His generation of the Virgin.
74. The next objection is this: "If the
Son has not those properties which all sons
have, He is no Son." INIay Father, Son, and
Holy Spirit pardon me, for I would pro-
pound the question in all devoutness. Surely
the Father is, and abides for ever : created
things, too, are as God hath ordained
them. Is there any one, then, amongst
these creatures which is not subject to the
limitations of place, time, or the fact of hav-
ing been created, or to some originating
cause or creator. ' Surely, none. What,
then .' Is there any one of them whereof
the Father stands in need .'' So to say were
blasphemy. Cease, then, to apply to the
Godhead what is proper only to created
existences, or, if you insist upoti forcing the
comparison, bethink you whither your
wickedness leads. God forbid that we
should even behold the end thereof.
3 St. Ambrose here uses causa in ihe sense of caitsa efficiem—
oPXi ■'■^5 (cii'r/treios.
214
ST. AMBROSE.
75. We maintain the answer given by
piety. God is Almighty, and therefore God
the Father needs none of those things, for
in Him there is no changing, nor any place
for such help as we need, we whose weak-
ness is supported by means of things of this
kind. But He Who is Almighty, plainly He
is uncreate, and not confined to any place,
and surpasses time. Before God was not
anything — nay, even to speak about any-
thing being before God is a grave sin. If,
then, you grant that in the nature of God
the Father there is nought that implies a
being sustained, because He is God, it fol-
lows that nothing of this sort can be sup-
posed to exist in the Son of God, nothing
that connotes a beginning, or growth, foras-
much as He is " very God of very God." '
76. Seeing, then, that we tindnotthe cus-
tomary order prevailing, be content, Arian,
to believe in a miraculous generation of the
Son. Be content, I say, and if you believe
me not, at least have respect unto the voice
of God saying, "To whom have ye es-
teemed Me to be like.-'"^ and again:
"God is not like a man that He should
repent. "3 If^ indeed, God works mysterious-
ly, seeing that He doth not work any work,
or fashion anything, or bring it to comple-
tion, by labor of hands, or in any course of
days, " for He spake, and they were made ;
He gave the word and they were created, "■♦
why should we not believe that He Whom
we acknowledge as a Creator, mysteriously
working, discerning it in His works, also
begat His Son in a mysterious manner ?
Surely it is fitting that He should be re-
garded as having begotten the Son in a
special and mysterious way. Let Him Who
hath the grace of majesty unrivalled like-
wise have the glory of mysterious genera-
tion.
77. Not only Christ's generation of the
Father, but His birth also of the Virgin,
demands our wonder. You say that the
former is like unto the manner wherein we
men are conceived. 1 will show — nay more,
I will compel you yourself to confess, that
the latter also hath no likeness to the manner
of our birth. Tell me how it was that He
was born of Mary, with what law did His
conception in a Virgin's womb agree, how
there could be any birth without the seed
of a man, how a maiden could become great
with child, how she became a mother before
experience of such intercourse as is between
wives and husbands. There was no [vis-
* Cf. Nicene Creed.
^ Num. xxiii. 19.
' Isa, xlvi. 5.
^ Ps. cxlviii. 5. Cf.xxxiii. 6, 9.
ible] cause, — and yet a son was begotten.
How, then, came about this birth, under a
new law ?
78. If, then, the common order of human
generation was not found in the case of the
\"irgin Mary, how can you demand that God
the Father should beget in such wise as you
were begotten in.' Surely the common
order is determined by difference of sex ; for
this is implanted in the nature of our flesh,
but where flesh is not, how can you expect
to find the infirmity of flesh ? No man calls
in question one who is better than he is : to
believe is enjoined upon you, without per-
mission to question. For it is written,
"Abraham believed God, and it was ac-
counted to him for righteousness."' Lan-
guage is vain to set forth, not only the
generation of the Son, but even the works
of God, for it is written : "All His works are
executed in faithfulness ; " ^ His works, then,
are done in faithfulness, but not His genera-
tion ? Ay, we call in question that which we
see not, we who are bidden to believe rather
than enquire of that we see.
CHAPTER XHL
Discussion of the Divine Generation is continued. St.
Ambrose illustrates its method by the same example
as that employed by the author of the Epistle to the
Hebrews. The duty of believing what is revealed is
shown by the example of Nebuchadnezzar and St.
Peter. Ky the vision granted to St. Peter was shown
the Son's Eternity and Godhead — the Apostle, then,
must be believed in preference to the teachers of
philosophy, whose authority was everywhere falling
into discredit. The Arians, on the other hand, are
shown to be like unto the heathen.
79. It will be asked : "In what sort was
the Son begotten .'' " As one who is for ever,
as the Word, as the brightness of eternal
light, 3 for brightness takes effect in the
instant of its coming into existence.
Which example is the Apostle's, not mine.
Think not. then, that there was ever a
moment of time when God was without
wisdom, any more than that there was ever
a time when light was without radiance.
Judge not, Arian, divine things by human,
but believe the divine where thou findest
not the human.
80. The heathen king saw in the fire,
together with the three Hebrew children, the
form of a fourth, like as of an angel, ■« and
because he thought that this angel excelled
all angels, he judged Him to be the Son of
God, Whom he had not read of, but in Whom
' Gen. XV. 6.
= Heb. i. 3.
* Ps. xxxiii. 4.
* Daii. iii. 25.
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— BOOK I.
215
he believed. Abraham, also, saw Three,
and adored One. ■
81. Peter, when he saw Moses and Elias
on the mountain, with the Son of God, was
not deceived as to their nature and glory.
For he enquired, not of them, but of Christ,
what he ought to do, inasmuch as though
he prepared to do homage to all three, yet he
waited for the command of one. But since
he ignorantly thought that for three persons
three tabernacles should be set up, he was
corrected by the sovereign voice of God
the Father, saying, "This is I\Iy dearly
beloved Son: hear ye Him."- That is to
say: "Why dost thou join thy fellow-
servants in equality with thy Lord ? " ' ' This
is IVIy Son." Not "Moses is My Son,"
nor "Elias is My Son," but "This is My
Son." The Apostle was not dull to un-
derstand the rebuke ; he fell on his face,
brought low by the Father's voice and the
glorious beauty of the Son, but he was raised
up by the Son, Whose wont it is to raise up
them that are fallen. 3 Then he saw one
only,'* the Son of God alone, for the servants
had withdrawn, that He might be seen to be
Lord alone. Who alone was entitled Son.
82. What, then, was the purpose of that
vision, which signified not that Christ and
His servants were equal, but betokened a
mystery, save that it should be made plain
to us that the Law and the Prophets, in
agreement with the Gospel, revealed as
eternal the Son of God, Whom they had her-
alded. When we, therefore, hear of the
Son coming forth of the womb, the Word
from the heart, let us believe that the Son
was not fashioned with hands but begotten
of the Father, not the work of a craftsman
but the offspring of a parent.
83. He, therefore. Who said, " This is My
Son, " said not, ' ' This is a creature of time, "
nor "This being is of My creation. My
making, My servant," but "This is My Son,
Whom ye see glorified. '' This is the God of
Abraham, the God of Isaac, the God of
Jacob, Who appeared to Moses in the bush,s
concerning Whom Moses saith, " He Who is
hath sent me." It was not the Father Who
spake to Moses in the bush or in the desert,
but the Son. It was of this Moses that
Stephen said, "This is He Who was in the
church, in the wilderness, with the Angel. "^
This, then, is He Who gave the Law, Who
spake with Moses, saying, " I am the God
of Abraham, the God of Isaac, the God of
Jacob." This, then, is the God of the patri-
archs, this is the God of the prophets.
' Gen. xv-iii. 1-3.
* S. Matt. xvii. 8.
2 S. Matt. xvii. 5.
8 Ex. ill. 14.
3 S. Matt. xvii. 6-8.
" .\cts vii. 38.
84. It is of the Son, therefore, that we
read, thy mind understandeth the reading,
let thy tongue make confession. Away
with arguments, where faith is required ;
now let dialectic hold her peace, even in the
midst of her schools. I ask not what it is
that philosophers say, but I would know
what they do. They sit desolate in their
schools. See the victory of faith over argu-
ment. They who dispute subtly are for-
saken daily by their fellows ; they who with
simplicity believe are daily increased. Not
philosophers but fishermen, not masters of
dialectic but tax-gatherers, now find cre-
dence. The one sort, through pleasures and
luxuries, have bound the world's burden
upon themselves ; the other, by fasting and
mortification, have cast it off, and so doth
sorrow now begin to win over more fol-
lowers than pleasure.
85. Let us now see how far Arians and
pagans do differ. The latter call upon gods,
who are different in sex and unequal in
power; the former affirm a Trinity where
there is likewise inequality of power and
diversity of Godhead. The pagans assert
that their Gods began to exist once upon a
time ; the Arians lyingly declare that Christ
began to exist in the course of time. Have
they not all dyed their impiety in the vats
of philosophy ? But indeed the pagans do
extol that which they worship,' the Arians
maintain that the Son of God, Who is God,
is a creature.
CHAPTER XIV.
That the Son of God is not a created being is proved
by the following arguments: (i) That He com-
manded not that the Gospel should be preached to
Himself ; (2) that a created being is given over unto
vanity; (3) that the Son has created all things; (4)
that we read of Him as begotten ; and (5) that the
difference of generation and adoption has always
been understood in those places where both natures
— the divine and the human — are declared to co.exist
in Him. All of which testimony is confirmed by the
Apostle's interpretation.
86. It is now made plain, as I believe,
your sacred Majesty, that the Lord Jesus is
neither unlike the Father, nor one that be-
gan to exist in course of time. We have
yet to confute another blasphemy, and to
show that the Son of God is not a created
being. Herein is the quickening^ word that
we read as our help, for we have heard the
' i.e., the pagans worship false gods, but they at least have the
decency to regard them as a higher order than human creatures, and
not to wilfully depreciate them.
" prcEsens. Cf. Acts. vii. 38 — " lively oracles."
2l6
ST. AMBROSE.
passage read where the Lord saith : "Go
ye into all the world, and preach the Gospel
to all creation." ' He Who saith " all crea-
tion " excepts nothing. How, then, do they
stand who call Christ a "creature".? If
He were a creature, could He have com-
manded that the Gospel should be preached
to Himself.? It is not, therefore, a creature,
but the Creator, Who commits to His dis-
ciples the work of teaching created beings.
87. Christ, then, is no created being ; for
" created beings are," as the Apostle hath
said, "given over to vanity.''^ Is Christ
given over unto vanity.? Again, "crea-
tion " — according to the same Apostle — •
"groans and travails together even until
now." What, then.? Doth Christ take any
part in this groaning and travailing — He
Who hath set us miserable mourners free
from death .? ' ' Creation, " saith the Apostle,
"shall be set free from the slavery of cor-
ruption. " 3 We see, then, that between crea-
tion and its Lord there is a vast difference,
for creation is enslaved, but "the Lord is
the Spirit, and where the Spirit of the Lord
is, there is freedom."-*
88. Who was it that led first into this
error, of declaring Him Who created and
made all things to be a creature .? Did the
Lord, I would ask, create Himself.? We read
that "all things were made by Him, and
without Him was nothing made, "s This
being so, did He make Himself.? We read
— and who shall deny .? — that in wisdom hath
God made all things.^ If so, how can
we suppose that wisdom was made in
itself.?
89. We read that the Son is begotten, in-
asmuch as the Father saith: "I brought
thee forth from the womb before the morn-
ing star. "7 We read of the "first-born"
Son,^ of the " only-begotten " 9 — first-born,
because there is none before Him ; only-
begotten, because there is none after Him.
Again, we read : "Who shall declare His
generation ?" '° "Generation," mark you,
not "creation." What argument can be
brought to meet testimonies so great and
mighty as these .?
90. Moreover, God's Son discovers the
difference between generation and grace
when He says : " I go up to My Father and
your Father, to My God and your God.""
He did not say, " I go up to our Father,"
' Rom. viii. 21-22.
* Ps. civ. 24.
* S. John i. 14.
^ S. Mark xvi. 15. ^ Rom. viii. 20.
* 2 Cor. ill. 17. * S. John i. 3.
' Ps. ex. 3. ' Col. i. 15.
"• Is. liii. 8.
" S. John XX. 17. The " grace " of which St. Ambrose speaks is the
grace of adoption. Jesus Christ is the Son of God (^uVet, we are
guus vlo0c<ria "by adoption."
but " I go up to My Father and your Father."
This distinction is the sign of a difference,
inasmuch as He Who is Christ's Father is
our Creator.
91. Furthermore He said, "to My God
and your God," because although He and
the Father are One, and the Father is His
Father by possession of the same nature,
whilst God began to be our Father through
the office of the Son, not by virtue of nature,
but of grace — still He seems to point us here
to the existence in Christ of both natures,
Godhead and Manhood, — Godhead of His
Father, IManheod of His Mother, the former
being before all things, the latter derived from
the Virgin. For the first, speaking as the
Son, He called God His Father, and after-
ward, speaking as man, named Him as God.
92. Everywhere, indeed, we have witness
in the Scriptures to show that Christ, in
naming God as His God, does so as man,
"My God, My God, why hast Thou for-
saken Me.?"' And again: "From My
mother's womb Thou art INIy God. "^ In
the former place He suffers as a man ; in
the latter it is a man vi'ho is brought forth
from his mother's womb. And so when He
says, "From My mother's womb Thou art
My God," He means that He Who was
always His Father is His God from the
moment when He was brought forth from
His Mother's womb.
93. Seeing, then, that we read in the Gos-
pel, in the Apostle, in the Prophets, of Christ
as begotten, how dare the Arians to say that
He was created or made.? But, indeed, they
ought to have bethought them, where they
have read of Him as created, where as made.
For it has been plainly shown that the Son
of God is begotten of God, born of God — let
them, then, consider with care where they
have read that He was made, seeing that
He was not made God, but born as God,
the Son of God ; afterward, however, He
was, according to the flesh, made man of
Mary.
94. "But when the fulness of time was
come, God sent His Son, ?fiade of a woman,
made under the Law." 3 " ffis Son," observe,
not as one of many, not as His in common
with another, but His own, and in saying
"His Son," the Apostle showed that it is
of the Son's nature that His generation is
eternal. Him the Apostle has affirmed to
have been afterwards " made " of a woman,
in order that the making might be under-
stood not of the Godhead, but of the putting
> Ps, xxii. I. C/. S. Matt, xxvii. 46; S. Mark xv. 24,
2 Ps. xxii. u. 8 Gal. iv. 4. See Note p, 217.
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— BOOK I.
217
on of a body — " made of a woman," then,
by taking- on of flesh; "made under the
Law " through observance of the Law.
Howbeit, the former, the spiritual generation
is before the Law was, the latter is after the
Law.
CHAPTER XV.
An explanation of Acts ii. 36 and Proverbs viii. 22,
which are shown to refer properly to Christ's man-
hood alone.
95. To no purpose, then, is the heretics'
customary citation of the Scripture, that
"God made Him both Lord and Christ."
Let these ignorant persons read the whole
passage, and understand it. For thus it is
written. " God made this Jesus, Whom ye
crucified, both Lord and Christ." ' It was
not the Godhead, but the flesh, that was
crucified. This, indeed, was possible, be-
cause the flesh allowed of being crucified.
It follows not, then, that the Son of God is
a created being.
96. Let us despatch, then, that passage
also, which they do use to misrepresent, —
let them learn what is the sense of the words,
"The Lord created Me. "^ It is not "the
Father created, " but " the Lord created Me. "
The flesh acknowledgeth its Lord, praise
declareth the Father : our created nature
confesseth the first, loveth, knoweth the
latter. Who, then, cannot but perceive that
these words announce the Incarnaticjn ?
Thus the Son speaketh of Himself as created
in respect of that wherein he witnesseth to
Himself as being man, when He says,
" Why seek ye to kill Me, a man. Who have
told you the truth.?" He speaketh of His
INIanhood, wherein He was crucified, and
died, and was buried.
97. Furthermore, there is no doubt but
that the writer set down as past that which
was to come ; for this is the usage of pro-
phecy, that things to come are spoken of as
though they were already present or past.
For example, in the twenty-first ^ psalm you
have read: "Fat bulls (of Bashan ) have
beset me,'' and again : ■* "They parted My
garments among them." This the Evange-
list showeth to have been spoken propheti-
cally of the time of the Passion, for to God
* Acts ii. 36. Cf I John iv. 3. * Prov. viii. 22. See Note below.
* The 22d in the Prayer-Book and Bible. See Ps. xxii. 13 — com-
pare S. Matt. xxTO. 36 ; S. Luke xxiii. 35.
< Ps. xxii. iQ. Cf. S. Matt, xxvii. 35; S.Mark xv. 24; S. Luke
xxiii. 34 ; S. John xix. 23-24.
the things that are to come are present,
and for Him Who foreknoweth all things,
they are as though they were past and over ;
as it is written, "Who hath made the things
that are to be." '
98. It is no wonder that He should declare
His place tu have been set fast before all
worlds, seeing that the Scripture tells us
that He was foreordained before the times
and ages. The following passage discovers
how the words in question present them-
selves as a true prophecy of the Incarnation :
"Wisdom hath built her an house, and set
up seven pillars to support it, and she hath
slain her victims. She hath mingled her
wine in the bowl, and made ready her table,
and sent her servants, calling men together
with a mighty voice of proclamation, say-
ing : ' He who is simple, let him turn in to
me. '"^ Do we not see, in the Gospel, that
all these things were fulfilled after the
Incarnation, in that Christ disclosed the
mysteries of the Holy Supper, sent forth His
apostles, and cried with a loud voice, say-
ing, " If any man thirst, let him x:ome to Me
and drink." 3 That which followeth, then,
answereth to that which went before, and
we behold the whole story of the Incarnation
set forth in brief by prophecy.
99. Many other passages might readily be
seen to be prophecies of this sort concerning
the Incarnation, but I will not delay over
books, lest the treatise appear too wordy,
lis. xlv.ii. A. v. — "Ask me of things to come." Vulgate, /.<r. —
I'entiira hiterrogate tne.
2 2 Tim. i. 9; Prov. ix. if. ^ S. John vii. 37.
Note on Gal. iv 4, cited in § 94. — St. Ambrose has factum
where St. Paul originally wrote yiv6tJ.ivov , rendered " bom " in
the A.V. St. Paul designedly, perhaps, wrote ytfonevoi', not
yei'r'i)9ei'Ta, the more usual word for "born." For -^i-^ViaSai is
used to denote other modes of beginning to exist, besides that in
which animals are brouj;ht into life ; it is used of inanimate, as well
as animate existence — e.g., Mark iv. 37: "There ariseth (yiverai)
a great storm of wind ; and thus we get the impersonal eyei-fTo,
"it came to pass," simply signifying an order of events. The
import, then, of the words factum ex viulicre, y(.v6fi.ivov kK
yi'vaiKo-;, is that Christ, in being born in human form, "in the
likeness of men," subjected Himself to the limits of human exist-
ence, " came into being," that is, in the sensual world. This was
his self-emptying fPhil. A. 7). Jesus, the man, the human person,
was made — " made man " (Nicene Creed) — was made " man of the
substance of His mother " (Athanas. Creed) ; but by this " making,"
St. Ambrose points out, we must understand no more than the tak-
ing on of fleshly form. The Son, on the other hand, Who is God,
never began to exist, as He will never cease ; and e%en if He had
not existed from eternity. He must have been pre-existent, in order
to assume a fleshly form, so that, in any case, birth of the Virgin
does not affect His pre-existence as Son of God, whilst to say that
He was ever " made " is to confound that birth with the Son's gen-
eration of the Father, eternity with time, the divine with the human
order, the self-existent with the created.
Note on Prov. viii. 22, cited in § 96.— The A.V. is " The Lord
possessed me," and tl j Vulgate likewise Dominus possedit tne.
The Greek versions of the passage appear to have presented two
readings, which might exhibit Ii -le difference to the eye in a closely-
written MS., though the difference in meaning was by no means
small. The two readings were : (i) eicxKre ju.e and (2) eKT>)<raT6 /uie :
the former meaning " founded," " established," or " created " me,
the latter " acquired me." The strict Greek equivalent of /i^i.rfa'z'/
(Vulgate) or " possessed " (A.V.) would be exeicTTjTo.
2l8
ST. AMBROSE.
CHAPTER XVI.
The Arians blaspheme Christ, if by the words " created "
and "begotten" they mean and understand one and
the same thing. If, however, they regard the words
as distinct in meaning, they must not speak of Him,
of Whom they have read that He was begotten, as if
He were a created being. This rule is upheld by the
witness of St. Paul, who, professing himself a servant
of Christ, forbade worship of a created being. God
being a substance pure and uncompounded, there is
no created nature in Him; furthermore, the Son is
not to be degraded to the level of things created,
seeing that in Him the Father is well pleased.
loo. Now will I enquire particularly of the
Arians, whether they think that begotten and
created are one and the same. If they call
them the same, then is there no difference
betwixt generation and creation. It follows,
then, that forasmuch as we also are created,
there is between us and Christ and the ele-
ments no difference. Thus much, how-
ever, great as their madness is, they will
not venture to say.
loi. Furthermore — to concede that which
is no truth, to their folly — I ask them, if
there is, as they think, no difference in the
words, why do they not call upon Him
Whom they worship by the better title.?
Why do they not avail themselves of the
Father's word ? ' Why do they reject the
title of honour, and use a dishonouring
name ?
102. If, however, there is — as I think there
is — a distinction between "created'' and
"begotten," then, when we have read that
He is begotten, we shall surely not under-
stand the same by the terms ' ' begotten "
and " created." Let them therefore confess
Him to be begotten of the Father, born of
the Virgin, or let them say how the Son of
God can be both begotten and created. A
single nature, above all, the Divine Being,
rejects strife (within itself).
103. But in any case let our private judg-
ment pass : Ictus enquire of Paul, who, tilled
with the Spirit of God, and so foreseeing
these questionings, hath given sentence
against pagans in general and Arians in
particular, saying that they were by God's
judgment condemned, who served the crea-
ture rather than the Creator. Thus, in fact,
you may read: "God gave them over to
the lusts of their own heart, that they might
one with another dishonour their bodies,
they who changed God's truth into a lie,
and worshipped and served the thing created
rather than the Creator, Who is God, blessed
for ever. " ^
' or " of the name of P'ather," i.e., of all the consequences of that
Name.
Rom. i. 24, 25.
104. Thus Paul forbids me to worship a
creature, and admonishes me of my duty to
serve Christ. It follows, then, that Christ is
not a created being. The Apostle calls him-
self " Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ," ' and
this good servant, who acknowledges his
Lord, will likewise have us not worship that
which is created. How, then, could he have
been himself a servant of Christ, if he thought
that Christ was a created person .? Let these
heretics, then, cease either to worship Him
Whom they call a created being, or to call
Him a creature. Whom they feign to worship,
lest under colour of being worshippers they
fall into worse impiety. For a domestic is
worse than a foreign foe, and that these men
should use the Name of Christ to Christ's
dishonour increaseth their guilt.
105. What better expounder of the Scrip-
tures do we indeed look for than that teacher
of the Gentiles, that chosen vessel — chosen
from the number of the persecutors 1 He
who had been the persecutor of Christ con-
fesses Him. He had read Solomon more,
in any case, than Arius hath, and he was
well learned in the Law, and so, because he
had read, he said not that Christ was created,
but that He was begotten. For he had
read, " He spake, and they were made : He
commanded, and they were created."^
Was Christ, I ask, made at a word .? Was
He created at a command.?
106. Moreover, how can there be any
created nature in God.? In truth, God is of
an uncompounded nature ; nothing can be
added to Him, and that alone which is
Divine hath He in His nature ; filling all
things, 3 yet nowhere Himself confounded
with aught ; penetrating all things, yet Him-
self nowhere to be penetrated ; present in all
His fulness at one and the same moment, in
heaven, in earth, in the deepest depth of the
sea, 4 to sight invisible, by speech not to be
declared, by feeling not to be measured ; to
be followed by faith, to be adored with de-
votion ; so that whatsoever title excels in
depth of spiritual import, in setting forth
glory and honour, in exalting power, this
you may know to belong of right to God.
107. Since, then, the Father is well
pleased in the Son ; believe that the Son is
worthy of the Father, that He came out
from God, as He Himself bears witness,
saying: "I went out from God, and am
come;"s and again: "I went out from
God." '^ He Who proceeded and came forth
' Rom. i. I. - Ps. xxxiii. 9; cxlviii. 5.
■'' Num. xiv. 21; Ps. Ixxii. ig; Is. vi. j; Zech. xiv. 9.
♦ Ps. cxxxix. 7-10. ' S. John viii. 42. ' S. John xvi. 27.
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— BOOK I.
219
from God can have no attributes but such as
arc proper to God.
CHAPTER XVn.
That Christ is very God is proved from the fact that
He is God's own Son, also from His having been
beo-otten and having come fortli from (]od, and fur-
ther, from the unity of will and operation subsisting
in Father and Son. The witness of the apostles
and of the centurion— which St. Ambrose sets over
against the Arian teaching— is adduced, together
w^th that of Isaiah and St. John.
108. Hence it is that Christ is not only
God, but very God indeed — very God of
very God, insomuch that He Himself is the
Truth,' If, then, we enquire His Name, it
is "the Truth;" if we seek to know His
natural rank and di.s^nity. He is so truly the
very Son of God, that He is indeed God's
ojvn Son ; as it is written, "Who spared not
His own Son, but gave Him up for our
sakes, " ^ gave Him up, that is, so far as the
flesh was concerned. That He is God's own
Son declares His Godhead ; that He is very
God shows that He is God's own Son ; His
pitifulness is the earnest of His submission,
His sacrifice, of our salvation.
109. Lest, however, men should wrest
the Scripture, that ' ' God gave Him up," the
Apostle himself has said in another place,3
"Peace from God the Father, and our Lord
jesus Christ, Who gave Himself for our sins ;"'
"and again : •+ "Even' as Christ hath loved
us, and given Himself for us." If, then. He
both was given up by the Father, and gave
Himself up of His own accord, it is plain
that the working and the will of Father and
Son is one.
no. If, then, we enquire into His natural
pre-eminence, we find it to consist in being
begotten. To deny that the Son of God is
begotten [of God] is to deny that He is
God's own Son, and to deny Christ to be
God's own Son is to class Him with the
rest of mankind, as no more a Son than any
of the rest. If, however, we enquire into
the distinctive property of His generation, it
is this, that He came forth from God. For
whilst, in our experience, to come out
implies something already existent, and that
which is said to come out seems to proceed
forth from hidden and inward places, we,
though it be presented but m short passages,
observe the peculiar attribute of the Divine
Generation, that the Son doth not seem to
have come forth out of any place, but as
God from God, a Son from a Father, nor to
have had a beginning in the course of time,
having come forth from the Father by being
born, as He Himself Who was born said :
" I came forth from the mouth of the Most
High."'
111. But if the Arians acknowledge not
the Son's nature, if they believe not the
Scriptures, let them at least believe the
mighty works. To whom doth the Father
say, "Let us make man?"^ save to Him
Whom He knew to be His true Son > In
Whom, save in one who was true, could He
recognize His Image .? The son by adoption
is not the same as the true Son ; nor would
the Son say, " I and the Father are one," 3 if
He, being Himself not true, were measuring
Himself with One Who is true. The Father,
therefore, says, "Let us make." He Who
spake is true ; can He, then. Who made
be not true .? Shall the honour rendered to
Him Who speaks be withheld from Him
Who makes ^
112. But how, unless the Father knew
Him to be His true Son, should He com-
mend to Him His will, for perfect co-opera-
tion, and His works, for perfect bringing in
out in actuality.? Seeing that the Son
worketh the works which the Father doeth,
and that the Son quickens whom He will, 4
as it is written, He is then equal in power
and free in respect of His will. And thus is
the Unity maintained, forasmuch as God's
power consists in that the Godhead is proper
to each Person, and freedom lies not in any
difference, but in unity of will.
113. The apostleo, being storm-tossed in
the sea, as soon as they saw the waters
leaping up round their Lord's feet, and be-
held His fearless footsteps on the water, as
He walked amid the raging waves of the
sea, and the ship, which was beaten upon
by the waves, had rest as soon as Christ
entered it, and they saw the waves and the
winds obeying Him,— then, though as yet they
did not believe in their hearts they believed
Him to be God's true Son, saying, "Truly
Thou art the Son of God." s
114. To the same effect the confession of
the centurion, and others who were with
him, when the foundations of the world
were shaken at the Lord's Passion,— and
this, heretic, thou deniest ! The centurion
said, "Truly this was the Son of Cod. "^
"Was" said the centurion— " Was wo/"
says the Arian. The centurion, then, with
bloodstained hands, but devout mind.
' S. John xiv. 6.
s Gal. i. 3, 4-
' Rom. viii. 32.
♦ Eph. V. 2.
' Ecclus. xxiv. 3.
* S. John V. 19,21.
2 Gen. i. 26.
^ S. Matt. xiv. 33.
' S. John X. 30.
6 S. Matt, xxvii. 54.
220
ST. AMBROSE.
declares both the truth and the eternity of
Christ's generation ; and thou, O heretic,
deniest its truth, and makest it matter of
time ! Would that thou hadst imbued thy
hands rather than thy soul ! But thou,
unclean even of hand, and murderous of
intent, seekest Christ's death, so far as in
thee lies, seeing; that thou thinkest of Him
as mean and weak ; nay, and this is a worse
sin, thou, albeit the Godhead can feel no
wound, still wouldst do thy diligence to
slay in Christ, not His Body, but His Glory.
115. We cannot then doubt that He is
very God, Whose true Godhead even execu-
tioners believed in and devils confessed.
Their testimony we require not now, but it
is withal greater than your blasphemies.
We have called them in to witness, to put
you to the blush, whilst we have also cited
the oracles of God, to the end that you
should believe.
116. The Lord proclaimeth by the mouth
of Isaiah: "In the mouth of them that
serve IMe shall a new name be called upon,
which shall be blessedover all the earth, and
they shall bless the true God, and they who
swear upon earth shall swear by the true
God."' These words, I say, Isaiah spake
when he saw God's Glory, and thus in
the Gospel it is plainly said that he saw
the Glory of Christ and spoke of Him. ^
117. But hear again what John the
Evangelist hath written in his Epistle,
saying: "We know that the Son of God
hath appeared, and hath given us discern-
ment, to know the Father, and to be in His
true Son Jesus Christ, our Lord. He is very
God, and Life Eternal."^ John calls Him
true Son of God and very God. If, then.
He be very God, He is surely uncreate,
without spot of lying or deceit, having in
Himself no confusion, nor unlikeness to His
Father.
CHAPTER XVIIL
The errors of the Arians are mentioned in the Nicene»
Definition of the Faith, to prevent their deceiving
anybody. These errors are recited, together with the
anathema pronounced against them, which is said
to have been not only pronounced at Nicaea, but also
twice renewed at Ariminum.
118. Christ, therefore, is "God of God,
Light of Light, very God of very God ; be-
gotten of the Father, not made ; of one
substance with the Father. "
119. So, indeed, following the guidance
' Is. Ixv. 16.
• I John V. 20.
• S. Johnxii. 41.
of the Scriptures, our fathers declared, hold-
ing, moreover, that impious doctrines should
be included in the record of their decrees, in
order that the unbelief of Arius should dis-
cover itself, and not, as it 'were, mask itself
with dye or face-paint. ' For they give a
false colour to their thougfhts who dare not
unfold them openly. After the manner of
the censor s rolls, then, the Arian heresy is
not' discovered by name,- but marked out
by the condemnation pronounced, in order
that he who is curious and eager to hear it
should be preserved from falling by knowing
that it is condemned already, before he hears,
it set forth to the end that he should believe.
120. " Those," runs the decree, "who say
that there was a time when the Son of God
was not, and that before He was born He
was not, and who say that he was made out
of nothing, or is of another substance or
(ih<7i<i.,i or that He is capable of changing, or
that with Him is any shadow of turning, —
them the Catholic and Apostolic Church
declares accursed."
121. Your sacred Majesty has agreed that
they who utter such doctrines are rightly
condemned. It was of no determination by
man, of no human counsel, that three hun-
dred and eighteen bishops met, as I showed
above more at length, 4 in Council, but that
in their number the Lord Jesus might prove,
by the sign of His Name and Passion, that
He was in the midst, where His own were
gathered together, s In the number of three
hundred was the sign of His Cross, in that
'^ Fucus, the word used by St. Ambrose, denoted face-paint in
general, but it seems to have also had the especial meaning of a red
pigment, or rouge for the cheeks. The custom of face-painting was
known of old in the East (2 Kings ix. 30; Ezek. xxiii. 40), whence,
most probably, it passed into Greece — it was known, in Ionia at
least, when the Odyssey was written (say 900 B.C.) — and thence to
Rome. See Diet. Antiq. art. " Fucus.
^ An allusion to the practice of the nota censoria. The censors,
under the Republic, were vested with the power of appointing
properly qualified citizens to vacancies in the Senate, and it w-as
their duty to make up the roll of senators for each lustrum, or period
of five years. Exclusion from the Senate was simply effected by
omitting a senator's name from the new list, and senators so " un-
seated were c?\\e.i. prcpteriti, since their names had been passed
over and not read out with the rest. The decrees of the Fathers of
the Church laid down, as it were, the qualification for membership :
all who came under the description established by these decrees
were regarded as admitted — whilst those who, like the Arians, did
not were tacitly excluded. Or we might say that the Anathema,
appended to the Nicene symbol, excluded the Arians, not by name,
but by description. In either way, the exclusion was tacit, like the
censorial, in so far as no names were mentioned. In the case of ex-
clusion from the Senate by the censors, it was understood that the
reason for exclusion was grave immorality.
^ St. Ambrose has here rendered into Latin the anathema ap-
pended to the original Nicene Creed of 325 a.d. Notice " substance
orouffia." The original is j^«i^.r;'rt«//rr rr/ovo-io. The closer Greek
equivalent of substantia is uTroo-rao-i! (found in Heb. i. 3, and trans-
lated " person " in A.V.), whilst the Latin for ovala. is essentia
("essence"). St. Ambrose appears to regard ovaia. as a proper
equivalent of substantia, whence we may perhaps infer that he also
identified ovoia and uTroo-rao-i? in meaning. But some distin-
guished the two, using the term ovaia in the sense of " essence or
" substance " (i.e., the Godhead)and vnoaradi^ in that of "person
— so that, according to them, there would be three "hypostases"
in the unity of the Godliead.
* C/. §§ 3 and 5, 6 S. Matt, xviii. zo.
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— BOOK I.
221
of eighteen was the sign of the Name
Jesus.
12 2. This also was the teaching of the
First Confession in the Council of Ariminum,
and of the Second Correction, after that
Council. Of the Confession, the letter sent
to the Emperor Constantine beareth witness,
and the Council that followed declares the
Correction.'
CHAPTER XIX.
Anus is charged with the first of the above-mentioned
errors, and refuted by the testimony of St. John.
The miserable death of the Heresiarch is described,
and the rest of his blasphemous errors are one by one
examined and disproved.
123. Arius, then, says : " There was a
time when the Son of God existed not,'' but
Scripture saith : "He was," not that "He
was not." Furthermore, St. John has writ-
ten : "In the beginning was the Word,
and the Word was with God, and the
Word was God. The same was in the
beginning with God." ^ Observe how often
the verb "was" appears, whereas "was
not " is nowhere found. Whom, then, are
we to believe ? — St. John, who lay on Christ's
bosom, or Arius, wallowing amid the out-
gush of his very bowels ? — so wallowing
that we might understand how Arius in his
teaching showed himself like unto Judas,
being visited with like punishment.
124. For Arius' bowels also
decency forbids to say where — and so he
burst asunder in the midst, falling headlong,
and besmirching those foul lips wherewith
he had denied Christ. He was rent, even
as the Apostle Peter said of Judas, because
he bought a field with the price of evil-doing,
and falling headlong he burst asunder in the
midst, and all his bowels gushed out. " ^ It
was no chance manner of death, seeing that
like wickedness was visited with like punish-
ment, to the end that those who denied and
betrayed the same Lord might likewise
undergo the same torment.
^ The Council of Ariminum (Rimini on the Adriatic coast of Italy)
was held in 359 A.D., Constantius being Emperor. "The Bishops
who attended the Council of Ariminum," observes Hurter, " to the
number of more than 400, informed the Emperor that they had re-
solved to allow no change in what had been determined upon at
Nicsa. This is the ' first confession.' That great confession, how-
ever, was not maintained for long. Partly overawed by the Em-
peror, partly deceived by the Arians, the Bishops agreed to strike
out the words 'substance' and ' consubstantial.' After tliis came
the 'correction,' which Ambrose calls the 'second,' being made
either by those Bishops who, recognizing their error, withdrew
the decrees of the Council held at Ariminum, or by the Councils
that followed — namely, the Councils of Alexandria (presided over
by Athanasius), of Paris (362 a.d.), and of Rome (held under Pope
Damasus, in A.v. 369}." ^ S. John i. 1-3.
^ Acts i. iS. Arius seems to have been carried off by a terrible
attack of cholera or some kindred malady. See Newman, Arians of
the Fourth Century, Ch. iii. § 2, and Robertson, History of the
Christian Church, vol i. pp. 301-2, ed. 1875.
gushed out —
125. Let us pass on to further points.
Arius says : " Before He was born, the Son of
God was not," but the Scripture saith that
all things are maintained in existence by the
Son's office. How, then, could He, Who
existed not, bestow existence upon others ?
Again, when the blasphemer uses the words
"when" and "before,"' he certainly uses
words which are marks of time. How,
then, do the Arians deny that time was ere
the Son was, and yet will have things
created in time to exist before the Son, see-
ing that the very words, "when," "before,''
and "did not exist once," announce the idea
of time .?
126. Arius says that the Son of God came
into being out of nought. How, then, is
He Son of God — how was He begotten from
the womb of the Father — how do we read
of Him as the Word spoken of the heart's
abundance, save to the end that we should
believe that He came forth, as it is written,
from the Father's inmost, unapproachable
sanctuary.? Now a son is so called either
by means of adoption or by nature, as we
are called sons by means of adoption.'
Christ is the Son of God by virtue of His
real and abiding nature. How, then, can
He, Who out of nothing fashioned all things,
be Himself created out of nothing.?
127. He who knows not whence the Son
is hath not the Son. The Jews therefore
had not the Son, for they knew not whence
He was. Wherefore the Lord said to
them : "Ye know not whence I came;"^
and again : "Ye neither have found out
Who I am, nor know My Father," for he
who denies that the Son is of the Father
knows not the Father, of Whom the Son is ;
and again, he knows not the Son, because
he knows not the Father.
128. Arius says : "[The Son is] of another
Substance." But what other substance is
exalted to equality with the Son of God, so
that simply in virtue thereof He is Son of
God } Or what right have the Arians for
censuring us because we speak, in Greek,
of the onriia, or in Latin, of the Substantia of
God, when they themselves, in saying that
the Son of God is of another "Substance,"
assert a divine Substantia.
129. Howbeit, should they desire to dis-
pute the use of the words "divine Sub-
stance " or " divine Nature," they shall
easily be refuted, for Holy Writ oft-times
hath spoken of ohaia in Greek, or Substantia
^ (i) " the word spoken," etc. — Ps. xlv. i. Ericctavit cor tneum
Tierbujn bonntn. — Vulg. e^rjpeiifaro r; KapSia fxov \6yov ayixdov.^-
LXX. (2) " sons by adoption." — Gal. iv. 4, 5.
^ .S. John viii. 14.
ST. AMBROSE.
in Latin, and St. Peter, as we read, would
have us become partakers in the divine
Nature. But if they will have it that the
Son is of another "Substance," they with
their own lips confute themselves, in that
they both acknowledge the term " Sub-
stance," whereof they are so afraid, and
rank the Son on a level with the creatures
above which they feign to exalt Him.
130. Arius calls the Son of God a creature,
but " not as the rest of the creatures." Yet
what created being is not different from an-
other.? Man is not as angel, earth is not as
heaven, the sun is not as water, nor light as
darkness. Arius' preference, therefore, is
empty — he hath but disguised with a sorry
dye his deceitful blasphemies, in order to
take the foolish.
131. Arius declares that the Son of God
may change and swerve. How, then, is
He God if He is changeable, seeing that
He Himself hath said: "I am, I am, and I
change not '" ? '
CHAPTER XX.
St. Ambrose declares his desire that some angel would
fly to him to purify him, as once the Seraph did to
Isaiah — nay more, that Christ Himself would come
to him, to the Emperor, and to his readers, and
finally prays ti.at Gratian and the rest of the faithful
may be exalted by the power and spell of the Lord's
Cup, which he describes in mystic language.
132. HowBEiT, now must I needs coiifess
the Prophet Isaiah's confession, which he
makes before declaring the word of the
Lord : "Woe is me, my heart is smitten,
for I, a man of unclean lips, and living in
the midst of a people of unclean lips, have
seen the Lord of Sabaoth." ^ Now if Isaiah
said "Woe is me," who looked upon the
Lord of Sabaoth, what shall I say of myself,
who, being "a man of unclean lips, ' am
constrained to treat of the divine genera-
tion ? How shall I break forth into speech
of things whereof I am afraid, when David
prays that a watch may be set over his
mouth in the matter of things whereof he
has knowledge.' 3 O that to me also one of
* St. Ambrose' version differs in expression from the Vulg. — Eg^o
enim Do»iinus et iion mutor (Mai. iii. 6) — I)ut not in substance, for
Ego sum Dotniiius And " I am the Lord " both mean " I am He who
is ' — (o til') — wliich is very well represented by Ego s^tjn, Ego sum
— " I am, I am." — Cf. Ex. iii. 14.
' Is. vi. 5. Contrast the Vulgate — Vce tni'hi, quia tacui, quia
vir pollutiis labiis ego sujit, et in medio pofiuli pallida labia habe^itis
ego habiio, et regem, Doviiiium exercituum viiii oculis meis ; and
the LXX. — J) ToAa? eyui. on Karayivvyixai (cojnpynticto corde sunt)
OTi ar^ptuTTOS Ixtv Ka'i aKa9af3Ta x^^^V f\yJi' . . . K. T. A Kai
TOi' /3acrtAea Kupioi' aajiaioS iiSov To'i<; o<j)6a\ixo7<; fiov." A.X. i6n
— " Woe is me, for / am loidone .... and mine eyes have seen
the King, the Lord of Hosts.
■* Ps. xxxix. I, 2; cxli. 3, 4.
the Seraphim would bring the burning coal
from the celestial altar, taking it in the
tongs of the two testaments, and with the
fire thereof purge my unclean lips !
133. But forasmuch as then the Seraph
came down in a vision to the Prophet,
whilst Thou, O Lord, in revelation of the
mystery hast come to us in the flesh, ' do
Thou, not by any deputy, nor by any mes-
senger, but Thou Thyself cleanse my con-
science from my secret sins, that I too,
erstwhile unclean, but now by Thy mercy
made clean through faith, may sing in the
words of David: "I will make music to
Thee upon a harp, O God of Israel, my lips
shall rejoice, in all my song to Thee, and
so, too, shall my soul, whom Thou hast
redeemed." -
134. And so, O Lord, leaving them that
slander and hate Thee, come unto us, sanc-
tify the ears of our sovereign ruler, Gratian,
and all besides into whose hands this little
book shall come — and purge my ears, that
no stains of the infidelity they haA^e heard
remain anywhere. Cleanse thoroughly,
then, our ears, not with water of well, river,
or rippling and purling brook, but with
words cleansing like water, clearer than
any water, and purer than any snow — even
the words Thou hast spoken — " Though
your sins be as scarlet, I will make them
white as snow." 3
135. Moreover, there is a Cup, wherewith
Thou dost use to purify the hidden cham-
bers of the soul, a Cup not of the old order,^
nor filled from a common Vine,- — a new
Cup, brought down from heaven to earth, 5
filled with wine pressed from the wondrous
cluster, which hung in fleshly form upon
the tree of the Cross, even as the grape
hangs upon the Vine. From this Cluster,
then, is the Wine that maketh glad the
heart of man, ^ uplifts the sorrowful, is fra-
grant with, pours into us, the ecstasy of
faith, true devotion, and purity.
136. With this Wine, therefore, O Lord
my God, cleanse the spiritual ears of our
sovereign Emperor, to the end that, just as
men, being uplifted with common wine,
love rest and quietness, cast out the fear
of death, have no feeling of injuries, 7 seek
not that which belongs to others, and forget
' St. Ambrose contrasts the appearance of the .Seraph to Isaiah in
a vision with our Lord's appearance to men in everyday life, in the
flesh, see Is. vi. 6, 7, and i Tim. iii. 16.
- Ps. Ixxi. 22, 23. ^ Is i. 18.
* /.<>., not of the old Dispensation — not provided for in the Mo-
saic ritual : also, not belonging to the old Creation, but a pledge
and premonition of the new (Rev. xxi. 5).
'' Cf. .S. John vi. 32, 50-51. " Judg. ix. 13.
' .St. .Ambrose seems to refer to the phenomena of narcosis rather
than those of alcoholic inebriation.
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— BOOK II.
223
their own ; and so he, too, intoxicated with
thy wine, may love peace, and, confident
in the exultation of faith, may never know
the death of unbelief, and may display
loving patience, have no part in other men's
jirofanitics, ' and hold the faith of more
account even than kindred and children,
as it is written : " Leave all that thou hast,
and come, follow Me. "^
137. With this Wine, also, Lord Jesus,
purify our senses, that we may adore Thee,
and worship Thee, the Creator of things
visible and invisible. Truly, Thou canst
not fail of being Thyself invisible and good.
Who hast given invisibility and goodness
to the works of Thy Hands. '
BOOK II.
INTRODUCTION.
Twelve names of the Son of God are recounted, being
distributed into three classes. These names are so
many proofs of the eternity not only of the Son, but
of the Father also. Furthermore, they are com-
pared with the twelve stones in the High Priest's
breastplate, and their inseparability is shown by a
new distribution of them. Returning to the com-
parison with the High Priest's breastplate, the writer
sets forth the beauty of the woven-work and the
precious stones of the mystic raiment, and the hid-
den meaning of that division into woven-work and
precious stones, which being done, he expounds the
comparison drawn by him, showing that faith must
be woven in with works, and adds a short summary
of the same faith, as concerning the Son.
1. Enough hath been said, as I think,
your sacred Majesty, in the book preceding
to show that the Son of God is an eternal
being, not diverse from the Father, begot-
ten, not created : we have also proved,
from passages of the Scriptures, that God's
true Son is God, 3 and is declared so to be
by the evident tokens of His Majesty.
2. Wherefore, albeit what hath already
been set forth is plentiful even to overflow-
ing for maintaining the Faith — seeing that
the greatness of a river is mostly judged of
from the manner in which its springs rise
and flow forth — still, to the end that our
belief may be the plainer to sight, the
waters of our spring ought, methinks, to
be parted off into three channels. There
are, then, firstly, plain tokens declar-
ing essential inherence in the God-
head ; secondly, the expressions of the
likeness of the Father and the Son ; and
lastly, those of the undoubtable unity of the
Divine Majesty. Now of the first sort are
the names "begetting," "God," "Son,"
"The Word; "4 of the second, "bright-
^ Cf. I Tim. V. 22 : fiijSe Kowdvn ofiaprtais aAAoTpiais.
2 S. Matt. xix. 21.
2 or "that God's Son is true God." " very God,"
* S. John i. 14, 18; Heb. i. 5; Rom. ix. 5; i. 3-4; S. John i.
1-3, 14-
ness, "expression, "mirror, "image; ^
and of the third, " wisdom," " power,"
" truth," "life. "3
3. These tokens so declare the nature of
the Son, that by them you may know both
that the Father is eternal, and that the Son
is not diverse from Him ; for the source of
generation is He Who is,-* and as begotten
of the Eternal, He is God ; coming forth
from the Father, He is the Son ; s from
God, He is the Word ; He is the radiance of
the Father's glory, the expression of His
substance,^ the counterpart of God, 7 the
image of His majesty ; the Bounty of Him
Who is bountiful, the W^isdom of Him Who
is wise, the Power of the IMighty One, the
Truth of Him Who is true,^ the Life of the
Living One. 9 In agreement, therefore,
stand the attributes of Father and Son, that
none may suppose any diversity, or doubt
but that they are of one Majesty. For each
and all of these names would we furnish
examples of their use were we not con-
strained by a desire to maintain our dis-
course within bounds.
4. Of these twelve, as of twelve precious
stones, is the pillar of our faith built up.
For these are the precious stones — sardius,
jasper, smaragd, chrysolite, and the rest, —
woven into the robe of holy Aaron, '° even
1 Cf. Col. i. 15-16.
- Heb. i. 3 ; S. John xiv. 9 ; Col. i. 15.
* I Cor. i. 24; .S. John xiv. 6; xi. 25.
* i.e., 6 uiv. Ex. iii. 14 (LXX.) — Kai" Hviv 6 ©ebs 7rpb5 Mioutr^r,
Aeywi' 'Eyai ci^t 6 "fii/. €/. S. John viii. 58 : xviii. 6 ; Rev. i. 4 and
8 ; iv. 8.
^ S. John viii. 42 ; xvi. 27-8.
* Heb. i. 3. anavyacrna t^? So^jjs Kal xapaKTrjp t^« i;7rocrTd<re<os
avTov. ' i7ro(TTa<7i5 is rendered "person" in theA.V. The R.V.
1881 has " effulgence of His glory and very image of His substance,"
and in the margin "the impress of His substance." The .Son does not
Ttproduce ihe /lerso/i of the Father — otherwise there would be no
distinction, but confusion, of Persons, but He eioes reproduce or
represent the substance, or essence, of the Father — i.e., the Aoyos
T7)5 oucrias is the same for both Persons.
' " spectilum Dei " — lit. " mirror of God."
' Jer. X. 10; S. John xiv. 6; xvii. 3 ; i John v. 20.
^ Deut. V. 26 ; Rom. xiv. 1 1 ; S. John xi. 25 ; v. 26 ; i John i. 2 ;
V. 20.
'" See Ex. xxviii. 15-21. The precious stones set in the breast-
plate are named as follows :
224
ST. AMBROSE.
of him who bears the likeness of Christ,'
that is, of the true Priest ; stones set in gold,
and inscribed with the names of the sons of
Israel, twelve stones close joined and fitting
one into another, for if any should sunder or
separate them, the whole fabric of the faith
falls in ruins.
5. This, then, is the foundation of our
faith — to know that the Son of God is be-
gotten ; if He be not begotten, neither is
He the Son. Nor yet is it sufficient to call
Him Son, unless you shall also distinguish
SepUiagtnt.
Vulgate. A A'. 161 1. R V. 1881.
text. margin.
i. o-apSiof. i. lapis sardius. i. sardius i. sardius or ruby.
(m. ruby).
Toira^ioi'. topazius. topaz. topaz.
<rju,apay6os. smaragdus. carbuncle. carbuncle
or emerald,
ii. ai/Bpa^. ii. carbunculus. ii. emerald, ii. emerald
or carbuncle.
a-djT<f>ei.po^. sapphirus. sapphire. sapphire.
lacTTTts. jaspis. diamond . diamond
or sardonyx,
iii. Aiyv'ptov. iii. ligurius. iii. ligure. iii. jacinth o?- amber.
ax<iTT)s. achates. agate. agate.
a;ae9u(TTo?. amethystus. amethyst. amethyst.
iv. xpv(T6\tBoi.iv. chrysolitus. iv. beryl. iv. beryl
or chalcedony.
jSj)puAAioi'. ^.beryllus. onyx. onyx (7r beryl.
oi'iixi-ov. a.onychinus. jasper. jasper.
With the mystic jewel-work of the High Priest's breastplate —
the Aoyetoi' Kpitreio?, rationale judicii — compare the " covering of
the King of Tyrus." — Ezek. xxviii. 13.
Septuagint. Vulgate. A.V.1611. j?. r. 1881.
text. margin, text. margin.
i.aap&Lov. I. sardius. i. sardius i. sardius
or ruby. or ruby.
2. TOTra^co^. 2. topazius. 2. topaz. 2. topaz.
3. (TfidpaySos. 6. jaspis. ? diamond. ? diamond.
4. ii'flpa^. 10. chrysolitus. 1 1. beryl ^;' 11. berjd.
chrysolite 10.
5. (Tdirijieipo?. 12. onyx. 12. onyx. 12. onyx.
6. iao-TTi?. ii.berillus. ? jasper. ? jasper.
7. Ai-yOpios. 5. sapphirus. 5. sapphire. 5. sapphire.
8. axaT>)?. 4. carbunculus. 3.emeraldor 3.emeraldo?'
chrysoprase. carbuncle 4.
g. a.p.iSvcrTo<;. 3. smaragdus. 4. carbuncle. 4. carbuncle
lO.xpi'o'oAiSos. <?r emerald 3.
11. jSrypuAAtoc.
12. bi'v^iov.
Also the foundations of the Heavenly City. — Rev. xxi. 19 f.
_ A. V.
i. iacrjris. jasper,
ii. <ran-</)eipos. sapphire,
iii. x'''A/<r)6an'. chalcedony,
iv. cr/xapa-j/6os. emerald.
V. aap&off^. sardonyx,
vi. (TapBiov. sardius.
vii. \pv<76\i.6o<;. chrysolyte.
viii. /JrjpuAAo?. beryl,
ix. T07ra^"ioi'. topaz.
X. xP"<^°''^P''-<^°'!- chiysoprasus.
xi. uaKi>'rfo9. jacinth,
xii. d^ie'Suo-Tos. amethyst.
The Heavenly City had 12 gates — each one a pearl — inscribed
with the names of the Twelve Tribes of Israel. Tlie foundations
were inscribed with tlie names of the Twelve Apostles.
These precious stones have been identified as follows, taking the
High Priest's breastplate :
i. \. Red cartielian. 2 . CArysoli'te (green- -x,. Emerald.
ish-yellow).
ii. ^. Carbuncle. c,. Lapis Lazuli b. Jasper (Greek
(blue). chalcedony, dark
green),
iii. 7. Jacinth. 8. Agate (white, with 9. A utethyst (blue
red or green transparent
grain). quartz).
Vi.io.Toiaz (gold- ii. A <j ua ma r i n e it.. Banded Carnelian
brown). (dark blue). (black and white,
or brown and
white).
' Aaron the type of Christ tlie true Priest. See Heb. iv. 15 ; v.
1-5; vii. 28 ; viii. 7.
Him as the Only-begotten Son. If He is a
creature. He is not God ; if He is not God,
He is not the Life ; if He is not the Life,
then is He not the Truth.
6. The first three tokens, therefore, that
is to say, the names "generation," "Son,""
" Only-begotten," do show that the Son is
of God originally and by virtue of His own
nature.
7. The three that follow — to wit, the
names "God," "Life," "Truth," reveal His
Power, whereby He hath laid the founda-
tions of, and upheld, the created world.
"For," as Paul said, "in Him we live and
move and have our being ; " ' and therefore,
in the first three the Son's natural right, ^ in
the other three the unity of action subsisting
between Father and Son is made manifest.
8. The Son of God is also called the
"image" and "effulgence" and "expres-
sion " [of God], for these names have dis-
closed the Father"s incomprehensible and
unsearchable Majesty dwelling in the Son,
and the expression of His likeness in Him.
These three names, then, as we see, refer
to [the Son's] likeness [to the Father]. 3
9. We have yet the operations of Power,
Wisdom, and Justice left, wherewith,
severally, to prove [the Son's] eternity. ■♦
10. This, then, is that robe, adorned with
precious stones ; this is the amice of the
true Priest ; this the bridal garment ; here
is the inspired weaver, who well knew how
to weave that work. No common woven
work is it, whereof the Lord spake by His
Prophet: "Who gave to women their skill in
weaving.? '^ No common stones again, are
they — stones, as we find them called, "of
filling ; '' ^ for all perfection depends on this
^ Acts xvii. 28.
2 so. to the name and title of God.
^ See Heb. i. 3. "Splendor" is St. Ambrose's rendering of
aTraiiyaa/iia. Theodoret says : " The radiance " (or " effulgence ")
" of a fire comes from it and accompanies it. The fire causes the
radiance, but the radiance is inseparable from the fire. Also the
radiance of the fire is of the same nature with it ; so also is the .Son
of the same nature with the Father." Theophylact — " The sun is
never seen without his radiance, and we cannot 'hink of a fatlier
v/ithout his child." Dehtzsch — " It is no nimbus around God tliat
is here called His " glory," but God's own inconceivable, spiritual
fire and brightness (die iibersintiliche geistige Fcuer jtnd Lichtnatur
Gottes selher). which He, in order to reveal Himself to Himself,
makes an object to Himself " {aus sich herausscizt).
* " The act of knowing and comprehending all tilings necessarily
includes the expression of mind-work or wisdom, tliat is. the Word,
and without this it cannot even be conceiv;jd of. Rightly, then, did
the Fathers deduce the eternity of the Word from the eternity of the
Father."— Hurter, adloc.
^' St. Ambrose's rendering of this passage (Job xxxviii. 36) agrees
with the I.,XX. — n? hi cSmkc yvt'ai^\v vciacrn.nTO'; <TO<t>(av. v Troift-
Atiktji' (lAio-Ti)/.ir)i'. The .A.V. 1611 has: " Who hth put wisdom in
the inward parts ? or who hath given understandii u' I0 the heart .' '
R.V. has " dark clouds " and " meteor " as margin.-^l substitutes for
" inward parts " and " heart." Vulgate — Quis posuit in visceribus
hominis sapietitiatn ? vel i;j<is dedit gallo intelligentiam ?
" Ex. XXXV. 27. Ka\ oi dpxovTf<; r)\'(yKav Tovi; \i9o\s rfi<;<TlxapdySov
Kat 70v<; \l0ov^ ttj? TrATjptocreiu? e(«; ttji- eniofxiSa Kal to AoyeToi'. —
LXX. Lapidcs onyctiinos et s;fm»ias ad siipcrhiivieralr rt ration-
ale.—VnXg. " Stones to be set."— A.V. & R.V. The LXX. gives
the closest rendering of the Hebrew.
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— BOOK II.
225
condition, that there be nought lacking.
They are stones joined together and set in
gold — that is, of a spiritual kind; the join-
ing of them by our minds and their setting
in convincing argument. Finally Scripture
teaches us how far from common are these
stones, inasmuch as, whilst some brought
one kind, and others another, of less pre-
cious offerings, these the devout princes
brought, wearing them upon their shoulders,
and made of them the "breastplate of judg-
ment," that is, a piece of woven work.
Now we have a woven work, when faith
and action go together.
1 1. Let none suppose me to be misguided,
in that I made at first a threefold division,
each part containing four, and afterwards a
fourfold division, each part containing three
terms. The beauty of a good thing pleases
the more, if it be shown under various
aspects. For those are good things, where-
of the texture of the priestly robe was the
token, that is to say, either the Law, or the
Church, which latter hath made two gar-
ments for her spouse, as it is written ' — the
one of action, the other of spirit, weaving
tos:ether the threads of faith and works.
Thus, in one place, as we read, she makes a
groundwork of gold, and afterwards weaves
thereon blue, and purple, with scarlet,
and white. ' Again, [as we read] elsewhere,
she first makes little flowerets of blue and
other colours, and attaches gold, and there
is made a single priestly robe, to the end
that adornments of diverse grace and beauty,
made up of the same bright colours, may
gain fresh glory by diversity of arrange-
ment.
12. Moreover (to complete our interpre-
tation of these types), it is certain that by
refined gold and silver are designated the
oracles of the Lord, whereby our faith stands
firm. "The oracles of the Lord are pure
oracles, silver tried in the fire, refined of
dross, purified seven times." ^ Now blue is
like the air we breathe and draw in ; purple,
again, represents the appearance of water ;
scarlet signifies fire ; and white linen, earth,
for its orisfin is in the earth. 3 Of these four
* Proverbs xxxi. 21 (22). St. Ambrose appears to follow the
LXX., whose rendering of the passage is different from the Vulgate,
with which our English versions agree. With what follows in the
text, cf. Ex. xxviii. 33. 34, also 5, 6.
- Ps. xii. Cxi. Vulg.) 6, 7. Cf. Prov. xxx. 5.
3 These colours entered into the fashioning of the High Priest's
Ephod (Ex. xxviii. 5, 6) and the Vail of the Tabernacle. Probably
a little symbolism was attached to the ornaments of Ahasuerus'
palace at Susa, "where were white, green, and blue" (or violet)
'■ hangings fastened with cords of fine linen and purple to silver
rings and pillars of marble : the beds were of gold and silver upon
a pavement of red and blue and white and black marble." White
and green might represent the earth, blue the air, purple the sea and
water generally, in the curtains : whilst in the variegated marble
pavement, red would naturally symbolize fire, blue the air, white
water (as colourless when pure), black earth (the soil). Notice
15
elements, again, the human body is com-
posed. '
13. Whether, then, you join to faith al-
ready present in the soul, bodily acts agree-
ing thereto ; or acts come first, and faith
be joined as their companion, presenting
them to God — here is the robe of the minis-
ter of religion, here the priestly vestment.
14. Faith is profitable, therefore, when
her brow is briirht with a fair crown of good
works. ^ This faith — that I may set the
matter forth shortly — is contained in the fol-
lowing principles, which cannot be over-
thrown. If the Son had His origin in noth-
ing. He is not Son ; if He is a creature. He
is not the Creator ; if He was made, He did
not make all things ; if He needs to learn,
He hath no foreknowledge ; if He is a re-
ceiver. He is not perfect ; if He progress,^
He is not God. If He is unlike (the Father)
He is not the (Father's) image ; if He is Son
by grace. He is not such by nature ; 4 if He
have no part in the Godhead, He hath it in
Him to sin. 5 "There is none good, but
Godhead." ^
CHAPTER I.
The Arian argument from S. Mark x. i8, " There is
none good but one, that is, God," refuted by explana-
tion of these words of Christ.
15. The objection I have now to face,
your sacred Majesty, fills me with bewilder-
ment, my soul and body faint at the thought
that there should be men, or rather not men,
but beings with the outward appearance of
men, but inwardly full of brutish folly —
who can, after receiving at the hands of the
Lord benefits so many and so great, say
that the Author of all good things is Himself
not good.
16. It is written, say they, that "There is
none good but God alone." I acknowledge
the Scripture — but there is no falsehood in
the letter ; would that there were none in
the Arians' exposition thereof. The written
signs are guiltless, it is the meaning in
which they are taken 7 that is to blame. I
"the air we breathe," etc. — ^' Aeris queni spiratnuset cujus car-
piuiitsjlatum.'" Compare Virgil, ^^n. I. 387. 388.
1 This was supposed by some of the Ionic philosophers to be the
explanation of perception. We perceived earfh, they supposed, by
reason of the earthly constituent of our organism.
■^ S. James ii. 14-26.
^ i.e. if it is possible for Him to ascend to a higher plane of ex-
istence.
■* i.e. He is a son " by adoption," as one of ourselves.
^ i.e. He may not have as yet actually sinned, but it is within
the range of possibility for Him — He is, as Hurler expresses it in
his note, " auctor malitice si non actu, saltern potentia.'"
« S. Mark x. 18.
' " Sensus in crimineP The " sense of a passage " is not some-
thing in the passage itself so much as our understanding of it. In
other words, the genitive after" sense " is objective, not possessive.
226
ST. AMBROSE.
acknowledge the words as the words of our
Lord and Saviour — but let us bethink our-
selves when, to whom, and with what com-
prehension He speaks.
17. The Son of God is certainly speaking
as man, and speaking to a scribe, — to him,
that is, who called the Son of God "Good
Master," but would not acknowledge Him
as God. What he believes not, Christ further
gives him to understand, to the end that he
may believe in God's Son not as a good
master, but as the good God, for if, where-
soever the "One God " is named, the Son of
God is never sundered from the fulness of
that unity, how, when God alone is said
to be good, can the Only-begotten be ex-
cluded from the fulness of Divine Goodness ?
The Arians must therefore either deny that
the Son of God is God, or confess that God
is good.
18. With divinely inspired comprehen-
sion, then, our Lord said, ?io/ "There is
none good but the Father alone, " but ' ' There
is none good but God alone,'' and "Father"
is the proper name of Him Who begets.
But the unity of God by no means excludes
the Godhead of the Three Persons, and there-
fore it is His Nature that is extolled. Good-
ness, therefore, is of the nature of God, and
exists the Son
which the pre-
agani
not to one single
in the nature of God,
of God — wherefore that
dicate expresses
Person, but to the [complete] unity [of the
Godhead].'
19. The Lord, then, doth not deny His
goodness — He rebukes this sort of disciple.
For when the scribe said, " Good Master,"
the Lord answered, "Why callest thou Me
good .'' " — which is to say, "It is not enough
to call Him good, W^hom thou believest not
to be God." Not such do I seek to be My
disciples — men who rather consider My man-
hood and reckon Me a good master, than
look to My Godhead and believe Me to be
the good God."
CHAPTER n.
The goodness of the Son of God is proved from His
works, namely, I lis benefits that He showed towards
the people of Israel under the Old Covenant, and to
Christians under the New. It is to one's own in-
terest to believe in the goodness of Him Who is one's
Lord and Judge. The Father's testimony to the
Son. No small number of the Jewish people bear
witness to the Son ; the Arians therefore are plainly
' Lat. — " non quod sin^ulariiaiis, sed qnod unitatis est,pripdica-
/ur." The Son is " in the nature of (iod " inasmuch as the eternal
Fatherhood of God implies an Eternal Son — His eternal Love an
eternal object of that Love.
worse than the Jews. The words of the Bride, de-
claring the same goodness of Christ.
20. HowBEiT, I would not that the Son
should rely on the mere prerogative of His
nature and the claims of peculiar rights of
His Majesty. Let us not call Him good, if
He merit not the title ; and if He merit not
this by works, by acts of lovingkindness,
let Him waive the right He enjoys by virtue
of His nature, and be submitted to our judg-
ment. He Who is to judge us disdains not
to be brought to judgment, that He may be
"justified in His saying, and clear when He
is judged." '
21. Is He then not good. Who hath shown
me good things ? Is He not good, Who
when six hundred thousand of the people of
the jews fled before their pursuers, suddenly
opened the tide of the Red Sea, an unbroken
mass of waters i* — so that the waves flowed
round the faithful, and were walls to them,
but poured back and overwhelmed the un-
believers.^
22. Is He not good, at Whose command
the seas became firm ground for the feet of
them that fled, and the rocks gave forth
water for the thirsty ? ^ so that the handiwork
of the true Creator might be known, when
the fluid became solid, and the rock streamed
with water .? That we might acknowledge
this as the handiwork of Christ, the Apostle
said : " And that rock was Christ. "4
23. Is He not good. Who in the wilderness
fed with bread from heaven such countless
thousands of the people, lest any famine
should assail them, without need of toil, in
the enjoyment of rest.'' — so that, for the
space of forty years, their raiment grew not
old, nor were their shoes worn,5 a figure to
the faithful of the Resurrection that was to
come, showing that neither the glory of
great deeds, nor the beauty of the power
wherewith He hath clothed us, nor the stream
of human life is made for nought ?
24. Is He not good. Who exalted earth to
heaven, so that, just as the bright companies
of stars reflect His glory in the sky, as in a
glass, so the choirs of apostles, martyrs, and
priests, shining like glorious stars, might give
light througlyjut the world. ^
25. Not only, then, is He good, but He is
more. He is a good Shepherd, not only for
' Ps. li. 4 (Prayer-book).
^ " Hath shown me good things." — Ps. xiii. 6. For the passage
of the Red Sea, vide Ex. xiv.
'■' Kx. xvii. 6: Num. xx. 8, ii. * i Cor. x. 4.
'' Ex. xvi. 12 ff. ; Deut. viii. 3, 4 ; xxix. 5; Ps. Ixxviii. 24, 25 ; cv. 40;
S. John vi. 31 ; i Cor. x. 3.
" Cf . S. Matt. xiii. 43 : Dan. xii. 3. The radiance of these heavenly
choirs is the reflection of Him Who is the Light of the World, the
True Light. — S. John i. 9; viii. 12 ; xii. 46; Rev. xxi. 23 ; xxii. 5.
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— BOOK II.
227
Himself, but to His sheep also, "for the
good shepherd layeth down his life for his
sheep. " Aye, He laid down His life to
exalt ours — but it was in the power of His
Godhead that He laid it down and took it
again : " I have power to lay down My life,
and I have power to take it. No man taketh
it from Me, but I lay it down of Myself." ■
26. Thou seest His goodness, in that He
laid it down of His own accord : thou seest
His power, in that He took it again — dost
thou deny His goodness, when He has said
of Himself in the Gospel, " If I am good,
why is thine eye evil ? " - Ungrateful wretch,
what doest thou .? Dost thou deny His
goodness, in Whom is thy hope of good
things — if, indeed, thou believest this }
Dost thou deny His goodness. Who hath
given us what " eye hath not seen, nor ear
heard " .-' ^
27. It concerns my interest to believe
Him to be good, for " It is a good thing to
trust in the Lord. "'•♦ It is to my interest to
confess Him Lord, for it is written : " Give
thanks unto the Lord, for He is good. "5
28. It is to my interest to esteem my
Judge to be good, for the Lord is a righteous
Judge to the house of Israel. If, then, the
Son of God is Judge, surely, seeing that the
[udge is the righteous God and the Son of
God is Judge, [it follows that] He who is
Judge and Son of God is the righteous God.^
29. But perchance thou believest not
others, nor the Son. Hear, then, the Father,
saying : "My heart hath brought forth out
of its depth the good Word. "7 The Word,
then, IS good^the Word, of Whom it is
written : ' ' And the Word was with God, and
the Word was God. " * If, therefore, the
Word is good, and the Son is the Word of
God, surely, though it displease the Arians,
the Son of God is God. Let them now at
least blush for shame. ■
30. The Jews used to say : ' ' He is good. "
Though some said : " He is not, " yet others
said: " He is good," — and ye do all deny His
goodness.
31. He is good who forgives the sin of
one man ; is He not good Who has takerr'
away the sin of the world .? For it was of
Him that it was said : ' ' Behold the Lamb of
God, behold Him Who taketh away the sin
of the world. " 9
^ S. John X. II, 17, 18.
- S. Matt. XX. 15 (the rendering in the Bible is slightly different).
' 1 Cor. ii. 9 ; Isa. Ixiv. 4. * Ps. cxviii. 8.
^ Ps. cxviii. I ; cxxxvi. i ; cvi. i : cvii. i.
" St. Ambrose's syllogism appears to be : The Judge is the right-
eous God, the .Son of God is the Judge ; there/ore, the Son of God
is the righteous God.
' Ps. xlv. I. « S. John i. i.
" The reff . in §§ 30 and 31 are to S. John -vii. 12 and i. 29.
32. But why do we doubt .^ The Church
hath believed in His goodness all these ages,
and hath confessed its faith in the saying :
" Let Him kiss me with the kisses of His
mouth ; for thy breasts are better than
wine;"' and again: " And thy throat is like
the goodliest wine." Of His goodness,
therefore, He nourisheth us with the breasts
of the Law and Grace, soothing men's sor-
rows with telling them of heavenly things ;
and do we, then, deny His goodness, when
He is the manifestation of goodness, ex-
pressing in His Person the likeness of the
Eternal Bounty, even as we showed above
that it was written, that He is the spotless
reflection and counterpart of that Bounty .? ^
CHAPTER in.
Forasmuch as God is One, the Son of God is God,
good and true.
33. Yet what think ye, who deny the good-
ness and true Godhead of the Son of God,
though it is written that there is no God
but One.? ^ For although there be gods so-
called, would you reckon Christ amongst
them which are called gods, but are not,
seeing that eternity is of His Essence, and
that beside Him there is none other that is
good and true God, forasmuch as God is in
Him ; 4 whilst it follows from the very nature
of the Father, that after Him there is no
other true God, because God is One, neither
confounding [the Persons of] the Father and
Son, as the Sabellians do, nor, like the
Arians, severing the Father and the Son.
For the Father and the Son, as Father and
Son, are distinct persons, but they admit no
division of their Godhead.
CHAPTER IV.
The omnipotence of the Son of God, demonstrated on
the authority of the Old and the New Testament.
34. Seeing, then, that the Son of God is
true and good, surely He is Almighty God.
Can there be yet any doubt on this point .?
We have already cited the place where it is
read that ' ' the Lord Almighty isHis Name. " s
Because, then, the Son is Lord, and the
Lord is Almighty, the Son of God is Al-
mighty.
35. But hear also such a passage as you
* Song of Solomon i. i.
* .S. John xvii. 22, 23.
^ Song vii. 9.
= Bk. I. ch. i.
* I Cor. viii. 4.
228
ST. AMBROSE.
can build no doubts upon : ' " Behold, He
Cometh," saith the Scripture, "with the
clouds, and every eye shall see Him, and
they which pierced Him, and all the tribes
of the earth shall mourn because of Him.
Yea, amen. I am Alpha and Omega, saith
the Lord God, Who is, and Who was, and
Who is to come, the Almighty."^ Whom,
I ask, did they pierce ? For Whose com-
ing hope we but the Son"s ? Therefore,
Christ is Almighty Lord, and God.
36. Hear another passage, your sacred
Majesty,— hear the voice of Christ. "Thus
saith the Lord Almighty : After His glory ^
hath He sent me against the nations which
have made spoil of you, forasmuch as he
that toucheth you is as he that toucheth the
pupil of His 'eye. For lo, I lay my hand
upon them which despoiled you, and I will
save you, and they shall be for a spoil,
which made spoil of you, and they shall
know that the Lord Almighty hath sent Me."
Plainly, He Who speaks is the Lord Al-
mighty, and He Who hath sent is the Lord
Almighty. By consequence, then, almighty
power appertains both to the Father and to
the Son ; nevertheless, it is One Almighty
God, for there is oneness of Majesty.
37. Moreover, that your most excellent
Majesty may know that it is Christ which
hath spoken as in the Gospel, so also in the
prophet, He saith by the mouth of Isaiah,
as though foreordaining the Gospel : " I
Myself, Who spake, am come,"^ that is to
say, I, Who spake in the Law, am present
in the Gospel.
38. Elsewhere, again. He saith : "All
things that the Father hath are Mine." s
What meaneth He by " all things " ?
Clearly, not things created, for all these
were made by the Son, but the things that
the Father hath — that is to say. Eternity,
Sovereignty, Godhead, which are His pos-
session, as begotten of the Father. We
cannot, then, doubt that He is Almighty,
Who hath all things that the Father hath
(for it is written : "All things that the
Father hath are Mine").
CHAPTER V.
Certain passages from Scripture, urged against the
Omnipotence of Christ, are resolved ; the writer is
' No doubts, because (i) the meaning of the passage is plain ; (2)
it is taken from an inspired Book.
2 Rev. i. 8.
* The quotation is from Zech. ii. 8 — "after His glory." Lat. —
" Post honor em.'''' LXX. — OTriVtu Sofr;?. Vulg. — ' Post gloriam.^''
A. v.—" After the glory.''
* Isa. Hi. 6. The Vulg. agrees with St. Ambrose. The A.V. has —
" Thev shall know in that dav that I am lie that doth speak : be-
luld, it is I." R.V. margin—" here I am."
^ S. John xvi. 25.
also at especial pains to show that Christ not sel-
dom spoke in accordance with the affections of
human nature.
39. Although it is written concerning God,
" Blessed and only Potentate,"' yet I have
no misgiving that the Son of God is thereby
severed from Him, seeing that the Scripture
entitled God, not the Father by Himself,
the "only Potentate." The Father Himself
also declares by the prophet, concerning
Christ, that "I have set help upon one that
is mighty."^ It is not the Father alone,
then. Who is the only Potentate ; God the
Son also is Potentate, for in the Father's
praise the Son is praised too.
40. Aye, let some one show what there
is that the Son of God cannot do. Who
was His helper, when He made the heavens,
— Who, when He laid the foundations of the
world .?^ Had He any need of a helper to
set men free, Who needed none in constitut-
ing ^ angels and principalities? 5
41. "It is written," say they: "'My
Father, if it be possible, take away this cup
from Me.'^ If, then, He is Almighty, how
comes He to doubt of the possibility .? "
Which means that, because I have proved
Him to be Almighty, I have proved Him
unable to doubt of possibility.
42. The words, you say, are the words
of Christ. True— consider, though, the oc-
casion of His speaking them, and in what
character He speaks. He hath taken upon
Him the substance of man, 7 and therewith
its affections. Again, you find in the place
above cited, that " He went forward a little
further, and fell on His face, praying, and
saying : Father, if it be possible."^ Not as
God, then, but as man, speaketh He, for
could God be ignorant of the possibility or
impossibility of aught.' Or is anything im-
possible for God, when the Scripture saith :
"For Thee nothing is impossible"? 9
43. Of Whom, howbeit, does He doubt —
of Himself, or of the Father? Of Him,
surely, Who saith : "Take away from Me,"
— being moved as man is moved to doubt.
The prophet reckons nothing impossible
with God. The prophet doubts not ; think
you that the Son doubts ? Wilt thou put God
lower than man ? What— God hath doubts
of His Father, and is fearful at the thought
of death ! Christ, then, is afraid — afraid,
whilst Peter fears nothing. Peter saith :
' I Tim. V. 15. - Ps. Ixxxix. 20.
•' lob xxxv-iii. 4-6; Isa. xl. 12-17.
■* Cf. the Collect for the Feast of St. Michael and all Angels.
•'• Col. i. 15, 16.
••■ S. Matt. xxvi. -^q ff. ; S. Matt. xiv. 155 ff. : S. l.uke xxii. 41 ff.
' /. e. human nature. Cf . " .Athanasian '
" S. Matt. xxvi. 39; S. Mark xiv. 35.
Creed, clause 31.
* Job xxii. 17.
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— BOOK 11.
229
" I will lay down my life for Thy sake."'
Christ saith : " My soul is troubled."^
44. Both records arc true, and it is equally
natural that the person who is the less
should not fear, as that He Who is the
greater should endure this feeling, for the
one has all a man's ignorance of the might
of death, whilst the other, as being God in-
habiting a body, displays the weakness of
the flesh, that the wickedness of those who
deny the mystery of the Incarnation might
have no excuse. Thus, tlien, hath He
spoken, yet the Manicha;an believed not ; -'
Valentinus denied, and Marcion judged
Him to be a ghost.
45. But indeed He so far put Himself on
a level with man, such as He showed Him-
self to be in the reality of His bodily frame,
as to say, "Nevertheless, not as I will, but
as Thou wilt, "4 though truly it is Christ's
especial power to will what the Father wills,
even as it is His to do what the Father
doeth.
46. Here, then, let there be an end of the
objection which it is your custom to oppose
to us. on the ground that the Lord said,
"Not as I will, but as Thou wilt;" and
again, "For this cause I came down from
heaven, not to do My own will, but the will
of Him that sent Me. "5
CHAPTER VL
The passages of Scripture above cited are taken as an
occasion for a digression, wherein our Lord's free-
dom of action is proved from the ascription to the
Spirit of such freedom, and from places where it is
attributed to the Son.
47. Let us now, for the present, explain
more fully why our Lord said, "If it be
possible," and so call a truce, as it were,
while we show that He possessed freedom
of will. Ye deny — so far are ye gone in the
way of iniquity — that the Son of God had a
free will. Moreover, it is your wont to de-
tract from the Holy Spirit, though you can-
not deny that it is written: "The Spirit
doth breathe, where He will. "^ "Where
1 S. John xiii. 37.
S. John xii. 27.
' The principle common to these and other like heretics (who
ignored or misconstrued many passages of Scripture which plainly
declare the completeness and truth of our Lord's humanity) was
that matter is inherently and by its very nature evil. Mani, there-
fore, and the rest were easily led to think, shame of attributing to
Christ a real, tangible, visible body. For the doctrines of Mani,
see note on I. 57. Valentinus wis a Gnostic, who lived at Rome
(whither he came fiom Alexandria) between 140 and 160 a.d.
Marcion became known as a heresiarch in the papacy of Eleuthe-
rius( '77-190 a.d). For the doctrines of Valentinus and Marcion, see
Robertson's Church History, Bk. I. ch. iv.
* S. Matt. xxvi. 39. " S. John vi. 38.
" S. John iii. 8. The same word, in Greek at least, serves to de-
note " wind " and " spirit " — the invisible and yet sensible and
real air, wind, or breath being taken as the best emblem of the
He will," saith the Scripture, not "where
He is ordered." If, then, the Spirit doth
breathe where He will, cannot the Son do
what He will } Why, it is the very same
Son of God Who in His Gospel saith that
the Spirit has power to breathe where He
will. Doth the Son, therefore, confess the
Spirit to be greater, in that He has power
to do what is not permitted to Himself.?
48. The Apostle also saith that " all is the
work of one and the same Spirit, distributing
to each according to His will." ' "According
to His will," mark you — that is, according
to the judgment of a free will, not in obedi-
ence to compulsion. Furthermore, the gifts
distributed by the Spirit are no mean gifts,
but such works as God is wont to do, — the
gift of healing and of working deeds of
power. While the Spirit, then, distributes
as He will, the Son of God cannot set free
whom He will. But hear Him speak when
He does even as He will : "I have willed
to do Thy will, O my God ;" ^ and again :
" I will offer Thee a freewill offering.'" ^
49. The holy Apostle later knew that
Jesus had it in His power to do as He would,
and therefore, seeing Him walk upon the
sea, said : ' ' Lord, if it be Thou, bid me come
to Thee over the waters."-* Peter believed
that if Christ commanded, the natural con-
ditions could be changed, so that water
might support human footsteps, and things
discrepant be reduced to harmony and
agreement. Peter asks of Christ to com-
mand, not to request : Christ requested not,
but commanded, and it was done — and
Arius denies it !
50. What indeed is there that the Father
will have, but the Son will not, or that the
Son will have, but the Father will not .-* " The
Father quicken eth whom He will," and the
Son quicken eth whom He will, even as it is
written. 5 Tell me now whom the Son hath
quickened, and the Father would not quicken.
Since, however, the Son quickeneth whom
He will, and the action [of Father and Son]
is one, you see that not only doeth the Son
the Father's will, but the Father also doeth
the .Sons. For what is quickening but
quickening through the passion of Christ.?
But the passion of Christ is the Father s will.
Whom, therefore, the Soti quickeneth, He
quickeneth by the will of the Father ; there-
fore their will is one.
51. Again, what was the will of the Father,
but that Jesus should come into the world
spirit, which is known and its presence realized only by its effects
Spiritus, " spirit," primarily means " breath."
' I Cor. xii. II. - Ps. xl. 10. ■* Ps. liv. 8.
* S. Matt. xiv. 28. = S. John v. 21.
230
ST. AMBROSE.
and cleanse us from our sins? Hear the
words of the leper: "If Thou wilt, Thou canst
make me clean. "' ' Christ answered, "I will. ''
and straightway health, the effect, followed.
See you not that the Son is master of His
own will, and Christ's will is the same as
the Father's. Indeed, seeing- that He hath
said, "All things that the Father hath are
Mine, "^ nothing of a certainty being ex-
cepted, the Son hath the same will that the
Father hath.
CHAPTER VII.
The resolution of the difficulty set forth for considera-
tion is again taken in hand. Christ truly and really
took upon Him a human will and affections, the
source of whatsoever was not in agreement with His
Godhead, and which must be therefore referred to
the fact that He was at the same time both God and
an.
52. There is, therefore, unity of will where
there is unity of working ; for in God His
will issues straightway in actual effect. But
the will of God is one, and the human will
another. Further, to show that life is the
object of human will, because w^e fear death,
whilst the passion of Christ depended on the
Divine Will, that He should suffer for us,
the Lord said, when Peter would have de-
tained Him from suffering : "Thou savour-
est not of the things which be of God, but
the things which be of men."^
53. My will, therefore, He took to Him-
self, my grief In confidence I call it grief,
because I preach His Cross. Mine is the
will which He called His own, for as man
He bore my grief, as man He spake, and
therefore said, "Not as I will, but as Thou
wilt."' Mine was the grief, and mine the
heaviness with which He bore it, for no
man exults when at the point to die. With
me and for me He suffers, for me He is sad,
for me He is heavy. In my stead, there-
fore, and in me He grieved Who had no
cause to grieve for Himself
54. Not Thy wounds, but mine, hurt Thee,
Lord Jesus ; not Thy death, but our weak-
ness, even as the Prophet saith : "For He
is afflicted for oursakes"4 — and we. Lord,
esteemed Thee afflicted, when Thou grievedst
not for Thyself, but for me.
55. And what wonder if He grieved for
all, Who wept for one .-* What wonder if, in
the hour of death. He is heavy for all. Who
wept when at the point to raise Lazarus
from the dead? Tlien, indeed. He was
1 S. Matt. viii. 2.
' S. Matt. xvi. 23.
- S. John xvi. 15.
* Is.i. liii. 4.
moved by a loving sister's tears, for they
touched His human heart, — here by secret
grief He brought it to pass that, even as His
death made an end of death, and His stripes
healed our scars, so also His sorrow took
away our sorrow. '
56. As being man, therefore, He doubts ;
as man He is amazed. Neither His power
nor His Godhead is amazed, but His soul ;
He is amazed by consequence of having
taken human infirmity upon Him. Seeing,
then, that He took upon Himself a soul
He also took the affections of a soul,^ for
God could not have been distressed or have
died in respect of His being God. Finally,
He cried: "My God, My God, why hast
Thou forsaken Me ? "^ As being man, there-
fore. He speaks, bearing with Him my ter-
rors, for when we are in the midst of dan-
gers we think ourself abandoned by God.
As man, therefore. He is distressed, as man
He weeps, as man He is crucified.
57. For so hath the Apostle Paul likewise
said : " Because they have crucified the
flesh of Christ. "4 And again the Apostle
Peter saith : "Christ having suffered accord-
ing to the flesh, "s It was the flesh, there-
fore, that suffered ; the Godhead above
secure from death; to suffering His body
yielded, after the law of human nature ; can
the (jodhead die, then, if the soul cannot ? ''
" Fear not them," said our Lord, "which
can kill the body, but cannot kill the soul."®
If the soul, then, cannot be killed, how can
the Godhead ?
58. When we read, then, that the Lord of
glory was crucified, let us not suppose that
He was crucified as in His glory. 7 It is
because He Who is God is also man, God by
virtue of His Divinity, and by taking upon
Him of the flesh, the man Christ Jesus, that
the Lord of glory is said to have been cru-
cified ; for, possessing both natures, that is,
' It is a very beautiful doctrine of the Fathers that Christ submitted
to the conditions and experiences of our life in order to restore and
sanctify and endue them with the virtue of His merits. Hence
Thomassini, after the Fathers, tlius discourses in iiis treatise on the
Incarnation: " Tlie Fathers liave been careful to attribute to the
Word of (Jod " (incarnate) " not only the physical parts — body and
soul — but even the smallest and most particular things: grief, fear,
tears; and all the emotions; conception, birth, babyhood ; all the
stages of life and growth : hunger, thirst, fatigue, and sadness, in
order that a remedy miglit be applied at even,' place where sin had
crept in, and that, as death had corrupted all, so upon all might the
water of life be sprinkled." C'.regory of Nazianzus strikingly ob-
serves {Or. 37): '■ Perchance indeed He sleeps, in order to bless
sleep : perchance, again. He is wear)', in order to sanctify weariness :
and perchance weeps, to give dignity to tears." Hurter ad loc,
who also cites Cyril of Alexandria on S. John xii. 27 — " Vou will
find each and ever\' human experience duly represented in Christ,
and that the affections of the flesh were called out into energ>'. not
that, as in us, they might gain ilie upper hand, but that, by the might
of the Word dwelling in flesh, they might be tamed and kept within
bounds, and our nature transformed into a better state."
^ Such as Aristotle enumerates in the Ethics, II. ch. 4 (5).
•' Ps. xxii. I ; .S. Matt, xxviii. 46; .S. Mark xv. 34.
* Gal. v. 24. (St. Ambrose lias made a curious use of this text).
^ I Pet. iv. 1. " S. Matt. x. 28. ' i Cor. ii. 8.
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— BOOK II.
231
the human and the divine, He endured the
Passion in His humanity, in order that with-
out distinction He Who suffered should be
called both Lord of glory and Son of
man, even as it is written : "Who descended
from heaven." '
CHAPTER VIII.
Christ's saying, " The Father is greater than I," is
explained in accordance with the principle just estab-
lished. Other like sayings are expounded in like
fashion. Our Lord cannot, as touching HLs God-
head, be called inferior to the Father.
59. It was due to His humanity, there-
fore, that our Lord doubted and was sore
distressed, and rose from the dead, for that
which fell doth also rise again. Again, it
was by reason of His humanity that He
said those words, which our adversaries use
to maliciously turn against Him : " Because
the Father is greater than I.'' ^
60. But when in another passage we read :
" I came out from the Father, and am come
into the world ; again, I leave the world,
and go to the Father," 3 how doth He go, ex-
cept through death, and how comes He,
save by rising again ? Furthermore, He
added, in order to show that He spake con-
cerning His Ascension : "Therefore have I
told' you before it come to pass, in order
that, when it shall have come to pass, ye
may believe. " ^ For He was speaking of the
sufferings and resurrection of His body, and
by that resurrection they who before doubted
were led to believe — for, indeed, God, Who
is always present in every place, passes not
from place to place. As it is a man who
goes, so it is He Himself Who comes.
Furthermore, He says in another place :
" Rise, let us go hence." 5 In that, there-
fore, doth He go and come, which is com-
mon to Him and to us.
61. How, indeed, can He be a lesser
God when He is perfect and true God ?
Yet in respect of His humanity He
is less — and still you wonder that speaking
in the person of a man He called the
Father greater than Himself, when in the
person of a man He called Himself a
worm, and not a man, saying : " But I am a
worm, and no man; " ^ and again : " He was
led as a sheep to the slaughter." 7
62. If you pronounce Him less than
the Father in this respect, I cannot deny
it ; nevertheless, to speak in the words of
* S. John iii. 13.
* S. John xiv. 20.
" Ps. xxii. 6.
^ S. John xiv. 28.
* S. John xiv. 31.
Isa. liii. 7.
S. John xvi. 2S.
Scripture, He was not begotten inferior, but
" made lower," ' that is, jnade inferior.
And how was He " made lower," except
that, " being in the form of God, He
thought it not a prey that He should be
equal with God, but emptied Himself ; " ^
not, indeed, parting with what He was, but
taking up what He was not, for " He took
the form of a servant." ^
63. Moreover, to the end that we might
know Him to have been " made lower,"
by taking upon Him a body, David has
shown that he is prophesying of a man,
'saying : " What is man, that Thou art mind-
ful of him, or the son of man, but that
Thou visitest him ? Thou hast made him a
little lower than the angels." 4 And in in-
terpreting this same passage the Apostle
says: "For we see Jesus, made a little
lower than the angels, crowned with glory
and honour because that He suffered death,
in order that apart from God He might taste
death for all. " s
64. Thus, the Son of God was made
lower than, not only the Father, but
angels also.- And if you will turn this to
His dishonour ; [I ask] is then the Son, in
respect of Plis Godhead, less than His
angels who serve Him and minister to
Him.? Thus, in your purpose to diminish
His honour, you run into the blasphemy of
exalting the nature of angels above the Son
of God. But " the servant is not above
his master."^ Again, angels ministered to
Him even after His Incarnation, to the end
that you should acknowledge Him to have
suffered no loss of majesty by reason of
His bodily nature, for God could not submit
to any loss of Himself, 7 whilst that which
He has taken of the Virgin neither adds to
nor takes away from His divine power.
65. He, therefore, possessing the fulness
of Divinity and glory,* is not, in respect of
His Divinity, inferior. Greater and less are
distinctions proper to corporeal existences ;
one who is greater is so in respect of rank,
or qualities, or at any rate of age. These
terms lose their meaning when we come to
treat of the things of God. He is common-
ly entitled the greater who instructs and
informs another, but it is not the case with
God's W'isdom that it has been built up by
teaching received from another, forasmuch
as Itself hath laid the foundation of all
teaching. But how wisely wrote the
Apostle: "In order that apart from God
iHeb. ii. 9. ^ phn. jj. 6, 7. ^ Phil. ii. 6, 7.
* Ps. viii. 5, 6. 8 Heb. ii. g. « S. Matt. x. 24.
^ For if that were so, God might cease to be God.
8 Col. ii. 9.
232
ST. AMBROSE.
He might taste death for all, " — lest we should
suppose the Godhead, not the flesh, to have
endured that Passion !
66. If our opponents, then, have found no
means to prove [the Father] greater [than
the Son], let them not pervert words unto
false reports, but seek out their meaning.
I ask them, therefore, as touching what do
they esteem the Father the greater ? If it
is because He is the Father, then [I
answer] here we have no question of age
or of time — the Father is not distinguished
by white hairs, nor the Son by youthfulness
— and it is on these conditions that the-
greater dignity of a father depends." ' But
"father" and "son " are names, the one of
the parent, the other of the child — names
which seem to join rather than separate ;
for dutifulness inspires no loss of personal
worth, inasmuch as kinship binds men to-
gether, and does not rend them asunder.
67. If, then, they cannot make the order
of nature a support for any questioning, let
them now believe the witness [of Scripture].
Now the Evangelist testifies that the Son is
not lower [than the Father] by reason of
being the Son ; nay, he even declares that,
in being the Son, He is equal, saying,
" For the Jews sought to kill Him for this
cause, that not only did He break the Sab-
bath, but even called God His own Father,
making Himself equal to God."^
68. This is not what the Jews said — it is
the Evangelist who testifies that, in calling
Himself God's own Son, He made Himself
equal to God, for the Jews are not presented
as saying, "For this cause we sought to
kill Him ;" the Evangelist, speaking for him-
self, says, " For the Jews sought to kill Him
for this cause. "3 Moreover, he has dis-
covered the cause, [in saying] that the Jews
were stirred with desire to slay Him because,
when as God He broke the Sabbath, and also
claimed God as His own Father, He ascribed
to Himself not only the majesty of divine
authority in breaking the Sabbath, but also,
in speaking of His Father, the right apper-
taining to eternal equality.
69. IVIost fitting was the answer which the
'Son of God made to these Jews, proving
Himself the Son and equal of God. " What-
soever things," He said, "the Father hath
* " In respect of age only does a father take precedence of his son
amongst men, for in regard to generic nature the father is on a level
with the son, and in other respects the son may even excel his
father. Hut where the Persons are eternal, there is no difference
constituted by age. Still, as St. Ambrose acutely remarks, the
names ' Father ' and ' Son ' indicate indeed a distinction of Persons
and mutual relations of those Persons, yet not diversity of nature
— rather, in fact, suppose equality and unity of nature." — Hurter in
loc.
' S. John V. 10. 3 ig^ i-ii^
done, the Son doeth also in like wise." '
The Son, therefore, is both entitled and
proved the equal of the Father — a true
equality, which both excludes difference of
Godhead, and discovers, together with the
Son, the Father also, to Whom the Son is
equal ; for there is no equality where there
is difference, nor again where there is but
one person, inasmuch as none is by himself
equal to himself. Thus hath the Evangelist
shown why it is fitting that Christ should
call Himself the Son of God, that is, make
Himself equal with God.
70. Hence the Apostle, following this
revelation, hath said : " He thought it not a
prey that He should be equal with God."*
For that which a man has not he seeks to
carry off as a prey. Equality with the
Father, therefore, which, as God and Lord,
He possessed in His own substance, He had
not as a spoil wrongfully seized. Wherefore
the Apostle added [the words] : " He took
the form of a servant.'" Now surely a ser-
vant is the opposite of an equal. Equal,
therefore, is the Son, in the form of God,
but inferior in taking upon Him of the flesh
and in His sufferings as a man. For how
could the same nature be both lower and
equal .'' And how, if [the Son] be inferior,
can He do the same things, in like manner,
as the Father doeth .-* How, indeed, can
there be sameness of operation with diversity
of power .? Can the inferior ever work such
effects as the greater, or can there be unity
of operation where there is diversity of sub-
stance.?
71. Admit, therefore, that Christ, as
touching His Godhead, cannot be called in-
ferior [to the Father]. 3 Christ speaks to
Abraham: "By Myself have I sworn. ''4
Now the Apostle shows that He Who swears
by Himself cannot be lower than any.
Thus he saith, "When God rewarded Abra-
ham with His promise. He swore by Him-
self, forasmuch as He had none other that
was greater, saying, Surely with blessing
will I bless thee, and with multiplying will
I multiply thee. "5 Christ had, therefore,
none greater, and for that cause sware He
by Himself. Moreover, the Apostle has
1 S. John. V. 19.
^ Phil. ii. 6. Here and in § 62 I have rendered " raftijia-m " in
accordance with Lightfoot's rendering of the original " opTra-c^o?. "
^ " Surely it is clear that the Son, in respect of His Godhead, is
not inferior to the Father, for there is, in the Father and the Son,
one and the same Godhead. .Still, the Greek Fathers allow that the
Father is not onlv greater than the Son in respect of the latter's
human nature, bi t.iKoin regard to personal properties, or a certain
' personal dignity '— (af (ouauTroffToTiKoi')." — Hurter /« loc. Canon
Mason, in his Faith 0/ the Gospel, remarks that whilst it is quite
right to speak of " God and His .Son " or " God's Son," the con-
vense language, " God and His Father," " God's Father," is not
right. Yet S. Ambrose says, " Dubitat de Patre Deus." See § 43.
* Gen. xxii. 16. '' Heb. vi. 13, 14.
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— BOOK II.
233
rightly added, " for men swear by one greater
than themselves," forasmuch as men have
one who is greater than themselves, but
God hath none.
72. Otherwise, if our adversaries will
understand this passage as referred to the
Father, then the rest of the record does not
agree with it. For the Father did not
appear to Abraham, nor did Abraham wash
the feet of God the Father, but the feet of
Him in Whom is the image of the man that
shall be.' Moreover, the Son of God saith,
"Abraham saw My day, and rejoiced."^
It is He, therefore. Who sware by Himself,
[and] Whom Abraham saw.
j'^. And how, indeed, hath He any greater
than Himself Who is one with the Father
in Godhead?^ Where there is unity, there
is no dissimilarity, whereas between greater
and less there is a distinction. The teach-
ing, therefore, of the instance from Scripture
before us, with regard to the Father and the
Son, is that neither is the Father greater,
nor hath the Son any that is above Him,
inasmuch as in Father and Son there is no
difference of Godhead parting them, but one
majesty.
CHAPTER IX.
The objection that the Son, being sent by the Father,
is, in that regard at least, inferior, is met by the
answer that He was also sent by the Spirit, Who is
yet not considered greater than the Son. Further-
more, the Spirit, in His turn, is sent by the Father to
the Son, in order that Their unity in action might be
shown forth. It is our duty, therefore, carefully to
distinguish what utterances are to be fitly ascribed
to Christ as God, and what to be ascribed to Him as
man.
74. I HAVE no fears in the matter of that
commonly advanced objection, that Christ
is inferior because He was sent. For even
if He be inferior, yet this is not so proved ; 4
on the other hand. His equal title to honour
is in truth proved. Since all honour the Son
as they honour the Father, s it is certain
that the Son is not, in so far as being sent,
inferior.
75. Regard not, therefore, the narrow
bounds of human language, but the plain
meaning of the words, and believe facts
accomplished. Bethink you that our Lord
Jesus Christ said in Isaiah that He had been
sent by the Spirit.^ Is the Son, therefore, less
* I John iii. 2, 3; Gen. xviii. 4. ^ S. John viii. 56.
' S. John X. 30.
* That is to say, it does not follow, from the fact that the Son was
sent, that He is inferior in nature. ^ S. John v. 23.
<" Isa. Ixi. I. " Since the Holy Scriptures frequently, in plain
words, teach the equality of the Son with the Father, and the Son's
than the Spirit because He was sent by the
Spirit.-* Thus you have the record, that the
Son declares Himself sent by the Father and
His Spirit. " I am the beginning," He saith, '
"and I live for ever, and My hand hath
laid the foundations of the earth. My right
hand hath made the heaven to stand abiding-
ly ;" ^ and further on : "I have spoken, and
I have called ; I have brought him, and
have made his way to prosper. Draw ye
near to Me, and hear these things : not in
secret have I spoken from the beginning.
When they were made, I was there : and
now hath the Lord and His Spirit sent
Me. "3 Here, indeed. He Who made the
heaven and the earth Himself saith that He
is sent by the Lord and His Spirit. Ye see,
then, that the poverty of language takes not
from the honour of His mission. He, then,
is sent by the Father ; by the Spirit also is
He sent.
76. And that you may gather that there is
no separating difference of majesty, the Son
in turn sends the Spirit, even as He Himself
hath said : ' ' But when the Comforter is come,
whom I will send you from My Father — the
Spirit of truth, who cometh forth from My
Father. "4 That this same Comforter is also
to be sent by the Father He has already
taught, saying, "But the Comforter, that
Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in
My name. "5 Behold their unity, inasmuch
as whom God the Father sends, the Son
sends also, and Whom the Father sends, the
Spirit sends also. Else, if the Arians will
not admit that the Son was sent, because
we read that the Son is the right hand of the
Father, then they themselves will confess
with respect to the Father, what they deny
concerning the Son, unless perchance they
discover for themselves either another Father
or another Son.
77. A truce, then, to vain wranglings over
words, for the kingdom of God, as it is
written, consisteth not in persuasive words,
but in power plainly shown forth. Let us
take heed to the distinction of the Godhead
from the flesh. In each there speaks one and
the same Son of God, for each nature is pre-
sent in Him ; yet while it is the same Person
Who speaks. He speaks not always in the
same manner. Behold in Him, now the
actual deeds likewise testify thereto, it is not permissible to call that
truth in question on the strength of a single phrase, which we are
compelled to make use of, in speaking of God, by reason of the limi-
tations of human language. For in speaking of God, and the things
of God, we make use of terms which we employ in treating of created
natures, and which on that account convey the notion of imperfec-
tion which is found only in such natures." — Hurler in loc.
' Isa. xlviii. 12.
2 Isa. xlvii. 13. "Mine hand also hath laid the foundation of
the earth, and My right hand hath spanned the heavens." — A.V.
3 Isa. xlviii. 15, 16. * S. John xv. 26. ^ S John xiv. 26.
234
ST. AMBROSE.
glory of God, now the affections of man.
As God He speaks the things of God, because
He is the Word ; as man He speaks the
things of man, because He speaks in my
nature.
78. " This is the living bread, which came
down from heaven."' This bread is His
flesh, even as He Himself said : "This bread
which I will give is IMy flesh. "^ This is
He Who came down from heaven, this is
He Whom the Father hath sanctified and
sent into this world. Even the letter itself
teaches us that not the Godhead but the
flesh needed sanctitication, for the Lord
Himself said, "And I sanctify Myself for
them," ^ in order that thou may est ac-
knowledge that He is both sanctified in the
flesh for us, and sanctifies by virtue of His
Divinity.
79. This is the same One Whom the Father
sent, but "born of a woman, born under
the law, "4 as the Apostle hath said. This
is He Who saith : "The Spirit of the Lord
is upon INIe ; wherefore He hath anointed
j\Ie, to bring good tidings to the poor hath
He sent Me : ' 5 This is He Who saith : My
doctrine is not Mine, but His, Who sent Me.
If any man will do His will, he shall know
of the doctrine, whether it be of God, or
whether I speak of Myself." ^ Doctrine that
is of God, then, is one thing ; doctrine that
is of man, another ; and so when the Jews,
regarding Him as man, called in question
His teaching,? and said, " How knoweth this
man letters, having never learnt.''" Jesus
answered and said, "My doctrine is not
Mine," for, in teaching without elegance of
letters, He seems to teach not as man, but
rather as God, having not learned, but de-
vised His doctrine.
80. For He hath found and devised all the
way of discipline, as we read above, inas-
much as of the Son of God it hath been said :
"This is our God, and none other shall be
accounted of in comparison with Him, Who
hath found all the way of discipline. After
these things He was seen on earth, and con-
versed with men."^ How, then, could He,
as divine, not have His own doctrine — He
Who hath found all the way of discipline
before He was seen on earth.'' Or how is
He inferior, of Whom it is said, "None shall
be accounted of in comparison with Him".?
* S. John vi. 51. ' S. John vii. 52. ^ S. John xvii. 19.
* Gal. iv. 4. 5 S. I. like iv. 18; Isa. Ixi. i. " S. John vii. 16.
' " re^rding Him as man." In the original " secundn»i hovii-
nem," lit. " after the way, or manner, of man." If the Jews had
accepted Jesus Christ's teachings as divine, they would not have
questioned it. But they acted as though they were confronted with
one who was no more than man, and whose authority therefore was
properly liable to be called in question.
* Haruch iii. 36 ff.
Surely He is entitled incomparable, in com-
parison of Whom none other can be ac-
counted of — yet so that He cannot be ac-
counted of before the Blather. Now if men
suppose that the Father is spoken of, they
shall not escape running into the blasphemy
of Sabellius, of ascribing the assumption of
human nature to the Father.
81. Let us proceed with what follows.
"He who speaketh of himself, seeketh his
own glory. " ' See the unity wherein Father
and Son are plainly revealed.^ He who
speaks cannot but be : yet that which He
speaks cannot be solely from Him, for in
Him all that is, is naturally derived from the
Father.
82. What now is the meaning of the words
"seeketh his own glory".? That is, not a
glory in which the Father has no part —
for indeed the Word of God is His glory.
Again, our Lord saith : "that they may see
My glory. "3 But that glory of the Word is
also the glory of the Father, even as it is
written: "The Lord Jesus Christ is in the
glory of God the Father. " 4 In regard of
His Godhead, therefore, the Son of God so
hath His own glory, that the glory of Father
and .Son is one : He is not, therefore, in-
ferior in splendour, for the glory is one, nor
lower in Godhead, for the fulness of the
Godhead is in Christ, s
%'^. How, then, you ask, is it written,
"Father, the hour is come; glorify Thy
Son } " ^ He Who saith these words needs to
be glorified, say you. Thus far you have
eyes to see; the remainder of the Scripture
you have not read, for it proceeds: "that
Thy Son may glorify Thee." Hath ever
the Father need of any, in that He is to be
glorified by the Son ?
CHAPTER X.
The objection taken on the ground of the Son's obedi-
ence is disproved, and the unity of power, Godhead,
and operation in the Trinity set forth. Christ's obe-
dience to His mother, to whom He certainly cannot
be called inferior, is noticed.
84. In like manner our adversaries com-
monly make a difficulty of the Sons obedi-
ence, forasmuch as it is written : "And
' S. John. vii. i8.
- " In these words attention is called to the Unity of Nature (or
Substance) in distinct Persons, for in the verj' act of speaking and
teaching, the Son shows that He is a Person, but He Who speaks
not of Himself, but as the Father hath taught Him, shows that He
is distinct from the Father, and yet He has, with the Father, one
and the same doctrine, and therefore one and the same nature ; for,
in God, being and knowing are one and the same." — Hurter.
^ S. John xvii. 24. ■* Phil. ii. 1 1 (another instance of adaptation).
^ Col. i. 19; ii. 9. " S. John xvii. i.
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— BOOK II.
235
being found in appearance as a man, He
humbled Himself, and became obedient
even unto death."' The writer has not
only told us that the Son was obedient even
unto death, but also first shown that He
was man, in order that we might under-
stand that obedience unto death was the
part not of His Godhead but of His Incar-
nation, whereby He took upon Himself
both the functions and the names belonging
to our nature.
85. Thus we have learnt that the power
of the Trinity is one, as we are taught both
in and after the Passion itself : tor the Son
suffers through His body, which is the
earnest of it ; the Holy Spirit is poured upon
the apostles : into the Father's hands the spirit
is commended; furthermore, God is with a
mighty voice proclaimed the Father. We
have learnt that there is one form, one like-
ness, one sanctification, of the Father and of
the Son, one activity, one glory, finally,
one Godhead.
86. There is, therefore, but one only God,
for it is written: "Thou shalt worship the
Lord thy God, and Him only shalt thou
serve. "^ One God, not in the sense that
the Father and the Son are the same Person,
as the ungodly Sabellius affirms — but foras-
much as there is one Godhead of the Father
and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost. But
where there is one Godhead, there is one
will, one purpose.
87. Again, that thou mayest know that
the Father is, and the Son is, and that the
work of the Father and of the Son is one,
follow the saying of the Apostle : " Now
may God Himself, and our Father, and our
Lord Jesus Christ direct our way unto you. " ^
Both Father and Son are named, but there
is unity of direction, ■♦ because unity of
power. So also in another place we read :
"Now may our Lord Himself, Jesus Christ,
and God and our Father, Who hath loved
us, and given us eternal consolation, and
good hope in grace, console and strengthen
your hearts, "s How perfect a unity it is
that the Apostle presents to us, insomuch
that the fount of consolation is not many,
but one. Let doubt be dumb, then, or, if
it will not be overcome by reason, let the
thought of our Lord's gracious kindliness
bend it.
88. Let us call to mind how kindly our
Lord hath dealt with us, in that He taught
us not only faith but manners also. For,
* Phil. ii. 7, 8. 2 Deut. vi. 13. * i Thess. iii. 11.
* The act of direction is one, and, correspondingly, the verb
' direct " is, in the Latin and the Greek, put in the singular number
'3 Thess. ii. 15, 16.
having taken His place in the form of man.
He was subject to Joseph and Mary.' Was
He less than all mankind, then, because He
was subject ? The part of dutifulness is
one, that of sovereignty is another, but
dutifulness doth not exclude sovereignty.
Wherein, then, was He subject to the
Father's law ? In His body, surely, where-
in He was subject to His mother.
CHAPTER XL
The purpose and healing effects of the Incarnation.
The profitableness of faith, whereby we know that
Christ bore all infirmities for our sakes, — Christ,
Whose Godhead revealed Itself in His Passion ;
whence we understand that the mission of the Son
of God entailed no subservience, which belief we
need not fear lest it displease the Father, Who
declares Himself to be well pleased in His Son.
89. Let us likewise deal kindly, let us
persuade our adversaries of that which is to
their profit, "let us worship and lament be-
fore the Lord our Maker. "^ For we would
not overthrow, but rather heal ; we lay no
ambush for them, but warn them as in duty
bound. Kindliness often bends those whom
neither force nor argument will avail to
overcome. Again, our Lord cured with oil
and wine the man who, going down from
Jerusalem to Jericho, fell among thieves ;
having forborne to treat him with the harsh
remedies of the Law or the sternness of
Prophecy.
90. To Him, therefore, let all come who
would be made whole. Let them receive
the medicine which He hath brought down
from His Father and made in heaven, pre-
paring it of the juices of those celestial
fruits that wither not. This is of no earthly
growth, for nature nowhere possesseth this
compound. Of wondrous purpose took He
our flesh, to the end that He might show
that the law of the flesh had been subjected
to the law of the mind. He was incarnate,
that He, the Teacher of men, might over-
come as man.
91. Of what profit would it have been to
me, had He, as God, bared the arm of His
power, and only displayed His Godhead
inviolate ? Why should He take human
nature upon Him, but to suffer Himself to
be tempted under the conditions of my
nature and my weakness .'* It was right
that He should be tempted, that He should
suffer with me. to the end that I might
know how to conquer when tempted, how
* S. Luke ii. 51.
^ Ps. xcv. 6. St. Ambrose follows the LXX.
236
ST. AMBROSE.
to escape when hard pressed. He over-
came by force of continence, of contempt
of riches, of faith ; He trampled upon am-
bition, fled from intemperance, bade wan-
tonness be far from Him.
93. This medicine Peter beheld, and left
His nets, that is to say, the instruments and
security of gain, renouncing the lust of the
flesh as a leaky ship, that receives the bilge,
as it were, of multitudinous passions.
Truly a mighty remedy, that not only re-
moved the scar of an old wound, but even
cut the root and source of passion. O Faith,
richer than all treasure-houses ; O excellent
remedy, healing our wounds and sins !
92. Let us bethink ourselves of the profit-
ableness of right belief. It is profitable to
me to know that for my sake Christ bore
my infirmities, submitted to the affections
of my body, that for me, that is to say,
for every man, He was made sin, and a
curse,' that for me and in me was He
humbled and made subject, that for me He
is the Lamb, the Vine, the Rock,^ the
Servant, the Son of an handmaid,^ knowing
not the day of judgment, for my sake igno-
rant of the day and the hour. 4
94. For how could He, Who hath made
days and times, be ignorant of the day ?
How could He not know the day. Who
hath declared both the season of Judgment
to come, and the cause ? ^ A curse, then,
He was made not in respect of His God-
head, but of His flesh ; for it is written :
"Cursed is everyone that hangeth on a
tree."^ In and after the flesh, therefore.
He hung, and for this cause He, Who bore
our curses, became a curse. 7 He wept that
thou, man, mightest not weep long. He
endured insult, that thou mightest not
grieve over the wrong done to thee.^
95. A glorious remedy — to have consola-
tion of Christ ! For He bore these things
*2 Cor. V. 21 ; Gal. iii. 13.
* S. John i. 29, 36 ; xv. i ; i Cor. x. 4.
' S. Mark x. 45 ; S. John xiii. 4, 5 ; Ps. Ixxxvi. 16 ; cxvi. 14 ; S.
Luke i. 38.
* S. Matt. xxiv. 36. On this place Hurter observes : " We must
certainly believe that Christ, as man, knew, through His human
understanding, the day and the hour of judgment — though not by
virtue of the natural power of that human understanding. Accord-
ingly, unless we are without sufficient reason to charge the holy
Doctor with erroneous views, these words must be explained as
meaning that Christ behaved Himself as though He knew not the
day of Judgment, and as though He were a servant, though in
reality He was not a servant, but the Son of God. And truly Christ
did ' for my sake ' — t.e. in order to set me an example — conceal
many titles and powers which He really possessed : thus, for thirty
years He did no miracle." Cf. Bk. V. § 53. " He feigns igno-
rance, that He may make the ignorant wise.
* See S. Matt. xxiv. 22 and 29; Ps. xcvi. 13; xcviii. 10.
' Deut. xxi. 23 ; Gal. iii. 13.
' This it is that has constituted the " offence of the Cross." — Gal.
V. II ; I Cor. i. 22.
' i.e. the sorrows met with during our passage through the world,
by reason of human unkindness. Or perhaps the possessive ad-
jective may be taken as equivalent to a sul)j. genitive, and we
should render by " the wrong that thou hast done."
with surpassing patience for our sakes — and
we forsooth cannot bear them with common
patience for the glory of His Name ! Who
may not learn to forgive, when assailed,
seeing that Christ, even on the Cross,
prayed, — yea, for them that persecuted
Him ? See you not that those weaknesses,
as you please to call them, of Christ's are
your strength r^ ' Why question Him in the
matter of remedies for us? His tears wash
us, His weeping cleanses us, — and there is
strength in this doubt, at least, that if you
begin to doubt, you will despair. The
greater the insult, the greater is the gratitude
due.
96. Even in the very hour of mockery and
insult, acknowledge His Godhead. He hung
upon the Cross, and all the elements did
Him homage.^ The sun withdrew his rays,
the daylight vanished, darkness came down
and covered the land, the earth trembled ;
yet He Who hung there trembled not.
What was it that these signs betokened, but
reverence for the Creator } That He hangs
upon the Cross — this, thou Arian, thou re-
gardest ; that He gives the kingdom of
God — this, thou regardest not. That He
tasted of death, thou readest, but that He
also invited the robber into paradise,^ to
this thou givest no heed. Thou dost gaze
at the women weeping by the tomb, but not
upon the angels keeping watch by it.*
What He said, thou readest : what He did,
thou dost not read. Thou sayest that the
Lord said to the Canaanitish woman: "I
am not sent, but to the lost sheep of the house
of Israel," s thou dost not say that He did
what He was besought by her to do.
97. Thou shouldst hereby understand
that His being "sent" means not that He
was compelled, at the command of another,
but that He acted, of free will, according to
His own judgment, otherwise thou dost
accuse Him of despising His Father. For
if, according to thine expounding, Christ
had come into Jewry, as one executing the
Father's commands, to relieve the inhabi-
tants of Jewry, and none besides, and yet
before that was accomplished, set free the
Canaanitish woman's daughter from her
complaint, surely He was not only the exe-
cutor of another's instruction, but was free to
exercise His own judgment. But where there
is freedom to act as one will, there can be
no transgressing the terms of one's mission,
98. Fear not that the Son's act displeased
the Father, seeing that the Son Himself
*2 Cor. xii. g; xiii. 4; 1 Pet. ii. 24; iv. 13.
2 S. Matt, xxvii. 51.
* S. John XX. II, 12.
' S. Luke xxiii. 43.
"^ S. Matt. XV. 24.
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— BOOK II.
237
saith : "Whatsoever things are His good
pleasure, I do always," and "The works
that I do, He Himself doeth. " ' How, then,
could the I'^ather be displeased with that
which He Himself did through the Son?
For it is One God, Who, as it is written,
" hath justified circumcision in consequence
of faith, and uncircumcision through faith." ^
99. Read all the Scriptures, mark all dili-
gently, you will then find that Christ so
manifested Himself that God mig-ht be dis-
cerned in man. Misunderstand not malici-
ously the Son's exultation in the Father,
when you hear the Father declaring His
pleasure in the Son.
CHAPTER XII.
Do the Catholics or the Arians take the better course
to assure themselves of the favour of Christ as their
Judge? An objection grounded on Ps. ex. i is dis-
posed of, it being shown that when the .Son is invited
by the Father to sit at His right hand, no subjection
is intended to be signified — nor yet any preferment,
in that the Son sits at the Father's right hand. The
truth of the Trinity of Persons in God, and of the
Unity of their Nature, is shown to be proved by the
angelic Trisagion.
ICO. HowBEiT, if our adversaries cannot
be turned by kindness, let us summon them
before the Judge. To what Judge, then,
shall we go ? Surely to Him Who hath the
Judgment. To the Father, then ? Nay, but
"the Father judgeth no man, for He hath
given all judgment to the Son."^ He hath
given, that is to say, not as of largess, but
in the act of generation. See, then, how
unwilling He was that thou shouldst dis-
honour His Son — even so that He gave Him
to be thy Judge.
loi. Let us see, then, before the judgment
which hath the better cause, thou or I ?
Surely it is the care of a prudent party to
a suit to gain first the favourable regard of
the judge. Thou dost honour man, — dost
thou not honour God.'' Which of the two,
I ask, wins the favour of the magistrate —
respect or contempt .-' Suppose that I am
in error — as I certainly am not : is Christ
displeased with the honour shown Him ?
We are all sinners — who, then, will deserve
forgiveness, he who renders worship, or he
who displays insolence.''
102. If reasoning move thee not, at least
let the plain aspect of the judgment move
thee ! Raise thine eyes to the Judge, see
Who it is that is seated, with Whom He is
' S. John viii. 29; xiv. ij.
2 S. John V. a.
' Rom. iii. 30,
seated, and where. Christ sitteth at the
right hand of the Father. If with thine
eyes thou canst not perceive this, hear the
words of the prophet : "The Lord said unto
my Lord, Sit Thou on ]\Iy right hand." '
The Son, therefore, sitteth at the right hand
of the Father. Tell me now, thou who
boldest that the things of God are to be
judged of from the things of this world —
say whether thou thinkest Him Who sits at
the right hand to be lower.? Is it any dis-
honour to the Father that He sits at the
Son's left hand ? The Father honours the
Son, and thou makest it to be insult ! The
Father would have this invitation to be a
sign of love and esteem, and thou wouldst
make it an overlord's command ! Christ
hath risen from the dead, and sitteth at the
right hand of God.
103. "But," you object, "the Father
said." Good, hear now a passage where
the Father doth not speak, and the Son
prophesies: "Hereafter ye shall see the
Son of Man sitting at the right hand of
power. "2 This He said with regard to tak-
ing back to Himself His body — to Him 3 the
Father said : "Sit Thou at My right hand."
If indeed you ask of the eternal abode of
the Godhead, He said — when Pilate asked
Him whether He were the King of the Jews
— "For this I was born." 4 And so indeed
the Apostle shows that it is good for us to
believe that Christ sitteth at the right hand
of God, not by command, nor of any boon,
but as God's most dearly beloved Son. For
it is written for you : "Seek the things that
are above, where Christ is, sitting at the
right hand of God ; savour the things that
are above, "s This is to savour the things
that be above — to believe that Christ, in His
sitting, does not obey as one who receives
a command, but is honoured as the well-
beloved Son. It is with regard, then, to
Christ's Body that the Father saith: "Sit
Thou at My right hand, until I make Thine
enemies Thy footstool."
104. If, again, you seek to pervert the
sense of these words, "I will make Thine
enemies Thy footstool," I answer that the
Father also bringeth to the Son such as the
Son raiseth up and quickeneth. For "No
man," saith Christ, "can come to Me, except
the Father, Which hath sent INIe, draw him,
and I will raise him up at the last day."^
And you say that the Son of God is subject
* Ps. ex. I. 25. Matt. xxvi. 64.
^ i.e. to the risen Christ. Eph. i. 20.
* St. Ambrose's words are : " /« Aoc sum naius." It is possible
that St. Ambrose understands " in hoc " as meaniDg " w£e "
" here ; " sc. " at God's right hand."
^ Col. iii. 3. 6 s. John vL 44.
238
ST. AMBROSE.
by reason of weakness — the Son, to Whom
the Father bringeth men that He may raise
them up in the last day. Seemeth this in
your eyes to be subjection, I pray you,
where the kingdom is prepared for the
Father, and the Father bringeth to the Son,
and there is no place for perversion of
words, since the Son giveth the kingdom to
the Father, and none is preferred before
Him ? ' For inasmuch as the Father render-
eth to the Son, and the Son, again, to the
Father, here are plain proofs of love and
regard : seeing that They so render, the One
to the Other, that neither He Who receiveth
obtaineth as it were what was another's, nor
He That rendereth loseth.
105. Moreover, the sitting at the right
hand is no preferment, nor doth that at the
left hand betoken dishonour, for there are no
degrees in the Godhead, Which is bound by
no limits of space or time, which are the
weights and measures of our puny human
minds. There is no difference of love,
nothing that divideth the Unity.
106. But wherefore roam so far afield.?
Thou hast looked upon all around thee, thou
hast seen the Judge, thou hast remarked
the angels proclaiming Him. They praise,
and fhou revilest Him ! Dominations and
powers fall down before Him — thou speakest
evil of His Name ! All His Saints adore
Him, but the Son of God adores not, nor
the Holy Spirit. The seraphim say: " Holy,
Holy, Holy ! " ^
107. What meaneth this threefold utterance
of the same name "Holy".? If thrice
repeated, why is it but one act of praise ?
If one act of praise, why a threefold repeti-
tion ? Why the threefold repetition, unless
that the Father and the Son and the Holy
Spirit are one in holiness ? The seraph
spake the name, not once, lest he should
exclude the Son; not twice, lest he should pass
by the Holy Spirit ; not four times, lest he
should conjoin created beings [in the praise
of the Creator]. Furthermore, to show that
the Godhead of the Trinity is One, he,
after the threefold "Holy," added in the
singular number ' ' the Lord God of Sabaoth. "
Holy, therefore, is the Father, holy the Son,
holy likewise the Spirit of God, and there-
fore is the Trinity adored, but adores not,
and is praised, but praises not. As for me,
I will rather believe as the seraphim, and
adore after the manner of all the principali-
ties and powers of heaven.
• This prerogative — viz. of sitting at the right hand of the Father
— in itself is sufficient ;o exclude any dishonourable suspicion that
the Son is a subject and servant. (Hurler.)
2 Isa. vi. 3.
CHAPTER XIII.
The wicked and dishonourable opinions held by Arians,
Sabellians, and Manichceans as concerning their
Judge are shortly refuted. Christ's remonstrances
regarding the rest of His adversaries being set forth,
.St. Ambrose expresses a hope of milder judgment
for himself.
108. Let us proceed, then, with your
accusations, and see how you gain the
favour of your Judge. Speak now, speak, I
say, and tell Him: "I consider Thee, O
Christ, to be unlike Thy Father ; " and He
will answer : " Mark, if thou canst, mark, I
say, and tell Me wherein thou boldest Me to
differ."
109. Say again : "I judge Thee to be a
created being ; " and Christ will reply : " If
the witness of two men is true, oughtest
thou not to have believed both Me and My
Father, Who hath called Me His Son .? "
no. Then you will say: "I deny Thy
[perfect] goodness ; " and He will answer :
" Be.it unto thee according to thy faith ; so
will I not be good to thee."
111. "That Thou art Almighty, I hold
not ; " and He will answer, in turn : "Then
can I not forgive thee thy sins."
112. "Thou art a subject being." Where-
to He will reply: "Why, then, dost thou
seek freedom and pardon of Him Whom
thou thinkest to be subject as a slave.? "
113. I see your accusation halt here. I
press you not, forasmuch as I myself know
my own sins. I grudge you not pardon, for
I myself would obtain indulgence, but I
would know the object of your prayers.
Look, then, whilst I recite before the Judge
your desires. I betray not your sins, but
look to behold your prayers and wishes set
forth in their order.
114. Speak, therefore, those desires, w^hich
all alike would have granted to them.
make me in the image of God."
He will
The
nnage
answer :
which
In what
thou hast
"Lord,
Whereto
image ?
denied.? "
115. "Make me incorruptible." Surely
His reply will be : "How can I make thee
incorruptible, I, Whom thou callest a created
being, and so wouldst make out to be cor-
ruptible .? The dead shall rise purified from
corruption — dost thou call Him corruptible
Whom thou seest to be God .? "
116. "Be good to me. " " Why dost thou
ask what thou hast denied [to Me] .? I
would have had thee to be good, and I said
' Be ye holy, for I Myself am holy,' '
1 Lev. xix. 2.
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— BOOK II.
239
and thou settest thyself to deny that I am
good? Dost ///o« then look for forgiveness
of sins ? Nay, none can forgive sins, but
God alone.' Seeing, then, that to thee I am
not the true and only God, I cannot by any
means forgive thee thy sins."
117. Thus let the followers of Arius and
Photinus speak. "1 deny Thy (jodhead."
To whom the Lord will make answer :
'"The fool hath said in his heart : There is
no God'- Of whom, think you, is this
said.^ — of Jew or Gentile, or of the devil.
Whosoever he be of whom it is said, O
disciple of Photinus, he is more to be borne
with, who held his peace ; ^ thou, never-
theless, hast dared to lift up thy voice to
utter it, that thou mightest be proved more
foolish than the fool. Thou deniest My
Godhead, whereas I said, ' Ye are gods,
and ye are all the children of the Most
Highest .' ' •♦ And thou deniest Him to be
God, Whose godlike works thou seest around
thee. "
118. Let the Sabellian speak in his turn.
" I consider Thee, by Thyself, to be at once
Father and Son and Holy Spirit." To whom
the Lord: "Thou hearest neither the
Father nor the Son. Is there any doubt on
this matter .'' The Scripture itself teaches
thee that it is the Father Who giveth over
the judgment, and the Son Who judges. s
Thou hast not given ear to My words :
' I am not alone, but I and 'the Father, Who
sent Me.' "^
119. Now let the Manichaean have his
word. " I hold that the devil is the creator
of our flesh. " The Lord will answer him :
"What, then, doest thou in the heavenly
places .'' Depart, go thy way to thy creator.
' My will is that they be with Me, whom
my Father hath given Me.' Thou, Mani-
chaean, boldest thyself for a creature of the
devil ; hasten, then, to his abode, the place
of fire and brimstone, where the fire thereof
is not quenched, lest ever the punishment
have an end."
120. I set aside other heretical — not per-
sons, but portents. What manner of judg-
ment awaits them, what shall be the form of
their sentence .? To all these He will, in-
deed, reply, rather in sorrow than in anger :
1 S. Mark. ii. 7.
2 Ps. xiv. I ; liii. i. These words mean, not so much that a man
says " There is no God " because he is a fool, because he is want-
ing in intelligence, but rather that when a man has left off to be-
have himself wisely and to do good — i.e. does foolishly, that is to
say, wickedly — it is because he has said in his heart, "There is no
God."
^ The " fool " {i.e. wicked man) has only said in his heart, secretly,
" No God ■' — he has not ventilated his atheism.
* Ps. Ixxxii. 6 ; S. John x. 34 ff.
^ S. John V. 22. ^ S. John viii. 16; xvi. 32.
' S. John xvii. 24.
"O My people, what have I done unto
thee, wherein have I vexed thee ? Did I
not bring thee up out of Egypt, and lead
thee out of the house of bondage into lib-
erty .? " ■
121. But it is not enough to have brought
us out of Fgypt into freedom, and to have
saved us from the house of bondage : a
greater boon than this. Thou hast given
Thyself for us. Thou wilt say then : "Have
I not borne all your sufferings ? ^ Have
I not given My Body for you .'' Have I not
sought death, which had no part in My
Godhead, but was necessary for your re-
demption ? Are these the thanks I am to
receive } Is it this that My Blood hath
gained, even iis I spake in times past by the
mouth of the prophet: 'What profit is there
in My Blood, for that I have gone down to
corruption V '^ Is this the profit, that you
should wickedly deny Me — you, for whom
I endured those things } "
122. As for me, Lord Jesu, though I am
conscious within myselfof great sin, yet will
I say : "I have not denied Thee; Thou
mayest pardon the infirmity of my flesh.
My transgression I confess ; my sin I deny
not. 4 If Thou wilt Thou canst make me
clean. 5 For this saying, the leper obtained
his request. Enter not, I pray, into judg-
ment with Thy servant.^ I ask, not that Thou
mayest judge, but that Thou mayest for-
give."
CHAPTER XIV.
The sentence of the Judge is set forth, the counter-
pleas of the opposers are considered, and the finality
of the sentence, from which there is no appeal,
proved.
123. What verdict do we look for from
Christ.? That do I know. Do I say, what
verdict will He give.? Nay, He hath already
pronounced sentence. We have it in our
hands. "Let all," saith He, " honour the
Son, even as they honour the Father. He
that honoureth not the Son, honoureth not
the Father, Who hath sent Him. '"^
124. If the sentence please you not, ap-
peal to the Father, cancel the judgment that
the Father hath given. Say that He hath
a Son Who is unlike Him. He will reply :
"Then have I lied, I, Who said to the Son,
'Let us make man in Our image and like-
ness. "
125. Tell the Father that He hath created
1 Micah vi. 3 ; Ex. xx. 2. " Isa. liii. 4. ' Ps. xxx. g..
* Ps. xxxii. 5 : li. 3. '' S. Matt. viii. 2..
8 Ps. cxliii. 2. ' S. John v. 23. * Gen. i. 26.
240
ST. AMBROSE.
the Son, and He will answer : "Why, then,
hast thou worshipped One Whom thou
thoughtest to be a created being ? "
126. Tell Him that He hath begotten a
Son Who is inferior to Himself, and He will
reply : "Compare Us, and let Us see."
127. Tell Him that you owed no credence
to the Son, whereto He will answer : "Did
I not say to thee, ' This is My well-beloved
Son, in Whom I am well pleased : hear ye
Him ' ? " ' What mean these words "hear ye
Him," if not " Hear Him when He saith :
'All things that the Father hath are
Mine' "? ^ This did the apostles hear, even
as it is written : " And they fell upon their
faces, and were greatly afraid."^ If they
who confessed Him fell to the earth, what
shall they do who have denied Him ? But
Jesus laid His hand upon His apostles, and
raised them up — you He will suffer to lie
prone, that ye may see not the glory ye
have denied.
128. Let us look to it, then, forasmuch
as whom the Son condemneth, the Father
condemneth also, and therefore let us honour
the Son, even as we honour the Father, that
by the Son we may be able to come to the
Father.
CHAPTER XV.
St. Ambrose deprecates any praise of his own merits :
in any case, the Faith is sufficiently defended by the
authoritative support of holy Scripture, to whose
voice the Arians, stubborn as the Jews, are deaf.
He prays that they may be moved to love the
truth ; meanwhile, they are to be avoided, as heretics
and enemies of Christ.
129. These arguments, your Majesty, I
have set forth, briefly and summarily, in the
rough, rather than in any form of full explana-
tion and exact order. If indeed the Arians
regard them as imperfect and unfinished, I
indeed confess that they are scarce even
begun ; if they think that there be any still
to be brought forward, I allow that there be
well-nigh all ; for whereas the unbelievers are
in uttermost need of arguments, the faithful
have enough and to spare. Indeed, Peter's
single confession was abundant to warrant
faith in Christ: "Thou art the Christ, the
Son of the living God ;" * for it is enough to
know His Divine Generation, without divi-
sion or diminution, being neither derivation
nor creation. 5
' S. Matt. xvii. 5. ^ .S. John xvi. 15; xvii. 10.
■ ' S. Matt. xvii. 6.
* S. Matt. xvi. 16 : Mark viii. 30. Cf. Peter's other confession,
S. John vi. 69, and Martha's confession in .S. John xi. 27.
^ " Without division or diminution," i.e. the generation of the
Sod entails no division or partition of the Godhead, still less any
130. This, indeed, is declared in the books
of Holy Writ, one and all, and yet is still
doubted by misbelievers: "For," as it is
written, ' ' the heart of this people is become
gross, and with their ears they have been
dull of hearing, and their eyes have they
darkened, lesteverthey should see with their
eyes, and hear with their ears, and under-
stand in their heart." ' For, like the Jews,
the Arians' wont is to stop their ears, or
make an uproar, as often as the Word of
salvation is heard.
131. And what wonder, if unbelievers
doubt the word of man, when they refuse to
believe the Word of God .? The Son of God,
as you will find it written in the Gospel,
said: "Father, glorify Thy Name," and from
heaven was heard the voice of the Father,
saying : " I have both glorified it, and again
will glorify. '' ^ These words the unbelievers
heard, but believed not. The Son spake,
the Father answered, and the Jews said :
" A peal of thunder answered Him ; " others
said: "An angel spake to Him."^
132. Paul, moreover, as it is written in
the Acts of the Apostles,-* when by the
Voice of Christ he received the call of grace,
several companions journeying with him at
the same time, alone said that he had heard
Christ's Voice. Thus, your sacred Majesty,
he who believes, hears — and he hears, that
he may believe, whilst he who believes not,
hears not, nay, he will not, he cannot hear,
lest he should believe !
133. As for me, indeed, would that they
might have a will to hear, that they might
believe — to hear with true love and meek-
ness, as men seeking what is true, and not
assailing all truth. For it is written that
we pay no heed to "endless fables and
genealogies, which do rather raise disputes
than set forward the godly edification,
which is in faith. But the aim of the charge
is love from a pure heart, and a good con-
science, and faith unfeigned, whence some
have erred and betaken themselves to
empty babbling, desirous of being teachers
diminution of it. The Father is none the less God. //is Godhead
loses nothing by His begetting His Eternal Son. Some manu-
scripts have "liemutatam" instead of '^ demitntta})!'" here — i.e.
" changed " for " diminished." Certainly the begetting of the Son
can make no change whatever in the Being of the Father, for the
Divine Generation is "from everlasting to everlasting," and is neces-
sarily implied in the ver\' Fatherhood, the personal essence, of the
Father. Hurter quotes St. Hilary, /?(? Tri>i. 6, 10. "The Church
knows of no apportionment made to the Son, but knows Him as
perfect God of perfect God, as One begotten of One, not shorn off
from Him, but bom : she knows the Nativity to entail no diminu-
tion of Him Who begets, nor weakness in Him Who is bom." The
fact is a spiritual relation, metaphysical in the highest sense, tran-
scending our intelligence, and only to be apprehended by faith, sim-
ply as a fact— as the ap\ri, or principle, which is sufficient for us.
The " how " we must wait to have revealed to us hereafter, if we
shall ever be able to receive it.
' Isa. vi. lo. ' S. John xii. 28.
^ S. John xii. 39. * Acts xxii. 9.
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITIL— BOOK II.
241
of the law, without understanding- the words
they say, nor the things whereof they speak
with assurance."' In another place also
the same Apostle saith : "But foolish and
ignorant questionings do thou avoid." ^
134. Such men, who sow disputes — that
is to say, heretics — the Apostle bids us leave
alone. Of them he says in yet another
place, that "certain shall depart from the
faith, giving heed to deceitful spirits, and the
doctrines of devils." ^
135. John, likewise, saith that heretics
are Antichrists,-* plainly marking out the
Arians. For this [Arian]. heresy began to
be after all other heresies, and hath gathered
the poisons of all. As it is written of the
Antichrist, that "he opened his mouth to
blasphemy against God, to blaspheme His
Name, and to make war with His saints," ^
so do they also dishonour the Son of God,
and His martyrs have they not spared.
Moreover, that which perchance Antichrist
will not do, they have falsified the holy
Scriptures. And thus he who saith that
Jesus is not the Christ, the same is Anti-
christ ; he who denies the Saviour of the
world, denies Jesus ; he who denies the Son,
denies the Father also, for it is written ;
"Every one which denieth the Son, denieth
the Father likewise."^
CHAPTER XVI.
St. Ambrose assures Gratian of victory, declaring that
it has been foretold in the prophecies of Ezekiel.
This hope is further stayed upon the emperor's piety,
the former disasters being the punishment of Eastern
heresy.' The book closes with a prayer to God,
that ffe will now show His mercy, and save the army,
the land, and the sovereign of the faithful.
136. I MUST no further detain your Majes-
ty, in this season of preparation for war,
and the achievement of victory over the
Barbarians. Go forth, sheltered, indeed,
under the shield of faith, and girt with the
sword of the Spirit ; go forth to the victory,
promised of old time, and foretold in oracles
given by God.
137. For Ezekiel, in those far-off days,
already prophesied the minishing of our
people, and the Gothic wars, saying : " Pro-
phesy, therefore. Son of Man, and say : O
Gog, thus saith the Lord — Shalt thou not,
in that day when My people Israel shall be
* I Tim. i. 4 £E. ^2 Tim. ii. 23. ^ i Tim. iv. i.
* I John ii. 18 ff. ® Rev. xiii. 6. ' i John ii. 23.
' The disasters here alluded to are the rout of the Roman army,
in 378 A.D., at Hadrianople, and the miserable death of the Emperor
Valens, who took refuge in a hut, which was surrounded and fired
by the Goths, the emperor perishing in the flames. This reverse
was regarded by the Orthodox as a judgment upon the Arianism of
Valens and others in high places.
16
established to dwell in peace, rise up and
come forth from thy place, from the far
north, and many nations with thee, all
riders upon horses, a great and mighty
gathering, and the valour of many hosts?
Yea, go up against my people Israel, as
clouds to cover the land, in the last days."'
138. That Gog is the Goth, whose coming
forth we have already seen, and over whom
victory in days to come is promised, accord-
ing to the word of the Lord: "And they
shall spoil them, who had been their de-
spoilers, and plunder them, who had carried
off their goods for a prey, saith the Lord.
And it shall be in that day, that I will give
to Gog" — that is, to the Goths — "a place
that is famous, for Israel an high-heaped
tomb of many men, of men who have made
their way to the sea, and it shall reach round
about, and close the mouth of the valley,
and there [the house of Israel shall] over-
throw Gog and all his multitude, and it
shall be called the valley of the multitude of
Gog : and the house of Israel shall over-
whelm them, that the land may be
cleansed. " ^
139. Nor, furthermore, may we doubt,
your sacred Majesty, that we, who have
undertaken the contest with alien unbelief,
shall enjoy the aid of the Catholic Faith that
is strong in you. Plainly indeed the reason
of God's wrath has been already made
manifest, so that belief in the Roman Em-
pire was first overthrown, where faith in
God gave way. 3
140. No desire have I to recount the
deaths, tortures, and banishments of con-
fessors, the offices of the faithful made into
presents for traitors. ^ Have we not heard,
from all along the border, — from Thrace,
and through Dacia by the river, IMoesia,
and all Valeria of the Pannonians, — a
mingled tumult of blasphemers preaching
and barbarians invading ? What profit
could neighbours so bloodthirsty bring us,
or how could the Roman State be safe with
such defenders .'' ^
^ Ezek. xxxviii. 14 £f. ^ Ezek. xxxix. 10 ff.
■* The success of the Goths at Hadrianople encouraged the north-
ern barbarians to fresh invasions of the empire, within which they
from now began to form permanent lodgments, and it correspond-
ingly discouraged the subjects of the empire, and sapped the old
belief — a legacy from paganism — in the fortune of Rome.
* Orthodox bishops and priests were expelled from their sees and
offices to make room for " betrayers of the faith," i.e. men who had
apostatized to Arianism. The mingled tumult of blasphemy and
foreign onslaughts is a description of the condition of the eastern
provinces of the empire, where Arianism was rampant, and all was
overrun by the Goths. The latter was regarded by some as the re-
sult of the former. Thus St. Jerome : " Our sins are the strength of
the barbarians, our vices bring defeat upon the arms of Rome." — H.
The provinces here mentioned lay along the right bank of the
Danube, and took in what is now Lower Hungary, Servia, and
Bulgaria. The result of the disaster of Hadrianople was to put all
these countries in the power of the Goths.
^ The Goths had been, driven in upon the Roman frontiers by the
242
ST. AMBROSE.
141. Enough, yea, more than enough,
Almighty God, have we now atoned for
the deaths of confessors, the banishment of
priests, and the guilt of wickedness so
overweening, by our own blood, our own
banishment — sufficiently plain is it that they,
who have broken faith, cannot be safe.
Turn again, O Lord, and set up the banners
of Thy faith.
142. No military eagles, no flight of birds, '
here lead the van of our army, but Thy
Name, Lord Jesus, and Thy worship. This
is no land of unbelievers, but the land whose
custom it is to send forth confessors — Italy ;
Italy, ofttimes tempted, but never drawn
away ; Italy, which your Majesty hath long
defended, and now again rescued from
the barbarian. No wavering mind in our
emperor, but faith firm fixed.
143. Show forth now a plain sign of Thy
Majesty, that he who believes Thee to be
the true Lord of Hosts, and Captain of the
armies of heaven ; he who believes that
Thou art the true Power and Wisdom of
God, no being of time nor of creation, but
even as it is written, the eternal Power and
Divinity of God, ' may, upheld by the aid of
thy Might Supreme, win the prize of victory
for his Faith.
BOOK III.
CHAPTER I.
Statement of the reasons wherefore the matters, treated
of shortly in the two former, are dealt with more
at length in the three later books. Defence of the
employment of fables, which is supported by the
example of Holy Writ, wherein are found various
figures of poetic fable, in particular the Sirens, which
are figures of sensual pleasures, and which Christians
ought to be taught to avoid, by the words of Paul
and the deeds of Christ.
1. Forasmuch as your most gracious
Majesty had laid command upon me to
write for your own instruction some trea-
tise concerning the Faith, and had yourself
called me to your presence and encour-
aged my timidity, I, being as one on the
eve of battle,^ composed but two books
only, for the pointing out of certain ways
and paths by which our faith progresses.
2. Seeing, however, that certain malici-
ous minds, bent on sowing disputes, have
inroads of the Huns, who expelled them from their former habita-
tions in S. & S. W. Russia. A treaty had been made between them
and the Emperor Valens, who agreed to take them under his pro-
tection, but the bad faith witli whicli tlie Goths soon found them-
selves treated led to hostilities, and so to the great overthrow at
Hadrianople in 378.
' No auguries — which were taken by observing the flight of birds,
as ODiefis were by noting their voices. These observances of course
disappeared from the Roman army as soon as the empire became
Christian. In saying that the Name of tlie Saviour leads the troops
to war, .St. -Ambrose probably alludes to the Labarum or banner
emblazoned with the monogram "/?', which is composed of the two
first letters of the Name Xpio-ro?.
- Lat. " /« procinctii,'" which is primarilv a military phrase, firo-
cincius meaning " girding up " or " girdle," the expression having
reference to the girding on of armour for the battle. " Testamen-
tiuit facere in frrocinctji " means " to make one's will on the eve of
battle." The expression passed into a proverb for readiness in gen-
eral. E.e;. " clementinm in procinclu habere" " to be ready to
show mercy." Here, however, St. Ambrose uses the phrase more
in its original sense, with reference to the impending conflict of the
Goths and Romans, in which (Iratian was expecting to take part,
though, as a matter of fact, the battle of Hadrianople had been
fought, aud Valens was dead, before he arrived on the scene of
action.
not yet exhausted the force of their assaults,
whilst your gracious INIajesty's pious anx-
iety calls me to further labours, inasmuch
as you desire to try in more things him
whom you have proved in a few, I am re-
solved to deal somewhat more particularly
with the matters whereof I have already
treated in a few words, lest it should be
thought, not that I have advanced those
propositions in quietness and confidence,
but that I, having asserted them, doubted
and so abandoned their defence.
3. Again, seeing that we spoke of the
Hydra and Scylla (I. vi. 46), and brought
them in by way of comparison, to show
how we must beware, whether of the ever-
renewed outgrowths of infidelity, or the ill-
omened shipwrecks made upon its shallows,
if any one holds that such embellishments of
an argument, borrowed from the romances
of poets, are unlawful, and, from lack of
opportunity to speak evil of my faith, assails
something in my language, then let him
know that not only phrases but complete
verses of poetry have been woven into the
text of Holy Writ.
4. Whence, for instance, came that verse,
"His offspring truly are we," ^ whereof Paul,
by prophetic experience,^ taught, makes use ?
The course of prophetic speech avoids
neither the Giants * nor the Valley of the
Titans, 5 and Isaiah spake of sirens and the
' I Cor. i. 24. - Acts xvii. 28.
^ Meaning that Paul, gifted with a prophet's insight into divine
truth, recognized in these words of the heathen poet a testimony to
( lod, and therefore had no scruples about citing them to this Athenian
audience.
■• The Anakim, or "sons of Anak." Cf. Deut. ix. 2; Josh. xi.
21-22.
^ The Valley of Rephaim. 2 Sara. v. 18.
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— BOOK III.
243
daughters of ostriches. ' Jeremiah also hath
prophesied concerning Babylon, that the
daughters of sirens shall dwell therein, Mn
order to show that the snares of Babylon,
that is, of the tumult of this world, arc to be
likened to stories of old-time lust, that seemed
upon this life's rocky shores to sing some
tuneful song, but deadly withal, to catch
the souls of youth, — which the Greek poet
himself tells us that the wise man escaped
through being bound, as it were, in the
chains of his own prudence.^ So hard a
thing, before Christ's coming, was it es-
teemed, even for the stronger, to save them-
selves from the deceitful shows and allure-
ments of pleasure.
5. But if the poet judged the enticement
of worldly pleasure and licence destruc-
tive of men's minds and a sure cause of ship-
wreck, what ought we to think, for whom
it hath been written : "Train not the flesh
in concupiscence ".? * And again : " I chas-
tise my body and bring it into servitude,
lest whilst I preach to others, I myself be-
come a castaway." 5
6. Truly, Christ won salvation for us, not
by luxury but by fasting. Moreover, it was
not to obtain favour for Himself, but to in-
struct us, that He fasted. Nor yet did He
hunger because He was overcome by the
weakness of the body, but by His hunger
He proved that He had verily taken upon
Himself a body ; that so He might teach us
that He had taken not only our body, but
also the weaknesses of that body, even as
it is written: "Surely He hath taken our
infirmities and borne our sicknesses." ^
CHAPTER II.
The incidents properly affecting the body which Christ
for our sake took upon Him are not to be accounted
to His Godhead, in respect whereof He is the Most
Highest. To deny which is to say that the Father
was incarnate. When we read that God is one, and
that there is none other beside Him, or that He alone
has immortality, this must be understood as true of
^ Isa. xiii. 22 — a passage referring to the desolation of Babylon
In this verse of Isaiah the LXX. has " bvoxivTavpoi " and " e^n'oi "
(onocentaurs and hedgehogs), the " sirens " (eretp^i'e?) coming in ver.
2 lb, in combination with " demons" (Saifioi'ia). The Vulgate has
in 22 " ulu/cp " (screech-owls) and " sirenes" with " struthiones "
(ostriches) and '' pilosi" (hairy men) in 21b. A.V. has in 22 " wild
beasts of the islands" and " dragons ; " in 21b, "owls" (marg.
"ostriches," the Hebrew meaning "daughters of the owl") and
"satyrs." R. V. in 22, "wolves" and " jackals :" in 21b, " os-
triches " and "satyrs" (marg. "he-goats"). The "sirens" then
appear to be jackals — though the ground of the comparison is hard
to find— the "daughters of sparrows" are ostriches (the Greek
name for which means, literally, "sparrow-camel."
2Jer. 1. 39.— The LXX. (Jer. xxvii. 39) has "fliiyarcpes o-eiprjrwi' ; "
the Vulg. "struthiones;" A.V. "owls." For the sirens, see
Odyssey, XII. 39-54, 165-200.
^ Odyssey, XII. 178-180, 192-197.
* Rom. xiii. 14—" Make not provision for the flesh, to fulfil the
lusts thereof." — A.V.
° I Cor. ix. 27. • Isa. liii. 4. Cf. S. Matt. viii. 17.
Christ also, not only to avoid the sinful heresy above-
mentioned (Patripas.sianism), but also because the
activity of the Father and the Son is declared to be
one and the same.
7. It was a bodily weakness, then, that is
to say, a weakness of ours, that He hungered ;
when He wept, and was sorrowful even unto
death, it was of our nature. Why ascribe
the properties and incidents of our nature to
the Godhead.? That He was even, as we
are told, "made," is a property of a body.
Thus, indeed, we read: " Sion our mother
shall say: 'He is a man,' and in her He
was made man, and the Most High Him-
self laid her foundations. " ' " He was made
man," mark you, not " He was made
God."^
8. But what is He Who is at once the Most
High and man, what but "the Mediator
between God and man, the man Christ Jesus
Who eave Himself as a ransom for us '' .? ^
This place indeed refers properly to His In-
carnation, for our redemption was made by
His Blood, our pardon comes through His
Power, our life is secured through His Grace.
He gives as the Most High, He prays as
man. The one is the office of the Creator,
the other of a Redeerner. Be the gifts as
distinct as they may, yet the Giver is one,
for it was fitting 4 that our Maker should be
our Redeemer.
9. Who indeed can deny that we have
plain evidence that Christ is the IMost High }
He who knows otherwise makes the sacra-
ment of Incarnation to be the work of God
the Father. 5 But that Christ is the Most
High is removed beyond doubt by what
Scripture hath said in another place, con-
cerning the mystery of the Passion: "The
Most High sent forth His Voice, and the
earth was shaken." ^ And in the Gospel you
may read : "And thou, child, shaltbe called
the Prophet of the Highest ; for thou shalt
go before the face of the Lord, to prepare
His ways. "7 Who is "the Highest".' The
Son of God. He, then. Who is the Most
High God is Christ.
10. Again, whilst God is everywhere said
to be One God, the Son of God is not sepa-
rated from this Unity. For He Who is the
1 Ps. Ixxxvii. 5. The R. V. renders "Yea, of Zion it shall be
said, This one and that one was bom in her." The verse is rather
prophetic of the universality of Christ's Church than of the In-
carnation.
2 He could not " be inade " doA if we use the Name " God in
its proper sense, but St. Ambrose probably had in his mind the
sense which the Arians attached to the name, as applicable to the
Son. According to them, it was a sort of " courtesy-title."
•'' I Tim. ii. 5.
* Cf . Anselm, " Cur Deus Homo ? " I. 5 ; II. 6.
5 The Incarnation was a sacrament, being the outward visible
sign of the divine love.
^ Ps. xviii. 7, 14. ' S. Luke i. 76.
244
ST. AMBROSE.
Most High is alone, as it is written : "And
let them know that Thy Name is the Lord :
Thou alone art INIost High over all the
earth." '
11. And so the adversaries' injurious con-
clusion is rejected with contempt and dis-
grace, which they drew from the Scripture
speaking of God : "Who alone hath im-
mortality and dwelleth in light unapproach-
able ; ^ for these words are written of God,
which Name belongs equally to Father and
to Son.
12. If, indeed, wheresoever they read the
Name of God, they deny that there is any
thought of the Son [as well as the Father],
they blaspheme, inasmuch as they deny the
Sons Divine Sovereignty, and they shall
appear as though they shared the sinful
error of the Sabellians in teaching the In-
carnation of the Father. Let them, indeed,
explain how they can fail to interpret in a
sense blasphemous to the Father the words
of the Apostle : "In Whom ye did also rise
again, by faith in the working of God, Who
raised Him from the dead." ^ Let them also
take warning from what follows of what
they are running upon — for this is what
comes after: "And though ye were dead
in your sins and the uncircumcision of your
flesh, He quickened us with Him, par-
doning us all our offences, blotting out the
handwriting of the Ordinance, which was
opposed to us, and removed it fron^i our
midst, nailing it to His Cross, divesting
Himself of the flesh." 4
13. We are not, then, to suppose that the
Father Who raised the flesh is alone [God] ;
nor, again, are we to suppose the like of the
Son, Whose Body s was raised again. He
Who raised, did surely also quicken ; and
He who quickened, also pardoned sins ; He
who pardoned sins, also blotted out the
handwriting ; He Who blotted out the hand-
writing, also nailed it to the Cross : He who
nailed it to the Cross, divested Himself of
the flesh. But it was not the Father Who di-
vested Himself of the flesh ; for wo/ the Father,
but, as we read, the Word was made flesh. ^
You see, then, that the Arians, in dividing
the Father from the Son, run into danger of
saying that the Father endured the Passion.
14- We, however, can easily show that
the words treat of the Son's action, for the
Son Himself indeed raised His own Body
again, as He Himself said: "Destroy this
Temple, and in three days I will raise it
» Ps. Ixxxiii. 18. 2 I Tim. vi. i6.
3 Col. ii. 12. •> Col. ii. 13-14.
^ " Body "—in the one. " temilum." Cf. i Cor. vi. ig.
« S. John i. i.(-
agam
And He Himself quickens us to-
gether with His Body : " For as the Father
raiseth the dead and quickeneth them, so
also the Son quickeneth Whom He will." ^
And He Himself hath sfranted forsifiveness for
sins, saying, "Thy sins be forgiven thee. " 3
He too hath nailed the handwriting of the
record to His Cross, in that He was cru-
cified, and suffered in the body. Nor did
any divest Himself of the flesh, save the Son
of God, Who invested Himself therewith.
He, therefore, Who hath achieved the work
of our resurrection is plainly pointed out to
be very God.
CHAPTER in.
That the Father and the Son must not be divided ■* i.s
proved by the words of the Apostle, seeing that it is
befitting to tlie Son that He should be blessed, only
Potentate, and immortal, by nature, that is, and not
by grace, as even the angels themselves are immortal,
and that He should dwell in the unapproachable light.
How it is that the Father and the Son are alike and
equally said to be " alone."
15. When, therefore, you read the Name
"God," separate neither Father nor Son, for
the Godhead of the Father and the Son is one
and the same, and therefore separate them
not, when you read the words " blessed and
only Potentate," 5 for the words are spoken
of God, even as you may read : "I charge
thee before God, Who quickeneth all things. " ^
Christ also indeed doth quicken, and therefore
the Name of God is meetly given both to
the Father and to the Son, inasmuch as the
eft'ect of their activity is in agreement. Let
us go on to the words following: "I
charge thee," he says, "before God, Who
quickeneth all things, and Jesus Christ. "7
16. The Word is in God, even as it is
written : "In God will I praise His Word. "^
In God is His Eternal Power, even Jesus ;
in [speaking of] God, therefore, the Apostle
hath witnessed to the unity of the Godhead,
whilst by the Name of Christ he hath
witnessed to the sacrament of the Incarna-
tion.
17. Furthermore, to show that he hath
spoken of the Incarnation of Christ, he
added: " Who bore witness under Pontius
Pilate with the good confession," [I charge
thee] "keep undefiled the commandment,
until the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ,
^ S. Jolin ii. 19. - S. John v. 21. •'' S. Luke v. 20.
■* That is, in respect of substance or nature, though tlic Persons
must be distinguished.
" I 'l"im. vi. 15. " I Tim. vi. 13.
' That is to say, God and Christ Jesus are united in the work of
quickening.
8 Ps. Ivi. :o.
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— BOOK HI.
245
Wliich in His own good time the blessed
and only Potentate shall manifest, the King
of kings and Lord of lords, Who alone hath
immortality, and dwclleth in light unap-
proachable. Whom no man hath seen, nor
can see.'' ' Those words, thcii, are written
with regard to God, of which Name the
dignity and truth are common to [both the
Father and] the Son.
18. Why, then, should there be no thought
of the Son in this place, seeing that all these
things hold good of the Son also.? If they
do not so, then deny His Godhead, and so
mayest thou deny what is proper to be said
of God. His Blessedness cannot be denied.
Who bestows blessings, for " Blessed are
they whose iniquities are forgiven."- He
cannot but be called "Blessed," Who hath
given us wholesome teaching, even as it is
written : " Which is according to the Gospel
of the beauty of the Blessed God. "^ His
Power cannot be denied, of Whom the
Father saith : "I have laid help upon One
that is mighty. "'^ And who dare refuse to
acknovv^ledge Him to be immortal, when
He Himself hath made others also immortal,
as it is written of the Wisdom of God : " By
her shall I possess immortality." 5
19. But the immortality of His Nature is
one thing, that of ours is another. Things
perishable are not to be compared to things
divine. The Godhead is the one only Sub-
stance that death cannot touch, and there-
fore it is that the Apostle, though knowing
both the [human] soul and angels to be
immortal, declared that God only had im-
mortality. In truth, even the soul may die:
"The soul that sinneth, it shall die," ^ and
an angel is not absolutely immortal, his
immortality depending on the will of the
Creator. 7
20. Do not hastily reject this, because
Gabriel dies not, nor Raphael, nor Uriel. ^
1 I Tim. \-i. 13-16. ^ Ps. xxxii. i.
^ I Tim. i. II. * Ps. Ixxxix. ig.
■> Wisd. viii. 13. " Ezek. xviii. 20.
" " That is to saj', immortality is not of the essential nature of an
angel as it is of the essential Nature of God, For God's existence
is such that He necessarily exists, He cannot but exist ; His exist-
ence is not derived from another, but is from the power of His es-
sential Nature, or rather is that very Nature. Not so with the
angel, whose existence is a gift of God, and so the angel's existence
is no part of the idea of an angel, but is a property which is, so to
speak, added on from without and accessorv to the conception of
such a being. Hence, in so far as an angel's existence issues not
of the mere force of his essential properties, but only of the Creator's
Will, we may say that by virtue of the said Will, not by force of his
own nature, he continues in existence, and so far is immortal,
although in another sense immortality may be called a natural prop-
erty of an angel, inasmuch as there is no created power whereljy he
may be destroyed, and nothing in him that renders him liable to be
destroyed by God— nay rather, everything about him demands that,
once he is created, he should be for ever preserved in being." — H.
* Hurler observes that St. Ambrose understands mortality in a
wide sense, as including the capacity of any and ever>' sort of change.
Immortality, then, in accordance with this definition, would con-
note perfect absence of change. Hurter cites St. Bernard, § .Si /«
'"""' ■ " Omnis imttatio qucedam mortis imitatio. . . . Si tot
Cant.
Even in their nature there is a capacity of
sin, though not one of improvement by dis-
cipline, • for every reasonable creature is
exposed to influences from without itself,
and liable to judgment. It is on the influ-
ences which work upon us that the award
of judgment, and corruption, or advance to
perfection, do depend, and therefore Ecclcsi-
astcs saith: "For God shall bring all His
work to judgment." ^ Every creature, then,
has within it the possibility of corruption
and death, even though it do not [at present]
die or commit sin ; nor, if in anything it
deliver not itself over to sin, hath it this
boon of its immortal nature, but of disci-
pline or of grace. Immortality, then, that is
of a gift is one thing : immortality without
the possibility of change is another.^
21. Do we deny the immortality of
Christ's Godhead,-* because He tasted death
for all in the flesh .? Then is Gabriel better
than Christ, for Gabriel never died, but
Christ gave up the ghost. But the servant
is not above his lord,s and we must discern
the weakness of flesh from the eternity
of Godhead. Christ's Death had its source
in the flesh, immortality is of the nature of
Christ's sovereignty. But if the Godhead
brought it to pass that the flesh saw not
corruption, the flesh being surely by nature
liable to corruption, how could the Godhead
itself have died .?
22. And how is it that the Son dwelleth
not in light unapproachable, if He is in the
bosom of the Father, if the Father is Light,
and the Son also is Light, because God is
Light } ^ Or, if we suppose some other
light, beside the Light of the Godhead, to be
the unapproachable Light, is, then, this Light
better than the Father, so that He is not in
that Light, Who, as it is written, is both with
the Father and in the Father .? 7 Let men,
therefore, not exclude the thought of the Son,
when they read only of ''God" — and let
inertes qiiot jfiutationes, ubi itnmortaliins V and Plutarch, in
Eusebius, Pmpar. Ev. XI. 12. Plutarch's view perhaps owed
something to study of the reliques of Heraclitus. IMany fathers
expounded i Tim. vi. 16 on this definition of immortality as=iinmuta-
bility. This definition would exclude angels, who are naturally
fallible (as the rebellion of Lucifer and the third part of the host of
heaven proved) — or if they are no%v no longer fallible, they owe it
not to their own natural constitution but to grace. In so far then
as angels are mutable, whether for better or worse, they are not
immortal.
' Angels being by nature mutable, either for better or for worse,
that is, capable of good or evil, and so of death, are de/acto sinless,
and hence need not, are not meet to be placed under, penal discipline.
Or the meaning may be that the angelic nature vvas not created to
be gradually taught in the way of holiness, as human nature vvas.
■ Eccl. xii. 14. Hurter observes that God would not judge rational
creatures, were thev not capable of advance or retrogression, of be-
coming better or falling into degradation, and had, as a matter of
fact, advanced or fallen back.
" The .■\rians regarded the Son as immortal de gratia ; the
Orthodox esteem Him immortal dejure, with true, absolute im-
mortalitv.
* i.e. Is Christ God in the true .sense of the Name, or not ?
« S. Matt. X. 24- « I John i. s- ' S. John i, 1 ; xvii. S, 21-
246
ST. AMBROSE.
them not exclude that of the Father, when
they read of "the Son" only.'
23. On earth, the Son is not without^ the
Father, and thou thinkest that the Father is
without the Son in heaven .? The Son is in
the flesh — (when I say " He is in the flesh"
or " He is on earth," I speak as though we
lived in the days whose story is in the Gos-
pel, for now we no longer know Christ
" after the flesh "3) — He is in the flesh, and
He is not alone, as it is written: " And I am
not alone, because the Father is withlMe,"^
and think you that the Father dwells alone
in the Light?
24. Lest you should regard this argument
as mere speculation take this sentence of
authority. ''No man," saith the Scripture, ^
" hath seen God at any time, save the Only-
begotten Son, Who is in the bosom of the
Father; He hath revealed Him. " ^ How
can the Father be in solitude, if the Son be
in the bosom of the Father.? How doth the
Son reveal Him, Whom He seeth not .-* The
Father, then, exists not alone.
25. Observe now what the "solitude" of
the Father and of the Son is. The Father is
alone, because there is no other Father ; the
Son is alone, because there is no other Son;
God is alone, because the Godhead of the
Trinity is One.
CHAPTER IV.
We are told that Christ was only "made" so far as
regards the flesh. P'or the redemption of mankind
He needed no means of aid, even as He needed none
in order to His Resurrection, whereas others, in
order 10 raise the dead, had need of recourse to
prayer. Even when Christ prayed, the prayer was
offered by Him in His capacity as human ; whilst
He must be accounted divine from the fact that
He commanded (that such and such things should be
done). On this point the devil's testimony is truer
than the Arians' arguments. The discussion con-
cludes with an explanation of the reason why the
title of " mighty " is given to the Son of Man.
26. It is now sufficiently made plain that
the Father is not God in solitude, without
the Son, and that the Son cannot be thought
of as God alone, without the Father, for it is
in respect of His flesh ^ that we read that the
Son of God was "made," not in respect of
His generation from God the Father.
27. Indeed,in what sense He was •• made"
He has declared by the mouth of the holy
' S. John xvi. 32. */.f. S. John x. 30. ' 2 Cor. v. i6.
< S. John viii 16. « S. John i. iS.
"Greek cfTjyijo-aTo, "explained," "expounded." The Incarna-
tion has taught us sometliing about God and about man tliat we
never knew before and never could have known by ourselves.
' Phil. ii. 7 ; Gal. iv. 4 : S. John i. 1, 2, cpd. with 14.
patriarch, saying: "For My soul is filled
with sorrow to overflowing, and My life
hath drawn near unto hell. I have been
counted with them that go down into the pit ;
I have been made as a man free, without
help, amongst" the dead."' Here, then, we
read: "I have been made as a man," not
" I have been made as God;" and again:
" My soul overfloweth with sorrows." " My
soul, " mark you, not "My Godhead." He
was " made " in so far as that was concerned
wherein He was due to hell,^ wherein He
was reckoned with others, f6r the Godhead
admits of no likeness which may be ground
for classing it with others. Yet mark how
the majesty of Godhead shpws itself in
Christ, even in that flesh which was ap-
pointed to death. Although He was "made "
as a man, and "made" as flesh, yet He
was made free amongst the dead, "free,
without help."
28. But how can the Son say here that He
was without help, when it has already been
said : " I have laid help upon One that is
mighty " .'' ^ Distinguish here also the two
natures present. The flesh hath need of help,
the Godhead hath no need. He is free, then,
because the chains of death had no hold
upon Him. He was not made prisoner
by the powers of darkness, it is He Who
exerted power amongst them. 4 He is
"without help," because He Himself, the
Lord, hath by no office of messenger or
ambassador, but by His own might, saved
His people. How could He, \Vho raised
others to life, require any help in order to
raise His own body.''
29. And though men also have raised the
dead, still they did this not of their own
power, but in the Name of Christ. To ask
is one thing, to command is another ; to
obtain is different from bestowing.
30. Elijah, then, raised the dead, but he
prayed — he did not command. 5 Elisha
raised one to life after laying himself upon
the dead body, in accordance with its pos-
ture ;^ and, again, the very contact of Elisha's
corpse gave life to the dead, that the pro-
phet might foreshow the coming of Him,
Who, being sent in the likeness of sinful
flesh, 7 should, even after His burial, raise
the dead to life.
» Ps. Ixxxviii. 4. See the R.V.
' " Due " by His own and the Father's Will. Some reference also,
perhaps, to the preaching to the spirits in Hades, a necessary part
of our Lord's work and ministry, i Pet. iii. 19.
^ Ps. Ixxxix. 20. See ch. ii. p. 243.
* I Pet. iii. 19 ; Acts ii. 24. " « Kings xvii. 20 tf.
" 2 Kings iv. 34.
' Rom. viii 3. Note" in the likeness of sinful flesh," not "in
sinful flesh." Cf. Phil. ii. 7; for the miracle referred to, see a
Kings xiii. 2 1 .
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— BOOK III.
247
31. Peter, again, when he healed Aeneas,
said : "In the Name of Jesus of Nazareth,
rise and walk." ' Not in his own name, but
in the Name of Christ. But "rise" is a
command ; on the other hand, it is an in-
stance of confidence in one's right, ^ not an
arrogant claim to power, and the authority
of the command stood in the effective influ-
ence of the Name, not in its own might.
What answer, then, make the Arians ?
Peter commands in the Name of Christ, — this
on the one hand : on the other, they will
have it that the Son of God did not command,
but requested.
32. We read, they objected, of His utter-
ing a prayer. 3 But take note of the differ-
ence. He prays as Son of Afa?i, He com-
mands as Son of God. Will you not ascribe
unto the Son of God what even the devil
has ascribed.' Will you accuse yourselves of
greater wickedness than Satan's.? The devil
saith : "If Thou be the Son of God, com-
mand this stone that it become bread." *
Satan saith "command," you say "en-
treat." The devil believes that, at the word
of God's Son,- the nature of an elementary
substance may be exchanged for that of a
composite one ; you think that, unless the
Son of God prefers a request, even His Will
cannot be done. Again, the devil thinks
that the Son of God is to be esteemed from
His power, 5 you that He is to be esteemed
from His infirmity. The devil's temptations
are more tolerable than the Arians' disput-
mgs.
^$. Let us not, then, be troubled if we
find the Son of ]\lan entitled "mighty" in
one place, and yet in another, that the Lord
of glory was crucified.^ Wliat might is
greater than sovereignty over the powers of
heaven.? But this was in the hands of Him
Who ruled over thrones, principalities,
angels ; for, although He was amongst the
wild beasts, as it is written, yet angels
ministered to Him, that you may perceive
the difference between what is proper to the
Incarnation, and what is proper to Sove-
reignty. So far as His flesh is concerned,
then, He endures the assault of wild beasts ;
in regard of His Godhead, 7 He is adored by
angels.
34. We have learnt, then, that He was
made man, and that His being made must
be referred to His manhood. Furthermore,
in another passage of Scripture, you may
read : " Who was made for Him of the seed
* Actsiii. 6; ix. 34. * See S. Mark xvi. 17, 18.
^ S. John xi. 41. * S. Luke iv. 3. ^ Rom. i. 4.
I Cor. ii. 8. ' S. Mark i. 13. Cf. Eph. i. 21.
of David,"' that is to say, in respect of the
flesh He was " made " of the seed of David,
but lie was God begotten of God before the
worlds.
CHAPTER V.
Passages brought forward from Scripture to show that
"made" does not always mean the same as
" created ; " whence it is concluded that the letter of
Holy Writ should not be made the ground of cap-
tious arguments, after the manner of the Jews, who,
however, are shown to be not so bad as the heretics,
and thus the principle already set forth is confirmed
anew.
35. At the same time, becoming ^ does
not always imply creation ; for we read :
" Lord, Thou art become our refuge," 3 and
"Thou hast become my salvation." 4
Plainly, here i-s no statement of the fact or
purpose of a cr^a//o?i, but God is said to have
become my "refuge" and have turned
to my " salvation, "5 even as the Apostle
hath said : " Who became for us ^ Wisdom
from God, and Righteousness, and Sancti-
fication, and Redemption,"'' that is, that
Christ was " made " for us, of the Father,
not created. Again, the writer has ex-
plained in the sequel in what sense he
says that Christ was made Wisdom for us :
"But we preach the Wisdom of God in doc-
trine o'f mystery, which Wisdom is hidden,
foreordained by God before the existence of
the world ^ for our glory, and which none
of the princes of this world knew, for ha^
they known they would never have cruci-
fied the Lord of glory. " 9 When the mystery
of the Passion is set forth, surely there is no
speaking of an eternal process of genera-
tion.
36. The Lord's Cross, then, is my wis-
dom ; the Lord's Death my redemption ; for
we are redeemed with His precious blood,
as the Apostle Peter hath said. '° With His
blood, then, as man, the Lord redeemed us,
Who also, as God, hath forgiven sins."
* Rom. i. 3.
2 i.e. we are not to infer from the fact that the Word became flesh,
that the Word is a created being. For that which becomes is
already existing — that which is created did not exist before it was
made.
2 Ps. xc. i. The R.V. runs : " Lord, thou hast been our refuge "
(hast been, and still art).
* Ps. cxviii. 14. The "becoming" is rather in us. It is we
who have come into being, to find a refuge and salvation in the
Lord.
^ Lat. " conversns ad salute tn." ® i Cor. i. 30.
' Note that it is Christ Himsel/Who is our justification, etc., not
a certain course of Hfe ; in other words, the saving power is not so
much in the mere example of Christ's life on earth, but primarily
and necessarily in Himself, now seated in heaven, at the Father's
right hand, interceding for us, and communicating His grace,
especially through the sacraments.
* Cf. I Pet. i. 19-21 ; Eph. i. 4; Col. i. 26, 27.
9 I Cor. ii. 6 ff. i" i pgt. i. jg. u 3. Mark ii. 8-12.
24§
ST. AMBROSE.
2,'^. Let us not, therefore, lay snares as it
were in words, and eagerly seek out en-
tanglements therein ; let us not, because
misbelievers make out the written word to
mean that it means not, set forth only what
this letter bears on the face of it, instead of
the underlying sense. This way went the
Jews to destruction, despising the deep-
hidden meaning, and following only after
the bare form of the word, for ' ' the letter
killeth, but the Spirit maketh alive." '
38. And yet, of these two grievous impie-
ties, to ascribe to the Godhead what is true
only of manhood is perchance more detest-
able than to attribute to spirit what belongs
only to letter. The Jews feared to believe
in manhood taken up into God, and there-
fore have lost the grace of redemption, be-
cause they reject that on which salvation
depends ; the Arians degrade the majesty
of Godhead to the weakness of humanity.
Detestable as are the Jews, who crucified
the Lord's flesh, more detestable still do I
hold them who have believed that the God-
head of Christ was nailed to the Cross. So
one who ofttimes had dealings with Jews
said : "An heretic avoid, after once renrovino-
him"2
39. Nor, again, are these men careful to
avoid doing dishonour to the Father, in
their impious application of the fact, that
Christ was "made" Wisdom for us, to His
incomprehensible generation, that tran-
scends all limits and divisions of time ; for,
leaving it out of account that dishonour
done to the Son is an insult to the Father,
they do even carry their blasphemy in as-
sault upon the Father, of Whom it is
written : "Let God be made truthful, but
every man a liar. " 3 If indeed they think
that the Son is spoken of, they do not
foreclose against His generation, 4 but in
that they rest on the authority of this text
they do confess that which they reject,
namely, that Christ is God, and true God.
40. It_ would be a lengthy matter were I
to pass in review each several place where
we read of His being "made," not indeed
by nature, but by way of gracious dispen-
sation. Moses, for example, saith : "Thou
art niade my Helper and Protector, to save
me ; "s and David : "Be unto me for a God
of salvation, and an house of refuge, that
Thou mayest save me ; " ^ ^nd Isaiah :
"He is become an Helper for every city
that is lowly." 7 Of a surety the holy men
say not to God : "Thou hast been created "
J 2 Cor. ui. 6. _ _2 Titus iii. ,o. a Rom. iii. 4.
Hecause generation is quite distinct from absolute creation,
i-x. XV. 2. 0 ps, xxxi. 3. ' Isa. XXV. 4.
but "By Thy grace Thou art made a Pro-
tector and Helper unto us."
CHAPTER VL
In order to dispose of an objection grounded on a text
in St. John, St. Ambrose first shows that the Arian
interpretation lends countenance to the Manichaans-
then, after setting forth the different ways of divid-
ing the words in this same passage, he shows plainly
that It cannot, without dishonour to the Father be
understood with such reference to the Godhead as
the A nans give it, and expounds the true meaning
thereon. °
41. We have no reason, therefore, to fear
the argument which the Arians, in their reck-
less manner of expounding, use to construct,
showing that the Word of God was " made,"
for, say they, it is written : "That which
has been made in Him is life." ^
42. First of all, let them understand that
if they make the words "That which has
been made " to refer to the Godhead, they
entangle themselves in the difficulties raised
by the Manichaeans, for these people argue:
" If that which has been made in Him is
life, then there is something which has not
been made in Him, and is death," so that
they may impiously bring in two principles.
But this teaching the Church condemns.
43- Again, how can the Arians prove that
the Evangelist actually said this .? The most
part of those who are learned in the Faith
read the passage as follows: "All things
were made by Him, and without Him was
not anything made that has been made."
Others read thus: "All things were made
by Him, and without Him was nothing
made." Then they proceed: "What has
been made," and to this they join the words
"in Him;" that is to say, "But whatso-
ver is has been made in Him." But
what mean the words "in Him".? The
Apostle tells us, M-hen he says : "In Him
we have our being, and live, and move."^
44. Howbeit, let them read the passage
as they will, they cannot diminish the
majesty of God the Word, in referring to
His Person, 3 as subject, the words "That
which was made,"" without also doing dis-
honour to God the F'ather, of Whom" it is
written: "But he who doeth the truth
Cometh to the light, that his works may be
made manifest that they are wrought in
' S. John i. 4 Observe that St. Ambrose follows a different
punctuation to that of our Bible. .St. Ambrose's stopping is the
same as that adopted by Westcott (Co,„7,ientary on S.Johu) and by
W estcott and Hort in their edition of the Greek text of the N.T.
- Acts XVII. 28.
^f'.i!'''^'" ""ih'""''"" 'V'"^i, '^'^'■e seems to be used in the sense
lUh^^h r Jr°7"'"'r T''^ "distinction of Persom without divi-
sionof the Godhead IS evidently what St. Ambrose here has in view.
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— BOOK III.
249
God."' See then — here we read of maivs
works being wrought in God, and yet for
all that we cannot understand the God-
head as the subject of them. Wc must
either recognize the works as wrought through
Him, as the Apostle's affirmation showeth
that "all things are through Him, and were
created in Him, and He is before all, and
all things exist logefher in Him,''^ or, as the
witness of the text here cited teaches us,
we ought to regard the virtues whereby the
fruit ot life eternal is gained, as wrought in
God — chastity, piety, devoutness, faith, and
others of this kind, whereby the will of God
is expressed. 3
45. Just as the works, then, are the expres-
sion of the will and power of God the
Father, so are they of Christ's, even as we
read : "Created in Christ in good works ;" ^
and in the psalm : " Peace be made in Thy
power ;" 5 and again : "In wisdom hast Thou
made them all. "^ "In wisdom hast Thou
made," mark you — not "Thou hast made
wisdom ;" for since all things have been
made in wisdom, and Christ is the Wisdom
of God, then this Wisdom is plainly not an
accident, but a substance, and an everlast-
ing one, but if the Wisdom hath been made,
then is it made in a worse condition than
all things, forasmuch as it could not, by
itself, be made Wisdom. If, then, being
made is oftentimes referred to something
accidental, not to the essence of a thing, so
may creation also be referred to some end
had in view. 7
CHAPTER VII.
Solomon's words, " The Lord created Me," etc.,
mean that Christ's Incarnation was done for the
redemption of the Father's creation, as is shown by
the Son's own words. That He is the " beginning "
may be understood from the visible proofs of His
virtuousness, and it is shown how the Lord opened
the ways of all virtues, and was their true beginning.
46. Hereby we are brought to understand
that the prophecy of the Incarnation, "The
Lord created me the beginning of His ways
for His works, ''^ means that the Lord Jesus
was created of the Virgin for the redeeming
of the Father's works. Truly, we cannot
doubt that this is spoken of the mystery of
1 S. John iii. 21. ^ Col i. 16. See the Greek.
' Or, " which are done in," i.e. " in accordance with, under the
impulse of, the Will of God."
■* Eph. ii. 10. '' Ps. cxxii. 7. ^ Ps. civ. 24.
' A thing may be said to be " created " relatively, as well as ab-
solutely— i.e. it nay be " created " when newly appointed for a cer-
tain purpose, as when men were " created " consuls, which did not
mean that before the convening of the centuries they were absolutely
non-existent.
" Prov. viii, 22.
the Incarnation, forasmuch as the Lord took
upon Him our flesh, in order to save the
works of His hands from the slavery of cor-
ruption, so that He might, by the sufferings
of His own body, overthrow him who had
the power of death. For Christ's flesh is
for the sake of things created, but His God-
head existed before them, seeing that He
is before all things, whilst all things exist
together in Him. '
47. His Godhead, then, is not by reason of
creation, but creation exists because of the
Godhead ; even as the Apostle showed, say-
ing that all things exist because of the Son
of God, for we read as follows : " But it was
fitting that He, through Whom and because
of Whom are all things, after bringing many
sons to glory, should, as Captain of their
salvation, be made perfect through suffer-
ing. "^ Has he not plainly declared that the
Son of God, Who, by reason of His Godhead,
was the Creator of all, did in after time, for
the salvation of His people, submit to the
taking on of the flesh and the suffering of
death ?
48. Now for the sake of what works the
Lord was "created" of a virgin, He Him-
self, whilst healing the blind man, has
shown, saying: "In Him must I work the
works of Him that sent Me. "3 Furthermore
He said in the same Scripture, that we might
believe Him to speak of the Incarnation :
" As long as I am in this world, I am the
Light of this world," -* for, so far as He is man.
He is in this world for a season, but as God
He exists at all times. In another place,
too. He says : "Lo, I am with you even
unto the end of the world." 5
49. Nor is there any room for questioning
with respect to "the beginning," seeing
that when, during His earthly life. He was
asked, "Who art Thou.?" He answered
"The beginning, even as I tell you
This refers not only to the essential nature
of the eternal Godhead, but also to the
visible proofs of virtues, for hereby hath He
proved Himself the eternal God, in that He
is the beginning of all things, and the Author
of each several virtue, in that He is the Head
of the Church, as it is written: "Because
He is the Head of the Body, of the Church ; 7
Who is the beginning, first-begotten from the
dead. "8
50. It is clear, then, that the words " be-
1 Col. 1. 16. ^ Heb. ii. lo.
2 S. John ix. 4. " In him " is, in our Bible, attached to the pre-
ceding verse.
■• S. John ix. 5. " S. Matt, xxviii. 20.
•^S. John \'iii. 25. St. Ambrose's words: ^' Principinin quod et
loquor vobis."
' Col. 18. 8 Cf. Eph. iv. IS, 16.
'-• 6
250
ST. AMBROSE.
ginning of His ways," which, as it seems,
we must refer to the mystery of the putting
on of His body, are a prophecy of the In-
carnation. For Christ's purpose m the In-
carnation was to pave for us the road to
heaven. Mark how He says: " I go up to
.My Father and your Father, to My God and
your God."' Then, to give you to know
that the Almighty Father appointed His
ways to the Son, after the Incarnation,^
you have in Zechariah the words of the
angel speaking to Joshua clothed in filthy
garments : "Thus saith the Lord Almighty :
U thou wilt walk in My ways and observe
My precepts. "3 What is the meaning of
that filthy garb save the putting on of the
flesh ?
51. Now the ways of the Lord are, we
may say, certam courses taken in a good
life, guided by Christ, Who says, "I am
the Way, and the Truth, and the Life. "4
The way, then, is the surpassing power of
God, for Christ, is our way, and a good
way, too, is He, a way which hath opened
the kingdom of heaven to believers, s
Moreover, the ways of the Lord are
straight, as it is written : " Make Thy ways
known unto me, O Lord." ^ Chastity is a
way, faith is a way, abstinence is a way.
There is, indeed, a way of virtue, and there
is a way of wickedness ; for it is written :
"And see if there be any way of wicked-
ness in me." 7
52. Christ, then, is the beginning of our
virtue. He is the beginning of purity,
Who taught maidens not to look for the em-
braces of men,^ but to yield the purity of
their bodies and minds to the service of
the Holy Spirit rather than to a husband.
Christ is the beginning of frugality, for He
became poor, though He was rich. 9 Christ
is the beginning of patience, for when He
was reviled. He reviled not again, when He
was struck. He did not strike back. Christ
is the beginning of humility, for He took
the form of a servant, though in the majesty
of His power He was equal with God the
Father. '° From Him each several virtue has
taken its origin.
53. For this cause, then, that we might learn
these divers virtues, " a Son was given us,
Whose beginning was upon His shoulder." "
' S. John XX. 17.
- " secundum t/tcarnaiioneni" " as a result of the Incarnation."
' Zech. iii. 7. ' S. John xiv. 6.
" Cf. the " Te I)euw," ver. 17.
® Ps. XXV. 4. ' Ps. cxxxix. 24.
' Cf. I Cor. vii. 29 and 34. It seems unwarrantable to suppose a
reference to 2 Cor. xi 2.
" I Cor. viii. 9. ■" i Pet. ii. 23 ; Phil. ii. 7.
" Isa. ix. 6. St. Ambrose' version is " Filius datus est nobis,
cujus principium super humeros ejus."
That "beginning " is the Lord's Cross— the
beginning of strong courage, wherewith a
way has been opened for the holy martyrs
to enter the sufferings of the Holy War.
CHAPTER VIH.
The prophecy of Christ's Godhead and Manhood, con-
tained in the verse of Isaiah just now cited, is un-
folded, and its force in refuting various heresies de-
monstrated.
54. This beginning did Isaiah see, and
therefore he says : " A Child is born, a Son
is given to us," as also did the INIagi, and
therefore worshipped they, when they saw
the little One in the stable, and said: "A
Child is born," and, when they saw the
star, declared, " A Son is given to us." On
the one hand, a gift from earth — on the
other, a gift from heaven — and both are
One Person, perfect in respect of each, with-
out any changeableness in the Godhead, as
without any taking away from the fulness
of the Manhood. One Person did the Magi
adore, to one and the same they offered
their gifts, to show that He Who was seen
in the stall was the very Lord of heaven.
55. IMark how the two verbs differ in their
import : "A Child is born, a Son is given."
Though born of the Father, yet is He not
born, but given to us, forasmuch as the
Son is not for our sakes, but we for the
Son's. For indeed He was not born to us,
being born before us, and the maker of all
things created : nor is He now brought to
life for the first time. Who was always, and
was in the beginning ; ' on the other hand,
that which before-time was not is born to
us. Again we find it thus recorded, how
that the angel, when he spoke to the
shepherds, said that He had been born :
' ' Who is this day born to us a Saviour,
Who is Christ the Lord, in the city of
David." ^ To us, then, was born that which
was not before— that is, a child of the Vir-
gin, a body from Mary— for this was made
after man had been created, whereas [the
Godhead] was before us.
56. Some manuscripts read as follows:
"A Child is born to us, a Son is given to us ;'[i
that is to say. He, Who is Son of God, is
born as Marv's child for us, and given to
us. As for the fact that He is "given," lis-
ten to the prophet's words : "And grant us
Thy salvation. "4 But that which is above
' S. John i. I. - S. Luke ii. 11.
■■' This is the right rendering. See Driver's Liye and Titnes
0/ Isaiah, p. 30, note 2. ■* Ps. Ixxxv,
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— BOOK III.
251
us IS given : what is from heaven is given :
even as indeed we read concerning the
Spirit, that " the love of God is shed abroad
in our hearts by the Holy Spirit, Who is
given unto us. " '
57. But note how this passage is as
water upon fire to a crowd of heresies.
"A Child is born to us," not to the Jews ;
"to «s," not to the Manichaeans ; "to us,"
not to the Marcionites. The prophet says
"to us," that is, to those who believe, not
to unbelievers. And He indeed, in His
pitifulness, was born for all, but it is the
disloyalty of heretics that hath brought it to
pass that the birth of Him Who was born
for all should not profit all. For the sun is
bidden to rise upon the good and the bad,
but to them that see not there is no appear-
ance of sunrise.
58. Even as the Child, then, is born not
unto all. but unto the faithful : so the Son is
given to the faithful and not to the unbeliev-
ing. He is given to us, not to the Photi-
nians ; for they affirm that the Son of God
was not given unto us, but was born and
first began to exist amongst us. To us is
He given, not to the Sabellians, who will not
hear of a Son being given, maintaining that
Father and Son are one and the same.
Unto us is He given, not unto the Arians,
in whose judgment the Son was not given
for salvation, but sent over subject and
inferior, to whom, moreover, He is no
" Counsellor," inasmuch as they hold that
He knows nought of the future, no Son,
since they believe not in His eternity,
though of the Word of God it is written :
"That which was in the beginning ;" and
again: "In the beginning was the Word." ^
To return to the passage we set before us
to discuss. "In the beginning," saith the
Scripture, "before He made the earth, be-
fore He made the deeps, before He brought
forth the springs of water, before all the
hills He begat Me. "3
CHAPTER IX.
The preceding quotation from Solomon's Proverbs
receives further explanation.
59. Perchance you will ask how I came
to cite, as referring to the Incarnation of
Christ, the place, "The Lord created Me,"
seeing that the creation of the universe took
place before the Incarnation of Christ.''
But consider that the use of holy Scripture
is to speak of things to come as though
already past, and to make intimation of the
union of two natures, Godhead and I\Ian-
hood, in Christ, lest any should deny either
His Godhead or His IManhood.
60. In Isaiah, for example, you may
read : "A Child is born unto us, and a Son
is given unto us ; " so here also [in the
Proverbs] the prophet sets forth first the
creation of the flesh, and joined thereto the
declaration of the Godhead, that you might
know that Christ is not two, but One, being
both begotten of the Father before the
worlds, and in the last times ' created of the
Virgin. And thus the meaning is : I, Who
am begotten before the worlds, am He Who
was created of mortal woman, created for
a set purpose.
61. Again, immediately before the de-
claration, "The Lord created Me," He
says, " I will tell of the things which are
from eternity," and before saying, " He
begat," He premised, "In the beginning,
] before He made the earth, before all hills."
In its extent, the preposition "before"
reaches back into the past without end or
limit, and so "Before Abraham was, I
am," ^ clearly need not mean " after Adam,"
just as "before the Morning Star " 3 need not
mean "after the angels." But when He
said "before," He intended, not that He
was included in any one's existence, but
that all things are included in His, for thus
it is the custom of Holy Writ to show the
eternity of God. Finally, in another pas-
sage you may read: "Before the moun-
tains were brought forth, or ever the earth
and the world were made. Thou art from
everlasting to everlasting."-*
62. Before all created things, then, is the
Son begotten ; within all and for the good
of all is He made ; begotten of the Father,
above the Law,s brought forth of Mary, under
the Law.^
CHAPTER X.
Observations on the words of John the Baptist (John
i. 30), which may be referred to divine fore-ordinance,
but at any rate, as explained by the foregoing con-
siderations, must be understood of the Incarnation.
The precedence of Christ is mystically expounded,
with reference to the history of Ruth.
63. But [say they] it is written : "After
me cometh a Man, Who is made before me,
because He was before me ;" 7 and so they
* Rom. V. 5.
' Prov. viii. 23 ff.
* S. John i. I, 2.
^ I Pet. i. 21 ; Heb. i. 1,2: Gal. iv. 4.
* Ps. ex. 3.
5 S. Mark ii. 28.
'' S. Johni. 30.
* S. John viii. 58.
* Ps. xc. 2.
« Gal. iv. 4.
252
ST. AMBROSE.
argue: "See, He Who was aforetime is
' made.'" Let us take the words by them-
selves. "After me cometh a Man." He,
then, Who came is a IMan, and this is the
Man Who "was made." But the word
" man " connotes sex, and sex is attributed
to human nature, but never to the God-
head.
64. I mig-ht arg-ue : The Man [Christ
Jesus] was in pre-e.xistence so far as His
body was foreknown, though His power is
from everlasting — for both the Church and
the Saints were foreordtiined before the
worlds began. But .here I lay aside this
argument, and urge that the being made
concerns not the Godhead, but the nature
of the Incarnation, even as John himself
said: "This is He of Whom I said : After
me cometh a Man, Who was made before
me."
65. The Scripture, then, having, as I
showed above, discovered the twofold nature
in Christ, that you might understand the pre-
sence of both Godhead and Manhood, here
begins with the flesh ; for it is the cutsom of
Holy Writ to begin without fixed rule some-
times with the Godhead of Christ, and de-
scend to the visible tokens of Incarnation ;
sometimes, on the other hand, to start from
its humility, and rise to the glory of the God-
head, as oftentimes in the Prophets and
Evangelists, and in St. Paul. Here, then,
after this use, the writer begins with the
Incarnation of our Lord, and then proclaims
His Divinity, not to confound, but to dis-
tinguish, the human and the divine. But
Arians, like Jew vintners, ' mix water with
the wine, confounding the divine generation
with the human, and ascribing to the
majesty of God what is properly said only
of the lowliness of the flesh.
66. I have no fears of a certain objection
they are likely to put forward, namely, that
in the words cited we have "a 7nan" — for
some have, " Who cometh after me." But
here, too, let them observe what precedes.
* ' The Word," it is said, ' ' was made flesh. " ^
Having said that the Word was made
flesh, the Evangelist added no mention
of man. We understand "man" there in
the mention of "flesh," and "flesh" by
* Cf. Athanasius, Third Oration Against the Arians, § 35—" But
sliould any man, noticing the divinity revealed in the action of
the Word, deny the reality of the body, or marking the things
peculiar to the body, deny the presence of the Word in flesh, or
judgmg from His human experiences and behaviour, conceive a low
esteem of the Word, such a person, like the Jew vintner, mixing
water with his wine, will hold the Cross a scandal, and, like a
heathen philosopher, regard the preaching as folly— which is just
the state of the ungodly followers of Arius." Horace, Sat. I. v.
3, 4—" indtr Forjtm Appi, Differtum nauiis, cauponibus atgjte
tnalrgnis.
' S. John i. 14,
the mention of "man." After the statement
made, then, that "the Word was made
flesh" there was no need here to particularly
mention "man," whom he already intended
by using the name " flesh. "
67. Later on, St. John uses the lamb, that
" taketh away the sins of the world," as an
example ; and to teach you plainly the Incar-
nation of Him, of Whom he had spoken be-
fore, he says : " This is He of Whom I said
before : After me cometh a INIan, Who is
made before me," to wit, of Whom I said
that He was " made " as being man, not as
being God. However, to show that it was
He Who was before the worlds, and none
other, that became flesh, lest we should
suppose two Sons of God, he adds: "be-
cause He was before me." If the words
"was made'' had referred to the divine
generation, what need was there that the
writer should add this, and repeat himself.-'
But, having first said, with regard to the
Incarnation only, "After me cometh a
Man, Who is made before me, "he added:
"because He was before me," because it
was needful to teach the eternity of [Christ's]
Godhead ; and this is the reason why St. John
acknowledged Christ's priority, that He,
Who is His own Father's eternal Power,
may be presented as on that account duly
preferred. '
68. But the abounding activity of the
spiritual understanding makes it a pleasing
exercise to sally forth and drive into a cor-
ner the Arians, wdio will understand the
term "made " in this passage, not of the
manhood, but of the Godhead [of Christ].
What ground, indeed, is left for them to take
their stand upon, when the Baptist has
declared that "after me cometh One Who
is made before me," that is, Who, though in
the course of earthly life He comes after
me, yet is placed above the degree of my
worth and grace, and Who has title to
be worshipped as God. For the words
"cometh after me "belong to an event in
time, but "was before me " signify Christ's
eternity ; and " is made before me" refer to
His pre-eminence, forasmuch as, indeed, the
mystery of the Incarnation is above human
deserving. ^
' The explanation of St. John Baptist's words in the Fourth Gos-
pel is to be found, indeed, in the same Gospel (i. 27) and in the
other three Gospels. See S. Matt. iii. 11 S. Mark i. 7; S. Luke
iii. 16. In S. John i. 30, the Baptist says of Jesus Christ not merely
" iTpoTepo? [1.0V i]v " but " 7rpu)To« (uov rji' " — i.e. " first in relation to
me " (and every other human being), " the principle of my very be-
ing." The Arians understood the phrase as if the ordinary com-
parative, suitable for expressing the ordinary priority of human
beings to each other, had been used.
-' Or the meaning may be understood by reference to the fact that
in the Man Christ Jesus there was seen, and felt, grace, authority,
and power such as was more than carihlv. more than human. " Full
of grace are Thy lips, because God hath blessed thee for ever." So
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— BOOK HI.
253
69. Ag-aiii, St. John Baptist also taught in
less weighty language what ideas they were
he hail combined, saying : " Alter me cometh
a ?Nlan, Whose shoes I am not worthy to
bear," setting forth at least the more excel-
lent dignity [of Christ], though not the
eternity of His Divine Generation. Now
these words are so fully intended of the
Incarnation, that Scripture hath giv^en us, in
an earlier book, a human counterpart of the
mystic sandal. For, by the Law, when a
man died, the marriage bond with his wife
was passed on tt) his brother, or other man
next of kin, in order that the seed of the
brother or next of kin might renew the life
of the house, and thus it was that Ruth,
though she was foreign-born, but yet had
possessed a husband of the Jewish people,
who had left a kinsman of near relation,
being seen and loved of Boaz whilst glean-
ing and maintaining herself and her mother-
in-law with that she gleaned, was yet not
taken of Boaz to wife, until she had first
loosed the shoe from [the foot of] him
whose wife she ought, by the Law, to have
become. '
70. The story is a simple one, but deep are
its hidden meanings, for that which was
done was the outward betokening of some-
what further. If indeed we should rack the
sense so as to fit the letter exactly, we
should almost find the words an occasion
of a certain shame and horror, that we
should regard them as intending and con-
veying the thought of common bodily inter-
course ; but it was the foreshadowing of
One Who was to arise from Jewry — whence
Christ was, after the flesh — Who should,
with the seed of heavenly teaching, revive
the seed of his dead kinsman, that is to say,
the people, and to Whom the precepts of the
Law, in their spiritual significance, assigned
the sandal of marriage, for the espousals of
the Church.
71. INIoses was not the Bridegroom, for to
him cometh the word, " Loose thy shoe from
off thy foot," ^ that he might give place to
his Lord. Nor was Joshua, the son of Nun,
the Bridegroom, for to him also it was told,
saying, ' ' Loose thy shoe from off thy foot, " 3
lest, by reason of the likeness of his name,
he should be thought the spouse of the
Church. None other is the Bridegroom but
it was thit He spake as never man spake, teaching with authority,
and lot as the scribes.
1 n-ut. XXV. 5-10: Ruth iv. 5-7. - Ex. iii. 5.
^ Josh. V. 16,
Christ alone, of Whom St. John said : " He
Who hath the bride is the Bridegroom." '
They, therefore, loose their shoes, but His
shoe cannot be loosed, even as St. John
said : "I am not worthy to loose the latchet
of His shoe."^
72. Christ alone, then, is the Bridegroom
to Whom the Church, His bride, comes from
the nations, and gives herself in wedlock ;
aforetime poor and starving, but now rich
with Christ's harvest ; gathering in the hid-
den bosom of her mind handfuls of the rich
crop and gleanings of the Word, that so she
may nourish with fresh food her who is
worn out, bereaved by the death of her son,
and starving, even the mother of the dead
people, — leaving not the widow and desti-
tute, whilst she seeks new children.
73. Christ, then, alone is the Bridegroom,
grudging not even to the synagogue the
sheaves of His harvest. Would that the
synagogue had not of her own will shut
herself out ! She had sheaves that she
might herself have gathered, but, her peo-
ple being dead, she, like one bereaved by
the death of her son, began to gather
sheaves, whereby she might live, by the
hand of the Church — the which sheaves they
who come in joyfulness shall carry, even as
it is written : " Yet surely shall they come
with joy, bringing their sheaves with
them. " 3
74. Who, indeed, but Christ could dare to
claim the Church as His bride, whom He
alone, and none other, hath called from
Libanus, saying : "Come hither from Liba-
nus, my bride ; come hither from Libanus " ? ^
Or of Whom else could the Church have
said : " His throat is sweetness, and He is
altogether desirable " ? 5 And seeing that we
entered upon this discussion from speaking
of the shoes of His feet, — to Whom else but
the Word of God incarnate can those words
apply ? " His legs are pillars of marble, set
upon bases of gold."^ For Christ alone
walks in the souls and makes His path in
the minds of His saints, in which, as upon
bases of gold and foundations of precious
stone the heavenly Word has left His foot-
prints ineffaceably impressed.
75. Clearly we see, then, that both the
man and the type point to the mystery of
the Incarnation.
' S. John iii. 29.
^ Ps. cxxvi. 7.
^ Song of Solomon v. 26,
- S. John i. 27.
* Song of Solomon iv. 8.
® Song of Solomon v. 15.
254
ST. AMBROSE.
CHAPTER XI.
St. Ambrose returns to the main question, and shows
that whenever Christ is said to have " been made "
(or " become "); this must be understood with refer-
ence to His Incarnation, or to certain limitations. In
this sense several passages of Scripture — especially
of St. Paul — are e.vpounded. The eternal Priesthood
of Christ, prefigured in Melchizedek. Christ pos-
sesses not only likeness, but oneness with the
Father.
76. Whex, therefore, Christ is said to have
been " made/' to have "become," the phrase
relates, not to the substance of the God-
head, but often to the Incarnation — some-
times indeed to a particular office ; for if you
understand it of His Godhead, then God was
made into an object of insult and derision
inasmuch as it is written : " But thou hast
rejected thy Christ,' and brought Him to
nought ; thou hast driven Him to wander ; "
and again : "And He was made the deri-
sion of His neighbours. '" ^ Of His neighbours,
mark you — not of them of His household,
not of them who clave to Him, for "he
who cleaveth to the Lord is one Spirit ; " 3
he who is neighbour doth not cleave to
Him. Again, "He was made a derision, "
because the Lord's Cross is to Jews a stum-
bling-block, and to Greeks is foolishness : 4
for to them that are wise He is, by that
same Cross, made higher than the heavens,
higher than angels, and is made the Medi-
ator of the better covenant, even as He was
Mediator of the former.
']']. Mark how I repeat the phrase ; so
far am I from seeking to avoid it. Yq.\. take
notice in what sense He is " made."
78. In the first place, "having made puri-
fication, He sitteth on the right hand of
Majesty on high, being made so much
better than the angels. " 5 Now where puri-
fication is, there is a victim ; where there
is a victim, there is also a body ; where
a body is, there is oblation ; where there is
the office of oblation, there also is sacrifice
made with suffering.
79. In the next place, He is the Mediator
of a better covenant. But where there is
testamentary disposition, the death of the
testator must first come to pass,^ as it is
written a little further on. Howbcit, the
death is not the death of His eternal God-
head, but of His weak human frame.
80. Furthermore, we are taught how He
is made "higher than the heavens.'' " Un-
'Or, as E. v. —"Thine Anointed " (xpio-rbs from xpi«>=anoint).
^ Ps. Ixxxix. ■>,^ and 40- * i Cor. vi. 17.
« J Cor. i. 23. 0 Heb. i. 3, 4. 0 Heb. vii. 22 ; xi. 16
spotted, " saith the Scripture, • ' ' separate from
sinners, and made higher than the heavens ;
not having daily need, as the priests have
need, to offer a victim first for his own sins,
and then for those of the people. For this
He did by sacrificing Himself once and for
all. " None is said to be made higher, save
he who has in some respect been lower ;
Christ, then, is, by His sitting at the right
hand of the Father, made higher in regard
of that wherein, being made lower than the
angels, He offered Himself to suffer.
81. Finally, the Apostle himself saith to
the Philippians, that "being made in the
likeness of man, and found in outward ap-
pearance as a man, He humbled Himself,
being made obedient even unto death." ^
Mark that, in regard whereof He is " made,"
He is made, the Apostle saith, in the like-
ness of man, not in respect of Divine Sov-
ereignty, and He was made obedient unto
death, so that He displayed the obedience
proper to man, and obtained the kingdom
appertaining of right to Godhead.
82. How many passages need we cite
further in evidence that His " being made"
must be understood with reference to His
Incarnation, or to some particular dispen-
sation .? Now whatsoever is made, the same
is also created, for " He spake and they were
made ; He gave also the word, and they
were created. "3 "The Lord created me."
These words are spoken with regard to His
Manhood ; and we have also shown, in our
First Book, that the word "created " appears
to have reference to the Incarnation.
83. Again, the Apostle himself, by declar-
ing that no worship is to be rendered to a
created existence, has shown that the Son
has not been created, but begotten, of God. 4
At the same time he shows in other places
what there was in Christ that was created,
in order to make plain in what sense he has
read in Solomon's book : " The Lord created
Me."
84. Let us now review a whole passages
in order. "Seeing, then, that the sons have
parts of flesh and blood, He too likewise
was made to have part in the same, to the
end that by death He might overthrow him
who had the power of death." ^ \\'ho, then,
is He Who would have us to be partakers
in His own flesh and blood } Surely the
Son of God. How, save by means of the
flesh, was He made partaker with us, 7 or by
1 Heb. vii. 26, 27. 2 p^ji j; ^^ g 3 pg cxlviii. 5.
* Rom. i. 25.
^ Viz. : the complete section Heb. ii. 14 — iii. i, 2.
I Heb. ii. 14.
" Particeps nosier— onr partner, companion, sharing all our la-
bours (and taking the lion's share, too). Isa. liii. 4.
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— BOOK III.
255
what, save by bodily death, brake He the
chains of death ? For Christ's endurance of
death was made the death of Death. ' This
text, then, speaks of the Incarnation.
85. Let us see what follows : " For He did
not indeed [straightway] put on Him the
nature of angels, but that of Abraham's seed.
And thus was He able to be made like to
His brethren in all things throughout, that
He might become a compassionate and
faithful Prince, a Priest unto God. to make
propitiation for the sins of the people ; for
in that He Himself suffered He is able also
to help them that are tempted. Wherefore,
brethren most holy, ye who have each his
share in a heavenly calling, look upon the
Apostle and High Priest of our confession,
Jesus, regard His faithfulness to His Creator,
even as Moses was in his house. "^ These,
then, are the Apostle's words.
86. You see what it is in respect whereof
the writer calls Him created. : "In so far as
He took upon Him the seed of Abraham ; "
plainly asserting the begetting of a body.
How, indeed, but in His body did He
expiate the sins of the people.'' In what did
He suffer, save in His body — even as we said
above : " Christ having suffered in the
flesh " ? In what is He a priest, save in
that which He took to Himself from the
priestly nation ? 3
67. It is a priest's duty to offer something,
and, according to the Law, to enter into the
holy places by means of blood ; seeing,
then, that God had rejected the blood of
bulls and goats, this High Priest was indeed
bound to make passage and entry into the
holy of holies in heaven through His own
blood, in order that He might be the ever-
lasting propitiation for our sins. Priest and
victim, then, are one ; the priesthood and
sacrifice are, however, exercised under the
conditions of humanity, for He was led as a
lamb to the slaughter, and He is a priest
after the order of Melchizedek. 4
88. Let no man, therefore, when he be-
holds an order of human establishment,
contend that in it resides the claim of Di-
vinity ; 5 for even that INIelchizedek, by
whose office Abraham offered sacrifice, the
Church doth certainly not hold to be an
angel (as some Jewish triflers do), but a
holy man and priest of God, who, prefigur-
ing our Lord, *" is described as "without
^ I Cor. XV. 54, 55. 2 Heb. ii. i6 — iii. 2.
^ " Priestly nation." — Ex. xix. 5 ; i Pet. ii. 9. We must not
understand especial reference to the priestly tribe of Levi only, but
to the whole people of Israel. Cf. Heb. vii.
■• Ps. ex. 4. ^ Gen. xiv. 18 £f.
^ Grig. " tyfitim gerens Domini " — " bearing the stamp of our
Lord," marked with His mark, as a coin is stamped with the image
and superscription of the king or other authority who issues it.
father or mother, without history of his de-
scent, without beginning and without end, '' '
in order to show beforehand the coming
into this world of the eternal Son of God,
Who likewise was incarnate and then
brought forth without any father, begotten
as God without mother, and was without
history of descent, for it is written : "His
generation who shall declare ? " ^
89. This Mclchizedek, then, have we re-
ceived as a priest of God made upon the
model of Christ, but the one we regard as
the type, the other as the original. Now a
type is a shadow of the truth, and we have
accepted the royalty of the one in the name
of a single city, but that of the other as
shown in the reconciliation of the whole
world ; for it is written : ' ' God was in Christ,
reconciling the world to Himself ; "3 that is
to say, [in Christ was], eternal Godhead :
or, if the Father is in the Son, even as the
Son is in the Father, then Their unity in
both nature 4 and operation is plainly not
denied.
90. But how, indeed, could our adversaries
justly deny this, even if they would, when
the Scripture saith : "But the Father, Who
abideth in Me, even He doeth the works;"
and "The works that 1 do, He Himself
worketh " ? s Not "He also doeth the works,"
but one should regard it as similarity rather
than unity of work; in saying, "The things
that I do. He Himself doeth, " the Apostle
has left it clear that we ought to believe that
the work of the Father and the work of the
Son is one.
91. On the other hand, when He would
have similarity, not unity, of works, to be
understood. He said : " He that believethin
Me, the works which I do, shall he do
also. "^ Skilfully inserting here the word
"also,"' He hath allowed us similarity, and
yet hath not ascribed natural unity. One,
therefore, is the work of the Father and the
work of the Son, whether the Arians please
so to think or not.
CHAPTER XII.
The kingdom of the Father and of the Son is one and
undivided, so likewise is the Godhead of each.
92. I WOULD now ask how they suppose the
kingdom of the Father and the Son to be
divided, when the Lord hath said, as we
showed above : " Every kingdom divided
against itself shall be speedily overthrown. " 7
» Heb. vii. i S.
* Lat. substantia.
' Matth. xii. 25.
2 Isa. liii. 8.
^ S. John xiv. 10.
^ 2 Cor. V. 19.
'' S. John xiv. 12.
256
ST. AMBROSE.
93. Indeed, it was to debar the impious
teaching of Arian enmity that Saint Peter
himself asserted the dominion of the Father
and the Son to be one, saying : "Wherefore,
my brethren, labour to make your calling
and election sure, for so doing you shall
not go astray, for thus your entrance into
the eternal realm of God and our Lord and
Saviour ' Jesus Christ shall be granted with
the greater abundance of grace. ^
94. Now, if it be thought that Christ's do-
minion alone is spoken of, and the place be
therefoFe understood in such sense that the
Father and the Son are regarded as divided
in authority — yet it will be still acknow-
ledged that it is the dominion of the Son,
and that an eternal one, and thus not only
will two kingdoms, separate, and so liable
to fail, be brought in, but, furthermore, in-
asmuch as no kingdom is to be compared
with God's kingdom, which they cannot,
however greatly they may desire to, deny
to be the kingdom of the Son, they must
either turn back upon their opinion, and
acknowledge the kingdom of the Father
and the Son to be one and the same ; or
they must ascribe to the Father the govern-
ment of a lesser kingdom — which is blas-
phemy ; or they must acknowledge Him,
Whom they wickedly declare to be inferior
in respect of Godhead, to possess an equal
kingdom, which is inconsistent.
95. But this [their teaching] squares not,
agrees not, holds not [with its premisses].
Let them confess, then, that the kingdom is
one, even as we confess and prove, not
indeed on our own evidence, but upon tes-
timony vouchsafed from heaven.
96. To begin with, learn, from further
testimonies [of Scripture], how that the
kingdom of heaven is also the kingdom of
the Son : "Verily, verily, I say unto you,
that there are some amon^rst those which
stand here with us, who shall not taste
death, until they seethe Son of Man coming
into His kingdom." ^ There is therefore no
room for doubt that the kingdom apper-
taineth to the Son of God.
97. Now learn that the kingdom of the
Son is the very same as the kingdom of the
Father: "Verily, I say unto you that there
be some of those which stand around us,
who shall not taste death until they see the
kingdom of God coming in power. "■♦ So
far, indeed, is it one kingdom, that the
reward is one, the inheritor is one and the
* Grig. '■ conservator. " This title must have reference to the
present work of Christ.
- 1 Pet. ii. JO, II. 35. Matt. xvi. 28. * S. Mark viii. 39.
same, and so also the merit, and He Who
promises [the reward].
98. How can it but be one kingdom,
above all when the Son Himself hath said
of Himself: "Then shall the righteous
shine like the sun in the kingdom of My
Father " } ' For that which is the Father's,
by fitness to Llis majesty, is also the Son's,
by unity in the same glory." - The Scrip-
ture, therefore, hath declared the kingdom to
be the kingdom both of the Father and of
the Son.
99. Now learn that where the kingdom of
God is named, there is no putting aside of
the authority either of the Father or of the
Son, because both the kingdom of the
Father and the kingdom of the Son is in-
cluded under the single name of God, say-
ing : "When ye shall see Abraham, Isaac,
and Jacob, and all the prophets, in the
kingdom of God. "^ Do we deny that the
prophets are in the kingdom of the Son,
when even to a dying robber who said,
"Remember me, when Thou comest into
Thy kingdom," the Lord made answer :
'^Verily, I say unto thee, to-day shalt thou
be with Me in paradise. " 4 What, indeed, do
we understand by being in the kingdom of
God, if not the having escaped eternal death.?
But they who have escaped eternal death
see the Son of IMan coming into His king-
dom.
100. How, then, can He not have in His
power that which He gives, saying: "To
thee will I give the keys of the kingdom of
heaven".? 5 See the gulf between [the one
and the other]. The servant opens, the
Lord bestows ; the One through Himself,
the other through Christ ; the minister re-
ceives the keys, the Lord appoints powers :
the one is the right of a giver, the other the
duty of a steward.
loi. See now yet another proof that the
kingdom, the government, of the Father
and the Son is one. It is written in the
Fpistle to Timothy: "Paul, an apostle of
Jesus Christ, according to the government
of God, our Saviour, and Christ Jesus, our
Hope. "^ One, therefore, the kingdom of
the Father and the Son is plainly declared
to be, even as Paul the Apostle also as-
serted, saying : " For know this, that no
shameless person, none that is impure, or
covetous (which meaneth idolatry), hath in-
heritance in the kingdom of Christ and of
God. "7 It is, therefore, one kingdom, one
Godhead.
' S. Matt. xiii. 43. ^ S. John xvii. 5.
■ * S. Luke xxiii. 42, 43. ^ S. Matt. xvi. 19.
' Eph. V. 5.
^ S. I.uke xiiL 28.
* I Tim. i. I.
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— BOOK III.
257
102. Oneness in Godhead the Law hath
proved, which speaks of OJie God,' as also
the Apostle, by saying of Christ ; "In
Whom dwelleth all the. fulness of the God-
head bodily." ^ For if, as the Apostle
saith, all the fulness of the Godhead,
bodily, is in Christ, then must tlie Father
and the Son be confessed to be of one
Godhead ; or if it is desired to sunder the
Godhead of the Son from the Godhead of
the Father, whilst the Son possesses all
the fulness of the Godhead bodily, what is
supposed to be further reserved, seeing that
nothing remains over and above the fulness
of perfection ? Therefore the Godhead is one.
CHAPTER XIII.
The majesty of the Son is His own, and equal to that
of the Father, and the angels are not partakers, but
beholders thereof.
103. Now, we having already laid down
that the Father and the Son are of one image
and likeness, 3 it remains for us to show that
They are also of one majesty. And we need
not go far afield for proof, inasmuch as the
Son Himself has said of Himself: "When
the Son of ]Man shall come in His majesty,
and all the angels with Him, then shall He
sit upon the throne of His majesty. "^
Behold, then, the majesty ot the Son de-
clared ! What lacketh He yet. Whose un-
created majesty cannot be denied .'' s Ma-
jesty, then, belongeth to the Son.
1/04. Let our adversaries now hold it
proved beyond doubt that the majesty of the
Father and of the Son is one, forasmuch as
the Lord Himself hath said : "For he who
shall be ashamed of Me and of My words,
of Him shall the Son of Man be ashamed,
when He cometh in His majesty and His
Father's, and the majesty of the holy an-
gels."^ What is the force of the words
"and the majesty of the holy angels," but
that the servants derive honour from the
worship of their Lord .''
105. The Son, therefore, ascribed His
majesty to His Father as well as to Him-
self, not, indeed, in such sort that the
angels should share in that majesty on
equal terms with the Father and the Son,
but that they should behold the surpassing
glory of God ; for truly not even angels
^ Deut. vi. 4.
- Col. ii. 9. " Bodily," i.e. manifested in bodily form, in human
flesh and blood.
* S. Matt. XXV. 31. 3 Bk. I. vii.
^ The majesty of the Universal Judge cannot take its rise in or be
derived from any human or any created source — it must transcend
»11 created existences, even angels and archangels, cherubim ^nd
seraphim — it must be eternal, divitie.
* S. Luke ix. 26. i
possess a majesty of their own, after the
manner in which Scripture speaks of the
Son : "When He shall sit upon the throne
of His majesty," but they stand in the pre-
sence, that they may see the glory of the
Father and the Son, in such degrees of vision
as they are either worthy of or able to
bear.
106. Furthermore, the God-given words
themselves declare their own meaning,
that you may understand that glory of the
Father and the Son not to be held in com-
mon with them by angels, for thus they run :
"But when the Son of Man shall come in
His majesty, and all the angels with Him."
Again, to show that His Father's majesty
and glory and His own majesty and glory
are one and the same, our Lord Himself
saith in another book: "And the Son of
Man shall confound him, when He shall
come in the glory of His Father, with the
holy angels." ■ The angels come in obedi-
ence, He comes in glory : they are His
retainers. He sits upon His throne : they
stand, He is seated — to borrow terms of the
daily dealings of human life. He is the
Judge : they are the officers of the court.
Note that He did not place first His Father's
divine majesty, and then, in the second
place, His own and the angels', lest He
should seem to have made out a sort of de-
scending order, from the highest to lower
natures. He placed His own majesty first,
and then spoke of His Father's, and the
majesty of the angels (because the Father
could not appear lower than they), in order
that He might not, by placing mention of
Himself between that of His Father and
that of the angels, seem to have made out
some ascending scale, leading from angels
to the Father through increase of His own
dignity ; nor, again, be believed to have, con-
trariwise, shown a descent from the Father
to angels, entailing diminution of that
dignity. Now we who confess one God-
head of the Father and the Son suppose no
such order of distinction as the Arians do.^
CHAPTER XIV.
The Son is of one substance with the Father.
108. And now, your Majesty, with regard
to the question of the substance, why need
I tell you that the Son is of one substance
' S. Mark viii. 38.
* i.e. no such gradation as will lead without a break from angels
to the Father through th? Son, ignoring the difference of creature
and Creator.
258
ST. AMBROSE.
with the Father, when we have read that
the Son is the image of the Father's sub-
stance, that you may understand that there
is nothing wherein, so far as Godhead is
regarded, the Son differs from the Father.
109. In virtue of this likeness Christ
said : "Ail things that the Father hath are
Mine."' We cannot, then, deny substance
to God, for indeed He is not unsubstantial,
Who hath given to others the ground of
their being, though this be different in God
from what it is in the creature. The Son of
God, by Whose agency all things endure,'
could not be unsubstantial.
no. And therefore the Psalmist saith :
"My bones are not hidden, which Thou
didst make in secret, and my substance in
the underworld. " 3 For to His power and
Godhead, the things that before the foun-
dation of the world were done, though their
magnificence was [as yet] invisible, could
not be hidden. Here, then, we find mention
of " substance."
111. But it may be objected that the men-
tion of His substance is the consequence of
His Incarnation. I have shown that the
word " substance " is used more than once,
and that not in the sense of inherited pos-
sessions, as you would construe it. Now,
if it please you, let us grant that, in accord-
ance with the mystic prophecy, the sub-
stance of Christ was present in the under-
world— for truly He did exert His power in
the lower world to set free, in the soul
which animated His own body, the souls
of the dead, to loose the bands of death, to
remit sins.'*
1 1 2. And, indeed, what hinders you
from understanding, by that substance,
His divine substance, seeing that God is
everywhere, so that it hath been said to
Him : " If I go up into heaven, Thou art
there ; if I go down into hell. Thou art
present." s
113. Furthermore, the Psalmist hath in
the words following made it plain that we
must understand the divine substance to be
mentioned when he saith: "Thine eyes
did see My being, [as] not the effect of
^ S. John xvi. 15.
* Latin, " subsisiiint" subsist, persist, last through changes.
Even the ephemeris thus persists, subsists, or endures, for its few
hours of life.
•* " Noti est occultatum os meunt quod fecisti in abscondito, ei
vibstantia mea in inferiorihis ierrrF" The Prayer-book version
runs : " My bones are not hid from I'hee, though I be made secretly,
and fashioned beneath in the earth." — Ps. cxxxix. 14. " My bones
were not hid from Thee, when I was made in secret, fwhen] I was
curiously wrought fasj in the lower parts of the earth." — Perowne.
* I Pet. iii. 19.
* Ps. cxxxix. 7. SeeR.V. " Hell "is " Sheol," a word also ren-
dered " grave." It means the " place cf darkness," the gloomy
underworld, where the spirits of the departed were believed to
abide. It is the place from which Samuel s spirit was called up by
the witch of Endor.— i Sam. xxviiL
working ;" ' inasmuch as the Son is not
made, nor one of God's works, but the be-
gotten Word of eternal power. He called
Him " axaTipyaarov," meaning that the Word
neither made nor created, is begotten
of the Father without the witnessing pre-
sence of any created being. Howbeit, we
have abundance of testimony besides this.
Let us grant that the substance here spoken
of is the bodily substance, provided you
also yourself say not that the Son of God
is something effected by working, but con-
fess His uncreated Godhead.
114. Now I know that some assert that
the mystic incarnate form was uncreated,
forasmuch as nothing was done therein
through intercourse with a man, because
our Lord was the offspring of a virgin. If,
then, many have, on the strength of this
passage, asserted that neither that which
was brought forth of Mary was produced by
creative operation, dare you, disciple of
Arius, think that the Word of God is some-
thing so produced '^
115. But is this the only place where we
read of "substance"'.? Hath it not also
been said in another passage : "The gates
of the cities are broken down, the moun-
tains are fallen, and His substance is re-
vealed " ? ^ What, does the word mean
something created here also ? Some, 1
know, are accustomed to say that the sub-
stance is substance in money. Then, if
you give this meaning to the word, the
mountains fell, in order that some one's
possessions of money might be seen.
Ii6. But let us remember wA<7/ mountains
fell, those, namely, of which it hath been
said : "If ye shall have faith as a grain of
mustard seed ye shall say to this mountain :
Be thou removed, and be thou cast into
the sea ! " ^ By mountains, then, are meant
high things that exalt themselves.*
117. Moreover, in the Greek, the render-
ing is this : "The palaces are fallen." What
palaces, save the palace of Satan, of whom
the Lord said: "How shall His kingdom
stand .^ " 5 We are reading, therefore, of the
things which are the devil's palaces as being
very mountains, and therefore in the fall ot
those palaces from the hearts of the faithful,
the truth stands revealed, that Christ, tlu-
' Ps. cxxxix. 15.
^ Nahum ii. 6. — The LXX. shows — " irvXtu riav -noXeiav Siiji'O'y-
6r]<Tav, K<x\ TO/SaO'iAfia hUmae. icai 17 im6(TTa<Ti<; aireKa\v(j>\iii)." The
Vulg. — " Portce Jliivioru»t aperttp siint, ct iejit/>htt>i ad sohiin di-
riitum. Et miles captivus adductiis est" R.V. — "The gates of
the rivers are opened and the palace is dissolved, and Huzzab is
uncovered, and it is decreed ; she is uncovered, she is carried away,"
etc.
•"* S. Matt. Tvii. 19. ■• 2 Cor. x. 5.
^ RegMim is used in Latin to denote a domain as well as in the
general sense of "kingdom." Virg., Eel. \. 70 ; S. Matt. xii. 26.
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— BOOK III.
259
Son of God, is of the Father's eternal sub-
stance. What, again, are those mountains
of bronze, from the midst of which four
chariots come forth ? '
118. We behold that height, lifting up
itself against the knowledge of God, cast
down by the word of the Lord, when the
Son of Gotl said : " Hold thy peace, and
come forth, thou foul spirit."^ Concerning
whom the prophet also said: '"Behold, I
am come to thee, thou mount of corrup-
tion ! " 3
119. Tliose mountains, then, are fallen,-*
and it is revealed that in Christ was the sub-
stance of God, in the words of those who
had seen Him : "Truly Thou art the Son
of God," s for it was in virtue of divine, not
human power, that He commanded devils.
Jeremiah also saith : ' ' Make mourning upon
the mountains, and beat your breasts upon
the desert tracks, for they have failed ; for-
asmuch as there are no men, they have not
heard the word of substance : from flying
fowl to beasts of burden, they trembled,
they have failed."^
120. Nor has it escaped us, that in an-
other place also, setting forth the frailties of
man's estate, m order to show that He had
taken upon Himself the infirmity of the
flesh, and the affections of our minds, the
Lord said, by the mouth of His prophet :
"Remember, O Lord, what My substance
is," 7 because it was the Son of God speak-
ing in the nature of human frailty.^
121. Of Him the Scripture saith, in the
passage cited, ^ in order to discover the mys-
teries of the Incarnation : " But Thou hast
rejected, O Lord, and counted for nought —
Thou hast cast out Thy Christ. '° Thou hast
overthrown the covenant made with Thy
Servant, and trampled His holiness in the
earth."" What was it, in regard whereof
the Scripture called Him "Servant," but
' Zech. vi. I. 2 s Mark i. 25.
■'' Jer. li. 25. The " mount of corruption " is Babylon.
■• i.e. those cities and nations and persons who have exalted them-
selves, lifted themselves up as high mountains, challenging, as it
were, the majesty of heaven. Cf. Ps. Ixviii. 16, R.V.
^ S Luke iv. 41.
" Jer. ix. 10. St. Ambrose follows the text of the LXX. with one
or two variations in the punctuation. What St. Ambrose renders
as " t/(7^ substantice" ("word of substance" or "voice of sub-
stance ") appears in the LXX. as " (^uji-r) iindp^eux; " (which z'ox stcb-
stanticp represents verbatim), and in Vulg. as " vox possidentis "
(" the voice of the possessor "—/.^. landowner); in the A.V. and
R.V. as " the voice of the cattle."— On-apfi? and substantia should be
taken in the concrete sense (as they clearly represent a concrete
term), like our " substance, "or " possessions." Now in primitive
society— like, e.g., that of the nomad Tartars — possessions consist
mainly in horses and cattle. Cf. the evolution of the term pecunia
=money.
" Ps. Ixxxix. 46.
' The text will then be prophetic of the Agony in the Garden and
upon the Cross.
^ Ps. Ixxxix. 37, 38.
'" Or, "thine Anointed." Cf. Ps. xxii. i ; S. Matt, xxvii. 46.
'1 " Holiness." E. V.— "crown."
His flesh? — seeing that " He did not hold
equality with God as a prey, but emptied
Himself, taking the form of a servant, being
made into the likeness of men, and found
in fashion as a man." ' So, then, in that He
took upon Himself My nature, He was a
servant, but by virtue of His own power
He is tlie Lord.
122. Furthermore, what meaneth it that
thou readest : "Who hath stood in the
truth {substantia) of the Lord } " and
again: "Now if they had stood in My
truth, and had given ear to My words,
and had taught My people, I would have
turned them from their follies and trans-
gressions " .'' ^
CHAPTER XV.
The Arians, inasmuch as they assert the Son to be "of
another substance," plainly aclvnowledge substance
in God. The only reason why they avoid the use of
this term is that they will not, as Eusebius of Nico-
media has made it evident, confess Christ to be the
true Son of God.
123. How can the Arians deny the sub-
stance of God } 3 How can they suppose
that the word " substance " which is found in
many places of Scripture ought to be de-
barred from use, when they themselves do
yet, by saying that the Son is " irepoouatog"
that is, of another substance, admit sub-
stance in God ?
124. It is not the term itself, then, but its
force and consequences, that they shun, be-
cause they will not confess the Son of God
to be true [God]. 4 For though the process
of the divine generation cannot be compre-
hended in human language, still the Fathers
judged that their faith might be fitly dis-
tinguished by the use of such a term, as
against that of " irepooutTLo?," following the
authority of the prophet, who saith : " Who
hath stood in the truth {substantia) of the
Lord, and seen His Word .-' " s Arians, there-
fore, admit the term " substance " when it is
used so as to square with their blasphemy ;
contrariwise, when it is adopted in accord-
ance with the pious devotion of the faithful,
they reject and dispute against it.
125. What other reason can there be for
their unwillingness to have the Son spoken
of as " (j,'j.i>(>ij(Ttn?/' of the same substance,
with the Father, but that they are unwilling
1 Phil.ii. 6, 7.
^ St. Ambrose's "substantia" is, in the LXX., viroarrjixa —
"standing-ground." R.V. "council." — Jer. xxiii. 18-22.
■* i.e. how can they say there is no Divine Substance, that the use
of the term " substance " is illegitimate ?
* Or to be the trite Son of God, Son by nature, not by adoption.
' Jer. xxiii. 18.
26o
ST. AMBROSE.
to confess Him the true Son of God? This
is betrayed in the letter of Eusebius of
Nicomedia. "If," writes he, "we say that
the Son is true God and uncreate, then we
are in the way to confess Him to be of one
substance (J.uoofWjo^) with the Father."
When this letter had been read before the
Council assembled at Nicsea, the Fathers
put this word in their exposition of .the Faith,
because they saw that it daunted their ad-
versaries ; in order that they might take the
sword, which their opponents had drawn, to
smite off the head of those opponents' own
blasphemous heresy. '
126. Vain, however, is their plea, that
they avoid the use of the term, because of
the Sabellians ; ^ whereby they betray their
own ignorance, for a being is of the same
substance {ofinn'xrcir/) with another, not with
itself. Rightly, then, do we call the Son
''ofiooixTco?" (of the same substance), with
the Father, forasmuch as that term expresses
both the distinction of Persons and the unity
of nature.
127. Can they deny that the term "'ouffia "
is met with in Scripture, when the Lord has
spoken of bread, that is, " ^Tztouffcu?," ^ and
Moses has written " o/iei's easadi fioi Xad? Trepc-
ooffLoq " ? 4 What does " obrria " mean, whence
comes the name, but from " "u^ra asi" s " that
which endures for ever.? For He Who is,
and is for ever, is God ; and therefore the
Divine Substance, abiding everlastingly, is
^ Cf. I Sam. xvii. 51.
^ The Sabellians reduced the distinction of Persons in the Trinity
to a distinction of three different self-manifestations of one and the
same Person, appearing at different times in different aspects or
characters, as " one man in his time plays many parts.'' They, there-
fore, would mean, if they said that the Son was omooutrio? with the
Father, that He was identicai wnih Him. Another perverse use of
the term supervened upon the argument that if the Father and the
Son were o/ioouo-iot there must be some ovolo., identical with neither,
but in which both, so to speak, had a share, by virtue of participa-
tion in which they existed and were what they were — a theory which
adapted the Platonic doctrine of Universal Ideas to expound the
mysteries of the Godhead. It was the perverse use of the term by
such persons as Paul of Samosata (condemned by the .Synod of An-
tioch, 269 A.D.) that caused it to be received at first with suspicion
even by the orthodox at the Nicene Synod in 325 A.D. The true
doctrine would be to this effect, that in relation to the Persons, the
Godhead is not a separate, more comprehensive entity, existing in-
dependently, and the fount of existence to each and all of the Per-
sons— not as the Platonic (ivrav&punroi; (ideal or archetypal man), for
example, to the nokKoi av&p<oiTOi (sundry individuals), but is in each
of the Persons fully and completely, yet without destruction of its
unity. The Godhead is a Trpiorr) ova-La, a single, individual substance.
So also is each One of the Three Persons — but their inter-relation is
such that neither is the Godhead anything apart from them, nor they
anything apart from the Godhead or from each other It is the
Three to^^ei/u^r that constitute the One Oi'aia or Essence, it is the
definition of this Essence that applies to Each of tliem equally,
without difference, whilst Each Person retains His Personal char-
acteristics and Personal (not natural or substantial) " differentia."
Speaking logically, the Three Persons are "of one definition;"
speaking metaphysically, they are " of one Essence" Now both
"of one definition" and " of one essence " may be rendered by
6/Aoou(rtoi.
^ .S. Matt. vi. II. 67rioi)o-io?— " required for our subsistence, proper
for our sustenance." See .Alford /'« loc.
* Ex. xix. 6.
'The derivation is philologically incorrect, for oucriais formed
upon the fern, of the pres. part, of elvai, but for all that it em-
bodies a certain truth, inasmuch as ovaia in its abstract use denotes
simple existence, without reference to conditions. .
called ohnia. Bread is i-tooffco's, because,
taking the substance of abiding power from
the substance of the Word, it supplies this
to heart and soul, for it is written : "And
bread strengtheneth man's heart." '
128. Let us, then, keep the precepts of
our forefathers, nor with rude and reckless
daring profane the symbols bequeathed to
us. That sealed book of prophecy, whereof
we have heard, neither elders, nor powers,
nor angels, nor archangels, ventured to
open ; for Christ alone is reserved the pe-
culiar right of opening it. ^ Who amongst
us dare unseal the book of the priesthood,
sealed by confessors, and long hallowed by
the testimony of many .? ^ They who have
been constrained to unseal, nevertheless
have since, respecting the deceit put upon
them, sealed again ; they who dared not lay
sacrilegious hands upon it, have stood forth
as martyrs and confessors. How can we
deny the Faith held by those whose victory
we proclaim?
CHAPTER XVL '
In order to forearm the orthodox against the strata-
gems of the Arians, St. Ambrose discloses some of
the deceitful confessions used by the latter, and
shows by various arguments, that though they some-
times call the .Son " God," it is not enough, unless
they also admit His equality with the Father.
129. Let none fear, let none tremble ; he M
who threatens gives the advantage to the
faithful. The soothing balms of deceitful
men are poisoned — then must we be on
our guard against them, when they pretend
to preach that they do deny. Thus were
those aforetime, who lightly trusted to
them, deceived, so that they fell into the
snares of treachery, when they thought all
was good faith.
130. "Let him be accursed," say they,
"who says that Christ is a creature, after
the manner of the rest of created beings."
Plain folks have heard this, and put faith in
it, for, as it is written, " the simple man be-
lieves every word. " 4 Thus have they heard
and believed, being taken in by the first
sound thereof, and, like birds, eager for the
' Ps. civ. 15. The term en-iouVios has a spiritual import, inasmuch
as the life of the body, supported by bread, is not all but should be
subordinate to the spiritual life — the healthy body to be the instru-
ment and vehicle of the healthy soul, for man's reuilUe (though he
is not apt to think it such) is not dependent on bread alone — his
7vhole existence is not material, though one side of it is. St. Am-
brose, however, seems rather disposed to overlook the physical ma-
terial bread (which we are certainly taught to pray for) for the
sake of the supra. sensible Bread of Heaven and Food of Angels.
- Rev. V. 5.
■' .\ reference to the Synod of Ariminum. See Bk. I. xiii. 122.
' Prov. xiv. 15.
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— BOOK III.
261
beiit of faith, have not noted the net spread
for them, and so, pursuing after faith, have
caught the hook of ungodly deceit. Where-
fore "be ye wise as serpents," saith the
Lord, " and harmless as doves." ' Wisdom is
jnit foremost, in order that harmlessness may
be unharmed.
131. For those are serpents, such as the
Gospel intends, who put off old habits, in
order to put on new manners : " Putting off
the old man, together with his acts, and
putting on the new man, made in the image
of Him Who created him."^ Let us learn,
then, the ways of those whom the Gospel
calls the serpents, throwing off the slough
of the old man, that so, like serpents, we
may know how to preserve our life and be-
ware of fraud.
132. It would have been sufficient to say,
" Accursed be he who saith that Christ is a
created being. " Why, then, Arian, dost thou
mingle poison with the good that is in
thy confession, and so defile the whole
body of it? For by addition of "after the
manner of the rest of created beings,"
you deny not that Christ is a being
created, but that He is a created being like
[all] others — for created being you do entitle
Him, albeit you assign to Him dignity
transcending the rest of creation. Further-
more, Arius, the first teacher of this un-
godly doctrine, said that the Son of God was
a perfect created being, and not as the rest
of created beings. See you, then, how that
you have adopted language bequeathed you
from your father. To deny that Christ is a
being created is enough: why add "but
not as the rest of beings created " ? Cut away
the gangrened part, lest the contagion spread
— it is poisonous, deadly.
133. Again, you say sometimes that
Christ is God. Nay, but so call Him true
God, as meaning, that you acknowledge
Him to possess the fulness of the Father's
Godhead — for there are gods, so called,
alike in heaven or upon earth. The name
"God," then, is not to be used as a mere
manner of address and mention, but with
the understanding that you affirm, of the
Son, that same Godhead which the Father
hath, as it is written : ' ' For as the Father
hath life in Himself, so hath He given to
the Son also to have life in Himself ;" '
that is to say. He hath given it to Him, as
to His Son, through begetting Him — not by
grace, as to one indigent.
134. "And He hath given Him power to
execute judgment, because He is the Son
' S. Matt. X. i5. ' Col. iii. 9, 10.
3 S. John V. z6.
of Man." ' Note well this addition, that you
may not take occasion, upon a word, to
preach falsehood. You read that He is the
Son of Man ; do you therefore deny that
He accepts [the power given] ? Deny God,
then, if all things proper to God are not
given to the Son, for whereas He has said,
" All things that the Father hath are
Mine,"^ why not acknowledge that all the
properties and attributes of Divinity are in
the Son [as they are in the Father] ? For
He who saith, " All things that the
Father hath are Mine," what does He ex-
cept as having not ?
135. Why is it that you recount "with
insistence " and in such sincere language,
Christ's raising the dead to life, walking
upon the waters, healing the sicknesses
of men ? These powers, indeed, He has
given to His bondmen to display as well
as Himself. They do the more arouse my
wonder when seen present in men, foras-
much as God hath given them power so
great. I would hear somewhat concerning
Christ that is His distinctly and peculiarly,
and cannot be held in common with Him
by created beings, now that He is be-
gotten, the only Son of God, very God of
very God, sitting at the Father's right
hand.
136. Wheresoever I read of the Father
and Son sitting side by side, I find the Son
always upon the right hand. Is that be-
cause the Son is above the Father.? Nay,
we say not so ; but He Whom God's love
honours is dishonoured by man's ungodli-
ness. The Father knew that doubts as
concerning the Son must needs be sown,
and He hath given us an example of rever-
ence for us to follow after, lest we dis-
honour the Son.
CHAPTER XVII.
An objection based on St. Stephen's vision of the
Lord standing is disposed of, and from the prayers
of the same saint, addressed to the Son of God, the
equaUty of the Son with the Father is shown.
137. There is just one place, in which
Stephen hath said that he saw the Lord
Jesus standing at the right hand of God.-^
Learn now the import of these words, that
you may not use them to raise a question
upon. Why (you would ask) do we read
every where else of the Son as sitting at the
right hand of God, but in one place of His
standing? He sits as Judge of quick and
' S. John V. 27.
* S. John xvi. 15.
^ Acts vii. 55.
262
ST. AMBROSE.
dead ; He stands as His people's Advocate.
He stood, then, as a Priest, whilst He was
offering- to His Father the sacrifice of a
g-ood martyr ; He stood, as the Umpire, to
bestow, as it were, upon a good wrestler the
prize of so mighty a contest.
138. Receive thou also the Spirit of God,
that thou mayest discern those things, even
as Stephen received the Spirit ; and thou
mayest say, as the martyr said: "Behold,
I see the heavens opened, and the Son of
Man standing at the right hand of God. " '
He who hath the heavens opened to him,
seeth Jesus at the right hand of God : he
whose soul's eye is closed, seeth not Jesus
at the right hand of God. Let us, then,
confess Jesus at God's right hand, that
to us also the heavens may be opened.
They who confess otherwise close the gates
of heaven against themselves.
139. But if any urge in objection that the
So7i was standing, let them show upon this
passage that the Father was seated, for
though Stephen said that the Son of Man
was standing, still he did not further say
here that the Father was sitting.
140. Howbeit, to make it more abun-
dantly clear and knowMi that the standing
implied no dishonour, but rather sovereignty,
Stephen prayed to the Son, being desirous
to commend himself the more to the Father,
saying: "Lord Jesu, receive my spirit. " ^
Again, to show that the sovereignty of the
Father and of the Son is one and the same,
he prayed again, saying, " Lord, lay not this
sin to their charge. " ' These are the words
that the Lord, in His own Passion, speaks
to the Father, as the Son of Man — these
the words of Stephen's prayer, in his own
martyrdom to the Son of God. When the
same grace is sought of both the Father and
the Son, the same power is affirmed of
each.
141. Otherwise, if our opponents will
have it that Stephen addressed himself to
the Father, let them consider what, on their
own showing, they affirm. We indeed are
unmoved by their arguments ; howbeit, let
them, to whom the letter and sequence is
all important, take notice that the Jirsi
petition is addressed to the Son. Now we,
even on their understanding of the passage,
prove from it the unity of the Father's
and the Son's majesty ; for when the Son is
addressed in prayer as well as the Father,
the equality which the prayer assigns points
to unity in action. But if they will not
allow that the Son was addressed with the
title "Lord," we see that they do indeed
seek to deny that He is Lord.
142. Seeing, however, that so great a
martyr's crown has been brought forth,
let us abate the eagerness of disputa-
tion, and bring to-day's discourse to a
close. Let us sing the praises of the holy
martyr, as is fitting always after a mighty
conflict — the martyr bleeding indeed from
the enemy's blows, but rewarded with the
crown bestowed by Christ.
BOOK IV.
CHAPTER L
The marvel is, not that men have failed to know Christ,
but that they have not listened to the words of the
Scriptures. Christ, indeed, was not known, even of
angels, save by revelation, nor again, by His fore-
runner. Follows a description of Christ's triumphal
ascent into heaven, and the excellence of its glory
over the assumption of certain prophets. Lastly,
from exposition of the conversation with angels upon
this occasion, the omnipotence of the Son is proved,
as against the Arians.
I. Ox consideration, your Majesty, of the
reason wherefore men have so far gone
astray, or that many — alas! — should follow
' Acts
vu. ss.
Acts vii. 58.
diverse ways of belief concerning the Son of
God, the marvel seems to be, not at all that
human knowledge has been baffled in deal-
ing with superhuman things, but that it has
not submitted to the authority of the Scrip-
tures.
2. What reason, indeed, is there to wonder,
if by their worldly wisdom men failed to
comprehend the mystery of God the Father
and the Lord Jesus Christ, in Whom all the
treasures of wisdom and knowledge are
hidden,^ that mystery of which not even
angels have been able to take knowledge,
save by revelation .-'
* Acts vii. 51.
* Col. ii. 3.
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— BOOK IV.
263
3. For who could by force of imagination,
and not by faith, follow the Lord Jesus, now
descending from the highest heaven to the
shades below, now rising again from Hades
to the heavenly places ; in a moment self-
emptied, that He might dwell amongst us,
and yet never made less than He was, the
Son being ever in the P'ather and the Father
in the Son ?
4. Even Christ's forerunner, though only
in so far as representing 'the synagogue, '
doubted concerning Him, even he who
was appointed to go before the face of the
Lord, and at last sending messengers,
enquired : "Art Thou He that should come,
or do we look for another? " *
5. Angels, too, stood spellbound in won-
der at the heavenly mystery. And so,
when the Lord rose again, and the heights
of heaven could not bear the glory of His
rising from the dead. Who of late, so far as
regarded His flesh, had been confined in the
narrow bounds of a sepulchre, even the
heavenly hosts doubted and were amazed.
6. For a Conqueror came, adorned with
wondrous spoils, the Lord was in His holy
Temple, before Him went angels and arch-
angels, marvelling at the prey wrested from
death, and though they knew that nothing
can be added to God from the flesh, because
all things are lower than God, nevertheless,
beholding the trophy of the Cross, whereof
"the government was upon His shoulder,"
and the spoils borne by the everlasting
Conqueror, they, as if the gates could not
afford passage for Him Who had gone forth
from them, though indeed they can never
o'erspan His greatness — they sought some
broader and more lofty passage for Him on
His return — so entirely had He remained
undiminished by His self-emptying.
7. However, it was meet that a new way
should be prepared before the face of the
new Conqueror — for a Conqueror is always,
as it were, taller and greater in person than
others ; but, forasmuch as the Gates of
Righteousness, which are the Gates of the
Old and the New Testament, wherewith
heaven is opened, are eternal, they are not
indeed changed, but raised, for it was not
merely one man but the whole world that
entered, in the person of the All-Redeemer.
8. Enoch had been translated, Elias caught
i:p, but the servant is not above his Master.
' St. Ambrose perhaps meant that John Baptist had, for a space,
lost the prophetic Light, when he doubted, and sent disciples to en-
quire of Jesus. The darkness of the dungeon had drawn a cloud
over the prisoner's soul, and for a time he was in the state described
by Isaiah ix. i, walking in darkness and the shadow of death, the
state of the people of Israel (represented by the synagogue) at the
time of our Lord's Advent. See S. Matt. iv. 12-16.
- S. Matt. xi. 3.
For "No man hath ascended into heaven,
but He Who came down from heaven ; " '
and even of Moses, though his corpse was
never seen on earth, we do nowhere read
as of one abiding in celestial glory, unless it
was after that the Lord, by the earnest of
His own Resurrection, burst the bonds of
hell and exalted the souls of the godly.
Enoch, then, was translated, and Elias
caught up ; both as servants, both in the
body, but not after resurrection from the
dead, nor with the spoils of death and the
triumphal train of the Cross, had they been
seen of angels.
9. And therefore [the angels] descrying
the approach of the Lord of all, first and
only Vanquisher of Death, bade their princes
that the gates should be lifted up, saying in
adoration, "Lift up the gates, such as are
princes amongst you, and be ye lifted up, O
everlasting doors, and the King of glory
shall come in." ^
10. Yet there were still, even amongst the
hosts of heaven, some that were amazed,
overcome with astonisliment at such pomp
and glory as they had never yet beheld, and
therefore they asked: "Who is the King of
glory .? " 3 Howbeit, seeing that the angels
(as well as ourselves) acquire their know-
ledge step by step, and are capable of ad-
vancement, they certainly must display dif-
ferences of power and understanding, for God
alone is above and beyond the limits im-
posed by gradual advance, possessing, as He
does, every perfection from everlasting.
11. Others, again, ^those, to wit, whohad
been present at His rising again, those who
had seen or who already recognized Him, —
made reply: "It is the Lord, strong and
mighty, the Lord mighty in battle."
12. Then, again, sang the multitude of
angels, in triumphal chorus : " Lift up the
gates, O ye that are their princes, and be ye
lift up, ye everlasting doors, and the King of
glory shall come in."
13. And back again came the challenge of
them that stood astonished : "Who is that
King of glory .'' For we saw Him having
neither form nor comeliness;'* if then it be
not He, who is that King of glory .? "
14. Whereto answer they which know :
"The Lord of Hosts, He is the King of
glory." Therefore, the Lord of Hosts, He
is the Son. How then do the Arians call
Him fallible. Whom we believe to be Lord
of Hosts, even as we believe of the Father }
How can they draw distinctions between
* S. John iii. 13.
' Ps. xxiv. 7. St. Ambrose follows the LXX.
* Ps. xxiv. 8. * Isa. liii. 3.
264
ST. AMBROSE.
the sovereign powers of Each, when we have
found the Son, even as also the Father,
entitled " Lord of Saboath " ? For, in this
very passage, the reading in many copies
is : "The Lord of Sabaoth, He is the King
of glory." Now the translators have, for the
" Lord of Sabaoth," rendered in some places
' ' the Lord of Hosts, " in others "the Lord the
King," and in others "the Lord Omnipotent."
Therefore, since He Who ascended is the
Son, and, again. He Who ascended is the
Lord of Sabaoth, it surely follows that the
Son of God is omnipotent !
CHAPTER n.
None can ascend to heaven without faith ; in any case,
he who hath so ascended thither will be cast out ;
wherefore, faith must be zealously preserved. We
ourselves each have a heaven within, the gates
whereof must be opened and be raised by confession
of the Godhead of Christ, which gates are not
raised by Arians, nor by those who seek the Son
amongst earthly things, and who must therefore, like
the Magdalene, be sent back to the apostles, against
whom the gates of hell shall not prevail. Scriptures
are cited to show that the servant of the Lord must
not diminish aught of his Master's honour.
15. What shall we do, then .? How shall
we ascend unto heaven ? There, powers are
stationed, principalities drawn up in order,
who keep the doors of heaven, and challenge
him who ascends. Who shall give me
passage, unless I proclaim that Christ is
Almighty.'' The gates are shut, — they are
not opened to any and every one ; not
every one who will shall enter, unless he
also believes according to the true Faith.
The Sovereign's court is kept under guard.
16. Suppose, however, that one who is
unworthy hath crept up, hath stolen past
the principalities who keep the gates of
heaven, hath sat down at the supper of the
Lord ; when the Lord of the banquet enters,
and sees one not clad in the wedding gar-
ment of the Faith, He will cast him into
outer darkness, where is weeping andgnash-
ing of teeth, ' if he keep not the Faith and
peace.
17. Let us, therefore, keep the wedding
garment which we have received, and not
deny Christ that which is His own. Whose
omnipotence angels announce, prophets
foretel, apostles witness to, even as we have
already shown above. ^
18. Perchance, indeed, the prophet hath
spoken of His entering in not only with
regard to the gates of the universal heaven ;
1 S. Matt. xxii. ii.
2Bk. II. iv.
for there be other heavens also where-
in to the Word of God passeth, whereof it is
said : " We have a great Priest, a High
Priest, Who hath passed through the heavens,
Jesus, the Son of God. "^ What are those
heavens, but even the heavens whereof the
prophet sayeth that "the heavens declare
the glory of God " ? ^
19. For Christ standeth at the door of thy
soul. Hear Him speaking. "Behold, I
stand at the door, and knock : if any man
opqn to Me, I will come in to him, and I
will sup with him, and he with Me." 3 And
the Church saith, speaking of Him : "The
voice of my brother soundeth at the door. " *
20. He stands, then — but not alone, for
before Him go angels, saying : " Lift up the
gates, O ye the princes." What gates.'
Even those of the which the Psalmist sings
in another place also : ' ' Open to me the gates
of righteousness. " 5 Open, then, thy gates to
Christ, that He may come into thee — open
the gates of righteousness, the gates of
chastity, the gates of courage and wisdom.
21. Believe the message of the angels:
"Be ye lift up, ye everlasting doors, and the
King of glory shall come in, the Lord of
Sabaoth." Thy gate is the loud confession
made with faithful voice ; it is the door of
the Lord, which the Apostle desires to have
opened for him, as he says: "That a door
of the word may be opened for me, to pro-
claim the mystery of Christ." ^
22. Let thy gate, then, be opened to
Christ, and let it be not only opened, but
lifted up, if, indeed, it be eternal and not con-
demned to ruin ; for it is written : "And be
ye lift up, ye everlasting doors." The lintel
was lift up for Isaiah, when the seraph
touched his lips and he saw the Lord of
Sabaoth.
23. Thy gates shall be lifted up, then, if
thou believest the Son of God to be eternal,
omnipotent, above and beyond all praise
and understanding, knowing all things, both
past and to come, whilst if thou judgest Him
to be of limited power and knowledge, and
subordinate, thou liftest not up the everlast-
ing doors.
24. Be thy gates lifted up, then, that Christ
may come in unto thee, not such a Christ as
theArians take Him to be— petty, and weak,
and menial — but Christ in the form of God,
Christ with the Father ; that He may enter
such as He is, exalted above the heaven
and all things ; and that He may send forth
upon thee His holy Spirit. It is expedient
' Heb. iv. 14.
^ Song of Solomon v. 2.
* Ps. xix. I.
^ Ps. cxviii.
^ Rev. iii. 20.
8 Col. iv. 3.
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— BOOK IV.
265
for thee that thou shouldst believe tlmt
He hath ascended aiul is sitting- at the right
hand of the Father, for if in impious thought
thou detain Him amongst things created and
earthly, if He depart not for thee, ascend
not for thee, tlien to thee the Comforter shall
not come, even as Christ Himself hath told
us : " For if I go not away, the Comforter
will not come unto you, but if I depart, I
will send Him unto you." '
25. But if thou shouldst seek Him
amongst earthly beings, even as Mary of
Magdala sought Him, take heed lest He say
to thee, as unto her : "Touch Me not, for
lam not yet ascended unto My Father. " ^
For thy gates are narrow — they give me no
passage — they cannot be lifted up, and
therefore I cannot come in.
26. Go thy way, therefore, to my brethren
— that is, to those everlasting doors, which,
as soon as they see Jesus, are lifted up.
Peter is an "everlasting door," against whom
the gates of hell shall not prevail. ^ John
and James, the sons of thunder, to wit,4
are " everlasting doors." Fverlasting are
the doors of the Church, where the pro-
phet, desirous to proclaim the praises of
Christ, says : "That I may tell all thy
praises in the gates of the daughter of
Sion."5
27. Great, therefore, is the mystery of
Christ, before which even angels stood
amazed and bewildered. For this cause,
then, it is thy duty to worship Him, and,
being a servant, thou oughtest not to de-
tract from thy Lord. Ignorance thou may-
est not plead, for to this end He came
down, that thou mayest believe ; if thou
beiievest not. He has not come down for
thee, has not suffered for thee. "If I had
not come," saith the Scripture, " and spoken
with them, they would have no sin : but
now have they no excuse for their sin.
He that hateth Me, hateth My Father
also."^ Who, then, hates Christ, if not he
who speaks to His dishonour.'' — for as it is
love's part to render, so it is hate's to with-
draw honour. 7 He who hates, calls in
question ; he who loves, pays reverence.
CHAPTER HI.
The words, " The head of every man is Christ . . . and
the head of Christ is God," misused by the Arians,
are now turned back against them, to their confu-
1 S. John xvi. 7. 2 S. John xx. 17. ' S. Matt. xvi. 18.
* S. Mark iii. 17. ^ Ps. ix. 14. "^ S. John xv. 22, 23.
^ Grig. " derogare.'''' Derogare was a Roman law-term, meaning
to repeal a law in part, to restrict or modify it — hence it came to be
used generally of diminishing or taking away from anything already
established.
tation. Next, another passage of Scripture, com-
monly taken by the same heretics as a ground of ob-
jection, is called in to show that God is the Head
of Christ, in so far as Christ is human, in regard of
His Manhood, and the unwisdom of their opposition
upon the text, " He who plaiitethand He who water-
eth are one," is displayed. After which explanations,
the meaning of the doctrine that the Father is in the
Son, and the Son in the Father, and that the faithful
are in Both, is expounded.
28. Now let us examine some other ob-
jections raised by the Arians. It is written,
say they, that "the head of every man is
Christ, and the head of woman is man,
and the head of Christ is God." ' Let them,
if they please, tell me what they mean by
this objection — whether to join together, or
to dissociate, these four terms. Suppose
they mean to join them, and say that God
is the Head of Christ in the same sense and
manner as man is the head of woman.
INIark what a conclusion they fall into. For
if this comparison proceeds on the supposed
equality of the terms of it, and these four —
woman, man, Christ, and God — are viewed
together as in virtue of a likeness resulting
from their being of one and the same nature,
then woman and God will begin to come
under one definition.
29. But if this conclusion be not satis-
factory, by reason of its impiety, let them
divide, on what principle they will. Thus,
if they will have it that Christ stands to
God the Father in the same relation as
woman to man, then surely they pronounce
Christ and God to be of one substance, inas-
much as woman and man are of one nature
in respect of the flesh, for their difference is
in respect of sex. But, seeing that there is
no difference of sex between Christ and His
Father, they will acknowledge then that
which is one, and common to the Son and
the Father, in respect of nature, whereas
they will deny the difference lying in sex.
30. Does this conclusion content them 1
Or will they have woman, man, and Christ
to be of one substance, and distinguish the
Father from them .? Will this, then, serve
their turn } Suppose that it will, then ob-
serve what they are brought to. They
must either confess themselves not merely
Arians, but very Photinians, because they
acknowledge only the Manhood of Christ,
Whom they judge fit only to be placed on
the same scale with human beings. Or
else they must, however contrary to their
leanings, subscribe to our belief, by which
we dutifully and in godly fashion maintain
that which they have come at by an im-
1 I Cor. xi. 3.
266
ST. AMBROSE.
pious course of thought, that Christ is in-
deed, after His divine generation,' the
power of God, whilst after His putting on of
thefiesh, He is of one substance withal! men
in regard of His flesh, excepting indeed the
proper glory of His Incarnation,^ because
He took upon Himself the reality, not a
phantom likeness, of flesh.
31. Let God, then, be the Head of Christ,
with regard to the conditions of IVIanhood.
Observe that the Scripture says not that the
Father is the Head of Christ, but that God is
the Head of Christ, because the Godhead,
as the creating power, is the Head of the
being created. And well said [the Apostle]
" the Head of Christ is God ; " to bring be-
fore our thoughts both the Godhead of Christ
and His flesh, implying, that is to say, the
Incarnation in the mention of the name of
Christ, and, in that of the name of God,
oneness of Godhead and grandeur of sove-
reignty.
32. But the saying, that in respect of the
Incarnation God is the Head of Christ, leads
on to the principle that Christ, as Incarnate,
is the Head of man, as the Apostle has
clearly expressed in another passage, where
he says : ' ' Since man is the head of woman,
even as Christ is the Head of the Church ; " ^
whilst in the words following he has added :
"Who gave Himself for her. " 4 After His In-
carnation, then, is Christ the head of man,
for His self-surrender issued from His In-
carnation.
33. The Head of Christ, then, is God, in
so far as His form of a servant, that is, of
man, not of God, is considered. But it is
nothing against the Son of God, if, in ac-
cordance with the reality of His flesh, He is
like unto men, whilst in regard of His God-
head He is one with the Father, for by this
account of Him we do not take aught from
His sovereignty, but attribute compassion
to Him.
34. But who can with a good conscience
deny the one Godhead of the Father and the
Son, when our Lord, to complete His teach-
ing for His disciples, said : "That they
may be one, even as we also are one."''
The record stands for witness to the Faith,
though Arians turn it aside to suit their
heresy ; for, inasmuch as they cannot deny
the Unity so often spoken of, they endea-
vour to diminish it, in order that the Unity of
Godhead subsisting between the Father and
' " After " somewhat as in " Neither reward us after our ini-
quities " — i.e . (i) according to, and so (2) " by virtue of." Here the
second stage of the metaphorical usage seems to be arrived at.
^ Referring to Christ's sinlessness.
the Son may seem to be such as is unity of
devotion and faith amongst men, though
even amongst men themselves community
of nature makes unity thereof
35. Thus with abundant clearness we dis-
prove the objection commonly raised by
Arians, in order to loosen the Divine Unity,
on the ground that it is written : " But he
who planteth and he who watereth are
one. " This passage the Arians, if they were
wise, would not quote against us ; for how
can they deny that the Father and the Son
are One, if Paul and Apollos are one, both
in nature and in faith .? At the same time,
we do grant that these cannot be one
throughout, in all relations, because things
human cannot bear comparison with things
divine. '
36. No separation, then, is to be made of
the Word from God the Father, no separa-
tion in power, no separation in wisdom, by
reason of the Unity of the Divine Substance.
Again, God the Father is in the Son, as we
ofttimes find it written, yet [He dwells in
the Son] not as sanctifying one who lacks
sanctification, nor as filling a void, for the
power of God knows no void. Nor, again, is
the power of the one increased by the power
of the other, for there are not two powers,
but one Power ; nor does Godhead entertain
Godhead, for there are not two Godheads,
but one Godhead. We, contrariwise, shall
be One in Christ through Power received
[from another] and dwelling in us.
37. The letter [of the unity] is common,
but the Substance of God and the substance
of man are different. We shall be, the
Father and the Son [already] are, one ; we
shall be one by grace, the Son is so by
substance. Again, unity by conjunction is
one thing, unity by nature another. Finally,
observe what it is that Scripture hath already
recorded: "That they may all be one, as
Thou, Father, art in ]\Ie, and I in Thee. "^
38. Mark now that He said not " Thou in
us, and we in Thee,'' but "Thou in Me, and
I in Thee," to place Himself apart from His
creatures. Further He added: "that they
also may be in Us," in order to separate
here His dignity and His Father's from us.
Eph.
.23.
Eph. V. 25.
^ S. John xvii.
1 The citation is from i Cor. iii. 8. Paul and Apollos are
ofiooiio-ioi, "of one substance, nature, essence," in so far as the
definition of man can be applied to each But the presence of Paul
does not carry with it the presence of .■\polIos, and the existence of
Paul is not bound up, save accidentally, with that of Apollos. Paul
could not say, " He that hath seen me hath seen Apollos." No
human being can say that of another, even though the other be a
twin and closely resembling him in appearance. The root of the
difference is in the difference between the Creator and the crea-
ture, the Eternal, knowing neither beginning of life nor end of days,
existing from everlasting to everlasting, and that which lives under
conditions and limits of time and space.
^ S. John xvii. 21.
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— BOOK IV.
267
that our union in the Father and the Son
may appear the issue, ix)t of nature, but of
grace, whilst with regard to the unity of the
Father and the Son it may be beh'eved that
the Son has not received tliis by grace, but
possesses by natural right of His Sonship.
CHAPTER IV.
The passage quoted adversely by heretics, namely,
'• The Son can do nothing of Himself," is first ex-
plained from the words which follow ; then, the text
being examined, word by word, their acceptation in
the Arian sense is shown to be impossible without
incurring the charge of impiety or absurdity, the
proof resting chiefly on the creation of the world
and certain miracles of Christ.
39. Again, another objection that the
Arians bring up, denying that the Power of
the Father and the Son can be one and the
same, is rested on His saying : "Verily,
veril}', I say unto you ; the Son can do
nothing of Himself, but what He hath seen
the Father doing. "^ And therefore they
affirm that the Son has done nothing of
Himself, and can do nothing, save what He
hath seen the Father doing.
40. O wise foreknowledge of the argu-
ments of unbelievers, which made further
provision of means whereby to answer ques-
tions, by adding the words that follow :
" For whatsoever the Father doeth, the same
doeth the Son also, in like fashion," ^ for this
indeed is the sequel. Why, then, is it
written : " The Son doeth the same things,"
and not "such like things," but that thou
mightest judge that in the Son there is unity
in the Father's works, not imitation of
them }
41. But to put their proofs in turn upon
trial : I would have them answer the ques-
tion, whether the Son sees the works of the
Father. Does He see, I ask, or not .? If He
sees them, then He also does them ; if He
does them, let heretics cease to deny the
omnipotence of Him Whom they confess
able to do all things that He has seen the
Father doing.
42. But w^hat are we to understand by
"hath seen"? Has the Son any need of
bodily eyes .? Nay, if they will affirm this
of the Son, they will make out in the Father
also a need of bodily activity, 3 in order that
the Son may see that which He Himself is
to do.
43. Furthermore, what mean the words :
'^ S. John V. 19. ^ S. John v. 19.
=* i e. that the Father is not a Spirit (S. John iv. 24) but exists in
bodily shape.
"The Son can do nothing of Himself".? Let
us put this question, and debate it. Now is
there anything impossible to God's Power
and Wisdom } These, observe, are names
of the Son of God, Whose Might is certainly
not a gift received from another, but just as
He is the Life,' not depending upon an-
other's quickening action, but Himself quick-
ening others, because He is the Life ; so
also He is Wisdom,^ not as one that is
ignorant acquiring wisdom, but making
others wise from His own store; so, too,
He is Power, 3 not as having through weak-
ness obtained increase of strength, but
being Himself Power, and bestowing power
upon the strong.
44. How, then, does Power assert, as it
were, under oath: "Verily, verily I say
unto you," which means : "Of a truth, of a
truth, I tell you".?-* Truly, then, Thou
speakest. Lord Jesus, and dost affirm,
repeating indeed thy solemn declaration,
that Thou canst do nothing, save what
Thou hast seen the Father doing. Thou
didst make the universe. Did Thy Father
then make another universe, for Thee to
take as a model } So must Thy blasphemers
confess that there are two, or a multitude of
universes, as philosophers affirm, and thus
also entangle themselves in this heathen
error, 5 or, if they will follow the truth, let
them say that what Thou hast made. Thou
didst make, without any pattern.
45. Tell me. Lord, when Thou sawest
Thy Father incarnate, and walking upon the
sea, for I know not, I hold it impious to
believe this thing of the Father, knowing
that Thou only hast taken our flesh upon
Thee. When sawest Thou the Father at a
marriage-feast, turning water into wine .? ^
Nay, but I have read that Thou alone art
the only Son, begotten of the Father. I have
been taught that Thou alone, in the mystery
of the Incarnation, wast born of the Holy
Ghost and the Virgin. The things, then,
which we have cited as Thy doings, the
Father did not, but Thou alone, without
guidance of any work done by Thy Father,
for the purchase of the world's salvation
with Thy Blood, didst come forth spotless
from the Virgin's womb.
46. When they say, "The Son can do
nothing of Flimself, " they indeed except
nothing, so that one blasphemer has even
said: "He cannot make even a gnat,"''
I Cor. i. 24.
° I Cor. i. 24.
* S. John xiv. 6.
* S. John V. ig.
^ Namely, the error of postulating two mutually exclusive in-
finites.
•• S. John ii. 4. For the walking on the sea, vide S. Mark vi. 48.
' As a matter of fact, gnats and insects generally are far from be-
268
ST. AMBROSE.
mocking with so headstrong profanity and
with insolence so overweening the majesty
of Supreme Power ; yet perhaps they may
thinl<: the mystery of Thine Incarnate Life
a needful exception. But say, Lord Jesu,
what earth the Father made without Thee.
For without Thee He made no heaven, see-
ing that it is written : "By the Word of the
Lord were the heavens established."
47. But neither did the Father make the
earth without Thee, for it is written: "All
things were made by Him, and without Him
was not anything made. " ' For if the Father
made aught without Thee, God the Word,
then not all things were made by the Word,
and the Evangelist lies. Whereas if all
things were made by the Word, and if by
Thee all things begin to be, which before
were not, then surely Thou Thyself, of
Thyself, hast made what Thou didst not see
made by the Father ; though perchance our
adversaries may have recourse to that theory
of Plato, and place before Thee the ideas
supposedby philosophers, which, indeed, we
know have been exploded by philosophers
themselves. On the other hand, if Thou
Thyself hast of Thyself made all things,
vain are the assertions of the unbelieving,
which ascribe progress in learning to the
Maker of all. Who of Himself supplies the
teaching of His craft.
48. But if heretics deny that either the
heavens or the earth were made by Thee,
let them take heed into what a gulf they
are by their own madness hurling them-
selves, seeing that it is written: "Perish
the gods, which have not made heaven and
earth. "^ Shall He then perish, O Arian,
Who has found and saved that which had
perished .'' But to purpose.
CHAPTER V.
Continuing the exposition of the disputed passage,
which he had begun, Ambrose brings forvvard four
reasons why we affirm that something cannot be, and
shows that the first three fail to apply to Christ, and
infers that the only reason why the Son can do
nothing of Himself is His Unity in Power with the
Father.
49. In what sense can the Son do nothing
of Himself.' Let us ask what it is that He
cannot do. There are many different sorts
of impossibilities. One thing is naturally
impossible, another is naturally possible,
ing the least wonderful of God's works. In them as much as, if not
more than, in anything we may recognize His eternal power and
wisdom and Godhead. Cf. Prov. vi. 6-8.
' S. John i. 3 ; Ps. xxxiii. 6. * Jer. x. 11.
but impossible by reason of some weakness.
Again, there are things which are rendered
possible by strength, impossible by unskil-
fulness or weakness, of body and mind.
Further, there are things which it is impos-
sible to change, by reason of the law of an un-
changeable purpose, the endurance of a firm
will, and, again, faithfulness in friendship.
50. To make this clearer, let us consider
the matter in the light of examples. It is
impossible for a bird to pursue a course of
learning in any science or become trained to
any art : it is impossible for a stone to move
in any direction, -inasmuch as it can only be
moved by the motion of another body. Of
itself, then, a stone is incapable of moving,
and passing from its place. Again, an eagle
cannot be taught in the ways of human
learning.
51. It is, to take another example, impos-
sible for a sick man to do a strong man's
work ; but in this case the reason of the im-
possibility is of a different kind, for the man
is rendered unable, by sickness, to do v/hat
he is naturally capable of doing.. In this
case, then, the cause of the impossibility
is sickness, and this kind of impossibility
is different from the first, since the man is
hindered by bodily weakness from the possi-
bility of doing. '
52. Again, there is a third cause of impos-
sibility. A man may be naturally capable,
and his bodily health may allow of his
doing some work, which he is yet unable to
do by reason of want of skill, or because his
rank in life disqualifies him ; because, that
is, he lacks the required learning or is a
slave. ^
53. Which of these three different causes
of impossibility, think you, which we have
enumerated (setting aside the fourth) can we
meetly assign to the case of the Son of God ?
Is He naturally insensible and immovable,
like a stone ? He is indeed a stone of
stumbling to the wicked, a corner-stone for
the faithful ; ^ but He is not insensible,
upon Whom the faithful affection of sentient
peoples are stayed. He is not an immov-
able rock, "for they drank of a Rock that
followed them, and that Rock was Christ. ''■♦
The work of the Father, then, is not rendered
impossible to Christ by diversity of nature.
54. Perchance we may suppose some
things were made impossible for Him by
reason of weakness. But He was not
weakly Who could heal the weaknesses of
others by His word of authority. Seemed
> Cf. Aristotle, EiA. Nic. I. viii. 15.
* Cf. Aristotle, Eth. Nic. I. viii. 15.
•■' I Pet. ii. 7, from Isa. xxviii. 16.
* I Cor. X. 4.
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— BOOK IV.
269
He weak when bidding the paralytic take
up his bed and walk ? ' He charged the man
to perform an action of which health was the
necessary condition, even whilst the patient
was yet praying a remedy for his. disease.
Not weak was the Lord of hosts when He
gave sight to the blind,- made the crooked
to stand upright, raised the dead to life, 3
anticipated the effects of medicine at our
prayers, and cured them that besought Him,
and when to touch the fringe of His robe
was to be purified.*
55. Unless, peradventure, you thought it
was weakness, you wretches, when you saw
His wounds. Truly, they were wounds
piercing His Body, but there was no weak-
ness betokened by that wound, whence
flowed the Life of all, and therefore was it
that the prophet said: "By His stripes we
are healed, "s Was He, then, Who was not
weak in the hour when He was wounded,
weak in- regard of His Sovereignty .'* How,
then; I ask.'' When He commanded the
devils, and foro-ave the offences of sinners .'' ^
Or when He made entreaty to the Father .'
56. Here, indeed, our adversaries may per-
chance enquire : " How can the Father and
the Son be One, if the Son at one time com-
mands, at another entreats .'' "' True, They
are One ; true also. He both commands and
prays : yet whilst in the hour when He
commands He is not alone, so also in the
hour of prayer He is not weak. He is not
alone, for whatsoever things the Father
doeth, the same things doeth the Son also,
in like manner. He is not weak, for though
in the flesh He suffered weak^iess for our
sins yet that was the chastisement of our
peaci upon Him, 7 not lack of sovereign
Power in Himself.
57. Moreover, that thou mayest know that
it is after His Manhood that He entreats,
and in virtue of His Godhead that He com-
mands, it is written for thee in the Gospel
that He said to Peter: "I have prayed for
thee, that thy faith fail not." ^ To the same
Apostle, again, when on a former occasion
he said, "Thou art the Christ, the Son of
the living God," He made answer : "Thou
art Peter, and upon this Rock will I build My
Church, and I will give thee the keys of the
kingdom of heaven."^ Could He not, then,
strengthen the faith of the man to whom,
acting on His own authority. He gave the
kingdom, whom He called the Rock, thereby
declaring him to be the foundation of the
Church .' Consider, then, the manner of His
' S. Mark ii. ii. ^ pg (-xlv. 8. ' S. Matt. xi. 5.
■ S. Mark vi. 56, " Isa. liii. 5. ' S. Luke v. 20.
' Isa. liii. 5. * S, Luke xxii. 32. '■' S. Matt. xvi. 18.
entreaty, the occasions of His commanding.
He entreats, when He is shown to us as on
the eve of suffering : He commands, when
He is believed to be the Son of God.
58. We see, then, that two sorts of impossi-
bility furnish no explanation,' inasmuch as
the Power of God can be neither insensible
nor weakly. Will you then proffer the third
kind [as an account of the matter], namely,
that He can do nothing, just as an unskilled
apprentice can do nothing without his mas-
ter's instructions, or a slave can do nothing
without his lord. Then didst Thou speak
falsely, Lord Jesu, in calling Thyself Master
and Lord, and Thou didst deceive Thy dis-
ciples by Thy words : "Ye call Me Master
and Lord, and ye say well, for so I am." *
Nay, but Thou, O Truth, wouldst never have
deceived men, least of all them whom Thou
didst call friends.^
59. Yet if our enemies sunder Thee from
the Creator, as being unskilled, let them see
how they affirm that skill was lacking to
Thee, that is to say, to the Divine Wisdom ;
for all that, however, they cannot divide the
unity of substance that Thou hast with the
Father. It is not, indeed, by nature, but
by reason of ignorance, that the difference
exists between the craftsman and the un-
skilled ; but neither is handicraft attributable
to the Father, nor ignorance to Thee, for
there is no such thing as ignorant wisdom.
60. Therefore, if insensibility is no attri-
bute of the Son, and if neither weakness, nor
ignorance, nor servility, let unbelievers put
it to their minds for meditation that both by
nature and sovereignty the Son is One with
the Father, and by its working His power is
not at cross-purpose wnth the Father, inas-
much as "all things that the Father hath
done, the Son doeth likewise," for no one
can do in like fashion the same work that
another has done, unless he shares in the
unity of the same nature, whilst he is also
not inferior in method of working.
61. Yet I would still enquire what it is
that the Son cannot do, unless He see the
Father doing it. I will take the fool's line,
and propound some examples drawn from
things of a lower M'-orld. "I am become a
fool ; ye have compelled me."'* What indeed
is more foolish than to debate over the
majesty of God, which rather occasions
questionings, than godly instruction which
is in faith, s But to arguments let argu-
* i.e. we are not to suppose that in S. John v. 19 Jesus refers to
any sort of physical impossibility, to any external restraint or limi-
tation.
^ S. John xiii. 13. ^ S. John xv. 14, 15.
* 2 Cor. xii. II. •' I Tim. i. 4; vi. 20, 21.
270
ST. AMBROSE.
ments reply ; let words make answer to
them, but love to us, the love which is in
God, issuing of a pure heart and good con-
science and faith unfeigned. And so I
stickle not to introduce even the ludicrous,
for the confutation of so vain a thesis.
62. How, then, does the Son see the
Father ? A horse sees a painting, which
naturally it is unable to imitate. Not thus
does the Son behold the Father. A child
sees the work of a grown man, but he can-
not reproduce it ; certainly not thus, again,
does the Son see the Father.
63. If, then, the Son can, by virtue of a
common hidden power of the same nature
which He has with the Father, both see
and act in an invisible manner, and by the
fulness of His Godhead execute every decree
of His Will, what remains for us but to
believe that the Son, by reason of indivisible
unity of power, does nothing, save what He
has seen the Father doing, forasmuch as
because of His incomparable love the Son
does nothing of Himself, since He wills
nothing that is against His Father's Will ?
Which truly is the proof not of weakness but
of unity. '
CHAPTER VI.
The fourth kind of impossibility (§ 49) is now taken
into consideration, and it is shown that the Son does
nothing that the Father approves not, there being
between Them perfect unity of will and power.
64. The Son, moreover, — to consider now
our fourth premiss, — is not self-assertive, for
He, the Divine Assessor, ^ hath done nought
that is not in agreement with His Father's
Will. Further, the Father hath seen the
things that the Son made, and pronounced
them very good; for so it is written in
Genesis: "And God said, Let there be
light ; and there was light. And God saw
the light that it was good. " 3
65. Now, did the Father say on that occa-
sion, "Let there be such light as I Myself
have made," or " Let there be light" — light
haviiig as yet not existed ; or did the Son
ask what sort of light the Father made .'' ^
Nay, the Son made light, according to His
own Will, and so far in accordance with the
* Our Lord did not simply assert that He and His Father are One,
without revealing to those, at least, who had faith to perceive it,
what is one great bond of that Unity, sliowing men, so far as man
can comprehend the matter, what that Unity consists in, viz., abso
lute and perfect harmony of will.
-' Lat. " co}isiliarius." Cf. Prov. viii. 29, 30.
•• (ien. i. 3 4.
•* Or " what sort of thing He made it to be." How could the
Son ask such a question, being Himself the true Light ? S. John
i. 9-
Father's good pleasure, that He approved.
It is of new, original work by the Son that
the place speaks.
66. Again, if, as Arian expositions of the
Scriptures make out, it is a discredit to the
Son to have made what He saw, whereas
the Scriptures present Him as having made
what He [before] saw not, and to have
given being to things which as yet were
not, what should they say of the Father,
Who praised that He had seen, as though
He could not have foreseen the things that
were to be made .?
67. The Son, therefore, sees the Father's
work in like manner as the Father sees the
Son's, and the Father praises not the work
as one would praise work of another's doing,
but recognizes it as His own, for "what-
soever things the Father hath done, the
same doeth the Son, in like manner." [So
was it written, that] you might understand
one and the same work to be the work both
of the Father and of the Son. And thus the
Son does nothing save what is approved of
by the Father, praised by the Father, willed
by the Father, because His whole Being is
of the Father; and He is not as the created
being, which commits many faults, ofttimes
offending the Will of its Creator, in lusting
after and falling into sin. Nought, then, is of
the Son's doing, save what is pleasing to the
Father, forasmuch as one Will, one Purpose,
is Theirs, one true Love, one effect of action.
68. Furthermore, to prove to you that it
comes of Love, that the Son can do nothing
of Himself save what He hath seen the
Father doing, the Apostle has added to
the words, "Whatsoever the Father hath
done, the same things doeth the Son also,
in like manner," this reason: " For the Father
loveth the Son," and thus Scripture refers
the Son's inability to do, whereof it tes-
tifies, to unity in Love that suffers no sepa-
ration or disagreement.
69. But if the inseparableness of the Per-
sons in Love rest, as it truly does, upon
[identity of] nature, then surely they are
also inseparable, for the same reason, in
action, and it is impossible that the work of
the Son should not be in agreement with the
Father's Will, when what the Son works,
the Father works also, and what the
Father works, the Son works also, and
what the Son speaks, the Father speaks
also, as it is written : "My Father, Who
dwclleth in Me, He it is that speaketh,
and the works that I do He Himself
doeth." ■ For the Father appointed nought
1 S. John xiv. 10.
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— BOOK IV.
271
save by the exercise of His Power and
Wisdom, forasmuch as He made all things
wisely, as it is written : "In wisdom
hast Thou made them all ; " ' and likewise,
God the Word made nought without the
Father's participation.
70. Not without the Father does He
work ; not without His Father's Will did He
offer Himself for that most holy Passion,
the Victim slain for the salvation of the
whole world ; '^ not without His Father's Will
concurring did He raise the dead to life.
For example, when He was at the point to
raise Lazarus to life. He lifted up His eyes
and said, "Father, I thank Thee, for that
Thou hast heard Me. And I knew that
Thou dost always hear IMe, but for the sake
of the multitude that standeth round I
spake, that they may believe that Thou hast
sent Me, "3 in order that, though speaking
agreeably to His assumed character of man,
in the flesh, 4 He might still express His one-
ness with the Father in will and operation,
in that the Father hears all and sees all that
the Son wills, and therefore also the Father
sees the .Son's doings, hears the utterances
of His Will, for the Son made no request,
and yet said that He had been heard.
71. Again, we cannot suppose that the
Father hears not all, whatsoever the Son's will
resolves ; and to show that He is always
heard by the Father, not as a servant, not
as a prophet, but as Son, He said : "And I
knew that Thou dost always hear Me, but
for the sake of the multitude which standeth
round I spake, that they may believe that
Thou hast sent Me."
72. It is for our sakes, therefore, that He
renders thanks, lest we should suppose that
the Father and the Son are one and the
same Person, when we hear of one and the
same work being wrought by the Father
and the Son. Further, to show us that His
rendering of thanks had not been the tribute
due from one wanting in power, that, on
the contrary, He, as Son of God, ever
claimed for Himself the possession of divine
authority, He cried, "Lazarus, come forth. "
Here, surely, is the voice of command, not
of prayer.
CHAPTER VII.
The doctrine had in view for enforcement is corrobo-
rated by the truth that the Son is the Word of the
^ Ps. civ. 24. ^ Heb. x. 10-12 ; S John iii. 16, 17; i. 29.
' S. John xi. 40.
* Lat. " ex personce homhiis incarnati susceptioneV St. Am-
brose does not mean that there were ttvo Persons in Christ — the
Divine Logos or Word and the man Jesus. " Persona " is here
used in its dramatic rather than its strict theological sense.
Father — the Word, not in the sense in which we
understand the term, but a living and active Word.
This being so, we cannot deny llim to be of the same
Will, Power, and Substance with the Father.
73. To return, however, to what we had
in hand before, and finish the task set be-
fore us. The Son, as the Word, carries out
His Father's Will. Now, a word, as we un-
derstand and use it, is an ufferance. There
are syllables and sounds, which, however,
are not at variance with the thought of our
mmd, and what we apprehend and are af-
fected by inwardly we give token of by the
testimony of the spoken word, which, as it
were, works [for us]. But the words we
speak have no direct efficacy in themselves,
it is the Word of God alone, which is neither
an utterance, nor an "inward concept," as
they call it, but works efficaciously, is liv-
ing, and has healing power.
74- Wouldstthou know what is the nature
of the Word — hear the Scriptures. ' ' For the
Word of God is living and mighty, yea,
working effectually, sharp and keener than
any the sharpest sword, piercing even to the
sundering of soul and spirit, of limbs and
marrow." '
75. Hearest thou, then, the Word of God,
and wilt separate Him from the Father's
Will and Power.? Thou hearest Him called
the living Word, the healing Word — seek
not then to compare Him with the word of
our mouth ; for if the word we utter, though
it have not eyes to see, nor ears to hear,
yet speaks, and still the knowledge of
what it speaks is wrought by virtue of hidden
mysteries of man's nature, how can he es-
cape the charge of blasphemy, who requires
that some sort of bodily vision and hearing
shall go along with the Godhead in the
Word of God, and thinks that the Son can
do nothing of Himself, save what He shall
have seen the Father doing, though (as we
have said) there is in the Father, Son, and
Holy Spirit the same Will, both to do and
not to do, and the same Power, by reason
of unity in the same substance.
76. But if, though men are, as a rule, dif-
ferent in respect of their thoughts and feel-
ings, they yet agree as to the meaning of a
single proposition, what ought we to think
as concerning the Father and the Son of God,
seeing that in the Substance of the Godhead
there is that is imitated by human love.?
jj. Let us, however, suppose — as our
adversaries would have it — that the Son
does, as it were, copy the pattern of that
which He has seen His Father doing. But
' Heb. iv. 12.
272
ST. AMBROSE.
even this, we must confess, means that He
is of the same substance, for none can com-
pletely imitate the working of another,
unless he be one with him in the same na-
ture.
CHAPTER Vni.
The heretical objection, that the Son cannot be equal
to the Father, because He cannot beget a Son, is
turned back upon the authors of it. From the case
of human nature it is shown that whether a person
begets offspring or not, has nothing to do with his
power. Most of all must this be true since, other-
wise, the Father Himself would have to be pronounced
wanting in power. Whence it follows that we have
no right to judge of divine things by human, and
must take our stand upon the authority of Holy
Writ, otherwise we must deny all power either to the
Father or to the Son.
78. There is a fool's demurrer, your INIa-
jesty, which certain persons are given to
raising, in order to show the Father and the
Son to be not equal together, saying that the
Father is Almighty, because He hath be-
gotten the Son, but that the Son is not Al-
mighty, because He hath not been able to
beget.
79. But see how wild is their blasphemy,
how their philosophers' logic confutes itself
For the raising of this question must lead
either to their confessing with their own
mouths that the Son is co-eternal with the
Father, or, if they impose a beginning upon
the Son's existence, to their assigning of ne-
cessity a beginning to the Father's power.
When, therefore, they deny that the Son is
Almighty, they are on the road to assert —
which is impious — that the Father began to
be Almighty by help of the Son.
80. For if the Father is Almighty by rea-
son of begetting the Son, then, certainly,
either the Son is co-eternal with the Father,
because if the Father is eternally Almighty,
then the Son also is eternal, or, if there
was a time when there was not an eternal
Son, there was by consequence a time when
there was not an Almighty Father. For
when they would make out that there was
a time when the Son began to be, they are
sliding back into [the error of] saying
that the Father's Power also has not been
from everlasting, but began to be in con-
sequence of the generation of the Son. So,
in their desire to do dishonour to the Son
of God, they do so increase His honour as
to seem to make Him, contrary to all right
belief, the source of His Father's Power,
though the Son saith, "All things that the
Father hath are Mine " ' — that is to say, not
* S. John xvi. 15,
the things which He has bestowed upon the
Father, but which He has received from
the Father, by right as the Son Whom the
Father has beirotten.
81. And therefore we do declare the Son
to be Eternal Power ; ' if, then, His Power
and Godhead be eternal, surely His Sove-
reignty is eternal also. He, then, who dis-
honours the Son dishonours the Father, and
is an enemy and offender against duty and
love. Let us honour the Son, in Whom the
Father is well pleased, for it is the Father's
pleasure that praise be given to the Son,
in Whom He Himself is well pleased.
82. Let us, however, make answer to the
conclusion they strive to establish ; but we
seem to have sought, in pursuit of a per-
sonal appeal, to escape from the difficulty of
treating the question before us. The Father,
they say, has begotten a Son ; the Son has
not. \M-iat proof is this that they are not
equal .? To beget is the Father's natural
function, as a Father, and no necessary
outcome of His Sovereign Power. ^ Further-
more, dutiful regard places persons on an
equality with each other, and does not sun-
der them. Again, our own experience of
what holds good amongst us frail mortals
teaches us that it may frequently happen
that weak men have sons, whilst stronger
men have not ; that slaves have children,
whilst their masters are childless ; and that
the poor beget offspring, whilst rich men
are unblessed with any.
83. But if our adversaries say that this too
may be the result of infirmity, inasmuch as
men may desire to beget children, but be
unable to do so; then, though things divine
are not to be judged of and determined by
things human, yet let them understand that
with men also, as with God, whether one
has children or no, is not dependent upon
or derived of his authoritative power, but
upon the personal attributes of a father, and
that begetting lies not in the power of our
will, but is contingent upon our qualities of
body ; for if it were a matter of sovereign
authority, then the mightier king would have
the greater number of sons. To have sons,
then, or to be childless, therefore, is not in
necessary connection or relation to sovereign
authority. Is it, then, so with nature .?
84. If you [my Arian adversaries] regard
what you object as natural weakness, and
rely upon examples taken from the nature of
mankind, remember that the Father's nature
is the same as the Son's, and therefore you
^ Cf. Rom. i. 20.
^ i.e. The Father begets guc^ Fattier, not qu& Almighty (6 Uav
TOKpCLTUlp),
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— BOOK IV.
273
do either confess the Son to be a true Son,
and dishonour the Father in the Person of
the Son, by reason of Their unity in one and
the same Nature (for as the Father is by
Nature God, so also is the Son ; whereas the
Apostle says that the "gods many"' are not
so by nature, but are only so called) ; or, if
you deny Him to be a true Son, that is to
say, possessing- the same Nature, then He is
not begotten, and if the Son 'is not begotten,
the Father did not beget Him.
85. The conclusion we come at, therefore,
on the line of your persuasion, is that God
the Father is not Almighty, because He could
not beget, if He did not beget the Son, but
created Him. But forasmuch as the Father
is Almighty, He being, as you hold, the
Almighty in so far as He is the only Author
of Being, then surely He has begotten His
Son, and not created Him. Howbeit, we
ought to believe His word before yours.
He says: "I have begotten,"' and that
more than once, witnessing to Himself as
begetting.
86. It is no sign, then, of infirmity, whether
of nature or authority, in Christ, that He has
not begotten, for to beget, as we have
already said ofttimes, bears no relation to
supremacy of authority, but to a personal
property in a nature.^ For if the Omni-
potence of the Father is thereby constituted,
that He hath a Son, then He might have
been more Almighty had He begotten more
Sons.
87. Then is His power exhausted in the
begetting of One ? Nay, but I will show
that Christ also hath sons, whom He begets
every day, but with that generation, or rather
regeneration, which is related to personal
authority rather than nature, for adoption is
the exercise and bestowal of authority, and
generation the manifestation of a property,
as Scripture itself hath taught us : for John
saith that '"He was in this world, and the
world was made by Him, and the world
knew Him not. He came to His own, and
His own received Him not. But as many
as received Him, to them gave He power ^
to become sons of God, to them which
believe in His Name. "4
88. We say, therefore, that it is the func-
tion and exercise of His Authority that He
has made us sons of God, whereas the
oracles of God discover that His generation
is in relation to personal attribute, for the
Wisdom of God saith : "I came forth out of
the mouth of the IMost High,"s that is to
' Ps. ex. 3.
• S. John i. 10 £E
18
' See § 82.
^ Ecclus. xxiv.
3 Or "authority."
say, not of compulsion, but free, not under
bond of authority, but born in a hidden
birth, according to personal powers of Su-
preme Sovereignty and rightfulness of
authority. Again, concerning the same
Wisdom, Which is the Lord Jesus, the
Father saith in another place : "Out of the
womb I begat Thee, before the morning
star." •
89. Now this He said, not to make us
think of a bodily womb,^ but to show that
true generation is His proper activity, ^ for
if we understand the words as speaking of
generation from a body, then [we imply]
the Father Almighty conceived and brought
forth in travail. But far be it from us that
we should make this weak bodily frame the
measure of God's greatness. The word
"womb" represents the hidden mystery,
the inner sanctuary of the Father's being,
into which neither angels nor archangels
nor powers nor dominations, nor any
created nature, hath been able to enter.
For the Son is always with the Father, and
in the Father — with the Father, by virtue of
the distinction, without division, proper to
the Eternal Trinity ; 4 in the Father, by
reason of the essential unity of the Divine
Nature.
90. What room here, then, for one to sit
in judgment upon the Godhead, to call in
question the Father and the Son, — the One
for begetting, the Other for not begetting.
No man condemns his servant or handmaid
for begetting (or bearing) offspring ; but
those Arians condemn Christ for not be-
getting— they do condemn Him, for they
privately pass sentence of condemnation
upon Him, when they take from His glory
and dignity. The question, why they have
not begotten offspring, does not lead those
who are joined in marriage into loss of
their love, or denial of each other's merits,
but the Arians, because Christ hath not be-
gotten a Son, make light of His sovereignty.
91. Why, ask they, is the Son not a Father?
Because, on the other side, the Father is not
a Son. Why has not Christ begotten .? Even
because the Father is not begotten. Yet the
Son stands none the lower, because He is
not a Father ; nor the Father, because He is
not a Son, for the Son said : "All things
that the Father hath are Mine"5 — so truly
is generation involved in the Father's per-
1 Ps. ex. 3.
- The word " womb " is used metaphorieally in the original, from
which St. Ambrose (though inaccurately) quotes. See Ps. ex. in
the R.V.
■* Or " to show the distinctive character of true " or " perfect gen-
eration " — as an absolute act, unconditioned of time or space.
* Ath. Creed 4. ^ 3. John xvi. 15.
274
ST. AMBROSE.
sonal attributes, and comes not by mere right
of sovereignty.
92. The Substance of the Trinity is, so to
say, a common Essence in that which
is distinct,' an incomprehensible, ineffable
Substance. We hold the distinction, not
the confusion of Father, Son, and Holy
Spirit ; a distinction without separation ; a
distinction without plurality ; ^ and thus we
believe in Father, Son, and Holy Spirit as
each existing from and to eternity in this
divine and wonderful Mystery : not in two
Fathers, nor in two Sons, nor in two Spirits.
For " there is one God, the Father, of Whom
are all things, and we in Him ; and one
Lord, Jesus Christ, by Whom are all things,
and we by Him. "^ There is One born of
the Father, the Lord Jesus, and therefore He
is the Only-begotten. " There is also One
Holy Spirit, "'^ as the same Apostle hath
said. So we believe, so we read, so we
hold. We know the fact of distinction, we
know nothing of the hidden mysteries ; we
pry not into the causes, but keep the outward
signs vouchsafed unto us.
93. O monstrous wickedness, that they who
have no power over their own procreation
should claim and usurp power to enquire into
the Divine Generation ! Let them deny,
them, that the Son is equal to the Father,
forasmuch as He hath not begotten ; let
them deny that the Son is equal to the
Father,' because He hath a Father ! But if
they talked after this fashion about men,
who sometimes desire to beget sons, yet
cannot, we should call it an insult, just as
we should so call it, if of two men, one
having: sons and the other childless, the latter
were said to be inferior to the former on
that ground. So monstrous also, I say,
does it seem, in regard simply to men,
that one should therefore be esteemed the
more lightly because he hath a father. Per-
adventure, indeed, the Arians suppose that
Christ is in the position of one in a family,
and frets because He is not set free and
independent of His Father's authority, and
is not empowered to administer the estate.
But Christ is not under tutelage ; nay, rather
has He abolished all tutelage. 5
94. How then, let them tell us, would they
have these things to be .'' — a true generation,
the true Son begotten of God the Father,
that is, of the Substance of the Father, or of
another substance .'* If they say " begotten of
the Father, that is, of the Substance of God, "
* sc. internally.
^ I.e. without plurality of substance or essential nature. There
is one Godhead of the Father and the Son and the Holy Ghost — not
three Godheads.
* I Cor. viii. 6. * i Cor. xji. ii. ^ Cf. Gal. iii. 23 ff.
well and good, for then they acknowledge
the Son as begotten of the Substance of the
Father. If, then, they are of one Substance,
surely they are also of one sovereign Power.
Whereas, if the Son is begotten of another
substance, how can the Father be Almighty,
and the Son not Almighty.'' For what ad-
vantage hath God, if He have made His
Son of another substance, when confessedly
the Son, on "His part, hath of another sub-
stance made us sons of God ? The Son,
therefore, is either of one Substance with
the Father, or of one sovereign Power.
95. Our adversaries' question, then, falls
flat, because they cannot judge Christ — or
rather, because He is clear, when He is
judged.' They are worthy, however, to be
condemned upon their own sentence, who
raise this question against us, for if the Son
be therefore not equal to the Father, because
He hath not begotten a Son, then by all
means let them who sow discussions of this
kind ^ confess, if they have not children,
that their very servants are to be preferred
before themselves, inasmuch as they can-
not be the equals of those who have chil-
dren— whereas, if they have children, let
them regard the merit thereof as due not to
themselves, but of right to their sons.
96. The objection, then, holds not to-
gether, that the Son cannot be equal to the
Father, by reason of the Father having
begotten the Son, whilst the Son has begot-
ten no Son of Himself, for the spring begets
the stream, though the stream begets no
spring out of itself, and light begets radiance,
and not radiance light, yet the nature of
radiance and light is one.^
CHAPTER IX.
Various quibbling arguments, advanced by the Arians
to show that the Son had a beginning of e.xistence, are
considered and refuted, on the ground that whilst the
Arians plainly prove nothing, or if they prove any-
thing, prove it against themselves, (inasmuch as He
Who is the beginning of all cannot Himself have a
beginning), their reasonings do not even hold true
with regard to facts of human existence. Time could
not be before He was. Who is the Author of time —
if indeed at some time He was not in e.xistence, then
the Father was without His Power and Wisdom.
Again, our own human experience shows that a per-
son is said to exist before he is born.
97. Now that our opponents have failed to
maintain their objection against the truth of
1 Ps. li. 4.
- Or " engage in discussions of this kind." Lat. — seruttt hujus-
iiirnii qutrstiones.
■' Cf . Heb. i. 3, where Christ is called the Radiance of the Father's
Glory (d7rauya<TjaTa^s 56fr)?).
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— ROOK IV.
2/5
His Son's equality with the Father, on the
i^round of His Generation, let them see that
their well-known device of controversy, their
stock misrepresentation, is frustrated. Their
common use is to propound this riddle :
" How can the Son be equal with the Father.?
If He is a Son, then before He was begotten
He was not in existence. If He was in ex-
istence, why was He begotten ? " And men
who advance difficulties raised by Arius yet
sturdily deny that they are Arians.
98. Accordingly, they demand our answer,
intending, if we say, "The Son existed
before He was begotten," to meet us with a
subtle retort, that "If so, then, before He
was begotten. He was created, and there is
no difference between Him and the rest of
created beings, for He began to be a crea-
ture before He began to be the Son." To
which they add : " Why was He begotten,
when He was already in existence.? Be-
cause He was imperfect, and in order that
He might afterwards be made more perfect ?"'
Whilst if we reply that the Son did not exist
before He was begotten, they will immedi-
ately reply : "Then by being begotten He
was brought into existence, not having
existed before He was begotten," so as
to lead on from this to the conclusion
that " the Son existed, when He did not
exist. " '
99. But let those who propound this diffi-
culty and endeavour to enwrap the truth in
a cloud tell us themselves whether the
Father exerts His power of begetting within
or without limits of time. If they say
" within limits of time," then they will attri-
bute to the Father what they object against
the Son, so as to make the Father seem to
have begun to be what He was not before.
If their answer is "without such limits,"
then what is left them but to resolve for
themselves the problem they have pro-
pounded, and acknowledge that the Son is
not begotten under limits and conditions of
time, since they deny that the Father so
begets .-*
100. If the Son, then, is not begotten
within limits of time, we are free to judge
that nothing can have existed before the
Son, Whose being is not confined by time.
If, indeed, there was anything in being be-
fore the Son, then it instantly follows that in
Him were not created all things in heaven
or in earth, and the Apostle is shown to
have erred in so setting it down in his
Epistle,^ whereas, if before He was begotten
' St. Ambrose exhibits the argument as a reductio ad absurdum .
2 Col. i. 16. ■
there was nothing, I see not wherefore He,
before Whom none was, should be said to
have been after any.
loi. With the consideration whereof we
must join another most blasphemous objec-
ticMi of theirs, which covers a.subtle purpose
to confuse the sense and understanding of
simple folk. They ask whether everything
that comes to an end had also at any time
a beginning. If they are told that what
has an end also had a beginning, then they
return to the charge with the question
whether the Father has ceased to beget His
Son. This by our consent being granted
them, they conclude that the generation of
the Son had a beginning. The which if
you allow, it seems to follow that if the
Generation had a beginning, it appears to
have begun in Him Who was begotten ; so
that one, who had not existed before, may
be called "begotten " — their intent being to
close the inquiry by laying down as conclu-
sive that there was a time when the Son
existed not.
102. Besides this, there are other vain
objections, such as persons of their glibness
of tongue would readily urge. If, say they,
the Son is the Word of the Father, then He
is called "begotten," inasmuch as He is the
Word. But then since He is the Word, He
is not a work. Now the Father has spoken
"in divers manners,"' whence it follows
that He has begotten many Sons, if He has
spoken His Word, not created it as a work
of His hands. O fools, talking as though
they knew not the difference between the
word uttered and the Divine Word, abid-
ing eternally, born of the Father — born, I
say, not uttered only — in Whom is no
combination of syllables, but the fulness
of the eternal Godhead and life without
end ! ^
103. Follows another blasphemy, whereby
they enquire whether it was of His own free
will, or on compulsion, that the Father be-
gat [His Son], intending, if we say, "Of
His own free will," that we should appear
as though we acknowledged that the Father's
Will preceded the [Divine] Generation, and
to answer that there being something that
preceded the existence of the Son, the Son
is not co-eternal with the Father, or that He,
like the rest of the world, is a being created,
forasmuch as it is written, "He hath
made all things, as many as He would, "^
though this is spoken, not of the Father and
J Heb.i. I.
-Col. i. 19; ii. 9; iii. 4; S. John i. 4; v. 26; xi. 25; xiv. 6;
Rev. i. 18.
' Ps. cxv. 3, which, however, in the English, runs : " He hath done
whatsoever pleased Him." — Prayer-boolc.
2/6
ST. AMBROSE.
the Son, but of those creatures which the
Son made. Whereas if we answered that
the Father begat [His Son] on compulsion,
we sliould seem to Iiave attributed infirmity
to the Father.
104. But in the eternal Generation there
is no foregoing condition, neither of will,
nor of unwillingness, and therefore I can
neither say that the Father begat of His
free Will, nor yet that He begat on compul-
sion, for to beget depends not upon possi-
bility as determined by will, but rather
appears to stand in a certain right and pro-
perty of the hidden being of the Father.
For just as the Father is not good because
He wills to be so, or is compelled to be so,
but is above these conditions — is good, that
is, by nature, — even so the putting forth of
His generative power is neither of will nor
of necessity.
105. Yet let us grant their proposal.
Granted that the Generation depends on
the Will of Him Who generates ; when do
they say that this act of will took place ?
If it was in the beginning, then, plainly, the
Son was in the beginning. If the Will is
eternal, then the Son also is eternal. If the
Will began to exist, then God the Father, as
He was, was so displeased with Himself,
that He made a change in His condition,
that is to say, without His Son He was dis-
pleasing to Himself; in His Son He began
to be well pleased.
106. To follow out the consequences
thereof If the Father conceived, after the
manner of human nature, a desire to beget,
then did He also pass through all the ex-
periences which befal men before the birth
takes place — but we find that generation is
not determined merely by will, but is an
object of wish.
107. Thus do they betray their own un-
godliness, who would have it that Christ's
generation had a beginning, in order that it
may seem, not that true begetting of the
Word abiding, but the utterance of words
that pass and are forgotten, and that by in-
trusion of [the premiss of] a multitude of
sons, they may [be warranted to] deny
Christ's personal possession of the divine
attributes, to the end that He may be re-
garded as neither the only-begotten nor the
first-begotten Son ; and lastly, that given the
belief that His existence had a beginning, it
may also be deemed as appointed to have
an end.
108. But neither had the Son of God any
)eginning, seeing that He already was at
the beginning, nor shall He come to an end,
Who is the Beginning and the End of the
Universe ; ' for being the Beginning, how
could He take and receive that which He
already had,^ or how shall He come to an
end, being Himself the End of all things, so
that in that End we have an abiding-place
without end.-* The Divine Generation is not
an event occurring in the course of time,
and within its limits, and therefore before
it time is not, and in it time has no place.
109. Again, their aimless and futile ques-
tion finds no loophole for entry, even when
directed upon the creation itself; 3 nay,
indeed, temporal existences appear, in certain
cases, to admit of no division of time. For
instance, light generates radiance, but we
can neither conceive that the radiance begins
to exist after the light, nor that the light
is in existence before the radiance, for where
there is a light, ■♦ there is radiance, and where
there is radiance there is also a light ; and
thus we can neither have a light without
radiance, nor radiance without light, be-
cause both the light is in the radiance, and
the radiance in the light. Thus the Apostle
was taught to call the Son " the Radiance of
the Father's Glory, "5 for the Son is the
Radiance of His Father's light, co-eternal,
because of eternity of Power ; inseparable,
by unity of brightness.
no. If then we can neither understand
the mystery of, nor dissociate, these created
objects in the sky above us, which we see,
can we comprehend Him Whom we see not,
Who is above every created existence, God,
as He is in the very Holy of Holies of His
own Generation ? Can we make time a
barrier between Him and the Son, when all
time is the creation of the Son ?
III. Let them cease therefore, and say no
more that before He was begotten the Son
was not. For the word " before" is a mark
of time, whereas the Generation is before
' Rev. i. 8, 17; ii. 8; iii. 14; xxii. 13; Isa. xli. 4; xliv. 6; xlviii.
12.
2 "And," we may add, "already was." — St. Ambrose refers to
St. John viii. 25, but the reference is only justifiable by means of a
defective rendering of the (ireek ; unless we suppose our Saviour
to be aMuding to what the prophets had said of Himself as well as
to His own statements. Cf. Hk. III. vii. 49.
^ On the analogy of which, indeed, Arianism endeavoured to
conceive of the Nature and Activities of God.
■• Or " a shining body "' — honcn, not tux, as in other places of this
passage. St. Ambrose probably was unaware that "radiance " or
" effulgence " from an incandescent or otherwise shining body is
due to the presence of the atmosphere, so that his analogy requires
modification when bodies sliining in vacuo come into the ac-
count. But with regard to these it may be urged that the shining
of the body may be taken as the sole object of consideration, whilst
it is fully admitted that the brightness and the body, though sepa-
rated for purposes of mental treatment and thought, are not so i-i
fact and actual reality. In the Book of Wisdom, vii. 26, the Divine
Wisdom is called " the brightness of everlasting Li.ght ' (aTraiiyao-ziia
♦tuTOf aiSiou) — These texts would naturally suggest the ' Light
of Light ' (<l><os e/c <l><oTos,) of the Nicene Creed. The analogy
of light and radiance is employed by many of the Fathers in
maintaining the doctrine of the Church, see Alford's note oiiHeb.
i- .^•
^ Heb. i. 3.
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— BOOK IV.
277
all times,' and therefore that which comes
after aught comes not before it, and the
work cannot be before the maker, seeing
that necessarily objects made take their
commencement from the craftsman who
makes them. How can the customary
action of any created object be regarded as
existing prior to the maker of it, whilst all
time is a creation, and every creation has
taken its being from its creator.?
112. I would, therefore, further examine
our opponents, who esteem themselves so
cunning, and have them make good the ap-
plication of their theory to human existence,
seeing that they use it to disparage the glory
of God's Existence, and keep far away from
any confession of an inscrutable mystery in
the Divine Generation. I would have them
find ground for their objection in the facts of
human generation. Of God's Son they as-
sert that before He was begotten He was
not, — that is to say, they say this of the
Wisdom, the Power, the Word of God,
Whose Generation knows nothing prior to
itself. But if, as they would have us believe,
there was a time when the Son existed not
(the which it is blasphemy to affirm), then
there was a time when God lacked the ful-
ness of Divine Perfection, if afterwards He
passed through a process of begetting a Son.
113. To show them, however, the weak-
ness and transparency of their objection,
though it has no real relation to any truth,
divine or human, I will prove to them that
men have existed before they were born.
Else, let them show that Jacob, who whilst
yet hidden in the secret chamber of his
mother's womb supplanted his brother, had
not been appointed and ordained, ere ever
he was born ; ^ let them show that Jeremiah
had not likewise been so, before his birth, —
Jeremiah, to whom the message comes :
" Before I formed thee in thy mother's womb,
I knew thee ; and before thou camest forth
from the belly, I sanctified thee, and ap-
pointed thee for a prophet amongst the
nations. "3 What testimony can we have
stronger than the case of this great prophet,
who was sanctified before he was born, and
known before he was shaped ?
114. What, again, shall I say of John, of
whom his holy mother testifies that, whilst
he yet lay in her womb, he perceived in
spirit 4 the presence of his Lord, and leaped
for joy, as we remember it to be written,
1 Or "before all worlds." Cf. Heb. i. 2, in the Greek, Latin,
and English.
^ Gen. XXV. 23. * Jer. i. 5.
* Or " by the Spirit," i.e. by the help, power of the Spirit, work-
ing indeed with his spirit.
his mother saying : "For lo, as soon
as the voice of the salutation entered mine
ears, the babe leaped in my womb for
joy."' Was he, then, who prophesied, in
existence or \^o\.} Nay, surely he was — ■
surely he was in l)eing who worshipped his
Maker; he was in being who spake in his
mother's womb. And so Elisabeth was
filled with the spirit of her son, and Mary
sanctified by the Spirit of hers, for thus you
may find it recorded, that " the babe leaped
in her womb, and Elisabeth was filled with
the Holy Ghost." ^
115. Consider the proper force of each
word. Elisabeth was indeed the first to
hear the voice of Mary, but John was first to
feel His Lord's gracious Presence. Sweet is
the harmony of prophecy with prophecy, of
woman with woman, of babe with babe.
The women speak words of grace, the babes
move hiddenly, and as their mothers ap-
proach one another, so do they engage in
mysterious converse of love ; and in a two-
fold miracle, though in diverse degrees of
honour, the mothers prophesy in the spirit
of their little ones. Who, I ask, was it that
performed this miracle 1 W^as it not the
Son of God, Who made the unborn to be .?
1 16. Thus your objection fails of reconcile-
ment with the truths of human existence —
can it attain thereto with divine mysteries }
What mean you by your principle that "be-
fore He was begotten He was not".-' Was
the- Father engaged for some time in con-
ception, so that certain epochs passed away
before the Son was begotten.? Was He,
like women, in travail of birth, so that just
this travail } What would you } Why seek
we to pry into divine mysteries 1 The Scrip-
tures tell me the necessary effects of the
Divine Generation,^ not how it is done.
CHAPTER X.
The objection that Christ, on the showing of St.
John, lives because of the Father, and therefore
is not to be regarded as equal with the Father, is met
by the reply that for the Life of the Son, in respect
of His Godhead, there has never been a time when it
began, and that it is dependent upon none, whilst the
passage in question must be understood as referring
to the His human life, as is shown by His speaking
there of His body and blood. Two expositions of
the passage are given, the one of which is shown to
refer to Christ's Manhood, whilst the second teaches
His equality with the Father, as also His likeness
with men. Rebuke is administered to the Arians for
the insult which they are seeking to inflict upon the
Son, and the sense in which the Son can be said to
live "because of" the Father is explained, as also the
1 S. Luke i. 44. 2 s Luj^g i. 41.
* i.e. that " such as the Father is, such is the Son."
278
ST. AMBROSE.
union of life with our the divine life. A further ob-
jection, based upon the Son's prayer that He may be
glorified by the Father, is briefly refuted.
ii8. There are not a few who raise this
further objection, that it is written : "As the
Hving- Father hath sent Me, and I live by the
Father ; so he that eateth Me, liveth also
by Me."' "How," ask they, "is the Son
equal with the Father, when He has said
that He lives by the Father.'' "
119. Let those who oppose us on this
ground tell us first what the Life of the Son
is. Is it a life bestowed by the Father upon
one lacking life .■' But how could the Son ever
fail to possess life, He Himself being the Life,
as He says, "I am the Way, the Truth,
and the Life. "^ Truly, His life is eternal,
even as His power is eternal. Was there a
time, then, when (so to speak) Life pos-
sessed not itself.'
120. Bethink you what is read this day
concerning the Lord Jesus, that " He died
for our sakes, to the end that whether we
wake or whether we sleep, we may live
with Him. "3 He Whose Death is Life, is
not His Godhead Life, seeing that the God-
head is Life eternal ?
121. But is His Life truly in the Father's
power .-* Why, He showed that even His
bodily life was not in the power of any other,
as we have it on record : "I lay down My
life, that I may take it again. No man
taketh it from Me, but I lay it down of My-
self I have power to lay it down, and
again I have power to take it. This com-
mandment have I received of My Father." 4
122. Is His divine Life then to be regarded
as depending upon the power of another,
when His bodily life was subject to no other
power but His own ? For it would have
been the power of another, but for the
Unity of power. But just as He gives us
to understand that His laying down His life
was done of His own power, and of His
free Will, so also He teaches us, in lay-
ing it down in obedience to His Father's
command, the unity of His own with the
Father's Will.
1 23. If, then, there has neither been a time
when the Life of the Son took a commence-
ment, nor any power to which it has been
subjected, let us consider what His mean-
ing was when He said : "Even as the liv-
ing Father hath sent Me, and I live by the
Father".? Let us expound His meaning as
best we can ; nay, rather let Him expound it
Himself.
' S. John vi. 58.
' I Thcss. V. JO.
^ Isa. xiv. 6.
* S. John X. 17 ff.
124. Take notice, then, what He said in
an earlier part of His discourse. "Verily,
verily, I say unto you." He first teaches
thee how thou oughtest to listen. " Verily,
verily, I say unto you, unless ye eat the
flesh of the Son of Man, and drink His blood,
ye shall have no life in you."' He first
premised that He was speaking as Son of
Man ; dost thou then think that what He
hath said, as Son of Man, concerning His
Flesh and His Blood, is to be applied to His
Godhead ?
125. Then He added : " For i\Iy Flesh is
meat indeed, and My Blood is drink [in-
deed]."^ Thou hearest Him speak of His
Flesh and of His Blood, thou perceivest
the sacred pledges, [conveying to us the
merits and power] of the Lord's death, 3
and thou dishonourest His Godhead. Hear
His own words: "A spirit hath not flesh
and bones. "4 Now we, as often as we re-
ceive the Sacramental Elements, which by
the mysterous efficacy of holy prayer are
transformed into the Flesh and the Blood,
"do show the Lord's Death. "s
126. Then, after calling on us to take
notice that He speaks as Son of Man,
and frequent repeated mention of His Flesh
and His Blood, He adds: "Even as the
living Father hath sent Me, and I live by the
Father, so he that eateth Me, he also liveth
by Me. " How then do they suppose that we
are to understand these words.' — for the
comparison can be shown as a double one.
The first comparison being after the follow-
ing manner: "Even as the living Father
hath sent Me, I live by the Father ; " the
second : " Even as the living Father hath sent
Me, and I live by the Father, so also he
that eateth Me, he too liveth by Me."
127. If our adversaries choose the former,
the meaning is this, that, " as I am sent iiy
the Father and am come down from the
Father, so (in accordance therewith) I
live by the Father." But in what character
was He sent, and came down, save as Son
of Man, even as He Himself said before :
"No man hath ascended into heaven, save
He that hath come down from heaven as
Son of Man."^ Then, just as He was sent
and came down as Son of Man, so as
Son of Man He lives by the Father. Fur-
thermore, he that eateth Him, as eating the
Son of Man, doth himself also live by the
Son of Man. Thus, He has compared the
effect of His Incarnation to His comintr.
^ S. John vi. 54. 2 S. John vi. 56. 3 g. John vi. 52.
* S. Luke xxiv. 39.
'' I Cor. xi. 26. St. Ambrose's term for "are transformed" is
iransfi,^7trantur ."
* S. John iii. 13.
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— BOOK IV.
279
128. But if they choose the second
method, do we not infer both the equahty
of the Son with the Father, and His hkcncss
to men, tog-ether, though in clear mutual
distinction.'' For what is the meaning of
the words, "Even as He Himself liveth by
the Father, so we also live by Him," but
that the Son so quickeneth a man, as the
Father hath in the Son quickened human
nature.-*' "For as the Father raiseth the
dead and quickeneth them, so also the Son
quickeneth whom He will, "^ as the Lord
Himself hath already said.
129. Thus the equality of the Son to the
Father is established simply upon unity in the
action of quickening, since the Son so quick-
eneth as the Father doth. Acknowledge
therefore the eternity of His Life and Sove-
reignty. Again, our likeness with the
Son is discovered, and a certain unity with
Him in the flesh, ^ because that, like as the
Son of God was quickened in the flesh ■* by
the Father, so also is man quickened ; for
thus it is written, that as God raised Jesus
Christ from the dead, so we also, as men,
are quickened by the Son of God. s
130. According to this interpretation, then,
immortality is not only applied to our con-
dition by grace of bounty, but is also pro-
claimed as the property of Godhead — the
latter, because it is the Godhead which
quickeneth ; the former, because manhood
is quickened in Christ.
131. But if any would apply the force of
either comparison to Christ's Godhead, then
the Son of God is put on one footing with
men, so that the Son of God lives by the Father
just as we live by the Son of God. But the
Son of God bestows eternal life by free gift,
we cannot so do. If then He be placed on
a level with us, He too does not bestow
this gift. Let Arius' disciples then have the
due reward of their faith — which is, not to
obtain eternal life of the Son.
132. I would now go further. If our
opponents are pleased to apply the teaching
of this passage to the principle of the eter-
nity of the Divine Substance, let them hear
a third exposition : Does not our Lord
plainly appear to say that as the Father is a
living Father, so too the Son also lives ? —
and who can but observe that here we must
understand a reference to unity of Life, for-
asmuch as the same Life is the Life of the
Father and the Life of the Son ? •' For as
the Father hath Life in Himself, so hath He
1 Or "flesh." 2 S. John v. 21.
3 Or " is discovered to be a certain unity, etc."
* i.e. in respect of His Body of flesh and blood.
^ Rom iv. 24.
given to the Son also to have Life in Him-
self."' He hath given — by reason of unity
with Him. He hath given, not to take
away, but that He may be glorified in the
Son. He hath given, not that He, the
Father, might keep guard over it, but that
the Son might have it in possession.
133. But the Arians think that they must
oppose hereto the fact that He had said,
"I live by the Father." Of a certainty
(suppose that they conceive the words as
referring to His Godhead) the Son lives by
the Father, because He is the Son begotten
of the Father, — by the Father, because He
is of one Substance with the Father, — by the
Father, because He is the Word given forth
from the heart of the Father,^ because He
came forth from the Father, because He is
begotten of the "bowels of the Father, "^
because the Father is the Fountain and
Root of the Son's being.
134. But peradventure they may urge :
" If you hold that the Son, in saying, 'And I
live by the Father,' spoke of the unity of
life subsisting between the Father and the
Son, does it not follow that He discovered
the unity of life between the Son and man-
kind in saying that ' he that eateth Me, the
same liveth by Me ' } "
135. Even so. Just as I confess the
unity of celestial Life subsisting in Father
and Son by reason of the unity of the sub-
stance of the Godhead, so too, save as con-
cerns the prerogatives of the Divine Nature
or those which are the effect of the Incarna-
tion of our Lord, I affirm of the Son a parti-
cipation of spiritual life with us by virtue of
the unity of His Manhood with ours, for
"as is the heavenly, such are they also
that are heavenly." ■♦ Further, even as in
Him we sit at the right hand of the Father,
not in the sense that we share His throne,
but that we rest in the Body of Christ — even
as, I say, we have part in Christ's session
by reason of corporal unity, so too we live
1 S. John V. 26. = Ps. xlv. I. » Ps. ex. 3.
* I Cor. XV. 40 On this place H. observes: "As the Son, by
reason of a nature numerically identical with the Father's, lives
together with Him t.ie same Divine Life, so we by virtue of a man-
hood specifically the same as Christ's have power to live the life
which the Man Christ lives ; which life indeed resides in its great-
est fulness in Him as its Head and Fountain, and from His Person
overflows into us, His members — yet not without a certain differ-
ence, for the comparison is incomplete, by reason, namely, of the
reservation of prerogatives attaching to the Divine Nature or to the
Lord's Incarnation. The Godhead is numerically One, the Life of
the Father and the Life of the Son is numerically one, but Christ's
Life and ours are not so. Moreover, this (Divine) Life subsistent
in the Son is united to His Manhood in and by the unity of His Per-
son, but is not communicated to us in so close an alliance, overflow-
ing rather into us only by a certain participation. . . . But perhaps
the sainted Doctor's meaning here is that we live and abide in Christ
by a corporal unity, because, Christ having Manhood specifically
the same as ours, whatsoever is fittingly predicted of manhood as
existing in Christ is applicable to all His fellow-men. The first con-
struction, however, explains St. Ambrose's analogy more fully."
28o
ST. AMBROSE.
in Christ by reason of unity of our bodies
with His Body.
136. Not only, then, have I no fears of the
text, "IHve by the Father," but I should
have none, even though Christ had said, "I
hve by help of the Father."'
137. Now another objection commonly
urged by them starts from the text : " This
sickness' is not unto death, but for the glory
of God, to the end that His Son may be
glorified by Him."^ But not only is the
Son glorified through the Father and by the
Father, as it is written : ' ' Glorify Me,
Father ;" 3 and again : " Now hath the Son
of Man been glorified, and God hath been
glorified in Him, and God glorifieth Him,"-*
but the Father also is glorified through the
Son and by the Son, for Truth hath said : " I
have glorified Thee upon earth." s
138. Even as the Son, therefore, is glori-
fied through the Father, so too He lives by
the Father. There are some who have been
led by consideration of these words to the
supposition that [the Greek] " 86^a" means
"opinion, belief," rather than "glory," and
therefore have interpreted as follows: "I
have given thee a d(>^a upon earth, I have
finished the work which Thou gavest Me to
do, and now, O Father, give me a do^a ; "
that is to say : "I have taught men so to
believe concerning Thee, as to know that
Thou art the true God; do Thou also establish
in them, concerning Me, the belief that I am
Thy Son, and very God."
CHAPTER XI.
The particular distinction which the A rians endeavoured
to prove upon the Apostle's teaching that all things
are " of " the Father and " through " the Son, is over-
thrown, it being shown that in the passage cited the
same Omnipotence is ascribed both to Father and
to Son, as is proved from various texts, especially
from the words of St. Paul himself, in which heretics
foolishly find a reference to the Father only, though
indeed there is no diminution or inferiority of the
Son's sovereignty proved, even by such a reference.
Finally, the three phrases, "of Whom," "through
Whom," "in Whom," are shown to suppose or imply
no difference (of power), and each and all to hold
true of the Three Persons.
139. Now we come to that laughable me-
thod, attempted by some, of showing' a
difference of Power to subsist between
' St. Ambrose quotes the words from St. John vi. 58, thus:
"propter J'atretn. This seeming expression of dependence, he
says, does not in the least disturb his belief in the co-eteniity and
co-equality of the Son with the Father; which belief would indeed
remain unshaken even though Christ's words had been still more
expressive, to all appearance, of dependence and inferiority.
^ S. John xi. 4. 3 g j(,},n xvii. 5.
* b. John .xiii. 31, 32, <- S. John xvii. 4.
Father and Son, on the strength of apostolic
testimony, it being written : "But for us
there is One God, the Father, of Whom are
all things, and we in Him, and One Lord,
Jesus Christ, through Whom are all things,
and we through Him." ' It is urged that no
small difference in degree of Divine Majesty
is signified in the affirmation that all things
are "of" the Father, and "through" the
Son. Whereas nothing is clearer than that
here a plain reason is given of the Omni-
potence of the Son, inasmuch as whilst all
things are "of" the Father, none the less
are they all " through " the Son.^
140. The Father is not "amongst" all
things, for to Him it is confessed that "all
things serve Thee. "3 Nor is the Son reck-
oned "amongst" all things, for " all things
were made by Him," 4 and " all things exist
together 5 in Him, and He is above all the
heavens."^ The Son, therefore, exists
not "amongst" but above all things, being,
indeed, after the flesh, of the people,? of the
Jews, but yet at the same time God over all,
blessed for ever,^ having a Name which is
above every name, 9 it being said of Him,
"Thou hast put all things in subjection
under His feet." '° But in making all things
subject to Him, He left nothing that is not
subject, even as the Apostle hath said. " But
suppose that the Apostle's words were in-
tended with reference to the Incarnate Lord ;
how then can we doubt the incomparable
majesty of His Divine Generation .'
14 r. Certain it is, then, that between
Father and Son there can be no difference
of Power. Nay, so far is such difference
from being present, that the same Apostle
has said that all things are "of" Him, by
Whom are all things, as followeth : " For of
Him and through Him and in Him are all
things.""
142. Now if, as they suppose, it is the
Father alone Who is spoken of, it cannot
be that He is at once Omnipotent because
all things are of Him, and not Omnipotent
because all things are through Him. '3 On
\ I Cor. viii. 6. = Cf. Bk. I. iii. 26.
^ Ps. cxix. 91. * S. John i. 3.
''Or "consist;" Lat. — constant; Greek — ra ndvTa iv avTif
" Col. i. 17.
'' 'LdL.\..—/atnilia. Cf. the expression "house of Israel." — Ps.
cxv. 9.
' Rom. ix. 5 ; cf. i. 3. " Phil. ii. 9. '" Ps. viii. 6.
" Heb. ii. 8. '= Rom. xi. 36.
'' " You think, perhaps," St. .Ambrose might have said to his Arian
opponents, " that this text speaks of God the Father only, as it be-
gins with ' of Him.' Very good. But whilst, in dealing with 1 Cor.
viii. 6, you acknowledge that the Father is Omnipotent because
'all things are of Him,' you deny that the Son is Omnipotent, on
the strength of the statement that all things are ' throue^h ' Him.
Now here (Rom. xi. 36) we find that all things are said to be
' through ' as well as ' of ' One and the same Person— the Father.
On your own showing, then, you must conclude that the Father is
both Omnipotent (all things being ' of ' Him) and not Omnipotent
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— BOOK IV.
281
their own showing, then, they will declare
the Father lacking in Power, and not Umni-
potent, or at the least they will be confess-
ing with their own mouth, all against their
will though it be, the Omnipotence of the
Son as well as of the Father.
143. Howbeit, let them decide whether
they will understand this affirmation as made
concerning the Father. If they do so decide,
then all things are "through" Him also. If
they decide that it is the Son Who is spoken
of, then all things are "of Him as well as
"of" the Father. But if all things are
" through " the Father also, then surely there
is no argument for diminishing from the
honour due to the Son ; and if all things are
"of" the Son, the Son must be honoured in
like manner as the Father is.
144. In case our opponents should suspect
that we are taking advantage of some intru-
sion of a single spurious verse into the text,
let us review the whole passage. " O depth
of the riches of God's wisdom and know-
ledge ! " exclaims the Apostle, "how un-
searchable are His judgments, and His ways
past finding out ! For Who hath known the
mind of the Lord, or who hath been His
counsellor ? Or who hath been first to give
unto Him, and shall be recompensed ?
For of Him and through Him and in
Him are all things. To Him be glory for
ever ! " '
145. Who, then, think they, is here spoken
of — the Father or the Son ? If it be the
Father — ^then we answer that the Father is
not the Wisdom of God, for the Son is. But
what is there that is impossible to Wisdom,
of Whom it is written : " Seeing that she is
almighty and abiding, she maketh all things
new in herself" ? ^ We read of Wisdom, then,
not as approaching, but as abiding. ^ Thus
have you the authority of Solomon to teach
you of the Omnipotence and Eternity of
Wisdom, and of her Goodness as well, for
it is written : " But malice overcometh not
Wisdom." 4
146. But to purpose. " How unsearch-
able," saith the Apostle, "are His judg-
ments!" Now if "the Father hath given
(all things being only 'through ' Him) at the same time and in the
same respect. Wh'ch is absurd and impossible. Clearly, then, the
inference you want to draw from the difference of the expressions
'of Him and 'by Him' will not stand, if you make Rom. xi.
36 a declaration regarding the Father only. But if you make it a
declaration concerning the Son, or even including the Son in its
reference, you upset your own position."
^ Rom. xi. 33-36. St. Ambrose's quotation of the passage in ex-
tetiso shows us how texts ought to be used in argument — namely,
not rent from their coiiX^yX, not as unrelated apophthegms.
^ Wisd. vii. 27.
' " Approaching" — Lat. accedentem. A?i " accidentem " potius
iit legendum ? — ut Sapientia non sit accidetts, sed propriuni. Sub-
stantia Divince.
* Wisd. vii. 30.
all judgment to the Son," ' it seems that the
Father- points to the Son as Judge.
147. But now, to show us that He is
speaking of the Son, not of the Father, St.
Paul proceeds : "Who was first in giving to
Him } " For " the Father hath given to the
Son," but it was as acknowledijin" the ritrhts
of Him Whom He has begotten, not by way
of largess. Therefore, it being undeniable
that the Son has received at the hands of the
Father, as it is written, "All tilings have
been given unto Me of My Father,"^ yet,
in saying, "Who was first in giving to Him.?"
the Apostle has not denied that the Son has
received gifts of the Father, by virtue of His
Nature, but he has indeed shown that, of
Father and Son, Neither can be said to be
before the Other, forasmuch as, albeit the
Father has given gifts unto the Son, yet He
has not so bestowed them as upon one that
began to be after Him ; because the uncreate
and incomprehensible Trinity, Which is of
One Eternity and Glory, admits neither
difference of time nor degree of precedence.
148. If, however, we hold ourselves more
bound to observe those Greek manuscripts
which show " Ti<; r.poaidfuxzv abzuj; " it is clear
that He to Whom nothing can be added is
not unequal to Him Who is perfect and
complete. Therefore, if this passage from
the Apostle, in its entirety, is better under-
stood with reference to the Son, we see that
we must also believe concerning the Son,
that all things are of Him, even as it is
written : " For of Him and through Him
and in Him are all things."
149. Be it so, nevertheless, that they
suppose the passage to be intended of the
Father, then let us call to mind that even as
we read of all things being 0/ Him, so too
we read of all things being through Him,
that is to say, the authority of the Father
and of the Son is extended over the whole
created universe. And, though we have
already proved the Omnipotence of the Son
by the Omnipotence of the Father, 4 still —
forasmuch as they are ever bent upon dis-
paragement— let them consider that they
disparage the Father as well as the Son.
For if the Son be: limited in might, because
all things are through Him, do we say
further, that the Father likewise is limited,
because all things are through Him also .'*
150. But to bring them to understand that
1 S. John V. 22.
^ Potest hie matins incnriose transcribentis deprehendi, cum
" Pa7i/i" pro " Patris" nomen potius legendum esse videatitr.
Nee tamen prohibemjtr qiiin sie 7'erba intelligainus, ut Pater Ipse
in hoc EpistoliF Romante loco, per ealantutn Apostoli sit locjttus.
3 S. Matt. xi. 27.
* See § 140, and comparison of Ps. cxix. 91, with St. John i. 3;
Col. i. 17, and Ps. viii. 8, with Heb. ii. 8.
282
ST. AMBROSE.
these phrases involve no difference, I will
once again show that it is the same person,
"of" whom anything is, and "through"
whom anything is, and that we read of
things being related in both these ways to
the Father. For we find : " Faithful is God,
through Whom ye were called into the
fellowship of His Son." ' Let our ad-
versaries weigh the meaning of the Apostle's
words. We are called ' ' through " the Father
— they raise no controversy : we are created
" through " the Son — and this they have set
down as a mark of inferiority.^ The Father
has called us into fellowship with His Son,
and this truth we, as in duty bound, devoutly
receive. The Son has created all things, and
Arius' followers imagine that here they have
not the decree of a free Will, but a forced
service, slavishly performed !
151. Again, to obtain fuller understanding
that, forasmuch as we are called through
the Father into fellowship with His Son,
there is no difference of Power in the Father
and the Son, [note that] the fellowship it-
self has its beginning of the Son, as it is
written : "For from His fulness have we all
received," though, if we follow the Greek
text of the Gospel, we ought to render ''of
His fulness." 3
152. See, then, how there is fellowship
both through the Father and o/" the Son, and
yet not a different fellowship, but one and
the same. "And that our fellowship be
with the Father and with His Son Jesus
Christ. "4
153. Observe, further, that Scripture
speaks of our having one fellowship not
only " of " the Father and the Son, but also
"of" the Holy Spirit. "The grace of Our
Lord Jesus Christ," saith the Apostle, "and
the love of God, and the fellowship of the
Holy Spirit be with you all." s
154. Now, I ask, wherein does He,
through Whom are all things, appear less
than He, of Whom are all things } Is it be-
cause He is declared to be the Worker } But
the Father also works, for He is true who
said, " My Father worketh hitherto, and I
work. "^ Therefore, even as the Father
worketh, so worketh the Son also ; and so
He Who worketh is not limitary in power
nor abject, for the Father also worketh ;
which being so, that which is common to
the Son with the Father, or even which the
Son has by the Father, ought not to be the
^ Or "into fellowship with His Son." " Fellowship " in the orig.
is cominunio (Koivhivia). i Cor. i. a.
'^ Or " as an inferior work." •' S. John i. i6. * i John i. 3.
' 2 Cor. xiii. 13. " Fellowship" in the Latin of St. Ambrose is
(in this citation and that of i John i. 3, in § 152) covtmu7iicatio ;
Greek Koiviavia. * S. John v. 17.
less esteemed, lest heretics further dishonour
the Father in the Person of the Son.
155. Not to be passed over for silencing
the disputings of Arian misbelief are those
words of the same Saint John, which he set
down in another Scripture: "If ye know
that He is just, know that he which doeth
righteousness is born of Him,"' But who
is righteous, save the Lord, Who loveth
righteousness .-* ^ Or whom — as the foregoing
texts warn us — have we to assure us of ever-
lasting life, if we have not the Son } If,
therefore, the Son of God hath promised us
everlasting life, and He is righteous, surely
we are born "of" Him. Else, if our ad-
versaries deny that we are born of the Son
by grace, they likewise deny His righteous-
ness.
156. Thou must therefore believe that all
things are of the Son of God [even as of
God the Father], for even as God is the
Father of all, so likewise is the Son the
Author and Creator of all. We see, then, the
vanity of this their questioning, foras-
much as it holds good of the Son [as of the
Father], that " of Him and through Him and
in Him are all things."
157. We have shown how all things are
"of" Him, and likewise how all things are
also "through" Him. Who then doubts
that all things are "in " Him, when another
Scripture saith : " For in Him are all things
founded, that are in the heavens, and in
Him they were created, and He is before all
things, and all things consist in Him " }
(Col. i. 16). Of Him, then, thou hast
grace; Himself thou hast for thy Creator ;
in Him thou findest the foundation of all
things,
o
CHAPTER Xn.
The comparison, found in the Gospel of St. John, of
the Son to a Vine and the Father to a husbandman,
must be understood with reference to the Incarnation.
To understand it with reference to the Divine Gene-
ration is to doubly insult the Son, making Him
inferior to St. Paul, and bringing Him down to the
level of the rest of mankind, as well as in like manner
the Father also, by making Him not merely to be on
one footing with the same Apostle, but even of no
account at all. The Son, indeed, in so far as being
God, is also the husbandman, and, as regards His
Manhood, a grape-cluster. True statement of the
Father's pre-eminence.
158. There is yet another Scripture, which
our opponents commonly object against us,
in order to prove their division of the God-
head of the Father from the Godhead of the
' 1 John ii. 29.
= Ps. xi. 8.
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— BOOK IV.
283
Son, namely, our Lord's words in the Gospel:
" I am the true Vine and My Father is the
Husbandman." The vine and the husband-
man, say they, are of different natures, and
the vine is in the power of the husbandman.
159. Thus, then, ye would have us believe
that the Son, as touching His Godhead, is
like to a vine, so that without a vine-drcsser
He is nothinjj, and may be neglected or even
rooted up. Thus ye juggle up a lie from the
letter of the Scripture which sayeth that our
Lord called Himself the Vine, intending
thereby the mystery of His Incarnation.'
Howbeit, if ye are bent on it that we dispute
upon the letter, I too confess, yea, I pro-
claim, that the Son called Himself the Vine.
For woe be to me, if I deny the pledge^ of
the salvation of His people !
160. How then do you purpose to under-
stand the truth that the Son of God called
Himself the Vine.? If you interpret the
saying with respect to the Substance of His
Godhead, and if you suppose such a diver-
sity of Godhead between the Father and the
Son as there is of nature between a husband-
man and a vine, you do double insult both
to Father and to Son — to the Son, because if,
as you afitirm. He is, as touching His God-
head, beneath a husbandman, then must He
on the same showing be esteemed lower
than the Apostle Paul, forasmuch as Paul
indeed called himself a husbandman, as we
find it written : "I have planted, Apollos
hath watered : but God hath given the
increase."^ Will you have Paul, then, to be
better than the Son of God ?
161. Thus far the one insult. As for the
other, it lies herein, that if the Son is the Vine
in respect of His eternally-begotten Person,
then, He having said : "I am the Vine, ye
are the branches, ""^ that divinely-begotten
One appears to be of one substance with us.
But " who is like unto Thee among the gods,
O Lord ? " 5 as it is Avritten ; and again, in the
Psalms : " For who is there among the clouds
that shall be equal to the Lord.'* Or who
among the sons of God shall be like unto
God. " ^
162. Moreover, ye disparage not only the
Son, but the Father also. For if the term
"husbandman " is to comprehend in its de-
signation all the prerogative of the Father's
Sovereignty, then, seeing that Paul too is a
husbandman, you set the Apostle, to whom
you deny that the Son is equal, on an even
footing with the Father.
1 Or " intendins; an emblem " or " token (orig. sacramentuni) of
His Incarnation."
- Orig. sacramentuni. * i Cor. iii. 6.
* S. John XV. 5. ^ Exod. xv. 11. * Ps. Ixxxix. 6.
163. Again, it being written, " But neither
he which planteth is anything, nor he that
watereth ; but God, Who giveth the in-
crease,"' you will rest the fulness of the
Father's Majesty in a name which, as you
see, stands for weakness. For if he that
planteth is nothing, and he that watereth is
nothing, but it is God, Who giveth the
increase [Who is all], observe what your
blasphemy intends — even to expose the
Father to contempt under the title of a
husbandman, and to demand another God
to provide the increase of the Father's
labour. Wickedly, therefore, do they think
to extol the Dignity of God the Father by
this use of the term " husbandman," in
which God the Father is brought down to
the level of man, as being designated by a
common title.
164. Yet what wonder if, as ye heretics
would have it, the Father is to be exalted
above a Son Whose Godhead differs not a
whit from the common condition of man-
kind } If ye suppose the Son to have been
entitled the Vine with respect to His God-
head, then do ye esteem Him not only as
liable to corruption and subject to changes
of wind and weather, but even as partaking
of manhood only, forasmuch as the Vine
and its branches are of one nature, so that
the Son of God appears, not to have taken
upon Him our flesh, through the mystery of
Incarnation, but to have altogether sj^rung
into being from the flesh.
165. But I will indeed openly confess that
His flesh, though born in a new^ and mys-
terious birth, was yet of the same nature
with ours, and that this is the pledge of our
salvation, not the source of the Divine Gene-
ration. Fle indeed is the Vine, for He
bears my sufferings, whensoever manhood,
hitherto frail, leans on Him and so matures
with plenteous fruit of renewed devotion.
166. Yet if the husbandman's power allure
thee, tell me, prithee, who it was that spake
in the prophet, saying : "O Lord, make it
known to me, that I may know ; then saw I
their thoughts. I was led as a harmless
lamb to the slaughter and knew it not : they
took counsel together against me, saying,
Come, let us throw wood into his bread. "^
For if the Son here speaks of the mystery of
His coming Incarnation — for it were blas-
phemy to suppose that the words are spoken
concerning the Father — then surely it is the
Son Who speaks in an earlier passage : "I
have planted thee as a fruitful vine — how art
Thou become bitter, and a wild vine } " ^
^ sc. is all. See Alford in loc. i Cor. iii. 7.
* Jer. xi. iS. 3 Jcr. ii. 21.
284
ST. AMBROSE.
167. And thus thou seestthat the Son also
is the husbandman, — the Son, of one Name
with the Father, one work, one dignity and
Substance. If, then, the Son is both Vine
and Husbandman, plainly we infer the
meaning of the Vine with regard to the
mystery of the Incarnation.
168. But not only has our Lord called
Himself a Vine — He has also given Himself,
by the voice of the prophet, the title of a
Grape-cluster — even when Moses, at the
command of the Lord, sent spies to the
Valley of the Cluster. ' What is that valley
but the humility of the Incarnation and the
fruitfulness of the Passion? I indeed think
that He is called the Cluster, because that
from the Vine brought out of Egypt, that is,
the people of the Jews, there grew a fruit for
the world's good. No man, truly, can un-
derstand the Cluster as a token of the Divine
Generation — or if there be any who so under-
stand it, they leave no conclusion open but
that we should believe that Cluster to have
sprung from the Vine. And thus in their
folly they attribute to the Father that which
they refuse to believe of the Son.
169. But if there be now left no room for
doubt that the Son of God is called the Vine
with respect and intention to His Incarna-
tion,' you see what hidden truth it was to
which our Lord had regard in saying, " The
Father is greater than 1." ^ For after this
premised, He proceeded immediately : " I
am the true Vine, and INIy Father is the Hus-
bandman," that you might know that the
Father is greater in so far as He dresses and
tends our Lord's flesh, as the husbandman
dresses and tends his vines. Further, our
Lord's flesh is that which could increase in
stature with age,^ and be wounded through
suffering, to the end that the whole human
race might rest guarded from the pestilent
heat of the pleasures of this world, under
the shadow of the Cross whereon Its limbs
are spread.
BOOK V.
PROLOGUE.
Who is a faithful and wise servant .'' His reward is
pointed out in the case of Peter, as also in the case
of Paul. Aml)rose, being an.xious to follow Paul's
guidance, wished this book to be added to the others,
for it could not be included in the preceding one.
The subject for discussion is then stated, and the
reason for such a discussion given. He must needs
be pardoned, for usury is to be demanded from every
servant for the money which has been entrusted to
him. Their faithfulness is the usury desired in his
own case. He will be happy if he may hope for a
reward ; but he does not look so much for the recom-
pense of the saints, as for exemption from punish-
ment. He urges all to seek to merit this.
1. " Who, then, is a faithful and wise ser-
vant, whom his lord hath made ruler over
his household, to give them meat in due
season ? Blessed is that servant, whom his
lord when he cometh shall find so doing." ^
Not worthless is this servant ; some great
one ought he to be. Let us think who he
may be.
2. It is Peter, chosen by the Lord Him-
self to feed His flock, who merits thrice to
hear the words : "Feed My little lambs;
feed My lambs ; feed My sheep. " ^ And so,
by feeding well the flock of Christ with the
' Num. xiii. 24.
8 S. John Mi. 15 flf.
* S. Matt. xxiv. 45, 46,
food of faith, he effaced the sin of his former
fall. For this reason is he thrice admon-
ished to feed the flock ; thrice is he asked
whether he loves the Lord, in order that he
may thrice confess Him, Whom he had
thrice denied before His Crucifixion. f
3. Blessed also is that servant who can
say: "I have fed you with milk and not
with meat ; for hitherto ye were not able to
bear it." 5 For he knew how to feed them.
Who of us can do this ? Who of us can
truly say : " To the weak became I as weak,
that I might gain the weak " ? ^
4. Yet he, being so great a man, and
chosen by Christ for the care of His flock,
so as to strengthen the weak and to heal the
sick, — he, I say, rejects forthwith after one
admonition ? a heretic from the fold entrusted
to him, for fear that the taint of one erring
sheep might infect the whole flock with a
spreading sore. He further bids that foolish
questions and contentions be avoided.*
5. How. then, shall wc act, being but
ignorant dwellers set amongst these fresh
tares in the old-standine harvest field.? 9 If
' i.e. the Incarnate Son of God, not the Pre-existent Logos, is
the Vine.
2 .S. John xiv. 28. » S. lAike ii. ad fin.
* S. Matt. xxvi. 70 ff. ' I Cor. iii. 2.
" I Cor. ix. 22. » Tit. iii. 10. » Tit. iii. g.
» S. Matt. xiii. 25. '
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— BOOK V.
285
we are silent, we shall seem to be giving
way ; and if we contend against them, there
is the fear that we too shall be held to be
carnal. For it is written of matters of this
sort, which beget strife: "The servant of
the Lord must not strive, but be gentle unto
all, apt to teach, patient, with moderation
instructing those that oppose then\selves. " '
And in another place : "If any man is con-
tentious, we have no such custom, neither
the Church of God. " ^ For this reason it was
our intention to write somewhat, in order
that our writinsfs might without any din
answer the impiety of heretics on our behalf.
6. And so we prepare to commence this
our Fifth Book, O Emperor Augustus. For
it was butriofht that the Fourth Book should
end with our discussion on the Vine, lest
otherwise we should seem to have over-
loaded that book with a tumultuous mass of
subjects, rather than to have filled it with
the fruit of the spiritual vineyard. On the
other hand, it was not seemly that the gath-
ering of the vintage of the faith should be
left unfinished, whilst there was still an
abundance of such great matters for discus-
sion.
7. In the Fifth Book, therefore, we speak of
the indivisible Godhead of the Father, the
Son, and the Holy Ghost (omitting, how-
ever, a full discussion on the Holy Ghost),
being urged by the teaching of the Gospel
to let out on interest to human minds the
five talents ^ of the faith entrusted to us —
these five books being as it were the princi-
pal ; lest perhaps when the Lord comes,
and finds His money hidden in the earth.
He may say to me: "Thou wicked and
slothful servant, thou knewest that I reap
where I do not sow ; and gather where I
have not strawed ; thou oughtest therefore
to have put My money to the exchangers,
that at My coming I might have received
Mine own,"'^ or as it stands in another
book: "And I," it says, "at My coming
might have received it with usury. ''s
8. I pray those to pardon me, whom the
boldness of such a lengthy address dis-
pleases. The thought of my office compels
me to entrust to others what I have received.
"We are stewards of the heavenly mys-
teries."^ We are ministers, but not all alike.
" But, " it says, "even as the Lord gave to
every man, I have planted ; Apollos
watered; but God gave the increase. "7
Let each one then strive that he may be able
to receive a reward according to his labour.
' 2 Tim. ii. 24, 25.
'' S. Matl. XXV. 26, 27.
' I Cor. iii. s, 6.
* I Cor. xi. 16.
* S. Luke xix. 23.
8 S. Matt. XXV. 15.
* I Cor. iv. I.
" For we are labourers together with God,"
as the Apostle said; "we are God's hus-
bandry, God's building. " ' Blessed therefore
is he who sees such usury on his principal ;
blessed too is he who beholds the fruit of
his work ; blessed again is he "who builds
upon the foundation of faith, gold, silver,
precious stones. " ==
9. Ye who hear or read these words are
all things to us. Ye are the usury of the
money-lender, — the usury on speech, not on
money ; ye are the return given to the hus-
bandman ; ye are the gold, the silver, the
precious stones of the builder. In your
merits lie the chief results of the labours of
the priest ; in your souls shines forth the
fruit of a bishop's work ; in your progress
glitters the gold of the Lord ; the silver is
increased if ye hold fast the divine words.
" The words of the Lord are pure words, as
silver tried in the fire ; proved on the earth,
purified seven times. "^ Ye therefore will
make the lender rich, the husbandman to
abound in produce ; ye will prove the
master-builder to be skilful. I do not speak
boastfully ; for I do not desire so much my
own advantage as yours.
10. Oh that I might safely say of you at
that time: "Lord, Thou gavest me five
talents, behold I have gained five other
talents ;"■* and that I might show the pre-
cious talents of your virtues I "For we
have a treasure in earthen vessels. "5 These
are the talents which the Lord bids us
spiritually to trade with, or the two coins
of the New and the Old Testament, which
that Samaritan in the Gospel left for the
man robbed by the thieves, for the purpose
of getting his wounds healed.^
11. Neither do I, my brethren, with
greedy desires, long for this, so that I may
be set over many things ; the recompense I
get from the fact of your advance is enough
for me. Oh that I rnay not be found un-
worthy of that which I have received I Let
those things which are too great for me be
assigned to better men. I demand them
not! Yet mayest Thou say, O Lord: "I
will give unto this last, even as unto thee. "7
Let the man that deserves it receive autho-
rity over ten cities.^
1 2. Let him be such an one as was Moses,
who wrote the Ten Words of the Law.
Let him be as Joshua, the son of Nun, who
subdued five kings, and brought the Gibe-
onites into subjection, that he might be the
figure of a Man of his own name Who was
* I Cor. iii. g.
* S. Matt. XXV. 2o.
* S. Matt. XX. 14.
' I Cor. iii. 12.
" 2 Cor. iv. 7.
* S. Luke xix. 17.
' Ps. xii. 6.
* S. Luke X. 35.
286
ST. AMBROSE.
to come, by Whose power all fleshly lust
should be overcome, and the Gentiles should
be converted, so that they might follow the
faith of Jesus Christ rather than their former
pursuits and desires. Let him be as David,
whom the young- maidens came to meet
with songs, saying: "Saul hath triumphed
over thousands, David over ten thousands. "'
13. It is enough for me, if I am not thrust
out into the outer darkness, as he was, who
hid the talent entrusted to him in the earth,
so to speak, of his own flesh. This the
ruler of the synagogue did, and the other
rulers of the Jews ; for they employed ^. 3 the
words of the Lord, which had been entrusted
to them, on the ground as it were of their
bodies ; and, delighting in the pleasures of
the flesh, sunk the heavenly trust as though
into the pit of an overweening heart.
14. Let us then not keep the Lord's money
buried and hidden in the flesh ; nor let us
hide our one talent in a napkin ; '^ but like
good money-changers let us ever weigh it
out with labour of mind and body, with an
even and ready will, that the word may be
near, even in thy mouth and in thy heart. s
15. This is the word of the Lord, this is
the precious talent, whereby thou art re-
deemed. This money must often be seen
on the tables of souls, in order that by con-
stant trading the sound of the good coins
may be able to go forth into every land, by
the means of which eternal life is purchased.
"This is eternal life," which Thou, Almighty
Father, givest freely, that we may know
" Thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ
Whom Thou hast sent." ^
CHAPTER L
How impious the Arians are, in attacking that on
which human happiness depends. John ever unites
the Son with the Father, especially where he says :
" That they may know Thee, the only true God, etc."
In that place, then, we must understand the words
"true God " also of the Son; for it cannot be denied
that lie is God, and it cannot be said He is a false
god, and least of all that He is God by appellation
only. This last point being proved from the Apos-
tle's words, we rightly confess that Christ is true
God.
16. Wherefore let the Arians observe,
how impious they are in calling in question
our hope and the object of our desires. And
since they are wont to cry out on this point
above all others, saying that Christ is dis-
tinct from the only and true God, let us con-
^ I Sam. xviii. 7. 2 5 Matt, xxiii. 14 ff.
' i.e. Either ' used to their own earthly advantage ' or ' explained
in a carnal earthly sense.'
* S. Luke xix. 20. ° Deut. xxx. 14. " S. John xvii. 3.
fute their impious ideas so far as lies in our
power.
17. For on this point they ought rather to
understand, that this is the benefit, this the
reward of perfect virtue, namely, this divine
and incomparable gift, that we may know
Christ together with the Father, and not
separate the Son from the Father ; as also
the Scriptures do not separate them. For
the following tells rather for the unity than
for the diversity of the Divine Majesty,
namely, that the knowledge of the Father
and of the Son gives us the same recom-
pense, and one and the same honour ;
which rew^ard no man will have but he that
has known both the Father and the Son.
For as the knowledge of the Father procures
eternal life, so also does the knowledge of
the Son.
18. Therefore as the Evangelist forthwith
at the outset joined the Word with God the
Father in his devout confession of faith,
saying : "And the Word was with God ; " '
and here too, in writing the words of the
Lord : "That they may know Thee, the only
true God, and Jesus Christ Whom Thou hast
sent, "^ he has undoubtedly, by thus con-
necting Them, bound together the Father
and the Son, so that no one may separate
Christ as true God from the majesty of the
Father, for union does not dissever.
19. Therefore in saying, "That they
may know Thee, the only true God, and
Jesus Christ Whom Thou hast sent," he put
an end to the Sabellians, and has also put
the Jews out of court, — those at any rate
who heard him speak ; so that the former
might not suppose the Same to be the Father
as the Son, which they might have done if
he had not added also Christ, and that the
latter might not sever the Son from the
Father.
20. But, I ask, why do they not think
we ought to gather and understand this from
what has been already said ; that as he has
declared the Father to be only, true God, so
we may understand Jesus Christ also to be
only, true God .^ For it could not be
expressed in any other way, for fear he
might seem to be speaking of two Gods.
For neither do we speak of two Gods ; and
yet we confess the Son to be of the same
Godhead with the Father.
21. May we ask, therefore, on what
grounds they think a distinction is made in
the Godhead, and whether they deny Christ
to be God.? But they cannot deny it. Do
they deny Him to be true God } But if they
> S. John i. I.
' S. John xvii. 3.
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— BOOK V.
287
deny Him to be true God, let them say
whether they declare Him to be a false God,
or God by appellation only. For according-
to the Scriptures the word " God " is used
either of the true God, or by appellation
only, or of a false god. True God as the
Father ; God by appellation as the saints ;
a false god like the demons and idols. Let
them say then how they will acknowledge
and describe the Son of God. Do they
suppose the name of God to have been
falsely assumed ; or was there in truth
merely an indwelling of God within Him,
as it were by appellation only .'*
22. I do not think they can say the name
was falsely assumed, and so involve them-
selves in the open wickedness of blasphemy;
lest they should betray themselves on the one
hand to the demons and idols, and on the
other to Christ, by insinuating that the name
of God was falsely given to Him. But if
they think He is called God because He had
an indwelling of the Godhead within Him,
— as many holy men were (for the Scrip-
ture calls them Gods to whom the word of
God came),' — they do not place Him be-
fore other men, but think He is to be com-
pared with them ; so that they consider
Him to be the same as He has granted other
men to be, even as He says to Moses : "I
have made thee a god unto Pharaoh." ^
Wherefore it is also said in the Psalms : " I
have said, ye are gods." 3
23. This idea of these blasphemers Paul
puts aside ; for he said : " For though there
be that are called gods, whether in heaven
or in earth. "4 He said not: "There be
gods," but "There be that are called gods."
But "Christ," as it is written, " is the same
yesterday and to-day." = " He is," it says ;
that is, not only in name but also in truth.
24. And well is it written : " He is the
same yesterday and to-day," so that the im-
piety of Arius might find no room to pile up
its profanity. For he, in reading in the
second psalm of the Father saying to the
Son, "Thou art ^ly Son, this day have I be-
gotten Thee," ^ noted the word " to-day," not
"yesterday," referring this which was spoken
of the assumption of our flesh to the eternity
of the divine generation ; of which Paul also
says in the Acts of the Apostles : "And we
declare unto you the promise which was
made to our fathers : for God has fulfilled
the same to our children, in that He hath
raised up the Lord Jesus Christ again, as it
is written in the second psalm : Thou art
^ S. John X. 35.
* I Cor. viii. 5.
* Ex. vii. I.
^ Heb. xiii.
3 Ps. Ixxxii. 6.
« Ps. ii. 7.
My Son, this day have I begotten Thee."'
Thus'the Apostle, filled with the Holy (ihost,
in order that he might destroy that fierce
madness of his, said : "The same, yesterday,
to-day, and for ever." "Yesterday" on
account of His eternity; "to-day "on ac-
count of His taking to Himself a human
body.
25. Christ therefore is, and always is ; for
He, Who is, always is. And Christ always
is, of Whom Moses says: "He that is
hath sent me."^ Gabriel indeed was,
Raphael was, the angels were ; but they
who sometime have not been are by nc
means with equal reason said always to be.
But Christ, as we read, " was not it is, and,
it is not, but, it is was in Him. "3 Wherefore
it is the property of God alone to be, Who
ever is.
26. Therefore if they dare not say He is
God by appellation, and it is a mark of
deep impiety to say He is a false god, it
remains that He is true God, not unlike to
the true Father, but equal to Him. And as
He sanctifies and justifies whom He will,*
not by assuming that power from without
Himself, but having within Himself the
power of sanctification, how is He not true
God ? For the Apostle called Him indeed
true God, Who according to His nature was
God, as it is written : " Howbeit then, when
ye knew not God, ye did service unto them,
who by nature were not gods ; " s that is,
who could not be true gods, for this title by
no means belonged to them by nature.
CHAPTER II.
Since it has been proved that the Son is true God, and
in that is not inferior to the Father, it is shown that
by the word sohts (alone) when used of the Father in
the Scriptures, the Son is not excluded ; nay, that
this expression befits Him above all, and Him alone.
The Trinity is alone, not amongst all, but above all.
The Son alone does what the Father does, and alone
has immortality. But we must not for this reason
separate Him from the Father in our controversies.
We may, however, understand that passage of the
Incarnation. Lastly the Father is shut out from a
share in the redemption of men by those who would
have the .Son to be separated from Him.
27. We have fully demonstrated by pas-
sages of Scripture, in the earlier books, that
Christ is true, yea, very true God. There-
fore if Christ, as it has been taught, is true
God, let us enquire why they desire to
separate the Son from the Father, when
they read that the Father is the only true
God.
^ Acts xiii. 32, 33.
* Rom. ix. 18.
- Ex. iii. 14.
^ Gal. iv. 8.
^ 2 Cor. i. 19.
288
ST. AMBROSE.
28. If they say that the Father alone is
true God, they cannot deny that God the
Son alone is the Truth ; for Christ is the
Truth. Is the Truth then something in-
ferior to Him that is true, seeing that ac-
cording to the use of terms a man is called
true from the word "truth," as also wise
from wisdom, just from justice? We do not
deem it so between the P'athcr and the Son.
For there is nothing wanting to the Father,
because the Father is full of truth ; and the
Son, because He is the Truth, is equal to
Him that is true.
29. But that they may know, when they
see the word " alone," that the Son is in no
wise to be separated from the Father, let
them remember it was said by God in the
Prophets: "I stretched forth the heavens
alone."' The Father certainly did not
stretch them forth without the Son. For
the Son Himself, Who is the Wisdom of God,
says : "When He prepared the heavens I
was present with Him. '' ^ And Paul declares
that it was said of the Son : "Thou, Lord,
in the beginning hast laid the foundation of
the earth, and the heavens are the work of
Thy hands. "3 Whether therefore the Son
made the heavens, as also the Apostle
would have it understood, whilst He
Himself certainly did not alone spread
out the heavens without the Father ; or as
it stands in the Book of Proverbs : "The
Lord in wisdom hath founded the earth,
in understanding hath He prepared the
heavens ; " '^ it is proved that neither the
Father made the heavens alone without the
Son, nor yet the Son without the Father.
And yet He who spread out the heavens is
said to be alone.
30. To show indeed how plainly we must
understand the expression "alone" of the
Son (although we may never believe that
He did anything without the knowledge of
the Father), we have here also another pas-
sage, where it is written: "Which alone
spreadeth out the heavens, and walketh as
it were on a pavement over the sea." s For
the Gospel of the Lord has taught us that it
was not the Father but the Son that walked
upon the sea, when Peter asked Him, say-
ing, "Lord, bid me come unto Thee. "^
But even prophecy itself gives proof of this.
For holy Job prophesied of the coming of
the Lord ; of Whom he said in truth that He
would vanquish the great Leviathan,? and it
was done. For that dread Leviathan, tliat
is, the devil. He smote, and struck down,
' Isn. xliv. 24. - Prov. viii. 27.
^ Hcb. i. 10. Cf. also l^s. cii. 21^.
s Job ix. 8. " S. Matt. xiv. 28.
'' Prov. iii. 19.
' Job xli. 8.
and laid low in the last times by the ador-
able Passion of His own Body.'
31. The Son therefore is only and true
God ; for this also is assigned to the Son as
His sole right. For of no created being can
it be accurately said that he is alone. How
can he to whom fellowship in creation
belongs be separated from the rest, as
though he were alone ? Thus man is seen
to be a rational being amongst all earthly
creatures, yet he is not the only rational
being ; for we know that the heavenly works
of God also are rational, we confess that
angels and archangels are rational beings.
If then the angels are rational, man cannot
be said to be the only rational being.
32. But they say that the sun can be said
to be alone, because there is no second sun.
But the sun himself has many things in
common with the stars, for he travels across
the heavens, he is of that ethereal and
heavenly substance, he is a creature, and is
reckoned amongst all the works of God. He
serves God in union with all, blesses Him
with all, praises Him with all.^ Therefore
he cannot accurately be said to be alone,
for he is not set apart from the rest.
2^.. Wherefore since no created being can
be compared with the Godhead of the Father,
the Son, and the Holy Ghost, Which is alone,
not amongst all, but over all (our declaration
concerning the Spirit being meanwhile held
back) ; as the Father is said to be the only
true God, because He has nothing in com-
mon with others ; so also is the Son alone
the Image of the true God, He alone is the
Hand of the Father, He alone is the Virtue
and Wisdom of God.
34. Thus the Son alone does what the
Father docs ; for it is written : ' ' Whatsoever
thines I do, He doth." ^ And since the work
of the Father and of the Son is one, it is well
said of the Father and the Son, that God
worked alone ; wherefore also when we
speak of the Creator, we own both the Father
and the Son. For assuredly when Paul said,
"Who served the creature more than the
Creator, "'t he neither denied the Father to be
the Creator, from Whom are all these things,
nor yet the Son, through Whom are all
things, s
35. And it does not seem out of agreement
with this that it is written : ' ' Who alone hath
immortality."^ For how could He not have
immortality Who has life in Himself.'' He
has it in His nature ; He has it in His essen-
tial Being ; and He has it not as a temporal
* Isa. xxvii. i.
■* Rom. i. 25.
- Ps. cxlviii. 3.
' Rom. xi. 36.
■'' S. John V. 19.
*" 1 Tim. vi. 16.
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— BOOK V.
289
grace, but owing to His eternal Godhead.
He has it not by wa}-- of a gift as a servant,
but by peculiar right of His Generation, as
the co-eternal Son. He has it, too. as has
the Father. "For as the Father hath life in
Himself, so also hath He given to the Son
to have life in Himself"' As He has it, it
says, so He has given it. Thou hast learnt
already how He gave it,^ that thou may est
not think it to be a free gift of "-race, when
it is a secret of His generation. Since, then,
there is no divergence of life between the
Father and the Son. how can it be supposed
that the P'ather alone has immortality, whilst
the Son has it not .-'
36. Wherefore let them understand that in
this passage the Son is not to be separated
from the Father. Who is the only true God.
For they cannot prove that the Son is not
the only and true God, especially as here
also it may be gathered, as I have said, that
Christ too is true and only God ; or the pas-
sage may at least be understood partly in
reference to the Godhead of the Father and
the Son, and partly to the Incarnation of
Christ : for knowledge is not perfect unless
it confesses Jesus Christ from eternity to be
only-begotten God, true Son of God. and,
according to the flesh, begotten of a Virgin.
Which also this very Evangelist has taught
us elsewhere, saying: "Every spirit that
confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the
flesh, is of God. "3
11. Lastly, the whole of our passage
teaches us that it is not improper in this
verse to understand a reference to the sacra-
ment of the Incarnation. For thus it is
written : " Father, the hour is come, glorify
Thy Son. "4 When, therefore. He states that
the hour is come, and prays to be glorified,
how can one suppose Him to have spoken
but only in accordance with the assumption
of our flesh .' For the Godhead has no fixed
moments of time, nor does eternal light
stand in need of glorification. Therefore in
the only true God, Who is the Father, we
also understand the only true Son of God
to be in accordance with the unity of the
Godhead. And in the name of Jesus Christ,
which He received when born of the Virgin,
we acknowledge the sacrament of the Incar-
nation.
38. But if they wish to separate the Son,
when they read that the Father is the only
true God, I suppose that when they read of
the Incarnation of the Son : "This is the
stone which was set at naught of you build-
ers, which is become the head of the
corner ; " and further : " There is none other
name under heaven given among men,
whereby we must be saved ; '' ' then they
imagine the Father is to be cut off from the
benefit of imparting salvation to us. But
there is neither salvation without the Father,
nor eternal life without the Son.
CHAPTER III.
To the objection of the Arian.s, that two Gods are
introduced by a unity of substance, the answer is
that a plurality of Gods is more Hkeiy to be inferred
from diversity of substance. Further, their charge
recoils upon themselves. Manifold diversity is the
reason why two men cannot be said to be one man,
though all men are called individually man, where a
unity of nature is referred to. There is one nature
alone in them, but there is wholly a unity in the
Divine Persons. Therefore the Son is not to be
severed from the Father, especially as they dare not
deny that worship is due to Him.
39. But the Arians maintain the following :
If you say that, as the Father is the only
true God, so also is the Son, and confess
that the Father and the Son are both of one
substance, you introduce not one God, but
two. For they who are of one substance
seem not to be one God but two Gods.
Just as two men or two sheep or more are
spoken of, but a man and a sheep are not
spoken of as two men or two sheep, but as
one man and one sheep.
40. This is what the Arians say ; and by
this cunning argument they attempt to
catch the more simple-minded. However
if we read the divine Scriptures we shall
find that plurality occurs rather amongst
those things which are of a diverse and
different substance, that is, krtpaixna. We
have this set forth in the books of Solomon,
in that passage in which he said: "There
are three things impossible to understand,
yea, a fourth which I know not, the track of
an eagle in the air, the way of a serpent
upon a rock, the path of a ship in the sea,
and the way of a man in his youth." ^ An
eagle and a ship and a serpent are not of
one family and nature, but of a distinguish-
able and different substance, and yet they
are three. On the testimony of Scripture,
therefore, they learn that their arguments are
against themselves.
41. Therefore, in saying that the sub-
stance of the Father and of the Son is
diverse and their Godhead distinguishable,
they themselves assert there are two Gods.
* S. John V. 26.
' I John iv. 2.
^ De Fide, iv. 6
* S. John xvii. i.
' Acts iv. II, ij.
Prov. XXX. 18, 19.
290
ST. AMBROSE.
But we, when we confess the Father and
the Son, in declaring them still to be of one
Godhead, say that there are not two Gods,
but one God. And this we establish by
the word of the Lord. For where there are
several, there there is a difference either of
nature or of will and work. Lastly, that
they may be refuted on their own witness,
two men are mentioned : But though they
are of one nature by right of birth, yet in
time and thought and work and place, they
are apart ; and so one man cannot be
spoken of under the signification and number
of two ; for there is no unity where there is
diversity. But God is said to be one, and
the glory and completeness of the Father,
the Son, and the Holy Spirit is thus ex-
pressed.
42. Such, indeed, is the truth of unity that,
when the nature alone of human birth or of
human flesh is indicated, one man is the
term used for the many, as it is written :
"The Lord is my helper, I will not fear
what man can do unto me ; " ' that is, not
the one person of a man, but the one flesh,
the one frailty of human birth. It added
also : " It is better to trust in the Lord than
to trust in man." ^ Here, too, it did not de-
note one particular man, but a universal
condition. Then, immediately after it added,
speaking of many : " It is better to put con-
fidence in the Lord than to put confidence
in princes."^ Where man is spoken of, as
we have already said, there the common
unity of the nature, which exists between all
is indicated ; but where the princes are
mentioned, there is a certain distinction be-
tween their different powers.
43. Amongst men, or in men, there exists
a unity in some one thing, either in love, or
desire, or flesh, or devotion, or faith. But
a universal unity, that embraces within it-
self all things agreeably to the divine glory,
is the property of the Father, the Son,
and the Holy Spirit alone.
44. Wherefore the Lord also, in pointing
out the diversity that exists among men, who
have nothing in common that can tend to-
wards the unity of an indivisible substance,
says: "In your law it is written that the
testimony of two men is true."-* But
though He had said, "The testimony of
two men is true," when He came to the
testimony of Himself and His Father, He
said not : "Our testimony is true, for it is
the testimony of two Gods ; " but : "I am
One that bear witness of Myself, and the
Father that sent Me beareth witness of
* Ps cxviii. 6.
^ Ps. cxviii. 9.
* Ps. cxviii. 8.
* S. John viii. 17.
]\Ie. "' Earlier He also says : " If I judge,
My judgment is true ; for I am not alone,
but I and the Father that sent Me." ^ Thus,
both in one place and the other, He in-
dicated both the Father and the Son, but
neither implied the plurality, nor severed the
unity of their divine Substance.
45. It is plain, then, that whatsoever is
of one substance cannot be severed, even
though it be not single, but one. By single-
ness I mean that which the Greeks call
aouDTTJ?. Singleness has to do with a person ;
unity with a nature. That those things
which are of a different substance are wont
to be called, not one alone, but many,
though already proved on the testimony of
the prophet, the Apostle himself has stated
in so many words, saying: "For though
there be that are called gods, whether in
heaven or in earth. "3 Dost thou see, then,
that those who are of different substances,
and not of the verity of one nature, are
called ' ' gods " ? But the Father and the Son,
being of one substance, are not two Gods,
but "One God, the Father, of Whom are
all things, and one Lord Jesus Christ,
through Whom are all things.""'* "One
God," he says, " and one Lord Jesus ; " and
above: "One God, not two Gods;" and
then : "One Lord, not two Lords. "5
46. Plurality, therefore, is excluded, but
the unity is not destroyed. But as, on the
one hand, when we read of the Lord Jesus,
we do not dissociate the Father, as l have
already said, from the prerogative of ruling,
because He has that in common with the
Son ; so, on the other hand, when we
read of the only true God, the Father, we
cannot sever the Son from the prerogative
of the only true God, for He has that in
common with the Father.
47. Let them say what they feel or what
they think, when we read: "Thou shalt
worship the Lord thy God, and Him only
shall thou serve. ""^ Do they think Christ
should not be worshipped, and that He
ought not to l)e served ? But if that woman
of Canaan who worshipped Him, 7 merited to
gain what she asked for, and the Apostle
Paul, who confessed himself to be the
servant of Christ in the very outset of his
letters, merited to be an Apostle "not of
men, neither by man, but by Jesus Christ ; " ^
let them say what they think should follow.
Would they prefer to join with Arius in a
league of treachery, and so show, by deny-
ing Christ to be the only true God, that
* .S. John viii.
* I Cor. viii. 6.
' S. Matt. XV
2S-
' S. John viii. i6.
^ I Cor. viii. 4, 6.
8 Gal. i. I.
' I Cor. viii. 5.
• S. Matt. iv. 10.
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— BOOK V.
291
they consider He should neither be wor-
shipped nor served ? Or would they sooner
go in company with Paul, who in serving
and worshipping Christ did not disown in
word and heart the only true God, Whom
he acknowledged with dutiful service ?
CHAPTER IV.
It is objected by heretics that Christ offered worship
to His Father. But instead it is shown that this
must be referred to His humanity, as is clear from an
examination of the passage. However, it also offers
fresh witness to His Godhead, as we often see it
happening in other actions that Christ did.
48. But if any one were to say that the
Son worships God the Father, because it is
written, ' ' Ye worship ye know not what, we
know what we worship," ' let him consider
when it was said, and to whom, and to
whose wishes it was in answer.
49. In the earlier verses of this chapter it
was stated, not without reason, that Jesus,
being weary with the journey, was sitting
down, and that He asked a woman of Sa-
maria to give Him drink ; ^ for He spoke as
man ; for as God He could neither be weary
nor thirst.
50. So when this woman addressed Him
as a Jew, and thought Him a prophet, He
answers her, as a Jew who spiritually taught
the mysteries of the Law : "Ye worship ye
know not what, we know what we wor-
ship." "We," He says ; for He joined Him-
self with men. But how is He joined with
men, but according to the flesh.? And to
show that He answered as being incarnate.
He added : "for salvation is of the Jews." 3
51. But immediately after this He put
aside His human feelings, saying: "But
the hour cometh, and now is, when the true
worshippers shall worship the Father. "^
He said not: " We shall worship." This He
would certainly have said, if He had a share
in our obedience.
52. And when we read that Mary wor-
shipped Him, 5 we ought to learn that it is
not possible for Him under the same nature
both to worship as a servant, and to be
worshipped as Lord ; but rather that as
man He is said to worship among men,
and that as Lord He is worshipped by His
servants.
53. Many things therefore we read and
believe, in the light of the sacrament of the
Incarnation. But even in the very feel-
ings of our human nature we may behold
the Divine Majesty. Jesus is wearied with
His journey, that He may refresh the
weary ; He desires to drink, when about to
give spiritual drink to the thirsty ; He was
hungry, when about to supply the food of
salvation to the hungry; He dies, to live
again ; He is buried, to rise again ; He
hangs upon the dreadful tree, to strengthen
those in dread ; He veils the heaven with
thick darkness, that He may give light ;
He makes the earth to shake, that He may
make it strong ; He rouses the sea, that He
may calm it ; He opens the tombs of the
dead, that He may show they are the homes
of the living; He is made of a Virgin, that
men may believe He is born of God ; He
feigns not to know, that He may make the
ignorant to know ; as a Jew He is said to
worship, that the Son may be worshipped as
true God.
CHAPTER V.
Ambrose answers those who press the words of the
Lord to the mother of Zebedee's children, by saying
that they were .spoken out of kindness, because
Christ was unwilling to cause her grief. Ample
reason for such tenderness is brought forward. The
Lord would rather leave the granting of that request
to the Father, than declare it to be impossible. This
answer of Christ's, however, is not to His detriment,
as is shown both by His very words, and also by
comparing them with other passages.
54. "How," they say, "can the Son of
God be the only true God, like to the Father,
when He Himself said to the sons of
Zebedee : 'Ye shall drink indeed of My
cup ; but to sit on INIy right hand or on My
left,' is not Mine to give to you, but to those
for whom it has been prepared of My
Father'.?"' This, then, is, as you desire,
your proof of divine inequality ; though in
it you ought rather to reverence the Lord's
kindness and to adore His grace ; if, that is,
you could but perceive the deep secrets of
the virtue and wisdom of God.
55. For think of her who, with and for
her sons, makes this request. It is a
mother, who in her anxiety for the honour
of her sons, though somewhat unrestrained
in the measure of her desires, may for all
that yet find pardon. It is a mother, old in
years, devout in her zeal, deprived of con-
solation ; who at that time, when she might
have been helped and supported by the aid
of her able bodied offspring, suffered her
children to leave her, and preferred the re-
ward her sons should receive in following
' S. John iv. 22.
■* S. John iv. 23.
- S. John iv. 6, 7.
^ S. Matt, xxviii. 9.
^ .S. John iv. 22.
^ S. Matt. XX. 2j.
292
ST. AMBROSE.
Christ to her own pleasure. For they when
called by the Lord, at the first word, as we
read, left their nets and their father and
followed Him. '
56. .She then, somewhat yielding to the
devotion of a mother's zeal, besought the
Saviour, saying : "Grant that these my two
sons may sit the one on Thy right hand,
the other on Thy left in Thy kingdom." ^
Although it was an error, it was an error of
a mother's affections : for a mother's heart
knows no patience. Though eager for the
object of her desires, yet her longing was
pardonable, for she was not greedy for
money, but for grace. Not shameless was
her request, for she thought not of herself,
but of her children. Contemplate the
mother, reflect upon her.
57. But it is nothing wonderful if the feel-
ings of parents for their children seem
nothing to you, who think the love of the
Almighty Father for His only-begotten Son
a trifling matter. The Lord of heaven and
earth was ashamed (to speak as accords
with the assumption of our flesh and the
virtues of the soul) — -He was ashamed, I
say, and, to use His own word, disturbed,
to refuse a share even in His own seat to a
mother making request for her sons. You
maintain sometimes that the proper Son of
the eternal God stands to give service, at
other times you would have His co-session
to be as that of an attendant, that is, not
because there is a oneness of majesty, but
because it is the order of the Father ; and
you deny to the Son of God, Who is true
God, that which He plainly was unwilling
to refuse to men.
58. For He thought of the mother's love,
who solaced her old age with the thought of
her sons' reward, and, though harassed with
a mother's longings, endured the absence of
those dearest pledges of her love.
59. Think also of the woman, that is, the
weaker sex, whom the Lord had not yet
strengthened by His own Passion. Think, I
say, of a descendant of Eve, the first woman,
sinking under the inheritance of unrestrained
passion, which had been passed on to all ;
one, too, whom the Lord had not yet re-
deemed with His own Blood, and from
whom He had not yet washed out in His
Blood the desire implanted in the hearts of
all for unbounded honour even beyond what
is right. Thus the woman offended owing
to an inherited tendency to wrong.
60. And what wonder if a mother should
strive to win preference for her children
(which is far better than if she had done it
for herself), when even the Apostles them-
selves, as we read, strove amongst them-
selves, as to who should have the prefer-
ence .'' '
61. The physician, therefore, ought not to
wound a mother who has been deprived of
all, nor a suftering mind, with shameful re-
proaches, lest when the request had been
made and had been proudly denied, she
should grieve over the condemnation of her
petition as being unreasonable.
62. Lastly, the Lord, Who knew that a
mother's affection is to be honoured, an-
swered not the woman, but her sons, say-
ing : " Are ye able to drink of the cup that
I shall drink of.? " When they say: "We are
able," Jesus says to them : "Ye shall drink
indeed of My cup ; but to sit on My right
hand and on INIy left is not Mine to give to
you, but to those for whom it is prepared of
My Father."^
63. How patient and kind the Lord is;
how deep is His wisdom and good His
love ! For wishing to show that the dis-
ciples asked for no slight thing, but one they
could not obtain. He reserved His own
peculiar rights for His Father's honour, not
fearing to detract aught from His own
rights : " Who thought it not robbery to be
equal with (jod;"^ and loving, too, His
disciples (for "He loved them," as it is
written, "unto the end"), 4 He was un-
willing to seem to refuse to those whom
He loved what they desired ; He, I say, the
good and holy Lord, Who would rather
keep some of His own prerogative secret,
than lay aside aught of His love. "For
charity suffereth long, and is kind ; charity
envieth not, and seeketh not her own."s
64. Lastly, that you may learn it was no
sign of weakness, but rather of tenderness,
that He said: "It is not Mine to give to
you ; " note that when the sons of Zebedee
make the request without their mother, He
said nothing about the Father; for thus it is
written : " It is not Mine to give to you. but
those for whom it has been prepared."^
So the Evansfelist Mark has stated it. But
when the mother makes this request on her
sons' behalf, as we find it in INIatthew, He
says : "It is not JNIine to give to you, but to
those for whom it has been prepared of My
Father." 7 Here He added : " of My Father,"
for a mothers feelings demanded greater
tenderness.
65. But if they think that by saying.
' S. Matt. iv. 22.
2 S. Matt. XX. 21.
' S. Luke xxii. 24.
' .'^. John xiii. i.
' ;.. Matt. XX. 23.
- S. Matt. XX. 22, 23.
'' I Cor. xiii. 4.
3 Phil. ii. 6.
" S. Mark x. 40.
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— BOOK V.
293
" For whom it hath been prepared of My
Father, '" He assig-ncd greater power to His
Father, or detracted auy^iit from His own ;
let them say whether they think there is any
detraction from the Father's jiowcr, because
the Son in the (iospel says of the Father :
"The Father judsi^eth no man."'
66. But if we think it im])ious to believe
that the Father has handed over ah judg-
ment to the Son in such wise that He has
it not Plimself, — for He has it, and cannot
lose what the Divine Majesty has by its
very nature, — we oug'ht to consider it equally
impiovis to suppose that the Son cannot give
what either men can merit, or any creature
can receive ; especially as He Himself has
said: " I go unto My Father, and whatso-
ever ye shall ask of Him in My name, that
will I do.'" - For if the Son cannot give
what the Father can give, the Truth has
lied, and cannot do what the Father has
been asked for in His name. He therefore
did not say : " For whom it has been pre-
pared of INIy Father, " in order that requests
should be made only of the Father. For all
things which are asked of the Father, He
has declared that He will give. Lastly, He
did not say: "Whatsoever ye shall ask of
Me, that will I do ; " but : "Whatsoever ye
shall ask of Him in IMy name, that will I do."
CHAPTER VI.
Wishing to answer the above-stated objection some-
what more fully, he maintains that this request, had
it not been impossible in itself, would have been
possible for Christ to grant ; especially as the Father
has given all judgment to Him ; which gift we must
understand to have been given without any feature
of imperfection. However, he proves that the re-
quest must be reckoned amongst the impossibilities.
To make it really possible, he teaches that Christ's
answer must be taken in accordance with His human
nature, and shows this next by an exposition of the
passage. Lastly, he once more confirms the reply he
has given on the impossibility of Christ's session.
67. I ASK now whether they think the
request made by the wife and sons of Zebe-
dee was possible or impossible to human
circumstances, or to any created being.'' If
it was possible, how is it that He Who made
all things which were not had not the
power of granting a seat to His apostles on
His right hand and on His left .-* or how was
it that He, to Whom the Father gave all
judgment, could not judge of men's merits.''
68. We know well in what way He gave
it ; for how did the Son, who created all
' S. John V. 22.
^ S. John xiv. 12, 13.
things out of nothing, receive it as though
in want.'' Had He not the judgment of
those whose natures He had made.' The
Father gave all judgment to the Son, "that
all men should honour the Son, even as they
honour the Father." ' It is not therefore the
power of the Son, but our knowledge of it,
that increases ; nor does what is learnt by
us add aught to His being, but only to our
advantage; so that by knowing the Son of
God, we may have eternal life.
69. As, then, in our knowledge of the Son
of God His honour, but our profit, not His,
is concerned ; if any one thinks that the
power of God is augmented by that honour.
He must also believe that God the Father
can receive augmentation ; for He is glori-
fied by our knowledge of Him, as is the Son :
as it is written on the word of the Son :
"I have glorified Thee upon the earth. ''^
Therefore if that which was asked for was
at all possible, it certainly was in the power
of the Son to grant it.
70. Let them show, if they consider it
possible, who of men or of other created
beings sits either on the right hand or the
left of God. For the Father says to the Son :
"Sit Thou on My right hand. "^ Therefore
if any one sits on the right hand of the Son,
the Son is found to be sitting (to speak in
human wise) between Himself and the
Father.
71. A thing impossible for man, then, was
asked of Him. But He was unwilling to
say that men could not sit with Him ; see-
ing that He desired His divine glory should
be veiled, and not revealed before He rose
again. 4 For before this, when He had ap-
peared in glory between His attendants
Moses and Elias, He had warned His dis-
ciples that they should tell no man what
they had seen.
72. Therefore if it was not possible for
men or other created beings to merit this,
the Son ought not to seem to have less
power because He gave not to His apostles,
what the Father has not given to men or
other created beings. Or else let them say
to which of them He has given it. Cer-
tainl}^ not to the angels ; of whom Scripture
says that all the angels stood round about
the throne. s Thus Gabriel said that he
stands, as it says: "I am Gabriel that
stand before God." ^
'j'^. Not to the angels, then, has He given
it, nor to the elders who worship Him that
sitteth ; for they do not sit upon the seat of
* S. John V. 23.
* S. Matt. xvii.
9-
' S. John xvii. 4.
Rev. v-ii. 1 1.
' Ps. ex. I.
" S. Luke i. 19.
294
ST. AMBROSE.
majesty, but as the Scripture has said, round
about the throne ; for there are four and
twenty other seats, as we have it in the
Revelation of Jolni : "And upon the seats
four and twenty elders sitting-."' In the
Gospel also the Lord Himself says : "When
the Son of Man shall sit in the throne of His
glory, ye also shall sit upon twelve thrones,
judging the twelve tribes of Israel." == He
did not say that a share in His own throne
could be given to the apostles, but that
there were those other twelve thrones ;
which, however, we ought not to think of as
referring to actual sitting down, but as show-
ing the happy issue of spiritual grace.
74. Lastly, in the Book of the Kings,
JNIicaiahthe prophet said : " I saw the Lord
God of Israel sitting on His throne, and all
the host of heaven standing around Him, on
His rig-ht hand and on His left. " 3 How then,
when the angels stand on the right hand and
on the left of the Lord God, when all the
host of heaven stands, shall men sit on the
rig^ht hand of God or on His left, to whom
is promised as a reward for virtue likeness
to the angels, as the Lord says : "Ye shall
be as the angels in heaven ".'4 "As the
angels," He says, not "more than the an-
gels."
75. If, then, the Father has given nothing
more than the Son, the Son certainly has
Sfiven nothino^ less than the Father. There-
fore the Son can in no wise be less than the
Father.
76. Suppose, however, that it had been
possible for men to obtain what was desired ;
what does it mean when He says : " But to
sit on My right hand and on My left is not
Mine to give to you " ? s What is ' ' Mine " ?
Above He said : " Ye shall drink indeed of
My cup ; " and again He added : "It is not
Mine to give to you." Above He said
"Mine," and again lower down He said
" Mine." He made no change. And so the
earlier passages tell us why He said " Mine."
77. For being asked by a woman as man
to allow her sons to sit on His right hand
and His left, because she asked Him as man,
the Lord also as though only man answered
concerning His Passion : "Are ye able to
drink of the cup that I shall drink of ? " ^
78. Therefore because He spoke according
to the flesh of the Passion of His Body, He
wished to show that according to the flesh
He left behind Him an example and pattern
to us of the endurance of suffering ; but that
according to His position as man He could
not grant them fellowship in the throne
above. This is the reason why He said :
"It is not Mine ; " as also in another place
He says : " My doctrine is not Mine." ' It
is not. He says, spoken after my flesh ; for
the words which are divine belong not to
the flesh.
79. But how plainly He showed His
tenderness for His disciples, whom He loved,
saying first : " Will ye drink of iNIy cup ? "
For as He could not grant what they sought.
He offered them something else, so that He
might mention what He would assign to
them, before He denied them anything ; in
order that they might understand that the
failure lay more in the equity of their request
to Him, than in the wish of their Lord to
show kindness.
80. " Ye shall indeed drink of My cup,"
He says ; that is, "I will not refuse you the
suffering, which My flesh will undergo. For
all that I have taken on Myself as man, ye
can imitate. I have granted you the victory
of suffering, the inheritance of the cross.
'But to sit on INIy right hand and on ]\Iy
left is not Mine to give to you.'" He did
not say, "It is not Mine to give," but : "It
is not Mine to give to you ; " meaning by
this, not that He lacked the power, but that
His creatures were wanting in merit.
81. Or take in another way the words :
" It is not Mine to give to you," that is. " It
is not Mine, for I came to teach humility ;
it is not Mine, for I came, not to be minis-
tered unto, but to minister ; it is not Mine,
for I show justice, not favour. "
82. Then, speaking of the Father, He
added: "For whom it has been prepared,"
to show that the Father also is not wont to
give heed merely to requests, but to merits ;
for God is not a respecter of persons.^
Wherefore also the Apostle says : " Whom
He did foreknow. He also did predestinate. "^
He did not predestinate them before He
knew them, but He did predestinate the
reward of those whose merits He foreknew.
83. Rightly then is the woman checked,
who demanded what was impost^ible, as a
special kind of privilege from Him the Lord,
Who of His own free gift granted not only
to two apostles, but to all the disciples, those
things which He had adjudged to be given
to the saints ; and that too without a prayer
from any one, as it is written : "Ye shall
sit upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve
tribes of Israel. "■*
84. Therefore, although we may think the
^ Rev. iv. 4.
♦ S. Matt xxii. 30.
2 S. Matt. xix. 28.
" S. Matt. XX. 23.
* I Kings xxii. 19.
* S. Matt. XX. 22.
' S. John vii. 16.
^ Rom. viii. 29.
* Acts X. 34.
* S. Matt. xix. 28.
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— BOOK V.
295
demand to have been possible, there is no
room for false attacks. However, when I
read that the seraphim stand,' how can 1
suppose that men may sit on the right hand
or the left of the Son of God ? The Lord sits
upon the cherubim, as it says : "Thou that
sittest upon the cherubim, show myself."^
And how shall the apostles sit upon the
cherubim ?
85. And I do not come to this conclusion
of my own mind, but because of the utter-
ances of our Lord's own mouth. For the
Lord Himself later on, in commending the
apostles to the Father, says : ' ' Father, I
will that they also whom Thou hast given
Me be with ^le where I am.'' ^ But if He
had thought that the Father would give the
divine throne to men. He would have said :
"I will that where I sit, they also may sit
with Me." But He says : " I will that they
be with Me," not "that they may sit with
Me ; " and "where I am," not " as I am."
86. Then follow the words : " That they
may see My glory." Here too He did not
say : " that they may have My glory," but
"that they may see" it. For the servant
sees, the Lord possesses ; as David also has
taught us, saving: "That I may see the
delight of the Lord." 4 And the Lord Himself
m the Gospel has revealed it, stating :
" Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall
see God. "5 "They shall see," He says ; not
" They shall sit with God upon the cheru-
bim."
87. Let them therefore cease to think little
of the Son of God according to His Godhead,
lest they should think little also of the
Father. For he who believes wrongly of
the Son cannot think rightly of the Father ;
he who thinks wrongly of the Spirit cannot
think rightly of the Son. For where there
is one dignity, one glory, one love, one
majesty, whatsoever thou thinkest is to be
withdrawn in the case of any one of the
Three Persons, is withdrawn from all alike.
For that can never have completeness which
thou canst separate and divide into various
portions.
CHAPTER VIL
Objection is taken to the following passage: "Thou
hast loved them, as Thou hast loved Me." To re-
move it, he shows first the impiety of the Arian ex-
planation ; then compares these words with others -,
and lastly, takes the whole passage into consideration.
Hence he gathers that the mission of Christ, although
it is to be received according to the flesh, is not to
His detriment. When this is proved he shows how
the divine mission takes place.
88. There are some, O Emperor Augustus,
who in their desire to deny the unity of the
divine Substance, strive to make little of the
love of the Father and the Son, because it
is written : ' ' Thou hast loved them, as Thou
hast loved Me."' But when they say this,
what else do they do but adopt a Ukeness
of comparison between the Son of God and
men ?
89. Can men indeed be loved by God as
the Son is, in Whom the Father is well-
pleased.' - He is well-pleasing in Himself;
we through Hmi. For those in whom God
sees His own Son after His own likeness.
He admits through His Son into the favour
of sons. So that as we go through likeness
unto likeness, so through the Generation of
the Son are we called unto adoption. The
eternal love of God's Nature is one thing,
that of grace is another.
90. And if they start a debate on the words
that are written: "And Thou hast loved
them, as Thou hast loved Me," and think a
comparison is intended ; they must think
that the following also was said by way of
comparison: -Be ye merciful, as your
Father Which is in heaven Is merciful ; " 3
and elsewhere: "Be ye perfect, as My
Father Which is in heaven is perfect." ^
But if He is perfect in the fulness of His
glory, we are but perfect according to the
growth of virtue within us. The Son also
is loved by the Father according to the ful-
ness of a love that ever abideth, but in us
growth in grace merits the love of God.
91. Thou seest, then, how God has given
o-race to men, and dost thou wish to dis-
sever the natural and indivisible love of the
Father and the Son ? And dost thou still
strive to make nothing of words, where thou
dost note the mention of a unity of majesty ?
92. Consider the whole of this passage,
and see from what standpoint He speaks ;
for thou hearest Him saying: "Father,
glorify Thou Me with the glory which I had
with Thee before the world was. " s See how
He speaks from the standpoint of the first
man. For He begs for us in that request
those things which, as Man. He remembered
were granted in paradise before the Fall, as
also He spoke of it to the thief at His Pas-
sion : "Verily, verily, I say unto thee, to-
day shalt thou be with Me in paradise."^
This is the glory before the world was.
• Isa. vi. 2.
♦ Ps. xx^-ii. 4.
- Ps. Ixxx. I.
» S. Matt. V. 8.
3 S. John xvii. 24.
1 S. John xvii. 23.
4 S. Matt. V. 48.
' R. Matt. iii. 17.
^ S. John xvii. 5.
* S. Luke vi. ;?6.
" S. Luke xxiii. 43.
296
ST. AMBROSE.
But He used the word "world
"men," as also thou hast it
" instead of
: "Lo! the
whole world goeth after Him ; " ' and again :
"That the world may know that Thou hast
sent Me. " ^
93. But that thou mightest know the great
God, even the life-giving and Almighty Son
of God, He has added a proof of His majesty
by saying : "And all Mine are Thine, and
Thine are jMine."^ He has all things, and
dost thou turn aside the fact that He was
sent, to wrong Plim ?
94. But if thou dost not accept the truth
of His mission according to the flesh, as the
Apostle spoke of it,-* and dost raise out of a
mere word a decision against it, to enable
thee to say that inferiors are wont to be sent
by superiors ; what answer wilt thou give
to the fact that the Son was sent to men ?
For if thou dost think that he who is sent is
inferior to him by whom he is sent, thou
must learn also that an inferior has sent a
superior, and that superiors have been sent
to inferiors. For Tobias sent Raphael the
archangel,5 and an angel was sent to
Balaam,^ and the Son of God to the Jews.
95. Or was the Son of God inferior to the
Jews to whom He was sent ? For of Him
it is written : "Last of all He sent unto
them His only Son, saying, They will rever-
ence My Son. "7 And mark that He men-
tioned first the servants, then the Son, that
thou mayest know that God, the only-begot-
ten Son according to the power of His God-
head, has neither name nor lot in common
with servants. He is sent forth to be rever-
enced, not to be compared with the house-
hold.
96. And rightly did He add the word
" My," that we might believe He came, not
as one of many, nor as one of a lower
nature or of some inferior power, but as true
from Him that is true, as the Image of the
Father's Substance.
97. Suppose, however, that he who is sent
is inferior to him by whom he is sent.
Christ then was inferior to Pilate ; for Pilate
sent Him to Herod. But a word docs not
prejudice His power. Scripture, which says
that He was sent from the Father, says that
He was sent from a ruler.
98. Wherefore, if we sensibly hold to those
things which be worthy of the Son of God,
we ought to understand Him to have been
sent in such a way that the Word of God,
out of the incomprehensible and ineffable
mystery of the depths of His majesty, gave
* S. John xii. 19.
* Rom. viii. 3.
' S. Matt. xxi. 37.
* S. John xvii. 21.
^ Tob ix. 3.
* S. John xvii. 10.
* Num. xxii. 22.
Himself for comprehension to our minds, so
far as we could lay hold of Him, not only
when He "emptied" Himself, but also
when He dwelt in us, as it is written : "I
will dwell in them."' Elsewhere also it
stands that God said: "Go to, let us eo
down and confound their language." ^ God,
indeed, never descends from any place ; for
He says : " I fill heaven and earth. "^ But
He seems to descend when the Word of
God enters our hearts, as the prophet has
said: "Prepare ye the way of the Lord,
make His paths straight." '* We are to do
this, so that, as He Himself promised, He
may come together with the Father and
make His abode with us.5 It is clear, then,
how He comes.
CHAPTER VHL
Christ, so far as He is true Son of God, has no Lord,
but only so far as He is Man; as is shown by His
words in which He addressed at one time the Father,
at another the Lord. How many heresies are silenced
by one verse of .Scripture ! We must distinguish be-
tween the things that belong to Christ as Son of
God or as Son of David. For under the latter title
only must we ascribe it to Him that He was a
servant. Lastly, he points out that many passages
cannot be taken except as referring to the Licar-
nation.
99. Wherefore also it is plain how He
calls Him Lord, Whom He knew as Father.
For He says : "I confess to Thee, Father,
Lord of heaven and earth. "^ First Wisdom
spoke of His own Father, and then pro-
claimed Him Lord of creation. For this
reason the Lord shows in His Gospel that
no lordship is exercised where there is a
true offspring, saying: "What think ye of
Christ .!* Whose Son is He.-* They say unto
Him, The son of David. Jesus saith to
them, How then doth David in spirit call
Him Lord, saying : The Lord said unto my
Lord : Sit Thou on INIy right hand " ? Then
he added: "If David in spirit then call
Him Lord, how is He his son.? And no
man was able to answer Him a word. "7
100. With what care did the Lord provide
for the faith in this witness because of the
Arians ! For He did not say : "The spirit
calls Him Lord," but that " David spake in
spirit ; " in order that men might believe that
as He is his, that is, David's son according
to the flesh, so also He is his Lord and God
according to His Godhead. Thou seeest,
then, that there is a distinction between the
* 2 Cor. vi. 16.
■* Isa. xl. 3.
' S. Matt. xxii. 42-46.
* Gen. xi. 7.
^ S. John xiv. 23.
* Jer. xxiii. 24.
" S. Matt. xi. 2$.
OF THE CHRISTIA:N FAITH.— BOOK V.
297
titles that are used of relationship and of
lordship.
loi. And rightly did the Lord speak of
His own Father, but of the Lord of heaven
and earth ; so that thou, when thou readest
of the Father antl the Lord, mayest under-
stand it is the Father of the Son, and the
Lord of Creation. In the one title rests the
claim of nature, in the other the authority
to rule. For taking on Himself the form of
a servant, He calls Him Lord, because He
has submitted to service ; being equal to
Him in the form of God, but being a
servant in the form of His body : for service
is the due of the flesh, but lordship is the due
of the Godhead. Wherefore also the Apostle
says : "The God of our Lord Jesus Christ,
the Father of glory," ' that is, terming Him
God of the adoption of humanity but the
Father of glory. Did God have two Sons,
Christ and Glory.' Certainly not. There-
fore if there is one Son of God, even Christ,
Christ is Glory. Why dost thou strive to
belittle Him who is the glory of the Father.'
102. If then the Son is glory, and the
Father is glory (for the Father of glory
cannot be anything else than glory), there
is no separation of glories, but glory is one.
Thus glory is referred to its own proper
nature, but lordship to the service of the
body that was assumed. For if the flesh is
subject to the soul of a just man as it is
written : "I chastise my body and bring it
into subjection ; " ^ how much more is it
subject to the Godhead, of Which it is said :
"For all things serve Thee".'' ^
103. By one question the Lord has shut
out both Sabellians and Photinians and
Arians. For when He said that the Lord
spoke to the Lord, Sabellius is set aside,
who will have it that the same Person is
both Father and Son. Photinus is set aside,
who thinks of Him merely as man ; for none
could be Lord of David the King, but He
Who is God, for it is written : "Thou shalt
worship the Lord Thy God, and Him only
shalt thou serve." * Would the prophet who
ruled under the Law act contrary to the
Law ? Arius is set aside, who hears that
the Son sits on the right hand of the Father ;
so that if he argues from human ways, he
refutes himself, and makes the poison of his
blasphemous arguments to flow back upon
himself. For in interpreting the inequality
of the Father and the Son by the analogy of
human habits (wandering from the truth in
either case), he puts Him first Whom he
' 2 Cor. i. 3.
■' Ps. cxix. 91.
^ I Cor. ix. 27.
■• Deut. \'i. 13.
makes little of, confessing Him to be the
First, Whom he hears to be at the right
hand. I'hc Manicha^an also is set aside,
for he does not deny that He is the Son of
David according to the flesh, Who, at the
cry of the blind men, "Jesus, Thou Son of
David, have mercy on us," ' was pleased at
their faith and stood and healed them. But
He does deny that this refers to His eternity,
if He is called Son of David alone by those
who are false.
1 04. For ' ' Son of God " is against Ebion, *
"Son of David," is against the Manichees ; ^
"Son of God " is against Photinus, •» " Son of
David" is against Marcion ; s " Son of God" is
against Paul of Samosata,^ " Son of David " ?s
against Valentinus ; 7 " Son of God " is against
Arius and Sabellius, the inheritors of heathen
errors. " Lord of David " is against the Jews,
who beholding the Son of God in the flesh, in
impious madness believed Him to be only
man.
105. But in the faith of the Church one
and the same is both Son of God the Father
and Son of David. For the mystery of the
Incarnation of God is the salvation of the
whole of creation, according to that which
is written : "That without God He should
taste death for every man ; " ^ that is, that
every creature might be redeemed without
any suffering at the price of the blood of the
Lord's Divinity, as it stands elsewhere :
" Every creature shall be delivered from the
bondage of corruption." 9
106. It is one thing to be named Son ac-
cording to the divine Substance, it is another
thing to be so called according to the adop-
tion of human flesh. For, according to the
divine Generation, the Son is equal to God
the Father ; and, according to the adoption
of a body. He is a servant to God the Father.
"For," it says, "He took upon Him the
form of a servant." '"^ The Son is. however,
one and the same. On the other hand, ac-
cording to His glory. He is Lord to the holy
patriarch David, but his Son in the line of
actual descent, not abandoning aught of
His own, but acquiring for Himself the rights
that go with the adoption into our race.
107. Not only does He undergo service in
the character of man by reason of His de-
scent from David, but also by reason of His
name, as it is written : " I have found David
My Servant ; " " and elsewhere : " Behold I
1 S. Matt. XX. 30.
- Ebion recognnized our Lord absolutely as man and no more.
"1. 57ir. *I.6sc. ^11.44-
^ His error was much the same as that of Ebion. except that he
asserted that the Word descended from heaven and dwelt in Jesus.
' II. 44. ' Heb. ii. g. " Rom. viii. 21,
1° Phii. ii. 7.
'1 Ps. Ixxxix. 20.
298
ST. AMBROSE.
will send unto you My Servant, the Orient
is His name." ' And the Son Himself says :
"Thus saith the Lord, that formed Me from
the womb to be His servant, and said unto
Me : It is a great thing for Thee to be called
My Servant. Behold I have set Thee up
for a witness to My people, and a light to
the Gentiles, that Thou mayest be for sal-
vation unto the ends of the earth."- To
whom is this said, if not to Christ.? Who,
being in the form of God, emptied Himself,
and took upon Him the form of a servant. ^
But what can be in the form of God, except
that which exists in the fulness of the God-
head ?
108. Learn, then, what this means : " He
took upon Him the form of a servant." It
means that He took upon Him all the per-
fections of humanity in their completeness,
and obedience in its completeness. And so
it says in the thirtieth Psalm : "Thou hast
set my feet in a large room. I am made a
reproach above all mine enemies. Make
Thy face to shine upon Thy servant."*
"Servant " means the Man in whom He was
sanctified ; it means the Man in whom He
was anointed ; it means the Man in whom
He was made under the law, made of the
Virgin ; and, to put it briefly, it means the
Man in whose person He has a mother,
as it is written : " O Lord, I am Thy Servant,
I am Thy Servant, and the Son of Thy hand-
maid ; " 5 and again : "I am cast down and
sore humbled."^
109. Who is sore humbled, but Christ, Who
came to free all through His obedience.''
" For as by one man's disobedience many
were made sinners, so by the obedience of
one shall many be made righteous. "7 Who
received the cup of salvation ? Christ the
High Priest, or David who never held the
priesthood, nor endured suffering? Who
offered the sacrifice of Thanksgiving ? ^
no. But that is insufficient ; take again :
"Preserve My soul, for I am holy. ''9 Did
David say this of himself.? Nay, He says
it, Who also says: "Thou wilt not leave
My soul in hell, neither wilt Thou suffer
Thine Holy One to see corruption." '° The
Same then says both of these.
III. He has added further: "Save Thy
Servant;"" and, further on: "Give Thy
strength to Thy servant, and to the Son of
Thy handmaid ; " '^ and, elsewhere, that is,
in Ezekiel : "And I will set up one Shepherd
1 Zech. ill. 8. '
* Ps. xxxi. 3, II, 16.
' Rom. V. ig.
'" Ps. xvi. 10.
^ Isa. xlix. 5, 6.
'' Ps. cxvi. 16.
" Ps, cxvi. 13, 17.
'^ Ps. Ixxxvi. 2.
3 Phil. ii. 6, 7.
" Ps. xxxviii. 8.
* Ps. Ixxxvi. 2.
^- Ps. Ixxxvi. 16.
over them, and He shall rule them, even
My Servant David. He shall feed them,
and He shall be their Shepherd. And I the
Lord will be their God, and My Servant
David a prince among them." ' Now David
the Son of Jesse was already dead. There-
fore he speaks of Christ, Who for our sakes
was made the Son of a handmaiden in the
form of man ; for according to His divine
Generation He has no Mother, but a Father
only : nor is He the fruit of earthly desire,
but the eternal Power of God.
112. And so, also, when we read that the
Lord said : " My time is not yet full come ; " ^
and : " Yet a little while I am with you ; "
and: "I go unto Him that sent Me ; " 3
and: "Now is the Son of Man glori-
fied ; " ■* we ought to refer all this to the
sacrament of the Incarnation. But when
we read : ".\nd God is glorified in Him,
and God hath glorified Him ; " s what doubt
is there here, where the Son is glorified by
the Father, and the Father is glorified by
the Son ?
113. Next, to make clear the faith of the
Unity, and the Union of the Trinity, He also
said that He would be glorified by the Spirit,
as it stands: "He shall receive of Mine,
and shall glorify ]\Ie. "^ Therefore the Holy
Spirit also glorifies the Son of God. How,
then, did He say : " If I glorify Myself, My
glory is nothing. "7 Is then the glory of
the Son nothing.? It is blasphemy to say
so, unless we apply these words to His flesh ;
for the Son spoke in the character of man,
for by comparison with the Godhead, there
is no glory of the flesh.
114. Let them cease from their wicked ob-
jections which are but thrown back upon their
own falseness. For they say, it is written :
' ' Now is the Son of Man glorified. " I do not
deny that it is written : " The Son of Man is
glorified." But let them see what follows :
"And God is glorified in Him." I can plead
some excuse for the Son of IMan, but He has
none for His Father ; for the Father took not
flesh upon Himself I can plead an excuse,
but do not use it. He has none, and is
falsely attacked. I can either understand it
in its plain sense, or I can apply to the flesh
what concerns the flesh. A devout mind
distinguishes between the things which
are spoken after the flesh or after the God-
head. An impious mind turns aside" to the
dishonour of the Godhead, all that is said with
regard to the littleness of the flesh.
' Ez. xxxiv. 23, 24.
* S. John xiii. 31.
' S. John viii. 54.
^ S. John vii. 8.
* S. John xiii. 31.
^ .S. John vii. 33.
•^ S. John xvi. 14.
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— ROOK V.
299
CHAPTER IX.
The saint meets those who in Jewish wise object to
the order of the words : '• In the name of the Father
and of the Son and of the foly Cihost," with the retort
that the Son also is often placed before the Father ;
though he first points out that an answer to this ob-
jection has been already given by him.
115. Why is it that the Arians, after the
Jewish fashion, are such false and shameless
interpreters of the divine words, going in-
deed so far as to say that there is one
power of the Father, another of the Son,
and another of the Holy Ghost, since it is
written : " Go ye, teach all nations, baptiz-
ing them in the name of the Father and of
the Son and of the Holy Ghost " .'* And why
do they make a distinction of divine power
owing to the mere order of words ?
116. Though I have already given this
very witness for a unity of majesty and
name in my former books ; yet if they
make this the ground of debate, I can main-
tain on the testimony of the Scriptures that
the Son is mentioned tirst in many places,
and that the Father is spoken of after Him.
Is it therefore a fact that, because the name
of the Son is placed first, by the mere
accident of a w^ord, as the Arians would
have it, the Father comes second to the Son ?
God forbid, I say, God forbid. Faith, knows
nothing of such order as this ; it knows
nothing of a divided honour of the Father
and the Son. I have not read of, nor heard
of, nor found any varying degree in God.
Never have I read of a second, never of a
third God. I have read of a first God, " I
have heard of a first and only God.
117. If we pay such excessive regard to
order, then the Son ought not to sit at the
right hand of the Father, nor ought He to
call Himself the First and the Beginning.
The Evangelist was wrong in beginning
with the Word and not with God, where he
says : "In the beginning was the Word, and
the Word was with God. "^ For, according
to the order of human usage, he ought to
name the Father first. The Apostle also
was ignorant of their order, who says :
"Paul the servant of Jesus Christ, called to
be an Apostle, separated' unto the Gospel
of God ;" 3 and elsewhere : "The grace of
our Lord Jesus Christ, and the love of God,
and the communion of the Holy Ghost. " ^
If we follow the order of the words, he has
placed the Son first, and the Father second.
But the order of the words is often changed ;
^ Isa. xliv. 6.
^ Rom. i. I.
^ S. John i. I.
* 2 Cor. xiii. 14.
and therefore thou oughtest not to question
about order or dejjree, in the case of God
the Father and His Son, for there is no
severance of unity in the Godhead.
CHAPTER X.
The Arians openly take sides with the heathen in at-
tacking the words : " He that believeth on Me, be-
lieveth not on Me," etc. The true meaning of the
passage is unfolded; and to prevent us from believ-
ing that the Lord forbade us to have faith in Him,
it is shown how He spoke at one time as God, at an-
other as Man. After bringing forward examples of
various results of that faith, he shows that certain
other passages also must be taken in the same way.
1 18. Last of all, to show that they are not
Christians, they deny that we are to believe
on Christ, saying that it is written : "He
that believeth on Me, believeth not on Me,
but on Him that sent Me." ' I was await-
ing this confession ; why did you delude
me with your quibbles.? I knew I had to
contend with heathens. Nay, they indeed are
converted, but ye are not. If they believe,
that the sacrament [of Baptism] is safe ;
ye have received it, and destroyed it, or
perchance it has never been received, but
was unreal ^ from the first.
119. It is written, they say: "He that
believeth on Me, believeth not on Me, but on
Him that sent Me." But see what follows,
and see how the Son of God wishes to be
seen ; for it continues : "And he that seeth
Me, seeth Him that sent Me," 3 for the
Father is seen in the Son. Thus, He has
explained what He had spoken earlier, that
he who confesses the Father believes on
the Son. For he who knows not the Son,
neither knows the Father. For every one
that denies the Son has not the Father, but
he that confesses the Son has both the Father
and the Son.*
1 20. What, then, is the meaning of " Be-
lieveth not on Me".? That is, not on that
which you can perceive in bodily form, nor
merely on the man whom you see. For
He has stated that we are to believe not
merely on a man, but that thou mayest
believe that Jesus Christ Himself is both God
and Man. Wherefore, for both reasons He
says: "I came not from Myself ;" s and
again : "I am the beginning, of which also
I speak to you."^ As IVIan He came not
from Himself ; as Son of God He takes not
' S. John xii. 44.
- It would seem that the form of words was sometimes changed
by Arians, in which case there would be of course no valid baptism.
3 S. John xii. 45. * ijohn ii. 23.
° S John vii. 28. ° S. John viii, 25.
300
ST. AMBROSE.
His beginning from men ; but "I am," He
says, " Myself ' the beginning of which also
I speak to you.' Neither are the words
which I speak human, but divine."
121. Nor is it right to believe that He
denied we were to believe on Him, since
He Himself said : " That whosoever be-
lieveth on "Sle should not abide in dark-
ness ; " • and in another place again : " For
this is the will of My Father that sent Me,
that every one that seeth the Son, and
believeth on Him, may have eternal life ; " ^
and again: "Ye believe in God, believe
also in Me. "3
12 2. Let no one, therefore, receive the Son
without the Father, because we read of the
Son. The Son hath the Father, but not in
a temporal sense, nor by reason of His pas-
sion, nor owing to His conception, nor by
grace. I have read of His Generation,
I have not read of His Conception. And
the Father says: "I have begotten; "'4
He does not say: " I have created." And
the Son calls not God His Creator in the
eternity of His divine Generation, but
Father.
123. He represents Himself also now in
the character of man, now in the majesty of
God ; now claiming for Himself oneness of
Godhead with the Father, now taking upon
Him all the frailty of human flesh ; now
saying that He has not His own doctrine,
and now that He seeks not His own will ;
now pointing out that His testimony is not
true, and now that it is true. For He
Himself has said: " If I bear witness of
Myself, My witness is not true. "5 Later
on He says : " If 1 bear witness of Myself,
My witness is true." ^
124. And how is Thy testimony, Lord
Jesus, not true .-* Did not he who believed
it, though he hung upon the cross, and
paid the penalty for the crime he owned to,
cast aside the deserts of the robber and gain
the reward of the innocent .-' 7
125. Was Paul deceived, who received
his sight, because he believed ; ^ which sight
he had lost, before he believed ?
126. And did Joshua, the son of Nun, err
in recognizing the leader of the heavenly
host .'' 9 But after he believed, he forthwith
conquered, being found worthy to triumph
in the battle of faith. Again, he did not lead
forth his armed ranks into the fight, nor did
he overthrow the ramparts of the enemy's
walls, with battering rams or other engines
' S. John xii. 46.
< Ps. ii. 7.
' S. Luke xxiii. 41
* S. John vi. 40.
* S. John V. 31.
" Acts ix. 12.
' S. John xiv. I.
* S. John vii. 14.
* Josli. V. 13.
of war, but with the sound of the seven
trumpets of the priests. Thus the blare of
the trumpet and the badge of the priest
brought a cruel war to an end.
127. A harlot saw this ; and she who in
the destruction of the city lost all hope of
any means of safety, because her faith had
conquered, bound a scarlet thread in her
window, and thus uplifted a sign of her faith
and the banner of the Lord's Passion ; ' so
that the semblance of the mystic blood,
which should redeem the world, might be in
memory. So, without, the name of Joshua
was a sign of victory to those who fought;
within, the semblance of the Lord's Passion
was a sign of salvation to those in danger.
Wherefore, because Rahab understood the
heavenly mystery, the Lord says in the
Psalm : "I will be mindful of Rahab and
Babylon that know Me. " ^
128. How, then, is Thy testimony not true,
O Lord, except it be given in accordance
with the frailty of man ? For "every man
is a liar." 3
129. Lastly, to prove that He spoke as
man, He says : "The Father that sent Me,
He beareth witness of Me. "-> But His
testimony as God is true, as He Himself
says: "My record is true: for I know
whence I come, and whither I go, but ye
know not whence I come, and whither I
go. Ye judge after the flesh. "5 They
judge then not after the Godhead but after
the manhood, who think that Christ had not
the power of bearing witness.
130. Therefore, when thouhearest : "He
that believeth, believeth not on Me ; " or :
"The Father that sent Me, He gave Me a
commandment;"^ thou hast now learnt
whither thou oughtest to refer those words.
Lastly, He shows what the commandment
is, saying: "I lay down My life, that I
may take it again. No man taketh it from
Me, but I lay it down of Myself."? Thou
seest, then, what is said so as to show He
had full power to lay down or to take up
His life; as He also said : "I have power
to lay it down, and I have power again to
take it up. This commandment have I re-
ceived of My Father."^
131. Whether, then, a command, or, as
some Latin manuscripts have it, a direction
was given, it Avas certainly not given to
Him as God, but as incarnate man, with
reference to the victory He should gain in
undergoing His Passion.
' Josh. ii. 18.
* S. John viii. i8.
• S Jolm X. 17.
* Ps. Ixxxvii. 4.
I* S. John viii. 14,
1 S. John X. 18.
'5-
^ Ps. cxvi. II
" .S. John xii. 49.
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— BOOK V.
301
CHAPTER XL
. We must refer the fact that Christ is said to speak
nothing of Himself, to His human nature. After
explaining liow it is right to say that Me hears and
sees the Father as being (lod, lie shows conclusively,
by a large number of proofs, that the Son of Clod
is not a creature.
132. Are we indeed to brings the Son of
God to such a low estate that lie may not
know how to act or speak, except as He hears,
and are we to suppose that a fi.xed measure
of action or of speech is assigned to Him,
because it is written : "I speak not of My-
self," and, further on : " As the Father hath
said unto Me, even so I speak".?' But
those words have reference to the obedience
of the flesh, or else to the faith in the Unity.
For many learned men allow that the Son
hears, and that the Father speaks to the Son
through the unity of their Nature ; for that
which the Son, through the unity of their
will, knows that the Father wills, He seems
to have heard.
133. Whereby is meant no personal duty,
but an indivisible sentence of co-operation.
For this does not signify any actual hearing
of words, but the unity of will and of power,
which exists both in the Father and in the
Son. He has stated that this exists also in
the Holy Spirit, in another place, saying,
"For He shall not speak of Himself, but
whatsoever He shall hear, that shall He
speak, " ^ so that we may learn that what-
soever the Spirit says, the Son also says;
and whatsoever the Son says, the Father
says also ; for there is one mind and one
mode of working in the Trinity. For, as
the Father is seen in the Son, not indeed in
bodily appearance, but in the unity of the
Godhead, so also the Father speaks in the
Son, not with a voice of earth, not with a
human sound, but in the unity of Their work.
So when He had said: "The Father that
dwelleth in Me, He speaketh ; and the works
that I do, He doeth;"3 He added: "Be-
lieve Me, that I am in the Father, and the
Father in Me ; or else believe Me for the
very work's sake. " 4
134. This is what we understand accord-
ing to the whole course of the holy Scrip-
tures ; but the Arians, who will not think of
God the things that be right, may be put to
silence by an example just suited to their
deserts ; that they may not believe every-
thing in carnal fashion, since they them-
selves do not see the works of their father
* S. John xii. 50.
* S. John xiv. lo.
^ S. John xvi. 13.
* S. John xiv. 17.
the devil with bodily eyes. So the Lord has
declared of their fellows the Jews, say in (^ ;
' ' Ye do what ye have seen your father
doing ; "' ' though they are reproved not
because they saw the work of the devil, but
because they did his will, since the devil
unseen works out sin in them in accordance
witli their own wickedness. We have written
this, as the Apostle did, because of the folly
of these traitors. -
135. But we have sufficiently proved by
examples from Scripture that it is a property
of the unity of the divine majesty that the
Father should abide in the Son, and that
the Son should seem to have heard from the
Father those things which He speaks. How
else can we understand the unity of majesty
than by the knowledge that the same defer-
ence is paid to the Father and the Son ? For
what can be better put than the Apostle's
saying that the Lord of glory was crucified ? 3
136. The Son then is the God of glory
and the Lord of glory, but glory is not sub-
ject to creatures ; the Son therefore is not a
creature.
137. The Son is the Image of the Fathers
Substance ; -» but every creature is unlike
that divine Substance, but the Son of the
Father is not unlike God ; therefore the Son
is not a creature.
138. The Son thought it not robbery to be
equal with God ; 5 but no creature is equal
with God, the Son, however, is equal ; there-
fore the Son is not a creature.
139. Every creature is changeable ; but
the Son of God is not changeable ; therefore
the Son of God is not a creature.
140. Every creature meets with chance
occurrences of good and evil after the powers
of its nature, and also feels their passing
away ; but nothing can pass away from or
bring addition to the Son of God in His God-
head ; therefore the Son of God is not a
creature.
141. Every work of His God will bring
into judgment; ^ but the Son of God is not
brought into judgment; for He Himself
judges ; therefore the Son of God is not a
creature.
142. Lastly, that thou mayest understand
the unity, the Saviour in speaking of His
sheep says : "No man is able to pluck them
out of My hand. My Father Which gave
them to Me is greater than all, and no man
is able to pluck them out of My Fathers
hand. I and My Father are one." 7
143. So the Son gives life as does the
38.
' S. John viii.
« Heb. i. 3.
" S. John X. 28-30.
^ 2 Tim. iii. 9.
= Phil. ii. 6.
* I Cor. ii. 8.
^ Eccles. xii. 14.
302
ST. AMBROSE.
Father. "For as the Father raiseth up the
dead and quickeneth them, even so the Son
quickeneth whom He will."'' So the Son
raises up as does the Father : so too the Son
preserves as does the Father. He Who is
not unequal in grace, how is He unequal in
power ? So also the Son does not destroy,
as neither does the Father. Therefore lest
any one should believe there were two
Gods, or should imagine a diversity of
power. He said that He was one with His
Father. How can a creature say that ?
Therefore the Son of God is not a crea-
ture.
144. It is not the same thing to rule as to
serve ; but Christ is both a King and the
Son of a King. The Son of God therefore is
not a servant. Ever)?- creature, however,
gives service. But the Son of God, Who
makes servants become the sons of God,
does not give service. Therefore the Son
of God is not a servant.
CHAPTER XII.
He confirms what has been already said, by the par-
able of the rich man who went into a far country to
receive for himself a kingdom ; and shows that when
the Son delivers up the kingdom to the Father,
we must not regard the fact that the Father is said
to put all things in subjection under Him, in a dis-
paraging way. Here we are the kingdom of Christ,
and in Christ's kingdom. Hereafter we shall be in
the kingdom of God, where the Trinity will reign
together.
145. In divine fashion has He represented
that parable of the rich man, who went to a
far-off country to receive a kingdom, and to
return,^ thus describing Himself in the sub-
stance of the Godhead, and of His Manhood.
For He being rich in the fulness of His
Godhead, Who was made poor for us though
He was rich and an eternal King, and the
Son of an eternal King ; He, I say, went to
a foreign country in taking on Him a body,
for He entered upon the ways of men as
though upon a strange journey, and came
into this world to prepare for Himself a
kingdom from amongst us.
146. Jesus therefore came to this earth to
receive for Himself a kingdom from us, to
whom He says : "The kingdom of God is
within you." 3 This is the kingdom which
Christ has received, this the kingdom which
He has delivered to the Father. For how
did He receive for Himself a kingdom. Who
was a King eternal.? "The Son of INIan
therefore came to receive a kingdom and to
' S. John V. 21.
' S. Luke xix. 12.
'' S. John xvii. 21.
return."' The Jews were unwilling to ac-
knowledge Him, of whom He says : "They
which would not that I should reien over
them, bring hither and slay them." '
147. Let us follow the course of the Scrip-
tures. He W^ho came will deliver up the
kingdom to God the Father; and when He
has delivered up the kingdom, then also
shall He be subject to Him, Who has put
all things in subjection under Him, that God
may be all in all.^ If the Son of God has
received the kingdom as Son of Man, surely
as Son of Man also He will deliver up what
He has received. If He delivers it up as
Son of Man, as Son of Man He confesses
His subjection indeed under the conditions
of the flesh, and not in the majesty of His
Godhead.
148. And dost thou make objections and
contemn Him, because God has put all
things in subjection under Him, when thou
hearest that the Son of Man delivers up the
kingdom to God, and hast read, as we said
in our earlier books : "No man can come
to Me, except the Father draw him ; and I
will raise him up at the last day ".''.^ If we
follow it literally, see rather and notice the
unity of honour each gives to other : The
Father has put all things in subjection
under the Son, and the Son delivers the
kingdom to the Father. Say now which is
the greater, to deliver up, or to raise up to
life ? Do we not after human fashion speak
of the service of delivering up, and the
powxr of raising to life ? But both the Son
delivers up to the Father, and also the Father
to the Son. The Son raises to life, and the
Father also raises to life. Let them create
the fiction of a blasphemous division where
there is a unity of power.
149. Let the Son then deliver up His
T
I
kingdom to the Father.
The kingdom
which He delivers up is not lost to Christ,
but o-rows. We are the kingdom, for it was
said to us : " The kingdom of God is within
you. "4 And we are the kingdom, first of
Christ, then of the Father ; as it is written :
" No man cometh to the Father, but by
Me. "s When I am on the way, I am
Christ's ; when I have passed through, I
am the Father's ; but everywhere through
Christ, and everywhere under Him.
1 50. It is a good thing to be in the king-
dom of Christ, so that Christ may be with
us; as He Himself says: " Lo I am with
you always, even unto the end of the
world. "^ But it is better to be with Christ :
' .S. Luke xix. 27.
* S. Luke xvii. 21.
- I Cor. XV. 24-28.
^ S. John xiv. 6.
' S. John vi. 44.
* S. Matt, xxviii. 20.
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— ROOK V.
303
"For to depart and be with Christ is far
better."' Though we are under sin in this
world, Christ is with us, that "by the
obedience of one man many may be made
just."^ And if I escape the sin of this
world, I shall begin to be with Christ. And
so He says : "I will come again, and
receive you unto Myself ;"3 and further on :
"I will that where I am, there ye may be
also with Me. "4
151. Therefore we are now under Christ's
rule, whilst we are in the body, and are not
yet stripped of the form of a servant, which
He put upon Him, when He "emptied
Himself." But when we shall see His
glory, which He had before the world was,
we shall be in the kingdom of God, in which
are the patriarchs and prophets, of whom it
is written: "When ye shall see Abraham,
Isaac, and Jacob, and all the prophets in
the kingdom of God; "5 and shall thus ac-
quire a deeper knowledge of God.
152. But in the kingdom of the Son the
Father also reigns ; and in the kingdom of
the Father the Son also reigns : for the Father
is in the Son, and the Son in the Father ; and
in whomsoever the Son dwells, in him also
the Father dwells ; and in whomsoever the
Father dwells, in him also the Son dwells,
as it is written: "Both I and My Father
will come to Him, and make Our abode with
Him."^ Thus as there is one dwelling, so
also there is one kingdom. Yea, and so far
is the kingdom of the Father and of the Son
but one, that the Father receives what the
Son delivers, and the Son does not lose
what the Father receives. Thus in the one
kingdom there is a unity of power. Let no
one therefore sever the Godhead between
the Father and the Son.
CHAPTER XIII.
With the desire to learn what subjection to Christ
means, after putting forward and rejecting various
ideas of subjection, he runs through the Apostle's
words ; and so puts an end to the blasphemous opin-
ions of the heretics on this matter. The subjection,
which is shown to be future, cannot concern the
Godhead, since there has always been the greatest
harmony of wills between the Father and the .Son.
Also to that same Son in His Godhead all things
have indeed been made subject ; but they are said to
be not yet subject to Him in this sense, because all
men do not obey His commands. But after that they
have been made subject, then shall Christ also be
made subject in them, and the Father's work be
perfected.
153-
But if the one name and right of God
1 Phil. i. 23.
* S. John xiv. 3.
^ Rom. V. 19.
5 S. Luke xiii.
28.
belong to both the Father and the Son,
since the Son of God is also true God, and a
King eternal, the Son of God is not made
subject in His Godhead. Let us then,
Emperor Augustus, think how we ought to
regard His subjection.
154. How is the Son of God made subject.?
As the creature to vanity? But it is blas-
phemous to have any such idea of the Sub-
stance of the Godhead.
155. Or as every creature is to the Son of
God, for it is rightly written : "Thou hast
put all things in subjection under His feet " ? '
But Christ is not made subject to Himself
1 56. Or as a woman to a man, as we read :
" Let the wives be subject to their hus-
bands ; " ^ and again : " Let the woman learn
in silence in all subjection "? 3 But it is
impious to compare a man to the Father, or
a woman to the Son of God.
157. Or as Peter said : "Submit yourselves
to every human creature ".?4 But Christ was
certainly not so subject.
158. Or as Paul wrote : "Submitting your-
selves mutually to God and the Father in
the fear of Christ".? s But Christ was not
subject either in His own fear, nor in the
fear of another Christ. For Christ is but one.
But note the force of these words, that we
are subject to the Father, whilst we also fear
Christ.
159. How, then, do we understand His
subjection.? Shall we review the whole
chapter which the Apostle wrote, so as to
give no appearance of having falsely with-
held anything, or of having weakened its
force with intention to deceive ? "If in this
life only, " he says, ' ' we have hope in Christ,
we are of all men most miserable. But if
Christ is risen from the dead. He is the first-
fruits of them that sleep. "^ Ye see how he
discusses the question of Christ's Resurrec-
tion.
160. " ' For since by one man," "' he says,
" came death, by man came also the resur-
rection of the dead. For as in Adam all die,
even so in Christ shall all be made alive.
But each one in his own order : Christ the
firstfruits ; afterward they that are Christ's,
who have believed in His coming. Then
Cometh the end, when He shall have deli-
vered up the kingdom to God,even the Father,
when He shall have put down all rule and
authority and power. For He must reign
until He hath put all enemies under His feet.
The last enemy that shall be destroyed is
death ; for He hath put all things under His
3 S. John xiv. 3. ^ Ps. viii. 6. - Eph. v. 22.
" S. John xiv. 23. * i Pet. ii. 13. ^ Eph. v. 21.
' I Tim. ii. 11.
' I Cor. XV. 19, 20.
304
ST. AMBROSE.
feet. But when He saith, all things are put
under Him, it is manifest that He is excepted
Which did put all things under Him. But
when all things shall be subdued unto Him,
then shall the Son also Himself be subject
unto Him, that put all things under Him,
that God may be all in all."' Thus also the
same Apostle said to the Hebrews : " But
now we see not yet all things put under
Him."'^ We have heard the whole of the
Apostle's discourse.
i6i. How, then, do we speak of His sub-
jection .-' The Sabellians and Marcionites
say that this subjection of Christ to God the
Father will be in such wise that the Son will
be re-absorbed into the Father. If, then, the
subjection of the Word means that God the
Word is to be absorbed into the Father ; then
whatsoever is made subject to the Father and
the Son will be absorbed into the Father
and the Son, that God may be all and in all
His creatures. But it is foolish to say so.
There is therefore no subjection through re-
absorption. For there are other things
which are made subject, those, that is to say,
which are created, and there is Another, to
Whom that subjection is made. Let the
expounders of a cruel re-absorption keep
silence.
162. Would that they too were silent, who,
as they cannot prove that the Word of God
and Wisdom of God can be re-absorbed,
attribute the weakness of subjection to His
Godhead, saying that it is written: "But
when all things shall be subdued vmto Him,
then shall the Son also Himself be subject
unto Him." ^
163. We see, then, that the Scripture states
that He is not yet made subject, but that
this is to come : Therefore now the Son is
not made subject to God the Father. In
what, then, do ye say that the Son will be
made sul)ject .-* If in His Godhead, He is not
disobedient, for He is not at variance with
the Father; nor is He made subject, for He
is not a servant, but the only Son of His own
proper Father. Lastly, when He created
heaven, and formed the earth, He exercised
both power and love. There is therefore no
subjection as that of a servant in the (jod-
head of Christ. But if there is no subjection
then the will is free.
164. But if they think of this as the sub-
jection of the Son, namely, that the Father
makes all things in union with His will, let
them learn that this is really a proof of in-
separable power. For the unity of Their will
is one that began not in time, but ever existed.
' J Cor. XV. 21-28.
"■ Heb. ii. 8.
Cor. XV. 2S.
But where there is a constant unity of will,
there can be no weakness of temporal sub-
jection. For if He were made subject through
His nature. He would always remain in
subjection : but since He is said to be made
subject in time, that subjection must be part
of an assumed office and not of an everlast-
ing weakness : especially as the eternal
Power of God cannot change His state for
a time, neither can the right of ruling fall to
the Father in time. For if the Son ever will
be changed in such wise as to be made subject
in His Godhead, then also must God the
Father, if ever He shall gain more power,
and have the Son in subjection to Himself
in His Godhead, be considered now in the
meantime inferior according to your explana-
tion.
165. But what fault has the Son been
guilty of, that we should believe that He
could hereafter be made subject in His God-
head.? Has he as man seized for Himself
the right to sit at His Father's side, or has
He claimed for Himself the prerogative of
His Father's throne, against His Father's
will.' But He Himself says : " For I do
always those things that please Him."'
Therefore if the Son pleases the Father in all
things, why should He be made subject.
Who was not made subject before .''
166. Let us see then that there be not a
subjection of the Godhead, Init rather of us
in the fear of Christ, a truth so full of grace,
and so full of mystery. Wherefore, again,
let us weigh the Apostle's words: "But
when all things shall be subdued unto Him,
then shall the Son also Himself be subject
unto Him that put all things under Him :
that God may be all in all. " What then
dost thou say ? Are not all things now sub-
ject unto Him ? Are not the choirs of the
saints made subject.' Are not the angels,
who ministered to Him when on the earth. " ^
Are not the archangels who were sent to
Mary to foretell the coming of the Lord ?
Are not all the heavenly hosts ? Are not the
cherubim and seraphim, are not thrones
and dominions and powers which worship
and praise Him .'
167. How, then, will they be brought into
subjection ? In the way that the Lord Him-
self has said. ' ' Take My yoke upon you. " '
It is not the fierce that bear the yoke, but
the humble and the gentle. This clearly is
no base subjection for men, but a glorious
one: "that in the Name of Jesus every
knee should bow, of things in heaven and
things beneath ; and that every tongue
S. John viii. 29.
' S. Matt. iv. n.
' S. Matt, xi. 2y.
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— BOOK V.
305
should confess that Jesus is Lord in the
glory of God the Father."' But for this
reason all things were not made subject be-
fore, for they had not yet received the wis-
dom of God, not yet did they wear the easy
yoke of the Word on the neck as it were of
their mind. "But as many as received
Him," as it is written, "to them gave He
power to become the sons of God. " ^
168. Will any one say that Christ is now
made subject, because many have be-
lieved .'' Certainly not. For Christ's subjec-
tion lies not in a few but in all. For just
as I do not seem to be brought into subjec-
tion, if the flesh in me as yet lusts against
the spirit, and the spirit against the flesh, ^
although I am in part subdued ; so because
the whole Church is the one body of Christ,
we divide Christ as long as the human race
disagrees. Therefore Christ is not yet made
subject, for His members are not yet brought
into subjection. But when we have become,
not many members, but one spirit, then He
also will become subject, in order that
through His subjection "God maybe all
and in all."
169. But as Christ is not yet made sub-
ject, so is the work of God not yet perfected ;
for the Son of God said : ' ' ]My meat is to do
the will of My Father that sent Me, and to
finish His work. "^ What manner of doubt
is there that the subjection of the .Son in me
is still in the future, in whom the work of
the Father is unfinished, because I myself
am not yet perfect .'' I, who make the work
of God to be unfinished, do I make the Son
of God to be in subjection .'' But that is not
a matter of wrong, it is a matter of grace.
For in so far as we are made subject, it is to
our profit, not to that of the Godhead, that
we are made subject to the law, that we are
made subject to grace. For formerly, as the
Apostle himself has said, the wisdom of the
flesh was at enmity with God, for "it was
not made subject to the law," 5 but now it is
made subject through the Passion of Christ.
CHAPTER XIV.
He continues the discussion of the difficulty he has en-
tered upon, and teaches that Christ is not subject
but only according to the flesli. Christ, however,
whilst in subjection in the Flesh, still gave proofs
of His Godhead. He combats the idea that Christ is
made subject in This. The humanity indeed, which
He adopted, has been so far made subject in us, as
ours has been raised in that very humanity of His.
1 Phil. ii. 10.
' Gal. V. 17.
^ Rom. viii. 7.
20
* S. John i. 12.
* S. Joha iv. 34.
Lastly, we are taught, when that same subjection of
Christ will take place.
170. However, lest anyone should cavil,
see what care Scripture takes under divine
inspiration. For it shows to us in what
Christ is made subject to God, whilst it also
teaches us in what He made the universe
subject to Himself And soitsays : "Now
we see not yet all things put under Him."'
For we sec Jesus made a little lower than
the angels for the suffering of death. ^ It
shows therefore that He was made lower
in taking on Him our flesh. What then
hinders Him from openly showing His sub-
jection in taking on Him our flesh, through
which He subjects all things to Himself,
whilst He Himself is made subject in it to
God the Father ?
171. Let us then think of His subjection.
"Father," He says, "if Thou be willing,
remove this cup from Me ; nevertheless not
My will but Thine be done. " 3 Therefore
that subjection will be according to the
assumption of human nature ; as we read :
"Being found in fashion as a man. He
humbled Himself, being made obedient unto
death." 4 The subjection therefore is that
of obedience ; the obedience is that of death ;
the death is that of the assumed humanity ;
that subjection therefore will be the subjec-
tion of the assumed humanity. Thus in no
wise is there a weakness in the Godhead,
but there is such a discharge of pious duty
as this.
172. See how I.do not fear their intentions.
They allege that He must be subject to God
the Father, I say He was subject to Mary
His INIother. For it is written of Joseph and
INIary : " He was subject unto them." 5 But
if they think so, let them say how the Deity
was made subject to men.
173. Let not the fact that He is said to
have been made subject work against Him,
Who receives no hurt from the fact that He
is called a servant, or is stated to have been
crucified, or is spoken of as dead. For
when He died He lived ; when He was
made subject He was reigning ; when He
was buried He revived again. He offered
Himself in subjection to human power, yet
at another time He declared He was the
Lord of eternal glory. He was before the
judge, yet claimed for Himself a throne at
the right hand of God, as Judge forever.
For thus it is written : " Hereafter ye shall
see the Son of Man sitting on the right hand
of the power of God. and coming in the
1 Heb. ii. 8.
* Phil. ii. 8.
2 Heb. ii. g.
5 S. Luke ii.
^ S. Luke xxii. 4^.
\o6
ST. AMBROSE.
clouds of heaven."'' He was scourged by
the Jews, and commanded the angels ; He
was born of Mary under the law ; ^ He was
before Abraham above the law. On the
cross He was revered by nature ; the sun
fled ; the earth trembled ; the angels became
silent. Could the elements see the Genera-
tion of Him Whose Passion they feared to
see.? And will they uphold the sulijection
of an adorable Nature in Him, in Whom they
could not endure the subjection of the
body ?
174. But since the Father, the Son, and
the Holy Spirit are of one Nature, the Father
certainly will not be in subjection to Him-
self. And therefore the Son will not be in
subjection in that in which He is one with
the Father ; lest it should seem that through
the unity of the Godhead the Father also is
in subjection to the Son. Therefore, as upon
that cross it was not the fulness of the God-
head, but our weakness that was brought
into subjection, so also will the Son here-
after become subject to the Father in the
participation of our nature, in order that
when the lusts of the flesh are brought into
subjection the heart may have no care for
riches, or ambition, or pleasures ; but that
God may be all to us, if we live after His
image and likeness, as far as we can attain
to it, through all.
175. The benefit has passed, then, from
the individual to the community ; for in His
flesh He has tamed the nature of all human
flesh. Thus, according to the Apostle : "As
we have borne the image of the earthly, so
also shall we bear the image of the heaven-
ly. "* This thing certainly cannot come to
pass e.xcept in the inner man. Therefore,
" laying aside all these," that is those things
which we read of: "anger, malice, blas-
phemy, filthy communication ; '' 4 as he also
says below : " Let us, having put off the old
man with his deeds, put on the new man,
which is renewed in knowledge after the
image of Him that created Him."s
176. And that thou mightest know that
when he says : "That God may be all in
all," he does not separate Christ from God
the Father, he also says to the Colossians :
"Where there is neither male nor female,
Jew nor Greek, Barbarian nor Scythian,
bond nor free, but Christ is all and in all." ^
So also saying to the Corinthians : "That
God may be all and in all," he com-
prehended in that the unity and equality of
Christ with God the Father, for the Son is
» S. Matt. xxvi. 64.
♦Col.iii. 8.
2 Gal. iv. 4.
" Col. iii. 9, 10.
Cor.
XV. 49.
' Col. iii. II.
not separated from the Father. And in like
manner as the Father worketh all and in all,
so also Christ worketh all in all. If, then,
Christ also worketh all in all. He is not made
subject in the glory of the Godhead, but in us.
But how is He made subject in us, except in
the way in which He was made lower than
the angels, I mean in the sacrament of His
body ? For all things which served their
Creator from their first beginning seemed not
as yet to be made subject to Him in that.
177. But if thou shouldst ask how He
was made subject in us. He Himself shows
us, saying : "I was in prison, and ye came
unto ]Me ; I was sick, and ye visited ^le : In-
asmuch as ye have done it unto one of the
least of these ye have done it unto Me." '
Thou hearest of Him as sick and weak, and
art not moved. Thou hearest of Him in '
subjection, and art moved, though He is sick
and weak in Him in whom He is in sub-
jection, in whom He was made sin and a
curse for us.
1 78. As, then. He was made sin and a curse
not on His own account but on ours, so
He became subject in us not for His own
sake but for ours, being not in subjection in
His eternal Nature, nor accursed in His
eternal Nature. " For cursed is every one that
hangethon atree." ^ Cursed He was, for He
bore our curses ; in subjection, also, for He
took upon Him our subjection, but in the as-
sumption of the form of a servant, not in the
glory of God ; so that whilst he makes Him-
self a partaker of our weakness in the flesh,
He makes us partakers of the divine Nature
in His power. But neither in one nor the
other have we any natural fellowship with
the heavenly Generation of Christ, nor is there
any subjection of the Godhead In Christ.
But as the Apostle has said that on Him
through that flesh which is the pledge of our
salvation, we sit in heavenly places, 3 though
certainly not sitting ourselves, so also He
is said to be subject in us through the
assumption of our nature.
179. For who is so mad as to think, as
we have said already, 4 that a seat of honour
is due to Him at the right hand of God the
Father, when that is granted to Christ
according to the flesh by the Father of His
Generation, even a seat of a heavenly and
equal power.? The angels worship, and
dost thou attempt to overthrow the throne
of God with impious presumption ?
180. It is written, thou sayest, that "when
we were dead in sins. He hath quickened us
* S. Matt. XXV. 36, 40. * Gal. iii. 13.
Eph.ii. 6. *. C£. ch.v
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— BOOK V.
307
in Christ, by Whose grace ye are saved, and
hath raised us up together, and made us sit
together in heavenly places in Christ Jesus." '
I acknowledge that it is so written ; but it is
not written that God suffers men to sit on
His right hand, but only to sit there in the
Person of Christ. For He is the foundation
of all, and is the head of the Church,^ in
Whom our common nature according to the
tlesh has merited the right to the heavenly
throne. For the fiesh is honoured as having
a share in Christ Who is God, and the nature
of the whole human race is honoured as
having a share in the flesh.
181. As we then sit in Him by fellowship
in our fleshly nature, so also He, Who through
the assumption of our fiesh was made a
curse for us (seeing that a curse could not
fall upon the blessed Son of God), so, I say.
He through the obedience of all will become
subject in us ; when the Gentile has be-
lieved, and the Jew has acknowledged Him
Whom he crucified ; when the Manichasan
has worshipped Him, Whom he has not
believed to have come in the flesh ; when
the Arian has confessed Him to be Almighty,
Whom he has denied; when, lastly, the wis-
dom of God, His justice, peace, love, resur-
rection, is in all. Through His own works
and through the manifold forms of virtues
Christ will be in us in subjection to the
Father. And when, with vice renounced
and crime at an end, one spirit in the heart
of all peoples has begun to cleave to God in
all things, then will God be all and in all. 3
CHAPTER XV.
He briefly takes up again the same points of dispute,
and shrewdly concludes from the unity of the divine
power in the Father and the Son, that whatever is
said of the subjection of the Son is to be referred to
His humanity alone. He further confirms this on
proof of the love, which exists alike in either.
182. Let us then shortly sum up our con-
clusion on the whole matter. A unity of
power puts aside all idea of a degrading
subjection. His giving up of power, and
His victory as conqueror won over death,
have not lessened His power. Obedience
works out subjection. Christ has taken
obedience upon Himself, obedience even to
taking on Him our flesh, the cross even to
gaining our salvation. Thus where the
work lies, there too is the Author of the
work. When therefore, all things have be-
come subject to Christ, through Christ's
obedience, so that all bend their knees in
' Eph. ii. 5, 6.
Eph. V. 23.
I Cor. XV. 28.
His name, then He Himself will be all in all.
For now, since all do not believe, all do not
seem to be in subjection. But when all
have believed and done the will of God,
then Christ will be all and in all. And when
Christ is all and in all, then will God be all
and in all ; for the Father abides ever in the
Son. How, then, is He shown to be weak,
Who redeemed the weak ?
183. And lest thou shouldst by chance
attribute to the weakness of the Son, that it
is written, that God hath put all things in
subjection under Him ; learn that He has
Himself brought all things into subjection
to Himself, for it is written : "Our conver-
sation is in heaven, from whence also we
look for the Saviour, the Lord Jesus, Who
shall change our vile body that it may be
fashioned like unto His glorious body accord-
ing to the working, whereby He is able to
subdue all things unto Himself."' Thou
has learnt, therefore, that He can subdue all
things unto Himself according to the work-
ing of His Godhead.
184. Learn now how He receives all
things in subjection according to the flesh,
as it is written : "Who wrought in Christ,
raising Him from the dead, and setting Him
at His own right hand in the heavenly
places, above principality and power and
might and dominion and every name that is
named not only in this world, but also in
that which is to come ; and hath put all
things under His feet. "^ According to the
flesh then all things are given to Him in
subjection ; according to which also He was
raised from the dead, both in His human
soul and His rational subjection.
185. Many nobly interpret that which is
written : "Truly my soul will be in subjec-
tion to God ;''3 He said soul not Godhead,
soul not glory. And that we might know
that the Lord has spoken through the prophet
of the adoption of our human nature, He
added : " How long will ye cast yourselves
upon a man .' " ^ As also He says in the
Gospel : "Why do ye seek to kill Me, a
man .'"5 And He added again: "Never-
theless they 'desired to refuse My price, they
ran in thirst, they blessed with their mouth,
and cursed with their heart." ^ For the
Jews, when Judas brought back the price, 7
would not receive it, running on in the
thirst of madness, for they refused the grace
of a spiritual draught.
186. This is the reverent interpretation of
subjection, for since this is the office of the
^ Phil. iii. 20, 21.
* Ps Ixii. 3.
' S. Matt, xxvii. 4.
^ Eph. i. 20, 21.
^ S. John viii. 40.
^ Ps. Ixii. I.
" Ps. Ixii. 4.
;o8
ST. AMBROSE.
Lords Passion, He will be subject in us in
that in which He suffered. Do we ask
wherefore.? That "neither angels, nor
powers, nor height, nor depth, nor things
present, nor things to come, nor any other
creature may separate us from the love of
God, which is in Christ Jesus."' We see
then, from what has been said, that no
creature is excepted ; but that every one, of
whatever kind it may be, is enumerated
among those he mentioned above.
187. At the same time, we must also
think of the words which, after first saying :
"Who shall separate us from the love of
Christ.' "^ he wrote next: "Neither death,
nor life, nor any other creature can separate
us from the love of God, which is in Christ
Jesus." We see, then, that the love of God
is the same as the love of Christ. Thus it
was not without reason that he wrote of
the love of God, " which is in Christ Jesus,"
lest otherwise thou mightest imagine that
the love of God and of Christ was divided.
But there is nothing that love divides, no-
thing that the eternal Godhead cannot do,
nothing that is unknown to the Truth, or
deceives Justice, or escapes the notice of
Wisdom.
CHAPTER IV.
The Arians are condemned by the Holy Spirit through
the mouth of David: for they dare to Umit Christ's
knowledge. The passage cited by them in proof of
this is by no means free from suspicion of having
been corrupted. But to set this right, we must mark
the word "Son." For knowledge cannot fail Clirist
as Son of God, since He is Wisdom ; nor the recog-
nition of any part, for He created all things. It is
not possible that He, who made the ages, cannot
know the future, much less the day of judgment.
Such knowledge, whether it concerns anything great
or small, may not be denied to the Son, nor yet to
the Holy Spirit. Lastly, various proofs are given
from which we can gather that this knowledge ex-
ists in Christ.
188. Wherefore we ought to know that
they who make such statements are ac-
cursed and condemned by the Holy Spirit.
For whom else but the Arians in chief does
the prophet condcnm, seeing that they say
that the Son of God knows neither times nor
years. For there is nothing which God is
ignorant of; and Christ, yea the most high
Christ, is God, for He is "God over all. "3
189. See how horrified holy David is at
such men, in limiting the knowledge of the
Son of God. For thus it is written : "They
are not in the troubles of other men, neither
will they be scourged with men ; therefore
their pride has laid hold on them ; they are
covered with their wickedness and blas-
phemy ; their iniquity hath stood forth as it
were with fatness ; they have passed on to
the thoughts of their heart. " ' Truly he con-
demns those who think that divine things
are to be regarded in the light of the
regarded
thoughts of the heart. For God is not
seeing
subject to arrangement or order ;
that we do not perceive even those very
things, which are common among men
and often occur in the history of the human
race, to turn out always after the arrange-
ment of some stated rule, but often to hap-
pen suddenly in some secret and mysterious
manner.
190. "They have thought," he says,
" and have spoken wickedness. They have
spoken wickedness against the Most High.
They have set their mouth against heaven. " ^
We see then that he condemns, as guilty of
wicked blasphemy, those who claim for
themselves the right to arrange the heavenly
secrets after the semblance of our human
nature.
191. And they have said: "How hath
God known 'i
the Most High }
And
3
is there knowledcfe in
Do not the Arians echo
this daily, saying that all knowledge can-
not exist in Christ.? For He, they say,
stated that He knew not the day nor hour.
Do they not say, how did He know, while
they maintain that He could not know any-
thing but what He heard and saw, and
apply by a blasphemous interpretation that
which concerns the unity of the divine
Nature to weaken His power.'
192. It is written, they say : " But of that
day and that hour knoweth no man, no,
not the angels Avhich are in heaven, neither
the Son, but the Father only. "4 First of all
the ancient Greek manuscripts do not con-
tain the words, " neither the Son." But it
is not to be wondered at if they who have
corrupted the sacred Scriptures, have also
falsified this passage. The reason for which
it seems to have been inserted is perfectly
plain, so long as it is applied to unfold such
blasphemy.
193. Suppose however that the Evange-
list wrote thus. The name of "Son" em-
braces both natures. For He is also called
Son of Man, so that in the ignorance at-
tached to the assumption of our nature. He
seems not to have known the day of the
judgment to come. For how could the Son
' Rom. viii. 38, 39.
■ Rom. viii. 35.
' Rom. ix.5.
' Ps. Ixxiii. 5-7.
^ Ps. Ixxiii. II.
= Ps. Ixxii. 8, 9.
* S. Marik xiii. 32.
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— BOOK V.
309
of God be ignorant of the day, seeing that
the treasures of the wisdom and knowledge
of God are hidden in Him ? '
194. I ask then, whether He had this
knowledge by reason of His Being, or by
chance? For all knowledge comes to us
either through nature, or by learning. It is
supplied by nature, as for instance to a
horse to enable it to run, or to a fish to en-
able it to swim. For they do this without
learning. On the other hand, it is by learn-
ins: that a man is enabled to swim. For he
could not do so unless he had learnt. Since
therefore nature enables dumb animals to
do and to know what they have not learnt,
why shouldst thou give an opinion on the
Son of God, and say whether He has know-
ledge by instruction or by nature.'' If by
instruction, then He was not begotten as
Wisdom, and gradually began to be perfect,
but was not always so. But if He has
knowledge by nature, then He was perfect
in the beginning, He came forth perfect
from the Father ; and so needed no fore-
knowledge of the future.
195. He therefore was not ignorant of the
days ; for it does not fall to the lot of the
Wisdom of God to know in part and in part
to be ignorant. For how can He who made
all things be ignorant of a part, since it is a
less thing to know than to make. For we
know many things which we cannot make,
neither do we all know things in the same
way but we know them in part. For a
countryman knows the force of the wind
and the courses of the stars in one way —
the inhabitant of a city knows them in
another way — and a pilot in yet a third
way. But although all do not know all
things, they are said to know them ; but He
alone knows all things in full. Who made
all things. The pilot knows for how many
watches Arcturus continues, what sort of a
rising of Orion he will discover, but he
knows nothing of the connection of the
Vergiliae and of the other stars, or of their
number or names, as does He "Who num-
bers the multitude of stars, and calleth
them all by their names ; " ^ Whom indeed
the power of His work cannot escape.
196. How then do you wish the Son of
God to have made these things ? Like a
signet ring which does not feel the impres-
sion it makes .'* But the Father made all
things in wisdom, s that is, He made all
things through the Son, who is the Virtue
and Wisdom of God.* But it befits such
» Col. ii. 3.
' Ps. civ. 24.
* Ps. cxlvii. 4.
* I Cor. i. 24.
Wisdom as that to know both the powers and
the causes of His own works. Thus the
Creator of all things could not be ignorant
of what He did — or be without knowledge of
what He had Himself given. Therefore He
knew the day which He made.
197. But thou sayest that He knows the
present and does not know the future.
Though this is a foolish suggestion, yet that
I may satisfy thee on Scriptural grounds,
learn that He made not only what is past,
but also what is future, as it is written :
"Who made things to come."' Elsewhere
too Scripture says: "By whom also He
made the ages, who is the brightness of
His glory and the express Image of His
Person." 2 Now the ages are past and pre-
sent and future. How then were those
made which are future, unless it is that His
active power and knowledge contanis within
itself the number of all the ages ? For just
as He calls the things that are not as though
they were, ^ so has He made things future
as though they were. It cannot come to
pass that they should not be. Those things
which He has directed to be, necessarily
will be. Therefore He who has made the
things that are to be, knows them in the
way in which they will be.
198. If we are to believe this about the
ages, much more must we believe it about
the day of judgment, on the ground that
the Son of God has knowledge of it, as being
already made by Him. For it is written :
"According to Thine ordinance the day will
continue."^ He did not merely say, "the
day continues, " but even "will continue," so
that the things which are to come might be
governed by His ordinance. Does He not
know what Heordered.? " He who planted
the ear, shall He not hear.'' He that formed
the eye shall He not see ? " 5
199. Let us however see if by chance
there may be some great thing, which could
be beyond the knowledge of its Creator ; or
at least let them choose whether they will
think of something great and superior to
other things, or something very little and
mean. If it is very little and mean, it is no
loss, to speak after our fashion, to know
nothing of worthless and petty things. For
as it is a sign of power to know the greatest
things, it seems rather to be a sign of inferior
work to look upon what is worth less.
Thus He is freed from fastidiousness, yet is
not deprived of His power.
200. But if they think it a great and im-
* Isa. xlv. II.
^ Ps. cxxi. 91.
* Heb. i. 2, 3.
* Ps. xciv. 9.
^ Rom. iv. 17.
310
ST. AMBROSE.
portant thing to know the day of judgment :
Let them say what is greater or better than
God the Father. He knows God the Father,
as He Himself says : " No man knoweth the
Father but the Son and he to whomsoever
the Son will reveal Him." ' I say, does He
know the Father and yet not know the day.?
So then ye believe that He reveals the
Father, and yet cannot reveal the day.?
20 1. Next because you make certain
grades, so as to put the Father before the
Son, and the Son before the Holy Spirit, tell
me whether the Holy Spirit knew the day of
judgment. For no thing is written of Him
in this place. You deny it entirely. But
what if I show you He knew it ? For it is
written: " But God hath revealed them to
us by His Spirit, for the Spirit searcheth
all things, yea the deep things of God. "^
Wherefore, because He searches the deep
things of God, since God knows the day of
judgment, the Spirit also knows it. For
He knows all that God knows, as also the
Apostle states, saying : "For what man
knoweth the things of a man, save the spirit
of man which is in him, even so the things
of God knoweth no man, but the Spirit of
God. "3 Take heed therefore lest either by
denying that the Holy Spirit knows, you
should deny that the Father knows ; (For the
things of God, the Spirit of God also knows,
but the things which the Spirit of God does
not know, are not the things of God). Or
by confessing that the Spirit of God knows,
what you deny that the Son of God knows,
you should put the Spirit before the Son in
opposition to your own declaration. But
to hesitate on this point is not only blas-
phemous but also foolish.
202. Now consider how knowledge is
acquired, and let us show that the Son Him-
self proved that He knew the day. For
what we know we make clear either by
mention of time or place or signs or persons,
or by giving their order. How then did He
not know the day of judgment Who de-
scribed both the hour and the place of
judgment, and the signs and the cases.?
203. And so thou hast it : '• In that hour
he which shall be on the housetop let him
not come down to take his goods out of his
house, and he that is in the tield, let him
likewise not return back." •♦ To such a point
in the future did He know the issues of
dangers, that He even showed the means of
safety to those in danger.
204. Could the Lord be ignorant of a day
' S. Matt. xi. 27.
^ t Cor. ii. II.
" I Cor. ii. 10.
* S. Luke xvii. 31.
Who Himself said of Himself that the Son of
Man is Lord of the Sabbath ? '
205. He has also elsewhere marked out a
place, when He said to His disciples who
were showing Him the building of the temple,
"Do ye see all these things .? Verily I say
unto you, there shall not be left one stone
upon another which shall not be thrown
down." ^
206. When questioned also about a sign
by His disciples, He answered : "Take heed
that ye be not deceived. For many shall
come in My name, saying I am Christ ;"3
and further on He says : " and great earth-
quakes shall be in divers places, and famines,
and pestilences, and terrors from heaven, and
there shall be great signs. "4 Thus He has
described both persons and signs.
207. In what manner He tells that the
armies will surround Jerusalem, or that the
times of the Gentiles are to be fulfilled, and
in what order, — all this is disclosed to us by
the witness of the Gospel words. Therefore
He knew all things.
CHAPTER XVII.
Christ acted for our advantage in being unwilling to
reveal the day of judgment. This is made plain by
other words of our Lord and by a not dissimilar
passage from Paul's writings. Other passages in
which the same ignorance seems to be attributed to
the Father are brought forward to meet those who
are anxious to know why Christ answered His
disciples, as though He did not know. From these
Ambrose argues against them that if they admit
ignorance and inability in the Father, they must
admit that the same Substance exists in the Son as
in the Father ; unless they prefer to accuse the Son
of falsehood ; since it belongs neither to Him nor to
the Father to deceive, but the unity of both is pointed
out in the passage named.
208. But we ask for what reason He was
unwilling to state the time. If we ask it,
we shall not find it is owing to ignorance,
but to wisdom. For it was not to our
advantage to know ; in order that we being
ignorant of the actual moments of judg-
ment to come, might ever be as it were on
guard, and set on the watch-tower of virtue,
and so avoid the habits of sin ; lest the day
of the Lord should come upon us in the
midst of our wickedness. For it is not to
our advantage to know but rather to fear the
future; for it is written: "Be not high-
minded but fear. " s
209. For if He had distinctly stated the
day, he would seem to have laid down a rule
' S. Matt. xii.
* S. Luke xxi.
^ S. Matt. xxiv. 2.
' Rom. xi. 20.
' S. Luke xxi. 8.
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— BOOK V.
311
of life for that one age which was nearest to
the judgment, and the just man in the
earlier times would be more negligent, and
the sinner more free from care. P'or the
adulterer cannot cease from the desire of
committing adultery unless he fears punish-
ment day by day, nor can the robber for-
sake the hiding places in the woods where
he dwells, unless he knows punishment is
hanging over him day by day. For im-
purity generally spurs them on, but fear is
irksome to the end.
210. Therefore I have said that it was not
to our advantage to know ; nay, it is to our
advantage to be ignorant, that through igno-
rance we might fear, through watchfulness
be corrected, as He Himself said: " Be ye
ready, for ye know not at what hour the Son
of Man Cometh." ' For the soldier does not
know how to watch in the camp unless he
knows that war is at hand.
2 11, Wherefore at another time also the
Lord Himself when asked by his Apostles
(Yes, for they did not understand it as Arius
did, but believed that the Son of God knew
the future. For unless they had believed
this, they would never have asked the ques-
tion.) — the Lord, I say, when asked when
He would restore the kingdom to Israel, did
not say that He did not know, but says :
"It is not for you to know the times or
years, which the Father hath put in His own
power. "2 Mark what He said: It is not
for you to know! Read again, "It is not
for you." "For you," He said, not "for
Me," for now He spoke not according to His
own perfection but as was profitable to the
human body and our soul. "For you"
therefore He said, not "for ]\Ie. "
212. Which example the Apostle also fol-
lowed : "But of the times and seasons,
brethren," he says, "ye have no need that
I write unto you. "^ Thus not even the
Apostle himself, the servant of Christ, said
that he knew not the seasons, but that there
was no need for the people to be taught ;
for they ought ever to be armed with spiri-
tual armour, that the virtue of Christ may
stand forth in each one. But when the
Lord says : "Of the times which the Father
hath put in His own power, "4 He certainly
cannot be without a share in His Father's
knowledge, in whose power He is by no
means without a share. For power grows
out of wisdom and virtue ; and Christ is
both of these.
213. But you ask, why did He not refuse
* S. Matt. xxiv. 44.
' I Thess. V. I.
* Acts i. 7.
* Acts i. 7.
His disciples as one who knew, but would
not say ; and, why did He state instead that
neither the angels nor the Son knew ? ' I
too will ask you why God says in Genesis :
" I will go down now, and see whether they
have done altogether according to the cry
that is come unto Me. And if not, that I
may know. "=* Why does Scripture also
say of God: "And the Lord came down
to see the city and the tower, which the
sons of men builded. "3 Why also does
the prophet say in the Book of the Psalms :
"The Lord looked down upon the children
of men, to sec if there were any that did
understand, and that did seek God ".''4
Just as though in one place, if God had not
descended, and in the other, if He had not
looked down, He would have been ignorant
either of men's work or of their merits.
214. But in the Gospel of Luke also thou
hast the same, for the Father says : " What
shall I do.f* I will send My beloved Son;
it may be that they will reverence Him." s
In Matthew and in Mark thou hast: "But
He sent His only Son, saying : they will
reverence. My Son ; " ^ In one book He
says : "It may be that they will reverence
My Son ; "7 and is in doubt as though He
does not know ; for this is the language of
one in doubt. But in the two other books
He says : '■' They will reverence My Son ; "
that is. He declares that reverence will be
shown.
215. But God can neither be in doubt, nor
can He be deceived. For he only is in
doubt, who is ignorant of the future ; and
he is deceived, who has predicted one thing,
whilst another has happened. Yet what is
plainer than the fact that Scripture states
the Father to have said one thing of the
Son, and that the same Scripture proves
another thing to have taken place ? The
Son was beaten, He was mocked, was
crucified, and died.^ He suffered much
worse things in the flesh than those ser-
vants who had been appointed before. Was
the Father deceived, or was He ignorant of
it, or was He unable to give help .'' Bnt He
that is true cannot make a mistake ; for it is
written: "God is faithful Who doth not
lie. "9 How was He ignorant. Who knows
all.^ What could He not do. Who could do
all.?
216. Yet if either He was ignorant, or had
not power (for you would sooner agree to
say that the Father did not know than own
that the Son knows), you see from this very
' S. Mark xiii. 32.
* Ps. liii. 2.
' S. Mark xii. 6.
' Gen. xviii. 21.
'' S. Luke XX. 13.
' S. Matt, xxvii. 29 ff.
' Gen. xi. 5.
* S. Matt. xxi. 37.
3 Tit. i. 2.
312
ST. AMBROSE.
fact that the Son is of one Substance with
the Father ; seeing that the Son like the
Father (to speak in accordance with your
foolish ideas) does not know all things, and
cannot do all things. For I am not so
eager or rash in giving praise to the Son,
as to dare to say that the Son can do more
than the Father ; for I make no distinction
of power between the Father and the Son.
217. But perhaps you say that the Father
did not say so, but that the Son erred about
the Father. So now you convict the Son
not only of weakness, but also of blasphemy
and lying. However if you do not believe
the Son with regard to the Father, neither
may you believe Him with regard to that.
For if He wished to deceive us in saying
that the Father was in doubt as though He
knew not what would take place, He wished
also to deceive us about Himself in saying
that He did not know the future. It would
be far more endurable for Him to stretch
the veil of ignorance in front of that which
He does of His own accord, than that He
should seem to be deluded by a result con-
trary to what He had foretold in the things
He had declared of His Father.
218. But neither is the Father deceived,
not does the Son deceive. It is the cus-
tom of the holy Scriptures to speak thus, as
the examples I have already given, and
many others testify, so that God feigns not
to know what He does know. In this then
a unity of Godhead, and a unity of character
is proved to exist in the Father and in the
Son ; seeing that, as God the Father hides
what is known to Him, so also the Son, Who
is the image of God in this respect, hides
what is known to Him.
CHAPTER XVIII.
Wishing to give a reason for the Lord's answer to the
apostles, he assigns the one received to Christ's ten-
derness. Then when another reason is supplied by
others he confesses that it is true ; for the Lord
spoke it by reason of His human feelings. Hence he
gathers that the knowledge of the Father and the
Son"is equal, and that the Son is not inferior to the
Father. After having set beside the text, in which He
is said to be inferior, another whereby He is declared
to be equal, he censures the rashness of the Arians
in judging about the Son, and shows that whilst they
wickedly make Him to be inferior, He is rightly
called a Stone by Himself.
219. We have been taught therefore that
the Son of God is not ignorant of the future.
If they confess this, I too — that I may now
answer why He declared that neither angels,
nor the Son, but only the Father knows —
call to mind His wonted love for His dis-
ciples also in this passage, and His grace,
which by its very frequency ought to have
been known to all. For the Lord, filled
with deep love for His disciples, when they
asked from Him what He thought unpro-
fitable for them to know, prefers to seem
ignorant of what He knows, rather than to
refuse an answer. He loves rather to pro-
vide what is useful for us, than to show His
own power.
220. There are, however, some not so
faint-hearted as I. For I would rather fear
the deep things of God, than be wise.
There are some, however, relying on the
words: "And Jesus increased in age and
in wisdom and in favour with God and
man,"' who boldly say, that according to
His Godhead indeed He could not be
ignorant of the future, but that in His as-
sumption of our human state He said that
He as Son of Man was in ignorance before
His crucifixion. For when He speaks of
the Son, He does not speak as it were of
another ; for He Himself is our Lord the
Son of God and the Son of a Virgin. But
by a word which embraces both, He guides
our mind, so that He as Son of INIan accord-
ing to His adoption of our ignorance and
growth of knowledge, might be believed as
yet not fully to have known all things.
For it is not for us to know the future.
Thus He seems to be ignorant in that state in
Avhich He makes progress. For how does He
progress according to His Godhead, in Whom
the fulness of the Godhead dwells ? ^ Or what
is there which the Son of God does not
know. Who said: "Why think ye evil in
your hearts.?"^ How does He not know,
of Whom Scripture says : "But Jesus knew
their thoughts " ? *
221. This is what others say, but I — to
return to my former point, where I stated
it was written of the Father: "It may be
they will reverence My Son," — I think in-
deed this was written in order that the
Father, as He was speaking of men, might
also seem to have spoken with human feel-
ings. But still more am I inclined to think
that the Son Who went about with men,
and lived the life of man, and took upon
Him our flesh, assumed also our feelings ;
so that after our ignorance He might say
He knew not, though there was not any-
thing He did not know. For though He
seemed to be a man in the reality of His
body, yet was He Life, and Light, and
virtue came out of Him,5 to heal the
' S. Luke ii. 52.
4 S. Luke vi. 8.
« Col. ii. 9.
^ Sf Luke vi. 19.
8 S. Matt. i.x. 4.
OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.— BOOK V.
313
wounds of the injured by the power of His
Majesty.
222. Ye see then that this matter has been
solved for you, since the saying of the Son
is referred to the assumption of our state in
its fuhiess, and it was thus written concern-
ing the Father, in order that you might cease
to cavil at the Son.
223. There was nothing then of which
the Son of God was ignorant, for there was
nothing of which the Father was ignorant.
But if the Son was ignorant of nothing, as
we now conclude, let them say in what
respect they wish Him to seem to be in-
ferior. If God has begotten a Son inferior
to Himself, He has granted Him less. If
He has granted Him less, He either wished
to give less, or could only give less. But
the Father is neither weak nor envious, see-
ing that there was neither will nor power
before the Son. For wherein is He inferior,
Who has all things even as the Father has
them ? He has received all things from the
Father by right of His Generation,' and has
shown forth the Father wholly by the glory
of His Majesty.
224. It is written, they say: "For the
Father is greater than I. " ^ It is also
written : " He thought it not robbery to be
equal with God. " ^ It is written again that
the Jews wished to kill Him, because He
said He was the Son of God, making Him-
self equal with God.^ It is written: "I
and My Father are one. '" s They read ' ' one "
they do not read "many." Can He then be
both inferior and equal in the same Nature.''
Nay, the one refers to His Godhead, the
other to His flesh.
225. They say He is inferior : I ask who
has measured it, who is of so overweening
a heart, as to place the Father and the Son
before his judgment seat to decide upon
which is the greater .-^ "My heart is not
haughty nor are mine eyes raised unto
vanity," ^ says David. King David feared
to raise his heart in pride in human affairs,
but we raise ours even in opposition to the
divine secrets. Who shall decide about the
Son of God ? Thrones, dominions, angels,
powers .'' But archangels give attendance
and serve Him, cherubim and seraphim
minister to Him and praise Him. Who
then decides about the Son of God, on read-
ing that the Father Himself knows the Son,
but will not judge Him. "For no man
knoweth the Son, but the Father." 7 " Know-
eth" it says, not "judgeth. " It is one thing
* S. John xvi. 15.
* S. John V. 18.
' S. Matt. ». 27.
* S. John xiv. 28.
* S. John X. 30.
3 Phil. ii. 6.
'' Ps. cxxxi. I.
to know, another to judge. The Father
has knowledge in Himself. The Son has
no power superior to Himself. And again :
" No man knoweth the Father, but the
Son ; " and He Himself knows the Father,
as the Father knows Him.
226. But thou sayest that He said He
was inferior, He said also He was a Stone.
Thou sayest more and yet dost impiously
attack Him. I say less and with reverence
add to His honour. Thou sayest He is
inferior and confessest Him to be above the
angels. I say He is less than the angels,
yet do not take from His honour ; for I do
not refute His Godhead, but I do proclaim
His pity.
CHAPTER XIX.
The Saint having turned to God the Father, explains
why he does not decide that the Son is inferior to the
Father, then he declares it is not for him to measure
the Son of God, since it was given to an angel — nay,
perhaps even to Christ as man — to measure merely
Jerusalem. Arius, he says, has shown himself to
be an imitator of Satan. It is a rash thing to hold
discussions on the divine Generation. Since so great
a sign of human generation has been given by Isaiah,
we ought not to make comparisons in divine things.
Lastly he shows how carefully we ought to avoid the
pride of Arius, by putting before us various examples
of Scriptures.
227. To Thee now. Almighty Father, do I
direct my words with tears. I indeed have
readily called Thee inapproachable, incom-
prehensible, inestimable ; but I dared not
say Thy Son was inferior to Thyself. For
when I read that He is the Brightness of
Thy glory, and the Image of Thy Person, '
I fear lest, in saying that the Image of Thy
Person is inferior, I should seem to say that
Thy Person is inferior, of which the Son is
the Image ; for the fulness of Thy Godhead
is wholly in the Son. I have often read, I
freely believe, that Thou and Thy Son and
the Holy Spirit are boundless, unmeasur-
able, inestimable, ineffable. And therefore I
cannot appraise Thee so as to weigh Thee.
228. But be it so, that I desired with a
daring and rash spirit to measure Thee .-'
From whence, I ask, shall I measure Thee,
The prophet saw a line of flax with which
the angel measured Jerusalem. An angel
was measuring, not Arius. And he was
measuring Jerusalem, not God. And per-
chance even ah angel could not measure
Jerusalem, for it was a man. Thus it is
written : "I raised mine eyes and saw and
beheld a man, and in his hand there was a
1 Heb. i. 3.
314
ST. AMBROSE.
line of flax." ' He was a man, for a type of
the body that was to be assumed was thus
shown. He was a man, of whom it was
said: "There cometh a man after me.
Whose shoe's latchet 1 am not worthy to un-
loose. "^ Therefore Christ in a type mea-
sures Jerusalem. Arius measures God.
229. Even Satan transforms himself into
an angel of light ; ^ what wonder then if
Arius imitates his Author in taking upon
himself what is forbidden ? Though his
father the devil did it not in his own case,
that man with intolerable blasphemy as-
sumes to himself the knowledge of divine
secrets and the mysteries of the heavenly
Generation. For the devil confessed the
true Son of God, Arius denies Him.
230. If, then, I cannot measure Thee,
Almighty Father, can I without blasphemy
discuss the secrets of Thy Generation ? Can
I say there is anything more or less between
Thee and Thy Son when He Himself Who
was begotten of Thee, says: "All things
which the Father hath are Mine. "4 Who
has made Me a judge and a divider of human
affairs ? This the Son says, 5 and do we claim
to ^make a division and to give judgment
between the Father and the Son ? A right
feeling of duty avoids arbiters even in the
division of an inheritance. And shall we
become arbiters, to divide between Thee and
Thy Son the glory of the uncreated Sub-
stance ?
231. "This generation," it says, "is an
evil generation. It seeketh a sign, and there
shall no sign be given it, but the sign of
Jonas the prophet. '' ^ A sign of the God-
head then is not given, but only of the
Incarnation. Thus when about to speak of
the Incarnation the prophet says: "Ask
thee a sign." And when the king had said :
"I will not ask, neither will I tempt the
Lord," the answer was: "Behold a Virgin
shall conceive. "7 Therefore we cannot see
a sign of the Godhead, and do w^e seek a
measure of it .'* Alas ! woe is me ! we impi-
ously dare to discuss Him, to Whom we
cannot worthily pray !
232. Let the Arians see to what they do.
I have unlawfully compared Thee, O Father,
with Thy works in saying that Thou art
greater than all. If greater than Thy Son,
as Arius maintains, I have judged wickedly.
Concerning Thee first will that judgment
be. For no choice can be made except by
* Ezek. xl. 3.
* S. John xvi. 15.
' Isa. vii. 1 1 ff.
^ S. John i. 27.
'' S. Luke xii. 14.
* 2 Cor. xi. 14.
" S. Luke xi. 29.
comparison, nor can anyone be put before
another without a decision being first given
on Himself
233. It is not lawful for us to swear by
heaven, but it is lawful to judge about God.
Yet Thou hast given to Thy Son alone judg-
ment over all.
234. John feared to baptize the flesh of
the Lord, John forbade Him, saying : "I
have need to be baptized of Thee, and
comest Thou to me.'"' ' And shall 1 bring
Christ under my judgment .''
235. Moses excuses himself from the
Priesthood, Peter is for avoiding the obedi-
ence demanded in the Ministry ; and does
Arius examine even the deep things of God ?
But Arius is not the Holy Spirit. Nay, it
was said even to Arius and to all men :
' ' Seek not that which is too deep for
thee." 2
236. Moses is prevented from seeing the
face of God ; 3 Arius merited to see it in
secret. Moses and Aaron among His Priests.
Moses who appeared with the Lord in glory,
that Moses then saw only the back parts
of God in appearance ; Arius beholds God
wholly face to face ! But " no one," it says,
"can see My face and live.''*
237. Paul also speaks of inferior beings :
"We know in part and we prophesy in
part." 5 Arius says : " I know God altogether
and not in part." Thus Paul is inferior to
Arius, and the vessel of election knows in
part, but the vessel of perdition knows
wholly. "I know," he says, "a man,
whether in the body or out of the body, I
cannot tell, God knoweth, how he was
caught up into Paradise and heard unspeak-
able words." ^ Paul carried up to the third
heaven, knew not himself; Arius rolling in
filth, knows God. Paul says of himself :
"God knows;" Arius says of God : "I
know."
238. But Arius was not caught up to
heaven, although he followed him who with
accursed boastfulness presumed on what
was divine, saying : "I will set my throne
upon the clouds ; I will be like the Most
High."7 For as he said: "I will be like
the Most High," so too Arius wishes the I\Iost
High Son of God to seem like himself, Whom
he does not worship in the eternal glory of
His Godhead, but measures by the weak-
ness of the flesh.
' S. Matt. iii. 4.
' Ex. xxxiii. 20.
' Isa. xiv. 14.
" Ecclus. iii. 22.
* I Cor. xiii. 9.
' Ex. xxxiii. 23.
° 2 Cor. xiii. 3, 4.
ON THE MYSTERIES.
INTRODUCTION.
The writer explains in the commencement of this treatise that his object was to set
forth, for the benefit of those about to be baptized, the rites and meaning of that Sacra-
ment, as well as of Confirmation and the Holy Eucharist. For all these matters were
treated with the greatest reserve in the Early Church, for fear of profanation by the heathen,
and it was the custom, as in the case of the well-known Catechetical Lectures of St. Cyril
of Jerusalem, to explain them to the catechumens during the latter part of Lent.
Treatises of this kind possess therefore a special interest, as in them we find clearly
stated the full teaching of the Church at the time when those addresses which have come
down to our times were drawn up.
St. Ambrose goes through and explains the greater part, first of the rites usual at the
time of solemn baptism, pointing out the deep truths and mysteries underlying these
outward things. He then treats Confirmation, referring to the seven gifts of the Holy
Spirit : and lastly, speaks of the Holy Eucharist, especially setting forth the doctrine of the
Real Presence.
Some writers in and since the sixteenth century have endeavoured to prove that this
treatise has been falsely attributed to St. Ambrose, but there can be no real doubt on the
matter, as is conclusively shov.m by the Benedictine Editors, and now universally
admitted. The treatise was composed for use during Lent, but in what year cannot be
fixed, possibly, from reference made to the treatise De Patriarchis, about a. d. 387.
315
THE BOOK OF ST. AMBROSE, BISHOP OF MILAN,
CONCERNING THE MYSTERIES.^
CHAPTER I.
St. Ambrose states that after the explanations he has
already given of holy living, he will now explain the
Mysteries. Then after giving his reasons for not
having done so before, he explains the mystery of
the opening of the ears, and shows how this was cf
old done by Christ Himself.
1. We have spoken daily upon subjects
connected with morals, when the deeds of
the Patriarchs or the precepts of the Pro-
verbs were being read, in order that being
taught and instructed by these you might
grow accustomed to enter the ways of the
ancients and to walk in their paths, and
obey the divine commands ; in order that
being renewed by baptism you might hold
to that manner of life which beseems those
who are washed.
2. The season now warns us to speak of
the [Mysteries, and to set forth the purport
of the sacraments, which if we had thought
it well to teach before baptism to" those who
were not yet initiated, we should be con-
sidered rather to have betrayed than to have
portrayed the Mysteries. And then, too, an-
other reason is that the light itself of the
Mysteries will shed itself with more effect
upon those who are expecting they know
not nvhat, than if any discourse had come
beforehand.
3. Open, then, your ears, inhale the good
savour of eternal life which has been
breathed upon you by the grace of the
sacraments ; which was signified to )'Ou by
us, when, celebrating the mystery of the
opening,^ we said, " Epphatha, which is, Be
^ It must be borne in mind that the name Mysteries was that by
which the sacraments were commonly known in the Early Church,
as it is at the present day in the Greek Church the equivalent of our
word sacraments. Of course the word has also its usual wider
signifi-ation.
- This " opening " was a symbolical act, as is explained in the next
section. The celebrant moistened his finger with spittle, wherewith
he then touched the ear of the catechumen, saying, " Epphatha."
opened,"' that whosoever was coming in
quest of peace might know what he was
asked, and be bound to remember what he
answered.
4. Christ made use of this mystery in the
Gospel, as we read, when He healed him
who was deaf and dumb. But He touched
the mouth, because he who was healed was
dumb and was a man, as regards one point
that he might open his mouth with the
sound of the voice given to him ; as regards
the other point because that touch was
seemly towards a man, but would have been
unseemly towards a woman.
CHAPTER n.
What those who were to be mitiated promised on
entering the Church, of the witnesses to these
promises, and wherefore they then turned themselves
to the East.
5. After this the Holy of holies ^ was
opened to you, you entered the sanctuary
of regeneration ; recall what you were
asked, and remember what you answered.
You renounced the devil and his works, the
world with its luxury and pleasures. That
utterance of yours is preserved not in the
tombs of the dead, but in the book of the
living.
6. You saw there the deacon, you saw
the priest, you saw the chief priest [t.e.
the bishop]. Consider not the bodily forms,
but the grace of the Mysteries. You spoke
in the presence of the angels, as it is
written: " For the priests lips keep know-
ledge, and they seek the law at his mouth,
for he is the angel of the Lord Almighty. "3
1 S. Mark vii. 34.
2 " Holy of holies," a figurative name given to the baptistery.
Comp. St. Cyril of Jerusalem, CaL Led. XIX. 11; and with this
whole treatise the last four Catechetical Lectures of St. Cyril of
Jerusalem in this series, Vol. VII. p. 144 ff.
3 Mai. ii. 7.
1>^7
,i8
ST. AMBROSE.
There is no place for deception nor for
denial. He is an angel who proclaims the
kingdom of Christ and eternal life. He is
to be esteemed by you not according to his
appearance, but according to his office.
Consider what he delivered, reflect upon the
rule of life he gave you, recognize his posi-
tion.
7. You entered, then, that you might dis-
cern your adversary, whom you were to
renounce as it were to his face, then you
turned to the east ; for he who renounces
the devil turns to Christ, and beholds Him
face to face.
CHAPTER HI.
St. Ambrose points out that we must consider the
divine presence and working in the water and the
sacred ministers, and then brings forward many Old
Testament figures of baptism.
8. What did you see .'' Water, certainly,
but not water alone ; you saw the deacons
ministering there, and the bishop asking
questions and hallowing. First of all, the
Apostle taught you that those things are not
to be considered " which we see, but the
things which are not seen, for the things
which are seen are temporal, but the things
which are not seen are eternal." ' For you
read elsewhere : " That the invisible things
of God, since the creation of the world, are
understood through those things which have
been made ; His eternal power also and
Godhead are estimated by His works. "^
Wherefore also the Lord Himself says : "If
ye believe not Me, believe at least the
works. "3 Believe, then, that the presence of
the Godhead is there. Do you believe the
working, and not believe the presence ?
Whence should the working proceed unless
the presence went before ?
9. Consider, however, how ancient is the
mystery prefigured even in the origin of the
world itself In the very beginning, when
God made the heaven and the earth, "the
Spirit," it is said, " moved upon the
waters. "4 He Who was moving upon the
waters, was He not w^orking upon the
waters? But why should I say, "work-
ing".? As regards His presence He was
moving. Was He not working Who was
moving ? Recognize that He was working
in that making of the world, when the pro-
phet says : "By the word of the Lord were
the heavens made, and all their strength by
' I Cor. V. 18.
» S. John X. 38.
* Rom. i. 20.
* Gen. i. 2.
the spirit of His mouth." ' Each statement
rests upon the testimony of the prophet,
both that He was moving and that He was
working. Moses says that He was moving,
David testifies that he was working.
10. Take another testimony. All flesh
was corrupt by its iniquities. " My Spirit,"
says God, "shall not remain among men,
because they are flesh. "^ Whereby God
shows that the grace of the Spirit is turned
away by carnal impurity and the pollution
of grave sin. Upon which, God, willing to
restore what was lacking, sent the flood and
bade just Noah go up into the ark. And
he, after having, as the flood was passing
off, sent forth first a raven which did not re-
turn, sent forth a dove which is said to have
returned with an olive twig.^ You see the
water, you see the wood [of the ark], you
see the dove, and do you hesitate as to the
mystery.'
11. The water, then, is that in which the
flesh is dipped, that all carnal sin may be
washed away. All wickedness is there
buried. The wood is that on which the
Lord Jesus was fastened when He suffered
for us. The dove is that in the form of
which the Holy Spirit descended, as you
have read in the New Testament, Who in-
spires in you peace of soul and tranquillity
of mind. The raven is the figure of sin,
which goes forth and does not return, if, in
you, too, inwardly and outwardly righteous-
ness be preserved.
12. There is also a third testimony, as the
Apostle teaches us: "For all our fathers
were under the cloud, and all passed through
the sea, and were all baptized to Moses in
the cloud .and in the sea. "■» And further,
Closes himself says in his song: "Thou
sentcst Thy Spirit, and the sea covered
them." 5 You observe that even then holy
baptism w^as prefigured in that passage of
the Hebrews, wherein the Egyptian per-
ished, the Hebrew escaped. For what else
are we daily taught in this sacrament but
that guilt is swallowed up and error done
away, but that virtue and innocence remain
unharmed ?
13. You hear that our fathers were under
the cloud, and that a kindly cloud, which
cooled the heat of carnal passions. That
kindly cloud overshadows those whom the
Holy Spirit visits. At last it came upon the
Yirgin Mary, and the Power of the Highest
OA^ershadowed her,^ when she conceived
Redemption for the race of men. And that
^ Ps. xxxiii. [xxxii.] 6.
■* I Cor. X. I, 2.
^ Gen. vi. 3.
" Ex. XV. 10.
» Gen. vii. I ff.
« S. Luke i. 35.
ON THE MYSTERIES.
319
miracle was wrought in a figure through
IMoses. If, then, the Spirit was in the figure,
is He not present in the reaUty, since Scrip-
ture says to us : "For the law was given
by IMoses, but grace and truth came by
Jesus Christ." '
14. ?*Iarah was a fountain of most bitter
water : Moses cast wood into it and it be-
came sweet.- For water without the preach-
ing of the Cross of the Lord is of no avail
for future salvation, but, after it has been
consecrated by the mystery of the saving
cross, it is made suitable for the use of the
spiritual laver and of the cup of salvation.
As, then, INIoscs, that is, the prophet, cast wood
into that fountain, so, too, the priest utters
over this font the proclamation of the Lords
cross, and the water is made sweet for the
purpose of grace.
15. You must not trust, then, wholly to
your bodily eyes ; that which is not seen is
more really seen, for the object of sight is
temporal, but that other eternal, which is
not apprehended by the eye, but is discerned
by the mind and spirit.
16. Lastly, let the lessons lately gone
through from the Kings teach you. Naaman
was a Syrian, and suffered from leprosy, nor
could he be cleansed by any. Then a
maiden from among the captives said that
there was a prophet in Israel, who could
cleanse him from the defilement of the
leprosy. And it is said that, having taken
silver and gold, he went to the king of
Israel. And he, when he heard the cause of
his coming, rent his clothes, saying, that
occasion was rather being sought against
him, since things were asked of him which
pertained not to the power of kings. Elisha,
however, sent word to the king, that he
should send the Syrian to him, that he might
know there was a God in Israel. And when
he had come, he bade him dip himself seven
times in the river Jordan.
17. Then he began to reason with him-
self that he had better waters in his own
country, in which he had often bathed and
never been cleansed of his leprosy; and so
remembering this, he did not obey the com-
mand of the prophet, yet on the advice and
persuasion of his servants he yielded and
dipped himself. And being forthwith
cleansed, he understood that it is not of
the waters but of grace that a man is
cleansed. 3
18. Understand now who is that young
maid among the captives. She is the con-
eresration g-athered out of the Gentiles, that
is, the Church of God held down of old by
the captivity of sin, when as yet it possessed
not the liberty of grace, by whose counsel
that foolish people of the Gentiles heard the
word of prophecy as to which it had before
been in doubt. Afterwards, however, when
they believed that it ought to be obeyed,
they were washed from every defilement
of sin. And he indeed doubted before he
was healed ; you are already healed, and
therefore ought not to doubt
CHAPTER IV.
That water does not cleanse without the Spirit is
shown by the witness of John and by the very form
of the administration of the sacrament. And this is
also declared to be signified by the pool in the Gos-
pel and the man who was there healed. In the
same passage, too, is shown that the Holy Spirit truly
descended on Christ at His baptism, and the meaning
of this mystery is explained.
19. The reason why you were told before
not to believe only what you saw was that
you might not say perchance, This is that
great mystery "which eye hath not seen,
nor ear heard, neither has it entered into
the heart of man." ' I see water, which I
have been used to see every day. Is that
water to cleanse me now in which I have
so often bathed without ever being cleansed .''
By this you may recognize that water does
not cleanse without the Spirit.
20. Therefore read that the three wit-
nesses in baptism, the water, the blood, and
the Spirit,^ are one, for if you take away
one of these, the Sacrament of Baptism
does not exist. For what is water without
the cross of Christ.? A common element,
without any sacramental effect. Nor, again,
is there the Sacrament of Regeneration with-
out water: "For except a man be born
again of water and of the Spirit, he cannot
enter into the kingdom of God. "^ Now,
even the catechumen believes in the cross
of the Lord Jesus, wherewith he too is
signed ; but unless he be baptized in the
Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of
the Holy Spirit, he cannot receive remission
of sins nor gain the gift of spiritual grace.
21. So that Syrian "dipped himself seven
times '^ under the law, but you were bap-
tized in the Name of the Trinity, you con-
fessed the Father. Call to mind what you
did : you confessed the Son, you confessed
the Holy Spirit. Mark well the order of
things in this faith: you died to the world,
1 S. John i. 17.
* Ex. XV. 23 ff.
^ 2 [4] Kings V. I ff.
I Cor. ii. 9.
■ S. John iii. 5.
* I John V. 7.
♦ 2 [4] Kings V. 14.
ST. AMBROSE.
and rose again to God. And as though
buried to the world in that element, being
dead to sin, you rose again to eternal life.
Believe, therefore, that these waters are not
void of power.
2 2. Therefore it is said: "An angel of
the Lord went down according to the season
into the pool, and the water v/as troubled ;
and he who first after the troubling of the
water went down into the pool was healed
of whatsoever disease he was holden." ■
This pool was at Jerusalem, in which one
was healed every year, but no one was
healed before the angel had descended.
Because of those who believed not the
water was troubled as a sign that the angel
had descended. They had a sign, you have
faith ; for them an angel descended, for
you the Holy Spirit ; for them the creature
was troubled, for you Christ Himself, the
Lord of the creature, works.
23. Then one was healed, now all are
made whole ; or more exactly, the Christian
people alone, for in some even the water is
deceitful.^ The baptism of unbelievers
heals not but pollutes. The Jew washes
pots and cups, as though things without
sense were capable of guilt or grace. But
do you wash this living cup of yours, that
in it your good works may shine and the
glory of your grace be bright. For that
pool was as a type, that you might believe
that the power of God descends upon this
font.
24. Lastly, that paralytic was waiting for
a man. And what man save the Lord
Jesus, born of the Virgin, at Whose coming
no longer the shadow should heal men one
by one, but the truth should heal the whole.
He it is, then, Whose coming down was
being waited for, of Whom the Father said
to John the Baptist: "Upon Whom thou
shalt see the Spirit descending and abiding
upon Him, this is He Who baptizeth with
the Holy Spirit.''^ And John bare v/itness
of Him, and said: "I saw the Spirit
descending from heaven like a dove and
abiding upon Him." 4 And why did the
Spirit descend like a dove, but in order that
you might see, that you might acknowledge,
that that dove also which just Noah sent
forth from the ark was a likeness of this
dove, that you might recognize the type of
the sacrament .-*
25. Perhaps you may object : Since that
was a real dove which was sent forth, and
the Spirit descended like a dove, how is it
■" S. John V. 4.
3 S. John i. 33.
2 Jer. XV. 18.
* S. John i. 32.
that we say that the likeness was there and
the reality here, whereas in the Greek it is
written that the Spirit descended in the like-
ness of a dove ? But what is so real as the
Godhead which abides for ever ? Now the
creature cannot be the reality, but only a
likeness, which is easily destroyed and
changed. So, again, because the simplicity
of those who are baptized ought to be not
in appearance but in reality, and the Lord
says : " Be ye wise as serpents and simple
as doves."' Rightly, then, did He descend
like a dove, in order to admonish us that we
ought to have the simplicity of the dove.
And further we read of the likeness being
put for the reality, both as regards Christ :
" And was found in likeness as a man ; " ^
and as regards God the Father : " Nor have
ye seen His likeness. "^
CHAPTER V.
Christ is Himself present in Baptism, so that we need
not consider the person of His ministers. A brief ex-
planation of the confession of the Trinity as usually
uttered by those about to be baptized.
26. Is there, then, here any room left for
doubt, when the Father clearly calls from
heaven in the Gospel narrative, and says :
"This is My beloved Son, in Whom lam
well pleased " ? 4 When the Son also speaks,
upon Whom the Holy Spirit showed Him-
self in the likeness of a dove .'' When the
Holy Spirit also speaks, Who came down in
the likeness of a dove.? When David, too,
speaks: "The voice of the Lord is above
the waters, the God of glory thundered, the
Lord above many waters " ? 5 When Scrip-
ture testifies that at the prayer of Jerubbaal,
fire came down from heaven,^ and again,
when Elijah prayed, fire was sent forth and
consecrated the sacrifice. 7
27. Do not consider the merits of indivi-
duals, but the office of the priests. Or, if you
look at the merits, consider the priest as
Elijah. Look upon the merits of Peter also,
or of Paul, who handed down to us this mys-
tery which they had received of the Lord
jesus. To those [of old] a visible fire was
"sent that they might believe ; for us who be-
lieve, the Lord works invisibly; for them that
happened for a figure, for us for warning.
Believe, then, thatthe Lord Jesus is present
at the invocation of the priest, Who said :
"Where two or three are, there am I also. "^
' S. Matt. X. 16.
♦ S. Matt. iii. 17.
' I (3I Kings xviii. 38.
» Phil, ii. 8.
* Ps. xxix. [xxviii.] 3.
* S. Matt, xviii. 20.
^ S. John V. 37.
" Judg. vi. 21.
ON THE MYSTERIES.
321
How much where the Church is, and where
His Mysteries are, does He vouchsafe to
impart His presence !
28. You went down, then (into the water),
remember what you replied to tlie questions,
that you believe in the Fatlier, that you be-
lieve in the Son, that you believe in the
Holy Spirit. The statement there is not : I
believe in a greater and in a less and in a
lowest person, but you are bound by the
same guarantee of your own voice, to be-
Heve in the Son in like manner as you be-
lieve in the Father ; and to believe in the
Holy Spirit in like manner as you believe in
the Son, with this one exception, that you
confess that you must believe in the cross
of the Lord Jesus alone.
CHAPTER VI.
Why they who come forth from the laver of baptism
are anointed on the head ; why, too, after baptism,
their feet are washed, and what sins are remitted in
each case.
29. After this, you went up to the priest,
consider what followed. Was it not that of
which David speaks: "Like the ointment
upon the head, which went down to the
beard, even Aaron's beard " ? ' This is the
ointment of which Solomon, too, says :
" Thy Name is ointment poured out, there-
fore have the maidens loved Thee and
drawn Thee. "^ How many souls regene-
rated this day have loved Thee, Lord Jesus,
and have said : "Draw us after Thee, we
are running after the odour of Thy gar-
ments, "3 that they might drink in the odour
of Thy resurrection.
30. Consider now why this is done, for
" the eyes of a wise man are in his head ;"4
therefore the ointment flows down to the
beard, that is to say, to the beauty of youth ;
and therefore, Aaron's beard, that we, too,
may become a chosen race, priestly and
precious, for we are all anointed with spiri-
tual grace for a share in the kingdom of God
and in the priesthood.
31. You went up from the font ; remem-
ber the Gospel lesson. For our Lord Jesus
Christ in the Gospel washed the feet of His
disciples. When He came to Simon Peter,
Peter said: "Thou shalt never wash my
feet." 5 He did not perceive the mystery,
and therefore he refused the service, for he
thought that the humility of the servant
would be injured, if he patiently allowed the
* Ps. cxxxiii. fcxxxii.J 2.
' Cant. i. 3.
■* Eccles. U. 14.
- Cant. i. 2.
° S. John xiii. 8.
Lord to minister to him. And the Lord an-
swered him : " If I wash not thy feet, thou
wilt have no part with Me." Peter, hearing
this, replies: " Lord, not my feet only, but
also my hands and my head." The Lord
answered : "He that is washed needeth not
save to wash his feet but is clean every
whit. " ■
32. Peter was clean, but he must wash
his feet, for he had sin by succession from
the first man, when the serpent overthrew
him and persuaded him to sin. His feet
were therefore washed, that hereditary sins
might be done away, for our own sins are
remitted through baptism.
$^. Observe at the same time that the
mystery consists in Ihc very office of humi-
lity, for Christ says: "If I, your Lord and
Master, have washed your feet ; how much
more ought you to wash one another's feet."
For, since the Author of Salvation Himself
redeemed us through His obedience, how
much more ought we His servants to offer
the service of our humility and obedience.
CHAPTER VIL
The washing away of sins is indicated by the white
robes of the catechumens, whence the Church
speaks of herself as black and comely. Angels
marvel at her brightness as at that of the flesh of
the Lord. Moreover, Christ Himself commended
His beauty to His Spouse under many figures. The
mutual affection of the one for the other is described.
34. After this white robes were given to
you as a sign that you were putting off the
covering of sins, and putting on the chaste
veil of innocence, of which the prophet
said : " Thou shalt sprinkle me with hyssop
and I shall be cleansed. Thou shalt wash
me and I shall be made whiter than snow."^
For he who is baptized is seen to be purified
both according to the Law and according to
the Gospel : according to the Law, because
Moses sprinkled the blood of the lamb with
a bunch of hyssop ; ^ according to the Gos-
pel, because Christ's garments were white
as snow, when in the Gospel He showed
forth the glory of His Resurrection. He,
then, whose guilt is remitted is made whiter
than snow. .So that God said by Isaiah :
"Though your sins be as scarlet, I will
make them white as snow." 4
35. The Church, "having put on these gar-
ments through the laver of regeneration,
says in the Song of Songs : "I am black
1 S. John xiii. 9, lo,
* Ex. xii. 22.
2 Ps. li. [1.] 9.
♦ Isa. i. 18.
322
ST. AMBROSE.
and comely, O daughters of Jerusalem." '
Black through the frailty of her human con-
dition, comely through the sacrament of
faith. And the daughters of Jerusalem be-
holding these garments say in amazement :
" Who is this that cometh up made white ? " ^
She was black, how is she now suddenly
made white ?
36. The angels, too, were in doubt when
Christ arose ; the powers of heaven were in
doubt when they saw that flesh was ascend-
ing into heaven. Then they said : " Who is
this King of glory ? " And whilst some said :
" Lift up your gates, O princes, and be ye
lift up, ye everlasting doors, and the King
of glory shall come in." ^ In Isaiah, too, we
find that the powers of heaven doubted and
said : ' ' Who is this that cometh up from
■ Edom, the redness of His garments is from
Bosor, He who is glorious in white ap-
parel .'' " 4
37. But Christ, beholding His Church, for
whom He Himself, as you find in the book
of the prophet Zechariah, had put on filthy
garments, now clothed in white raiment,
seeing, that is, a soul pure and washed in
the laver of regeneration, says: "Behold,
thou art fair, i\Iy love, behold thou art fair,
thy eyes are like a dove's, "^ in the like-
ness of which the Holy Spirit descended
from heaven. The eyes are beautiful like
those of a dove, because in the likeness
of a dove the Holy Spirit descended from
heaven.
38. And farther on : "Thy teeth are like
a flock of sheep that are shorn, which are
come up from the pool, wdiich all bear
twins, and none is barren among them,
thy lips are as a cord of scarlet." ^ This is
no slight praise. First by the pleasing
comparison to those that are shorn ; for we
know that goats both feed in high places
without risk, and securely find their food in
rugged places, and then when shorn are
freed from what is superfluous. The Church
is likened to a flock of these, having in
itself the many virtues of those souls which
through the laver lay aside the superfluity
of sins, and offer to Christ the mystic faith
and the grace of good living, which speak
of the cross of the Lord Jesus.
39. The Church is beautiful in them. So
that God the Word says to her : "Thou art
all fair, My love, and there is no blemish in
thee," for guilt has been washed away.
"Come hither from Lebanon, My spouse,
come hither from Lebanon, from the begin-
ning of faith wilt thou pass through and
pass on," ' because, renouncing the world,
she passed through things temporal and
passed on to Christ. And again, God the
Word says to her: "How beautiful and
sweet art thou made, O love, in thy de-
lights ! Thy stature is become like that of
a palm-tree, and thy breasts like bunches of
grapes.
^ Cant. i. 4.
* Isa. Ixiii. 1.
- Cant. viii. 5.
" Cant. iv. i.
^ Ps. xxiv. [xxiii.] 8, 9.
" Cant. iv. 2, 3.
40. And the Church answers Him, "Who
will give Thee to me, my Brother, that
didst suck the breasts of my mother ? If I
find Thee without, I will kiss Thee, and in-
deed they will not despise me. I will take
Thee, and bring Thee into the house of my
mother ; and into the secret chamber of her
that conceived me. Thoushalt teach me. "^
You see how, delighted with the gifts of
grace, she longs to attain to the innermost
mysteries, and to consecrate all her affections
to Christ. She still seeks, she still stirs up
His love, and asks of the daughters of
Jerusalem to stir it up for her, and desires
that by their beauty, which is that of faithful
souls, her spouse may be incited to ever
richer love for her.
41. So that the Lord Jesus Himself, invited
by such eager love and by the beauty of
comeliness and grace, since now no offences
pollute the baptized, says to the Church :
"Place Me as a seal upon thy heart, as a
signet upon thine arm ;"* that is, thou art
comely. My beloved, thou art all fair,
nothing is wanting to thee. Place Me as a
seal upon thine heart, that thy faith may
shine forth in the fulness of the sacrament.
Let thy works also shine and set forth- the
image of God in the Whose image thou
w^ast made. Let no persecution lessen thy
love, which many waters- cannot quench,
nor many rivers drown.
42. And then remember that you received
the seal of the Spirit ; the spirit of wisdom
and understanding, the spirit of counsel and
strength, the spirit of knowledge and god-
liness, and the spirit of holy fear,5 and pre-
served what you received. God the Father
sealed you, Christ the Lord strengthened
you, and gave the earnest of the Spirit in
your heart, ^ as you have learned in the
lesson from the Apostle. 7
' Cant. iv. 7, 8. - Cant. vii. 6, 7. ' Cant. viii. i, 2.
•* Cant. viii. 6. '' Isa. xi. 2. '' 2 Cor. v. 5.
' This passage evidently refers to confirmation, and to the seven
gifts of the Holy Spirit received therein. In the Early Church as in
the Eastern Church to the present day, confirmation was adminis-
tered immediately after baptism.
ON THE MYSTERIES.
Z2i
CHAPTER VIII.
Of the mystical feast of the altar of the Lord. Lest
any should think lightly of it, St. Ambrose shows
that it is of higher antiquity than the sacred rites of
the Jews, since it was foreshadowed in the sacrifice
of Melchisedech, and far better than the manna, as
being the Body of Christ.
43. The cleansed people, rich with these
adornments, hastens to the altar of Christ,
saying: "I will go to the altar of God, to
God Who maketh glad my youth ; " ' for
having laid aside the slough of ancient
error, renewed with an eagle's youth, it
hastens to approach that heavenly feast.
It comes, and seeing the holy altar arranged,
cries out : " Thou hast prepared a table in
my sight." David introduces the people
as speaking, where he says: "The Lord
feedeth me, and nothing shall be wanting to
me, in a place of good pasture hath He
placed me. He hath led me forth by the
water of refreshment. " And later: "For
thousfh I walk in the midst of the shadow
of death, I will fear no evils, for Thou art
with me. Thy rod and Thy staff have
comforted me. Thou hast prepared in my
sieht a table against them that trouble me.
Thou hast anointed my head with oil, and
Thy inebriating cup, how excellent it is ! " ^
44. We must now pay attention, lest per-
chance any one seeingthat what is visible (for
things which are invisible cannot be seen
nor comprehended by human eyes), should
say, "God rained down manna and rained
down quails upon the Jews, "^ but for the
Church beloved of Him the things which
He has prepared are those of which it is
said: "That eye hath not seen, nor ear
heard, neither hath it entered into the heart
of man, what things God hath prepared for
them that love Him. "■♦ So, lest any one
should say this, we will take great pains to
prove that the sacraments of the Church are
both more ancient than those of the syna-
gogue, and more excellent than the manna.
45. The lesson of Genesis just read shows
that they are more ancient, for the syna-
gogue took its origin from the law of Moses.
But Abraham was far earlier, who, after con-
quering the enemy, and recovering his own
nephew, as he was enjoying his victory,
was met by Melchisedech, who brought
forth those things which Abraham reverently
* Ps. xliii. [xliL] 4.
- Ps. xxiii. [xxii.l 1-5. After being baptized and confirmed in the
baptister)', which was detached from the church, the newly " en-
lightened " were led in solemn procession into the church to be
present at the celebration of the Mysteries, and to receive their first
communion.
Ex. xvi. 13.
■* I Cor. ii.
received. It was not Abraham who brought
them forth, but Melchisedech, who is in-
troduced without father, without mother,
having neither beginning of days, nor end-
ing, but like the Son of God, of Whom Paul
says to the Hebrews : "that He remaineth
a priest for ever," Who in the Latin version
is called King of righteousness and King
of peace.
46. Do you recognize Who that is } Can
a man be king of righteousness, when him-
self he can hardly be righteous.'' Can he
be king of peace, when he can hardly be
peaceable .? He it is Who is without
mother according to His Godhead, for He
was begotten of God the Father, of one
substance with the Father; without a father
according to His Incarnation, for He was
born of a Virgin ; having neither beginning
nor end, for He is the beginning and end
of all things, the first and the last. The
sacrament, then, which you received is the
gift not of man but of God, brought forth
by Him Who blessed Abraham the father
of faith, whose grace and deeds we admire.
47. We have proved the sacraments of
the Church to be the more ancient, now
recognize that they are superior. In very
truth it is a marvellous thing that God
rained manna on the fathers, and fed them
with daily food from heaven ; so that it is
said, "So man did eat angels' food."'
But yet all those who ate that food died in
the wilderness, but that food which you
receive, that living Bread which came down
from heaven, furnishes the substance of
eternal life ; and whosoever shall eat of this
Bread shall never die, and it is the Body of
Christ.
49. Now consider whether the bread of
angels be more excellent or the Flesh of
Christ, which is indeed the body of life.
That manna came from heaven, this is
above the heavens ; that was of heaven,
this is of the Lord of the heavens ; that was
liable to corruption, if kept a second day,
this is far from all corruption, for whosoever
shall taste it holily shall not be able to feel
corruption. For them water flowed from
the rock, for you Blood flowed from Christ ;
water satisfied them for a time, the Blood
satiates you for eternity. The Jew drinks
and thirsts again, you after drinking will be
beyond the power of thirsting ; that was in
a shadow, this is in truth.
49. If that which you so wonder at is
but shadow, how great must that be whose
very shadow you wonder at. See now
• Ps. Ixxxviii. [Ixxxvii.] 25.
324
ST. AMBROSE.
what happened in the case of the fathers
was shadow: "They drank, it is said, of
that Rock that followed them, and that
Rock was Christ. But with many of them
God was not well pleased, for they were
overthrown in the wilderness. Now these
things were done in a figure concerning
us. "' You recognize now which are the
more excellent, for light is better than
shadow, truth than a figure, the Body of its
Giver than the manna from heaven.
CHAPTER IX.
In order that no one through observing the outward
part should waver in faith, many instances are
brought forward wherein the outward nature has
been changed, and so it is proved that bread is made
the true body of Christ. The treatise then is
brought to a termination with certain remarks as to
the effects of the sacrament, the disposition of the
recipients, and such like.
50. Perhaps you will say, "I see some-
thing else, how is it that you assert that I
receive the Body of Christ ? '' And this is the
point which remains for us to prove. And
what evidence shall we make use of .-' Let
us prove that this is not what nature made,
but what the blessing consecrated, and the
power of blessing is greater than that of
nature, because by blessing nature itself is
changed.
51. Moses was holding a rod, he cast it
down and it became a serpent.^ Again,
he took hold of the tail of the serpent and
it returned to the nature of a rod. You see
that by virtue of the prophetic office there
were two changes, of the nature both of
the serpent and of the rod. The streams of
Egypt were running with a pure flow of
water ; of a sudden from the veins of the
sources blood began to burst forth, and
none could drink of the river. Again, at the
prophet's prayer the blood ceased, and the
nature of water returned. ^ The people of
the Hebrews were shut in on every side,
hemmed in on the one hand by the Egyp-
tians, on the other by the sea ; Moses lifted
up his rod, the water divided and hardened
like walls, and a way for the feet appeared
between the waves. 4 Jordan being turned
back, returned, contrary to nature, to the
source of its stream, s Is it not clear that
the nature of the waves of the sea and of
the river stream was changed.? The people
of the fathers thirsted, Moses touched the
rock, and water flowed out of the rock.''
' I Cor. X. 4.
* Ex. xiv. 21 ff.
- Ex. iv. 3, 4.
^ Josh. iii. 16.
* Ex. vii. 20 ff.
" Ex. xvii. 6.
Did not grace work a result contrary to
nature, so that the rock poured forth water,
which by nature it did not contain ? Marah
was a most bitter stream, so that the thirst-
ing people could not drink. Moses cast
wood into the water, and the water lost its
bitterness, which grace of a sudden tem-
pered.' In the time of Elisha the prophet
one of the sons of the prophets lost the
head from his axe, which sank. He who
had lost the iron asked Elisha, who cast in
a piece of wood and the iron swam. This,
too, we clearly recognize as having happened
contrary to nature, for iron is of heavier
nature than water.
52. We observe, then, that grace has more
power than nature, and yet so far we have
only spokeii of the grace of a prophet's bless-
ing. But if the blessing of man had such
power as to change nature, what are we to
say of that divine consecration where the
very words of the Lord and Saviour operate ?
For that sacrament which you receive is
made what it is by the word of Christ. But
if the word of Elijah had such power as to
bring down fire from heaven, shall not the
word of Christ have power to change the
nature of the elements.' You read concern-
ing the making of the whole world : '" He
spake and they were made, He commanded
and they were created." ^ Shall not the
word of Christ, which was able to make out
of nothing that which was not, be able to
change things which already are into what
they were not ? For it is not less to give a
new nature to things than to change them.
53. But why make use of arguments ?
Let us use the examples He gives, and by
the example of the Incarnation prove the
truth of the mystery. Did the course of
nature proceed as usual when the Lord Jesus
was born of Mary.-* If we look to the usual
course, a woman ordinarily conceives after
connection with a man. And this body
which we make is that which was born of
the Virgin. Why do you seek the order of
nature in the Body of Christ, seeing that the
Lord Jesus Himself was born of a Virgin,
not according to nature ? It is the true
Flesh of Christ which crucified and buried,
this is then truly the Sacrament of His
Body.
54. The Lord Jesus Himself proclaims :
"This is My Body." 3 Before the blessing
of the heavenly words another nature is
spoken of. after the consecration the Body
is signified. He Himself speaks of His Blood.
Before the consecration it has another name.
I
' Ex. XV. 25,
» jPs. iii. 5.
3 S. Matt. xxvi. 26.
ON THE MYSTERIES.
325
after it is called Blood. And you say, Amen,
that is, It is true. Let the heart within con-
fess what the mouth utters, let the soul feel
what the voice speaks.
55. Christ, then, feeds His Church with
these sacraments, by means of which the
substance of the soul is strengthened, and
seeing the continual progress of her grace,
He rightly says to her : "How comely are
thy breasts, my sister, m'y spouse, how
comely they are made by wine, and the
smell of thy garments is above all spices.
A dropping honeycomb are thy lips, my
spouse, honey and milk are under thy
tongue, and the smell of thy garments is as
the smell of Lebanon. A garden enclosed
is my sister, my spouse, a garden enclosed,
a fountain sealed." ' By which He signifies
that the mystery ought to remain sealed up
with you, that it be not violated by the
deeds of an evil life, and pollution of chas-
tity, that it be not made known to thou, for
whom it is not fitting, nor by garrulous
talkativeness it be spread abroad amongst
unbelievers. Your guardianship of the faith
ought therefore to be good, that integrity of
life and silence may endure unblemished.
56. For which reason, too, the Church,
guarding the depth of the heavenly mys-
teries, rei)els the furious storms of wind, and
calls to her the sweetness of the grace of
spring, and knowing that her garden cannot
displease Christ, invites the Bridegroom,
saying: "Arise, O north wind, and come,
thou south ; blow upon my garden, and let
my ointments flow down. Let my Brother
come down to His garden, and eat .the fruit
of His trees. " ^ For it has good trees and
fruitful, which have dipped their roots in the
water of the sacred spring, and with fresh
growth have shot forth into good fruits, so
as now not to be cut with the axe of the pro-
phet, but to abound with the fruitfulness of
the Gospel.
57. Lastly, the Lord also, delighted with
their fertility, answers : " I have entered
into ]\Iy garden, My sister, My spouse ;
I have gathered My myrrh with My spices,
I have eaten My meat with My honey, I
have drunk My drink with ]\Iy milk. "^ Un-
* Cant. iv. 10 ff .
' Cant. iv. 15 ; v. i.
^ Cant. V. I.
derstand, you faithful, why He spoke of
meat and drink. And there is no doubt that
He Himself eats and drinks in us, as you
have read that He says that in our persons
He is in prison. '
58. Wherefore, too, the Church, behold-
ing so great grace, exhorts her sons and her
friends to come together to the sacraments,
saying: "Eat, my friends, and drink and
be inebriated, my brother."^ What we eat
and what we drink the Holy Spirit has else-
where made plain by the prophet, saying,
"Taste and see that the Lord is good, bless-
ed is the man that hopeth in Him. "3 In
that sacrament is Christ, because it is the
Body of Christ, it is therefore not bodily food
but spiritual. Whence the Apostle says of
its type: "Our fathers ate spiritual food
and drank spiritual drink," 4 for the Body of'
God is a spiritual body ; the Body of Christ
is the Body of the Divine Spirit, for the Spirit
is Christ, as we read: "The Spirit before
our face is Christ the Lord. ''s And in the
Epistle of Peter we read : "Christ died for
us."^ Lastly, that food strengthens our
heart, and that drink " maketh glad the
heart of man, " ^ as the prophet has recorded.
59. So, then, having obtained everything,
let us know that we are born again, but let us
not say, How are we born again .'' Have
we entered a second time into our mother's
womb and been born again ? I do not
recognize here the course of nature. But
here there is no order of nature, where is the
excellence of grace. And again, it is not
always the course of nature which brings
about conception, for we confess that Christ
the Lord was conceived of a Virgin, and re-
ject the order of nature. For Mary con-
ceived not of man, but was with child of
the Holy Spirit, as INIatthew says : " She
was found with child of the Holy Spirit.'"^
If, then, the Holy Spirit coming down upon
the Virgin wrought the conception, and
effected the work of generation, surely we
must not doubt but that, coming down upon
the Font, or upon those who receive Bap-
tism, He effects the reality of the new birth.
• S. Matt. XXV. 36.
* I Cor. X. 3.
" Ps. civ. [ciii.] 15.
* Cant. v. I.
^ Lam. iv. 20.
8 S. Matt. i. 18.
^ Ps. xxxiv. [xxxiii.] 9.
^ 1 Pet. ii. 21.
m
TWO BOOKS CONCERNING REPENTANCE.
INTRODUCTION.
These two books were written against the Novatian heresy, which took its name, and to a
considerable extent its form, from Novatus, a priest of the Church of Carthage,, and Novatian,
schismatically consecrated bishop at Rome. It was the outcome of a struggle which had
long existed in the Church upon the question of the restitution to Church privileges of
those who had fallen into grievous sin, and the possibility of their repentance.
The severest ground was taken by the Novatians, who were condemned successively
by many councils, which maintained the power of the Church to admit those guilty of
any sin whatsoever to repentance, and prescribed various rules and penalties applicable
to different cases. The heresy, however, lasted for some time, becoming weaker in
the fifth century, and gradually fading away as a separate body with a distinctive name.
" Novatianism, in the tests which it used, its efforts after a perfectly pure communion, its
crotchetty interpretations of Scripture, and many other features, presents a striking parallel
to many modern sects." [See Dict.Chr. Biog., Blunt, Sects and heresies, Ceillier, II. 427, etc.]
St. Ambrose, in writing against the Novatians, seems to have had some recent publi-
cation of theirs in his mind, which is now unknown. He begins by commending gentle-
ness, a quality singularly wanting in the sect ; speaks of the power committed to the
Church of forgiving the greatest sins, and points out how God is more inclined to mercy
than to severity, and refutes the arguments of the Novatians based on certain passages of
holy Scripture. In the second book, after urging the necessity of careful and speedy
repentance, and the necessity of confessing one's sins, St. Ambrose meets the Novatian
arguments based on Heb. vi. 4-6, from which they inferred the impossibility of restora-
tion ; and on St. Matt. xii. 31, 32, our Lord's words concerning sin against the Holy
Spirit.
As regards the date of this treatise, it must have been somewhat before the exposition
of Ps. xxxvii., which refers to it, but there is nothing else which can be taken as a certain
guide. Possibly the Benedictine Editors are right in assigning it to about a. d. 384.
Some few persons, probably on doctrinal grounds, have been led to question the author-
ship of this treatise, but it is quoted by St. Augustine, and there has never been any real
doubt on the subject.
327
TWO BOOKS OF ST. AMBROSE, BISHOP OF MILAN,
CONCERNING REPENTANCE.
BOOK I.
CHAPTER I.
St. Ambrose writes in praise of gentleness, pointing
out how needful that grace is for the rulers of the
Church, and commended to them by the meekness of
Christ. As the Novatians have fallen away from this,
they cannot be considered disciples of Christ. Their
pride and harshness are inveighed against.
1. If the highest end of virtue is that
which aims at the advancement of most,
gentleness is the most lovely of all, which
does not hurt even those whom it condemns,
and usually renders those whom it con-
demns worthy of absolution. Moreover, it
is the only virtue which has led to the in-
crease of the Church which the Lord sought
at the price of His own Blood, imitating
the lovingkindness of heaven, and aiming
at the redemption of all, seeks this end with
a gentleness which the ears of men can en-
dure, in presence of which their hearts do
not sink, nor their spirits quail.
2. For he who endeavours to amend the
faults of human weakness ought to bear
this very weakness on his own shoulders,
let it weigh upon himself, not cast it off.
For we read that the Shepherd in the Gospel '
carried the weary sheep, and did not cast it
off. And Solomon says : " Be not overmuch
righteous ; " ^ for restraint should temper
righteousness. For how shall he offer him-
self to you for healing whom you despise,
who thinks that he will be an object of con-
tempt, not of compassion, to his physician ?
3. Therefore had the Lord Jesus compas-
sion upon us in order to call us to Himself,
not frighten us away. He came in meek-
ness. He came in humility, and so He said:
" Come unto Me, all ye that labour and are
heavy laden, and I will refresh you."' So,
then, the Lord Jesus refreshes, and does not
shut out nor cast off, and fitly chose such
disciples as should be interpreters of the
Lord's will, as should gather together and
not drive away the people of God. Whence
it is clear that they are not to be counted
amongst the disciples of Christ, who think
that harsh and proud opinions should be
followed rather than such as are gentle and
meek ; persons who, while they themselves
seek God's mercy, deny it to others, such as
are the teachers of the Novatians, who call
themselves pure. ^
4. What can show more pride than this,
since the Scripture says : "No One is free
from sin, not even an infant of a day old ; " 3
and David cries out : " Cleanse me from my
sin. "4 Are they more holy than David, of
whose family Christ vouchsafed to be born
in the mystery of the Incarnation, whose
descendant is that heavenly Hall which re-
ceived the world's Redeemer in her virgin
womb? For what is more harsh than to in-
flict a penance which they do not relax, and
by refusing pardon to take away the incen-
tive to penance and repentance .? s Now no
one can repent to good purpose unless he
hopes for mercy.
CHAPTER II.
The assertion of the Novatians that they refuse com-
munion only to the lapsed agrees neither with the
teaching of holy Scripture nor with their own. And
whereas they allege as a pretext their reverence for
S. Luke XV. 5.
* Eccles. vii. 17.
* S. Matt. xi. 28.
^ In order to distinguish themselves from Catholics the Nova-
tians assumed the name xadapoi, " pure."
^ Job xiv. 4 [LXX. looselyj. * Ps. li. [1 ] 2
» It is necessary to vary the translation of the word f^nitentia in
this place, as it bears the meaning both of " penance," the temporal
punishment inflicted on the sinner, and also of " repentance."
330
ST. AMBROSE.
the divine power, they really are contemning it, inas-
much as it is a sign of low estimation not to use the
whole of a power entrusted to one. But the Church
rightly claims the power of binding and loosing,
which heretics have not, inasmuch as she has re-
ceived it from the Holy Spirit, against Whom they
act presumptuously.
5. But they say that those should not be
restored to communion who have fallen
into denial ' of the faith. If they made
the crime of sacrilege the only excep-
tion to receiving forgiveness, they would be
acting harshly indeed, and, as it would seem,
would be in opposition to the divine utter-
ances only, while consistent with their own
assertions. For when the Lord forgave all
sins. He made an exception of none. But
since, as it were after the fashion of the
Stoics, they think that all sins are equal in
gravity, and assert that he who has stolen a
common fowl, as they say, no less than he
who has smothered his father, should be for
ever excluded from the divine mysteries,
how can they select those guilty of one
special offence, since even they themselves
cannot deny that it is most unjust that the
penalty of one should extend to many .f" ^
6. They affirm that they are showing
great reverence for God, to Whom alone they
reserve the power of forgiving sins. But in
truth none do Him greater injury than they
who choose to prune His commandments,
and reject the office entrusted to them. For
inasmuch as the Lord Jesus Himself said in
the Gospel: "Receive ye the Holy Spirit :
whosesoever sins ye forgive they are forgiven
unto them, and whosesoever sins ye retain,
they are retained," ^ who is it that honours
Him most, he who obeys His bidding or he
who rejects it .^
7. The Church holds fast its obedience on
either side, by both retaining and remitting
sin ; heresy is on the one side cruel, and on
the other disobedient ; wishes to bind what
it will not loosen, and will not loosen what
it has bound, whereby it condemns itself by
its own sentence. For the Lord willed that
the power of binding and of loosing should
be alike, and sanctioned each by a similar
condition. So he who has not the power to
loose has not the power to bind. For as,
according to the Lord's word, he who has
the power to bind has also the power to
loose, their teaching destroys itself, inas-
much as they who deny that they have the
power of loosing ought also to deny that of
' PrcEvaricatio.
'■' i.e. the penalty of the one sin of denying the faith should be ex-
tended to all sins.
■* S. John XX. 22, 23.
binding. For how can the one be allowed
and the other disallowed.? It is plain and
evident that either each is allowed or each is
disallowed in the case of those to whom each
has been given. Each is allowed to the
Church, neither to heresy, for this power has
been entrusted to priests alone. Rightly,
therefore, does the Church claim it, which
has true priests ; heresy, which has not the
priests of God, ■ cannot claim it. And by not
claiming this power heresy pronounces its
own sentence, that not possessing priests it
cannot claim priestly power. And so in
their shameless obstinacy a shamefaced ac-
knowledgment meets our view.
8. Consider, too, the point that he who
has received the Holy Ghost has also re-
ceived the power of forgiving and of retain-
ing sin. For thus it is written: "Receive
the Holy Spirit : whosesoever sins ye forgive,
they are forgiven unto them, and whosesoever
sins ye retain, they are retained. " ^ So, then,
he who has not received power to forgive
sins has not received the Holy Spirit. The
office of the priest is a gift of the Holy Spirit,
and His right it is specially to forgive and to
retain sins. How, then, can they claim His
gift who distrust His power and His right.?
9. And what is to be said of their excessive
arrogance .? For although the Spirit of God
is more inclined to mercy than to severity,
their will is opposed to that which He wills,
and they do that which He wills not ; where-
as it is the office of a judge to punish, but of
mercy to forgive. It would be more endur-
able, Novatian, that thou shouldst forgive
than that thou shouldst bind. In the one
case thou wouldst assume the right as one
who rarely offended ; in the other thou
wouldst forgive as one who had fellow-
feeling with the misery of sin.
CHAPTER in.
To the argument of the Novatians, that they only deny
forgiveness in the case of greater sins, St. Ambrose
replies, that this is also an offence against God, Who
gave the power to forgive all sins, but that of course
a more severe penance must follow in case of graver
sins. He points out hkewise that this distinction as
to the gravity of sins assigns, as it were, severity to
God, Whose mercy in the Incarnation is overlooked
by the Novatians.
ID. But they say that, with the exception
of graver sins, they grant forgiveness to
those of less weight. This is not the teach-
1 This is not a denial of the validity of Novatian ordinations, which
were admitted by the 8th Canon of the Council of Nica;a, but of their
lawful jurisdiction.
' S. John XX. 22, 23.
CONCERNING REPENTANCE, BOOK I.
331
ing of your father, Novatian, who thought
that no one should be admitted to penance,
considering that what he was unable to loose
he would not bind, ' lest by binding he should
inspire the hope that he would loose. So that
your father is condemned by your own sen-
tence, you who make a distinction between
sins, some of which you consider that you
can loose, and others which you consider to
be without remedy. But God does not make
a distinction. Who has promised His mercy
to all, and granted to His priests the power
of loosing without any exception. But he
who has heaped up sin must also increase
his penitence. For greater sins are washed
away by greater weeping. So neither is
Novatian justified, who excluded all from
pardon ; nor are you, who imitate and, at the
same time, condemn him, for you diminish
zeal for penance where it ought to be in-
creased, since the mercy of Christ has taught
us that graver sins must be made good by
greater efforts.
11. And what perversity it is to claim for
yourselves what can be forgiven, and, as
you say, to reserve to God what cannot be
forgiven. This would be to reserve to one-
self the cases for mercy, to God those for
severity. And what as to that saying :
" Let God be true but every man a liar, as it
is written. That Thou mightest be justified
in Thy words, and overcome when Thou art
judged "' ? ^ In order, then, that we may re-
cognize that the God of mercy is rather prone
to indulgence than to severity, it is said :
"I desire mercy rather than sacrifice. "3
How, then, can your sacrifice, who refuse
mercy, be acceptable to God, since He says
that He wills not the death of a sinner, but
his correction ? 4
12. Interpreting which truth, the Apostle
says : "For God, sending His own Son in
the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin con-
demned sin in the flesh, that the righteous-
ness of the Law might be fulfilled in us. "5
He does not say " in the likeness of flesh,"
for Christ took on Himself the reality not the
likeness of flesh ; nor does He say in the like-
ness of sin, for He did no sin, but was made
sin for us. Yet He came ' ' in the likeness of
sinful flesh;" that is, He took on Him the
likeness of sinful flesh, the likeness, because
it is written : "He is man, and who shall
know Him.?"^ He was man in the flesh,
according to His human nature, that He
might be recognized, but in power was above
' Binding and loosing here refer rather to the infliction of open
penance, the outward sign of repentance, than to absolution.
' Rom iii. 4. ^Hosea vi. 6. ^ Ezek. xviii. 2
^ Rom. viii. 3, 4. ^ Jerem. xvdi. 9 [LXX.].
32-
man, that He might not be recognized, so
He has our flesh, but has not the failings of
this flesh.
13. For He was not begotten, as is every
man, by intercourse between male and
female, but born of the Holy Spirit and of
the Virgin ; He received a stainless body,
which not only no sins polluted, but which
neither the generation nor the conception
had been stained by any admixture of defile-
ment. For we men are all born under
sin, and our very origin is in evil, as we
read in the words of David : "For lo, I was
conceived in wickedness, and in sin did my
mother bring me forth."' Therefore the
flesh of Paul was a body of death, as he him-
self says : "Who shall deliver me from the
body of this death .? " ^ But the flesh of Christ
condemned sin, which He felt not at His
birth, and crucified by His death, so that in
our flesh there might be justification through
grace, in which before there had been pol-
lution by guilt.
14- What, then, shall we say to this, except
that which the Apostle said : "If God is for
us, who is against us ? He who spared not
His own Son, but gave Him up for us all,
how has He not with Him also given us all
things .? Who shall lay a charge against the
elect } It is God Who justifieth, who is he
that shall condemn .? It is Christ Who died,
yea, Who also rose again, Who is at the right
hand of God, Who also maketh interces-
sion for us. " 3 Novatian then brings charges
against those for whom Christ intercedes.
Those whom Christ has redeemed unto salva-
tion Novatian condemns to death. Those to
whom Christ says : "Take My yoke upon
you, and learn of Me, for I am gentle,"*
Novatian says, I am not gentle. On those
to whom Christ says : "Ye shall find rest for
your souls, for My yoke is pleasant and ]\Iy
burden is light, "s Novatian lays a heavy
burden and a hard yoke.
CHAPTER IV.
St. Ambrose proceeds with the proof of the divine
mercy, and shows by the testimony of the Gospels
that it prevails over severity, and he adduces the in-
stance of athletes to show that of those who have
denied Christ before men, all are not to be esteemed
alike.
15. Although what has been said suf-
ficiently shows how inclined the Lord Jesus
is to mercy, let Him further instruct us with
His own words, when He would arm us
against the assaults of persecution. " Fear
' Ps. li. [1.1 5.
* S. Matt. xi. 29.
^ Rom. vii. 24.
° S. Matt. xi. 30.
Rom. viii. 31-35.
332
ST. AMBROSE.
not," He says, " those who kill the body,
but cannot kill the soul, but rather fear Him
Who can cast both body and soul into
hell. " ' And farther on : " Every one, there-
fore, who shall confess Me before men, him
will I also confess before My Father, Who is
in heaven, but he who shall deny Me before
men, him will I also deny before My Father,
Who is in heaven." ^
1 6. Where He says that He will confess.
He will confess " every one."^ Where He
speaks of denying-, He does not speak of
denying "everyone." For, whereas in the
former clause He says, "Every one who
shall confess Me, him will I confess," we
should expect that in the following clause
He would also say, "Every one who shall
deny Me." But in order that He might not
appear to deny every one. He concludes :
" But he who shall deny Me before men, him
will I also deny." He promises favour to
every one, but He does not threaten the
penalty to every one. He makes more of
that which is merciful. He makes less of
what is penal.
17. And this is written not only in that
book of the Gospel of the Lord Jesus, which
is written according to Matthew, but it is
also to be read in that which we have ac-
cording to Luke, 4 that we might know that
neither had thus related the saying by
chance.
18. We have said that it is thus written.
Let us now consider the meaning-. "Every
one," He says, "who shall confess Me,"
that is to say, of whatever age, of whatever
condition he may be, who shall confess Me,
he shall have Me as the Rewarder of his con-
fession. Whereas the e-xpression is, "every
one," no one who shall confess is excluded
from the reward. But it is not said in like
manner, "Every one who shall deny shall
be denied," for it is possible that a man
overcome by torture may deny God in word,
and yet worship Him in his heart.
19. Is the case the same with him who
denies voluntarily, and with him whom tor-
ture, not his own will, has led to denial ?
How unfit were it, since with men credit is
given for endurance in a struggle, that one
should assert that it had no value with God !
For often in this world's athletic contests the
public crown together with the victors even
the vanquished whose conduct has been ap-
proved, especially if perchance they have
seen that they lost the victo-ry by some trick
or fraud. And shall Christ suffer His athletes,
1 S. Matt. X. 28.
' Omnis,
* S. Matt. X. 32, 33.
* S. Luke xii. 8, 9.
whom He has seen to yield for a moment to
severe torments, to remain without forgive-
ness .?
20. .Shall not He take account of their toil.
Who will not cast off for ever even those
whom He casts off.? For David says :
"God will not cast off for ever,"' and in
opposition to this shall we listen to heresy
asserting, "He does cast off for ever"?
David says : "God will not for ever cut off
His mercy from generation to generation,
nor will He forget to be merciful. '^ This is
the prophet's declaration, and there are those
who would maintain a forgetfulness of mercy
on God's part.
CHAPTER V.
The objection from the unchangeableness of God is
answered from several passages of Scripture, where-
in God promises forgiveness to sinners on their re-
pentance. St. Ambrose also shows that mercy will
be more readily accorded to such as have sinned, as
it were, against their will, which he illustrates by the
case of prisoners taken in war, and by language put
into the mouth of the devil.
2 1. But they say that they make these
assertions in order not to seem to make God
liable to change, as He would be if He for-
gave those with whom He was angry. What
then ? Shall we reject the utterances of God
and follow their opinions } But God is not
to be judged by the statements of others,
but by His own words. What mark of
His mercy have we more ready at hand
than that He Himself, through the prophet
Hosea, is at once merciful as though recon-
ciled to those whom in His anger He had
threatened.? For He says: " O Ephraim,
what shall I do unto thee, or what shall I do
unto thee, O Judah.? Your kindness," etc. 3
And further on: "How shall I establish
thee.? I will make thee as Admah. and as
Zeboim."4 In the midst of His indignation
He hesitates, as it were, with fatherly love,
doubting how He can give over the wanderer
to punishment ; for although the Jew de-
serves it, God yet takes counsel with Him-
self. For immediately after having said,
' ' I will make thee as Admah and as Zeboim, "
which cities, owing to their nearness to
Sodom, suffered together in like destruction,
He adds, "My heart is turned against Me,
My compassion is aroused, I will not do ac-
cording to the fierceness of Mine anger." s
1 Ps. Ixxvii. [Ixxvi.] 7. In the Psalm this passage is a question
of the Psalmist in his bitter troubles, " Will God cast off?" St.
Ambrose, in arguing against Novatian, not only modifies the text,
but somewhat modifies its meaning.
2 Ps. Ixxvii. [lx.\vi.] 8, 9. ' Hos. vl. 4.
* Hos. xi. S. ^ Hos. xi. 8.
CONCERNING REPENTANCE, BOOK I.
333
22. Is it not evident that the Lord Jesus
is angry with us when we sin in order that
lie may convert us through fear of His in-
dignation ? His indignation, then, is not the
carrying out of vengeance, but rather the
working out of forgiveness, for these are
His words : "If thou shalt turn and lament,
thou shalt be saved."' He waits for our
lamentations here, that is, in lime, that He
may spare us those which shall be eternal.
He waits for our tears, that He may pour
forth His goodness. So in the Gospel,
having pity on the tears of the widow. He
raised her son. He waits for our conver-
sion, that He may Himself restore us to
grace, which would have continued with us
had no fall overtaken us. But He is angry
because we have by our sins incurred guilt,
in order that we may be humbled; we are
humbled, in order that we may be found
worthy rather of pity than of punishment.
23. Jeremiah, too, may certainly teach
when he says : " For the Lord will not cast
off for ever ; for after He has humbled, He
will have compassion according to the multi-
tude of His mercies, Who hath not humbled
from His whole heart nor cast off the children
of men."- This passage we certainly find
in the Lamentations of Jeremiah, and from
it, and from what follows, we note that the
Lord humbles all the prisoners of the earth
under His feet,^ in order that we may escape
His judgment. But He does not bring
down the sinner even to the earth with His
whole heart Who raises the poor even from
the dust and the needy from the dunghill.
For He brings not down with His whole
heart Who reserves the intention of forgiv-
mg.
24. But if He brings not down every
sinner with His whole heart, how much less
does He bring down him with His whole
heart who has not sinned with his whole
heart ! For as He said of the Jews : "This
people honoureth Me with their lips, but their
keart is far from Me,"^ so perhaps He
may say of some of the fallen : "They
denied Me with their lips, but in heart they
are with Me. It was pain which overcame
them, not unfaithfulness which turned them
aside." s But some without cause refuse
pardon to those whose faith the persecutor
himself confessed up to the point of striving
to overcome it by torture. They denied the
Lord once, but confess Him daily ; they
denied Him in word, but confess Him with
groans, with cries, and with tears ; they con-
1 Ps. XXX. 15 [LXX.].
* Isa. xxix. 13.
* Lam. iii. 31, 32.
5 S. Matt. XV. 8.
' Lam. iii. 34.
fess Him with willing words, not under
compulsion. They yielded, indeed, for a
moment to the temptation of the devil, but
even the devil afterwards departed from
those whom he was unable to claim as his
own. He yielded to their weeping, he
yielded to their repentance, and after mak-
ing them his own lost those whom he at-
tached when they belonged to Another.
25. Is not the case such as when any one
carries away captive the people of a con-
quered city ? The captive is led away, but
against his will. He must of necessity go
to foreign lands, does not willingly make
the journey ; he takes his' native land with
him in his heart, and seeks an opportunity
to return. What then ? When any such
return, does any one urge that they should
not be received; with less honour indeed, but
with readier will, that the enemy may have
nothing with which to reproach them ? If
you pardon an armed man who was able to
fight, do you not pardon him in whom faith
alone waged the battle ?
26. If we were to enquire what is the
opinion of the devil concerning those who
have fallen after this sort, would he not
probably reply : "This people honours me
with their lips, but their heart is far from
me .'' For how can he be with me who
does not depart from Christ ? Without any
cause do they appear to honour me who
keep the doctrine of Jesus, and I thought
that they would teach mine. They con-
demn me all the more when they forsake
me after trial. Indeed Jesus is more glori-
fied in these, when He receives them on
their return to Him. All the angels rejoice,
for in heaven there is greater joy over one
sinner that repents, than over ninety and
nine just persons who need not repentance.
I am triumphed over in heaven and on
earth. Christ loses nothing when they who
came to me with weeping return with long-
ing to the Church, and I am in danger even
as regards my own, who will leani that in
reality there is nothing here where men are
led on by present rewards, but that there
must be very much there where groans
and tears and fasts are preferred to my
feasts. "
CHAPTER VI.
The Novatians, by excluding such from the banquet of
Christ, imitate not indeed the good Samaritan, but
the proud lawyer, the priest, and the Levite who are
blamed in the Gospel, and are indeed worse than
these.
27. Do you then, 0 Novatian&, shut out
334
ST. AMBROSE.
these ? For what is it when you refuse the
hope of forgiveness but to shut out ? But
the Samaritan did not pass by the man who
had been left half dead by the robbers ; he
dressed his wounds with oil and wine, first
pouring in oil in order to comfort them ; he
set the wounded man on his own beast, on
which he bore all his sins ; nor did the
Shepherd despise His wandering sheep.
28. But you say : " Touch me not." You
who wish to justify yourselves say, " He is
not our neighbour," being more proud than
that lawyer who wished to tempt Christ, for
he said, " Who is my neighbour ? " He asked,
you deny, going on like that priest, like
that Levite passing by him whom you
ought to have taken and tended, and not
receiving- them into the inn for whom Christ
paid the twopence, whose neighbour Christ
bids you to become that you might show
mercy to him. For he is our neighbour
whom not only a similar condition has
joined, but whom mercy has bound to us.
You make yourself strange to him through
pride, in vain putting up yourself in your
carnal mind, and not holding the Head.'
For if you held the Head you would con-
sider that you must not forsake him for
whom Christ died. If you held the Head you
would consider that the whole body, by
joining together rather than by separating,
grows unto the increase of God ^ by the
bond of charity and the rescue of a sinner.
29. When, then, you take away all the fruits
of repentance, what do you say but this :
Let no one who is wounded enter our inn,
let no one be healed in our Church ? With
us the sick are not cared for, we are whole,
we have no need of a physician, for He
Himself says : "They that are whole need
not a physician, but they that are sick "
CHAPTER VH.
St. Ambrose, addressing Christ, complains of the
Novatians, and shows that they have no part with
Christ, Who wishes all men to be saved.
30. So, then, Lord Jesus, come wholly to
Thy Church, since Novatian makes excuse.
Novatian says, " I have bought a yoke of
oxen," and he puts not on the light yoke of
Christ, but lays upon his shoulders a heavy
burden which he is not able to bear. Novatian
held back Thy servants by whom he was in-
vited, treated them contemptuously and slew
them, polluting them with the stain of a reiter-
ated baptism. Send forth, therefore, into the
1 Col. ii. 18.
* Col. ii. 19.
highways, and gather together good and
bad,' bring the weak, the blind, and the
lame nito Thy Church. Command that Thy
house be filled, bring in all unto Thy supper,
for Thou wilt make him whom Thou shalt
call worthy, if he follow Thee. He indeed
is rejected who has not the wedding gar-
ment, that is, the vestment of charity, the
veil of grace. Send forth I pray Thee to all.
31. Thy Church does not excuse herself
from Thy supper, Novatian makes excuse.
Thy family says not, " I am whole, I need
not the physician,'' but it says : " Heal me,
0 Lord, and I shall be healed ; save me, and
1 shall be saved. "^ The likeness of Thy
Church is that woman who went behind and
touched the hem of Thy garment, saying
within herself : " If I do but touch His gar-
ment I shall be whole." ^ So the Church
confesses her wounds, but desires to be
healed.
32. And Thou indeed, O Lord, desirest
that all should be healed, but all do not wish
to be healed. Novatian wishes not, who
thinks that he is whole. Thou, O Lord,
sayest that Thou art sick, and feelest our in-
firmity in the least of us, saying : "I was
sick and ye visited Me. '^ Novatian does
not visit that least one in whom Thou de-
sirest to be visited. Thou saidst to Peter
when he excused himself from having his
feet washed by Thee : " If I wash not thy
feet, thou wilt have no part with Me. "5
What fellowship, then, can they have with
Thee, who receive not the keys of the king-
dom of heaven, saying that they ought not
to remit sins ?
^^. And this confession is indeed rightly
made by them, for they have not the suc-
cession of Peter, who hold not the chair of
Peter, which they rend by wucked schism ;
and this, too, they do, wickedly denying
that sins can be forgiven even in the Church,
whereas it was said to Peter: "I will give
unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven,
and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth
shall be bound also in heaven, and
whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth
shall be loosed also in heaven."^ And the
vessel of divine election himself said : "If
ye have forgiven anything to anyone, I for-
give also, for what I have forgiven I have
done it for your sakes in the person of
Christ. "7 Why, then, do they read Paul's
writings, if they think that he has erred so
wickedly as to claim for himself the right of
his Lord.'' But he claimed what he had re-
' .S. Luke xiv. 21.
* S. Matt. XXV. 36.
' 2 Cor. ii. 10.
^ Jerem. xvii. 14.
" S. John xiii. 8.
^ S. Matt. ix. 21.
" S. Matt. xvi. 19.
CONCERNING REPENTANCE, BOOK I.
335
ceived, he did not usurp that which was not
due to him.
CHAPTER VIII.
It was the Lord's will to confer great gifts on His dis-
ciples. Further, the Novatians confute themselves
by the practices of laying on of hands and of baptism,
since it is by the same power tiiat sins are remitted
in penance and in baptism. Their conduct is then
contrasted witli that of our Lord.
34. It is the will of the Lord that His dis-
ciples should possess great powers ; it is His
will that the same things which He did when
on earth should be done in His Name by His
servants. For He said : ' ' Ye shall do greater
things than these." ■ He gave them power
to raise the dead. And whereas He could
Himself have restored to Saul the use of his
sight, He nevertheless sent him to His dis-
ciple Ananias, that by his blessing Saul's
eyes might be restored, the sight of which he
had lost.- Peter also He bade walk with
Himself on the sea, and because he faltered
He blamed him for lessening the grace given
him by the weakness of his faith. ^ He Who
Himself was the light of the world granted
to His disciples to be the light of the world
through grace. •♦ And because He purposed
to descend from heaven and to ascend thither
-again, He took up Elijah into heaven to re-
store him again to earth at the time which
should please Him. And being baptized
with the Holy Spirit and with fire, He fore-
shadowed the Sacrament of Baptism at the
hands of John.s
35. And in fine He gave all gifts to His
disciples, of whom He said : " In My Name
they shalt cast out devils ; they shall speak
with new tongues ; they shall take up ser-
pents ; and if they shall drink any deadly
thing it shall not hurt them ; they shall lay
hands on the sick, and they shall do well. " ^
So, then. He gave them all things, but there
is no power of man exercised in these things,
in which the grace of the divine gift ope-
rates.
36. Why, then, do you lay on hands, and
believe it to be the effect of the blessing, if
perchance some sick person recovers ? Why
do you assume that any can be cleansed by
you from the pollution of the devil .' Why
do you baptize if sins cannot be remitted by
man .'' If baptism is certainly the remission
of all sins, what difference does it make
whether priests claim that this power is given
1 S. John xiv. 12 ; S. Matt. x. 8.
' S. Matt. xiv. 31.
^ S. Matt. iii. 11.
^ Acts ix. 17.
* S. Matt. V. 14.
* S. Mark xvi. 17,
to them in penance or at the font .'' In each
the mystery is one.
37. But you say that the grace of the
mysteries works in the font. What works,
then, in penance.'' Does not the Name of
God do the work .'' What then ? Do you,
when you choose, claim for yourselves the
grace of God, and when you choose reject
it.-* But this is a mark of insolent presump-
tion, not of holy fear, when those who wish
to do penance are despised by you. You
cannot, forsooth, endure the tears of the
weepers ; your eyes cannot bear the coarse
clothing, the filth of the squalid ; with proud
eyes and puffed-up hearts you delicate ones
say with angry tones, "Touch me not, for
I am pure."
38. The Lord said indeed to Marv Mag-
dalene, "Touch Me not,"' but He Who
was pure did not say, " because I am pure."
Do you, Novatian, dare to call yourself
pure, whilst, even if you were pure as re-
gards your acts, you would be made impure
by this saying alone.? Isaiah says: "O
wretched that I am, and pricked to the
heart ; for that being a man, and having
unclean lips, I dwell also in the midst of a
people having unclean lips," ^ and do you
say, " I am clean," when, as it is written,
not even an infant of a day old is pure ? ^
David says, " And cleanse me from my
sin, "4 whom for his tender heart the grace
of God often cleansed ; are you pure who
are so unrighteous as to have no tenderness,
as to see the mote in your brother's eye, but
not to consider the beam which is in your
own eve.' For with God no one who is
unjust is pure. And what is more unjust
than to desire to have your sins forgiven
you, and yet yourself to think that he who
entreats you ought not to be forgiven ?
What is more unjust than to justify your-
self in that wherein you condemn another,
whilst you yourself are committing worse
offences ?
39. Then, too, the Lord Jesus when about
to consecrates the forgiveness of our sins
replied to John, who said : "I ought to be
baptized of Thee, and comest Thou to me .''
Suffer it now, for thus it becometh us to
fulfil all righteousness."^ And the Lord in-
deed came to a sinner, though indeed He
had no sin, and desired to be baptized, hav-
ing no need of cleansing ; who, then, can
tolerate you, who think there is no need for
you to be cleansed by penance, because you
say you are cleansed by grace, as though
it were now impossible for you to sin ?
' S. John XX. 17.
* Ps. li. [1.] 2.
^ Isa. vi. 5.
^ Ce/eira/urus.
3 Job xiv. 4[LXX.].
* S. Matt. iii. 14, 15.
336
ST. AMBROSE.
CHAPTER IX.
By collating similar passages with i Sam. iii. 25, St.
Ambrose shows that the meaning is not that no one
shall intercede, but that the intercessor must be
worthy as were Moses and Jeremiah, at whose
prayers we read that God spared Israel.
40. But you say, It is written : " If a
man sin ag-ainst the Lord, who shall entreat
for him ? " ' First of all, as I already said
before, I might allow you to make that ob-
jection if you refused penance to those only
who denied the faith. But what difficulty
does that question produce .'' For it is not
written, "No one shall entreat for him;"
but, "Who shall entreat .? " that is to say, the
question is. Who in such a case can entreat .-'
The entreaty is not excluded.
41. Then you have in the fifteenth Psalm :
" Lord, who shall dwell in Thy tabernacle,
or who shall rest upon Thy holy hill .? " ^
It is not that no one, but that he who is ap-
proved shall dwell there, nor does it say
that no one shall rest, but he who is chosen
shall rest. And that you may know that
this is true, it is said not much later in the
twenty-fourth Psalm: "Who shall ascend
into the hill of the Lord, or who shall stand
in His holy place.' "3 The writer implies,
not any ordinary person, or one of the com-
mon sort, but only a man of excellent life
and of singular merit. And that we may
understand that when the question is asked,
Who .? it does not imply no one, but some
special one is meant, after having said :
" Who shall ascend into the hill of the Lord?"
the Psalmist adds: "He that hath clean
hands and a pure heart, who hath not lift up
his mind unto vanity. "* And elsewhere it
is said : " Who is wise and he shall under-
stand these things } " s And in the Gospel :
"Who is the faithful and wise steward,
whom the Lord shall set over His house-
hold to give them their measure of wheat
in due season ? " ^ And that we may under-
stand that He speaks of such as really exist,
the Lord added: "Blessed is that servant,
whom his Lord when He cometh shall find
so doing."? And I am of opinion that where
it is said, " Lord, who is like unto Thee ? " ^
it is not meant that none is like, for the Son
is the image of the Father.
42. We must then understand in the same
manner, "Who shall entreat for him.?"
as implying : It must be some one of ex-
cellent life who shall entreat for him who
1 I Sam. [i Kings] ii. 25. 2 Ps. xv. [xiv.] i.
* Ps. xxiv. [xxiii.] 3. ♦ Ps. xxiv. [xxiii.] 4. ^ Hos. xiv. 10.
* S. Luke xii. 4?, ' S. Luke xii. 43. » Ps. Ixxi. [Ixx.] 19.
has sinned against the Lord. The greater
the sin, the more worthy must be the prayers
that are sought. For it was not any one of
the common people who prayed for the
Jewish people, but INIoses, ' when forgetful
of their covenant they worshipped the head
of the calf Was Moses wrong .? Certainly
he was not wrong in praying, who both
merited and obtained that for which he
asked. For what should such love not
obtain as that of his when he offered
himself for the people and said: "And
now, if Thou wilt forgive their sin, forgive ;
but if not, blot me out of the book of life." ^
We see that he does not think of himself,
like a man full of fancies and scruples,
whether he may incur the risk of some
offence, as Novatian says he dreads that he
might, but rather, thinking of all and for-
getful of himself, he was not afraid lest he
should offend, so that he might rescue and
free the people from danger of offence.
43. Rightly, then, is it said : "Who shall
entreat for him .? " It implies that it must
be such an one as Moses to offer himself
for those who sin, or such as Jeremiah,
who, though the Lord said to him, "Pray
not thou for this people, "3 and yet he
prayed and obtained their forgiveness. For
at the intercession of the prophet, and the
entreaty of so great a seer, the Lord was
moved and said to Jerusalem, which had
meanwhile repented for its sins, and had
said : " O Almighty Lord God of Israel, the
soul in anguish, and the troubled spirit
crieth unto Thee, hear, O Lord, and have
mercy. "4 And the Lord bids them lay
aside the garments of mourning, and to
cease the groanings of repentance, saying :
"Put off, O Jerusalem, the garment of thy
mourning and affliction, and clothe thyself
in beauty, the glory which God hath given
thee for ever. " 5
CHAPTER X.
St. John did not absolutely forbid that prayer should
be made for those who "sin unto death," since he
knew that Moses, Jeremiah, and Stephen had so
prayed, and he himself implies that forgiveness is not
to be denied them.
44- Such intercessors, then, must be
sought for after very grievous sins, for if
any ordinary persons pray they are not
heard.
45. So that point of yours will have no
' Kx. xxxii. 31.
* Bar. iii- ', 2,
' Ex. xxxii. 32.
* Par. V. I.
^ Jer. vii. i(>.
CONCERNING REPENTANCE, BOOK I.
337
weiglit. which you take from the Epistle of
John, where he says: "He who knows
lliat his brother sinncth a sin not unto death,
let him ask, and God will give him life, be-
cause he sinned not unto death. There is
a sin unto death : not concerning it do I
say, let him ask."' He was not speak-
ing to Moses and Jeremiah, but to the
people, who must seek another intercessor
for their sins ; the people, for whom it is
sufficient they entreat God for their lighter
faults, and consider that pardon for weight-
ier sins must be reserved for the prayers of
the just. For how could John say that
graver sins should not be prayed for, when
he had read that Moses prayed and obtained
his request, where there had been wilful
casting off of faith, and knew that Jeremiah
also had entreated ?
46. How could John say that we should
not pray for the sin unto death, who him-
self in the Apocalypse wrote the message
to the angel of the Church of Pergamos .''
"Thou hast there those that hold the doc-
trine of Balaam, who taught Ealac to put a
stumbling-block before the children of Israel,
to eat tilings sacrificed unto idols, and to
commit fornication. So hast thou also them
that hold the doctrines of the Nicolaitans.
Repent likewise, or else I will come to thee
quickly."^ Do you see that the same God
Who requires repentance promises forgive-
ness.? And then He says: "He that hath
ears let him hear what the Spirit saith to the
churches : To him that overcometh will I
give to eat of the hidden manna." ^
47. Did not John himself know that
Stephen prayed for his persecutors, who
had not been able even to listen to the
Name of Christ, when he said of those
very men by whom he was being stoned :
" Lord, lay not this sin to their charge".'''*
And we see the result of this prayer in the
case of the Apostle, for Paul, who kept
the garments of those who were stoning
Stephen, not long after became an apostle
by the grace of God, having before been a
persecutor.
CHAPTER XL
The passage quoted from St. John's Epistle is con-
firmed by another in which salvation is promised to
those who believe in Christ, which refutes the No-
vatians who try to induce the lapsed to believe,
although denying them pardon. Furthermore, many
who had lapsed have received the grace of martyr-
dom, whilst the example of the good Samaritan
' I John V. 16.
^ Rev. ii. 17.
- Rev. ii. r4. 15, 16.
'' Acts vii. 60.
shows that we must not abandon those in whom
even the faintest amount of faith is still alive.
48. Since, then, we have spoken of the
general Papistic of St. John, let us enquire
whether the writings of John in the Gospel
agree with your interpretation. For he
writes that the Lord said : " God so loved
this world, that He gave His only-begotten
Son, that every one that believeth on Him
should not perish but have everlasting life." '
If, then, you wish to reclaim any one of the
lapsed, do you exhort him to believe, or not
to believe.? Undoubtedly you exhort him
to believe. But, according to the Lord's
words, he who believes shall have everlast-
ing life. How, then, will you forbid to
pray for him, who has a claim to everlasting
life.? since faith is of divine grace, as the
Apostle teaches where he speaks of the dif-
ferences of gifts, for " to another is given
faith by the same Spirit."^ And the dis-
ciples say to the Lord : " Increase our
faith." 3 He then who has faith has life, and
he who has life is certainly not shut out
from pardon ; "that every one," it is said,
" that believeth on Him should not perish."
Since it is said, Every one, no one is shut
out, no one is excepted, for He does not
except him who has lapsed, if only after-
wards he believes effectually.
49. We find that many have at length
recovered themselves after a fall, and have
suffered for the Name of God. Can we
deny fellowship with the martyrs to these to
whom the Lord Jesus has not denied it ?
Do we dare to say that life is not restored
to those to whom Christ has given a crown ?
As, then, a crown is given to many after they
have lapsed, so, too, if they believe, their
faith is restored, which faith is the gift of
God, as you read: "Because unto you it
hath been granted by God not only to
believe in Him, but also to suffer in His be-
half" ^ Is it possible that he who has the
gift of God should not have His forgiveness ?
50. Now it is not a single but a twofold
grace that every one who believes should
also suffer for the Lord Jesus. He, then,
who believes receives his grace, but he re-
ceives a second, if his faith be crowned by
suffering. For neither was Peter without
grace before he suffered, but when he suf-
fered he received a second gift. And many
who have not had the grace to suffer for
Christ have nevertheless had the grace of
believing on Him.
51. Therefore it is said: "That every
^ S. John iii. i5.
* S. Luke xvii. 5.
- I Cor. xii. 9.
* Phil. i. 29.
338
ST. AMBROSE.
one that believeth in Him should not
perish." Let no one, that is, of whatever
condition, after whatever fall, fear that he
will perish. For it may come to pass that
the good Samaritan of the Gospel may find
some one going down from Jerusalem to
Jericho, that is, faUing back from the mar-
tyr's conflict to the pleasures of this life and
the comforts of the world ; wounded by
robbers, that is, by persecutors, and left
half dead ; that good Samaritan, Who is the
Guardian of our souls (for the word Samari-
tan means Guardian),' may, I say, not pass
by him but tend and heal him.^
52. Perchance He therefore passes him
not by, because He sees in him some signs
of life, so that there is hope that he may
recover. Does it not seem to you that he
who has fallen is half alive if faith sustains
any breath of life.? For he is dead who
wholly casts God out of his heart. He,
then, who does not wholly cast Him out,
but under pressure of torments has denied
Him for a time, is half dead. Or if he be
dead, why do you bid him repent, seeing he
cannot now be healed ? If he be half dead,
pour in oil and wine, not wine without oil,
that may be the comfort and the smart.
Place him upon thy beast, give him over to
the host, lay out two pence for his cure, be
to him a neighbour. But you cannot be a
neighbour unless you have compassion on
him ; for no one can be called a neighbour
unless he have healed, not killed, another.
But if you wish to be called a neighbour,
Christ says to you : "Go and do likewise. "^
CHAPTER XH.
Another passage of St. John is considered. The
necessity of keeping the commandments of God
may be complied with by those who, having fallen, re-
pent, as well as by those who have not fallen, as is
shown in the case of David.
53. Let us consider another similar pas-
sage : " He that believeth on the Son hath
eternal life, but he tliat believeth not the Son
shall not see life, but the wrath of Godabid-
eth on him. "4 That which abideth has cer-
tainly had a commencement, and that from
some offence, viz., that first he not believe.
When, then, any one believes, the wrath of
God departs and life comes. To believe,
' The Samaritans took tlieir name from the territory which they
inhabited. But they called themselves Hebrew [Shomrim], Guar-
dians, tliat is, of the Law. This idea is referred to liere by St. Am-
brose as elsewhere by others of tlie Fathers.
^ S. Luke X. 33 ff. ^ S. Luke x. 37.
* S. John iii. 36.
then, in Christ is to gain life, for "he that
believeth in Him is not judged." '
54. But with reference to this passage they
allege that he who believes in Christ ought
to keep His sayings, and say that it is writ-
ten in the Lord's own words : "I am come a
light into this world, that whosoever believ-
eth in Me may not abide in darkness. And
if any man hear My word and keep it, I
judge him not."^ He judges not, and do
you judge ? He says, " that whosoever be-
lieveth on Me may not abide in darkness,"
that is, that if he be in darkness he may not
remain therein, but may amend his error,
correct his fault, and keep My command-
ments, for I have said, ' ' I will not the death
of the wicked, but the correction." ^ I said
above that he that believeth on Me is not
judged, and I keep to this : "For I am not
come to judge the world, but that the world
may be saved through Me. "t I pardon
willingly, I quickly forgive, "I will have
mercy rather than sacrifice," s because by
sacrifice the just is rendered more accept-
able, by mercy the sinner is redeemed. " I
come not to call the righteous but sinners. "^
Sacrifice was under the Law, in the Gospel
is mercy. "The Law was given by Moses,
grace by INIe. " 7
55. And again further on He says : " He
that despiseth Me, and receiveth not My
words, hath one that judgeth him."^ Does
he seem to you to have received Christ's
words who has not corrected himself.? Un-
doubtedly not. He, then, who corrects him-
self receives His word, for this is His word,
that every one should turn back from sin.
So, then, of necessity you must either reject
this saying of His, or if you cannot deny it
you must accept it.
56. It is also necessary that he who leaves
off sinning must keep the commandments of
God and renounce his sins. We ought not,
then, to interpret this saying of him who has
always kept the commandments, for if this
had been His meaning He would have added
the word a/ways, but by not adding it He
shows that He was speaking of him who has
kept what he has heard, and what he heard
has led him to correct his faults ; he has then
kept what he has heard.
57. But how hard it is to condemn to pen-
ance for life one who even afterwards keeps
the commandments of the Lord, let Him
teach us Himself Who has not refused for-
giveness. Even to those who do not keep
His commandments, as you read in the
' S. ,ohn iii.
^ Ezek. xxiii.
" S. Matt. ix.
•3-
^ S. John xii. 47 [not exact].
* S. John iii. 17. " Hosea vi. 6.
^ S. John i. 17. * S. John xii. 48.
CONCERNING REPENTANCE, BOOK I.
339
Psalm: "If they profane INIy statutes and
keep not My commandments, I will visit
their offences with the rod and their sins
with scourges, but My mercy will I not take
from them."' So, then, lie promises mercy
to all.
58. Yet that we may not think that this
mercy is without judgment, there is a dis-
tinction made between those who have paid
continual obedience to God's command-
ments, and those who at some time, either
by error or by compulsion, have fallen. And
that you may not think that it is only our
arguments which press you, consider the
decision of Christ, Who said : ' • If the ser-
vant knew his Lord's will and did it not, he
shall be beaten with many stripes, but if he
knew it not, he shall be beaten with few
stripes." ^ Each, then, if he believes, is re-
ceived, for God ' ' chasteneth every son
whom He receiveth,"3 and him whom He
chasteneth He does not give over unto
death, for it is written: "The Lord hath
chastened me sore, but He hath not given
me over unto death." 4
CHAPTER XIII.
They who have committed a " sin unto death " are not
to be abandoned, but subjected to penance, accord-
ing to St. Paul. Explanation of the phrase " Deliver
unto Satan." Satan can afflict the body, but these
afflictions bring spiritual profit, showing the power of
God, Who thus turns Satan's devices against himself.
59. Lastly, Paul teaches us that we must
not abandon those who have committed a sin
unto death, but that we must rather coerce
them with the bread of tears and tears to
drink, yet so that their sorrow itself be
moderated. For this is the meaning of the
passage: "Thou hast given them to drink
in large measure, "s that their sorrow itself
should have its measure, lest perchance he
who is doing penance should be consumed
by overmuch sorrow, as was said to the
Corinthians : ' ' What will ye ? Shall I come
to you with a rod, or in love and a spirit of
meekness ? " ^ But even the rod is not
severe, since he had read: "Thou shalt
beat him indeed with the rod, but shalt de-
liver his soul from death. '"7
60. What the Apostle means by the rod is
shown by his invective against fornication,^
his denunciation of incest, his reprehension
of pride, because they were puffed up who
ought rather to be mourning, and lastly, his
* Ps. Ixxxix. [Ixxxviii.] 31, 32.
* Heb. xii. 6. * Ps. cxviii. [cxvii.] 18.
^ I Cor. iv. 21. ' Prov. xxiii. 13.
^ S. Luke xii. 47, 48.
° Ps. Ixxx. [Ixxix.] 5.
8 I Cor. V. I £f
sentence on the guilty person, that he should
be excluded from communion, and delivered
to the adversary, not for the destruction of
the soul but of the flesh. For as the Lord
did not give power to Satan over the soul of
holy Job, but allowedhim to afflict his body, '
so here, too, the sinner is delivered to Satan
for the destruction of the flesh, that the ser-
pen, might lick the dust^ of his flesh, but not
hurt his soul.
61. Let, then, our flesh die to lusts, let it
be captive, let it be subdued, and not war
against the law of our mind, but die in sub-
jection to a good service, as in Paul, who
buffeted his body that he might bring it into
subjection, in order that his preaching might
become more approved, if the law of his
flesh agreed and was consonant with the law
of his flesh. For the flesh dies when its
wisdom passes over into the spirit, so that
it no longer has a taste for the things of the
flesh, but for the things of the spirit. Would
that I might see my flesh growing weak,
would that I were not dragged captive into
the law of sin, would that I lived not in the
flesh, but in the faith of Christ ! And so
there is greater grace in the infirmity of the
body than in its soundness.
62. Having explained Paul's meaning, let
us now consider the words themselves, in
what sense he said that he had delivered
him to Satan for the destruction of the flesh,
for the devil it is who tries us. For he
brings ailments on each of our limbs, and
sickness on our whole bodies. And then,
too, he smote holy Job with evil sores from
the feet to the head, because he had received
the power of destroying his flesh, when God
said: "Behold, I give him up unto thee,
only preserve his life. "3 This the Apostle
took up in the same words, giving up this
man to Satan for the destruction of the flesh,
that his spirit might be saved in the day of
our Lord Jesus Christ."*
63. Great is the power, great is the gift,
which commands the devil to destroy him-
self. For he destroys himself when he
makes the man whom he is seeking to over-
throw by temptation stronger instead of
weak, because wdiilst he is weakening the
body he is strengthening his soul. For sick-
ness of the body restrains sin, but luxury sets
on fire the sin of the flesh.
64. The devil is then deceived so as to
wound himself with his own bite, and to
arm against himself him whom he thought
to weaken. So he armed holy job the more
1 Job ii. 6.
Job ii. 6.
^ Mic. vii. 17.
* I Cor. V. 5.
340
ST. AMBROSE.
after he wounded him, who, with his
whole body covered with sores, endured in-
deed the bite of the devil, but felt not his
poison. And so it is well said of him,
"Thou shalt draw out the dragon with an
hook, thou wilt play with him as with a bird,
thou shalt bind him as a boy doth a sparrow,
thou shalt lay thine hand upon him."'
65. You see how he is mocked by Paul,
so that, like the child in prophecy, he lays
his hand on the hole of the asp, and the
serpent injures him not ; he draws him out of
his hiding-places, and makes of his venom a
spiritual antidote, so that what is venom be-
comes a medicine, the venom serves to the
destruction of the flesh, it becomes medicine
to the healing of the spirit. For that which
hurts the body benefits the spirit.
66. Let, then, the serpent bite the earthy
part of me, let him drive his tooth into my
flesh, and bruise my body ; and may the
Lord say of me : "I give him up unto thee,
only preserve his life." How great is the
power of Christ, that the guardianship of
man is made a charge even to the devil him-
self, who always desires to injure him. Let
us then make the Lord Jesus favourable to
ourselves. At the command of Christ the
devil himself becomes the guardian of his
prey. Even unwillingly he carries out the
commands of heaven, and, though cruel,
obeys the commands of gentleness.
67. But why do I commend his obedience ?
Let him be ever evil that God may be ever
good, Who converts his ill-will into grace for
us. He wishes to injure us, but cannot if
Christ resist him. He wounds the flesh but
preserves the life. And then it is written :
"Then shall the wolves and the lambs feed
together, the lion and the ox shall eat straw,
and they shall not hurt nor destroy in My
holy mountain, saith the Lord." ^ For this is
the sentence of condemnation on the serpent:
" Dust shall be thy food."^ What dust.'
Surely that of which it is said : " Dust thou
art, and into dust shalt thou return." 4
CHAPTER XIV.
St. Ambrose explains that the flesh given to Satan
for destruction is eaten by the serpent when the soul
is set free from carnal desires. He gives, therefore,
various rules for guarding the senses, points out the
snares laid for us by means of pleasures, and exhorts
his hearers not to fear the destruction of the flesh by
the serpent.
68. The serpent eats this dust, if the Lord
' Jobxli. I, 5, 8[LXX.].
^ Gen. iii. 14.
^ Isa. xi. 6, 8, 9.
* Gen. iii. 19.
Jesus is favourable to us, that our spirit may
not sympathize with the weakness of the
flesh, nor be set on fire by the vapours of
the flesh and the heat of our members. " It
is better to marry than to burn," ' for there
is a flame which burns within. Let us not
then suffer this fire to approach the bosom
of our minds and the depths of our hearts,
lest wc burn up the covering of our inmost
hearts, and lest the devouring fire of lust con-
sume this outward garment of the soul and
its fleshy veil, but let us pass through the
fire. ^ And should any one fall into the fire
of love let him leap over it and pass forth ;
let him not bind to himself adulterous lust
with the bands of thoughts, let him not tie
knots around himself by the fastenings of
continual reflection, let him not too often
turn his attention to the form of a harlot,
and let not a maiden lift her eyes to the
countenance of a youth. And if by chance
she has looked and is caught, how much
more will she be entangled if she gazes with
curiosity.
69. Let custom itself teach us. A woman
covers her face with a veil for this reason,
that in public her modesty may be safe.
That her face may not easily meet the gaze
of a youth, let her be covered with the nup-
tial veil, so that not even in chance meetings
she might be exposed to the wounding of
another or of herself, though the wound of
either were indeed hers. But if she cover
her head with a veil that she may not acci-
dentally see or be seen (for when the head
is veiled the face is hidden), how much more
ought she to cover herself with the veil of
modesty, so as even in public to have her
own secret place.
70. But granted that the eye has fallen
upon another, at least let not the inward
affection follow. For to have seen is
no sin, but one must be careful that it be
not the source of sin. The bodily eye sees,
but let the eye of the heart be closed ; let
modesty of mind remain. We have a Lord
Who is both strict and indulgent. The
prophet indeed said: " Look not upon the
beauty of a woman that is an harlot. " ^ But
the Lord said : "Whoever shall look on a
woman to lust after her, hath committed
adultery with her already in his heart. " ■* He
does not say, " Whosoever shall look hath
committed adultery, " but " Whosoever shall
look on her to lust after her. " He condemned
not the look but sought out the inward
affection. But that modesty is praiseworthy
^ I Cor. vii. 9 ; Prov. vi. 27.
^ Possibly from Prov. v. condensed.
' Isa xliii. 2.
* S. Matt. V. 28.
CONCERNING REPENTANCE, ROOK I.
341
which has so accustomed itself to close the
bodily eyes as often not to see what we
really behold. For we seem to behold with
the bodily sight whatever meets us ; but if
there be not joined to this any attention of
the mind, the sight also, according to what
is usual in the body, fades away, so that in
reality we see rather with the mind than
with the body.
71. And if the flesh has seen the flame, let
us not cherish that flame in our bosoms, that
is, in the depths of the heart and the inward
part of the mind. Let us not instil this fire
into our bones, let us not bind bonds upon
ourselves, let us not join in conversation
with such as may be the cause to us of un-
holy fires. The speech of a maiden is a
snare to a youth, the words of a youth are
the bonds of love.
72. Joseph saw the fire when the woman
eager for adultery spoke to him.' She
wished to catch him with her words. She
set the snares of her lips, but was not able
to capture the chaste man. For the voice
of modesty, the voice of gravity, the rein of
caution, the care for integrity, the discipline
of chastity, loosed the woman's chains. So
that unchaste person could not entangle
him in her meshes. She laid her hand upon
him ; she caught his garment, that she might
tighten the noose around him. The words
of a lascivious woman are the snares of lust,
and her hands the bonds of love ; but the
chaste mind could not be taken either by
snares or by bonds. The garment was cast
off, the bonds were loosed, and because he
did not admit the fire into the bosom of his
mind, his body was not burnt.
73. You see, then, that our mind is the
cause of our guilt. And so the flesh is in-
nocent, but is often the minister of sin. Let
not, then, desire of beauty overcome you.
Many nets and many snares are spread by
the devil. The look of a harlot is the snare
of him who loves her. Our own eyes are
nets to us, wherefore it is written : " Be not
taken with thine eyes. " ^ So, then, we spread
nets for ourselves in which we are entangled
and hampered. We bind chains on our-
selves, as we read: "For every one is
bound with the chains of his own sins. "^
74- Let us then pass through the fires of
youth and the glow of early years ; let us
pass through the waters, let us not remain
therein, lest the deep floods shut us in. Let
us rather pass over, that we too may say :
"Our soul has passed over the stream, "^
' Gen. xxxix. 7.
' Prov. vi. 2 [LXX.] very loosely.
- Prov. vi. 25.
* Ps. cxxiv. [cxxiii.] 4.
for he who has passed over is safe. And
lastly, the Lord speaks thus: " If thou pass
through the water, I am with thee, the
rivers shall not overflow thee."' And the
prophet says: "I have seen the wicked
exalted above the cedars of Libanus, and I
passed by, and lo, he was not." Pass by
things of this world, and you will see that
the high places of the wicked have fallen.
Moses, too, passing by things of this world,
saw a great sight and said: "I will turn
aside and see this great sight, "^ for had he
been held by the fleeting pleasures of this
world he would not have seen so great a
mystery.
75. Let us also pass over this fire of lust,
fearing which Paul — but fearing for us, inas-
much as by buffeting his body he had come
no longer to fear for himself — says to us :
"Flee fornication. "3 Let us then flee it as
though following us, though indeed it fol-
lows not behind us, but within our very
selves. Let us then diligently take heed
lest while we are fleeing from it we carry
it with ourselves. For we wish for the most
part to flee, but if we do not wholly cast it
out of our mind, we rather take it up than
forsake it. Let us then spring over it, lest
it be said to us : "Walk ye in the flame of
your fire, which ye have kindled for your-
selves. "^ For as he who "takes fire into
his bosom burns his clothes, "5 so he who
walks upon fiery coals must of necessity burn
his feet, as it is written: "Can one walk
upon coals of fire and not burn his feet.-* " ^
76. This fire is dangerous, let us then
not feed it with the fuel of luxury. Lust is
fed by feastings, nourished by delicacies,
kindled by wine, and inflamed by drunken-
ness. Still more dangerous than these are
the incentives of words, which intoxicate
the mind as it were with a kind of wine of
the vine of Sodom. Let us be on our guard
against abundance of this wine, for when
the flesh is intoxicated the mind totters, the
heart wavers, the heart is carried to and fro.
And so with regard to each that precept is
useful wherein Timothy is warned : " Drink
a little wine because of thy frequent infirmi-
ties. "7 When the body is heated, it ex-
cites the glow of the mind ; when the flesh
is chilled with the cold of disease, the spirit
is chilled ; when the body is in pain, the
mind is sad, but the sadness shall become
joy.
77. Do not then fear if your flesh be eaten
away, the soul is not consumed. And so
' Isa. xliii. z.
*_ Isa 1. II.
' I Tim. V. 23.
^ Ex. iii. 3.
^ Prov. vi. 27.
' I Cor. vi. 18.
8 Prov. vi. 28.
342
ST. AMBROSE.
David says that he does not fear, because
the enemy were eating up his flesh but not
his soul, as we read: "When evil-doers
come near upon me to eat up my flesh, my
foes who trouble me, they were weakened
and fell. "' ' So the serpent works overthrow
for himself alone, therefore is he who has
been injured by the serpent given over to
the serpent that he may raise up again him
whom he cast down, and the overthrow of
the serpent may be the raising again of the
man. And Scripture testifies that Satan is
the author of this bodily suffering and weak-
ness of the flesh, where Paul says : " There
was given unto me a thorn in the flesh, a
messenger of Satan to buffet me, that I
should "not be exalted."^ So Paul learned
to heal even as he himself had been made
whole.
CHAPTER XV,
Returning from this digression, St. Ambrose explains
what is the meaning of St. Paul where he speaks of
coming "with a rod or in the spirit of meekness."
One who has grievously fallen is to be separated, but
to be again restored to religious privileges when he
has sufficiently repented. The old leaven is purged
out when the hardness of the letter is tempered by
the meal of a milder interpretation. All should be
sprinkled with the Church's meal and fed with the
food of charity, lest they become like that envious
elder brother, whose example is followed by the
Novatians.
78. That faithful teacher, having pro-
mised one of two things, gave each. He
came with a rod, for he separated the guilty
man from the holy fellowship. And well is
he said to be delivered to Satan who is
separated from the body of Christ. But he
came in love and with the spirit of meekness,
whether because he so delivered him up as
to save his soul, or because he afterwards
restored to the sacraments him whom he had
before separated.
79. For it is needful to separate one who
has grievously fallen, lest a little leaven
corrupt the whole lump. And the old leaven
must be purged out, or the old man in each
person ; that is, the outward man and his
deeds, he who among the people has grown
old in sin and hardened in vices. And
well did he say purged, not cast forth,
for what is purged is not considered wholly
valueless, for to this end is it purged, that
what is of value be separated from the
worthless, but that which is cast forth is
considered to have in itself nothing of
value.
* Ps. xxvii. 2.
■ 2 Cor, xii. 7.
80. The Apostle then judged that the sin-
ner should then at once be restored to the
heavenly sacraments if he himself wished
to be cleansed. And well is it said " Puree,"
for he is purged as by certain things done
by the whole people, and is washed in the
tears of the multitude, and redeemed from
sin by the weeping of the multitude, and is
purged in the inner man. For Christ granted
to His Church that one should be re-
deemed by means of all, as she herself was
found worthy of the coming of the Lord
Jesus, in order that through One all might
be redeemed.
81. This is Paul's meaning which the
words make more obscure. Let us consider
the exact words of the Apostle : ' ' Purge
out," says he, "the old leaven, that ye may
be a new lump, even as ye are unleavened. " '
Either that the whole Church takes up
the burden of the sinner, with whom she
has to suffer in weeping and prayer and
pain, and, as it were, covers herself with his
leaven, in order that by means of all that
which is to be done away in the individual
doing penance may be purged by a kind of
contribution and commixture of compassion
and mercy offered with manly vigor. ^ Or
one may understand it as that woman in
the Gospel teaches us, who is a type of the
Church, when she hid the leaven in her
meal, till all was leavened, and the whole
could be used as pure.
82. The Lord taught me in the Gospel
what leaven is when He said : " Do ye not
understand that I said not concerning bread.
Beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and
Sadducees .'' '" ^ Then, it is said, they under-
stood that He spake not of bread, but that they
should beware of the doctrine of the Phari-
sees and Sadducees. This leaven, then — that
is, [he doctrine of the Pharisees and the con-
tentiousness of the Sadducees — the Church
hides in her meal, when she softened the hard
letter of the Law by a spiritual interpreta-
tion, and ground it as it were in the mill of
her explanations, bringing out as it were
from the husks of the letter the inner secrets
of the mysteries, and setting forth the belief
in the Resurrection, wherein the mercy of
God is proclaimed, and wherein it is be-
' I Cor. V. 7.
- There is probably here a reference to a generous custom of
antiquity, whereby if any one were visited by calamity and loss of
goods, his friends contributed according to their power to present
him with a gift which should help to re-establish him. St. Ambrose
seems to apply this to the bearing one another's burdens by mourn-
ing, fasting, and praying with the penitent, that God might be moved
by the entreaties of all, offered with great energy, and forgive what
might be lacking in the individual. It is an instructive commentary
on tlie doctrine of the communion of saints.
2 S. Matt. .\vi. II,
CONCERNING REPENTANCE, BOOK I.
343
lieved that the life of those who are dead is
restored.
8$. Now this comparison seems to be not
unfitly brought forward in this place, since
the king-dom of heaven is redemption from
sin, and therefore we all, both bad and good,
are mingled with the meal of the Church
that we all may be a new lump. But that
no one may be afraid that an admixture of
evil leaven might injure the lump, the Apostle
said : " That ye may be a new lump, even
as ye are unleavened ; " ' that is to say. This
mixture will render you again such, as in
the pure integrity of your innocence. If
we thus have compassion, we are not
stained with the sins of others, but we gain
the restoration of another to the increase of
our own grace, so that our integrity remains
as it was. And therefore he adds: "For
Christ our Passover is sacrificed for us ; " =*
that is, the Passion of the Lord profited all,
and gave redemption to sinners who re-
pented of the sins they had committed.
84. Let us then keep the feast on good
food, doing penance yet joyful in our re-
demption, for no food is sweeter than kind-
ness and gentleness. Let no envy towards
the sinner who is saved be mingled with
our feasts and joy, lest that envious brother,
as is set forth in the Gospel, exclude himself
from the house of his Father, because he
grieved at the reception of his brother, at
whose lasting exile he was wont to rejoice.
85. And you Novatians cannot deny that
you are like him, who, as you say, do not
come together to the Church because by
penance a hope of return had been given to
those who had lapsed. But this is only a
pretence, for Novatian contrived his schism
through grief at his loss of the episcopal
office.
86. But do you not understand that the
Apostle also prophesied of you and says to
you: "And ye are puffed up and did not
rather mourn, that he who did this deed
might be taken away from among you " ? 3
He is, then, wholly taken away when his sin
is done away, but the Apostle does not say
that the sinner is to be shut out of the
Church who counsels his cleansing.
CHAPTER XVI.
Comparison between the apostles and Novatians.
The fitness of the words, " Ye know not what spirit
ye are of," when applied to them. The desire of
penance is extinguished by them when they take
away its fruit. And thus are sinners deprived of the
promises of Christ, though, indeed, they ought not
' I Cor. V. 7.
'■ I Cor. V. 7.
' I Cor. V. 2.
to be too soon admitted to the mysteries. Some ex-
amples of repentance.
87. Inasmuch, then, as the Apostle forgave
sins, by what authority do you say that they
are not to be forgiven .' Who has the most
reverence for Christ, Paul or Novatian ?
But Paul knew that the Lord was merciful.
He knew that the Lord Jesus was offended
more by the harshness of the disciples than
by their pitifulness.
88. Furthermore, Jesus rebuked James and
John when they spoke of bringing down fire
from heaven to consume those who refused
to receive the Lord, and said to them :
" Ye know not whose spirit ye are of; for
the Son of Man is not come to destroy men's
lives but to save them." ' To them, indeed.
He said, " Ye know not whose spirit ye are
of," who were of His spirit ; but to you He
says, "Ye are not of My spirit, who hold
not fast My clemency, who reject My
mercy, who refuse repentance which I willed
to be preached by the apostles in My Name. "
89. For it is in vain that you say that you
preach repentance who remove the fruits
of repentance. For men are led to the
pursuit of anything either by rewards or re-
sults, and every pursuit grows slack by delay.
And for this reason the Lord, in order that
the devotion of His disciples might be in-
creased, said that every one who had left
all that was his, and followed God, should
receive sevenfold more both here and here-
after.2 First of all He promised the reward
here, to do away with the tedium of delay,
and again hereafter, that we might learn to
believe that rewards will also be given to us
hereafter. Present rewards are then an
earnest of those hereafter.
90. If, then, any one, having committed
hidden sins, shall nevertheless diligently
do penance, how shall he receive those re-
wards if not restored to the communion of
the Church } I am willing, indeed, that the
guilty man should hope for pardon, should
seek it with tears and groans, should seek it
with the aid of the tears of all the people,
should implore forgiveness ; and if com-
munion be postponed two or three times, that
he should believe that his entreaties have not
been urgent enough, that he must increase
his tears, must come agaiii even in greater
trouble, clasp the feet of the faithful with his
arms, kiss them, wash them with tears, and
not let them go, so that the Lord Jesus may
say of him too : " His sins which are many
are forgiven, for he loved much. " '
* S. Luke ix. 55, 56. - S. Matt. xix. 29. 3 5. Luke vii. 47.
344
ST. AMBROSE.
91. I have known penitents whose coun-
tenance was furrowed with tears, their cheeks
worn with constant weeping, who offered
their body to be trodden under foot by all,
who with faces ever pale and worn with
fasting bore about in a yet living body the
likeness of death.
CHAPTER XVII.
That gentleness must be added to severity, as is
shown in the case of St. Paul at Corinth. The man had
been baptized, though the Novatians argue against it.
And by the word " destruction " is not meant annihi-
lation but severe chastening.
92. Why do we postpone the time of
pardon for those who have mortified them-
selves, who during life have done them-
selves to death.' "Sufficient," says St. Paul,
"to such a one is this punishment which is
inflicted by the many ; so that contrariwise,
ye should rather forgive him and comfort
him, lest by any means he should be swal-
lowed up with overmuch sorrow. " ' If the
punishment which is inflicted by the many
is sufficient for condemnation, the interces-
sion which is made by many is also suffi-
cient for the remission of sin. The Master
of morals. Who both knows our weakness
and is the interpreter of the will of God,
wills that comfort should be given, lest
sorrow through the weariness of long delay
should swallow up the penitent.
93. The Apostle then forgave him, and
not only forgave him, but desired that love
to him should again grow strong. He who
is loved receives not harshness but mercy.
And not only did he himself forgive him only,
but willed that all should forgive him, and
says that he forgave for the sake of others,
lest many should be longer saddened on ac-
count of one. "To whom," says he, "ye
have forgiven anything, I forgive also, for I
also have forgiven for your sakes in the
person of Christ, for we are not ignorant of
his devices."^ Rightly can he be on his
guard against the serpent who is not igno-
rant of his devices, of which there are so
many to our detriment. He is always de-
sirous to do harm, always desirous to cir-
cumvent us, that he may cause death ; but
we ought to take heed lest our remedy be-
come an occasion of triumph for him ; for
2 Cor. ii. 6.
^ 2 Cor. ii. 10.
we are circumvented by him, if any one
perish through overmuch sorrow, who might
be set free by pitifulness.
94. And that we may know that this per-
son was baptized, he added: "I wrote to
you in my epistle to have no company with
fornicators, not altogether with fornicators of
this world."'' And farther on he adds:
" But now I write unto you not to keep
company if any man that is named a
brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an
idolator. "'2 Those whom he has joined to-
gether under one penalty, he willed to at-
tain together to forgiveness. "If any be
such," he says, " with him not to eat."3
How severe he is with the obstinate, how
indulgent to those who seek. Against those
rises up in arms the injury done to Christ,
whilst the calling upon Christ aids these.
95. But lest any one be perplexed because
it is written : "I have delivered such an one
unto Satan for the destruction of the flesh, "4
and should say : How can he attain forgive-
ness whose whole flesh has perished, seeing
that it is evident that man was redeemed
both in body and soul, and is saved in both ;
and that neither the soul without the body,
nor yet the body without the soul, since both
are united by their fellowship in the deeds
that have been done, can be without fellow-
ship either in punishment or in reward.'' Let
this suffice for an ansvv'er to him : That
"destruction" does not mean the complete
annihilation of the flesh, but its chastening.
For as he who is dead to sin lives to God,
so the allurements of the flesh perish, and
the flesh dies to its lusts, in order that it may
live again to purity and to other good works.
96. And what more suitable example can
we take than one from our common mother.''
For the earth itself, from which we are all
taken, when it is not worked and cultivated,
seems to be desert ; and the field dies to the
vines or olive-trees with which it was
planted, and yet it does not lose its own
nutritive power, which is, as it were, its life.
And then later, when cultivation begins once
more, and the seed is sown for which the
land seems suitable, it breaks forth again
more fruitful than before with its products.
It is not, then, anything so strange if our flesh
is said to die, and yet is understood to be
subdued rather than annihilated.
* I Cor. V. 9.
^ I Cor. V. II.
^ I Cor. V. II.
* I Cor. V. 5.
CONCERNING REPENTANCE, BOOK II.
345
BOOK II.
CHAPTER I.
St. Ambrose gives additional rules concerning repent-
ance, and shows that it must not be delayed.
1. Although in the former book we have
written many things which may tend to the
more perfect practice of .epentance, yet in-
asmuch as a g-reat deal more may be added,
we will continue the repast so as not to
seem to have relinquished the provisions of
our teaching only half consumed.
2. For repentance must be taken in hand
not only anxiously, but also quickly, lest
perchance that father of the house in the
Gospel who planted a fig-tree in his vineyard
should come and seek fruit on it, and find-
ing none, say to the vine-dresser : " Cut it
down, why doth it cumber the ground.?'''
And unless the vine-dresser should intercede
and say : ' ' Lord, let it alone this year also,
until I dig about it and dung it, and if it
bear fruit — well ; but if not let it be cut
down." ^
3. Let us then dung this field which we
possess, and imitate those hard-working
farmers, who are not ashamed to satiate the
land with rich dung and to scatter the grimy
ashes over the field, that they may gather
more abundant crops.
4. And the Apostle teaches us how to
dung it, saying: "I count all -things but
dung, that I may gain Christ,"^ and he,
through evil report and good report, attained
to pleasing Christ. For he had read that Abra-
ham, when confessing himself to be but dust
and ashes, •♦ in his deep humility found favour
with God. He had read how Job, sitting
among the ashes, s regained all that he
had lost. ^ He had heard in the utterance
of David, how God " raiseth the poor out of
the dust, and lifteth the needy out of the
dunghill." 7
5. Let us then not be ashamed to confess
our sins unto the Lord. Shame indeed there
is when each makes known his sins, but
that shame, as it were, ploughs his land, re-
moves the ever-recurring brambles, prunes
the thorns, and gives life to the fruits which
he believed were dead. Follow him who,
by diligently ploughing his field, sought for
eternal fruit : "Being reviled we bless, being
' S. Luke xiii. 7.
* Gen. xviii. 27.
' Ps. cxiii. [cxii.] 7.
^ S. Luke xiii. 8, 9.
^ Job ii. a.
3 Phil iii. 8.
^ Job xiii. 10.
persecuted we endure, being defamed we
entreat, we are made as the offscouring of
the world." ' If you plough after this fash-
ion you will sow spiritual seed. Plough that
you may get rid of sin and gain fruit. He
ploughed so as to destroy in himself the last
tendency to persecution. What more could
Christ give to lead us on to the pursuit of
perfection, than to convert and then give us
for a teacher one who was a persecutor.-'
CHAPTER II.
A passage quoted by the heretics against repentance
is e.xplained in two ways, the first being that Heb.
vi. 4 refers to the impossibility of being baptized
again ; the second, that what is impossible with man
is possible with God.
6. Being then refuted by the clear example
of the Apostle and by his writings, the here-
tics yet endeavour to resist further, and say
that their opinion is supported by apostolic
authority, bringing forward the passage in
the Epistle to the Hebrews : " For it is im-
possible that those who were once enlight-
ened, and have tasted the heavenly gift, and
have been made partakers of the Holy Spirit,
and have tasted the good word of God, and
the powers of the world to come, should if
they fall away be again renewed unto re-
pentance, crucifying again the Son of God,
and put Him to open shame." ^
7. Could Paul teach in opposition to his
own act .-* He had at Corinth forgiven sin
through penance, how could he himself
speak against his own decision ? Since, then,
he could not destroy what he had built, we
must assume that what he says was different
from, but not contrary to, what had gone be-
fore. For what is contrary is opposed to
itself, what is different has ordinarily an-
other meaning. Things which are contrary
are not such that one can support the other.
Inasmuch, then, as the Apostle spoke of re-
mitting penance, he could not be silent as to
those who thought that baptism was to be
repeated. And it was right first of all to
remove our anxiety, and to let us know that
even after baptism, if any sinned their sins
^ I Cor. iv. 12, 13.
^ Heb vi. 4-6. The use made by the Montanists and Novatians
of this passage in support of their heresy seems to have been one
of the reasons why the Epistle to the Hebrews was so late in being
received as canonical. This is stated by one authority in so many
words: " Epistola ad Hebmos Jton legititr propter Novatiaiios,
Philastrius, de Hter. 41.
346
ST. AMBROSE.
could be forgiven them, lest a false belief in
a reiterated baptism should lead astray those
who were destitute of all hope of forgive-
ness. And secondly, it was right to set forth
in a well-reasoned argument that baptism is
not to be repeated.
8. And that the writer was speaking of
baptism is evident from the very words in
which it is stated that it is impossible to re-
new unto repentance those who were fallen,
inasmuch as we are renewed by means of
the laver of baptism, whereby we are born
again, as Paul says himself: " For we are
buried with Him through baptism into death,
that, like as Christ rose from the dead
through the glory of the Father, so we, too,
should walk in newness of life."' And in
another place : " Be ye renewed in the spirit
of your mind, and put on the new man
which is created after God. " ^ And else-
where again : " Thy youth shall be renewed
like the eagle, "^ because the eagle after
death is born again from its ashes, as we
being dead in sin are through the Sacrament
of Baptism born again to God, and created
anew. So, then, here as elsewhere, he
teaches one baptism. " One faith," he says,
" one baptism. " ■♦
9. This, too, is plain, that in him who is
baptized the Son of God is crucified, for our
flesh could not do away sin unless it were
crucified in Jesus Christ. And then it is
written that: "All we who were baptized
into Jesus Christ were baptized into His
death. " 5 And farther on: "If we have
been planted in the likeness of His death,
we shall be also in the likeness of His resur-
rection, knowing that our old man was fas-
tened with Him to His cross. "^ And to
the Colossians he says : " Buried with Him
by baptism, wherein ye also rose again with
Him. "7 Which w^as written to the intent
that we should believe that He is crucified
in us, that our sins may be purged through
Him, that He, Who alone can forgive sins.
may nail to His cross the handwriting which
was against us.^ In us He triumphs over
principalities and powers, as it is written of
Him : "He made a show of principalities
and powers, triumphing over them in Him-
self "9
ID. So, then, that which he says in this
Epistle to the Hebrews, that it is impossible
for those who have fallen to be "renewed
unto repentance, crucifying again the Son
of God, and putting Him to open shame,"
must be considered as having reference to
■ Rom. vi. 4.
* Eph. iv. 5.
' Col. ii. 12.
^ Eph. iv. 23
" Rom. vi. 3.
" Col. ii- 14.
•■' Ps. civ. [ciii.] 5.
" Rom. vi. 5, 6.
• Col. ii. 15.
baptism, wherein we crucify tfie Son of God
in ourselves, that the world may be by Him
crucified for us, who triumph, as it were,
when we take to ourselves the likeness of
His death, who put to open shame upon His
cross principalities and powers, and tri-
umphed over them, that in the likeness of
His death we, too, might triumph over the
principalities whose yoke we throw off.
But Christ was crucified once, and died to
sin once, and so there is but one, not several
baptisms.
11. But wdiat of the passage wherein the
doctrine of baptisms is spoken of .' Because
under the Law there were many baptisms or
washings, he rightly rebukes those who for-
sake what is perfect and seek again the first
principles of the word. He teaches us that
the whole of the washings under the Law
are done away with, and that there is one
baptism in the sacraments of the Church.
But he exhorts us that leaving the first prin-
ciples of the word we should go on to per-
fection. "And this," he says, "we will
do, if God permits," ' for no one can be per-
fect without the grace of God.
12. And indeed I might also say to any
one who thought that this passage spoke of
repentance, that things which are impossible
with men are possible with God ; and God
is able whensoever He wills to forgive us our
sins, even those which we think cannot be
forgiven. And so it is possible for God to
give us that which it seems to us impossible
to obtain. For it seemed impossible that
water should wash away sin, and Naaman
the Syrian ^ thought that his leprosy could
not be cleansed by water. But that which
was impossible God made to be possible,
Who gave us so great grace. In like manner
it seemed impossible that sins should be for-
given through repentance, but Christ gave
this power to His apostles, which has been
transmitted to the priestly office. That,
then, has become possible which was im-
possible. But, by a true reasoning, he con-
vinces us that the reiteration by any one of
the Sacrament of Baptism is not permitted.
CHAPTER III.
Explanation of the parable of the Prodigal Son, in
which St. Ambrose applies it to refute the teaching
of the Novatians, proving that reconciliation ought
not to be refused to the greatest offender upon suit-
able proof of repentance.
13. And the Apostle does not contradict
^ Heb. vi. 3.
■ 2 [4] Kings V. II.
CONCERNING REPENTANCE, BOOK 11.
347
the plain teaching of Christ, Who set forth,
a? a comparison of a repentant sinner, one
going- to a foreign country after receiving
all his substance from his father, wasted it
in riotous living, and later, when feeding
upon luisks, longed for his father's bread,
and then gained the robe, the ring, the
shoes, and the slaying of the calf,' which is
a likeness of the Passion of the Lord, where-
by we receive forgiveness.
14. Well is it said that he went into a
foreign country who is cut off from the
sacred altar, for this is to be separated from
that Jerusalem which is in heaven, from the
citizenship and home of the saints. For
which reason the Apostle says : "Therefore
now ye are no more strangers and for-
eigners, but fellow-citizens with the saints
and of the household of God." ^
15. "And, "it is said, "wasted his sub-
stance." Rightly, for he whose faith halts
in bringing forth good works does consume
it. For, "faith is the substance of things
hoped for, the evidence of things not seen. " ^
And faith is a good substance, the inherit-
ance of our hope.
16. And no wonder if he was perishing
for hunger, who lacked the divine nourish-
ment, impelled by the want of which he
says: "I will arise and go to my father,
and will say unto him : Father, I have
sinned against heaven, and before thee."
Do you not see it plainly declared to us,
that we are urged to prayer for the sake of
gaining the sacrament ? and do you wish
to take away that for the sake of which
penance is undertaken ? Deprive the pilot
of the hope of reaching port, and he will
wander uncertainly here and there on the
waves. Take away the crown from the
athlete, and he will fail and lie on the
course. Take from the fisher the power of
catching his booty, and he will cease to
cast the nets. How, then, can he, who
suffers hunger in his soul, pray more ear-
nestly to God, if he has no hope of the
heavenly food .-*
17. "I have sinned," he says, "against
heaven, and before thee." He confesses
what is clearly a sin unto death, that you
may not think that any one doing penance 4
is rightly shut out from pardon. For he
who has sinned against heaven has sinned
either against the kingdom of heaven, or
against his own soul, which is a sin unto
1 S. Luke XV. 13 ff. ^ Eph. ii. ig. ^ Heb. xi. i.
* Penitcjitiavi agere must here and elsewhere be translated
thus, for it implies not mere repentance, but the undergoing out-
ward discipline. The v.oxd petiitentia means both repentance and
penance.
death, and against God, to Whom alone is
said: "Against Thee only have I sinned,
and done evil before Thee." '
18. So quickly does he gain forgiveness,
that, as he is coming, and is still a great
way off, his father meets him, gives him a
kiss, which is the sign of sacred peace;
orders the robe to be brought forth, which
is the marriage garment, which if any one
have not, he is shut out from the marriage
feast ; places the ring on his hand, which is
the pledge of faith and the seal of the
Holy Spirit ; orders the shoes to be brought
out, ^ for he who is about to celebrate the
Lord's Passover, about to feast on the
Lamb, ought to have his feet protected
against all attacks of spiritual wild beasts
and the bite of the serpent ; bids the
calf to be slain, for " Christ our Pass-
over hath been sacrificed. " ^ For as often
as we receive the Blood of the Lord, we
proclaim the death of the Lord.* As, then.
He was once slain for all, so whensoever
forgiveness of sins is granted, we receive
the Sacrament of His Body, that through
His Blood there may be remission of sins.
19. Therefore most evidently are we bid-
den by the teaching of the Lord to confer
again the grace of the heavenly sacrament
on those guilty even of the greatest sins, if
they with open confession bear the penance
due to their sin.
CHAPTER IV.
St. Ambrose turns against the Novatians themselves
another objection concerning blasphemy against the
Holy Spirit, showing that it consists in an erro-
neous belief, proving this by St. Peter's words against
Simon Magus, and other passages, exhorting the No-
vatians to return to the Church, affirming that such is
our Lord's mercy that even Judas would have found
forgiveness had he repented.
20. But we have heard that you are ac-
customed to bring forward as an objection
that which is written: "Every sin and blas-
phemy shall be forgiven unto men, but
blasphemies against the Spirit shall not be
forgiven unto men. And whosoever shall
speak a word against the Son of Man, it
shall be forgiven him, but whosoever shall
speak against the Holy Spirit, it shall not be
forgiven him, neither in this world, nor in
that which is to come. "5 By which quota-
tion the whole of your assertion is destroyed
and done away, for it is written : ' ' Every sin
and blasphemy shall be forgiven unto men."
' Ps. li. [1.] 4.
* I Cor. xi. 26.
- Ex. xii. II.
° S. Matt. xii. 31, 32.
^ 1 Cor. V. 7 ,
348
ST. AMBROSE.
Why, then, do you not remit them ? Why
do you bind chains which you do not loose?
Why do you tie knots which you do not un-
fasten ? Forgive the others, and deal with
those who you think are bound for ever by
the authority of the Gospel for sinning
against the Holy Spirit.
21. But let us consider the case of those
whom the Lord so binds, going back to the
words before the passage quoted, that we
may understand it more clearly : The Jews
were saying : "This man doth not cast out
devils, but by Beelzebub, prince of the
devils." Jesus replied: "Every kingdom
divided against itself shall be destroyed, and
every city or house divided against itself
shall not stand ; for if Satan casteth out
Satan, he is divided against himself, how
then shall his kingdom stand.? But if I cast
out devils by Beelzebub, by whom do your
sons cast them out .-' " '
22. Now we see plainly here that the
words are expressly used of those who were
saying that the Lord Jesus cast out devils
through Beelzebub, to whom the Lord gave
that answer, because they were of the
heritage of Satan, who compared the
Saviour of all to Satan, and attributed the
grace of Christ to the kingdom of the devil.
And that we might know that He was speak-
ing of this blasphemy, He added: "O
generation of vipers, how can ye speak good,
being yourselves evil.?" He says, then,
that those who thus speak attain not to for-
giveness.
23. Then, when Simon, depraved by long
practice of magic, had thought he could
gain by money the power of conferring the
grace of Christ and the infusion of the Holy
Spirit, Peter said : "Thou hast neither part
nor lot in this faith, for thy heart is not
right with God. Repent therefore of this
thy wickedness, and pray the Lord, if per-
chance this thought of thy heart may be
forgiven thee, for I see that thou art in the
bond of iniquity and in the bitterness of
gall. "^ We see that Peter by his apostolic
authority condemns him who blasphemes
against the Holy Spirit through magic
vanity, and all the more because he had not
the clear consciousness of faith. And yet
he did not exclude him from the hope of
forgiveness, for he called him to repentance.
24. The Lord then replies to the blas-
phemy of the Pharisees, and refuses to
them the grace of His power, which consists
in the remission of sins, because they as-
serted that His heavenly power rested on
> S. Matt. xii. 24 S.
' Acts viii. 21 ff.
the help of the devil. And He affirms that
they act with satanic spirit who divide
the Church of God, so that He includes the
heretics and schismatics of all times, to
whom He denies forgiveness, for every
other sin is concerned with single persons,
this is a sin against all. For they alone
wish to destroy the grace of Christ who
rend asunder the members of the Church for
which the Lord Jesus suffered, and the Holy
Spirit was given us.
25. Lastly, that we may know that He is
speaking of those who destroy the unity of
the Church, we find it written : " He that is
not with Me is against Me, and he that
gathered not with Me, scattereth. " ' And
that we might know that He is speaking of
these. He at once added : " Therefore I say
unto you, every sin and blasphemy shall be
forgiven unto men, but blasphemies against
the Spirit shall not be forgiven unto men. "
When He says, " Therefore say I unto you,"
is it not evident that He intended the words
following to be laid to heart by us beyond
the others.? And He rightly added : "A good
tree bringeth forth good fruits, but a bad
tree bringeth forth bad fruits,'"^ for an evil
association cannot produce good fruits.
The tree, then, is the association ; the fruits of
the good tree are the children of the Church.
26. Return, then, to the Church, those of
you who have wickedly separated your-
selves. For He promises forgiveness to all
who are converted, since it is written :
"Whosoever shall call on the Name of the
Lord shall be saved. "^ And lastly, the
Jewish people who said of the Lord Jesus,
"He hath a devil," 4 and "He casteth out
devils through Beelzebub," and who cruci-
fied the Lord Jesus, are, by the preaching of
Peter, called to baptism, that they may put
away the guilt of so great a wickedness.
27. But what wonder is it if you should
deny salvation to others, ■who reject your
own, though they lose nothing who seek
for penance from you ? For 1 suppose that
even Judas might through the exceeding
mercy of God not have been shut out from
forgiveness, if he had expressed his sorrow
not before the Jews but before Christ. " I
have sinned," he said, "in that I have be-
trayed righteous blood. "5 Their answer
was : "What is that to us, see thou to that. "
What other reply do )'ou give, when one
guilty of a smaller sin confesses his deed to
you ? What do you answer but this: "What
is that to us, see thou to that " ? The halter
' S. Matt. xii. 30.
* S. John viii. 43.
2 S. Matt. vii. 17.
^ S. Matt, xxvii. 5.
^ Joel ii. 32.
CONCERNING REPENTANCE, BOOK II.
349
followed on those words, but the puishment
is all the more severe, the smaller the sin is.
28. But if they be not converted, do you at
least repent, whoby many a slip have fallen
from the lofty pinnacle of innocence and
faith. We have a good Lord, Whose will it
is to forgive all. Who called you by the
prophet, and said: "I, even I, am He that
blotteth out transgressions, and I will not re-
member, but do thou remember, and let us
plead together.'' '
CHAPTER V.
As to the words of St. Peter to Simon Magus, from
which the Novatians infer that there was no forgive-
ness for the latter, it is pointed out that St. Peter,
knowing his evil heart, might well use words of doubt,
and then by some Old Testament instances it is
pointed out that " perchance " does not exclude for-
giveness. The apostles transmitted to us that peni-
tence, the fruits of which are shown in the case of
David. St. Ambrose then adduces the example of
the Ephraimites, whose penitence must be followed
in order to gain the divine mercy and the sacra-
ments.
29. The Novatians bring up a question
from the words of the Apostle Peter. Be-
cause he said, "if perchance," they think
that he did not imply that forgiveness would
be granted on repentance. But let them
consider concerning whom the words were
spoken : of Simon, who did not believe
through faith, but was meditating trickery.
So too the Lord to him who said, "Lord,
I will follow Thee withersoever Thou
goest," replied, "Foxes have holes."^ For
He knew that the man's sincerity was not
wholly perfect. If, then, the Lord refused to
him who was not baptized permission to
follow Him, because He saw that he was not
sincere, do you wonder that the Apostle did
not absolve him who after baptism was
guilty of deceit, and whom he declared to
be still in the bond of iniquity .''
30. But let this be my answer to them.
As to myself. I say that Peter did not doubt,
and I do not think that so great a question
can be burked by the questionable interpre-
tation of a single word. For if they think
that Peter doubted, did God doubt. Who
said to the prophet Jeremiah : "Stand in
the court of the Lord's house, and thou shalt
give an answer to all Judah, to those who
* Isa. xliii. 25 [LXX.]. St. Ambrose, taking the Septuagint
reading, majces the contrast to be between man's remembering and
God's forgetting. But the contrast in the Hebrew is different : God
will do away sins of His pure mercy and challenges Israel to bring
forward any merits which can plead for pardon. God shows that
His mercy is even greater than His justice. St. Ambrose, as is
shown more clearly in chap, vi., is merely using a verbal antithesis.
^ S. Matt. viii. 19, 20.
come to worship in the Lord's house, even
all the words which I have appointed for thee
to answer them. Keep not back a word,
perchance they will hearken and be con-
verted.'' ' Let them say, then, that God also
knew not what would happen.
31. But ignorance is not implied in that
word, but the common custom of holy
Scripture is observed, in order to simplicity
of utterance. Inasmuch as the Lord says
also to Ezckiel : "Son of man, I will send
thee unto the house of Israel, to those who
have angered Me, both themselves and their
fathers, unto this day, and thou shalt say
unto them, Thus saith the Lord, if per-
chance they will hear and be afraid." ^ Did
He not know that they could or could not
be converted.'' So, then, that expression is
not always a proof of doubt.
32. Lastly, the wise men of this world,
who stake all their reputation on expressions
and words, do not everywhere use the Latin
word forte, " perchance, "or its Greek equi-
valent *«/«, as an expression of doubt. And
so they say that their earliest poet used the
words.
7] -axa xvpn
Eaojiai,
which is, "I shall soon be a widow ; " and
the passage goes on :
. . . Taxa yap ce KaraKveovmv 'AxcloI
navTEQ e<pop/n}6EVT£g.^
But he had no doubt that when all were
joining in the attack one might well be laid
low by all.
33. But let us use our own instances
rather than foreign ones. You find in the
Gospel that the Son Himself says of the
Father (when He had sent His servants to
His vineyard, and they had been slain),
that the Father said, "I will send l\Iy well-
beloved Son, perchance they will reverence
Him. "4 And in another place the Son says
of Himself: "Ye know neither Me nor My
Father ; for if ye knew Me, ye would per-
chance know My Father also."s
34. If, then, Peter used those words which
were used by God without any prejudice to
His knowledge, why should we not assume
that Peter also used them without prejudice
to his belief.'' For he could not doubt con-
cerning the gift of Christ, Who had given
him the power of forgiving sins ; especiall)'-
' Jer. xxvi. 2, 3. ^ Ezek. ii. 4, 5.
' Hom. //. III. 408. St. Ambrose is hardly right in assuming that
Homer used rdxa. with the sense of "perchance," though this is
common in later Greek. In Homer it means quickly.
* S. JNIatt. xxi. 37. = S. John viii. 19.
350
ST. AMBROSE.
since he was bound not to leave any place
for the craftiness of heretics who desire to
deprive men of hope, in order the more
easily to msinuate into the despairing their
opinion as to the reiteration of baptism.
35. But the apostles, having this baptism
according to the direction of Christ, taught
repentance, promised forgiveness, and re-
mitted guilt, as David taught when he said :
"Blessed are they whose transgressions
are forgiven, and whose sins are covered.
Blessed is the man to whom the Lord hath
not imputed sin." ' He calls each blessed,
both him whose sins are remitted by the
font, and him whose sin is covered by good
works. For he who repents ought not only
to wash away his sin by his tears, but also
to cover and hide his former transgressions
by amended deeds, that sin may not be im-
puted to him.
36. Let us, then, cover our falls by our sub-
sequent acts ; let us purify ourselves by
tears, that the Lord our God may hear us
when we lament, as He heard Ephraim
when weeping, as it is written : "I have
surely heard Ephraim weeping."^ And He
expressly repeats the very words of Eph-
raim : "Thou hast chastised me and I was
chastised, like a calf I was not trained. "^
For a calf disports itself, and leaves its stall,
and so Ephraim was untrained like a calf
far away from the stall ; because he had
forsaken the stall of the Lord, followed
Jeroboam, 4 and worshipped the calves, which
future event was prophetically indicated
through Aaron, 5 namely, that the people of
the Jews would fall after this manner. And
so repenting, Ephraim says : " Turn Thou
me, and I shall be turned, for Thou art the
Lord my God. Surely in the end of my
captivity I repented, and after I learned I
mourned over the days of confusion, and
subjected myself to Thee because I received
reproach and made Thee known. '"^
'iff. We see how to repent, with what words
and with what acts, that the days of sin are
called "days of confusion ; "' for there is
confusion when Christ is denied.
38. Let us, then, submit ourselves to God,
and not be subject to sin, and when we
ponder the remembrance of our offences, let
us blush as though at some disgrace, and
not speak of them as a glory to us, as some
boast of overcoming modesty, or putting
down the feeling of justice. Let our con-
version be such, that we who did not know
God may now ourselves declare Him to
^ Ps. xxxii. [xxxi.] i, 2. -' Jer. xxxi.
* Ecclus. xlvii. 23. ' Ex. xxxi.
* Jer. xxxi. 19 [ver>' loosely].
18.
^ Jer. xxxi. i8.
others, that the Lord, moved by such aeon-
version on our part, may answer to us :
" Ephraim is from youth a dear son, a plea-
sant child, for since jNIy words are concern-
ing him, I will verily remember him,
therefore have I hastened to be over him ;
I will surely have mercy on him, saith the
Lord." '
39. And what mercy He promises us, the
Lord also shows, when He says further on :
"I have satiated every thirsty soul, and
have satisfied every hungry soul. There-
fore, I awaked and beheld, and My sleep
was sweet unto ]\Ie. " ^ We observe that the
Lord promises His sacraments to those who
sin. Let us, then, all be converted to the
Lord.
CHAPTER VL
St. Ambrose teaches out of the prophet Isaiah what
they must do who have fallen. Then referring to
our Lord's proverbial expression respecting piping
and dancing, he condemns dances. Next by the ex-
ample of Jeremiah he sets forth the necessary accom-
paniments of repentance. And lastly, in order to
show the efficacy of this medicine of penance, he
enumerates the namesaof many who have used it for
themselves or for others.
40. But if they be not converted, do you
at least repent, who by many a slip have
fallen from the lofty pinnacle of innocence
and faith. We have a good Lord, ^^'hose
will it is to forgive all, Who called you by
the prophet and said: "L even I, am He
that blotteth out thy transgressions, and I
will not remember, but do thou remember
that we may plead together." "l,"He
says, "will not remember, but do thou re-
member," that is to say, "I do not recall
those transgressions which I have forgiven
thee, which are covered, as it were, with
oblivion, but do thou remember them. I
will not remember them because of My
erace, do thou remember them in order to
correction ; remember, thou mayest know
that the sin is forgiven, boast not as though
innocent, that thou aggravate not the sin,
but thou wilt be justified, confess thy sin."
For a shamefaced confession of sins looses
the bands of transgression.
41. You see what God requires of you,
that you remember that grace which you
have received, and boast not as though you
had not received it. You see by how com-
plete a promise of remission He draws you
to confession. Take heed, lest by resisting
the commandments of God you fall into the
^ Jer. xxxi. [LXX.] 20.
- Jer. xxxi. 25, 26.
CONCERNING REPENTANCE, BOOK II.
351
offence of the Jews^ to whom the Lord Jesus
said : ' ' We piped to you and ye danced not ;
we wailed and ye wept not. " ^
42. The words are ordinary words, but
the mystery is not ordinary. And so one
must be on one's guard, lest, deceived by
any common interpretation of this saying-,
one sliould suppose that the movements of
wanton dances and the madness of the
stage were commended ; for these are full
of evil in youthful age. But the dancing is
commended which David practised before
the ark of God. For everything is seemly
which is done for religion, so that we need
be ashamed of no service which tends to the
worship and honouring of Christ.
43. Dancing, then, which is an accom-
paniment of pleasures and luxury, is not
spoken of, but spiritually such as that where-
with one raises the eager body, and suf-
fers not the limbs to lie slothfully on the
ground, nor to grow stiff in their accustomed
tracks. Paul danced spiritually, when for
us he stretched forward, and forgetting the
things which were behind, and aiming at
those which were before, he pressed on to
the prize of Christ.^ And you, too, when
you come to baptism, are warned to raise
the hands, and to cause your feet where-
with you ascend to things eternal to be
swifter. This dancing accompanies faith,
and is the companion of grace.
44. This, then, is the mystery. " We piped
to you," singing in truth the song of the
New Testament, "and ye danced not."
That is, did not raise your souls to the spiri-
tual grace. ' ' We wailed, and ye wept not. "
That is, ye did not repent. And therefore
was the Jewish people forsaken, because it
did not repent, and rejected grace. Re-
pentance came by John, grace by Christ.
He, as the Lord, gives the one ; the other is
proclaimed, as it were, by the servant.
The Church, then, keeps both that it may
both attain to grace and not cast away re-
pentance, for grace is the gift of One Who
confers it ; repentance is the remedy of the
sinner.
45. Jeremiah knew that penitence was a
great remedy, which he in his Lamentations
took up for Jerusalem, and brings forward
Jerusalem itself as repenting, when he says :
" She wept sore in the night, and her tears
are on her cheeks, nor is there one to com-
fort her of all who love her. The ways of
Sion do mourn. "3 And he says further:
" For these things I weep, my eyes have
grown dim with weeping, because he who
' S. Luke vii. 32.
- Phil. ii. 13, 14.
" Lam. i. 2, 4.
used to comfort me is gone far from me." '
We notice that he thought this the bitterest
addition to his woes, that he who used to
comfort the mourner was gone far from him.
How, then, can you take away the very com-
fort by refusing to repentance the hope of
forgiveness .'*
46. But let those who repent learn how
they ought to carry it out, with what zeal,
with what affection, with what intention of
mind, with what shaking of the inmost
bowels, with what conversion of heart :
"Behold," he says, " O Lord, that I am in
distress, my bowels are troubled by my
weeping, my heart is turned wuthin me. '^
47. Here you recognize the intention of
the soul, the faithfulness of the mind, the
disposition of the body : "The elders of the
daughters of Sion sat," he says, " upon the
ground, they put dust upon their heads,
they girded themselves with haircloth, the
princes hung their heads to the ground, the
virgins of Jerusalem fainted with weeping,
my eyes grew dim, my bowels were
troubled, my glory was poured on the
earth. "3
48. So, too, did the people of Nineveh
mourn, and escaped the destruction of their
city. 4 Such is the remedial power of re-
pentance, that God seems because of it to
change His intention. To escape is, then, in
your own power ; the Lord wills to be en-
treated, He wills that men should hope in
Him, He wills that supplication should be
made to Him. Thou art a man, and wiliest
to be asked to forgive, and dost thou think
that God will pardon thee without asking
Him.?
49. The Lord Himself wept over Jeru-
salem, that, inasmuch as it would not weep
itself, it might obtain forgiveness through
the tears of the Lord. He wills that we
should weep in order that we may escape,
as )^ou find it in the Gospel : " Daughters of
Jerusalem, weep not for IMe, but weep for
yourselves." 5
50. David wept, and obtained of the
divine mercy the removal of the death of
the people who were perishing, when of the
three things proposed for his choice he
selected that in which he might have the
most experience of the divine mercy. Why
do you blush to weep for your sins, when
God commanded even the prophets to weep
for the people ?
51. And, lastly, Ezekiel was bidden to
weep for Jerusalem, and he took the book,
' Lam. i. i6.
* Jon. iii. 5.
^ Lam. i. 20.
^ S. Luke xxiii. 28.
' Lam. ii. 10, 11.
352
ST. AMBROSE.
at the beginning of which was written :
" Lamentation, and melody, and woe,'" ' two
things sad and one pleasant, for he shall be
saved in the future who has wept most in
this age. " For the heart of the wise is in
the house of mourning, and the heart of
fools in the house of feasting."^ And the
Lord Himself said : "Blessed are ye that
weep now, for ye shall laugh. "3
CHAPTER Vn.
An exhortation to mourning and confession of sins,
for Christ is moved by these and the tears of the
Church. Illustration from the story of Lazarus.
After showing that the Novatians are the successors
of those who planned to kill Lazarus, St. Ambrose
argues that the full forgiveness of every sin is signified
by the odour of the ointment poured by Mary on the
feet of Christ ; and further, that the Novatian heretics
find their likeness in Judas, who grudged and envied
when others rejoiced.
52. Let us, then, mourn for a time, that
we may rejoice for eternity. Let us fear the
Lord, let us anticipate Him with the confes-
sion of our sins, let us correct our back-
slidings and amend our faults, lest of us too
it be said: "Woe is me, my soul, for the
godly man is perished from the earth, and
there is none amongst men to correct them. " 4
53. Why do you fear to confess your sins
to our good Lord .-* "Set them forth," He
says, " that thou mayest be justified. " The
rewards of justification are set before him
who is still guilty of sin, for he is justified
who voluntarily confesses his own sin ; and
lastly, " the just man is his own accuser in
the beginning of his speaking. "5 The Lord
knows all things, but He waits for your
words, not that He may punish, but that He
may pardon. It is not His will that the
devil should triumph over you and accuse
you when you conceal your sins. Be be-
forehand with your accuser : if you accuse
yourself, you will fear no accuser ; if you
report yourself, though you were dead you
shall live.
54. Christ will come to your grave, and if
He finds there weeping for you Martha the
woman of good service, and Mary who
carefully heard the Word of God, like holy
Church which has chosen the best part. He
will be moved with compassion, when at
your death He shall see the tears of many
and will say : " Where have ye laid him ? "^
that is to say, in what condition of guilt is
he? in which rank of penitents .? I would
» Ezek. ii. 9 [LXX.J.
* Mic. vii. 2 [LXX.].
'■' Eccles. vii. 4.
^ Prov. xviii. 17.
•'' S. Luke vi. 21.
" S. John xi. 34.
see him for whom ye weep, that he himself
may move Me with his tears. I will see if
he is already dead to that sin for which for-
giveness is entreated.
55. The people will say to Him, "Come
and see."' What is the meaning of
"Come".? It means, Let forgiveness of
sins come, let the life of the departed
come, the resurrection of the dead, let
Thy kingdom come to this sinner also.
56.^ He will come and will command that
the stone be taken away which his fall has
laid on the shoulders of the sinner. He
could have removed the stone by a word of
command, for even inanimate nature is wont
to obey the bidding of Christ. He could by
the silent power of His working have re-
moved the stone of the sepulchre, at Whose
Passion the stones being suddenly removed
many sepulchres of the dead were opened,
but He bade men remove the stone, in very
truth indeed, that the unbelieving might be-
lieve what they saw, and see the dead rising
again, but in a type that He might give us
the power of ligh'tening the burden of sins,
the heavy pressure as it w^ere upon the
guilty. Ours it is to remove the burdens,
His to raise again. His to bring forth from
the tombs those set free from their bands.
57. So the Lord Jesus, seeing the heavy
burden of the sinner, weeps, for the Church
alone He suffers not to weep. He has com-
passion with His beloved, and says to him
that is dead, "Come forth, "^ that is, "Thou
who liest in darkness of conscience, and in
the squalor of thy sins, as in the prison-
house of the guilty, come forth, declare thy
sins that thou mayest be justified. "For
with the mouth confession is made unto
salvation. "3
58. If you have confessed at the call of
Christ the bars will be broken, and every
chain loosed, even the stench of the bodily
corruption be grievous. For he had been
dead four days and his flesh stank in the
tomb ; but He Whose flesh saw no corrup-
tion was three days in the sepulchre, for He
knew no evils of the flesh, which consists of
the substances of the four elements. How-
ever great, then, the stench of the dead body
may be, it is all done away so soon as the
sacred ointment has shed its odour ; and the
dead rises again, and the command is given
to loose his hands who till now was in sin ;
the covering is taken from his face which
veiled the truth of the grace which he had
received. But since he has received for-
' S. John xi. 34.
' Rom. X. 10.
* S. John xi. 43.
CONCERNING REPENTANCE, BOOK II.
353
giveness, the command is given to uncover
his face, to lay bare his features. For he
whose sin is forgiven has nothing whereof
to be ashamed.
59. But in the presence of such grace
given by the Lord, of such a miracle of di-
vine bounty, when all ought to have re-
joiced, the wicked were stirred up and
gathered a council against Christ,' and
wished moreover to kill Lazarus also.^ Do
you not recognize that you are the succes-
sors of those whose hardness you inherit .''
For you too are angry and gather a council
against the Church, because you see the
dead come to life again in the Church, and
to be raised again by receiving forgiveness
of their sins. And thus, so far as in you,
you desire to slay again through envy those
who are raised to life.
60. But Jesus does not revoke His bene-
fits, nay, rather He amplifies them by
additions of His liberality. He anxiously
revisits him who was raised again, and re-
joicing in the gift of the restored life. He
comes to the feast which His Church has
prepared for Him, at which he who had
been dead is found as one amongst those
sitting down with Christ.
61. Then all wonder who look upon him
with the pure gaze of the mind, who are free
from envy, for such children the Church has.
They wonder, as I said, how he who yester-
day and the day before lay in the tomb is
one of those sitting with the Lord Jesus.
62. Mary herself pours ointment on the
feet of the Lord Jesus. 3 Perchance for this
reason on His feet, because one of the low-
liest has been snatched from death, for we
are all the body of Christ, * but others per-
chance are the more honourable members.
The Apostle was the mouth of Christ, for he
said, "Ye seek a proof of Christ that speaketh
in me. '5 The prophets through whom He
spake of things to come were His mouth,
would that I might be found worthy to be
His foot, and may Mary pour on me her
precious ointment, and anoint me and wipe
away my sin.
63. What, then, we read concerning Laza-
rus we ought to believe of every sinner who
is converted, who, though he may have
been stinking, nevertheless is cleansed by
the precious ointment of faith. For faith
has such grace that there where the dead
stank the day before, now the whole house
is filled with good odour.
64. The house of Corinth stank, when it
' S. John xi. 47.
* I Cor. xii. 27
- S. John xii. lo.
^ 2 Cor. xiii. 3.
^ S. John xii. 3.
was written concerning it : " It is reported
that there is fornication among you, and
such fornication as is not even among the
Gentiles."' There was a stench, for a little
leaven had corrupted the whole lump. A
good odour began when it was said : "If
ye forgive anything to any one I forgive
also. For what I also have forgiven, for
your sakes have I done it in the person of
Christ."^ And so, the sinner being set free,
there was great joy in that place, and the
whole house was filled with the odour of
the sweetness of grace. Wherefore the
Apostle, knowing well that he had shed
upon all the ointment of apostolic forgive-
ness, says: " We are a sweet savour of
Christ unto God in them that are saved. "^
65. At the pouring forth, then, of this oint-
ment all rejoice ; Judas alone speaks against
it. 4 So, too, now he who is a sinner speaks
against it, he who is a traitor blames it, but he
is himself blamed by Christ, as he knows not
the remedy of the Lord's death, and under-
stands not the mystery of that so great
burial. For the Lord both suffered and
died that He might redeem us from death.
This is manifest from the most excellent
value from His death, which is sufficient for
the absolution of the sinner, and his resto-
ration to fresh grace ; so that all may come
and w^onder at his sitting at table with
Christ, and may praise God, saying: "Let
us eat and feast, for he was dead and is
alive again, had perished and is found. "5
But any one devoid of faith objects : "Why
does He eat with publicans and sinners.'' "
This is his answer: "They that are whole
have no need of the physician, but they that
are sick. "^
CHAPTER Vni.
In urging repentance St. Ambrose turns to his own
case, expressing the wish that he could wash our
Lord's feet Uke the woman in the Gospel, which
is a great pattern of penitence, though such as cannot
attain to it find acceptance. He prays for himself,
especially that he may sorrow with sinners, who are
better than himself. Those for whom Christ died
are not to be contem.ned.
66. Show, then, your wound to the Phy-
sician that He may heal it. Though you
show it not, He knows it, but waits to hear
your voice. Do away your scars by tears.
Thus did that woman in the Gospel, and
wiped out the stench of her sin ; thus did she
' I Cor. V. I.
* S. John xii. 4.
" 2 Cor. ii. 10.
^ S. Luke XV. 24.
^ 2 Cor. ii. 15.
8 S. Matt. ix. II, 12.
354
ST. AMBROSE.
wash away her fault, when washing the
feet of Jesus with her tears.
67. Would that Thou, Lord Jesus, mightest
reserve for me the washing off from Thy
feet of the stains contracted since Thou
walkest in me ! O that Thou mightest offer
to me to cleanse the pollution which I by
my deeds have caused on Thy steps ! But
whence can I obtain living water, where-
with I may wash Thy feet.' If I have no
water I have tears, and whilst with them I
wash Thy feet I trust to cleanse myself.
Whence is it that Thou shouldst say to me :
"His sins which are many are forgiven, be-
cause he loved much".? I confess that I
owe more, and that more has been forgiven
me who have been called to the priesthood
from the tumult and strife of the law courts
and the dread of public administration ; and
therefore I fear that I may be found ungrate-
ful, if I, to whom more has been forgiven,
love less.
68. But all are not able to equal that
woman, who was deservedly preferred even
to Simon, who was giving the feast to the
Lord ; who gave a lesson to all who desire
to gain forgiveness, by kissing the feet of
Christ, washing them with her tears, wiping
them with her hair, and anointing them
with ointment.
69. In a kiss is the sign of love, and there-
fore the Lord Jesus says : " Let her kiss Me
with the kisses of her mouth."' What is
the meaning of the hair, but that you may
learn that, having laid aside all the pomp of
worldly trappings, you must implore pardon,
throw yourself on the earth with tears, and
prostrate on the ground move pity. In the
ointment, too, is set forth the savour of a
good conversation. David was a king, yet
he said : " Every night will I wash my bed,
I will water my couch with tears." ^ And
therefore he obtained such a favour, as that
of his house the Virgin should be chosen,
who by her child-bearing should bring forth
Christ for us. Therefore is this woman also
praised in the Gospel.
70. Nevertheless if we are unable to equal
her, the Lord Jesus knows also how to aid
the weak, when there is no one who can
prepare the feast, or bring the ointment, or
carry with her a spring of living water. He
comes Himself to the sepulchre.
71. Would that Thou wouldst vouchsafe
to come to this sepulchre of mine, O Lord
Jesus, that Thou wouldst wash me with
Thy tears, since in my hardened eyes I
possess not such tears as to be able to wash
away my offence. If Thou shalt weep for
me I shall be saved ; if I am worthy of Thy
tears I shall cleanse the stench of all my of-
fences ; if I am worthy that Thou weep but
a little, Thou wilt call me out of the tomb
of this body and will say : "Come forth,"
that my meditations may not be kept pent
up in the narrow limits of this body, but may
go forth to Christ, and move in the light,
that I may think no more on works of dark-
ness but on works of light. For he who
thinks on sins endeavours to shut himself up
within his own consciousness.
72. Callforth, then, Thy servant. Although
bound with the chain of my sins I have my
feet fastened and my hands tied ; being now
buried in dead thoughts and works, yet at ,
Thy call I shall go forth free, and shall be
found one of those sitting at Thy feast, and
Thy house shall be filled with precious oint-
ment. If Thou hast vouchsafed to redeem
any one. Thou wilt preserve him. For it
shall be said, "See, he was not brought
up in the bosom of the Church, nor trained
from childhood, but hurried from the judg-
ment-seat, brought away from the vani-
ties of this world, growing accustomed to
the singing of the choir instead of the shout
of the crier, but he continues in the priest-
hood not by his own strength, but by the
grace of Christ, and sits among the guests
at the heavenly table.
73. Preserve, O Lord, Thy work, guard
the gift which Thou hast given even to him
who shrank from it. For I knew that I was
not worthy to be called a bishop, because I
had devoted myself to this world, but by
Thy grace I am what I am. And I am
indeed the least of all bishops, and the low-
est in merit ; yet since I too have imdertaken
some labour for Thy holy Church, watch
over this fruit, and let not him whom when
lost Thou didst call to the priesthood, to be
lost when a priest. And first grant that I
may know how with inmost affection to
mourn with those who sin ; for this is a very
great virtue, since it is written : " And thou
shalt not rejoice over the children of Judah
in the day of their destruction, and speak not
proudly in the day of their trouble." ' Grant
that so often as the sin of any one who has
fallen is made known to me I may suffer
with him, and not chide him proudly, but
mourn and weep, so that weeping over
another I may mourn for myself, saying.
' ' Tamar hath been more righteous than I. " ^
74. Perchance a maiden may have fallen,
deceived and hurried away by those occa-
1 Cant. i. 2.
2 Ps. vi. 6.
' Obed. 12.
^ Gen. xxxviii. 26.
CONCERNING REPENTANCE, BOOK II.
3S5
sions which are the sources of sins. Well,
we who are older sin too. In us, too, the law
of this flesh wars against the law of our
mind, and makes us captives of sin, so that
we do what we would not." Her youth is
an excuse for her, I now have none, for she
ought to learn, we ought to teach. So that
" Tamar hath been more righteous than I."
75. We inveigh against some one's cove-
tousness, let us call to mind whether we
ourselves have never done anything cove-
tously ; and if we have, since covetousness
is the root of all evils, and is working in our
bodies like a serpent secretly under the
earth, let each of us say : " Tamar hath
been more righteous than I."
76. If we have been seriously moved
against any one, a layman may act hastily
for a smaller matter than a bishop. Let us
ponder that with ourselves and say, He who
is reproved for quick temper is more right-
eous than I. For if we thus speak, we
guard ourselves against this, that the Lord
jesus or one of His disciples should say to
us: "Thou beholdest the mote in thy
brother's eye, but beholdest not the beam
which is in thine own eye. Thou hypocrite,
cast out first the beam out of thine own eye,
and then shalt thou see to cast out the
mote out of thy brother's eye. "^
77. Let us, then, not be ashamed to say
that our fault is more serious than that of
him whom we think we must reprove, for
this is what Judah did who reprimanded
Tamar, and remembering his own fault said :
"Tamar is more righteous than I." In
which saying there is a deep mystery and a
moral precept ; and therefore is his offence
not reckoned to him, because he accused
himself before he was accused by others.
78. Let us, then, not rejoice over the sin
of any one, but rather let us mourn, for it
is written : " Rejoice not against me, O my
enemy, because I have fallen, for I shall
arise ; for if I sit in darkness the Lord shall
be a light unto me. I will bear the indig-
nation of the Lord, because I have sinned
against Him, until He maintain my cause,
and execute judgment for me, and bring me
forth to the light, and I shall behold His
righteousness. Mine enemy, too, shall see
it and shall be covered with confusion,
which said unto me, Where is the Lord thy
God .-* Mine eyes shall behold her, and she
shall be for treading down as the mire in the
streets. "3 And this not undeservedly, for
he who rejoices at the fall of another re-
joices at the victory of the devil. Let us,
' Rom. vii. 23 S.
' S. Matt. vii. 4, 5.
2 Mic. vii. 8, 9, 10.
then, rather mourn when we hear that one
has perished for whom Christ died. Who de-
spises not even the straw in time of harvest.
79. O that He may not cast away this
straw at His harvest, the empty stalks of
my produce ; but may He gather it in, as is
said by some one : " Woe is me, for I am
become as one that gathereth straw in har-
vest, and grape gleanings in the vintage,"'
that He may eat of the lirstfruits at least of
His grace in me, though He approve not the
later fruit.
CHAPTER IX.
In what way faith is neces.sary for repentance.
Means for paying our debts, in which work, prayer,
tears, and fasting are of more value than money.
Some instances are adduced, and St. Ambrose de-
clares that generosity is profitable, but only when
joined with faith ; it is, moreover, liable to certain
defects. lie goes on to speak of some defects in
repentance, such as too great haste in seeking recon-
ciliation, considering abstinence from sacraments all
that is needed, of committing sin in hope of repent-
ing later.
80. So, then, it is fitting for us to believe
both that sinners must repent and that for-
giveness is to be given on repentance, yet
still as hoping for forgiveness as granted
upon faith, not as a debt, for it is one thing
to earn, and anotherpresumptuously to claim
a right. Faith asks for forgiveness, as it
were, by covenant, but presumption is more
akin to demand than to request. Pay lirst
that which you owe, that you may be in a
position to ask for what you have hoped.
Come with the disposition of an honest
debtor, that you may not contract a fresh
liability, but may pay that which is due of
the existing debt with the possessions of
your faith.
81. He who owes a debt to God has more
help towards payment than he who is in-
debted to man. Man requires money for
money, and this is not always at the debt-
or's command. God demands the affection
of the heart, which is in our own power.
No one who owes a debt to God is poor,
except one who has made himself poor.
And even if he have nothing to sell, yet has
he wherewith to pay. Prayer, fasting, and
tears are the resources of an honest debtor,
and much more abundant than if one from
the price of his estate offered money with-
out faith.
82. Ananias was poor, when after selling
his land he brought the money to the
* Mic. vii. X.
ST. AMBROSE.
apostles, and was not able with it to pay his
debt, but involved himself the more. ' That
widow was rich who cast her two small
pieces into the treasury, of whom Christ
said : "This poor widow hath cast in more
than they all. " ^ For God requires not
money but faith.
83. And I do not deny that sins may be
diminished by liberal gifts to the poor, but
only if faith commend what is spent. For
what would the giving of one's whole pro-
perty benefit without charity }
84. There are some who aim at the credit
of generosity for pride alone, because they
wish thereby to gain the good opinion of the
multitude for leaving nothing to themselves ;
but whilst they are seeking rewards in this
life, they are laying up none for the life to
couie, and having received their reward here
they cannot hope for it there.
85. Some again, having, through impul-
sive excitement and not after long consider-
ation, given their possessions to the Church,
think that they can claim them back. These
eain neither the first nor the second reward,
for the gift was made thoughtlessly, its re-
call sacrilegiously.
86. Some repent of having distributed
their property to the poor. But they who
are doing penance must not repent of this,
lest they repent of their own repentance.
For many seek for penance through fear of
future punishment, being conscious of their
sins, and having received their penance are
held back by fear of the public entreaties.
These persons seem to have sought for re-
pentance for their evil deeds, but to exer-
cise it for their good ones.
87. Some seek penance because they wish
to be at once restored to communion. These
wish not so much to loose themselves as to
bind the priest, for they do not put off the
guilt from their own conscience, but lay it
on that of the priest, to whom the command
is given : "Give not that which is holy to
the dogs, neither cast your pearls before the
swine ; " ^ that is to say, that partakmg of
the holy Communion is not to be allowed
to those polluted with impurity.
88. .\nd so one may see those walking in
other attire, who ought to be weeping and
groaning because they had defiled the robe
of sanctification and grace ; and women
loading their ears with pearls, and weighing
down their necks, who had better have bent
to Christ than to gold, and who ought to be
weeping for themselves, because they have
lost the pearl from heaven.
* Acts V. I, 2.
' S. Luke xxi. 3.
3 S. Matt. vii. 6.
89, There are, again, some who think that
it is penitence to abstain from the heavenly
sacraments. These are too cruel judges
of themselves, who prescribe a penalty for
themselves but refuse the remedy, who
ought to be mourning over their self-imposed
penalty, because it deprives them of heaven-
ly grace.
90. Others think that licence is granted
them to sin, because the hope of penitence
is before them, whereas penitence is the
remedy, not an incentive to sin. For the
salve is necessary for the wound, not the
wound for the salve, since a salve is sought
because of the wound, the wound is not
wished for on account of the salve. The
hope which is put off to a future season is
but feeble, for every season is uncertain,
and hope does not outlive all time.
■ CHAPTER X.
In order to do away with the feehng of shame which
holds back the guilty from public penance, St. Am-
brose points out the advantage of prayers offered by
the whole Church, and sets forth the example of saints
who have sorrowed. Then, after reproving those who
imagine that penance may be often repeated, he points
ont the difficulty of repentance, and how it is to be
carried out.
91. Can any one endure that you should
blush to entreat God, when you do not blush
to entreat a man .? That you should be
ashamed to entreat Him Who knows you
fully, when you are not ashamed to confess
your sins to i\. man who knows you not.'''
Do you shrink from witnesses and sympa-
thizers in your prayers, when, if you have
to- satisfy a man, you must visit many and
entreat them to be kind enough to inter-
vene ; when you throw yourself at a man's
knees, kiss his feet, bring your children, still
unconscious of guilt, to entreat also for their
father s pardon } And you disdain to do
this in the Church in order to entreat God,
in order to gain for yourself the support of
the holy congregation ; where there is no
cause for shame, except indeed not to con-
fess, since we are all sinners, amongst
whom he is the most praiseworthy who is
the most humble ; he is the most just who
feels himself the lov^-est.
92. Let the Church, our Mother, weep for
' A good deal of controversy has arisen about this passage, which
certainly appears, fir hiia facie, to contrast confession to God and to
a man obviously priest or bishop. The Renedictine editors insist
much upon the use of the singular number, hoviiiii, a man. But
the word might conceivably be used in a general sense. There is
no real doubt as to the practice of the Early Church. See note at
the end of this treatise.
CONCERNING REPENTANCE, BOOK II.
357
you, and wash away your guilt with her
tears ; let Christ see you mourning and say,
" Blessed arc ye that are sad, for ye shall re-
joice." It pleases Him that many should
entreat for one. In the Gospel, too, moved
by the widow's tears, because many were
weeping for her, He raised her son. He
heard Peter more quickly when He raised
Dorcas, because the poor were mourning
over the death of the woman. He also
forthwith forgave Peter, for he wept most
bitterly. And if you weep bitterly Christ
will look upon you and your guilt shall leave
you. For the application of pain does away
with the enjoyment of the wickedness and
the delight of the sin. And so while mourn-
ing over our past sins we shut the door
against fresh ones, and from the condemna-
tion of our guilt there arises as it were a
training in innocence.
93. Let, then, nothing call you away from
penitence, for this you have in common
with the saints, and would that such sor-
rowing for sin as that of the saints were
copied by you. David, as it were, " ate
ashes for bread, and mingled his drink with
weeping."' and therefore now rejoices the
more because he wept the more : "Mine
eyes ran down," he said, "with rivers of
water. '' ^
94. John wept sore,^ and, as he tells us,
the mysteries of Christ were revealed to
him. But that woman who, when she was
in sin and ought to have wept, nevertheless
rejoiced, and covered herself with a robe of
purple and scarlet,^ and adorned herself
with much gold and precious stones, now
mourns the misery of eternal weeping.
95. Deservedly are they blamed who
think that they often do penance, for they
are wanton against Christ. For if they
went through their penance in truth, they
would not think that it could be repeated
again ; for as there is but one baptism, so
there is but one course of penance, so far as
the outward practice goes, for we must re-
pent of our daily faults, but this latter has to
do with lighter faults, the former with such as
are graver.
96. But I have more easily found such as
had preserved their innocence than such as
had fittingly repented. Does any one think
that that is penitence where there still exists
the striving after earthly honours, where
wine flows, and even conjugal connection
takes place .'^ The world must be renounced;
less sleep must be indulged in than nature
1 Ps. cii. fci.] 9.
* Rev. xvii. 4.
■ Ps. cxix. [cxviii.] 136.
s Rev
V. 4-
demands ; it must be broken by groans, in-
terrupted by sighs, put aside by prayers ;
the mode of life must be such that we die to
the usual habits of life. Let the man deny
himself and be wholly changed, as in the
fable they relate of a certain youth, who left
his home because of his love for a harlot,
and, having subdued his love, returned ;
then one day meeting his old favourite and
not speaking to her, she, being surprised and
supposing that he had not recognized her,
said, when they met again, "It is I."
"But," was his answer, "I am not the
former I."
97. Well then did the Lord say : "If any
man will come after Me, let him deny him-
self, and take up his cross and follow Me." '
For they who are dead and buried in Christ
oueht not aeain to make their conclusions as
though living in the world. "Touch not,"
it is said, " nor attend to those things which
tend to corruption by their very use, ^ for the
very customs of this life corrupt integrity."
CHAPTER XL
The possibility of repentance is a reason why bap-
tism should not be deferred to old age, a practice
which is against the will of God in holy Scripture.
But it is of no use to practise penance whilst still
serving lusts. These must be first subdued.
98. Good, then, is penitence, and if there
were no place for it, every one would defer
the grace of cleansing by baptism to old age.
And a sufficient reason is that it is better to
have a robe to mend, than none to put on ;
but as that which has been repaired once is
restored, so that which is frequently mended
is destroyed.
99. And the Lord has given a sufficient
warning to those who put off repentance,
when He says: "Repent ye, for the king-
dom of heaven is at hand. " 3 We know not at
what hour the thief will come, we know not
whether our soul may be required of us this
next night. God cast Adam out of Paradise
immediately after his fault : there was no de-
lay. At once the fallen were severed from
all their enjoyments that they might do
penance ; at once God clothed them with
garments of skins, not of silk.*
ICO. And what reason is there for putting
1 S. Matt. xvi. 24.
- Col. ii. 21. We have here an instance of a ver%' extreme kind,
of the way in which St. Ambrose and other writers occasionally
quote the words nf holy Scripture without reference to their con-
text or real meaning The words suit the argument of .St. Ambrose
and he uses them. But they mean almost the very opposite in the
original. They are part of the argument which St. Paul is oppos-
ing, not his argument.
' S. Matt. iv. 17. * Gen. iii. 21, 2x.
35S
ST. AMBROSE.
off? Is it that you may sin yet more?
Then because God is good you are evil, and
"despise the riches of His goodness and
long-suffering."' But the goodness of the
Lord ought rather to draw you to repent-
ance. Wherefore holy David says to all :
"Come, let us worship and fall down be-
ford Him, and mourn before our Lord Who
made us. " * But for a sinner who has died
without repentance, because nothing re-
mains but to mourn grievously and to
weep, you find him groaning and saying :
" O my son Absalom ! my son Absalom ! "3
For him who is wholly dead mourning is
without alleviation.
loi. But of those who as exiles and ban-
ished from their ancestral homes, which the
holy law of Moses had assigned them, will
be entangled in the errors of the world, you
hear him saying : "By the waters of Baby-
lon we sat down and wept, when we re-
membered Zion."4 He sets forth the wail-
ings of those who have fallen, and shows
that they who are living in this condition of
passing time and changing circumstances
ought to repent, after the example of those
who, as a reward for sin, had been led into
miserable captivity.
102. But nothing causes such exceeding
grief as when any one, lying under the cap-
tivity of sin, calls to mind whence he has
fallen, because he turned aside to carnal
and earthly things, instead of directing his
mind in the beautiful ways of the knowledge
of God.
103. So you find Adam concealing him-
self, when he knew that God was present,
and wishing to be hidden when called by
God with that voice which wounded the
soul of him who was hiding: "Adam,
where art thou .-' " 5 That is to say, Where-
fore hidest thou thyself? Why art thou con-
cealed ? Why dost thou avoid Him, Whom
thou once didst long to see ? A guilty con-
science is so burdensome that it punishes
itself without a judge, and wishes for cover-
ing, and yet is bare before God.
104. And so no one in a state of sin ought
to claim a right to or the use of the sacra-
ments, for it is written : " Thou hast sinned,
be still. "^ As David says in the Psalm
lately quoted : "We hanged our harps upon
the willows in the midst thereof ; " and
again : " How shall we sing the Lord's song
* Ps. xcv. [xciv.] 6
* Ps. cxxxvii. [cxxxvi.] i.
* Rom. ii. 4.
' 2 Sam. [2 Kings] xviii. 33.
° Gen. iii. 9.
' Gen. iv. 7 [LXX.]. These words occur in the .Septuagint only,
and would seem to be taken here by St. .Ambrose as a warning from
God to Cain, not to sacrifice whilst in .sin, and so be applied to those
sinners whom he enjoins not to communicate before they repent.
ni a strange land? " ' For if the flesh wars
against the mind, and is not subject to the
guidance of the Spirit, that is a strange land
which is not subdued by the toil of the cul-
tivator, and so cannot produce the fruits of
charity, patience, and peace. It is better,
then, to be still when you cannot prac-
tise the works of repentance, lest in the very
acts of repentance there be that which after-
ward will need further repentance. For if
it be once entered upon and not rightly car-
ried out, it obtains not the result of a first
repentance and takes away the use of a later
one.^
105. When, then, the flesh resists, the soul
must be intent upon God, and if results do
not follow, let not faith fail. And if the en-
ticements of the flesh come upon us, or the
powers of the enemy attack us, let the soul
keep in submission to God. For we are
then specially oppressed when the flesh
yields. And some there are who trouble
heavily the wretched soul, seeking to de-
prive it of all protection. To which case
the words apply: "Rase it, rase it, even
to the foundations. " ^
106. And David, pitying her, says: "O
wretched daughter of Babylon." * Wretched
indeed, as being the daughter of Babylon,
when she ceased to be the daughter of Jeru-
salem, s And yet he calls for a healer for
her, and says: "Blessed is he who shall
take thy little ones and dash them against
the rock. "^ That is to say, shall dash all
corrupt and filthy thoughts against Christ,
Who by His fear and His rebuke will break
down all motions against reason, so as, if
any one is seized by an adulterous love, to
extinguish the fire, that he may by his zeal
put away the love of a harlot, and deny
himself that he may gain Christ.
107. We have then learned that we must
do penance, and this at a time when the
heat of luxury and sin is giving way ; and
that we, when under the dominion of sin,
must show ourselves Godfearing by re-
fraining, rather than allowing ourselves in
evil practices. For if it is said to Moses
when he was desiring to draw nearer : " Put
off thy shoes from off thy feet," ? how much
' Ps. cxxxvii. [cxxxvi.] 2, 4.
2 I do not feel sure of the meaning of this passage, but it appears
to be as above, that a person going through the outward exercises of
penance without inward repentance, gains no benefit, and as sinners
were not admitted to a second course of penance, does away with
his chance for the future. [Ed]
•* Ps. cxxxvii. [cxxxvi] 7. * Ps. cxxxvii. [cxxxvi ] 8 [LXX.].
^ This passage is another instance of the way in which St. Am-
brose, like many other early writers, lost sight of the original mean-
ing of the text in drawing allegorical lessons from it. The " daugh-
ter of Babylon," /.<•. the people, had never been a "daughter of
God," nor was the dashing of the children against the rock ever in-
tended to bear the beautiful interpretation given to it by our author.
' Ps. cxxxvii. [cxxxvi.] 9. '' Ex. iii. s-
CONCERNING REPENTANCE, BOOK II.
359
more must we free the feet of our soul from
the bonds of the body, and clear our steps
from all connection with this world.
Note on the Penitential Discipline of the
Early Church.
It was always believed in the Church that
the power of binding and loosing had been
entrusted by our Lord to His apostles, and
by them handed on to their successors in
the ministry. The earlier practice would
seem to have been short and simple : ex-
clusion from Communion, some outward
discipline, not always' continued for a long
period, and reconciliation on true repent-
ance, these matters being decided by the
bishop at his discretion. Gradually the
practice became more systematized, various
periods of discipline were prescribed for
various sins, and the time for this discipline
was lengthened.
There were three parts in the discipline of
Penitence as a whole :
1. Confession, i^ofjLuX6yr/ffi<;, a term used
frequently of the whole course.
2. Penance, properly so called, i.e. the
mortifications, fasting, etc. , prescribed.
3. Reconciliation, performed solemnly by
the bishop, often at Easter.
The confession was probably in private
to the bishop, who determined whether any
public confession should be made or not.
But as only great sins — at first, idolatry,
adultery, and murder {peccafa morialia) —
were punished by outward penance, it was
clear that the sin must have been very
grievous.
The Montanists taught that the Church
had not power to forgive great sins, and
this led to clearing the doctrine, and from
the middle of the third century, even those
who had lapsed into idolatry were admitted
to penance.
Hermas already says : to?? d»ohH<i rouSeoo
liiravotd i/rrt /ua, Mand. iv. i. And this rule
seems to have been maintained as regards
the formal penance and reconciliation, not
as implying doubt of possible forgiveness,
but as a matter of discipline, and this rule
deprived those who fell a second time from
communion at least till their deathbed.
For this public penance the Greek words
are iisra^ota and i^<i;j.(ih)yrj/rc<: ; the Latin, peni-
tentia and frequently exoniologesis. As the
word penitentia includes not merely sor-
row for sin and change of heart, but also
penance, or the penalty inflicted by au-
thority, and is used in such phrases as peni-
tentiam agere or facere, it has been neces-
sary in the translation of the De Peni-
tentia to vary the English terms, and to use
sometimes repentance, sometimes penance.
For further information on this subject,
the reader is referred specially to the Articles,
Buss-Disciplin, in the Freiburg Kirchen-
Lexiko?!, by Wetzer and Welte ; and to those
on Exomologesis, Penitence, and Recon-
ciliation, in the Diet, of Christian Anti-
quities, where other authorities and refer-
ences will be found.
CONCERNING VIRGINS.
INTRODUCTION.
The state of Virginity is undoubtedly commended in holy Scripture, both by our
Lord and St. Paul, but learned men have differed in their opinions as to the original cus-
toms and rules observed by virgins in the earliest ages. Some suppose that from the
very beginning it was the custom for them to make a solemn profession of the virgin life,
and to live together in common. Others consider that their vows were private, and they
lived sometimes together, sometimes in the homes of their parents. Others, again, believ-
ing that there was no more than a simple purpose on the part of the virgins signified by
the veil, and the simplicity of their dress, attribute the first commencements of community
life to St. Ambrose himself
The first opinion is hardly tenable as regards any profession which was notorious.
Statements in the earlier Acts of Martyrs are to be regarded with suspicion, as so much of
this class of writings is spurious. The utterances also of Fathers and Councils hardly
establish anything on this point more than on the second mentioned above.
There would seem to have been some who publicly, like Marcellina, the sister of St.
Ambrose, made their profession, and formally received the veil at the hands of the
Bishop ; and others, equally steadfast in purpose, whose vow of virginity was made in
private. Of the former, those living in Milan hardly seem to have led a life in common,
but at Bologna [1. 60] they did. The terms, vow, taking the veil, and profession, were in
use in St. Ambrose's day, as at presen L
It would appear, then, that from the days of the apostles there were some who devoted
themselves to God in a life of chastity, and that later on the promise or vow was made in
the presence of others — the bishop, clergy, and friends. These virgins lived at home with
their parents, whilst the times of persecution endured, making it practically impossible for
them to live elsewhere. Common life amongst them would seem to have commenced in
the East, and St. Athanasius, when, seeking refuge from the Arians, he came to Rome,
introduced the custom to the Western Church.
St. Ambrose worked vigorously in this direction, not only in his own diocese, but in
neighbouring provinces, and even in Africa. Early in his episcopate he addressed his
flock on the subject, and at the request of his sister, Marcellina, gathered up his teaching
in the following three books.
In the first book he treats of the dignity of Virginity, and states his reason for writing.
As he commences his addresses on the anniversary of the martyrdom of St. Agnes, he takes
her story as the subject of the earlier part of the treatise, and shows how, amongst the
Jews, and even amongst the heathen, the grace of virginity was shadowed forth, and
eventually proclaimed by the coming of our Lord. He then warns parents, especially
widows, not to prevent their daughters from hearing addresses on this subject, and touches
on the number of those who came even from great distances to receive the veil at Milan.
In the second book, speaking of the character and manner of life of virgins, he does
this, as he says, by adducing examples and instances, preferably to laying down a code
of rules. He speaks of Thecla, patron saint of Milan, a disciple of St. Paul, and of other
virgins.
In the third book he goes through a summary of the address given by Pope Liberius,
when Marcellina received the veil at his hands, before a large congregation. Some
361
362 INTRODUCTION.
cautions are introduced by St. Ambrose against excessive austerity, and instead of some
outward acts, prayer and the practice of interior virtues are recommended. The subject of
certain virgins who had committed suicide rather than lose their chastity is dwelt upon in
answer to a question of Marcellina.
The writer himself states that this treatise was composed in the third year of his
episcopate, a.d. 377. and it is quoted with approval by St. Jerome, Ep. XXII. 22 and
XLVIII. 14 [Vol. VI., pp. 31 and 75, of this series"", and St. Augustine, de doct. Christ.
IV. 48, 50.
THREE BOOKS OF ST. AMBROSE, BISHOP OF MILAN,
CONCERNING VIRGINS, TO MARCELLINA, HIS SISTER.
BOOK I.
CHAPTER I.
St. Ambrose, reflecting upon the account he will have
to give of his talents, determines to write, and con-
soles himself with certain examples of God's mercy.
Then recognizing his own deficiencies desires that he
may be dealt with like the fig-tree in the Gospel, and
expresses a hope that words will not fail him in his
endeavour to preach Christ.
1. If, according- to the decree of heavenly-
truth, we have to give account of every
idle word which we have spoken,' and if
every servant will incur no small blame
when his lord returns, who, either like a
timid money-lender or covetous owner, has
hidden in the earth the talents of spiritual
grace which were entrusted to him in order
that they- might be multiplied by increasing
interest, I, who, although possessed of but
moderate ability, yet have a great necessity
laid on me of making increase of the say-
ings of God entrusted to me, must rightly
fear lest an account of the profit of my
words be demanded of me, especially see-
ing that the Lord exacts of us effort, not
profit. Wherefore I determined to write
something, since, too, my words are lis-
tened to with greater risk to modesty than
when they are written, for a book has no
feeling of modesty.
2. And so distrusting indeed my own
ability, but encouraged by the instances of
divine mercy, I venture to compose an
address, for when God willed even the ass
spoke. ^ And 1 will open my mouth long
dumb, that the angel may assist me also, en-
gaged in the burdens of this world, for He can
do away with the hindrances of unskilful-
ness. Who in the ass did away those of
1 S. Matt. xii. 36.
* Num. xxii. 28.
nature. In the ark of the Old Testament
the priest's rod budded ; ' with God it is
easy that in Holy Church a flower should
spring from our knots also. And why
should we despair that God should speak in
men. Who spoke in the thorn bush ? ^ God
did not despise the bush, and would He
might give light also to my thorns. Per-
haps some may wonder that there is some
light even in our thorns ; some our thorns
will not burn ; there will be some whose
shoes shall be put off their feet at the sound
of my voice, that the steps of the mind may
be freed from bodily hindrances.
3. But these things are gained by holy
men. Would that Jesus would cast a glance
upon me still lying under that barren fig-
tree,^ and that my fig-tree might also after
three years bear fruit. ■♦ But whence should
sinners have so great hope .'' Would that at
least that Gospel dresser of the vineyard,
perhaps already bidden to cut down my fig-
tree, would let it alone this year also, until
he dig about it and dung it, that he may
perchance lift the helpless out of the dust,
and lift the poor out of the mire. s Blessed
are they who bind their horses under the
vine and olive, ^ consecrating the course of
their labours to light and joy : the fig-tree,
that is, the tempting attraction of the plea-
sures of the world, still overshadows me, low
in height, brittle for working, soft for use,
and barren of fruit.
4. And perhaps some one may wonder
why I, who cannot speak, venture to write.
And yet if we consider what we read in the
writings of the Gospel, and the deeds of the
priests, and the holy prophet Zacharias is
* Num. xvii. 8.
* S. Luke xiii. 6 ff.
' Exod. iii. 4.
* Ps. cxiii. [cxii.] 6.
'S. John i. 48.
" Gen. xlix. 11.
3^3
3^4
ST. AMBROSE.
taken as an instance, he will find that there
is something which the voice cannot ex-
plain, but the pen can write. And if the
name John restored speech to his father,'
I, too, ought not to despair that although
dumb I may ye* receive speech, if I speak
of Christ, of Whom, according to the pro-
phet's word: "Who shall declare the gen-
eration .?" == And so as a servant I will
announce the family of the Lord, for the
Lord has consecrated to Himself a family
even in this body of humanity replete with
frailty.
CHAPTER n.
This treatise has a favourable beginning, since it is the
birthday of the holy Virgin Agnes, of whose name,
modesty, and martyrdom St. Ambrose speaks in com-
mendation, but more especially of her age, seeing
that she, being but twelve years old, was superior to
terrors, promises, tortures, and death itself, with a
courage wholly worthy of a man.
5. AxD my task begins favourably, that
since to-day is the birthday of a virgin, I
have to speak of virgins, and the treatise
has its beginning from this discourse. It is
the birthday of a niartyr, let us offer the
victim. It is the birthday of St. Agnes, let
men admire, let children take courage, let
the married be astounded, let the unmarried
take an example. But what can I say
worthy of her whose very name was not
devoid of bright praise ? In devotion be-
yond her age, in virtue above nature, she
seems to me to have borne not so much a
human name, as a token of martyrdom,
whereby she showed what she was to be.
6. But I have that which may assist
me. The name of virgin is a title of mo-
desty. I will call upon the martyr, I will
proclaim the virgin. That panegyric is
long enough which needs no elaboration,
but is within our grasp. Let then labour
cease, eloquence be silent. One word is
praise enough. This word old men and
young and boys chant. No one is more
praiseworthy than he vvho can be pra).-.c(l by
all. There are as many heralds as there are
men, who when they speak proclaim the
martyr.
7. She is said to have suffered martyrdom
when twelve years old. The more hateful
was the cruelty, which spared not so tender
an age, the greater in truth was the power
of faith which found evidence even in that
age. Was there room for a wound in that
small body.? And she who had no room
' S. Luke i. 63, 64.
- Isa. liii. 8.
for the blow of the steel had that where-
with to conquer the steel. But maidens of
that age are unable to bear even the angry
looks of parents, and are wont to cry at the
pricks of a needle as though they were
wounds. She was fearless under the cruel
hands of the executioners, she was unmoved
by the heavy weight of the creaking chains,
offering her whole body to the sword of the
raging soldier, as yet ignorant of death, but
ready for it. Or if she were unwillingly
hurried to the altars, she was ready to
stretch forth her hands to Christ at the
sacrificial fires, and at the sacrilegious altars
themselves, to make the sign of the Lord
the Conqueror,' or again to place her neck
and both her hands in the iron bands, but
no band could enclose such slender limbs.
8. A new kind of martyrdom! Not yet
of fit age for punishment but already ripe
for victory, difficult to contend with but
easy to be crowned, she filled the office of
teaching valour while having the disadvan-
tage of youth. She would not as a bride so
hasten to the couch, as being a virgin she
joyfully went to the place of punishment
with hurrying step, her head not adorned
with plaited hair, but with Christ. All wept,
she alone was without a tear. All won-
dered that she was so readily prodigal of
her life, which she had not yet enjoyed,
and now gave up as though she had gone
through it. Every one was astounded that
there was now one to bear witness to the
Godhead, who as yet could not, because of
her age, dispose of herself. And she brought
it to pass that she should be believed con-
cerning God, whose evidence concerning
man would not be accepted. For that
which is beyond nature is from the Author
of nature.
9. What threats the executioner used to
make her fear him, what allurements to
persuade her, how many desired that she
would come to them in marriage ! But she
answered: "It would bean injury to my
spouse to look on any one as likely to
please me. He who chose me first for
Himself shall receive me. Why are you de-
laying, executioner ? Let this body perish
which can be loved by eyes which I would
not." She stood, she prayed, she bent
down her neck. You could see the execu-
tioner tremble, as though he himself had
been condemned, and his right hand shake,
his face grow pale, as he feared the peril of
another, while the maiden feared not for
her own. You have then in one victim
' i.e. raise her arms in the form of a cross.
CONCERNING VIRGINS, BOOK I.
365
a twofold imartyrdom, of modesty and of
religion. She both rem;
she obtained martyrdom.
religion. She both remained a virgin and
CHAPTER III.
Virginity is praised on many grounds, but chiefly be-
cause it brought down the \Vord from heaven, and
hence its pursuit, which existed in but few under the
old covenant, lias spread to countless numbers.
10. And now the love of purity draws me
on, and you, my holy sister, even though
not speaking in your silent habit, to say
something about virginity, lest that which
is a principal virtue should seem to be
passed by with only a slight reference.
For virginity is not praiseworthy because
it is found in martyrs, but because itself
makes martyrs.
11. But who can comprehend that by
human understanding which not even
nature has included in her laws ? Or who
can explain in ordinary language that which
is above the course of nature .-" Virginity has
brought from heaven that which it may imi-
tate on earth. And not unfittingly has she
sought her manner of life from heaven, who
has found for herself a Spouse in heaven.
She, passing beyond the clouds, air, angels,
and stars, has found the Word of God in
the very bosom of the Father, and has
drawn Him into herself with her whole
heart. For who having found so great
a Good would forsake it.? For "Thy
Name is as ointment poured out, therefore
have the maidens loved Thee, and drawn
Thee."' And indeed what I have said is
not my own, since they who marry not nor
are given in marriage are as the angels in
heaven. Let us not, then, be surprised if
they are compared to the angels who are
joined to the Lord of angels. Who, then,
can deny that this mode of life has its
source in heaven, which we don't easily
find on earth, except since God came down
into the members of an earthly body ?
Then a Virgin conceived, and the Word be-
came flesh that flesh might become God.
1 2. But some one will say : ' ' But Elijah is
seen to have had nothing to do with the
embraces of bodily love." And therefore
was he carried by a chariot into heaven,^
therefore he appeared glorified with the
Lord, 3 and therefore he is to come as the
forerunner of the Lord's advent. ■♦ And
]\Iiriam taking the timbrel led the dances
^ Cant. i. 2, 3 ; S. Mark xii. 25.
2 S, Matt. xvii. 3.
^ [4] Kings ii. ii.
* Mai. iv. 5.
with maidenly modesty.' But consider
whom she was then representing. Was she
not a type of the Church, who as a virgin
with unstained spirit joins together the
religious gatherings of the people to sing
divine songs .'' For we read that there were
virgins appointed also in the temple at
Jerusalem. But what says the Apostle ?
"These things happened to them in a
figure, that they might be signs of what
was to come. "^ For the figure is shown in
few, the life exists in many.
13. But in truth after that the Lord, com-
ing in our flesh, joined together the God-
head and flesh without any confusion or
mixture, then the practice of the life of
heaven spreading throughout the whole
world was implanted in human bodies. .
This is that which angels ministering on
earth signified should come to pass, -5 which
ministry should be offered to the Lord with
the service of an unstained body. This is
that heavenly service which the host of
rejoicing angels spoke of for the earth. 4
We have, then, the authority of antiquity
from of old, the fulness of the setting forth
from Christ Himself.
CHAPTER IV.
The comeliness of virginity never existed amongst the
heathen, neither with the vestal virgins, nor amongst
philosophers, such as Pythagoras.
14. I CERTAINLY have not this in common
with the heathen, nor in regard to it am I
associated with barbarians, nor practise it
with other animals, with whom, although
we breathe one and the same vital air, and
have a common condition of an earthly
body, and from whom we differ not in the
mode of generation, in this point alone we
nevertheless avoid the reproach of likeness,
that virginity is aimed at by the heathen,
but when consecrated it is violated, it is
attacked by barbarians, and is iniknown to
others.
15. Who will allege to me the virgins
of Vesta, and the priests of Pallas.? What
sort of chastity is that which is not of
morals, but of years, which is appointed
not for ever, but for a term ! Such purity is
all the more wanton of which the corrup-
tion is put off for a later age. They teach
that their virgins ought not to persevere,
and are unable to do so, who have set a term
to virginity. What sort of a religion is that
' Exod. XV. 20.
3 S. Matt. iv. II.
* I Cor. X. II.
* S. Luke ii. 13, 14.
366
ST. AMBROSE.
in which modest maidens are bidden to be
immodest old women ? Nor is she modest
who is bound by law, and she immodest
who is set free by law. O the mystery !
O the morals ! where chastity is enforced
by law and authority given for lust ! And
so she is not chaste, who is constrained by
fear ; nor honourable, who is hired for a
price ; nor is that modesty which, exposed
to the daily importunity of lascivious eyes,
is attacked by disgraceful looks. Exemptions
are bestowed upon them, prices are offered
them, as though to sell one's chastity were
not the greatest sign of wantonness. That
which is promised for a price is given up for
a price ; is made over for a price ; is consid-
ered to have its price. She who is wont to
.sell her chastity knows not how to redeem
it.
1 6. What shall I say of the Phrygian rites,
in which immodesty is the rule, and that
too of the weaker sex ? What of the orgies
of Bacchus, where the mystery of the rites
is an incentive to lust ? Of what sort can
the lives of priests be, then, where the adul-
teries of the gods arc matters of religion.
So then they have no sacred virgins.
17. Let us see whether perchance the pre-
cepts of philosophers have formed any, for
they are wont to claim the teaching of all
virtues. A certain Pythagorean virgin is
spoken of in story, whom a tyrant was
endeavouring to compel to reveal the
secret, and lest it should be possible even in
her torments for revelation to be extorted
from her, she bit off her tongue and spat it
in the tyrant's face, that he who would not
make an end of questioning might not have
aught to question.
18. But that same virgin, so constant in
mind, was overcome by lust, though she
could not be overcome by torments. And so
she who could keep the secret of her mind
could not conceal the shame of her body.
She overcame nature, but observed not dis-
cipline. How she would desire that her
speech had existed as a defence of her chas-
tity ! So she was not unconqucred on every
side, for although the tyrant could not find
out that which he sought, yet he did find
what he sought not.
19. How much stronger are our virgins,
who overcome even those powers which
they do not see ; whose victory is not only
over flesh and blood, but also over the
prince of this world, and ruler of this age !
In age, Agnes indeed was less, but in virtue
greater, triumphing over more, more con-
stant in her confidence ; she did not de-
stroy her tongue through fear, but kept it for
a trophy. For there was nothing in her
which she feared to betray, since that which
she acknowledged was holy, not sinful.
And so the former merely concealed her
secret, the latter bore witness to the Lord, 1
and confessed Him in her body. Whom her *
age did not yet suffer to confess.
CHAPTER V.
Heaven is the home of virginity, and the Son of God
its Author, Who though He was a Virgin before the
Virgin, yet being of the Virgin took the Virgin
Church as His bride. Of her we have all been born.
Some of her gifts are enumerated. Her daughters
have a special excellence in that virginity is not a
matter of precept, and that it is a most powerful help
in the pursuit of piety.
20. It is the custom in encomiums to
speak of country and parentage of the sub-
ject, that the greatness of the offspring may
be enhanced by mention of the father.
Now I, who have not undertaken to praise
but to set forth virginity, yet think it to the
purpose to make known its country and its
parent. First, let us settle where is its
country. Now, if one's country be there
where is the home of one's birth, without
doubt heaven is the native country of chas-
tity. And so she is a stranger here, but a
denizen there.
21. And what is virginal chastity but
purity free from stain ? And whom can we
judge to be its author but the immaculate
Son of God, Whose flesh saw no corruption.
Whose Godhead experienced no infection .''
Consider, then, how great are the merits of
virginity. Christ was before the Virgin,
Christ was of the Virgin. Begotten indeed
of the Father before the ages, but born of
the Virgin for the ages. The former was of
His own nature, the latter is for our benefit.
The former always was, the latter He willed.
22. Consider, too, another merit of vir-
ginity. Christ is the spouse of the Virgin,
and if one may so say of virginal chastity,
for virginity is of Christ, not Christ of vir-
ginity. He is, then, the Virgin Who was
espoused, the Virgin Who bare us. Who fed
us with her own milk, of whom we read :
" How great things hath the virgin of Jeru-
salem done ! The teats shall not fail from
the rock, nor snow from Lebanon, nor the
water which is borne by the strong wind." *
Who is this virgin that is watered with the
streams of the Trinity, from whose rock
waters flow, whose teats fail not, and whose
honey is poured forth ? Now, according to
the Apostle, the rock is Christ.^ Therefore,
* Jer. xviii. 13 (very freely).
* I Cor. X. 4.
CONCERNING VIRGINS, BOOK I.
l<^7
from Christ the teats fail not, nor brightness
from God, nor the river from the Spirit.
This is the Trinity which waters their
Church, the Father, Christ, and the Spirit.
23. But let us now come down from the
mother to the daughters. "Concerning
virgins," says the Apostle, "I have no
commandment of the Lord." ' If the teacher
of the Gentiles had none, who could have
one.!" And in truth he had no command-
ment, but he had an example. For virgin-
ity cannot be commanded, but must be
wished for, for things which are above us
are matters for prayer rather than under
mastery. "But I would have you," he
says, "be without carefulness. For he
who is without a wife is careful for the
things which are the Lord's, how he may
please God. . . . And the virgin taketh
thought for the things of the Lord, that she
may be holy in body and in spirit. For she
that is married taketh thought for the things
of the world, how she may please her hus-
band."^
CHAPTER VL
St. Ambrose explains that he is not speaking against
ma'-riage, and proceeds to compare the advantages
and disadvantages of the single and married state.
24. I AM not indeed discouraging mar-
riage, but am enlarging upon the benefits of
virginity. ' ' He who is weak, " says the Apos-
tle, " eateth herbs. "^ I consider one thing
necessary, I admire another. "Art thou
bound to a wife .? Seek not to be loosed.
Art thou free from a wife.? Seek not a
wife." '■ This is the command to those who
are. But what does he say concerning vir-
gins .!* "He who giveth his virgin in mar-
riage doeth well, and he who giveth her not
doeth better. " s The one sins not if she mar-
ries, the other, if she marries not, it is for
eternity. In the former is the remedy for
weakness, in the latter the glory of chastity.
The former is not reproved, the latter is
praised.
25. Let us compare, if it pleases you, the
advantages of married women with that
which awaits virgins. Though the noble
woman boasts of her abundant offspring,
yet the more she bears the more she en-
dures. Let her count up the comforts of
her children, but let her likewise count up
the troubles. She marries and weeps.
How many vows does she make with tears.
She conceives, and her fruitfulness brings
* I Cor. vii. 25.
* 1 Cor. vii. 27.
2 I Cor. \'ii. 32, 34.
^ I Cor. vii. 38.
^ Roro. xiv. 2.
her trouble before offspring. She brings
forth and is ill. How sweet a pledge which
begins with danger and ends in danger,
which will cause pain before pleasure ! It
is purchased by perils, and is not possessed
at her own will.
26. Why speak of the troubles of nursing,
training, and marrying .' These are the
miseries of those who are fortunate. A
mother has heirs, but it increases her sor-
rows. For we must not speak of adversity,
lest the minds of the holiest parents trem-
ble. Consider, my sister, how hard it must
be to bear what one must not speak of.
And this is in this present age. But the
days shall come when they shall say :
"Blessed are the barren, and the wombs
that never bare.'' ' For the daughters of
this age are conceived, and conceive ; but
the daughter of the kingdom refrains from
wedded pleasure, and the pleasure of the
flesh, that she may be holy in body and in
spirit.
27. Why should I further speak of the pain-
ful ministrations and services due to their
husbands from wives, to whom before slaves
God gave the command to serve .-'^ And I
mention these things that they may comply
more willingly, whose reward, if approved,
is love ; if not approved, punishment for the
fault.
28. And in this position spring up those
incentives to vice, in that they paint their
faces with various colours, fearing not to
please their husbands ; and from staining
their faces, come to think of staining their
chastity. What madness is here, to change
the fashion of nature and seek a painting,
and while fearing a husband's judgment to
give up their own. For she is the first to
speak against herself who wishes to change
that which is natural to her. So, while
studying to please others, she displeases
herself. What truer witness to thy unsight-
liness do we require, O woman, than thy-
self who art afraid to be seen .' If thou
art beautiful, why hidest thou thyself.? If
unsightly, why dost thou falsely pretend to
beauty, so as to have neither the satisfac-
tion of thy own conscience, nor of the error
of another.? For he loves another, thou de-
sirest to please another. And art thou angry
if he love another, who is taught to do so in
thy own person .? Thou art an evil teacher
of thy own injury.
29. And next, what expense is necessary
that even a beautiful wife may not fail to
please.? Costly necklaces on the one hand
* S. Luke xxiii. 29.
* Gen. iii, i^.
368
ST. AMBROSE.
hang on her neck, on the other a robe woven
with gold is dragged along the ground. Is
this display purchased, or is it a real pos-
session ? And what varied enticements of
perfumes are made use of! The ears are
weighed down with gems, a different colour
from nature is dropped into the eyes. What
is there left which is her own, when so
much is changed ? The married woman
loves her own perceptions, and does she
think that this is to live.''
30. But you, O happy virgins, who know
not such torments, rather than ornaments,
whose holy modesty, beaming in your bash-
ful cheeks, and sweet chastity are a beauty,
ye do not, intent upon the eyes of men, con-
sider as merits what is gained by the errors
of others. You, too, have indeed your own
beauty, furnished by the comeliness of vir-
tue, not of the body, to which age puts not
an end, which death cannot take away, nor
any sickness injure. Let God alone be sought
as the judge of loveliness, Who loves even
in less beautiful bodies the more beautiful
souls. You know nothing of the burden
and pain of childbearing, but more are the
offspring of a pious soul, which esteems all
as its children, which is rich in successors,
barren of all bereavements, which knows no
deaths, but has many heirs.
31. So the holy Church, ignorant of wed-
lock, but fertile in bearing, is in chastity a
virgin, yet a mother in offspring. She, a
virgin, bears us her children, not by a human
father, but by the Spirit. She bears us not
with pain, but with the rejoicings of the
angels. She, a virgin, feeds us, not with
the milk of the body, but with that of the
Apostle, wherewith he fed the tender age of
tiie people who were still children. ' For
what bride has more children than holy
Church, who is a virgin in her sacra-
ments and a mother to her people, whose
fertility even holy Scripture attests, saying,
"For many more are the children of the
desolate than of her that hath an hus-
band".' - She has not an husband, but she
has a Bridegroom, inasmuch as she, whether
as the Church amongst nations, or as the
soul in individuals, without any loss of mod-
esty, she weds the Word of God as her
eternal Spouse, free from all injury, full of
reason.
CHAPTER VII.
St. Ambrose exhorts parents to train their children to
virginity, and sets before them the troubles arising
' I Cor. ii:. 2.
from their desire to have grandchildren. He says
however that he does not forbid marriage, but rather
defends it against heretics who oppose it. Still set-
ting virginity before marriage, he speaks of the beauty
of their spouse, and of the gifts wherewith He adorns
them, and applies to these points certain verses of
the Song of Songs.
32. You have heard, O parents, in what
virtues and pursuits you ought to train your
daughters, that you may possess those by
whose merits your faults may be redeemed.
The virgin is an offering for her mother, by
whose daily sacrifice the divine power is
appeased. A virgin is the inseparable
pledge of her parents, who neither troubles
them for a dowry, nor forsakes them, nor
injures them in word or deed.'
SS- But some one perhaps wishes to have
grandchildren, and to be called grandfather.
In the first place, such a one gives up what
is his own, while seeking what is another's,
and is already losing what is certain, while
hoping to gain what is uncertain ; he gives
away his own riches, and still more is asked
for ; if he does not pay the dowry, it is ex-
acted ; if he lives long, he becomes a burden.
This is to buy a son-in-law, not to gain one
who would sell a sight of their daughter to
her parents. W^as she borne so long in her
mother's womb in order that she might pass
under the power of another.? And so the
parents take the charge of setting off their
virgin that she may so be the sooner re-
moved from them.
34. Some one may say, Do you, then, dis-
courage marriage .? Nay, I encourage it, and
condemn those who are wont to discourage
it. so much so, that indeed I am wont to speak
of the marriages of Sarah, Rebecca, and
Rachel, and other women of old time, as
instances of singular virtues. J'or he who
condemns marriage, condemns the birth of
children, and condemns the fellowship of
the human race, continued by a series of
successive generations. For how could
generation succeed generation in a continual
order, unless the gift of marriage stirred up
the desire of offspring ? Or how could one
set forth that Isaac went to the altar of God
as a victim of his father's piety, or that Is-
rael, when yet in the body, saw God,^ and
gave a holy name to the people while speak-
ing against that whereby they came into
being.' Those men, though wicked, have
one point at any rate, wherein they are ap-
proved even by the wise persons, that in
' Isa. liv. I ; Gal. iv. 27. |
From this passage it is clear that in the days of St. Ambrose it
was not yet the rule at .Milan, though it was in other places, for the
consecrated virgins to live together, but the older custom still con-
tinued.
'•' Gen. xxxii. 28.
CONCERNING VIRGINS, BOOK I.
369
speaking- against marriage they declare that
they ought not to have been born.
35. I do not then discourage marriagfe.but
recapitulate tlie advantages of holy virginity.
This is the gift of few only, that is of all.
And virginity itself cannot exist, unless it
have some mode of coming into existence.
I am comparing good things with good
things, that it may be clear which is the
more excellent. Nor do I allege any opin-
ion of my own, but I repeat that which
the Holy Spirit spake by the prophet :
" Blessed is the barren that is undefiled. " '
36. First of all, in that which those who
purpose to marry desire above all things,
that they may boast of the beauty of their
husband, they must of necessity confess that
they are inferior to virgins, to Whom alone
it is suitable to say : "Thou art fairer than
the children of men, grace is poured on Thy
lips." ^ Who is that Spouse.? One not given
to common indulgences, not proud of pos-
sessing riches, but He Whose throne is for
ever and ever. The king's daughters share
in His honour : '• At Thy right hand stood
the queen in a vesture of gold, clothed with
variety of virtues. Hearken, then, O daugh-
ter, and consider, and incline thine ear, and
forget thine own people and thy father's
house ; for the king hath desired thy beauty,
for He is thy God. "^
l"]. And observe what a kingdom the
Holy Spirit by the witness of the divine
Scriptures has assigned to thee — gold, and
beauty ; gold, either because thou art the
bride of the Eternal King, or because having
an unconquered mind, thou art not taken
captive by the allurements of pleasures, but
rulest over them like a queen. Gold again,
because as that metal is more precious when
tried by fire, so the appearance of the virginal
body, consecrated to the Divine Spirit,
gains an increase of its own comeliness, for
who can imagine a loveliness greater than
the beauty of her who is loved by the King,
approved by the judge, dedicated to the
Lord, consecrated to God ; ever a bride,
ever unmarried, so that neither does love
suffer an ending, nor modesty loss.
38. This is indeed true beauty, to which
nothing is wanting, which alone is worthy
to hear the Lord saying : "Thou art all fair,
My love, and no blemish is in thee. Come
hither from Lebanon, My spouse, come
hither from Lebanon. Thou shalt pass and
pass through from the beginning of faith,
from the top of Sanir and Hermon, from the
dens of the lions, from the mountains of the
' Wisd. iii. 13. - Ps. xlv. [xHv.] 2.
Ps. xlv. [xliv.] 9, 10, II.
leopards." ' By which references is set forth
the perfect and irreproachable ))eauty of a
virgin soul, consecrated to the altars of God,
not moved by perishable things amidst the
haunts and dens of spiritual wild beasts, but
intent, by the mysteries of God, on being
found worthy of the Beloved, Whose breasts
are full of joy. For "wine maketh glad the
heart of man." ^
39. "The smell of thy garments," says
He, "is above all spices."^ And again:
"And the smell of thy garments is like the
smell of Lebanon."* See what progress
thou settest forth, O Virgin. Thy first odour
is above all spices, which were used upoii
the burying of the Saviour, 5 and the fragrance
arises from the mortified motions of the body,
and the perishing of the delights of the
members. Thy second odour, like the odour
of Lebanon, exhales the incorruption of the
Lord's body, the flower of virginal chastity.
CHAPTER Vin.
Taking the passage concerning the honeycomb in the
Song of Songs, he expounds it, comparing the sacred
virgins to bees.
40. Let, then, your work be as it were a
honeycomb, for virginity is fit to be com-
pared to bees, so laborious is it, so modest,
so continent. The bee feeds on dew, it
knows no marriage couch, it makes honey.
The virgin's dew is the divine word, for the
words of God descend like the dew. The
virgin's modesty is unstained nature. The
virgin's produce is the fruit of the lips, with-
out bitterness, abounding in sweetness.
They work in common, and their fruit is in
common.
41. How I wish you, my daughter, to be
an imitator of these bees, whose food is
flowers, whose offspring is collected and
brought together by the mouth. Do imitate
her, my daughter. Let no veil of deceit be
spread over your words ; let them have no
covering of guile, that they may be pure, and
full of gravity.
42. And let an eternal succession of merits
be brought forth by your mouth. Gather
not for yourself alone (for how do you know
when your soul shall be required of you }'),
lest leaving your granaries heaped full with
corn, which will be a help neither to your
life nor to your merits, you be hurried thither
where you cannot take your treasure with
you. Be rich then, but towards the poor.
' Cant. iv. 7, 8.
* Cant, iv ii.
^ Ps. civ. [ciii.] 15.
* S. John xix. 39.
® Cant. iv. lo.
370
ST. AMBROSE.
that as they share in your nature they may
also share your goods.
43. And I also peint out to you what
flower is to be culled, that one it is Who
said : " I am the Flower of the field, and the
Lily of the valleys, as a lily among thorns, " '
which is a plain declaration that virtues
are surrounded by the thorns of spiritual
wickedness, so that no one can gather the
fruit who does not approach with caution.
CHAPTER IX.
Other passages from the Song of Songs are considered
with relation to the present subject, and St. Ambrose
exhorting the virgin to seek for Christ, points out
where He may be found. A description of His per-
fections follows, and a comparison is made between
virgins and the angels.
44. Take, then, O Virgin, the wings of the
Spirit, that you may fly far above all vices,
if you wish to attain to Christ : " He dwell-
eth on high, but beholdeth lowly things ; " ^
and His appearance is as that of a cedar of
Lebanon, which has its foliage in the clouds,
its roots in the earth. For its beginning is
from heaven, its ending on earth, and it
produces fruit very close to heaven. Search
diligently for so precious a flower, if per-
chance you may find it in the recesses of
your breast, for it is most often to be enjoyed
in lowly places.
45. It loves to grow in gardens, in M^hich
Susanna, while walking, found it, and was
ready to die rather than it should be violated.
But what is meant by the gardens He Hirn-
self points out, saying : "A garden encloseid
is My sister. My spouse, a garden enclosed,
a fountain sealed ; " 3 because in gardens of
this kind the water of the pure fountain
shines, reflecting the features of the image
of God, lest its streams mingled with mud
from the wallowing places of spiritual wild
beasts should be polluted. For this reason,
too, that modesty of virgins fenced in by the
wall of the Spirit is enclosed lest it should
lie open to be plundered. And so as a gar-
den inaccessible from without smells of the
violet is scented with the olive, and is
resplendent with the rose, that religion may
increase in the vine, peace in the olive, and
the modesty of consecrated virginity in the
rose. This is the oflour of which the patri-
arch Jacob smelt when he heard his father
say : "See the smell of my son is as the
smell of a field which is full."-» For although
the field of the holy patriarch was full of al-
^ Cant. ii. i, 2.
* Cant. iv. 12.
' Ps. cxiii. s. (>■
* Gen. xxvii. 27.
most all fruits, the other brought forth its
crops with greater labour, the latter flowers.
46. To work, then, O Virgin, and if you
wish your garden to be sweet after this sort,
enclose it with the precepts of the prophets :
' ' Set a watch before thy mouth, and a door to
thy lips," ' that you, too,may be able to say :
"As the apple- tree among the trees of the
wood, so is my Beloved among the sons.
In His shadow I delighted and sat down,
and His fruit was sweet to my palate.^ I
found Him Whom my soul loved, I held
Him and would not let him go. My beloved
came down into His garden to eat the fruit
of His trees. 3 ComiC, my Beloved, let us go
forth into the field. ■♦ Set me as a signet upon
Thine heart, and as a seal upon Thine arm.s
My Beloved is white and ruddy. " ^ For it is
fitting, O Virgin, that you should fully know
Him Whom you love, and should recognize in
Him all the mystery of His Divine Nature
and the Body which He has assumed. He
is white fittingly, for He is the brightness of
the Father ; and ruddy, for He was born of
a Virgin. The colour of each nature shines
and glows in Him. But remember that the
marks of His Godhead are more ancient in
Him than the mysteries of His body, for He
did not take His origin from the Virgin, but,
He Who already existed came into the Vir-
gin.
47. He Who was spoiled by the soldiers,
Who was wounded by the spear, that He
might heal us by the blood of His sacred
wounds, will assuredly answer you (for He
is meek and lowly of heart, and gentle in as-
pect) : "Arise, O north wind, and come, O
south, and blow upon IVIy garden, that My
spices may flow out." 7 For from all parts
of the world has the perfume of holy re-
ligion increased, and the limbs of the con-
secrated Virgin have glowed. "Thou art
beautiful, O my love, as Tirzah, comely as
Jerusalem."^ So it is not the beauty of the
perishable body, which will come to an end
with sickness or old age, but the reputation
for good deserts, subject to no accidents and
never to perish, which is the beauty of vir-
gins.
48. And since you are worthy to be com-
pared not now with men but with heavenly
beings, whose life you are living on earth,
receive from the Lord the precepts you are
to observe: "Set Me as a signet upon
thine heart, and as a seal upon thine arm ; " 9
that clearer proofs of your prudence and
actions may be set forth, in which Christ the
* Ps. cxli. [cxl.] 3.
* Cant. vii. 1 1.
' Cant. iv. i6.
'Cant. ii. 3.
^ Cant. viii. 6.
* Cant. vi. 4.
•'' Cant, iii
' Cant. V 10.
" Cam. viii. 6,
4, 16,
CONCERNING VIRGINS, BOOK I.
371
Figure of God may shine, Who, equalling
fully the nature of the Father, has expressed
the whole which He took of the Father's
Godhead. Whence also the Apostle Paul
says that we are sealed in the Spirit ; ' since
we have in the Son the image of the Father,
and in the Spirit the seal of the Son. Let us,
then, sealed by this Trinity, take more dili-
gent heed, lest either levity of character or
the deceit of any unfaithfulness unseal the
pledge which we have received in our hearts.
49. But let fear secure this for the holy
virgins, for whom the Church first provided
such protection, who, anxious for the pro-
sperity of her tender offspring, herself as a
wall with breasts as many towers,^ increases
her care for them, until, the fear of hostile
attack being at an end, she obtains by the
care of a mother's love peace for her vigor-
ous children. Wherefore the prophet says :
" Peace be on thy virtue, and abundance in
thy towers. " ^
50. Then the Lord of peace Himself, after
having embraced in His strong arms the
vineyards committed to Him, and beholding
their shoots putting forth buds, with glad
looks, tempers the breezes to the young
fruits, as Himself testifies, saying: "My
vineyard is in My sight, a thousand for
Solomon, and two hundred who keep the
fruit thereof. " *
51. Above it is said: " Sixty strong men
round about its offspring, armed with drawn
swords, and expert in warlike discipline," ^
here there are a thousand and two hundred.
The number has increased, where the fruit
has increased, for the more holy each is,
the more is he guarded. So Elisha the
prophet showed the hosts of angels who
were present to guard him ; so Joshua the
son of Nun recognized the Captain of the
heavenly host. They, then, who are able also
to fight for us are able to guard the fruit
that is in us. And for you, holy virgins,
there is a special guardianship, for you who
with unspotted chastity keep the couch of
the Lord holy. And no wonder if the angels
fight for you who war with the mode of life
of angels. Virginal chastity merits their
guardianship whose life it attains to.
52. Why should I continue the praise of
chastity in more words ? For chastity has
made even angels. He who has preserved
it is an angel ; he who has lost it a devil.
And hence has religion also gained its name.
She is a virgin who is the bride of God, a
harlot who makes gods for herself What
* Eph. i. 13.
* Cant, viii li.
^ Cant. viii. 10.
5 Cant. iii. 7, 8.
3 Ps. cxxii. [cxxi.] 7.
shall I say of the resurrection of which you
already hold the rewards : "For in the re-
surrection they will neither be given in mar-
riage, nor marry, but shall be," He says, "as
the angels in heaven." ' That which is pro-
mised to us is already present with you, and
the object of your prayers is with you ; ye
are of this world, and yet not in this world.
This age has held you, but has not been able
to retain you.
53. But what a great thing it is that angels
because of incontinence fell from heaven
into this world, that virgins because of
chastity passed from the world into heaven.
Blessed virgins, whom the delights of the
flesh do not allure, nor the defilement of
pleasures cast down. Sparing food and ab-
stin.ence in drink train them in ignorance of
vices, seeing they keep them from knowing
the causes of vices. That which causes sin
has often deceived even the just. In this
way the people of God after they sat down
to eat and drink denied God.=' In this
way, too. Lot knew not, and so endured his
daughters' wickedness. 3 So, too, the sons of
Noah going backward covered their father's
nakedness, which he who was wanton
saw, he who was modest blushed at and
dutifully hid, fearful of offending if he too saw
it. 4 How great is the power of wine, so
that wine made him naked which the waters
of the deluge could not.
CHAPTER IX.
Finally, another glory of virginity is mentioned, that it
is free from avarice. St. Ambrose, addressing his
sister, reminds her of the great happiness of those
who are free from those troubles as to luxury and
vanity which come upon those who are about to
marry.
What then ? What happiness it is that no
desire of possessions inflames you ! The
poor man demands what you have, he does
not ask for what you have not. The fruit of
your labour is a treasure for the needy, and
two mites, if they be all one has, are wealth
on the part of the giver.
54. Listen, then, my sister, from what you
escape. For it is not for me to teach nor for
you to learn what you ought to guard
against, for the practice of perfect virtue
does not require teaching, but instructs others.
You see how like she is to the litters at pro-
cessions, who lays herself out to please,
attracting to herself the look and gaze of
^ S. Matt. xxii. 30.
3 Gen. xix. 32, 33.
2 Exod. xxxii. 5.
* Gen. ix. 22.
372
ST. AMBROSE.
all ; less beautiful is she because she strives
to please, for she displeases the people before
she pleases her husband. But in you the
rejection of all care for spendour is far more
becoming, and the very fact that you do not
adorn yourselves is an ornament.
55. Look at the ears pierced with wounds,
and pity the neck weighed down with bur-
dens. That the metals are different does
not lighten the suffering. In one case a
chain binds the neck, in another a fetter
encloses the foot. It makes no difference
whether the body be loaded with gold or
with iron. Thus the neck is weighed down
and the steps are hindered. The price makes
it no better, except that you women are
afraid lest that which causes you suffering
be lost. What is the difference whether the
sentence of another or your own condemn
you ? Nay, you, even more wretched than
those, are condemned by public justice, since
they desire to be set free, you to be bound.
56. But how wretched a position, that she
who is marriageable is in a species of sale
put up as it were to auction to be bid for, so
that he who offers the highest price pur-
chases her. Slaves are sold on more toler-
able conditions, for they often choose their
masters ; if a maiden chooses it is an offence,
if not it is an insult. And she, though she be
beautiful and comely, both fears and wishes
to be seen ; she wishes it that she may sell
herself for a better price ; she fears lest the
fact of her being seen should itself be unbe-
coming. But what absurdities of wishes
and fears and suspicions are there as to how
the suitors will turn out, lest a poor man
may beguile her, or a rich one contemn
her, lest a handsome suitor mock her, lest a
noble one despise her.
CHAPTER XI.
St. Ambrose answers objections made to the useless-
ness of his e.xhortations in favour of virginity, and
brings forward instances of virgins especially in vari-
ous places he mentions, and speaks of their zeal in
the cause.
57. Some one may say, you are always
singing the praises of virgins. What shall
I do who am always singing them and have
no success ? But this is not my fault. Then,
too, virgins come from Placentia to he con-
secrated, or from Bononia, and INIauritania,
in order to receive the veil here. You see a
striking thing here. I treat the matter here,
and persuade those who are elsewhere. If
this be so, let me treat the subject elsewhere,
that I may persuade you.
58. What is it, then, that even they who
hear me not follow my teaching, and those
who hear me follow me not.'* For I have
known many virgins who had the desire,
but were prevented from going forward by
their mothers, and, which is more serious,
mothers who were widows, to whom I will
now address myself. For if your daughters
desired to love a man, they could, by law,
choose whom they would. Are they, then,
who are allowed to choose a man not al-
lowed to choose God .''
59. Behold how sweet is the fruit of
modesty, which has sprung up even in the
affections of barbarians. Virgins coming
from the most distant on this and that side
of INIauritania desire to be consecrated here;
and though all the families be in bonds,
yet modesty cannot be bound. She who
mourns over the hardship of slavery avows
an eternal kingdom.
60. And what shall I say of the virgins of
Bononia, a fertile band of chastity, who, for-
saking worldly delights, inhabit the sanctu-
ary of virginity ? ' Not being of the sex which
lives in common, attaining in their common
chastity to the number of twenty, and fruit
to an hundredfold, leaving their parents'
dwelling they press into the houses of Christ,
as soldiers of unwearied chastity ; at one
time singing spiritual songs, they provide
their sustenance by labour, and seek with
their hands supplies for their liberality.
61. But if the attraction of searching for
virgins has grown strong (for they beyond
others follow up the search and watch for
purity), they follow up their hidden prey
with the greatest perseverance to its very
chambers ; or, if the flight of any one shall
have seemed more free, one may see them
rise on the wing, hear the rustling of their
feathers, and the bursting of applause ; so
as to surround the one on win"- with a
chaste band of modesty, until rejoicing in
that fair companionship, forgetful of her
father's house, she enters the regions of
modesty and the fenced-in home of chastity.
CHAPTER XII.
It is very desirable that parents should encourage the
desire for the virgin life, but more praiseworthy when
the love of (lod draws a maiden even against their
will. The violence of parents and the loss of pro-
perty are not to be feared, and an instance of this is
related by St. Ambrose.
62. It is a good thing, then, that the zeal
' It was very unusual for women to live together alone at this
period.
CONCERNING VIRGINS, BOOK I.
373
of parents, like favouring- gales, should aid
a virgin ; but it is more glorious if the fire
of tender age even without the incitement
of those older of its own self burst forth into
the flame of chastity. Parents will refuse
a dowry, but you have a wealthy Spouse,
satisfied with Whose treasures you will not
miss the revenues of a father's inheritance.
How much is poverty to chastity superior to
bridal gifts !
63. And yet of whom have you heard as
ever, because of her desire for chastity, hav-
ing been deprived of her lawful inheritance.''
Parents speak against her, but are willing to
be overcome. They resist at first because
they are afraid to believe ; they often are
angry that one may learn to overcome ;
they threaten to disinherit to try whether
one is able not to fear temporal loss; they
caress with exquisite allurements to see if
one cannot be softened by the inducement
of various pleasures. You are being exer-
cised, O virgin, whilst you are being urged.
And the anxious entreaties of your parents
are your first battles. Conquer your affec-
tion first, O maiden. If you conquer your
home, you conquer the world.
64. But suppose that the loss of your
patrimony awaits you ; are not the future
realms of heaven a compensation for per-
ishable and frail possessions ? For if we
believe the heavenly message, "there is no
one who has forsaken house, or parents, or
brethren, or wife, or children, for the king-
dom of God's sake, who shall not receive
sevenfold more in this present time, and in
the world to come shall have everlasting
life."' Entrust your faith to God, who en-
trust your money to man ; lend to Christ.
The faithful keeper of the deposit of your
hope pays the talent of your faith with mani-
fold interest. The Truth does not deceive.
Justice does not circumvent. Virtue does not
deceive. But if you believe not God's word,
at least believe instances.
65. Within my memory a girl once noble
^ S. Luke xviii. 29, 30.
in the world, now more noble in the sight
of God, being urged to a marriage by her
parents and kinsfolk, took refuge at the
holy altar. Whither could a virgin better
flee, than thither where the Virgin Sacrifice
is offered ? Nor was even that the limit of
her boldness. She, the oblation of modesty,
the victim of chastity, was standing at the
altar of God, now placing upon her head
the right hand of the priest, asking his
prayers, and now impatient at the righteous
delay, placing the top of her head under
the altar. "Can any better veil," she said,
" cover me better than the altar which conse-
crates the veils themselves .^ Such a bridal
veil is most suitable on which Christ, the
Head of all, is daily consecrated. What
are you doing, my kinsfolk ? Why do you
still trouble my mind with seeking marriage ?
I have long since provided for that. Do
you offer me a bridegroom .-" I have found
a better. Make the most you can of my
wealth, boast of his nobility, ,extol his
power, I have Him with Whom no one can
compare himself, rich in the world, power-
ful in empire, noble in heaven. If you have
such an one, I do not reject the choice ; if
you do not find such, you do me not a kind-
ness, my relatives, but an injury."
66. When the others were silent, one
burst forth somewhat roughly : " If," he
said, "your father were alive, would he
suffer you to remain immarried.'" Then
she replied with more religion and more re-
strained piety : "And perchance he is gone
that no one may be able to hinder me."
Which answer concerning her father, but
warning as to himself, he made good by
his own speedy death. So the others, each
of them, fearing the same for himself, be-
gan to assist and not to hinder her as before,
and her virginity involved not the loss of
the property due to her, but also received
the reward of her integrity. You see,
maidens, the reward of devotion, and do
you, parents, be warned Dy the example of
transgression.
374
ST. AMBROSE.
BOOK II.
CHAPTER I.
In this book St. Ambrose purposes to treat of the train-
ing of virgins, using examples rather than precepts,
and explains why he does so in writing rather than
by word of mouth.
1. In the former book I wished (though I
was not able) to set forth how great is the
gift of virginity, that the grace of the hea-
venly gift might of itself invite the reader.
In the second book it is fitting that the vir-
gin should be instructed and, as it were, be
educated by the teaching of suitable pre-
cepts.
2. But, inasmuch as I am feeble in ad-
vising and unequal to teaching (for he
who teaches ought to excel him who is
taught), lest I should seem to have aban-
doned the task I have undertaken, or to
have taken too much upon myself, I
thought it better to instruct by examples
than by precepts ; for more progress may be
made by means of an example, inasmuch as
that which has been already done is con-
sidered to be not difficult, and that which
has been tried to be expedient, and that
which has been transmitted in sucession to
us by a kind of hereditary practice of ances-
tral virtue to be binding in religion.
3. But if any one rebukes me for presump-
tion, let him rather rebuke me for zeal, be-
cause I thought that I ought not to refuse
even this to the virgins who asked it of me.
For I preferred rather to run the risk of
perilling my own modesty, than not to ful-
fil the wish of those whose pursuits even our
God favours with kindly approbation.
4. Nor can the mark of presumption be
set on my task, since, when they had those
from whom they could learn, they sought
my good-will rather than my teaching, and
my zeal may be excused, since when they
had the guidance of a martyr for the observ-
ance of discipline, I did not think it super-
fluous if I could turn the persuasion of my
discourse into an allurement to profession.
He who teaches with facility restrains fault
with severity ; I, who cannot teach, entice.
5. And because many who were absent
desired to have the use of my discourse, I
compiled this book, in order that holding in
their hands the substance of what my voice
had uttered to them, they might not think
that he whom they were holding failed them.
But let us go on with our plan.
CHAPTER II.
The life of Mary is set before virgins as an example,
and her many virtues are dwelt upon, her chastity,
humihty, hard life, love of retirement, and the like ;
then her kindness to others, her zeal in learning, and
love of frequenting the temple. St. Ambrose then
sets forth how she, adorned with all these virtues, will
come to meet the numberless bands of virgins and
lead them with great triumph to the bridal chamber
of the Spouse.
6. Let, then, the life of Mary be as it were
virginity itself, set forth in a likeness, from
which, as from a mirror, the appearance
of chastity and the form of virtue is re-
flected. From this you may take your
pattern of life, showing, as an example, the
clear rules of virtue : what you have to
correct, to effect, and to hold fast.
7. The first thing which kindles ardour in
learning is the greatness of the teacher.
What is greater than the Mother of God ?
What more glorious than she whom Glory
Itself chose.? What more chaste than she
who bore a body without contact with an-
other body.? For why should I speak of
her other virtues.? She was a virgin not
only in body but also in mind, who stained
the sincerity of its disposition by no guile,
who was humble in heart, grave in speech,
prudent in mind, sparing of words, studious
in reading, resting her hope not on uncer-
tain riches, but on the prayer of the poor,
intent on work, modest in discourse ; wont
to seek not man but God as the judge of her
thoughts, to injure no one, to have good-
will towards all, to rise up before her elders,
not to envy her equals, to avoid boastful-
ness, to follow reason, to love virtue. When
did she pain her parents even by a look ?
When did she disagree with her neighbours.?
When did she despise the lowly .? When
did she avoid the needy.? Being wont only
to go to such gatherings of men as mercy
would not blush at, nor modesty pass by.
There was nothing gloomy in her eyes,
nothing forward in her words, nothing un-
seemly in her acts, there was not a silly
movement, nor unrestrained step, nor was
her voice petulant, that the very appearance
CONCERNING VIRGINS, BOOK II.
375
of her outward being might be the image of
her soul, the representation of what is ap-
proved. For a well-ordered house ought
to be recognized on the very threshold,
and should show at the very first entrance
thatno darkness is hidden within, as our
soul hindered by no restraints of the body
may shine abroad like a lamp placed with-
in.
8. Why should I detail her sparencss of"
food, her abundance of services — the one
abounding beyond nature, the other almost
insufficient for nature? And there were no
seasons of slackness, but days of fasting,
one upon the other. And if ever the desire
for refreshment came, her food was gener-
ally what came to hand, taken to keep off
death, not to minister to comfort. Necessity
before inclination caused her to sleep, and
yet when her body was sleeping her soul was
awake, and often in sleep either went again
through what had been read, or went on
with what had been interrupted by sleep, or
carried out what had been designed, or fore-
saw what was to be carried out.
9. She was unaccustomed to go from
home, except for divine service, and this
with parents or kinsfolk. Busy in private
at home, accompanied by others abroad,
yet with no better guardian than herself, as
she, inspiring respect by her gait and address,
progressed not so much by the motion of
her feet as by step upon step of virtue.
But though the Virgin had other persons
who were protectors of her body, she alone
guarded her character ; she can learn many
points if she be her own teacher, who pos-
sesses the perfection of all virtues, for what-
ever she did is a lesson. Mary attended to
everything as though she were warned by
many, and fulfilled every obligation of
virtue as though she were teaching rather
than learning.
10. Such has the Evangelist shown her,
such did the angel find her, such did
the Holy Spirit choose her. Why delay
about details.? How her parents loved her,
strangers praised her, how worthy she was
that the Son of God should be born of her.
She, when the angel entered, was found at
home in privacy, without a companion, that
no one might interrupt her attention or dis-
turb her ; and she did not desire any
women as companions, who had the com-
panionship of good thoughts. Moreover, she
seemed to herself to be less alone when she
was alone. For how should she be alone,
who had with her so many books, so many
archangels, so many prophets ?
11. And so, too, when Gabriel visited
her," did he lind her, and Mary trembled,
being disturbed, as though at the form of a
man, but on hearing his name recognized
him as one not unknown to her. And so
she was a stranger as to men, but not as to
the angel ; that we might know that her
ears were modest and her eyes bashful.
Then when saluted she kept silence, and
when addressed she answered, and she
whose feelings were first troubled after-
wards promised obedience.
12. And holy Scripture points out how
modest she was towards her neighbours. For
she became more humble when she knew
herself to be chosen of God, and went forth-
with to her kinswoman in the hill country,
not in order to gain belief by anything ex-
ternal, for she had believed the word of God.
" Blessed," she said, "art thou who didst
believe."^ And she abode with her three
months. Now in such an interval of time it
is not that faith is being sought for, but kind-
ness which is being shown. And this was
after that the child, leaping in his mother's
womb, had saluted the mother of the Lord,
attaining to reason before birth.
13. And then, in the many subsequent
wonders, when the barren bore a son, the
virgin conceived, the dumb spake, the
wise men worshipped, Simeon waited, the
stars gave notice. Mary, who was moved
by the angel's entrance, was unmoved by
the miracles. " Mary," it is said, " kept all
these things in her heart." ^ Though she
was the mother of the Lord, yet she desired
to learn the precepts of the Lord, and she
who brought forth God, yet desired to know
God.
14. And then, how she also went every
year to Jerusalem at the solemn day of the
passover, and went with Joseph. Every-
where is modesty the companion of her
singular virtues in the Virgin. This, without
which virginity cannot exist, must be the
inseparable companion of virginity. And
so Mary did not go even to the temple with-
out the guardianship of her modesty.
15. This is the likeness of virginity. For
Mary was such that her example alone is a
lesson for all. If, then, the author displeases
us not, let us make trial of the production,
that whoever desires its reward for her-
self may imitate the pattern. How many
kinds of virtues shine forth in one Virgin !
The secret of modesty, the banner of faith,
the service of devotion, the Virgin within the
house, the companion for the ministry, the
mother at the temple.
1 S. Luke L 28.
' S. Luke i. 56.
* S. Luke ii. 19.
3/6
ST. AMBROSE.
16. Oh ! how many virgins shall she meet,
how many shall she embrace and bring to
the Lord, and say : "She has been faithful
to her espousal, to my Son ; she has kept
her bridal couch with spotless modesty."
How shall the Lord Himself commend them
to His Father, repeating again those words
of His : " Holy Father, these are they whom
I have kept for Thee, on whom the Son of
Man leant His head and rested ; I ask that
where I am there they may be with Me." '
And if they ought to benefit not themselves
only, who lived not for themselves alone,
one virgin may redeem her parents, another
her brothers. "Holy Father, the world
hath not known INIe, but these have known
Me, and have willed not to know the
world." ^
17. What a procession shall that be, what
joy of applauding angels when she is found
worthy of dwelling in heaven who lived on
earth a heavenly life ! Then too Mary,^ tak-
mg her timbrel, shall stir up the choirs of
virgins, singing to the Lord because they
have passed through the sea of this world
without suffering from the waves of this
world. •♦ Then each shall rejoice, saying :
"I will go to the altar of God, to God Who
maketh my youth glad ;" ^ and, " I will offer
unto God thanksgiving, and pay my vows
unto the Most High. "^
18. Nor would I hesitate to admit you to
the altars of God, whose souls I would with-
out hesitation call altars, on which Christ is
daily offered for the redemption of the body.
For if the virgin's body be a temple of God,
what is her soul, which, the ashes, as it
were, of the body being shaken off, once
more uncovered by the hand of the Eternal
Priest, exhales the vapour of the divine fire.
Blessed virgins, who emit a fragrance
through divine grace as gardens do through
flowers, temples through religion, altars
through the priest.
CHAPTER HL
St. Ambrose having set forth the Virgin Mary as a pat
tern for life, adduces Thecia as a model for learning
how to die. Thecia suffered not from the beasts to
whom she was condemned, but on the contrary re-
ceived from them signs of reverence. He then pro-
ceeds to introduce a more recent example.
19. Let, then, holy Mary instruct you in
the discipline of life, and Thecia teach you
how to be offered, for she, avoiding nuptial
' S. John xvii. 24. ' S. John xvii. 25.
^ Marv is the same name as the Hebrew Miriam.
♦ Ex. XV, 20, <> Ps. xliii. [xlii.] 4. « Ps. 1. [xlix.] 14.
intercourse, and condemned through her
husband's rage, changed even the disposition
of wild beasts by their reverence for virgin-
ity. For being made ready for the wild
beasts, when avoiding the gaze of men, she
offered her vital parts to a fierce lion, caused
those who had turned away their immodest
looks to turn them back modestly.
20. The beast was to be seen lying on the
ground, licking her feet, showing without a
sound that it could not injure the sacred
body of the virgin. So the beast reverenced
his prey, and forgetful of his own nature,
put on that nature which men had lost.
One could see, as it were, by some transfu-
sion of nature, men clothed with savageness,
goading the beast to cruelty, and the beast
kissing the feet of the virgin, teaching them
what was due from men. Virginity has in it-
self so much that is admirable, that even lions
admire it. Food did not induce them though
kept without their meal ; no impulse hurried
them on when excited; anger did not ex-
asperate them when stirred up, nor did their
habits lead them blindly as they were wont,
nor their own natural disposition possess
them with fierceness. They set an example of
piety when reverencing the martyr ; and
gave a lesson in favor of chastity when they
did nothing but kiss the virgin "s feet, with
their eyes turned to the ground, as though
through modesty, fearing that any male,
even a beast, should see the virgin naked.
21. Some one will say : "Why have you
brought forward the example of Mary, as if
any one could be found to imitate the Lords
mother.'' And why that of Thecia, whom
the Apostle of the Gentiles trained ? Give us
a teacher of our own sort if you wish for
disciples." I will, therefore, set before you
a recent example of this sort, that you may
understand that the Apostle is the teacher,
not of one only, but of all.
CHAPTER IV.
A virgin at Antioch, having refused to sacrifice to idols,
was condemned to a house of ill-fame, whence she
escaped unharmed, having changed clothes with a
Christian soldier. Then when he was condemned for
this, she returned and the two contended for the prize
of martyrdom, which was at last given to each.
2 2. There was lately at Antioch a virgin
who avoided being seen in public, but the
more she shrank from men's eyes, the more
they longed for her. For beauty which is
heard of but not seen is more desired, there
being two incentives to passion, love and
knowledge — so long as nothing is met with
CONCERNING VIRGINS, BOOK II.
377
which pleases less : and that which pleases is
thoug-ht to be of more wortli. because the
eye is not in this case the judge by inv^esti-
gation, but tlie mind inllanied with love is
full of longing. And so the holy virgin,
lest their passions should be longer fed by
the desire of gaining her, professed her in-
tention of preserving her chastity, and so
quenched the fires of those wicked men, that
she was no longer loved, but informed
against.
23. So a persecution arose. The maiden,
not knowing how to escape, and afraid lest
she might fall into the hands of those who
were plotting against her chastity, prepared
her soul for heroic virtue, being so religious
as not to fear death, so chaste as to expect
it. The day of her crown arrived. The
expectation of all was at its height. . The
maiden is brought forward, and makes her
twofold profession, of religion and of chas-
tity. But when they saw the constancy
of her profession, her fear for her modesty,
her readiness for tortures, and her blushes at
being looked on, they began to consider how
they might overcome her religion by setting
chastity before her, so that, having deprived
her of that which was the greatest, they
might also deprive her of that which they had
left. So the sentence was that she should
either sacrifice, or be sent to a house of ill-
fame. After what manner do they worship
their gods who thus avenge them, or how do
they live themselves who give sentence after
this fashion ?
24. And the virgin, not hesitating about
her religion, but fearful as to her chastity,
began to reflect, What am I to do ? Each
crown, that of martyrdom and that of vir-
ginity, is grudged me to-day. But the
name of virgin is not acknowledged where
the Author of virginity is denied. How can
one be a virgin who cherishes a harlot.-'
How can one be a virgin who loves adulter-
ers.'' How a virgin if she seeks for a lover.'
It is preferable to have a virgin mind than a
virgin body. Each is good if each be pos-
sible ; if it be not possible, let me be chaste,
not to man but to God. Rahab, too, was a
harlot, but after she believed in God, she
found salvation.' And Judith adorned her-
self that she might please an adulterer, but
because she did this for religion and not for
love, no one considered her an adulteress.^
This instance turned out well. For if she
who entrusted herself to religion both pre-
served her chastity and her country, per-
haps I, by preserving my religion, shall also
1 Jos, ii. g.
- Juditli X.
preserve my chastity. But if Judith had
preferred her chastity to her religion, when
her country had been lost, she v/ould also
have lost her chastity.
25. And so, instructed by such examples,
and at the same time bearing in mind the
words of the Lord, where He says : " Who-
soever shall lose his life for My sake, shall
find it,"' she wept, and was silent, that the
adulterer might not even hear her speaking,
and she did not choose the wrong done to
her modesty, but rejected wrong done to
Christ. Consider whether it was possible
for her to suffer her body to be unchaste,
who guarded even her speech.
26. For some time rhy words have been
becoming bashful, and fear to laud on or
describe the wicked series of what was
done. Close your ears, ye virgins ! The
Virgin of God is taken to a house of shame.
But now unclose your ears, ye virgins.
The Virgin of Christ can be exposed to
shame, but cannot be contaminated. Every-
where she is the Virgin of God, and the
Temple of God, and houses of ill-fame can-
not injure chastity, but chastity does away
with the ill-fame of the place.
27. A great rush of wanton men is made
to the place. Listen, ye holy virgins,- to
the miracles of the martyr, forget the name
of the place. The door is shut within, the
hawks cry without ; some are contending
who shall first attack the prey. But she,
with her hands raised to heaven, as though
she had come to a house of prayer, not to
a resort of lust, says : "O Christ, Who didst
tame the fierce lions for the virgin Daniel,^
Thou canst also tame the fierce minds of
men. Fire became as dew to the Hebrew
children, 3 the water stood up for the Jews,
of Thy mercy, not of its own nature. 4
Susanna knelt down for punishment and
triumphed over her adulterous accusers, s the
right hand withered which violated the gifts
of Thy temple;^ and now thy temple itself
is violated ; suffer not sacrilegious incest,
Thou Who didst not suffer theft. Let Thy
Name be now again glorified in that I who
came here for shame, may go away a virgin ! "'
28. Scarcely had she finished her prayer,
when, lo ! a man with the aspect of a terrible
warrior burst in. How the virgin trembled
before him to whom the trembling people
gave way. But she did not forget what she
had read. "Daniel," said slie, "had gone
to see the punishment of Susanna, and alone
pronounced her guiltless,? whom the people
' S. Matt. X. 39.
* Ex. xiv. 22.
' Hist. Sus. 46.
^ Dan. vi. 22.
5 Hist. Sus. 45.
* Dan. iii. 27 fnoj.
* I L3] Kings xiii, 4,
2>7^
ST. AMBROSE.
had condemned. A sheep may be hidden
in the shape of this wolf. Christ has His
soldiers also, Who is Master of legions.'
Or, perchance, an executioner has come in.
Fear not, my soul, such an one makes
martyrs. O Virgin ! thy faith has saved
thee."
29. And the soldier said to her: "Fear
not, sister, I pray you. I, a brother, am
come hither to save life, not to destroy it.
Save me, that you yourself may be saved.
I came in like an adulterer, to go forth, if
you will, as a martyr. Let us change our
attire, mine will fit you, and yours will fit
me, and each for Christ. Your robe will
make me a true soldier, mine will make you
a virgin. You will be clothed well, I shall
be unclothed even better that the persecutor
may recognize me. Take the garment
which will conceal the woman, give me
that which shall consecrate me a martyr.
Put on the cloak which will hide the limbs
of a virgin, but preserve her modesty. Take
the cap which will cover your hair and con-
ceal your countenance. They who have
entered houses of ill-fame are wont to
blush. When you have gone forth, take
care not to look back, remembering Lot's
wife, ^ who lost her very nature because she
looked back at what was unchaste, though
with chaste eyes. And be not afraid lest
any part of the sacrifice fail. I will offer the
victim to God for you, do you offer the
soldier to Christ for me. You have served
the good service of chastity, the wages
of which are everlasting life ; you have the
breastplate of righteousness, which pro-
tects the body with spiritual armour, the
shield of faith with which to ward off
wounds, and the helmet of salvation, J for
there is the defence of our' salvation where
Christ is, since the man is the head of the
woman, and Christ of the virgin.
30. Whilst saying this he put off his
cloak. This garment has been up to this
time suspected of being that of a persecutor
and adulterer. The virgin offered her neck,
the soldier his cloak. What a spectacle that
was, what a manifestation of grace when
they were contending for martyrdom in a
house of ill-fame ! Let the characters be
also considered, a soldier and a virgin, that
is, persons unlike in natural disposition, but
alike by the mercy of God, that the saying
might be fulfilled : "Then the wolves and
the lambs shall feed together. "•♦ Behold
the lamb and the wolf not only feed to-
' S. Matt. xxvi. 53.
' Epli. vi, 14-17.
- fien. xix. 26.
* Isa. Ixv. 25.
gether but are also offered together. Why
should I say more.'' Having changed her
garment, the maiden flies from the snare,
not now with wings of her own, seeing she
was borne on spiritual wings, and (a sight
which the ages had never seen) she leaves
the house of ill-fame a virgin, but a virgin
of Christ.
31. But they who were looking with their
eyes, yet saw not, raged like robbers for
prey, or wolves for a lamb. One who was
more shameless went in. But when he
took in the state of the matter with his eyes,
he said. What is this .-• A maiden entered,
now a man is to be seen here. This is not
the old fable of a hind instead of a maiden,
but in truth a virgin become a soldier. I
had heard but believed not that Christ
changed water into wine ; now He has
begun also to change the sexes. Let us
depart hence whilst we still are what we
were. Am I too changed who see things
differently from what I believe them to be .?
I came to a house of ill-fame, and see a
surety. ' And yet I go forth changed, for I
shall go out chaste who came in unchaste.
32. When the affair was known, because
a crown was due to such a conqueror, he
was condemned for the virgin who was
seized for the virgin, and so not only a vir-
gin but a martyr came forth from the house
of ill-fame. It is reported that the maiden
ran to the place of punishment, and that
they both contended for death He said :
"I am condemned to death, the sentence
let you go free when it retained me." And
she replied : "I did not choose you as my
surety on pain of death, but as a guarantee
for my chastity. If chastity be attacked,
my sex remains ; if blood is sought, I desire
none to give bail for me, I have the means
to pay. The sentence was pronounced on
me, which was pronounced for me. Un-
doubtedly, if I had offered you as security
for my debt, and in my absence the judge
had assigned your property to the creditor,
you would share the sentence with me, and
I should pay your obligations with my pa-
trimony. Were I to refuse, who would not
judge me worthy of a shameful death.?
How much more am I bound where there
is a question of death.? Let me die inno-
cent, that I may not die guilty. In this
matter there is no middle course ; to-day I
shall either be guilty of your blood or a
martyr in my own. If I came back quickly,
who dares to shut me out .? If I delayed,
who dares acquit me.? I owe a greater
' The soldier who remained in the place of the virgin is spoken
of as being her " surety,"
CONCERNING VIRGINS, BOOK II.
379
debt to the laws who am guilty not only of
my own flight, but also of the death of
another. My limbs are equal to death,
which were not equal to dishonour. A vir-
gin can accept a wound who could not
accept contumely. I avoided disgrace, not
martyrilom. I gave up my robe to you ; I
did not alter my profession. And if you
deprive me of death, you will not have res-
cued but circumvented me. Beware, pray,
of resisting, beware of venturing to contend
with me. Take not away the kindness you
have conferred on me. In denying me the
execution of this sentence, you are setting
up again the former one. For the sen-
tence is changed for a former one. If the
latter binds me not, the former one does.
We can each satisfy the sentence if you
suffer me to be slain first. From you they
can exact no other penalty, but her chas-
tity is in danger with a virgin. And so you
will be more glorious if you are seen to have
made a martyr of an adulteress, than to
have made again an adulteress of a martyr. "
^^. What do you think was the end ?
The two contended, and both gained the
victory, and the crown was not divided, but
became two. So the holy martj'rs, confer-
ring benefits one on the other, gave the one
the impulse and the other the result to their
martyrdom.
CHAPTER V.
The story of the two Pythagorean friends, Damon and
Pythias, is related by St. Ambrose, who points out
that the case mentioned in the last chapter is more
praiseworthy. A comparison is instituted between
the treatment of their gods by heathen without any
punishment, and Jeroboam's irreverence with its
punishment.
34. And the schools of the philosophers
laud Damon and Pythias — the Pythagor-
eans— to the skies, of whom one, when con-
demned to death, asked for time to set his
affairs in order, whereupon, the tyrant, in
his cunning, not supposing that such could
be found, asked for a bondsman who should
suffer the penalty if the other delayed his
return. I do not know which act of the
two was the more noble. The one found
the bondsman, the other offered himself.
And so while he who was condemned met
with some delay, the bondsman with calm
countenance did not refuse death. As he
was being led forth his friend returned, and
offered his neck to the axe. Then the
tyrant, wondering that friendship was
dearer to philosophers than life, asked him-
self to be received into friendship by those
whom he had condemned. The grace of
virtue was so great that it moved even a
tyrant.
35. These things are worthy of praise,
but are inferior to our instance. For those
two were men, with us one was a virgin,
who had first to be superior to her sex ;
those were friends, these were unknown to
each other ; those offered themselves to one
tyrant, these to many tyrants ; and these
more cruel, for in the former case the tyrant
spared them, these slew them ; with the
former one was bound by necessity, with
these the will of each was free. In this,
too, the latter were the wiser, that with
those the end of their zeal was the pleasure
of friendship, with these the crown of
martyrdom, for they strove for men, these
for God.
36. And since we have mentioned that
man who was condemned, it is fitting to
add what he thought of his gods, that you
may judge how weak they are whom
their own followers deride. For he,
having come into the temple of Jupiter,
bade them take off the fillet of gold with
which his image was crowned, and to put
on one of wool instead, saying that the
golden fillet was cold in winter and heavy
in summer. So he derided his god as being
unable to bear either a weight or cold.
He, too, when he saw the golden beard
of .^sculapius, bade them remove it, saying
that it was not fit for the son to have a
beard when the father had none. Again,
he took away the golden bowls from the
images which held them, saying that he
ought to receive what the gods gave. For.
said he, men make prayers to receive good
things from the gods, and nothing is better
than gold ; if, however, gold be evil, the
gods ought not to have it ; if it be good, it
is better that men should have it who know
how to use it.
37. Such objects of ridicule were they,
that neither could Jupiter defend his gar-
ment, nor yEsculapius his beard, for Apollo
had not yet begun to grow one ; nor could
all those who are esteemed gods keep the
golden bowls which they were holding, not
fearing the charge of theft so much as not
having any feeling. Who, then, would wor-
ship them, who can neither defend them-
selves as gods nor hide themselves as men ?
38. But when in the temple of our God,
that wicked king Jeroboam took away the
gifts which his father had laid up, and
offered to idols upon the holy altar, did not
his right hand, which he stretched out,
wither, and his idols, which he called upon,
38o
ST. AMBROSE.
were not able to help him ? Then, turning
to the Lord, he asked tor pardon, and at
once his hand which had withered by sacri-
lege was healed by true religion. So com-
plete an example was there set forth in one
person, both of divine mercy and wrath,
when he who was sacrificing suddenly lost
his right hand, but when penitent received
forgiveness. '
CHAPTER VI.
St. Ambrose, in concluding the second book, ascribes
any good there may be in it to the merits of the vir-
gins, and sets forth that it was right before laying
down any severe precepts to encourage them by e.\-
amples, as is done both in human teaching and in
holy Scripture.
39. I, WHO have been not yet three years
a bishop, have prepared this offering for
you, holy virgins, although untaught by
my own experience, yet having learnt
much from your mode of life. For what
experience could have grown up in so short
a time of being initiated in religion .' If
you find any flowers herein, gather them
together in the bosom of your lives. These
are not precepts for virgins, but instances
taken from virgins. My words have
sketched the likeness of your virtue, you
may see the reflection of your gravity, as it
were, in the mirror of this discourse. If
you have received any pleasure from my
ability, all the fragrance of this book is
yours. And since there are as many opin-
ions as there are persons, if there be any-
thing simple in my treatise let all read it ;
if anything stronger, let the more mature
prove it; if anything modest, let it cleave to
the breast and tinge the cheeks ; if there be
anything flowery, let the flowery age of
youth not disdain it.
40. We ought to stir up thelove of the bride,
for it is written : "Thou shalt love the Lord
thy God."^ At bridal feasts we ought to
adorn the hair at least with some ornaments
of prayer, for it is written : "Smite the
hands together, and strike with the foot. "3
We ought to scatter roses on those uninter-
rupted bridals. Even in these temporal
marriages the bride is received with ac-
clamation before she receives commands,
lest hard commands should hurt her, before
love cherished by kindness grows strong.
41. Horses learn to love the sound of
patting their necks, that they may not refuse
the yoke, and are first trained with words
of enticement before the stripe of disci-
pline. But when the horse has submitted
its neck to the yoke, the rein pulls in, and
the spur urges on, and its companions draw
it, and the driver bids it. So, too, our
virgin ought first to play with pious love,
and admire the golden supports of the
heavenly marriage couch on the very
threshold of marriage, and to see the door-
posts adorned with wreaths of leaves, and
to taste the delight of the musicians playing
within ; that she may not through fear
withdraw herself from the Lords yoke, be-
fore she obeys His call.
42. "Come, then, hither from Lebanon,
My spouse, come hither from Lebanon,
thou shalt pass and pass through." ' This
verse must be often repeated by us, that at
least being called by the words of the Lord,
she may follow if there be any who will not
trust the words of man. We have not
formed this power for ourselves, but have
received it ; this is the heavenly teaching of
the mystic song: "Let Him kiss me with
the kisses of His mouth, for Thy breasts are
better than wine, and the odor of Thy oint-
ments is above all spices. Thy name is as
ointment poured forth." ^ The whole of
that place of delights sounds of sport, stirs
up approval, calls forth love. "There-
fore," it continues, "have the maidens
loved Thee and have drawn Thee, let us
run after the odour of Thy ointments. The
King hath brought me into His chamber. "^
She began with kisses, and so attained to
the chamber.
43. She, now so patient of hard toil, and
of practised virtue, as to open the bars with
her hand, go forth into the field, and abide
in strongholds, at the beginning ran after
the odour of the ointment ; soon when she is
come into the chamber the ointment is
changed. And see whither she goes : "If
it be a wall," it is said, "we will build upon
it towers of silver. " 4 She who sported with
kisses now builds towers that, encircled
with the precious battlements of the saints,
she may not only render fruitless the
attacks of the enemy, but also erect the safe
defences of holy merits.
' I [3] Kings xiii. 4.
* Deut. vi. 5.
^ £zek. xxi 14.
' Cant. iv. 8.
^ Cant. i. 3, 4.
- Cant. i. 2, 3.
* Cant. viii. g.
CONCERNING VIRGINS, BOOK III.
381
BOOK III.
CHAPTER I.
St. Ambrose now goes back to the address of Liberius
when he gave the veil to MarcelUna. Touchmg on the
crowds pressing to the bridal feast of that Spouse Who
feeds them all, he passes on to the fitness of her pro-
fession on the day on which Christ was born of a
Virgin, and concludes with a fervent exhortation to
love Him.
1. Inasmuch as I have digressed in what
I have said in the two former books, it is now
time, holy sister, to reconsider those pre-
cepts of Liberius' of blessed memory which
you used to talk over with me, as the holier
the man the more pleasing- is his discourse.
For he, when on the Nativity of the Saviour
in the Church of St. Peter you signifieu
your profession of virginity by your change
of attire - (and what day could be better
than that on which the Virgin received her
child.?) whilst many virgins were standing
round and vying with each other for your
companionship. "You," said he, "my
daughter, have desired a good espousal.
You see how great a crowd has come
together for the birthday of your Spouse,
and none has gone away without food.
This is He, Who, when invited to the mar-
riage feast, changed water into wine.^ He,
too, will confer the pure sacrament of
virginity on you who before were subject to
the vile elements of material nature. This
is He Who fed four thousand in the wilder-
ness with five loaves and two fishes. "^ He
could have fed more ; if more had been there
to be fed, they would have been. And now
He has called many to your espousal, but it
is not now barley bread, but the Body
from heaven which is supplied.
2. To-day, indeed, He was born after the
manner of men, of a Virgin, but was begot-
ten of the Father before all things, resem-
bling His mother in body, His Father in
power. Only-begotten on earth, and Only-
begotten in heaven. God of God, born of
a Virgin, Righteousness from the Father,
Power from the Mighty One, Light of Light,
not unequal to His Father, nor separated in
1 This is Liberius. Bishop of Rome a.d. 352-^66, who tempc-
rized with Ariamsm. [St. Hil. Pict. Fragm. VI.; St. Athan.
Apol. C Arian.iit): Hist. Arian. 41; St. Jerome, Z)^ I'ir. III.
97, etc.] He subsequently returned to the Catholic teaching and
atoned by later acts for his temporary weakness.
- Evidently a public profession with receiving the veil, etc.
35. John ii. 9. * S. Luke ix. 13.
power, not confused by extension of the
Word or enlargement as though mingled
with the Father, but distinguished from the
Father by virtue of His generation. He is
your Brother,' without Whom neither things
in heaven, nor things in the sea, nor things
on earth consist. The good Word of the
Father, Which was, it is said, " in the begin-
ning," ^ here you have His eternity. " And,"
it is said, " the Word was with God. "^ Here
you have His power, undivided and insepa-
rable from the Father. " And the Word was
God. "4 Here you have His unbegotten
Godhead, for your faith is to be drawn from
the mutual relationship.
3. Love him, my daughter, for He is good.
For, " None is good save God only." s For
if there be no doubt that the Son is God, and
that God is good, there is certainly no doubt
that God the Son is good. Love Him I say.
He it is Whom the Father begat before the
morning star,^ as being eternal. He brought
Him forth from the womb as the Son ; He
uttered him from His heart, 7 as the Word.
He it is in Whom the Father is well pleased ; *
He is the Arm of the Father, for He is Crea-
tor of all, and the Wisdom 9 of the Father, for
He proceeded from the mouth of God; '° the
Power of the Father, because the fulness of
the Godhead dwelleth in Him bodily. " And
the Father so loved Him, as to bear Him in
His bosom, and place Him at His right
hand, that you may learn His wisdom, and
know His power.
4, If, then, Christ is the Power of God,
was God ever without power.? Was the
Father ever without the Son } If the Father
of a certainty always was, of a certainty the
Son always was. So He is the perfect Son
of a perfect Father. For he who derogates
from the power, derogates from Him Wliose
is the power. The Perfection of the God-
head does not admit of inequality. Love,
then. Him Whom the Father loves, honour
Him Whom the Father honours, for "he
that honoureth not the Son, honoureth not
the Father," '^ and "whoso denieth the Son,
hath not the Father. "'3 So much as to the
faith.
1 Cant. V. I.
•• S. John i. I.
' Ps. xlv. [xliv.]
1" Wisd. xxiv. 3.
13 I John ii. 2.3.
^ S. John J. I.
^ .S. Luke xviii
8 S. Matt. xvii. 5
" Col. ii. 9.
19.
3 S. John i. I.
'' Ps. ex. fcix.] 3.
* I Cnr. i. JO.
*' S. John V. 23.
382
ST. AMBROSE.
CHAPTER II.
Touching next upon the training of a virgin, he speaks
of moderation in food and drink, and of restraint up-
on the impulses of the mind, introducing some teach-
ing upon the fable of the death and resurrection of
Hippolytus, and advises the avoidance of certain
meats.
5. But sometimes even when faith is to
be rehed upon, youth is not trusted. Use
wine, therefore, sparingly, in order that the
weakness of the body may not increase, not
for pleasurable excitement, for each alike
kindles a flame, both wine and youth. Let
fasts also put a bridle on tender age, and
spare diet restrain the unsubdued appe-
tites with a kind of rein. Let reason check,
hope subdue, and fear curb them. For he
who knows not how to govern his desires,
like a man run away with by wild horses,
is overthrown, bruised, torn, and injured.
6. And this is said to have happened to a
youth for his love of Diana. But the fable
is coloured with poet's tales, that Neptune,
stirred with grief at his rival being preferred,
sent madness upon his horses, whereby his
great power might be set forth in that he
overcame the youth, not by strength, but
by fraud. And from this event a yearly
sacrifice is celebrated for Diana, when a
horse is offered at her altar. And they say
that she was a virgin, and (of which even
harlots would be ashamed) yet could love
one who did not love her. But as far as I
am concerned let their fables have authority,
for though each be criminal, it is yet a less
evil that a youth should have been so ena-
moured of an adulteress as to perish, than
that two gods should, as they relate,
contend for committing adultery, and that
Jupiter avenged the grief of his daughter who
played the harlot on the physician who
cured the wound of him who had violated
Diana in the woods, a most excellent
huntress, no doubt, not of wild beasts, but
of lust : yet also of wild beasts, so that she
was worshipped naked.
7. Let them ascribe, then, to Neptune the
mastery over madness, in order to fix on
him the crime of unchaste love. Let them
ascribe to Diana the rule over the woods,
wherein she dwelt, so as to establish the
adultery which she practised. Let them
ascribe to .^sculapius the restoration of the
dead so long as they confess that when
struck by lightning he himself escaped not.
Let them also ascribe to Jui)iter the thunder-
bolts which he did not possess, so that they
witness to the disgrace with which he was
laden.
8. And I think that one should sparingly
eat all kinds of food which cause heat to the
limbs, for flesh drags down even eagles as
they fly. But within you let that bird of
which we read, "Thy youth shall be re-
newed like the eagle's,'" ' holding its course
on high, swift in its virgin flight, be igno-
rant of the desire for unnecessary food. The
gathering of banquets and salutations must
be avoided.
CHAPTER III.
Virgins are exhorted to avoid visits, to observe modesty,
to be silent during the celebration of the Mysteries
after the example of Mary. Then after narrating the
story of a heathen youth, and saying of a poet, St.
Ambrose relates a miracle wrought by a holy priest.
9. I WILL, too, that visits amongst the
younger, except such as may be due to
parents and those of like age, be few.
For modesty is worn away by intercourse,
and boldness breaks forth, laughter creeps
in, and bashfulness is lessened, whilst
politeness is studied. Not to answer one
who asks a question is childishness, to
answer is nonsense. I should prefer, there-
fore, that conversation should rather be
wanting to a virgin, than abound. For if
women are bidden to keep silence in
churches, even about divine things, and to
ask their husbands at home, what do we
think should be the caution of virgins, in
whom modesty adorns their age, and
silence commends their modesty.
10. Was it a small sign of modesty that
when Rebecca came to wed Isaac, and saw
her bridegroom, she took a veil,^ that she
might not be seen before they were united.?
Certainly the fair virgin feared not for her
beauty, but for- her modesty. What of
Rachel, how she, when Jacob's kiss had
been taken, 3 wept and groaned, and would
not have ceased weeping had she not known
him to be a kinsman } So she both observed
what was due to modesty, and omitted not
kindly affection. But if it is said to a man :
" Gaze not on a maid, lest she cause thee to
fall," 4 what is to be said to a consecrated
virgin, who, if she loves, sins in mind ; if
she is loved, in act also }
11. The virtue of silence, especially in
Church, is very great. Let no sentence of
the divine lessons escape you ; if you give
ear, restrain your voice, utter no word with
your lips which you would wish to recall.
* Ps. ciii. [cii.l 5.
^ Gen. xxix. 11.
' Gen. xxiv. 65.
* Ecclus. ix. 5.
CONCERNING VIRGINS, BOOK III.
383
but let your boldness to speak be sparing.
For in truth in much speaking there is abun-
dance of sin. ■ To the murderer it was said :
"Thou hast sinned, be silent, "^ that he
might not sin more ; but to the virgin it must
be said, "Be silent lest thou sin." For
Mary, as we read, kept in heart all things
that were said concerning her Son, 3 and do
you, when any passage is read where Christ
is announced as about to come, or is shown
to have come, not make a noise by talking,
but attend. Is anything more unbecoming
than the divine words should be so drowned
by talking, as not to be heard, believed, or
made known, that the sacraments should be
indistinctly heard through the sound of
voices, that prayer should be hindered when
offered for the salvation of all ?
12. The Gentiles pay respect to their idols
by silence, of which this instance is given :
As Alexander, the king of the Macedonians,
was sacrificing, the sleeve of a barbarian lad
who was lighting the lamp for him caught
fire and burnt his body, yet he remained
without moving and neither betrayed the
pain by a groan, nor showed his suffering by
silent tears. Such was the discipline of rev-
erence in a barbarian lad that nature was
subdued. Yet he feared not the gods, who
were no gods, but the king. For why
should he fear those who if the same fire had
caught them would have burnt .'*
13. How much better still is it where a
youth at his father's banquet is bidden not
to betray by coarse gestures his unchaste
loves. And do you, holy virgin, abstain
from groans, cries, coughing, and laughter
at the Mystery. Can you not at the INIystery
do what he did at a banquet.? Let virginity
be first marked by the voice, let modesty
close the mouth, let religion remove weak-
ness, and habit instruct nature. Let her
gravity first announce a virgin to me, a
modest approach, a sober gait, a bashful
countenance, and let the march of virtue be
preceded by the evidence of integrity. That
virgin is not sufficiently worthy of approval
who has to be enquired about when she is
seen.
14. There is common story how, when
the excessive croakmg of frogs was resound-
ing in the ears of the faithful people, the
priest of God bade them be silent, and show
reverence to the sacred words, and then at
once the noise was stilled. Shall then the
marshes keep silence and not the frogs ?
And shall irrational animals re-acknowledge
by reverence what they know not by
Prov. X. 19.
' Gen. iv. 7.
^ S. Luke ii. 19.
nature.'' While the shamelessness of men is
such, that many care not to pay that re-
spect to the religious feelings of their minds,
which they do to the pleasure of their ears.
CHAPTER IV,
Having summed up the address of Liberius, St. Am-
brose passes on to the virtues of his sister, especially
her fasts, which however he advises her to moderate
to some extent, and to exercise herself in other mat-
ters, after the example which he adduces. Especi-
ally he recommends the Lord's Prayer, and the repe-
tition of Psalms by night, and the recitation of the
Creed before daylight.
15. After such a fashion did Liberius of
holy memory address you, in words beyond
the reality of practice in most cases, but
coming short of your performance, who
have not only attained to the whole of dis-
cipline by your virtue, but have surpassed it
in your zeal. For we are bidden to prac-
tise fasting, but only for single days ; but
you, multiplying nights and days, pass un-
told periods without food, and if ever re-
quested to partake of some, and to lay aside
your book a little while, you at once an-
swer : "Man doth not live by bread alone,
but by every word of God."' Your very
meals consisted but of what food came to
hand, so that fasting is to be preferred to
eating what was repugnant ; your drink is
from the spring, your weeping and prayer
combine, your sleep is on your book.
16. These kings were suited to younger
years, whilst he was ripening with the gray
hairs of age ; but when a virgin has gained
the triumph over her subdued body, she
should lessen her toil, that she may be pre-
served as teacher for a younger age. The
vine laden with the fruitful branches of full
growth soon breaks unless it be from time
to time kept back. But whilst it is young
let it grow rank, and as it grows older be
pruned, so as not to grow into a forest of
twigs, or die deprived of life by its exceptive
produce. A good husbandman by tending
the soil keeps the vine in excellent order,
protects it from cold, and guards it from
being parched by the mid-day sun. And he
works his land by turns, or if he will not let
it lie fallow, he alternates his crops, so that
the fields may rest through change of pro-
duce. Do you too, a veteran in virginity,
at least sow the fields of your breast with
different seeds, at one time with moderate
sustenance, at another with sparing fasts,
1 S. Matt. iv. 4.
384
ST. AMBROSE.
with reading, work, and prayer, that change
of toil may be as a truce for rest.
17. The whole land does not produce the
same harvest. On one side vines grow on
the hills, on another you can see the purple
olives, elsewhere the scented roses. And
after leaving the plough, the strong hus-
bandman with his fingers scrapes the soil to
plant the roots of flowers, and with the
rough hands wherewith he turns the bullocks
striving amongst the vines, he gently
presses the udders of the sheep. The land
is the better the more numerous are its fruits.
So do you, following the example of a good
husbandman, avoid cleaving your soil with
perpetual fastings as if with deep ])lough-
ines. Let the rose of modestv bloom iii
your garden, and the lily of the mind, and
let the violet beds drink from the source of
sacred blood. There is a common saying,
"What you wish to perform abundantly,
sometimes do not do at all. "' There ought to
be something to add to the days of Lent,
but so that nothing be done for the sake of
ostentation, but of religion.
18. Frequent prayer also commends us
to God. For if the prophet says, "Seven
times a day have I praised Thee,"' though
he was busy with the affairs of a kingdom,
what ought we to do, who read: "Watch
and pray that ye enter not into tempta-
tion " ? 2 Certainly our customary prayers
ought to be said with giving of thanks,
when we rise from sleep, when we go forth,
when we prepare to receive food, after re-
ceiving it, and at the hour of incense, ^ when
at last we are going to rest.
19. And again in your bed-chamber itself,
1 would have you join psalms in frequent
interchange with the Lord's prayer, either
when you wake up, or before sleep bedews
your body, so that at the very commence-
ment of rest sleep may find you free from
the care of worldly matters, meditating upon
the things of God. And, indeed, he who
first found out the name of Philosophy it-
self, "♦ every day before he went to rest, had
the flute-player play softer melodies to
soothe his mind disturbed by worldly cares.
But he, like a man washing tiles, fruitlessly
desired to drive away worldly things by
worldly means, for he was, indeed, rather
besmearing himself with fresh mud, in seek-
ing a reward from pleasure, but let us, hav-
' Ps. cxix. rcxviii.] 164. ^ S. Matt. xxvi. 41.
' It is doubtful whether incense was burnt as an adjunct of Cliris-
tian worship so early ns the time of St. Ambrose, and the reference
here may be to the offering at evening in the Jewish temple. He
speaks again of incense in Expos. Kv. sec. Ljccniti. § 2S, but again
there is no conclusive proof. It was certainly used as a perfume.
* Pythagoras.
ing wiped off the filth of earthly vices, purify
our utmost souls from every defilement of
the flesh.
20. We ought, also, specially to repeat
the Creed, as a seal upon our hearts, daily,
before light, and to recur to it in thought
whenever we are in fear of anything. For
when is the soldier in his tent or the warrior
in battle without his military oath }
CHAPTER V.
St. Ambrose, speaking of tears, explains David's saying,
'' Eve?-}' night toash I my couch with 7ny teats ," and
goes on to speak of Christ bearing our griefs and in-
firmities. Everything should be referred to His hon-
our, and we ought to rejoice with spiritual joy, but not
after a worldly fashion.
2 1. And who can now fail to understand
that the holy prophet said for our instruc-
tion : "Every night will I wash my couch
and water my bed with my tears " .'" For
if you take it literally for his bed, he shows
that such abundance of tears should be shed
as to wash the bed and water it with tears,
the couch of him who is praying, for weep-
ing has to do with the present, rewards with
the future, since it is said : " Blessed are ye
that weep, for ye shall laugh ; " ^ or if we
take the word of the prophet as applied to
our bodies, we must wash away the offences
of the body with tears of penitence. For
Solomon made himself a bed of wood from
Lebanon, its pillars were of silver, its bot-
tom of gold, its back strewn with gems. ^
What is that bed but the fashion of our
body } For by gems is set forth the splen-
dour of the brightness of the air, fire is set
forth by the gold, water by silver, and earth
by wood, of which four elements the human
body consists, in which our soul rests, if it
do not exist deprived of rest by the rough-
ness of hills or the damp ground, but raised
on high, above vices, supported by the
wood. For which reason David also says :
"The Lord will send him help upon his
bed of pain. "4 For how can that be a bed
of pain which capnot feel pain, and which
has no feeling.? But the body of pain is like
the body of that death,. of which it is said :
"O wretched man that I am, who shall de-
liver me from the body of this death .'' "s
22. Arid since I have inserted a clause in
which mention is made of the Lord's Body,
lest any one should be troubled at reading
that the Lord took a body of pain, let him
remember that the Lord grieved and wept
1 Ps. vi. 6.
* Ps. xli. Ul.] 3.
^ S. Lukv vi
^ Rom. vii
3 Cant. iii. 6.
24-
CONCERNING VIRGINS, BOOK III.
385
over the death of Lazarus,' and was wound-
ed in His passion, and that from the wound
there went forth blood and water, ^ and that
He g:ave up His Spirit. Water for washint^,
Blood for drink, the Spirit for His rising
again. For Christ alone is to us hope,
faith, and love — hope in His resurrection,
faith in the laver, and love in the sacra-
ment.
23. And as He took a body of pain, so
too He turned His bed in His weakness, ^ for
He converted it to the benetit of human
flesh. For by His Passion weakness was
ended, and death by His resurrection. And
yet you ought to mourn for the world but
to rejoice in the Lord, to be sad for peni-
tence but joyful for grace, though, too, the
teacher of the Gentiles by a wholesome
precept has bidden to weep with them that
weep, and to rejoice with them that do re-
ioice.4
24. But let him who desires to solve the
whole difficulty of this question have re-
course to the same Apostle. " Whatsoever
ye do," says he, "in word or deed, do all
in the Name of our Lord Jesus Christ, giv-
ing thanks to God the Father by Him."5
Let us then refer all our words and deeds to
Christ, Who brought life out of death, and
created light out of darkness. For as a sick
body is at one time cherished by warmth,
at another soothed by cool applications, and
the variation of remedies, if carried out ac-
cording to the direction of the physician, is
healthful, but if done in opposition to his
orders increases the sickness ; so whatever
is paid to Christ is a remedy, whatever is
done by our own will is harmful.
25. There ought then to be the joy of the
mind, conscious of right, not excited by un-
restrained feasts, or nuptial concerts, for in
such modesty is not safe, and temptation
may be suspected where excessive dancing
accompanies festivities. I desire that the
virofins of God should be far from thi|/ For
as a certain teacher of this \yorl(t»has said:
"No one dances when sober unless he is
mad. "^ Now if, according to the wisdom
of this world, either drunkenness or mad-
ness is the cause of dancing, what a warn-
ing is given to us amongst the instances
mentioned in the Divine Scriptures, where
John, the forerunner of Christ, being be-
headed at the wish of a dancer, is an in-
stance that the allurements of dancing did
more harm than the madness of sacrilegious
anger.
1 S. John xi. 35.
♦ Rom. xii. 15.
^ S. John xix. 34.
^ Col. iii. 17.
3 Ps. xli. [xl.] 3.
" Cicero,/. Murena.
CHAPTER VI.
Having mentioned the Baptist, St. Ambrose enters into
a description of the events concerning his death, and
speaks against dancing and the festivities of the
wicked.
26. And since we must not cursorily pass
by the mention of so great a man, let us
consider who he was, by whom, on what
account, how, and at what time he was
slain. A just man, he is put to death by
adulterers, and the penalty of a capital
crime is turned off by the guilty on to the
judge. Again the reward of the dancer is
the death of the prophet. Lastly (a matter of
honour even to all barbarians), the cruel sen-
tence is given in the midst of banqueting
and festivities, and the news of the deadly
crime is carried from the banquet to the
prison, and then from the prison to the ban-
quet. How many crimes are there in one
wicked act !
27. A banquet of death is set out with
royal luxury, ' and when a larger concourse
than usual had come together, the daughter
of the queen, sent for from within the private
apartments, is brought forth to dance in the
sight of men. What could she have learnt
from an adulteress but loss of modesty .'' Is
anything so conducive to lust as with un-
seemly movements thus to expose in naked-
ness those parts of the body^which either
nature has hidden or cust6m has veiled,
to sport with the looks, to turn the neck, to
loosen the hair } Fitly was the next step
an offence against God. For what modesty
can there be wlfere there is dancing and
noise and clafpping of hands .''
28. "Then," it is said, "the king be-
ing pieased, said unto the damsel, that
she should ask of the king whatsoever she
■\\;ould. Then he swore that if she asked
he would give her even the half of his king-
dom."^ See how worldly men themselves
judge of their worldly power, so as to give
even kingdoms for dancing. But the dam-
sel, being taught by her mother, demanded
that the head of John should be brought to
her on a dish. That which is said that
" the king was sorry, "3 is not repentance on
the part of the king, but a confession of
guilt, which is, accordmg to the wont of the
divine rule, that they who have done evil
condemn themselves by their own confes-
sion. " But for their sakes which sat with
him," it is said. What is more base than
that a murder should be committed in order
J S. M^rk vj. 21 ff. ' S. Mark vi. 22, 23, » S. Mark vi. 25 ft
386
ST. AMBROSE.
not to displease those who sat at meat ?
"And," it follows, "for his oath's sake."
What a new religion ! He had better have
forsworn himself. The Lord therefore in
the Gospel bids us not to swear at all,'
that there be no cause for perjury, and no
need of offending. And so an innocent
man is slain that an oath be not violated. I
know which to have in the greatest horror.
Perjury is more endurable than are the
oaths of tyrants.
29. Who would not think when he saw
some one running from the banquet to the
prison, that orders had been given to set
the prophet free.' Who, I say, having heard
that it was Herod's birthday, and of the
state banquet, and the choice given to the
damsel of choosing whatever she wished,
would not think that the man was sent to
set John free ? What has cruelty in com-
mon with delicacies.' What have death
and pleasure in common .' The prophet is
hurried to suffer at a festal time by a festal
order, by which he would even wish to be
set free ; he is slain by the sword, and his
head is brought on a platter. This dish was
well suited to their cruelty, in order that
their insatiate savageness might be feasted.
30. Look, most savage king, at the
sights worthy of thy feast. Stretch forth
thy right hand, that nothing be wanting to
thy cruelty, that streams of holy blood may
pour down between thy fingers. And since
the hunger for such unheard-of cruelty
could not be satisfied by banquets, nor the
thirst by goblets, drink the blood pouring
from the still flowing veins of the cut-off
head. Behold those eyes, even in death,
the witnesses of thy crime, turning away
from the sight of the delicacies. The eyes
are closing, not so much owing to death, as
to horror of luxury. That bloodless golden
mouth, whose sentence thou couldst not
endure, is silent, and yet thou fearest. Yet
the tongue, which even after death is wont
to observe its duty as when living, con-
demned, though with trembling motion, the
incest. This head is borne to Herodias : she
rejoices, she exults as though she had
escaped from the crime, because she has
slain her judge.
31. What say you, holy women.' Do
you see what you ought to teach, and
what also to unteach your daughters.' She
dances, but she is the daughter of an adul-
teress. But she who is modest, she who is
chaste, let her teach her daughter religion,
not dancing. And do you, grave and pru-
1 S. Matt. V. 34.
^ S. Mark vi. 27.
dent men, learn to avoid the banquets of
hateful men. If such are the banquets,
what will be the judgment of the impious?
CHAPTER Vn.
In reply to Marcellina, who had asked what should be
thought of those who to escape violence killed them-
selves, -St. Ambrose replies by narrating the history of
Pelagia, a virgin, with her mother and sister, and goes
on to speak of the martyrdom of the blessed Sotheris,
one of their own ancestors.
32. As I am drawing near the close of my
address, you make a good suggestion, holy
sister, that I should touch upon what we
ought to think of the merits of those who
have cast themselves down from a height,
or have drowned themselves in a river, lest
they should fall into the hands of perse-
cutors, seeing that holy Scripture forbids a
Christian to lay hands on himself. And in-
deed as regards virgins placed in the neces-
sity of preserving their purity, we have a
plain answer, seeing that there exists an
instance of martyrdom.
33. Saint Pelagia ' lived formerly at Anti-
och, being about fifteen years old, a sister
of virgins, and a virgin herself. She shut
herself up at home at the first sound of
persecution, seeing herself surrounded by
those who would rob her of her faith and
purity, in the absence of her mother and
sisters, without any defence, but all the
more filled with God. "What are we to
do, unless," says she to herself, " thou, a
captive of virginity, takest thought.' I
both wish and fear to die, for I meet not
death but seek it. Let us die if we are
allowed, or if they will not allow it,
still let us die. God is not offended
by a remedy against evil, and faith permits
the act. In truth, if we think of the real
meaning of the word, how can what is
voluntary be violence.' It is rather vio-
lence to wish to die and not to be able.
And we do not fear any difficulty. For who
is there who wishes to die and is not able
to do so, when there are so many easy
ways to death.' For I can now rush upon
the sacrilegious altars and overthrow them,
and quench with my blood the kindled fires.
I am not afraid that my right hand may fail
to deliver the blow, or that my breast may
1 Cf . Ep. XXXVII. 38. St. Ambrose, being asked by his sister for
his opinion concerning such virgins as had committed suicide rather
than suffer themselves to be violated, would seem to say that in
some cases this vi-as allowable. St. Augustine [</<• O'?'. Vci, I. lyj
speaks with some hesitation on the same subject. There is some
doubt as to who this St. Pelagia mentioned below may be. St.
Chrysostom says she committed suicide by throwing herself from
the roof ; see Pelagia (1) in Did. Chr. Biog.
CONCERNING VIRGINS, BOOK III.
387
shrink from the pain. I shall leave no sin
to my flesh. I fear not that a sword will be
wanting. I can die by my own weapons,
I can die witliout the help of an execu-
tioner, in my mothers bosom."
34. She is said to have adorned her head,
and to have put on a bridal dress, so that
one would say that she was going to a
brides:room, not to death. Eut when the
hateful persecutors saw that they had lost
the prey of her chastity, they began to seek
her mother and sisters. But they, by a
spiritual flight, already held the field of
chastity, when, as on the one side, perse-
cutors suddenly threatened them, and on the
other, escape was shut off by an impetuous
river, they said, what do we fear ? See the
water, what hinders us from being baptized?
And this is the baptism whereby sins are for-
given, and kingdoms are sought. This is a
baptism after which no one sins. Let the
water receive us, which is wont to regene-
rate. Let the water receive us, which makes
virgins. Let the water receive us, which
opens heaven, protects the weak, hides
death, makes martyrs. We pray Thee, God,
Creator of all things, let not the water scatter
our bodies, deprived of the breath of life ; let
not death separate our obsequies, whose
lives affection has always conjoined ; but let
our constancy be one, our death one, and
our burial also be one.
35. Having said these words, and having
slightly girded up the bosom of their dress,
to veil their modesty without impeding their
steps, joining hands as though to lead a
dance, they went forward to the middle of
the river bed, directing their steps to where
the stream was more violent, and the depth
more abrupt. No one drew back, no one
ceased to go on, no one tried where to place
her steps, they were anxious only when they
felt the ground, grieved when the water was
shallow, and glad when it was deep. One
could see the pious mother tightening her
grasp, rejoicing in her pledges, afraid of a
fall lest even the stream should carry off her
daughters from her. "These victims, O
Christ," said she, " do I offer as leaders of
chastity, guides on my journey, and com-
panions of my sufferings.''
37. But who would have cause to wonder
that they had such constancy whilst alive,
seeing that even when dead they preserved
the position of their bodies unmoved ? The
water did not lay bare their corpses, nor did
the rapid course of the river roll them along.
Moreover, the holy mother, though without
sensation, still maintained her loving grasp,
and held the sacred knot which she had tied,
and loosed not her hold in death, that she
who had paid her debt to religion might die
leaving her piety as her heir. For those
whom she had joined together with herself
for martyrdom, she claimed even to the
tomb.
38. But why use instances of people of
another race to you, my sister, whom the
inspiration of hereditary chastity has taught
by descent from a martyred ancestor.-* For
whence have you learnt who had no one
from whom to learn, living in the country,
with no virgin companion, instructed by no
teacher.'' You have played the part then
not of a disciple, for this cannot be done
without teaching, but of an heir of virtue.
39. For how could it come to pass that
holy Sotheris should not have been the
originator of your purpose, who is an ances-
tor of your race ? Who, in an age of perse-
cution, borne to the heights of suffering by
the insults of slaves, gave to the executioner
even her face, which is usually free from
injury when the whole body is tortured,
and rather beholds than suffers torments ; so
brave and patient that when she offered her
tender cheeks to punishment, the executioner
failed in striking before the martyr yielded
under the injuries. She moved not her face,
she turned not away her countenance, she
uttered not a groan or a tear. Lastly, when
she had overcome other kinds of punish-
ment, she found the sword which she de-
sired.
CONCERNING WIDOWS.
INTRODUCTION.
The writer informs us himself at the beginning of his treatise that he felt moved by
the example of St. Paul, after speaking about virgins, to continue with the subject of
widows. But there was also another matter in his own diocese which touched him per-
sonally, and caused him at once to take up the matter. A certain widow who had
several daughters, some married already and others of marriageable age, began to think
of a second marriage for herself. St. Ambrose, partly for her own sake, partly that it
might not be supposed that he had in any way advised the step, published the following
treatise.
In the first place he affirms that the profession of widowhood comes very close to that
of virginity, and is to be esteemed far above the married state. He proves this by the
testimony of St. Paul and by his description of one who is a widow indeed ; also by many
examples taken both from the Old and New Testament. Having mentioned St. Peter's
wife's mother, he turns more particularly to the widow for whose sake he is writing,
though he avoids mentioning her name, pointing out how really empty and insufficient
are all the reasons she is setting before herself for marrying again. The marriage bond
is, indeed, he says, holy and good, and the married and single are as various kinds of
flowers in the field of the Church. There is, however, more corn produced than lilies,
more that is married than virgins. He points out that widowhood has been held in dis-
honour by idolaters alone, for which reason it may well be held in honour by Christians.
St. Ambrose does not condemn a second marriage, though placing widowhood before it,
as being bound to aim at leading those committed to his loving care to the highest possible
degree of perfection.
The treatise was written not long after that concerning Virgins, that is, soon after
A.D. 377. •
* It is interesting to compare with this treatise the letter of St. Jerome to Furia on the same subject, No. 54, Vol. VI. of this series
THE TREATISE OF ST. AMBROSE, BISHOP OF MILAN.
CONCERNING WIDOWS.
CHAPTER I.
After having written about virgins, it seemed needful
to say sometiiing concerning widows, since the
Apostle joins the two classes together, and the latter
are as it were teachers of the former, and far superior
to those who are married. Elijah was sent to a
widow, a great mark of honour; yet widows are not
honourable like her of Sarepta, unless they copy her
virtues, notably hospitality. The avarice of men is
rebuked, who forfeit the promises of God by their
grasping.
I. SiNXE I have treated of the honour of
virgins in three books, it is fitting now, my
brethren, that a treatise concerning widows
should come in order ; for I ought not to leave
them without honour, nor to separate them
from the commendation belonging to virgins,
since the voice of the Apostle has joined them
to virgins, according to what is written: "The
unmarried woman and the virgin careth for
the things of the Lord, that she may be
holy both in body and in spirit." ' For in a
certain manner the inculcation of virginity
is strengthened by the example of widows.
They who have preserved their marriage
bed undefiled are a testimony to virgins that
chastity is to be preserved for God. And it
is almost a mark of no less virtue to abstain
from marriage, which was once a delight,
than to remain ignorant of the pleasures of
wedlock. They are strong in each point, in
that they regret not wedlock, the faith of
which they keep, and entangle not them-
selves with wedded pleasures, lest they ap-
pear weak and not able to take care of them-
selves.
2. But in this particular virtue is contamed
also the prizes of liberty. For : " The wife is
bound as long as her husband liveth ; but if
her husband fall asleep she is freed : let her
marry whom she will, only in the Lord.
But she will be happier if she so abide, after
my judgment, for I think I also have the
1 I Cor. vii. 34.
Spirit of God." ' Evidently, then, the
Apostle has expressed the difference, having
said that the one is bound, and stated that
the other is happier, and that he asserts not
so much as the result of his own judgment,
as of the infusion of the Spirit of God, that
the decision should be seen to be heavenly,
not human.
3. And what is the teaching of the fact that
at that time when the whole human race was
afflicted by famine and Elias was sent to the
widow ? ^ And see how for each is reserved
her own special grace. An angel is sent to
the Virgin, 3 a prophet to the widow. Notice,
farther, that in one case it is Gabriel, in the
other Elisha. The most excellent chiefs of the
number of angels and prophets are seen to be
chosen. But there is no praise simply in
widowhood, unless there be added the vir-
tues of widowhood. For, indeed, there were
many widows, but one is preferred to all, in
which fact it is not so much that others are
called back from their pursuit as that they are
stimulated by the example of virtue.
4. What is said at first makes the ears at-
tentive, although the simplicity itself of the
understanding has weight to attract widows
to the pattern of virtue ; since each seems
to excel, not according to her profession,
but her merit, and the grace of hospitality
is not lost sight of by God, Who, as He
Himself related in the Gospel, rewards a
cup of cold water with the exceeding recom-
I pense of eternity, and compensates the
\ small measure of meal and oil by an unfail-
ing abundance of plenty ever coming in.
For if one of the heathen 4 has said that all
the possessions of friends should be com-
mon, how much more ought those of rela-
tives to be common ! For we are relatives
who are bound into one body.
5. But we are not bound by any prescribed
limit of hospitality. For why do you think
1 I Cor. vii. 39, 40.
' S. Luke i. 26, 27.
2 I [3] Kings xvii. 9.
* Pythagoras.
391
392
ST. AMBROSE.
that what is of this world is private property
when this world is common ? Or why do
you consider the fruits of the earth are
private, when the earth itself is common
property? " Behold," He said, "the fowls
of the air, they sow not, neither do they
reap."' For to those to whom nothing- is
private property nothing is wanting-, and
God, the master of His own word, knows
how to keep His promise. Again, the birds
do not gather together, and yet they eat, for
our heavenly Father feeds them. But we,
turning aside the warnings of a general
utterance to our private advantage, God
says : " Every tree which has in it the fruit
of a tree yielding seed shall be to you for
meat, and to every beast, and to every bird,
and to everything that creepeth upon the
earth." ^ By gathering together we come to
want, and by gathering together we are
made empty. For we cannot hope for the
promise, who keep not the saying. It is
also good for us to attend to the- precept of
hospitality, to be ready to give to strangers,
for we, too, are strangers in the world.
6. But how holy was that widow, who,
when pinched by extreme hunger, observed
the reverence due to God, and was not using
the food for herself alone, but was dividing
it with her son, that she might not outlive
her dear offspring. Great is the duty of
affection, but that of religion brings more
return. For as no one ought to be set before
her son, so the prophet of God ought to be
set before her son and her preservation.
For she is to be believed to have given to
him not a little food, but the whole support
of her life, who left nothing for herself. So
hospitable was she that she gave the whole,
so full of faith that she believed at once.
CHAPTER n.
The precepts of the Apostleconceminga widow indeed
are laid down, such as, that she bnng up children,
attend to her parents, desire to please God, show
herself irreproachable, set forth a ripeness of merits,
have been the wife of one man. St. Ambrose notes,
however, that a second marriage was not condemned
by St. Paul, and adds that widows must have a good
report for virtue with all. The reasons why younger
widows are to be avoided, and what is meant by
its being better to marry than to burn. .St. Ambrose
then goes on to speak of the dignity of widows, shown
by the fact that any injury done to them is visited by
the anger of God.
7. So, then, a widow is not only marked
off by bodily abstinence, but is distinguished
by virtue, to whom I do not give command-
* S. Matt. vi. 26
■ Gen. i. 29, 30.
ments, but the Apostle. I am not the only
person to do them honour, but the Doctor
of the Gentiles did so first, when he said :
" Honour widows that are widows indeed.
But if any widow have children or nephews,
let her first learn to govern her own house,
and to requite her parents." ' Whence we
observe that each inclination of affection
ought to exist in a widow, to love her chil-
dren and to do her duty to her parents. So
when discharging her duty to her parents
she is teaching her children, and is rewarded
herself by her own compliance w'ith duty, in
that what she performs for others benefits
herself
8. "For this," says he, "is acceptable
with God. "^ So that if thou, O widow, carest
for the things of God, thou oughtest to follow
after that which thou hast learnt to be well
pleasing to God. And, indeed, the Apostle
somewhat farther back,^ exhorting widows
to the pursuit of continence, said that they
mind the things of the Lord. But elsewhere,
when a widow who is approved is to be
selected, she is bidden not only to bear in
mind but also to hope in the Lord: "For
she that is a widow indeed," it is said, " and
desolate, must hope in God, and be instant
in supplications and prayers night and
day. "4 And not without reason does he
show that these ought to be blameless, to
whom, as virtuous works are enjoined, so,
too, great respect is paid, so that they are
honoured even by bishops.
9. And of what kind she ought to be who
is chosen the description is given in the words
of the teacher himself : ' ' Not less than three-
score years old, having been the wife of one
man. "5 Not that old age alone makes the
widow, ^ but that the merits of the widow are
the duties of old age. For she certainly is
the more noble who represses the heat of
youth, and the impetuous ardour of youth-
ful age, desiring neither the tenderness of a
husband, nor the abundant delights of chil-
dren, rather than one who, now worn out in
body, cold in age, of ripe years, can neither
grow warm with pleasures, nor hope for off-
spring.
10. Nor in truth is anyone excluded from
the devotion of widowhood, if after entering
upon a second marriage, which the precepts
of the Apostle certainly do not condemn as
' I Tim. V. 3, 4. - I Tim. v. 3, 4. ' i Cor. vii. 34.
* I Tim. V. 5. ^ I Tim. v. 9.
" The rule of St. Paul as to age was not always strictly observed
after early days, though probably so in the experience of .St. Am-
brose, though tile Benedictine Editors think that he did not uphold
the restriction, but it is spoken of in the Exhort. ]'irgiintatis. § 25,
wherejuliana of Hononia speaks of herself as " adlinc iiniiiaturain
I'hluitatis stifiendiis" not yet old enough to receive widow's pay.
See Diet. Chr Antiq., art Widows.
CONCERNING WIDOWS.
393
though the fruit of chastity were lost, if she
be again loosed from her husband. She will
have, indeed, the merit of her chastity, even
if it be tardy, but she will be more approved
who has tried a second marriage, for the
desire of chastity is conspicuous in her. for
the other old age or shame seems to have
put an end to marrying.
11. Nor yet is bodily chastity alone the
strong purpose of the widow, but a large and
most abundant exercise of virtue. "Well
reported of for good works, if she have
brought up children ; if she have lodged
strangers ; if she have washed the saints'
feet; if she have ministered to those suffer-
ing tribulation ; if, lastly, she have followed
after every good work. " ' You see how
many practices of virtue he has included.
He demands, first of all, the duty of piety ;
secondly, the practice of hospitality and
humble service ; thirdly, the ministry of
mercy and liberality in assisting ; and,
lastly, the performance of every good work.
12. And he, therefore, that the younger
should be avoided,'- because they are not
able to fulfil the requirements of so high a
degree of virtue. For youth is prone to fall
because the heat of various desires is in-
flamed by the warmth of glowing youth, and
it is the part of a good doctor to keep off the
materials of sin. For the first exercise in
training the soul is to turn away sin, the
second to implant virtue. Yet, since the
Apostle knew that Anna, the widow of four-
score years, from her youth was a herald of
the works of the Lord, I do not think that
he thought that the younger should be ex-
cluded from the devotion of widowhood,
especially as he said : " It is better to marry
than to burn. " 3 For certainly he recom-
mended marriage as a remedy, that she who
would else perish might be saved ; he did
not prescribe the choice that one who could
contain should not follow chastity, for it is
one thing to succour one who is falling,
another to persuade to virtue.
13. And what shall I say of human judg-
ments, since in the judgments of God the
Jews are set forth as having offended the
Lord in nothing more than violating what
was due to the widow and the rights of
minors.' This is proclaimed by the voices
of the prophets as the cause which brought
upon the Jews the penalty of rejection.
This is mentioned as the only cause which
will mitigate the wrath of God against their
sin, if they honour the widow, and execute
true judgment for minors, for thus we read :
Tin
' I Tim. V. II.
^ I Cor. vii. g.
•'Judge the fatherless, deal justly with the
widow, and come let us reason totrether,
saith the Lord."' And elsewhere: "The
Lord shall maintain the orphan and the
widow.'' ^ And again : "1 will abundantly
bless her widow." 3 Wherein also the like-
ness of the Church is foreshadowed. You
see, then, holy widows, that that office
which is honoured by the assistance of divine
grace must not be degraded by impure
desire.
CHAPTER III.
St. Ambrose returns to the story of the widow of
Sarepta, and shows that she represented the Church,
hence that she was an example to virgins, married
women, and widows. Then he refers to the prophet
as setting forth Christ, inasmuch as he foretold the
mysteries and the rain which was to come. Next he
touches upon r.nd explr.ins the twofold sign of Gideon,
and points out that it is not in every one's power to
work miracles, and that the Incarnation of Christ
and the rejection of the Jews were foreshadowed in
that account.
14. To return to what was treated of
above, 4 what is the meaning of the fact that
when there was a very great famnie in all
the land, yet the care of God was not want-
ing to the widow, and the prophet was sent to
sustain her.? And when in this story the
Lord warns me that He is about to speak in
truth, 5 He seems to bid my ears attend to a
mystery. For what can be more true than
the mystery of Christ and the Church ? Not,
then, without a purpose is one preferred
amongst many widows. Who is such an
one, to whom so great a prophet who was
carried up into heaven, should be guided,
especially at that time when the heaven was
shut for three years and six months, when
there was a great famine in the whole land .'*
The famine was everywhere, and yet not-
withstanding this widow did not want.
What are these three years ? Are they not,
perchance, those in which the Lord came to
the earth and could not find fruit on the fig--
tree, according to that which is written :
"Behold, there are three years that I came
seeking fruit on this fig-tree, and find none. "^
15. This is assuredly that widow of whom
it was said : " Rejoice, thou barren that
bearest not, break forth and cry, thou that
availest not with child ; for many are the
children of the desolate, more than of her
who hath an husband. "7 And well is she a
widow of whom it is well said: "Thou
^ Isa. i. 17.
^ Ps. cxxxii. fcxxxi.] 15 [LXX.]
^ S. Luke iv. 25. * "5 T nt^ ■
^ Ps. cxlvi. [cxlv.] 9.
,.— J. * I [3 I Kings xvii. 14.
S. Luke xiii. 7. ' Isa. liv. i.
394
ST. AMBROSE.
shalt not remember thy shame and thy
widowhood, for 1 am the Lord Who make
thee."' And perchance therefore is she a
widow who has lost her Husband indeed in
the suffering of His body, but in the day of
judgment shall receive again the Son of Man
Whom she seemed to have lost. "For a
short time have I forsaken thee," ^ He says,
in order that, being forsaken, she may the
more gloriously keep her faith.
I'i. All, then, have an example to imitate,
virgins, married women, and widows. And
perchance is the Church therefore a virgin,
married, and a widow, because they are one
body in Christ. She is then that widow
for whose sake when there was a dearth of
the heavenly Word on earth, the prophets
were appointed, for there was a widow who
was barren, yet reserved her bringing forth
for its own time.
17. So that his person does not seem to
us of small account, who by his word
moistened the dry earth with the dew of
heaven, and unlocked the closed heavens
certainly not by human power. For who is
he who can open the heavens except Christ,
for Whom daily out of sinners food is gath-
ered, an increase for the Church.? For it is
not in the power of man to say : "The bar-
rel of meal shall not waste, and the cruse
of oil shall not fail, until the day on which
the Lord shall send rain on the earth. "^
For though it be the rule of the prophets to
speak thus, the voice is in truth that of the
Lord. And so it is stated first : "For thus
saith the Lord. " ■♦ For it is of the Lord to
vouch for a continuance of heavenly sacra-
ments, and to promise that the grace of
spiritual joy shall not fail, to grant the de-
fences of life, the seals of faith, the gifts of
virtues.
18. But what does this mean : "Until the
day on which the Lord shall send rain on
the earth " ? except that He, too, ' ' shall come
down like rain upon a fleece, and like the
drops that water the earth. "5 In which pas-
sage is disclosed the mystery of the old his-
tory where Gideon, the warrior of the
mystic conflict, receiving the pledge of
future victory, recognized the spiritual sacra-
ment in the vision of his mind, that that
rain was the dew of the Divine Word, which
first came down on the fleece, when all the
earth was parched with continual drought,
and by a second true sign, moistened the
floor of all the earth with a shower, whilst
dryness was upon the fleece.^
' Isa. liv. }.
* I [3] Kinjs xvii. 14.
Tsa. liv. 7.
Ps. Ixxii. [Ixxi.] 6.
•' ■ f.^l Kings xvii. 14
" Judg. vi. 37 ff.
19. For the prescient man observed the
sign of the future growth of the Church. For
first in Judaea the dew of the divine utterance
began to give moisture (for "in Jewry is
God known"),' whilst the whole earth re-
mained without the dew of faith. But when
Joseph's flock began to deny God, and by
venturing on various enormous offences to
incur guilt before God, then when the dew
of the heavenly shower was poured on the
whole earth, the people of the Jews began
to grow dry and parched in their own un-
belief, when the clouds of prophecy and
the healthful shower of the Apostles watered
the holy Church gathered together from all
parts of the world. This is that rain, now
condensed from earthly moisture, now from
mountain mists, but diffused throughout the
whole world in the salutary shower of the
heavenly Scriptures.
20. By this example, then, it is shown
that not all can merit the miracles of divnie
power, but they who are aided by the pur-
suits of religious devotion, and that they
lose the fruits of divine working who are
devoid of reverence for heaven. It is also
shown in a mystery that the Son of God. in
order to restore the Church, took upon Him-
self the inystery of a human body, casting
off the Jewish people, from whom the coun-
sellor and the prophet and the miracles of
the divine benefits were taken away, be-
cause that as it were by a kind of national
blemish they were not willing to believe in
the Son of God.
CHAPTER IV.
By the example of Anna St. Ambrose shows what ought
to be the life of widows, and shows that she was an
example of chastity at every age. From this he argues
that there are three degrees of the same virtue, all
of which are included in the Church, and sets forth
several examples in Mary, in Anna, and in Susanna.
But, he adds, the state of virginity is superior to
either of the others, but that a widow ought to take
greater care for the preservation of her good name.
21. Scripture then teaches as how much
grace is conferred by unity, and how great
is the e:ift of divine blessing in widows.
And since such honour is given them by
God, we must observe what mode of I'ife
corresponds thereto ; for Anna shows what
widows ought to be, who, left destitute by
the early death of her husband, yet obtained
the reward of full praise, being intent not
less on the duties of religion than on the
pursuit of chastity. .A. widow, it is said, of
' Ps. Ixxvi. [Ixxv.] I.
^ Isa. iii. 2.
CONCERNING WIDOWS.
395
fourscore and four years, a widow who
departed not from the temple, a widow who
served God night and day with fastings and
with prayers. '
2 2. You see what sort of person a widow
is said to be, the wife of one man, tested
also by the progress of age, vigorous in
religion, and worn out in body, whose rest-
ing-place is the temple, whose conversation
is prayer, whose life is fasting, who in the
times of day and night by a service of un-
wearied devotion, though the body acknow-
ledge old age, yet knows no age in her piety.
Thus is a widow trained from her youth,
thus is she spoken of in her age, who has
kept her widowhood not through the chance
of time, nor through weakness of body, but
by large-heartedness in virtue. For when it
is said that she was for seven years from her
virginity with her husband, it is a setting
forth that the things which are the support
of her old age began in the aims of her
routh.
23. And so we are taught that the virtue of
chastity is threefold, one kind that of married
life, a second that of widowhood, and the
third that of virginity, for we do not so set
forth one as to exclude others. These result
each in that which belongs to each. The
training of the Church is rich in this, that it
has those whom it may set before others,
but has none whom it rejects, and would
that it never could have any ! We have so
spoken of virginity as not to reject widow-
hood, we so reverence widows as to reserve
its own honour for wedlock. It is not our
precepts but the divine sayings which teach
this.
24. Let us remember then how Mary, how
Anna, and how Susanna are spoken of. Cut
since not only must we celebrate their
praises but also follow their manner of life, let
us remember where Susanna,^ and Anna,3
and Mary 4 are found, and observe how each
is spoken of with her special commendation,
and where each is mentioned, she that is
married in the garden, the widow in the
temple, the virgin in her secret chamber.
25. But in the former the fruit is later, in
virginity it is earlier ; old age proves them,
virginity is the praise of youth, and does
not need the help of years, being the fruit of
every age. It becomes early years, it adorns
youth, it adds to the dignity of age, and at
all ages it has the gray hairs of its righteous-
ness, the ripeness of its gravity, the veil of
modesty, which does hinder devotion and in-
1 S. Luke ii. 36, 37.
•' .S. I. like ii. 37.
2 Sus. 63.
* S. Luke i. 28.
creases religion. For we see by what follows
that holy Mary went every year with Joseph
to Jerusalem on the solemn day of the
passover. ' Everywhere in company with
the Virgm is eager devotion and a zealous
sharer of her chastity. Nor is the Mother of
the Lord puffed up, as though secure of her
own meritG, but the more she recognized
her merit, the more fully did she pay her
vows, the more abundantly did she perform
her service, the more fully did she discharge
her office, the more religiously did she per-
form her duty and fill up the mystic time.
26. How much more then does it beseem
you to be intei t on the pursuit of chastity,
lest you leave any place for unfavourable
opinion who have the evidence of your
modesty and your behaviour alone. For a
virgin, though in her also character rather
than the body has the first claim, puts away
calumny by the integrity of her body, a
widow who has lost the assistance of being
able to prove her virginity undergoes the
inquiry as to her chastity not according to
the word of a midwife, but according to her
own manner of life. Scripture, then," has
shown how attentive and religious should
be the disposition of a widow.
CHAPTER V.
Liberality to the poor is recommended by the example
of the widow in the Gospel, whose two mites were
preferred to the large gifts of the rich. The two
mites are treated as mystically representing the two
Testaments. What that treasure is for which we are
taught to offer, after the example of the wise men,
three gifts, or after that of the widow, two. St. Am-
brose concludes the chapter by an exhortation to
widows to be zealous in good works.
27. In the same book, too, but in another
place, we are taught how fitting it is to be
merciful and liberal towards the poor, and
that this feeling should not be checked by the
consideration of our poverty, since liberal-
ity is determined not by the amount of our
possessions, but by the disposition of giving.
For by the voice of the Lord that widow is
preferred to all of whom it was said : "This
widow hath cast in more than all."^ In
which instance the Lord characteristically
teaches all, that none should be held back
from giving assistance through shame at his
own poverty, and that the rich should not
flatter themselves that they seem to give
more than the poor. For the piece of money
out of a small stock is richer than treasures
out of abundance, because it is not the
' S. Luke ii. 41.
' S. Luke xxi. 3.
39^
ST. AMBROSE.
amount that is given but the amount that
remains which is considered. No one gives
more than she who has left nothing for
herself.
28. Why do you, rich woman, boast your-
self by comparison with the poor, and when
you are all loaded with gold, and drag along
the ground a costly robe, desire to be hon-
oured as though she were inferior and small
in comparison with your riches, because
you have surpassed the needy with your
gifts ? Rivers too overflow, when they are
too full, but a draught from a brook is more
pleasant. New wine foams while ferment-
ing, and the husbandman does not consider
as lost that which runs over. While the
harvest is being threshed out, grains of corn
fall from the groaning floor ; but though the
harvests fail, the barrel of meal wastes not,
and the cruse full of oil gives forth.' But
the draught emptied the casks of the rich,
while the tiny cruse of oil of the widow
gave abundance. That, then, is to be reck-
oned which you give for devotion, not what
you cast forth disdainfully. For in fine, no
one gave more than she who fed the prophet
with her children's nourishment. And so
since no one gave more, no one had greater
merit. This has a moral application.
29. And considering the mystical sense,
one must not despise this woman casting
in two mites into the treasury. Plainly the
woman was noble who in the divine judg-
ment was found worthy to be preferred to
all. Perchance it is she who of her faith has
given two testaments for the help of man,
and so no one has done more. Nor could
any one equal the amount of her gift, who
joined faith with mercy. Do you, then,
whoever you are, who exercise your life in
the practice of widowhood, not hesitate to
cast into the treasury the two mites, full of
faith and grace.
30. Happy is she who out of her treasure
brings forth the perfect image of the King.
Your treasure is wisdom, your treasure is
chastity and righteousness, your treasure is
a good understanding, such as was that
treasure from which the Magi, when they
worshipped the Lord, brought forth gold,
frankincense, and myrrh ; ^ setting forth by
gold the power of a king, venerating God
by the frankincense, and by myrrh acknow-
ledging the resurrection of the body. You
too have this treasure if you look into your-
self: " For we have this treasure in earthen
vessels. "3 You have gold which you can
give, for God does not exact of you the
' I [3] Kings xvii. 16. ' S. Matt. ii. 11. * 2 Cor. iv. 7.
precious gift of shining metal, but that gold
which at the day of judgment the fire shall
be unable to consume. Nor does He re-
quire precious gifts, but the good odour of
faith, which the altars of your heart send
forth and the disposition of a religious mind
exhales.
31. From this treasure, then, not only the
three gifts of the Magi but also the two mites
of the widow are taken, on which the perfect
image of the heavenly King shines forth,
the brightness of His glory and the image
of His substance. Precious, too, are those
hardly earned gains of chastity which the
widow gives of her labour and daily task,
continually night and day working at her
task, and by the wakeful labour of her
profitable chastity gathering treasure ; that
she may preserve the couch of her deceased
husband unviolated, be able to support her
dear children, and to minister to the poor.
She is to be preferred to the rich, she it is
who shall not fear the judgment of Christ.
32. Strive to equal her, my daughters : "It
is good to be zealously aftected in a good
thing."' "Covet earnestly the best gifts. "^
The Lord is ever looking upon you, Jesus
looks upon you when He goes to the trea-
sury, and you think that of the gain of your
good works assistance is to be given to those
in need. What is it, then, that you should give
your two mites and gain in return the Lord's
Body ? Go not, then, empty into the sight of
the Lord your God,^ empty of mercy, empty
of faith, empty of chastity ; for the Lord
Jesus is wont to look upon and to com-
mend not the empty, but those who are
rich in virtues. Let the maiden see you at
work, let her see you ministering to others.
For this is the return which you owe to God,
that you should make your return to God
from the progress of others. No return is
more acceptable to God than the offerings
of piety.
CHAPTER VL
Naomi is an instance of a widow receiving back from
lier daughter-in-law the fruits of her own good train-
ing, and is a token that necessary support will never
fail the good widow. And if her life appears sad,
she is happy, since the promises of the Lord are made
to her. St. Ambrose then touches upon the benefits
of weeping.
33. Does the widow Naomi seem to you
of small account, who supported her widow-
hood on the gleanings from another's har-
*Gal.iv. 18.
^ I Cor. xii. 31
Exod.
xxxiv. 20.
CONCERNING WIDOWS.
397
vest, and who, when licavy with age, was
supported by her daughter-in-hiw ? ■ It is a
great benefit both for the support and for
the advantage of widows, that they so train
their daughters-in-law as to have in them a
support in full old age, and, as it were, pay-
ment for their teaching and reward for their
training. For to her who has well taught
and well instructed her daughter-in-law a
Ruth will never be wanting w^ho will prefer
the widowed life of her mother-in-law to her
father's house, and if her husband also be
dead, will not leave her, will support her in
need, comfort her in sorrow, and not leave
her if sent away ; for good instruction will
never know want. So that Naomi, de-
prived of her husband and her two sons,
having lost the offspring of her fruitfulness,
lost not the reward of her pious care, for she
found both a comfort in sorrow and a sup-
port in poverty.
34. You see, then, holy women, how
fruitful a widow is in the offspring of vir-
tues, andtheresults of her own merits, which
cannot come to an end. A good widow,
then, knows no want, and if she be weary
through age, in extreme poverty, yet she has
as a rule the reward of the training she has
given. Though the nearest to herself have
failed, she tinds those not so near akin to
cherish their mother, revere their parent,
and by the trifling gifts for her support de-
sire to gain the fruit of their own kindness,
for richly are gifts to a widow repaid. She
asks food and pays back treasures.
35. But she seems to spend sad days, and
to pass her time in tears. And she is the
more blessed in this, for by a little weeping
she purchases for herself everlasting joys,
and at the cost of a few moments gains
eternity. To such it is well said : " Blessed
are ye that weep, for ye shall laugh." ^
Who then would prefer the deceitful appear-
ances of present joys to the pleasure of
future freedom from anxiety ? Does he seem
to us an insignificant authority, the elect fore-
father of the Lord after the flesh, who ate
ashes as it were bread, and mingled his
drink with weeping, 3 and by his tears at
night gained for himself the joy of redemp-
tion in the morning.^ Whence did he gain
that great joy except that he greatly wept,
and, as it were, at the price of his tears
obtained the grace of future glory for him-
self.
36. The widow has, then, this excellent
recommendation, that while she mourns her
husband she also weeps for the world, and the
redeeming tears are ready, which shed for the
dead will benefit the living. The weeping
of the eyes is fitted to the sadness of the
mind, it arouses pity, lessens labour, relieves
grief, and preserves modesty, and she no
longer seems to herself so wretched, finding
comfort in tears which are the pay of love
and proofs of pious memory.
CHAPTER VII.
By the example of Judith is shown that courage is not
wanting in widows ; her preparation for her visit to
llolofernes is dwelt upon, as also her chastity and
her wisdom, her sobriety and moderation. Lastly,
St. Ambrose, after demonstrating that she was no
less brave than prudent, sets forth her modesty after
her success.
37. But bravery also is usually not want-
ing to a good widow. For this is true bra-
very, which surpasses the usual nature and
the weakness of the sex by the devotion of
the mind, such as was in her who was named
Judith,' who of herself alone was able to
rouse up from utter prostration and defend
from the enemy men broken down by the
siege, smitten with fear, and pining with
hunger. For she, as w^e read, when Holo-
fernes, dreaded after his success in so many
battles, had driven countless thousands of
men within the walls ; when the armed men
were afraid, and were already treating about
the final surrender, went forth outside the
wall, both excelling that army which she
delivered, and braver than that which she
put to flight.
38. But in order to learn the dispositions
of ripe widowhood, run through the course
of the Scriptures. From the time when her
husband died ohe laid aside the garments of
mirth, and took those of mourning. Every
day she was intent on fasting except on
the Sabbath and the Lord's Day and the
times of holy days, not as yielding to desire
of refreshment, but out of respect for re-
ligion. For this is that which is said :
"Whether ye eat or drink, all is to be done
in the name of Jesus Christ,"^ that even
the very refreshment of the body is to have
respect to the worship of holy religion. So
then, holy Judith, ^ strengthened by length-
ened mourning and by daily fasting, sought
not the enjoyments of the world regardless
of danger, and strong in her contempt for
death. In order to accomplish her strata-
gem she put on that robe of mirth, where-
wath in her husband's lifetime she was wont
Ruthii. 2.
' S. Luke vi. 21,
* Ps. cii. [ci.] 9.
* Judith viii. 1 1 ff,
' I Cor. X. 31,
3 Judith X. 3 ff
398
ST. AMBROSE.
to be clothed, as though she would give
pleasure to her husband, if she freed her
country. But she saw another man whom
she was seeking to please, even Him, of
Whom it is said: "After me cometh a Alan
Who is preferred before me." ' And she did
well in resuming her bridal ornaments when
about to fight, for the reminders of wedlock
are the arms of chastity, and in no other
way could a widow please or gain the
victory.
39. Why relate the sequel ? How she.
amongst thousands of enemies, remained
chaste. Why speak of her wisdom, in that
she designed such a scheme.' She chose
out the commander, to ward off from her-
self the insolence of inferiors, and prepare
an opportunity for victory. She reserved
the merit of abstinence and the grace of
chastity. For unpolluted, as we read,
either by food or by adultery, she gained no
less a trmmph over the enemy by preserv-
ing her chastity than by delivering her
country.
40. What shall I say of her sobriety ?
Temperance, indeed, is the virtue of women.
When the men were intoxicated with wine and
buried in sleep, the widow took the sword,
pat forth her hand, cut off the warrior's head,
and passed unharmed through the midst of the
ranks of the enemy. You notice, then, how
much drunkenness can injure a woman, see-
ing that wine so weakens men that they are
overcome by women. Let a widow, then, be
temperate, pure in the first place from wine,
that she may be pure from adultery. He
will tempt you in vain, if wine tempts you
not. For if Judith had drunk she would
have slept with the adulterer. But because
she drank not, the sobriety of one without
difficulty was able both to overcome and
to escape from a drunken army.
41. And this was not so much a work of
her hands, as much more a trophy of her
wisdom. For having overcome Holofernes
b)' her hand alone, she overcame the whole
army of the enemies by her wisdom. For
hanging up the head of Holofernes, a deed
which the wisdom of the men had been un-
able to plan, she raised the courage of her
countrymen, and broke down that of the
enemy. She stirred up her own friends by her
modesty, and struck terror into the enemy
so that they were put to flight and slain.
And so the temperance and sobriety of one
widow not only subdued her own nature,
but, which is far more, even made men more
brave.
' S. .John i. 30.
42. And yet she was not so elated by this
success, though she might well rejoice and
exult by right of her victory, as to give up
the exercises of her widowhood, but refus-
ing all who desired to wed her she laid aside
her garments of mirth and took again those
of her widowhood, not caring for the adorn-
ments of her triumph, thinking those things
better whereby vices of the body are sub-
dued than those whereby the weapons of an
enemy are overcome.
CHAPTER VHL
Though many other widows came near to Judith in
virtue, St. Ambrose proposes to speak of Deborah
only. What a pattern of virtue she must have been
for widows, who was chosen to govern and defend
men. It was no small glory to her that when her
son was over the host he refused to go forth to battle
unless she would go also. So that she led the army
and foretold the result. In this story the conflicts
and triumphs of the Church, and her spiritual wea-
pons, are set forth, and every excuse of weakness is
taken from women.
43. And in order that it may not seem as
if only one widow had fulfilled this inimi-
table work, it seems in no way doubtful that
there were many others of equal or almost
equal virtue, for good seed corn usually bears
many ears filled with grains. Doubt not.
then, that that ancient seed-time was fruitful
in the characters of many women. But as
it would be tedious to include all, consider
some, and especially Deborah,' whose vir-
tue Scripture records for us.
44. For she showed not only that widows
have no need of the help of a man, inas-
much as she, not at all restrained by the
weakness of her sex, undertook to perform
the duties of a man, and did even more than
she had undertaken. And, at last, when the
Jews were being ruled under the leadership
of the judges, because they could not govern
them with manly justice, or defend them
with manly strength, and so wars broke
out on all sides, they chose Deborah, ^ by
whose judgment they might be ruled. And
so one widow both ruled many thousands
of men in peace, and defended them from the
enemy. There were many judges in Israel,
but no woman before was a judge, as after
Joshua there were many judges but none
was a prophet. And I think that her judge-
ship has been narrated, and her deeds de-
1 Jud. iv. 4 ff.
2 St. Jerome agrees with St. Ambrose in believing that Deborah
literally was a judge, as indeed seems conclusive from the Scrip-
tural account, but doubts whether she was a widow and mother of
Barak, and is probably right in the latter case. Whether Lapidoth,
however, was still alive is not so clear. Si. Jerome, £p. ad Furtam,
§.7.
CONCERNING WIDOWS.
399
scribed, that women should not be re-
strained from deeds of valour by the weak-
ness of their sex. A widow, she governs
the people ; a widow, she leads armies ; a
widow, she chooses generals ; a widow,
she determines wars and orders triumphs.
So, then, it is not nature which is answer-
able for the fault or which is liable to weak-
ness. It is not sex, but valour which makes
strong.
45. And in time of peace there is no com-
plaint, and no fault is found in this woman,
whereas most of the judges were causes of
no small sins to the people. But when the
Canaanites, a people fierce in battle and rich
in troops, successively joined them, showed
a horrible disposition against the people of
the Jews, this widow, before all others, made
all the preparations for war. And to show
that the needs of the household were not
dependent on the public resources, but
rather that public duties were guided by the
discipline of home life, she brings forth from
her home her son as leader of the army, that
we may acknowledge that a widow can
train a warrior ; whom, as a mother, she
taught, and, as judge, placed in command,
as, being herself brave, she trained him,
and, as a prophetess, sent to certain vic-
tory.
46. And lastly, her son Barak shows the
chief part of the victory was in the hands of
a woman when he said : "If thou wilt not
go with me I will not go, for I know not the
day on which the Lord sendeth His angel
with me. "' How great, then, was the might
of that woman to whom the leader of the
army says, " If thou wilt not go I will not
go." How great, I say, the fortitude of the
widow who keeps not back her son from
dangers through motherly affection, but
rather with the zeal of a mother exhorts her
son to go forth to victory, while saying that
the decisive point of that victory is in the
hand of a woman !
47. So, then, Deborah foretold the event of
the battle. Barak, as he was bidden, led
forth the army ; Jael carried off the triumph,
for the prophecy of Deborah fought for her,
who in a mystery revealed to us the rising
of the Church from among the Gentiles, for
whom should be found a triumph over Sisera,
that is, over the powers opposed to her.
For us, then, the oracles of the prophets
fought, for us those judgments and arms of
the prophets won the victory. And for this
reason it was not the people of the Jews but
Jael who gained the victory over the enemy.
> Jud. iv. 8 [LXX.].
Unhappy, then, was that people which could
not follow up by the virtue of faith the enemy,
whom it had put to flight. And so by their
fault salvation came to the Gentiles, by their
sluggishness the victory was reserved for us.
48. Jael then destroyed Sisera, whom
however the band of Jewish veterans had
put to flight under their brilliant ' leader, for
this is the interpretation of the name Barak ;
for often, as we read, the sayings and mer-
its of the prophets procured heavenly aid
for the fathers. But even at that time was
victory being preparedover spiritual wicked-
ness for those to whom it is said in the Gos-
pel : " Come, ye blessed of My Father, take
possession of the kingdom prepared for you
from the foundation of the world. "^ So the
commencement of the victory was from the
Fathers, its conclusion is in the Church.
49. But the Church does not overcome the
powers of the enemy with weapons of this
world, but with spiritual arms, "which are
mighty through God to the destruction of
strongholds and the high places of spiritual
wickedness." 3 And Sisera 's thirst was
quenched with a bowl of 'milk, because he
was overcome by wisdom, for what is health-
ful for us as food is deadly and weakening
to the power of the enemy. The weapons
of the Church are faith, the weapons of the
Church are prayer, which overcomes the
enemy.
50. And so according to this history a
woman, that the minds of women might be
stirred up, became a judge, a woman set all
in order, a woman prophesied, a woman
triumphed, and joining in the battle array
taught men to war under a woman's lead.
But in a mystery it is the battle of faith and
the victory of the Church.
51. You, then, who are women have no
excuse because of your nature. You who
are widows have no excuse because of the
weakness of your sex, nor can you attri-
bute your changeableness to the loss of the
support of a husband. Every one has suffi-
cient protection if courage is not wanting to
the soul. And the very advance of age is a
common defence of chastity for widows ;
and grief for the husband who is lost, regular
work, the care of the house, anxiety for
children, frequently ward off wantonness
hurtful to the soul ; while the very mourning
attire, the funeral solemnities, the constant
weeping, and grief impressed on the sad
brow in deep wrinkles, restrains wanton
The word Barak sigriiifies lightning. It is probably the same as
the Punk Barca, the surname of Hamilcar, father of Hannibal, or
possibly was a family name.
^ S. Matt. XXV. 34. 8 2 Cor. x. 4.
400
ST. AMBROSE.
eyes, checks lust, turns away forward looks.
The sorrow of regretful affection is a good
guardian of chastity, guilt cannot find an
entrance if vigilance be not wanting.
CHAPTER IX.
To an objection that the state of widowhood might in-
deed be endurable if circumstances were pleasant, St.
Ambrose replies that pleasant surroundings are more
dangerous than even trouble ; and goes to show by
examples taken from holy Scripture, that widows
may find much happiness in their children and their
sons-in-law. They should have recourse to the
Apostles, who are able to help us, and should entreat
for the intercessions of angels and martyrs. He
touches then on certain complaints respecting lone-
liness, and care of property, and ends by pointing out
the unseemliness of a widow marrying who has
daughters either married already or of marriageable
age.
52. You have learnt, then, you who are
widows, that you are not destitute of the
help of nature, and that you can maintain
sound counsel. Nor, again, are you devoid
of protection at home, who are able to claim
even the highest point of public power.
53. But perhaps some one may say that
widowhood is more endurable for her who
enjoys prosperity, but that widows are soon
broken down by adversity, and easily suc-
cumb. On which point not only are we
taught by experience that enjoyment is more
perilous for widows than difficulties, but by
the examples in the Scriptures that even in
weakness widows are not usually without
aid,' and that divine and human support
is furnished more readily to them than to
others, if they have brought up children and
chosen sons-in-law well. And, finally, when
Simon's mother-in-law was lying sick with
violent fever, Peter and Andrew besought
the Lord for her : "And He stood over her
and commanded the fever and it left her,
and immediately she arose and ministered
unto them.'" ^
54. "She was taken," it is said, "with a
great fever, and they besought him for her. " J
You too have those near you to entreat for
you. You have the Apostles near, you have
the Martyrs near ; if associated with the Mar-
tyrs in devotion, you draw near them also
by works of mercy. Do you show mercy
and you will be close to Peter. It is not
relationship by blood but affinity of virtue
which makes near, for we walk not in the
flesh but in the Spirit. Cherish, then, the
nearness of Peter and the affinity of Andrew,
that they may pray for you and your lusts
^ I Tim. V. 16.
* S. Luke iv. 39,
8 S. Luke iv. 38.
give way. Touched by the word of God you,
who lay on the earth, will then forthwith
rise up to minister to Chnst. "For our con-
versation is in heaven, \yhence also we look
for the Saviour, the Lc^d Jesus Christ.'"'
For no one lying down can minister to
Christ. Minister to the poor and you have
ministered to Christ. " For what ye have
done unto one of these,"' He says, " ye have
done unto Me." ^ You, widows, have then
assistance, if you choose such sons-in-law
for yourselves, such patrons and friends for
your posterity.
55. So Peter and Andrew prayed for the
widow. Would that there were some one
who could so quickly pray for us, or better
still, they who prayed for the mother-in-law,
Peter and Andrew his brother. Then they
could pray for one related to them, now
they are able to pray for us and for all.
For you see that one bound by great sin is
less fit to pray for herself, certainly less
likely to obtain for herself. Let her then
make use of others to pray for her to the
physician. For the sick, unless the physi-
cian be called to them by the prayers of
others, cannot pray for themselves. The
flesh is weak, the soul is sick and hindered
by the chains of sins, and cannot direct its
feeble steps to the throne of that physician.
The angels must be entreated for us, who
have been to us as guards ; the martyrs
must be entreated, whose patronage we
seem to claim for ourselves by the pledge as
it v/ere of their bodily remains. They can
entreat for our sins, who, if they had any
sins, washed them in their own blood ; for
they are the martyrs of God, our leaders,
the beholders of our life and of our actions.
Let us not be ashamed to take them as in-
tercessors for our weakness, for they them-
selves knew the weaknesses of the body,
even when they overcame.
56. So, then, Peter's mother-in-law found
some to pray for her. And you, O widow,
find those who will pray for you, if as a
true widow and desolate you hope in God,
continue instant in supplications, persist in
prayers, 3 treat your body as dying daily,
that by dying you may live again ; avoid
pleasures, that you, too, being sick, may be
healed. "For she that liveth in pleasure
is dead while she liveth. " 4
57. You have no longer any reason for
marrying, you have some to intercede for
you. Say not, " I am desolate. " This is
the complaint of one who wishes to marry.
' Phil. iii. 20.
? I Tim. V. 5.
* S. Matt. XXV. 40.
* I Tim. V. 6.
CONCERNING WIDOWS.
401
Say not, " I am alone." Chastity seeks
solitude : the modest seek privacy, the im-
modest company.' But you have necessary
business ; you ha"e also one to plead for
you. You are afr.id of your adversary ; the
Lord Himself will' intervene with the judge
and say: "Judge for the fatherless, and
justify the widow." '
58. But you wish to take care of your in-
heritance. The inheritance of modesty is
greater, and this a widow can guard better
than one married. A slave has done wrong.
Forgive him, for it is better that you should
bear with another's fault than expose it.
But you wish to marry. Be it so. The
simple desire is no crime. I do not ask
the reason, why is one invented.? If you
think it good, say so ; if unsuitable, be
silent. Do not blame God, do not blame
your relatives, saying that protection fails
you. Would that the wish did not fail !
And say not that you are consulting the
interests of your children, whom you are
depriving of their mother.
59. There are some things permissible in
the abstract, but not permissible on account
of age. Why is the bridal of the mother
being prepared at the same time with that
of the daughters, and often even after-
wards ? Why does the grown-up daughter
learn to blush in the presence of her
mothers betrothed rather than her own ? I
confess that I advised you to change your
dress, but not to put on a bridal veil ; to
go away from the tomb, not to prepare a
bridal couch. What is the meaning of a
newly-married woman who already has
sons-in-law .' How unseemly it is to have
children younger tlian one's grand-children !
CHAPTER X.
St. Ambrose returns again to the subject of Christ,
speaking of His goodness in all misery. The various
ways in which the good Physician treats our diseases,
and the quickness of the healing if only we do not
neglect to call upon Him. He touches upon the
moral meaning of the will, which he shows was mani-
fested in Peter's mother-in-law, and lastly points out
what a minister of Christ and specially a bishop
ought to be, and says that they specially must ri.se
through grace.
60. But let us return to the point, and
not, while we are grieving over the wounds
of our sins, leave the physician, and whilst
ministering to the sores of others, let our
own go on increasing. The Physician is
then here asked for. Do not fear, because
' Isa. i. 17.
the Lord is great, that perhaps He will not
condescend to come to one who is sick, for
He often comes to us from heaven ; and is
wont to visit not only the rich but also the
poor and the servants of the poor. ' And so
now He comes, when called upon, to Peter's
mother-in-law. "And He stood over her
and rebuked the fever, and it left her, and
immediately she arose and ministered unto
them.'"^ As He is worthy of being remem-
bered, so, too, is He worthy of being longed
for, worthy, too, of love, for His condescen-
sion to every single matter which affects
men, and His marvellous acts. He dis-
dains not to visit widows, and to enter the
narrow rooms of a poor cottage. As God
He commands, as man He visits.
61. Thanks be to the Gospel, by means
of which we also, who saw not Christ when
He came into this world, seem to be with
Him when we read His deeds, that as they,
to whom He drew near, borrowed faith from
Him, so may He, when we believe His
deeds, draw near to us.
62. Do you see what kinds of healing are
with Him.? He commands the fever. He
commands the unclean spirits, at another
place He lays hands on them. He wbs
wont then to heal the sick, not only by
word but also by touch. And do you then,
who burn with many desires, taken either
by the beauty or by the fortune of some
one, implore Christ, call in the Physician,
stretch forth your right hand to Him, let the
hand of God touch your inmost being, and
the grace of the heavenly Word enter the
veins of your inward desires, let God's right
hand strike the secrets of your heart. He
spreads clay on the eyes of some that they
may see,^ and the Creator of all teaches us
that we ought to be mindful of our own
nature, and to discern the vileness of our
body ; for no one can see divine things
except one who through knowledge of his
vileness cannot be puffed up. Another is
bidden to show himself to the priest, that
he may for ever be free from the scales of
leprosy. 4 For he alone can preserve his
purity, both of body and soul, who knows
how to show himself to that priest. Whom
we have received as an Advocate for our
sins, and to Whom is plainly said : "Thou
art a priest for ever after the order of Mel-
chisedech."5
63. And be not afraid that there will be
any delay in healing. He who is healed
by Christ has no hindrances. You must
1 S. Luke iv. 18.
* S. Luke V. 14.
2 S. Luke iv. 38.
•^ Ps. ex. [cix.J 4.
* S. John ix. 6.
402
ST. AMBROSE.
use the remedy which you have received ;
and as soon as He has given the command,
the blind man sees, the paralytic walks, the
(luml) speaks, the deaf hears, she that has a
fever ministers, the lunatic is delivered.
And do you. then, wlio ever after an un-
seemly fashion languish for desire of any-
thing, entreat the Lord, show Him your
faith, and fear no delay. Where there is
prayer, the Word is present, desire is put to
flight, lust departs. And be not afraid of
offending by confession, take it rather as a
right, for you who were before afflicted by
an intense disease of the body will begin to
minister to Christ.
64. And in this place can be seen the dis-
position of the will of Peter's mother-in-law,
from which she received for herself, as it
were, the seed corn of what was to come,
for to each his will is the cause of that
which is to come. For from the will springs
wisdom, which the wise man takes in mar-
riage to himself, saying : "I desire to make
her my spouse." ' This will, then, which
at first was weak and languid under the
fever of various desires, afterwards by the
office of the apostles rose up strong to min-
ister unto Christ.
65. At the same time it is also shown
what he ought to be who ministers to Christ,
for first he must be free from the enticements
of various pleasures, he must be free from
inward languor of body and soul, that he
may minister the Body and Blood of Christ.
For no one who is sick with his own sins,
and far from being whole, can minister the
remedies of the healing of immortality. See
what thou doest, O priest, and touch not
the Body of Christ with a fevered hand.
First be healed that thou mayest be able to
minister. If Christ bids those who are now
cleansed, but were once leprous, to show
themselves to the priests,^ how much more
is it fitting for the priest himself to be pure.
That widow, then, cannot take it ill that I
have not spared her, since I spare not my-
self
66. Peter's mother-in-law, it is written,
rose up and niinistered to them. Well is it
said, rose up, for the grace of the apostle-
ship was already furnishing a type of the
sacrament. It is proper to the ministers of
Christ to rise, according to that which is
written : "Awake, thou that sleepest, and
arise from the dead. "^
CHAPTER XL
Having shown that the pretexts usually alleged for
second marriages have no weight, St. Ambrose de-
clares that he does not condemn them, though from
the Apostle's words he sets forth their inconveniences,
though the state of those twice married is approved
in the Church, and he takes occasion to advert to
those heretics who forbid them. And he says that
it is because the strength of different persons varies
that chastity is not commanded, but only recom-
mended.
67. I say, then, that widows who have
been in the habit of giving neither are in
want of their necessary expenses, nor of
help, who in very great dangers have often
guarded the resources of their husbands ;
and further, I think that the good offices of
a husband are usually made up for to them
by sons-in-law and other relatives, and
that Gods mercy is more ready to help
them, and therefore, when there is no special
cause for marrying, the desire of so doing
should not exist.
68. This, however, I say as a counsel, we
do not order it as a precept, stirring up the
wills of widows rather than binding them,
for I do not forbid second marriages, only I
do not advise them. The consideration of
human weakness is one thing, the grace of
chastity is another. I say more, I do not
forbid second, but do not approve of often
repeated marriages, for not everything is
expedient which is lawful : "All things are
lawful to me,"' says the Apostle, " but all
things are not expedient."' As, also, to
drink wine is lawful, but, for the most part,
it is not expedient.
69. It is then lawful to marry, but it is
more seemly to abstain, for there are bond.s
in marriage. Do you ask what bonds .-^
"The woman who is under a husband is
bound by the law so long as her husband
liveth ; but if her husband be dead she is
loosed from the law of her husband."^ It
is then proved that marriage is a bond by
which the woman is bound and from which
she is loosed. Beautiful is the grace of mu-
tual love, but the bondage is more constant.
"The wife hath not power of her own
body, but the husband. '"^ And lest this
bondage should seem to be rather one of
sex than of marriage, there follows ; "Like-
wise, also, the husband hath not power of
his own body, but the wife." How great,
then, is the constraint in marriage, which
subjects even the stronger to the other ; for
by mutual constraint each is bound to
serve. Nor if one wishes to refrain can he
withdraw his neck from the yoke, for he is
subject to the incontinence of the other. It
is said : "Ye are bought with a price, be
' WisiJ viii. 2.
- S. Luke xvii. 14.
' Eph. V. 14.
' I Cor. vi. 12.
^ Rom. vii. 2.
^ I Cor. vii. 4.
CONCERNING WIDOWS.
403
not ye servants of men. "' You see how
plainly the servitude of marriage is defined.
It is not I who say this, but the Apostle ; or,
rather, it is not he. but Christ, Who spoke
m him. And he spoke of this servitude in
the case of good married people. For
above you read : "The unbelieving husband
is sanctified by his belicvi\ig wife ; and
the unbelieving wife by her believing
husband."^ And further on: "But if
the unbelieving depart, let him depart.
A brother or a sister is not bound in such
cases. "3 If, then, a good marriage is
servitude, what is a bad one, when they
cannot sanctify, but destroy one an-
other ?
70. But as I exhort widows to keep the
grace of their gift, so, too, I incite women
to observe ecclesiastical discipline, for the
Church is made up of all. Though it be the
flock of Christ, yet some are fed on strong
food, others are still nourished with milk,
who must be on their guard against those
wolves who are hidden in sheep's clothing,
pretending to an appearance of continence,
but inciting to the foulness of incontinence.
For they know how severe are the bur-
dens of chastity, since they cannot touch
them with the tips of their fingers ; they
require of others that which is above mea-
sure, when they themselves cannot even
observe any measure, but rather give way
under the cruel weight. For the measure
of the burden must always be according to
the strength of him who has to bear it ;
otherv/ise, where the bearer is weak, he
i)reaks down with the burden laid upon
him ; for too strong meat chokes the throats
of infants.
71. And so as in a multitude of bearers
their strength is not estimated by that of a
few ; nor do the stronger receive their tasks
in accordance with the weakness of others,
but each is allowed to bear as great a bur-
den as he desires, the reward increasing
with the increase of strength ; so, too, a
snare is not to be set for women, nor a bur-
den of continence beyond their strength to
be taken up, but it must be left to each to
weigh the matter for herself, not compelled
by the authority of any command, but in-
cited by increase of grace. And so for dif-
ferent degrees of virtue a different reward is
set forth, and one thing is not blamed that
another may be praised; but all are spokei*
of, in order' that what is best may be pre-
ferred.
CHAPTFR XII.
The difference between matters of precept and of coun-
sel is treated of, as shown in the case of the young
man in the Gospel, and the difference of the rewards
set forth both for ccjunsels and precepts is spoken of.
72. Marria(;k, then, is honourable, but
chastity is more honourable, for "he that
giveth his virgin in marriage docth well,
but he that giveth her not in marriage doeth
better."' That, then, which is good need
not be avoided, but that which is better
should be chosen. And so it is not laid
upon any, but set before him. And, there-
fore, the Apostle said well: "Concerning
virgins I have no commandment of the
Lord, yet I give my counsel. "^ For a com-
mand is issued to those subject, counsel is
given to friends. Where there is a com-
mandment, there is a law ; where counsel,
there is grace. A commandment is given
to enforce what is according to nature, a
counsel to incite us to follow grace. And,
therefore, the Law was given to the Jews,
but grace was reserved for the elect. The
Law was given that, through fear of pun-
ishment, it might recall those who were
wandering beyond the limits of nature, to
their observance, but grace to incite the
elect both by the desire of good things, and
also by the promised rewards.
73. You will see the difference between
precept and counsel, if you remember the
case of him in the Gospel, to whom it is first
commanded to do no murder, not to com-
mit adultery, not to bear false witness ; for
that is a commandment which has a penalty
for its transgression. But when he said that
he had fulfilled all the commandments of the
Law, there is given to him a counsel that he
should sell all that he had and follow the
Lord, 3 for these things are not imposed as
commands, but are offered as counsels.
For there are two ways of commanding
things, one by way of precept, the other by
way of counsel. And so the Lord in one
way says: '•Thou shalt not kill," where
He. gives a commandment : in the other He
says : " If thou wilt be perfect, sell all that
thou hast." He is, then, not bound by a
commandment to whom the choice is left.
74. And so they who have fulfilled the
commandments are able to say: " We are
unprofitable servants, we have done that
which was our duty to do."^ The virgin
does not say this, nor he who sold all his
goods, but they rather await the stored-up
' I Cor. vii. 23.
* I Cor. vii. 15.
2 I Cor. vii. 14.
' I Cor. vii. 28.
3 S. Matt. xix. 18-21.
^ I Cor. vii. 2;.
* S. Luke xvii. 10.
40-
ST. AMBROSE.
rewards like the holy Apostle who says :
" Behold we have forsaken all and followed
Thee, what shall we have therefore ? " ' He
says not, like the unprofitable servant, that
he has done that which was his duty to do,
but as being profitable to his Master, be-
cause he has multiplied the talents entrusted
to him by the increase he has gained, hav-
ing a good conscience, and without anxiety
as to his merits he expects the reward of his
faith and virtue. And so it is said to him
and the others : "Ye which have followed
I\Ie, in the regeneration, when the Son of
Man shall sit in the throne of His glory,
shall also yourselves sit upon twelve
thrones, judging the tribes of Israel."^ And
to those who had faithfully preserved their
talents He promises rewards indeed,
though smaller, saying: "Because thou
hast been faithful over a few things, I will
make thee ruler over many things."^ Good
faith, then, is due, but mercy is in the re-
wards. He who has kept good faith has
deserved that good faith should be kept
with hini ; he who has made good profit, be-
cause he has not sought his own benefit,
has gained a claim to a heavenly reward.
CHAPTER Xni.
St. Ambrose, treating of the words in tlie Gospel con-
cerning eunuchs, condemns those who make them-
selves such. Those only deserve praise who have
through continence gained the victory over them-
selves, but no one is to be compelled to live this life,
as neither Christ nor the Apostle laid down such a
law, so that the marriage vow is not to be blamed,
though that of chastity is better.
75. So, then, a commandment to this
effect is not given, Init a counsel is. Chas-
tity is commanded, entire continence coun-
selled. "'But all men cannot receive this
saying, but they to wdiom it is given. For
there are eunuchs which were so born from
their mother's womb, "-t in whom exists a
natural necessity not the virtue of chastity.
"And there are eunuchs who have made
themselves eunuchs," of their own will,
that is, not of necessity. "And there are
eunuchs which were made eunuchs of
men. . . . " 5 And, therefore, great is the
grace of continence in them, because it is
the will, not incapacity, which makes a man
continent. Yor it is seemly to preserve the
gift of divine working whole. And le^
them not think it too little not to be im-
1 .S. Matt. xix. 27. 2 ,S. Matt. xix. 28.
' S. Matt. XXV. 21. ■• S. Matt. xxv. 11, 12.
' There would seem to be a passage lost here.
peded by the inclination of the body, for if
the reward for going through that conflict is
taken from their reach, the matter of sin is
also removed, and though they cannot re-
ceive the crown, no more can they be over-
come. They have other kinds of virtues by
which they ought to commend themselves
if their faith be firm, their mercifulness
abundant, avarice far from them, grace
abundant. But in them there is no fault, for
they are ignorant of the act of sin.
76. The case is not the same of those who
mutilate themselves, and I touch upon this
point advisedly, for there are some who
look upon it as a holy deed to check by the
evil violence of this sort. And though I am
not willing to express my own opinion con-
cerning them, though decisions of our fore-
fathers are in existence ; but then consider
whether this tends not rather to a declara-
tion of weakness than to a reputation for
strength. On this principle no one should
fight lest he be overcome, nor make use of
his feet, fearing the danger of stumbling,
nor let his eyes do their office because he
fears a fall through lust. But what does it
profit to cut the flesh, when there may be
guilt even in a look.? "For whosoever
looketh on a woman to lust after her hath
committed adultery already with her in his
heart."' And likewise she who looks on a
man to lust after him commits adultery. It
becomes us, then, to be chaste, not weak, to
have our eyes modest, not feeble.
77. No one, then, ought, as many suppose,
to mutilate himself, but rather gain the vic-
tory ; for the Church gathers in those who
conquer, not those who are defeated. And
why should I use arguments when the
words of the Apostle's command are at
hand.' For you find it thus written: "I
would that they were mutilated ^^■ho desire
that you should be circumcised. " ^ For why
should the means of gaining a crown and of
the practice of virtue be lost to a man who
is born to honour, equipped for victory ?
how can he through courage of soul muti-
late himself.' "There be eunuchs which
have made themselves eunuchs for the
kingdom of heaven's sake. "^
78. This, however, is not a commandment
given to all, but a wish set before all. For he
who commands must always keep to the
exact scope of the commandments, and he
who distributes tasks must observe equity in
looking into them, for: "A false balance is
abomination to the Lord."'' There is, then,
S. Matt. V. 28.
S. Matt. xix. 12.
^ Gal. V. 12 [very loose].
* Prov. xi. I.
CONCERNING WIDOWS.
405
an excess and a defect in weight, but the
Church accepts neither, for : " Excessive ami
defective wei.Lrhts ami divers measures, both
of them are alike abominable in the siirht of
the Lord. " ■ There are tasks which wisdom
apportions, and apportions according- to the
estimate of the virtue and strength of each.
•' He that is able to receive it let him re-
ceive it. "^
79. For the Creator of all knows that the
dispositions of each are different, and there-
fore incited virtue by rewards, instead of
binding weakness by chains. And he, the
teacher of the Gentiles, the good guide of
our conduct, and instructor of our inmost
affections, who had learnt in himself that the
law of the flesh resists the law of the mind,
but yields to the grace of Christ, he knows,
I say, that various movements of the mind
are opposed to each other ; and, therefore, so
expresses his exhortations to chastity, as not
to do away with the grace of marriage, nor
has he so exalted marriage as to check the
desire of chastity. But beginning with the
recommendation of chastity, he goes on to
remedies against incontinence, and having
set before the stronger the prize of their high
calling, he suffers no one to faint by the
way ; approving those who take the lead so
as not to make little of those who follow.
For he, himself, had learnt that the Lord
Jesus gave to some barley bread ^ lest they
should faint by the way, and administered
His Body to others, •♦ that they might strive
for the kingdom.
80. For the Lord Himself did not im.pose
this commandment, but invited the will, and
the Apostle did not lay down a rule, but
gave a counsel.' But this not a man s coun-
sel as to things within the compass of man's
strength, for he acknowledges that the gift
of divine mercy was bestowed upon him,
that he might know how faithfully to set
first the former, and to arrange the latter.
And, therefore, he says: "I think," not, I
order, but, " I think that this is good be-
cause of the present distress." ^
81. The marriage bond is not then to be
shunned as though it were sinful, but rather
declined as being a galling burden. For the
law binds the wife to bear children in labour
and in sorrow, and is in subjection to her
husband, for that he is lord over her. So,
then, the married woman, but not the widow,
is subject to labour and pain in bringing
forth children, and she only that is married,
not she that is a virgin, is under the power
' Prov. XX 10.
*S. Matt. xxvi. 26.
^ S. Matt. xix. 12.
•" J Cor. vii. 25.
' S. John vi. g.
•^ I Cor. vii. 26.
of her husband. The \irgin is free from all
these things, who has vowed her affection to
the Word of God, who awaits the Spouse of
blessing with her lamp burning with the
light of a good will. And so she is moved
by counsels, not l)ound by chains.
CHAPI'KR XIV.
Though a widow may have received no commandment,
yet she has received so many counsels that she ought
not to think Uttle of them. ,St. Ambrose would he
sorry to lay any snare for her, seeing that the field
of the Church grows richer as a result of wedlock,
but it is absolutely impossible to deny that widow-
hood, which St. Paul praises, is profitable. Con-
sequently, he speaks severely about those who have
proscribed widowhood by law.
82. But neither has the widow received
any command, but a counsel : a coun-
sel, however, not given once only but often
repeated. For, first, it is said : " It is good
for a man not to touch a woman."' And
again : "I would that all men were even as
I myself;"^ and once more: " It is good
for them if they remain even as I;"^ and
a fourth time : "It is good for the present
distress. "4 And that it is well pleasing to
the Lord, and honourable, and, lastly, that
perseverance in widowhood is happier, he
lays down not only as his own judgment,
but also as an aspiration of the Holy Spirit.
Who, then, can reject the kindness of such
a coimsellor? Who gives the reins to
the will, and advises in the case of others
that which he has found advantageous by
his own experience, he who is not easy to
catch up, and is not hurt at being equalled.
Who, then, would shrink from becoming
holy in l)ody and spirit, since the reward is
far above the toil, grace beyond need, and
the wages above the Avork ?
83. And this, I say, not in order to lay a
snare for others, but that as a good husband-
man of the land entrusted to me, I may see
this field of the Church to be fruitful, at one
time blossoming with the flowers of purity, at
another time strong in the gravitv of widow-
hood, and yet agam abounding with the
fruits of wedlock. For though they 1)e
diverse, yet they are the fruits of one field ;
there are not so many lilies in the gardens as
ears of corn in the fields, and many more
fields are prepared for receiving seed than
lie fallow after the crops are gathered in.
84. Widowhood is, then, good, which is
so often praised by the judgment of the
apostles, for it is a teacher of the faith
' I Cor. vii. I.
2 I Cor. vii. 8.
- I Cor. vii. 7.
* I Cor. vii. 26.
4o6
ST. AMBROSE.
and a teacher of chastity. Whereas they
who honour the adulteries and the shame
of their g-ods appointed penalties for celi-
bacy and widowhood ; ' that zealous in pur-
suit of crimes they might punish the study
of virtues ; under the pretext, indeed, of
seeking increase of the population, but in
reality that they might put an end to the
purpose of chastity. For the soldier, when
his time is ended, lays aside his arms, and
leaving the rank which he held, is dismissed
as a veteran to his own land, that he may
obtain rest after the toils of a laborious life,
and cause others to be more ready to undergo
labour in the hope of future repose. The
labourer, too, as he grows too old, entrusts
the guiding of the plough to others, and
worn out by the toil of his youth, enjoys in
his old age that which his foresight has cared
for, still ready to prune the vine rather than
to press the grapes, so as to check the
luxuriance of early life, and to cut off with
his pruning knife the wantonness of youth,
teaching, as it were, that blessed fruitful-
ness is to be aimed at even in the vine.
85. In like manner the widow, as a vet-
eran, having served her time, though she
lays aside the arms of married life, yet
orders the peace of the Avhole house :
though now freed from carrying burdens,
she is yet watchful for the younger who
are to be married ; and with the thoughtful-
ness of old age she arranges where more
pains would be profitable, where produce
would be more abundant, which is fitted for
the marriage bond. And so, if the field is
entrusted to the cklcr rather than to the
younger, why should you think that it is
more advantageous to be a married woman
than a widow ? But, if the persecutors of
the faith have also been the persecutors of
widowhood, most certainly by those who
hold the faith, widowhood is not to be
shunned as a penalty, but to be esteemed
as a reward.
CHAPTER XV.
St. Ambrose meets the objection of those who make
the desire of having children an excuse for second
marriage, and especially in the case of those who
have children of their former marriage; and points
out the consequent trouljles of disagreements
amongst the children, and even between the married
persons, and gives a warning against a wrong use of
.Scripture instances in this matter.
86. Perhaps, however, it may seem good
1 The reference would seem to be to the " Lex Julia et Papia
Popp<eap but the object of this law was not, as St. Ambrose seems
to imply, to check celibacy, but to meet the growing licentiousness
of the age, which avoided the obligations of married life wliile in-
dulging in every kind of impure abominations.
to some that marriage should again be en-
tered upon for the sake of having children.
But if the desire of children be a reason for
marrying, certainly where there are chil-
dren, the reason does not exist. And is it
wise to wish to have a second trial of that
fruitfulness which has already been tried in
vain, or to submit to the solitude which you
have already borne.? This is the case of
those who have no children.
87. Then, too, she who has borne chil-
dren, and has lost them (for she who has a
hope of bearing children will have an in-
tenser longing), does not she, I say, seem
to herself to be covering over the deaths of
her lost children by the celebration of a
second marriage } Will she not again suffer
what she is again seeking .? and does she
not shrink at the graves of her hopes, the
memories of the bereavements she has suf-
fered, the voices of the mourners .'' Or,
when the torches are lit andnig-ht is comine
on, does she not think rather that funeral
rites are being prepared than a bridal
chamber .? Why, then, my daughter, do
you seek again those sorrows which you
dread, more than you look for children
whom you no longer hope for.' If sorrow
is so grievous, one should rather avoid than
seek that which causes it.
88. And what advice shall I give to you
who have children .-' What reason have you
for marrying } Perhaps foolish light-mind-
edness, or the habit of incontinence, or the
consciousness of a wounded spirit is urging
you on. But counsel is given to the sober,
not to the drunken, and so my words are ad-
dressed to the free conscience which is whole
in each respect. She that is wounded has
a remedy, she that is upright a counsel.
What do you intend to do then, my
daughter .-* Why do you seek for heirs from
without when you have your own } You
are not desiring of children, for you have
them, but servitude from which you are
free. For this true servitude, in which
love is exhausted, which no longer the
charm of virginity, and early youth, full of
holy modesty and grace, excites; when of-
fences are more felt, and rudeness is more
suspected, and agreement less common,
which is not bound fast by love deeply
rooted by time, or by beauty in its prime of
youth. Duty to a husband is burdensome,
so that you are afraid to love your children
and blush to look at them ; and a cause of
disagreement arises from that which ordi-
narily causes mutual love to increase the
tender affections of parents. You wish to
give birth to offspring who will be not the
CONCERNING WIDOWS.
407
brothers but the adversaries of your chil-
dren. For what is to bring- forth other chil-
dren other than to rob the children which you
have, who are deprived alike of the offices of
affection and of the profit of their possessions.
89. The divine law has bound tog-ether
husband and wife by its authority, and yet
mutual love remains a difficult matter. For
God took a rib from the man, and formed
the woman so as to join them one to the
other, and said: "They shall be one
flesh."' He said this not of a second
marriage but of the first, for neither did Eve
take a second husband, nor does holy
Church recognize a second bridegroom.
"For that is a great mystery in Christ and
in the Church. "^ Neither, again, did Isaac
know another wife besides Rebecca, ^ nor
* Gen. ii. 24.
■ Eph. V. 32.
3 Gen. xxiv. 67.
bury his father, Abraham, with any wife but
Sarah." '
90. But in holy Rachel ^ there was rather
the figure of a mystery tlian a true order of
marriage. Notwithstanding-, in her, also,
we have something which we can refer to
the grace of tlie first marriage, since he
loved her best whom he had first betrothed,
and deceit did not shut out his intention,
nor the intervening marriage destroy his
love for his betrothed. And so the holy
patriarch has taught us, how highly we
ought to esteem a first marriage, since he
himself esteemed his first betrothal so
highly. Take care, then, my daughter, lest
you be both unable to hold fast the grace of
marriage, and also increase your own
troubles.
* Gen. XXV. 10.
' Gen. xxix. 28 ff.
V.
THE LETTERS OF ST. AMBROSE.
Of the 91 Epistles considered genuine by the Benedictine Editors, sixty-three are
referred by them to fairly certain dates, -^ and a large number of these would well be worth
translation, throwing as they do so clear a light on the events of St. Ambrose's life, and
in many cases on the history of the period. Only a few are here presented to the reader.
Perhaps some others might have been better selected, but if they were to be so few, it
seemed as if these would give the best general impression of the indomitable energy and
fearless constancy of the great Bishop.
' This is really in excess of the number which are now to be considered as fixed in date.
409
SELECTIONS FROM THE LETTERS OF ST. AMBROSE.
MEMORIAL OF SYMMACHUS, THE
PREFECT OF THE CITY.
Symmachus in the name of the heathen members of
the Senate asks that the Altar of Victory, which had
been removed by Gratian, should be restored in the
Senate House, and that oaths should be taken there
as of old. He argues that the example of former
Emperors should be followed as to the things which
they retained, not which they abolished. Rome ex-
pects this of them, and no injury can accrue to the
treasury in consequence, whereas it is unjust to con-
fiscate legacies to the Vestal Virgins and ancient
rites.
There was a determined move on the
part of Symmachus, Prefect of the city, and
other heathen to regain the observances of
their religion. He was perhaps the leading
man of the day at Rome, equally renowned
as a statesman, a scholar, and an orator. In
A.D. 382 he headed a deputation of the
Senate to the Emperor Gratian to request the
replacement of the Altar of Victory in the
Senate House, and the restoration of their
endowments to the Vestal Virgins and the
colleges of priests. There was a counter-
petition on the part of the Christian senators
forwarded through Pope Damasus, and
Gratian refused to receive the deputation.
In 384 the attempt was repeated, and these
letters or memorials have to do with this
application to Valentinian II., the brother
of Gratian, who was now Emperor of the
AVest ; this attempt was also foiled.
It would seem that he took part in mis-
sions for the same purpose to Theodosius
after the defeat of i\Iaximus, and to Valen-
tinian II. in A.D. 392, and again unsuccess-
fully. In the next year, Eugenius, who had
been made Emperor by Flavian and Arbo-
gastes, restored the Altar of Victory, which
however was finally removed by Theodosius
after the defeat of Eugenius and Arbogastes.
Probably Symmachus made a final attempt
in 403 or 404, but fruitlessly. [See Did.
Clirisi. Biog. s. V. Symmachus.]
The statue and Altar of Victory in ques-
tion had been first removed by Constantius,
son of Constantine, when at Rome, a. d.
356, but were restored by Julian with other
heathen symbols and rites. Valentinian I.
tolerated them, but possibly (at any rate for
some time), as St. Ambrose says, did so in
ignorance [Ep. XVII. 16]. They were once
more removed by Gratian, and then the
action of Symmachus comes in. It may be
mentioned that though a heathen he was on
intimate terms with Damasus, St. Ambrose,
and many leading Christians.
The three Epistles or rather " Memorials "
which follow refer to this part of the death-
struggle of paganism.
EPISTLE XVII.
This Epistle was written when Symmachus sent his
memorial to Valentinian II. St. Ambrose presses on
the Emperor the consideration that it is his business
to defend religion, and not superstition. The me-
morial was sent without the adhesion of the Christian
senators, and therefore did not represent that body.
He warns Valentinian that if he accedes to the re-
quest he will incur the censures of the- Church, be-
sides acting in a manner derogatory to the memory
of his father and brother.
Ambrose, Bishop, to the most blessed Prince
and most Christian Emperor Valentinian.
1. As all men who live under the Roman
sway engage in military service under you,
the Emperors and Princes of the world, so
too do you yourselves owe service to
Almighty God and our holy faith. For
salvation is not sure unless everyone wor-
ship in truth the true God, that is the God
of the Christians, under Whose sway are all
things ; for He alone is the true God, Who
is to be worshipped from the bottom of the
heart; for "the gods of the heathen," as
Scripture says, " are devils." ■
2. Now everyone is a soldier of this true
God, and he who receives and worships
' Ps. xcvi. [jtcv.] 5.
411
412
ST. AMBROSE.
Him in his inmost spirit, does not bring to
His service dissimulation, or pretence, but
earnest faith and devotion. And if, in fine,
he does not attain to this, at least he ought
not to give any countenance to the worship
of idols and to profane ceremonies. For no
one deceives God, to whom all things, even
the hidden things of the heart, are mani-
fest.
3. Since, then, most Christian Emperor,
there is due from you to the true God both
faith and zeal, care and devotion for the
faith, I wonder how the hope has risen up
to some, that you would feel it a duty to
restore by your command altars to the gods
of the heathen, and furnish the funds re-
quisite for profane sacrifices ; for whatsoever
has long been claimed by either the imperial
or the city treasury you will seem to give
rather from your own funds, than to be re-
storing what is theirs.
4. And they are complaining of their
losses, who never spared our blood, who
destroyed the very buildings of the churches.
And they petition you to grant them privi-
leges, who by the last Julian law' denied us
the common right of speaking and teaching,
and those privileges whereby Christians also
have often been deceived ; for by those
privileges they endeavoured to ensnare
some, partly through inadvertence, partly
in order to escape the burden of public re-
quirements ; and, because all are not found
to be brave, even under Christian princes,
many have lapsed.
5. Had these things not been abolished I
could prove that they ought to be done
away by your authority ; but since they
have been forbidden and prohibited by many
princes throughout nearly the whole world,
and were abolished at Rome by Gratian ^ of
august memory, the brother of your Clem-
ency, in consideration of the true faith,
and rendered void by a rescript ; do not, I
pray you, either pluck up what has been
established in accordance with the faith,
nor rescind your brother's precepts. In
civil matters if he established anything, no
one thinks that it ought to be treated lightly,
while a precept about religion is trodden
under foot.
6. Let no one take advantage of your
youth ; if he be a heathen who demands this,
it is not right that he should bind your mind
' Julian's edict referred to here by St. Ambrose was doubtless
intended to keep the Christian children in ignorance. Christians
were forbidden to teach, and heathen teachers were directly bidden
to teach heathenism, so that Christians could not send their children
to the schools.
' Constantius, in a law dc Pa^anis, closed the temples and abol-
ished sacrifices, but his work was undone by Julian, and again
carried farther by Valentinian, Valens, and Gratian.
with the bonds of his own superstition ; but
by his zeal he ought to teach and admonish
you how to be zealous for the true faith,
since he defends vain things with all the
passion of truth. I myself advise you to
defer to the merits of illustrious men, but
undoubtedly God must be preferred to
all.
7. If we have to consult concerning
military affairs, the opinion of a man experi-
enced in warfare should be waited for, and
his counsel be followed ; when the question
concerns religion, think upon God. No one
is injured because God is set before him.
He keeps his own opinion. You do not
compel a man against his will to worship
what he dislikes. Let the same liberty be
given to you, O Emperor, and let every one
bear it with patience, if he cannot extort
from the Emperor what he would take it
ill if the Emperor desired to extort from him.
A shuffling spirit is displeasing to the
heathen themselves, for everyone ought
freely to defend and maintain the faith and
purpose of his own mind.
8. But if any. Christians in name, think
that any such decree should be made, let
not bare words mislead your mind, let not
empty words deceive you. Whoever advises
this, and whoever decrees it, sacrifices. But
that one should sacrifice is more tolerable
than that all should fall. Here the whole
Senate of Christians is in danger.
9. If to-day any heathen Emperor should
build an altar, which God forbid, to idols,
and should compel Christians to come to-
gether thither, in order to be amongst those
who were sacrificing, so that the smoke and
ashes from the altar, the sparks from the
sacrilege, the smoke from the burning might
choke the l^reath and throats of the faithful ;
and should give judgment in that court
where members were compelled to vote after
swearing at the altar of an idol (for they
explain that an altar is so placed for this
purpose, that every assembly should delib-
erate under its sanction, as they suppose,
though the Senate is now made up with a
majority of Christians), a Christian who
was compelled with a choice such as this to
come to the Senate, would consider it to be
persecution, which often happens, for they
are compelled to come together even by
violence. Are these Christians, when you
are Emperor, compelled to swear at a
heathen altar.? What is an oath, but a con-
fession of the divine power of Him Whom
you invoke as watcher over your good faith ?
When you are Emperor, this is sought and
demanded, that you should command an
LETTER XVII.
413
altar to be built, and the eost of profane
sacrifices to be granted.
10. But this cannot be decreed without
sacrilege, wherefore I implore you not to
decree or order it, nor to "subscribe to any
decrees of that sort. I, as a priest of Christ,
call upon your faith, all of us bishops would
have joined in calling upon you, were
not the report so sudden and incredible, that
any such thing had been either suggested in
your council, or petitioned for by the Senate.
But far be it from the Senate to have peti-
tioned this, a few heathen are making use
of the common name. For, nearly two
years ago, when the same attempt was
being made, holy Damasus, Bishop of the
Roman Church, elected by the judgment of
God, sent to me a memorial, which the
Christian senators in great numbers put
forth, protesting that they had given no such
authority, that they did not agree with such
requests of the heathen, nor give consent to
them, and they declared publicly and pri-
vately that they would not come to the
Senate, if any such thing were decreed. Is
it agreeable to the dignity of your, that is
Christian, times, that Christian senators
should be deprived of their dignity, in
order that effect should be given to the pro-
fane will of the heathen .' This memorial
I sent to your Clemency's brother,' and
from it it was plain that the Senate had
made no order about the expenses of
superstition.
1 1. But perhaps it may be said, why were
they not before present in the Senate when
those petitions were made.'' By not "being
present they sufticiently say what they wish,
they said enough in what they said to the
Emperor. And do we wonder if those
persons deprive private persons at Rome of
the liberty of resisting, who are unwilling
that you should be free not to command
what you do not approve, or to maintain
your own opuiion ?
12. And so, remembering the legation^
lately entrusted to me, I call again upon
your faith. I call upon your own feelings
not to determine to answer according to this
petition of the heathen, nor to attach to an
answer of such a sort the sacrilege of your
subscription. Refer to the father of your
Piety, the Emperor Theodosius, whom you
have been wont to consult in almost all
matters of greater importance. Nothing is
' i.e. Gratian.
^ The legation referred to above, when Damasus requested him
to present the memorial of the Christian senators to Gratian. The
" again " does not refer to a previous mission to Valentinian, but
to the one he himself had undertaken to the then emperor, and his
similar task at present.
greater than religion, nothing more exalted
than faith.
13. If it were a civil cause the right of reply
would be reserved for the opposing party ;
it is a religious cause, and I the bishop make
a claim. Let a copy of the memorial which
has been sent be given me, that I may
answer more fully, and then let your Clem-
ency's father be consulted on the whole sub-
ject, and vouchsafe an answer. Certainly if
anything else is decreed, we bishops cannot
contentedly suffer it and take no notice ;
you indeed may come to the church, but
will find either no priest there, or one who
will resist you.
14. What will you answer a priest who
says to you, "The church does not seek
your gifts, because you have adorned the
heathen temples with gifts. The Altar of
Christ rejects your gifts, because you have
made an altar for idols, for the voice is
yours, the hand is yours, the subscription is
yours, the deed is yours. The Lord Jesus
refuses and rejects your service, because you
have served idols, for He said to you : ' Ye
cannot serve two masters.'' The Virgins
consecrated to God have no privileges from
you, and do the Vestal Virgii:is claim them .''
Why do you ask for the priests of God, to
whom you have preferred the profane peti-
tions of the heathen .'' We cannot take up a
share of the errors of others."
1 5. What will you answer to these words ?
That you who have fallen are but a boy ?
Every age is perfect in Christ, every age is
full of God. No childhood is allowed in
faith, for even children have confessed
Christ against their persecutors with fearless
mouth.
16. What will you answer your brother.''
Will he not say to you, " I did not feel that
I was overcome, because I left you as Em-
peror ; I did not grieve at dying, because I
had you as my heir; I did not mourr: at
leaving my imperial command, because I
believed that my commands, especially those
concerning divine religion, would endure
through all ages. I had set up these me-
morials of piety and virtue, I offered up
these spoils gained from the world, these
trophies of victory over the devil, these I
offered up as gained from the enemy of all,
and in them is eternal victory. What more
could my enemy take away from me .' You
have abrogated my decrees, which so far he
who took up arms ^against me did not do.
Now do I receive a more terrible wound
in that my decrees are condemned by my
' S. Matt. vi. 24.
' Maximus.
414
ST. AMBROSE.
brother. My better part is endangered by
you, that was but the death of my body,
this of my reputation. Now is my power an-
nulled, and what is harder, annulled by my
own family, and that is annulled, which
even my enemies spoke well of in me. If
you consented of your own free will, you
have condemned the faith which was mine; if
you yielded unwillingly, you have betrayed
your own. So, too. which is more serious, I
am in danger in your person.
1 6. What will you answer your father
also .? who with greater grief will address
you, saying, "You judged very ill of me,
my son, when you supposed that I could
have connived at the heathen. No one ever
Jold me that there was an altar in the Roman
Senate House, I never believed such wicked-
ness as that the heathen sacrificed in the com-
mon assembly of Christians and heathen,
that is to say that the Gentiles should insult
the Christians who were present, and that
Christians should be compelled against their
will to be present at the sacrifices. Many
and various crimes were committed whilst
I was Emperor. I punished such as were
detected ; if any one then escaped notice,
ought one to say that I approved of that
of which no one informed me ? You have
judged very ill of me, if a foreign supersti-
tion and not my own faith preserved the
empire.''
17. Wherefore, O Emperor, since you see
that if you decree anything of that kind, in-
jury will be done, first to God, and then to
your father and brother, I implore you to
do that which you know will be profitable
to your salvation before God.
THE MEMORIAL OF SYMMACHUS,
PREFECT OF THE CITY.
Symmachus addresses his memorial in the name of the
Senate, nominally to the three Emperors, Valentinian,
Theodosius, and Arcadius, though really to the first
of these alone, who was sole Emperor of the West.
The memorial sets fortli a request that the old reli-
gion should be restored, and the Altar of Victory
again erected in the Senate House, that the ancient
customs might be observed. The e.\ample of the
late emperors should be followed in what they main-
tained, not in what they did away. The treasury
would suffer no loss, whilst it is unjust that the Ves-
tal Virgins and priests should be deprived of ancient
legacies, a sacrilege which the gods- punished by a
famine. The memorial is drawn up with consum-
mate skill, both in what is brought forward and in
what is left unsaid.
I. As soon as the most honourable Senate,
always devoted to you, knew that crimes
were made amenable to law, and that the
reputation of late times was being purified
by pious princes, it, following the example
of a more favourable time, gave utterance to I
its long suppressed grief, and bade me be
once again the delegate to utter its com-
plaints. ' But through wicked men audience
was refused me by the divine ^ Emperor,
otherwise justice would not have been want-
ing, my lords and emperors, of great renown,
Valentinian, Theodosius, and Arcadius, vic-
torious and triumphant, ever august.
2. In the exercise, therefore, of a twofold
office, as your Prefect I attend to public
business, and as delegate I recommend to
your notice the charge laid on me by the
citizens. Here is no disagreement of wills,
for men have now ceased to believe that
they excel in courtly zeal, if they disagree.
To be loved, to be reverenced, to be esteemed
is more than imperial sway. Who could
endure that private disagreement should
injure the state .'' Rightly does the Senate
censure those who have preferred their own
power to the reputation of the prince.
3. But it is our task to watch on behalf of
your Graces. P'or to what is it more suitable
that we defend the institutions of our ances-
tors, and the rights and destiny of our
country, than to the glory of these times,
which is all the greater when you under-
stand that you may not do anything con-
trary to the custom of your ancestors } We
demand then the restoration of that condi-
tion of religious affairs which was so long
advantageous to the state. Let the rulers
of each sect and of each opinion be counted
up ; a late one 3 practised the ceremonies of
his ancestors, a later •♦ did not put them
away. If the religion of old times does not
make a precedent, let the connivance of the
lasts do so.
4. Who is so friendly with the barbarians
as not to require an Altar of \'ictory ? We
will be careful henceforth, and avoid a show
of such things. But at least let that h()n(.)ur
be paid to the name'' which is refused to the
goddess — your fame, which will last for ever,
owes much and will owe still more to vic-
tory. Let those be averse to this power,
whom it has never benefited. Do you refuse
to desert a patronage which is friendly to
your triumphs.-' That power is wished for
by all, let no one deny that what he acknow-
ledges is to be desired should also be vene-
rated.
' This is the legation to Gratian referred to in § lo of tlie preced-
ing letter; .Symmachus fared ill, being ordered from the imperial
presence, and forbidden to come within a hundred miles of Rome.
^ i e. deceased. ■' Julian.
* Valentinian I. " Valentinian and Valens.
•"' The play upon the words 7io»ie» (name) and numeii (divinity)
cannot be reproduced in English.
MEMORIAL OF SYMMACHUS.
415
5. But even if the avoidance of such an
omen ' were not sufficient, it would at least
have been seemly to abstain from injuring
the ornaments of the Senate House. Allow
us, we beseech you, as old men to leave to
posterity what we received as boys. The
love of custom is great. Justly did the act
of the divine Constantius last but for a short
time. All precedents ought to be avoided
by you, which you know were soon abo-
lished. We are anxious for the permanence
of your glory and your name, that the time
to come may find nothing which needs cor-
rection.
6. Where shall we swear to obey your
laws and commands ? by what religious
sanction shall the false mind be terrified, so
as not to lie in bearing witness .'* All things
are indeed filled with God, and no place is
safe for the perjured, but to be urged in the
very presence of religious forms has great
power in producing a fear of sinning. That
altar preserves the concord of all, that altar
appeals to the good faith of each, and no-
thing gives more authority to our decrees
than that the whole of our order issues every
decree as it were under the sanction of an
oath. So that a place will be opened to
perjury, and this will be determined by my
illustrious Princes, whose honour is defended
by a public oath.
7. But the divine Constantius is said to
have done the same. Let us rather .imitate
the other actions of that Prince, who would
have undertaken nothing of the kind, if any
one else had committed such an error before
him. For the fall of the earlier sets his suc-
cessor rieht, and amendment results from
the censure of a previous example. It was
pardonable for your Grace's ancestor in so
novel a matter to fail in guarding against
blame. Can the same excuse avail us if we
imitate what we know to have been dis-
approved ?
8. Will your ^Majesties listen to other
actions of this same Prince, which you may
more worthily imitate ? He diminished
none of the privileges of the sacred virgins,
he filled the priestly offices with nobles, he
did not refuse the cost of the Roman cere-
monies, and following the rejoicing Senate
through all the streets of the eternal city,
he contentedly beheld the shrines with un-
moved countenance, he read the names of
the gods inscribed on the pediments, he
enquired about the origin of the temples,
and expressed admiration for their builders.
' The ev{\ omen resulting from destrojring the image and altar
of Victory.
Although he himself followed another re-
ligion, he maintained its own for the empire,
for everyone has his own customs, every-
one his own rites. The divine Mind has
distributed different guardians and different
cults to different cities. As souls are sepa-
rately given to infants as they arc born, so
to peoples the genius of their destiny. Here
comes in the proof from advantage, which
most of all vouches to man for the gods.
For, since our reason is wholly clouded,
whence does the knowledge of the gfods
more rightly come to us, than from the
memory and evidence of prosperity ? Now
if a long period gives authority to religious
customs, we ought to keep faith with so
many centuries, and to follow our ancestors,
as they happily followed theirs.
9. Let us now suppose that Rome is
present and addresses you in these words :
"Excellent princes, fathers of your country,
respect my years to which pious rites have
brought me. Let me use the ancestral
ceremonies, for I do not repent of them.
Let me live after my own fashion, for I am
free. This worship subdued the world to
my laws, these sacred rites repelled Han-
nibal from the walls, and the Senones from
the capitol. Have I been reserved for this,
that in my old age I should be blamed ?
I will consider what it is thought should be
set in order, but tardy and discreditable is
the reformation of old age."
10. We ask, then, for peace for the gods of
our fathers and of our country. It is just
that all worship should be considered as
one. We look on the same stars, the sky
is common, the same world surrounds us.
What difference does it make by what pains
each seeks the truth .? We cannot attain to
so great a secret by one road ; but this dis-
cussion is rather for persons at ease, we
offer now prayers, not conflict.
1 1. With what advantage to your treasury
are the prerogatives of the Vestal Virgins
diminished ? Is that refused under the most
bountiful emperors which the most parsi-
monious have granted.'' Their sole honour
consists in that, so to call it, wage of
chastity. As fillets are the ornament of
their heads, so is their distinction drawn
from their leisure to attend to the offices
of sacrifice. They seek for in a measure
the empty name of immunity, since by
their poverty they are exempt from pay-
ment. And so they who diminish anything
of their substance increase their praise, in-
asmuch as virginity dedicated to the public
good increases in merit when it is without
reward.
4i6
ST. AMBROSE.
12. Let such gains as these be far from
the purity of your treasury. Let the revenue
of good princes be increased not by the
losses of priests, but by the spoils of ene-
mies. Does any gain compensate for the
odium .' And because no charge of avarice
falls upon your characters, they are the
more wretched whose ancient revenues are
diminished. For under emperors who ab-
stain from what belongs to others, and
resist avarice, that which does not move
the desire of him who takes it, is taken
solely to injure the loser.
13. The treasury also retains lands be-
queathed to virgins and ministers by the
will of dying persons. I entreat you,
priests of justice, let the lost right of suc-
cession be restored to the sacred persons
and places of your city. Let men dictate
their wills without anxiety, and know that
what has been written will be undisturbed
under princes who are not avaricious. Let
the happiness in this point of all men give
pleasure to you, for precedents in this
matter have begun to trouble the dying.
Does not then the religion of Rome apper-
tain to Roman law.? What name shall be
given to the taking away of property which
no law nor accident has made to fail.
Freedmen take legacies, slaves are not
denied the just privilege of making wills ;
only noble virgins and the ministers of
sacred rites are excluded from property
sought by inheritance. What does it profit
the public safety to dedicate the body to
chastity, and to support the duration of
the empire with heavenly guardianship, to
attach the friendly powers to your arms
and to your eagles, to take upon oneself
vows efficacious for all, and not to have
common rights with all ? So, then, slavery
is a better condition, which is a service ren-
dered to men. We injure the State, whose
interest it never is to be ungrateful.
14. And let no one think that I am de-
fending the cause of religion only, for from
deeds of this kind have arisen all the mis-
fortunes of the Roman race. The law of
our ancestors honoured the Vestal Virgins
and the ministers of the gods with a
moderate maintenance and just privileges.
This grant remained un assailed till the time
of the degenerate money-changers, who
turned the fund for the support of sacred
chastity into hire for common porters. A
general famine followed upon this, and a
poor harvest disappointed the hopes of all
the provinces. This was not the fault of
the earth, we impute no evil influence to
the stars. Mildew did not injure the crops,
nor wild oats destroy the corn ; the year
failed through the sacrilege, for it was neces-
sary that what was refused to religion
should be denied to all.
15. Certainly, if there be any instance of
this evil, let us impute such a famine to the
power of the season. A deadly wind has
been the cause of this barrenness, life is
sustained by trees and shrubs, and the
need of the country folk has betaken itself
once more to the oaks of Dodona. ' What
similar evil did the provinces suffer, so long
as the public charge sustained the ministers
of religion ? When were the oaks shaken
for the use of men, when were the roots of
plants torn up, when did fertility on all
sides forsake the various lands, when sup-
plies were in common for the people and
for the sacred virgins ? For the support of
the priests was a blessing to the produce
of the earth, and was rather an insurance
than a bounty. Is there any doubt that
what was given was for the benefit of all,
seeing that the want of all has made this
plain .''
16. But some one will say that public
support is only refused to the cost of foreign
religions. Far be it from good princes to
suppose that what has been given to certain
persons from the common property can be
in the power of the treasury. For as the
State consists of individuals, that which goes
out from it becomes again the property of
individuals. Vou rule over all ; but you
preserve his own for each individual ; and
justice has more weight with you than arbi-
trary will. Take counsel with your own
liberality whether that which you have con-
ferred on others ought to be considered
public property. Sums once given to the
honour of the city cease to be the property
of those who have given them, and that
which at the commencement was a gift, by
custom and time becomes a debt. Anyone
is therefore endeavouring to impress upon
your minds a vain fear, who asserts that you
share the responsibility of the givers unless
you incur the odium of withdrawing the
gifts.
17. ^L'^y the unseen guardians of all sects
be favourable to your Graces, and may they
especially, who in old time assisted your
ancestors, defend you and be worshipped by
us. We ask for that state of religious mat-
ters which preserved the empire for the
divine parent^ of your Highnesses, and
* i.e. to acorns for food.
' Valentinian I., who, as Symmachus said above, did not destroy
idol worship, tlinugh lie did not practise it, so that St. .Ambrose
says in his funeral oration on Valentinian II. : " Quod patri de-
fiierat adjunxit ; quod /rater const iiuit, aistodtvit."
LETTER XVIII.
417
furnished that blessed prince witli lawful
heirs. That venerable father beholds from
the starry height the tears of the priests,
and considers himself censured by the vio-
lation of that custom which he willingly
observed.
18. Amend also for your divine brother
that which he did by the counsel of others,
cover over the deed which he knew not
to be displeasing to the Senate. For it
is allowed that that legation was denied
access to him, lest public opinion should
reach him. It is for the credit of former
times, that you should not hesitate to abolish
that which is proved not to have been the
doing of the prince.
EPISTLE XVIII.
Reply of St. Ambrose to the Memorial of Symmachus,
in which after complimenting Valentinian he deals
with three points of the Memorial. He replies to his
opponent's personification of Rome in a singularly
telling manner, and proves that the famine spoken of
by Symmachus had nothing to do with the cessation
of heathen rites.
Ambrose, Bishop, to the most blessed
prince and most gracious Emperor Valen-
tianus, the august.
1. Since the illustrious Symmachus, Pre-
fect of the city, has sent petition to your
Grace that the altar, which was taken away
from the Senate House of the city of Rome,
should be restored to its place ; and you, O
Emperor, although still young in years and
experience, yet a veteran in the power of
faith, did not approve the prayer of the
heathen, I presented a request the moment
I heard of it, in which, though I stated such
things as it seemed necessary to suggest, I
requested that a copy of the Memorial might
be given to me.
2. So, then, not being in doubt as to your
faith, but anxiously considering the risk,
and sure of a kindly consideration, I am
replying in this document to the assertions
of the Memorial, making this sole request,
that you will not expect elegance of lan-
guage but the force of facts. For, as the
divine Scripture teaches, the tongue of wise
and studious men is golden, which, gifted
with glittering words and shining with the
brilliancy of splendid utterance as if of some
rich colour, captivates the eyes of the mind
with the appearance of beauty and dazzles
with the sight. But this gold, if you consider
it carefully, is of value outwardly but within
is base metal. Ponder well, I pray you,
and examine the sect of the heathen, their
utterances, sound, weighty, and grand, but
defend what is without capacity for truth.
They speak of God and worship idols.
3. The illustrious Prefect of the city has
in his Memorial set forth three proposi-
tions which he considers of force : that
Rome, as he says, asks for her rites again,
that pay be given to her priests and Vestal
Virgins, and that a general famine followed
upon the refusal of the priests' stipends.
4. In his first proposition Rome com-
plains with sad and tearful words, asking,
as he says, for the restoration of the rites of
her ancient ceremonies. These sacred rites,
he says, repulsed Hannibal from the walls,
and the Senones from the Capitol. And so
at the same time that the power of the
sacred rites is proclaimed, their weakness is
betrayed. So that Hannibal long insulted
the Roman rites, and while the gods were
fighting against him, arrived a conqueror at
the very walls of the city. Why did they
suffer themselves to be besieged, for whom
their gods were fighting in arms ?
5. And why should I say anything of the
Senones, whose entrance into the inmost
Capitol the remnant of the Romans could
not have prevented, had not a goose
by its frightened cackling betrayed them ?
See what sort of protectors the Roman
temples have. Where was Jupiter at that
time.'' Was he speaking in the goose.?
6. But why should I deny that their sacred
rites fought for the Romans .'' For Hannibal
also worshipped the same gods. Let them
choose then which they will. If these
sacred rites conquered in the Romans, then
they were overcome in the Carthaginians ; if
they triumphed in the Carthaginians, they
certainly did not benefit the Romans.
7. Let, then, that invidious complaint of
the Roman people come to an end. Rome
has given no such charge. She speaks
with other words. " Why do you daily stain
me with the useless blood of the harmless
herd .? Trophies of victory depend not on
the entrails of the flocks, but on the strength
of those who fight. I subdued the world by
a different discipline. Camillus was my
soldier, who slew those who had taken the
Tarpeian rock, and brought back the stan-
dards taken from the Capitol ; valour laid
those low whom religion had not driven off.
What shall I say of Attilius [Regulus], who
gave the service of his death .'' Africanus
found his triumphs not amongst the altars
of the Capitol, but amongst the lines of
Hannibal. Why do you bring forward the
rites of our ancestors ? I hate the rites of
Neros. Why should I speak of the Em-
4i8
ST. AMBROSE.
perors of two months," and the ends of
rulers closely joined to their commence-
ments. Or is it perchance a new thing for
the barbarians to cross their boundaries ?
Were they, too, Christians in whose wretched
and unprecedented cases, Mhe one, a captive
Emperor, and, under the other, the captive
world made manifest that their rites which
promised victory were false. Was there
then no Altar of Victory ? I mourn over my
downfall, my old age is tinged with that
shameful bloodshed. I do not blush to be
converted with the whole world in my old
age. It is undoubtedly true that no age is
too late to learn. Let that old age blush
which cannot amend itself Not the old
age of years is worthy of praise but that
of character. There is no shame in passing
to better thins^s. This alone was common
to me with the barbarians, that of old I
knew not God. Your sacrifice is a rite of
being sprinkled with the blood of beasts.
Why do you seek the voice of God in dead
animals ? Come and learn on earth the
heavenly warfare ; we live here, but our
warfare is there. Let God Himself, Who
made me, teach me the mystery of heaven,
not man, who knew not himself. Whom
rather than God should I believe concer-
ning God.? How can I believe you, who
confess that you know not what you wor-
ship ?
8. By one road, says he, one cannot at-
tain to so great a secret. What you know
not, that we know by the voice of God.
And what you seek by fancies, we have
found out from the very Wisdom and Truth
of God. Your ways, therefore, do not agree
with ours. You implore peace for your gods
from the Emperors, we ask for peace for the
Emperors themselves from Christ. You
worship the works of your own hands, we
think it an offence that anything which can
be made should be esteemed God. God
wills not that He should be worshipped in
stones. And, in fine, your philosophers
themselves have ridiculed these things.
9. But if you deny Christ to be God, be-
cause you believe not that He died (for you
are ignorant that that death was of the body
not of the Godhead, which has brought it
' Perhaps by a rhetorical exaggeration reference is made to Galba,
Otho, and Vitellius, who reigned less than tliree years between them ;
or else to Pertinax and hlli successor Julian, each of whom was mur-
dered under three months.
- These emperors were Valerian, taken prisoner by Sapor and
treated with great indignity by the Persians, a.d. 260; and his son
Gallienus, under whom a numberof generals, nicknamed the " Thirty
Tyrants," claimed and exercised independent authority. " Gal-
lienus made but feeble and desultory attempts to put any of them
down, turning into wretched jests each new humiliation, and taking
refuge in sensuality from the hopeless task of state reorganization."
'—Diet. Chr. Biog. s. vuc.
to pass that now no one of those who be-
lieve dies), what is more thoughtless than
you who honour with insult, and disparage
with honour, for you consider a piece of
wood to be your god. O worship full of
insult ! You believe not that Christ could
die, O perversity founded on respect !
10. But, says he, let the altars be restored
to the images, and their ornaments to the
shrines. Let this demand be made of one
who shares in their superstitions ; a Christian
Emperor has learnt to honour the altar of
Christ alone. Why do they exact of pious
hands and faithful hps the ministry to their
sacrilege.? Let the voice of our Emperor
utter the Name of Christ alone, and speak of
Him only. Whom he is conscious of, for,
"the King's heart is in the hand of the
Lord."' Has any heathen Emperor raised
an altar to Christ .? While they demand the
restoration of things which have been, by
their own example they show us how great
reverence Christian Emperors ought to pay
to the religion which they follow, since
heathen ones offered all to their supersti-
tions.
\\a. We began long since, and now they
follow those whom they excluded. We
glory in yielding our blood, an expense
moves them. We consider these things in
the place of victories, they think them loss.
Never did they confer on us a greater bene-
fit than when they ordered Christians to be
beaten and proscribed and slain. Religion
made a reward of that which unbelief
thought to be a punishment. See their
greatness of soul ! We have increased
through loss, through want, through punish-
ment ; they do not believe that their rites
can continue without contributions.
11. Let the Vestal Virgins, he says, retain
their privileges. Let those speak thus, who
are unable to believe that virginity can exist
without reward, let those who do not trust
virtue, encourage by gain. But how many
virgins have the promised rewards gained
for them .? Hardly are seven Vestal Virgins
received. See the whole number whom the
fillets and chaplets for the head, the dye of
the purple robes, the pomp of the litter sur-
rounded by a company of attendants, the
greatest privileges, immense profits, and a
prescribed time of virginity have gathered
together.
1 2. Let them lift up the eyes of soul and
body, let them look upon a people of
modesty, a people of *""-^iH'. an assembly
of virginity. Not fille 3 ornament
' Prov. :
LETTER XVIII.
419
of their heads, but a veil common in use
but ennobled by chastity, the enticement of
beauty not sought out but laid aside, none
of those purple insignia, no delicious lux-
uries, but the practice of fasts, no privileges,
no gains ; all things, in tine, of such a kind
that one would think them restrained from
enjoyment whilst practising their duties.
But whilst the duty is being practised the
enjoyment of it is aroused. Chastity is in-
creased by its own sacrifices. That is not
virginity which is bought with a price, and
not kept through a love of virtue ; that is
not purity which is bought by auction for
money, which is bid for for a time. The first
victory of chastity is to conquer the desire
of wealth, for the pursuit of gain is a temp-
tation to modesty. Let us, however, lay
down that bountiful provision should be
granted to virgins. What an amount will
overflow upon Christians ! What treasury
will supply such riches.'' Or if they think
that gifts should be conferred on the Vestals
alone, are they not ashamed that they who
claimed the whole for themselves under
heathen Emperors should think that we
oueht to have no common share under
Christian Princes.-'
13. They complain, also, that public sup-
port is not considered due to their priests
and ministers. What a storm of words has
resounded on this point ! But on the other
hand even the inheritance of private prop-
erty is denied us by recent laws,' and
no one complains ; for we do not consider
it an injury, because we grieve not at the
loss. If a priest seeks the privilege of de-
clining the municipal burdens,^ he has to
give up his ancestral and all other property.
If the heathen suffered this how would they
urge their complaint, that a priest must
purchase the free time necessary for his
ministry by the loss of all his patrimony,
and buy the power to exercise his public
ministry at the expense of all his private
means ; and, alleging his vigils for the
public safety, must console himself with the
reward of domestic .want, because he has
not sold a service but obtained a favour.
14. Compare the cases. Vou wish to ex-
' The law of Valentinian, de Episcopis, of which St. Jerome says
[Ep. LI I. ad Nepotiatium, vol. 6, p. 92, of this series] : " I do not
complain of the law, but I grieve that we have deserved a statute
so l^rsh " . . . "yet even so," he adds, " rapacity goes on un-
cliecked." With the conversion of Constantine the world entered
into the Church, and bishops becoming great personages, ambition
and worldly passions gained a hold on many, and the scandals and
evil of succeeding centuries seem likely to last, till the world once
more turns against the Church of God. (Comp. Fr. Puller, Primitive
Saints and the See 0/ Rome, chap, iv.)
' Exemption had been granted to the clergy from municipal offices
by Constantine, but in consequence of abuse the privilege had been
restrained. (See note on Ep. XL. § 29.)
cuse a decurio, when it is not allowed
the Church to excuse a priest. Wills are
written on behalf of ministers of the tem-
ples, no profane person is excepted, no
one of the lowest condition, no one shame-
lessly immodest, the clergy alone are ex-
cluded from the common right, by whom
alone common prayer is offered for all, and
common service rendered, no legacies even
of grave widows, no gifts are permitted.
And where no fault can be found in the
character, a penalty is notwithstanding im-
posed on the office. That which a Christian
widow has bequeathed to the priests of a
temple is valid, her legacy to the ministers
of God is invalid. And 1 have related this
not in order to complain, but that they may
know what I do not complain of ; for I prefer
that we should be poorer in money than in
grace.
1 5. But they say that what has been given
or left to the Church has not been touched.
Let them also state who has taken away
gifts from the temples, Avhich has been done
to Christians.* If these things had been
done to the heathen the wrong would have
been rather a requital than an injury. Is
it now only at last that justice is alleged as
a pretext, and a claim made for equity .''
Where was this feeling when, after plunder-
ing the goods of all Christians, they grudged
them the very breath of life, and .forbade
them the use of that last burial nowhere
denied to any dead .-' The sea restored
those whom the heathen had thrown into
it. This is the victory of faith, that they
themselves now blame the acts of their
ancestors whose deeds they condemn.
But what reason is there in seeking bene-
fits from those whose deeds they con-
demn }
16. No one, however, has denied gifts to
the shrines, and legacies to the soothsayers,
their land alone has been taken away, be-
cause they did not use religiously that
which they claimed in right of religion.
Why did they not practise what we did if
they allege our example ^ The Church has
no possessions of her own except the Faith.
Hence are her returns, her increase. The
possessions of the Church are the main-
tenance of the poor.^ Let them count up
how man)-- captives the temples have ran-
somed, what food they have contributed for
the poor, to what exiles they have supplied
the means of living. ■ Their lands then have
been taken away, not their rights.
^ See Sozomen, Eccl. Hist. V. 5 ; Theodoret, Eccl. Hist. III. ».
"- Cf. de Off. Min. IL 78, 137, 138.
420
ST. AMBROSE.
17. See what was done, and a public
famine avenged, as they say, the sad im-
piety that what was before profitable only
for the comfort of the priests began to be
profitable to the use of all. For this reason
then, as they say, was the bark shipped
from the copses, and fainting men's mouths
supped up the unsavoury sap. For this
reason changing corn for the Chaonian
acorn, going back once more to the food of
cattle and the nourishment of wretched pro-
visions, they shook the oaks and solaced
their dire hunger in the woods. These,
forsooth, were new prodigies on earth,
which had never happened before, while
heathen superstition was fervent throughout
the world ! When in truth before did the
crop mock the prayers of the grasping hus-
bandman with empty straw, and the blade
of corn sought in the furrows fail the hope
of the rustic crew ?
18. And from what did the Greeks derive
the oracles of their oaks except from their
thinking that the support of their sylvan
food was the gift of heavenly religion ?
For such do they believe to be the gifts of-
their gods. Who but heathen people wor-
shipped the trees of Dodona, when they
gave honour to the sorry food of the wood-
land .' It is not likely that their gods in
anger inflicted on them as a punishment
that which they used when appeased to
confer as a gift. And what justice would
there be if, being grieved that support was
refused to a few priests, they denied it to
all, since the vengeance would be more
unbearable than the fault .'' The cause, then,
is not adequate to bring such suffering on a
failing world, as that the full-grown hope of
the year should perish suddenly while the
crops were green.
19. And, certainly, many years ago the
lights of the temples were taken away
throughout the world ; has it only now at
length come into the mind of the gods of
the heathen to avenge the injury .? And did
the Nile fail to overflow in its accustomed
course, in order to avenge the losses of the
priests of the city, whilst it did not avenge
its own .'
20. But let it be that they suppose that
the injuries done to their gods were avenged
in the past year. Why have they been un-
noticed in the present year } For now neither
do the country people feed upon torn up
roots, nor seek refreshment from the berries
of the wood, nor pluck its food from thorns,
but joyful in their prosperous labours, while
wondering at their harvest, made up for
their fasting by the full accomplishment of
their wishes ; for the earth rendered her
produce with interest.
21. Who, then, is so unused to human
matters as to be astonished at the differences
of years ? And yet even last year we know
that many provinces abounded with pro-
duce. What shall I say of the Gauls which
were more productive than usual ? The
Pannonias sold corn which they had not
sown, and Phoetia Secunda experienced
harm of her own fertility, for she who was
wont to be safe in her scarcity, stirred up
an enemy against herself by her fertility.
The fruits of the autumn fed Liguria and
the Venetias. So, then, the former year did
not wither because of sacrilege, and the
latter flourished with the fruits of faith. Let
them too deny if they can that the vineyards
abounded with an immense produce. And
so we have both received a harvest with
interest and possess the benefit of a more
abundant vintage.
22. The last and most important point
remains, whether, O Emperors, you ought
to restore those helps which have profited
you ; for he says : ' Let them defend you,
and be worshipped by us.' This it is, most
faithful princes, which we cannot endure,
that they should taunt us that they suppli-
cate their gods in your names, and without
your commands, commit an immense sacri-
lege, interpreting your shutting your eyes
as consent. Let them have their guardians
to themselves, let these, if they can, protect
their worshippers. For, if they are not able
to help those by whom they are worshipped,
how can they protect you by whom they
are not worshipped ?
23. But, he says, the rites of our ances-
tors ought to be retained. But what, see-
ing that all things have made progress
towards what is better ? The world itself,
which at first was compacted of the germs
of the elements throughout the void, in a
yielding sphere, or was dark with the shape-
less confusion of the work as yet without
order, did it not afterwards receive (the dis-
tinction between sky, sea, and earth being
established), the forms of things whereby it
appears beautiful .'' The lands freed from the
misty darkness wondered at the new sun.
The day does not shine in the beginning,
but as time proceeds, it is bright with in-
crease of light, and grows warm with in-
crease of heat.
24. The moon herself, by which in the
prophetic oracles the Church is represented,
when first rising again, she waxes to her
monthly age, is hidden from us in darkn
and filling up her horns little by little,
LETTER XVIII.
421
completing' them opposite to the sun, g-lows
with the brig-litness of clear shining-.
25. The earth in former times was without
experience of being worked for fruits ; after-
wards when the careful husbandman betran
to lord it over the fields, and to clothe the
shapeless soil with vines, it put off its wild
disposition, being softened by domestic cul-
tivation.
26. The first age of the 3'ear itself, which
has tinged us with a likeness to itself as
things begin to grow, as it goes on becomes
springlike with flowers soon about to fall,
and grows up to full age in fruits attheend.
27. We too, inexperienced in age, have
an infancy of our senses, but changing as
years go on, lay aside the rudiments of our
faculties.
28. Let them say, then, that all things
ought to have remained in their first begin-
nings, that the world covered with darkness
is now displeasing, because it has brightened
with the shining of the sun. And how much
more pleasant is it to have dispelled the
darkness of the mind than that of the body,
and that the ray of faith should have shone
than that of the sun. So, then, the primeval
state of the world as of all things has passed
away, that the venerable old age of hoary
faith might follow. Let those whom this
touches find fault with the harvest, because
its abundance comes late ; let them find
fault with the vintao-e, because it is at the
close of the year; let them find fault with
the olive, because it is the latest of fruits.
29. So, then, our harvest is the faith of
souls ; the grace of the Church is the vintage
of merits, which from the beginning of the
world flourished in the Saints, but in the last
age has spread itself over the people, that all
might notice that the faith of Christ has
entered minds which were not rude (for there
is no crown of victory without an adversary),
but the opinion being exploded which before
prevailed, that which was true is rightly
preferred.
30. If the old rites pleased, why did Rome
also take up foreign ones .' I pass over the
ground hidden by costly building, and shep-
herds' cottages glittering with degenerate
gold. Why, that I may reply to the very
matter which they complain of, have they
eagerly received the images of captured
cities, and conquered gods, and the foreign
rites of alien superstition .'' Whence is the
pattern for Cybele washing her chariots in
a stream counterfeiting the Almo .' Whence
were the Phrygian bards, and the deities of
unjust Carthage always hateful to the
Romans .-' And her whom the Africans
worship as Celestis, the Persians as Nitra,
and the greater number as Venus, according
to a difference of name, not a variety of
deities. So they believed that Victory was
a goddess, which is certainly a gift, not a
power ; is granted and does not rule, results
from the aid of legions not the power of
religions. Is that goddess then great whom
the number of soldiers claims, or the event
of battle gives ?
31. They ask tt) have her altar erected in
the Senate House of the city of Rome, that is
where the majority who meet together are
Christians ! There are altars in all the
temples, and an altar also in the temple of
Victories. Since they take pleasure in num-
bers they celebrate their sacrifices every-
where. To claim a sacrifice on this one
altar, what is it but to insult the Faith .-' Is
it to be borne that a heathen should sacrifice
and a Christian be present .-* Let them
imbibe, he says, let them imbibe, even
against their will, the smoke \vith their eyes,
the music with their ears, the ashes with
their throats, the incense with their nostrils,
and let the dust stirred up from our hearths
cover their faces though they detest it. Are
not the baths, thecolonnades, the streets filled
with images sufficient for them ? Shall there
not be a common lot in that common
assembly ? The faithful portion of the senate
will be bound by the voices of those that
call upon the gods, by the oaths of those
that swear by them. If they oppose they
will seem to exhibit their falsehood, if they
acquiesce, to acknowledge what is sacri-
lege.
32. Where, says he, shall we swear obe-
dience to your Grace's laws and decrees?
Does then your mind, which is contained in
the laws, gain assent and bind to faithfulness
by heathen ceremonies ? The faith ■ is at-
tacked, not only of those who are present but
also of those who are absent, and what is
more, O Emperors, your faith, too, is at-
tacked, for you compel if you command.
Constantius of august memory, though not
yet initiated in the sacred Mysteries, thought
that he would be polluted if he saw that
altar. He commanded it to be removed, he
did not command it to be replaced. The
removal has the authority of an act, the
restoration has not that of a command.
22- Tet no one flatter himself because he
is absent. He who joins himself to others
in mind is more present than he whose
assent is given by bodily presence. For it
is more to be united in mind than to be
joined in body. The Senate has you as the
presidents who convene the assembly, it
422
ST. AMBROSE.
comes together for you ; it gives its con-
science to you, not to the gods of the heathen;
it prefers you to its children, but not to its,
faith. This is a love to be desired, this is
a love greater than any dominion, if faith
which preserves dominion be secure.
34. But perhaps it may move some that
if this be so, a most faithful Emperor ' has
been forsaken, as if forsooth the reward of
merits were to be estimated by the transi-
tory measure of things present. For what
wise man is ignorant that human affairs are
ordered in a kind of round and cycle, for
they have not always the same success, but
their state varies and they suffer vicissi-
tudes.
35. Whom have the Roman temples sent
out more prosperous than Cneius Pompeius ?
Yet, when he had encompassed the earth
with three triumphs, defeated in battle, a
fugitive from war, and an exile beyond the
bounds of his own empire, he fell by the hand
of an eunuch of Canopus.
36. Whom has the whole land of the East
given to the world more noble than Cyrus,
king of the Persians ? He too, after con-
quering the most powerful princes who
opposed him, and retaining them, when con-
quered, as prisoners, perished, overthrown by
the arms of a woman. ^- And that king who
was acknowledged to have treated even the
vanquished with honour, had his head cut
off, placed in a vessel full of blood, and was
bidden to be satiated, being thus subject to
the. mocking of a woman's power. So in
the course of that life of his like is not
repaid by like, but far otherwise.
37. And whom do we find more devoted
to sacrificing than Hamilcar, leader of the
Carthaginians .? 3 Who, having offered sacri-
fice between the ranks during the whole
time of the battle, when he saw that his side
was conquered, threw himself into the fire
which he was feeding, that he might ex-
tinguish even with his own body those fires
which he had found to profit him nothing.
38. What, then, shall 1 say of Julian ? Who,
having credulously trusted the answers of
the soothsayers, destroyed his own means of
retreat.^ Therefore even in like cases there
is not a like offence, for our promises have
deceived no one.
39. I have answered those who provoked
me as though I had not been provoked, for
^ Gratian, murdered a.d. 383. St. Ambrose on Ps. Ixii. [Ixi.] § 23,
gives some details mentioned by no otlier writer. The Emperor
was noted for his great conscientiousness, and especially for purity.
^ Tomvris, queen of the Massaget*. — Herodot. I. 214.
3 Herod. VI I. 167.
♦.Sozomen, //. /f. VI. i. Cf. St. Aug. i/e Ck'. Dei, IV. 29;
V. 21.
my object was to refute the Memorial, not
to expose superstition. But let their very
memorial make you, O Emperor, more care-
ful. For after narrating of former princes,
that the earlier of them practised the cere-
monies of their fathers, and the later did not
abolish them ; and saying in addition that,
if the religious practice of the older did not
make a precedent, the connivance of the
later ones did; it plainly showed what you
owe, both to your faith, viz., that you should
not follow the example of heathen rites, and
to your affection, that you should not abolish
the decrees of your brother. For if for their
own side alone they have praised the con-
i nivance of those princes, who, though
Christians, yet in no way abolished the
heathen decrees, how much more ought you
to defer to brotherly love, so that you, who
ought to overlook some things even if you
did not approve them in order not to detract
from your brother's statutes, should now
maintain what you judge to be in agree-
ment both with your own faith, and the bond
of brotherhood.
EPISTLE XX.
St. Ambrose relates to his sister the events at Milan
connected with the demand of the Arians for a basi-
lica, and how the people rose up in opposition.
Then that on the second day the basilica had been
occupied by soldiers, who however fraternized with
the Catholics. He gives a sketch of his address,
cotnparing their trials to those of Job, more particu-
larly those caused by his wife, and other cases owing
to women. Though the basilica was surrendered, he
himself had been threatened by a notary, but this
did not trouble him. He adapts the story of Jonah
to the present circumstances, relates the joy of the
people at recovering their church, Vaientiuian's words
to his courtiers, and the behaviour of Calligonus to
himself. The date of the letter is Easter, a.d. 385.
1. Since in almost all your letters you en-
quire anxiously about the Church, you shall
hear what is taking place. The day after I
received your letter, in which you said you
were troubled by dreams, the pressure of
heavy troubles began to be felt. And this
time it was not the Portian basilica, that is
the one outside the walls, which was de-
manded, but the new basilica, that is the
one within the walls, which is larger.
2. First of all some great men, counsellors
of state, begged of me to give up the basi-
lica, and to manage that the people should
make no disturbance. I replied, of course,
that the temple of God could not be sur-
rendered by a Bishop.
3. On the following day this ans
approved by the people in the Chui
LETTER XX.
423
the Prefect ' came there, and began to per-
suade us to give up at least the Portian ba-
silica, but the people clamoured against it.
He then went away implying that he should
report to the Emperor.
4. The day after, which was Sunday, after
the lessons and the sermon, when the Cate-
chumens were dismissed, I was teaching the
creed to certain candidates ^ in the baptistery
of the basilica. There it was reported to me
that they had sent decani 3 from the palace,
and were putting up hangings, ■♦ and that
part of the people were going there. I, how-
ever, remained at my ministrations, and be-
gan to celebrate mass. ^
5. Whilst offering the oblation, I heard
that a certain Castulus, who, the Arians said,
was a priest, had been seized by the people.
Passers-by had come upon him in the streets.
I began to weep bitterly, and to implore
God in the oblation that He would come to
our aid, and that no one's blood be shed in the
Church's cause, or at least that it might be my
blood shed for the benefit not of my people
only, but also for the unbelievers themselves.
Not to say more, I sent priests and deacons
and rescued the man from violence.
6. Thereupon the heaviest sentences were
decreed, first upon the whole body of mer-
chants. And so during the holy days of the
last week of Lent, when usually the bonds
of debtors are loosed, chains were heard
grating, were being placed on the necks of
innocent persons, and two hundred pounds'
weight of gold was required within three
days' time. They replied that they would
give as much or twice as much, if demanded,
so that only they might preserve their
faith. The prisons were full of trades-
people.
7. All the officials of the palace, that is
the recorders, the commissioners, the ap-
paritors of the different -magistrates, were
commanded to keep away from what w^as
going on, on the pretence that they were
forbidden to take part in any sedition ; many
very heavy penalties were threatened against
men of position, if they did not surrender
the basilica. Persecution was raging, and
had they but opened the floodgates, they
' The Praetorian Prefect, one of the four great officers of the Em-
pire, their power extending over all departments of state, except
the army. See Diet. Gr. and Rovt. A)ii.
'^ The Competentes, those of the Catechumens who having re-
quested to be baptized were admitted to be instructed in the Creed
and the Lord's Prayer in preparation. This was usually done in
Lent.
^ Officials probably of the same kind as lictors.
* The officials were fixing outside the basilica certain vela or
hangings, the effect of which was to mark the building as Imperial
property.
^ Missant facere . This is the earliest extant instance of the use
of this subsequently almost universal name for the Holy Eucharist,
the meaning of which is uncertain.
seemed likely to break out into every kind
of violence.
8. The Counts and Tribunes come and
urged me to cause the basilica to be quickly
surrendered, saying that the Emperor was
exercising his rights since everything was
under his power. I answered that if he
asked of me what was mine, that is, my
land, my money, or whatever of this kind
was my own, I would not refuse it, although
all that I have belonged to the poor, but
that those things which are God's are not
subject to the imperial power. "If my
patrimony is required, enter upon it, if my
body, 1 will go at once. Do you wish to
cast me into chains, or to give me to death }
it will be a pleasure to me. I will not de-
fend myself with throngs of people, nor will
I cling to the altars and entreat for my life,
but will more gladly be slain myself for the
altars."
9. I was indeed struck with horror when
I learnt that armed men had been sent to
take possession of the basilica, lest while
the people were defending the basilica,
there might be some slaughter which would
tend to the injury of the whole city. I
prayed that I might not survive the destruc-
tion of so great a city, or it might be of the
whole of Italy. I feared the odium of shed-
ding blood, I offered my own neck. Some
Gothic tribunes were present, whom I ac-
costed, and said, " Have you received the
gift of Roman rights in order to make your-
selves disturbers of the public peace }
Whither will you go, if things here are de--
stroyed .? "
10. Then I was desired to restrain the
people ; I answered that it was in my power
not to excite them, but in God's hands to
quiet them. And that if they thought that I
was urging them on, they ought at once to
punish me, or that I ought to be sent to any
desert part of the earth they chose. After I
had said this, they departed, and I spent the
whole day in the old basilica, and thence
went home to sleep, that if any one wanted
to carry me off he might find me ready.
11. Before day when I left the house the
basilica was surrounded by soldiers. It is
said that the soldiers had intimated to the
Emperor that if he wished to go forth he
could do so ; that they would be in attend-
ance, if they saw him go to join the
Catholics ; if not that they would go to the
assembly which Ambrose had convened.
12. None of the Arians dared to go forth,
for there was not one among the citizens,
only a few of the royal family, and some of
the Goths. And they as of old they made
424
ST. AMBROSE.
use of their waggons as dwellings, now make
the Church their waggon. Wherever that
woman goes, she carries with her all assem-
blage.
13. I heard that the Basilica was sur-
rounded by the groaning of the people, but
whilst the lessons were being read, I was
informed that the new Basilica also was full
of people, that the crowd seemed greater
than when they were all free, and that a
Reader was being called for. In short, the
soldiers themselves who seemed to have
occupied the Basilica, when they knew that
I had ordered that the people should abstain
from communion with them, began to come
to our assembly. When they saw this, the
minds of the women were troubled, and one
rushed forth. But the soldiers themselves
said that they had come for prayer not for
lighting. The people uttered some cries.
With great moderation, with great instancy,
with great faithfulness they begged that we
would go to that Basilica. It was said, too,
that the people in that Basilica were de-
manding my presence.
14. I then commenced the following
address. You have heard, my children, the
reading of the book of Job, which, according
to the appointed order and season,' is being
gone through. By experience the devil also
knew that this book would be explained, in
which all the power of his temptations is
shown and made clear, and so to-day he
roused himself with greater vigour. But
thanks be to our God, who has so estab-
lished you with faith and patience. I had
mounted the pulpit to praise Job alone, and
I have found in you all Jobs to praise. In
each of you Job lives again, in each the
patience and valour of that saint has shone
forth again. For what more resolute could
have been said by Christian men, than what
the Holy Spirit has to-day spoken in you ?
We request, O Augustus, we do not fight,
we do not fear, but we request. This be-
seems Christians both to wish for peace and
tranquillity, and not to suffer constancy of
faith and truth to be checked by fear. For
the Lord is our Leader, " Who is the Saviour
of them that hope in Him." ^
15. But let us come to the lessons before
us. You see that permission is given to the
devil, that the good may be tested. The
evil one envies all progress in good, he
tempts us in divers way. He tried holy
Job in his possessions, in his children, in
pain of body. The stronger is tried in his
* The Book of Job is still read in the evenings of Holy Week in
the Eastern Church.
' Ps. xvii. [xvi.] 7.
own person, the weaker in that of another.
And he was desirous of carrying off my
riches which I possess in you, and wished
to dissipate this patrimony of your tran-
quillity. And he strove to deprive me ot
yourselves also, my good children, for whom
I daily renew the Sacrifice, you he endea-
voured to involve in the ruin as it were of a
public disturbance. I have then already
been assailed by two kinds of temptation.
And perhaps because the Lord our God
knows me to be too weak, He has not yet
given him power over my body. Though
I myself may desire it, though I offer my-
self. He deems me yet it may be unequal to
this conflict, and exercises me with divers
labours. And Job did not begin with that
conflict but finished with it.
16. But Job was tried by accumulated
tidings of evils, he was also tried by his
wife, who said, " Speak a word against God
and die."' You see what terrible things
are of a sudden stirred up, the Goths,
armed men, the heathen, the fines of the
merchants, the sufferings of the Saints. You
observe what was commanded, when the
order was given " surrender the Basilica ; "
that is "speak a word against God and die.
And not only, speak against God," but. Do
something against Him. For the command
was, surrender the altars of God.
17. So, thSn, we are prepared by the im-
perial commands, but are strengthened by
the words of Scripture, which replies :
"Thou hast spoken as one of the foolish."
That temptation then is no light one, for,
we know that those temptations are more
severe which arise through women. For
even Adam ^ was overthrown by Eve,
whereby it came to pass that he erred from
the Divine commandments. And when he
recognized his error, feeling the reproach
of a guilty conscience, he would fain have
hidden himself, but he could not be hidden,
and so God said to him : "Adam, where art
thou ? " 3 that is, what wast thou before }
where hast thou now begun to be .'' Where
had I placed thee ? Whither hast thou wan-
dered ? Thou owncst that thou art naked
because thou hast lost the robe of a good
faith. Those are leaves with M'hich thou
now seekest t*^ thyself Thou hast re-
jected the fi desired to hide under
the leaves 01 •, but thou art be-
trayed. Thou ^d to depart from
the Lord thy God .. e of one woman,
therefore thou flee^ 'm Whom thou
soughtest before to s 1 hast chosen
' Job. ii. 9.
* Gen. iii.
'n ui. 9.
LETTER XX.
42 [
'de thyself with one woman, to forsake
ror of the world, the abode in Para-
.e grace of Christ.
i». Why should I relate that Jezebel,'
also persecuted Elisha after a bloodthirsty
fashion ? or that Herodias^ caused John the
Baptist to be slain ? Individuals persecuted
individuals ; but for me, whose merits are
far inferior, the trials are all the harder.
My strength is less, but I have more danger.
Of women change follows on change, their
hatreds alternate, their falsehoods vary,
elders assemble together, wrong done to
the Emperor is made a pretence. What is
then the reason of such severe temptation
against me, a mere worm ; e.xcept that they
are attacking not me but the Church .■*
19. At last the command was given :
Surrender the Basilica. 'Sly reply was, it
is not lawful for me to surrender it, nor ad-
vantageous for you, O Emperor, to receive
it. By no right can you violate the house
of a private person, and do you think that
the House of God may be taken away ■*
It is asserted that everything is lawful for
the Emperor, that all things are his. My
answer is : Do not, O Emperor, lay on
yourself the burden of such a thought as
that you have any imperial power over
those things which belong to God.^ Exalt
not yourself, but if you desire to reign long,
submit yourself to God. Pt^ is written :
"The things which are God's to God, those
which are Caesar's to Caesar. " 4 The palaces
belong to the Emperor, the churches to the
Bishop. Authority is committed to you
over public, not over sacred buildings.
Again the Emperor was stated to have de-
clared : I also ought to have one Basilica.
My answer was : It is not lawful for you
to have it. What have you to do with an
adulteress .-* For she is an adulteress who
is not joined to Christ in lawful wedlock.
20. Whilst I was treating on this matter,
tidings were brought me that the royal
hangings were taken down, and the Basilica
filled with people, who were calling for
my presence, so I at once turned my dis-
course to this, and said : How high and
how deep are the oracles of the Holy Spirit !
We said at Matins, as you, brethren, re-
member, and made the response with the
greatest grief of mind : " O God. the heathen
are come into Thine inheritance." s And in
very deed the heathen came, and even
* I [3T Kings xix. i. _ * S. Matt. xiv. 3.
^ St. Ambrose is here repeating in plain words wliat he has also
said before, that the secular power has no authority over the Church,
and what belongs to God.
* S. Matt. xxii. 21. * Ps. Ixxix. flxxviii.] i.
worse than the heathen came ; for the
Goths ' came, and men of different nations ;
they came with weapons and surrounded
and occupied the Basilica. We in our ig-
norance of Thy greatness mourned over
this, but our want of foresight was in
error.
21. The heathen are come, and in very
truth are come into Thine inheritance, for
they who came as heathen have become
Christians. Those who came to invade
Thine inheritance, have been made coheirs
with God. I have those as protectors
whom I considered to be adversaries.
That is fulfilled which the Prophet oang of
the Lord Jesus that "His dwelling is in
peace," and "There brake He the horns of
the bows, the shield, the sword and the
battle." ^ For whose gift is this, whose
work is this but Thine, Lord Jesus ? Thou
sawest armed men coming to Thy temple ;
on the one hand the people wailing and com-
ing in throngs so as not to seem to surrender
the Basilica of God, on the other hand the
soldiers ordered to use violence. Death
was before my eyes, lest madness should
gain any footing whilst things were thus.
Thou, O Lord, didst come between, and
madest of twain one. ^ Thou didst restrain
the armed men, saying. If ye run together
to arms, if those shut up in My temple
are troubled, "what profit is therein My
blood. " Thanks then be unto Thee, O
Christ. No ambassador, no messenger, but
Thou, O Lord, hast saved Thy people,
"Thou hast put off my sackcloth and girded
me with gladness. "5
2 2. I said these things, wondering that
the Emperor's mind could be softened by
the zeal of the soldiers, the entreaties of the
Counts, and the supplication of the people.
Meanwhile I was told that a notary had
been sent to me, to bring me orders. I re-
tired a little, and he intimated the order to
me. What were you thinking of, he said,
in acting against the Emperor's decree.'' I
replied : I do not know what has been de-
creed, and I have not been informed of
what has been unadvisedly done. He
asked : Why did you send priests to the
Basilica ? If you are a tyrant I wish to
know it, that I may know how to prepare
against you. I replied by saying that I
had done nothing hastily regarding the
Church. That at the time when I heard
that the Basilica was occupied by soldiers.
' The Goths were mostly Arians, and so worse than heathen.
- Ps. Ixxvi. [Ixxv.] 2, 3. E.V. — Salem, which means "peace.
^ Eph. ii. 15. * Ps. Kxx. [xxix.] 9.
'' Ps. XXX. [xxix.] II.
426
ST. AMBROSE.
I only gave freer utterance to groans, and
that when many were exhorting me to go
thither, I said : I cannot surrender the ba-
silica, but I may not fight. But after I heard
that the royal hangings had been taken
away, when the people were urging me to
go thither, I sent some priests ; that 1 would
not go myself, but said, I believe in Christ,
that the Emperor himself will treat with
us.
23. If these acts looked like tyranny, that
I had arms, but only in the Name of Christ,
that I had the power of offering my own
body. Why, I said, did he delay to strike,
if he thought me a tyrant ? That by ancient
right imperial power had been given by
bishops, never assumed, and it was com-
monly said that emperors had desired the
priesthood, rather than priests the imperial
power. That Christ withdrew lest He
should be made a kina:. That we had our
own power ; for the power of a bishop was
his weakness. "When I am weak," says
the Apostle, "then I become strong."'
But let him against whom God has not
stirred up an adversary beware lest he make
a tyrant for himself. That Maximusdid not
say that I was the tyrant of Valentinian, he
complained that by the intervention of my
legation he had been unable to cross over
into Italy. ^ And I added that priests had
never been tyrants, but had often suffered
from them.
24. We passed that whole day in sadness,
but the imperial hangings were cut by boys
in derision. I could not return home, be-
cause the soldiers who were guarding the
basilica were all around. We repeated
Psalms with the brethren in the smaller ba-
silica of the Church.
25. On the following day the Book of
Jonahs was read according to custom, after
the completion of which I began this dis-
course. A book has been read, brethren, in
which it is foretold that sinners shall be
converted. Their acceptance takes place
because that which is to happen is looked
forward to at present. I added that the
just man had been willing even to incur
blame, in order not to see or denounce the
destruction of the city. And because the
sentence was mournful he was also sad-
dened that the gourd had withered up. God
too said to the prophet : " Art thou sad be-
cause of the gourd .? " and Jonah answered :
" I am sad. "4 And the Lord then said, that
If he grieved that the gourd was withered,
J 2 Cor. xii. 10. 2 The first legation, a.d. 383 or 3S4.
•' Read now in tlie West on Holy Saturday.
■• Jonah iv. 9.
how much should He Himself care for the
salvation of so many people. And there-
fore that He had put away the destruction
which had been prepared for the whole city.
26. And without further delay, tidings
are brought that the Emperor had com-
manded the soldiers to retire from the ba-
silica, and that the sums which had been
exacted of the merchants should be restored.
How great then was the joy of the whole
people ! how just their applause ! and how
abundant their thanks ! And it was the day
on which the Lord was delivered up for us,
on which penance is relaxed in the Church.
The soldiers vied with each other in bring-
ing in these tidings, rushing to the altars,
giving kisses, the mark of peace. Then I
recognized that God had smitten the early
worm that the whole city might be pre-
served.
27. These things w^ere done, and would
that all was at an end ! but the Emperor's
words full of excitement foreshadow future
and worse troubles. I am called a tyrant,
and even more than a tyrant. For when
the Counts were entreating the Emperor to
go to the Church, and said that they were
doing this at the request of the soldiers, he
answered : If Ambrose bade you, you
would deliver me up to him in chains. You
can think what may be coming after these
words. All shuddered when they heard
them, but he has some by whom he is ex-
asperated.
28. Lastly, too, Calligonus, the chief cham-
berlain, ventured to address me in peculiar
language. Do you, said he, whilst I am
alive treat Valentinian with contempt.'' I
will take your head from you. My reply
was, God grant you to fulfil your threat;
for then I shall suffer as bishops do, you
will act as do eunuchs. Would that God
might turn them away from the Church, let
them direct all their weapons against me,
let them satisfy their thirst with my blood.
LETTER XXI.
427
LETTER XXI.
St. Ambrose excuses himself for not having gone to the
consistory when summoned, on the ground that in
matters of faith no one but bishops could rightly
judge, and that he was not contumacious because he
\-ould not suffer wrong to be done to his own order.
And he adds that Auxentius would perhaps choose
as judges either Jews or unbelievers, that is, persons
hostile to Christ. He says further that he is willing
to discuss the matters in dispute at a synod, and that
he would have told the Emperor by word of mouth
what he is now writing, but that his fellow bishops
and the people would not suffer him to do so.
Ambrose, Bishop, to the most gracious
Emperorand blessed Augustus, Valentinian.
1. Dalmatius, the tribune and notary,
summoned me by the orders of your Cle-
mency, as he asserted, demanding tliat I
should also choose judges, as Auxentius
had done. He did not mention the names
of those who had been asked for, but he
added that there was to be a discussion in
the consistory, and that the judgment of
your piety would give the decision.
2. To this I make, as I think, a suitable
answer. No one ought to consider me
contumacious when I affirm what your
father of august memory not only replied
by word of mouth,' but also sanctioned by
his laws, that, in a matter of faith, or any
ecclesiastical ordinance, he should judge
who was not unsuited by office, nor dis-
qualified by equity, for these are the words
of the rescript. That is, it was his desire
that priests should judge concerning priests.
Moreover, if a bishop were accused of
other matters also, and a question of character
was to be enquired into, it was also his
will that this should be reserved for the
judgment of bishops.
3. Who, then, has answered your Clemen-
cy contumaciously ? He who desires that
you should be like your father, or he that
wishes you to be unlike him ? Unless, per-
haps, the judgment of so great an Empe-
ror seems to any persons of small account,
whose faith has been proved by the con-
stancy of his profession,^ and his wisdom
declared by the continual improvement of
the State.
1 " When Valentinian was journeying from Constantinople to
Rome . . . some bishops despatched Hypatian ... to request
permission to assemble themselves together for deliberation on
questions of doctrine. . . . Valentinian made the following reply ;
' I am but one of the laity, and have therefore no right to interfere in
these transactions ; let the priests, to whom such matters appertain,
assemble where they please." Sozomen, Ecc/. Hist. VI. 7 [Vol.
II. of this series]. The law referred to is not extant.
- Allusion is here made to a celebrated act of Valentinian, when
attending on the Emperor Julian at the temple of Fvirtune. One
of the attendants sprinkled him with lustral water, and Valentinian
struck him with his fist, saying that this water defiled rather than
purified those whom it touched. Comp. Sozomen, Hist. Eccl.
VI. 6.
4. When have you heard, most gracious
Emperor, that laymen gave judgment con-
cerning a bishop in a matter of faith ? Are
we so prostrate through the flattery of some
as to be unmindful of the rights of the
priesthood, and do I think that I can entrust
toothers what God has given me.'' If a
bishop is to be taught by a layman, what
will follow.? Let the layman argue, and
the bishop listen, let the bishop learn of the
layman. But undoubtedly, whether we go
through the series of the holy Scriptures, or
the times of old. who is there who can deny
that, in a matter of faith, — in a matter I
say of faith, — bishops are wont to judge
of Christian emperors, not emperors of
bishops.
5. You will, by the favour of God, attain
to a riper age, and then you will judge what
kind of bishop he is who subjects the rights
of the priesthood to laymen. Your father,
by the favour of God a man of riper age,
used to say : It is not my business to judge
between bishops. Your Clemincy now
says: I ought to judge. And he,though bap-
tized in Christ, thought himself unequal to
the burden of such a judgment, does your
Clemency, who have yet to earn for your-
self the sacrament of baptism, arrogate to
vourself a judgment concerning the faith,
though ignorant of the sacrament of that
faith .?
6. I can leave it to be imagined what sort
of judges he will have chosen, since he is
afraid to publish their names. Let them
simply come to the Church, if there are any
to come ; let them listen with the people, not
for every one to sit as judge, but that each
may examine his own disposition, and
choose whom to follow. The matter is con-
cerning the bishop of that Church : if the
people hear him and think that he has the
best of the argument, let them follow him, I
shall not be jealous.
7. I omit to mention that the people have
themselves already given their judgment.
I am silent as to the fact that they demanded
of your father him whom they now have.'
I am silent as to the promise of your father
that if he who was chosen would undertake
the bishopric there should be tranquillity. I
acted on the faith of these promises.
8. But if he boasts himself of the approval
of some foreigners, let him be bishop there
from whence they are who think that he
ought to receive the name of bishop. For
I neither recognize him as a bishop, nor
know 1 whence he comes.
• St. Ambrose is alluding to the circumstances of his own elec-
tion.
428
ST. AMBROSE.
9. And how, O Emperor, are we to settle
a matter on which you have already de-
clared your judgment, and have even pro-
mulgated laws," so that it is not open to any
one to judge otherwise? But when you
laid down this law for others, you laid it
down for yourself as well. For the Em-
peror is the first to keep the laws which he
passes. Do you, then, wish me to try how
those who are chosen as judges will either
come, contrary to your decision, or at least
excuse themselves, saying that they cannot
act against so severe and so stringent a law
of the Emperor.'
10. But this would be the act of one contu-
macious, not of one who knew his position.
See, O Emperor, you are already yourself
partially rescinding your law, would that it
were not partially but altogether ! for I
would not that your law should be set above
the law of God. The law of God has taught
us what to follow ; human laws cannot
teach us this. They usually extort a change
from the fearful, but they cannot inspire
faith.
11. Who, then, will there be, who when he
reads that at one instant through so many
provinces the order was given, that whoever
acts against the Emperor shall be beheaded,
that whoever does not give up the temple of
God shall at once be put to death ; who, I
say, is there who will be able either alone or
with a few others to say to the Emperor : I
do not approve of your law ? Priests are not
allowed to say this, are then laymen allowed .''
And shall he judge concerning the faith who
either hopes for favour or is afraid of giving
offence .-*
12. Lastly, shall I myself choose laymen
for judges, who, if they upheld the truth of
their faith, would be either proscribed or
put to death, as that law passed concerning
the faith decrees ? Shall I then expose these
men either to denial of the truth or to pun-
ishment ?
13. Ambrose is not of sufficient import-
ance to degrade the priesthood on his own
account. The life of one is not of so much
value as the dignity of all priests, by whose
advice I gave those directions, when they in-
timated that there might perchance be some
heathen or Jew chosen by Auxentius, to
whom I should give a triumph over Christ,
if I entrusted to him a judgment concerning
Christ. What else pleases them but to hear
of some insult to Christ .'' What else can
please them unless (which God forbid) the
' A law in favour of the Arian^, allowing them to meet together
freely, passed through the influence of Justina. See Sozomen, Hist
Eccl. VII. 13.
Godhead of Christ should be denied .?
they agree well with the Arian wh
that Christ is a creature, which also h
and Jews most readily acknowledge.
14. This was decreed at the Synod
minum, and rightly do I detest that c
following the rule of the Nicene C
from which neither death nor the SW'
detach me, which faith the father ■:
Clemency also, Theodosius, the most
Emperor, both approved and follows
Gauls hold this faith, and Spain, ar
it with the pious confession of the
Spirit.
15. If anything has to be discusse(
learnt to discuss it in church as thos„ ^^^wI^..
me did. If a conference is to be held con-
cerning the faith, there ought to be a gather-
ing of Bishops, as was done under Con-
stantine, the Prince of august memory,
who did not promulgate any laws before-
hand, but left the decision to the Bishops.
This was done also under Constantius, Em-
])eror of august memory, the heir of his
father's dignity. But what began well ended
otherwise, for the Bishops had at first sub-
scribed an unadulterated confession of faith,
but since some were desirous of decidinp-
concerning the faith inside the palace, they
managed that those decisions of the Bishops
should be altered by fraud. But they im-
mediately recalled this perverted decision,
and certainly the larger number at Ariminum
approved the faith of the Nicene Council and
condemned the Arian propositions.
16. If Auxentius appeals to a synod, in
order to discuss points concerning the faith
(although it is not necessary that so many
Bishops should be troubled for the sake of
one man, who, even if he were an angel
from heaven, ought not to be preferred to
the peace of the Church), when I hear that
a synod is gathering, I, too, will not be
wanting. Repeal, then, the law if you wish
for a disputation.
17. I would have come, O Emperor, to
your consistory, and have made these re-
marks in your presence, if either the Bishops
or the people had allowed me, but they said
that matters concerning the faith ought to
be treated in the church, in presence of the
people.
18. And I wish, O Emperor, that you had
not given sentence that I should go into
banishment whither I would. I went out
daily. No one guarded me. You ought to
have appointed me a place wherever you
would, for I offered myself for anything.
But now the clergy say to me, "There is
not much difference whether you voluntarily
LETTER XXI.
429
leave the altar of Christ or betray it, for if
you leave it you will betray it."
19. And I wish it were clearly certain to
me that the Church would by no means be
given over to the Arians. I would then
willingly offer myself to the will of your
piety. But if I only am guilty of disturb-
ance, why is there a command to invade all
other churches ? I would it were established
that no one should trouble the churches,
and then I could wish that whatever sentence
seems good should be pronounced concern-
ing me.
20. Vouchsafe, then,0 Emperor, to accept
the reason for which I could not come to
the consistory. I have never learned to ap-
pear in the consistory except on your be-
half,' and I am not able to dispute within
the palace, who neither know nor wish to
know the secrets of the palace.
21. 1, Ambrose, Bishop, offer this memo-
rial to the most gracious Emperor, and most
blessed Augustus Valentinian.
' Tins refers modestly to the legations undertaken by St. Ambrose
on two separate occasions to Maxinuis, when the Kmpress Justina
feared for the safety of herself and Valentinian. In his first mission,
A.D. 3S3, he had at great personal risk induced Maximus not to in-
vade Italy, but to leave Valentinian in peaceful possession of a share
of the empire. In liis second embassy, a.d. 387, he was less suc-
cessful, as Maximus had determined on invading Italy; so that
Justina and Valentinian escaped to the East, seeking the protection
of Theodosius, who took their part, and defeated Maximus and put
him to death at Aquileia, a.u. 388.
430
ST. AMBROSE.
SERMON AGAINST AUXENTIUS ON THE
GIVING UP OF THE BASILICAS.
To calm the anxiety of the people over the imperial
decree, he lays his answer before them, and adds that
he did not go to the consistory, because he was
afraid of losing the basilica. Then, first challenging
his opponents to a discussion in the church, he says
that he is not terrified at their weapons ; and also, after
recalling his answer on the subject of the sacred ves-
sels, declares that he is ready for the contest. The
will of God, he maintains, cannot be frustrated, nor
can His protection be overcome, yet He is ready too
to suffer in His servants. Since he has not already
been taken before this, it is plain that the heretics
are causing this disturbance for no reason whatever.
Next, after applying Naboth's history and Christ's
entry into Jerusalem to the present state of affairs,
he censures Auxentius' cruel law, answers the
Arians' objections, and states that he will gladly
discuss the matter in the presence of the people.
Auxentius, he adds, has been already condemned
by the pagans, whom he had chosen to sit as judges,
as he had been condemned by Paul r.nd by Christ.
The heretic had forgotten the year before, when he
had made the same appeal to Csesar ; and the Arians,
in stirring up ill-will against the servants of Christ,
are much worse than the Jews! for the Church
does not belong to Caesar, but displays the image of
Christ. Then adding to these a few more words on
his answer and his hymns, he declares that he is not
disobedient, that the Emperor is a son of the Church,
and that Auxentius is worse than a Jew.
1. I SEE that you are unusually disturbed,
and that you are closely watching me. I
wonder what the reason is .? Is it that you
saw or heard that I had received an imperial
order at the hands of the tribunes, to the
effect that I was to go hence, whither I
would, and that all who wished might fol-
low me .'* Were you afraid that I should
desert the Church and forsake you in fear
for my own safety .' But you could note the
message I sent, that the wish to desert the
Church had nev^er entered my mind; for I
feared the Lord of the universe more than
an earthly emperor ; and if force were to drag
me from the Church, my body indeed could
be driven out, but not my mind. I was
ready, if he were to do what royal power is
wont to do, to undergo the fate a priest has
to bear.
2. Why, then, are you disturbed.'' I will
never willingly desert you, though if force
is used, I cannot meet it. I shall be able
to grieve, to weep, to groan ; against
weapons, soldiers, Goths, my tears are my
weapons, for these are a priest's defence.
I ought not, I cannot resist in any other
way ; but to fly and forsake the Church is
not my way ; lest any one should suppose I
did so from fear of some heavier punish-
ment. You yourselves know that I am
wont to show respect to our emperors, but
not to yield to them, to offer myself freely
to punishment, and not to fear what is pre-
pared for me.
3. Would that I were sure the Church
would never be given over to heretics.
Gladly would I go to the Emperor's palace,
if this but fitted the office of a priest, and so
hold our discussion in the palace rather than
the church. But in the consistory Christ is
not wont to be the accused but the judge.
Who will deny that the cause of faith should
be pleaded in the church .' If any one has
confidence let him come hither ; let him not
seek the judgment of the Emperor, which
already shows its bias, which clearly proves
by the law that is passed that he is against
the faith ; neither let him seek the expected
goodwill of certain people who want to
stand well with both sides. I will not act
in such a way as to give any one the chance
of making money out of a wrong to Christ.
4. The soldiers around, the clash of the
arms wherewith the church is surrounded, do
not alarm my faith, but they disquiet me
from fear that in keeping me here you might
meet with some danger to your lives. For
I have learnt by now not to be afraid, but I
do begin to have more fear for you.
Allow, I beg you, your bishop to meet his
foes. We have an adversary who assails
us, for our adversary "the devil goeth
about, as a roaring lion, seeking whom he
may devour, " ' as the Apostle said. He has
received, no doubt, he has received (we are
not deceived, but warned of this) the power
to tempt in this" wise, lest I might perhaps
by the wounds of my body be drawn away
from the earnestness of my faith. You
have read how the devil tempted holy Job
in these many ways, and how at last he
sought and obtained power to try his body,
which he covered with sores.
5. When it was suggested that I should
give up the vessels of the Church, I gave the
following answer : I will willingly give up
whatever of my own property is demanded,
whether it is estates, or house, or gold, or
silver — anything, in fact, which is in my
power. But I cannot take aught away from
the temple of God ; nor can I give up what
I have received to guard and not to give up.
In doing this I am acting for the Emperor's
good, for it would neither be right for me to
give it up, nor for him to receive it. Let
him listen to the words of a free-spoken
bishop, and if he wishes to do what is best
for himself, let him cease to do wrong to
Christ.
» : Pet. V. 8.
SERMON AGAINST AUXENTIUS.
431
6. These words are full of humility, and
as I think of that spirit which a bishop ought
to show towards the Emperor. But smce
"our contest is not against flesh and blood,
but also" (which is worse) "against spiri-
tual wickedness in high places," ■ that temp-
ter the devil makes the struggle harder by
means of his servants, and thinks to make
trial of me by the wounds of my flesh. I
know, my brethren, that these wounds which
we receive for Christ's sake are not wounds
that destroy life, but rather extend it. Allow,
I pray, the contest to take place. It is for
you to be the spectators. Reflect that if a
city has an athlete, or one skilled in some
other noble art, it is eager to bring him
forward for a contest. Why do you refuse
to do in a more important matter what you
are wont to wish in smaller affairs.'' He
fears not weapons nor barbarians who fears
not death, and is not held fast by any
pleasures of the flesh.
7. And indeed if the Lord has appointed
me for this struggle, in vain have you kept
sleepless watch so many nights and days.
The will of Christ will be fulfilled. For our
Lord Jesus is almighty, this is our faith :
and so what He wills to be done will be
fulfilled, and it is not for us to thwart the
divine purpose.
8. You heard what was read to-day : The
Saviour ordered that the foal of an ass
should be brought to Him by the apostles,
and bade them say, if any one withstood
them: "The Lord hath need of him." ^
What if now, too, He has commanded that
foal of an ass, that is, the foal of that animal
which is wont to bear a heavy burden, as
man must, to whom is said: " Come
unto Me all ye that labour and are heavy
laden, and I will give you rest ; take My
yoke upon you, for it is easy ; " ^ what if, I
say, He has commanded that foal to be
brought to Him now, sending forth those
apostles, who, having put off their body,
wear the semblance of the angels unseen
by our eyes .'' If withstood by any, will
they not say : The Lord hath need of him ?
If, for instance, love of this life, or flesh and
blood, or earthly intercourse (for perhaps
we seem pleasing to some), were to with-
stand them ? But he who loves me here,
would show his love much more if he
would suffer me to become Christ's victim,
for "to depart and be with Christ is much
better, though to abide in the flesh is more
needful for you," 4 There is nothing therefore
' Eph. vi. 12.
3 S. Matt. xi. 28 ff.
* .S. Luke xix. 35.
* Phil. i. 23.
for you to fear, beloved brethren. For I know
that whatever I may suff"er, I shall suffer
for Christ's sake. And I have read that I
ought not to fear those that can kill the
flesh.' And I have heard One Who says:
"He that loseth his life for My sake shall
find it."^
9. Wherefore if the Lord wills, surely no
one will resist. And if as yet He delay
my struggle, what do you fear .^ It is not
bodily guardianship but the Lord's provi-
dence that is wont to fence in the servant
of Christ.
10. You are troubled because you have
found the double doors open, which a blind
man in seeking his chamber is said to have
unfastened. In this you learn that human
watchfulness is no defence. Behold! one
who has lost the gift of sight has broken
through all our defences, and escaped the
notice of the guards. But the Lord has not
lost 3 the guard of His mercy. Was it not
also discovered two days ago, as you re-
member, that a certain entrance on the left
side of the basilica was open, which you
thought had been shut and secured ? Armed
men surrounded the basilica, they tried this
and the other entrance, but their eyes were
blinded so that thay could not see the one
that was open. And you know well that
it was open many nights. Cease, then, to
be anxious ; for that will take place which
Christ commands and which is for the best.
11. And now I will put before you exam-
ples from the Law. Eliseus was sought by
the king of Syria ; an army had been sent
to capture him; and he was surrounded on all
sides. His servant began to fear, for he was
a servant, that is, he had not a free mind,
nor had he free powers of action. The holy
prophet sought to open his eyes, and said :
" Look and see how many more are on our
side than there are against us." 4 And he
beheld, and saw thousands of angels. Mark
therefore that it is those that are not seen
rather than those that are seen that guard
the servants of Christ. But if they guard
you, they do it in answer to your prayers :
for you have read that those very men, who
sought Eliseus, entered Samaria, and came
to him whom they desired to take. Not
only were they unable to harm him, but they
were themselves preserved at the interces-
sion of the man against whom they had
come.
' S. Matt. X. 28. = .S. Matt. x. 39.
' The words a»iisit (lost) and custodiam (guard) are repeated by
St. Ambrose from the earlier part of the sentence. Such play upon
words is not uncommon in his writings.
* 2 Kings vi. 16.
432
ST. AMBROSE.
12. The Apostle Peter also gives you an
example of either case. ' For when Herod
sought him and took him, he was put into
prison. For the servant of God had not got
away, but stood firm without a thought of
fear. The Church prayed for him, but the
Apostle slept in prison, a proof that he was
not in fear. An angel was sent to rouse
him as he slept, by whom Peter was led
forth out of prison, and escaped death for a
time.
13. And Peter again afterwards, when he
had overcome Simon, in sowing the doctrine
of God among the people, and in teaching
chastity, stirred up the minds of the Gen-
tiles. And when these sought him, the
Christians begged that he would withdraw
himself for a little while. And although he
was desirous to suffer, yet was he moved
at the sight of the people praying, for they
asked him to save himself for the instruction
and strengthening of his people. Need I
say more .'' At night he begitis to leave the
town, and seeing Christ coming to meet
him at the gate, and entering the city, says :
Lord, whither goest Thou ? Christ answers :
I am coming to be crucified again. Peter
understood the divine answer to refer to his
own cross, for Christ could not be crucified
a second time, for He had put off the flesh
by the passion of the death which He had
undergone; since: "In that He died. He
died unto sin once, but in that He liveth,
He liveth unto God.'' ^ So Peter understood
that Christ was to be crucified again in the
person of His servant. Therefore he will-
ingly returned ; and when the Christians
questioned him, told them the reason. He
was immediately seized, and glorified the
Lord Jesus by his cross.
14. You see, then, that Christ wills to suf-
fer in His servants. And what if He says
to this servant, " I will that he tarry, follow
thou Me," 3 and wishes to taste the fruit of
this tree ? For if His meat was to do the
will of His Father, •» so also is it His meat
to partake of our sufferings. Did He not,
to take an example from our Lord Himself, —
did He not suffer when He willed, and was
He not found when He was sought .'' But
when the hour of His passion had not yet
come. He passed through the midst of those
that sought Him, 5 and though they saw
Him they could not hold Him fast. This
plahily shows us that when the Lord wills,
each one is found and taken, but because
the time is put off, he is not held fast, al-
' Acts xii. 4 ff.
* S. John iv. 34.
' Rom. vi. 10.
* S. John vii. 30.
* S. John xxi. 22.
though he meets the eyes of those who seek
him.
15. And did not I myself go forth daily to
pay visits, or go to the tombs of the mar-
tyrs.'' Did I not pass by the royal palace
both in going and returning .' Yet no one
laid hands on me, though they had the in-
tention of driving me out, as they afterwards
gave out, saying. Leave the .city, and go
where you will. I was, I own, looking for
some great thing, either sword or fire for the
Name of Christ, yet they offered me pleasant
things instead of sufferings ; but Christ's
athlete needs not pleasant things but suffer-
ings. Let no one, then, disturb you, because
they have provided a carriage,' or because
hard words, as he thinks them, have been
uttered by Auxentius, who calls himself
bishop.
16. Many stated that assassins had been
despatched, that the penalty of death had
been decreed against me. I do not fear all
that, nor am I going to desert my position
here. Whither shall I go, when there is no
spirit that is not filled with groans and tears ;
when throughout the Churches Catholic
bishops are being expelled, or if they resist,
are put to the sword, and every senator who
does not obey the decree is proscribed. And
these things were written by the hand and
spoken by the mouth of a bishop who, that
he might show himself to be most learned,
omitted not an ancient warning. For we
read in the prophet that he saw a flying
sickle.^ Auxentius, to imitate this, sent a
flying sword through all cities. But Satan,
too, transforms himself into an angel of
light, 3 and imitates his power for evil.
17. Thou, Lord Jesus, hast redeemed the
world in one moment of time : shall Auxen-
tius in one moment slay, as far as he can,
so m.any peoples, some by the sword, others
by sacrilege.'' He seeks my basilica with
bloody lips and gory hands. Him to-day's
chapter answers well: "But unto the
wicked said God : Wherefore dost thou de-
clare My righteousness.''"'* That is, there
is no union between peace and madness,
there is no union between Christ and Belial. 5
You remember also that we read to-day of
Naboth, a holy man who owned his own
^ The storj' is related at length by Pauliniis in his Life of St.
Ambrose, c)\. 12. He tells us that whilst many tried to drive the
saint into exile, one named Euterymius went the greatest lengths to
accomplish this purpose. He hired a house near the church and
kept a carriage there, so as to be able the more readily to carry off St.
Ambrose into exile, if he could once but seize him. But that very
day year he was himself put into the same carriage, and from the
same house was carried into exile. For " his wickedness fell on his
own pate." (Ps.vii. 7.) He adds also that the bishop did much to
comfort him, and gave him money and other things he needed.
^ Zech. v. I. '2 Cor. xi. 14.
* Ps. 1. 16. ^ 2 Cor. vi. 15.
SERMON AGAINST AUXENTIUS.
433
vineyard, being urg-cd on the king's request
to give it up. When the king after rooting
up the vines intended to plant common
herbs, he answered him : " God forbid that
I should give up the inheritance of my
fathers."' The king was grieved, because
what belonged by right to another had been
refused him on fair grounds, but had been
unfairly got by a woman's device. Naboth
defended his vines with his own blood. And
if he did not give up his vineyard, shall we
give up the Church of Christ .'
1 8. Was the answer that I gave then con-
tumacious.'' For when summoned I said:
God forbid that I should give up the inherit-
ance of Christ. If Naboth gave not up the
inheritance of his fathers, shall I give up the
inheritance of Christ ? And I added further :
God forbid that I shall give up the inherit-
ance of my fathers, that is, the inheritance
of Dionysius, who died in exile in the cause
of the faith ; the inheritance of the Confessor
Eustorgius, the inheritance of Mysocles and
of all the faithful bishops of bygone days.
I answered as a bishop ought to answer :
Let the Emperor act as an emperor ought
to. He must take away my life rather than
my faith.
19. But to whom shall I give it up .-* To-
day's lesson from the Gospel ought to teach
us what is asked for and by whom it is
asked. You have heard read that when
Christ ^ sat upon the foal of an ass, the
children cried aloud, and the Jews were
vexed. At length they spoke to the Lord
Jesus, bidding Him to silence them. He
answered: "If these should hold their
peace, the stones will cry out."^ Then on
entering the temple, He cast out the money-
changers, and the tables, and those that
sold doves in the temple of God. That
passage was read by no arrangement of
mine, but by chance ; but it is well fitted to
the present time. The praises of Christ are
ever the scourges of the unfaithful. And
now when Christ is praised, the heretics say
that sedition is stirred up. The heretics say
that death is being prepared for them, and
truly they have their death in the praises of
Christ. For how can they bear His praises,
Whose weakness they maintain. And so
to-day, when Christ is praised, the madness
of the Arians is scourged.
20. The Gerasenes could not bear the
presence of Christ ; ^ these, worse than the
Gerasenes, cannot endure the praises of
Christ. They see boys singing of the glory
' I Kings xxi. 3.
' S- Luke xix. 40.
' S. Luke xix. 35.
* S. Luke viii. 37.
of Christ, for it is written : "Out of the
mouths of babes and sucklings Thou hast
perfected praise."' They mock at their
tender age, so full of faith, and say : "Be-
hold, why do they cry out ? " But Christ
answers them : "If these should hold their
peace, the stones will cry out, " ^ that is, the
stronger will cry out, both youths and the
more mature will cry out, and old men will
cry out ; these stones now firmly laid upon
that stone of which it is written : "The
stone which the builders rejected is become
the head of the corner. "'
21. Invited, then, by these praises, Christ
enters His temple, ^ and takes His scourge
and drives the money-changers out of the
temple. For He does not allow the
slaves of money to be in His temple, nor
does He allow those to be there who sell
seats. What are seats but honours .'' What
are the doves but simple minds or souls that
follow a pure and clear faith ? Shall I, then,
bring into the temple him whom Christ shuts
out .'' For he who sells dignities and honours
will be bidden to go out. He will be bidden
to go out who desires to sell the simple
minds of the faithful.
22. Therefore, Auxentius is cast out.
Mercurius is shut out. The portent is one,
the names are two ! That no one might
know who he was, he changed his name so
as to call himself Auxentius, because there
had been here an Arian bishop, named Aux-
entius. He did this to deceive the people
over whom the other had had power. He
changed his name, but he did not change
his falseness. He puts off the wolf, yet
puts on the wolf again. It is no help to
him that he has changed his name ; what-
ever happens he is known. He is called by
one name in the parts of Scythia, he is called
by another here. He has a name for each
country he lives in. He has two names
already, and if he were to go elsewhere from
here, he will have yet a third. For how
will he endure to keep a name as a proof of
such wickedness ? He did less in Scythia,
and was so ashamed that he changed his
name. Here he has dared to do worse
things, and will he be ready to be betrayed
by his name wherever he goes .'' Shall he
write the death warrant of so many people
with his own hand, and yet be able to be
unshaken in mind.-*
23. The Lord Jesus shut a few out of His
temple, but Auxentius left none. Jesus with
a scourge drove them out of His temple.
* Ps. viii. 2.
^ Ps. cxWii. [cxvii.] 22.
' S. Luke xix. 40.
* S. John ii. 15.
434
ST. AMBROSE.
Auxentius with a sword ; Jesus with a
scourge, Mercurius with an axe. The holy
Lord drives out the sacrilegious with a
scourge ; the impious man pursues the holy
with a sword. Of him you have well said
to-day: Let him take away his laws with him.
He will take them, although he is unwilling ;
he will take with him his conscience,
although he takes no writing ; he will take
with him his soul inscribed with blood,
although he will not take a letter inscribed
with ink. It is written: "Juda, thy sin is
written with a pen of iron and with the
point of a diamond, and it is graven upon
thy heart,"' that is, it is written there,
whence it came forth.
24. Does he, a man full of blood and full
of murder, dare to make mention to me of
a discussion ? He who thinks that they
whom he could not mislead by his words
are to be slain with the sword, giving bloody
laws with his mouth, writing them with his
hand, and thinking that the law can order a
faith for man to hold. He has not heard
what was read to-day : " That a man is not
justified by the works of the law,"^ or "I,
through the law, am dead to the law, that
I may live unto God, ''^ that is, by the spiri-
tual law he is dead to the carnal interpreta-
tion of the law. And we, by the law of our
Lord Jesus Christ, are dead to this law,
which sanctions such perfidious decrees.
The law did not gather the Church together,
but the faith of Christ. For the law is not
by faith, but " the just man lives by faith. "' 4
Therefore, faith, not the law, makes a man
just, for justice is not through the law, but
through the faith of Christ. But he who
casts aside his faith and pleads for that the
claims of the law, bears witness that he is
himself unjust ; for the just man lives by
faith.
25. Shall any one, then, follow this law,
whereby the Council of Ariminum is con-
firmed, wherein Christ was said to be a
creature. But say they: "God sent forth
His Son, made of a woman, made under the
law."s And so they say "made," that is,
" created. " Do they not consider these very
words which they have brought forward ;
that Christ is said to have been made, but of
a woman ; that is, He was "made" as re-
gards his birth from a Virgin, Who was be-
gotten of the Father as regards His divine
generation ? Have they read also to-day,
"that Christ redeemed us from the curse of
the law, being made a curse for us " ? ^
' Jer. xvii. i.
* Gal. iii. ii.
= Gal. ii. 16.
* Gal. iv. 4.
* Gal. ii. 19.
* Gal. iii. 13.
Was Christ a curse in His Godhead ? But
why He is called a curse the Apostle tells
us, saying that it is written : "Cursed is
every one that hangeth on a tree," ' that is.
He Who in his flesh bore our flesh, in His
body bore our infirmities and our curses,
that He might crucify them ; for He was
not cursed Himself, but was cursed in thee.
So it is written elsewhere : " Who knew no
sin, but was made sin for us, for He bore
our sins,^ that he might destroy them by
the Sacrament of His Passion."
26. These matters, my brethren, I would
discuss more fully with him in your pre-
sence ; but knowing that you are not igno-
rant of the faith, he has avoided a trial before
you, and has chosen some four or five
heathen to represent him, if that is he has
chosen any, whom I should like to be
present in our company, not to judge con-
cerning Christ, but to hear the majesty of
Christ. They, however, have already given
their decision concerning Auxentius, to
whom they gave no credence as he pleaded
before them day by day. What can be more
of a condemnation of him than the fact, that
without an adversary he was defeated be-
fore his own judges ? So now we also have
their opinion against Auxentius.
27. And that he has chosen heathen is
rightly to be condemned ; for he has dis-
regarded the Apostle's command, where he
says : " Dare any of you, having a matter
against another, go to law before the unjust
and not before the saints ? Do ye not know
the saints shall judge the world .'' " 3 And be-
low he says : " Is it so, that there is not a
wise mai:i among you, who can judge be-
tween heathen ? But brother goeth to law
with brother, and that before the un-
believers. " •* You see, then, that what he has
introduced is against the Apostle's authority.
Do you decide, then, whether we are to
follow Auxentius or Paul as our master.
28. But why speak of the Apostle, when
the Lord Himself cries through the prophet :
" Hearken unto Me, My people, ye who
know judgment, in whose heart is INIy law."s
God says : " Hearken unto Me, My people,
ye that know judgment." Auxentius says :
Ye know not judgment. Do you see
how he condemns God in you, who re-
jects the voice of the heavenly oracle :
" Hearken unto Me, My people," says the
Lord. Hesaysnot, "Hearken, ye Gentiles,"
nor does He say, " Hearken, ye Jews. " For
they who had been the people of the Lord
1 Gal, iii. 13.
* I Cor. vi. 5.
- 2 Cor. V. :
' Isa. Ii. 7.
I Cor. vi. I, 2.
SERMON AGAINST AUXENTIUS.
435
have now become the people of error, and
they who were the people of error have be-
gun to be the people of God ; for they have
believed on Christ. That people then judi^es
in whose heart is the divine, not the human,
law, the law not written in ink, but in the
spirit of the living' God ; ' not set down on
paper, but stamped upon the heart. Who,
then, does you a wron^, he who refuses, or
he who chooses to be heard by you ?
29. Hemmed in on all sides, he betakes
himself to the wiles of his fathers. He
wants to stir up ill-will on the Emperor's
side, saying that a youth, a catechumen,
ignorant of the sacred writings, ought to
judge, and to judge in the consistory. As
though last year when I was sent for to go
to the palace, when in the presence of the
chief men the matter was discussed before
the consistory, when the Emperor wished
to seize the basilica, I was cowed then at
the sight of the royal court, and did not show
the firmness a bishop should, or departed
with diminished claims. Do they not re-
member that the people, when they knew I
had gone to the palace, made such a rush
that they could not resist its force ; and all
offered themselves to death for the faith of
Christ as a military officer came out with
some light troops to disperse the crowd ?
Was not I asked to calm the people with a
long speech ? Did I not pledge my word that
no one should invade the basilica of the
church ? And though my services were
asked for to do an act of kindness, yet the
fact that the people came to the palace was
used to bring ill-will upon me. They wish
to bring me to this now again.
30. I recalled the people, and yet I did
not escape their ill-will, which ill-will, how-
ever, I think we ought rather to tempt than
fear. For why should we fear for the Name
of Christ ? Unless perchance I ought to be
troubled because they say : '' Ought not the
Emperor to have one basilica, to which to
go, and Ambrose wants to have more power
than the Emperor, and so refuses to the
Emperor the opportunity of going forth to
church ? " When they say this, they desire
to lay hold of my words, as did the Jews
who tried Christ with cunning words, say-
ing : " Master, is it lawful to give tribute to
Caesar or not.''"^ Is ill-will always stirred
up against the servants of God on Caesar's
account, and does impiety make use of this
with a view to starting a slander, so as to
shelter itself under the imperial name.? and
can they say that they do not share in
' 2 Cor. iii. 3.
* S. Matt. xxii. 17.
the sacrilege of those whose advice they
follow ?
31. See how much worse than the Jews
the Arians are. They asked whether He
thought that the right of tribute should be
given to Caesar ; these want to give to Caesar
the right of the Church. But as these faith-
less ones follow their author, so also let us
answer as our Lord and Author has taught
us. For Jesus seeing the wickedness of the
Jews said to them : Why tempt yc Me?
show Me a penny. When they had given
it, He said : " Whose image and superscrip-
tion hath it? " ' They answered and said :
Caesar's. And Jesus says to them : "Ren-
der unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's,
and to God the things that are God's. "^ So,
too, I say to these who oppose me : Show
me a penny. Jesus sees Caesar's penny and
says : Render unto Caesar the things that
are Caesar's, and unto God the things that
are God's. Can they in seizing the basi-
licas of the church offer Caesar's penny ?
32. But in the church I only knov/ of one
Image, that is the Image of the unseen
God, of Which God has said: "Let us
make man in Our image and Our likeness ; '' 3
that Image of Which it is written, that Christ
is the Brightness of His glory and the Image
of His Person. 4 In that Image I perceive
the Father, as the Lord Jesus Himself has
said : ' ' He that seeth Me seeth the Father. "5
For this Image is not separated from the
Father, which indeed has taught me the
unity of the Trinity, saying: "I and My
Father are One, " ^ and again: "All things
that the Father hath are Mine. " 7 Also of the
Holy Spirit, saying that the Spirit is Christ's,
and has received of Christ, as it is written :
"He shall receive of Mine, and shall de-
clare it unto you."' ^
33. How, then, did we not answer humbly
enough ? If he demand tribute, we do not re-
fuse it. The lands of the Church pay tribute.
If the Emperor wants the lands, he has the
power to claim them, none of us will inter-
fere. The contributions of the people are
amply sufficient for the poor. Do not stir
up ill-will in the matter of the lands.
Let them take them if it is the Emperor's
will. I do not give them, but I do not
refuse them. They ask for gold. I can
say : Silver and gold I do not ask for. But
they stir up ill-will because gold is spent.
I am not afraid of such ill-will as this. I have
dependents. My dependents are Christ's
poor. I know how to collect this treasure.
' S. Matt. xxii. i8.
3 Gen. i. 26.
^ S. John X. 30.
♦ Heb. i. 3.
' S. John xvi. 15.
- S. Matt. xxii. 21.
^ S. John xiv. 9.
' .S. John xvi. 14.
436
ST. AMBROSE.
On that they may even charge me with this
crime, that I have spent money on the
poor ! and if they make the charge that I
seek for defence at their hands, I do not
deny it ; nay, I soHcit it. I have my
defence, but it consists in the prayers of the
poor. The blind and the lame, the v/eak
and the old, are stronger than hardy war-
riors. Lastly, gifts to the poor make God
indebted to us, for it is written : " He that
giveth to the poor, lendeth to God."' The
guards of warriors often do not merit divine
grace.
34. They declare also that the people
have been led astray by the strains of my
hymns. ^ I certainly do not deny it. That
is a lofty strain, and there is nothing more
powerful than it. For what has more
power than the confession of the Trinity
which is daily celebrated by the mouth of
the whole people.' All eagerly vie one with
the other in confessing the faith, and know
how to praise in verse the Father, Son, and
Holy Spirit. So they all have become
teachers, who scarcely could be disciples.
35. What could show greater obedience
than that we should follow Christ's example,
"Who, being found in fashion as a man,
humbled Himself and became obedient
even unto death ? " 3 Accordingly He has
freed all through His obedience. "For as
by one man's disobedience many were made
sinners, so by the obedience of One shall
many be made righteous. "4 If, then, He
was obedient, let them receive the rule of
obedience : to which we cling, saying to
those who stir up ill-will against us on the
Emperor's side : We pay to Caesar what is
Caesar's, and to God what is God's. Tribute
is due to Caesar, we do not deny it. The
Church belongs to God, therefore it ought
not to be assigned to Caesar. For the
temple of God cannot be Caesar'o by right.
37. That this is said with respectful
feeling for the Emperor, no one can deny.
For what is more full of respect than that
the Emperor should be called the son of the
Church. As it is said, it is said without sin,
since it is said with the divine favour. For
the Emperor is within the Church, not above
it. For a good emperor seeks the aid of
the Church and docs not refuse it. As 1 say
this with all humility, so also I state it with
' Prov. xix. 17.
^ St. Augustine speaks of this introduction of hymns into the ser-
vices of the Church at Milan (Con/css. IX. 7) : " then was it first in-
stituted that after the manner of the Eastern Churches, hymns and
psalms should be sung, lest the people should wax faint throuj-h the
tediousness of sorrow.'"— Eng. Trans. Such a hymn as "The
eternal gifts of Christ the king," etc., written by St. Ambrose, was
perhaps first sung there.
» Phil. ii. 7, 8. * Rom. V. 19.
firmness. Some threatei th fire,
sword, exile ; we have leai vants of
Christ not to fear. To those wno have no
fear, nothing is ever a serious cause of
dread. Thus too is it written : " Arrows of
infants their blows have become. " '
^y. A sufficient answer, then, seems to have
been given to their suggestion. Now I ask
them, what the Saviour asked: "The bap-
tism of John, was it from heaven or men?"^
The Jews could not answer Him. If the
Jews did not make nothing of the baptism
of John, does Auxentius make nothing of
the baptism of Christ.? For that is not a
baptism of men, but from heaven, which the
angel of great counsel 3 has brought to us,
that we might be justified to God. Where-
fore, then, does Auxentius hold that the faith-
ful ought to be rebaptized, when they have
been baptized in the name of the Trinity,
when the Apostle says: "One faith, one
baptism".? 4 And wherefore does he say
that he is man's enemy, not Christ's, seeing
that he despises the counsel of God and con-
demns the baptism which Christ has granted
us to redeem our sins.
LETTER XXII.
St. Ambrose in i letter to his sister gives an account
of the finding of the bodies of SS. Gervasius and Pro-
tasius, and of his addresses to the people on that occa-
sion. Preaching from Psalm xix., he allegorically ex-
pounded the " heavens " to represent the martyrs and
apostles, and the " day" he takes to be their confession.
They were humbled by God, and then raised again.
He then gives an account of the state in which their
bodies were found, and of their translation to the
basilica. In another address he speaks of the joy of
the Catholics and the malice of the Arians who denied
themiracles that were being wrought, as the Jews used
to do, and points out that their faith is quite different
from that of the martyrs, and that since the devils
acknowledge the Trinity, and they do not, they are
worse than the very devils themselves.
To the lady, his sister, dearer to him than
his eyes and life, Ambrose Bishop.
I. As I do not wish anything which takes
place here in your absence to escape the
knowledge of your holiness, you must know
that we have found some bodies of holy
martyrs. For after I had dedicated the
basilica, 5 many, as it were, with one mouth
began to address me, and said : Consecrate
this as you did the Roman basilica. And I
answered: "Certainly I will if I find any
' S. Luke XX. 4.
* Eph. iv. 5.
' Ps. Ixiv. [Ixiii.] 7.
' Isa. ix. 6.
<■' This was probably the church now kno\vn as Sant Ambrogio,
at Milan, where St. Ambrose and his brother, together with SS.
Clervasius and Protasius, now rest. Of course the church has been
rebuilt, though in ancient times. The church of SS. Nabor and
Felix is that now called San Francisco.
LETTER XXII.
437
relics of martyrs.'' And at once a kind of
prophetic ardour seemed to enter my heart.
2. Why should I use many words ? God
favoured us, for even the clergy were afraid
who were bidden to clear away the earth
from the spot before the chancel screen of
SS. Felix and Nabor. I found the titting-
signs, and on bringing in some on whom
hands were to be laid,' the power of the holy
martyrs became so manifest, that even
whilst I was still silent, one ^ was seized
and thrown prostrate at the holy burial-place.
We found two men of marvellous stature,
such as those of ancient days. All the bones
were perfect, and there was much blood.
During the whole of those two days there
was an enormous concourse of people.
Briefly we arranged the whole in order, and
as evening was now coming on transferred
them to the basilica of F^austaj^ where watch
was kept during the night, and some received
the laying on of hands. On the following
day we translated the relics to the basilica
called Ambrosian. During the translation a
blind man was healed.-* I addressed the
people then as follows :
3. W^hen I considered the immense and
unprecedented numbers of you who are here
gathered together, and the gifts of divine
grace which have shone forth in the holy
martyrs, I must confess that I felt myself
unequal to this task, and that I could not
express in words what we can scarcely con-
ceive in our minds or take in with our eyes.
But when the course of holy Scripture be-
gan to be read, the Holy Spirit Who spake
in the prophets granted me to utter some-
thing worthy of so great a gathering, of your
expectations, and of the merits of the holy
martyrs.
4. "The heavens, " it is said, "declare
the glory of God. " s When this Psalm is read,
it occurs to one that not so much the ma-
terial elements as the heavenly merits seem
to offer praise worthy of God. And by the
chance of this day's lessons it is made clear
what "heavens'' declare the glory of God.
Look at the holy relics at my right hand
and at my left, see men of heavenly conver-
sation, behold the trophies of a heavenly
mind. These are the heavens which declare
* This laying on of hands was not confirmation, but for the exor-
cising of those possessed of evil spirits, the energatneni. See Diet.
Chr. Ant. s.v. " Exorcism."
2 [i/>-?«r.] But it would seem, though all MS. authority sup-
ports this reading, as though una, " a woman," must be the true one.
For from the context it would seem plain that one of those brought
in was thrown prostrate, and there is no connection in which an
" um " could be brought into the narrative. See Fleury, XVIII. 47.
3 Now SS. Vitalis and Agricola.
* This statement is corroborated by St. Augustine, Conf. IX. 7;
De Civ. Dei. XXII. 8, 2; and Sermo de Diversis, CCLXXVI. 5.
^ Ps. xix. [xviii.] i.
the glory of God, these are His handiwork
which the firmament proclaims. For not
worldly enticements, but the grace of the
divine working, raised them to the firmament
of the most sacred Passion, and long before
by the testimony of their character and vir-
tues bore witness of them, that they con-
tinued steadfast against the dangers of this
world.
5. Paul was a heaven, when 'he said :
"Our conversation is in heaven."' James
and John were heavens, and then were
called " sons of thunder " ; ^ and John, being
as it were a heaven, saw the Word with
God. 3 The Lord Jesus Himself was a
heaven of perpetual light, when He was
declaring the glory of God, that glory which
no man had seen before. And therefore He
said : "No man hath seen God at any time,
except the only-begotten Son, Who is in the
bosom of the Father, He hath declared
Him. "4 If you seek for the handiwork of
God, listen to Job when he says: "The
Spirit of God Who hath made me. "s And
so strengthened against the temptations of
the devil, he kept his footsteps constantly
without offence. But let us go on to what
follows.
6. " Day,' it is said, " unto day uttereth
speech."^ Behold the true days, where no
darkness of night intervenes. Behold the
days full of life and eternal brightness, which
uttered the word of God, not in speech which
passes away, but in their inmost heart, by
constancy in confession, and perseverance
in their witness.
7. Another Psalm which was read says :
"Who is like unto the Lord our God, Who
dwelleth on high, and regardeth lowly things
in heaven and in the earth.?"? The Lord
regarded indeed lowly things when He re-
vealed to His Church the relics of the holy
martyrs lying hidden under the unnoted
turf, whose souls were in heaven, their
bodies in the earth : " raising the poor out of
the dust, and lifting the needy from the
mire,"^ and you see how He hath "set them
with the princes of His people." 9 Whom
are we to esteem as the princes of the peo-
ple but the holy martyrs .' amongst whose
number Protasius and Gervasius long un-
known are now enrolled, who have caused
the Church of INIilan, barren of martyrs hith-
erto, now as the mother of many children,
to rejoice in the distinctions and instances
of her own sufferings.
1 Phil. iii. 20. ^ S. Mark iii. 17.
* S. John i. 17, 18. ^ Job xxxiii. 4.
' Ps. cxiii. [cxii.] 5, 6. * Ps. cxiii. [cxiii.J 7.
' S. John i. I.
* Ps. xix. [xviii.] 2.
* Ps. cxiii. [cxii.] 8.
438
ST. AMBROSE.
8. Nor let this seem at variance with the
true faith : ' ' Day unto day uttereth the word; ''
soul unto soul, life unto life, . resurrection
unto resurrection; "and night unto night
showeth knowledge ; " ' that is, flesh unto
flesh, they, that is, whose passion has shown
to all the true knowledge of the faith. Good
are these nights, bright nights, not without
stars: "For as star diffcreth from star in
brightness, so too is the resurrection of the
dead. " ^
9. For not without reason do many call
this the resurrection of the martyrs. I do not
say whether they have risen for themselves,
for us certainly the martyrs have risen.
You know — nay, you have yourselves
seen — that many are cleansed from evil
spirits, that very many also, having touched
with their hands the robe of the saints, are
freed from those ailments which oppressed
them ; you see that the miracles of old time
are renewed, when through the coming of
the Lord Jesus grace was more largely shed
forth upon the earth, and that many bodies
are healed as it were by the shadow of the
holy bodies. How many napkins are passed
about ! how many garments, laid upon the
holy relics and endowed with healing power,
are claimed ! All are glad to touch even the
outside thread, and whosoever touches will
be made whole.
10. Thanks be to Thee, Lord Jesus, that
at this time Thou hast stirred up for us
the spirits of the holy martyrs, when Thy
Church needs greater protection. 3 Let all
know what sort of champions I desire, who
are able to defend, but desire not to attack.
These have I gained for you, O holy people,
such as may help all and injure none. Such
defenders do I desire, such are the soldiers I
have, that is, not soldiers of this world, but
soldiers of Christ. I fear no ill-will on
account of them, the more powerful their
patronage is the greater safety is there in it.
And I wish for their protection for those
very persons who grudge them to mc. Let
them come, then, and see my attendants. I
do not deny that I am surrounded by such
arms : "Some trust in chariots, and some in
horses, but we will boast in the Name of the
Lord our God. " '»
11. The course of divine Scripture relates
that Elisha, when surrounded by the army
of the Syrians, told his servant, who was
• Ps. xix. [xviii. ] 2. - i Cor. xv. 41.
^ This would seem to refer to tlie persecution stirred up by Jus-
tina, in order to gain one of the cliurches for Arian use. The fol-
lowing sentence : " Tales ego ainbio de/efisores" was inscribed by
St. Charles Borromeo on a banner of -S.S. Gervasius and Protasius,
which he caused to be made and carried in procession through
Milan at the time of the great plague.
« Ps. XX. [xix. I 8.
afraid, not to fear; "for," said he, "they
that be for us are more than those against
us ; " ■ and in order to prove this, he prayed
that the eyes of Gehazi might be opened,
and when they were opened, he saw that
numberless hosts of angels were present.
And we, though we cannot see them, yet
feel their presence. Our eyes were shut, so
long as the bodies of the saints lay hidden.
The Lord opened our eyes, and we saw the
aids wherewith we have been often pro-
tected. We used not to see them, but yet
we had them. And so, as though the Lord
had said to us when trembling, "See what
great martyrs I have given you," so we
with opened eyes behold the glory of the
Lord, which is passed in the passion of
the martyrs, and present in their working.
We have escaped, brethren, no slight load
of shame ; we had patrons and knew it not.
We have found this one thing, in which we
seem to excel those who have gone before
us. That knowledge of the martyrs, which •
they lost, we have regained.
12. The glorious relics are taken out of an
ignoble burying-place, the trophies are dis-
played under heaven. The tomb is wet
with blood. The marks of the bloody
triumph are present, the relics are found un-
disturbed in their order, the head separated
from the body. Old men now repeat that
they once heard the names of these martyrs
and read their titles. The city which had
carried off the martyrs of other places had
lost her own. Though this be the gift of
God, yet I cannot deny the favour which
the Lord Jesus has granted to the time of
my priesthood, and since I myself am not
worthy to be a martyr, I have obtained these
matryrs for you.
13. Let these triumphant victims be
brought to the place where Christ is the
victim. But He upon the altar. Who suf-
fered for all ; they beneath the altar, who
were redeemed by His Passion. 1 had de-
stined this place for myself, for it is fitting
that the priest should rest there where he
has been wont to offer, but I yield the right
hand portion to the sacred victims ; that
place was due to the martyrs. Let us, then,
deposit the sacred relics, and lay them up
in a worthy resting-place, and let us
brate the whole day with faithful dev
14- The people called out and dem;
that the deposition of the martyrs shoi
postponed until the Lord's day, bi
length it was agreed that it should
place the following day. On the folio
' 2 [4] Kings vi. i6.
LETTER XXII.
439
day again I preached to the people on this
sort.
15. Yesterday I handled the verse, "Day
unto day uttereth speech,"' as my ability
enabled me ; to-day holy Scripture seems to
me not only to have prophesied in former
times, but even at the present. For when
I behold your holy celebration continued
day and night, the oracles of the prophet's
song have declared that these days, yester-
day and to-day, are the days of which it is
most opportunely said: "Day unto day
uttereth speech ; '' and these the nights of
which it is most fittingly said that "Night
unto night showeth knowledge.'' For what
else but the Word of God have you during
these two days uttered with inmost affection,
and have proved yourselves to have the
knowledge of the faith.
16. And they who usually do so have a
grudge against this solemnity of yours ;
and since because of their envious disposi-
tion they cannot endure this solemnity, they
hate the cause of it, and go so far in their
madness as to deny the merits of the mar-
tyrs, whose deeds even the evil spirits con-
fess. But this is not to be wondered at,
since such is the faithlessness of unbelievers
that the confession of the devil is often
more easy to endure. For the devil said :
"Jesus, Son of the living God, why art
Thou come to torment us before the time .'' " ^
And the Jews hearing this, even themselves
denied Him to be the Son of God. And at
this time you have heard the devils crying
out, and confessing to the martys that they
cannot bear their sufferings, and saying,
" Why are ye come to torment us so
severely.?" And the Arians say : "These
are not martys, and they cannot torment the
devil, nor deliver any one, while the tor-
ments of the devils are proved by their own
words, and the benefits of the martyrs are
•declared by the restoring of the healed, and
the proof of those that are loosed.
17. They deny that the blind man re-
ceived sight, but he denies not that he is
healed. He says : I who could not see now
see. He says : I ceased to be blind, and
proves it by the fact. They deny the
benefit, who are unable to deny the fact. ^
The man is known : so long as he was well
he was employed in the public service ; his
' Ps. xix. [xviii.] 2. ^ S. Matt. viii. 29.
' The truth of this miracle, of which, unless it took place, St.
Ambrose could not have spoken in a public address, is also sup-
ported by St. Augustine, who was at this time in Milan, and if not
himself on the spot, as he may well have been, would at least know
whether such an event had taken place. See St. Augustine, De
Civ. Dei. XXII. 8, and specially, Sermc in natali Mariyrum Ger-
vasii et Proiasii.
name is Severus, a butcher by trade. He
had given up his occupation when this
hindrance betel him. He calls for evi-
dence those persons by whose kindness
he was supported ; he adduces those as
able to afiirm the truth of his visita-
tion whom he had as witnesses of his
blindness. He declares that when he
touched the hem of the robe of the mar-
tyrs, wherewith the sacred relics were
covered, his sight was restored.
18. Is not this like that which we read in
the Gospel.'' For we praise the power of
the same Author in each case, nor does it be
a work or a gift, since He confers a gift in
His works, and works in His gift. For
that which He gave to others to be done,
this His Name effects in the work of others.
So we read in the Gospel, that the Jews,
when they saw the gift of healing in the
blind man, called for the testimony of his
parents, and asked: " How doth your son
see.-*" when he said: "Whereas I was
blind, now I see."' And in this case the
man says, "I was blind and now I see."
Ask others if you do not believe me ; ask
strangers if you think his parents are in
collusion with me. The obstinacy of these
men is more hateful than that of the Jews,
for the latter, when they doubted, at least
asked his parents ; the others enquire in
secret and deny in public, incredulous not
as to the work, but as to its Author.
19. But I ask what it is that they do not
believe ; is it w^hether any one can be aided
by the martyrs } This is the same thing as
not to believe Christ, for He Himself said :
"Ye shall do greater things than these. " ^
How } By those martyrs whose merits
have been long efficacious, whose bodies
were long since found } Here I ask, do
they bear a grudge against me, or against
the holy martyrs .' If against me, are any
miracles wrought by me.'* by my means or
in my name '^. Why, then, grudge me what is
not mine } If it be against the martyrs (for if
they bear no grudge against me, it can only
be against them), they show that the mar-
tyrs were of another faith than that which
they believe. For otherwise they would
not have any feeling against their works,
did they not judge that they have not the
faith w^hich was in them, that faith estab-
lished by the tradition of our forefathers,
which the devils themselves cannot deny,
but the Arians do.
21. We have to-day heard those on whom
hands were laid say, that no one can be
' S. John ix. 25.
^ S. John xiv. 12.
440
ST. AMBROSE.
saved unless he believe in the Father, the
Son, and the Holy Spirit ; that he is dead
and buried who denies the Holy Spirit, and
believes not the almighty power of the
Trinity. The devil confesses this, but the
Arians refuse to do so. The devil says :
Let him who denies the Godhead of the
Holy Spirit be so tormented as himself was
tormented by the martyrs.
22. I do not accept the devil's testimony
but his confession. The devil spoke un-
willingly, being compelled and tormented.
That which wickedness suppresses, torture
extracts. The devil yields to blows, and
the Arians have not yet learned to yield.
How great have been their sufferings, and
yet. like Pharaoh, they are hardened by
their calamities ! The devil said, as we find
it written : " I know Thee Who Thou art,
Thou art the Son of the living God." ' And
the Jews said : "We know not whence He
is."^ The evil spirits said to-day, yester-
day, and during the night, We know that ye
are martyrs. And the Arians say. We know
not, we will not understand, we will not be-
lieve. The evil spirits say to the martyrs,
Ye are come to destroy us. The Arians
say, The torments of the devils are not real
but fictitious and made-up tales. I have
heard of many things being made up, but
no one has ever been able to feign that he
was an evil spirit. What is the meaning of
the torment we see in those on whom hands
are laid ? What room is there here for fraud.''
what suspicion of pretence.?
23. But I will not make use of the voice
of evil spirits in support of the martyrs.
Their holy sufferings are proved by the
benefits they confer. These have persons
to judge of them, namely, those who are
cleansed, and witnesses, namely, those who
are set free. That voice is better than that
of devils, which the soundness of those
utters who came infirm ; better is the voice
which blood sends forth, for blood has a
loud voice reaching from earth to heaven.
You have read how God said : " Thy
brother's blood crieth unto Me."'^ This
blood cries by its colour, the blood cries by
the voice of its effects, the blood cries by
the triumph of its passion. We have
acceded to your request, and have post-
poned till to-day the deposition of the relics
which was to have taken place yesterday.
^ S. Mark i. 24.
' Gen. iv. 10.
' S. John ix. 30.
LETTER XL.
St. Ambrose begs Theodosius to listen to him, as he
cannot be silent without great risk to both. He
points out that Theodosius though God-fearing may
be led astray, and points out that his decision respect-
ing the restoration of the Jewish synagogue is full of
peril, exposing the bishop to the danger of either act-
ing against the truth or of death. The case of Julian
is referred to, and the reasons given for the imperial
rescript are met, especially by the plea that the Jews
had burnt many churches. St. Ambrose touches on
the temple of the Valentinians, whom he declares to
be worse than heathen, and points out what a door
would be opened to the calumnies of the Jews and a
triumph over Christ Himself. The Emperor is lastly
■ warned by the example of Maximus not to take the
part of Jews or heretics, and is urged to clemency.
Ambrose, Bishop, to the most clement prince, and
blessed Emperor, Theodosius the Augustus.
1. I am continually harassed by almost incessant
cares, most blessed Emperor, but I have never been in
such anxiety as at present, smce I see that I must take
heed that there be nothing which may be ascribed to
me savouring even of sacrilege. And so I entreat you
to listen with patience to what I say. For, if I am
unworthy to be heard by you, I am unworthy to offer
for you, who have been entrusted by you with your
vows and prayers. Will you not yourself hear him
whom you wish to be heard for you .' Will you not
hear him pleading his own cause whom you have
heard for others .'' And do you not fear for your own
decision, lest by thinking him unworthy to be heard by
you, you make him unworthy to be heard for you ?
2. But it is neither the part of an emperor to refuse
liberty of speech, nor of a priest not to say what he
thinks. For there is nothing in you emperors so
popular and so estimable as to appreciate freedom in
those even who are in subjection to you by military
obedience. For this is the difference between good
and bad princes, that the good love liberty, the bad
slavery. And there is nothing in a priest so full of
peril as regards God, or so base in the opinion of men,
as not freely to declare what he thinks. For it is
written : " I spoke of Thy testimonies before kings,
and was not ashamed ; " ' and in another place : " Son
of man, I have set Thee a watchman unto the house
of Israel, in order," it is said, "that if the righteous
doth turn from his righteousness, and commit iniquity,
because thou hast not given him warning," that is, hast
not told him what to guard against, " the memory of
his righteousness shall not be retained, and I will
require his blood at thine hand. But if thou warn the
righteous that he sin not, and he doth not sin, the
righteous shall surely live because thou hast warned
him, and thou shalt deliver thy soul " ^
3. I had rather then, O Emperoi, have fellowship
with you in good than in evil, and therefore the
silence of the priest ought to displease your Clemency,
and his freedom to please you. F'or you are involved
in the risk of my silence, but are aided by the benefit
of my freedom. I am not, then, officiously intruding
in things where I ought not, nor interfering in the
affairs of others. I am obeying the commands of God.
And I do this first of all out of love for you, good-will
toward you, and desire of preserving your well-doing.
If I am not believed in this, or am forbidden to act on
this feeling, I speak in very truth for fear of offending
God. For if my peril would set you free, I would
patiently offer myself for you, though not willingly,
for I had rather that without my peril you might be
acceptable to God and glorious. But if the guilt of
silence and dissimulation on my part would both
weigh me down and not set you free, I
' Ps. cxix. [cxviii.] 46.
■* Ezek. iii. 17, 20, 21.
LETTER XL.
441
rather that you should think me too impor-
tunate, than useless and base. Since it is
written, as the holy Apostle Paul says, whose
teaching you cannot controvert: "Be in-
stant, in season, out of season, reprove, en-
treat, rebuke with all patience and doc-
trine." '
4. We, then, also have One Whom it is
even more perilous to displease, especially
since even emperors are not displeased
when every one discharges his own office,
and you patiently listen to every one making
suggestions in his own sphere, nay, you re-
buke him if he act not according to the order
of his service. Can this, then, seem to you
offensive in priests, which you willingly ac-
cept from those who serve you ; since we
speak not what we wish, but what we are
bidden ? For you know the passage : ' ' When
ye shall stand before kings and rulers, take
no thought what ye shall speak, for it shall
be given you in that hour what ye shall
speak ; for it is not ye that speak, but the
Spirit of your Father Who speaketh in you. " -
And if I were speaking in state causes, al-
though justice must be observed even in
them, I should not feel such dread if I were
not listened to, but in the cause of God
whom will you listen to, if not to the priest,
at whose greater peril sin is committed .?
Who will dare to tell you the truth if the
priest dare not ?
5. I know that you are Godfearing, mer-
ciful, gentle, and calm, having the faith and
fear of God at heart, but often some things
escape our notice. "Some have a zeal of
God, but not according to knowledge. "^
And I think that we ought to take care lest
this also come upon faithful souls. I know
your piety towards God, your lenity towards
men, I myself am bound by the benefits of
your favour. And therefore I fear the more,
I am the more anxious ; lest even you con-
demn me hereafter by your own judgment,
because through my want of openness or
my flattery you should not have avoided
some fault. If I saw that you sinned
against me, I ought not to keep silence,
for it is written : "If thy brother sin
against thee, rebuke him at first, then
chide him sharply before two or three wit-
nesses. If he will not hear thee, tell the
Church. "•♦ Shall I, then, keep silence in the
cause of God.? Let us, then, consider what
I have to fear.
6. A report was made by the military
Count of the East that a synagogue had
' 2 Tim. iv. 2.
' Rom. X. 2.
2 S. Matt. X. ig, 20.
* S. Matt, xviii. 15 ff.
been burnt, and that this was done at the
instigation of the Bishop. You gave com-
mand that the others should be punished, and
the synagogue be rebuilt by the Bishop him-
self I do not urge that the Bishop's ac-
count ought to have been waited for, for
priests are the calmers of disturbances, and
anxious for peace, except when even they
are moved by some offence against God, or
insult to the Church. Let us suppose that
that Bishop was too eager in the matter of
burning the synagogue, and too timid at
the judgment-seat, are not you afraid, ()
Emperor, lest he comply with your sentence,
lest he fail in his faith .'
7. Are you not also afraid, lest, which will
happen, he oppose your Count with a re-
fusal ? He will then be obliged to make him
either an apostate ' or a martyr, either of
these alien to the times, either of them
equivalent to persecution, if he be com-
pelled either to apostatize or to undergo
martyrdom. You see in what direction the
issue of the matter inclines. If you think
the Bishop firm, guard against making a
martyr of a firm man ; if you think him
vacillating, avoid causing the fall of one
who is frail. For he has a heavy responsi-
bility who has caused the weak to fall.
8. Having, then, thus stated the two sides
of the matter, suppose that the said Bishop
says that he himself kindled the fire,^ col-
lected the crowd, gathered the people to-
gether, in order not to lose an opportunity
of martyrdom, and instead of the weak to
put forward a stronger athlete. O happy
falsehood, whereby one gains for others
acquittal, for himself grace ! This it is, O
Emperor, which I, too, have requested, that
you wo\i|d rather take vengence on me.
and if you consider this a crime, would
attribute it to me. Why order judgment
against one who is absent.? You have the
guilty man present, you hear his confes-
sion. I declare that I set fire to the syna-
eojrue, or at least that I ordered those who
did it, that there might not be a place where
Christ was denied. If it be objected to me
that I d'd not set the synagogue on fire here,
I answer, it began to be burnt by the judg-
ment of God, and my work came to an end.
And if the very truth be asked, I was the
more slack because I did not expect that it
would be punished. Why should I do that
' Pmvaricator, in a civil case, one who acts collusively with the
defendant, and betrays the other side. Hence in ecclesiastical Latin
tlie word came to mean Apostate.
- A (!anon [60] of the Council of Elvira, a.d. 305 or 6, lays down
that if any one is killed for breaking idols, he is not to be reckoned
as a martyr, but perhaps St. Ambrose here considers the burning
of the syn.igogue as a retaliation for the destruction of churches.
442
ST. AMBROSE.
which as it was unavenged would also be
without reward ? These words hurt modesty
but recall grace, lest that be done whereby
an offence against God most High may be
committed.
9. But let it be granted that no one will
cite the Bishop to the performance of this
task, for I have asked this of your Clemency,
and altliough I have not yet read that this
edict is revoked, let us notwithstanding as-
sume that it is revoked. What if others more
timid offer that the synagogue be restored at
their cost ; or that the Count, having found
this previously determined, himself orders it
to be rebuilt out of the funds of Christians ?
You, O Emperor, will have an apostate
Count, and to him will vou entrust the vie-
torious standards ? Will you entrust the
labarum, consecrated as it is by the Name
of Christ, to one who restores the syna-
gogue which knows not Christ .? Order the
labarum to be carried into the synagogue,
and let us see if they do not resist.
10. Shall, then, a place be made for the
unbelief of the Jews out of the spoils of the
Church, and shall the patrimony, which by
the favour of Christ has been gained for
Christians, be transferred to the treasuries of
unbelievers .' We read that of old temples
were built for idols of the plunder taken from
Cimbri, and the spoils of other enemies.
Shall the Jews write this inscription on the
front of their synagogue: "The temple of
impiety, erected from the plunder of Chris-
tians " .-'
11. But, perhaps, the cause of discipline
moves you, O Emperor. Which, then, is of
greater importance, the show of discipline
or the cause of religion .-" It is needful that
judgment should yield to religion.
12. Have you not heard, O Emperor, how,
when Julian had commanded that the
temple of Jerusalem should be restored,
those who were clearing the rubbish were
consumed by fire.'" Will you not beware
lest this happen now again ? For you ought
not to have commanded what Julian com-
manded.
13. But what is your motive.^ Is it be-
cause a public building of whatever kind
has been burnt, or because it was a syna-
gogue .'' If you are moved by the burning of
a building of no importance (for what could
there be in so mean a town ?). do you not
remember, O Emperor, how many prefects'
houses have been burnt at Rome, and no
' The miracles of this nature which prevented the rebuilding of
the Jewish Temple are mentioned by the usual ecclesiastical his-
torians, and confirmed by the heathen Ammianus Marcellinus,
XXIII. I.
one inflicted punishment for it ? And, in
truth, if any emperor had desired to punish
the deed sharply, he would have injured the
cause of him vrho had suffered so great a
loss. Which, then, is more fitting, that a
tire in some part of the buildings of Callini-
cum, or of the city of Rome, should be
punished, if indeed it were right at all ? At
Constantinople lately, the house of the bishop
was burnt and your Clemency's son inter-
ceded with his father, praying that you
would not avenge the insult offered to him,
that is, to the son of the emperor, and the
burning of the episcopal house. Do you not
consider, O Emperor, that if you were to
order this deed to be punished, he would
again intervene against the punishment .•'
That favour was, however, fittingly obtained
by the son from the father, for it was worthy
of him first to forgive the injury done to
himself. That was a good division in the
distribution of favour, that the son should
be entreated for his own loss, the father for
that of the son. Here there is nothing for
you to keep back for your son. Take heed,
then, lest you derogate aught from God.
14. There is, then, no adequate cause for
such a commotion, that the people should be
so severely punished for the burning of a
building, and much less since it is the burn-
ing of a synagogue, a home of unbelief, a
house of impiety, a receptacle of folly, which
God Himself has condemned. For thus we
read, where the Lord our God speaks by the
mouth of the prophet Jeremiah: "And I
will do to this house, which is called by My
Name, wherein ye trust, and to the place
which I gave to you and to your fathers, as
I have done to Shiloh, and I will cast you
forth from ]\Iy sight, as I cast forth your
brethren, the w hole seed of Ephraim. And
do not thou pray for that people, and do not
thou ask mercy for them, and do not come
near Me on their behalf, for I will not hear
thee. Or seestthou not what they do in the
cities of Judah ? " ' God forbids intercession
to be made for those.
15. And certainly, if I were pleading ac-
cording to the law of nations, I could tell
how many of the Church's basilicas the
Jews burnt in the time of the Emperor
Julian: two at Damascus, one of which is
scarcely now repaired, and this at the cost
of the Church, not of the Synagogue ; the
other basilica still is a rough mass of shape-
less ruins. Basilicas were burnt at Gaza,
Ascalon, Berytus, and in almost every
place in those parts, and no one demanded
• Jer. vii. 14.
LETTER XL.
443
punishment. And at Alexandria a basilica
was burnt by heathen and Jews, which sur-
passed all the rest. The (?hurch was not
avenged, shall the Synagogue be so ?
i6. Shall, then, the burning of the temple
of the Valentinians be also avenged ? But
what is but a temple in which is a gather-
ing of heathen .' Although the heathen in-
voke twelve gods, the Valentinians wor-
ship thirty-two ^^ons whom they call gods.
And I have found out concerning these also
that it is reported and ordered that some
monks should be punished, who, when the
Valentinians were stopping the road on
which, according to custom and ancient
use, they were singing ])salms as they went
to celebrate the festival of the Maccabees,
enraged by their insolence, burnt their hur-
riedly-built temple in some country village.
17. How many have to offer themselves
to such a choice, when they remember that
in the time of Julian, he who threw down
an altar, and disturbed a sacrifice, was con-
demned by the judge and suffered martyr-
dom ? And so the judge who heard him
was never esteemed other than a prose-
cutor, for no one thought him worthy of
being associated with, or of a kiss. And
if he were not now dead, I should fear, O
Emperor, that you would take vengeance
on him, although he escaped not the ven-
geance of heaven, outliving his own heir.
18. But it is related that the judge was
ordered to take cognizance of the matter,
and that it was written that he ought not to
have reported the deed, but to have pun-
ished it, and that the money chests which
had been taken away should be demanded.
1 will omit other matters. The buildings of
our churches were burnt by the Jews, and
iiothing was restored, nothing was asked
back, nothing demanded. But what could
the Synagogue have possessed in a far dis-
tant town, when the whole of what there is
there is not much ; there is nothing of value,
and no abundance ? And what then could
the scheming Jewslose by the fire .^ These
are artifices of the Jews who wish to calum-
niate us, that because of their complaints,
an extraordinary military inquiry may be
ordered, and a soldier sent, who will, per-
haps, say what one said once here, O Em-
peror, before your accession: "How will
Christ be able to help us who fight for the
Jews against Christ, who are sent to avenge
the Jews.? They have destroyed their own
armies, and wish to destroy ours."
19. Further, into what calumnies will they
not break out, who by false witness calum-
niated even Christ.? Into what calumnies
will not men break out who are liars, even
in things belonging to God? Whom will
they not say to have been the instigators of
that sedition ? Whom will they not assail,
even of those whom they recognize not,
that may gaze upon the numberless ranks
of Christians in chains, that they may see
the necks of the faithful people bowed in
captivity, that the servants of God may be
concealed in darkness, may be beheaded,
given over to the fire, delivered to the
mines, that their sufferings may not quickly
pass away ?
20. Will you give this triumph over the
Church of God to the Jews ? this trophy
over Christ's people, this exultation, O Em-
peror, to the unbelievers ? this rejoicing to
the Synagogue, this sorrow to the Church.?
The people of the Jews will set this solem-
nity amongst their feast-days, and will
doubtless number it amongst those on
which they triumphed either over the
Amorites, or the Canaanites, or were de-
livered from the hand of Pharaoh, King of
Egypt, or of Nebuchodonosor, King of Baby-
lon. They will add this solemnity, in
memory of their having triumphed over the
people of Christ.
21. And whereas they deny that they
themselves are bound by the Roman laws,
and repute those laws as criminal, yet now
they think that they ought to be avenged,
as it were, by the Roman laws. Where
were those laws when they themselves
set fire to the roofs of the sacred basilicas.?
If Julian did not avenge the Church be-
cause he was an apostate, will you, O Em-
peror, avenge the injury done to the Syna-
gogue, because you are a Christian ?
22. And what will Christ say to you after-
wards .? Do you not remember what He
said by the prophet Nathan to holy David .? '
" I have chosen thee the youngest of thy
brethren, and from a private man have made
thee emperor. I have placed of the fruit
of thy seed on the imperial throne. I have
made barbarous nations subject unto thee, I
have given thee peace, I have delivered
thine enemy captive into thy power. Thou
hadst no corn for provision for thine army,
I opened to thee the gates, I opened to
thee their stores by the hand of the enemies
themselves. Thy enemies gave to thee their
provisions which they had prepared for them-
selves. I troubled the counsels of thy enemy,
so that he made himself bare. I so fettered
the usurper of the empire himself and bound
his mind, that whilst he still had means of
* 2 Sam. [2 Kings] vii. 8.
444
ST. AMBROSE.
escape, yet with all belonging to him, as
though for fear lest any should escape thee,
he shut himself in. His officer and forces on
the other element,' whom before I had scat-
tered, that they might not join to fight against
thee, I brought together again to complete
thy victory. Thy army, gathered together
from many unsubdued nations, I bade keep
faith, tranquillity, and concord as if of one
nation. When there was the greatest dan-
ger lest the perfidious designs of the bar-
barians should penetrate the Alps, I conferred
victory on thee within the very wall of the
Alps, that thou mightest conquer without
loss. Thus, then, I caused thee to triumph
over thy enemy, and thou givest My enemies
a triumph over My people."'
23. Is it not on this account that Maximus
was forsaken, who, before the days of the
expedition, hearing that a synagogue had
been burnt in Rome, had sent an edict to
Rome, as if he were the upholder of public
order ? Wherefore the Christian people said,
No good is in store for him. That king has
become a Jew, we have heard of him as a
defender of order, and Christ, Who died for
sinners, soon tested him. If this was said of
words, what will be said of punishment ?
And then at once he was overcome by the
Franks and the Saxons, in Sicily, at Siscia, at
Petavio, in a word everywhere. What has
the believer in common with the unbeliever.?
The instances of his unbelief ought to be
done away with together with the unbeliever
himself. That which injured him, that
wherein he who was conquered offended,
the conqueror ought not to follow but to
condemn.
24. I have, then, recounted these things not
as to one who is ungrateful, but have enu-
merated them as rightly bestowed, in order
that, warned by them, you, to whom more
has been given, may love more. When
Simon answered in these words the Lord
Jesus said : "Thou hast judged rightly."^
And straightway turning to the woman who
anointed His feet with ointment, setting
forth a type of the Church, He said to Simon :
" Wherefore I say unto thee, her sins which
are many are forgiven, since she loved much.
But he to whom less is forgiven loveth less. " ^
This is the woman who entered into the
house of the Pharisee, and cast off the Jew,
but gained Christ. For the Church shutout
the Synagogue, why is it now again at-
tempted that in the servant of Christ the
' Referring to the fleet under Andragathius, which Maximus had
prepared expecting that Theodosius would come by sea.
' S. Luke \-ii. 43. ^ S. Luke vii. 47.
Synagogue should exclude the Church from
the bosom of faith, from the house of Christ ?
25. I have brought these matters together
in this address, O Emperor, out of love
and zeal for you. For I owe it to your kind-
nesses (whereby, at my request, you have
liberated many from exile, from prison, from
the extreme penalty of death) that I should
not fear even offending your feelings for the
sake of your own salvation (no one has
greater confidence than he who loves from
his heart, certainly no one ought to injure
him who takes thought for him); that I may
not lose in one moment that favour granted
to every priest and received by me for so
many years ; and yet it is not the loss of
favour which I deprecate but the peril to sal-
vation.
26. And yet how great a thing it is, O
Emperor, that you should not think it neces-
sary to enquire or to punish in regard to a
matter as to which up to this day no one has
enquired, no one has ever inflicted punish-
ment. It is a serious matter to endaneer
your salvation for the Jews. When Gideon'
had slain the sacred calf, the heathen said,
The gods will themselves avenge the injury
done to them. Who is to avenge the Syna-
gogue .'' Christ, Whom they slew, Whom they
denied ? Will God the Father avenge those
who do not receive the Father, since they
have not received the Son ? Who is to avenge
the heresy of the Valentinians .-* How can
your piety avenge them, seeing it has com-
manded them to be excluded, and denied
them permission to meet together.? If I set
before you Josiah as a king approved of
God, will you condemn that in them which
was approved in him .'' ^
27. But at any rate if too little confidence
is placed in me, command the presence of
those bishops whom you think fit, let it be
discussed, O Emperor, what ought to be done
without injury to the faith. If you consult
your officers concerning pecuniary causes,
how much more just is it that you should
consult the priests of God in the cause of
religion.
28. Let your Clemency consider from
how many plotters, how many spies the
Church suffers. If they come upon a slight
crack, they plant a dart in it. I speak after
the manner of men, but God is feared more
than men, Who is rightly set before even
emperors. If any one thinks it right that
deference should be paid to a friend, n
parent, or a neighbour, I am right i-
ing that deference should be paid t
' Judg. vi. 31, very loosely.
' 2 [4] Kings
LETTER XLI.
445
and that He should be preferred to all.
Consult, O Emperor, your own advantage,
or suffer me to consult mine.
29. What shall I answer hereafter, if it be
discovered that, by authority given from
this place, Christians have been slain by
the sword, or by clubs, or thongs knotted
with lead.-* How shall I explain such a
fact .' How shall I excuse it to those bishops,
who now mourn bitterly because some,
who have discharged the office of the priest-
hood for thirty and many more years, or
other ministers of the Church, are withdrawn
from their sacred office, and set to discharge
municipal duties ? ' For if they who war for
you serve for a stated time of service, how
much more ought you to consider those who
war for God. How, I say, shall I excuse
this to the bishops, who make complaint
concerning the clergy, and write that the
Churches are wasted by a serious attack
upon them ?
30. I was desirous that this should come
to the knowledge of your Clemency. You
will, when it pleases you, vouchsafe to con-
sider and give order according to your will,
but exclude and cast out that which troubles
me, and troubles me rightly. You do
yourself whatever you order to be done,
even if he, your officer, do not do it. I
much prefer that you should be merciful,
than that he should not do what he has been
ordered.
31. You have those ^ for whom you ought
yet to invite and to merit the mercy of the
Lord in regard to the Roman Empire ; you
have those for whom you hope even more
than for yourself ; let the grace of God for
them, let their salvation appeal to you in
these words of mine. I fear that you may
commit your cause to the judgment of
others. Everything is still unprejudiced be-
fore you. On this point I pledge myself to
our God for you, do not fear your oath. 3
Is it possible that that should displease
God which is amended for His honour ?
You need not alter anything in that letter,
whether it be sent or is not yet sent.
Order another to be written, which shall be
full of faith, full of piety. For you it is
possible to change for the better, for me it is
not possible to hide the truth.
^2. You forgave the Antiochians the insult
offered to you ; * you have recalled the daugh-
ters of your enemy, and given them to be
brought up by a relative ; you sent sums
of money to the mother of your enemy
from your own treasury. This so great
piety, "this so great faith towards God, will
be darkened by this deed. Do not you,
then, 1 entreat, who spared enemies in arms,
and preserved your adversaries, think that
Christians ought to be punished with such
eagerness.
1 Cf. Ep. XVIII. 13, 14- - '■«■ his children.
5 It is possible that keeping an oath may be contrary to duty.
Cf. O^. Mm. I. 264.
* In the year before this the people of Antioch, enraged at new
taxation, rose and destroyed the statues of the Emperor and Em-
press. This was the occasion on which St. Chrysostom preached
^^. And now, O Emperor, I beg you not
to disdain to hear me who am in fear both
for yourself and for myself, for it is the
voice of a Saint which says : " Wherefore
was I made to see the misery of my
people.''"' that 1 should commit an offence
against God. I, indeed, have done what
could be done consistently with honour to
you, that you might rather listen to me in
the palace, lest, if it were necessary, you
should listen to me in the Church.
LETTER XLI.
St. Ambrose in this letter to his sister continues the
account of the matters contained in his letter to
Theodosius, and of a sermon which he subsequently
delivered before the Emperor, with the result that
the Emperor, when St. Ambrose refused to offer the
Sacrifice before receiving a promise that the objec-
tionable order should be revoked, yielded.
THE BROTHER TO HIS SISTER.
1. You were good enough to write me
word that your holiness was still anxious,
because I had written that I was so, so that
I am surprised that you did not receive my
letter in which I wrote word that satisfac-
tion had been granted me. For when it
was reported that a synagogue of the Jews
and a conventicle of the Yalentinians had
been burnt by Christians at the instigation
of the bishop, an order was made while I
was at Aquileia, that the synagogue should
be rebuilt, and the monks punished who
had burnt the Yalentinian building. Then
since I gained little by frequent endeavours,
I wrote and sent a letter to the Emperor,
and when he went to church I delivered this
discourse.
2. In the book of the prophet it is written :
" Taketo thyself the rod of an almond tree. " ^
We ought to consider why the Lord said
this to the prophet, for it was not written
without a purpose, since in the Pentateuch
too we read that the almond rod of Aaron the
priest, after being long laid up, blossomed.
the Homilies on the Statues. Theodosius, at first greatly enraged,
subsequently pardoned the people. Cf. St. (^hrys. Horn. 20 ad
A ntioch .
1 I Mace. ii. 7. - Jer. i. 11.
446
ST. AMBROSE.
For the Lord seems to signify by the rod
that the prophetic or priestly authority ought
to be straightforward, and to advise not so
much what is pleasant as what is expedient.
3. And so the prophet is bidden to take
an almond rod, because the fruit of this tree
is bitter in its rind, hard in its shell, and
inside it is pleasant, that after its likeness
the prophet should set forth things bitter and
hard, and should not fear to proclaim harsh
things. Likewise also the priest ; for his
teaching, though for a time it may seem
bitter to some, and like Aaron's rod be long
laid up in the ears of dissemblers, yet after
a time, when it is thought to have dried up,
it blossoms.
4. Wherefore also the Apostle says :
" What will ye, shall I come to you with a
rod, or in love and in the spirit of gentle-
ness ? " ' First he made mention of the rod,
and like the almond rod struck those who
were wandering:, that he might afterwards
comfort them in the spirit of meekness.
And so meekness restored him whom the
rod had deprived of the heavenly sacra-
ments. And to his disciple he gave similar
injunctions, saying: "Reprove, beseech,
rebuke."^ Two of these are hard, one is
gentle, but they are hard only that they may
soften ; for as to suffering from excess of gall,
bitter food or drink seems sweet, and on
the other hand sweet food is bitter, so where
the mind is wounded it grows worse under
the influence of pleasurable
again is made sound by the
correction.
5. Let thus much be gathered from the
passage of the prophet, and let us now con-
sider what the lesson from the Gospel con-
tains : " One of the Pharisees invited the
Lord Jesus to eat with him, and
inte the Pharisee's house and
And behold a woman, who was
the city, when she knew that
meat in the PhariseeTTToiise," -brought
alabaster box of ointment, \and standing
behind at His feet, began to wash His feet
with her tears." And then he read as far as
this place : "Thy faith hath saved thee, go
in peace."3 How simple, I wenton to say,
is this Gospel lesson in words, how deep in
its counsels ! And so because the words are
those of the " Great Counsellor," * let us
consider their depth.
6. Our Lord Jusus Christ judged that men
could more readily be bound and led on to
do the things that are right by kindness
flattery, and
bitterness of'
He entered
sat down,
a sinner in
Jesus sat at
an
1 I Cor. iv. 21.
2 S. Luke vii. 36 ff.
' 2 Cor. ii. 10.
* Ua. ix. 6.
than by fear, and that love avails more
than dread for correction. And so, when
He came, being born of a Virgin, He sent
forth His grace, that sin might be forgiven
in baptism in order to make us more
grateful to Himself Then if we repay Him
by services befitting men who are grateful.
He has declared in this woman that there
will be a reward for this grace itself to all men.
For if He had forgiven only our original
debt. He would have seemed more cautious
than merciful, and more careful for our cor-
rection than magnificent in His rewards.
It is only the cunning of a narrow mind that
tries to entice, but it is fitting for God that
those whom He has invited by grace He
should lead on by increase of that grace.
And so He first bestows on us a gift by
baptism, and afterwards gives more abun-
dantly to those who serve Him faithfully.
So, then, the benefits of Christ are both in-
centives and rewards of virtue.
7. And let no one be startled at the word
•' creditor." ' We were before under a hard
creditor, who was not to be satisfied and
paid to the full but by the death of the
debtor. The Lord Jesus came, He saw us
bound by a heavy debt. No one could pay
his debt with the patrimony of his inno-
cence. I could have nothing of my own
wherewith to free myself He gave to me
a new kind of acquittance, changing my
creditor because-t-had nothing wherewith
to pay my debt. But it was sin, not nature,
which had made us debtors, for we had con-
tracted heavy debts by our sins, that we
who had been free should be bound, for he
is a debtor who received any of his creditor's
money. Now sin is of the devil ; that wicked
one has, as it were, these riches in his pos-
session. For as the riches of Christ are
A'irtues, so crimes are the wealth of the devil.
He had reduced the human race to perpe-
tual captivity by the heavy debt of inherited
liability, which our debt-laden ancestor had
transmitted to his posterity by inheritance.
The Lord Jesus came, He offered His death
for the death of all. He poured out His
Blood for the blood of all.
8. So, then, we have changed our creditor,
not escaped wholly, or rather we have es-
caped, for the debt remains but the interest
is cancelled, for the Lord Jesus said, "To
those who are in bonds, Come out, and to
those who are in prison, Go forth ;" ^ so
your si'ns are forgiven. All, then, are for-
given, nor is there any one whom He has not
loosed. For thus it is written, that He has
S. Luke vii. 41.
- Isa. xlix.
LETTER XLI.
447
forgiven " all trangressions, doing away
the handwriting of the ordinance that was
against us." ' Why, then, do we hold the
bonds of others, and desire to exact the debts
of others, while we enjoy our own remis-
sion ? He who forgave all, required of all
that what every one remembers to have
been forgiven to himself, he also should
forgive others.
9. Take care that you do not begin to be
in a worse case as creditor tlian as debtor,
like the man in the Gospel,^ to whom his
lord fore^ve all his debt, and who after-
wards began to exact from his fellow-servant
that which he himself had not paid, for which
reason his master being angry, exacted from
him, with the bitterest reproaches, that which
he had before forgiven him. Let us, there-
fore, take heed lest this happen to us,
that by not forgiving that which is due to
ourselves, we should incur the payment of
what has been forgiven us, for thus is it
written in the words of the Lord Jesus : ".So
shall My Father, Which is in heaven, do also
imto you, if ye from your hearts forgive not
every one his brother. "^ Let us, then, for-
give few things to whom many have been
forpfiven, and understand that the more we
forgive the more acceptable shall we be to
God, for we are the more well pleasing to
God, the more we have been forgiven.
10. And, finally, the Pharisee, when the
Lord asked him, "which of them loved him
most,"4 answered, "I suppose that he to
whom he forgave most.'' And the Lord re-
plied : "Thou hast judged rightly. " 5 The
judgment of the Pharisee is praised, but his
affection is blamed. He judges well con-
cerning others, but does not himself believe
that which he thinks well of in the case of
others. You hear a Jew praising the dis-
cipline of the Church, extolling its true grace,
honouring the priests of the Church ; if you
exhort him to believe he refuses, and so fol-
lows not himself that which he praises in us.
His praise, then, is not full, because Christ
said to him : "Thou hast rightly judged,'"
for Cain also offered rightly, but did not
divide rightly, and therefore God said to
him : " If thou offerest rightly, but dividest
not rightly, thou hast sinned, be still. "^ So,
then, this man offered rightly, for he judges
that Christ ought to be more loved by Chris-
tians, because He has forgiven us many sins ;
but he divided not rightly, because he thought
that He could be ignorant of the sins of men
Who forgave the sins of men.
1 Col. ii. i-i. 14. ' S. Matt, xviii. 23 ff, ' S. Matt, xviii. 35.
* S. Luke vii. 42. ° S. Luke vii. 43.
« Gen. iv. 7 [LXX.
11. And, therefore, He said to Simon:
" Thou seest this woman. I entered into
thine house, and thou gavest Me no water
for My feet, but she hath washed My feet
with her tears. ' ' We are all the one body of
Christ, the head of which is God, and we are
the members ; some perchance eyes, as the
prophets ; others teeth, as the apostles, who
liave passed the food of the Gospel jjreached
into our breasts, and rightly is it written :
" His eyes shall be bright with wine, and
his teeth whiter than milk. "^ And His
hands are they who are seen to carry out
good works, His belly are they who dis-
tribute the strength of nourishment on the
poor. So, too, some are His feet, and would
that I might be worthy to be His heel ! He,
then, pours water upon the feet of Christ,
who forgives the very lowest their offences,
and while delivering those of low estate, yet
is washing the feet of Christ.
12. And he pours water upon the feet of
Christ, who purifies his conscience from the
defilement of sin, for Christ walks in the
breast of each. Take heed, then, not to have
your conscience polluted, and so to begin to
defile the feet of Christ. Take heed lest He
encounter a thorn of wickedness in you,
whereby as He walks in you His heel may
be wounded. For this was why the Pharisee
gave no water for the feet of Christ, that he
had not a soul pure from the filth of un-
belief. For how could he cleanse his con-
science who had not received the water of
Christ } But the Church both has this water
and has tears. For faith which mourns over
former sins is v.'ont to guard against fresh
ones. Therefore, Simon the Pharisee, who
had no water, had also, of course, no tears.
For how should he have tears who had no
penitence } For since he believed not in
Christ he had no tears. For if he had had them
he would have washed his eyes, that he
might see Christ, Whom, though he sat at
meat with Him, he saw not. For had he
seen Him, he would not have doubted of
His power.
13. The Pharisee had no hair, inasmuch
as he could not recognize the Nazarite ; the
Church had hair, and she sought the Naza-
rite. Hairs are counted as amongst the
superfluities of the body, but if they be
anointed, they give forth a good odour, and
are an ornament to the head ; if they be not
anointed with oil, are a burden. So, too,
riches are a burden if you know not how to
use them, and sprinkle them not with the
odour of Christ. But if you nourish the poor,
■ S. Luke vii. 44.
^ Gen. xlix. 12.
448
ST. AMBROSE.
if you wash their wounds and wipe away
their tilth, you have indeed wiped the feet of
Christ.
14. "Thou gavest jNIe no kiss, but she
from the time she came in hath not ceased
to kiss My feet." ' A kiss is the sign of love.
Whence, then, can a Jew have a kiss, seeing
he has not known peace, nor received
peace from Christ when He said: "My
peace I give you. My peace I leave you."^
The Synagogue has not a kiss, but the
Church has, who waited for Him, who loved
Him, who said: "Let Him kiss me with
the kisses of His mouth. "3 For by His
kisses she wished gradually to quench the
burning of that long • desire, which had
grown with looking for the coming of the
Lord, and to satisfy her thirst by this gift.
And so the holy prophet says : " Thou shalt
open my mouth, and it shall declare Thy
praise. "■* He, then, who praises the Lord
Jesus kisses Him, he who praises Him un-
doubtedly believes. Finally, David him-
self says : "I believed, therefore have I
spoken ; "5 and before : " Let my mouth be
filled with Thy praise, and let me sing of
Thy glory." ^
15. And the same Scripture teaches you
concerning the infusion of special grace, that
he kisses Christ who receives the Spirit,
where the holy prophet says : " I opened
my mouth and drew in the Spirit."? He,
then, kisses Christ who confesses Him:
"For with the heart man believeth unto
righteousness, and with the mouth confes-
sion is made unto salvation," ^ He, again,
kisses the feet of Christ who, when reading
the Gospel, recognizes the acts of the Lord
Jesus, and admires them with pious affection,
and so piously he kisses, as it were, the
footprints of the Lord Jesus as He walks.
We kiss Christ, then, with the kiss of com-
munion : "Let him that readeth under-
stand." 9
16. Whence should the Jew have this kiss.?
For he who believed in His coming, believed
not in His Passion. For how can he believe
that He has suffered Whom he believes not to
have come .'' The Pharisee, then, had no kiss
except perchance that of the traitor Judas.
But neither had Judas the kiss ; and so when
he wished to show to the Jews that kiss
which he had promised as the sign of be-
trayal, the Lord said to him : "Judas, be-
trayest thou the Son of Man with a kiss .'' " '°
that is, you, who have not the love marked
' S. Luke vii. 45.
« Ps. li. [1] 17.
« Ps. Ixxi. [Ixx.] 8.
* Rom. X. 10.
' S. John xiv. 27.
^ Ps. cxvi. [cxv.) 10.
' Ps. cxix. [cxviii.] 131.
" S. iMatt- xxiv.15.
» Cant 5. 2.
'0 S. Luke xxii. 48,
by the kiss, offer a kiss. You offer a kiss
who know not the mystery of the kiss. It
is not the kiss of the lips which is sought for,
but that of the heart and soul.
1 7.^ But you say, he kissed the Lord. Yes,
he kissed Him indeed with his lips. The
Jewish people has this kiss, and therefore it
is said : "This people honoureth Me with
their lips, but their heart is far from Me."'
So, then, he who has not faith and charity
has not the kiss, for by a kiss the strength
of love is impressed. When love is not,
faith is not, and affection is not, what sweet-
ness can there be in kisses ?
18. But the Church ceases not to kiss the
feet of Christ, and therefore in the Song of
Songs she desires not one but many kisses, *
and like Holy Mary she is intent upon all
His sayings, and receives all His words
when the Gospel or the Prophets are read,
and "keeps all His sayings in her heart. "3
So, then, the Church alone has kisses as a
bride, for a kiss is as it were a pledge of
espousals and the prerogative of wedlock.
Whence should the Jew have kisses, who
believes not in the Bridegroom .' Whence
should the Jew have kisses, who knows not
that the Bridegroom is come ?
19. And not only has he no kisses, but
neither has he oil wherewith to anoint the
feet of Christ, for if he had oil he would cer-
tainly, before now, soften his own neck.
Now Moses says: "This people is stiff-
necked," 4 and the Lord says that the priest
and theLevite passed by, and neither of them
poured oil or wine into the wounds of him
who had been wounded by robbers ; s for
they had nothing to pour in, since if they
had had oil they would have poured it into
their own wounds. But Isaiah declares :
" They cannot apply ointment nor oil nor
bandage." ^
20. But the Church has oil wherewith she
dresses the wounds of her children, lest the
hardness of the wound spread deeply ; she
has oil which she has received secretly.
With this oil Asher washed his feet as it is
written : "A blessed son is Asher, and he
shall be acceptable to his brothers, and shall
dip his feet in oil." ? With this oil, then, the
Church anoints the necks of her children,
that they may take up the yoke of Christ ;
with this oil she anointed the Martyrs, that
she might cleanse them from the dust of this
world ; with this oil she anointed the Con-
fessors, that they might not yield to their
labours, nor sink down through weariness ;
S. Matt. XV. 8.
Kxod. xxxiv. 9.
Deut. xxxiii. 24.
• Cant. i. 2.
^ S. Luke X. 31, 32.
' S. Luke ii. 51.
* Isa. i. 6.
LETTER XLI.
449
that they might not be overcome by the heat
of this world : and she anointed them in
order to refresh them witli the spiritual oil.
2 1. The Synagogue has not this oil, inas-
much as she has not the olive, and under-
stood not that dove which brought back the
olive branch after the deluge. ' For that
Dove descended afterwards when Christ was
baptized, and abode upon Him, as John tes-
titied in the Gospel, saying: "I saw the
Spirit descending from heaven like a dove,
and He abode upon Him." ' But how could
he see the Dove, who saw not Him, upon
Whom the Spirit descended like a dove .'
22. The Church, then, both washes the feet
of Christ and wipes them with her hair, and
anoints them with oil, and pours ointment
upon them, because not only does she care
for the wouiidcd and cherish the weary, but
also sprinkles them with the sweet odour of
grace ; and pours forth the same grace not
only on the rich and powerful, but also on
men of lowly estate. She weighs all with
equal balance, gathers all in the same bosom,
and cherishes them in the same lap.
23. Christ died once, and was buried once,
and nevertheless He wills that ointment
should daily be poured on His feet. What,
then, are those feet of Christ on which we
pour ointment .'' The feet of Christ are they
of whom He Himself says : " What ye have
done to one of the least of these ye have
done to INIe. " ^ These feet that woman in
the Gospel refreshes, these feet she bedews
with her tears ; when sin is forgiven to the
lowliest, guilt is washed away, and pardon
granted. These feet he kisses, who loves
even the lowest of the holy people. These
feet he anoints with ointment, who imparts
the kindness of his gentleness even to the
weaker. In these the martyrs, in these the
apostles, in these the Lord Jesus Himself
declares that He is honoured.
24. You see how ready to teach the Lord
is, that He may by His own example provoke
you to piety, for He is ready to teach when
He rebukes. So when accusing the Jews,
He says : " O My people, what have I done
to thee, or wherein have I troubled thee, or
wherein have I wearied thee .' Answer Me.
Is it because I brought thee out of the land
of Egypt, and delivered thee from the house
of bondage .' " adding : " And I sent before
thy face Moses and Aaron and Miriam. " *
Remember what Balaam conceived against
thee, 5 seeking the aid of magic art, but I
suffered him not to hurt thee. Thou wast
1 Gen. viii. 11.
* Mic. vi. 3, 4. 5-
^ S. John i. 32.
^ Num. xxiii. 2.
5 S. Matt. XXV. 40.
indeed weighed down an exile in foreign
lands, thou wast oppressed with heavy bur-
dens. 1 sent before thy face Moses and
Aaron and Miriam, and he who spoiled the
exile was first spoiled himself. Thou who
hadst lost what was thine, didst obtain that
which was another's, being freed from the
enemies who were hedging thee in, and safe
in the midst of the waters thou savvest the
destruction of thine enemies, when the same
waves which surrounded and carried thee
on thy way, pouring back, drowned tho
enemy.' Did I not, when food was lacking
to thee passing through the desert, supply a
rain of food, and nourishment around thee,
whithersoever thou wcntest.'* Did I not,
after subduing all thine enemies, bring thee
into the region of Eshcol .'' ^ Did I not
deliver up thee Sihon, King of the Amoritcs ^
(that is, the proud one, the leader of them
that provoked thee) .'' Did I not deliver up
to thee alive the King of Ai,4 whom after
the ancient curse thou didst condemn to be
fastened to the wood and raised upon the
cross .? Why should I speak of the troops of
the five kin^s which were slain s in endea-
vouring to deny thee the land given to thee .''
And now what is required of thee in return
for all this, but to do judgment andjustice, to
love mercy, and to be ready to walk with
the Lord thy God ? ^
25. And what was His expostulation by
Nathan the prophet to King David himself,
that pious and gentle man .'' I, He said,
chose thee the youngest of thy brethren, I
filled thee with the spirit of meekness, I
anointed thee king by the hand of Samuel, 7
in whom I and My Name dwelt. Having
removed that former king, whom an evil
spirit stirred up to persecute the priests of
the Lord, I made thee triumph after exile.
I set upon thy throne of thy seed one not
more an heir than a colleague. I made
even strangers subject to thee, that they
who attacked might serve thee, and wilt
thou deliver My servants into the power of
My enemies, and wilt thou take away that
which was My servants, whereby both thy-
self wilt be brandedwith sin, and My adver-
saries will have whereof to rejoice.
26. Wherefore, O Emperor, that I may
now address my words ndt only about you,
but to you, since you observe how severely
the Lord is wont to censure, see that the
more glorious you are become, the more
utterly you submit to your Maker. For it
is written: "When the Lord thy God shall
^ Exod. xiv. 2g. ' Num. xiii. 24. ' Num. xxi. 24.
" Josh. viii. 23 ff. '' Josh. x. 19 ff. « ^u^ y[ §_
' 2 Sam, [2 Kings] xii. 7 ff.
450
ST. AMBROSE.
have brought thee into a strange land, and
thou shalt eat the fruits of others, say not,
My power and my righteousness hath given
me this, for the Lord thy God hath given it
to thee;"' for Christ in His mercy hath
conferred it on thee, and therefore, in love
for His body, that is, the Church, give water
for His feet, kiss His feet, so that you may
not only pardon those who have been taken
in sin, but also by your peaceableness re-
store them to concord, and give them rest.
Pour ointment upon His feet that the whole
house in which Christ sits may be filled
with thy ointment, and all that sit with Him
may rejoice in thy fragrance, that is, honour
the lowest, so that the angels may rejoice in
their forgiveness, as over one sinner that
repenteth,^ the apostles may be glad, the
prophets be filled with delight. For the eyes
cannnot say to the hand: "We have no
need of thee, nor the head to the feet, Ye
are not necessary to me. "3 So, since all are
necessary, guard the whole body of the
Lord Jesus, that He also by His heavenly
condescension may preserve your kingdom.
27. When I came down from the pulpit,
he said to me : "You spoke about me." I
replied : "I dealt with matters intended for
your benefit.'' Then he said: "I had in-
deed decided too harshly about the repair-
ing of the synagogue by the bishop, but
that has been rectified. The monks com-
mit many crimes." Then Timasius the
general began to be over-vehement against
the monks, and I answered him: "With the
Emperor I deal as is fitting, because I know
that he has the fear of God, but with you,
who speak so roughly, one must deal other-
wise."
28. Then, after standing for some time, I
said to the Emperor: " Let me offer for you
without anxiety, set my mind at ease." As
he continued sitting and nodded, but did not
give an open promise, and I remained stand-
ing, he said that he would amend the edict. I
went on at once to say that he must end the
whole investigation, lest the Count should
use the opportunity of the investigation to
do any injury to the Christians. He pro-
mised that it should be so. I said to him, " I
act on your promise,'' and repeated, " I act
on your promise." "Act," he said, "on
my promise." And so I went to the altar,
whither I should not have gone unless he had
given me a distinct promise. And indeed so
great was the grace attending the offering,
that I felt myself that that favour granted by
the Emperor was very acceptable to our God,
and that the divine presence was not want-
ing. And so everything was done as I
wished.
LETTER LL
Addressed to the Emperor Theodosius after the mas-
sacre at Thessalonica.i St. Ambrose begins by stat-
ing his reasons for not having met the Emperor on
his return to Milan. He then mentions the senti-
ments of the bishops with regard to the slaughter at
Thessalonica, and points out that repentance for that
deed is necessary to obtain forgiveness and a victory
over the devil, the instigator to that crime. .St. Am-
brose could not offer the sacrifice in the Emperor's
presence, and, as truly loving the Emperor, grieves
and yet hopes.
1. The memory of your old friendship is
pleasant to me, and I gratefully call to mind
the kindnesses which, in reply to my fre-
quent intercessions, you have most gra-
ciously conferred on others. Whence it may
be inferred that I did not from any ungrate-
ful feeling avoid meeting you on your
arrival, which I had always before ear-
nestly desired. And I will now briefly set
forth the reason for my acting as I did.
2. I saw that from me alone in your court
the natural right of hearing was withdrawn,
so that I was deprived also of the othce of
speaking ; for you were frequently troubled
because certain matters which had been de-
cided in your consistory had come to my
knowledge. I, therefore, am without a
part in the common privilege, since the
Lord Jesus says: "That nothing is hidden,
which shall not be made known." ^ L there-
fore, as reverently as 1 could, complied with
the imperial will, and took heed that neither
yourself should have any reason for dis-
pleasure, when I effected that nothing should
be related to me of the imperial decrees ;
and that I, when present, either should not
hear, through fear of all others, and so in-
cur the reputation of connivance, or should
hear in such a fashion that my ears might
be open, my utterance prevented, that I
might not be able to utter what 1 had heard
lest 1 should injure and bring in peril those
who had incurred the suspicion of treachery.
3. What, then, could I do ? Should I not
hear.? But I could not close my cars with
the wax of the old fables. Should I utter
what I heard ? But I was bound to be on
my guard in my words against that which I
' Deut. vii.-ix.
^ S. Luke XV. 10.
* I Cor. xii. 21
' The mob at Thessalonica had barbarously murdered a number
of the officers of the garrison of that city. The F.mperor, being ex-
ceedingly angrv. sent orders in obedience to which over seven thou-
sand of the inhabitants were cruellv put to death. Tliis act of venge-
ance shocked the iniblic conscience, and St. Ambrose feJt it his duty
to speak -out in the name of the Church.
^ S. Luke viii. 17.
LETTER LI.
451
feared in your commands, namely, lest some
deed of blood should he committed. Should
I keep silence ? But then my conscience
would be bound, my utterance taken away,
which would be the most wretched con-
dition of all. And where would be that
text ? If the priest speak not to him that
crreth, he who errs shall die in his sin, and
the priest shall be liable to the penalty be-
cause he warned not the erring.'
4. Listen, august Emperor. I cannot
deny that you have a zeal for the faith : I
do confess that you have the fear of God.
But you have a natural vehemence, which,
if any one endeavours to soothe, you quickly
turn to mercy ; if any one stirs it up, you
rouse it so much more that you can scarcely
restrain it. Would that if no one soothe it,
at least no one may inflame it ! To your-
self I willingly entrust it, you restrain your-
self, and overcome your natural vehemence
by the love of piety.
5.- This vehemence of yours I preferred to
commend privately to your own considera-
tion, rather than possibly raise it by any
action of mine in public. And so I have
preferred to be somewhat wanting in duty
rather than in humility, and that others
should rather think me wanting in priestly
authority than that you should tind me lack-
ing in most loving reverence, that having
restrained your vehemence your power of
decidimr on vour counsel should not be
weakened. I excuse myself by bodily sick-
ness, which was in truth severe, and scarcely
to be lightened but by great care. Yet I
would rather have died than not wait txyo
or three days for your arrival. But it was
not possible for me to do so.
6. There was that done in the city of the
Thessalonians of which no similar record
exists, which I was not able to prevent
happening : which, indeed, I had before
said would be most atrocious when I so
often petitioned against it, and that which
you yourself show by revoking it too late
you consider to be grave, ^ this I could not
extenuate when done. When it was first
heard of, a synod had met because of the
arrival of the Galilean Bishops. There was
not one who did not lament it. not one who
thought lightly of it ; your being in fellow-
ship with Ambrose was no excuse for your
deed. Blame for what had been done would
have been heaped more and more on me,
1 Ezek. iii. 18.
- Theodosius had promised to forgive the Thessalonians, but was
again stirred up by his courtiers, as Paulinas relates in his life of St.
.Ambrose.
had no one said that your reconciliation to
our God was necessary.
7. Are you ashamed, () Emperor, to do
that which the royal prophet David, the
forefather of Christ, according to the flesh,
did.' To him it was told how the rich man
who had many flocks seized and killed the
poor man's one lamb, because of the arrival
of his guest, and recognizing that he him-
self was being condemned in the tale, for
that he himself had done it, he said: "I
have sinned against the Eord. "' Bear it,
then, without impatience, O Emperor, if it
be said to you : '• You have done that which
was spoken of to King David by the prophet.
For if you listen obediently to this, and say :
" I have sinned against the Lord," if you re-
])eat those words of the royal prophet : "O
come let us worship and fall down ])cfore
Him, and mourn before the Lord our God,
Who made us, ''^ it shall be said to you
also : "Since thou repentest, the Lord put-
teth away thy sin, and thou shalt not die. " ^
8. And again, David, after he had com-
manded the people to l)e numbered, was
smitten in heart, and said to the Lord : "I
have sinned exceedingly, because I have
commanded this, and now, O Lord, take
away the iniquity of Thy servant, for 1 have
transgressed exceedingly. "^ And the pro-
phet Nathan was sent again to him, to
offer him the choice of three things, that
he should select the one he chose — famine
in the land for three years, or that he should
flee for three months before his enemies, or
mortal pestilence in the land for three days.
And David answered : "These three things
are a great strait to me, but let me fall into
the hand of the Lord, for very many are
His mercies, and let me not fall into the
hands of man. "5 Now his fault was that
he desired to know the number of the whole
of the people which was with him, which
knowledge he ought to have left to God
alone.
9. And, we are told, when death came
upon the people, on the very first day at
dinner time, when David saw the angel
smiting the people, he said : " I have sinned,
and L the shepherd, have done wickedly,
and this flock, what hath it done.' Let
Thine hand be upon me, and upon my
father's house. "^ And so it repented the
Lord, and He commanded the angfel to
spare the people, and Davitl to offer a sacri-
fice, for sacrifices were then offered for sins ;
sacrifices are now those of penitence. And
' 2 Sam. \2 Kings] xii. 13.
^ 2 Sam. [2 Kings] xii. 13.
^2 Sam. [2 Kings] xxiv. 14.
- Ps. xcv. fxciv] 6.
* 2 .Sam. [2 Kings] xxiv. 10.
" 2 Sam. [2 Kings] xxiv. 17.
452
ST. AMBROSE.
so by that humbling- of himself he became
more acceptable to God, for it is no matter
of wonder that a man should sin, but this is
reprehensible, if he does not recognize that
he has erred, and humble himself before
God.
10. Holy Job, himself also powerful in this
world, says: "I hid not my sin, but de-
clared it before all the people."' His son
Jonathan said to the fierce King Saul him-
self: "Do not sin against thy servant
David ;'■== and: "Why dost thou sin
against innocent blood, to slay David with-
out a cause ? " ^ For, although he was a
king, yet he would have sinned if he slew
the innocent. And again, David also, when
he was in possession of the kingdom, and
had heard that innocent Abner had been
slain by joab, the leader of his host, said :
"I am guiltless and my kingdom is guilt-
less henceforth and for ever of the blood of
Abner, the son of Ner,"-* and he fasted for
sorrow.
11. I have written this, not in order to
confound you, but that the examples of
these kings may stir you up to put away
this sin from your kingdom, for you will do
it away by humbling your soul before God.
You are a man, and it has come upon you,
conquer it. Sin is not done away but by
tears and penitence. Neither angel can do
it, nor archangel. The Lord Himself, \\'ho
alone can say, "I am with you," 5 if -we
have sinned, does not forgive any but those
who repent.
12. I urge, I beg, I exhort, I warn, for it
is a grief to me, that you who were an ex-
aniple of unusual piety, who were conspicu-
ous for clemency, who would not suffer
single offenders to be put in peril, should
not mourn that so many have perished.
Though you have waged battle most suc-
cessfully, though in other matters, too, you
are worthy of praise, yet piety was ever the
crown of your actions. The devil envied
that which was your most excellent posses-
sion. Conquer him whilst you still possess
that wherewith you may conquer. Do not
add another sin to your sin by a course of
action which has injured many.
13. I, indeed, though a debtor to your
kindness, for which I cannot be ungrateful,
that kintlness which has surpassed that of
many emperors, and has been equalled by
one only ; I, 1 say, have no cause for a
charge of contumacy against you, but have
cause for fear ; I dare not offer the sacrifice
' Job xxxi. .■<4 [LXX.].
^ : Sam. fi Kings] xix. 5
^ S. Matt, xxviii. 20.
^ I Sam. [i Kings] xix. 4.
* 2 Sam. [2 Kings] iii. 28.
if you intend to be present. Is that which
is not allowed after shedding the blood of
one innocent person, allowed after shedding
the blood of many .'' I do not think so.
14. Lastly, I am writing with my own
hand that which you alone may read. As
I hope that the Lord will deliver me from
all troubles, I have been warned, not by
man, rior through man, but plainly by
Himself that this is forbidden me. For when
I was anxious, in the very night in which
I was preparing to set out, you appeared to
me in a dream to have come into the
Church, and I w^as not permitted to offer the
sacrifice. I pass over other things, which I
could have avoided, but I bore them for
love of you, as I believe. May the Lord
cause all things to pass peaceably. Our
God gives warnings in many ways, by
heavenly signs, by the precepts of the
prophets ; by the visions even of sinners He
wills that we should understand, that we
should entreat Him to take away all dis-
turbances, to preserve peace for you em-
perors, that the faith and peace of the Church,
w^hose advantage it is that emperors should
be Christians and devout, may continue.
15. You certainly desire to be approved
by God. " To everything there is a time," '
as it is written : "It is time for Thee,
Lord, to work."^ "It is an acceptable
time, O Lord. ' 3 You shall then make
your offering when you have received per-
mission to sacrifice, when your offering
shall be acceptable to God. Would it not
delight me to enjoy the favour of the Em-
peror, to act according to your wish, if the
case allowed it .-' And prayer by itself is a
sacrifice, it obtains pardon, when the obla-
tion would bring offence, for the one is a
sign of humility, the other of contempt.
For the Word of God Himself tells us that
He prefers the performance of His com-
mandments to the offering of sacrifice.
God proclaims this, Moses declares it to
the people, Paul preaches it to the Gen-
tiles. Do that which you understand is
most profitable for the time. "I prefer
mercy, " it is said, "rather than sacrifice. '"■♦
Are they not, then, rather Christians in
truth who condemn their own sin, than
they who think to defend it.'' " The just is
an accuser of himself in the beginning of
his words. '' 5 He who accuses himself when
he has sinned is just, not he who praises
himself.
1 6. I wish, O Emperor, that before this I
' Eccles. iii. i.
' Ps. Ixix. r'xviii.] n.
^ Prov. xviii. 17 [LXX.].
' Ps. cxix. [cxviii J 126.
*S. Matt. ix. n.
LETTER LVII.
453
had trusted rather to myself, than to your
habits. When I consider tliat you quickly
pardon, and quickly revoke your sentence,
as you have often done ; you have been
anticipated, and I have not shunned that
which I needed not to fear. But thanks be
to the Lord, Who willcth to chastise His ser-
vants, that He may not lose them. This I
have m common with the pro]ihets, and you
shall have it in common with the saints.
17. Shall I not value the father of Gratian
more than my very eyes ? Your other holy
pledges also claim pardon. I conferred
beforehand a dear name on those to whom
I bore a common love. I follow you with
my love, my affection, and my prayers. If
you believe me, be guided by me ; if, I say,
you believe me, acknowledge what I say ; if
you believe me not, pardon that which I do,
in that I set God before you. May you,
most august Emperor, with your holy off-
spring, enjoy perpetual peace with perfect
happiness and prosperity.
LETTER LVH.
St. Ambrose informs the Emperor Eugenius why he
was absent from Milan. He then proceeds to reprove
him for his conduct with regard to heathen worship.
This was, he says, the reason why he did not write
sooner, and he promises that for the future he will treat
him with the same freedom as the other emperors.
Ambrose, Bishop, to the most gracious Em-
peror Eugenius.
1. The cause of my departure was the fear
of the Lord, to Whom, so far as I am able, I
am accustomed to refer all my acts, and
never to turn away my mind from Him,
nor to make more of any man than of the
grace of Christ. For 1 do no one an injury,
if I set God before all, and, trusting in Him,
I am not afraid to tell you emperors my
thoughts, such as they are. And so I will
not keep silence before you, O Emperor, as
to things respecting which I have not kept
silence before other emperors. And that
I may keep the order of the matters, I will
go through, one by one, the things which
have to do with this matter.
2. The illustrious Symmachus, when
prefect of the city, had memorialized ' the
Emperor Valentinian the younger of
august memory, requesting that he would
command that what had been taken away
should be restored to the temples. He per-
formed his part in accordance with his zeal
and his religion. And I also, as Bishop,
* The memorial is given on p.
was bound to recognize my part. I pre-
sented two petitions ' to the Emperors, in
which I pointed out that a Christian man
could not contribute to the cost of the sacri-
fices ; that I indeed had not been the cause
of their being abolished, but I certainly did
urge that they should not be decreed ; and
lastly, that he himself would seem to be
giving not restoring those sums to the
images. For what he had not himself
taken away, he could not, as it were,
restore, but of his own will to grant towards
the expenses of susperstition. Lastly, that,
if he did it, either he must not come to the
Church, or, if he came, he would either not
find a priest there, or he would find one
withstanding him in the Church. Nor
could it be alleged in excuse that he was a
catechumen, seeing that catechumens are
not allowed to contribute to the idols' ex-
penses.
3. My letters were read in the consistory.
Count Bauto, a man of the highest rank of
military authority was present, and Rumo-
ridus, himself also of the same dignity, ad-
dicted to the worship of the gentile nations
from the first years of his boyhood. Valen-
tinian at that time listened to my sugges-
tion, and did nothing but what the rule of
our faith required. And they yielded to his
officer.
4. Afterwards I plainly addressed the
most clement Emperor Theodosius, and
hesitated not to speak to his face. And he,
having received a similar message from the
Senate, though it was not the request of the
v/hole Senate, at length assented to my
recommendation, and so I did not go near
him for some days, nor did he take it ill, for
he knew that I was not acting for my own
advantage, but was not ashamed to say in
the sight of the king that which was for
the profit of himself and of my own soul. ^
5. Again a legation sent into Gaul from
the Senate 'to the Emperor Valentinian of
august memory could procure nothing ; and
then I was certainly absent, and had not
written anything at that time to him.
6. But when your Clemency took up the
reins of government it was afterwards dis-
covered that favours of this kind had been
granted to men, excellent indeed in matters
of state but in religion heathens. And it
may, perhaps, be said, august Emperor,
that you did not make any restitution to the
temples, but presented gifts to men who had
deserved well of you. But you know that
we must constantly act in the cause of God,
' Letters 17 and 18, pp.
^ Ps. cxix. [cxviii.j 46.
454
ST. AMBROSE.
as is often done in the cause of liberty, also
not only by priests, but also by those who
are in your armies, or are reckoned in the
number of those who dwell in the provinces.
When you became Emperor envoys re-
quested that you would make restitution to
the temples, and you did not do it ; others
came a second time and you resisted, and
afterwards you thought fit that this should
be granted to those very persons who made
the petition.
7. Though the imperial power be great,
yet consider, O Emperor, how great God is.
He sees the hearts of all, He questions the
inmost conscience, He knows all things be-
fore they happen, He knows the inmost
things of your breast. You do not suffer
yourselves to be deceived, and do you de-
sire to conceal anything froni God .^ Has
not this come into your mind.? For al-
though they acted with such perseverance,
was it not your duty, O Emperor, to resist
with still greater perseverance because of
the reverence due to the most high and true
and living God, and to refuse what was an
offence against His holy law ?
8. Who grudges your having given what
you would to others ? We are not scru-
tinizers of your liberality, nor envious of the
advantages of others, but are interpreters of
the faith. How will you offer your gifts
to Christ.-' X<jt many but will put their
own estimate on what you have done, all
will do so on your intentions. Whatever
they do will be ascribed to you ; whatever
they do not do, to themselves. Although
you are Emperor, you ought to be all the
more subject to God. How shall the minis-
ters of Christ dispense your gifts .''
9. There was a question of this sort in
former times, and yet persecution itself
yielded to the faith of our fathers, and
heathendom gave way. For when in the
city of Tyre the quinquennial game was be-
ing kept, and the intensely wicked King of
Antioch had come to witness it, Jason ap-
pointed officers of sacred rites, who were
Antiochians, to carry three hundred di-
drachms of silver from Jerusalem, and give
them to the sacrifice of Hercules.' But the
fathers did not give . the money to the
heathen, but having sent faithful men de-
clared that that money should not be spent
on sacrifices to the gods, because it was not
fitting, but on other expenses. And it was
decreed that because he had said that the
money was sent for the sacrifice of Hercules,
it ought to be taken for that for which it was
' 2 Mace. iv. 18, ff.
sent ; but, because they, who had brought
it, because of their Zealand religion, pleaded
that it ahould not be used for the sacrifice,
but for other expenses, the money was
given for the building of ships. Being com-
pelled they sent it, but it was not used for
sacrifice, but for other expenses of the state.
10. Now they who had brought the money
might, no doubt, have kept silence, but
would have done violence to their faith, be-
cause they knew whither the money was be-
ing carried, and therefore they sent men who
feared God to contrive that what was sent
should be assigned, not to the temple, but
to the cost of ships. For they entrusted the
money to those who should plead the cause
of the sacred Law, and He Who absolves the
conscience was made judge of the matter.
If they when in the power of another were
so careful, there can be no doubt what you,
0 Emperor, ought to have done. You, at
any rate, whom no one compelled, whom
no one had in his power, ought to have
sought counsel from the priest.
11. And I certainly when I then resisted,
although I was alone in resistance, was not
alone in what I wished, and was not alone
in what I advised. Since, then, I am bound
by my own words both before God and be-
fore all men, I felt that nothing else was
allowable or needful for me but to act for
myself, because I could not well trust you.
1 kept back and concealed my grief for a
long time ; I thought it not right to intimate
anything to anybody, now I may no longer
dissemble, nor is it open to me to keep
silence. For this reason also at the com-
mencement of your reign I did not reply
when you wrote to me, because I foresaw
that this would happen. Then at last, when
you required a letter, because I had not
written a reply, I said : This is the reason
that I think this v-ill be extorted from
him.
12. But when a reason for exercising my
office arose, I both wrote and petitioned for
those who Mxre in anxiety about them-
selves, that I might show that in the cause
of God I felt a righteous fear, and that I
did not value flattery above my own soul ;
but in those matters in which it is fittin<r
that petitions should be addressed to you.
I also pay the deference due to authority,
as it is written : " Honour to whom honour
is due, tribute to whom tribute."* For
since I deferred from the bottom of my
heart to a private person, how could I not
defer to the Emperor ? But do you who
R.
om. xiu 7.
LETTERS LXI., LXII.
455
desire that deference be paiM to you
suftcr us to pay- deference to Him Whom
you are desirous to be proved the Author of
your power.
LETTER LXI.
St. .\mbrose explains his absence from Milan on the
arrival of the Kmperor Theodosius after his victory
over Kiigeniiis,' and after expressing his thankfulness
for that success he promises obedience to the Em-
peror's will, and while commending his piety urges
him to be merciful to the conquered.
Ambrose, to the Emperor Theodosius.
1. You thought, most blessed Einperor, so
far as 1 gathered from your letter, that I kept
away from the city of Milan, because I be-
lieved that your cause was forsaken by God.
But I was not so wanting in foresight, nor
so unmindful in my absence of your virtue
and merits, as not to anticipate that the aid
of Heaven w^ould be with your piety, with
which you would rescue the Roman Em-
pire from the cruelty of a barbarian robber,
and the dominion of an unworthy usurper.
2. 1 therefore made haste to return thither,
<is soon as 1 knew that he, whom I thought
it right to avoid, ^ was now gone, for I had
not deserted the Church of ^lilan, entrusted
to me by the judgment of God, but avoided
the presence of him who had involved him-
self in sacrilege. I returned, therefore, about
the Calends of August, and have resided
here since that day. Here, too, O Augustus,
your letter found me.
3. Thanks be to our Lord God, Who re-
sponded to your faith and piety, and has
restored the form of ancient sanctity, suffer-
ing us to see in our time that which we
wonder at in reading the Scriptures, namely,
such a presence of the divine assistance ^ in
battle, that no mountain heights delayed the
course of your approach, no hostile arms
were any hindrance.
4. For these mercies you think that I ought
to render thanks to the Lord our God, and
being conscious of your merits, I will do so
willingly. Certainly that offering will be
acceptable to God which is offered in your
name, and what a mark of faith and devo-
' .Arbogastes, a Prankish general, had been set by Theodosius over
the troops in Gaul, and determined to gain supreme power in the
West. Having removed all who were faithful from the person of
the Emperor Valentinian 11., he caused him to be murdered, and
then to conceal his own purposes caused the rhetorician Eugenius,
his private secretarj', to be acknowledged Emperor. Ambassadors
were sent to Theodosius begging him to acknowledge the new Em-
peror as his colleague, but he saw through the design, and after two
years' preparation marched into Italy, and defeated the usurper's
troops. Eugenius was beheaded, and Arbogastes ki'led himself.
'^ i.e. Eugenius. whom St. Ambrose avoided, because he had per-
tnitted the restoration of heathen ceremonies. .See also Ep. 57.
^ Theodoret, Hist. Eccl. V. 24, relates certain prophecies and sev-
eral prodigies connected with this victory, to which there seems to
be some allusion here.
tion is this ! Other emperors, immediately
u]ion a victory, order the erection of tri-
umphal arches, or other monuments of their
triumphs ; your Clemency prepares an offer-
ing for God, and desires that oblation and
thanksgiving should be presented by the
priests to the Lord.
5. Though I be unworthy and unequal to
such an office and the offering of such ac-
knowletlgments. yet will I describe what I
have done. I took the letter of your Piety
with me to the altar. I laid it upon the
altar. I held it in my hand whilst I offered
the Sacrifice ; so that your faith might speak
by my voice, and the I^mpcror's letter dis-
charge the function of the priestly oblation.
6. In truth, the Lord is propitious to the
Roman f^mpire, since He has chosen such
a prince and father of princes, whose virtue
and power, established on such a triumphant
height of dominion, rests on such humility,
that in valour he has surpassed emperors
and priests in humility. What can I wish.^
What can I desire.'' You have everything,
and therefore I will endeavour to gain the
sum of my desires. You, O Emperor, are
pitiful, and of the greatest clemency.
7. And for yourself, I desire again and
again an increase of piety, than which God
has given nothing more excellent, that by
your clemency the Church of God, as it de-
lights in the peace and tranquillity of the
innocent, so, too, may rejoice in the pardon
of the guilty. Pardon especially those who
have not offended before. May the Lord
preserve your Clemency. Amen.
LETTER LXII.
St. Ambrose excuses himself for having omitted an
opportunity of writing to the Emperor, but is now
sending a letter by the hands of a deacon, requesting
forgiveness for some of Eugenius' followers who had
sought the protection of the Church, especially in
consideration of the miraculous aid which had been
vouchsafed to the Emperor.
Ambrose, to the Emperor Theodosius.
1. Although 1 lately wrote to your Cle-
mency even a second time, it did not seem to
me that I had responded sufficiently to the
duty of intercourse by answering as it were
in turn, for I have been so bound by fre-
quent benefits from your Clemency, that I
cannot repay what I owe by any services,
most blessed and august Emperor.
2. And so just as the first opportunity was
not to be lost by me, when, through your
chamberlain, I was able to thank your Cle-
mency and to pay the duty of an address,
456
ST. AMBROSE.
especially lest my not having written before
should seem to have been owing to sloth
rather than necessity, so, too, 1 had to seek
some manner of rendering to your Piety my
dutiful salutations.
3. And rightly do I send my son, the
deacon Felix, to bear my letter, and, at the
same time, to present to you my duty, in
my place, and also a memorial on behalf of
those who have fled to the Church, the
IMother of your Piety, seeking mercy. I have
been unable to endure their tears without
anticipating by my entreaty the coming of
your Clemency.
4. It is a great boon that I ask, but I ask
it from him to whom the Lord has granted
great and unheard-of things, from him
whose clemency I know, and whose piety I
have as a pledge. For your victory is con-
sidered to have been granted to you after
the ancient manner, and with the old mira-
cles, a victory such as was granted to holy
Moses, and holy Joshua, son of Nave, and
Samuel, and David, not by human calcula-
tions, but by the outpouring of heavenly
grace. Now we expect an equal amount of
gentleness with that by virtue of which so
great a victory has been gained.
LETTER LXIII.
457
EPISTLE LXIII.
Limeniiis. Bishop of VercelLx, having died, the see re-
mained long vacant owing to domestic factions. St.
Ambrose, therefore, as Exarch, writes to the Chris-
tians at Vercellas, and commences by reference to the
speedy and unanimous election of Eusebius, a former
Bishop, and reminds them of the presence of Christ
as a reason for concord. He refers next to two
apostate monks, Sarmatio and Harbatianus, and
inveighs against sensuality, which degrades men
below the beasts. Thence he passes to the virtues
required in a bishop, referring again to luisebius, and
to Dionysius, Bishop of Milan, comparing the clerical
and monastic hves, and ends with exhortations to
Christian virtue. The letter seems to have been
written a.d. 396.
Ambrose, a servant of Christ, called to be
a Bishop, to the Church of Vercellae, and to
those who call on the Name of our Lord
Jesus Christ, Grace be fulfilled unto you in
the Holy Spirit from God the Father and
His only-begotten Son.
1. I am spent with grief that the Church
of God which is among you is still without
a bishop, and now alone of all the regions of
Liguria and .Emilia, and of the Venetiae and
other neighbouring parts of Italy needs that
care which other churches were wont to ask
for themselves from it ; and what is a greater
source of shame to myself, the tension
amongst you which causes the obstacle is
laid to my charge. Now since there are dis-
sensions among you, how can we decree
anything, or you elect, or anyone agree to
undertake this office amongst those who are
at variance which he could hardly sustain
. amongst those who are at unity.
2. Is this the training of a confessor, are
these the offspring of those righteous fathers
who, as soon as they saw, approved of
holy Eusebius, whom they had never known
before, preferring him to their fellow-citizens,
and he was no sooner amongst them than he
was approved, and much more when they
had observed him. Justly did he turn out
so great a man, whom the whole Church
elected, justly was it believed that he whom
all had demanded was elected by the judg-
ment of God. It is fitting then that you
follow the example of your parents, espe-
cially since you who have been instructed
by a holy confessor ought to be so much
better than your fathers, as a better teacher
has taught and instructed you, and to mani-
fest a sign of your moderation and concord
by agreeing in your request ' for a Bishop.
•The people demanded, requested, or acclaimed some one as
bishop [postu/avit], and he was then elected, if they thought well,
by the clergy. St. Ambrose makes this clear [Ep. XV. 12J, saying
of Acholius. " Ad sum mum sacerdotium a Macedonicis obse-
cratus populis, elect us a sacerdoiibus."
3. For if according to the Lord's saying,
that which two shall have agreed upon on
earth concerning anything which they shall
ask, shall be done for them, as He says, bv
IMy Father, Who is in heaven, for : "Where
two or three are gathered together in My
Name, there am I in the midst of them,' how
much less, where the full congregation is
gathered in the Name of the Lord. Where
the demand of all is unanimous, ought we
to doubt that the Lord Jesus is there as the
Author of that desire, and the Hearer of the
petition, the Prcsider over the ordination,
and the Giver of the grace.'
4. IMake yourselves then to appear worthy
that Christ should be in your midst. For
where peace is, there is Christ, for Christ is
Peace ; and where righteousness is, there is
Christ, for Christ is Righteousness. Let Him
be in the midst of you, that you may see
Him, lest it be said to you also : "There
standeth One in the midst of you. Whom ye
see not. " ^ The Jews saw not Him in Whom
they believed not ; we look upon Him by
devotion, and behold Him by faith.
5. Let Him therefore stand in your midst,
that the heavens, which declare the glory
of God, 3 may be opened to you, that you
may do His will, and work His works. He
who sees Jesus, to him are the heavens
opened as they were opened to Stephen,
when he said : "Behold I seethe heavens
opened and Jesus standing at the right hand
of God. ■' 4 Jesus was standing as his advo-
cate, He was standing as though anxious,
that He might help His athlete Stephen in
his conflict, He was standing as though
ready to crown His martyr.
6. Let Him then be standing for you,
that you may not be afraid of Him sitting-
for when sitting He judges, as Daniel says :
"The thrones were placed, and the books
were opened, and the Ancient of days did
sit."s But in the eighty-first [second] Psalm
it is written: "God stood in the congre-
gation of gods, and decideth among the
gods."^ So then when He sits He judges,
when He stands He decides, and He judges
concerning the imperfect, but decides among
the gods. Let Him stand for you as a
defender, as a good shepherd, lest the fierce
wolves assault you.
7. And not in vain is my warning turned
to this point ; for I hear that Sarmatio and
Barbatian us 7 are come to you, foolish talkers.
S. Matt, xviii. 21. ' S. John i. 26. ' Ps. xix. fxviii ] i
* Acts VII. 56. = Dan. vii. 9. « Ps. Ixxxii. [Ixxxi] i.
' There were two apostate monks, followers apparently of
Jovinian, who was condemned by synods at Rome and Milan a d
39°-
458
ST. AMBROSE.
who say that there is no merit in abstinence,
no grace in a frugal Hfe, none in virginity,
that all are valued at one price, that they
are mad who chasten their flesh with
fastings, that they may bring it into subjec-
tion to the spirit. But if he had thought it
madness, Paul the Apostle would never him-
self have acted thus, nor written to instruct
others. For he glories in it, saying : " But
I chasten my body, and bring it into bond-
age, lest, after preaching to others, I myself
should be found reprobate. " ' So they who
do not chasten their body, and desire to
preach to others, are themselves esteemed
reprobates.
S. For is there anything so reprobate as
that which excites to luxury, to corruption,
to wantonness, as the incentive to lust, the
enticer to pleasure, the fuel of incontinence,
the firebrand of desire ? What new school
has sent out these Epicureans .'' Not a school
of philosophers, as they themselves say, but
of unlearned men who preach pleasure,
persuade to luxury, esteem chastity to be of
no use. They were with us, but they were
not of us, ^ for we, are not ashamed to say
what the Evangelist John said. But when
settled here they used to fast at first, they
were enclosed' within the monastery, there
was no place for luxury, the opportunity of
mocking and disputing was cut off.
9. This these dainty men could not endure.
They went abroad, then when they desired
to return they were not received ; for I had
heard many things which necessitated my
being cautious ; I admonished them, but
effected nothing. And so boiling over they
began to disseminate such things as made
them the miserable enticers to all vices.
They utterly lost the benefit of having fasted;
they lost the fruits of their temporary con-
tinence. And so now they with Satanic
■ea-gerness envy the good works of others,
the fruit of which themselves have failed
to keep. .
ID. What virgin can hear that there is no
reward for her chastity and not groan ?
Far be it from her to believe this easily, and
still more to lay aside her zeal, or change
the intention of her mind. \\'hat widow,
when she learnt that there was no profit in
her widowhood, would choose to preserve
her marriage faith and live in sorrow, rather
than give herself up to a happier condition .-'
Who, bound by the marriage-bond, if she
hear that there is no honour in chastity,
might not be tempted b}' careless levity of
body or mind .-* And for this reason the
^ I Cor. ix. 27.
' .S. John ii. 19.
Church in the holy lessons, and in the
addresses other priests, proclaims the praise
of chastity and the glory of virginity.
11. In vain, then, does the Apostle say :
" I wrote to you in an Epistle, not to mingle
with fornicators," ' and lest perchance they
should say. We are not speaking of all the
fornicators of the world, but we say that he
who has been baptized in Christ ought not
now to be esteemed a fornicator, but his life,
whatever it is, is accepted of God,^ the
Apostle has added "Not at all [meaning]
with the fornicators of this world," and
farther on, " If any that is named a brother
be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolater,
or a reviler, or a drunkard, or an extortioner,
with such an one not even to eat. For what
have I to do with judging them that are
without.'' "3 And to the Ephesians : "But
fornication, and all uncleanness, and cove-
tousness let it not even be named among
you, as becometh saints. "* And imme-
diately he adds: "For this ye know, that
no immodest person, nor unclean, nor cove-
tous, which is an idolater, hath any inheri-
tance in the kingdom of Christ and of God. " s
It is clear that this is said of the baptized,
for they receive the inheritance, Avho are
baptized into the death of Christ^ and are
buried together with Him, that they may
rise again with Him. Therefore they are
heirs of God, and joint heirs with Christ : '
heirs of God, because the grace of Christ is
conveyed to them ; joint-heirs with Christ,
because they are renewed into His life ;
heirs also of Christ ; because to them is
given by His death as it were the inherit-
ance of the testator.
12. These then ought to take heed to
themselves who have that which they may
lose, rather than they who have it not. These
ought to act with greater care, these ought
to guard against the allurements of vice,
or incentives to error, which arise chiefly
from food and drink. For "the people sat
down to eat and drink, and rose up to
play. '' ^
13. Epicurus 9 himself also, whom these
persons think they should follow rather than
the apostles, the advocate of pleasure,
although he denies that pleasure brings in
evil, does not deny that certain things result
from it from which evils are generated ; and
asserts in fine that the life of the luxurious
which is filled with pleasures does not seem
to be reprehensible, unless it be disturbed
by the fear either of pain or of death. But
* I Cor. V. 9. * This was one of the errors of Jovinian.
' I Cor. V. 10, II. * Eph. V. 3. •'' Eph. v. 5. '' Rom. vi. 3.
' Rom. viii. 17. ' i Cor. x. 7. " -See i/e Off. i. 50.
LETTER LXIII.
459
how far he is from the truth is perceived
even from this, that he asserts that pleasure
was originally created in man by God its
author, as Philomarus ■ his follower argues
in his Epitoma?, asserting that the Stoics are
the authors of this opinion.
14. But Holy Scripture refutes this, for it
teaches us that pleasure was suggested to
Adam and Eve by the craft and enticements
of the serpent. Since, indeed, the serpent
itself is pleasure, and therefore the passions
of pleasure are various and slippery, and as
it were infected with the poison of corrup-
tions, it is certain then that Adam, being
deceived by the desire of pleasure, fell away
from the commandment of God and from
the enjoyment of grace. How then can
pleasure recall us to paradise, seeing that it
alone deprived us of it ?
15. Wherefore also the Lord Jesus, wishing
to make us more strong against the tempta-
tions of the devil, fasted when about to con-
tend with him. that we might know that we
can in no other way overcome the entice-
ments of evil. Further, the devil himself
hurled the first dart of his temptations from
the quiver of pleasure, saying: "If Thou
be the Son of God, command that these
stones become bread. "^ After which the
Lord said: "Man doth not live by bread
alone, but by every word of God ; '' ^ and
would not do it, although He could, in order
to teach us by a salutary precept to attend
rather to the pursuit of reading than to
pleasure. And since they say that we
ought not to fast, let them prove for what
cause Christ fasted, unless it were that
His fast might be an example to us.
Lastly, in His later words He taught us
that evil cannot be easily overcome except
by our fasting, saying: "This kind of
devils is not cast out but by prayer and
fasting." ■♦
16. And what is the intention of the Scrip-
ture which teaches us that Peter fasted, and
that the revelation concerning the baptism
of Gentiles was made to him when fasting
and praying, s except to show that the Saints
themselves advance when they fast. Finally,
Moses received the Law when he was fast-
ing ; ^ and so Peter when fasting was taught
the grace of the New Testament. Daniel
too iDy virtue of his fast stopped the mouths
of the lions and saw the events of future
times. 7 And what safety can there be for
us unless we wash away our sins by fasting,
1 Who this may be is unknown, and the name, even, owing to vari-
ous readings, is uncertain.
2 S. Matt. iv. 3. 3 S. Matt. iv. 4. * S. Matt. xvii. 21.
^ Acts X. 10. ^ Ex. xxxiv. 28. ' Dan. vi. vii.
since Scripture says that fasting and alms
do away sin ? '
17. Who tlien are these new teachers who
reject the merit of fasting.' Is it not the
voice of heathen who say, " Let us eat and
drink.?" whom the Apostle well ridicules,
when he says : " If after the manner of men
I have fought with beasts at Ephesus, what
advantageth it me if the dead rise not .'' Let
us eat and drink, for to-morrow we die. "^
That is to say, What profited me my con-
tention even unto death, except that I might
redeem my body ? And it is redeemed in
vain if there is no hope of the resurrection.
And, consequently, if all hope of the resur-
rection is lost, let us eat and drink, let us
not lose the enjoyment of things present,
who have none of things to come. It is
then for them to indulge in meats and drinks
who hope for nothing after death.
18. Rightly then does the Apostle, arguing
against these men, warn us that we be not
shaken by such opinions, saying : "Be not
deceived, evil communications corrupt good
manners. Be ye righteously sober and sin
not, for some have no knowledge of God. "^
Sobriety, then, is good, for drunkenness is
sin.
19. But as to that Epicurus himself, the
defender of pleasure, of whom, therefore, we
have made frequent mention in order to
prove that these men are either disciples of
the heathen and followers of the Epicurean
sect or himself, whom the very philoso-
phers exclude from their company as the
patron of luxury, what if we prove him to be
more tolerable than these men .'' He de-
clares, as Demarchus ^ asserts, that neither
drinking, nor banquets, nor offspring, nor
embraces of women, nor abundance of fish,
and other such like things which are pre-
pared for the service of a sumptuous ban-
quet, make life sweet, but sober discussion.
Lastly, he added that those who do not use
the banquets of society in excess, use them
with moderation. He who willingly makes
use of the juices of plants alone together
with bread and water, despises feasts on
delicacies, for many inconveniences arise
from them. In another place they also say :
It is not excessive banquets, nor drinking
which give rise to the enjoyment of pleasure,
but a life of temperance.
20. Since, then, philosophy has disowned
those men, is the Church not to exclude
them ? Seeing, too, that they, because they
' Tobit xii. 8, g.
r Cor. XV. 32.
' I Cor. XV. 33.
* Demarchus is mentioned by no writer besides St. Ambrose.
The Benedictine editors suggest that Hermachus is meant, who
succeeded Epicurus as leader of his school.
460
ST. AMBROSE.
have a bad cause, frequently fall foul of
themselves by their own assertions. For,
although their chief opinion is that there is
no enjoyment of pleasure except such as is
derived from eating and drinking, yet under-
standing that they cannot, without the
greatest shame, cling to so disgraceful a
definition, and that they are forsaken by all,
they have tried to colour it with a sort of
stain of specious arguments ; so that one of
them has said: Whilst we are aiming at
pleasure by means of banquets and songs,
we have lost that which is infused into us
by the reception of the Word, whereby alone
we can be saved.
21. Do not they by these various argu-
ments show themselves to us as differing
and disagreeing one with the other.? And
Scripture too condemns them, not passing
over those whom the Apostle refuted, as
Luke, who wrote the book as a history, tells
us in the Acts of the Apostles, "And certain
also of the Epicurean and Stoic philosophers
disputed with him. And some said, What
does this babbler mean ? And others said,
He seemeth to be a setter forth of new
gods. '" '
22. Yet from this band too the Apostle
did not go forth without success, since
even Dionysius the Areopagite together with
his wife Damaris and many others believed.
And so that company of most learned and
eloquent men showed themselves overcome
in a simple discussion by the example of
those who believed. What then do those
men mean, who endeavour to prevent those
whom the Apostle has gained, and whom
Christ has redeemed with His own blood ?
asserting that the baptized ought not to
give themselves to the discipline of the vir-
tues, that revellings injure them not, nor
abundance of pleasures ; that they are foolish
who go without them, that virgins ought to
marry, bear children, and likewise widows
to repeat that converse with man which
they have once experienced with ill results ;
and that even if they can contain, they are
in error who will not again enter the mar-
riage bond.
23. What then ? Would you have us put
off the man in order to put on the beast, and
stripping ourselves of Christ, clothe ourselves
or be superclothed with the garments of the
devil ? But since the very teachers of the
heathen did not think that honour and
pleasure could be joined together, because
they would seem thus to class beasts with
men, shall we as it were infuse the habits
' Acts xv:i iS.
of beasts into the human breast, and in-
scribe on the reasonable mind the unreason-
ing ways of wild beasts ?
24. And yet there are many kinds of ani-
mals, which, when they have lost their fel-
low, will not mate again, and spend their
time as it were in solitary life ; many too
live on simple herbs, and will not quench
their thirst except at a pure stream ; one can
also often see dogs refrain from food forbid-
den them, so that they close their famishing
mouths if restraint is bidden them. Must
men then be warned against that wherein
brutes have learned not to transgress .'
26. But what is more admirable than ab-
stinence, which makes even the years of
youth to ripen, so that there is an old age of
character .'' For as by excess of food and by
drunkenness even mature age is excited, so
the wildness of youth is lessened by scanty
feasts and by the running stream. An ex-
ternal fire is extinguished by pouring on
water, it is then no Avonder if the inward
heat of the body is cooled by draughts from
the stream, for the flame is fed or fails ac-
cording to the fuel. As hay, straw, wood,
oil, and such like things are the nourishment
which feeds fire, if you take them away,
or do not supply them, the fire is extin-
guished. In like manner then the heat of
the body is supported or lessened by food,
it is excited by food and lessened by food.
Luxury then is the mother of lust.
27. And is not temperance agreeable to
nature, and to that divine law, which in the
very beginning of all created things gave the
springs for drink and the fruits of the trees
for food ? After the Flood the just man found
wine a source of temptation to him. ' Let
us then use the natural drink of temperance,
and would that we all were able to do so.
But because all are not strong the Apostle
said : "Use a little wine because of thy fre-
quent infirmities." ^ We must drink it then
not for the sake of pleasure, but because
of infirmity, and therefore sparingly as a
remedy, not in excess as a gratification.
28. Lastly, Elijah, whom the Lord was
training to the perfection of virtue, found at
his head a cake and a cruse of water ; and
then fasted in the strength of that food forty
days and forty nights. 3 Our fathers, when
they passed across the sea on foot,-* draiik
water not wine. Daniel and the Hebrew
children, fed with their peculiar food,^ and
with water to drink, overcame, the former
the fury of the lions ; ^ the latter saw the
' Gen. ix. 20.
* Ex. xvii. 6.
' I Tim. V. 23.
' Dan. i. 8.
' I 13] Kings xix. 6.
* Dan. vi. 22.
LETTER LXIII.
461
burning- fire play around their limbs with
harmless touch. '
26. And why should I speak of men ?
Judith, in no way moved by the luxurious
banquet of Holophernes, carried off the
triumph of which men's arms despaired,
solely in right of her temperance ; delivered
her country from occupation and slew the
leader of the expedition with her own hands. -
A clear proof both that Ins luxury had ener-
vated that warrior, terrible to the nations,
and that temperance made this woman
stronger than men. In this case it was not
in her sex that nature was surpassed, but
she overcame by her diet. Esther by her
fasts moved a proud king. 3 Anna, who for
eighty-four years in her widowhood had
served God with fasts and prayers day and
night in the temple* recognized Christ,
Whom John, the master of abstinence, and
as it were a new angel on earth, announced.
30. O foolish Elisha, for feeding the
prophets with wild and bitter gourds ! s O
Ezra forgetful of Scripture, though he did
restore the Scriptures from memory ! ^ foolish
Paul, who glories in fastings, 7 if fastings
profit nothing.
31. But how should that not be profitable
by which our sins are purged.'' And if you
offer this with humility and with mercy,
your bones, as Isaiah said, shall be fat, and
you shall be like a well-watered garden.*
So, then, your soul shall grow fat and its
virtues also by the spiritual richness of fast-
ing, and your fruits shall be multiplied by
the fertility of your mind, so that there may
be in you the inebriation of soberness, like
that cup of which the Prophet says : " Thy
cup which inebriates, how excellent it is ! "9
^2. But not only is that temperance
worthy of praise which moderates food, but
also that which moderates lust. Since it is
written : "Go not after thy lusts, and deny
thy appetite. If thou givest her desires to
thy soul, thou wilt b: a joy to thine
enemies ;'''° and farther on; "Wine and
women make even A.'ise rien to fall away ; " "
So that Paul teaches temperance even in
marriage itself; for he who is incontinent
in marriage is a kind of adulterer, and vio-
lates the law of the Apostle.
^^. And why should I tell how great is
the grace of virginity, which was found
worthy to be chosen by Christ, that it might
be even the bodily temple of God, in which
as we read the fulness of the Godhead dwelt
* Dan. iii. 27.
* S. Luke ii. 37.
' 2 Cor. xi. 27.
» Ps. xxiii. [xxii.] 5 [LXX.]
" Ecclus. xix. 2.
- Judg. xiii. 16.
5 2 [4] Kings iv. 39.
' Isa. Iviii. II.
' Esth. iv. 16.
* Ezra vii. 6.
'* Ecclus. xviii. 30, 31.
bodily.' A Virgin conceived the Salvation
of the world, a Virgin brought forth the life
of all. Virginity then ought not to be left
to itself, seeing that it benefited all in Christ.
A Virgin bore Him Whom this world can-
not contain or support. And when He was
born from His mother's womb, He yet pre-
served the fence of her chastity and the in-
violate seal of her virginity. And so Christ
found in the Virgin that which He willed to
make His own, that which the Lord of all
might take to Himself Further, our flesh
was cast out of Paradise by a man and
woman and was joined to God through a
Virgin.
34. What shall I say concerning the other
jMary,* the sister of Moses, who as leader of
the women passed on foot the straits of the
sea .? 3 By the same gift Thecla also was
reverenced by the lions, so that the unfed
beasts stretched at the feet of their prey
prolonged a holy fast, and harmed the vir-
gin neither with wanton look nor claw,
since virginity is injured even by a look.
35. Again, with what reverence for vir-
ginity has the holy Apostle spoken : " Con-
cerning virgins I have no commandment of
the Lord, but I give my counsel, as having
obtained mercy of the Lord. "4 He has
received no commandment, but a counsel,
for that which beyond the law is not
commanded, but is rather advised by way
of counsel. Authority is not assumed but
grace is shown, and this is not shown by
anyone, but by him who obtained mercy
from the Lord. Are then the counsels of
these men better than those of the apostles ?
The Apostle says, "I give my counsel,"
but they think it right to dissuade any from
cultivating virginity.
36. And we ought to recognize what com-
mendation of it the prophet, or rather
Christ in the prophet, has uttered in a short
verse; " A garden enclosed, " says He, "is
My sister, My spouse, a garden enclosed, a
sealed fountain." 5 Christ says this to the
Church, which he desires to be a virgin,
without spot, without a wrinkle. A fertile
garden is virginity, which can bear many
fruits of good odour. A garden enclosed,
because it is everywhere shut in by the wall
of chastity. A sealed fountain, because
virginity is the source and origin of modesty,
having to keep inviolate the seal of purity,
in which source the image of God is re-
flected, since the purity of simplicity agrees
also with chastity of the body.
1 Col. 4. 9. * /. f. Miriam, the Hebrew form of the name.
* Ex. XV. 20. * I Cor. vii. 25. ^ Cant. iv. 12.
462
ST. AMBROSE.
I']. And no one can doubt that the Church
is a virgin, w^ho also in the Epistle to the
Corinthians is espoused and presented as a
chaste virgin to Christ. ' So in the first
Epistle he gives his counsel, and esteems
the gift of virginity as good, since it is not
disturbed by any troubles of the present
time, nor polluted by any of its defilements,
nor shaken by any storms ; in the later
Epistle he brings a spouse to Christ, because
he is able to certify the virginity of the
Church in the purity of that people.
38. Answer me now, O Paul, in what way
thou givest counsel for the present distress.^
" Because he that is without a wife is care-
ful," he says, "for the things of the Lord,
how he may please God." And he adds,
"The unmarried woman and the virgin
think of the things of the Lord, that they
may be holy in body and spirit."^ She has
then her wall against the tempests of this
world, and so fortified by the defence of
divine protection she is disturbed by none
of the blasts of this world. Good then is
counsel, because there is advantage in coun-
sel, but there is a bond in a commandment.
Counsel attracts the willing, commandment
binds the unwilling. If then anyone has
followed counsel, and not repented, she has
gained an advantage ; but if she has re-
pented, she has no ground for blaming the
Apostle, for she ought herself to have judged
of her own weakness ; and so she is respon-
sible for her own will, inasmuch as she
bound herself by a bond and knot beyond
her power to bear.
39. And so like a good physician, desiring
to preserve the stability of virtue in the
strong, and to give health to the weak, he
gives counsel to the one, and points out the
remedy to the others : "He that is weak
eateth herbs, "< let him take a wife ; he that
has more power let him seek the stronger
meat of virtue. And rightly he added :
" For he who being steadfast hath settled in
his own heart, having no necessity, but hath
power over his own will, and hath deter-
mined this in his own heart, to keep his
own virgin, doeth well. So then both he who
giveth his own virgin in marriage, doeth
well ; and he that giveth her not in marriage,
doeth better. A woman is bound by the
law, for so long a time as her husband liveth.
But if her husband have fallen asleep, she is
freed, let her marry whom she will, only in
the Lord. But she will be more happy if
she abide as she is, after my counsel, for I
* 2 Cor. xi. 2.
* I Cor. vii. 32.
' I Cor. vii, 26.
* Rom. xiv. 2.
think that I also have the Spirit of the Lord. " '
This is to have the counsel of God, to search
diligently into all things, and to advise
things that are best, and to point out those
that are safest.
40. A careful guide points out many paths,
that each may walk along the one which he
prefers and considers suitable to himself, so
long as he comes upon one by which he
can reach the camp. The path of virginity
is good, but being high and steep requires
the stronger wayfarers. Good also is that
of widowhood, not so difficult as the for-
mer, but being rocky and rough, it requires
more cautious travellers. Good too is that of
marriage ; being smooth and even it reaches
the camp of the saints by a longer circuit.
This way is taken by most. There are then
the rewards of virginity, there are the merits
of widowhood, there is also a place for
conjugal modesty. There are steps and
advances in each and every virtue.
41. Stand therefore firm in your hearts,
that no one overthrow you, that no one be
able to make you fall. The Apostle has
taught us what it is " to stand," that is what
was said to Moses; "The place whereon
thou standest is holy ground ; "^ for no one
stands unless he stand by faith, unless he
stands fixed in the determination of his own
heart. In another place also we read : "But
do thou stand here with Me. "^ Each sen-
tence was spoken by the Lord to Moses,
both "Where thou standest is holy ground, "
and "Stand here with Me," that is, thou
standest with Me, if thou stand firm in the
Church. For the very place is holy, the very
ground is fruitful with sanctity and fertile
with harvests of virtues.
42. Stand then in the Church, stand where
I appeared to thee, where I am with thee.
Where the Church is, there is the most
solid resting place for thy mind, there the
support of thy soul, where I appeared to thee
in the bush. Thou art the bush, I am the
fire ; the fire in the bush, I in the flesh.
Therefore am I the fire, that I may give light
to thee, that I may consume thy thorns,
that is, thy sins, and show thee My grace.
43. Standing firm then in your hearts, drive
away from the Church the wolves which
seek to carry off prey. Let there be no sloth
in you, let not your mouth be evil nor your
tongue bitter. Do not sit in the council of
vanity ; for it is written, " I have not sat in
the council of vanity. " ^ Do not listen to
those who speak against their neighbours,
' I Cor. vii. ■s^-^o■
^ Deut. V. 31.
* Ex. iii. 5.
* Ps. xxvi. [xxv.] 4.
LETTER LXIII.
463
lest whilst you listen to others, you be
stirred up yourselves to speak ag^ainst your
neig'hbours, and it be said to each of you :
"Thou satest and spakest against thy
brother." '
44. Men sit when speaking against others,
they stand when they praise the Lord, to
whom it is said : " Behold now, praise the
Lord, all ye servants of the Lord, ye that
stand in the house of the Lord. '' ^ He who
sits, to speak of the bodily habit, is as it
were loosened by ease, and relaxes the
energy of his mind. But the careful watch-
man, the active searcher, the watchful
guardian, who keeps the outposts of the
camp, stands. The zealous warrior, too,
who desires to anticipate the designs of the
enemy, stands in array before he is ex-
pected.
45. "Let him that standeth take heed lest
he fall. " 3 He who stands does not give way
to detraction, for it is the tales of those at
ease hi which detraction is spread abroad,
and malignity betrayed. So that the prophet
says : " 1 have hated the congregation of the
malignant, and will not sit with the ungod-
ly. "■♦ And in the thirty-sixth Psalm, which
he has filled with moral precepts, he has put
at the very beginning : "Be not malignant
amongst the malignant, neither be envious
of those who do iniquity, "s Malignancy is
more harmful than malice, because malig-
nancy has neither pure simplicity nor open
malice, but a hidden ill-will. And it is more
difficult to guard against what is hidden
than against what is known. For which
reason too our Saviour warns us to beware
of malignant spirits, because they would
catch us by the appearance of sweet plea-
sures and a show of other things, when they
hold forth honour to entice us to ambition,
riches to avarice, power to pride.
46. And so both in every action, and
especially in the demand for a bishop, by
whom [as a pattern] the life of all is formed ;
malignity ought to be absent ; so that the
man who is to be elected out of all, and to
heal all, may be preferred to all by a calm
and peaceful decision. For ' ' the meek man
is the physician of the heart. "^ And the
Lord in the Gospel called Himself this, when
He said : "They that be whole need not a
physician, but they that are sick. "7
47. He is the good Physician, Who has
taken upon Him our infirmities, has healed
our sicknesses, and yet He, as it is written,
* Ps. 1. [xlix.] 20.
' I Cor. X. 12.
* Fs. xxxvii. [xxxvi.] i.
* S. Matt. ix. 12.
' Ps. cxxxiv. fcxxxiii.] i, 2.
* Ps. xxvi. [xxv.] 5.
e Prov. xiv. 30 [LXX.J.
honoured not Himself to be made a Hiifh
Priest, but He Who spake to Him. The
Father said: "Thou art My Son, this day
have I begotten Thee.'' ' As He said in
another place : "Thou art a Priest for ever
after the order of Melchisedcch." Who, since
He was the type of all future priests, took
our flesh upon Him, that "in the days of
His flesh He might offer prayers and sup-
plications with a loud voice and tears ; and
by those things which He suffered, though
He was the Son of (iod, might seem to
learn obedience, which He taught us, that
He might be made to us tlie Author of
Salvation ? '' ^ And at last when His suffer-
ings were completed, as though completed
and made perfect Himself, He gave health
to all. He bore the sin of all.
48. And so He Himself also chose Aaron
as priest, that not the will of man but the
grace of God should have the chief part in
the election of the priest ; ^ not the vol-
untary offering of himself, nor the taking it
upon himself, but the vocation from heaven,
that he should offer gifts for sins who could
be touched for those who sinned, for He
Himself, it is said, bears our weakness.*
No one ought to take this honour upon him-
self but they are called of God, as was
Aaron, 5 and so Christ did not demand but
received the priesthood.
49. Lastly, when the succession derived
through family descent from Aaron, con-
tained rather heirs of the family than
sharers in his righteousness, there came,
after the likeness of that Melchisedech, of
whom we read m the Old Testament, the
true Melchisedech, the true King of peace,
the true King of righteousness, for this is
the interpretation of the Name, "without
father, without mother, without genealogy,
having neither beginning of days nor end
of life," ^ which also refers to the Son of God,
Who in His Divine Generation had no
mother, was in His Birth of the Virgin
Mary without a father ; begotten before the
ages of the Father alone, born in this age
of the Virgin alone, and certainly could
have no beginning of days seeing He " was
in the beginning." 7 And how could He
have any end of life, Who is the Author of
life to all ? He is "the Beginning and the
Fnding."^ But this also is referred to Him
as an example, that a priest ought to be
without father and without mother, since
in him it is not nob.'lity of family, but holi-
' Heb. V. 5,
^ Num. xvi.
• Heb. V. J.
40.
' Heb, V. 5, quoted loosely.
•Heb. V. 2. ''Heb. V. 4-
' S. John i. t. •Rev. i. 8.
464
ST. AMBROSE.
ness of character and pre-eminence in virtue
which is elected.
50. Let there be in him faith and ripeness
of character, not one without the other,
but let both meet together in one with good
works and deeds. For which reason the
Apostle Paul wishes that we should be
imitators of them, who, as he says, "by-
faith and patience"' possess the promises
made to Abraham, who by patience was
found worthy to receive and to possess the
grace of the blessing promised to him.
David the prophet warns us that we should
be imitators of holy Aaron, and has set
him amongst the Saints of God to be imi-
tated by us, saying: "Closes and Aaron
among his priests, and Samuel among those
that call upon His Name." ^
51. A man clearly worthy to be pro-
posed that all should follow him was he,
for when a terrible death on account of the
rebels was spreading over the people, he
offered himself between the dead and the
living, that he might arrest death, and that no
more should perish.^ A man truly of priestly
mind and soul, who as a good shepherd
Avith pious affection offered himself for the
Lords flock. And so he broke the sting of
death, restrained its violence, refused it
further course. Affection aided his deserts,
for he offered himself for those who were
resisting him.
52. Let those then who dissent learn to
fear to rouse up the Lord, and to appease
His priests. What ! did not the earthquake
swallow up Dathan, Abiron, and Korah be-
cause of their dissension ? •♦ For when
Korah, Dathan, and Abiron had stirred up
two hundred and fifty men against Moses
and Aaron to separate themselves from
them, they rose up against them and said :
" Let it suffice you that all the congregation
are holy, every one, and the Lord is amongst
them." 5
53. Whereupon the Lord was angry and
spoke to the whole congregation. The
Lord considered and knew those that were
His, and drew His saints to Himself; and
those whom He chose not, He did not draw
to Himself. And the Lord commanded
that Korah and all those who had risen up
with him against Moses and Aaron the
priests of the Lord should take to themselves
censers, and put on incense,'' that he who
was chosen of the Lord might be established
as holy among the Levites of the Lord.
54. And Moses said to Korah : "Hear me,
' Heb. vi. 12.
■* Mum. xvi. 32.
' Ps. xcix. fxcviii.] i.
^ Num. xvi. 3.
■' Num. xvi.
* Num. xvi.
48.
'7-
ye sons of Levi : Is this a small thing unto
you, that God hath separated you from the
congregation of Israel, and brought you near
to Himself, to minister the service of the
Tabernacle of the Lord." ' And farther on,
"Seek ye the priesthood also, so that thou
and all thy congregation are gathered
against the Lord. And what is Aaron that
ye murmur about him ? " ^
55. Considering, then, what causes of
offence existed, that unworthy persons de-
sired to discharge the offices of the priest-
hood, and therefore were causing dissen-
sions ; and were murmuring in censure of
the judgment of God in the choice of His
priest, the whole people were seized with a
great fear, and dread of punishment came
upon them all. But when all implore that
all perish not for the insolence of few, those
guilty of the wickedness are marked out ;
and two hundred and fifty men with their
leaders are separated from the whole body
of the people ; and then the earth with a
groan cleaves asunder in the midst of the
people, a deep gulf opens, the offenders are
swallowed up, and are so removed from
all the elements of this world, as neither to
pollute the air by breathing it, nor the
heavens by beholding them, nor the sea
by their touch, nor the earth by their sepul-
chres.
56. The punishment ceased, but the
wickedness ceased not : for from this very
thing a murmuring rose among them that
the people had perished through the priests.
In His wrath at this, the Lord would have
destroyed them all, had He not been moved
first by the prayers of Moses and Aaron,
and afterwards also at the intervention of
His priest Aaron (the humiliation of their
forgiveness being thereby greater), He willed
to give their lives to those whose privilege
they had repudiated.
57. Miriam the prophetess herself, who
with her brothers had crossed the straits of
the sea on foot, because, being still igno-
rant of the mystery of the Ethiopian woman,
she had murmured against her brother
Moses, broke out with leprous spots, ^ so
that she would scarcely have been freed
from so great a plague, unless ]\Ioses had
prayed for her. Although this murmuring
refers to the type of the Synagogue, which
is ignorant of the mystery of that Ethiopian
woman, that is the Church gathered out of
the nations, and murmurs with daily re-
proaches, and envies that people through
whose faith itself also shall be delivered
' Num. xvi. 8, 9.
' Num. xvi. 9-1 1
^ Num. xii. 10.
LETTER LXIII.
465
from the leprosy of its unbelief, accordinsi^
to what we read that: "blindness in part
has happened unto Israel, until the fulness
of the Gentiles be come in, and so all Israel
shall be saveil. ■
58. And that we may observe that divine
grace rather than human works in priests,
of the many rods which Moses had received
according to the Tribes, and had laid up,
that of Aaron alone blossomed. Antl so the
people saw' that the gift of the Divine voca-
tion is to be looked for in a priest, and ceased
from claiming equal grace for a human choice
though they had before thought that a sim-
ilar prerogative belonged to themselves.
But what else does that rod show, but that
priestly grace never decays, and in the
deepest lowliness has in its office the flower
of the power committed to it, or that this
also is refered to in mystery ? Nor do
we think that it was without a purpose that
this took place near the end of the life of
Aaron the priest. It seems to be shown
that the ancient people, full of decay through
the oldness of the long-continued unfaithful-
ness of the priests, being fashioned again in
the last times to zeal in faith and devotion
by the example of the Church, will again
send forth with revived grace its flowers
dead through so many ages.
59. But what does this signify, that after
Aaron was dead, the Lord commanded, not
the whole people, but Moses alone, who i§
amongst the priests, to clothe Aaron's son
Eleazar with the priest's garments, except
that we should understand that priest must
consecrate priest, and himself clothe him
with the vestments, that is, with priestly
virtues ; and then, if he has seen that no-
thing is wanting to him of the priestly gar-
ments, and that all things are perfect, should
admit him to the sacred altars. For he who
is to supplicate for the people ought to be
chosen of God and approved by the priests,
lest there be anything which might give
serious offence in him whose office it is to
intercede for the offences of others. For
the virtue of a priest must be of no ordinary
kind, since he has to guard not only from
nearness to greater faults, but even the very
least. He must also be prompt to have
pity, not recall a promise, restore the fallen,
have sympathy with pain, preserve meek-
ness, love piety, repel or keep down anger,
must be as it were a trumpet to excite the
people to devotion, or to soothe them to
tranquillity.
60. It is an old saying : Accustom your-
^ Rom. xi. 25.
self to be consistent, that your life may set
forth as it were a picture, always preserving
the same representation which it has re-
ceived. How can he be consistent who at
one time is inflamed by anger, at another
blazes up with tierce indignation, whose
face now burns, and now again is changed
to paleness, varying and changing colour
every moment .'* But let it be so, let it be
natural for one to be angry, or that there is
generally a cause, it is a man's duty to re-
strain anger, and not to be carried away
like a lion by fury, so as not to know to be
quieted, not to spread tales, nor to embitter
family quarrels; for it is written: "A
wrathful man diggeth up sin."' He will
not be consistent who is double-minded ;
he cannot be consistent who cannot restrain
himself when angry, as to which David well
says: "Be ye angry and sin not. "^ He
does not govern his anger, but indulges his
natural disposition, which a man cannot in-
deed prevent but may moderate. Therefore
even though we are angry, let our passion
admit only such emotion as is according to
nature, not sin contrary to nature. For who
would endure that he should not be able
to govern himself, who has undertaken to
govern others .?
61. And so the Apostle has given a
pattern, saying that a bishop must be blame-
less, 3 and in another place: "A bishop
must be without offence, as a steward of
God, not proud, not soon angry, not given
to wine, not a striker, not greedy of filthy
lucre. "4 For how can the compassion of
a dispenser of alms and the avarice of a
covetous man agree together.''
62. I have set down these things which I
have been told are to be avoided, but the
Apostle is the Master of virtues, and he
teaches that gainsayers are to be convicted
with patience, 5 who lays down that one
should be the husband of a single wife,^ not
in order to exclude him from the right of
marriage (for this is beyond the force of the
precept), but that by conjugal chastity he
may preserve the grace of his baptismal
washing ; nor again that he may be induced
by the Apostle's authority to beget children
in the priesthood ; for he speaks of having
children, not of begetting them, or marry-
ing again.
63. And I have thought it well not to pass
by this point, because many contend that
having one wife is said of the time after
Baptism ; so that the fault whereby any
' Prov. XV. 18
* Tit. i. 7.
• Ps. iv. 4.
" Tit. i. 9.
' I Tim. iii. 2.
«Tit. i. 6.
466
ST. AMBROSE.
obstacle would ensue would be washed
away in baptism. And indeed all faults and
sins are washed away ; so that if anyone
have polluted his body with very many
whom he has bound to himself by no law of
marriage, all the sins are forgiven him, but
if any one have contracted a second mar-
riage it is not done away ; for sin not law
is loosed by the laver, and as to baptism
there is no sin but law. That then which
has to do with law is not remitted as though
it were sin, but is retained. And the Apostle
has established a law, saying : "If any man
be without reproach the husband of one
wife. " ' So then he who is without blame
the husband of one wife comes within the
rule for undertaking the priestly office ; he,
however, wlio has married again has no
guilt of pollution, but is disqualified for the
priestly prerogative.
64. We have stated what is according to
the law, let us state in addition what is
according to reason. But first we must
notice that not only has the Apostle laid
down this rule concerning a bishop or
priest, but that the Fathers in the Nicene
Council^ added that no one who has con-
tracted a second marriage ought to be ad-
mitted amongst the clergy at all. For how
can he comfort or honour a widow, or exhort
her to preserve her widowhood, and the
faith pledged to her husband, which he him-
self has not kept in regard to his former
marriage ? Or what difference would there
be between people and priest, if they were
bound by the same laws ? The life of a
priest ought to excel that of others as does his
grace, for he who binds others by his precepts
ought himself to keep the precepts of the
law,
65. How I resisted my ordination, and
lastly, when I was compelled, endeavoured
that it might at least be deferred, but the
prescribed rule did not prevail against the
popular eagerness. Yet the Western Bishops
approved of my ordination by their decision,
the Eastern by an example of the same kind. 3
And yet the ordination of a neophyte is for-
bidden, lest he should be lifted up by pride. 4
' I Tim. hi. 2.
' />i concilio Niccetii tractates — " the Council of the Nicene trac-
tate or creed," possibly. The reference is plain, though there are
various readings, and tractatus may not mean the creed. The real
difficulty is that in the 20 extant Canons of Nicaea, there is no re-
ference of the kind, and there is no evidence that any are missing.
Perhaps St. Ambrose is quoting from memory, or some faulty col-
lection, and so other canons are wrongly spoken of as Nicene. On
the subject comp. St. Ambr. de Off. 1. 257, and Diet. Chr. Ant.
art. " Digamy."
^ Nectarius, unbaptized and holding a civil office, was appointed
to the see of Constantinople, on the resignation of St. Gregory of
Nazianzus, during the sitting of the second cecumenical council at
Constantinople.
* I Tim. ill. 6
If the ordination was not postponed it was
because of constraint, and if humility suit-
able to the priestly office be not wanting,
where there is no reason blame will not be
imputed to him.
66. But if so much consideration is needed
in other churches for the ordination of a
bishop, how much care is required in the
Church of Vercellse, where two things seem
to be equally required of the bishop, monastic
rule and church discipline.? For Euse-
bius of holy memory was the first in
Western lands to bring together these
differing matters, both while living in the
city observing the rules of the monks, and
ruling the Church with fasting and temper-
ance. For the grace of the priesthood is
much increased if the bishop constrain
young men to the practice of abstinence,
and to the rule of purity ; and forbid them
though living in the city, the manners and
mode of life of the city.
67. From such a rule sprang those great
men, Elijah, Elisha, John the son of Eliza-
beth, who clothed in sheepskins, poor and
needy, and afflicted with pain, wandered in
deserts,' in hollows and thickets of moun-
tains, amongst pathless rocks, rough caves,
pitfalls and marshes, of whom the world
was not worthy. From the same, Daniel,
Ananias, Azarias, and Misael,* who were
brought up in the royal palace, were fed
meagrely as though in the desert, with
coarse food, and ordinary drink. Rightly
did those royal slaves prevail over kingdoms,
despise captivity, shaking off its yoke, sub-
due powers, conquer the elements, quench
the nature of fire, dull the flames, blunt
the edge of the sword, stop the mouths
of lions ; 3 they were found most strong when
esteemed to be most weak, and did not
shrink from the mockings of men, because
they looked for heavenly rewards ; they did
not dread the darkness of the prison, on
whom was shining the beauty of eternal
light.
68. Following these, holy Eusebius went
forth out of his country, and from his own
relatives, and preferred a foreign wandering
to ease at home. For the faith also he pre-
ferred and chose the hardships of exile, in
conjunction with Dionysius^ of holy memory,
who esteemed a voluntary exile above an
Emperor's friendship. And so these illustri-
ous men, surrounded with arms, closed in
by soldiers, when torn away from the larger
' Heb. xi. 37. ^ Dan. i. i6. ' Heb. xi. 3;^, 34.
* The two Bishops, Eusebius of Vercells and Dionysius of
Milan, were banished by Valens, because in a council at Milan
A.D. 355.
LETTER LXIII.
467
Church, triumphed over the imperial power,
because by earthly shame they purchased
fortitude of soul, and kinj^ly power ; they
from whom the band of soldiers and the din
of arms could not tear away the faith sub-
dued the raging of the brutal mind, which
was unable to hurt the saints. For, as you
read in Proverbs, "the king's wrath is as
the wrath of a lion." '
69. He confessed that he was overcome
when he asked them to change their deter-
mination, but they thought their pen
strono-er than swords of iron. Tlicn it was
unbelief which was wounded so that it fell,
not the faith of the saints ; they did not de-
sire a tomb in their own country, for whom
was reserved a home in the heavens. They
wandered over the whole earth, "having
nothing and yet possessing all things. "_^
Wherever they were sent, they esteemed it
a place full of delights, for nothing was
wantina: to them in whom the riches of faith
abounded. Lastly, they enriched others,
being themselves poor as to earthly means,
rich in grace. They were tried but not
killed, in fasting, in labours, in watchings,
in vigils. Out of weakness they came forth
strong. They did not wait for the entice-
ments of pleasure who were satiated by
fasting ; the burning summer did not parch
' those whom the hope of eternal grace re-
freshed, nor did the cold of icy regions break
them down, whose devotion was ever bud-
ding afresh with glowing devotion ; they
feared not the chains of men whom Jesus
had set free ; they desired not to be rescued
from death, who expected to be raised again
I by Christ.
70. And at last holy Dionysius requested
in his prayers, that he might end his life in
exile, for fear that he might, if he returned
home, find the minds of the people or the
clergy disturbed through the teaching or
practice of the unbelievers, and he obtained
this favour, so that he bore with him the
peace of the Lord with a quiet mind. Thus
as holy Eusebius first raised the standard of
confessorship, so blessed Dionysius in his
exile gave up his life with honour higher
even than martyrs.
71. Now this patience in holy FAisebius
grew strong by the discipline of the monas-
tery, and from the custom of hard endurance
he derived the power of enduring hardships.
For who doubts that in stricter Christian de-
votion these two things are the most excel-
lent, the offices of the clergy and the rule of
the monks ? The former is a discipline
^ Prov. xix, 12.
* 2 Cor. vi. 10.
which accustoms to courteousness and good
morals, the latter to abstinence and patience ;
the former as it were on an open stage, the
latter in secret ; the one is visible, the other
hidden. And so he who was a good athlete
said: "We are made a spectacle to this
world and to Angels."' Worthy indeed
was he to be gazed upon by Angels, when
he was striving to attain the prize of Christ,
when he was striving to lead on earth the
life of Angels, and overcome the wickedness
of spirits in heaven, for he wrestled with
spiritual wickedness.^ Rightly did the world
gaze upon him, that it might imitate him.
72. The one life, then, is on the open arena,
the other hidden as in a cave ; the one is
opposed to the confusion of the world, the
other to the desires of the flesh; the one
subdues, the other shun§ the pleasures of
the body; the one was more agreeable,
the other mOfS safe ; the one ruling, the
other restraining itself, in oT'l^-^ tO be whoUv
Christ's, for to the perfect it is saia : • xxv.,
who Avill come after Me, let him deny him-
self, and take up his cross and follow I\Ie. ''^
Now he follows Christ who is able to say :
"It is no longer I that live, but Christ liveth
in me. " ■*
73. Paul denied himself, when, knowing
that chains and tribulations awaited him in
jesusalem, he willingly offered himself to
danger, saying: " Nor do I count my life
dear to myself, if only I can accomplish my
course, and the ministry of the Word, M'hich
I have received of the Lord Jesus. '' s And at
last, though many were standing round,
weeping and beseeching him, he did not
change his mind, so stern a censor of itself
is ready faith.
74. The one then contends, the other re-
tires ; the one overcomes incitements, the
other flees from them ; by the one the world
is triumphed over, the other rejoices over it ;
to the one the world is crucified, or itself is
crucified to the world, ^ to the other it is
unknown ; the one endures more frequent
temptations, and so has the greater victory,
the other falls less often, and keeps guard
more easily.
75. Elijah himself too, that the word
spoken by his mouth might be confirmed,
was sent by the Lord to hide himself by the
brook Cherith.7 Ahab threatened, Jezebel
threatened, Elijah was afraid and rose up,
and then "went in the strength of that
spiritual meat forty days and forty nights
Cor.
VI. 9.
* Gal. ii. 20.
' 1 [3] Kings xv-ii. 3
^ Kph. vi. 12.
' Acts XX. 24.
* S. Matt. xvii. 24.
• Gal. vi. 14.
468
ST. AMBROSE.
unto Horeb the mount of God ; " ' and en-
tered into a cave and rested there ; and
afterwards was sent to anoint kings. He
was then inured to patience by dwelling
in solitude, and, as though fed to the fatness
of virtue by the homely food, went on more
strong.
76. John, too, grew up in the desert, and
baptized the Lord, and there first practised
constancy, that afterwards he might rebuke
kings.
77. And since in speaking of holy Elijah's
dwelling in the desert, we have passed by
without notice the names of places which
w^ere not given without a purpose, it seems
well to go back to what they signify.
Elijah was sent to the brook Cherith, and
there the ravens nourished him, bringing
him bread in the morning, for it ' ' strengthens
man's heart."- For how should the pro-
phet be nourished except by mystical food ?
At evening fleshi was supplied. Understand
what you read, for Cherith means "under-
standing," Horeb signifies " heart "or " as a
heart," Beersheba also is interpreted " the
well of the seventh," or "of the oath."
78. Elijah went first to Beersheba, to
the mysteries and sacraments of the divine
and holy Law, next he is sent to the brook,
to the stream of the river which makes
glad the City of God. ^ You perceive the
two Testaments of the One Author; the
old Scripture as a well deep and obscure,
whence you can only draw with labour ; it
is not full, for He Who was to fill it was
not yet come. Who afterwards said : "I am
come not to destroy but to fulfil the Law. "4
And so the Saint is bidden of the Lord to pass
over to the stream, for he who has drunk
of the New Testament, not only is a river,
but also "from his belly shall flow rivers
of living water," 5 rivers of understanding,
rivers of meditation, spiritual rivers, which,
however, dried up in the times of unbelief,
lest the sacrilegious and unbelieving should
drink.
79. At that place the ravens recognized
the Prophet of the Lord, whom the Jews did
not recognize. The ravens fed him, whom
that royal and noble race were persecuting.
What is Jezebel, who persecuted him but
the Synagogue, vainly fluent, vainly abound-
ing in the Scriptures, which it neither keeps
nor understands ? What ravens fed him but
tliose whose young call uj^on Him, to whose
cattle He gives food as we read ; "to the
young ravens that call upon Him." ^ Those
* 1 [3] Kings xix. 8.
^ Ps. xlvi. fxlv.] 4.
* S. John vii. 38.
' Ps. civ. fciii.] 15.
* S. Matt. V. 17.
• Ps. cxlvii. [cxlvi.] g.
ravens knew whom they were feeding, who
were close upon understanding, and brought
food to that stream of sacred knowledgre.
80. He feeds the prophet, who under-
stands and keeps the things that are written.
Our faith gives him sustenance, our pro-
gress gives him nourishment ; he feeds
upon our minds and senses, his discourse
is nourished by our understanding. In the
morning we give him bread, who, being
placed in the light of the Gospel, bestow
on him the settled strength of our hearts.
By these things he is nourished, by thc::e he
is strong, with these he fills the mouthc of
those who fast, to whom the unbelief of the
Jews supplied no food of faith. To them
every prophetic utterance is but fasting
diet, the interior richness of which they do
not see ; empty and thin, such as cannot
fatten their jaws.
81. Perhaps they brought him flesh in the
evening, as it were stronger food, such as
the Corinthians, whose minds were weak,
could not take, and were therefore fed by
the Apostle with milk. ^ So, stronger meat
was brought in the evening of the world,
in the morning bread. And so, because the
Lord commanded this food to be supplied,
that word of prophecy may be suitably ad-
dressed to Him in this place: "Thou wilt
give joy in the outgoings of morning and
evening; " ^ and, farther on : "Thou hast
prepared their food, for so is its prepara-
tion." 3
82. But I think that enough has been
said of the Master, let us now go on to the
lives of the disciples, who have given them-
selves to His praise and celebrate it with
hymns day and night. For this is the ser-
vice of the Angels, to be always occupied
in the praises of God, to propitiate and
entreat the Lord with frequent prayers.
They attend to reading, or occupy their
minds with continual labours, and separated
from the companionship of women, aftbrd
safe protection to each other. What a life
is this, in which is nothing to fear, much to
imitate ! The pain of fnb.ting is compen-
sated by tranquillity of mind, is lightened by
practice, aided by leisure, or beguiled by
occupation ; is not burdened with worldly
cares, nor occupied with uncongenial
troubles, nor weighed down with the dis-
tractions of the city.
83. You perceive what kind of teacher
must be found for the preservation or teach-
ing of this gift, and we can find him, if you
assist by unanimity, if you forgive one
• I Cor. iii. 2.
* Ps. Ixv. [Ixiv.] 8.
* Ps. Ixv. [Ixiv.] 9.
LETTER LXIII.
469
another should any one think liimsclf in-
jured by another. For it is not the only
kind of justice, not to injure him who
has not injured us, but also to forgive
him who has most injured us. We are
often injuretl by the fraud of another, by
the guile of a neighbour ; do we consider
it a mark of virtue, to avenge guile by
guile, or to repay frauil by fraud .' For if
justice is a virtue it should be free from
offence, and should not repel wickedness
by wickedness. For what virtue is it that
the same thing should be done by you
which you yourself punish in another.?
That is the spreading of wickedness not its
punishment, for it makes no difference
whom one injures, whether a just man or an
unjust, seeing one ought not to injure any-
one. Nor does it make any difference in
what way one bears ill will, whether from a
desire of revenging oneself, or from a wish
to injure, since in neither case is ill will
free from blame. For to bear ill will is the
same thing as to be unjust, and so it is said
to thee: "Bear not ill will amongst those
that bear ill will, and emulate not those
that do unrighteousness ; '"' and above ; "I
have hated the congregation of them that
bear ill will." ^ He clearly comprehends all
and makes no exception, he lays hold of ill
will and asks not the cause.
84. But what better pattern can there be
than that of Divine justice .'' For the Son of
God says: "Love your enemies ;" ^ and
again: " Pray for those that persecute you
and speak against you. "^ So far does He
remove the desire of vengeance from the
perfect that He commands charity towards
those who injure them. And since He had
said in the Old Testament : '' Vengeance is
Mine, I will repay. "5 He says in the Gos-
pel, that we are to pray for those who have
injured us, that He Who has said that He
will avenge, may not do so ; for it is His
will to pardon at your desire with which
according to His promise He agrees. But
if you seek for you know that the unjust is
more severely punished by his own convic-
tions than by judicial severity.
85. And since no one can be without some
adversities, let us take care that they do
not happen to us through our own fault.
For no one is more severely condemned by
the judgment of others, than a foolish man,
who is the cause of his misfortunes, is con-
demned by his own. For which reason we
should decline matters which are full of
1 Ps. xxxvii. [xxxvi.] i. - Ps. xxvi. fxxv.] 5. ' S. Matt. v. 44-
« S. Matt. V. 44. ^ Deut. xxxii. 35.
trouble and contention, which have no
advantage, but cause hindrances. Although
we ought to take care not to have to repent
our decisions or acts. For it is the part of
a prudent man U> look forward, so as not
often to have to repent, for never to repent
belongs to God alone. But what is the fruit
of righteousness, but tranquillity of mind ?
Or what is to live righteously but to live
with tranquility .' Such as is the pattern of
the master, such is the condition of the whole
house. But if these things are requisite in
a house, how much more in the Church,
"where we, both rich and poor, bond and
free, Greek and Scythian, noble and com-
mon, are all one in Christ Jesus." '
86. Let no man suppose that because he
is rich, more deference is to be paid him.
Li the Church he is rich who is rich in faith,
for the faithful has a whole world of riches.
What wonder is it if the faithful possesses
the world, who possesses the inheritance
of Christ, which is of more value than the
world.'' "Ye were redeemed with the Pre-
cious Blood, "^ was certainly said to all, not
to the rich only. But if you will be rich,
obey him who says: "Be ye holy in all
your conversation. ' ^ He is speaking not
to the rich only but to all ; for He judges
without respect of persons, as the Apostle
His faithful witness says. And therefore
says he : "Spend the time of your sojourn-
ing here,""* not in luxury, or fastidiousness,
nor haughtiness of heart, but in fear. On
this earth you have time not eternity, do
you use the time as those who must pass
hence.
8j. Do not trust in riches ; for all such
things are left here, faith alone will accom-
pany you. And righteousness indeed will
go with you if faith has led the way. ^^'hy
do riches entice you.'' "Ye were not
redeemed with gold and silver," with pos-
sessions, or silk garments, "from your vain
conversation, but with the precious Blood of
Christ. "5 He then is rich who is an heir of
God, a joint heir with Christ. Despise not
the poor man, he has made you rich.
"This poor man cried, and the Lord heard
him."^ Do not reject a poor man, Christ
when He was rich became poor, and be-
came poor because of you, that by His pov-
erty He might make you rich. 7 Do not then
as though rich exalt yourself. He sent forth
His apostles without money.
88. And the first of them said: "Silver
and gold have I none. "^ He glories in
' Col. iii. II.
* I Pet. i. 17.
' 2 Cor. viii. 9.
* I Pet. i. 18, 19.
" I Pet. i. 18.
• Acts iii. 6.
' I Pet. i. 15.
* Ps. xxxiv. fxxxiii.] 6.
4/0
ST. AMBROSE.
poverty as thoug^h shunning contamination.
'"Silver and gold," he says, "I have none, ""
— not gold and silver. He knows not their
order in value who knows not the use of
them. " Silver and gold have I none,'' but
I have faith. I am rich enough in the Name
of Jesus, "which is above every name. " '
I have no silver, neither do I require any ; I
have no gold, neither do I desire it, but I
have what you rich men have not, I have
what even you would consider to be of more
value, and I give it to the poor, namely that
I say in the Name of Jesus : "Be strength-
ened, ye weak hands, and ye feeble knees. "^
89. But if you will be rich, you must be
poor. Then shall you in all things be rich,
if you are poor in spirit. It is not property
which makes rich, but the spirit.
90. There are those who humble them-
selves in abundance of riches, and they act
rightly and prudently, for the law of nature
is sufficiently rich for all, according to which
one may soon find what is more than enough ;
but for lust any abundance of riches is still
penury. Again, no one is born poor but
becomes so. Poverty then is not in nature
but in our own feelings, and so to find one-
self rich is easy for nature, but hard for lust.
For the more a man has gained the more he
thirsts for gain, and burns as it were with a
kind of intoxication from his lusts.
91. Why do you seek for a heap of riches
as though it were necessary ? Nothing is so
necessary as to know that this is not neces-
sary. Why do you throw the l)lame on the
flesh.' It is not the belly in the body but
avarice in the mind which makes a man
insatiable. Does the flesh take away the
hope of the future .-* Does the flesh destroy
the sweetness of spiritual grace .'' Does the
flesh hinder faith.' Is it the flesh which
attributes any weight to vain opinions as it
were to insane masters ? The flesh prefers
frugal moderation, by which it is freed from
burdens, is clothed with health, because it
has laid aside its care and has obtained
tranquillity.
92. But riches themselves are not blame-
able. For "the ransom of a man's life are
his riches," ^ since he that gives to the poor
redeems his soul.4 So that even in these
material riches there is place for virtue.
You are like steersmen in the vast sea. If
a man steers his course well, he quickly
passes over the sea so as to attain to the
port, but one who knows not how to direct
his property is drowned together with his
' Phil. ii. q.
^ Prov. xiii. 8.
- Isa. XXXV. 3.
* Probably a reference to Dan. iv. 27 [LXX.
freight. And so it is written : " The wealth
of rich men is a most strong city." '
93. And what is that city but Jerusalem
which is in heaven, in which is the kingdom
of God .? This is a good possession which
brings eternal fruit. A good possession
which is not left here, but is possessed there.
He who possesses this says : "The Lord is
my portion."^ He says no*, ]\Iy portion
stretches and extends from this boundary
to that. Nor does he say. My portion is
amongst such and such neighbours, except
perchance amongst the apostles, amongst
the prophets, amongst the saints of the Lord,
for this is the righteous man's portion. He
does not say, My portion is in the meadows,
or in the woods, or the plains, except per-
chance those wooded plains in which the
Church is found, of which it is written :
"We found it in the wooded plains. "^ He
does not say, My portion consists of herds
of horses, for " a horse is a vain thing for
safety. " ^ He does not say, My portion con-
sists of herds of oxen, asses, or sheep ; except
perchance he reckons himself amongst those
which know their Owner, and wishes to
company with the ass which does not shun
the cribs of Christ; and that Sheep is his
portion which was led to the slaughter, and
that Lamb which was dumb before the
shearer, and opened not His mouth, ^ in
Whose humiliation judgment has been exalt-
ed. Well does he say "before the shearer, "
for He laid aside what was additional, not
His own essence, on the cross, when He laid
aside His Body, but lost not His Divinity.
94. It is not then everyone who can say.
"The Lord is my portion." The covetous
man cannot, for covetousness draws near
and says : Thou art my portion, I have thee
in subjection, thou hast served me, thou hast
sold thyself to me with that gold, by that
possession thou hast adjudged thyself to
me. The luxurious man says not : Christ is
my portion, for luxury comes and says :
Thou art my portion, I made thee mine in
that banquet, I caught thee in the net of
that feast, I hold thee by the bond of thy
gluttony. Dost thou not know that thy
table was more valued by thee than thy
life ? I refute thee by thine own judgment,
deny if thou canst, but thou canst not. And
in fine thou hast reserved nothing for thy
life, thou hast spent it all for thy table.
The adulterer cannot say : " The Lord is
my portion ; '' for lust comes and says : I am
' Prov. X. 15. - Ps. Ixjtiii. [Ixxii.J 26.
* Vs. xxxiii. [xxxii.] 17.
'' Isa. liii. 7.
■* Ps. cxxxii. [cx-xxi.
' Isa. i. -1.
LETTER LXIII.
471
thy portion, thou didst bind thyself to me in
the love of that maiden, by a night with
that harlot thou hast come under my laws
and into my power. The traitor cannot say :
"Christ is my portion," for at once the
wickedness of his sin rushes on him and
says : He is deceiving Thee, Lord Jesus, he
is mine.
95. We have an example of this, for when
Judas had received the bread from Christ,
the devil entered into his heart, as though
claiming his own property, as though retain-
ing his right to his own portion, as though
saying : He is not Thine but mine ; clearly
he is my servant, Thy betrayer, plainly he is
mine. He sits at table with Thee, and
serves me ; with Thee he feasts, but is fed by
me ; from Thee he receives bread, from me
money ; with Thee he drinks, and has sold
Thy Blood to me. And he proved how
truly he spoke. Then Christ departed from
him, Judas also himself left Jesus and fol-
lowed the devil.
96. How many masters has he who has
forsaken the One ! But let us not forsake
Him. Who would forsake Him Whom they
follow bound with chains indeed, but chains
of love, which set free and do not bind,
those chains in which they who are bound
boast, saying: "Paul the bondservant of
Jesus Christ, and Timothy."' It is more
glorious for us to be bound by Him, than to
be set free and loosed from others. Who
then would flee from peace ? Who would
flee from salvation ? Who would flee from
mercy .' Who would flee from redemption ?
97. You see, my sons, what has been the
end of those who followed these things, how
being dead they yet work. Let us study
to gain the diligence of those the glory of
whose virtues we admire, and what we
praise in others, let us silently recognize
in ourselves. Nothing effeminate, nothing
feeble attains to praise. "The kingdom of
heaven suffereth violence, and the violent
take it by force. " * The fathers ate the lamb
in haste. Faith hastens, devotion is quick,
hope is active, it loves not objections of the
mind, but to pass from fruitless ease to the
fruits of toil. Why do you put off till to-
morrow f You can gain to-day ; and must
guard against not attaining the one and
losine the other. The loss even of one hour
is no slight one, one hour is a portion of our
whole life.
98. There are young persons who desire
quickly to attain to old age, so as no longer
to be subject to the will of their elders ; and
' Phil. i. I.
* S. Matt. xi. 12.
there are also old men who would wish if
they could to return again to youth. And 1
approve of neither desire, for the young, dis-
dainful of things present, as it were ungrate-
fully desire a change in their way of living,
the old wish for its lengthening, whereas
youth can grow old in character, and old
age grow green with action. For it is disci-
pline as much as age which brings amend-
ment of character. How much the more
then ought we to raise our hopes to the
kingdom of God, where will be newness of
life, and where will be a change of grace not
of age !
99. Reward is not obtained by ease or by
sleep. The sleeper does no work, ease
brings no profit, but rather loss. Esau by
taking his ease lost the blessing of the first-
born, for he preferred to have food given to
him rather than to seek it. Industrious Jacob
found favour with each parent.
100. And yet although Jacob was superior
in virtue and favour, he yielded to his
brother's anger, who grieved that his
younger brother was preferred to him. And
so it is written: "Give place to wrath,"'
lest the wrath of another draw you also into
sin, when you wish to resist, and to avenge
yourself You can put away sin both from
him and from yourself, if you think well to
yield. Imitate the patriarch who by his
mother's counsel went far away. And who
was the mother ? Rebecca, that is, Patience.
For who but Patience could have given this
counsel .-* The mother loved her son, but
preferred that he should be cut off from her-
self rather than from God. And so because
the mother was good, she benefited both
her sons, but to the youngest she gave a
blessing which he could keep ; yet she pre-
ferred not one son to the other as sons ;
but the active to the easy-going, the faithful
to the unbelieving.
loi. And so since he was separated from
his parents through piety not on account of
impiety, he talked with God, he increased
in riches, in children, and in favour. Nor
was he elated by these things when he met
his brother ; but humbly bowed down to
him, not indeed considering him the pitiless,
the furious, the degenerate, but Him Whom
he reverenced in him. And so he bowed
down seven times, which is the number of re-
mission, for he was not bowing down to man,
but to Him Whom he foresaw in the Spirit,
as hereafter to come in human flesh to take
away the sins of the world. ^ And this
mystery is unfolded to you in the answer
' Rom. xii. 19.
* S. John i. 29.
472
ST. AMBROSE.
given to Peter, when he said: "If my
brother trespass against me how often shall
I forgive him ? Until seven times ? " ' You
see that remission of sins is a type of that
great Sabbath, of that rest of everlasting
grace, and therefore is given by contem-
plation.
102. But what is the meaning of his hav-
ing arranged his wives and children and all
his servants, and ordered that they should
bow down to the earth ? It was certainly
not to the element of earth, which is often
filled with blood, in which is the workshop
of all crimes, which often is rough with huge
rocks, or broken cliffs, or barren and hungry
soil, but as to that Flesh which is to be for
our salvation. And perchance this is that
mystery which the Lord taught, when He
said: "Not only seven times, but even
seventy times seven. "^
103. Do you then forgive injuries done to
you that you may be children of Jacob. Be
not provoked as was Esau. Imitate holy
David, who as a good master left us what
we should follow, saying : " Instead of lov-
ing me they spake against me,but I prayed," ^
and when he was reviled, he prayed.
Prayer is a good shield, wherewith con-
tumely is kept away, cursing is repelled and
often is turned back on those who utter it,
so that they are wounded by their own
weapons. ' ' Let them curse, " he says, ' ' but
bless Thou. " 4 The curse of man is to be
sought for, which procures the blessing of
the Lord.
104. And for the rest, most dear brethren,
consider that Jesus suffered without the gate,
and do you go forth out of this earthly city,
for your city is Jerusalem which is above.
Let your conversation be there, that you
may say: "But our conversation is in
heaven." s Therefore did Jesus go forth out
of the city, that you going out of this world
may be above the world. Moses alone, who
saw God, had his tabernacle without the
camp when he talked with God ; ^ and the
blood indeed of the victims which were
offered for sin, was brought to the altar, but
the bodies were burnt without the camp ; ^
for no one placed amidst the evil of this
world can lay aside sin, nor is his blood
accepted of God, except he go forth from
the defilement of this body.
105. Love hospitality, whereby holy
Abraham found favour, and received Christ
as his guest, and Sarah already worn with
age gained a son ; Lot also escaped the fire
' S. Matt, xviii. 21.
^ Ps. cix. [cviii.J 4.
" Phil. iii. 20.
' S. Matt, xviii. 22.
* Ps. cix. [cviii.] 28.
^ Ex. xxxiii. 7.
Ex. xxix. 12, 13.
of the destruction of Sodom. You too can
receive Angels if you offer hospitality to
strangers. What shall I say of Rahab who
by this means found safety .'
106. Compassionate those who are bound
with chains, as though bound with them.
Comfort those in sorrow ; for, "It is better
to go into the house of mourning than into
the house of rejoicing."' From the one is
gained the merit of a good work, from the
other a lapse into sin. Lastly, in the one
case you still hope for the reward, in the
other you have already received it. Feel
with those who are afflicted as if also afflicted
with them.
107. Let a wife show deference, not be a
slave to her husband ; let her show herself
ready to be ruled not coerced. She is not
worthy of wedlock who deserves chiding.
Let a husband also guide his wife like a
steersman, honour her as the partner of his
life, share with her as a joint heir of grace.
108. Mothers, wean your children, love
them, but pray for them that they may long
live above this earth, not on the earth but
above it, for there is nothing long-lived on this
earth, and that which lasts long is but short
and very frail. Warn them rather to take
up the Cross of the Lord than to love this
life.
109. Mary, the mother of the Lord stood
by her Son's Cross ; no one has taught me
this but the holy Evangelist St. John.^
Others have related how the earth was
shaken at the Lord's passion, the sky was
covered with darkness, the sun withdrew
itself ; 3 that the thief was after, a faithful
confession received into paradise. ^ John
tells us what the others have not told, how
the Lord fixed on the Cross called to His
mother, esteeming it of more worth that,
victorious over, His sufferings, He rendered
her the offices of piety, than that He gave
her a heavenly kingdom. For if it be
according to religion to grant pardon to the
thief, it is a mark of much greater piety that
a mother is honoured with such affection by
her Son. "Behold," He says, " thy Son "
. . . . " Behold thy mother. "5 Christ testi-
fied from the Cross, and divided the offices
of piety between the mother and the dis-
ciple. The Lord made not only a public
but also a private testament, and John
signed this testament of His, a witness
worthy of so great a Testator. A good
testament not of money but of eternal life,
which was written not with ink bst with
' Eccl. vii. 2.
* S. Luke xxiii. 43.
' S. John xix. 25.
^ S. John xix. 27.
' S. Matt. xxni. 45.
LETTER LXllI.
473
the Spirit of the livings God, Who says :
" My tongue is the pen of a quickly writing
scribe." '
no. Nor was Mary below what was be-
coming the mother of Christ. When the
apostles fled, she stood at the Cross, and
with pious eyes beheld her Son's wounds,
for she did not look for the death of her
Offspring, but the salvation of the world.
Or perchance, because that "royal hall " -
knew that the redemption of the world would
be through the death of her Son, she thought
that by her death also she might add some-
thing to the public weal. But Jesus did not
need a helper for the redemption of all, Who
saved all without a helper. Wherefore also
He says : "1 am become like a man with-
out help, free among the dead. "3 He re-
ceived indeed the affection of His mother,
but sought not another's help.
111. Imitate her, holy mothers, who in
her only dearly beloved Son set forth so
great an example of maternal virtue ; for
neither have you sweeter children, nor did
the Virgin seek the consolation of being able
to bear another son.
112. ]\'Iasters, command your servants not
* Ps. xlv. [xliv.] I.
- The expression " Aula regaJis " applied to the Blessed Virgin
is also used by St. Ambrose, de lust. I'irg. XII. 79, and in the
Hymn for the Nativity of our Lord — " V^eni Redeinptor gentiui>!"
verse 4 — " Procedit e thalamo Suo, Pudoris aula Regia." The
force is lost in the translation adopted in Hymns A ncient and Jilod-
ern, No. 57, but is preserved in Dr. Neale's version, " Proceeding
from His chamber free, The royal hall ol chastity." — Hymtial Noted,
No. 31.
* Ps. Ixxxviii. [Lutxvii.] 4, 5.
as being below you in rank, but as remem-
bering that they are sharers of the same
nature as yourselves. ' Servants, serve your
masters with good will, for each ought
patiently to support that to which he is
born, and be obedient not only to good but
also to froward masters. For what thanks
has your service if you zealously serve good
masters } But if you thus serve the froward
also you gain merit : for the free also have
no reward, if when they transgress they are
punished by the judges, but this is their
merit to suffer without transgressing. And
so you, if contemplating the Lord Jesus
you serve even difticult masters with pa-
tience, will have your reward. Since the
Lord Himself suffered, the just at the hand
of the unjust, and by His wonderful patience
nailed our sins to His Cross, that he who
shall imitate Him may wash away his sins
in fLs Blood.
113. \x\ fine, turn all to the Lord Jesus.
Let your enjoyment of this life be with a
good conscience, your endurance of death
with the hope of immortality, your assur-
ance of the resurrection through the grace
of Christ ; let truth be with simplicity, faith
with confidence, abstinence with holiness,
industry with soberness, conversation with
modesty, learning without vanity ; let there
be soberness of doctrine, faith without the
intoxication of heresy. The grace of our
Lord Jesus Christ be with you all. Amen.
1 i Pet. ii. 18.
ST. AMBROSE.
INDEX OF SUBJECTS.
Aaron, his blessedness, 45 ; a type
of Christ as the true priest,
225 ; his robe, 223 sq. ; his rod
that budded, 446, 465.
Abdemeleck [Ebedmelek] raising
Jeremiah from tiie pit, a type
of the Gentiles, 129.
Abraham, 19, 20, 20 r, 215, 255,
345 ; an example of passion
subject to reason, 19; also of
prudence, 20, 21 ; of justice,
20 ; of fortitude, 20 ; of tem-
perance, 20; of hospitality, ig,
59, 60, 1S9 ; as a type of Christ
a pattern for us, 1S9; his
sacrifice of Isaac, 190; his
character, 190; recognized the
Three in One, 189; pleased by
his obedience, 190 ; saw Three
and adored One, 215; the sym-
bolism of the number of his
servants, 201, 201 n.
Absalom tried flattery, 6r.
Absolving and retaining sins, only
the Church as having true
priest can claim this power,
330-
Absorption of Son in the Father,
reference to Sabellian theory
of, 21, 304.
Abuse not to be answered, 4 sq.
Achan, example of avarice, 63.
Actions, three rules to be observed
in our actions, 18; affected
actions to be deprecated, 13 ;
to be suited to circumstances,
36; of body and soul being in
common, each of these to re-
ceive reward or punishment,
188.
Actors spoken of, 13, 35.
Adam, 357.
Adukery common in heathen re-
ligions, 366.
Advantage to self not to be sought
at another's expense, 69.
Adversity, not to be cast down in,
31 ; friendship proved in, 88.
Advice, prudence and justice need-
ed in giving, 50 ; also upright-
ness of life, 52 ; who most fit
to give, 51, 58 ; danger of bad,
58 ; best in the pure from vice,
52' 53-
^neas, 247.
yEsculapius, fable about, 3S2.
Aetius, 207 ; his teaching, 207,
207 n. ; Bishop of Antioch,
207 n. ; was deposed, 207 n. ;
had Eunomius as teacher,
207 n.
Age of life desires change, every,
195-
Agnes, St., 351, 364; her birthday
as a martyr, 364 ; her history,
364. 365. 366.
Agony in Gethsemane, the, 228,
229.
Agreements to be made in good
faith, 78.
Ahab was wretched in Naboth's
vineyard, 46.
Ahimelech, 87-
A'lcjv, qiui'ti-. the interpretation of,
2b6)n.
Allophyllos, 24.
Alms and fasting, merit of, 459 ;
advantage of, 460.
Altar of Christ, for the priests to
minister at, 323,429; for the
baptized to communicate at,
323; to be alone honoured by
a Christian, 417, 421.
Altar of Victory, in the Senate
house, xvi; account of the
disputes over, xvi, 411 sq., 414
sq., 421 sq., 453.
Altars, heathen, ought not to be
restored, 412 ; ought not to be
used to make Christians lapse,
412.
Ambition, a hindrance to justice,
-3-
Ambrose, St., avoided his call to
the office of Bishop, i ; his
duty is to teach, i ; called
from the magistracy, xvi, 354;
in teaching has to learn, i ;
what made him write (/e Off.,
5 ; refused priesthood to un-
suitable persons, 13; sold the
sacred vessels for the redemp-
tion of captives, 64 ; opposed
attempts to seize trust money,
66 ; found more easily those
who had preserved innocence
than such as had repented
fittingly, 357 ; his hurried elec-
tion, I ; his humility as a
teacher, XV, 15, 354, 355, 363,
430, 431 ; his teaching, xiv, xv,
19 n., 39; his kindred, xv, 159,
361 ; built the basilica at
^lilan, 164; knew his Virgil
and Homer, 208 ; wrote De
Fide at Gratian's request, 199,
201 ; was a model Bishop, xv,
xvi; fostered Virginity and
wrote on it, xvi, 361 ; his rela-
tion to Novatianism, 323 ;
pleaded for the lapsed, 329
sq. ; gives an account of the
Arian intrigues and violence,
422 sq., 430 sq. ; resisted at
the basilica, 423, 425, 430 sq. ;
was ministering at the altar
and catechising, 423 sq. ;
notes on his doctrine, xiv ;
strongly opposed Arianism,
xiv, XV, xvi ; close of his active
life, xvii ; an earnest defender
of the Church, xvii; wrote to
Valentinian II., 411 sq., 414
sq., 427 sq. ; wrote to Theodo-
sius, 440, 450, 453 ; wrote to
Marcellina, 363, 371, 422, 436,
465 ; his sermon against Aux-
entius, 430; had great in-
fluence with Theodosius, 445,
450 ; remonstrated with Eu-
genius, 453; counselled the
church at Vercells, 457 sq. ;
excused himself from acting
as judge, 427 sq., 430, 435 ;
literature of his works, xi ;
Biographies and Lives, xi, xii ;
historical summary and tables,
xiii; the Scripture text he
used, xiv ; details of his life,
XV ; list of his extant works,
xvii-xxii ; list of doubtful,
spurious and lost, xxii ; list of
hymns, xxii.
Ambrose, Bp. of Ticinum, 66 n.
Amice of the true priest, 224.
Ananias, sin of, 79.
Anathema, appended to Nicene
Creed, 220.
Angels, 231, 245, 247,254,257,260,
264 ; glory of, different to the
Son's glory, 257 ; not immortal
by nature, 245 ; not able to
475
476
ST. AMBROSE.
comprehend the mystery of
the Incarnation, 263 ; adore
the risen and ascended Christ,
263; their adoration of as-
cended Saviour the counter-
part of right faith concerning
Him, 264 ; their hierarchies,
202 n., 212.
Anger to be restrained, 3, 16;
results of restrained,
J >
the
devil's opportunity, 3 ; to be
checked by reason, 16; allow-
able against evil, 17.
Anna, type of widowhood, 394, 395.
Annunciation, the, 13.
Anomaeans, 201.
Answer given to question " why
wicked live at ease," etc., 10,
II, 12.
Anthropomorphism, how to un-
derstand Scripture when it
attnbutes a body or members
to God, 1 15 sq.
Antichrist, spirit of, in Arianism,
132; will be judged and pun-
ished by Christ, but in the
Spirit, 141.
Antioch, the virgin martyr of, 376
sq.
Antiochus, son of Lysias, 34.
Antiochus the king, 2i3y 34- 65.
Apocrypha and the canonical
Scriptures, 171 n.
Apollinarianism, refuted, 70 sq.
ApoUos, 266.
Apologists, effects of the Christian,
207 n.
Apostles, 264.
Arbogastes, Frankish general and
regicide, 455 n.
Arcadius the Emperor, 414.
Archytes of Tarentum, saying of,
17-
Arian denials, 206, 214, 225, 267,
286; misinterpretations of St.
Paul, 280, 28 1 ; also of St,
John, 278, 282 sq.
Arianism, 133, 203,227; refuted,
138, 221, 286, 291, 295, 296,
299, 308 ; a lapse to paganism,
202 n., 207 n., 215 ; was related
to Eunomianism, 207 n. ;
argued against the Eternity,
208, 210; its corrupting in-
fluence, 199; its ideas on the
Fatherhood and Sonship, 211
n., 211 sq. ; broke up the Tri-
nity and the Unity, 202, 203 ;
its history, 202, 202 n.
Arians, 239, 240, 251, 297 ; com-
pared to pagans, 215, 219, 435;
and to Jewish innkeepers, 252;
guilty of Sabellianism, 244 ;
object to speak of the divine
substance, 259, 260 ; subtleties
of, 260, 261 ; close door of
their hearts against Christ,
264; who dissemble their her-
esy, objections raised Ijy, 275;
deprive themselves of life
eternal, 279; dilemma for, 281 ;
ungodliness of, 282, 283 ; deny
Christ to be true God, 284;
though calling themselves
Christians, denied by Christ,
153; attempt to obtain a ba-
silica at Milan, 422 sq. ; oppose
even captive redeeming, 54 n.,
64; were to be received on
repentance, 169 n. ; their her-
etical teaching, 203, 204 sq.,
215, 216, 218, 221, 222, 286 sq.,
422 sq. ; their blasphemies
cited and warned against, 206,
207, 216, 220 sq., 286 sq., 430 ;
always arguing and disputing,
206, '207, 215, 218,220, 430;
worshipped a creature, 213,
215, 216, 218 ; were favoured
by Valentinian II., 428,429;
their violence at Milan, 422
sq., 429 sq. ; were favoured
by Justina, 438 n. ; denied the
true Godhead, 289, 295 ;
changed the baptismal for-
mula, 299; called Christ a
creature, 301 ; limited Chris i's
knowledge, 308 sq.
Ariminum, Council of, 221, 428,
434-
Aristotle wrote on duty, 6; his
ideas on God, 9; his ideas on
a happy life, 442, 444.
Arius, 20 n., 202, 207, 20S, 210, 221,
247, 314; believed in an in-
ferior creator, 20 ; his teaching,
20, 20 n., 202 n., 207, 210; his
dates, 20, 202 ; his powers,
202 ; w'SLS supported by some
Bishops, 202 n. ; his dogmatic
dilemmas, 202 n. 221 ; his
errors summarised, 202 n. ;
how related to Eunomius, 207 ;
was Anomaean, 221 ; was not
condemned by name, 220, 220
n. ; his death described, 221,
221 n.
Ascension, our Lord's, proves His
Godhead, 263, 264.
Ass, story of the, applied by St.
Ambrose, 433.
Athanasius of Alexandria, defend-
ed by Lucifer, 169 n. ; taught
truly regarding the Incarna-
tion, 206 n.
Athanasius, Bishop of Anazarbus,
favoured Arius, 202 n.
Auxentius, heretic and Arian
Bishop, XV, 207, 428; notes on
his life and character, xvh. ;
Ambrose's sermon against, 430
sq. ; synopsis of the sermon,
430 ; his cruel law censured,
430; his open violence, 432
sq.; personated another IMshop,
433; despised Christian bap-
tism, 436.
Avarice, a hindrance to justice,
23; especially opposed to for-
titude, 33 ; destroys feeling of
kindness, 40 ; misses its mark,
40, 46 ; an old standing sin,
63; examples of Balaam, 63 ;
Achan, 63 ; Delilah, 63.
Babylon, 243.
Balak and Balaam, 22.
Balaam was bought by money, 63;
his deeper knowledge, 180.
Banquet, the Lord's, 264.
Banquets, dangers of, 31, 385;
attendance of priests at, 15.
Baptism, the bond of unity, 29 ;
its relation to ordination, 41,
41 n., 466; often postponed,
169, 169 n. 357 ; in the name
of the Trinity, 205, 299, 319 ;
one of the mysteries, 317 ; its
forms and ceremonial, 299,
317 sq. ; its power and teach-
ing, xii, 317 sq., 465, 466 ; as
preceding the communion,
323 ; confers forgiveness of
sins, XV, 41, 154, 346, 466; does
away with all sins and
faults, but does not dissolve
marriage — sin, not the law, is
done away, 41, 466; we are
renewed by the Holy Spirit
in, 85 ; with water and the
Holy Spirit, 103; the cere-
monies of 217, 320, 321 sq. ;
figures of, 59, 318 ; must be
given in the name of the
Trinity, 319; why only once
conferred, 346 ; the baptism of
unbelievers defiles, 320 ; pro-
fession at, 321 ; anointing at,
321 sq. ; Flood, figure of, 150.
Baptist, John the, 3S5.
Baptistery called " the Hoh- of
Holies," 317.
Barak, if son of Deborah, 399.
Barbarian invasions, 162; atro-
cities, 166.
Barbatianus, an apostate monk,
457 sq.
Basilica, Arian attempts at getting
one at Milan, 422; Ambrose'
resistance in, 422 sq., 430 sq. ;
its consecration, 436 sq. ; list
of those destroyed by the
Jews, 442.
Bauto, a count at court, 453.
Bee, a type of Virginity, 369.
" Before all worlds," its equiva-
lents, 202 n.
Begotten and Begetter personally
distinct, 204 n. ; not relating
to time, 213, 216 ; said of the
Son, 213, 214, 216, 224.
Belief, threefold incentives to, 181.
Benefits to be freely returned, 28 ;
on whom to be conferred, 62
sq. ; not to be conferred in
hope of a return, 63.
Bethesda, the Pool of, typical,
320.
Binding and loosing, 330, 331.
I'irth from the Virgin, work of the
Holy Spirit, the, 119.
Bishops, their office is to teach,
I ; not to be jealous of their
clergy, 62 ; to treat the clergy
as sons, 64 ; to make suitable
appointments, 62, 64; to ex-
communicate only if neces-
sary, 65 ; election of, 457 ; to
be the husband of a single
wife, 465 ; not to beget chil-
dren or to marry again, 465 ;
this applies to time even be-
fore baptism, 465 ; chief of
the priesthood, 317, 465 ; not
amenable to secular tribunals,
INDEX OF SUBJECTS.
477
427 ; forms of their appoint-
ment, 457, 457 n. ; to be models
for all, 465 ; requirements for
their office, 465, 466.
Blasphemy against the Spirit, 347,
34^-
Blessed, neither suffering nor sor-
row, but victory over them,
makes a man, 46.
Blood of Christ, the, 278.
Body and soul, as their actions
were in common, must be each
rewarded or punished, rSS.
Bones, the dry, in Ezekiel, a sign
of the resurrection, 185.
Book with seven seals, the, 260.
Boy allowed his armed to be con-
sumed, 283.
Breastplate, Aaron's, 223 ; its pre-
cious stones, 223, 224 n. ; its
jewel work, 224 n. ; its inter-
pretation, 224 n.
Brotherly affection, 192 sq., 196.
Cali.ipho, Epicurean, 44.
Captives redeemed by the Church,
54, 54 n., 65 ; often sold into
slavery, 54, 54 n. ; redeemed
by the price of the sacred ves-
sels, 64.
Casuistry on duties, 42.
Catechumens at Milan, 423.
Cathari, the Novatian teachers
call themselves pure, 329.
Catholic, Catholics, hold by the
apostles' teaching, 206 n.
Causa efficiens, 213 n.
Celibacy required to be checked,
406 n.
Censor and his rolls, 220.
Chalice sold for redeeming cap-
tives, 64, 65 ; holds the Blood
of Christ, 65.
Change in the Eucharist effected
by Christ's word, the, 324.
Chastity, commended, 2, 12, 13,
366 sq., 376 sq., 418 sq. ; a
purely Christian grace, 366
sq-, 395' 403, 458. 462 ; an en-
couragement to marriage, 368,
367, 369 ; a part of piety, 376 ;
in the martyr maiden of An-
tioch, 376 sq. ; as compared
with marriage, 403 ; a duty
commanded, 404, 458 ; seen
in the Church herself, 462,
463.
Cherubim and seraphim, Isaiah's
vision of, explained, 157.
Children, the Three, 206.
Christ, as Priest, offers Himself
now, 40 ; the power of God,
211, 242, 249, 252; the wis-
— dom of, 211, 225, 249, 252;
—transfiguration of, 215 ; the
God of the patriarchs, 215 ;
type of, Aaron, 223 ; Melchi-
zedek, 255 ; Joshua, 285, 463 ;
Abraham, 189 ; Christ the
true Priest, 224, 255, 398 ; our
judge, 226, 227, 237 ; the
Rock, 226, 268 ; our Shepherd,
226 ; the Almighty, 228, 264 ;
Alpha and Omega, 228; God
and Man, 206, 208, 216, 230,
243, 247, 250 ; the Son of God,
199, 216, 218, 219; is truly
God, 207, 208, 218, 219, 220 ;
Begotten of the Father, 218,
219; is present in baptism,
320; is present in the Holy
Nlysteries, 324; is the efful-
gence of the Father, 208, 208
n., 22311., 224; His resurrec-
tion, iSo, 231 ; sul)ject to the
Father in His human nature,
235 ; sitting at God's right
hand, 237, 238 ; is the most
High God, 206, 206 n., 243 ;
His Name the assurance of
the Incarnation, 244 ; in the
Incarnation, 163, 203, 216, 217,
384 ; in His resurrection, 180,
322 ; raises the dead, 186, 187 ;
is blessed, 244 ; has immortality,
244 ; has sovereignty, 247 ; His
temptation, 247; is the be-
ginning, 249 ; is source of all
goodness, 250 ; is our true
strength, 31, 32, 180; our
example, 69, 70, 470 ; our
Physician and Remedy, 180 ;
is one not two, 251 ; the Bride-
groom of the Church, 253 ;
Mediator of the New Cove-
nant, 254 ; His sacrifice, 255 ;
is both Priest and Victim,
255; King and Priest forever,
255 ; sends the Holy Spirit,
264 ; the mystery of Christ,
265 ; His divinity argued upon
by Ambrose, 199, 203, 208 sq. ;
born of the Virgin Mary, 202,
214, 216, 319, 320, 324, 365,
366, 434, 446, 461,463; not
Joseph's Son, 202 n. ; paid the
debt of sin as to a creditor,
446; the teaching in His acts,
445 sq. ; His Power, signs of,
26S, 269 ; His will free, 278,
282 ; His Flesh and Blood,
278; His likeness to us, 279 ; is
God blessed for ever, 280 ; one
with the Father, 286, 289 ;
true God, 287, 288 ; perfect
man, 298 ; how said not to
have known the day of judg-
ment, 300 ; as God knew all
things, 308 ; His knowledge,
limited by the Arians, 308
sq. ; how subject in us, 312 ;
emptied Himself not so as to
be void of His own fulness,
but that we who could not re-
ceive His fulness might re-
ceive Him according to our
several capacities, 105; Holy
Spirit "abode" upon Christ,
but is " poured out " upon
man, 105 ; the fulness of
Christ, through anointing of
the Holy Spirit, 107 ; Christ
took that which He was not,
that He might conceal what
He was and be tempted, 107 ;
died that we might live in His
body raised to life again, 108;
His taking away sin prefigur-
ed in the coal which touched
Isaiah's lips, 108 ; we shall
reign with Him by adoption
and grace, the Holy Spirit by
])ower and nature, 108 ; Christ
wept not for what affected
Himself but for us, 162; in
what nature He was sad, 162;
is one Person in two natures,
163; unlike the Father in His
human nature, 163; the death
of Christ redeemed the world,
168 ; the Cross the sign of
Christ, 168 ; universe rose
again in the resurrection of
Christ, 186, 191 ; Christ was
" free among the dead," for
He had power to raise Him-
self, 191 ; Christ's anger ra-
ther to bring men to repent-
ance and mercy, 333; He
willed to give great power to
His disciples, 335; suffered
and died to deliver us from
death, 187, 340.
Christianity, how distinct from
paganism, Judaism, etc., 202.
Christians brought to heathen
altars, 412 ; compelled to
swear there, 41.2; their suffer-
ings, 445.
Chrysostom preached his Homily
on the Statues, 445 n.
Church, the, 225, 227, 248, 249,
252; is it ever lawful to sell
the sacred vessels of the
Church, 65; Church is one in
faith and love, 70; the Bride
of Christ, 78, 79 ; type of the
Church, Ruth, 78, 79 ; also the
woman hiding the leaven in
the meal, 342 ; how black and
comely, 322; the place for re-
turning thanks, 168; her
beauty, 322, 462 ; her fertility
in chastity, 368 ; cared and
provided for the virgins, 371 ;
has modelsfor virgins, married
and widows, 394 ; is restored
in Christ by His Incarnation,
394 ; fell by contact with the
world, 419 ; the poor, her only
possessions, 419, 436; pays
tribute to the Emperor for her
lands, 435 ; suffered from
worldliness, xii; suffered from
plotters, 444.
Cicero, wrote on duty, 8, 15,30;
says order is to be obser\ed
in what is seemly, 15; his
ideas on fortitude, whence
derived, 5 n., 30.
Circe, her drugs and cup, 195.
Clergy not to display theatrical
actions, 5 ; not to be always in
a hurry, 13 ; to take heed to
their words, 14, 16 ; not to
listen to evil, 15; to avoid
feasts, 15; to spend leisure
time in reading, 16, 41 ; what
they ought to be, 16; not to
jest, 18 ; not intended only to
make themselves agreeable,
16; Scripture to be their chief
subject of conversation, 18 ;
not to engage in business, 31 ;
a teaching body, 18, 62; must
478
ST. AMBROSE.
guard their modesty, 15;
amount of their renunciation,
26, 26 n. ; should not be avari-
cious, 60 ; to be neither harsh
nor yet too easy, 60 ; younger
clergy not to visit single
women, 15; to be detached
from earthly things, 41 ; not
to marry a second time, 41 ;
this forbidden even before
baptism, 41 ; a high standard
expected of them, 41 sq. ;
they hold a very high office,
42 sq. ; to see House of God
is well ordered, 60 ; to see to
the poor and needy, 60.
Clerical office, many afraid of the
difficulties of the, 36; should
not be hereditary, 36, 36 n. ;
impediments to, 41, 41 n. ;
marriage in, 41.
Cneius Pompeius, 42.
Coeternity and coequality of the
Father and the Son, 281.
Communion and fellowship of
Christ, the, 282.
Communion of newly baptized and
confirmed, 323.
Company of profligate to be avoid-
ed, 1 5 sq. ; of old and wise to
be sought, 36.
Confession to God and man, 356 ;
by the public exhomologesis,
345' 35-. 356-
Confessors, 241, 242, 260.
Confidence in us, how others get
to have, 50.
Confirmation, the seal of the
Spirit, 322 ; the sevenfold gifts
of the Spirit therein, 50.
Consecration, I'.ucharistic, 278 ; of
the baptismal water, 318; its
meaning as a word, 35 n. ;
spoken of by St. Lawrence, 35,
35 n-
Constantine, the Emperor, 221.
Constantius, the Emperor, 169 n.,
221 n., 415; his liberal acts,
415.
Continence demanded of the cler-
gy, 41, 404; disregarded in
some places, 41.
Contrast between present and
future life, 39.
Conversion necessary to salvation,
350-
Cosmas and Damian, martyrs,
finding the bodies of, xii, 437 ;
translation to Ambrosian Ba-
silica, 437.
Council of Nica;a, 201, 220, 260;
of Ariminum, 221 ; of Chal-
cedon, 202 n. ; of Paris, 221 n. ;
of Rome, 221 n.
Councils, authority of, 201.
Counsels of perfection, 7.
Courage and bravery considered,
33 sq.
Covenant, the new, 254.
Creation out of nothing by God,
184; as true of Christ, 218;
does not contain Christ as Son
of God, 301.
Creature as affirmed of Christ by
the Arians, 301.
Creatures are fallible, all, 245.
Creed, its repetition, 384.
Cross, sign of the, 180, iSo n., 181 ;
seen in the number of Abra-
ham's servants, 201, 201 n. ;
the tree of the cross, 222.
Crucifixion, the, 230, 236, 254.
Cup, Eucharistic, spoken of by
Ambrose, 222; filled from the
cluster on the Cross, 222.
Custom, an ancient, in bathing, 14.
Daci.\, 262.
Damasus, 96 ; opposed the resto-
ration of the heathen altars,
411,413.
Damon and Pythias Pythagorean
friends, 379.
Dancing condemned, 351, 3S5.
Daniel, 30, 45, 51, 52 ; was moved
by the Holy Ghost in the case
of Susannah, 136.
David, 19, 39, 48, 53, 177, 248 ;
patient under abuse, 4, 39,
164 ; self-restrained, 177;
example of fortitude, 177 ; as a
teacher, 4sq., 39; his character
and actions, 19, 45, 47, 451;
his meekness, 48, 49, 451 ; his
sorrows, 177, 17S, 451.
Dead, weeping for the, no fault,
162; their condition consid-
ered, 176; the resurrection of,
174 sq.
Death, Christ's, 230, 254, 278; the
redemption of the world, 180;
death of One, the benefit of
many, 180 ; the sacrament of
Christ's Passion, 434.
Death, no real separation, 162,
177; repaying a loan, 162,
174 sq. ; a good, not an object
of fear, 180, 181 ; death not an
evil because it sets free from
miseries, 177; sets soul free
from prison of the body, 177 ;
is threefold, 177 ; of martyrs a
benefit to religion and the
Church, 180.
Deborah, her position considered,
398, 398 n., 399 ; a type of the
Church, 399.
Decortim and Hoiieshini, 37,
Dccits [what is seemly] always to
be looked to, 15.
Defence of the weak is right, the,
59-
De Fide, history and object of the
treatise, 199; the treatise it-
self, 201 sq.; called also De
Trittitate, 199.
Delilah, 63.
IJemarchus, an unknown, 459.
Demetrius, Antiochus, General,
34-
Demophilus, Bishop of Constanti-
nople, and compelled by
Theodosius to resign his see,
207, 207 n.
Denials, Arian, 206, 214, 225, 244.
Desire for children, 406.
Destruction of the flesh by disci-
pline, 339.
Devil, the, 247 ; works through
others, 2; the world and the
devil renounced at baptism,
317; recognizing martyrs, 439,
wounded by his own bite, 339,
340 ; was the creditor for
human sin, 446.
Dialectic, 207, 215, 272.
Diana, fable of, 3S2.
Digamy before baptism a bar to
ordination, 41.
Dilemma for Arians, 280, 281.
Diodorus, 44, 44 n.
Dionysius and the two Pythagore-
ans, story of, So.
Dionysius, Bishop of Milan, 433,
467 ; preferred exile to the
Emperor's friendship, 466,
466 n., 467.
Dionysius the Areopagite, 460.
Discipline, its use in the Church,
339. 342, 343 ; to be tempered
with gentleness, 344; rules of
clerical, 466.
Discourse. Cf. Speech.
Dissension and schism punished
in the case of Korah, 464 sq.
Distinction of the two natures in
one Christ, 230, 233, 236, 243,
246 sq., 249, 252, 254, 269.
Distress, tales of, to be enquired
into, 55.
I)ominations, 247.
f5o;«, 280.
Dragon, people who believe that
men sprang from dragons'
teeth sown by Cadmus ought
to believe the resurrection,
1S5.
Duties of youth, 12.
Duties derived from the four
cardinal virtues, 20 ; those
suited to individual characters
to be followed, 36 sq.
Duty, divisions of, 5, 7 ; Christian
and heathen aspects of, 5, 6;
Panaetius and Aristotle wrote
on, 5, 6 ; due measure in
speech the first duty, 7 ; duty
may be ordinary or perfect, 7 ;
prudence the first source of,
22 ; owed to God first, 22 ;
its full meaning, 5 sq.
Ebion, 297.
Kgypt, 239.
Elders, the, 260.
Eleazar, 54.
Elections of Bishops, 457.
E/eitchiis or Dialectic, 2<~'7 n.
Elijah [EHas], 46, 68, 215, 246,
263. 335-
Elijah and others, examples of
self-denial to Christians, 467,
468.
Elisabeth, 277.
Elisha [Eliseus], 24, 68, 237, 243,
431 ; example of justice
toward enemies, 24, 68, 431.
Emperor, called " Son of the
Church," 436; his place in ap-
pointing a liishop, 457, 457 n.
ii'(ii('iHr7()i; 27 I .
Enemies, justice to be kept to-
wards, 24 ; called strangers of
old, 24.
INDEX OF SUBJECTS.
479
Enoch, translation of, 189, 263.
Ephphatha, " be opened," a cere-
mony used in baptism, 317.
Epicureans, opinions of, 9; matce
happiness to consist in pleas-
ure, 44, 44 n.
Epicurus, 458.
£7vioiviog, 246.
Eschol, the mystic lesson of, 284.
Esdras, the books of, 171 n.
Eternal life, rests on the know-
ledge of C'rod and the pursuit
of good works, 44, 51, 52.
Eternity of the Son with the
Father, 208, 209, 210.
erepoovmog, 259.
hepo'vata, 2S9.
Eucharist, the body in, is that
which was born of Blessed
Virgin Mary, 324; change in
the, effected by Christ's word,
324 ; on behalf of the de-
parted, 174, 174 n.
Eucharistic consecration, 278.
Eudoxius, Arian, promoted Euno-
mius and Aetius, 207 n.
Eugenius, Emperor, restored the
Altar of Victory, xvi, 41 1 ;
letter to, from St. Ambrose,
453 sq. ; was reproved by St.
Ambrose, 450 ; his history
and fate as a usurper, 455 n.
Eunomius, 20, 207, 210.
Eunuch, his position considered
404, 426; not to be self-made,
404.
haxvi^o'^'^Q, 37-
Eusebius, Bishop of Milan, 466,
467 ; exiled, 466.
Eusebius, Bishop, of Caesarea,
favoured Arius, 202 n.
Eusebius, Bishop of Nice, favoured
Arius, 202 n.
Eusebius, Bishop of Vercellas,
was banished by Valens,
466 n; preferred exile to the
Emperor's friendship, 466 n. ;
model of patriotism, 467.
Eve, her fall, 2.
Evils of body less than of soul.
Examples to the young : Isaac,
12 ; Joseph, 12.
Exclusion from communion, 339,
358; necessary in penance,358.
Excommunicated persons in need,
to be assisted, 55.
Exposition of, Ex. xvi. 18, 26 sq. ;
Prov. xxiii. i, 27 ; i Kings x.
6-8, 51 ; S. Mark x. 18, 225 ;
S. Mark xiii. 32, 308 ; S. John
i. 4, 248 ; S. John i. 30, 252 ;
S. John vi. 57, 278, 279; S.
John xiv. 28, 231, 232; S.
John xvi. 7, 264 ; S. John xvii.
4, 280; Rom. xi. 33-36, 2S1.
Ezekiel, vision of the dry bones,
teaches the resurrection, 185.
Fablf.s, ancient, alluded to: Ores-
tes and Pylades, 35; Gyges'
ring, 72; The Hydra, 242;
Scylla, 242 ; Titans, 242 ; Dra-
gon's teeth sown by Cadmus,
185; Sirens, 242; Phoenix, 183.
Faith, good, foundation of justice,
24.
Faith, profitableness of, 206, 236,
240 ; necessary to obtain bene-
fit of Christ's passion, 265;
and works, 225 ; required in
repentance, 355, 356.
Faith of the Church concerning the
Son of Ciod, 202, 220, 225 ;
compared to the seven sealed
books, 260; typified in the
wedding garment, 264.
Faith of the Church concerning the
Trinity, 274.
Faitliful Christians have first claim
to assistance, 25.
Fasting and alms, merit of, 459 ;
advantage of, 460.
Father, the, Fount of the Son's
Godhead, 279 ; could not beget
a .Son inferior to I limself, 313 ;
His relation to the Son, 163,
202, 208, 211, 211 n., 218, 223
sq.; His relation to the Trinity,
163; Eternal with the Son,
223 sq. ; not Himself the Son,
202; created the world by the
Son, 206 n. ; is worshipped in
Christ and in the Holy Spirit,
146.
Father and Son one not by confu-
sion of person but by unity of
nature, 203 ; always insepar-
able, 246, 273, 2S0, 286, 289;
their unity in will and opera-
tion, 270, 271, 288; distinct in
person, 271, 273, 274; their
relation declared in St. John
xvii, 4, 280
Fatherhood co-ordinates with Son-
ship, 209, 211 n., 212.
Felix, deacon and messenger, from
St. Ambrose, 456.
Felix and Nabor, saints at Milan,
437-
Female ornaments, 372.
Festivals of rejoicing, 193.
Filioque clause, 202 n.
Finger of Cod, Holy Spirit not a
portion only of God because
so called, 136.
P'ire, preservation of the sacred fire
of the Jews, S3.
Fire from heaven, the, a type of
the Holy Ghost, 84.
Firstfruits, Adam of death, Christ
of Resurrection, 1S9.
Flatterers to be avoided, 35, 38.
Flattery, condemned, 38; no part
of true friendship, 88, 89.
Flesh, our Lord took, that by death
of the flesh He might rise
again, 188.
Flood, the water, the wood of the
ark, and the dove typical, 318.
Footstool (Ps. xcix. 5) means the
Flesh of Christ, 137 ; is to be
worshipped in the Mysteries,
137-
Forgiveness of sins, 244, 247 ; nar-
rowed by the Xovatians, 330,
333 sq. ; as conveyed by cer-
tain persons, 330 ; promised
by God, 332, 336, 337 ; by con-
secration, 335 ; on penance,
345 ; to be given for the same
received, 447, 472; how by
Christ and for His sake, 446,
447. 472-
Fortitude, definition of, 20; con-
sists of two parts, 30; never
stands alone, 30 ; without jus-
tice is a source of wickedness,
30 ; depends more on mind
than body, 30 ; to be employed
for others, 30 ; shown in self-
subjection, 30 ; also in con-
tempt for earthly things, 31 ;
ought to contend against all
vices, 31 ; especially avarice, 31.
Fraud of all kinds forbidden, 76 sq.
Freedom of the Son's will, 278, 282.
Friend, a, true witness to be given
in a trial against, 88 ; to be
rebuked privately, 88 ; one's
heart to be open to, 88 ; not
to be forsaken in time of need,
88; trouble to be borne for,
88 ; a man unfaithful to God
cannot be a true friend, 88.
Friendship, makes many one, 29;
how to be regarded, 87 sq. ;
not to hinder us from doing
right, 87 sq. ; kindly rebuke
often better than silence in a
case of, 88 ; to be lasting and
firm, 88 ; proved by adversity,
88; nothing so beautiful as,
88 ; makes men equal, 88 ; is
a virtue, 89 ; of the poor better
than of the rich, 89 ; Christ
gave us an example of friend-
ship to follow, 89 ; nothing so
hateful as a man who misuses,
89 ; seen in Damon and Py-
thias, 379.
Frogs, story of the, 3S3.
Fucus, a face paint, 220 n.
Future to be considered, the, 32.
Gabriel, 245.
Gait should not be too slow, etc.,
13, 14.
Gallienus, the Emperor, 41S n.
Gates, the eternal, 265.
Genealogies, 261.
Generation, eternal, outside time,
211, 212, 213, 216.
Gennesis, the Divine, 210 sq., 248,
250, 273, 274 sq. ; constituting
the Son's Godhead, 272, 273,
274, 275 ; also the Father's
perfection, 277; contrasted
with the Birth from the Vir-
gin's womb, 250 scj. ; an eter-
nal supra-temporal process,
274 sq. ; effected neither by
nor against the Father's sole
volition, 276 ; heretical mis-
representations of, 275; their
blasphemy, 278; the incom-
parableness of, 280.
Gentleness, an excellent virtue,
329; needful in discipline, 344.
Georgias, 34.
Gervasius and Protasius, their
bodies found, 436 sq.
Gibeonites, 24, 78.
Gideon, 34 ; and his sacrifice, a
type of Christ, 93, 394.
4So
ST. AMBROSE.
Gnosticism, the system, 202 n'
207 n ; a form of the early
philosophies, 207 n ; appears
in Manichaeanism, 210 n.
God, erroneous ideas as to His
care for men's actions, 7 ; He
pervades all things, 9; even
man's spirit, 9; knows all, 8,
9 ; cares for His creation, 9 sq.
our Judge, 10, 363 ; could
command the resurrection,
187 ; created from nothing,
184, 188; gave His Son for
us, 190 ; is One, 202 sq. ; as
■represented in Sabellianism,
202 n. ; is One in the Trinity,
203 ; IS perfect in all respects,
203 ; has the future present,
217 ; can use any instrument,
^d;^; the Christians' God to
Be worshipped even by Empe-
rors, 411, 412, 454; is One in
One substance, 289 sq. ; His
dealings to be made more
clear hereafter, 1 1 ; meaning
of the Name, 202 ; He does
not pass from place to place,
for He is everywhere, 231 ;
the Name common to the
Father and the Son, 244 ; God
the head of Christ, meaning
of the phrase, 265, 266; three
meanings of the word, 2S7 ;
He cannot be deceived, 8,
311 ; four distinctive iT\arks or
attributes of, 154.
Godhead, and manhood distinct in
Christ, 230, 233, 236, 243, 246,
247, 249, 252, 254, 269 ; fulness
of Godhead in Christ, 163,
203 sq., 234; Godhead of
Christ proved by his ascen-
sion, 263, 264 ; unity of, 95,
107, 202, 220, 285 ; Godhead
does not admit of plurality,
148, 285; has no parts or
members, 123, 218; Holy
Ghost does not imply three
Gods, 148 ;
Gods, false, 227, 268, 272 ; false
are not to be mentioned with
the Christian God, 411, 412.
Gog identihed with the Goths,
241.
(iold is less valuable than souls,
64.
Goodwill, a part of kindness, 24;
better than liberality, 28 ;
placed by God in the heart of
man, 29 ; e.\ists especially in
the Church, 29; its effects, 29.
Good works, value of, 51.
Goose, a, saved the Capitol, 417.
Gospel, the, 228.
Gothic war, the, 241.
Goths, their invasion in the fourth
century, 54 n. ; were opposed
by Valens, 199; accepted
Arianism, 202 n. ; were mostly
Arians and worse than hea-
thens, 425.
Grace is of the Holy Spirit as of
the Father and of the Son,
no.
Grace of righteousness, the, 282.
Gratian the Emperor, prayer for,
222, 223, 242 ; faith the safe-
guard of the empire, 201, 241 ;
a Christian from childhood,
201, 422 ; had blessing asked
up by St. Ambrose, 222 ; was
banished from Rome, 414 n. ;
his death, 422 ; suggested to
St. Ambrose the writing of
£)e Fide, 199, 201, 222; also
asked for a treatise on the
Holy Spirit, 199; refused the
deputation headed by Sym-
machus, 411, 414; was ap-
pealed to by St. Ambrose, 411,
413-
Gratitude of more value than
money, 27, 28, 29, 88.
Greek, original of the New Testa-
ment, 282.
Gregory, of Constantinople, 96,
207 n.
Grief in excess, not to be yielded
to, 162 sq., 174.
Gyges' ring, story of, 72.
Habits alter nature, 6, 37, 168, 196.
Hair, its significance, 448.
Ham sinned against modesty,
14.
Hamilcar, the Carthaginian leader,
422.
Hannibal's repulse from the walls
of Rome, 417.
Happiness gained by living virtu-
ously, 43.
Happy life, heathen ideas on a,
44 sq. ; what it really rests on,
44.
Harshness to be avoided, 60.
Heathen must not be provoked to
persecute, 35.
Heathen legends, use of, defended,
263.
Heavens, tlie, which declare the
glory of God are mystically
martyrs, apostles, etc., 437.
Heliodorus, 65.
Heresy, compared to Scylla and
the Hydra, 208, 242 ; en-
dangers the Roman empire,
241.
Heretics, See Aetius, Arius, Aux-
entius, Demophilus, Euno-
mius, Mani, Manichaeans, Mar-
cion, Palladius, Paul of Samo-
sata, Photinus, Sabellius,
Sabellians.
Heretics, and the judgment, 23S,
239; spiritual insensibility of,
240, 241 ; condemned by St.
Paul, 240, 241 ; and by St.
John, 241 ; denied forgiveness
by Christ, 348; Christ and
schismatics led by Satan, 348.
Herillus, 44.
Herod's oath, shameful, 42, 80;
better to break than to keep
such an one, 42, 80.
Hieronymus, of Rhodes, 44.
Hiram, 201.
Holiness, an attribute of each of
the Three Persons, 13S.
Holof ernes, overcome by Judith,
398.
Holy Scripture the best subject for
conversation, 18.
Homo, meaning of word, 70.
Honey, mystical interpretation of
Samson's, 116.
Honorius, Bishop of Rome, 168 n.
Hormuz, Persian King, 210 n.
Horse, its training, 380.
HospitaUty, to be shown, 15, 59;
Abraham showed, 59 ; also
Lot, 59; a Christian virtue,
47 n., 59, 60.
Hosts, the Lord of, 263.
Human analogies are imperfect,
206, 208 sq., 212, 213, 214.
Humiliation, Christ's, 236, 254.
Humility, to be guarded, 4; marks
of true, 64.
Husband and wife one, 407.
Hydra and Hercules, 208, 242.
Hydra's teeth, the story of, 185.
Hymns used in the Church, 436.
Hypocrisy, cannot succeed, 60;
Absalom, example of, 61.
Icarus, the story of, 196.
Ideas, Platonic, 268.
Idols ought not to be given to
Christians for worship, 411,
412; question as to breaking
them, 441, 441 n.
Illyria ravaged, 54.
Image as applied to God the Son,
208, 209, 313; as applied to
man made by God, 208, 209;
only One image of God, 313,
435 ; what is a Christian
image .'' 420.
Immortality, not the same in the
angels as in God, 245 ; in this
life would be unendurable,
195 ; held by the heathen, 181,
184; in relation to the resur-
rection, 184 n.
Impossibility, kinds of, 268 ; noth-
ing impossible to the Son save
what the Father wills not,
270.
Incarnation, necessary to believe
in, 'iz, 248, 251 ; subjection of
Christ in, 231, 254, 259;
causes no diminution of Son's
Godhead, 231, 263, 26S, 280;
completeness, of 234 ; purpose
of, 235, 236, 249, 254, 255;
Christ's Name the assurance
of the, 244 ; mystery of, 263,
264 ; does not imply inferi-
ority or inability as touching
His Person, 268, 269; and
Passion prefigured in the true
vine, 283, 284 ; heretical dis-
figurement of, 283; a mystery,
but a real conjunction of God-
head and manhood, 283 ; In-
carnation of God the salva-
tion of man, 297.
Incense in worship, 3S4.
Infula, I.
Innkeepers, Jewish, 252.
Innocence more easily found than
repentance, 357.
Innocents, Holy, 35.
Instructions not to be wearisome,
18.
INDEX OF SUBJECTS.
481
Intercourse with older men reconi-
ineiided, 36.
Isaac, a pattern, 190 ; example to
youth, 12, 46, 190.
Isaiah, 24S, 250; vision and cheru-
l)im, etc., explained, 157;
teaches the resurrection, 184,
1S5.
Italy, 242.
Jacoh, 19. 46, 177, 277 ; a pattern
of self-restraint, 16; also of
the cardinal virtues, 21 ; char-
acter of, 190; a type of Christ
and a pattern for us, 16, 19,
190; his blessedness, 46; in
sorrows, 177; was superior to
Ksau, 471 ; the interpretation
of his actions, 472.
Jael was victorious over God's
enemies, 399.
James, St., 265.
Jeduthun, 5.
Jephtha, 43, 55, 56.
Jeremiah, 84 ; bew;
179 ; is callec
Ambrose, 205,
Jerubbaal, 30, 93.
Jesting unsuitable for clergy, 18.
Jesus, His Name the defence of
the empire, 242 ; the power of
God, 244; the Son of God,
264; Master and Lord, 269;
is the Truth, 269; Jesus
Christ, Name of, 280.
Jewish rites, their inner meaning,
42; synagogue, 44r, 442, 445;
one said to have been burned,
441,445; objections to Chris-
tian teaching, 299. »
Jews, the. 202, 203, 227, 348 ; testi-
mony to Christ, 227 ; sought
to stone Him, 232 ; Christ
born of the race of, 280 ; their
enmity and violence, 443 ; re-
fused to present an offering to
a heathen, 454.
Job, 7, 8, 19, 33, 46 ; was against
his three friends, 8; his char-
acter, 19, 47 ; his fortitude in
troubles, 23^ 47 ; his blessed-
ness, 47 ; deplored his birth,
178; the teaching of his life,
424, 452 ; the book read in the
Lessons of Holy Week, 424,
424 n.
John. St., the Evangelist, 59, 252,
265, 282.
John Baptist, St., 76, 82, 252, 253,
263, 277.
Jonah, the book of, read in the
lessons, 426.
Jonathan, 29, ;23.
Jonathan Maccabaeus, 34.
Joseph. 46, 55, 60, 177 ; remark-
able for his virtues, 19, 56;
especially for his modesty, 12;
14; and obedience, 12, 19,52,
57 ; was blest in his chastity,
47' 57> 341 ; provident in his
liberality, 55, 56; in sorrows,
'77-
Joshua, 30, 33, 58, 201, 214, 253,
300; a type of Christ, 285.
Judas, a warning, 12; ruined
31
through misuse of' grace, 12,
471 ; Arius compared with,
221 ; might have been forgiven
had he gone to Christ, 348;
a ty])e of the N'ovatians, 353;
turned traitor through love of
money, 47 ; a friend, yet a
traitor, 89 ; partook of the
Sacrament, 471.
Judas Maccaba:;us, 54.
Judgment to be given impartially,
62.
Judgment, the, 238, 239; the Son's
power of judgment, 2S1 ; not
to our advantage to know
the day of, 301 sq. ; Christ's
ignorance of the day, 310.
Judith, 81 ; a model in widow-
hood, 397, 398.
Julian law, the, 411 sq.
Julian, trusted in soothsayers,
422 ; restored the Altar of Vic-
tory, 41 1 ; restored temples and
sacrifices, 412 n., 427 ; his laws
regarding Christian and
heathen schools, 412 n; his
apostacy, xii. ; was a model in
temperance, 461.
Justice, . definition of, 20, 22;
towards whom to be directed,
22 ; Christian and heathen
views of, 22 ; hindered by
avarice, 23 ; to be observed
toward enemies, 23, 24 ; as
shown in case of Gibeonites,
23, 24 ; or of .Syrians, 24 ;
faith the foundation of, 24;
to be always done by the
clergy, 62 ; a Christian vir-
tue and without offence, 469 ;
divine our highest pattern,
469; demands our resur-
rection, 188 ; makes men
trust us more than prudence
does, 51.
Justina, mother of Valentinian TL,
66 n. ; Arian, xii., xvi. ; her in-
fluence against St. Ambrose,
XVI.
Just man is never alone, 68 ; will
not sin though certain to be
undetected, 72.
KaTopdufia, 7, 6g.
Kindness consists of two quali-
ties, 24 ; to be done in good
faith, 25; not to be made a
boast of, 25 ; must take note
of age and weakness, 27 ;
valuable according to the
spirit in which done, 25, 28;
to be returned, 27 ; two ways
of repaying, 28.
King, Christ our, 255 ; Kings,
245.
Kingdom of God, the, 233.
Kiss, the significance, 448.
Knowledge, of Christ discussed,
308 ; a unity of knowledge in
Three Persons of Trinity,
130; of things of God is the
natural knowledge of Holy
Spirit, 130, 131; of one's self,
168.
Lanc.uaok, what we should culti-
vate, 17, 18.
Lapsed were refused communion
by tlie Novatians, 329 sq. ;
were condemned for denying
the faith, 330 ; were not all
alike, 332, ;i22'^ t'l^ir treat-
ment and penalties, 330.
Law, the, 225; and the Gospel,
229.
Lawfulness or otherwise of putting
up the price of corn, 73 sq.
Lawrence, Xystus' deacon, 35 ; his
death foretold, 35; ordered to
give up the treasure of the
Church, 65; declared the poor
to be that treasure, 65 ; mar-
tyred, 35, 65.
Lazarus and Dives, example of, 6.
Lazarus, raising of, revealed Christ
as Son of God, equal with
God, 271 ; some lessons from
His resurrection, 186; typical
of forgiveness of sin, 352.
Leisure time of clergy to be em-
ployed in reading, 16.
Lessons of Scripture read in the
service, 423, 424, 426.
Levites, meaning of name, 41 ; fig-
ures of the clergy, 24, 41, 42 ;
teaching us by example, 41,
42, 43 ; their place and office,
41, 42, 43.
Liba, Libanus, 192 n.
Liberality, . a part of kindness,
54 sq., 395 ; and a Christian vir-
tue 24, 25, 26; to be rightly ex-
ercised, 25, 396 ; to give to one
what is taken from another
not, 25; to be guided with dis-
cretion, 55, 60, 395 ; done in
secret is true, 25; to whom to
be shown, 25, 26, 27, 54; rests
on good-will, 28 ; shown either
by giving money or service,
54 ; due measure to be shown
in, 55, 60 ; was honored in the
widow's two mites to the
treasury, 396.
Liberius, Bishop of Rome, 159,
168, 381, 38 1 n ; his address to
the Virgins, 381, 383.
Life not to be sought at the risk
of another's death, 71 ; gives
room for sorrows, 177 ; re-
mains in death as with the
patriarchs, 189 ; the present
compared with that of the
resurrection, 195.
Life of the Father and the Son is
one, 279; of the .Son spiri-
tually partaken and entered
into by men through the In-
carnation, 279; eternal life as-
sured us by the Son, 282.
Light, unapproachable, 245 ; crea-
tion of, 270 ; the Father. .Son.
and Spirit are, ill.
Likeness here and truth hereafter,
40.
Limenius, Bishop of Vercellae,
, 457-
Toyog in Christ, 202 n., 206 n.
Lord, the meaning of Name, 202.
Lot, his hospitality, 59.
482
ST. AMBROSE.
Love, how to be gained, 48 ;
Moses gained, 48 ; and David,
48; stronger motive than fear
to win obedience, 50 ; begets
confidence, 50.
Lucifer, Bishop of Cagliari, 168,
169 n.; his acts, 169 n. ; was
defended by Athanasius, 169;
was banished to Syria, 169.
Lucifer, 168.
Lust, the fires of, 340, 341, 342.
Lysias, 33.
Maccabees, ;i^, 34, 35.
" Made " not the same as " creat-
ed," 247.
Maiden, the, in Syria, 319; gentle-
ness to those fallen, 355.
Magi, 205, 250.
Man, superior to the animals, how,
21, 23; his natural disposi-
tion to be guided, not eradi-
cated, 17 ; not made for himself
alone, 23; his natural condi-
tion like the ferocity of wild
beasts, but is changed by
grace, 128; his duty to the
whole body and to each mem-
ber, 70 ; is best not to be
born, 178; his growth and de-
velopment, 183.
Manhood, Christ's, reality of, 284;
shown in the Agony, 229; in
the Passion, 230; in grief and
sufferings, 230; in fastings
and weakness, 243; is the
bond of union between God
and man, 279; is true and con-
substantial with our manhood,
283 ; our manhood exalted in,
283- , .
Mani and Manichaeism, 210, 230,
-39-
Manichaeans, 119, 251, 297 ; and St.
John, 201, 248 ; worship the
devil, 20 ; based on opposition
to Zoroastrianism, 210; essen-
tially Dualistic, 210 n., 297;
partly Gnostic, Judaic, and
Pantheistic, 210 n.
Marah, water of, typical, 317.
Marcellina, Saint, xv, 159, 166;
sister of St. Ambrose, xv, 159,
160, 361 ; received the veil
from Pope Liberius, xv, 159,
361, 381, 383; was addressed
in St. Ambrose' Treatise on
Virginity, 363 ; was free from
worldly troubles, 371, 372;
had no female ornaments,
372; put a question about
suicide, 386 ; had three letters
addressed to her by .St. Am-
brose, 422 sq., 436 sq., 445 sq.
Marcion, 20, 229, 297.
Marcionites, 251, 297.
Marriage, its laws, 41 ; not op-
posed to or set against vir-
ginity, 367, 403 ; its advan-
tages and disadvantages, 367,
403 ; not to be discouraged,
368, 369, 403 ; different for
virgins and widows, 389, 393 ;
not condemned by widowhood,
393 ; want of it is not to be
made a snare, 403 ; only to be
declined as a burden, 405 ; if
for child-bearing, 406; first
and second, 367 sq., 389, 402,
462; second considered, 41,
389, 402, 462, 466 ; second
rather doubtful, 41, 402, 462;
second a matter for counsel,
405, 462 ; Nicene decree re-
garding second, 466, 4C6 n. ;
clerical, 36 n., 41 n., 462; not
allowed a second time for
priests, 41 ; or for bishops,
462.
Martyrs, 226, 260 ; not rashly to
offer themselves to death, 31,
32 ; best examples of forti-
tude, 30 ; miracles wrought
by, 438, 439 ; their bodies to
be laid beneath the altar on
which Christ is the victim,
438 ; merits of, denied by
heretics, 439; miracles of, also
denied, 439 ; devils recognize,
439 ; the Maccabees, 34 ; a
named list of, 34, 35 ; vows to,
164, 164 n. ; their power and
work, 180 ; the fellowship
with, belongs to the martyrs,
337' 33^ y ■''• Agnes one of
the martyrs, 363. 364, 365; the
Maid of Antioch one of the,
376 sq. ; relics and merits of,
437 ; the resurrection of, 437,
438; their sufferings, 445;
destroyed a heathen altar and
disturbed a sacrifice, 443.
Mary, the Virgin, 13, 43, 277 ; an
example of modesty, 13, 395;
the temple of God, not to be
adored, 137, 146; Mother of
the Lord, 13, 163, 214, 366,
374; the virgin mother, 163,
214, 216, 366, 374; in the An-
nunciation, 13 ; in her Concep-
tion, 318 ; her life a mirror for
virginity, 374 ; her life a mir-
ror for all, 375, 472, 473; was
pictured in Miriam, 376; stood
by her Son's cross, 472, 473;
had only one child, 473 ; how
the Au/a Regaiis, 473 n.
Mary Magdalen, 265.
Mass, its earliest occurrence as a
word, 423, 423 n.
Massacre at Thessalonica con-
demned by all, 450, 451.
Maximus, the P^mperor, 411,413.
Meditation, commended, 67.
Melchizedek, the type of Christ,
255, 464.
Mental motions of two kinds, 17.
Mercy, makes men perfect, 7 ; to
be shown to the poor, 7 ; its
blessing, 7 ; to be shown in
spite of bringing ill-will from
others, 64; St. Ambrose him-
self an example of this, 64 ; is
promised to all, 338; yet not
without punishment propor-
tioned to the offence, 339.
Merit decides the order of the
Resurrection, 189, 194.
Midianites, why they were de-
stroyed, 24.
Milan, disturbances connected with
Arian attempts at obtaining a
basilica at, 164 n., 422 sq. ;
Auxentius intruded bishop at,
143-
Mildness, tempered with discre-
tion, 60.
Miracles, by relics, 437, 438, 439;
if genuine, 439, 440 ; in the
time of Theodosius, 455, 456.
Miriam, as a Christian type, 461,
464; her murmuring against
the Ethiopian woman, 464.
Misfortunes, no proof of sin, 8.
" Missa," first use of the term, 423,
423 n.
Moderation. Cf. Temperance.
Modesty, a great virtue, 12, 461 ;
seen in actions, words, and
looks, 12, 13,381 sq. ; shown
in keeping silence at times, 12 ;
Mother of Christ an example
of, 13; as seen in Rebecca,
382 ; based on virginity, 461 ;
must be fenced off from vile
contact, 15, 370 sq. ; enters
into prayer, 13 ; taught by
nature, 14; derivation of word,
14; forbids to do or name
certain things, 14; especially
suited to youth, 12, 15; dan-
gers to, 1 5.
Moesia (Roman Province), 241.
Money, etc., entrusted to be re-
stored, 42 ; exceptions to this
rule, 42 ; to be despised, 33 ;
valuable for many purposes,
54, 55; to be handled very
prudently by the clergy, 62,
64 ; examples of the love of,
63; not to beloved by bishops
or clergy, 64.
Moon, the usual symbol of the
Church, 420.
Moral questions on divine provi-
dence, 8 sq. ; on the divine
knowledge and judgments, 9,
ID; on the distribution of
good and evil, 10, 11.
Moses, 21, 30, 45, 48, 82, 215, 216,
248, 253, 255, 260, 263, 284;
his wisdom, 21 ; saw inner
meaning of old rites, 42 ; his
rod, figure of Christ, 82; put-
ting his hand in his bosom,
etc., also figure of Christ, 83 ;
was blessed in the midst of
trouble, 324 ; refused the
Egyptian wisdom, 21 ; was
strong in a good conscience,
46; his meekness and wise
counsel, 48, 52, 67 ; knew the
value of meditation, 67 ; as a
type of the Christian mys-
teries, 324.
Mourning, tor sin, 352.
Mouth, to be guarded from sin,
2 sq.
Mutilation (self), forbidden, 404.
Mysteries, the holy, 29, 16S; a
name for the sacraments, 317 ;
used to save in shipwreck,
168, 169 n.
Mystery of the Trinity, 274; of
eucharistic consecration, 278.
INDEX OF SUBJECTS.
483
Xaaman, a type, 319.
Nahor and Felix, saints at Milan,
437- ^
Xabotli, 46, 77.
Name, of God, one, iii, 202, 203;
of Jesus Christ, 280; of the
Son, 203. 2aS. 223, 224.
Naomi, honoured in her daughter-
in-law, 396, 397.
.Vdtiini, use and force of the
Latin word. 202 n.
Nature, the divine, 203, 204, 21S;
of Father, Son, and Holy
Spirit, one, i 53.
Nature, the teacher of modesty,
14; nothing is seemly that is
contrary to, 37, 16S, 196, 326;
bids us help one another, '37;
forbids excessive grief, 174,
175; binds us to show kindly
feelings, 37 ; teaches us to
make a good return for gifts
received, 1 1.
Nebuchadnezzar, 214.
Nehemiah, S4.
Neptune, fable of, 3S2.
New Testament, Greek original of,
2S0.
Nicaea, council of, xii, 201, 220,
42S, 466; use of ouonvatnr at,
259; its symbol or creed,
202 n. ; anathemas appended
to the Creed, 202 n., 220; de-
crees regarding the Son, 220;
decrees regarding second mar-
riages, 460, 466 ; a turning-
point in the Church's develop-
ment and life, xii ; bishops
present at, 201 n., 220, 221.
Nicanor, 23-
Noah, an example of the cardinal
virtues, 21.
Novatian formed a schism after
his deposition, 343.
Novatians and their ideas, 329, 330,
33I' 335' 343 ; refuted, 332,
336, 345, 349; denied sins
could be forgiven in the
Church, 334 ; laid hands on
sick that they might recover,
and baptized, being inconsist-
ent in either case, 335 ; their
history, 327 sq. ; heresy based
on the question of repentance
and forgiveness, 327 sq. ; their
ordinations questioned, 330 ;
narrowed the field of forgive-
ness, 327, 330, 332, 233' 334 sq. ;
were too narrow for Christ's
liberality, 334 sq. ; a hindrance
to conversions, 337 ; were like
the elder brother, 343 ; were
not Christian in spirit, 343;
grudged like Judas, 345 ; hin-
dered the acceptance of the
Epistle to the Hebrews, 353.
Number of Abraham's servants,
201.
Oaths, wrong, not to be kept, 43 ;
their definition, 412; were
given to Christians at heathen
altars, 412; their value, 412,
414, 421, 445.
Obedience of Christ, the, 254.
OfficiiiDi [duty], a ])hiloso]3hic
term, 5; also a Christian term,
5; found in Scripture, 5; its
derivation, 5.
liiKnOTnq, pro/^riclas, kinship, 204 n.
Oil, the significance of, 448.
( )mnipotence, belongs to both
Father and Son, or to neither,
272; of the Son, Arian objec-
tions to, 272.
ofumvaiov, 202 n., 221, 259, 260.
Operation of Father, Son, and
Holy Ghost, one, 134.
Oracles, of the Old 'i'estament,
204; of the heathen, 204 n.
Order of resurrection decided by
merits, 1S9, 193.
Order of names in Holy Trinity
implies no difference of hon-
our, 299.
Ordination refused for unseemly
behaviour, 13; barred by a
second marriage, 41 ; those of
the Novatians questioned,
33°-
Orestes and Pylades, story of, 35.
opuv, 2'^-
bvaia, 202 n., 219, 220, 221.
Palladium, 207.
Palladius, a heretic, 207.
Panaetius, 5, 6, 30.
Pantheism, distinction between
Christian belief and, 126, 2 ion.
Panutius wrote " On Duties," 5,
5n., 6, 30; his work was used
by Cicero, 5 n.
Pardon for lighter and for weightier
sins, 337.
Parents should train their children
for virginity, 368 ; should for-
give one running off to it, 273.
Passion, implanted in us, 16; its
effect, 17; must be subject to
reason, 18, 38.
Passion, Christ's, 227, 254 ; efficacy
of, 236 ; purpose of, 284 ; pre-
figured in Abraham's victory
over the four kings, 1S9.
Patriarchs' example, how to be fol-
lowed, 189.
Patripassians or .Sabellians, 202 n.
Paul, St., 39, 57, 266 ; and St.
Peter sent by Holy Spirit to
call Gentiles into the Church,
127, 128; not inferior to St.
Peter, though latter is founda-
tion of Church, 135.
Paul of Samosata, 297.
Paulinus, i.
Pelagia, saint of Antioch, 386;
several of the same name,
386 n.
Penance, repeated, blamed, 357 ;
only one, so far as outward
discipline is concerned, 357 ;
as related to repentance, 345,
356, 357, 358 ; the translation
of Penite)itia, 347 ; the public
exhomologesis, 345, 352, 356,
357; excludes from the com-
munion, 339, 35S.
Penitences not an outward penance,
356; in common with the
saints, 357.
Perfection, counsels of, 7 ; of God-
head and manhood in (!hrist,
250.
7rii)ioi'Oi()t;, 260.
Peripatetics, 44.
Persecution of Orthodox by
Arians, 241, 242, 432.
Persian war, a story of the. Si.
Person of Christ, the, 233.
Peter, St., 215, 228, 229, 236, 247,
256, 265, 269; in his washing,
321 ; his chair and succession,
334; commission given to,
334 ; his fall a lesson for us,
177, 432; story of Christ
appearing to, 432.
Peter of Alexandria, 96.
Pharisee and Christ, as interpreted,
446.
Philomarus, an unknown, 459.
Philosophers, some refused to God
the creation of the world, 9
sq. ; their relation to revela-
tion, 44, 207 ; how they ap-
peared to Christian teachers,
207 n.
Philosophy was usually a Clnosti-
cism, 207 n.; was sometimes
highly spoken of, 207 n.
Phoenix represents the resurrec-
tion, story of, 1S3.
Photinianism refuted, 151, 297.
Photinians, 251, 297.
Photinus, 202, 210, 239, 297.
Physician of souls must not de-
spise those who seek His aid,
329-
Piety, defined, 22.
Pitchers of CJideon represent our
bodies, and the light within,
spiritual grace, 94.
Plato, as a moral writer, 8.
Platonic ideas, 268.
Popular election of a Bishop, 457,
457 n.
Porch, Solomon's, is the heart of
the wise, 152.
Poverty and riches, their distribu-
tion, II.
Power, of Holy Spirit same as of
Father and Son, 140, 151 ; the
Power of God, a name of
Christ, 208 ; of Emperor does
not extend to buildings be-
longing to f;od, 425 ; to for-
give sins granted to apostles
and transmitted to priests, 331.
Powers, celestial, 247, 260, 264.
Practice necessary to attaining per-
fection, 6.
Prayer not always heard, else God
would appear to act by a kind
of necessity, 171; to the Fa-
ther through the -Son, 203 ;
commending to God a depart-
ing soul, 173.
Precept and counsel, difference
between, 403, 404.
Prefect, his rank and work, 423 n.
I'referment to be sought from good
motives, 61, 62.
irpe-nv, -pt-ttv, 6, 31.
Prepositions, the heretical quibble
as to the use of, 116; "in"'
and " with " used interchange-
484
ST. AMBROSE.
ably of Holy Spirit in reference
to the Father, 124, 125; "if,"
" through," and " in " explain-
ed, 126; "with," '■ through,"
and " in " Him, applied to
Christ, are equivalent, 125.
Presence, Real, proved, 324.
I'riest, Christ the true, 223, 224,
255-
Priesthood not to be assumed but
at the call of God, 463 ; a
teaching function, i ; seen be-
fore in Aaron, 465.
Priestly robe, signiticance of, 225.
Priests, 226 ; power to forgive sins
transmitted through apostles
to, 225; were trained in mod-
esty, 14; their position in the
presence of an Emperor, 440 ;
their freedom of speech, 440 ;
present the offerings, 455.
Princes had their revenues from
their enemies, 413, 416.
Principalities, 264.
Prodigal Son, the story used
against the Novatians, 346,
347-
Professions are often hereditarv,
36-
Promises not always binding, 43,
80; Herod's, an example, 43,
80 : no vow at all better tlian
a bad one, 80.
Property entrusted to the Church
to be guarded, 65.
I'rophets, 264.
Protasius and Gervasius, saints at
Milan, 437.
Proverbs viii. 22 and the Incarna-
tion, 249.
Providence, teachings upon, 9.
I'rudence, defined, 20 ; false or
true, 21 ; to be striven after,
22 ; engaged in searching for
the truth, 20; cannot exist
without justice, 22, 5t sq. ;
prime source of duties, 22.
Psalm xxxix. 10 serve as an intro-
duction to de Off., 5 ; its depth
of meaning, 5.
Psalm xxiv. is prophetic of Christ's
Ascension, 263 n.; mystic inter-
pretation of, 264.
Pylades and Orestes, 35.
Pyrrhic war, story of the. 82.
Pythagoras, wrote on Duties, 6;
his rule of silence, 6.
Pythagoreans, story of the two, 80.
Queen' of Sheba, the, 59, 201.
Quickening of the Son by the
Father, 279; of man by the
Son, 279.
Rachel, a figure of mystery, 407.
Raguel, 83.
Kaiiab's scarlet thread a type of
Christ's Passion, 300.
Raphael, 245.
Reason, to be our governingprinci-
ple. 38; if reason convinces,
faith is lost, 188; distinguishes
man from the animals, 21 ;
passion must be subject to,
18, IQ.
Rebecca, a model of modesty, 382 ;
a model of patience, 471.
Recompense for good and evil,
present, 8.
Reconciliation to be sought, 16.
Red Sea, passage of, 226 ; typical,
318.
Redemption, 243, 247.
Reflection to anticipate anger, 17 ;
what it is, 17.
Regard to be paid to what good
men think of us, 38.
Regeneration, the Son's divine
power shown in, 273, 274; the
work of the Holy Spirit, 116;
in baptism, 317 sq.
Rehoboam, 58.
Relatives to be considered if in
need, 25.
Relics, the translation of, 164,
437 ; beneath the altar, xii,
438-
Religion, how much in Arianism,
207 n. ; all kinds slioukl be
equal before Roman law, 414
sq. ; the law said to be only
against foreign religions, 416.
Remission of sins, 243.
Renouncing the devil and the
world at laaptism, 317 ; after
renouncing the candidate for
baptism turns to the east, 318.
Repentance, the doctrine q uestion-
ed by Novatus, 329; treated
fully by .St. Ambrose, 345 sq ;
as related to baptism, 345,
346; as a remedy for sin, 351 ;
must be mixed with faith, 355 ;
an argument against the de-
ferring of l)aptism, 357.
Resurrection, Christ's, 228, 246;
and the forgiveness of sins,
244 ; the power of, 279 ; the
Resurrection proved by three
arguments, iSi ; argument
from nature for, 1S2 ; of these
swallowed by sea, or torn I^y
wild beasts, 183; at the Re-
surrection those who have be-
lieved shall be caught up to
meet the Lord, those who be
lieve not shall be left self-con-
demned, 186 ; its order, accord-
ing to merit, 1S9, 194; Resur-
rection of Christ was for us
alone, not for Himself, 191 ;
the hope in, 172, 174 sq. ;
treatise upon, 174; necessary
for the reunion of soul and
body, iSi ; difficult for our
faith. 182, 183, 184; not in-
credible, 182 .sq., 187 ; illus-
trated, 182, 183, 184; its time,
184, 1S6, 194; its relation to
immortality, 1S4 n. ; its relation
to the judgment, 185; is
taught by the prophets, 184,
185 ; and by the acts of Christ,
186, 1S7 ; awaits all, 189; dif-
ferences to l)e in, 1 89, 194 ; its
completeness, 194; as compar-
ed with the present life, 195.
Revenge the devil's bait, 3.
Reverence due to God, 168.
Rewards and punishments, future.
II, 12; according to deserts,
II, 12.
Rich, not to expect deference in
the Church, 469; young man
in the Gospel, 403.
Riches to be contemned, 40 ; no
help to blessedness, 40, 46;
love of them to be despised,
53 ; cannot ward off death,
162 ; are wholly unnecessary,
470 ; are not to be trusted in,
469, 470 ; not in themselves
blamable, 470.
Riddle, Samson's, mystical inter-
pretation of, 1 16. •
Righteousness, how a name of
Christ, 208.
Rites, heathen, 411 sq., 414 sq. ;
ineffectual to preserve their
votaries, 422.
Robe of Aaron, as interpreted, 224.
Rock, water from the, 226.
Rod, Moses', type of Christ, .82.
Roman Church in St. Ambrose'
time, 168, 1 68 n.
Roman Empire, the, 241.
Rome, the late expulsion of for-
eigners from, 75.
Rule, penitential, 357.
Rumoridus, a count at Court, 453.
Ruth, a type of the Church, 78, 79.
SAii.AOTH, 263.
Sabellianism refuted, 151 ; its
teaching, 202 n., 210, 297 ; it
confounded the Persons, 210,
210 n.
Sabellians' impiety, 244.
Sabellians, 131, 133, 227, 234, 238,
251, 286, 297.
Sabellius, 202, 206, 224, 235, 289.
Sacrament of the Lord's Bodv and
Blood, 278.
Sacraments, there can be no grace
received, unless there has been
forgiveness of sins, 1 1 1 ; not
to be sought by those in a
state of sin, 357 ; more ancient
than those of Jews, 323 ; more
excellent than the manna, 323 ;
most ancient of the Mysteries,
Sacranu'iituvi, what it was, 283,
283 n.
Sacred vessels, disputes over, 430 ;
were demanded in vain from
St. Ambrose, 430.
Sacrilice, Christ's, 255 ; the sacri-
fice we offer, 181.
.Sacrilege punished from heaven,
412, 415, 416, 420, 432, 44T,
443, 444; the question dis-
cussed, 420, 441.
Saints, predestinated, 252 ; com-
munion of, 342; at Milan,
437-
.Samaritans, 338 n.
Samson, 14,63; worked through
Holy .Spirit, 115; his hair,
mystical interpretation of, 116.
Samuel, 36.
Sanctification, 201 ; work of ?"a-
ther. Son, and Holy Spirit,
136; used as equivalent to
regeneration, 201, 201 n.
INDEX OF SUBJIXTS.
48:
Sarmatio, an apostate monk, 457
sq.
Satan, our enemy and tempter, 3
sq., 40; must tind jjlace in us,
40.
Satyrus, doubtless found accejit-
ance through prayers and
tears of faithful. 165: in ship-
wreck hound the Sacrament
round his neck, 16S; his
virtues, 169; brother of St.
.\mbrose xv, 159, 162; also
called Uranius, 159; an ad-
vocate and devoted himself to
St. .Ambrose, 159, 170 ; his
death, .xvii, 159, 162; hi-^
funeral orations, 159 sq. ; his
epitaph, 159; his character,
162, 169, 170; his benefits in
death, 165, 166 ; his eloquence,
169; received a late baptism,
169, 169 n. ; his view of
business, 170; taken away
from the evil, 166; his rela-
tion to the resurrection, 174
sq. ; was made judge between
brother and sister, 167, 170 ;
was in Africa, 165.
Schism punished in the case of
Korah, 464 ; of East and West,
202 n.
Scipio, 67.
Scriptitnc, not necessarily the
Scriptures, 1S3 n.
Scriptures, a feast of wisdom, 28 ;
as represented in the dishes of
a feast, 28 : appealed to for
doctrine, 199, 204, 220; quoted
as authoritative, 204, 216;
teach of Christ as God and
man, 216 ; as read in Church,
394, 424, 426, 431, 433, 437-
Scylla, 208, 242.
Sea, Christ walking on the, 219,
267.
Seasons and their fruits, 183.
Secular power has no authority in
the Church, 422 sq., 425, 426,
427, 430.
Seed of the Resurrection, human
body contains, 1S4.
Seemliness, in Scripture holds the
first place, 6; two kinds of,
22, 23 ; anything contrary to
nature, contrary to, 37 ; as a
Christian virtue, 37, 60.
Self-denial makes a man worthy of
Christ. 24.
Senones driven from before the
Capitol, 417.
Seraphim, 222 ; and Cherubim,
Isaiah's vision of, explained,
157-
Servants, Abraham's, 220.
Shame kept some from open pen-
ance, 356, 357.
Shapur I., king of Persia, 210 n.
Sheba, queen of, 51, 201.
Sick, hands laid on, by Novatians,
*> ■* c
Sickness weakens sm, 339.
.Silence, value of, i ; how to keep
silence, chief thing to learn, i ;
to know how to keep silence,
mark of wisdom, 1 ; saints of
old kept, 2; may be idle or
active, 2; the safest thing
when irritated, 4, 3; David's
and TytliagorHs' rule of si-
lence contrasted, 6; necessary
in training for virginity, 382,
383 ; tiie gods served in, 383.
.Simon, governor of the temple, 65.
.Simon Slagus, 348, 349.
Simony in the ("hurch, 433.
" Sin unto death," a grievous
condition, 336, 337, 339.
Sin, no one in a state of, ought to
use .Sacraments, 357; in none
ought to l)e rejoiced over, 33S.
.Sinners are more numerous than
the lapsed, 338.
Sins, 244, 247 ; forgiven by men
not in their own name, but in
that of Father, Son, and Holy
Cihost, 154; forgiven in bap-
tism l)y Holy .Spirit, 41, 154 ;
power of forgiving sins given
to apostles and transmitted to
priests, 346 ; every sin, how-
ever great, forgiven to those
who openly confess and sub-
mit to penance, 347 ; forgiven
on confession, 350 ; a great sin
to allow a fellow-Christian
knowingly to be in want, 25.
Sirens, 242.
.Sirmium, 143.
Sisera defeated and slain by wo-
men, 399.
Slavery, the selling into, 54, 54 n. ;
redeeming from, 54, 54 n. ;
laws regarding slavery, 176.
Society rests on justice and good-
will, 22.
Solomon, 50, 51, 17S. 201, 281 ; his
judgment discussed, 50. .—•
Son, the. His attriljutes, 203, 228 ;
names of, 203, 20S, 223, 224 ;
image of the Father, 20S sq.,
227, 257, 258 ; not a creature,
215, 301; increate, 215, 216,
222 ; first begotten, only be-
gotten, 216; one with the
Father in nature and God-
head, 202, 204, 228, 244, 245,
257, 26[, 263, 266, 279, 283,
284 ; also in sovereignty, 255,
256, 262, 263, 283, 284 ; and in
will, 203, 229, 235, 259, 270;
and in operation, 203, 235,
255. 262, 267, 269, 270, 271 n.,
272 ; not the Feather, as taught
l)y Sabellius, 202, 202 n. ; in
the fulness of the Godhead,
163, 203 sq., 286; did not
come into being at the Con-
ception, as taught by Pho-
tinus, 202, 206 n. ; by nature,
not by grace, 266; begotten,
not created, 218; is ("reator,
216, 243, 267, 268, 282; is in
God, or God is not good,
226; is almighty, 227; eternal,
228, 272, 276; equal to the
Father, 232, 233, 241, 242,
269, 273; in relation to the
Father, 203, 204, 207, 208,
211 sq., 221, 286 sq.; not un-
like the Father, 207, 21 1 sq.,
221 ; eternal with the Father,
208, 209, 211, 211 n., 215 sq.,
221, 223; as Hegotten, 213,
214, 2i6, 224; His generation
not in time, 211, 212, 213, 246;
He by nature and we by
adoption, 216 n., 287: of the
same substance with the
Father, 211; mission of, 233,
236; obedience of. 234. 235;
majesty of, 257, 262; session
of, 261; is Lord of Hosts,
263; is Life, Wisdom, Power,
267 ; is in the Father and
with the Father eternally, 273;
brightness of the Father's
light, 276; glorifies and is
glorified by the Father, 280;
is above all things, 280 ; of
Him are all things, 280; does
what the T'"ather does, 288;
has immortality as the F'ather
has, 289; fount of the Holy
Ghost, 113; knows all things,
124; in His human nature is
created, 129, 130; sent l^y
Holy Ghost, 137; is the right
hand of (iod, 137; in His hu-
man nature, the "footstool"
to be worshipped, 146; one in
person, twofold in nature,
162, 163; Arian blasphemies
cited, 206, 207, 221, 222 : Arian
questions about mutability
and peccability. 206 n., 222 ;
Arians denied the likeness to
the F'ather, 221 ; was wor-
shipped by the Arians, 213,
215, 218; was the angel with
the three children. 206,214;
names given to Him, 303 ;
the Truth and others. 208,
219; took our nature to re-
store the Church, 394; how
he worshipped the Father,
291 ; how subject to the
Feather, 303 sq.
Son of Man. the, 247, 278.
.Song of Songs, prophetic of Christ
and His Church, 153.
.Sonship by graoe, 282.
.Sorrow, over family losses, 162 sq. ;
to be moderate, 176 sq. ; in
public wailings, 175.
Sotheris, virgin martyr, 387.
Soul, has a separate existence,
177; in spiritual death, 179;
in transmigration, T84. 195,
196; in relation to imnK)rtal-
ity and the resurrection, 184,
196; co-partner with the body,
188 ; our Lord's, endowed with
reason, and perfect from the
first, roi.
Souls more precious than gold,
•77 sq-
.Speaking, dangers of, 121.
.Speech, two kinds of, 17, iS ; to be
kept within due bounds, 17,
18; should be easy, etc., 17,
18; free from passion, 17, 18.
Spirit, the Holy, is one with the
Father and the Son, 203, 219,
233 ; sends the Son, 233 ;
486
ST. AMBROSE.
sent by the Son, 233 ; one
and eternal, 274 ; communion
of, 282 ; is not subject to
cliange because always good,
102 ; separate from creatures,
103 ; is good as imparting,
not receiving goodness, 103;
not a creature because uncir-
cnmscribed, 104 ; poured on
different persons in the apos-
tles, but the gift but one, 104;
sanctifies men and angels but
does not share their nature,
104; is God because He fills
all things, 104, 105 ; descent
of Holy Ghost consecrating
waters of baptism typified by
angels who troubled the pool,
105 ; has same servants as
Father and Son, and work as
do Father and Son, 105 ; no
difference of will between
Father and, 105; given by
God, not by man, though
invoked by prayer, 105 ;
"abode " upon Christ, but is
"poured out" upon men, 105-
106 ; poured forth on Individ,
uals, but is not severed, 106;
unity of operation and grace
shown by fact that the love of
God is poured forth through,
106; grace of Holy Spirit
same as if Father, 106; His
eternity asserted by St. Paul,
106; Christ anointed with,
106, 107; Father and Son are
Spirit, but not to be con-
founded with, 107 ; fiery coal
from altar [Isa. vii, 21] figured
grace of Holy Spirit in Clirist
burning away sin, 108; said to
be sent, but does not proceed
from place to place as a crea-
ture, 108, 109; does not de-
scend to us, but we ascend to
Him, 109 ; does not come sepa-
rately from Father and Son,
109; one peace, one love, one
fellowship, and so certainly
one operation of Father and
Holy Spirit the power cannot
be divided nor substance sepa-
rated, no; has same Name
as Father and Son, a oneness
of Name not a confusion of
person, in ; is light, ni ; is
fire, in, 112; proceeds from
Son, \i;^; is life, n3 ; is fount
of eternal life. n4; is Creator.
n5, 138; at the beginning
joined with Father and .Son,
n5; is Lord, n7, 148, 149;
Holy Spirit and .Son not one
Person but one .Substance,
117, 148, 149; is Power or
might, n7; gives life, n7,
n8; gives life together with
Father and .Son, i iS ; to know
Holy Spirit is life, as it is to
know Father and .Son, n8;
is Creator together with
Father and Son, n8 ; birth
from the Virgin, work of Holy
Spirit, n9; is not reabsorbed,
121; as all things are "of'
the Father, so of Son and
Holy .Spirit, 127 ; also
" through," 127; will of Holy
.Spirit one with that of Father
and Son, 127, 133; called the
Gentiles as did Father and
Son, 127 ; knows all things as
do Father and Son, 129, 130 ;
of one substance with Father,
130; works with the Father,
but as free and controller of
His own gifts, 130; author of
prophecy, 133 ; as Christ with
Father sent Holy Spirit, so
Holy .Spirit sent .Son by the
Father, 135 sq. ; worked in
Daniel in the case of .Susan-
nah, 136; author of regenera-
tion, 136, 144; is sword of the
Word, as Word is sword of
Spirit, 136, 144; is God, 137 ;
to be adored as being Maker
of flesh of Christ which is to
be adored, 137 ; is finger of
God, 137 ; assertion of His
Godhead does not imply three
gods, 137 ; is to be worshipped,
138; is without sin, forgives
sin, 138; possesses all that
God possesses and is therefore
God, 138; sees through all
things, 140; judges in prophets,
140; dwells in temple, there-
fore He is God, 148; makes
us to increase and abound be-
fore God and our Father, 148 ;
guides and teaches, 149; has
all in common with Father
and Son, 151 ; four character-
istics of God possessed by
Holy Spirit, 154, 155.
Stars, 226.
Stoics taught all things were made
for man, 23.
.Stones in the Breastplate, precious,
223, 224, 224 n. ; their inter-
pretation, 223, 224, 224 n.
Story of the two J'ythagoreans,
80; the Persian war, Si ; the
Pyrrhic war, 82.
Strangers not to be expelled a city
in famine, 75.
Subjection of Christ not in His
Godhead, 303 ; not by reab-
sorption, 304 , is future, 304 ; is
in the assumption of human-
ity, 305 ; consists in subjection
of all in Him in the Church,
289, 295, 306, 307
Substance of the Father, 274 ; its
unity denied by the Arians,
289, 295.
Suffering and sorrow do not make
men blessed, but victory over
suffering, etc., 46; examples
of this: Isaac, 46; Jacob, 46;
David, 46: Job, 46.
Suicide, questions upon, if allow-
able to preserve chastity, 386.
.Sun, a figure of God's presence
everywhere, 10.
Sunday .Service at Milan describ-
ed, 423.
.Susannah, example of, 2, 13 ; aided
I
by the Holy .Spirit, 140; her
chastity, 2, 13, 370, 377, 395 ;
her modesty, 13, 370.
Symbolism of Aaron's breastplate
and robe, 115, 116.
Symmachusan Elronite, 3, 3 n.
Symmachus, patron of .Satyrus,
166, i66n. ; prefect of the city
of Milan, xvi, 411,453; friend-
ly to St. Ambrose, xvi; letter
to him by St. Ambrose, 41 1 ;
headed the deputation to Gra-
tian, 411 ; was sent with the
memorial to Valentinian H.,
xvi, 411, 453; his memorial to
the three Emperors, 417 sq. ;
St. Ambrose's reply to the
memorial of Symmachus, 417
sq.
Sympathy shown with St. Am-
brose, 165.
.Synagogue, 145.
Synod, of Aries, 169 n. ; of Milan,
169 n. ; of Alexandria, 169 n. ;
third of Carthage, 171 n.
Taxa, forte, perchance, considered
critically, 349.
Teaching the duty of the priest-
hood, I.
Temperance, definition of, 20, 35 ;
order a part of, 36 ; choice of
intercourse to do with, 36;
may exist in the midst of
abundance, 152; agreeable to
nature and divine law, 460,
461 ; a virtue seen in Judith,
398-
Temptation of Christ, the, 231,
247.
Thankfulness, both felt and given,
168.
Thecla, patron saint of Milan, 361,
461 ; a model for learning how
to die, 376.
Theodosius, expelled Demophilus
from the sea of Constanti-
nople, 207 n. ; removed the
Altar of Victory, 41 1 ; consult-
ed with Valentinian n., 413;
was included in Symmachus'
memorial to the three Em-
perors, 414 sq. ; had a letter
from St. Ambrose, 440 sq.,
453 ; his character as given by
St. Ambrose, 440, 441 ; par-
doned the Antiocheans after
Chrysostom's sermon, 445 n. ;
yielded to St. Ambrose, 450 ;
caused the massacre at Thes-
salonica, xvi, 450 n., 450 sq. ;
was disciplined by St. Am-
brose, 450 sq. ; strongly under
the influence of .St. Ambrose,
xii; defeated paganism at
Aquileia, xvi ; letters to, from
St. Ambrose, 440, 450, 455-
Theophrastus, 441.
Qtuq, derivation and meaning of
the word, 202 n.
Thessalonica, massacre at, caused
by Theodosius, 450 sq.
Thrace ravaged, 54.
Three children, interpretation of,
206,206 n.;the fourth with,2i4.
INDEX OF SUBJECTS.
487
Thrones, 247.
Ticenum, attempts to seize trust
property at, 66 ; Bisliop of,
seeks advice from St. Am
brose, 66.
Time in its fullest sense, 210 n. ;
does not belong as a proiierty
to the divine nature and being,
211, 212, 213.
Tobit. 83.
Torture applied to slaves, 212 n.
Touch as a channel of miracle, 317.
Training needful for every act, 6.
Transfiguration, the, 215; of the
Eucharistic elements, 278.
Transgressions of Satyrus washed
away by tears of poor. 161.
Transmigration of souls, more dif-
ficult than resurrection, 1S4,
195, 196.
Trinity, the Holy, a type of, in the
Three who appeared to Abra-
ham, 115, 189; the name one,
and presence one and indivisi-
ble, III, 124, 203, 306; in its
relation to Christ, 366 ; reveal-
ed in the Creation, 115; in
unity, 148, 158, 202, 203, 285,
306 ; distinction of persons,
unity of substance, 273, 274,
306.
Trisagion, 238.
Trumpets, signification of, in holy
Scripture, 191 ; always sym-
bols of rejoicing, 191 sq.
Trust not to be put in bought men,
61.
Trust money, etc., to be carefully
preserved, 65 ; to be restored,
42 : exceptions to the rule, 42.
Truth to be sought carefully, 21 ;
all desire to find it. 21, 22; a
name belonging to Christ, 208.
Type, definition of a, 255.
Type of the Church : Ruth, 253.
Type of Holy Spirit : fire from
heaven, 84.
Type of Incarnation : Moses' Rod,
82.
Types of Baptism : the flood, 85 ;
Red Sea, 139.
Types of Christ : Aaron, 201 ;
Melchizedek, 255; Abraham,
190; Gideon, 93 ; brazen ser-
pent, 142.
Union between old and young
noble, 58.
Unity of the Father and the Son,
266; of Father, Son, and
Holy Spirit, 138, 203, 219,
271 ; in Trinity declared in and
after the Passion, 235; con-
joined in love, 271.
vnoaraaiQ, its meaning and use,
202 n., 220 n., 223 n.
Uriel, 245.
Ursatius, 163.
Useful, what is [utile, utilias\, and
what is virtuous, and what is
just, interchangeable terms,
47 ; nothing to do with money
or worldly gain, 47. but with
growth in Godliness, 47 ;
nothing so " useful " as to be
loved, 48; of two kinds, 48;
nothing to be considered but
what is for the general good,
71-
Usefulness, what it is, 47, 68.
I'tterances, places of our Lord's
often a help to understand-
ing them, 152.
Valkns, 143; repelled the Goths,
199; died at Hadrianople,
199.
Valentinian, I., xvi, 416 n ; refused
to legislate upon the Church,
427, 427 n. ; was remonstrated
with by St. Ambrose, xvi.
Valentinian II., 66 n., 411 sq., 417
SI" 453! "^t- Ambrose ad-
dressed a letter to, 411 sq. ;
was accused of idol worship,
413; sole Emperor of the
West, 414; one of the three
Emperors addressed by Sym-
machus, 411 sq., 453 ; recog-
nized formally St. Ambrose's
appointment as Bishop, xv :
his funeral oration made by
St. Ambrose, xvi.
Valentinus, 229, 297.
Valeria Pannoniorum, [Roman
Province], 241.
Veil, given at profession of Vir-
ginity, XV, 361, 381, 3S3.
VercellcE, the Church of, 457 ; its
troubles and a letter upon
them, 467 sq. ; the Church
without a bishop, 457 ; the re-
quirements for its bishop, 466,
Vessels, sacred, of the Church,
may be sold or melted down
to serve some great need, 64,
65.
Vestal virgins compared with the
Christian, 365,413; their posi-
tion and privileges, 415, 416,
418.
Vine brought from Egypt, 2S4; the
term blasphemously misrepre-
sented by Arians, 282, 283 ;
nourishes goodness in us, 283.
Virgin, the, 249, 251 ; birth from,
the work of the Holy .Spirit,
119; the mother of Christ,
202, 214, 216, 261 ; the means
of uniting our flesh to God,
461.
Virgin, martyr of Antioch, 376-79.
Virginity, Christian, contrasted
with heathen, 458; preferable
to marriage, 458 ; not of com-
mand but of counsel, 461 ;
different forms of embracing
the life, 361 ; is praised on
many grounds, 365, 45S, 461 ;
treatise upon, 361 sq. ; a
Christian grace and come-
liness, 36S, 458, 462 ; must be
a voluntary offering, 365, 366 ;
has its strength in Christ, 366;
not set up against marriage,
367 ; trained to by parents,
36S ; was in sanctuary, 372 ;
mirrored in the B. V. ^I., 374,
461 ; and in the Church, 462 ;
Liberius' address upon, 381 sq.
Virgins, not to be visited by the
clergy, 15; outrage, to, 166,
172 ; the Vestal were for a
time, 365, 366 ; compared with
the angels, 371 ; came from
different countries, 372 ; pro-
fessed against their parents
will sometimes, 373 ; were
trained in silence, 382, 383 ;
rules for training by example,
374 sq-. 382, 45^"^-
Virtue, the highest good, 44 ; not
hindered by pains or misfor-
tunes but rather helped, 45 ;
as shown by Moses, 45 ;
Aaron, 45 ; Elias, 46; nor in-
creased by riches, etc., 43, 45,
46 ; various examples of :
Judith, 81, 82 ; Elisha, 81 ;
John ]3aptist, 82 ; Susannah,
82 ; Moses, 82 ; Tobit, 82.
Virtues, the, do not exist indepen-
dently, 22 ; how necessary to
the clergy, 20 ; the four car-
dinal, 20 ; Satyrus' example
of, 169 ; all derived from four
cardinal, 20, 194 ; the saving,
248, 250 ; all combined with
prudence, 36, 37, 53.
Virtuous living, according to na-
ture. 36, 37, 43 sq. ; IS eternal
life, 43 ; is ussful, 57, 48, 68 ;
as against the useful, 68.
Vitalis and Agricola, saints at
Milan, 437.
Voice, how to be used, 15 ; to be
clear, etc., 18.
Vow. Cf. Promise.
Vows, to martyrs, 164 ; in prayer,
167.
Vulgate and Latin versions, 171
n. ; gives different readings,
202, 205, 217, 221, 222, 224.
" Was," quadrupled, its theolo-
gical force, 209 n. ; as related
to the idea of time, 209 n.
Washing Peter's feet, meaning of,
321.
Water and the Spirit in baptism,
319 sq. ; blessed for baptism,
3i«-
W' ays, the Lord s, 250.
Weeping tor dead natural not
blameworthy, 162 ; its object
and value, 397.
Wheels, Ezekiel's vision of, alle-
gorically explained, 157.
White robes in baptism, 321.
Wicked not happy, 8, 9.
Widowhood, held in dishonour by
idolaters, 389; honoured in
the Church, 389 ; conditions
of, required by .St. Paul, 393 ;
its tyjie in Anna, 395; hon-
oured in the two mites to the
treasury, 396 ; examples and
models in, 395 sq. ; a question
of counsel, 404, 405, 406.
Widows, not to be visited by the
clergy, 15; their property is
to be carefully guarded, 65.
66; of Ticinum, case of, 66;
outrages to, 166 ; mourning
for their husbands in mod-
488
ST. AMBROSE.
esty, 176 ; their state near to
virginity, 389, 391 ; occasion of
St. Ambrose' treatise upon,
389 ; were honoured in the
Church, 391 sq. ; were hon-
oured Ijy St. Paul, 392, 392 n. ;
conditions for, required in the
Church, 392, 393 ; their inter-
cessary duty, 400 ; are useful
in many ways, 309, 400, 406 ;
their moral trial, 405.
Will, freedom of the Son's, 278,
280 ; of God the cause of
all things, 126; oneness of the
divine, 133.
Wills not to be tampered with,
77 ; as made and adminis-
tered, 419.
Wine, water turned into, 267 ; to
be drunk not for pleasure, but
because of infirmity, 460 ;
better for clergy to abstain
from, 40 ; pressed on the
Cross, 222 ; for worship and
service, 223.
Wisdom, false and true, 21 ; can-
32
not exist without justice, 51 ;
to know how to keep silence,
a mark of, 2 ; the divine, is
omnipotent and eternal, 281.
Woman, strong in modesty, 340.
Word of God, the, 209, 221, 227,
230, 234, 244, 252, 266, 271; liv-
ing, efficient, healing, 271, 275;
not to be compared with the
word of man, 271, 275.
Words to be checked, 3 ; index to
character, 3 ; different mean-
ings with which used, 69 ; are
the reflection of the mind, 12.
World, the theological senses of
the word, 206 n. ; the time of
its end, 183, 283 n. ; its origin
and changes, 420.
World and the devil, renouncing
the, at baptism, 317.
Worlds, plurality of, 267.
Worship, a proof of belief in the
divinity, 213, 215, 218 ; of a
creature forbidden, 218.
Wrong notions about God's care
for men, 7, 8.
Wrongs, best disregarded. 4 ; how
borne by various men, 39.
Xystus, pope, 35 ; foretells Law-
rence's death, 35 ; martyred,
35-
Young, duties of, 12; modesty
chief virtue of young, 12;
should choose company of
wise, 58; show by daily life
what company they keep, 58 ;
intercourse between old and
young is good, 59; examples
to: Isaac, 12; Joseph, 12;
Joshua, 59.
Zacch.^us, 25.
Zacharias, 5.
Zebedee's children, the mother of,
291 sq.
Zeno of Citium, stoic, 44 ; makes
virtue the only good, 44.
Zoroaster and his teaching, 210 n. ;
Manes, a pupil of, 210 n.
ST. AMBROSE.
INDEX OF TEXTS.
PAGE
I'AGt:
PAGE
PAGE
Gen. i. I . . 115, 119
Geii. XV. 6 sq.
. 190
Cieii. xxxviii. 26
• 354
Exod. XV. 20. 365,376, 461
i. 2 .
. . . .316
xvii. 15
■ 19
xxxix. I sq.
. . 19
XV, 23 sq. . . . 319
i-3 •
• . 134. 206
xviii. 1-3 .
• -55
xxxix. 7
47. 341
XV. 25 .
• • 324
i-3. 4
. 270
xviii. I sq.
59,60
xxxix. 8, 9
• • 57
xvi. 12 sq.
. 226
i. 4 .
. . .115
xviii. 2
. 189
xxxix. 12 .
12, 14
xvi. 13 . .
• 46, 323
i.6,7
. 204
xviii. 3
• 59
xxxix. 12 sq.
• 177
xvi. 18 .
. . 26
i. 6 sq.
. . .187
xviiL 4
• 95. ^33
xii. 9 sq. .
• ■ 52
xvii. 6 . 226,
324, 460
i. II
. . .186
xviii. 21
■ 311
xii. 17 sq.
. . 56
xvii. II
. . 67
i. 26
23, 115, 127,
.xviii. 22, 23
. 100
xii. 22 sq.
. . 56
xviii. 13 .
• 52
147, 209, 219,
xviii. 27 .
• 345
xii. 33 sq.
. • 52
xix. 5 . .
239. 435
xix. 3 . .
. 60
xii. 43-57
• • 55
XIX. 6 .
. . 260
i. 26, 27 . . . 204
xix. 24 .
150, 204
xlii. 2 .
. . 46
xix. 10 .
. . 41
i. 29, 30 . . . 392
xix. 26 .
• • 378
xliv. 2 sq. .
• ■ 56
XX. 2
• 239
ii. 18 . . . . 23
xix. 29 .
• 59
xlvii. 14-20
. . 56
XX. 17 .
"3
ii. 20 . . . . 23
xix. 32, 33.
• • 371
xlvii. 25 .
. . 56
xxii 2 .
• 70
ii. 24 . 29, 204, 407
XX. I sq. .
. . 141
xlix. II
• 363
xxiii. 4
• 70
iii. 6 . . . . 424
xxi. 30 . .
. . 115
xlix. 12
•■447
xxiv. 12 sq.
. . 58
iii. 9 . . 358, 426
xxii. 3 .
. 20
xlix. 22, 25, 2(
3 . 56
xxiv. 15
• • 193
iii. 14 . . . .340
xxii. 9 .
12
xlix. 29.
• • 177
xxiv. 17
. 67
iii. 15 . . ■ • 95
xxii. II
. . iSo
Exod. ii. 1 1
• 30
xxviii. 15-21
• 223
iii. 16 . . . .367
xxii. 13
80, 180
iii. 3 . .
• • 341
x.xviii. 42, 43
• 1=;
iii. 17 . . . . 100
xxii. 16
• 232
iii. 4
• 21, 363
xxix. 12, 13
• 472
iii. 17 sq. (LXX.) 179
xxiv. 62
• • '^5
iii. 5 . 253,
358. 462
xxxi. 12 sq.
• • 350
iii. 19 . . . .340
xxiv. 65
• 382
111. 6 . 47,
112, 212
x.xxii. 5
• 371
iii. 21, 24 . . . 357
xxiv. 67
• 407
iii. 14 . 215,
222, 287
xxxii. 31 .
• 33(>
iv. 7 . . 3S3, 447
XXV. 10
• • 407
iii. 14 (LXX.)
• 223
xxxiii. 32 . 83
144. 33^'
iv. 7 (LXX.) . . 358
XXV. 23
• • 277
iii. 15 .
. 202
xxxiii. 7
. 472
iv. 10 . . . ■ 440
XXV. 34
. . 19
iv. 3 . .
. . 186
xxxiii. 19 .
. Ill
V. 24 . . 166, 189
xxvii. 28
. 46
iv. 3, 4 . .
• ^l^
xxxiii. 20 .
• 314
vi. 3 . . . . 318
xxvii. 42
. 16
iv. 6, 7 . .
• 83
xxxiii. 22 ,
• 139
vi. 14 . . . . 21
xxvii. 42 sq.
. . 19
iv. 10 .
12
xxxiii. 23 .
■ 314
vi. 16 . . . . 14
xxviii. 5
• 177
vi. I
. 287
xxxiv. 6
• 203
vii. I sq. . . . 318
xxviii. 12 .
. 190
vii. 19 .
. 82
xxxiv. 9 .
• 448
vii. 23 . . . -85
xxviii. 17 .
. 100
vii. 20 sq. .
• 324
xxxiv. 20 .
• 356
viii/ II . . . . '449
xxix. II
• 382
L\. 10 .
. 82
xxxiv. 23, 24
. 298
viii. 21 . . . .123
xxix. 28 sq.
• 407
ix. 23 . .
. 82
xxxiv. 30 .
. 48
ix. 20 . . . . 460
xxxi. 32
. 40
ix. 29 .
. 82
XXXV. 27 .
. 224
ix. 22 . . . 14, 371
xxxi. 41
. 46
X. 22 .
. 82
Lev. ix. 24 .
. 84
xi. 5 . . . .311
xxxii. 3 sq.
. 16
xii. II .
• • 347
X. 2 . .
. 84
xi. 7 . . 109, 296
xxxii. 24, 26
. 21
xii. 22 .
• 321
xix. 2 .
103, 23S
xii. I sq. . . . 19
xxxii. 25 .
. 190
xii. 29 .
. 82
xix. 13
• 70
xii. 5 . . . . i;9
xxxii. 28 .
. 368
.xiv. 16
• 67
xxiii. 24, 25
. 192
xiv. I sq. . . . 190
xxxii. 29, 30
. 21
xiv. 21
• 59
Num. i. 49-51
• 42
xiv. 14 ... 19
xxxii. 32 .
. 48
xiv. 21 sq.
• 324
ii. 3 . .
. 82
xiv. 14 sq. . 20
xxxiii. 4 .
• 19
xiv. 22
• 377
iii. 12, 13 .
• 42
xiv. 16 ... 54
xxxiii. 8
. 21
xiv. 22 sq.
. 186
viii. 8, 1 1 .
. 226
xiv. 18 sq. . . 255
xxxiv. 2
■ 177
xiv. 29
45
X. I-IO
. 192
XV. 4 . . . . 19
xxxiv. 5
21, 46
XV. 2 .
. 248
x. 8 . .
• 193
XV. 5 . . . 189
xxxvii. 4 sq.
• 177
XV. 6 .
0 '38
xi. 4 . .
■ 93
XV. 6 . 20, 137, 188,
xxxvii. 9 .
. 12
XV. 10 .
138, 318
xi. 25 . . .
. 141
190, 214
xxxvii. 28 .
• 56
XV. II .
. 283
xii. 10 . . .
• 464
489
490
ST. AMBROSE.
PAGE
PAGE
PAGE
PAGE
Num. xiii. 24 .
284, 449
Judg. vi. 31 . . . 444
2 Sam. XV. 1-6.
. . 61
2 Kings vii. 8, 9 . -87
xiii. 27, 28
. . 76
vi. 36 . .
94
xvi. 6 sq. .
• • 4
vii. 16-20 ... 87
xiv. 3 . .
. . 76
vi. 37 sq.
394
xvi. 10
• • 39
ix. 30 . . . . 220
xiv. II sq.
. . 76
vii. 22 sq.
33
xvi. 1 1
• • 39
xiii. 21 . 187, 246
xiv. 12
. . 80
ix. 13 . .
222
xvi. II, 12
• • 39
xxii. I sq. . . . 444
xiv. 21
. . 218
xi. 30 sq.
43
xvi. 12
• • 39
xxiii. 21 sq. . . 67
xiv. 29
. . 76
xi. 35 .
80
xviii. 5
. . 61
xxiv. 13 . . .64
xiv. 37
. . 76
XI. 36 .
80
xviii. 14 .
• • 177
Ezra vii. 6 . . . . 461
xvi. 3 . .
• • 464
xi. 40 .
So
xviii. 33 .
• • 47
Esther iv. 16 . .87, 461
xvi. 8, 9 .
• • 464
xiii. 6 .
461
xviii. 23 i^-^
:x.) . 178
vi. 10 . . . 87
xvi. 9-1 1 •
• ■ 464
xiii. 25
115, 117
xxi. 15
• ■ 30
vii. 9, 10 . . .87
xvi. 17
• • 464
xiv. 6 .
63, "7
xxiv. 10 .
• • 451
Jobi. 12 .... 30
xvi. 21
. . 80
xiv. 14
. 116
xxiv. 17
• 49, 451
i. 14 sq. . . . 47
xvi. 32
• • 464
xiv. 18
. 116
xxiv. 24 .
• • 451
i. 21 ... 32
xvi. 40
■ • 463
xiv. 19
. 116
I Kings ii. 5
• • 49
i. 22 .... 30
xvi. 48
• 45. 464
XV. 14, 15
■ .63
iii. 9
• • 51
ii. 6 ... 30, 339
xvii. 8 .
■ • 363
XV. 15 .
. 116
iii. 26 .
• • 51
ii- 8 342
xviii. 23 .
. . 41
xvi. 6 .
• 63
in. 26 sq. .
• • 50
ii- 9 424
XX. II .
. . 186
xvi. 7, II, I
9
. 116
iv. 23, 30 .
. . 69
ii. 10 . . . 30, 32
xxi. 24 .
• • 449
xvi. 17 .
• "7
V. I . .
. 201
iii. 3 . . . .178
xxii. 17
• • 63
XVI. 20 .
• 6:
5, 117
X. I
. 201
V. 21 . . . . 2
xxii. 28
• • 363
xvi. 21
320
X. 2, 3 . .
• • 51
ix. I sq. . * . . 217
xxiii. 2
• • 449
xix. 1-3
85
xi. 34 . .
• ■ 49
ix. 8 . . . . 288
xxiii. 10 (L>
iX.) 180
xix. 4-9
85
xii. 4 sq. .
• • 58
xiv. 4 (LXX.) 329, 335
xxiii. 19 .
. . 214
xix. 10-21
86
xii. 16 .
. . 58
xix. 21 . . . . 88
xxiv. 17 .
. 206
xix. 22-26
86
xiii. 4 .
377' 380
xix. 26 (LXX.) . 184
xxxi. 7 sq.
• • 24
XX. I sq.
. 86
xvii. I .
. . 68
xxi 8
Deut. iv. 24
. 8s, 112
XX. 48 .
. 86
xvii. 3 .
• • 467
xxi. 2-4 ... 8
V. 26 .
• ■ 233
xxi. I sq. .
86
xvii. 6 .
• 46, 396
xxi. 7-9 ... 8
V. 31 . .
. . 462
Ruth ii. 2 .
397
xvii. 9 .
• 95.391
xxi. 14 ... 8
vi. 4- 2.15
3, 204, 257
iv. 5-7 •
253
xvii. 14 41
?. 393. 394
xxi. 17 ... 8
vi. 5. . .
. 42, 380
I Sam. i. 21-27
77
xvii. 16
. . 68
xxi. 24 ... 8
vi. 13 ■ ■
146, 154,
ii. 25 .
336
xvii. 20 sq.
. . 246
xxi. 28 ... 8
235, 297
iv. I .
24
xvii. 22
• • 'P
xxi. 32 ... 8
vii.-ix .
• • 450
vii. 51 .
260
xviii. 30 sq.
. . 85
xxii. 17 ... 228
viii. 3 . .
■ 58,75
xiii. 14
212
xviii. 38
• 320
xxiv. 14, 15 . . 10
viii. 3, 4 .
. . 226
xiv. I .
33
xviii. 45 .
. 122
xxvi. 14 (LXX.) . 121
ix. 2 . .
• • -4^
xvii. 32
49
xix. I .
• • 425
XX vii. 2, 3 . . .123
xxiii. 19 .
. . 70
xvii. 39 sq.
30
xix, 4 .
• • 195
XX vii. 3 . . .155
XXV. 5-10 .
• • 253
xviii. 7.
286
xix. 6 .
. 460
xxix. 12, 13 . . 30
xxix. 5.
. . 226
xviii. 33
358
xix. 8 .
. . 468
xxix. 13 . • -25
XXX. 14
. . 286
xix. 4 .
452
xix. II
. 122
xxix. 15, 16 . . 7
xxxii. 35 .
. . 469
xix. 5 .
452
xix. 18
. . 192
xxix. 23 ... 28
xxxlii. 8, 9.
• • 43
xix. 24
36
xix. 20
. . 26
xxxi. 3 ... 248
xxxiii. II .
• • 43
XX. II sq.
28
xix. 21
• • 59
xxxi. 26-28 . . 212
xxxiii. 16, 17
. . 56
XX. 27 .
87
xxi. 3 . .
• 77,433
xxxi. 32 ... 29
xxxiii. 24 .
. . 448
XX. 34 .
49
xxi. 13-16
• • 77
xxxi. 34 (LXX.) . 452
xxxiv. 6 .
. . 48
xxi. 13
36
xxi. 23
. . 78
.x.xxi. 35 (LXX.) . 29
xxxiv. 9 .
• • 59
xxii. 9 .
. 79
xxii. 19
• ■ 294
xxxiii. 4 120, 154, 437
Josh. ii. 9 .
• • 377
xxii. 17
87
xxii. 36
• • "5
xxxviii. 4-6 . . 228
ii. 18 . .
■ ■ 300
xxiv. 10
77
2 Kings ii. 1 1 .
189, 365
XXX vih. 36 . .224
iii. 15 sq. .
• ■ 59
XXV. 35
17
iii. 17 .
. 68, 122
xl. 2, 5, 6 (LXX.) 30
iii. 16 .
• • 324
xxvi. 2
72
iv. 16 .
. . 68
xl. 4 . . . .212
v. 13 . .
• 94. 300
xxvi. 8-10
73
iv. 34 . 6
3, 187, 246
xU. I, 5, 8 (LXX.) 340
V. 16 .
• • -53
xxvi. 23 sq
73
iv. 39 . .
. 461
xii. 8 . . . .288
vi. 6 . .
. 201
xxviii. 7 sq
258
iv. 41 .
. . 68
Ps. ii. 7
287, 300
vi. 13 sq. .
. 201
2 Sam. i. 23
88
iv. 44 . .
. . 68
iii. 5 .
. . 324
viii. 23 sq.
• • 449
ii. 3 .
49
V. I sq.
• • 319
iv. 4
• . 3.465
ix. 3 sq. .
. . 78
iii. 20
49
V. 10 .
. . 68
iv. 6
. 1X2
ix. 27 . .
• 24, 79
iii. 28
452
V. II
• • 346
iv. 6, 7
. . 103
X. I sq.
• • 33
V. I, 2
49
V. 14 .
• 95.319
iv. 7 .
. . 107
X. 12 .
• 33< 59
v. 18
242
vi. 6
. . 68
vi. I
. . 140
X. 12, 13 .
• ■ 59
V. 19
30
vi. 8-23 .
. . 24
vi. 5
• . 384
X. 19 . .
• • 449
vi. 14
36
vi. 8 sq.
. . 68
vi. 6 .
• • 354
xi. 21, 22 .
. . 242
vii. 8
443
vi. 16 . 2:
2, 431, 438
vi. 7 .
. . 162
xiv. 6 .
. . 76
vii. 21
212
vi.20 .
. . 81
vii. 4 .
• • 77
XV. 21 .
: :3^
xii. 7
449
vi. 22
. 24, 86
vii. 9 .
■ ■ 155
Judg. iv. 4 sq .
xii. 13
451
vi. 23 . .
. . 24
vii. 15 . .
. . 114
iv. S sq. .
• • 399
xii. 16
47
vi. 25-31 .
. . 86
viii. 2 .
• - 433
vi. II.
• • 93
xii. 18 sq.
177
vi. 32 . .
. . 86
viii. 3 .
• - 139
vi. 14 .
• ■ 93
xiii. 21
47
vii. I . .
. . 68
viii. 5, 6 .
- - 231
vi. 19-21 .
• • 93
xiii. 29
177
vii. I, 2
• • ^7
viii. 6 .
280, 303
vi. 21 .
• • 93
xiii. 31
47
vii. 3, 4 .
. . 87
viii. 7, 8 .
• • 23
vi. 26 .
• . 94
xiv. 25
61
vii. 6, 7 .
. . 87
viii. 8 .
. . 281
INDEX OF TEXTS.
491
Ps.
PAGE
ix. 14 .
26^
xi. 4
148
xi. 6
121
xi. S
282
xii. I
•45
xii. 6 .
.285
xii. 6, 7
225
xiii. 6 .
226
xiv. I .
20
.-39
xiv. 3 .
102
XV. I
336
XV. 2, 3
170
XV. 3 . .
78
xvi. 5 .
41
xvi. 6 .
129
xvi. 10
298
xvii. 7 .
424
xviii. 7, 14
243
xviii. 26 .
29
xix. I .
139.
168,
2
64,
437
457
xix. 2 . 4
37.
43«
439
xLx. 4 .
128
xix. 6 .
194
XX. S
438
xxii. [ . 2
16,
230
259
xxii. 6 .
231
xxii. 1 1
216
xxii. 13
217
xxii. 19
217
xxiii. 1-5 .
323
xxiii. 2
95
xxiii. 5 (L'S
:x
') '-
461
xxiv. I
104
xxiv. 3
33^
xxiv. 4
336
xxiv. 4-6
170
xxiv. 7
263
xxiv. 8
263
xxv. 4
250
XXV. 8
205
xxvi. 4 .
462
xxvi. 5 .
463, 469
xxvii. 2
342
xxvii. 4
196,
295
xxvii. 9
212
xxix. 3
320
XXX. 2
150
XXX. 9 .
17.
239.
425
XXX. II
425
XXX. 15 (L>
:x
•) •
333
xxxi. 3, II,
16
298
xxxii. I
245
xxxii. 1,2.
350
xxxii. 5
239
xxxiii, 4
214
xxxiii. 6
103,
119,
127, 147. 158.
268, 318
xxxiii. 6, 9 . . 214
xxxui. 9
xxxiii. 17 .
xxxiv. 6
xxxiv. 9 .
xxxiv. 1 1 .
xxxiv. 13, 14
xxxiv, 18 .
134, i»»,
191, 21S '
470
469
325
I
16
57
XXX vi. 9 112, 113,208
xxxvii. I . 463, 469
xxxvii. 4 . . .28
xxxvii. 21 . . 50, 71
xxxvii. 25 . . .31
xxxviii. 8 . . . 298
's. XXX vm. 13
xxxix. I
xxxix. I, 2
xxxix. 2
xxxix. 4
xxxix. 5 (LXX.)
.\1. 10 .
xii. 3 .
xlii. 3 .
xlii. 4 (LXX.)
xliv. 10
.xiv.
II
329
266 (
xiv. 1 .
xiv. 6 .
.xiv. 7 .
.xiv. 8 .
xiv. 9, 10,
xlvi. 4 .
1.3. .
1. 16 .
1. 20
1. 21 .
li. 2 .
li. 3 ■
li.4 •
li. 5 •
li. 7 •
li.9 •
li. II .
li. 17 •
Hi. 2 .
liii. I
liii. 2 .
liv. 8 .
liv. 12 .
liv. 13,14
Iv. 3 .
Iv. 4
Iv. 6 .
Ivi. 4 .
Ivi. 10 .
Ix. 12 .
Ixii. I .
Ixii. 3 .
Ixiv. 7 .
Ixv. 3 .
Ixv. 8 .
Ixv. 9 .
Ixvi. 13
Ixviii. 9
Ixviii. 16
Ixviii. 18
l.xviii. 30
Ixviii. 31
Ixix. 9 .
Ixix. 13
Ixxi. 6
Ixxi. 8
Ixxi. 15 (LXX
Ixxi. 19
Ixxi. 22, 2
Ixxii. 6
Ixxii. 8,9
Ixxii. 19
Ixxii. 20 (LXX.)
Ixxiii. 5, 7
Ixxiii. II
Ixxiii. 12 sq
Ixxiii. 26
Ixxv. II
Ixxvii. 7
Ixxvii. 8, 9
PAGE
6
2,67
4
39. 178
179
229
384, 385
"3
193
125
204
221 227
79, 281, 47 j
204
204
107
369
3.468
1X2
432
463
140
335
339
P.B.),
Ps.
67
94
274. 347
331
434
321
100
448
79
239
3"
229
89
89
17
17
17
124
244
124
307
307
436
196
468
468
125
96
259
102
128
129
20"?
452
124
448
73
336
222 i
3941
308 1
218 1
40
308
308
177
4701
95
232
332
07.
Ixxviii. 17, 18
Ixxviii. 24, 25
Ixxx. I
Ixxx. 5
Ixxxi. 3
Ixxxi. 9, ID
Ixxxi. 10
Ixxxii. I.
Ixxxii 4
Ixxxii. 6
Ixxxiii. 18
Ixxxv. 7
Ixxxvi. 2
Ixxxvi. 16
Ixxxvii. 4
Ixxxvii. 5
Ixxxviii. 4
Ixxxviii. 4, 5
Ixxxviii. 25
Ixxxix. 6 .
Ixxxix. 16 .
Ixxxix. 19 .
Ix.xxix. 20
Ixxxix. 31, 32
Ixxxix. 37, 40
Ixxxix. 37, 38
Ixxxix. 46
xc. 2
xc. 2-4
xc. 3 (LXX.)
xcii. 4 .
xcii. 12
xciii. I
xciv. 3
xciv. 7
xciv. 8-11
xciv. 9
xciv. 12
xcv. 4 .
xcvi. 13
xcviii. 2
xcviii. 10
xcix. I
xcix. 5
c. 3 .
ci. 2
ci. 6
cii. 9 .
cii. 25 .
cii. 25-27
cii. 26 .
ciii. 5 .
ciii. 15 .
civ. 5 .
civ. 1 5 .
civ. 24 .
239.
191
civ. 29, 30
cv. 37 .
cv. 40 .
cvi. I .
cvii. I .
cix. 4 .
cix. 28 .
ex. I
ex. 3 .
ex. 4 .
cxi. 10 .
cxii. I .
cxii. 3 .
49:
PAGB
141
226
295
166, 339
191
212
152
457
12
287
244
250
298
236, 298
300
163, 243
246
473
323
203, 283
124
245
49. 228,
246, 297
339
254
2i;9
259
251
203
3
139
128, 152
37
10
ID
10
9.309
• ■ 44
147. 235,
358. 451
236
212
236
464
145
205
128
357. 397
488
203;
139;
382
178 I
3461
468
216,
P.s.
147.
249.
271. 309
119, 154
125
226
227
227
472
472
117, 150,
247, 293
216, 251,
279. 381
255, 401
. 20, 42
I
• ' 44
cxii. 5 .
cxii. 5, 6
cxii. 9 .
cxiii. 5,6
cxiii. 6 .
cxiii. 7 .
cxiii. 8 .
cxiv. 3 .
cxv. 3 .
cxvi. 10
cxvi. 1 1
cxvi. 13, I
cxvi. 14
cxvi. 15
cxvi. 16
cxviii. I
cxviii. 6
cxviii. 8
cxviii. 9
cxviii. 14
cxviii 16
cxviii. 18
cxviii. 19
cxviii. 22
cxviii. 59
cxix. 9 .
cxix. 17
cxix. 36
cxix. 46
cxix. 72, 73
cxix. 73
cxix. 89
cxix. 91
(LXX.
(LXX
cxix. 120
cxix. 126
cxix. 131
cxix. 136
cxix. 164
cxx. 5 .
cxxii. 7
cxxiv. 4
cxxvi. 7
cxxviii. 3
cxxxi. I
cxxxii. 6
cxxxii. 15
cxxxiii. 2
cxxxiv. I,
cxxxvi. I
cxxxvii. I
cxxxvii. 2,
cxxxvii. 7
cxxxvii. 8
cxxxix, 5
cxxxix. 7 100,
cxxxix. 7-10
cxxxix. 14
cxxxix. 15
cxxxix. 24
cxii. 3 .
cxii. 3, 4
cxliii. 2
cxliii. ic
cxliv. 4
cxlv. 3
cxlv. 8
cxlv. 15, 16
cxlvi. 9
cxlvii. 4
cxlvii. 5
cxlvii. 9
cxlviii. 3
cxlviii. 4
PAGB
• • 50
• • 44
20, 44, 170
370, 437
• 3(>3
345. 437
437
186
275
!, 448
300
298
236
180
298
227
290
127, 290
290
247
123
339
264
433
xiv
118
48
440. 453
152
140
132, 212
96, 280,
281, 297, 309
107
• ^52
• 448
• 357
. 384
179. 195
249. 371
341
253
152
128, 470
) 395
321
463
358
. 358
) 358
13
104, 558
218
258
258
250
370
222
239
. 149
178
211
269
126
393
309
218
468
288
157
102
492
ST. AMBROSE.
PAGE
P.s. cxlviii. 5. 184, 214, 254
cl. 3
Prov. iii. 19
iv. 23 . .
V. 15 . .
V. 15, 16 .
V. 16 .
V. 17-19 •
vi. 2-(LXX.)
vi. 25 .
vi. 27 .
vi. 28 . .
viii. 12 .
viii. 22 . 121
viii. 23 sq. .
viii. 27 .
viii. 27, 30 .
viii. 29, 30 .
viii. 30,31 (LXX
ix. I
IX. 10 . .
ix. 12 .
X. 15 . .
X. 19 .
xi. I
xi. 26 .
xiv. 3 . .
xiv. 15
xiv. 30 (LXX
XV. 17 .
XV. 18 . .
xvi. 32 . .
xvii. I .
xvii. I S (LXX
xviii. 17 .
xix. 12
xix. 17
XX. 1 .
XX. 5 .
XX. 10
xxi. I .
xxii. 28
xxiii. I (
xxiii. 13
xxiv. 7 (LXX
xxiv. 1 1
(I
xxiv. 30
XXV. 18
xxvi. 4
xxvii. 6
xxvii. 10
x.xvii. 16
XXX. 5
XXX. 18,
xxxi. 21
Eccles. ii. 14
iii. I .
iii. 7 .
iv. 2 sq.
vii. 2 .
vii. 4 .
vii. 17
xii. 14
Song of Sol.
i. 2 . .
i. 2, 3 .
i- 3 •
1. 3, 4 .
i. 4
i. 5. .
ii. I
ii. I, 2
ii. 3 .
iii. 4-16
LXX
XX
191,193
188
67
114
152
67
342
341
340, 341
341
I 22
7.249
251
147, 288
188
270
38
I 22
42
69
470
78, 404
73' 74
71
■8, 260
463
60
465
17
60
Song of Sol. iii. 6
iii. 7, 8 . .
PAGE
• 384
• 370
•)
35
17a
78
'' i
452
467
'. 436
60
67
,405
418
70
27
339
20
30
27
88
7
[,88
30
194
225
289
225
321
452
178
472
352
329
301
227
321. 354. 44S
365. 380
106,321
380
322
129
119
370
370
370
IV. I .
iv. 2,3
iv. 7. 8
iv. 8
iv. 10
iv. 10 s
iv. II
iv. 12
iv. 15
iv. 16
V. I
V. 2
V- 3
V. 10
V. II
V- 15
V. 26
vi. 4
vii. 6, 7
vii. 8
vii. 9
vii. II
viii. 5
viii. 6
viii. 9
viii. 10
viii. 12
Isai. i. 3 . .
i. 6 (LXX.
393.
) .
1. 17 .
i. 18 .
iii. 2 .
iii. 10 (LXX
V. 6 .
vi. 2 ... 212,
vi. 3 151, 204, 218,
vi. 5 . . 3, 222,
vi. 6
vi. 7 ... 108,
vi. 10 . . . 158,
vii. 1 1 sq. ...
117,322
-722
194, 322, 369
253. 380
• • 369
• • 325
• • 369
370,461
• • 325
194, 370
325.381
264
95
370
117
253
253
370
322
123
227
370
322
370
380
371
371
470
448
401
321
394
47
94
294
238
335
108 I
222 I
2401
314
1 12
163,
446
217
102, 136,
250. 436,
x. 17 .
112
XI. I .
119
XI. 2 94,
114, 117
322
XI. 6, 8, c
» . . .
340
XUl. I .
204
XIU. 22
243
xiv. 6 .
278
xiv. 14
314
XXV. 4
248
XXV. 8, 9
184
xxvi. 18-2
I (LXX.)
i8s
XXVU. I
288
xxviii. 16
• .24,
268
XXIX. 13
.333
xl. 3 •
296
xl. 12 .
126
xl. 12-17
228
xl. 13 .
126
xli. 4 .
276
xlii. I .
los
xlii. 5 .
1.37
xlii. 6, 7.
137
xlii. 8 .
202
xlii. 12 sq
. (LXX.)
136
xliii. 2
• 340,
341
xliii. 10
209
xliii. 25
144
xliii. 25 (I
.XX. j .
349
Isai. xliv. 6
xliv. 24
xliv. II .
xiv. II.
xiv. 14
xiv. 14 (LXX )
xiv. 15 .
xiv. 18 .
xlvi. 6
xlvii. 13 .
xlviii. 12 .
xlviii. 15, 16
xlix. 5 . .
xlix. 5, 6 .
xlix. 9 .
1. 4 (LXX.)
1. II . .
Hi. 6 . .
liii. I . .
liii. 2 . .
liii. 4 230, 239,
liii. 5 . .
liii. 7
liii. 8 . .
liv. I . .
liv. 4 . .
liv. 7 . .
liv. IS (LXX
Iv. I . .
Iv. I, 2
Iviii. 1 1 .
Ixi. I . . 105
Ixi. I (LXX.)
Ixiii. I .
Ixiii. 10 .
Ixiii. 13, 14
Ixiv. 4
Ixv. 16 .
Ixv. 25 .
Ixvi. I
Lxvi. 2 .
Ixvi. 12 .
lxvi. 22-24
Jer. i. 5 . . .
i. 6 . . .
i. II . .
ii. 13 . .
ii. 21 . .
ii. 27 . .
vi. 14 . .
vii. 10
* vii. 16
ix. 10 . .
X. 10 . .
X. I I . .
.xi. 18 . .
XV. 10 (LXX.)
XV. 18 . .
xvii. I . .
xvii. 9 (LXX.)
-wii. 10 .
xviii. 13 .
XX. 9 .
XX. 18 . .
xxiii. 6 .
xxiii. 18 .
xxiii. 18-22
xxiii. 24 .
xxvi. 2, 3
xxxi. 18 .
xxxi. 19 .
xxxi. 20 (LXX
xxxi. 25, 26
xxxiii. 16
233:
PAGE
276
288
105
309
204
124
214
204
299
233
276
233
212
298
446
341
228
158
263
243. 254
108, 269
231.470
255. 364
368, 393
394
394
127
153
153
461
-j4
II
201
203
38
04
'35
322
141
142
227
220
378
146
139
114
188
277
12
445
85.94
283
20
442
131
336
259
22 '*
268
283
179
320
434
331
10
366
84
19^
20S
259
259
296
349
350
350
350
350
208
Jer. xxxvii. 39
xxxviii. n
1. 39 . .
Ii. 25 . .
Lam. i. 2, 4 .
i. 16 . .
i. 20 . .
ii. 10, II .
iii. 31, 32
iii. 34 . .
iv. 20 . . . 107
Ezek. i. 16 .
ii- 4. 5 ■
ii. 9 (LXX.)
iii. 17, 20, 21
iii. 18 . .
v. 7 . .
xvi. 43 .
xviii. 4 .
xviii. 20 .
xviii. 32 .
xxi. 14 .
xxiii. 1 1 .
xxiii. 40 .
xxviii. 3 .
xxviii. 13
xxxvii. 1-7
xxxvii. 9, 10
xxxvii. 13, 14
xxxviii. 14 sq
xxxix. 7-14
xxxix. 10 sq
xl. 3 .
Dan. i. 16 .
ii. 27 sq.
iii. 16 sq,
iii. 25 .
iii. 27 . . . 377,
iv. 3 .
iv. 17 .
iv. 22
iv. 25 .
iv. 27 .
iv. 28 .
v. 14 .
vi. vii.
vi. 3 .
VI. 22 . . . 377
vii. 9 .
ix. 7 .
ix. 9, ID
xii. I, 2,
xii. 3 .
IIos. ii. 23 .
vi. 4 .
vi.6 .
xi. 8 .
xiv. 5 .
xiv. 10
Joel ii. 28 96, 104,
ii. 32 .
Amos iv. 13
Obad. 12 .
Jonah iii. 5
iv. 9 .
Micah vi. 3
vi. 3. 4. 5
vi. 8 .
vii. I .
vii. 2 .
vii. 8, 9, i(
vii. 17
Nahum ii.6
Zech. ii. 8 .
PACE
243
127
243
259
351
35r
351
351
->->-,
333
.325
157
349
352
440
451
185
141
179
245
331
380
338
220
2,69
224
185
156
156
241
186
241
314
466
52
88
214
441
203
206
206
206
470
206
141
459
141
,460
457
203
203
184
226
127
332
338
332
206
336
.i'7
348
, 121
354
351
426
339
449
449
355
352
355
339
258
228
INDEX OF TEXTS.
493
Zech. iii. 2, 3
iii. 4 .
iii. 7 .
iii. 8 .
V. I
vi. T .
xii. I .
xii. 10
xii. 5, 6 (LXX.)
xiv. 9 .
Mai. iv. 5 .
2 Esdras vi. 41
X. 6 .
x. 6-1 1
X. 15, 16
x. 20-24
Tobit ii. 4 .
vii. 1 1 .
ix. 3 .
xii. 8, 9
Judith viii. 1 1 sq.
X. I sq.
X. 3 .
xii. 20 .
XV. I sq.
Wisdom i. 4
i. 7 . .
1. 13 sq.
iii. 13 .
iv. II
vii. 17 sq
vii. 22 .
vii. 22, 23
vii. 26 .
vii. 27 .
vii. 29, 30
vii. 30 .
viii. 2 .
viii. 7 .
viii. 13 .
XIV. 3 .
Ecclus. iii. 22
iii. 31 .
iv. 9
vi. 16 .
ix. 5 .
xviii. 30, 3
xix. 2 .
XX. 7
xxii. 25
xxii. 26
xxii. 31
xxiii. 18
xxiii. 31
x.xiv. 3 .
xxiv. 5 .
xxvii. 23
xxviii. 24,
xxviii. 28
xxix. 10
xxxi. 9 .
Baruch iii. i, 2
iii. 36-38
iii. 36 sq.
V. I
Susanna 23
35 • ■
44> 45
45 •
46 .
Bel V. 39
V. 44
I Mace. ii. 7
ii. 35 sq.
145
154
PAGE
108
loS
250
297
432
259
122
no
21S
365
120
171
171
>7i
172
83
S3,
296
459]
397
377^
397 I
8r
Si
.153
104
181
369
1-66
178
,158
53' 140
208
281
53
281
402
53
245
381
314
28
12
49,88
382
461
461
2
88
88
49. 50
TO
10,29
120, 219
109, 273
350
J
208
49
336
205
82
2, 13
140
377
377
30. 45' 52
51
445
33
I Mace. vi. 43
ix. 8 .
xi. 68 .
2 Mace. i. 19
i. 20 sq.
i. 36 .
ii. I sq.
ii. 5 .
ii. 1 1
iii. 6, 10
iv. 18 sq.
vii. I sq.
vii. 20 .
Matt. i. 18 . 120,
i. 20
ii. 2, I I
ii. I r
ii. 16
iii. 4
iii. II 98, 1 12,
iii. 17 122, 212,
iv. I
iv. 3
iv. 4 . 28,
iv. 10
iv. 1 1
iv. 1 2-1
iv. 22
iv. 27
v-3
V. 4 sq.
V. 6
V. 8
V. II, I
V. 14
V. 17
V. 28
V. 34
V. 39
V. 44
V. 45
V. 48
vi. 2
vi- 3
vi. II
vi. 19
vi. 24
vi. 26
vii. 4, 5
vii. 6
vii. II
vii. 15
vii. 17
vii. 21
vii. 25-2;
viii. 2
viii. 8
viii. 10
viii. 1 1
viii. 17
viii. 20
viii. 22
viii. 29
ix. 4
ix. II, 12
ix. 13
ix. 21
X. 8
9
16
19,20
20
23 •
24 .
43'
69,
50:
ID,
34
34
^4
83
83
84
84
84
85
65
4";4
34
34
122,325
119, 127
. 206
• 396
• 35
• 3M
252, 335 '
295, 320
. no
• 459
383. 459
I 20, 290
304, 365
263
292
357
170
1 1
58
,295
45
335
468
404
3861
1161
469!
7 '
295
43
25
260
114
.413
393
355
356
102
128
102, 348
153.203
. 122
239
115
325
190 I
243
79
179
439
312
353
452
• 334
. 204
63, 64
261, 320
■ 441
97. Joi
■ 32
231.245
II,
32
340,
.39.
203,
204
230,
155
339.
Matt. X. 28 . 230,
X. 30
X. 32.33
X. 34
X. 39
X. 41
X. 42
xi. 3
xi. 5
xi. n
xi. 21
xi. 25 . 109,
xi. 27 130, 205,
xi. 28
xi. 28 sq.
xi. "JO
xii. 8
xii. 24 sq
xii. 25 . 157,
xii. 26
xii. 27
xii. 28
xii. 28,
xii. 30
xii. 31,
xii. 32
xii. 36
xii. 37
xii. 50
xiii. 25
xiii. 43
xiv. 3
xiv. 4
xiv. 6 sq
xiv. 28
xiv. 31
xiv. 33
xiv. 35 sq
XV. 24
XV. 25
xvi. 1 1
xvi. 16
xvi. 18
xvi. 19
xvi. 23
xvi. 24
xvi. 28
xvii. 3
xvii. 5 211, 215
xvii. 6
xvii. 6-8
xvii. 8
xvii. 9
xvii. 19
xvii. 21
xvii. 24
xvii. 27
xviii. 3
xviii. 15 sq
xviii. 20
xviii. 21
xviii. 22
xviii. 23 sq
xviii. 35
xix. 12 48,
xix. 17 .
xix. 17, 18, 19
xix. 18-21
xix. 20, 21
xix. 21
xix. 27
xix. 28
xix. 29
XX. 6
I'AfiE
332. 431
• "7
• 332
140, 141
367.431
60
60
263
269
27
47'
t5o, 296
3'o.3'3
329
431
331
310
348
255
258
•57
^37
194
348'
347
100 !
2' 363
■J I
52
284
226, 256 ;
73.425;
82!
43!
288
3jj
219
228
236
290
342
240
265, 269
256. 334
• 230
45' 357
189, 256
46, 365
240,381
147,240
215
215
293
258
459
467
41
16
441
220, 320
457.473
472
447
447
404, 405
154
7
403
7
404
404
294, 404
44, 343
. 184
94:
Matt. XX. 14
XX. 15 .
XX. 21
XX. 22, 23
XX. 23 . 291
XX. 28 .
XX. 30 .
xxi. 37 . 296,
x::-i. 1 1
xxii. 17.
xxii. 18
xxii. 21
xxii. 30
xxii. 42-46
xxii. 43, 45
xxiii. 14 sq
xxiii. 21
I :
0"
44
45.46
[I, 12
XXI v.
xxiv.
xxiv.
xxiv.
xxiv.
xxiv.
XXV.
XXV. 15
XXV. 20
XXV, 26, 27
XXV. 31
XXV. 34
XXV. 35
XXV. 36
XXV. 40
xxvi. 12
xxvi. 26
292,
3"
60,
65.
PAGB
285
227
292
92
94
95
297
349
264
435
435
435
294.371
296
150
286
425
3'o
448
118
236
3"
284
404
28s
285
285
257
399
65
334
449
XXVI.
xxvi.
xxvi.
xxvi.
xxvi.
xxvi.
39 •
39 sq.
52 ■
53 •
63 •
64 117
xxvi. 70 sq.
xxvii. 5
xxvii. 29 sq.
xxvii. 35 .
xxvii. 36
xxvii. 46 .
237.
XXVll. !,0-
;i
XXVll. 51
xxvii. 54
xxviii. I
xxviii. 9
xxviii. 17 .
xxviii. 18 .
xxviii. 19
III, 124,
-x.xviii. 20
xxviu. 25,
xxviii. 46
Mark i. n .
i. 13 .
i. 24
i. 25 .
11. 7
ii. 8-12
ii. n
ii. 28 .
iii. 17 .
iv. 37 ■
V. 38, 43
vi. 1 1
vi. 21 .sq.
vi. 22, 23
vi. 25 sq.
54:
325:
400,
• • '33
324,405
228, 229
. . 228
71
378
2
306
284
348
3"
217
217
•16,259
187
236
219
291
291
146
203
100, 103,
156 203
III, 249,
302, 452
•57
212
247
440
259
252
239.
^47
269
^5'
265, 437
217
187
269
385
494
ST. AMBROSE.
Mark vi. 27
vi. 28
vi. 48
vii. 7, 8
vii. 34
viii. 30
viii. 38
viii. 39
IX. 7
X. 23
X. 40
X.45
xi. 24
xi. 27 .
xii. 6 .
xii. 25 .
xiii. 32
xiv. 35
XV. 24
XV. 34
XV. 39
xvi. 15
xvi. 15 sq
xvi. 17, ij
Luke i. 19
i. 23 .
i. 26, 27
i. 27
i. 28
i. 29 sq
i-35
i- 37
i.38
1. 41
i. 42
i.44
i. 56
1. 63, 64
i. 76
ii. II
ii. 13,
ii. 19
ii. 36,
ii- 27
ii. 41
ii. 51
ii. 52
iii. 16
iii. 22
iv. I
iv. 3
iv. 14
iv. 16
iv. 18
iv. 21
iv. 24
iv. 38
iv. 39
iv. 41
V. 20
V. 21
vi. 8
vi. 15
vi. 19
vi. 20, 21
vi. 21 .
vi. 24, 25
vi. 36 .
vi. 37, j^
vii. 12
vii. 2C
vii. 36 sq
vii. 41
vii. 42
104
107
12
32,
47
375-
19^
75-
395^
PAGE
80 i
267 I
203
3171
240
257 I
256 I
I 211 :
4r:
292
236
203
281
3'i
365
311
217
230
122
216
134
335
293
5
391
318
395
•3
146
203
236
277
119
277
375
364
243
250
365
395
461
395
5, 305, 448
284,312
- . 252
149, 212
104
247
401
98
401
135
393
400
400
259
269
154
10,312
67
312
46
397
18
295
28
,65
117
446
446
447
36:
244
12
384
Luke vii. 43
vii. 44
vii. 45
vii. 47
vii. 52
viii. 17
viii. 37
viii. 46
ix. 13
ix. 26
ix- 35
ix. 55, 56
ix. 56
x. 2
x. 19 .
X. 3I' 32
X. T,T, sq.
x-35 ■
X. 37 ■
xi. 8 .
xi. 9, 10
xi- 13 -
xi. 20 .
xi. 25 .
xi. 28 .
xi. 29 .
xi. 49 .
xii. 8, 9
xii. II, 12
xii. 14
xii. 15
xii. 17
xii. 47, 48
xii. 49
^ii: 55
xiii
xiii.
xiii
xiii.
xiii. 28
xiv. 7, 8
xiv. 12, I
xiv. 13
xiv. 21
XV. 5 .
XV. 10
XV. 13 sq
XV. 24
xvi. 9 .
xvi. 19 sq
xvi. 23, 2.
xvi. 24
xvi. 25
xvii. 5
xvii.
xvii.
xvii.
xvii.
xviii
xviii. 13,
xviii. 19
x"iii. 27
xviii. 29,
xix. 8
xix. 10
xix.
xix.
xix.
xix.
xix. 27
xix. 35
xix. 40
XX. 4 .
XX. 11,12
444>
6 sq.
7
8,9
26
10
14
21
3'
. 1 1
12
•7
20
23
30
J'
343'
85
45
56.
PACE
PAGE
1
PA-.iE
447
Luke XX. 13 . .
• • 3"
John iii. 24 . . .
. . 106
447
XX. 38 . .
. . 189
iii. 29 . . .
' • 253
44S
xxi. 3. . .
•356
iii. 35 . . .
. . 212
444
xxi. 3, 4 . .
■ - 25
iii. 36 . . .
• 337
35'
xxi. 5 . . .
- - 395
iv. 6 . . .
. .114
450
xxi. 8 . . .
■ 310
iv. 6, 7 . .
. . 291
433
xxi. II . .
- 3'o
iv. 10 . . .
• • "3
126
xxii. 24 . .
. 292
iv. 14 . . .
. 114
381
xxii. 32 . .
. 269
iv. 18 . . .
- - 234
257
xxii. 41 sq. .
. 228
IV. 22 . . .
. . 291
211
xxii. 42 . .
• 305
iv. 23 . . .
. . 291
343
xxii. 43 . . .
. 206
iv. 23, 24 . .
- • 145
23
xxii. 48 . . I
53' 448
iv. 24 . 107,
205, 267
94
xxii. 60, 61 . .
• 177
iv. 34 . . 28,
305- 43^
95
xxiii. 28 . .
- 351
v. 4 ...
105, 320
446
xxiii. 29 . . .
• 367
v. 10 . . .
• 23^
338
xxiii. 30 . . .
■ 179
v. 1 7 . lie.
132, 282
'H
xxiii. 34 . . .
. 217
V. 18 . . ."
- ■ 3^3
338
xxiii. 35 . .
. 217
V. 19 . 132, :
232, 267,
27
xxiii. 36, 37 .
. 212
269, 288
203
xxiii. 41 . . .
■ 300
V. 19, 21 . .
. . 219
102
xxiii. 42, 43 .
. 256
V. 19, 30 . .
203
^37
-xxiii. 43 . .
44, 236
V. 20 . . .
212, 220
52
1
95. 472
V. 21 . . . I
56, 220,
52
xxiii. 46 . .
. 122
244.
279. 302
314
xxiv. 39 . . .
. 278
V. '''*
237. 239
133
xxiv. 49 . . .
- "7
V. 22, 23 212,
281, 293
332
John i. I 109, 209, 227, 245,
V. 23 211,233,
239.381
lOI
2 so, :
:86, 299
V. 26 . 223, 2
61, 27r,
314
381,437,463
279. 289
9
i. I, 2 . . . .
• -5'
V. 27 . . .
. . 261
74
i. 1-3 202,
203,216
V. 30 . . .
132
339
. . 221,.
223, 280
V. 31 . . .
300
'93
i. 1-18 . . .
. 208
V. 37 . . -
320
122
i. I sq. ...
. 209
V. 43 . . .
III
363
i. I, 14 203,216,.
246, 275
vi. 6 ...
114
393
i. 3 . . .97, 268, 281
vi. 9 - • •
405
345
i- 4
. 248
vi. 31 . . .
22li
194
303
i. 8
. 112
vi. 32, 50, 51
vi. 38 . . .
2'?'>
i. 9 . . . .
[12, 226
229
187
i. 10 sq. . . .
• 273
vi.39 . . .
1 88
62
i. 12 . . . .
• 305
vi. 40 . . .
188, 300
203
i. 12, 13 . . .
. 122
vi. 44 . . .
237. 302
334
i. 13 . . .
■ 149
vi. 51 . . .
• 234
329
i. 14 191, 223,
346, 263
vi. 52 . . .
278
450
i. 16 . . .
. 126
VI. 54 . . .
278
347
i. 17 . . . .
3 > 9. 337
vi. 56 . . .
27S
353
i. 17, 18 . . .
• 437
vi. 58 . . .
275,
, 280
89
i. 18 205,223.
246, 363
vi. 64 . . .
"3
10
i. 21 . . . .
• 314
vii. 8 . . .
298
203
i. 26 . . . .
- 457
vii. 12 . . .
227
1 80
i. 26, 27 . . .
. 98
vii. 14 . . .
300
6
i. 27 . . . :
:52. 253
vii. 16 ... .
234
, 294
337
i. 29 227. 236, :
^71.471
vii. 18 . . .
234
403
i. 29, 36 . . .
• -36
vii. 28 . . .
299
402
i. 30 . . 251,
252- 398
vii. 30 . . .
432
302
i. 32 . . 136,320,449
vii. 23. . .
298
310
i. y^ 84, 106,
36. 320
vn. 37 . . .
217
57
u. 4 . . . ■
. 267
vii. 37, 38 . .
85,156
13
ii. 9 ....
■ 381
vii. 38 . . .
I 1 4, 468
38
ii. 15 . . . .
■ 433
vii. 38, 39 .
• "3
203
ii. 17 . . .
67, 203
vii. 39 . . .
. 116
373
ii. 19 . 191, ;
44. 458
vii. 52 . . .
• 234
25
iii. 5 ... 1
44. 3 '9
viii. 12 . . .
OO J
175
iii. 6 . 127, 1
43. '44
viii. 14
. 221
302
iii. 7, 8 ...
- 144
viii. 14, 15 .
- 300
285
iii. 8 99, 109, I
22, 229
viii. 16 . . ;
239, 246
286
iii. 12 . . . .
• '44
viii. 17 . . .
. 290
285
iii. T3 231,263,
278,338
viii. 18 . . :
90, 300
302
iii. 14 . . . .
- 83
viii. 19 . . .
• 349
433
iii. 16 . . . no, 337
viii. 25 249, :
276, 299
433
iii. 16, 17 . . .
■ 271
viii. 29 . . .
-37- 304
436
iii. 17 . . .
- 338
viii. 38 . . .
- 301
236
iii. 21 . . .
124,249
viii. 40 . . .
•
3°7
INDEX OF TEXTS.
495
ia(;f.
I'Af.E
PAGE
PAGE
John viii. 42 . . 21S, 223
John xiv. 16, 17. . . 101
Acts i. 5 ...
99
Komi. 20 137, 211, 272, 318
viii. 43 . . . . 34S
xiv. 17 . . . .301
i. 7 . . . .
31'
i. 24, 25 . . . 21S
viii. 54 .... 29S
xiv. 20 . . .231
i. 8 . . . 104
. 117
i. 25 . 120, 154, 155,
viii. 56 . . . 94, 233
xiv. 21 . . no
i. 18 . . .
221
254. 288
viii. 58 . . 223, 251
xiv. 23 . . 109, 148,
ii. 2 ...
117
u. 4 .... 35S
ix. 4 249
296. 303
li. 2, 3 . . .
112
iii. 2 . . . . 204
ix. 5 249
xiv. 26 . Ill, 136, 233
ii. 13 . . . .
84
iii. 4 . 15s, 248, 331
ix. 6 401
xiv. 27 . . . .448
ii. 24 . . . .
246
iii. 30 . . . .237
ix. 25 439
xiv. 28 . 231, 284, 313
ii. 36 . . .
217
iv. 17 . . . . 309
ix. 30 440
xiv. 30 . . 40, 270
ii. 38 . . .
no
iv. 24 . . . . 279
X. II. 17, iS . . 227
xiv. 31 . . . .231
iii. 6 . 63, 247
, 469
V. 3. 4 - • . - 3'
X. 17 300
XV. I . . . . 236
iii. 12 .
III
V. 5 ... 9S, 102,
X. 17 sq 278
XV. 5 . . . . 283
iv. II, 12 . .
289
106, 251
X. 18 300
XV. 14 . . . . 89
iv. 31 . . .
105
V. 12 175
X. 28. 30 . . . . 301
XV. 14, 15 . . . 269
iv.32 . . .
204
V. 19 . 298, 303, 436
X. 29 97,151
XV. 15 . . 89, 132
V. I, 2 . . .
356
V. 20 145
X. 29. 30 . . . .151
XV. 16 . . 203
V. 2 ...
79
vi. 3 . . . 346, 458
.X. 30 152,203,219,233,
XV. 22, 23 . . . 265
V. 3 ...
lOI
vi. 4 . . . 127,346
246,313.439
XV. 26 . . 96, 99, 108,
V. 3, 4 . . .
143
vi. 5. 6 . . . . 346
X. 31 152
120, 136, 233
V. 5 ...
•43
vi. 6 . . . .85
X- 34 sq 239
xvi. 7 . . . . 265
V. 9 . . loi
, 142
vi. 10 . . . . 432
X- 35 2S7
xvi. 7, 8 . . . 140
V. I I . . .
25
vii. 14 . . 192
x.3« .
- • 205, 318
xvi. 12, 13. . .149
vii. 22 . . .
21
vii. 23 ... . 180
xi. 4 .
.... 280
xvi 13 . . 129, 131,
vii. 38 . . 204
,215
vii. 23 sq. . . . 355
xi. 25
. 208, 223, 275
'55' 301
vii. 51 .
262
vii. 24 . . 331, 384
xi. 27
. ... 240
xvi. 14 . 120, 126, 136,
vii. 53 • • •
262
vii. 24, 25 . . . 180
xi- 34
• • 3^-
151, 298,435
vii. 55 • • ■
261
viii. 2 . . 101, 124
xi- "35
• 3^5
xvi. 14, 15 . 130
vii. 56 . . .
457
viii. 3 . . 246, 296
XI. 40
. . 271
xvi. 15 102, 132, 156,
vii. 58 . . .
262
viii. 3, 4 . . .331
xi. 41
132, 247
230, 240. 258,
vii. 60 . . .
339
viii. 7 . . . .305
xi. 42
• 0; '^-
261, 272, 273,
viii. 21 sq.
348
viii. 9 . . 1 01, 142
xi. 43
186, 352
313.314,435
ix. 5 . . . .
^33
viii. 10 ... 142
xi. 47
• ■ 353
xvi 25 ... 228
ix. 8 .
158
viii. II . 101. 118,
xii. 3
• • 353
xvi. 27 . . .218
ix. 12 .
300
127, 156
xii. 4
■ • 353
xvi. 27, 28 . . 223
ix. 15 .
127
viii. 13 . . 127
xii. 6
. 12
xvi. 28 . 109, 231
ix. 17 .
335
viii. 16 ... 144
xii. 10
• ■ 353
xvi. 32 . 239, 246
ix. 20 . . .
135
viii. 16, 17 . . 125
xii. 19
. . 296
xvii. I . . 234, 289
ix. 34 . . .
247
viii. 17 ... 458
xii. 27
■ ■ 230
xvii. I, 2, 5 . .212
ix.39 . . .
165
viii. 19, 21 . . loi
xii. 28
121, 240
xvii. 3 . . 44, 118,
ix. 40 . . .
187
viii. 20 . . .216
xii. 29
192, 240
223, 286
X. 10 .
459
viii. 21 ... 297
xii. 36-
41
. . 158
xvii. 4 . . 280, 293
x. II sq.
128
viii. 21, 22 . . 216
xii. 41
. . 220
xvii. 5 . 256, 280, 295
X. 15 . . .
128
viii. 29 . . 69, 294
xii. 44
• 0 -99
xvii. 5, 21 . . . 245
X. 19, 20 .
128
viii- 31-35 • • 331
xii. 45
208, 299
xvii. 10 . 240, 296
X. 34 . . 17
',294
viii. 32 1 10, 190, 219
xii. 46
226, 300
xvii. II ... 266
X. 37, 2^ . .
107
viii. 35 ... 308
xii. 47
• • 33S
xvii. 14, 1 5 . . I iS
X.38 . .
99
viii. 35, 38 . . 68
xii. 48
• ■ y,^
xvii. 17 . . . 139
XI. 16 . . .
144
viii. 38, 39 . . 308
xii. 49
■ ■ 330
xvii. 19 ... 234
xi. 17 .
105
ix. 5 . .99,213.223,
xii. 50
• • -301
xvii. 21 266, 296, 302
xii. 4 sq. .
• 432
280, 308
xiii. I
. 292
xvii. 22, 23 . . 227
xiii. 2 . . 13
3.135
ix. 10 ... . 352
xm. 4
■ ■ 95
xvii. 23 . . . 295
xiii. 2 sq. .
■ '-0^
ix. 18
287
xiii. 4,
• • 236
xvii. 24 115, 124, 234,
xiii. 32, 33 .
. 287
ix. 20
114
xiii. 7
• • • 95
239, 295. 376
xiv. 22
II
ix. 21
114
xiii. 8
95' 321, 334
xvn. 25 . . .376
XV. 8, 9 . .
• 129
X. 4
448
xiii. 9, 10
• • 321
xviii. 6 ... 223
XV. 28 . . .
• 133
X. 10
193
xiii. 13
150, 269
xix. 23, 24 . . 217
XV. 39, 40 . .
• 59
xi. 5
116
xiii. 13, 14 . • 95
xix. 25 ... 472
xvi. 3 . . .
59
XI. 20
310
xiii. 31, 32 280, 298
xix. 27 ... 472
xvii. 18
. 460
xi. 23
465
xiii. S7 ■ 177. 229
xix. 34 . . . 385
xvii. 26
. 204
XI. 36
I2e
>, 288
xiv. I . . . . 300
xix. 39 . . . 369
xvii. 28 224, 24;
:, 248
xii. 2
206
xiv. 3 . . . .303
XX. 17 . . 216, 250,
xix. 5 sq. .
58
xii. 15
385
xiv. 6 . . Ill, 145,
265, 335
XX. 24 . . .
• 467
xii. 19 . . . iC
>, 471
208, 211, 219,
XX. 17, 18 . . . 145
XX. 28 . . .
• 134
xiii. 7 ...
- 454
223, 267, 275
XX. 22 . . 100, lOI,
xxi. II .
^33
xiii. 13
37
xiv. 9 . 158, 223, 43 q
112, 154
xxii. 9 . . .
. 240
xiii. 14
- 243
xiv. 9, 10 . . . 208
XX. 22, 23 . . . 330
xxvi. 12
52
xiV. 2 .
-367
xiv. 10 . . 109. 124,
XX. 28 . . . .150
XX vi. 16
,58
xiv. 9 .
• 175
204, 255, 301
XX. 29 . . . . 183
xxvii. 40 .
122
xiv. 1 1
• 223
xiv. II. . . 205
XX. 31 . . . . 203
Rom. i. I . . 2ii
5,299
xiv. 17
• '57
xiv. 12. . 237,255
xxi. 15 . . . 134
i. 3 . . . 24-
7, 280
I Cor. i. I .
127
335. 439
xxi. 15 sq. . . 284
i. 3, 4 . . .
22"?
i. 2
. 124
xiv. 12, 13 . 293
xxi. 22 . 161, 432
i. 4 . . . 20
3.247
i. 9 .
. 282
xiv. 16
■
■ III, 137
xxi. 25 ... 181
i. 7 . . . .
. no
i. 13 .
207
31
496
ST. AMBROSE.
PAGE
PAGE
PAGE
PAGE
I Cor. i. 20 . .
. . . 206
I Cor. vii. 29, ^4
[ . .250
1 Cor. XV. 28 . 189,304,307
Gal. iii. 15
• ■ 434
i. 22
. . . 236
vii. 32 . .
. . 462
XV. 31 . .
• ■ 179
iii. 16 . .
• • -203
i. 23, 24 .
211, 254
vii. 32, 34
■ • 367
XV. 32 . .
• • 459
iii. 23 sq. .
■ • -374
i. 24 . .
. 117, 203,
vii. 34 . .
■ 391.392
XV. 33 . .
■ • 459
iii. 28 . .
. 124,204
20S, 223.
vii. 35 . .
. . . 47
XV. 36 . .
. 182
iv. 4 122, 21
6,217,234,
24
2, 267, 309
vii. 37, 40
. . 462
XV. 40 .
• • 279
246, 251, 4'24
i. 24-30 .
. . .208
vii. 38 . .
. . . 367
XV. 42 .sq. .
• • 183
iv. 4. 5 •
. . . 221
i. 27 . .
• • -05
vii. 39, 40
• • 391
XV. 43 • •
. . 184
iv. 6, 7
. . . lOI
i. 30 . .
139, 20S,
viii. 4 . •
. . 227
XV. 48 .
• ■ 123
iv. 7 . .
. . . 127
247, 381
viii. 4, 6 .
290
XV. 49 . .
• • 306
iv. 8 . .
. . . 287
li. 4, 5 .
. . 207
viii. 5 . •
287, 290
XV. 52 . 1S6, 189, 191
iv. 18 . .
• • -396
ii. 6 . .
. . 206
viii. 6 . .
97. 98, 99,
XV. 54. 55 •
• ■ 255
iv. 27 . .
. . . 368
ii. 6 sq. .
• • • ^47
120, 125, 147,
2 Cor. 1. 3 . .
■ • 297
IV. 28, 29
. . . 123
ii. 7 sq. .
• ■. ' 130
20;
-. 205, 274,
i. 19 . .
• • 387
V. II . .
. . . 236
ii.8 . 23
0. 247, 301
2S0, 290
ii. 6 . .
• • 344
V. 12 . .
. . .404
ii. 9 . 22
7, 3'9. 333
viii. 9 . .
. . 250
ii. 10 334, 34
4. 353. 446
V. 17 . .
• • -305
ii. 9, 10 .
. . . 130
ix. 17 . •
• • ^5
ii. 14 . .
. . 152
V. 22 . .
. 102,110
ii. 10 96, I.
27,130,310
ix. 22 . .
. . 284
ii. 15 . .
107. 353
V. 24 . .
• ■ • -3o
ii. II . 13
0, 131, 310
ix. 27 . 24
3. 297, 458
ii. 17 . .
. . 124
vi. 2 . .
. . . 88
ii. 12 . .
■ ■ 134
X. 1,2. .
85, 318
iii. 3 . .
137,435
vi. 7 . .
. . . 191
ii. 12, 13 .
• • 131
X. I, 2, 3, 4
■ • 139
iii. 6
. . 248
vi. 8 . .
. . . 126
ii. 15 . .
. . 140
X. 3 . .
. 226, 325
iii. 7 . .
. . 216
vi. 10 . .
. . . 25
ii. 16 . .
. . . 138
X. 4 . 93' 226, 236,
iii. 14 .
. . 298
vi. 14 . .
142, 467
iii. 2 . 28
4, 368, 46S
268, 324, 366
iii. 15-17 .
• • 149
Eph. i. 4 . .
• • -247
iii. 5, 6 .
• • -15
X. 7 . .
• • 45«
iii. 17, 18 .
• • 149
i. 13 . .
• 112.371
iii. 6 . .
. . . 283
X. 9 . .
. . 141
iv 4 . .
. . 206
i. 13, 14 .
. . . 103
iii. 8 . .
. . .266
X. I I . .
• ■ 365
iv. 6
• • 147
i. 20 . .
• • -237
iii. 9 . .
. . . 285
X. 23, 24 .
. . 69
iv.7 . (
35, 285, 396
i. 20, 21 .
• • 307
iii. II. .
■ ■ 24, 42
X. 31 . .
• • 397
iv. 14 . .
. .188
ii. 2 . .
. . . 206
iii. 12 . .
. . . 285
xi. 3 . .
117, 265
iv. 18 .
. . 52
ii. 5, 6 .
• • -307
iii. 13 . .
. . . 84
xi. 13. 14
• • 37
V. 5 . .
• • 322
ii. 6 . .
• • 306
iii. 15 . .
. . . 84
xi. 16 . .
• . ^^5
v. 16 . i:
,2, 189, 246
ii. 8 sq. .
. . 122
iii. 16 . .
. . . 148
xi. 26 . .
27S, 347
v. 18 . .
• • 97
ii. 10 . .
• • 249
iv. I . .
. . . 285
xi- 33' 36
. . 281
V. 19 . .
• • 255
ii. 15 . .
• • 425
iv. 5 . .
. . .207
xii. 3 • • •
loi, 100,
v. 21 . IC
8, 124, 125
ii. 19 .. .
■ • -347
iv. 12 . .
• • • 39
12
4, 145, 158
236. 434
iii. 9 . .
. .124
iv. 12, 13
• • -345
xii. 4 . .
• • 145
vi. 9 sq.
. . 68
iii. 16 . .
. . . 127
iv. 16 . .
. . . 162
xii. 4, 5, 6
• • 132
vi. 10 .
■ • 467
iv. 5 . .
346, 436
iv. 20 . .
. . . 207
xii. 5 . .
■ • 133
vi. 14 . .
• • 57
iv. II . .
. . I
iv. 21 . .
• 339.446
xii. 8 . .
127, 140
vi. 15 . .
• . 432
iv. 14 . .
. . 402
V. I . .
• ■ 353
xii. 8, 9 .
• • 134
vi. 16 .
. 296
iv. 15, 16
126, 249
V. I sq. .
• • 339
xii. 8, 9, 10
• • ^33
vii. 40 .
■ • 143
iv. 23 . .
144, 346
V. 2 . .
. • -343
xii. 8 sq.
■ ■ 133
viii. 9 .
. 20, 469
iv. 23, 24
• • 123
V- 3- 5 • •
. . . 85
xii. 9 . .
■ ■ 337
viii. 10
. . 26
iv. 30 . .
. . 141
V. 4 • •
. . .124
xii. 10. .
. . I
viii. 11-15
. . 26
V. 2 . .
no, 219
V. 5 . .
• 339. 344
xii. II. .
• 96. 155.
X. 4 ■ ■
191,399
V. 3 . .
• • 458
V. 7 ■ 34
2. 343. 345
229, 274
X. 5 . .
• ■ 258
V. 5 • ■
• • 256
V. 9 . .
344, 45^
xii. 13 . .
. 99, 1 01
X. 17 . .
. . 124
V. 8 . .
. . 102
V. 10, I r .
. . . 45S
xii. 17 . .
. . 70
xi. 2 .
250,462
V. 14 . .
158,189
V. I I . .
• • -344
xii. 21 . .
• • 450
xi. 3 . .
. . 124
V. 18 . .
• • 105
V. 18 . .
• • • 3i«
xii. 22, 23
. . 14
XI. 7 . .
. . 25
V. 21 . .
• .; 303
vi. I, 2 .
■ • 434
xii. 26 . .
. . 70
xi. 14 .
314,432
V. 23 . .
206, 307
vi. 5 . .
■ • 434
xii. 27 . .
• ■ 353
xi. 24 sq. .
• • 31
V. 25 . .
. . 266
vi. 9 . .
• • 467
xii. 28 . . .
■ • 134
xi. 27 . .
. . 401
V.32 . .
• • 407
vi. II. .
• 124.139
xii. 30 . . .
• • 134
xi. 36 . .
. . 280
vi. 12 . IC
1,431,467
vi. 12 . .
47. 402
xii. 31 . .
• • 396
xii. 2-5 .
212
vi. 14-17
• • 378
vi. 17 . .
204, 254
xiii. 4 . . .
. 292
xii. 7 . .
• • 342
vi. 16, 17 .
. . 141
vi. 18 . .
■ • 341
xiii. 7, 8 .
• • 49
xii. 9 . .
• • 236
rhil. i. I . .
• • 471
vi. 19 . .
148, 244
xiii. 9 . .
• • 314
xii. 10 . .
. . 426
i. 21 . . .
. . 180
vii. I . .
. . .405
xiii. 12 .1
I, 178. 192
xii. 11. .
. . 269
i. 23 . 12
5. 303. 431
vii. 4 . .
. • 402
xiv. 2
• • 131
xiii. 3 . .
142,353
i. 23, 24 .
. . t8o
vii. 5 . .
. . . 31
xiv. 8
. . 191
xiii. 3, 4 .
• • 3'4
i. 29 . .
• • 337
vii. 7 . .
■ • 405
xiv. 23, 25
• • 155
xiii. 4 . .
• ■ -i?^
ii. 3, 4 .
. . 69
vii. 8 . .
• • 405
xiv. 40
• • 37
xiii. 13 .
282
ii. 4 . .
. . 64
vii. 9 . .
340, 393
XV. 10
. . 28
xiii. 14 .
1 1 0, 1 48
ii. 6 . 10
5. 232, 292,
vii. 14 . .
• ■ 403
XV. 13
. . 191
Gal.i. I . .
. . 290
301.313
vii. 15. .
• •• • 403
XV. 19
. . 192
i- 3. 4 • •
136,219
ii. 6, 7 . .7
0, 153.231,
vii. 22 . .
. . 102
XV. 19, 20
• • 3°3
i. 4 . .
, . 206
259, 298
vii. 23 . .
• ■ 403
XV. 21
. . i88
ii.8 . .
• • 134
ii. 6, 8 .
. . 202
vii. 25 . .5;
'.367. 403.
XV. 21-28
• • 304
ii. 16 . .
• • 434
ii. 7 206, 21
7. 246, 297
405, 461
XV. 22
. . 189
ii. 19 . .
■ • 434
ii.7,8 . .
191,235,
vii. 26. .
. 405, 462
XV. 23 .
39. 189
ii. 20 . .
110,467
254, 436
vii. 27 . .
• • 367
XV. 24
• • 99
iii. II . .
• • 434
ii. 8 ...
305, 320
vii. 28. .
• • 403
XV. 24-28
• • 302
iii. 13 . .2;
;6, 306, 434
ii. 9 . . .
280, 470
INDEX OF TEXTS.
497
1
PAdE
PAGE
pa(;b
i'At;B
Phil. ii. 10 .
• • -305
2 Tliess. ii. 1 5,
16 . . 235
Heb. i. 3 . . 132, :
n4, 220,
I Peter ii. 21
• • 325
ii. II . .
• • -234
iii. 5 . .
. . 169
223,
324, 274,
ii. 22 .
• • '54
ii. 13, 14 •
• • -35'
I Tim. i. I .
• • 256
276, 301,
3'3. 435
ii. 23 .
• • '7
iii. 2 . .
. . .208
i. 4 . .
. 269
i. 3, 4 • • •
• 254
ii. 24 .
108, 236
iii. 2, 3 .
. . . 120
i. 4 sq.
. . 241
i. 5
• 223
iii. 4
• ; "3
iii. 3 . .
. 146,155
i. 9
• • 72
i. 6 . 99,
145. 155
iii. 19 .
246, 258
iii. 7, 8 .
... 45
i. II
• . 245
i. 10 . .
. 288
iv. I
• • 230
iii. 8 . .
• 48, 345
ii. 5 .
• • 243
i. 14 • •
■ 99
iv. 13 .
• . 236
iii. 12 . .
... 69
ii. 9 .
• • 13
ii. 3, 4 . .
„ • „99
V. 8 .
• • 40, 430
iii. 15 . .
... 69
ii. 9, 10
■ • 37
ii. 8 . .
280, 281,
2 Peter i. 21
. . . 100
iii. 20 . . 128, 400,
ii. II .
• • 303
304, 305
I John i. 2
"3. 223
437.472
iii. 2 .
465, 466
ii. 9 • 231,
297. 305
>• 3 • •
no, 282
iii. 20,21 ... 307
iii. 2-10
. . 41
ii. 10 .
6
i. 5 . .
•III, 245
iv. 7 212
iii. 6 .
. . 466
ii. 14 • •
254
ii. I . .
.III
iv. II 57
iii. 16 .
222
ii. 16 . .
255
ii. 18 sq.
. 241
iv. 12 57
iv. I
. . 241
iii. I, 2
254
ii. 23 .
. . 241
Col. i. 9 ... 105, 461
iv. 8 .
37. 47. 48
iii. 2 . .
255
ii. 29 .
. . 282
i- 14 132
iv. 12 sq.
• • 57
iii. 4
155
iii. 2
. 209
i. 1 5 . . . 202, 208,
V. 3, 4 .
• •392-
iii. 7-1 1
142
iii. 2, 3
• • 233
216, 223
V. 5
392, 400
iii. 10 . .
249
iv. 2
. . 289
i. 15, 16 . . 223,228
V. 6
. 400
iv. 12 .
131
. 271
iv. 3 .
. . 217
i. 16 . . 99, 147, 202,
V. 9 .
• • 392
iv. 14 . . .
264
IV. 13 .
. . 127
249,275
V. 10 .
• ;, -■593
iv. 15 .
224
V. 6, 7, 8
• • 144
i. 16, 17 . . . . 100
V. II .
228, 393
v. 1-5 . .
224
V. 7
. 111,319
i. 17 125,191,280,281
V. 16 .
. 54,400
V. 2 . .
463
V. 8 .
. • 103
i. 18 . . . 1S9, 249
V. 22 .
■ • -223
V. 3 . .
463
V 16 .
336, 337
i. 19 . . 204, 234, 275
V. 23 .
341, 460
V. 4 . .
463
V. 20
• • 223
i. 26, 27 . . . . 247
vi. 6
. . . 48
V. 5 . .
463
V. 23 .
• • 299
ii. 3 . . 203, 262, 309
vi. 10 .
■ 57. 170
V. 7-10
203
Rev. i. 4
. . 223
ii. 9 138,204,231,234
vi. 12 .
. . . 31
vi. 3 . .
346
i. 8
228, 463
257.312,381
vi. 13 .
. . 246
vi. 4-6
345
i. 8, 17
. . .276
ii. 9, 10 .
. . .261
vi. 13-16
. • 245
vi. 12 . .
464
i. 8, 18 .
. 202, 223
ii. 12 . .
• 244, 346
vi. 15 .
■ • 244
vi. 13, 14 •
232
i. 16 .
. 206
ii. 13. 14 •
• 244, 447
vi. 16 . :
244, 245, 288
vi. 18 .
3'
i. 18 .
. . .275
ii. 14 . .
... 346
vi. 20 .
. . 127
vii.
25s
ii. 8 .
. . .276
ii. 15 . .
... 346
vi. 20, 21
• • 249
vii. I sq. .
255
ii. 14. 15. I
6 ■ -337
ii. 16 . .
... 192
2 Tim. i. 9 .
. . .217
vii. 22 .
254
ii. 17 .
• ■ -337
ii. 18 . .
• • -334
i. 18 .
. . .150
vii. 26, 27 .
254
iii. 14 .
. . .276
ii. 19 . .
• 126, 334
ii. 4
• • 31
vii. 28 .
224
iii. 20 .
. 264
ii. 20, 21, :
!2 . . 31
11. 5 .
• • 31
viii. 7 .
. 224
iv. I
. . .191
ii. 21 . .
• • • 357
ii. II, 12 .
125,157
ix. 13, 14 •
106
iv. 4
. . .294
iii. I, 2 .
... 31
ii. 23 .
. . .241
X. 1 .
40
iv. 8 .
• . -223
iii. 2 . .
• • -237
ii. 24, 25
. . 284
X. 10-12 .
271
V. 4 .
. . • . 387
111. 3, . .
• 73. 124
iii. 9 .
• . -301
xi. I . .
347
V. 5 .
. . . 260
iii. 4 . .
• 73.275
iv. 2
• • 441
xi. 16 .
-54
V. 6 .
. . .114
111. 5 . .
... 31
iv. 10 .
. 206
xi. 33' 34 •
• 3«
), 466
vii. I .
. 122
iii. 8 . .
. . .306
vii. 7, 8
. II
xi. 37 . .
466
vii. 1 1 .
• • -293
iii. 9, 10 .
. . .306
Tit. i. 2 . .
• • 3"
xii. 6 .
339
viii. 2 .
. . .191
iii. II. .
• 306, 469
i. 5 .
• • • 59
xiii. 8 .
287
ix. 6
• • 179
iii. 17 . .
... 385
i. 6 .
• • 465
Jas. i. 13 . .
203
xi. 15 .
. . .191
iv. 3 . . . . 264
i. 7 . .
. . .465
i. 17, 18 .
203
xiii. 6 .
. . . 241
I Thess. iii. II . . 235
i. 9 . .
. . 46";
ii. 14-26 .
225
xiv. 2 .
. 196
iii. 12, 13 . . . 149
ii. I
. . . 6
I Peter i. 15 .
469
XV. 3, 4
. 196
iv. 6 .
. . 80
iii- 3-7
. . 128
i. 17 . .
469
xvii. 4 .
• • • 357
iv. 8 .
• • 137
iii. 5 .
• • 144
i. 18 . .
469
xix. 15 .
. . .141
iv. 14
162, 189
iii. 9
. . 284
i. 18, 19 .
469
XX. 12, 13
• • -194
iv. 16, 17
181, 192
iii. 10 .
. 248, 284
i. 19 . .
247
xxi. I .
. . .191
iv. 17 .
186, 189
iii. 10, II
. . . 208
i. 19-21
247
xxi. 5 .
. 222
V. I .
• • 3"
Heb. i. I .
• ^33' 275
i. 21
251
xxi. 19 sq.
. 224
v. 10 .
. . 278
i. I, 2 .
. 100
ii. 7 . .
26S
xxi. 23 .
. 226
v-33 •
• • -139
i. 1-12 .
. 202
ii. 9 . .
255
xxii. 1,2
. . .156
2 Thess. i. 2
. . 124
i. 2
. 202, 206,
ii. 10, II .
256
xxii. 5 .
. 226
ii. 8 .
. . .141
2
08, 251, 277
ii. 13 .
303
xxii. 13
. . .276
ii. 13 .
■ 139. 149
i. 2, 3 .
• • 309
ii. 18 .
473
xxii. 16
. . . 206
^
0
i
Date Due
htB 9 *i
5
. FEB 1 0 '^
5
f/ES J 3 '
\5
'|H
a
^H
'^H
^j
^B
^^H
L. B. Cat. No. 1137
WELLESLEY COLLEGE LIBRARY
3 5002 03044 4348
BR 60 .S42 1890 10
A Select library of Nicene
and post-Nicene fathers of
^i■S■■'!v^: ••■fi^^?^^^*■i
Source edition
A Select library of Nicene and post-Nicene fathers of the Christian church. Second series. Publication date: 1896. View the original scan at Internet Archive →
Source file SHA-256:
A Select library of Nicene and post-Nicene fathers of the Christian church. Second series. Publication date: 1896. View the original scan at Internet Archive →
Source file SHA-256:
619127bceb5b80926008129256e87264c2c6ef2310427be40437cfa386c795a4